XML 27 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
Acquired Intangible Assets and Goodwill
12 Months Ended
Dec. 29, 2018
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Text Block]
Note 5 — Acquired Intangible Assets and Goodwill
 
The carrying basis and accumulated amortization of recognized intangible assets are summarized in the following table:
 
 
 
2018
 
 
2017
 
In Thousands
 
Gross

Carrying

Amount
 
 
Accumulated

Amortization
 
 
Gross

Carrying

Amount
 
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Patents
 
 
24,515
 
 
 
23,506
 
 
$
24,515
 
 
$
23,322
 
Non-compete agreements
 
 
2,749
 
 
 
2,625
 
 
 
2,749
 
 
 
2,545
 
Customer list
 
 
13,963
 
 
 
4,520
 
 
 
13,913
 
 
 
3,403
 
Trademarks
 
 
8,181
 
 
 
124
 
 
 
7,905
 
 
 
121
 
Developed technology
 
 
475
 
 
 
16
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
License agreements
 
 
700
 
 
 
7
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
50,583
 
 
 
30,798
 
 
$
49,082
 
 
$
29,391
 
 
Amortization expense was $1.4 million, $1.6 million and $2.3 million for 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
 
Estimated future amortization expense is summarized in the following table:
 
In Thousands
 
2019
 
 
2020
 
 
2021
 
 
2022
 
 
2023
 
 
Thereafter
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sporting Goods
 
 
1,446
 
 
 
1,401
 
 
 
1,351
 
 
 
1,332
 
 
 
1,254
 
 
 
5,217
 
 
All goodwill is allocated to the operating segment of the business. The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill were:
 
In Thousands
 
Sporting Goods
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2016
 
$
21,456
 
Acquisition
 
 
92
 
Balance at December 30, 2017
 
$
21,548
 
Acquisition
 
 
4,833
 
Balance at December 29, 2018
 
$
26,381
 
 
The Company reviews goodwill for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable, in accordance with guidance in FASB ASC 350,
Intangibles – Goodwill and Other
. A qualitative assessment is first performed to determine if the fair value of the reporting unit is "more likely than not" less than the carrying value. If so, we proceed to step one of the two-step goodwill impairment test, in which the fair value of the reporting unit is compared to its carrying value. If not, then performance of the second step of the goodwill impairment test is not necessary. If the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied estimated fair value calculated in the second step, an impairment charge to current operations is recorded to reduce the carrying value to the implied estimated fair value.