XML 32 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Acquired Intangible Assets and Goodwill
12 Months Ended
Dec. 30, 2017
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Text Block]
Note 5 —
Acquired Intangible Assets and Goodwill
 
The carrying basis and accumulated amortization of recognized intangible assets are summarized in the following table:
 
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
In Thousands
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Patents
 
$
24,515
 
$
23,322
 
$
24,515
 
$
23,068
 
Non-compete agreements
 
 
2,749
 
 
2,545
 
 
2,749
 
 
2,377
 
Customer list
 
 
13,913
 
 
3,403
 
 
13,703
 
 
2,247
 
Trademarks
 
 
7,905
 
 
121
 
 
7,703
 
 
121
 
 
 
$
49,082
 
$
29,391
 
$
48,670
 
$
27,813
 
 
Amortization expense was $1.6 million, $2.3 million and $2.9 million for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
 
Estimated future amortization expense is summarized in the following table:
 
In Thousands
 
2018
 
2019
 
2020
 
2021
 
2022
 
Thereafter
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sporting Goods
 
$
1,379
 
$
1,279
 
$
1,234
 
$
1,188
 
$
1,182
 
$
5,645
 
 
All goodwill is allocated to the operating segment of the business. The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill were:
 
In Thousands
 
Sporting Goods
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at December 26, 2015
 
$
20,047
 
Acquisition
 
 
1,409
 
Balance at December 31, 2016
 
$
21,456
 
Acquisition
 
 
92
 
Balance at December 30, 2017
 
$
21,548
 
 
The Company reviews goodwill for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable, in accordance with guidance in FASB ASC 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other. A qualitative assessment is first performed to determine if the fair value of the reporting unit is "more likely than not" less than the carrying value. If so, we proceed to step one of the two-step goodwill impairment test, in which the fair value of the reporting unit is compared to its carrying value. If not, then performance of the second step of the goodwill impairment test is not necessary. If the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied estimated fair value calculated in the second step, an impairment charge to current operations is recorded to reduce the carrying value to the implied estimated fair value.