Fair Values of Financial Instruments

12 Months Ended

Dec. 29, 2012

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]

Note 17 -– Fair Values of Financial Instruments

The following methods were used to estimate the fair value of all financial instruments recognized in the accompanying balance sheets at amounts other than fair values.

Cash and Cash Equivalents and Time Deposits

Fair values of cash and cash equivalents and time deposits approximate cost due to the short period of time to maturity.

Notes Payable and Long-term Debt

The Company believes the carrying value of short-term debt, including current portion of long-term debt, and long-term debt adequately reflects the fair value of these instruments.

The following table presents estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments in accordance with FASB ASC 825 at December 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

	Fair Value Measurements Using
					Significant
			Quoted Prices in		Other
			Active Markets		Observable		Significant
2012			for Identical		Inputs (Level		Unobservable
In Thousands	Fair Value		Assets (Level 1)		2)		Inputs (Level 3)
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,544	$	2,544	$	—	$	—
Time deposits	$	1,200	$	1,200	$	—	$	—
Financial liabilities
Note payable and Short-term debt	$	17,070	$	—	$	17,070	$	—
Current portion of Long-term debt	$	2,000	$	—	$	2,000	$	—
Long-term debt	$	3,500	$	—	$	3,500	$	—

	Fair Value Measurements Using
					Significant
			Quoted Prices in		Other
			Active Markets		Observable		Significant
2011			for Identical		Inputs (Level		Unobservable
In Thousands	Fair Value		Assets (Level 1)		2)		Inputs (Level 3)
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	3,821	$	3,821	$	—	$	—
Time deposits	$	950	$	950	$	—	$	—
Financial liabilities
Note payable and Short-term debt	$	14,947	$	—	$	14,947	$	—
Current portion of Long-term debt	$	2,000	$	—	$	2,000	$	—
Long-term debt	$	5,000	$	—	$	5,000	$	—

The outstanding balance of the euro overdraft facility is included in Notes payable and Short-term debt. For the periods ended December 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the balance of the euro overdraft facility was $2.5 million and $2.2 million, respectively.

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies and inputs used for assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and recognized in the accompanying balance sheet, as well as the general classification of such assets pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

For purposes of the interim impairment test, the fair value of the Martin Yale Group reporting unit was determined using a combination of two methods; one based on market earnings multiples of peer companies identified for the business unit (the market approach), and a discounted cash flow model with estimates of cash flows based on internal forecasts of revenues and expenses over a five year period plus a terminal value period (the income approach). The market approach estimates fair value by applying earnings and revenue market multiples to the reporting unit’s operating performance for the trailing twelve-month period. The market multiples are derived from comparable publicly traded companies with operating and investment characteristics similar to those of the Martin Yale Group reporting unit. The income approach estimates fair value by discounting the reporting unit’s estimated future cash flows using a weighted-average cost of capital that reflects current market conditions and the risk profile of the business unit.

To arrive at the Martin Yale Group reporting unit’s future cash flows, the Company used estimates of economic and market information, including growth rates in revenues, costs, and estimates of future expected changes in operating margins, tax rates, and cash expenditures. Other significant estimates and assumptions include terminal value growth rates, future estimates of capital expenditures, and changes in future working capital requirements. Under the income approach, the Company applied a risk-adjusted discount rate of 11.2% to the future cash flows from the Martin Yale Group reporting unit. In addition to the earnings multiples and the discount rates disclosed above, certain other judgments and estimates were used to prepare the goodwill impairment test.

The fair values of the intangible assets for the Martin Yale Group reporting unit were estimated considering estimated royalty savings, discounted cash flows and average attrition rates associated with these assets.

As a result of the impairment tests performed, the goodwill of the Martin Yale Group reporting unit was written down to the implied fair value of zero from its carrying value of $13.2 million as of October 6, 2012. The intangible assets of this reporting unit were written down to their estimated fair value of $1.7 million from their carrying value of $1.9 million as of October 6, 2012.

Because of the significance of the unobservable inputs and management judgment used in the goodwill and intangible asset impairment analyses, these measurements were classified in level three of the valuation hierarchy.

Equity Method Investments

For purposes of the impairment analysis of the equity method investment in Escalade International, Ltd, the Company considered the impact of attrition of certain significant customers on future cash flows of this entity as well as expectations regarding future divestiture of the investment. Based on consideration of cash flows related to the potential divestiture, the Company has determined that other than temporary impairment in the amount of $0.4 million ($0.2 million, net of tax) is appropriate. Consequently, the investment was written down to its estimated fair value of $0.5 million from its carrying value of $0.9 million as of October 6, 2012. Because of the significance of the unobservable inputs and management judgment used in the equity method impairment analysis, this measurement was classified in level three of the valuation hierarchy.