The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements consolidate the accounts of CPM and Maxim, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries. Intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The provision for slow moving and obsolete inventory for the prior period unaudited condensed consolidated statement of cash flows has been reclassified to conform to the presentation of the current period unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. This reclassification had no effect on the previously reported unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets, statement of operations, and changes in stockholders’ equity.

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP, requires the Company’s management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the Company’s reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the valuation of inventories, the Company’s effective income tax rate, and the recoverability of deferred tax assets, which are based upon the Company’s expectation of future taxable income and allowable deductions and the fair value calculations of stock-based compensation and earn-out liability. (See Note 3, “CPM Acquisition”)

In accordance with Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 280, “Segment Reporting,” the Company uses the management approach for determining its reportable segments. The management approach is based upon the way that management reviews performance and allocates resources. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer serves as the Company’s chief operating decision maker, and his management team reviews operating results on a consolidated basis for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating the financial performance of the Company. The Company has integrated the operations of both CPM and Maxim. Accordingly, the Company has determined that it has one operating segment and, therefore, one reporting segment.

Basic net loss per common share is calculated by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, without consideration of common stock equivalents. Shares of restricted stock are included in the basic weighted-average number of common shares outstanding from the time they vest. Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common share equivalents outstanding for the period determined using the treasury stock method. For the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company excluded the effects of outstanding stock options as their effects were antidilutive due to the Company’s net loss during these periods.

During the preparation of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2019, the Company identified an error in the weighted average number of shares used in its calculation of earnings per share for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2018.

Three Months Ended September 30, 2018

As Previously

Reported

As Revised

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding

54,118,506

68,658,304

Net loss per share - basic

(0.01

)

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018

As Previously

Reported

As Revised

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding

54,118,506

66,816,698

Net loss per share - basic

(0.04

)

(0.03

)

The Company performed a quantitative and qualitative analysis and determined that the error was not material to the previously reported results for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2018.

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. The Company classifies assets and liabilities recorded at fair value under the fair value hierarchy based upon the observability of inputs used in valuation techniques. Observable inputs (highest level) reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs (lowest level) reflect internally developed market assumptions. The fair value measurements are classified under the following hierarchy:

Level 1—Observable inputs that reflect quoted market prices (unadjusted) for identical assets and liabilities in active markets;

Level 2—Observable inputs, other than quoted market prices, that are either directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace for identical or similar assets and liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets and liabilities; and

Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity that are significant to the fair value of assets or liabilities.

In connection with the CPM Acquisition, the Company recorded a $13,581,529 liability related to the earn-out (“Earn-Out”) portion of the purchase consideration. (See Note 3, “CPM Acquisition,” for further discussion of the Earn-Out liability.) The Company has classified the Earn-Out liability as a Level 3 liability and the fair value of the Earn-Out liability will be evaluated each reporting period and changes in its fair value will be included in the Company’s earnings. The payments are subject to the Company meeting certain earnings thresholds as detailed in the CPM Acquisition Agreement.

The fair value of the Earn-Out liability was calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation, which was then applied to estimated Earn-Out payments with a discount rate of four percent (4%). To determine the fair value of the Earn-Out liability, the Company’s management evaluates assumptions that require significant judgement. Significant assumptions used for estimating the Earn-Out liability included gross margins of approximately forty-eight percent (48%), net income margins averaging nine percent (9%) per year, revenue growth of approximately five percent (5%) over a forecast horizon period of 11 years.

For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company determined the earnings threshold as detailed in the CPM Acquisition Agreement were not met and therefore no payments for either the base or bonus Earn-Out tranches were achieved, based on the Company’s 2018 financial performance. The Earn-Out was re-measured to fair value under the probability weighted income approach. As a result, the initial fair value of the Earn-Out liability was reduced by $5,663,014 from $19,244,543 to $13,581,529, with the offset reflected as “Change in fair value of contingent purchase consideration” on the Company’s 2018 Annual Report.

The estimated fair value of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses are carried at historical cost basis, which approximates their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments. The recorded values of notes payable approximate their respective fair values based upon their effective interest rates.

The Company considers highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. There were no cash equivalents at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018. The Company’s cash is concentrated in large financial institutions that at times may exceed federally insured limits of $250,000 per financial institution. The Company has not experienced any financial institution losses from the Change-in-Control Date through September 30, 2019. As of September 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, there were deposits of $574,868 and $322,693, respectively, greater than federally insured limits.

Accounts receivable are non-interest bearing and are stated at gross invoice amounts less an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable and an allowance for contractual discount pricing. Credit is extended to customers based on an evaluation of their financial condition, industry reputation, and other judgment factors considered by the Company’s management. The Company generally does not require collateral or other security interest to support accounts receivable. Based on trends and specific factors, the customer’s credit terms may be modified, including required payment upon delivery.

The Company performs regular on-going credit evaluations of its customers as deemed relevant. As events, trends, and circumstances warrant, the Company’s management estimates the amounts that are uncollectible. These amounts are recognized as bad debt expense and are reflected within selling, general, administrative and other expenses on the Company’s accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

When accounts are deemed uncollectible, they are often referred to the Company’s outside legal firm for litigation. Accounts deemed uncollectible are written-off in the period when the Company has exhausted its efforts to collect overdue and unpaid receivables or otherwise has evaluated other circumstances that indicate that the Company should abandon such efforts. Accounts deemed uncollectible are removed from the Company’s accounts receivable portfolio, with a corresponding offset to the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable. The Company may record additional allowances for doubtful accounts based on known trends and expectations to ensure the Company’s accounts receivable portfolio is recorded at net realizable value. Specific allowances are re-evaluated and adjusted as additional facts and information become available. Previously written-off accounts receivable subsequently collected are recognized as a reduction of bad debt expense when funds are received.

The Company’s management estimates its allowance for contractual discount pricing, by evaluating specific accounts where information indicates the customer is offered contractual pricing and discount allowances. In these arrangements, the Company’s management uses assumptions and judgement, based on the best available facts and circumstances to record a specific allowance for the amounts due from those customers. The allowance is offset by a corresponding reduction to revenue. These specific allowances are re-evaluated, analyzed, and adjusted as additional information becomes available to determine the total amount of the allowance. The Company may record additional allowances based on trends and expectations to ensure the Company’s accounts receivable portfolio is recorded at net realizable value.

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value (first-in, first-out) less an allowance for slow-moving inventory, expired inventory, and inventory obsolescence. Inventories consist entirely of finished goods and include internal and external fixation products; upper and lower extremity plating and total joint reconstruction; soft tissue fixation and augmentation for sports medicine procedures; spinal implants for trauma, degenerative disc disease, and deformity indications (collectively, “Orthopedic Implants”) and osteo-biologics and regenerative tissue which include human allografts, substitute bone materials and tendons, as well as regenerative tissues and fluids (collectively, “Biologics”). The Company reviews the market value of inventories whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of inventories may not be recoverable from the estimated future sales price less cost of disposal and normal gross profit. In cases where the market values are less than the carrying value, a write-down is recognized equal to an amount by which the carrying value exceeds the net realizable value of inventories.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 the Company revised its estimate for slow moving and obsolete inventory. As a result, the Company’s management increased the inventory reserve for slow moving and obsolescence by approximately $2.4 million, which is reflected in Inventory and Cost of Revenues on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets and statements of operations, respectively.

Property and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets per the following table. Expenditures for additions and improvements are capitalized, while repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.

Category		Useful Life
Computer equipment and software		3 years
Furniture and fixtures		3 years
Office equipment		3 years
Software		3 years

Upon the retirement or disposition of property and equipment, the related cost and accumulated depreciation is removed. A gain is recorded when consideration received is more than the disposed asset’s cost, net of depreciation, and a loss is recorded when consideration received is less than the disposed asset’s cost, net of depreciation.

The Company reviews long-lived assets quarterly or whenever changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset might not be recoverable. Assets are grouped and evaluated for impairment at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets, which generally represents furniture and fixtures. Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) is the consolidated cash flow measure monitored for indicators of impairment. As the cash flow measure reaches levels to indicate potential impairment, the Company estimates the future cash flows expected to be generated from the use of the asset and its eventual disposal. If the sum of undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized. The impairment loss is measured by comparing the fair value of the asset to its carrying amount.

Goodwill is determined based on an acquisition purchase price in excess of the fair value of identified net assets acquired. Intangible assets with lives restricted by contractual, legal or other means are amortized over their useful lives.

Goodwill is not amortized, but is tested at least annually for impairment, or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount. The Company performs its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value.

The Company’s intangible assets subject to amortization consist primarily of acquired non-compete agreements, product technology, and customer relationships. Amortization expense is calculated using the straight-line method over the asset’s expected useful life. (See Note 4, “Maxim Acquisition” for Goodwill and Other Intangibles for additional related disclosures.)

The Company’s revenues are generated from the sales of Orthopedic Implants and Biologics to support orthopedic surgeries. The Company obtains purchase orders from its customers for the sale of its products which sets forth the general terms and conditions including line item pricing and payment terms (generally due upon receipt). The Company recognizes revenue when its customers obtain control over the assets (generally when the title passes upon shipment or when a product is utilized in a surgery) and it is probable that the Company will collect substantially all the amounts due. Individual promised goods are the Company’s only performance obligation.

Products that have been sold are not subject to returns unless the product is deemed defective. Credits or refunds are recognized when they are probable and reasonably estimable. The Company’s management reduces revenue to account for estimates of the Company’s credits and refunds.

The Company includes shipping and handling fees in net revenues. Shipping and handling costs are associated with outbound freight after control over a product has transferred to a customer are accounted for as a fulfillment cost and are included in cost of goods sold.

The Company measures sales volume based on medical procedures in which the Company’s products are sold and used (“Cases”). The Company considers Cases resulting from direct sales to medical facilities to be retail cases (“Retail Cases”) and Cases resulting from sales to third-parties, such as non-medical facilities, distributors, or sub-distributors, to be wholesale Cases (“Wholesale Cases”). Some of the Company’s sales for Wholesale Cases are on a consignment basis with a third-party. In the Company’s industry, Retail Cases are typically sold at a higher price points than Wholesale Cases, resulting in greater revenue and gross profit per Case.

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2019		September 30, 2018		September 30, 2019		September 30, 2018
Category
Retail	$	5,050,785	$	5,227,442	$	12,425,874	$	13,661,292
Wholesale		665,559		1,556,862		3,137,054		4,845,518
Total	$	5,716,344	$	6,784,304	$	15,562,928	$	18,506,810

Stock-based compensation expense is measured at the grant date fair value of the award and is expensed over the requisite service period. For employee stock-based awards, the Company calculates the fair value of the award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Determining the fair value of stock-based awards at the grant date under this model requires judgment, including estimating volatility, employee stock option exercise behaviors and forfeiture rates. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of stock-based awards represent the Company's best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment. For non-employee stock-based awards, the Company calculates the fair value of the award on the date of grant in the same manner as employee awards, however, the awards are revalued at the end of each reporting period and the pro-rata compensation expense is adjusted accordingly until such time the non-employee award is fully vested, at which time the total compensation recognized to date shall equal the fair value of the stock-based award as calculated on the measurement date, which is the date at which the award recipient’s performance is complete. The estimation of stock-based awards that will ultimately vest requires judgment, and to the extent actual results or updated estimates differ from original estimates, such amounts are recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period estimates are revised.

The Company considers the applicability and impact of all ASUs issued, both effective and not yet effective.

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases”, which requires a lessee to record a right of use asset and a corresponding lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than twelve (12) months. ASU 2016-02 is effective for all interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. Although the Company presently leases office space on a month to month basis as described in Note 12, management has analyzed the implied lease term considering entity factors, asset factors, and market factors and determined that the amounts to be recognized as a right to use assets and lease obligation upon adoption were not material.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. This guidance eliminates Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test, instead requiring an entity to recognize a goodwill impairment charge for the amount by which the goodwill carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. The Company adopted ASU 2017-04 for the three months ended September 30, 2019 on a prospective basis. The adoption of ASU 2017-04 had no impact on the condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows for the period ended September 30, 2019. The Company adopted provisions of ASU 2017-04 as it simplified the goodwill impairment testing process resulting in reductions of costs and time associated with the goodwill impairment testing.

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB, including its Emerging Issues Task Force, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the SEC did not or are not believed by the Company’s management to have a material impact on the Company's present or future consolidated financial statements.