The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, CPM, and Maxim, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries of which the operations have been integrated with the Company. Intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP, requires the Company’s management to make

estimates and assumptions that affect the Company’s reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements. Actual results could

differ from those estimates. Significant estimates on the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the valuation of

inventories, the Company’s effective income tax rate, and the recoverability of deferred tax assets, which are based upon the

Company’s management expectation of future taxable income and allowable deductions and the fair value calculations of stock-based compensation and earn-out (“Earn-Out”) liability.

In accordance with Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 280, “Segment Reporting,” the Company uses the management approach for determining its reportable segments. The management approach is based upon the way that management reviews performance and allocates resources. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer serves as the Company’s chief operating decision maker, and his management team review operating results on a consolidated basis for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating the financial performance of the Company. The Company has integrated the operations of both CPM and Maxim. Accordingly, the Company has determined that it has one operating segment and, therefore, one reporting segment.

Basic net loss per common share is calculated by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, without consideration of common stock equivalents. Shares of restricted stock are included in the basic weighted-average number of common shares outstanding from the time they vest. Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common share equivalents outstanding for the period determined using the treasury stock method.

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. The Company classifies assets and liabilities recorded at fair value under the fair value hierarchy based upon the observability of inputs used in valuation techniques. Observable inputs (highest level) reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs (lowest level) reflect internally developed market assumptions. The fair value measurements are classified under the following hierarchy:

Level 1—Observable inputs that reflect quoted market prices (unadjusted) for identical assets and liabilities in active markets;

Level 2—Observable inputs, other than quoted market prices, that are either directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace for identical or similar assets and liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets and liabilities; and

Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity that are significant to the fair value of assets or liabilities.

In connection with the CPM Acquisition, the Company recorded a $19,244,543 liability related to the Earn-Out portion of the purchase consideration. See Note 4, “CPM Acquisition,” for further discussion of the Earn-Out liability. The Company has classified the Earn-Out liability as a Level 3 liability and the fair value of the Earn-Out liability will be evaluated each reporting period and changes in its fair value will be included in the Company’s earnings. The Earn-Out payments are based on the financial performance of the Company between the period of January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2034. The base amount of the Earn-Out is $16,000,000 with an additional bonus payment of $10,000,000. The payments of the base and bonus Earn-Out amounts are subject to the Company meeting certain earnings thresholds as detailed in the CPM Acquisition Agreement. The Earn-Out payments during the Earn-Out period specified above, ranges from $0 to $26,000,000.

The fair value of the Earn-Out liability was calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation, which was then applied to estimated Earn-Out payments with a discount rate of four percent (4%). To determine the fair value of the Earn-Out liability, the Company’s management evaluates assumptions that require significant judgement. Significant assumptions used for estimating the Earn-Out liability included gross margins of approximately forty-eight percent (48%), net income margins averaging nine percent (9%) per year, revenue growth of approximately five percent (5%) over a forecast horizon period of 11 years.

The Earn-Out liability, which represented contingent consideration associated with the CPM Acquisition, is recorded as a liability. This liability is subject to re-measurement to fair value at each reporting date until the contingency is resolved and the changes in fair value are recognized in the statement of operations at each reporting period since the arrangement is not subject to the accounting for hedging instruments.

The estimated fair value of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses are carried at historical cost basis, which approximates their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments. The recorded values of notes payable approximate their respective fair values based upon their effective interest rates.

For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company has determined the earnings threshold as detailed in the CPM Acquisition

Agreement was not met and therefore no payments for either the base or bonus Earn-Out tranches would be achieved, based on the

Company’s 2018 financial performance. The Earn-Out was re-measured to fair value under the probability weighted income approach. As a result, the initial fair value of the Earn-Out liability was reduced by $5,663,014 from $19,244,543 to $13,581,529. The Earn-Out liability was reduced by $5,663,014 with the offset reflected as “Change in fair value of contingent purchase consideration” on the Company’s 2018 Annual Report.

The estimated fair value of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable

and accrued expenses are carried at historical cost basis, which approximates their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments. The recorded values of notes payable approximate their respective fair values based upon their effective interest rates.

Certain amounts in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. State income tax expense has been reclassified from selling, general, administrative and other expenses to income tax expense (benefit).

The Company considers highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. There were no cash equivalents at March 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018. The Company’s cash is concentrated in two large financial institutions that at times may exceed federally insured limits of $250,000 per financial institution. The Company has not experienced any financial institution losses from inception through March 31, 2019. As of March 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, there were deposits of $351,303 and $322,693, respectively, which were greater than federally insured limits.

Accounts receivable are non-interest bearing and are stated at gross invoice amounts less an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable and an allowance for contractual discount pricing. Credit is extended to customers based on an evaluation of their financial condition, industry reputation, and other judgmental factors considered by the Company’s management. The Company generally does not require collateral or other security interest to support accounts receivable. Based on trends and specific factors, the customer’s credit terms may be modified, including required payment upon delivery.

The Company performs regular on-going credit evaluations of its customers as deemed relevant. As events, trends, and circumstance, warrant, the Company’s management estimates the amounts that are more likely than not to be uncollectible; reflecting these amounts in the allowance for doubtful accounts along with an offset to bad debt expense is reflected within selling, general, administrative and other expenses on the Company’s accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

When accounts are deemed uncollectible, they are often referred to the Company’s outside legal firm for litigation. Accounts deemed uncollectible are written-off in the period when the Company has exhausted its efforts to collect overdue and unpaid receivables or otherwise has evaluated other circumstances that indicate that the Company should abandon such efforts. Accounts deemed uncollectible are removed from the Company’s accounts receivable portfolio, with a corresponding offset to the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable. The Company may record additional allowances for doubtful accounts based on known trends and expectations to ensure the Company’s accounts receivable portfolio is recorded at net realizable value. Specific allowances are re-evaluated and adjusted as additional facts and information become available. Previously written-off accounts receivable subsequently collected are recognized as a reduction of bad debt expense when funds are received.

The Company’s management estimates its allowance for contractual discount pricing, by evaluating specific accounts where information indicates the customer is offered contractual pricing and discount allowances. In these arrangements, the Company’s management uses assumptions and judgement, based on the best available facts and circumstances to record a specific allowance for the amounts due from those customers. The allowance is offset by a corresponding reduction to revenue. These specific allowances are re-evaluated, analyzed, and adjusted as additional information becomes available to determine the total amount of the allowance. The Company may record additional allowances based on trends and expectations to ensure the Company’s accounts receivable portfolio is recorded at net realizable value.

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value (first-in, first-out). Inventories consist entirely of finished goods and include internal and external fixation products; upper and lower extremity plating and total joint reconstruction; soft tissue fixation and augmentation for sports medicine procedures; spinal implants for trauma, degenerative disc disease, and deformity indications (collectively, “Orthopedic Implants”) and osteo-biologics and regenerative tissue which include human allografts, substitute bone materials and tendons, as well as regenerative tissues and fluids (collectively, “Biologics”). The Company reviews the market value of inventories whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of inventories may not be recoverable from the estimated future sales price less cost of disposal and normal gross profit. In cases where the market values are less than the carrying value, a write-down is recognized equal to an amount by which the carrying value exceeds the market value of inventories.

Property and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets per the following table. Expenditures for additions and improvements are capitalized while repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.

Category		Useful Life
Computer equipment and software		3 years
Furniture and fixtures		3 years
Office equipment		3 years
Software		3 years

Upon the retirement or disposition of property and equipment, the related cost and accumulated depreciation is removed. A gain is recorded when consideration received is more than the disposed asset’s cost, net of depreciation, and a loss is recorded when consideration received is less than the disposed asset’s cost, net of depreciation.

The Company reviews long-lived assets quarterly or whenever changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset might not be recoverable. Assets are grouped and evaluated for impairment at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets, which generally represents furniture and fixtures. Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) is the consolidated cash flow measure monitored for indicators of impairment. As the cash flow measure reaches levels to indicate potential impairment, the Company estimates the future cash flows expected to be generated from the use of the asset and its eventual disposal. If the sum of undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized. The impairment loss is measured by comparing the fair value of the asset to its carrying amount. Fair value is typically determined to be the value to repurchase furniture and fixtures.

Goodwill is determined based on an acquisition purchase price in excess of the fair value of identified net assets acquired. Intangible assets with lives restricted by contractual, legal or other means are amortized over their useful lives. The Company tests goodwill at least annually for impairment using the fair value approach on a reporting unit basis.

Since the Company is one reporting unit, potential goodwill impairment is evaluated by comparing the fair value of the Company to its carrying value. The fair value of the Company is determined using a market approach. If the carrying value of the Company exceeds fair value, a comparison of the fair value of goodwill against the carrying value of goodwill is made to determine whether goodwill has been impaired. The Company performs the annual assessment of the recoverability of goodwill during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year.

The Company’s intangible assets subject to amortization consist primarily of acquired non-compete agreements and customer relationships. Amortization expense is calculated using the straight-line method over the asset’s expected useful life. See Note 3 – “Maxim Acquisition” for Goodwill and Other Intangibles for additional related disclosures.

Revenue is recognized when a customer obtains control of promised goods. The amount of revenue recognized reflects the consideration that the Company expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for these goods.

The Company has contractual agreements with its customers that set forth the general terms and conditions of the relationship including line item pricing, payment terms, and contract duration.

Revenues are generated from the sales of Orthopedic Implants and Biologics to support orthopedic surgeries and related procedures. For customers that purchase products as needed, the Company invoices the customers on the date the product is utilized. For customers that have consigned product, the Company invoices the customers as each unit of the product is utilized. Payment terms are due upon receipt of invoice or contractual terms.

Products that have been sold are not subject to returns unless the product is deemed defective. Credits or refunds are recognized when they are determinable and estimable. The Company’s management reduces net revenues to account for estimates of the Company’s sales returns, discounts, and other incentives.

Stock-based compensation expense is measured at the grant date fair value of the award and is expensed over the requisite service period. For employee stock-based awards, the Company calculates the fair value of the award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Determining the fair value of stock-based awards at the grant date under this model requires judgment,

including estimating volatility, employee stock option exercise behaviors and forfeiture rates. The assumptions used in calculating the

fair value of stock-based awards represent the Company's best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the

application of management judgment. For non-employee stock-based awards, the Company calculates the fair value of the award on

the date of grant in the same manner as employee awards, however, the awards are revalued at the end of each reporting period and the

pro-rata compensation expense is adjusted accordingly until such time the non-employee award is fully vested, at which time the total

compensation recognized to date shall equal the fair value of the stock-based award as calculated on the measurement date, which is

the date at which the award recipient’s performance is complete. The estimation of stock-based awards that will ultimately vest

requires judgment, and to the extent actual results or updated estimates differ from original estimates, such amounts are recorded as a

The Company considers the applicability and impact of all ASUs issued, both effective and not yet effective.

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases”, which requires a lessee to record a right of use asset and a corresponding lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than twelve (12) months. ASU 2016-02 is effective for all interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. The adoption of this ASU did not have a significant impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In March 2018, the FASB issued ASU No.2018-05 “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118.” This new standard adds SEC paragraphs pursuant to the SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, which expresses the view of the staff regarding application of Topic 740, Income Taxes, in the reporting period that includes December 22, 2017 - the date on which the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (H.R.1, An Act to Provide for Reconciliation Pursuant to Titles II and V of the Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2018) was signed into law. ASU 2018-05 is effective upon inclusion in the FASB codification. The Company’s management is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASU 2018-05 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB, including its Emerging Issues Task Force, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the SEC did not or are not believed by the Company’s management to have a material impact on the Company's present or future consolidated financial statements.