NOTE I - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

3 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2016

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block]

NOTE I – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Operating Lease Commitments

Our executive offices are located in New York, NY. We have an agreement for use of office space at this location under a lease expiring on July 30, 2017. The monthly base rent is $8,750.

Rent expense was $51,234 and $57,457 for the three month periods ended July 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Litigation

The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of its business. Sparta can make no representations about the potential outcome of such proceedings.

As of July 31, 2016, we were not a party to any material pending legal proceeding except as stated below.  From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of business.

The Company was involved in three litigation matters in the Supreme Court of the State of New York wherein the Company had alleged that the respective lenders have charged the Company excessive and improper fees and penalties on its loans. These matters have since been discontinued.

On December 18, 2012, the Company filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District Court of New York against a former credit provider. The suit sought damages arising out of the credit provider's termination of the Company's credit line in 2009. The defendant counterclaimed for recovery of legal fees of $2 million under an indemnification clause contained in one of the loan documents. The matter proceeded to trial in May 2015, and the Court thereafter issued decisions dismissing the Company's claims and the defendant's counterclaim. On January 15, 2016 the complaint, the amended complaint and the defendant's counterclaim were dismissed. On February 12, 2016, the Company filed a Notice of Appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit from the judgment dismissing the complaint and amended complaint. On February 18, 2016 the defendant filed a Notice of Cross-Appeal of the dismissal of its counterclaim.  Sparta can make no representations about the potential outcome of the appeal or cross-appeal, but believes that the decision of the lower court dismissing the defendant's counterclaim was properly decided in holding that the indemnification clause did not apply to defendant's claim.

The Company has received notice from two lenders claiming defaults relating to conversion requests of $8,365 principal and $643 interest and $5,000 principal, with regard to notes in the total amounts of $55,125 and $27,500, respectively, which the Company has refused to process and believes it has defenses in that regard.  There can be no assurance that the Company would prevail should litigation with regard to any of these requests occur. These liabilities have been recorded in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.