XML 19 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2013
FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING  
FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING

NOTE 12   FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING

 

Fair value accounting establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value.  The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).  The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

 

Level 1                  Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

 

Level 2                  Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; and

 

Level 3                  Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity).

 

The following table identifies the fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities by level within the fair value hierarchy.  As required by accounting guidance, assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

 

 

 

Fair Value as a September 30, 2013

 

 

 

Total

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

31,062

 

$

31,062

 

$

 

$

 

IVA taxes receivable

 

10,129

 

 

10,129

 

 

 

 

$

41,191

 

$

31,062

 

$

10,129

 

$

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

$

10,041

 

$

38

 

$

10,003

 

$

 

 

 

$

10,041

 

$

38

 

$

10,003

 

$

 

 

 

 

Fair Value as at December 31, 2012

 

 

 

Total

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

70,921

 

$

70,921

 

$

 

$

 

IVA taxes receivable

 

9,150

 

 

9,150

 

 

 

 

$

80,071

 

$

70,921

 

$

9,150

 

$

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

$

21,235

 

$

 

$

21,235

 

$

 

Litigation settlement liability

 

3,830

 

3,830

 

 

 

 

 

$

25,065

 

$

3,830

 

$

21,235

 

$

 

 

The Company’s cash and cash equivalents is classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because it is valued using quoted market prices.  The carrying value of this balance approximates its fair value due to its short-term nature and historically negligible credit losses.  The cash equivalent instruments that are valued based on quoted market prices in active markets are primarily money market securities.

 

The fair value of the IVA receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximates their carrying value due to their short-term nature.

 

As at September 30, 2013, accounts payable included an accrual for the fair value of approximately 15,800 shares of common stock that are required to be issued as part of the settlement of certain amounts due by the Company to one of its vendors, as discussed in Note 7, Shareholders’ Equity. As the Company’s stock is quoted on an active market, this liability is classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

The litigation settlement liability at December 31, 2012 represented the fair value of the 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock that were required to be issued as part of the settlement with TNR Gold Corp. Since the Company’s common stock is quoted on an active market, the liability was classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

In the second quarter of 2013, the Company recorded impairment charges related to its mineral property interests in the Santa Cruz Province, Argentina and its investment in MSC, as discussed in Notes 5 and 6, respectively. The estimated fair values of the Santa Cruz mineral property interests were determined using observed market value per acre in the region. The estimated fair value of the Company’s investment in MSC was determined using a discounted cash flow approach. The discounted cash flow model used significant unobservable inputs and is, therefore, considered within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

The following table sets forth a summary of the quantitative and qualitative information related to the unobservable inputs used in the calculation of the Company’s non-recurring Level 3 fair value measurements.

 

 

 

Valuation

 

Unobservable

 

Range /

 

 

 

Technique

 

Input

 

Weighted Average

 

Investment in MSC

 

Discounted cash flow

 

Discount Rate
Long Term Gold Price
Long Term Silver Price
Argentina Inflation Index
United States Inflation Index

 

10.0%
$1,300 per ounce

$22.75 per ounce
10.0%
1.7%