XML 165 R33.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Financial instruments and financial risk factors
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
Financial Instruments [Abstract]  
Financial instruments and financial risk factors
Financial instruments and financial risk factors
The accounting classification of each category of financial instruments, and their carrying amounts, are set out below.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$ million

At 31 December 2017
 
Note

Loans and
receivables

Available-
for-sale 
financial
assets

Held-to-
maturity
investments

At fair value
through profit
or loss

Derivative
hedging
instruments

Financial
liabilities
measured at
amortized cost

Total carrying
amount

Financial assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other investments – equity shares
 
16


433





433

 – other
 
16


275


662



937

Loans
 
 
836






836

Trade and other receivables
 
18

24,361






24,361

Derivative financial instruments
 
28




6,454

688


7,142

Cash and cash equivalents
 
23

21,916

2,270

1,400




25,586

Financial liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trade and other payables
 
20






(54,054
)
(54,054
)
Derivative financial instruments
 
28




(5,705
)
(864
)

(6,569
)
Accruals
 
 


 


(5,465
)
(5,465
)
Finance debt
 
24






(63,230
)
(63,230
)
 
 
 
47,113

2,978

1,400

1,411

(176
)
(122,749
)
(70,023
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
At 31 December 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other investments – equity shares
 
16


407





407

 – other
 
16


42


628



670

Loans
 
 
791






791

Trade and other receivables
 
18

20,616






20,616

Derivative financial instruments
 
28




6,490

885


7,375

Cash and cash equivalents
 
23

21,539

1,749

196




23,484

Financial liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trade and other payables
 
20






(49,534
)
(49,534
)
Derivative financial instruments
 
28




(6,507
)
(1,997
)

(8,504
)
Accruals
 
 






(5,605
)
(5,605
)
Finance debt
 
24






(58,300
)
(58,300
)
 
 
 
42,946

2,198

196

611

(1,112
)
(113,439
)
(68,600
)

The fair value of finance debt is shown in Note 24. For all other financial instruments, the carrying amount is either the fair value, or approximates the fair value.
Financial risk factors
The group is exposed to a number of different financial risks arising from natural business exposures as well as its use of financial instruments including market risks relating to commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates; credit risk; and liquidity risk.
The group financial risk committee (GFRC) advises the group chief financial officer (CFO) who oversees the management of these risks. The GFRC is chaired by the CFO and consists of a group of senior managers including the group treasurer and the heads of the group finance, tax and the integrated supply and trading functions. The purpose of the committee is to advise on financial risks and the appropriate financial risk governance framework for the group. The committee provides assurance to the CFO and the group chief executive (GCE), and via the GCE to the board, that the group’s financial risk-taking activity is governed by appropriate policies and procedures and that financial risks are identified, measured and managed in accordance with group policies and group risk appetite.
The group’s trading activities in the oil, natural gas, LNG and power markets are managed within the integrated supply and trading function. Treasury holds foreign exchange and interest-rate products in the financial markets to hedge group exposures related to debt issuance; the compliance, control, and risk management processes for these activities are managed within the treasury function. All other foreign exchange and interest rate activities within financial markets are performed within the integrated supply and trading function and are also underpinned by the compliance, control and risk management infrastructure common to the activities of BP’s integrated and supply function. All derivative activity is carried out by specialist teams that have the appropriate skills, experience and supervision. These teams are subject to close financial and management control.
The integrated supply and trading function maintains formal governance processes that provide oversight of market risk, credit risk and operational risk associated with trading activity. A policy and risk committee monitors and validates limits and risk exposures, reviews incidents and validates risk-related policies, methodologies and procedures. A commitments committee approves value-at-risk delegations, the trading of new products, instruments and strategies and material commitments.
In addition, the integrated supply and trading function undertakes derivative activity for risk management purposes under a control framework as described more fully below.
27. Financial instruments and financial risk factors – continued
(a) Market risk
Market risk is the risk or uncertainty arising from possible market price movements and their impact on the future performance of a business. The primary commodity price risks that the group is exposed to include oil, natural gas and power prices that could adversely affect the value of the group’s financial assets, liabilities or expected future cash flows. The group enters into derivatives in a well-established entrepreneurial trading operation. In addition, the group has developed a control framework aimed at managing the volatility inherent in certain of its natural business exposures. In accordance with the control framework the group enters into various transactions using derivatives for risk management purposes.
The major components of market risk are commodity price risk, foreign currency exchange risk and interest rate risk, each of which is discussed below.
(i) Commodity price risk
The group’s integrated supply and trading function uses conventional financial and commodity instruments and physical cargoes and pipeline positions available in the related commodity markets. Oil and natural gas swaps, options and futures are used to mitigate price risk. Power trading is undertaken using a combination of over-the-counter forward contracts and other derivative contracts, including options and futures. This activity is on both a standalone basis and in conjunction with gas derivatives in relation to gas-generated power margin. In addition, NGLs are traded around certain US inventory locations using over-the-counter forward contracts in conjunction with over-the-counter swaps, options and physical inventories.
The group measures market risk exposure arising from its trading positions in liquid periods using value-at-risk techniques. These techniques make a statistical assessment of the market risk arising from possible future changes in market prices over a one-day holding period. The value-at-risk measure is supplemented by stress testing. Trading activity occurring in liquid periods is subject to value-at-risk limits for each trading activity and for this trading activity in total. The board has delegated a limit of $100 million value at risk in support of this trading activity. Alternative measures are used to monitor exposures which are outside liquid periods and which cannot be actively risk-managed.
(ii) Foreign currency exchange risk
Since BP has global operations, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates can have a significant effect on the group’s reported results and future expenditure commitments. The effects of most exchange rate fluctuations are absorbed in business operating results through changing cost competitiveness, lags in market adjustment to movements in rates and translation differences accounted for on specific transactions. For this reason, the total effect of exchange rate fluctuations is not identifiable separately in the group’s reported results. The main underlying economic currency of the group’s cash flows is the US dollar. This is because BP’s major product, oil, is priced internationally in US dollars. BP’s foreign currency exchange management policy is to limit economic and material transactional exposures arising from currency movements against the US dollar. The group co-ordinates the handling of foreign currency exchange risks centrally, by netting off naturally-occurring opposite exposures wherever possible and then managing any material residual foreign currency exchange risks.
Most of the group’s borrowings are in US dollars or are hedged with respect to the US dollar. At 31 December 2017, the total foreign currency borrowings not swapped into US dollars amounted to $928 million (2016 $809 million).
The group manages the net residual foreign currency exposures by constantly reviewing the foreign currency economic value at risk and aims to manage such risk to keep the 12-month foreign currency value at risk below $400 million. At no point over the past three years did the value at risk exceed the maximum risk limit. The most significant exposures relate to capital expenditure commitments and other UK, Eurozone and Australian operational requirements, for which hedging programmes are in place and hedge accounting is applied.
For highly probable forecast capital expenditures the group fixes the US dollar cost of non-US dollar supplies by using currency forwards. The exposures are sterling, euro, Australian dollar, Norwegian krone and Korean Won. At 31 December 2017 the most significant open contracts in place were for $437 million sterling (2016 $1,204 million sterling).
For UK, Eurozone and Australian operational requirements the group uses cylinders (purchased call and sold put options) to manage the estimated exposures. At 31 December 2017, there are no open positions hedging these exposures (2016 cylinders consisted of receive sterling, pay US dollar cylinders $1,885 million; receive euro, pay US dollar cylinders for $585 million; receive Australian dollar, pay US dollar cylinders for $274 million).
Where the group enters into foreign currency exchange contracts for entrepreneurial trading purposes the activity is controlled using trading value-at-risk techniques as explained in (i) commodity price risk above.
(iii) Interest rate risk
BP is also exposed to interest rate risk from the possibility that changes in interest rates will affect future cash flows or the fair values of its financial instruments, principally finance debt. Whilst the group issues debt in a variety of currencies based on market opportunities, it uses derivatives to swap the debt to a floating rate exposure, mainly to US dollar floating, but in certain defined circumstances maintains a US dollar fixed rate exposure for a proportion of debt. The proportion of floating rate debt net of interest rate swaps at 31 December 2017 was 70% of total finance debt outstanding (2016 84%). The weighted average interest rate on finance debt at 31 December 2017 was 3% (2016 2%) and the weighted average maturity of fixed rate debt was five years (2016 five years).
The group’s earnings are sensitive to changes in interest rates on the floating rate element of the group’s finance debt. If the interest rates applicable to floating rate instruments were to have increased by one percentage point on 1 January 2018, it is estimated that the group’s finance costs for 2018 would increase by approximately $442 million (2016 $488 million increase).
(b) Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk that a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument will fail to perform or fail to pay amounts due causing financial loss to the group and arises from cash and cash equivalents, derivative financial instruments and deposits with financial institutions and principally from credit exposures to customers relating to outstanding receivables. Credit exposure also exists in relation to guarantees issued by group companies under which the outstanding exposure incremental to that recognized on the balance sheet at 31 December 2017 was $656 million (2016 $309 million) in respect of liabilities of joint ventures and associates and $382 million (2016 $370 million) in respect of liabilities of other third parties.
27. Financial instruments and financial risk factors – continued
The group has a credit policy, approved by the CFO that is designed to ensure that consistent processes are in place throughout the group to measure and control credit risk. Credit risk is considered as part of the risk-reward balance of doing business. On entering into any business contract the extent to which the arrangement exposes the group to credit risk is considered. Key requirements of the policy include segregation of credit approval authorities from any sales, marketing or trading teams authorized to incur credit risk; the establishment of credit systems and processes to ensure that all counterparty exposure is rated and that all counterparty exposure and limits can be monitored and reported; and the timely identification and reporting of any non-approved credit exposures and credit losses. While each segment is responsible for its own credit risk management and reporting consistent with group policy, the treasury function holds group-wide credit risk authority and oversight responsibility for exposure to banks and financial institutions.
The maximum credit exposure associated with financial assets is equal to the carrying amount. The group does not aim to remove credit risk entirely but expects to experience a certain level of credit losses. As at 31 December 2017, the group had in place credit enhancements designed to mitigate approximately $14.7 billion of credit risk (2016 $11.6 billion). Reports are regularly prepared and presented to the GFRC that cover the group’s overall credit exposure and expected loss trends, exposure by segment, and overall quality of the portfolio.
Management information used to monitor credit risk indicates that 77% (2016 79%) of total unmitigated credit exposure relates to counterparties of investment-grade credit quality.
 
 
 
$ million

Trade and other receivables at 31 December
 
2017

2016

Neither impaired nor past due
 
22,858

19,459

Impaired (net of provision)
 
53

71

Not impaired and past due in the following periods
 
 
 
within 30 days
 
637

446

31 to 60 days
 
130

116

61 to 90 days
 
114

56

over 90 days
 
569

468

 
 
24,361

20,616


Movements in the impairment provision for trade receivables are shown in Note 19.
Financial instruments subject to offsetting, enforceable master netting arrangements and similar agreements
The following table shows the amounts recognized for financial assets and liabilities which are subject to offsetting arrangements on a gross basis, and the amounts offset in the balance sheet.
Amounts which cannot be offset under IFRS, but which could be settled net under the terms of master netting agreements if certain conditions arise, and collateral received or pledged, are also presented in the table to show the total net exposure of the group.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$ million

 
 
Gross
amounts of
recognized
financial
assets
(liabilities)

Amounts
set off

Net amounts
presented on
the balance
sheet

Related amounts not set off
in the balance sheet
 
Net amount

At 31 December 2017
 
Master
netting
arrangements

Cash
collateral
(received)
pledged

Derivative assets
 
8,522

(1,380
)
7,142

(1,554
)
(321
)
5,267

Derivative liabilities
 
(7,818
)
1,380

(6,438
)
1,554


(4,884
)
Trade and other receivables
 
11,648

(5,311
)
6,337

(2,156
)
(114
)
4,067

Trade and other payables
 
(12,543
)
5,311

(7,232
)
2,156


(5,076
)
At 31 December 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative assets
 
9,025

(1,882
)
7,143

(1,058
)
(133
)
5,952

Derivative liabilities
 
(10,236
)
1,882

(8,354
)
1,058


(7,296
)
Trade and other receivables
 
8,815

(4,468
)
4,347

(1,039
)
(118
)
3,190

Trade and other payables
 
(9,664
)
4,468

(5,196
)
1,039


(4,157
)

(c) Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that suitable sources of funding for the group’s business activities may not be available. The group’s liquidity is managed centrally with operating units forecasting their cash and currency requirements to the central treasury function. Unless restricted by local regulations, generally subsidiaries pool their cash surpluses to the treasury function, which will then arrange to fund other subsidiaries’ requirements, or invest any net surplus in the market or arrange for necessary external borrowings, while managing the group’s overall net currency positions.
Standard & Poor’s Ratings long-term credit rating for BP is A- (stable outlook) and Moody’s Investors Service rating is A1 (positive outlook).
During 2017, $8 billion of long-term taxable bonds were issued with terms ranging from one to twelve years. Commercial paper is issued at competitive rates to meet short-term borrowing requirements as and when needed.
As a further liquidity measure, the group continues to maintain suitable levels of cash and cash equivalents, amounting to $25.6 billion at 31 December 2017 (2016 $23.5 billion), primarily invested with highly rated banks or money market funds and readily accessible at immediate and short notice. At 31 December 2017, the group had substantial amounts of undrawn borrowing facilities available, consisting of $7,625 million of standby facilities, all of which is available to draw and repay up to the first half of 2022. These facilities are with 25 international banks, and borrowings under them would be at pre-agreed rates.
The group also has committed letter of credit (LC) facilities totalling $9,400 million with a number of banks, allowing LCs to be issued for a maximum 23-month duration. There were also uncommitted secured LC facilities in place at 31 December 2017 for $1,560 million, which are secured against inventories or receivables when utilized. The facilities only terminate by either party giving a stipulated termination notice to the other.
27. Financial instruments and financial risk factors – continued
The amounts shown for finance debt in the table below include future minimum lease payments with respect to finance leases. The table also shows the timing of cash outflows relating to trade and other payables and accruals.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$ million

 
 
 
 
 
2017

 
 
 
2016

 
 
Trade and
other
payablesa

Accruals

Finance
debtb

Interest on finance debt

Trade and
other
payablesa

Accruals

Finance
debtb

Interest on finance debtc

Within one year
 
40,472

4,960

7,626

1,757

35,774

5,136

6,620

1,217

1 to 2 years
 
1,693

135

7,331

1,537

2,005

186

5,909

1,083

2 to 3 years
 
1,413

83

7,068

1,321

1,278

91

6,624

942

3 to 4 years
 
1,378

70

6,766

1,114

1,239

53

6,201

801

4 to 5 years
 
1,368

54

7,986

894

1,229

33

6,564

658

5 to 10 years
 
6,181

115

24,162

1,951

5,826

75

22,190

1,446

Over 10 years
 
6,125

48

2,089

390

7,248

31

3,573

382

 
 
58,630

5,465

63,028

8,964

54,599

5,605

57,681

6,529

a 2017 includes $18,918 million (2016 $21,644 million) in relation to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill.
b Fair value adjustments relating to hedging activity have been excluded from finance debt which therefore is not equal the amounts presented on the balance sheet. 2016 has been amended to conform with this presentation.
c 2016 has been amended to exclude interest payments that do not relate to finance debt. Interest on liabilities is included in trade and other payables.

The group manages liquidity risk associated with derivative contracts, other than derivative hedging instruments, based on the expected maturities of both derivative assets and liabilities as indicated in Note 28. Management does not currently anticipate any cash flows that could be of a significantly different amount, or could occur earlier than the expected maturity analysis provided.
The table below shows the timing of cash outflows for derivative financial instruments entered into for the purpose of managing interest rate and foreign currency exchange risk associated with net debt, whether or not hedge accounting is applied, based upon contractual payment dates. The amounts reflect the gross settlement amount where the pay leg of a derivative will be settled separately from the receive leg, as in the case of cross-currency swaps hedging non-US dollar finance debt. The swaps are with high investment-grade counterparties and therefore the settlement-day risk exposure is considered to be negligible. Not shown in the table are the gross settlement amounts (inflows) for the receive leg of derivatives that are settled separately from the pay leg, which amount to $21,484 million at 31 December 2017 (2016 $18,014 million) to be received on the same day as the related cash outflows. For further information on our derivative financial instruments, see Note 28.
 
 
 
$ million

Cash outflows for derivative financial instruments at 31 December
 
2017

2016

Within one year
 
1,505

2,677

1 to 2 years
 
1,700

1,505

2 to 3 years
 
1,678

1,700

3 to 4 years
 
2,384

1,678

4 to 5 years
 
2,838

2,384

5 to 10 years
 
11,238

9,985

Over 10 years
 
724

1,413

 
 
22,067

21,342