XML 79 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Goodwill and Intangible Assets  
Goodwill and Intangible Assets

5. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

        The Company has two reportable business segments, Metalcutting Machine Solutions (MMS) and Aftermarket Tooling and Accessories (ATA).

        Detail and activity of goodwill by segment is presented below:

 
  MMS   ATA   Total  
 
  (in thousands)
 

Balance at December 31, 2011

  $ —   $ —   $ —  

Acquisition of Usach

    8,497     —     8,497  
               
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Balance at December 31, 2012

    8,497     —     8,497  

Acquisition of Forkardt

    —     5,678     5,678  

Impairment loss

    (3,809 )   —     (3,809 )

Disposal of Forkardt Switzerland

    —     (662 )   (662 )

Other adjustments

    160     —     160  
               
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Balance at December 31, 2013

  $ 4,848   $ 5,016   $ 9,864  
               
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​
               

        The gross carrying value of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $38.1 million and $32.3 million, respectively. Accumulated impairment losses were $27.6 million and $23.8 million, respectively.

        The major components of intangible assets other than goodwill are as follows:

 
  December 31,
2013
  December 31,
2012
 
 
  (in thousands)
 

Gross amortizable intangible assets:

             

Land rights

  $ 2,865   $ 2,784  

Patents

    3,030     3,006  

Technical know-how, customer list, and other

    21,375     12,152  
           
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Total gross amortizable intangible assets

    27,270     17,942  

Accumulated amortization:

   
 
   
 
 

Land rights

    (177 )   (116 )

Patents

    (2,884 )   (2,807 )

Technical know-how, customer list, and other

    (5,220 )   (3,870 )
           
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Total accumulated amortization

    (8,281 )   (6,793 )
           
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Amortizable intangible assets, net

    18,989     11,149  
           
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Indefinite lived intangible assets:

             

Assets associated with Bridgeport acquisition(1)

    7,354     7,595  

Usach trade name(2)

    1,550     2,840  

Forkardt trade name(3)

    4,170     —  
           
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

 

    13,074     10,435  
           
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Intangible assets other than goodwill, net

  $ 32,063   $ 21,584  
           
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​
           

(1)
Represents the aggregate value of the trade name, trademarks and copyrights associated with the former worldwide operations of Bridgeport. We use the Bridgeport brand name on all of our machining center lines. After consideration of legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic and other factors, the asset has been determined to have an indefinite useful life.

(2)
Represents the value of the trade name associated with Usach which the Company acquired in 2012. We use the Usach trade name on all of the grinding machines and grinding systems manufactured by Usach. After consideration of legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic and other factors, the asset has been determined to have an indefinite useful life.

(3)
Represents the value of the trade name associated with Forkardt which the Company acquired in 2013. We use the Forkardt trade name on all of the products manufactured by Forkardt. After consideration of legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic and other factors, the asset has been determined to have an indefinite useful life.

        Amortization expense related to these amortizable intangible assets was $1.5 million for 2013 and $0.8 million for 2012 and 2011 respectively. The aggregated amortization expense on existing intangible assets for each of the next five years is approximately $1.7 million, $1.7 million, $1.1 million, $1.1 million and $0.9 million, respectively.

        As of December 31, the remaining weighted average amortization period of our amortizable intangible assets are as follows:

 
  2013   2012  
 
  (in years)
 

Land rights

    46.9     47.9  

Patents

    2.8     3.0  

Technical know-how, customer list, and other

    15.4     14.7  
           
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Total weighted average amortization period

    19.7     23.1  

        As part of the annual impairment test as of December 31, 2013, the fair values of the Company's reporting units for goodwill impairment testing were estimated using the expected present value of future cash flows, recent industry transaction multiples and using estimates, judgments and assumptions that management believed were appropriate in the circumstances. The estimates and judgments used in the assessment included multiples of EBITDA, the weighted average cost of capital and the terminal growth rate. The Company performed a Step 1 analysis for each of the reporting units having a goodwill balance. For the Company's Usach reporting unit, which is part of the Company's MMS business segment and had a goodwill balance of $8.7 million, it was determined that its carrying value exceeded its fair value. As a result a step 2 analysis was performed and an impairment charge of $3.8 million was recognized in the impairment charge caption in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2013. The Company performed further analysis of the reporting units' long-lived assets and determined that impairments of these assets were not present.

        The Company's ATA reporting unit has a goodwill balance of $5.0 million as of December 31, 2013. The Company performed a Step 1 analysis for the reporting unit and determined its carrying value was less than its fair value.

        The Company also performed an annual impairment test of its indefinite lived intangible assets as of December 31, 2013. The fair value of the indefinite lived intangible assets were calculated using a discounted cash flow analysis. As a result of this impairment test, it was determined that the fair value of the Company's Usach trade name and Forkardt's trade name were less than their carrying values resulting in impairment charges of $1.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively, which were recognized in the impairment charge caption in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2013.

        See Footnote 11 for a discussion of the fair value measures used in determining these impairment charges.