XML 28 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT  v2.3.0.11
Note 13 - CONTINGENCIES
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2011
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block]
(13)           CONTINGENCIES

BWI Contingencies - Please See Note 2 – “Investment in BriteWater International, LLC” for further discussion on BWI contingencies.

IRS Examination - During 2008, we received a proposed adjustment to our federal tax liability for the calendar year 2005.  The proposed adjustment relates to the calculation of the adjusted current earnings (“ACE”) component of the alternative minimum tax and asserts that the Company recognized a gain for ACE purposes on the sale of the Global PLC stock in 2005.  In its proposed adjustment, the IRS alleges we owe approximately $3.6 million in tax for the year ended December 31, 2005. Penalties and interest calculated through June 30, 2011 in the amount of approximately $2.6 million could also be assessed. We filed a formal protest with the IRS Appeals Office during 2008 and a supplement to the written protest which included a third party valuation report supporting the basis of our recognized gain recorded for ACE purposes during April 2009. In February 2011, the IRS requested and we agreed to extend the statute of limitations to April 2012. Also during 2011, the IRS prepared and sent an internal memorandum outlining its position regarding the basis of our gain recorded for ACE purposes. In response, HKN has completed and finalized an additional third party valuation study as well as a rebuttal of the IRS internal memorandum, both of which provide additional support for our position.

ASC 740, Income Taxes, prescribes a recognition threshold of more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination. This guidance also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosures and transition. Utilizing the process outlined above, we have recorded an income tax contingency for this item, including interest and penalties, of $225 thousand in our consolidated condensed financial statements based, in part, on a preliminary indication of a fair value assessment of the Global stock. Although we intend to vigorously defend the proposed adjustment and strongly believe two third party valuation reports support our position and that we have meritorious defenses, if the IRS Appeals Office were to deny all of our protests and our assumptions and estimates associated with this income tax contingency are inaccurate, we could be liable for approximately $6 million in additional tax, penalties and interest.

Environmental Contingencies - The Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) visited our Main Pass facility and issued a report during April 2008 which detailed minor housekeeping violations, several of which were corrected during the course of the inspection. We responded to this report during June 2008 with explanations of how each violation was fully remediated. During May 2010, we received a follow-up letter from the EPA requesting a meeting to discuss our June 2008 response. We held an initial meeting with the EPA during July 2010, and we anticipate that we will settle this EPA action for less than $50 thousand during 2011.

Operational Contingencies - The exploration, development and production of oil and gas assets are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations designed to protect the environment. Compliance with these regulations is part of our day-to-day operating procedures. Infrequently, accidental discharge of such materials as oil, natural gas or drilling fluids can occur and such accidents can require material expenditures to correct. We maintain levels of insurance we believe to be customary in the industry to limit our financial exposure.