UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF
REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act File Number: 811-02958
T. Rowe Price International Funds, Inc. |
|
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) |
100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202 |
|
(Address of principal executive offices) |
David Oestreicher |
100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202 |
|
(Name and address of agent for service) |
Registrants telephone number, including
area code: (410) 345-2000
Date of fiscal year end: December 31
Date of reporting period: June 30, 2016
Item 1. Report to Shareholders
International Bond Fund |
June 30,
2016 |
The views and opinions in this report were current as of June 30, 2016. They are not guarantees of performance or investment results and should not be taken as investment advice. Investment decisions reflect a variety of factors, and the managers reserve the right to change their views about individual stocks, sectors, and the markets at any time. As a result, the views expressed should not be relied upon as a forecast of the funds future investment intent. The report is certified under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires mutual funds and other public companies to affirm that, to the best of their knowledge, the information in their financial reports is fairly and accurately stated in all material respects.
REPORTS ON THE WEB
Sign up for our Email Program, and you can begin to receive updated fund reports and prospectuses online rather than through the mail. Log in to your account at troweprice.com for more information.
Managers Letter
Fellow Shareholders
Developed market international bonds generated strong returns in U.S. dollar terms as yields decreased to record lows and many non-U.S. currencies gained against the dollar. Following the Brexit vote in late June, investors became convinced that the Fed would wait even longer before raising rates again and that other central banks would expand their aggressive monetary stimulus measures. After a long period of U.S. dollar strength in 2014 and 2015, the dollar lost ground against many other currencies in the first half of 2016.
The International Bond Fund returned 11.58% for the six months ended June 30, 2016. (Returns for the funds Advisor and I Class shares varied slightly due to their different fee structures.) The fund slightly underperformed the benchmark Barclays Global Aggregate ex USD Bond Index but outperformed the Lipper International Income Funds Average.
MARKET ENVIRONMENT
Expectations for the timing of the Feds second rate hike changed throughout the reporting period as elevated volatility in global financial marketsbookended by worries about plummeting oil prices and Chinas ability to manage its growth slowdown at the beginning of the year and then by the Brexit vote near the end of the reporting periodconvinced the central bank to further delay its next move. The outcome of the Brexit referendum shifted expectations for UK gross domestic product from modest expansion to barely positive growth as a result of political instability and companies delaying investment in the uncertain environment. By the end of June, market participants expected the Bank of England to ease monetary policy later in the summer to try to offset the negative drag of Brexit. The eurozone economy expanded at a weak pace even as the European Central Bank (ECB) expanded its quantitative easing (QE) program. In March, the ECB said that it would begin to buy euro-denominated investment-grade bonds from nonfinancial corporate issuers in June, supporting credit spreads. Japans economy continued to struggle to achieve positive growth and generate desired levels of wage and price inflation even as the Bank of Japan (BoJ) expanded its already large QE program.
Yields on high-quality developed markets government debt plummeted to ultralow or negative levels following the Brexit vote as investors became convinced that the Fed would wait even longer before raising rates again and that other central banks would expand their aggressive monetary stimulus measures. The German 10-year bund yield started 2016 over 0.60%, decreased to around 0.10% by May, and fell to almost -0.20% after the UK referendum before recovering to finish June near 0%. In Japan, the countrys 10-year government note yield fell into negative territory in February after the BoJ made certain deposit rates negative. At the end of the reporting period, Japanese 10-year bonds yielded approximately -0.25%, down from about 0.26% at the beginning of 2016. In the U.S., longer-term Treasury yields decreased markedly, with the yield on the 10-year Treasury note falling to 1.49% at the end of the reporting period from 2.27% at the beginning.
A sharp rebound in oil prices from their January lows near $26 per barrel for global benchmark Brent crude to just over $50 per barrel in June supported an equally sharp tightening of credit spreads on high yield bonds. Commodity-related sectors account for a significant proportion of the U.S. high yield market. These sectors make up a much smaller amount of the European high yield bond market, which did not rally as meaningfully. Credit spreads on investment-grade corporates also narrowed, but not as dramatically as in the high yield market. Anticipation of the ECBs purchases of corporate debt from nonfinancial issuers also supported the investment-grade corporate segment on both sides of the Atlantic. Sovereign and corporate bonds from emerging markets posted strong returns as oil prices rebounded and investor perceptions of the Fed turned more dovish.
After a long period of U.S. dollar strength in 2014 and 2015, the dollar lost ground against many other currencies in the reporting period. For example, the Japanese yen gained a remarkable 17% against the greenback. One glaring exception to the dollar weakness among the currencies of developed countries was the British pound sterling, which declined abruptly after the Brexit vote to finish down more than 9% against the U.S. dollar for the first half of 2016. Emerging markets currencies were more mixed versus the dollar. The Brazilian real climbed over 23% amid investor hopes that the government of interim President Michel Temer will be able to implement structural reforms to improve the countrys fiscal situation, while the Mexican peso, which is one of the more liquid emerging markets currencies and tends to trade as a proxy for risk in the asset class, dropped more than 6%.
PORTFOLIO REVIEW AND POSITIONING
The funds country allocation and exposure to interest rate changes made a marginally positive contribution to relative performance. The portfolio was overweight the sovereign debt of periphery eurozone countries such as Italy, Cyprus, and Slovenia, which we expect to benefit from the ECBs QE program, and underweight German government bonds, where negative yields offer little value. We were also underweight Japanese government bonds because of their negative yields, but this positioning weighed on returns as expectations that the BoJ will expand its QE program even more drove yields further into negative territory. In other developed sovereign debt markets, the fund was overweight Sweden, where the yield curve is very steep, and Australia, where we think that the central bank can cut interest rates. At the beginning of 2016, the portfolios overall duration was slightly shorter than the duration of the benchmark. Over the course of the reporting period, we extended the overall duration so that it was somewhat longer than the benchmarks duration by the end of June.
Sector selection also made a slight positive contribution to relative performance in the first half of 2016. The funds small overweight in European investment-grade corporate bonds was beneficial as the ECBs purchases of corporate debt from nonfinancial issuers supported that asset class. European high yield bonds also indirectly benefited from the ECBs corporate bond buying; about 3% of the funds net assets were in European high yield corporates at the end of the reporting period. We also had an allocation to Japanese inflation-linked government bonds that appeared to be mispriced relative to expectations for inflation in Japan, but their performance lagged.
In emerging markets, we continue to favor local currency sovereign bonds issued by nations making progress toward implementing structural, fiscal, and economic reforms, such as Mexico and Romania. We increased the portfolios allocation to emerging markets sovereign bonds denominated in local currencies over the course of the six-month period. These included positions in government debt from Brazil, which appeared inexpensive and poised to benefit from the countrys reform momentum under its interim president, as well as Poland and Israel. The portfolio also had a small allocation to emerging markets corporate bonds that accounted for less than 1% of net assets.
In terms of currency positioning, the portfolio was underweight the Japanese yen and did not receive the full benefit of its strong appreciation stemming from safe-haven demand. Beginning in the first quarter of 2016, we established an underweight in the British pound sterling against overweights in the U.S. dollar, Swiss franc, and Swedish krona as a hedge against the possibility that the UK would vote to leave the European Union in its late-June referendum. This positioning benefited performance as the surprising leave vote sent the pound to its lowest level against the U.S. dollar in 30 years. We maintained the underweight to the pound through the end of the reporting period, although we added back some long exposure prior to the Brexit vote.
The funds exposure to emerging markets currencies broadly favored countries that have the willingness and ability to implement meaningful structural reforms, such as India. We were overweight the Indian rupee through much of the reporting period, while our allocation to the Mexican peso varied as we actively traded the currency, taking advantage of its liquidity. In the second quarter of 2016, the portfolio was also overweight the Indonesian rupiah as a result of its inexpensive valuation. We were underweight the Malaysian ringgit and the Singapore dollar, which we anticipate will be dragged lower as economic growth slows in regional powerhouse China.
OUTLOOK
With the ramifications of the Brexit vote for Europe as a whole not yet fully understood, we anticipate further volatility in fixed income markets. Aside from the fallout from Brexit, there are various other risks that could emerge. China has recently fallen out of the spotlight of the financial media, but there is still a chance that the countrys economy could grind to an abrupt slowdown if the government is not able to manage its transition from export-driven expansion to an economy focused on domestic demand. Also, with an Italian referendum on constitutional reform due later in 2016 and the U.S. presidential election in November, political dysfunction in developed markets could remain at the forefront of investor worries.
The most significant risk to markets is a global recession, and the mere possibility of this scenario will likely dampen sentiment. However, on the positive side, the outcome of the UK referendum will probably further delay any Fed rate hikes, which should help stabilize sentiment toward emerging markets. In fact, we think that emerging markets now have more potential for stronger economic growth than developed countries. With the outlook for inflation in Brazil, Russia, and Indonesia moderating, the potential for central bank interest rate cuts in those countries should stimulate demand for their bonds from foreign investors.
The uncertainty and volatility dominating the market environment should provide a tailwind for our strategy as we try to find sectors and individual securities that are mispriced as a result of temporary market dislocations. In this environment, we believe that the extended reach of T. Rowe Prices global sovereign, credit, and equity research platforms, combined with our emphasis on collaboration across those platforms, gives us a critical edge in analyzing risks and opportunities in both developed and emerging fixed income markets.
Respectfully submitted,
Arif Husain
President of the International Fixed Income Division, co-portfolio
manager, and cochairman of the funds Investment Advisory
Committee
Kenneth Orchard
Co-portfolio manager and cochairman of the funds Investment
Advisory Committee
July 27, 2016
The committee chairmen have day-to-day responsibility for the portfolio and work with committee members in developing and executing the funds investment program.
RISK OF INTERNATIONAL BOND INVESTING
Funds that invest overseas generally carry more risk than funds that invest strictly in U.S. assets, including unpredictable changes in currency values. Investments in emerging markets are subject to abrupt and severe price declines and should be regarded as speculative. The economic and political structures of developing nations, in most cases, do not compare favorably with the U.S. or other developed countries in terms of wealth and stability, and their financial markets often lack liquidity. Some countries also have legacies of hyperinflation, currency devaluations, and governmental interference in markets.
International investments are subject to currency risk, a decline in the value of a foreign currency versus the U.S. dollar, which reduces the dollar value of securities denominated in that currency. The overall impact on a funds holdings can be significant and long-lasting depending on the currencies represented in the portfolio, how each one appreciates or depreciates in relation to the U.S. dollar, and whether currency positions are hedged. Further, exchange rate movements are unpredictable and it is not possible to effectively hedge the currency risks of many developing countries.
Bonds are also subject to interest rate risk, the decline in bond prices that usually accompanies a rise in interest rates, and credit risk, the chance that any fund holding could have its credit rating downgraded or that a bond issuer will default (fail to make timely payments of interest or principal), potentially reducing the funds income level and share price.
GLOSSARY
Barclays Global Aggregate ex USD Bond Index: An unmanaged index that tracks an international basket of bonds that contains government, corporate, agency, and mortgage-related bonds.
Credit spread: Measures the additional yield that investors demand as compensation for holding a bond with credit risk versus a similar-maturity Treasury security or other type of low-risk bond.
Duration: A measure of a bond or bond funds sensitivity to changes in interest rates. For example, a fund with a duration of six years would fall about 6% in response to a one-percentage-point rise in rates, and vice versa.
Gross domestic product: The total market value of all goods and services produced in a country in a given year.
J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global: An index that tracks U.S. dollar government bonds of 31 foreign countries.
Quasi-sovereign debt: Debt issued by a corporation and backed by the respective government, typically offering the higher yields of corporate debt with the added benefit of government support.
Weighted average maturity: A measure of a funds sensitivity to interest rates. In general, the longer the average maturity, the greater the funds sensitivity to interest rate changes. The weighted average maturity may take into account the interest rate readjustment dates for certain securities. Money funds must maintain a weighted average maturity of less than 60 days.
Performance and Expenses
Growth of $10,000 |
This chart shows the value of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in the fund over the past 10 fiscal year periods or since inception (for funds lacking 10-year records). The result is compared with benchmarks, which may include a broad-based market index and a peer group average or index. Market indexes do not include expenses, which are deducted from fund returns as well as mutual fund averages and indexes.
Fund Expense Example |
As a mutual fund shareholder, you may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees, and other fund expenses. The following example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the most recent six-month period and held for the entire period.
Please note that the fund has three share classes: The original share class (Investor Class) charges no distribution and service (12b-1) fee, Advisor Class shares are offered only through unaffiliated brokers and other financial intermediaries and charge a 0.25% 12b-1 fee, and I Class shares are available to institutionally oriented clients and impose no 12b-1 or administrative fee payment. Each share class is presented separately in the table.
Actual Expenses
The first line of the following table (Actual) provides
information about actual account values and expenses based on the funds actual
returns. You may use the information on this line, together with your account
balance, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide
your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by
$1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number on the first line under
the heading Expenses Paid During Period to estimate the expenses you paid on
your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison
Purposes
The information on the second
line of the table (Hypothetical) is based on hypothetical account values and
expenses derived from the funds actual expense ratio and an assumed 5% per year
rate of return before expenses (not the funds actual return). You may compare
the ongoing costs of investing in the fund with other funds by contrasting this
5% hypothetical example and the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the
shareholder reports of the other funds. The hypothetical account values and
expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or
expenses you paid for the period.
Note: T. Rowe Price charges an annual account service fee of $20, generally for accounts with less than $10,000. The fee is waived for any investor whose T. Rowe Price mutual fund accounts total $50,000 or more; accounts electing to receive electronic delivery of account statements, transaction confirmations, prospectuses, and shareholder reports; or accounts of an investor who is a T. Rowe Price Preferred Services, Personal Services, or Enhanced Personal Services client (enrollment in these programs generally requires T. Rowe Price assets of at least $100,000). This fee is not included in the accompanying table. If you are subject to the fee, keep it in mind when you are estimating the ongoing expenses of investing in the fund and when comparing the expenses of this fund with other funds.
You should also be aware that the expenses shown in the table highlight only your ongoing costs and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads. Therefore, the second line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. To the extent a fund charges transaction costs, however, the total cost of owning that fund is higher.
Unaudited
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Unaudited
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Unaudited
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Unaudited
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Unaudited
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Unaudited
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Unaudited
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Unaudited
Notes to Financial Statements |
T. Rowe Price International Funds, Inc. (the corporation), is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act). The International Bond Fund (the fund) is a nondiversified, open-end management investment company established by the corporation. The fund seeks to provide high current income and capital appreciation by investing primarily in high-quality, nondollar-denominated bonds outside the U.S. The fund has three classes of shares: the International Bond Fund original share class, referred to in this report as the Investor Class, incepted on September 10, 1986; the International Bond FundAdvisor Class (Advisor Class), incepted on March 31, 2000; and the International Bond FundI Class (I Class), incepted on August 28, 2015. Advisor Class shares are sold only through unaffiliated brokers and other unaffiliated financial intermediaries. I Class shares generally are available only to investors meeting a $1,000,000 minimum investment or certain other criteria. The Advisor Class operates under a Board-approved Rule 12b-1 plan pursuant to which the class compensates financial intermediaries for distribution, shareholder servicing, and/or certain administrative services; the Investor and I Classes do not pay Rule 12b-1 fees. Each class has exclusive voting rights on matters related solely to that class; separate voting rights on matters that relate to all classes; and, in all other respects, the same rights and obligations as the other classes.
NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Preparation The fund is an investment company and follows accounting and reporting guidance in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 (ASC 946). The accompanying financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), including, but not limited to, ASC 946. GAAP requires the use of estimates made by management. Management believes that estimates and valuations are appropriate; however, actual results may differ from those estimates, and the valuations reflected in the accompanying financial statements may differ from the value ultimately realized upon sale or maturity.
Investment Transactions, Investment Income, and Distributions Income and expenses are recorded on the accrual basis. Premiums and discounts on debt securities are amortized for financial reporting purposes. Inflation adjustments to the principal amount of inflation-indexed bonds are reflected as interest income. Dividends received from mutual fund investments are reflected as dividend income; capital gain distributions, if any, are reflected as realized gain/loss. Dividend income and capital gain distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income tax-related interest and penalties, if incurred, would be recorded as income tax expense. Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Realized gains and losses are reported on the identified cost basis. Income distributions are declared by each class daily and paid monthly. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Capital gain distributions, if any, are generally declared and paid by the fund annually.
Currency Translation Assets, including investments, and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar values each day at the prevailing exchange rate, using the mean of the bid and asked prices of such currencies against U.S. dollars as quoted by a major bank. Purchases and sales of securities, income, and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars at the prevailing exchange rate on the date of the transaction. The effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on realized and unrealized security gains and losses is reflected as a component of security gains and losses.
Class Accounting Shareholder servicing, prospectus, and shareholder report expenses incurred by each class are charged directly to the class to which they relate. Expenses common to all classes and investment income are allocated to the classes based upon the relative daily net assets of each classs settled shares; realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated based upon the relative daily net assets of each classs outstanding shares. The Advisor Class pays Rule 12b-1 fees, in an amount not exceeding 0.25% of the classs average daily net assets.
Redemption Fees A 2% fee is assessed on redemptions of fund shares held for 90 days or less to deter short-term trading and to protect the interests of long-term shareholders. Redemption fees are withheld from proceeds that shareholders receive from the sale or exchange of fund shares. The fees are paid to the fund and are recorded as an increase to paid-in capital. The fees may cause the redemption price per share to differ from the net asset value per share.
NOTE 2 - VALUATION
The funds financial instruments are valued and each classs net asset value (NAV) per share is computed at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), normally 4 p.m. ET, each day the NYSE is open for business.
Fair Value The funds financial instruments are reported at fair value, which GAAP defines as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The T. Rowe Price Valuation Committee (the Valuation Committee) has been established by the funds Board of Directors (the Board) to ensure that financial instruments are appropriately priced at fair value in accordance with GAAP and the 1940 Act. Subject to oversight by the Board, the Valuation Committee develops and oversees pricing-related policies and procedures and approves all fair value determinations. Specifically, the Valuation Committee establishes procedures to value securities; determines pricing techniques, sources, and persons eligible to effect fair value pricing actions; oversees the selection, services, and performance of pricing vendors; oversees valuation-related business continuity practices; and provides guidance on internal controls and valuation-related matters. The Valuation Committee reports to the Board and has representation from legal, portfolio management and trading, operations, risk management, and the funds treasurer.
Various valuation techniques and inputs are used to determine the fair value of financial instruments. GAAP establishes the following fair value hierarchy that categorizes the inputs used to measure fair value:
Level 1 quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical financial instruments that the fund can access at the reporting date
Level 2 inputs other than Level 1 quoted prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly (including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar financial instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar financial instruments in inactive markets, interest rates and yield curves, implied volatilities, and credit spreads)
Level 3 unobservable inputs
Observable inputs are developed using market data, such as publicly available information about actual events or transactions, and reflect the assumptions that market participants would use to price the financial instrument. Unobservable inputs are those for which market data are not available and are developed using the best information available about the assumptions that market participants would use to price the financial instrument. GAAP requires valuation techniques to maximize the use of relevant observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. When multiple inputs are used to derive fair value, the financial instrument is assigned to the level within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest-level input that is significant to the fair value of the financial instrument. Input levels are not necessarily an indication of the risk or liquidity associated with financial instruments at that level but rather the degree of judgment used in determining those values.
Valuation Techniques Debt securities generally are traded in the over-the-counter (OTC) market. Securities with remaining maturities of one year or more at the time of acquisition are valued at prices furnished by dealers who make markets in such securities or by an independent pricing service, which considers the yield or price of bonds of comparable quality, coupon, maturity, and type, as well as prices quoted by dealers who make markets in such securities. Securities with remaining maturities of less than one year at the time of acquisition generally use amortized cost in local currency to approximate fair value. However, if amortized cost is deemed not to reflect fair value or the fund holds a significant amount of such securities with remaining maturities of more than 60 days, the securities are valued at prices furnished by dealers who make markets in such securities or by an independent pricing service. Generally, debt securities are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy; however, to the extent the valuations include significant unobservable inputs, the securities would be categorized in Level 3.
Equity securities listed or regularly traded on a securities exchange or in the OTC market are valued at the last quoted sale price or, for certain markets, the official closing price at the time the valuations are made. OTC Bulletin Board securities are valued at the mean of the closing bid and asked prices. A security that is listed or traded on more than one exchange is valued at the quotation on the exchange determined to be the primary market for such security. Listed securities not traded on a particular day are valued at the mean of the closing bid and asked prices for domestic securities and the last quoted sale or closing price for international securities.
For valuation purposes, the last quoted prices of non-U.S. equity securities may be adjusted to reflect the fair value of such securities at the close of the NYSE. If the fund determines that developments between the close of a foreign market and the close of the NYSE will, in its judgment, materially affect the value of some or all of its portfolio securities, the fund will adjust the previous quoted prices to reflect what it believes to be the fair value of the securities as of the close of the NYSE. In deciding whether it is necessary to adjust quoted prices to reflect fair value, the fund reviews a variety of factors, including developments in foreign markets, the performance of U.S. securities markets, and the performance of instruments trading in U.S. markets that represent foreign securities and baskets of foreign securities. The fund may also fair value securities in other situations, such as when a particular foreign market is closed but the fund is open. The fund uses outside pricing services to provide it with quoted prices and information to evaluate or adjust those prices. The fund cannot predict how often it will use quoted prices and how often it will determine it necessary to adjust those prices to reflect fair value. As a means of evaluating its security valuation process, the fund routinely compares quoted prices, the next days opening prices in the same markets, and adjusted prices.
Actively traded equity securities listed on a domestic exchange generally are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Non-U.S. equity securities generally are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy despite the availability of quoted prices because, as described above, the fund evaluates and determines whether those quoted prices reflect fair value at the close of the NYSE or require adjustment. OTC Bulletin Board securities, certain preferred securities, and equity securities traded in inactive markets generally are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Investments in mutual funds are valued at the mutual funds closing NAV per share on the day of valuation and are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Listed options, and OTC options with a listed equivalent, are valued at the mean of the closing bid and asked prices and generally are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Financial futures contracts are valued at closing settlement prices and are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Forward currency exchange contracts are valued using the prevailing forward exchange rate and are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Swaps are valued at prices furnished by independent swap dealers or by an independent pricing service and generally are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy; however, if unobservable inputs are significant to the valuation, the swap would be categorized in Level 3. Assets and liabilities other than financial instruments, including short-term receivables and payables, are carried at cost, or estimated realizable value, if less, which approximates fair value.
Thinly traded financial instruments and those for which the above valuation procedures are inappropriate or are deemed not to reflect fair value are stated at fair value as determined in good faith by the Valuation Committee. The objective of any fair value pricing determination is to arrive at a price that could reasonably be expected from a current sale. Financial instruments fair valued by the Valuation Committee are primarily private placements, restricted securities, warrants, rights, and other securities that are not publicly traded.
Subject to oversight by the Board, the Valuation Committee regularly makes good faith judgments to establish and adjust the fair valuations of certain securities as events occur and circumstances warrant. For instance, in determining the fair value of troubled or thinly traded debt instruments, the Valuation Committee considers a variety of factors, which may include, but are not limited to, the issuers business prospects, its financial standing and performance, recent investment transactions in the issuer, strategic events affecting the company, market liquidity for the issuer, and general economic conditions and events. In consultation with the investment and pricing teams, the Valuation Committee will determine an appropriate valuation technique based on available information, which may include both observable and unobservable inputs. The Valuation Committee typically will afford greatest weight to actual prices in arms length transactions, to the extent they represent orderly transactions between market participants, transaction information can be reliably obtained, and prices are deemed representative of fair value. However, the Valuation Committee may also consider other valuation methods such as a discount or premium from market value of a similar, freely traded security of the same issuer; discounted cash flows; yield to maturity; or some combination. Fair value determinations are reviewed on a regular basis and updated as information becomes available, including actual purchase and sale transactions of the issue. Because any fair value determination involves a significant amount of judgment, there is a degree of subjectivity inherent in such pricing decisions, and fair value prices determined by the Valuation Committee could differ from those of other market participants. Depending on the relative significance of unobservable inputs, including the valuation technique(s) used, fair valued securities may be categorized in Level 2 or 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Valuation Inputs The following table summarizes the funds financial instruments, based on the inputs used to determine their fair values on June 30, 2016:
There were no material transfers between Levels 1 and 2 during the six months ended June 30, 2016.
NOTE 3 - DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the fund invested in derivative instruments. As defined by GAAP, a derivative is a financial instrument whose value is derived from an underlying security price, foreign exchange rate, interest rate, index of prices or rates, or other variable; it requires little or no initial investment and permits or requires net settlement. The fund invests in derivatives only if the expected risks and rewards are consistent with its investment objectives, policies, and overall risk profile, as described in its prospectus and Statement of Additional Information. The fund may use derivatives for a variety of purposes, such as seeking to hedge against declines in principal value, increase yield, invest in an asset with greater efficiency and at a lower cost than is possible through direct investment, or to adjust portfolio duration and credit exposure. The risks associated with the use of derivatives are different from, and potentially much greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in the instruments on which the derivatives are based. The fund at all times maintains sufficient cash reserves, liquid assets, or other SEC-permitted asset types to cover its settlement obligations under open derivative contracts.
The fund values its derivatives at fair value and recognizes changes in fair value currently in its results of operations. Accordingly, the fund does not follow hedge accounting, even for derivatives employed as economic hedges. Generally, the fund accounts for its derivatives on a gross basis. It does not offset the fair value of derivative liabilities against the fair value of derivative assets on its financial statements, nor does it offset the fair value of derivative instruments against the right to reclaim or obligation to return collateral.
The following table summarizes the fair value of the funds derivative instruments held as of June 30, 2016, and the related location on the accompanying Statement of Assets and Liabilities, presented by primary underlying risk exposure:
Additionally, the amount of gains and losses on derivative instruments recognized in fund earnings during the six months ended June 30, 2016, and the related location on the accompanying Statement of Operations is summarized in the following table by primary underlying risk exposure:
Counterparty Risk and Collateral The fund invests in derivatives in various markets, which expose it to differing levels of counterparty risk. Counterparty risk on exchange-traded and centrally cleared derivative contracts, such as futures, exchange-traded options, and centrally cleared swaps, is minimal because the clearinghouse provides protection against counterparty defaults. For futures and centrally cleared swaps, the fund is required to deposit collateral in an amount equal to a certain percentage of the contract value (margin requirement), and the margin requirement must be maintained over the life of the contract. Each clearing broker, in its sole discretion, may adjust the margin requirements applicable to the fund.
Derivatives, such as bilateral swaps, forward currency exchange contracts, and OTC options, that are transacted and settle directly with a counterparty (bilateral derivatives) expose the fund to greater counterparty risk. To mitigate this risk, the fund has entered into master netting arrangements (MNAs) with certain counterparties that permit net settlement under specified conditions and, for certain counterparties, also provide collateral agreements. MNAs may be in the form of International Swaps and Derivatives Association master agreements (ISDAs) or foreign exchange letter agreements (FX letters).
MNAs govern the ability to offset amounts the fund owes a counterparty against amounts the counterparty owes the fund (net settlement). Both ISDAs and FX letters generally allow net settlement in the event of contract termination and permit termination by either party prior to maturity upon the occurrence of certain stated events, such as failure to pay or bankruptcy. In addition, ISDAs specify other events, the occurrence of which would allow one of the parties to terminate. For example, a downgrade in credit rating of a counterparty would allow the fund to terminate while a decline in the funds net assets of more than a certain percentage would allow the counterparty to terminate. Upon termination, all bilateral derivatives with that counterparty would be liquidated and a net amount settled. ISDAs typically include collateral agreements whereas FX letters do not. Collateral requirements are determined based on the net aggregate unrealized gain or loss on all bilateral derivatives with each counterparty, subject to minimum transfer amounts that typically range from $100,000 to $250,000. Any additional collateral required due to changes in security values is transferred the next business day.
The following table summarizes the funds derivatives at the reporting date by loss exposure to each counterparty or clearinghouse after consideration of collateral, if any. Exchange-traded and centrally cleared derivatives that settle variation margin daily are presented at the variation margin receivable or payable on the reporting date, and exchange-traded options are presented at value.
Collateral may be in the form of cash or debt securities issued by the U.S. government or related agencies. Cash and currencies posted by the fund are reflected as cash deposits in the accompanying financial statements and generally are restricted from withdrawal by the fund; securities posted by the fund are so noted in the accompanying Portfolio of Investments; both remain in the funds assets. Collateral pledged by counterparties is not included in the funds assets because the fund does not obtain effective control over those assets. For bilateral derivatives, collateral posted by the fund is held in a segregated account by the funds custodian.
Forward Currency Exchange Contracts The fund is subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. It uses forward currency exchange contracts (forwards) primarily to protect its non-U.S. dollar-denominated securities from adverse currency movements and to gain exposure to currencies for the purposes of risk management or enhanced return. A forward involves an obligation to purchase or sell a fixed amount of a specific currency on a future date at a price set at the time of the contract. Although certain forwards may be settled by exchanging only the net gain or loss on the contract, most forwards are settled with the exchange of the underlying currencies in accordance with the specified terms. Forwards are valued at the unrealized gain or loss on the contract, which reflects the net amount the fund either is entitled to receive or obligated to deliver, as measured by the difference between the forward exchange rates at the date of entry into the contract and the forward rates at the reporting date. Appreciated forwards are reflected as assets and depreciated forwards are reflected as liabilities on the accompanying Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Risks related to the use of forwards include the possible failure of counterparties to meet the terms of the agreements; that anticipated currency movements will not occur, thereby reducing the funds total return; and the potential for losses in excess of the funds initial investment. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the volume of the funds activity in forwards, based on underlying notional amounts, was generally between 38% and 48% of net assets.
Futures Contracts The fund is subject to interest rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives and uses futures contracts to help manage such risk. The fund may enter into futures contracts to manage exposure to interest rate and yield curve movements, security prices, foreign currencies, credit quality, and mortgage prepayments; as an efficient means of adjusting exposure to all or part of a target market; to enhance income; as a cash management tool; or to adjust portfolio duration and credit exposure. A futures contract provides for the future sale by one party and purchase by another of a specified amount of a specific underlying financial instrument at an agreed-upon price, date, time, and place. The fund currently invests only in exchange-traded futures, which generally are standardized as to maturity date, underlying financial instrument, and other contract terms. Payments are made or received by the fund each day to settle daily fluctuations in the value of the contract (variation margin), which reflect changes in the value of the underlying financial instrument. Variation margin is recorded as unrealized gain or loss until the contract is closed. The value of a futures contract included in net assets is the amount of unsettled variation margin; net variation margin receivable is reflected as an asset, and net variation margin payable is reflected as a liability on the accompanying Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Risks related to the use of futures contracts include possible illiquidity of the futures markets, contract prices that can be highly volatile and imperfectly correlated to movements in hedged security values and/or interest rates, and potential losses in excess of the funds initial investment. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the volume of the funds activity in futures, based on underlying notional amounts, was generally between 15% and 28% of net assets.
Options The fund is subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives and uses options to help manage such risk. The fund may use options to manage exposure to security prices, interest rates, foreign currencies, and credit quality; as an efficient means of adjusting exposure to all or a part of a target market; to enhance income; as a cash management tool; or to adjust credit exposure. Options are included in net assets at fair value, purchased options are included in Investments in Securities, and written options are separately reflected as a liability on the accompanying Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Premiums on unexercised, expired options are recorded as realized gains or losses; premiums on exercised options are recorded as an adjustment to the proceeds from the sale or cost of the purchase. The difference between the premium and the amount received or paid in a closing transaction is also treated as realized gain or loss. In return for a premium paid, currency options give the holder the right, but not the obligation, to buy and sell currency at a specified exchange rate. Risks related to the use of options include possible illiquidity of the options markets; trading restrictions imposed by an exchange or counterparty; movements in the underlying security values and/or currency values; and, for written options, potential losses in excess of the funds initial investment. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the volume of the funds activity in options, based on underlying notional amounts, was generally between 0% and 27% of net assets. Transactions in written options and related premiums received during the six months ended June 30, 2016, were as follows:
Swaps The fund is subject to interest rate risk, and/or credit risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives and uses swap contracts to help manage such risks. The fund may use swaps in an effort to manage exposure to changes in interest rates, inflation rates, and credit quality; to adjust overall exposure to certain markets; to enhance total return or protect the value of portfolio securities; to serve as a cash management tool; or to adjust portfolio duration and credit exposure. Swap agreements can be settled either directly with the counterparty (bilateral swap) or through a central clearinghouse (centrally cleared swap). Fluctuations in the fair value of a contract are reflected in unrealized gain or loss and are reclassified to realized gain or loss upon contract termination or cash settlement. Net periodic receipts or payments required by a contract increase or decrease, respectively, the value of the contract until the contractual payment date, at which time such amounts are reclassified from unrealized to realized gain or loss. For bilateral swaps, cash payments are made or received by the fund on a periodic basis in accordance with contract terms; unrealized gain on contracts and premiums paid are reflected as assets and unrealized loss on contracts and premiums received are reflected as liabilities on the accompanying Statement of Assets and Liabilities. For centrally cleared swaps, payments are made or received by the fund each day to settle the daily fluctuation in the value of the contract (variation margin). Accordingly, the value of a centrally cleared swap included in net assets is the unsettled variation margin; net variation margin receivable is reflected as an asset and net variation margin payable is reflected as a liability on the accompanying Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
Interest rate swaps are agreements to exchange cash flows based on the difference between specified interest rates applied to a notional principal amount for a specified period of time. Risks related to the use of interest rate swaps include the potential for unanticipated movements in interest or currency rates, the possible failure of a counterparty to perform in accordance with the terms of the swap agreements, potential government regulation that could adversely affect the funds swap investments, and potential losses in excess of the funds initial investment.
Credit default swaps are agreements where one party (the protection buyer) agrees to make periodic payments to another party (the protection seller) in exchange for protection against specified credit events, such as certain defaults and bankruptcies related to an underlying credit instrument, or issuer or index of such instruments. Upon occurrence of a specified credit event, the protection seller is required to pay the buyer the difference between the notional amount of the swap and the value of the underlying credit, either in the form of a net cash settlement or by paying the gross notional amount and accepting delivery of the relevant underlying credit. For credit default swaps where the underlying credit is an index, a specified credit event may affect all or individual underlying securities included in the index and will be settled based upon the relative weighting of the affected underlying security(ies) within the index. Generally, the payment risk for the seller of protection is inversely related to the current market price or credit rating of the underlying credit or the market value of the contract relative to the notional amount, which are indicators of the markets valuation of credit quality. As of June 30, 2016, the notional amount of protection sold by the fund totaled $49,800,000 (1.0% of net assets), which reflects the maximum potential amount the fund could be required to pay under such contracts. Risks related to the use of credit default swaps include the possible inability of the fund to accurately assess the current and future creditworthiness of underlying issuers, the possible failure of a counterparty to perform in accordance with the terms of the swap agreements, potential government regulation that could adversely affect the funds swap investments, and potential losses in excess of the funds initial investment.
During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the volume of the funds activity in swaps, based on underlying notional amounts, was generally between 4% and 10% of net assets.
NOTE 4 - OTHER INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS
Consistent with its investment objective, the fund engages in the following practices to manage exposure to certain risks and/or to enhance performance. The investment objective, policies, program, and risk factors of the fund are described more fully in the funds prospectus and Statement of Additional Information.
Emerging and Frontier Markets The fund may invest, either directly or through investments in T. Rowe Price institutional funds, in securities of companies located in, issued by governments of, or denominated in or linked to the currencies of emerging and frontier market countries; at period-end, approximately 27% of the funds net assets were invested in emerging markets and 8% in frontier markets. Emerging markets, and to a greater extent frontier markets, generally have economic structures that are less diverse and mature, and political systems that are less stable, than developed countries. These markets may be subject to greater political, economic, and social uncertainty and differing regulatory environments that may potentially impact the funds ability to buy or sell certain securities or repatriate proceeds to U.S. dollars. Such securities are often subject to greater price volatility, less liquidity, and higher rates of inflation than U.S. securities. Investing in frontier markets is significantly riskier than investing in other countries, including emerging markets.
Restricted Securities The fund may invest in securities that are subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale. Prompt sale of such securities at an acceptable price may be difficult and may involve substantial delays and additional costs.
Other Purchases and sales of portfolio securities other than short-term securities aggregated $2,226,326,000 and $2,643,557,000, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2016.
NOTE 5 - FEDERAL INCOME TAXES
No provision for federal income taxes is required since the fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code and distribute to shareholders all of its taxable income and gains. Distributions determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations may differ in amount or character from net investment income and realized gains for financial reporting purposes. Financial reporting records are adjusted for permanent book/tax differences to reflect tax character but are not adjusted for temporary differences. The amount and character of tax-basis distributions and composition of net assets are finalized at fiscal year-end; accordingly, tax-basis balances have not been determined as of the date of this report.
At June 30, 2016, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was $4,915,212,000. Net unrealized gain aggregated $170,468,000 at period-end, of which $408,872,000 related to appreciated investments and $238,404,000 related to depreciated investments.
NOTE 6 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The fund is managed by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (Price Associates), a wholly owned subsidiary of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (Price Group). Price Associates has entered into a subadvisory agreement(s) with one or more of its wholly owned subsidiaries, to provide investment advisory services to the fund. The investment management agreement between the fund and Price Associates provides for an annual investment management fee, which is computed daily and paid monthly. The fee consists of an individual fund fee, equal to 0.35% of the funds average daily net assets, and a group fee. The group fee rate is calculated based on the combined net assets of certain mutual funds sponsored by Price Associates (the group) applied to a graduated fee schedule, with rates ranging from 0.48% for the first $1 billion of assets to 0.270% for assets in excess of $500 billion. The funds group fee is determined by applying the group fee rate to the funds average daily net assets. At June 30, 2016, the effective annual group fee rate was 0.29%.
The I Class is subject to an operating expense limitation (I Class limit) pursuant to which Price Associates is contractually required to pay all operating expenses of the I Class, excluding management fees, interest, borrowing-related expenses, taxes, brokerage commissions, and extraordinary expenses, to the extent such operating expenses, on an annualized basis, exceed 0.05% of average net assets. This agreement will continue until April 30, 2018, and may be renewed, revised or revoked only with approval of the funds Board. The I Class is required to repay Price Associates for expenses previously paid to the extent the classs net assets grow or expenses decline sufficiently to allow repayment without causing the classs operating expenses to exceed the I Class limit.
However, no repayment will be made more than three years after the date of a payment or waiver. Pursuant to this agreement, less than $1,000 of expenses were repaid to Price Associates during the six months ended June 30, 2016.
In addition, the fund has entered into service agreements with Price Associates and two wholly owned subsidiaries of Price Associates (collectively, Price). Price Associates provides certain accounting and administrative services to the fund. T. Rowe Price Services, Inc., provides shareholder and administrative services in its capacity as the funds transfer and dividend-disbursing agent. T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc., provides subaccounting and recordkeeping services for certain retirement accounts invested in the Investor Class and I Class. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, expenses incurred pursuant to these service agreements were $23,000 for Price Associates; $318,000 for T. Rowe Price Services, Inc.; and $16,000 for T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc. The total amount payable at period-end pursuant to these service agreements is reflected as Due to Affiliates in the accompanying financial statements.
Additionally, the fund is one of several mutual funds in which certain college savings plans managed by Price Associates may invest. As approved by the funds Board of Directors, shareholder servicing costs associated with each college savings plan are borne by the fund in proportion to the average daily value of its shares owned by the college savings plan. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, the fund was charged $12,000 for shareholder servicing costs related to the college savings plans, of which $11,000 was for services provided by Price. The amount payable at period-end pursuant to this agreement is reflected as Due to Affiliates in the accompanying financial statements. At June 30, 2016, less than 1% of the outstanding shares of the Investor Class were held by college savings plans.
The fund is also one of several mutual funds sponsored by Price Associates (underlying Price funds) in which the T. Rowe Price Spectrum Funds (Spectrum Funds), as well as the T. Rowe Price Retirement Funds (Retirement Funds) and T. Rowe Price Target Funds (Target Funds) may invest. Neither the Spectrum Funds, the Retirement Funds, nor the Target Funds invest in the underlying Price funds for the purpose of exercising management or control. Pursuant to separate special servicing agreements, expenses associated with the operation of the Spectrum Funds and Retirement Funds are borne by each underlying Price fund to the extent of estimated savings to it and in proportion to the average daily value of its shares owned by the Spectrum Funds and Retirement Funds, respectively. Prior to February 1, 2016, the Target Funds were subject to the same special servicing arrangement; thus expenses associated with the operation of the Target Funds prior to that date were borne by the underlying Price Funds. Effective February 1, 2016, expenses associated with the operation of the Target Funds are borne by the Target Funds.
Expenses allocated under these special servicing agreements are reflected as shareholder servicing expenses in the accompanying financial statements. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, the fund was allocated $431,000 of Spectrum Funds expenses, $2,621,000 of Retirement Funds expenses, and $14,000 of Target Funds expenses. Of these amounts, $1,379,000 related to services provided by Price. At period-end, the amount payable to Price pursuant to this agreement is reflected as Due to Affiliates in the accompanying financial statements. At June 30, 2016, approximately 80% of the outstanding shares of the Investor Class were held by the Spectrum Funds and Retirement Funds, and approximately 6% of the outstanding shares of the I Class were held by the Target Funds.
In addition, other mutual funds, trusts, and other accounts managed by Price Associates or its affiliates (collectively, Price funds and accounts) may invest in the fund; however, no Price fund or account may invest for the purpose of exercising management or control over the fund. At June 30, 2016, 13% of the funds I Classs outstanding shares were held by Price funds and accounts.
The fund may invest in the T. Rowe Price Reserve Investment Fund, the T. Rowe Price Government Reserve Investment Fund, or the T. Rowe Price Short-Term Reserve Fund (collectively, the Price Reserve Investment Funds), open-end management investment companies managed by Price Associates and considered affiliates of the fund. The Price Reserve Investment Funds are offered as short-term investment options to mutual funds, trusts, and other accounts managed by Price Associates or its affiliates and are not available for direct purchase by members of the public. The Price Reserve Investment Funds pay no investment management fees.
The fund may participate in securities purchase and sale transactions with other funds or accounts advised by Price Associates (cross trades), in accordance with procedures adopted by the funds Board and Securities and Exchange Commission rules, which require, among other things, that such purchase and sale cross trades be effected at the independent current market price of the security. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the fund had no purchases or sales cross trades with other funds or accounts advised by Price Associates.
Information on Proxy Voting Policies, Procedures, and Records |
A description of the policies and procedures used by T. Rowe Price funds and portfolios to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available in each funds Statement of Additional Information. You may request this document by calling 1-800-225-5132 or by accessing the SECs website, sec.gov.
The description of our proxy voting policies and procedures is also available on our corporate website. To access it, please visit the following Web page
https://www3.troweprice.com/usis/corporate/en/utility/policies.html
and scroll down to the section near the bottom of the page that says, Proxy Voting Policies. Click on the Proxy Voting Policies link in the shaded box.
Each funds most recent annual proxy voting record is available on our website and through the SECs website. To access it through T. Rowe Price, visit the website location shown above, and scroll down to the section near the bottom of the page that says, Proxy Voting Records. Click on the Proxy Voting Records link in the shaded box.
How to Obtain Quarterly Portfolio Holdings |
The fund files a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The funds Form N-Q is available electronically on the SECs website (sec.gov); hard copies may be reviewed and copied at the SECs Public Reference Room, 100 F St. N.E., Washington, DC 20549. For more information on the Public Reference Room, call 1-800-SEC-0330.
Approval of Investment Management
Agreement and Subadvisory Agreement |
On March 11, 2016, the funds Board of Directors (Board), including a majority of the funds independent directors, approved the continuation of the investment management agreement (Advisory Contract) between the fund and its investment advisor, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (Advisor), as well as the continuation of the investment subadvisory agreement (Subadvisory Contract) that the Advisor has entered into with T. Rowe Price International Ltd (Subadvisor) on behalf of the fund. In connection with its deliberations, the Board requested, and the Advisor provided, such information as the Board (with advice from independent legal counsel) deemed reasonably necessary. The Board considered a variety of factors in connection with its review of the Advisory Contract and Subadvisory Contract, also taking into account information provided by the Advisor during the course of the year, as discussed below:
Services Provided by the Advisor and
Subadvisor
The Board considered the
nature, quality, and extent of the services provided to the fund by the Advisor
and Subadvisor. These services included, but were not limited to, directing the
funds investments in accordance with its investment program and the overall
management of the funds portfolio, as well as a variety of related activities
such as financial, investment operations, and administrative services;
compliance; maintaining the funds records and registrations; and shareholder
communications. The Board also reviewed the background and experience of the
Advisors and Subadvisors senior management teams and investment personnel
involved in the management of the fund, as well as the Advisors compliance
record. The Board concluded that it was satisfied with the nature, quality, and
extent of the services provided by the Advisor and Subadvisor.
Investment Performance of the
Fund
The Board reviewed the funds
three-month, one-year, and year-by-year returns, as well as the funds average
annualized total returns over the 3-, 5-, and 10-year periods, and compared
these returns with a wide variety of previously agreed-upon comparable
performance measures and market data, including those supplied by Lipper and
Morningstar, which are independent providers of mutual fund data.
On the basis of this evaluation and the Boards ongoing review of investment results, and factoring in the relative market conditions during certain of the performance periods, the Board concluded that the funds performance was satisfactory.
Costs, Benefits, Profits, and Economies
of Scale
The Board reviewed detailed
information regarding the revenues received by the Advisor under the Advisory
Contract and other benefits that the Advisor (and its affiliates, including the
Subadvisor) may have realized from its relationship with the fund, including any
research received under soft dollar agreements and commission-sharing
arrangements with broker-dealers. The Board considered that the Advisor and
Subadvisor may receive some benefit from soft-dollar arrangements pursuant to
which research is received from broker-dealers
that execute the applicable funds portfolio transactions. The Board received
information on the estimated costs incurred and profits realized by the Advisor
from managing T. Rowe Price mutual funds. The Board also reviewed estimates of
the profits realized from managing the fund in particular, and the Board
concluded that the Advisors profits were reasonable in light of the services
provided to the fund.
The Board also considered whether the fund benefits under the fee levels set forth in the Advisory Contract from any economies of scale realized by the Advisor. Under the Advisory Contract, the fund pays a fee to the Advisor for investment management services composed of two componentsa group fee rate based on the combined average net assets of most of the T. Rowe Price mutual funds (including the fund) that declines at certain asset levels and an individual fund fee rate based on the funds average daily net assetsand the fund pays its own expenses of operations (subject to a expense limitation on operating expenses with respect to the I Class). Under the Subadvisory Contract, the Advisor may pay the Subadvisor up to 60% of the advisory fee that the Advisor receives from the fund. The Board concluded that the advisory fee structure for the fund continued to provide for a reasonable sharing of benefits from any economies of scale with the funds investors.
Fees
The Board was provided with information regarding industry trends in
management fees and expenses, and the Board reviewed the funds management fee
rate, operating expenses, and total expense ratio (for the Investor Class,
Advisor Class, and I Class) in comparison with fees and expenses of other
comparable funds based on information and data supplied by Lipper. The
information provided to the Board indicated that the funds management fee rate
was above the median for certain groups of comparable funds and at or below the
median for other groups of comparable funds. The information also indicated that
the total expense ratio for the Investor Class was above the median for certain
groups of comparable funds and at or below the median for other groups of
comparable funds, and the total expense ratio for the Advisor Class and I Class
was at or below the median for comparable funds.
The Board also reviewed the fee schedules for institutional accounts and private accounts with similar mandates that are advised or subadvised by the Advisor and its affiliates. Management provided the Board with information about the Advisors responsibilities and services provided to subadvisory and other institutional account clients, including information about how the requirements and economics of the institutional business are fundamentally different from those of the mutual fund business. The Board considered information showing that the Advisors mutual fund business is generally more complex from a business and compliance perspective than its institutional account business and considered various relevant factors, such as the broader scope of operations and oversight, more extensive shareholder communication infrastructure, greater asset flows, heightened business risks, and differences in applicable laws and regulations associated with the Advisors proprietary mutual fund business. In assessing the reasonableness of the funds management fee rate, the Board considered the differences in the nature of the services required for the Advisor to manage its mutual fund business versus managing a discrete pool of assets as a subadvisor to another institutions mutual fund or for an institutional account and that the Advisor generally performs significant additional services and assumes greater risk in managing the fund and other T. Rowe Price mutual funds than it does for institutional account clients.
On the basis of the information provided and the factors considered, the Board concluded that the fees paid by the fund under the Advisory Contract are reasonable.
Approval of the Advisory Contract and
Subadvisory Contract
As noted, the Board
approved the continuation of the Advisory Contract and Subadvisory Contract. No
single factor was considered in isolation or to be determinative to the
decision. Rather, the Board concluded, in light of a weighting and balancing of
all factors considered, that it was in the best interests of the fund and its
shareholders for the Board to approve the continuation of the Advisory Contract
and Subadvisory Contract (including the fees to be charged for services
thereunder). The independent directors were advised throughout the process by
independent legal counsel.
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
A code of ethics, as defined in Item 2 of Form N-CSR, applicable to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions is filed as an exhibit to the registrants annual Form N-CSR. No substantive amendments were approved or waivers were granted to this code of ethics during the registrants most recent fiscal half-year.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
Disclosure required in registrants annual Form N-CSR.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Disclosure required in registrants annual Form N-CSR.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
Not applicable.
Item 6. Investments.
(a) Not applicable. The complete schedule of investments is included in Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
(b) Not applicable.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not applicable.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Not applicable.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) The registrants principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the registrants disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days of this filing and have concluded that the registrants disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of that date, in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported timely.
(b) The registrants principal executive officer and principal financial officer are aware of no change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants second fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits.
(a)(1) The registrants code of ethics pursuant to Item 2 of Form N-CSR is filed with the registrants annual Form N-CSR.
(2) Separate certifications by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, are attached.
(3) Written solicitation to repurchase securities issued by closed-end companies: not applicable.
(b) A certification by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, is attached.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
T. Rowe Price International Funds, Inc.
By | /s/ Edward C. Bernard | |
Edward C. Bernard | ||
Principal Executive Officer | ||
Date August 17, 2016 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By | /s/ Edward C. Bernard | |
Edward C. Bernard | ||
Principal Executive Officer | ||
Date August 17, 2016 | ||
By | /s/ Catherine D. Mathews | |
Catherine D. Mathews | ||
Principal Financial Officer | ||
Date August 17, 2016 |
Item 12(a)(2).
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Edward C. Bernard, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund; | |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; | |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; | |
4. | The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have: | |
(a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |
(b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | |
(c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and | |
(d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and | |
5. | The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): | |
(a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and | |
(b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. | |
Date: August 17, 2016 | /s/ Edward C. Bernard | |
Edward C. Bernard | ||
Principal Executive Officer |
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Catherine D. Mathews, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund; | |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; | |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; | |
4. | The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have: | |
(a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |
(b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | |
(c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and | |
(d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and | |
5. | The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): | |
(a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and | |
(b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. | |
Date: August 17, 2016 | /s/ Catherine D. Mathews | |
Catherine D. Mathews | ||
Principal Financial Officer |
Item 12(b).
CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 | ||
Name of Issuer: T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund | ||
In connection with the Report on Form N-CSR for the above named Issuer, the undersigned hereby | ||
certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that: | ||
1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities | |
Exchange Act of 1934; | ||
2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial | |
condition and results of operations of the Issuer. |
Date: August 17, 2016 | /s/ Edward C. Bernard | |
Edward C. Bernard | ||
Principal Executive Officer | ||
Date: August 17, 2016 | /s/ Catherine D. Mathews | |
Catherine D. Mathews | ||
Principal Financial Officer |
,]^- R9+L84S#^K;+B3%V!WE*-2J4;((7+]Q@,"Z '(&+VB&$FOGQR"
MT1,# $ D)#@O9D#29
M6QT' (Z66]-X$ 0=]N08$68: 'XD8XU$ "@;,%'7,.5B%JA"A-0EF9YEFAY
MEC^0 ^MD$#_# R"P!1M "93P UN8EN@H UD!1D? "G_P!WT@ $^0 W>)EY2
M"/66#GBYF(PY 4@ !BXAB*HHE@K1E=QP=P"0;9N8%4[)#=H0E!U7
O$V\P&V]0CBW+'EA!"&E"#5K@"-I#0 H50_Q2&4GB#=Y#0"S#0 87)
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M '[M5W_MUWWMUS,LA7_E5STM6'F(R H!UBH@/\G.U>,
MW39;#8R_W-*L%,(,A4 O!0G
-D!0(&$
MS896B-D=<("9C=EF) &=A=DO@%F>)
R '@ ,0 $
M 0 !L@ 2<
M 0 0 0 &YU;&P "
M!F)O=6YD *O9< +T#Z%++-@VK:H.!,[6-!C $&@LNTR41[
M=+*:$>XWB#TV6JMMF*A+78652V+1-T=5AQ$J&D9QW" ANV]WRZ64VU_,\;;M
M8Z*1 ZC>5;85@SE35S2(18'IF##B(2*1;VB22'O'NTLI[CO/?$LC3MW:N0&:
MM) 6[+FK:D1KL@I%L X[(A]7EXAVD5GBUOR!>+\5\?J6K UO(ZF/E;E
MF0^D_#)FC^C9^DW^A]H^A^BQK7K6Q^W>E^H6?:1[ -SX=M:3
M]%KM-WT';_W*F>IZOII#K?3'/%5=QLN+F,]%K'AX-CFU#U&6-9Z6QSF>MZG\
MTS9_I*E7;G.M%P?THFRJL6.>YA8U[VBK]'4YU#[=[/[?LQ_T:BS+:UM+:^B6
M,J86A@+& UBMSA4YK&U/]U.[?7[_ *?J?\8DIM.ZWTH%V[) +7['2RSZ7O\
MH_H_TF[TG_0_[^Q+'ZSTW)=0RJTFW(_FZMCBX>ZRIWJ;6N97LLQ[V/\ ?_@E
M7MSJ6MIL=TE]CGM?8X"D$UEMGH1N]'](^QN^VOTO?=_@_P"=]1*W.++'C'Z4
MY[F6/J9:*V[?4J+HM7YS'T\U*JE/(6D5U>GJEM6IY ]25)3T&/M3K[.UW+
M;G")GTP_.[_?]S'/*(GEE+7C?]CC-2VI\L\>>W%*3<%AYL6GB]@G,-BN
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MQN?#/^C\A_\ ^5:Z?^QQ_P#4_]/Z,L_VAO[9?RZ[1R5;1*-C"^&W282)5\^WF)"M3"G;N4;E/U$1DD,7
MZEL7#AMGF)BV ?.V(84\>X#^ZX]*746/;CQYM&W17+J]6WBDX.5*(8@*J)80
M2$D)3R_7/<9[_L]NE);+,^ 8S*9!UPKERJ-IM6Q=JUS5"7NI&!H-D&MA[AX@
M'L,-PCW?9TI;2A\2KEGD9FU>M7&TR BV;HC; L^.SK/?M+;\A:"
M+D?(Z]/-4<,%9]R]= W[$0OHE"S!9N;+#7V";0CHOD9_T]+(A;ZHU6;5:JJ7
M66@A,2(RQA0 [C*!&.I=(ZD10(_SM$1P5(4,FUIS @(#'4B(I^ B,?&9G0I!1G:3\V[#KW38
M341>ED=)42;!M6&THF>L[D%U[?U=2RECJH:!H&@:!H&@L?\ ":Y]6^C_UOHR
MS_:&_ME_+KM')RGF_+?5167Y/9JV\L^[+L=Z2<@RN->*
M