Derivatives and Fair Value Measurements

12 Months Ended

Apr. 02, 2011

Derivatives and Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]

DERIVATIVES AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

7.   DERIVATIVES AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

We manufacture, market and sell our products globally. For the year ended April 2, 2011, approximately 53.1% of our sales were generated outside the U.S. in local currencies. We also incur certain manufacturing, marketing and selling costs in international markets in local currency. Accordingly, our earnings and cash flows are exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar, our reporting currency.

We have a program in place that is designed to mitigate our exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. That program includes the use of derivative financial instruments to minimize for a period of time, the unforeseen impact on our financial results from changes in foreign exchange rates. We utilize forward foreign currency contracts to hedge the anticipated cash flows from transactions denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the Japanese Yen and the Euro, and to a lesser extent the Swiss Franc, British Pound Sterling and the Canadian Dollar. This does not eliminate the volatility of foreign exchange rates, but because we generally enter into forward contracts one year out, rates are fixed for a one-year period, thereby facilitating financial planning and resource allocation.

Designated Foreign Currency Hedge Contracts

All of our designated foreign currency hedge contracts as of April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010 were cash flow hedges under ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. We record the effective portion of any change in the fair value of designated foreign currency hedge contracts in Other Comprehensive Income in the Statement of Stockholders’ Equity until the related third-party transaction occurs. Once the related third-party transaction occurs, we reclassify the effective portion of any related gain or loss on the designated foreign currency hedge contracts to earnings. In the event the hedged forecasted transaction does not occur, or it becomes probable that it will not occur, we would reclassify the amount of any gain or loss on the related cash flow hedge to earnings at that time. We had designated foreign currency hedge contracts outstanding in the contract amount of $154.8 million as of April 2, 2011 and $135.4 million as of April 3, 2010.

During fiscal year 2011 and 2010, we recognized net gains of $0.6 million and $1.4 million, respectively, in earnings on our cash flow hedges. All currency cash flow hedges outstanding as of April 2, 2011 mature within twelve months. For the year ended April 2, 2011, $4.1 million of losses, net of tax, were recorded in Other Comprehensive Income to recognize the effective portion of the fair value of any designated foreign currency hedge contracts that are, or previously were, designated as foreign currency cash flow hedges, as compared to net losses of $0.5 million as of April 3, 2010. At April 2, 2011, losses of $0.8 million, net of tax, may be reclassified to earnings within the next twelve months.

Non-designated Foreign Currency Contracts

We manage our exposure to changes in foreign currency on a consolidated basis to take advantage of offsetting transactions and balances. We use currency forward contracts as a part of our strategy to manage exposure related to foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities. These currency forward contracts are not designated as cash flow or fair value hedges under ASC Topic 815. These forward contracts are marked-to-market with changes in fair value recorded to earnings; and are entered into for periods consistent with currency transaction exposures, generally one month. We had non-designated foreign currency hedge contracts under ASC Topic 815 outstanding in the contract amount of $45.9 million as of April 2, 2011 and $29.6 million as of April 3, 2010.

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments

The following table presents the effect of our derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges under ASC Topic 815 in our consolidated statement of income for the year ended April 2, 2011.

				Amount of Loss
	Amount of			Reclassified
	Loss			from OCI into				Amount
	Recognized in			Earnings			Location in	Excluded from			Location in
	OCI (Effective			(Effective			Statement of	Effectiveness			Statement of
Derivative Instruments	Portion)			Portion)			Operations	Testing (*)			Operations
	(In thousands)
Designated foreign currency hedge contracts	$	(4,068	)	$	(769	)	Net revenues, COGS, and SG&A	$	(513	)	Other income
Non-designated foreign currency contracts								$	2,338		Other expense
	$	(4,068	)	$	(769	)		$	1,825

(*) We exclude the difference between the spot rate and hedge forward rate from our effectiveness testing.

We did not have fair value hedges or net investment hedges outstanding as of April 2, 2011 or April 3, 2010.

ASC Topic 815 requires all derivative instruments to be recognized at their fair values as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet. We determine the fair value of our derivative instruments using the framework prescribed by ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, by considering the estimated amount we would receive or pay to sell or transfer these instruments at the reporting date and by taking into account current interest rates, currency exchange rates, the creditworthiness of the counterparty for assets, and our creditworthiness for liabilities. In certain instances, we may utilize financial models to measure fair value. Generally, we use inputs that include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; other observable inputs for the asset or liability; and inputs derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data by correlation or other means. As of April 2, 2011, we have classified our derivative assets and liabilities within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy prescribed by ASC Topic 815, as discussed below, because these observable inputs are available for substantially the full term of our derivative instruments.

The following tables present the fair value of our derivative instruments as they appear in our consolidated balance sheets as of April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010 by type of contract and whether it is a qualifying hedge under ASC Topic 815.

	Location in	Balance as of		Balance as of
	Balance Sheet	April 2, 2011		April 3, 2010
	(In thousands)
Derivative Assets:
Designated foreign currency hedge contracts	Other current assets	$	2,563	$	4,407
		$	2,563	$	4,407
Derivative Liabilities:
Designated foreign currency hedge contracts	Other accrued liabilities	$	4,174	$	1,747
		$	4,174	$	1,747

Other Fair Value Measurements

ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC Topic 820 does not require any new fair value measurements; rather, it applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. In accordance with ASC Topic 820, for the year ended April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010, we applied the requirements under ASC Topic 820 to our non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities. As we did not have an impairment of any non-financial assets or non-financial liabilities, there was no disclosure required relating to our non-financial assets or non-financial liabilities.

On a recurring basis, we measure certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value, including our money market funds, foreign currency derivative contracts, and contingent consideration. ASC Topic 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. We base fair value upon quoted market prices, where available. Where quoted market prices or other observable inputs are not available, we apply valuation techniques to estimate fair value.

ASC Topic 820 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The categorization of assets and liabilities within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the measurement of fair value. The three levels of the hierarchy are defined as follows:

•  Level 1 — Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities.

•  Level 2 — Inputs to the valuation methodology are other observable inputs, including quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities and market-corroborated inputs.

•  Level 3 — Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable inputs based on management’s best estimate of inputs market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date, including assumptions about risk.

Our money market funds carried at fair value are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices.

We recognize all derivative financial instruments in our consolidated financial statements at fair value in accordance with ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. We determine the fair value of these instruments using the framework prescribed by ASC Topic 820 by considering the estimated amount we would receive or pay to terminate these agreements at the reporting date and by taking into account current spot rates, the creditworthiness of the counterparty for assets, and our creditworthiness for liabilities. We have classified our foreign currency hedge contracts within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because these observable inputs are available for substantially the full term of our derivative instruments. For the year ended April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010, we have classified our other liabilities — contingent consideration relating to our acquisition of Neoteric within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy because the value is determined using significant unobservable inputs.

Fair Value Measured on a Recurring Basis

Financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis consist of the following as of April 2, 2011 :

	Quoted
	Market Prices		Significant
	for		Other		Significant
	Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		Total
	(In thousands)
Assets
Money market funds	$	148,369	$	—	$	—	$	148,369
Forward currency exchange contracts		—		2,563		—		2,563
	$	148,369	$	2,563	$	—	$	150,932
Liabilities
Forward currency exchange contracts	$	—	$	4,174	$	—	$	4,174
Other liabilities — contingent consideration		—		—		2,284		2,284
	$	—	$	4,174	$	2,284	$	6,458

A description of the methods used to determine the fair value of the Level 3 liabilities (other liabilities — contingent consideration) is included within Note 3, Acquisitions. The table below provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending Level 3 liabilities for the year ended April 2, 2011.

	Fair Value
	Measurements
	Using Significant
	Unobservable
	Inputs
	(Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Beginning balance	$	4,101
Reversal of interest expense on contingent consideration, net		(416	)
Contingent consideration income		(1,894	)
Currency translation adjustment		493
Ending balance	$	2,284

Other Fair Value Disclosures

The fair value of our real estate mortgage obligation was $4.1 million and $5.1 million at April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010, respectively.