Fair Value

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2014

We use fair value measurements for the initial recording of certain assets and liabilities and periodic remeasurement of certain assets and liabilities on a recurring or nonrecurring basis.

Fair Value Measurement

Fair value measurement guidance defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and sets forth disclosures around fair value measurements. This guidance applies whenever other accounting guidance requires or permits assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. The guidance establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs into the valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority, Level 1, to measurements based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. The next highest priority, Level 2, is given to measurements of assets and liabilities based on limited observable inputs or observable inputs for similar assets and liabilities. The lowest priority, Level 3, is given to measurements based on unobservable inputs.

Recurring Changes in Fair Value

The following tables display our assets and liabilities measured in our condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value on a recurring basis subsequent to initial recognition, including instruments for which we have elected the fair value option as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.



		Fair Value Measurements as of March 31, 2014
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)			Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)			Netting Adjustment⁽¹⁾				Estimated Fair Value
		(Dollars in millions)
Recurring fair value measurements:
Assets:
Trading securities:
Mortgage-related securities:
Fannie Mae		$	—		$	5,983		$	—		$	—			$	5,983
Freddie Mac		—			1,657			—			—				1,657
Ginnie Mae		—			248			—			—				248
Alt-A private-label securities		—			833			655			—				1,488
Subprime private-label securities		—			—			1,453			—				1,453
CMBS		—			2,676			—			—				2,676
Mortgage revenue bonds		—			—			601			—				601
Other		—			—			102			—				102
Non-mortgage-related securities:
U.S. Treasury securities		17,587			—			—			—				17,587
Total trading securities		17,587			11,397			2,811			—				31,795
Available-for-sale securities:
Mortgage-related securities:
Fannie Mae		—			6,250			5			—				6,255
Freddie Mac		—			6,507			8			—				6,515
Ginnie Mae		—			557			—			—				557
Alt-A private-label securities		—			3,776			3,570			—				7,346
Subprime private-label securities		—			—			7,030			—				7,030
CMBS		—			1,569			—			—				1,569
Mortgage revenue bonds		—			2			5,006			—				5,008
Other		—			4			2,844			—				2,848
Total available-for-sale securities		—			18,665			18,463			—				37,128
Mortgage loans of consolidated trusts		—			12,029			2,608			—				14,637
Other assets:
Risk management derivatives:
Swaps		—			8,643			68			—				8,711
Swaptions		—			413			—			—				413
Other		—			—			29			—				29
Netting adjustment		—			—			—			(8,422		)		(8,422		)
Mortgage commitment derivatives		—			104			1			—				105
Total other assets		—			9,160			98			(8,422		)		836
Total assets at fair value		$	17,587		$	51,251		$	23,980		$	(8,422	)		$	84,396



		Fair Value Measurements as of March 31, 2014
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)			Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)			Netting Adjustment⁽¹⁾				Estimated Fair Value
		(Dollars in millions)
Liabilities:
Long-term debt:
Of Fannie Mae:
Senior floating		$	—		$	1,465		$	310		$	—		$	1,775
Total of Fannie Mae		—			1,465			310			—			1,775
Of consolidated trusts		—			14,867			506			—			15,373
Total long-term debt		—			16,332			816			—			17,148
Other liabilities:
Risk management derivatives:
Swaps		—			8,970			115			—			9,085
Swaptions		—			1,047			—			—			1,047
Other		—			—			1			—			1
Netting adjustment		—			—			—			(10,042		)	(10,042		)
Mortgage commitment derivatives		—			113			5			—			118
Total other liabilities		—			10,130			121			(10,042		)	209
Total liabilities at fair value		$	—		$	26,462		$	937		$	(10,042	)	$	17,357



		Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2013
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)			Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)			Netting Adjustment⁽¹⁾				Estimated Fair Value
		(Dollars in millions)
Assets:
Trading securities:
Mortgage-related securities:
Fannie Mae		$	—		$	5,828		$	42		$	—			$	5,870
Freddie Mac		—			1,837			2			—				1,839
Ginnie Mae		—			407			—			—				407
Alt-A private-label securities		—			898			618			—				1,516
Subprime private-label securities		—			—			1,448			—				1,448
CMBS		—			2,718			—			—				2,718
Mortgage revenue bonds		—			—			565			—				565
Other		—			—			99			—				99
Non-mortgage-related securities:
U.S. Treasury securities		16,306			—			—			—				16,306
Total trading securities		16,306			11,688			2,774			—				30,768
Available-for-sale securities:
Mortgage-related securities:
Fannie Mae		—			6,566			7			—				6,573
Freddie Mac		—			6,834			8			—				6,842
Ginnie Mae		—			588			—			—				588
Alt-A private-label securities		—			3,558			3,791			—				7,349
Subprime private-label securities		—			—			7,068			—				7,068
CMBS		—			1,606			—			—				1,606
Mortgage revenue bonds		—			3			5,253			—				5,256
Other		—			4			2,885			—				2,889
Total available-for-sale securities		—			19,159			19,012			—				38,171
Mortgage loans of consolidated trusts		—			11,564			2,704			—				14,268
Other assets:
Risk management derivatives:
Swaps		—			9,604			36			—				9,640
Swaptions		—			561			1			—				562
Other		—			—			28			—				28
Netting adjustment		—			—			—			(8,422		)		(8,422		)
Mortgage commitment derivatives		—			265			—			—				265
Total other assets		—			10,430			65			(8,422		)		2,073
Total assets at fair value		$	16,306		$	52,841		$	24,555		$	(8,422	)		$	85,280



		Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2013
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)			Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)			Netting Adjustment⁽¹⁾				Estimated Fair Value
		(Dollars in millions)
Liabilities:
Long-term debt:
Of Fannie Mae:
Senior fixed		$	—		$	353		$	—		$	—			$	353
Senior floating		—			—			955			—				955
Total of Fannie Mae		—			353			955			—				1,308
Of consolidated trusts		—			14,458			518			—				14,976
Total long-term debt		—			14,811			1,473			—				16,284
Other liabilities:
Risk management derivatives:
Swaps		—			9,444			96			—				9,540
Swaptions		—			1,084			—			—				1,084
Other		—			—			1			—				1
Netting adjustment		—			—			—			(9,370		)		(9,370		)
Mortgage commitment derivatives		—			206			8			—				214
Total other liabilities		—			10,734			105			(9,370		)		1,469
Total liabilities at fair value		$	—		$	25,545		$	1,578		$	(9,370	)		$	17,753

__________


⁽¹⁾	Derivative contracts are reported on a gross basis by level. The netting adjustment represents the effect of the legal right to offset under legally enforceable master netting agreements to settle with the same counterparty on a net basis, including cash collateral posted and received.

The following tables display a reconciliation of all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. The tables also display gains and losses due to changes in fair value, including both realized and unrealized gains and losses, recognized in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for Level 3 assets and liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. When assets and liabilities are transferred between levels, we recognize the transfer as of the end of the period.



	Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
				Total (Losses) or Gains (Realized/Unrealized)																										Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) Included in Net Income Related to Assets and Liabilities Still Held as of March 31, 2014⁽⁵⁾
	Balance, December 31, 2013			Included in Net Income			Included in Other Comprehensive Income⁽¹⁾			Purchases⁽²⁾		Sales⁽²⁾			Issues⁽³⁾			Settlements⁽³⁾			Transfers out of Level 3⁽⁴⁾			Transfers into Level 3⁽⁴⁾			Balance, March 31, 2014
	(Dollars in millions)
Trading securities:
Mortgage-related:
Fannie Mae	$	42		$	(1	)		$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	(2	)	$	(39	)	$	—		$	—			$	—
Freddie Mac	2			—				—		—		—			—			—			(2		)	—			—				—
Alt-A private-label securities	618			19				—		—		—			—			(16		)	(76		)	110			655				17
Subprime private-label securities	1,448			76				—		—		—			—			(71		)	—			—			1,453				76
Mortgage revenue bonds	565			40				—		—		—			—			(4		)	—			—			601				40
Other	99			5				—		—		—			—			(2		)	—			—			102				5
Total trading securities	$	2,774		$	139			$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	(95	)	$	(117	)	$	110		$	2,811			$	138

Available-for-sale securities:
Mortgage-related:
Fannie Mae	$	7		$	—			$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	(2	)	$	—		$	5			$	—
Freddie Mac	8			—				—		—		—			—			—			—			—			8				—
Alt-A private-label securities	3,791			13				73		—		—			—			(88		)	(609		)	390			3,570				—
Subprime private-label securities	7,068			33				219		—		—			—			(290		)	—			—			7,030				—
Mortgage revenue bonds	5,253			(20		)		193		—		(19		)	—			(401		)	—			—			5,006				—
Other	2,885			3				41		—		—			—			(85		)	—			—			2,844				—
Total available-for-sale securities	$	19,012		$	29			$	526	$	—	$	(19	)	$	—		$	(864	)	$	(611	)	$	390		$	18,463			$	—

Mortgage loans of consolidated trusts	$	2,704		$	25			$	—	$	24	$	—		$	—		$	(81	)	$	(148	)	$	84		$	2,608			$	11
Net derivatives	(40		)	30				—		—		—			—			(12		)	(1		)	—			(23		)		11
Long-term debt:
Of Fannie Mae:
Senior floating	$	(955	)	$	(90	)		$	—	$	—	$	—		$	(750	)	$	20		$	1,465		$	—		$	(310	)		$	(44	)
Of consolidated trusts	(518		)	(1		)		—		—		—			—			18			19			(24		)	(506		)		(1		)
Total long-term debt	$	(1,473	)	$	(91	)		$	—	$	—	$	—		$	(750	)	$	38		$	1,484		$	(24	)	$	(816	)		$	(45	)



	Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
				Total (Losses) or Gains or (Realized/Unrealized)																											Net Unrealized (Losses) Gains Included in Net Income Related to Assets and Liabilities Still Held as of March 31, 2013⁽⁵⁾
	Balance, December 31, 2012			Included in Net Income			Included in Other Comprehensive Income⁽¹⁾				Purchases⁽²⁾		Sales⁽²⁾			Issues⁽³⁾			Settlements⁽³⁾			Transfers out of Level 3⁽⁴⁾			Transfers into Level 3⁽⁴⁾			Balance, March 31, 2013
	(Dollars in millions)
Trading securities:
Mortgage-related:
Fannie Mae	$	68		$	(3	)		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—		$	(4	)	$	—		$	—		$	61			$	(2	)
Freddie Mac	2			—				—			—		—			—			—			—			—			2				—
Ginnie Mae	1			—				—			—		—			—			(1		)	—			—			—				—
Alt-A private-label securities	104			95				—			—		—			—			(16		)	(44		)	325			464				90
Subprime private-label securities	1,319			159				—			—		—			—			(32		)	—			—			1,446				160
Mortgage revenue bonds	675			(13		)		—			—		—			—			(1		)	—			—			661				(13		)
Other	117			2				—			—		—			—			(1		)	—			—			118				1
Total trading securities	$	2,286		$	240			$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—		$	(55	)	$	(44	)	$	325		$	2,752			$	236

Available-for-sale securities:
Mortgage-related:
Fannie Mae	$	29		$	—			$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—		$	(3	)	$	(14	)	$	—		$	12			$	—
Freddie Mac	10			—				—			—		—			—			(1		)	—			—			9				—
Alt-A private-label securities	6,564			9				218			—		—			—			(268		)	(1,192		)	781			6,112				—
Subprime private-label securities	7,447			44				677			—		—			—			(300		)	—			—			7,868				—
Mortgage revenue bonds	7,837			(2		)		(29		)	—		(19		)	—			(436		)	—			—			7,351				—
Other	3,147			4				44			—		—			—			(96		)	—			—			3,099				—
Total available-for-sale securities	$	25,034		$	55			$	910		$	—	$	(19	)	$	—		$	(1,104	)	$	(1,206	)	$	781		$	24,451			$	—

Mortgage loans of consolidated trusts	$	2,634		$	27			$	—		$	158	$	—		$	—		$	(112	)	$	(38	)	$	213		$	2,882			$	22
Net derivatives	14			(40		)		—			—		—			—			23			—			(4		)	(7		)		(18		)
Long-term debt:
Of Fannie Mae:
Senior floating	$	(400	)	$	17			$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	(383	)		$	17
Of consolidated trusts	(1,128		)	(54		)		—			—		—			(15		)	49			113			(42		)	(1,077		)		(55		)
Total long-term debt	$	(1,528	)	$	(37	)		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	(15	)	$	49		$	113		$	(42	)	$	(1,460	)		$	(38	)

__________


⁽¹⁾	Gains (losses) included in other comprehensive income are included in “Changes in unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of reclassification adjustments and taxes” in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.


⁽²⁾	Purchases and sales include activity related to the consolidation and deconsolidation of assets of securitization trusts.


⁽³⁾	Issues and settlements include activity related to the consolidation and deconsolidation of liabilities of securitization trusts.

⁽⁴⁾

Transfers out of Level 3 consisted primarily of private-label mortgage-related securities backed by Alt-A loans and credit risk sharing securities issued under our Connecticut Avenue Securities series. Prices for these securities were obtained from multiple third-party vendors or dealers supported by market observable inputs. Transfers into Level 3 consisted primarily of private-label mortgage-related securities backed by Alt-A loans. Prices for these securities are based on inputs from a single source or inputs that were not readily observable.


⁽⁵⁾	Amount represents temporary changes in fair value. Amortization, accretion and other-than-temporary impairments are not considered unrealized and are not included in this amount.

The following tables display realized and unrealized gains and losses included in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, for our Level 3 assets and liabilities measured in our condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value on a recurring basis.



		For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
	Interest Income			Fair Value Gains, net			Net OTTI				Other			Total
		(Dollars in millions)
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) included in net income		$	70		$	106		$	(45	)		$	1		$	132
Net unrealized gains related to Level 3 assets and liabilities still held as of March 31, 2014		$	—		$	115		$	—			$	—		$	115



		For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
	Interest Income			Fair Value Gains, net			Net OTTI				Other			Total
		(Dollars in millions)
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) included in net income		$	55		$	192		$	(5	)		$	3		$	245
Net unrealized gains related to Level 3 assets and liabilities still held as of March 31, 2013		$	—		$	202		$	—			$	—		$	202

Nonrecurring Changes in Fair Value

The following tables display assets measured in our condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when we evaluate loans for impairment) as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.



		Fair Value Measurements as of March 31, 2014
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)			Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)			Estimated Fair Value
		(Dollars in millions)
Nonrecurring fair value measurements:
Assets:
Mortgage loans held for sale, at lower of cost or fair value		$	—		$	73		$	232		$	305
Single-family mortgage loans held for investment, at amortized cost:⁽¹⁾
Of Fannie Mae		—			—			18,039			18,039
Of consolidated trusts		—			—			56			56
Multifamily mortgage loans held for investment, at amortized cost⁽²⁾		—			—			1,714			1,714
Acquired property, net:
Single-family		—			—			4,537			4,537
Multifamily		—			—			112			112
Other assets		—			—			65			65
Total nonrecurring fair value measurements		$	—		$	73		$	24,755		$	24,828



		Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2013
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)			Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)			Estimated Fair Value
	(Dollars in millions)
Assets:
Mortgage loans held for sale, at lower of cost or fair value		$	—		$	101		$	132		$	233
Single-family mortgage loans held for investment, at amortized cost:⁽¹⁾
Of Fannie Mae		—			—			19,966			19,966
Of consolidated trusts		—			—			79			79
Multifamily mortgage loans held for investment, at amortized cost		—			—			1,533			1,533
Acquired property, net:
Single-family		—			—			4,041			4,041
Multifamily		—			—			98			98
Other assets		—			—			121			121
Total nonrecurring fair value measurements		$	—		$	101		$	25,970		$	26,071

_________


⁽¹⁾	Excludes estimated recoveries from mortgage insurance proceeds.


⁽²⁾	Includes $522 million of mortgage loans held for investment that were redesignated to mortgage loans held for sale as of March 31, 2014.

The following table displays valuation techniques and the range and the weighted average of significant unobservable inputs for our Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.



	Fair Value Measurements as of March 31, 2014
	Fair Value		Significant Valuation Techniques	Significant Unobservable Inputs⁽¹⁾	Range⁽¹⁾			Weighted - Average⁽¹⁾
	(Dollars in millions)
Recurring fair value measurements:
Trading securities:
Mortgage-related securities:
Alt-A private-label securities⁽³⁾	$	322	Consensus	Default Rate (%)	0.7	-	8.2	6.3
				Prepayment Speed (%)	1.5	-	4.6	2.3
				Severity (%)	55.8	-	77.1	72.9
				Spreads (bps)	278.0	-	462.0	335.6
	290		Discounted Cash Flow	Default Rate (%)	0.7	-	9.5	8.4
				Prepayment Speed (%)	2.0	-	4.6	2.7
				Severity (%)	62.3	-	81.5	76.6
				Spreads (bps)	305.5	-	386.0	371.9
	43		Other
Total Alt-A private-label securities	655
Subprime private-label securities⁽³⁾	451		Consensus	Default Rate (%)	1.7	-	10.9	4.4
				Prepayment Speed (%)	0.2	-	4.1	1.9
				Severity (%)	33.3	-	95.0	64.9
				Spreads (bps)	290.0	-	390.0	383.6
	738		Consensus
	264		Other
Total subprime private-label securities	1,453
Mortgage revenue bonds	582		Discounted Cash Flow	Spreads (bps)	103.1	-	440.0	342.1
	19		Other
Total mortgage revenue bonds	601
Other	102		Discounted Cash Flow	Spreads (bps)	490.0			490.0
Total trading securities	$	2,811



	Fair Value Measurements as of March 31, 2014
	Fair Value		Significant Valuation Techniques	Significant Unobservable Inputs⁽¹⁾	Range⁽¹⁾			Weighted - Average⁽¹⁾
	(Dollars in millions)
Available-for-sale securities:
Mortgage-related securities:
Agency⁽²⁾	$	13	Other
Alt-A private-label securities⁽³⁾	1,740		Consensus	Default Rate (%)	0.2	-	9.9	3.8
				Prepayment Speed (%)	0.4	-	39.0	7.2
				Severity (%)	0.8	-	81.3	55.8
				Spreads (bps)	192.0	-	365.0	296.6
	649		Consensus
	621		Discounted Cash Flow	Default Rate (%)	1.6	-	17.2	6.3
				Prepayment Speed (%)	0.0	-	17.4	5.0
				Severity (%)	0.2	-	78.3	57.2
				Spreads (bps)	195.0	-	399.6	315.3
	560		Other
Total Alt-A private-label securities	3,570
Subprime private-label securities ⁽³⁾	2,826		Consensus	Default Rate (%)	0.0	-	25.0	6.0
				Prepayment Speed (%)	0.1	-	7.9	2.1
				Severity (%)	0.5	-	99.1	80.5
				Spreads (bps)	160.0	-	440.0	293.0
	2,796		Consensus
	1,068		Discounted Cash Flow	Default Rate (%)	0.9	-	9.3	4.9
				Prepayment Speed (%)	0.4	-	13.2	3.0
				Severity (%)	7.7	-	100.0	83.7
				Spreads (bps)	160.0	-	390.0	278.2
	340		Other
Total subprime private-label securities	7,030
Mortgage revenue bonds	2,165		Single Vendor	Spreads (bps)	0.0	-	393.9	75.8
	1,064		Single Vendor
	1,767		Discounted Cash Flow	Spreads (bps)	0.0	-	644.9	330.2
	10		Other
Total mortgage revenue bonds	5,006
Other	371		Consensus	Default Rate (%)	0.7	-	9.8	4.7
				Prepayment Speed (%)	3.0	-	7.6	3.2
				Severity (%)	60.8	-	100.0	85.9
				Spreads (bps)	236.4	-	484.8	331.7
	397		Consensus
	915		Discounted Cash Flow	Default Rate (%)	1.4	-	5.0	4.2
				Prepayment Speed (%)	3.0	-	8.0	4.0
				Severity (%)	4.5	-	85.0	67.5
				Spreads (bps)	182.1	-	476.0	367.2
	1,161		Other
Total Other	2,844
Total available-for-sale securities	$	18,463



	Fair Value Measurements as of March 31, 2014
	Fair Value			Significant Valuation Techniques	Significant Unobservable Inputs⁽¹⁾	Range⁽¹⁾			Weighted - Average⁽¹⁾
	(Dollars in millions)
Mortgage loans of consolidated trusts:
Single-family	$	1,751		Build-Up	Default Rate (%)	0.1	-	98.6	15.6
					Prepayment Speed (%)	2.5	-	50.4	15.5
					Severity (%)	5.1	-	100.0	28.0
	613			Discounted Cash Flow	Default Rate (%)	1.2	-	12.3	3.8
					Prepayment Speed (%)	0.5	-	14.2	5.4
					Severity (%)	43.5	-	100.0	83.5
					Spreads (bps)	160.0	-	915.0	326.6
	66			Other
Total single-family	2,430
Multifamily	178			Build-Up	Spreads (bps)	53.0	-	266.4	115.4
Total mortgage loans of consolidated trusts	$	2,608
Net derivatives	$	(84	)	Internal Model
	66			Dealer Mark
	(5		)	Other
Total net derivatives	$	(23	)
Long-term debt:
Of Fannie Mae:
Senior floating	$	(310	)	Discounted Cash Flow
Of consolidated trusts	(352		)	Discounted Cash Flow	Default Rate (%)	1.2	-	5.5	2.9
					Prepayment Speed (%)	0.5	-	100.0	10.3
					Severity (%)	43.5	-	100.0	87.3
					Spreads (bps)	120.1	-	915.0	416.6
	(154		)	Other
Total of consolidated trusts	(506		)
Total long-term debt	$	(816	)



	Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2013
	Fair Value		Significant Valuation Techniques	Significant Unobservable Inputs⁽¹⁾	Range⁽¹⁾			Weighted - Average⁽¹⁾
	(Dollars in millions)
Recurring fair value measurements:
Trading securities:
Mortgage-related securities:
Agency⁽²⁾	$	44	Other
Alt-A private-label securities⁽³⁾	60		Single Vendor	Default Rate (%)	6.0	-	10.8	8.7
				Prepayment Speed (%)	4.1	-	5.4	4.6
				Severity (%)	76.1	-	92.7	83.1
				Spreads (bps)	414.3	-	421.7	417.5
	325		Consensus	Default Rate (%)	6.9	-	10.4	8.9
				Prepayment Speed (%)	1.9	-	2.5	2.2
				Severity (%)	77.3	-	97.8	88.7
				Spreads (bps)	298.3	-	420.2	366.3
	85		Consensus
	148		Discounted Cash Flow	Default Rate (%)	4.0	-	6.9	6.5
				Prepayment Speed (%)	1.9	-	3.4	2.2
				Severity (%)	42.7	-	77.3	67.6
				Spreads (bps)	325.4	-	439.4	418.6
Total Alt-A private-label securities	618
Subprime private-label securities⁽³⁾	113		Single Vendor	Default Rate (%)	3.1	-	7.5	3.9
				Prepayment Speed (%)	1.8	-	2.5	2.0
				Severity (%)	75.0	-	87.2	75.8
				Spreads (bps)	325.0			325.0
	77		Single Vendor
	400		Consensus	Default Rate (%)	3.0	-	9.2	6.4
				Prepayment Speed (%)	1.4	-	2.2	1.9
				Severity (%)	50.4	-	87.2	74.4
				Spreads (bps)	325.0	-	425.0	353.0
	808		Consensus
	50		Discounted Cash Flow	Default Rate (%)	6.9			6.9
				Prepayment Speed (%)	0.1			0.1
				Severity (%)	75.0			75.0
				Spreads (bps)	325.0			325.0
Total subprime private-label securities	1,448
Mortgage revenue bonds	539		Discounted Cash Flow	Spreads (bps)	35.0	-	440.0	340.6
	26		Other
Total mortgage revenue bonds	565
Other	99		Discounted Cash Flow	Spreads (bps)	525.0			525.0
Total trading securities	$	2,774



	Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2013
	Fair Value		Significant Valuation Techniques	Significant Unobservable Inputs⁽¹⁾	Range⁽¹⁾			Weighted - Average⁽¹⁾
	(Dollars in millions)
Available-for-sale securities:
Mortgage-related securities:
Agency⁽²⁾	$	15	Other
Alt-A private-label securities⁽³⁾	139		Single Vendor	Default Rate (%)	0.9	-	6.4	3.9
				Prepayment Speed (%)	9.3	-	11.9	11.3
				Severity (%)	53.7	-	82.6	68.8
				Spreads (bps)	300.0	-	400.0	349.3
	435		Single Vendor
	1,948		Consensus	Default Rate (%)	0.1	-	10.3	3.5
				Prepayment Speed (%)	0.1	-	32.9	9.9
				Severity (%)	7.2	-	100.0	62.3
				Spreads (bps)	210.6	-	404.2	336.7
	740		Consensus
	420		Discounted Cash Flow	Default Rate (%)	2.3	-	10.1	5.1
				Prepayment Speed (%)	1.2	-	7.0	3.4
				Severity (%)	45.2	-	79.5	60.5
				Spreads (bps)	220.2	-	500.0	381.3
	109		Other
Total Alt-A private-label securities	3,791
Subprime private-label securities⁽³⁾	442		Single Vendor	Default Rate (%)	1.8	-	11.0	7.4
				Prepayment Speed (%)	1.0	-	9.4	2.0
				Severity (%)	65.0	-	100.0	82.2
				Spreads (bps)	275.0	-	375.0	315.2
	322		Single Vendor
	2,981		Consensus	Default Rate (%)	0.0	-	36.8	7.4
				Prepayment Speed (%)	0.3	-	9.7	2.3
				Severity (%)	36.8	-	100.0	81.7
				Spreads (bps)	175.0	-	375.0	319.9
	2,442		Consensus
	816		Discounted Cash Flow	Default Rate (%)	0.7	-	7.6	5.1
				Prepayment Speed (%)	0.2	-	12.5	4.1
				Severity (%)	43.8	-	98.0	79.5
				Spreads (bps)	175.0	-	375.0	292.4
	65		Other
Total subprime private-label securities	7,068
Mortgage revenue bonds	1,937		Single Vendor	Spreads (bps)	0.0	-	463.2	112.1
	1,386		Single Vendor
	1,899		Discounted Cash Flow	Spreads (bps)	5.5	-	490.0	310.0
	31		Other
Total mortgage revenue bonds	5,253
Other	122		Single Vendor
	483		Consensus	Default Rate (%)	0.1	-	5.0	5.0
				Prepayment Speed (%)	3.0	-	11.4	3.0
				Severity (%)	65.0	-	85.0	84.6
				Spreads (bps)	275.0	-	925.0	526.4
	625		Consensus
	610		Discounted Cash Flow	Default Rate (%)	5.0			5.0
				Prepayment Speed (%)	10.0			10.0
				Severity (%)	55.0			55.0
				Spreads (bps)	300.0	-	511.0	469.5
	1,045		Other
Total Other	2,885
Total available-for-sale securities	$	19,012



	Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2013
	Fair Value			Significant Valuation Techniques	Significant Unobservable Inputs⁽¹⁾	Range⁽¹⁾			Weighted - Average⁽¹⁾
	(Dollars in millions)
Mortgage loans of consolidated trusts:
Single-family	$	1,828		Build-Up	Default Rate (%)	0.1	-	95.6	15.7
					Prepayment Speed (%)	2.3	-	37.6	14.1
					Severity (%)	0.0	-	100.0	26.6
	219			Consensus
	112			Consensus	Default Rate (%)	1.1	-	4.7	3.2
					Prepayment Speed (%)	0.2	-	16.7	15.2
					Severity (%)	63.9	-	89.5	85.6
					Spreads (bps)	175.0	-	950.0	293.9
	310			Discounted Cash Flow	Default Rate (%)	1.2	-	15.7	7.0
					Prepayment Speed (%)	1.9	-	16.7	7.0
					Severity (%)	58.8	-	97.7	75.5
					Spreads (bps)	175.0	-	360.6	252.1
	60			Other
Total single-family	2,529
Multifamily	175			Build-Up	Spreads (bps)	62.0	-	243.4	114.3
Total mortgage loans of consolidated trusts	$	2,704
Net derivatives	$	(64	)	Internal Model
	32			Dealer Mark
	(8		)	Other
Total net derivatives	$	(40	)
Long-term debt:
Of Fannie Mae:
Senior floating	$	(266	)	Discounted Cash Flow
	(689		)	Consensus	Default Rate (%)	0.2			0.2
					Prepayment Speed (%)	8.4			8.4
					Spreads (bps)	171.000	-	438.000	306.2
Total of Fannie Mae	(955		)
Of consolidated trusts	(227		)	Consensus
	(116		)	Consensus	Default Rate (%)	1.1	-	4.7	3.2
					Prepayment Speed (%)	0.2	-	16.7	15.2
					Severity (%)	63.9	-	89.5	85.6
					Spreads (bps)	175.0	-	950.0	295.1
	(80		)	Single Vendor
	(95		)	Other
Total of consolidated trusts	(518		)
Total long-term debt	$	(1,473	)

_________

⁽¹⁾

Valuation techniques for which no unobservable inputs are disclosed generally reflect the use of third-party pricing services or dealers, and the range of unobservable inputs applied by these sources is not readily available or cannot be reasonably estimated. Where we have disclosed unobservable inputs for consensus and single vendor techniques, those inputs are based on our validations performed at the security level using discounted cash flows.


⁽²⁾	Includes Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae securities.


⁽³⁾	Default Rate as disclosed represents the estimated beginning annualized rate of default and is used as a basis to forecast the future default rates that serve as an input for valuation.

The following table displays valuation techniques for our Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The significant unobservable inputs related to these techniques primarily relate to collateral dependent valuations. The related ranges and weighted averages are not meaningful when aggregated as they vary significantly from property to property.



		Fair Value Measurements as of
	Valuation Techniques	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
		(Dollars in millions)
Nonrecurring fair value measurements:
Mortgage loans held for sale, at lower of cost or fair value	Consensus	$	118	$	132
	Build-Up	114		—
Total mortgage loans held for sale, at lower of cost or fair value		232		132
Single-family mortgage loans held for investment, at amortized cost:
Of Fannie Mae	Internal Model	18,039		19,966
Of consolidated trusts	Internal Model	56		79
Multifamily mortgage loans held for investment, at amortized cost	Appraisals	36		39
	Broker Price Opinions	196		248
	Build-Up	522		—
	Asset Manager Estimate	949		1,230
	Other	11		16
Total multifamily mortgage loans held for investment, at amortized cost		1,714		1,533
Acquired property, net:
Single-family	Accepted Offers	993		691
	Appraisals	1,251		1,077
	Walk Forwards	1,151		1,106
	Internal Model	957		1,049
	Other	185		118
Total single-family		4,537		4,041
Multifamily	Accepted Offers	15		24
	Appraisals	52		65
	Broker Price Opinions	45		9
Total multifamily		112		98
Other Assets	Appraisals	1		26
	Walk Forwards	4		9
	Internal Model	56		81
	Other	4		5
Total other assets		65		121
Total nonrecurring assets at fair value		$	24,755	$	25,970

We use valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The following is a description of the valuation techniques we use for fair value measurement and disclosure as well as our basis for classifying these measurements as Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy in more specific situations.

Cash Equivalents, Trading Securities and Available-for-Sale Securities

These securities are recorded in our condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value is measured using quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets, when available.

A description of our securities valuation techniques is as follows:

Single Vendor: This valuation technique utilizes one vendor price to estimate fair value. We generally validate these observations of fair value through the use of a discounted cash flow technique whose unobservable inputs (for example, default rates) are disclosed in the table above.

Consensus: This technique utilizes an average of two or more vendor prices for similar securities. We generally validate these observations of fair value through the use of a discounted cash flow technique whose unobservable inputs (for example, default rates) are disclosed in the table above.

Discounted Cash Flow: In the absence of prices provided by third-party pricing services supported by observable market data, we estimate the fair value of a portion of our securities using a discounted cash flow technique that uses inputs such as default rates, prepayment speeds, loss severity and spreads based on market assumptions where available.

We classify securities whose values are based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets as Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. We classify securities in active markets as Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy if quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets are not available. For all valuation techniques used for securities where there is limited activity or less transparency around these inputs to the valuation, these securities are classified as Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

For private-label securities, an increase in unobservable prepayment speeds in isolation would generally result in an increase in fair value, and an increase in unobservable spreads, severity rates or default rates in isolation would generally result in a decrease in fair value. For mortgage revenue bonds classified as Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy, an increase in unobservable spreads would result in a decrease in fair value. Although the sensitivities of the fair value of our recurring Level 3 securities of the valuation hierarchy to various unobservable inputs are discussed above in isolation, interrelationships exist among these inputs such that a change in one unobservable input typically results in a change to one or more of the other inputs.

Mortgage Loans Held for Investment

The majority of HFI loans are reported in our condensed consolidated balance sheets at the principal amount outstanding, net of cost basis adjustments and an allowance for loan losses. We estimate the fair value of HFI loans using the build-up and consensus valuation techniques, as discussed below, for periodic disclosure of financial instruments as required by GAAP. For our remaining loans, which include those containing embedded derivatives that would otherwise require bifurcation and consolidated loans of senior-subordinated trust structures, we elected the fair value option and therefore, we record these loans at fair value in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. We measure these loans on a recurring basis using the build-up, consensus, discounted cash flow and single vendor price techniques. Certain impaired loans are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis by using the fair value of their underlying collateral. Specific techniques used include internal models, broker price opinions and appraisals.

A description of our loan valuation techniques is as follows:

Build-up: We derive the fair value of mortgage loans using a build-up valuation technique. In the build-up valuation technique we start with the base value for our Fannie Mae MBS and then add or subtract the fair value of the associated guaranty asset, guaranty obligation (“GO”) and master servicing arrangement. We use observable market values of Fannie Mae MBS with similar characteristics, either on a pool or loan level, determined primarily from third party pricing services, quoted market prices in active markets for similar securities, and other observable market data as a base value. We set the GO equal to the estimated fair value we would receive if we were to issue our guaranty to an unrelated party in a stand-alone arm’s length transaction at the measurement date. We estimate the fair value of the GO using our internal valuation models, which calculate the present value of expected cash flows based on management’s best estimate of certain key assumptions such as current mark-to-market LTV ratios, future house prices, default rates, severity rates and required rate of return. We also estimate the fair value of the GO using our current guaranty pricing and adjust that pricing, as appropriate, for the seasoning of the collateral when such transactions reflect credit characteristics of loans held in our portfolio. As a result, the fair value of our mortgage loans will change when the pricing for our credit guaranty changes in the GSE securitization market.

Our performing loans are generally classified as Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy to the extent that significant inputs are observable. To the extent that unobservable inputs are significant, the loans are classified as Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

Consensus: The fair value of single-family nonperforming loans represents an estimate of the prices we would receive if we were to sell these loans in the nonperforming whole-loan market. These nonperforming loans are either two or more months delinquent, in an open modification period, or in a closed modification state (both performing and nonperforming in accordance with the loan’s modified terms). We calculate the fair value of nonperforming loans based on assumptions about key factors, including collateral value and mortgage insurance repayment. Collateral value is derived from the current estimated mark-to-market LTV ratio of the individual loan along with a state-level distressed property sales discount. The fair value of mortgage insurance is estimated by taking the loan level coverage and adjusting it by the expected claims paying ability of the associated mortgage insurer. The expected claims paying abilities used for estimating the fair value of mortgage insurance are consistent with our credit loss forecast. Using these assumptions, along with indicative bids for a representative sample of nonperforming loans, we estimate the fair value. The bids on sample loans are obtained from multiple active market participants. Fair value is estimated from the extrapolation of these indicative sample bids plus an amount for the recovery of any associated mortgage insurance estimated through our GO valuation models as described above. These loans are classified as Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy because significant inputs are unobservable.

We estimate the fair value for a portion of our senior-subordinated trust structures using the average of two or more vendor prices at the security level as a proxy for estimating loan fair value. These loans are classified as Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy because significant inputs are unobservable.

Discounted Cash Flow: We estimate the fair value of a portion of our senior-subordinated trust structures using discounted cash flow at the security level as a proxy for estimating loan fair value. This valuation technique uses unobservable inputs such as prepayment speeds, default rates, spreads, and loss severities to estimate the fair value of our securities. These inputs are weighted in a model that calculates the expected cash flow of the security which is used as the basis of fair value. These loans are classified as Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy because significant inputs are unobservable.

Single Vendor: We estimate the fair value of a portion of our senior-subordinated trust structures using the single vendor valuation technique at the security level as a proxy for estimating loan fair value. We also estimate the fair value of our reverse mortgages using the single vendor valuation technique. These loans are classified as Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy because significant inputs are unobservable.

Internal Model: For loans whose value it has been determined should be based on collateral value, we use an internal proprietary distressed home price model. The internal model used in this process takes one of two approaches when valuing properties. The first approach relies on comparable foreclosed property sales, where the value of the target property is the weighted average price of comparable foreclosed property sales. The weights in the comparable sales approach are determined by various factors such as geographic distance, transaction time and the value difference. The second approach relies on model calibrations that consider the target property’s attributes such as prior sales prices, tax assessment values and property characteristics to derive the foreclosed property values. In the second approach, we build separate predictive models for each Metropolitan Statistical Area (“MSA”). Specifically, we use data on prior sales prices, tax assessment values, property characteristics and historical foreclosure sales to calibrate the models in each MSA. We can use the available data about that property and our MSA-level model to estimate the fair value for a given property. The majority of the internal model valuations come from the comparable sales approach. The determination of whether the internal model valuations in a particular geographic area should use the comparable sales approach or model calibration is based on the quarterly evaluation of these two approaches for valuation accuracy. These loans are classified as Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy because significant inputs are unobservable.

Appraisals: For a portion of our multifamily loans, we use appraisals to estimate the fair value of the loan. There are three approaches used to estimate fair value of a specific property: (1) cost, (2) income capitalization and (3) sales comparison. The cost approach uses the insurable value as a basis. The unobservable inputs used in this model include the estimated cost to construct or replace multifamily properties in the closest localities available. The income capitalization approach estimates the fair value using the present value of the future cash flow expectations by applying an appropriate overall capitalization rate to the forecasted net operating income. The significant unobservable inputs used in this calculation include rental income, fees associated with rental income, expenses associated with the property including taxes, payroll, insurance and other items, and capitalization rates, which are determined through market extraction and the debt service coverage ratio. The sales comparison approach compares the prices paid for similar properties, the prices asked by owners and offers made. The unobservable inputs to this methodology include ratios of sales prices to annual gross income, price paid per unit and adjustments made based on financing, conditions of sale and physical characteristics of the property. These loans are classified as Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy because significant inputs are unobservable.

Broker Price Opinion (“BPO”): For a portion of our multifamily loans, we use BPO to estimate the fair value of the loan. This technique uses both current property value and the property value adjusted for stabilization and market conditions. These approaches compute net operating income based on current rents and expenses and use a range of market capitalization rates to estimate property value. The unobservable inputs used in this technique are property net operating income and market capitalization rates to estimate property value. These loans are classified as Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy because significant inputs are unobservable.

Asset Manager Estimate (“AME”): For a portion of our multifamily loans, AME is used to estimate the fair value of the loan. This technique uses the net operating income and tax assessments of the specific property as well as MSA-specific market capitalization rates and average per unit sales values to estimate property fair value. These loans are classified as Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy because significant inputs are unobservable.

An increase in prepayment speeds in isolation would generally result in an increase in the fair value of our mortgage loans classified as Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy, and an increase in severity rates, default rates or spreads in isolation would generally result in a decrease in fair value. Although the sensitivities of the fair value of mortgage loans classified as Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy to various unobservable inputs are discussed above in isolation, interrelationships exist among these inputs such that a change in one unobservable input typically results in a change to one or more of the other inputs.

Acquired Property, Net and Other Assets

Acquired property, net represents foreclosed property received in full satisfaction of a loan net of a valuation allowance. Acquired property is initially recorded in our condensed consolidated balance sheets at its fair value less its estimated cost to sell. The initial fair value of foreclosed properties is determined using a hierarchy based on the reliability of available information. The hierarchy for single-family acquired property includes accepted offers, appraisals, broker price opinions and proprietary home price model values. The hierarchy for multifamily acquired property includes accepted offers, appraisals and broker price opinions. We consider an accepted offer on a specific foreclosed property to be the best estimate of its fair value. If we have not accepted an offer on the property we use the next highest priority valuation methodology available, as described in our valuation hierarchy to determine fair value. While accepted offers represent an agreement in principle to transact, a significant portion of these agreements do not get executed for various reasons, and are therefore classified as Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

Third-party valuations can be obtained from either an appraisal or a broker price opinion. These valuations are kept current using a monthly walk forward process that updates them for any change in the value of the property. When accepted offers or third-party valuations are not available, we generally utilize the home price values determined using an internal model.

Subsequent to initial measurement, the foreclosed properties that we intend to sell are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less estimated costs to sell. Foreclosed properties classified as held for use, included in “Other Assets” in our condensed consolidated balance sheets, are depreciated and impaired when circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the property is no longer recoverable. The fair values of our single-family foreclosed properties subsequent to initial measurement are determined using the same information hierarchy used for the initial fair value measurement.

The most commonly used techniques in our valuation of acquired property are proprietary home price model and appraisals (both current and walk forward). Based on the number of properties measured as of March 31, 2014, these methodologies comprised approximately 74% of our valuations, while accepted offers comprised approximately 22% of our valuations. Based on the number of properties measured as of December 31, 2013, these methodologies comprised approximately 81% of our valuations, while accepted offers comprised approximately 16% of our valuations.

Acquired property is classified as Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy because significant inputs are unobservable.

A description of our acquired property significant valuation techniques is as follows:

Single-family acquired property valuation techniques

Appraisal: An appraisal is an estimate of the value of a specific property by a certified or licensed appraiser, in accordance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. Data most commonly used is from the local Multiple Listing Service and includes properties currently listed for sale, properties under contract, and closed transactions. The appraiser performs an analysis that starts with these data points and then adjusts for differences between the comparable properties and the property being appraised, to arrive at an estimated value for the specific property. Adjustments are made for differences between comparable properties for unobservable inputs such as square footage, location, and condition of the property. The appraiser typically uses recent historical data for the estimate of value.

Broker Price Opinion: This technique provides an estimate of what the property is worth based upon a real estate broker’s knowledge. The broker uses research of pertinent data in the appropriate market, and a sales comparison approach that is similar to the appraisal process. The broker typically has insight into local market trends, such as the number of and terms of offers, lack of offers, increasing supply, shortage of inventory and overall interest in buying a home. This information, all of which is unobservable, is used along with recent and pending sales and current listings of similar properties to arrive at an estimate of value.

We review the appraisals and broker price opinions received to determine if they have been performed in accordance with applicable standards and if the results are consistent with our observed transactions on similar properties. We make necessary adjustments as required.

Appraisal and Broker Price Opinion Walk Forwards (“Walk Forwards”): We use these techniques to adjust appraisal and broker price opinion valuations for changing market conditions by applying a walk forward factor based on local price movements since the time the third-party value was obtained. The majority of third-party values are updated by comparing the difference in our internal home price model from the month of the original appraisal/broker price opinion to the current period and by applying the resulting percentage change to the original value. If a price is not determinable through our internal home price model, we use our zip code level home price index to update the valuations.

Internal Model: We use an internal model to estimate fair value for distressed properties. The valuation methodology and inputs used are described under “Mortgage Loans Held for Investment.”

Multifamily acquired property valuation techniques

Appraisals: We use this method to estimate property values for distressed properties. The valuation methodology and inputs used are described under “Mortgage Loans Held for Investment.”

Broker Price Opinions: We use this method to estimate property values for distressed properties. The valuation methodology and inputs used are described under “Mortgage Loans Held for Investment.”

Derivatives Assets and Liabilities (collectively “Derivatives”)

Derivatives are recorded in our condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value on a recurring basis. The valuation process for the majority of our risk management derivatives uses observable market data provided by third-party sources, resulting in Level 2 classification of the valuation hierarchy.

A description of our derivatives valuation techniques is as follows:

Internal Model: We use internal models to value interest rate swaps which are valued by referencing yield curves derived from observable interest rates and spreads to project and discount swap cash flows to present value. Option-based derivatives use an internal model that projects the probability of various levels of interest rates by referencing swaption volatilities provided by market makers/dealers. The projected cash flows of the underlying swaps of these option-based derivatives are discounted to present value using yield curves derived from observable interest rates and spreads.

Dealer Mark: Certain highly complex structured swaps primarily use a single dealer mark due to lack of transparency in the market and may be modeled using observable interest rates and volatility levels as well as significant unobservable assumptions, resulting in Level 3 classification of the valuation hierarchy. Mortgage commitment derivatives that use observable market data, quotes and actual transaction price levels adjusted for market movement are typically classified as Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. To the extent mortgage commitment derivatives include adjustments for market movement that cannot be corroborated by observable market data, we classify them as Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

Debt

The majority of debt of Fannie Mae is recorded in our condensed consolidated balance sheets at the principal amount outstanding, net of cost basis adjustments. We elected the fair value option for certain structured Fannie Mae debt instruments and debt of consolidated trusts with embedded derivatives, which are recorded in our condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value on a recurring basis.

We classify debt instruments that have quoted market prices in active markets for similar liabilities when traded as assets as Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. For all valuation techniques used for debts instruments where there is limited activity or less transparency around these inputs to the valuation, these debt instruments are classified as Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

A description of our debt valuation techniques is as follows:

Consensus: We estimate the fair value of debt of Fannie Mae and our debt of consolidated trusts using an average of two or more vendor prices or dealer marks that represents estimated fair value for similar liabilities when traded as assets.

Single Vendor: We estimate the fair value of debt of Fannie Mae and our debt of consolidated trusts using a single vendor price that represents estimated fair value for these liabilities when traded as assets.

Discounted Cash Flow: In the absence of prices provided by third-party pricing services supported by observable market data, we estimate the fair value of a portion of the debt of Fannie Mae and our debt of consolidated trusts using a discounted cash flow technique that uses spreads based on market assumptions where available.

The valuation methodology and inputs used in estimating the fair value of MBS assets are described under “Cash Equivalents, Trading Securities and Available-for-Sale Securities.”

Valuation Control Processes

We have control processes that are designed to ensure that our fair value measurements are appropriate and reliable, that they are based on observable inputs wherever possible and that our valuation approaches are consistently applied and the assumptions used are reasonable. Our control processes consist of a framework that provides for a segregation of duties and oversight of our fair value methodologies and valuations, as well as validation procedures.

Our Enterprise Models Group develops models that are used in estimating the fair value of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes. In addition, our Model Oversight Committee (“MOC”) facilitates the cross-functional coordination and effectiveness of our modeling efforts in terms of research, model use and risk governance. The MOC is comprised of senior representatives from Underwriting and Pricing, Capital Markets, Multifamily, Credit Portfolio Management, Enterprise Risk Management and Finance and is co-chaired by our Chief Risk Officer and our Head of Enterprise Business Analytics. Our Model Risk Oversight Group is responsible for establishing risk management controls and for reviewing models used in the determination of fair value measurements for financial reporting.

The Pricing and Verification Group is responsible for the estimation and verification of the fair value for the majority of our financial assets and financial liabilities including review of material assumptions used when market-based inputs do not exist. The Pricing and Verification Group also provides a quarterly update to the Valuation Oversight Committee (“VOC”) on relevant market information, pricing trends, significant valuation challenges and the resolution of those challenges. The Pricing and Verification Group resides within our Finance Division and is independent of any trading or market related activities. Fair value measurements for acquired property and collateral dependent loans are determined by other valuation groups in the Finance Division.

Our VOC includes senior representation from our Capital Markets segment, our Enterprise Risk Office and our Finance division, and is responsible for providing overall governance for our valuation processes and results. The composition of the VOC is determined by the VOC chair, our Chief Financial Officer, with the objective of obtaining appropriate representation from Finance, Enterprise Risk Management and select business units within Fannie Mae. Based on its review of valuation methodologies and fair value results for various financial instruments used for financial reporting, the VOC is responsible for advising the VOC chair, who has the ultimate responsibility over all valuation processes and results. The VOC also reviews trend analysis for various financial assets and liabilities on a quarterly basis.

We use third-party vendor prices and dealer quotes to estimate fair value of some of our financial assets and liabilities. Third-party vendor prices are primarily used to estimate fair value for trading securities, available-for-sale securities, debt of Fannie Mae and consolidated MBS debt. Our Pricing and Verification Group performs various review and validation procedures prior to utilizing these prices in our fair value estimation process. We verify selected prices, using a variety of methods, including corroborating the prices by reference to other independent market data, such as non-binding broker or dealer quotations, relevant benchmark indices and prices of similar instruments. We also review prices for reasonableness based on variations from prices provided in previous periods, comparing prices to internally estimated prices, using primarily a discounted cash flow approach, and conducting relative value comparisons based on specific characteristics of securities.

We have discussions with the pricing vendors as part of our due diligence process in order to maintain a current understanding of the valuation processes and related assumptions and inputs that these vendors use in developing prices. The prices provided to us by third-party pricing services reflect the existence of market reliance upon credit enhancements, if any, and the current lack of liquidity in the marketplace. If we determine that a price provided to us is outside established parameters, we will further examine the price, including having follow-up discussions with the pricing service or dealer. If we conclude that a price is not valid, we will adjust the price for various factors, such as liquidity, bid-ask spreads and credit considerations. All of these procedures are executed before we use the prices in preparing our financial statements.

We have an internal property valuation function that utilizes an internal model to compare the values received on a property and assign a risk rating based on several factors including the deviation between the various values. Property valuations with risk ratings above a specified threshold are reviewed for reasonableness by a team of property valuation experts. The internal model that is used to assign a risk rating and the threshold specified is subject to VOC oversight. In addition, our Quality Control Group reviews the overall work performed and inspects a portion of the properties in major markets, for which the third-party valuations are obtained, in order to assess the quality of the valuations.

We calibrate the performance of our proprietary distressed home price model using actual offers in recently observed transactions. The model’s performance is reviewed on a monthly basis by the REO valuation team and compared quarterly to specific model performance thresholds. The results of the validation are regularly reviewed with the VOC.

Our Property Valuation Review Group reviews appraisals and broker price opinions to determine the most appropriate value by comparing data within these products with current comparable properties and market data. We conduct regular performance reviews of the counterparties that provide products and services for this process. In addition, valuation results and trend analyses are reviewed regularly by management responsible for valuing and disposing of real estate.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following table displays the carrying value and estimated fair value of our financial instruments as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The fair value of financial instruments we disclose includes commitments to purchase multifamily and single-family mortgage loans, which are off-balance sheet financial instruments that we do not record in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. The fair values of these commitments are included as “Mortgage loans held for investment, net of allowance for loan losses.” The disclosure excludes certain financial instruments, such as plan obligations for pension and postretirement health care benefits, employee stock option and stock purchase plans, and also excludes all non-financial instruments. As a result, the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities does not represent the underlying fair value of our total consolidated assets and liabilities.



	As of March 31, 2014
	Carrying Value		Quoted Price in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Netting Adjustment			Estimated Fair Value
	(Dollars in millions)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	38,639	$	29,239	$	9,400	$	—	$	—		$	38,639
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell or similar arrangements	12,750		—		12,750		—		—			12,750
Trading securities	31,795		17,587		11,397		2,811		—			31,795
Available-for-sale securities	37,128		—		18,665		18,463		—			37,128
Mortgage loans held for sale	1,494		—		157		1,345		—			1,502
Mortgage loans held for investment, net of allowance for loan losses:
Of Fannie Mae	251,899		—		28,725		213,181		—			241,906
Of consolidated trusts	2,764,623		—		2,588,130		181,818		—			2,769,948
Mortgage loans held for investment	3,016,522		—		2,616,855		394,999		—			3,011,854
Advances to lenders	3,904		—		3,362		518		—			3,880
Derivative assets at fair value	836		—		9,160		98		(8,422		)	836
Guaranty assets and buy-ups	261		—		—		710		—			710
Total financial assets	$	3,143,329	$	46,826	$	2,681,746	$	418,944	$	(8,422	)	$	3,139,094

Financial liabilities:
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase	$	25	$	—	$	25	$	—	$	—		$	25
Short-term debt:
Of Fannie Mae	65,448		—		65,460		—		—			65,460
Of consolidated trusts	1,899		—		—		1,899		—			1,899
Long-term debt:
Of Fannie Mae	416,405		—		426,479		906		—			427,385
Of consolidated trusts	2,710,943		—		2,711,787		13,518		—			2,725,305
Derivative liabilities at fair value	209		—		10,130		121		(10,042		)	209
Guaranty obligations	467		—		—		2,107		—			2,107
Total financial liabilities	$	3,195,396	$	—	$	3,213,881	$	18,551	$	(10,042	)	$	3,222,390



	As of December 31, 2013
	Carrying Value		Quoted Price in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Netting Adjustment			Estimated Fair Value
	(Dollars in millions)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	48,223	$	36,633	$	11,590	$	—	$	—		$	48,223
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell or similar arrangements	38,975		—		38,975		—		—			38,975
Trading securities	30,768		16,306		11,688		2,774		—			30,768
Available-for-sale securities	38,171		—		19,159		19,012		—			38,171
Mortgage loans held for sale	380		—		185		195		—			380
Mortgage loans held for investment, net of allowance for loan losses:
Of Fannie Mae	259,638		—		29,920		215,960		—			245,880
Of consolidated trusts	2,766,222		—		2,569,747		176,395		—			2,746,142
Mortgage loans held for investment	3,025,860		—		2,599,667		392,355		—			2,992,022
Advances to lenders	3,727		—		3,165		523		—			3,688
Derivative assets at fair value	2,073		—		10,430		65		(8,422		)	2,073
Guaranty assets and buy-ups	267		—		—		706		—			706
Total financial assets	$	3,188,444	$	52,939	$	2,694,859	$	415,630	$	(8,422	)	$	3,155,006

Financial liabilities:
Short-term debt:
Of Fannie Mae	$	72,295	$	—	$	72,304	$	—	$	—		$	72,304
Of consolidated trusts	2,154		—		—		2,154		—			2,154
Long-term debt:
Of Fannie Mae	457,139		—		463,991		1,557		—			465,548
Of consolidated trusts	2,702,935		—		2,684,224		13,362		—			2,697,586
Derivative liabilities at fair value	1,469		—		10,734		105		(9,370		)	1,469
Guaranty obligations	485		—		—		2,433		—			2,433
Total financial liabilities	$	3,236,477	$	—	$	3,231,253	$	19,611	$	(9,370	)	$	3,241,494

Financial Instruments for which fair value approximates carrying value—We hold certain financial instruments that are not carried at fair value but for which the carrying value approximates fair value due to the short-term nature and negligible credit risk inherent in them. These financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, the majority of advances to lenders, and federal funds and securities sold/purchased under agreements to repurchase/resell.

Federal funds and securities sold/purchased under agreements to repurchase/resell—The carrying value for the majority of these specific instruments approximates the fair value due to the short-term nature and the negligible inherent credit risk, as they involve the exchange of liquid collateral. Were we to calculate the fair value of these instruments we would use observable inputs resulting in Level 2 classification.

Mortgage Loans Held for Sale—Loans are reported at the lower of cost or fair value in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. The valuation methodology and inputs used in estimating the fair value of HFS loans are the same as for our HFI loans and are described under “Fair Value Measurement—Mortgage Loans Held for Investment.” These loans are classified as Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy to the extent that significant inputs are observable. To the extent that significant inputs are unobservable, the loans are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

HARP Loans—We measure the fair value of loans that are delivered under the Home Affordable Refinance Program (“HARP”) using a modified build-up approach while the loan is performing. Under this modified approach, we set the credit component of the consolidated loans (that is, the guaranty obligation) equal to the compensation we would currently receive for a loan delivered to us under the program because the total compensation for these loans is equal to their current exit price in the GSE securitization market. For a description of the build-up valuation methodology, refer to “Fair Value Measurement—Mortgage Loans Held for Investment.” We will continue to use this pricing methodology as long as the HARP program is available to market participants. If, subsequent to delivery, the refinanced loan becomes past due or is modified as a part of a troubled debt restructuring, the fair value of the guaranty obligation is then measured consistent with other loans that have similar characteristics.

The total compensation that we receive for the delivery of a HARP loan reflects the pricing that we are willing to offer because HARP is a part of a broader government program intended to provide assistance to homeowners and prevent foreclosures. If these benefits were not reflected in the pricing for these loans (that is, if the loans were valued using our standard build-up approach), the fair value disclosed in the table above would be lower by $11.1 billion as of March 31, 2014 and $11.5 billion as of December 31, 2013. The total fair value of our mortgage loans that have been refinanced under HARP as presented in the table above is $304.4 billion as of March 31, 2014 and $306.9 billion as of December 31, 2013.

Advances to Lenders—The carrying value for the majority of our advances to lenders approximates fair value due to the short-term nature and the negligible inherent credit risk. Were we to calculate the fair value of these instruments we would use discounted cash flow models that use observable inputs such as spreads based on market assumptions, resulting in Level 2 classification.

Advances to lenders also include loans for which the carrying value does not approximate fair value. These loans do not qualify for Fannie Mae MBS securitization and are valued using market-based techniques including credit spreads, severities and prepayment speeds for similar loans, through third-party pricing services or through a model approach incorporating both interest rate and credit risk simulating a loan sale via a synthetic structure. We classify these valuations as Level 3 given that significant inputs are not observable or are determined by extrapolation of observable inputs.

Guaranty Assets and Buy-ups—Guaranty assets related to our portfolio securitizations are recorded in our condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value on a recurring basis and are classified as Level 3. Guaranty assets in lender swap transactions are recorded in our condensed consolidated balance sheets at the lower of cost or fair value. These assets, which are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, are also classified as Level 3.

We estimate the fair value of guaranty assets based on the present value of expected future cash flows of the underlying mortgage assets using management’s best estimate of certain key assumptions, which include prepayment speeds, forward yield curves, and discount rates commensurate with the risks involved. These cash flows are projected using proprietary prepayment, interest rate and credit risk models. Because guaranty assets are like an interest-only income stream, the projected cash flows from our guaranty assets are discounted using one-month LIBOR plus an option-adjusted spread that is calibrated using a representative sample of interest-only swaps that reference Fannie Mae MBS. We believe the remitted fee income is less liquid than interest-only swaps and more like an excess servicing strip. Therefore, we take a further discount of the present value for these liquidity considerations. This discount is based on market quotes from third-party pricing services.

The fair value of the guaranty assets includes the fair value of any associated buy-ups, which is estimated in the same manner as guaranty assets but is recorded separately as a component of “Other assets” in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Guaranty Obligations—The fair value of all guaranty obligations, measured subsequent to their initial recognition, is our estimate of a hypothetical transaction price we would receive if we were to issue our guaranty to an unrelated party in a standalone arm’s-length transaction at the measurement date. These obligations are classified as Level 3. The valuation methodology and inputs used in estimating the fair value of the guaranty obligations are described under “Fair Value Measurement—Mortgage Loans Held for Investment, Build-up.”

Fair Value Option

We elected the fair value option for loans that contain embedded derivatives that would otherwise require bifurcation. Under the fair value option, we elected to carry these instruments at fair value instead of bifurcating the embedded derivative from the respective loan.

We elected the fair value option for all long-term structured debt instruments that are issued in response to specific investor demand and have interest rates that are based on a calculated index or formula and are economically hedged with derivatives at the time of issuance. By electing the fair value option for these instruments, we are able to eliminate the volatility in our results of operations that would otherwise result from the accounting asymmetry created by recording these structured debt instruments at cost while recording the related derivatives at fair value.

We elected the fair value option for the financial assets and liabilities of the consolidated senior-subordinate trust structures. By electing the fair value option for these instruments, we are able to eliminate the volatility in our results of operations that would otherwise result from different accounting treatment between loans at cost and debt at cost.

Interest income for the mortgage loans is recorded in “Mortgage loans interest income” and interest expense for the debt instruments is recorded in “Long-term debt interest expense” in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

The following table displays the fair value and unpaid principal balance of the financial instruments for which we have made fair value elections as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.



		As of
		March 31, 2014									December 31, 2013
	Loans of Consolidated Trusts⁽¹⁾			Long-Term Debt of Fannie Mae			Long-Term Debt of Consolidated Trusts⁽²⁾			Loans of Consolidated Trusts⁽¹⁾			Long-Term Debt of Fannie Mae			Long-Term Debt of Consolidated Trusts⁽²⁾
		(Dollars in millions)
Fair value		$	14,637		$	1,775		$	15,373		$	14,268		$	1,308		$	14,976
Unpaid principal balance		14,650			1,671			14,301			14,440			1,290			13,988

__________

⁽¹⁾

Includes nonaccrual loans with a fair value of $192 million and $196 million as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The difference between unpaid principal balance and the fair value of these nonaccrual loans as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was $77 million and $74 million, respectively. Includes loans that are 90 days or more past due with a fair value of $279 million and $288 million as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The difference between unpaid principal balance and the fair value of these 90 or more days past due loans as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was $81 million and $75 million, respectively.


⁽²⁾	Includes interest-only debt instruments with no unpaid principal balance and a fair value of $79 million and $85 million as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

Changes in Fair Value under the Fair Value Option Election

The following table displays fair value gains and losses, net, including changes attributable to instrument-specific credit risk, for loans and debt for which the fair value election was made. Amounts are recorded as a component of “Fair value (losses) gains, net” in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.



	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014										2013
	Loans		Long-Term Debt				Total (Losses) Gains				Loans			Long-Term Debt				Total Losses
	(Dollars in millions)
Changes in instrument-specific credit risk	$	9		$	(51	)		$	(42	)	$	(65	)		$	(5	)		$	(70	)
Other changes in fair value	123			(116		)		7			(157		)		66				(91		)
Fair value (losses) gains, net	$	132		$	(167	)		$	(35	)	$	(222	)		$	61			$	(161	)

In determining the changes in the instrument-specific credit risk for loans, the changes in the associated credit-related components of these loans, primarily the guaranty obligation, were taken into consideration with the overall change in the fair value of the loans for which we elected the fair value option for financial instruments. In determining the changes in the instrument-specific credit risk for debt, the changes in Fannie Mae debt spreads to LIBOR that occurred during the period were taken into consideration with the overall change in the fair value of the debt for which we elected the fair value option for financial instruments. Specifically, cash flows are evaluated taking into consideration any derivatives through which Fannie Mae has swapped out of the structured features of the notes and thus created a floating-rate LIBOR-based debt instrument. The change in value of these LIBOR-based cash flows based on the Fannie Mae yield curve at the beginning and end of the period represents the instrument-specific risk.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for the fair value of financial instruments (as defined), including financial assets and financial liabilities (collectively, as defined), and the measurements of those instruments as well as disclosures related to the fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities. Such disclosures about the financial instruments, assets, and liabilities would include: (1) the fair value of the required items together with their carrying amounts (as appropriate); (2) for items for which it is not practicable to estimate fair value, disclosure would include: (a) information pertinent to estimating fair value (including, carrying amount, effective interest rate, and maturity, and (b) the reasons why it is not practicable to estimate fair value; (3) significant concentrations of credit risk including: (a) information about the activity, region, or economic characteristics identifying a concentration, (b) the maximum amount of loss the entity is exposed to based on the gross fair value of the related item, (c) policy for requiring collateral or other security and information as to accessing such collateral or security, and (d) the nature and brief description of such collateral or security; (4) quantitative information about market risks and how such risks are managed; (5) for items measured on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis information regarding the inputs used to develop the fair value measurement; and (6) for items presented in the financial statement for which fair value measurement is elected: (a) information necessary to understand the reasons for the election, (b) discussion of the effect of fair value changes on earnings, (c) a description of [similar groups] items for which the election is made and the relation thereof to the balance sheet, the aggregate carrying value of items included in the balance sheet that are not eligible for the election; (7) all other required (as defined) and desired information.

+ References+ Details