XML 90 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Derivative Instruments
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2012
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]  
Derivative Instruments
Derivative Instruments
Derivative instruments are an integral part of our strategy in managing interest rate risk. Derivative instruments may be privately negotiated contracts, which are often referred to as over-the-counter derivatives, or they may be listed and traded on an exchange. We typically do not settle the notional amount of our risk management derivatives; rather, notional amounts provide the basis for calculating actual payments or settlement amounts. The derivatives we use for interest rate risk management purposes consist primarily of interest rate swaps and interest rate options. Our foreign currency swaps are used to manage foreign exchange risk.
We enter into forward purchase and sale commitments that lock in the future delivery of mortgage loans and mortgage-related securities at a fixed price or yield. Certain commitments to purchase mortgage loans and purchase or sell mortgage-related securities meet the criteria of a derivative. We typically settle the notional amount of our mortgage commitments that are accounted for as derivatives.
We recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheets at their fair value on a trade date basis. Fair value amounts, which are netted to the extent a legal right of offset exists and is enforceable by law at the counterparty level and are inclusive of the right or obligation associated with the cash collateral posted or received, are recorded in “Other assets” or “Other liabilities” in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. We present cash flows from derivatives as operating activities in our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.
Notional and Fair Value Position of our Derivatives
The following table displays the notional amount and estimated fair value of our asset and liability derivative instruments as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

  
As of June 30, 2012
 
As of December 31, 2011
  
Asset Derivatives
 
Liability Derivatives
 
Asset Derivatives
 
Liability Derivatives
  
Notional Amount
 
Estimated Fair Value
 
Notional Amount
 
Estimated Fair Value
 
Notional Amount
 
Estimated Fair Value
 
Notional Amount
 
Estimated Fair Value
  
(Dollars in millions)
Risk management derivatives:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Swaps:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pay-fixed
$
21,900

 
$
37

 
$
207,327

 
$
(19,559
)
 
$
30,950

 
$
102

 
$
155,807

 
$
(17,391
)
Receive-fixed
241,703

 
9,791

 
23,890

 
(14
)
 
170,668

 
8,118

 
59,027

 
(93
)
Basis
4,872

 
133

 
16,050

 
(8
)
 
382

 
122

 
9,240

 
(44
)
Foreign currency
621

 
160

 
530

 
(64
)
 
581

 
155

 
451

 
(62
)
Swaptions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pay-fixed
34,400

 
109

 
15,875

 
(81
)
 
48,600

 
165

 
47,750

 
(194
)
Receive-fixed
23,895

 
5,214

 
15,875

 
(2,605
)
 
33,695

 
6,371

 
47,750

 
(3,238
)
Other(1)
8,399

 
55

 
37

 

 
8,214

 
52

 
75

 

Total gross risk management derivatives
335,790

 
15,499

 
279,584

 
(22,331
)
 
293,090

 
15,085

 
320,100

 
(21,022
)
Accrued interest receivable (payable)

 
1,087

 

 
(1,482
)
 

 
920

 

 
(1,238
)
Netting adjustment(2)

 
(16,352
)
 

 
23,525

 

 
(15,829
)
 

 
21,898

Total net risk management derivatives
$
335,790

 
$
234

 
$
279,584

 
$
(288
)
 
$
293,090

 
$
176

 
$
320,100

 
$
(362
)

Mortgage commitment derivatives:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage commitments to purchase whole loans
$
11,825

 
$
63

 
$
4,360

 
$
(5
)
 
$
9,710

 
$
73

 
$
422

 
$

Forward contracts to purchase mortgage-related securities
43,987

 
281

 
18,566

 
(34
)
 
32,707

 
309

 
2,570

 
(6
)
Forward contracts to sell mortgage-related securities
14,403

 
24

 
83,078

 
(592
)
 
1,370

 
3

 
54,656

 
(548
)
Total mortgage commitment derivatives
$
70,215

 
$
368

 
$
106,004

 
$
(631
)
 
$
43,787

 
$
385

 
$
57,648

 
$
(554
)
Derivatives at fair value
$
406,005

 
$
602

 
$
385,588

 
$
(919
)
 
$
336,877

 
$
561

 
$
377,748

 
$
(916
)
__________
(1) 
Includes interest rate caps, futures, swap credit enhancements and mortgage insurance contracts that we account for as derivatives. The mortgage insurance contracts have payment provisions that are not based on a notional amount.
(2) 
The netting adjustment represents the effect of the legal right to offset under legally enforceable master netting agreements to settle with the same counterparty on a net basis, including cash collateral posted and received. Cash collateral posted was $7.2 billion and $6.8 billion as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. Cash collateral received was $3 million and $779 million as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
A majority of our derivative instruments contain provisions that require our senior unsecured debt to maintain a minimum credit rating from S&P and Moody’s. If our senior unsecured debt were to fall below established thresholds in our governing agreements, which range from A- to BBB+, we could be required to provide additional collateral to or terminate transactions with certain counterparties. The aggregate fair value of all derivatives with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a net liability position as of June 30, 2012 was $7.3 billion, for which we posted collateral of $7.2 billion in the normal course of business. Had all of the credit-risk-related contingency features underlying these agreements been triggered, an additional $147 million of collateral would have been required to be posted as collateral or to immediately settle our positions based on the individual agreements and our fair value position as of June 30, 2012.
The aggregate fair value of all derivatives with credit risk-related contingent features that were in a net liability position as of December 31, 2011 was $7.2 billion, for which we posted collateral of $6.8 billion in the normal course of business. Had all of the credit risk-related contingency features underlying these agreements been triggered, an additional $362 million would have been required to be posted as collateral or to immediately settle our positions based on the individual agreements and our fair value position as of December 31, 2011.
We record all derivative gains and losses, including accrued interest, in “Fair value losses, net” in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). The following table displays, by type of derivative instrument, the fair value gains and losses, net on our derivatives for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.
 
For the
 
For the
 
Three Months
 
Six Months
 
Ended June 30,
 
Ended June 30,
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012
 
2011
 
(Dollars in millions)
Risk management derivatives:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Swaps:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pay-fixed
$
(5,858
)
 
$
(5,474
)
 
$
(4,683
)
 
$
(4,872
)
Receive-fixed
3,592

 
2,784

 
2,674

 
2,528

Basis
18

 
10

 
56

 
29

Foreign currency
8

 
53

 
9

 
83

Swaptions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pay-fixed
79

 
327

 
57

 
272

Receive-fixed
345

 
733

 
251

 
500

Other(1)
(5
)
 
(49
)
 
(6
)
 
(40
)
Total risk management derivatives fair value losses, net
(1,821
)
 
(1,616
)
 
(1,642
)
 
(1,500
)
Mortgage commitment derivatives fair value losses, net
(562
)
 
(61
)
 
(767
)
 
(38
)
Total derivatives fair value losses, net
$
(2,383
)
 
$
(1,677
)
 
$
(2,409
)
 
$
(1,538
)
__________
(1) 
Includes interest rate caps, futures, swap credit enhancements and mortgage insurance contracts.
Derivative Counterparty Credit Exposure
Our derivative counterparty credit exposure relates principally to interest rate and foreign currency derivative contracts. We are exposed to the risk that a counterparty in a derivative transaction will default on payments due to us. If there is a default, we may need to acquire a replacement derivative from a different counterparty at a higher cost or may be unable to find a suitable replacement. We estimate our exposure to credit loss on derivative instruments by calculating the replacement cost, on a present value basis, to settle at current market prices all outstanding derivative contracts in a net gain position at the counterparty level where the right of legal offset exists. For derivative instruments where the right of legal offset does not exist, we calculate the replacement cost of the outstanding derivative contracts in a gain position at the transaction level. We manage our exposure by requiring counterparties to post collateral, which includes cash, U.S. Treasury securities, agency debt and agency mortgage-related securities.
The table below displays our counterparty credit exposure on outstanding risk management derivative instruments in a gain position by counterparty credit ratings, as well as the notional amount outstanding and the number of counterparties for all risk management derivatives as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
 
As of June 30, 2012
 
Credit Rating(1)
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
AA+/ AA/AA-
 
A+/A/A-
 
BBB+/BBB/BBB-
 
Subtotal(2)
 
Other(3)
 
Total
 
(Dollars in millions)
Credit loss exposure(4)
$

 
$
106

 
$
53

 
$
159

 
$
55

 
$
214

Less: Collateral held(5)

 
106

 
53

 
159

 

 
159

Exposure net of collateral
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
55

 
$
55

Additional information:
 
 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
 
Notional amount
$
15,032

 
$
555,148

 
$
44,705

 
$
614,885

 
$
489

 
$
615,374

Number of counterparties
4

 
14

 
3

 
21

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
As of December 31, 2011
 
Credit Rating(1)
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
AA+/AA/AA-
 
A+/A/A-
 
BBB+/BBB/BBB-
 
Subtotal(2)
 
Other(3)
 
Total
 
(Dollars in millions)
Credit loss exposure(4)
$

 
$
885

 
$

 
$
885

 
$
51

 
$
936

Less: Collateral held(5)

 
840

 

 
840

 

 
840

Exposure net of collateral
$

 
$
45

 
$

 
$
45

 
$
51

 
$
96

Additional information:
 
 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
 
Notional amount
$
63,294

 
$
546,967

 
$

 
$
610,261

 
$
2,929

 
$
613,190

Number of counterparties
6

 
10

 

 
16

 
 
 
 
__________
(1) 
We manage collateral requirements based on the lower credit rating of the legal entity, as issued by S&P and Moody’s. The credit rating reflects the equivalent S&P’s rating for any ratings based on Moody’s scale.
(2) 
We had no credit loss exposure for interest rate and foreign currency derivative counterparties as of June 30, 2012. We had credit loss exposure to four counterparties for interest rate and foreign currency derivative counterparties which had notional balances of $127.5 billion as of December 31, 2011.
(3) 
Includes mortgage insurance contracts and swap credit enhancements accounted for as derivatives.
(4) 
Represents the exposure to credit loss on derivative instruments, which we estimate using the fair value of all outstanding derivative contracts in a gain position. We net derivative gains and losses with the same counterparty where a legal right of offset exists under an enforceable master netting agreement. This table excludes mortgage commitments accounted for as derivatives.
(5) 
Represents both cash and non-cash collateral posted by our counterparties to us. Does not include collateral held in excess of exposure. We reduce the value of non-cash collateral in accordance with the counterparty agreements to help ensure recovery of any loss through the disposition of the collateral.