10-Q 1 d10q.txt FORM 10-Q UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q [X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2002 [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Transition Period From ____________ to ____________ Commission File Number 1-10290 Duquesne Light Company (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Pennsylvania 25-0451600 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) incorporation or organization) 411 Seventh Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219 (Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (412) 393-6000 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date: All 10 shares of Duquesne Light Company Common Stock outstanding as of October 31, 2002 are owned by DQE, Inc. PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Financial Statements.
Duquesne Light Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Millions of Dollars) ----------------------------------------- Three Months Nine Months Ended September 30, Ended September 30, ------------------- ------------------- 2002 2001 2002 2001 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Operating Revenues: Sales of Electricity: Customer revenues $248.7 $290.7 $719.6 $783.1 Utilities 1.8 1.6 5.1 8.7 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Sales of Electricity 250.5 292.3 724.7 791.8 Other 4.1 3.9 12.3 13.2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Operating Revenues 254.6 296.2 737.0 805.0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Operating Expenses: Purchased power 124.3 120.4 327.2 318.0 Other operating 24.1 24.9 67.2 79.4 Maintenance 3.9 5.7 17.6 17.4 Depreciation and amortization 28.1 92.8 147.3 251.9 Taxes other than income taxes 16.3 14.7 49.0 41.9 Income taxes 17.0 7.3 29.6 15.2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Operating Expenses 213.7 265.8 637.9 723.8 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Operating Income 40.9 30.4 99.1 81.2 Other Income and Deductions - Net 3.4 5.6 15.3 18.8 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Income Before Interest and Other Charges 44.3 36.0 114.4 100.0 Interest Charges 12.9 15.3 43.9 47.7 Monthly Income Preferred Securities Dividend Requirements 3.1 3.1 9.4 9.4 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Net Income 28.3 17.6 61.1 42.9 Dividends on Preferred and Preference Stock 0.9 0.9 2.5 2.6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Earnings for Common Stock $ 27.4 $ 16.7 $ 58.6 $ 40.3 =====================================================================================================
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. 2
Duquesne Light Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Millions of Dollars) ---------------------------- September 30, December 31, Assets 2002 2001 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Property, Plant and Equipment: Gross property, plant and equipment $2,018.2 $1,972.3 Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization (661.8) (627.4) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Property, Plant and Equipment - Net 1,356.4 1,344.9 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Long-Term Investments 23.6 28.9 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Current Assets: Investment in DQE Capital Cash Pool 335.2 314.8 Receivables - net 400.8 417.5 Other 42.6 41.4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Current Assets 778.6 773.7 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other Non-Current Assets: Transition costs 31.8 134.3 Regulatory assets 282.6 267.2 Other 13.7 11.2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Other Non-Current Assets 328.1 412.7 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Assets $2,486.7 $2,560.2 ============================================================================================================== Capitalization and Liabilities -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Capitalization: Common stock (authorized - 90,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding - 10 shares) $ -- $ -- Capital surplus 483.3 483.3 Retained earnings 52.0 44.3 Accumulated other comprehensive income (3.9) (1.0) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Common Stockholder's Equity 531.4 526.6 Company Obligated Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Trust Securities 150.0 150.0 Preferred and Preference Stock 75.4 74.5 Long-term debt 959.5 1,061.1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Capitalization 1,716.3 1,812.2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Current Liabilities: Accounts payable 133.2 131.5 Other 93.5 54.8 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Current Liabilities 226.7 186.3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Non-Current Liabilities: Deferred income taxes - net 419.4 418.3 Warwick mine liability 30.6 35.0 Other 93.7 108.4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Non-Current Liabilities 543.7 561.7 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Commitments and contingencies (Note F) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Capitalization and Liabilities $2,486.7 $2,560.2 ==============================================================================================================
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. 3
Duquesne Light Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Millions of Dollars) ------------------------------- Nine Months Ended September 30, ------------------------------- 2002 2001 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Flows From Operating Activities: Operations $ 190.4 $ 266.9 Changes in working capital other than cash 31.2 (167.4) Other (5.5) (0.2) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities 216.1 99.3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cash Flows From Investing Activities: Capital expenditures (51.3) (41.9) Proceeds from sale of investments 2.6 3.9 Other (3.2) (13.7) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Net Cash Used In Investing Activities (51.9) (51.7) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cash Flows From Financing Activities: Issuance of debt (Note E) 300.0 -- Reductions of long-term obligations (Note E) (403.0) (7.6) Dividends on capital stock (44.7) (42.6) Other (16.5) 2.6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Net Cash Used In Financing Activities (164.2) (47.6) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Net increase in cash and temporary cash investments -- -- Cash and temporary cash investments at beginning of period -- -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cash and Temporary Cash Investments at End of Period $ -- $ -- ============================================================================================================
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. Duquesne Light Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars) ----------------------------------------- Three Months Nine Months Ended September 30, Ended September 30, ----------------------------------------- 2002 2001 2002 2001 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Net income $28.3 $17.6 $61.1 $ 42.9 Other comprehensive income: Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period, net of tax of $0.5, $(1.7), $(2.0) and $(7.1) 0.7 (2.4) (2.9) (10.0) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Comprehensive Income $29.0 $15.2 $58.2 $ 32.9 ============================================================================================================
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. 4 Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) A. CONSOLIDATION AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES Consolidation Duquesne Light Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of DQE, Inc., is an electric utility engaged in the transmission and distribution of electric energy. Our subsidiaries are primarily involved in operating our automated meter reading technology and providing financing to certain affiliates. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Duquesne Light and our wholly and majority owned subsidiaries. The equity method of accounting is used when we have a 20 to 50% interest in other companies. Under the equity method, original investments are recorded at cost and adjusted by our share of undistributed earnings or losses of these companies. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation. Basis of Accounting Duquesne Light is subject to the accounting and reporting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Our electricity delivery business is also subject to regulation by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) with respect to rates for delivery of electric power, accounting and other matters. As a result of our PUC-approved restructuring plan, the electricity supply segment does not meet the criteria of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 71, "Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation." Pursuant to the PUC's final restructuring order, and as provided in the Pennsylvania Electricity Generation Customer Choice and Competition Act (Customer Choice Act), generation-related transition costs are being recovered through a competitive transition charge (CTC) collected in connection with providing transmission and distribution services, and these assets have been reclassified accordingly. The electricity delivery business segment continues to meet SFAS No. 71 criteria, and accordingly reflects regulatory assets and liabilities consistent with cost-based ratemaking regulations. The regulatory assets represent probable future revenue, because provisions for these costs are currently included, or are expected to be included, in charges to electric utility customers through the ratemaking process. (See Note B.) The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions with respect to values and conditions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the financial statements. The reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period also may be affected by the estimates and assumptions we are required to make. We evaluate these estimates on an ongoing basis, using historical experience, consultation with experts and other methods we consider reasonable in the particular circumstances. Nevertheless, actual results may differ significantly from our estimates. The interim financial information for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 is unaudited and has been prepared on the same basis as the audited financial statements. In the opinion of management, such unaudited information includes all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the interim information. This information does not include all footnotes which would be required for complete annual financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These statements should be read with the financial statements and notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 filed with the SEC. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. Recent Accounting Pronouncements On January 1, 2002, we adopted SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations," and SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," the impact of which was not significant to our financial statements. In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations," which addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. Specifically, this standard requires entities to record the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred, if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The entity is required to capitalize the cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. The capitalized cost is then depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. 5 Upon settlement of the liability, an entity either settles the obligation for its recorded amount or incurs a gain or loss. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. We are currently evaluating, but have yet to determine, the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 143 will have on our financial statements. Reclassification The 2001 condensed consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the 2002 presentation. B. RATE MATTERS Competition and the Customer Choice Act The Customer Choice Act enables electric utility customers to purchase electricity at market prices from a variety of electric generation suppliers. As of September 30, 2002, approximately 76.6% of our customers measured on a kilowatt-hour (KWH) basis and approximately 75.6% on a non-coincident peak load basis received electricity through our provider of last resort service arrangement (discussed below). The remaining customers are provided with electricity through alternative generation suppliers. The number of customers participating in our provider of last resort service will fluctuate depending on market prices and the number of alternative generation suppliers in the retail supply business. Customers who select an alternative generation supplier pay for generation charges set competitively by that supplier, and pay our CTC (discussed below) and/or transmission and distribution charges. Electricity delivery (including transmission, distribution and customer service) remains regulated in substantially the same manner as under historical regulation. In November 2001, the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue established an increased revenue neutral reconciliation tax (RNR) in order to recover a current shortfall that resulted from electricity generation deregulation. We requested and received PUC approval to recover approximately $13 million of costs we will incur in 2002 due to the RNR. Regional Transmission Organization FERC Order No. 2000 calls on transmission-owning utilities such as Duquesne Light to join regional transmission organizations (RTOs). We are committed to ensuring a stable, plentiful supply of electricity for our customers. Toward that end, we had planned to join the PJM West RTO. However, on July 31, 2002, the FERC issued a series of proposals designed to establish a standard market design and transmission service for interstate electricity transactions, and extend the deadline for joining an RTO until September 2004. We will continue to evaluate the FERC's proposals and their impact on the possibility of joining an RTO. Competitive Transition Charge In its final restructuring order, the PUC determined that we should recover most of the above-market costs of our generation assets, including plant and regulatory assets, through the collection of the CTC from electric utility customers. As of September 30, 2002, the CTC balance has been fully collected for approximately 95% of our customers, and 87% of the KWH sales for the first nine months of 2002. The transition costs, as reflected on the consolidated balance sheet, are being amortized over the same period that the CTC revenues are being recognized. For regulatory purposes, the unrecovered balance of transition costs was approximately $32.6 million ($19.8 million net of tax) at September 30, 2002, on which we are allowed to earn an 11% pre-tax return. A lower amount is shown on the balance sheet due to the accounting for unbilled revenues. Provider of Last Resort Although no longer a generation supplier, as the provider of last resort for all customers in our service territory, we must provide electricity for any customer who does not choose an alternative generation supplier, or whose supplier fails to deliver. As part of the generation asset sale, a third party agreed to supply all of the electric energy necessary to satisfy our provider of last resort obligations during the CTC collection period. We have extended the arrangement (and the PUC-approved rates for the supply of electricity) beyond the final CTC collection through December 31, 2004 (POLR II). The agreement also permits us, following CTC collection for each rate class, an average margin of 0.5 cents per KWH supplied through this arrangement. Except for this margin, these agreements, in general, effectively transfer to the supplier the financial risks and rewards associated with our provider of last resort obligations. While there are certain safeguards in the provider of last resort arrangements designed to mitigate losses in the event that the supplier defaults on its performance under the arrangement, we may face the credit risk of such a default. Contractually, we have various credit enhancements that would become activated upon certain events. If the supplier were to fail to deliver, we would have to contract with another supplier and/or make purchases in the market at the time of default at a time when market 6 prices could be higher. While the Customer Choice Act provides generally for provider of last resort supply costs to be borne by customers, recent litigation suggests that it may not be clear whether we could pass any costs in excess of the existing PUC-approved provider of last resort prices on to our customers. Additionally, the supplier has recently been downgraded by the rating agencies. Although we are following the situation closely, our knowledge is limited to public disclosure, and we do not know whether the downgrade could affect the supplier's ability to perform. We also retain the risk that customers will not pay for the provider of last resort generation supply. However, a component of our delivery rate is designed to cover the cost of a normal level of uncollectible accounts. On October 25, 2002, we petitioned the PUC to issue a declaratory order regarding a provision in our retail tariff that affects our largest industrial customer. The supplier and we have interpreted the tariff differently. The supplier's interpretation could increase the customer's bill by approximately $7 to $9 million annually. We have requested that the PUC affirm our interpretation of the tariff requirements. We retain the risk of recovering this increase from the customer, should the customer refuse to pay. This risk is not included in the "normal level" of uncollectible accounts described above. Rate Freeze In connection with POLR II, we negotiated a rate freeze for generation, transmission and distribution rates. The rate freeze fixes new generation rates through 2004 for retail customers who take electricity under POLR II, and continues the transmission and distribution rates for all customers at current levels through at least 2003. Under certain circumstances, affected interests may file a complaint alleging that, under these frozen rates, we have exceeded reasonable earnings, in which case the PUC could make adjustments to rectify such earnings. C. RECEIVABLES The components of receivables for the periods indicated are as follows: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Millions of Dollars) ---------------------------- September 30, December 31, 2002 2001 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Electric customer accounts receivable $100.5 $ 97.1 Unbilled revenue accrual 31.3 36.6 Other utility receivables 3.4 3.2 Loan to DQE 250.0 250.0 Affiliate receivables 15.6 23.9 Other receivables 8.1 13.0 Less: Allowance for uncollectible accounts (8.1) (6.3) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Receivables $400.8 $417.5 ================================================================================ D. RESTRUCTURING CHARGES During the fourth quarter of 2001, we recorded a pre-tax restructuring charge of $10.8 million. The restructuring plan included the (1) consolidation and reduction of certain administrative and back-office functions through an involuntary termination plan; (2) abandonment of certain office facilities to relocate employees to one centralized location; and (3) write-off of certain leasehold improvements related to abandoned office facilities. Of the $10.8 million, $8.3 million was for employee termination benefits for approximately 100 management, professional and administrative personnel; $1.5 million was for future lease payments; and $1.0 million was for other lease costs associated with the restructuring plan. To date, approximately 90 employees have been terminated. The restructuring liability at September 30, 2002 was $3.3 million and is included in "other current liabilities" on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The following table summarizes the current year activity for the accrued restructuring liability for the period ended September 30, 2002: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Restructuring Liability ---------------------------- (Millions of Dollars) ---------------------------- Employee Termination Lease Benefits Costs Total -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 2001 $ 6.6 $ 2.2 $ 8.8 2002 payments (5.3) (0.2) (5.5) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at September 30, 2002 $ 1.3 $ 2.0 $ 3.3 ================================================================================ We believe that the remaining provision is adequate to complete the restructuring plan. We expect the remaining restructuring liabilities to be paid on a monthly basis throughout 2006. E. DEBT In September 2002, we converted approximately $98 million of variable rate debt to fixed rate with maturities in 2011 and 2013, resulting in a weighted average interest rate of 4.20%. On August 5, 2002, we redeemed the following: (i) $10 million aggregate principal amount of our 8.20% first mortgage bonds due 2022 at a redemption price of 104.51% of the principal amount thereof, and (ii) $100 million aggregate principal amount of our 7 5/8% first mortgage bonds due 2023 at a redemption price of 103.9458% of the principal amount thereof. Our cash, invested in the cash pool, was used to retire these bonds. 7 On April 15, 2002, we issued $200 million of 6.7% first mortgage bonds due 2012. On April 30, 2002, we issued $100 million of 6.7% first mortgage bonds due 2032. In each case we used the proceeds to call and refund existing debt, including debt scheduled to mature in 2003 and 2004. F. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Construction We estimate that in 2002 we will spend, excluding the allowance for funds used during construction, approximately $70 million for electric utility construction. Employees We are a party to a labor contract with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, which represents the majority of our employees. This contract expires September 30, 2003. G. BUSINESS SEGMENTS AND RELATED INFORMATION We report the results of our business segments, determined by products, services and regulatory environment as follows: (1) transmission and distribution of electricity (electricity delivery business segment), (2) supply of electricity (electricity supply business segment), and (3) collection of transition costs (CTC business segment). 8 Business Segments for the Three Months Ended:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Millions of Dollars) ------------------------------------------------ Electricity Electricity Delivery Supply CTC Consolidated ------------------------------------------------ September 30, 2002 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Operating revenues $ 99.4 $139.9 $15.3 $ 254.6 Operating expenses 28.0 124.3 -- 152.3 Depreciation and amortization expense 14.1 -- 14.0 28.1 Income and other tax expense 22.5 9.9 0.9 33.3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Operating income 34.8 5.7 0.4 40.9 Other income 3.4 -- -- 3.4 Interest and other charges 16.9 -- -- 16.9 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Earnings for common stock $ 21.3 $ 5.7 $ 0.4 $ 27.4 ======================================================================================== Assets $2,454.9 $ -- $31.8 $2,486.7 ======================================================================================== Capital expenditures $ 16.4 $ -- $ -- $ 16.4 ========================================================================================
(Millions of Dollars) ------------------------------------------------- Electricity Electricity Delivery Supply CTC Consolidated ------------------------------------------------- September 30, 2001 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Operating revenues $ 84.5 $125.9 $ 85.8 $ 296.2 Operating expenses 30.5 120.5 -- 151.0 Depreciation and amortization expense 15.0 -- 77.8 92.8 Income and other tax expense 11.3 5.4 5.3 22.0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Operating income 27.7 -- 2.7 30.4 Other income 5.6 -- -- 5.6 Interest and other charges 19.3 -- -- 19.3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Earnings for common stock $ 14.0 $ -- $ 2.7 $ 16.7 ========================================================================================= Assets (a) $2,425.9 $ -- $134.3 $2,560.2 ========================================================================================= Capital expenditures $ 15.4 $ -- $ -- $ 15.4 =========================================================================================
(a) Relates to assets as of December 31, 2001. 9 Business Segments for the Nine Months Ended:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Millions of Dollars) ------------------------------------------------- Electricity Electricity Delivery Supply CTC Consolidated ------------------------------------------------- September 30, 2002 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Operating revenues $265.1 $358.0 $113.9 $737.0 Operating expenses 84.8 327.2 -- 412.0 Depreciation and amortization expense 42.3 -- 105.0 147.3 Income and other tax expense 50.5 21.7 6.4 78.6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Operating income 87.5 9.1 2.5 99.1 Other income 15.3 -- -- 15.3 Interest and other charges 55.8 -- -- 55.8 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Earnings for common stock $ 47.0 $ 9.1 $ 2.5 $ 58.6 ========================================================================================= Capital expenditures $ 51.3 $ -- $ -- $ 51.3 =========================================================================================
(Millions of Dollars) ------------------------------------------------- Electricity Electricity Delivery Supply CTC Consolidated ------------------------------------------------- September 30, 2001 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Operating revenues $238.9 $332.3 $233.8 $805.0 Operating expenses 96.7 318.1 -- 414.8 Depreciation and amortization expense 44.6 -- 207.3 251.9 Income and other tax expense 26.8 14.2 16.1 57.1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Operating income 70.8 -- 10.4 81.2 Other income 18.8 -- -- 18.8 Interest and other charges 59.7 -- -- 59.7 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Earnings for common stock $ 29.9 $ -- $ 10.4 $ 40.3 ========================================================================================= Capital expenditures $ 41.9 $ -- $ -- $ 41.9 =========================================================================================
10 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Part I, Item 2 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and the condensed consolidated financial statements, which are set forth in Part I, Item 1 of this Report. Duquesne Light Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of DQE, Inc., is an electric utility engaged in the transmission and distribution of electric energy. Our subsidiaries are primarily involved in operating our automated meter reading technology and providing financing to certain affiliates. Service Area Our electric utility operations provide service to approximately 586,000 direct customers in southwestern Pennsylvania (including in the City of Pittsburgh), a territory of approximately 800 square miles. Regulation We are subject to the accounting and reporting requirements of the SEC. Our electric delivery business is also subject to regulation by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) with respect to rates for delivery of electric power, accounting and other matters. Business Segments This information is set forth in "Results of Operations" below and in "Business Segments and Related Information," Note G to our condensed consolidated financial statements. Forward-looking Statements We use forward-looking statements in this report. Statements that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements, and are based on beliefs and assumptions of our management, and on information currently available to management. Forward-looking statements include statements preceded by, followed by or using such words as "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "plan," "estimate" or similar expressions. Such statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update publicly any of them in light of new information or future events. Actual results may materially differ from those implied by forward-looking statements due to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, some of which are discussed below. . Demand for and pricing of electric utility services, changing market conditions and weather conditions could affect earnings levels. . Earnings will be affected by the number of customers who choose to receive electric generation through POLR II, by final PUC approval of our post-2004 provider of last resort plan and by the continued performance of our generation supplier. . The ultimate structure of our post-2004 POLR plan will be subject to PUC review and approval, as well as our ability to contract with suitable third-party suppliers. . Overall performance could be affected by economic, competitive, regulatory, governmental (including tax) and technological factors affecting operations, markets, products, services and prices, as well as the factors discussed in our SEC filings made to date. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In June 2001 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a new accounting standard, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations." SFAS No. 143 addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. Specifically, this standard requires entities to record the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred, if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The entity is required to capitalize the cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. The capitalized cost is then depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. Upon settlement of the liability, an entity either settles the obligation for its recorded amount or incurs a gain or loss. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. We are currently evaluating, but have yet to determine, the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 143 will have on our financial statements. 11 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Overall Performance Three months ended September 30, 2002. Our earnings available for common stock were $27.4 million in the third quarter of 2002 compared with $16.7 million in the third quarter of 2001, an increase of $10.7 million or 64.1%. The hotter than normal weather during the third quarter of 2002 contributed favorably to our earnings available for common stock. In addition, we experienced lower operating expenses in 2002 due to the corporate restructuring that occurred in the fourth quarter of 2001, as well as our other cost reduction initiatives, which continue to generate incremental cost savings. Earnings generated from the POLR II arrangement in 2002 have more than offset the decline in the CTC earnings from 2001. Nine months ended September 30, 2002. Our earnings available for common stock were $58.6 million in the first nine months of 2002 compared with $40.3 million in the first nine months of 2001, an increase of $18.3 million or 45.4%. This increase is due in part to the hotter than normal weather during the month of June and the third quarter of 2002 which has contributed favorably to earnings available for common stock. In addition, our operating expenses have declined from 2001 due to the corporate restructuring that occurred in the fourth quarter of 2001, as well as our other cost reduction initiatives, which continue to generate incremental cost savings. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS BY BUSINESS SEGMENT We report the results of our business segments, determined by products, services and regulatory environment as follows: (1) transmission and distribution of electricity (electricity delivery business segment), (2) supply of electricity (electricity supply business segment), and (3) collection of transition costs (CTC business segment). Electricity Delivery Business Segment. Three months ended September 30, 2002. The electricity delivery business segment reported $21.3 million of earnings for common stock in the third quarter of 2002 compared to $14.0 million in the third quarter of 2001, an increase of $7.3 million, or 52.1%, due to the significantly higher revenues during the third quarter of 2002 as a result of the hotter than normal summer weather. Operating revenues for this business segment are primarily derived from the delivery of electricity, including related excise taxes. Sales to residential and commercial customers are primarily influenced by weather conditions. Warmer summer and colder winter seasons lead to increased customer use of electricity for cooling and heating. Commercial sales also are affected by regional development. Sales to industrial customers are influenced by national and global economic conditions. Operating revenues increased by $14.9 million or 17.6% compared to the third quarter of 2001. The increase can be attributed to two items, the increase in the excise taxes that are collected through revenue and the hotter than normal summer weather. The largest excise tax increase is in the Pennsylvania revenue neutral reconciliation (RNR) tax rate, which became effective January 1, 2002. Electric distribution companies, such as Duquesne Light, are permitted to recover this cost from consumers on a current basis. (See "Legal Proceedings.") The increase in the excise taxes caused an increase in revenue of approximately $6.2 million from the third quarter of 2001. In addition, sales to electric utility customers increased approximately 11.3% due to the hotter than normal summer weather, which caused revenues to increase by approximately $8.7 million from the third quarter of 2001. This summer was the nation's third warmest on record, bringing hotter than normal summer temperatures to the Pittsburgh region. This resulted in residential and commercial sales increasing 20.3% and 10.0%, respectively compared to the prior year, in response to higher cooling demands. Industrial sales, which are less sensitive to the weather, also increased by 3.0% due to higher sales to industrial customers in the primary metals sector. The following table sets forth kilowatt-hours (KWH) delivered to electric utility customers. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- KWH Delivered ---------------------- (In Millions) ---------------------- Third Quarter 2002 2001 Change -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Residential 1,235 1,027 20.3% Commercial 1,863 1,693 10.0% Industrial 871 846 3.0% ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Sales to Electric Utility Customers 3,969 3,566 11.3% ================================================================================ Operating expenses for the electricity delivery business segment consist primarily of costs to operate and maintain the transmission and distribution system; meter reading, billing and collection costs; customer service; and 12 administrative expenses. Operating expenses decreased $2.5 million or 8.2% compared to the third quarter of 2001, primarily due to the corporate restructuring that occurred in the fourth quarter of 2001, as well as our other cost reduction initiatives, which continue to generate incremental cost savings. Income and other tax expense for the electricity delivery business segment consists of income taxes and non-income taxes, such as gross receipts, property and payroll taxes. There was an increase of $11.2 million or 99.1% compared to the third quarter of 2001, due in part to a $4.0 million increase in gross receipts tax from the increased RNR, as well as increased income taxes due to the higher pre-tax income in the third quarter of 2002. Other income decreased $2.2 million or 39.3% compared to the third quarter of 2001, primarily due to higher interest earnings in the third quarter of 2001. Interest and other charges include interest on long-term debt, other interest and preferred stock dividends of Duquesne Light. Interest and other charges decreased $2.4 million or 12.4% compared to the third quarter of 2001, due to the retirement of $110.0 million of debt in August 2002, which reduced interest expense by $1.3 million, as well as favorable interest rates on the variable rate, tax-exempt debt. Nine months ended September 30, 2002. The electricity delivery business segment reported $47.0 million of earnings for common stock in the first nine months of 2002 compared to $29.9 million in the first nine months of 2001, an increase of $17.1 million, or 57.2%. This improvement is partially a result of lower operating expenses due to the corporate restructuring that occurred in the fourth quarter of 2001, as well as our cost reduction initiatives, which continue to generate incremental cost savings. In addition, the hotter than normal summer weather during the month of June as well as during the third quarter of 2002 has contributed favorably to earnings available for common stock. Operating revenues increased by $26.2 million or 11.0% compared to the first nine months of 2001. The increase can be primarily attributed to the $16.2 million increase in the excise taxes that are collected through revenue, in particular the RNR increase. In addition, sales to electric utility customers increased approximately 5.1% due to the hotter than normal summer weather. In addition to the nation's third warmest summer, we also experienced the fifth warmest winter on record. The higher than normal summer demand for cooling more than offset the lower than normal winter demand for heating, and residential and commercial sales increased by 9.0% and 5.0%, respectively. Industrial sales, which are less sensitive to the weather, also increased by 1.2% due to higher sales to industrial customers in the primary metals sector. The following table sets forth KWH delivered to electric utility customers. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- KWH Delivered ----------------------- (In Millions) ----------------------- First Nine Months 2002 2001 Change -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Residential 2,993 2,746 9.0% Commercial 4,982 4,747 5.0% Industrial 2,534 2,504 1.2% ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Sales to Electric Utility Customers 10,509 9,997 5.1% ================================================================================ Operating expenses decreased by $11.9 million or 12.3% compared to the first nine months of 2001. This decrease is due to the corporate restructuring that occurred in the fourth quarter of 2001, as well as our cost reduction initiatives, which continue to generate incremental cost savings. There was an increase in income and other tax expense of $23.7 million or 88.4% compared to the first nine months of 2001, primarily due to an $11.5 million increase in gross receipts tax due to the increased RNR, as well as increased income taxes due to the higher pre-tax income in the first nine months of 2002. Other income decreased $3.5 million or 18.6% compared to the first nine months of 2001, primarily due to higher interest earnings in the first nine months of 2001. Interest and other charges decreased $3.9 million or 6.5% compared to the first nine months of 2001, due to the retirement of $110.0 million of debt in August 2002, which reduced interest expense by $1.3 million, as well as favorable interest rates on the variable rate, tax-exempt debt. Electricity Supply Business Segment. Three months ended September 30, 2002. The electricity supply business segment reported earnings for common stock of $5.7 million in the third quarter of 2002, compared with earnings for common stock of zero in the third quarter of 2001. For the period April 28, 2000 through December 31, 2001, this segment's financial results reflected our initial provider of last resort service arrangement (POLR I), which was designed to be income neutral. During the first quarter of 2002, we began operating under our new provider of last resort arrangement (POLR II), which extends the provider of last resort service (and the PUC-approved rates for the supply 13 of electricity) beyond the final CTC collection through December 31, 2004. POLR II also permits us, following CTC collection for each rate class, an average margin of 0.5 cents per KWH supplied. Operating revenues for this business segment are derived primarily from the supply of electricity for delivery to retail customers and, to a much lesser extent, the supply of electricity to wholesale customers. Retail energy requirements fluctuate as the number of customers participating in customer choice changes. Energy requirements for residential and commercial customers are also influenced by weather conditions; temperature extremes lead to increased customer use of electricity for cooling and heating. Commercial energy requirements are also affected by regional development. Energy requirements for industrial customers are primarily influenced by national and global economic conditions. Short-term sales to other utilities are made at market rates. Fluctuations result primarily from excess daily energy deliveries to our electricity delivery system. Operating revenues increased $14.0 million or 11.1% compared to the third quarter of 2001, due to higher average generation rates. Average generation rates increased January 1, 2002, due to scheduled rate increases. In addition, the average rates increase incrementally as rate classes become subject to the POLR II arrangement. Those higher average generation rates more than offset the 1.4% decline in total KWH supplied. The following table sets forth KWH supplied for customers who had not chosen an alternative generation supplier, segregated by those customers supplied under the POLR I or the POLR II contract. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- KWH Supplied --------------------------------- (In Millions) --------------------------------- Third Quarter 2002 2001 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- POLR I POLR II Total POLR I -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Residential 60 783 843 675 Commercial 311 1,085 1,396 1,627 Industrial 530 277 807 806 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- KWH Sales 901 2,145 3,046 3,108 Sales to Other Utilities 53 36 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Sales 3,099 3,144 ================================================================================ Operating expenses for the electricity supply business segment consist of costs to obtain energy for our provider of last resort service which fluctuate in direct relation to operating revenues. Operating expenses increased $3.8 million or 3.2% compared to the third quarter of 2001, a result of the higher average generation rates charged to customers in the third quarter of 2002 under our provider of last resort arrangements. Income and other tax expense for the electricity supply business segment consists of gross receipts tax, which fluctuates in direct relation to operating revenues, and income taxes, which fluctuate in direct relation to pre-tax income. Income and other tax expense increased $4.5 million or 83.3% from the third quarter of 2001, due to the increase in revenues from electric utility customers. In addition, pre-tax income of $9.6 million was generated from the electricity supply business segment in the third quarter of 2002 since we began operating under the POLR II arrangement, which resulted in $3.9 million of income tax expense. Nine months ended September 30, 2002. The electricity supply business segment reported earnings for common stock of $9.1 million in the first nine months of 2002, compared to earnings for common stock of zero in the first nine months of 2001. During the first quarter of 2002, we began operating under the POLR II arrangement, discussed above. Operating revenues increased $25.7 million or 7.7% compared to the first nine months of 2001, due to higher average generation rates, discussed above. These higher average generation rates more than offset the 2.8% decline in total KWH supplied. The following table sets forth KWH supplied for customers who had not chosen an alternative generation supplier, segregated by those customers supplied under the POLR I or the POLR II arrangement. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- KWH Supplied ---------------------------------- (In Millions) ---------------------------------- First Nine Months 2002 2001 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- POLR I POLR II Total POLR I -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Residential 610 1,465 2,075 1,818 Commercial 2,257 1,473 3,730 4,103 Industrial 2,005 332 2,337 2,342 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- KWH Sales 4,872 3,270 8,142 8,263 Sales to Other Utilities 164 285 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Sales 8,306 8,548 ================================================================================ Operating expenses increased $9.1 million or 2.9% compared to the first nine months of 2001, a result of the higher average generation rates charged to customers in the first nine months of 2002 under our provider of last resort arrangements. Income and other tax expense increased $7.5 million or 52.8% from the first nine months of 2001, due to the increase in revenues from electric utility customers. In addition, pre-tax income of $15.3 million was generated from the electricity supply 14 business segment in the first nine months of 2002 since we began operating under the POLR II arrangement, which resulted in $6.2 million of income tax expense. CTC Business Segment. Three months ended September 30, 2002. For the CTC business segment, operating revenues are derived by billing electric delivery customers for generation-related transition costs. We are allowed to earn an 11% pre-tax return on the net of tax CTC balance. As revenues are billed to customers on a monthly basis, we amortize the CTC balance. The resulting decrease in the CTC balance causes a decline in the return we earn. In the third quarter of 2002, the CTC business segment reported earnings for common stock of $0.4 million compared to $2.7 million during the same period in 2001, a decrease of $2.3 million or 85.2%, due to lower earnings resulting from the decreased CTC balance. Operating revenues decreased $70.5 million or 82.2%, due to the full collection of the allocated CTC balance as of September 30, 2002 for most of our customers, as well as scheduled decreases in the average CTC rate charged from 2001 to 2002. As of September 30, 2002, the CTC balance has been fully collected for approximately 95% of our customers, and approximately 87% of the KWH sales for the first nine months of 2002. Depreciation and amortization expense consists of the amortization of transition costs. There was a decrease of $63.8 million or 82.0% compared to the third quarter of 2001, primarily due to the full collection of the allocated CTC balance for certain customers, as discussed above. Income and other tax expense consists of gross receipts tax, which fluctuates in direct relation to operating revenues and income taxes, which fluctuate in direct relation to pre-tax income. Income and other tax expense decreased $4.4 million or 83.0% compared to the third quarter of 2001, due to a $3.1 million decrease in gross receipts tax due to the decline in revenues and a $1.3 million decrease in income taxes due to lower pre-tax income in the second quarter of 2002. Nine months ended September 30, 2002. In the first nine months of 2002, the CTC business segment reported earnings for common stock of $2.5 million compared to $10.4 million during the same period in 2001, a decrease of $7.9 million or 76.0%. As the CTC balance is collected from customers, there is a resulting decline in the return we earn. Operating revenues decreased $119.9 million or 51.3% compared to the first nine months of 2001. This decrease is due to the full collection of the allocated CTC balance for certain customers, as well as scheduled decreases in the average CTC rate as discussed above. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $102.3 million or 49.3% compared to the first nine months of 2001, primarily due to the full collection of the allocated CTC balance for certain customers, as discussed above. Income and other tax expense decreased $9.7 million or 60.2% compared to the first nine months of 2001, due to the $5.3 million decrease in gross receipts tax due to the decline in operating revenues and the $4.4 million decrease in income taxes due to lower pre-tax income during the first nine months of 2002. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES Capital Expenditures We estimate that during 2002 we will spend, excluding the allowance for funds used during construction, approximately $70 million for electric utility construction. During the first nine months of 2002, we have spent $51.3 million on capital expenditures. Asset Dispositions During the first nine months of 2002, we did not make any acquisitions, but we received $1.3 million of proceeds from the sale of securities and recognized an after-tax gain of $0.8 million. We also received $1.3 million from the sale of a building and recognized an after-tax gain of $0.3 million. Financing and Capital Availability In September 2002, we converted approximately $98 million of variable rate debt to fixed rate with maturities in 2011 and 2013, resulting in a weighted average interest rate of 4.20%. On August 5, 2002, we redeemed the following: (i) $10 million aggregate principal amount of our 8.20% first mortgage bonds due 2022 at a redemption price of 104.51% of the principal amount thereof, and (ii) $100 million aggregate principal amount of our 7 5/8% first mortgage bonds due 2023 at a redemption price of 103.9458% of the principal amount thereof. Our cash, invested in the cash pool, was used to retire these bonds. 15 On April 15, 2002, we issued $200 million of 6.7% first mortgage bonds due 2012. On April 30, 2002, we issued $100 million of 6.7% first mortgage bonds due 2032. In each case we used the proceeds to call and refund existing debt, including debt scheduled to mature in 2003 and 2004. In the first quarter of 2002, Moody's Investor Service, Standard & Poor's, and Fitch Ratings assessed our short and long-term credit profiles. The ratings reflect the agencies' opinion of our overall financial strength. Ratings impact our ability to access capital markets for investment and capital requirements, as well as the relative costs related to such liquidity capability. In general, the agencies reduced our long-term credit ratings, although staying within the range considered to be investment grade. The agencies maintained the existing credit ratings for our short-term debt. This ratings downgrade does not limit our ability to access our revolving credit facility; it does, however, impact the cost of maintaining the credit facility and the cost of any new debt. These ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any securities of Duquesne Light, may be subject to revisions or withdrawal by the agencies at any time, and should be evaluated independently of each other and any other rating that may be assigned to our securities. At September 30, 2002, we had no commercial paper borrowings and no current debt maturities outstanding. During the quarter, the maximum amount of bank loans and commercial paper borrowings outstanding was $35 million, the amount of average daily borrowings was $5.3 million, and the weighted average daily interest rate was 2.16%. We recently renewed our 364-day, $150 million revolving credit agreement, which expires in October 2003. Interest rates can, in accordance with the option selected at the time of the borrowing, be based on one of several indicators, including prime and Eurodollar rates. Fees are based on the unborrowed amount of the commitment. At September 30, 2002, no borrowings were outstanding. The revolver includes a "ratings trigger," pursuant to which a change in our credit rating will result in an inverse change in the fees and interest rates charged. Under our credit facility, we are required to maintain a maximum debt-to-capitalization ratio of 65.0%. At September 30, 2002, we were in compliance, having a debt-to-total-capitalization ratio of approximately 56.2%. None of our long-term debt will mature before 2008. Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments As of September 30, 2002, we have certain contractual obligations and commercial commitments that extend beyond this year, the principal amounts of which are set forth in the following tables: Payments Due By Period
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (In Millions) ------------------------------------------- 2002 2003 2004 2005 After Total ------------------------------------------- Long-Term Debt $ -- $ -- $0.4 $0.4 $960.0 $960.8 Capital Lease Obligations 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.5 1.4 2.8 Operating Leases 0.8 3.3 3.5 3.8 24.1 35.5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Contractual Cash Obligations $0.9 $3.7 $4.3 $4.7 $985.5 $999.1 ===================================================================================
Other Commercial Commitments -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (In Millions) ---------------------------------------------- 2002 2003 2004 2005 After Total --------------------- ------------------------ Revolving Credit Agreements (a) $ -- $150.0 $ -- $ -- $ -- $150.0 Standby Letters of Credit (a) 9.3 -- -- -- -- 9.3 Surety Bonds (b) 41.6 -- -- -- -- 41.6 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Commercial Commitments $50.9 $150.0 $ -- $ -- $ -- $200.9 ================================================================================ (a) Revolving Credit Agreements and Letters of Credit are typically for a 364-day period and are renewed annually (b) Surely bonds are renewed annually. Some of these bonds cover regulatory and contractual obligations which exceed a one-year period 16 RATE MATTERS Competition and the Customer Choice Act The Pennsylvania Electricity Generation Customer Choice and Competition Act (Customer Choice Act) enables electric utility customers to purchase electricity at market prices from a variety of electric generation suppliers. As of September 30, 2002, approximately 76.6% of our customers measured on a KWH basis, and approximately 75.6% on a non-coincident peak load basis received electricity through our provider of last resort service arrangement. The remaining customers are provided with electricity through alternative generation suppliers. The number of customers participating in our provider of last resort service will fluctuate depending on market prices and the number of alternative generation suppliers in the retail supply business. Customers who select an alternative generation supplier pay for generation charges set competitively by that supplier, and pay us a competitive transition charge (discussed below) and/or transmission and distribution charges. Electricity delivery (including transmission, distribution and customer service) remains regulated in substantially the same manner as under historical regulation. In November 2001, the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue established an increased RNR tax in order to recover a current shortfall that resulted from electricity generation deregulation. We requested and received PUC approval to recover approximately $13 million of costs we will incur in 2002 due to the RNR. (See "Legal Proceedings.") Regional Transmission Organization FERC Order No. 2000 calls on transmission-owning utilities such as Duquesne Light to join regional transmission organizations (RTOs). We are committed to ensuring a stable, plentiful supply of electricity for our customers. Toward that end, we had planned to join the PJM West RTO. However, on July 31, 2002, the FERC issued a series of proposals designed to establish a standard market design and transmission service for interstate electricity transactions, and extend the deadline for joining an RTO until September 2004. We will continue to evaluate the FERC's proposals and their impact on the possibility of joining an RTO. Competitive Transition Charge In its final restructuring order, the PUC determined that we should recover most of the above-market costs of our generation assets, including plant and regulatory assets, through the collection of the CTC from electric utility customers. As of September 30, 2002, the CTC balance has been fully collected for approximately 95% of our customers, and 87% of the KWH sales for the first nine months of 2002. The transition costs, as reflected on the consolidated balance sheet, are being amortized over the same period that the CTC revenues are being recognized. For regulatory purposes, the unrecovered balance of transition costs was approximately $32.6 million ($19.8 million net of tax) at September 30, 2002, on which we are allowed to earn an 11.0% pre-tax return. A lower amount is shown on the balance sheet due to the accounting for unbilled revenues. Provider of Last Resort Although no longer a generation supplier, as the provider of last resort for all customers in our service territory, we must provide electricity for any customer who does not choose an alternative generation supplier, or whose supplier fails to deliver. As part of the generation asset sale, a third party agreed to supply all of the electric energy necessary to satisfy our provider of last resort obligations during the CTC collection period. Under POLR II, we have extended the arrangement (and the PUC-approved rates for the supply of electricity) beyond the final CTC collection through December 31, 2004. POLR II also permits us, following CTC collection for each rate class, an average margin of 0.5 cents per KWH supplied through this arrangement. Except for this margin, these agreements, in general, effectively transfer to the supplier the financial risks and rewards associated with our provider of last resort obligations. While there are certain safeguards in the provider of last resort arrangements designed to mitigate losses in the event that the supplier defaults on its performance under the arrangement, we may face the credit risk of such a default. Contractually, we have various credit enhancements that would become activated upon certain events. If the supplier were to fail to deliver, we would have to contract with another supplier and/or make purchases in the market at the time of default at a time when market prices could be higher. While the Customer Choice Act provides generally for provider of last resort supply costs to be borne by customers, recent litigation suggests that it may not be clear whether we could pass any costs in excess of the existing PUC-approved provider of last resort prices on to our customers. Additionally, the supplier has recently been downgraded by the rating agencies. Although we are following the situation closely, our knowledge is limited to public disclosure, and we do not know whether the downgrade could affect the supplier's ability to perform. We also retain the risk that 17 customers will not pay for the provider of last resort generation supply. However, a component of our delivery rate is designed to cover the cost of a normal level of uncollectible accounts. On October 25, 2002, we petitioned the PUC to issue a declaratory order regarding a provision in our retail tariff that affects our largest industrial customer. The supplier and we have interpreted the tariff differently. The supplier's interpretation could increase the customer's bill by approximately $7 to $9 million annually. We have requested that the PUC affirm our interpretation of the tariff requirements. We retain the risk of recovering this increase from the customer, should the customer refuse to pay. This risk is not included in the "normal level" of uncollectible accounts described above. We are preparing a post-2004 POLR supply plan to be filed with the PUC in the near future. This plan would provide capped rates and offer protection from electric market volatility for residential and small commercial POLR customers. This plan continues to evolve as the wholesale power markets continue to change. For example, given the interest many generating companies have shown in potentially supplying long-term POLR service, our affiliate Duquesne Power is no longer actively exploring the development of a generating station. We are in the process of evaluating various options and expect to complete our assessment prior to the new filing. Our goal is to mitigate various risks associated with a supply plan and to enhance shareholder value through a continuing earnings stream from the core electric business. Rate Freeze In connection with the POLR II agreement described above, we negotiated a rate freeze for generation, transmission and distribution rates. The rate freeze fixes new generation rates through 2004 for retail customers who take electricity under POLR II, and continues the transmission and distribution rates for all customers at current levels through at least 2003. Under certain circumstances, affected interests may file a complaint alleging that, under these frozen rates, we have exceeded reasonable earnings, in which case the PUC could make adjustments to rectify such earnings. Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. Market risk represents the risk of financial loss that may impact our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows due to adverse changes in market prices and rates. We manage our interest rate risk by balancing our exposure between fixed and variable rates, while attempting to minimize our interest costs. Currently, our variable interest rate debt is approximately $320.1 million or 33.4% of long-term debt. This variable rate debt is low-cost, tax-exempt debt. We also manage our interest rate risk by retiring and issuing debt from time to time and by maintaining a balance of short-term, medium-term and long-term debt. A 10% increase in interest rates would have affected our variable rate debt obligations by increasing interest expense by approximately $0.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and $0.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. A 10% reduction in interest rates would have increased the market value of our fixed-rate debt by approximately $38.6 million and $41.5 million as of September 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001. Such changes would not have had a significant near-term effect on our future earnings or cash flows. Item 4. Controls and Procedures. Within the 90 days prior to the date of this report, management (including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer) evaluated the effectiveness of our "disclosure controls and procedures" (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Rules 13a-14(c) and 15-d-14(c)). Management concluded that, as of the evaluation date, our disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and designed to ensure that material information relating to us and our consolidated subsidiaries would be made known to management by others within those entities. In addition, there were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect our disclosure controls and procedures subsequent to the evaluation date, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. ---------- 18 PART II. OTHER INFORMATION. Item 1. Legal Proceedings. As discussed elsewhere in this report, we requested and received PUC approval to recover approximately $13 million of costs we will incur in 2002 due to the RNR. On November 19, 2001, the Pennsylvania Office of Consumer Advocate (OCA) filed a complaint with the PUC, objecting to the recovery approval and stating various matters, such as rate of return and offsetting savings, that should be considered before allowing RNR recovery in excess of rate caps. An initial hearing on the OCA's complaint was held May 2, 2002 before a PUC administrative law judge, who denied the OCA's objections. However, on May 9, 2002, the PUC ordered that our quarterly earnings may be considered in the RNR proceedings. Additional hearings were held in July 2002. On August 8, 2002, the PUC voted to uphold dismissal of the OCA's case. Proceedings regarding rates are discussed under "Rate Matters." Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K a. Exhibits: EXHIBIT 12.1 - Calculation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. EXHIBIT 99.1 - Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002. EXHIBIT 99.2 - Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. b. We did not file any reports on Form 8-K in the third quarter. 19 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant identified below has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. Duquesne Light Company ------------------------------------- (Registrant) Date November 14, 2002 /s/ Frosina C. Cordisco ------------------------------------- (Signature) Frosina C. Cordisco Vice President and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) Date November 14, 2002 /s/ Stevan R. Schott ------------------------------------- (Signature) Stevan R. Schott Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) 20 CERTIFICATIONS I, Victor A. Roque, President of Duquesne Light Company, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Duquesne Light Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and 6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. Date: November 14, 2002 /s/ Victor A. Roque ------------------------------------- Victor A. Roque, President (Principal Executive Officer) 21 I, Frosina C. Cordisco, Vice President and Treasurer of Duquesne Light Company, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Duquesne Light Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and 6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. Date: November 14, 2002 /s/ Frosina C. Cordisco ------------------------------------- Frosina C. Cordisco Vice President and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) 22