XML 136 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Text Block]
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The following table shows changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, by operating segment:

Goodwill
Electronic
and
Functional
Materials

 
Coatings and
Infrastructure
Solutions

 
Ag
Sciences

 
Perf
Materials

 
Perf Plastics

 
Feedstocks
and Energy

 
Total  

In millions
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross goodwill at Jan 1, 2010
$
4,967

 
$
4,118

 
$
1,546

 
$
1,306

 
$
1,463

 
$
63

 
$
13,463

Accumulated impairments at Jan 1, 2010

 

 

 
(220
)
 
(30
)
 

 
(250
)
Net goodwill at Jan 1, 2010
$
4,967

 
$
4,118

 
$
1,546

 
$
1,086

 
$
1,433

 
$
63

 
$
13,213

Divestitures:


 


 


 


 


 


 
 
Styron

 

 

 
(111
)
 
(30
)
 

 
(141
)
Powder Coatings

 
(4
)
 

 

 

 

 
(4
)
Hydrocarbon Resins
(9
)
 

 

 

 

 

 
(9
)
Foreign currency impact
(9
)
 
(57
)
 

 
(9
)
 
(17
)
 

 
(92
)
Net goodwill at Dec 31, 2010
$
4,949

 
$
4,057

 
$
1,546

 
$
966

 
$
1,386

 
$
63

 
$
12,967

Acquisition of seed company

 

 
12

 

 

 

 
12

Sale of a Dow Automotive Systems product line

 

 

 
(7
)
 

 

 
(7
)
Foreign currency impact
(15
)
 
(16
)
 

 

 
(11
)
 

 
(42
)
Net goodwill at Dec 31, 2011
$
4,934

 
$
4,041

 
$
1,558

 
$
959

 
$
1,375

 
$
63

 
$
12,930

Accumulated impairments at Dec 31, 2011

 

 

 
209

 

 

 
209

Gross goodwill at Dec 31, 2011
$
4,934

 
$
4,041

 
$
1,558

 
$
1,168

 
$
1,375

 
$
63

 
$
13,139


The recording of the April 1, 2009 acquisition of Rohm and Haas resulted in goodwill of $9,707 million (see Note D) , which is not deductible for tax purposes. During the first quarter of 2010, goodwill related to the acquisition of Rohm and Haas increased $99 million for net adjustments made during the measurement period to the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. In the table above, these adjustments have been retrospectively reflected in the goodwill at January 1, 2010, in accordance with the accounting guidance for business combinations. The adjustments increased goodwill for the operating segments as follows: Electronic and Functional Materials ($33 million), Coatings and Infrastructure Solutions ($47 million), Agricultural Sciences ($2 million), Performance Materials ($4 million) and Performance Plastics ($13 million).

As a result of the June 17, 2010 divestiture of Styron, $141 million of associated goodwill and $16 million of intangible assets were divested (see Note E). On June 1, 2010, the Company divested its Powder Coatings business, including $4 million of associated goodwill, and on October 1, 2010, the Company divested its Hydrocarbon Resins business, including $9 million of associated goodwill. On November 30, 2011, the Company sold a Dow Automotive Systems product line, including $7 million of associated goodwill.

At December 31, 2011, the Company had accumulated goodwill impairments of $209 million ($246 million at December 31, 2010 and $250 million at January 1, 2010). During the past two years, the accumulated goodwill impairments balance was reduced by the following transactions: the June 17, 2010 divestiture of Styron, which included $4 million of impaired goodwill associated with the Rubber business (reflected in Performance Materials); the September 30, 2011 sale of the global Polypropylene business, which included $30 million of impaired goodwill (reflected in Performance Plastics); and the divestiture of the Dow Haltermann business during 2011, which included $7 million of impaired goodwill (reflected in Performance Materials).

Goodwill Impairments
In 2011, the Company early adopted ASU 2011-08, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment.” ASU 2011-08 simplifies how entities test goodwill for impairment and permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. This ASU is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted.

During the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company performed its annual impairment test for goodwill. The Company assessed qualitative factors to determine whether it was more likely than not that the fair value of each reporting unit was less than its carrying value amount. The qualitative factors assessed for the Company included, but were not limited to, GDP growth rates, long-term hydrocarbon and energy prices, equity and credit market activity, discount rates, foreign exchange rates and overall financial performance. Qualitative factors assessed for each of the reporting units included, but were not limited to, changes in industry and market structure, competitive environments, planned capacity and new product launches, cost factors such as raw material prices, and financial performance of each reporting unit. The qualitative assessment indicated that it was more likely than not that the fair value of each reporting unit exceeded its carrying value. Additional quantitative testing was not required for any of the Company's reporting units.

During the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company performed its annual impairment tests for goodwill. As a result of the review, it was determined that no additional goodwill impairments existed.

During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company performed its annual impairment tests for goodwill. As a result of the review, it was determined that the goodwill associated with the Dow Haltermann reporting unit was impaired. The impairment was based on a review of the Dow Haltermann reporting unit performed by management, in which discounted cash flows did not support the carrying value of the goodwill due to poor future projections for the business. As a result, an impairment loss of $7 million was recognized in the fourth quarter of 2009 against the Performance Materials segment.

Other Intangible Assets
The following table provides information regarding the Company’s other intangible assets:

Other Intangible Assets at December 31
2011
 
2010
In millions
Gross
Carrying
Amount

 
Accumulated
Amortization

 
Net

 
Gross
Carrying
Amount

 
Accumulated
Amortization

 
Net  

Intangible assets with finite lives:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Licenses and intellectual property
$
1,693

 
$
(594
)
 
$
1,099

 
$
1,733

 
$
(466
)
 
$
1,267

Patents
119

 
(97
)
 
22

 
121

 
(95
)
 
26

Software
1,049

 
(596
)
 
453

 
965

 
(506
)
 
459

Trademarks
695

 
(224
)
 
471

 
693

 
(168
)
 
525

Customer related
3,652

 
(730
)
 
2,922

 
3,647

 
(492
)
 
3,155

Other
150

 
(108
)
 
42

 
122

 
(78
)
 
44

Total other intangible assets, finite lives
$
7,358

 
$
(2,349
)
 
$
5,009

 
$
7,281

 
$
(1,805
)
 
$
5,476

IPR&D (1), indefinite lives
52

 

 
52

 
54

 

 
54

Total other intangible assets
$
7,410

 
$
(2,349
)
 
$
5,061

 
$
7,335

 
$
(1,805
)
 
$
5,530

(1)    In-process research and development ("IPR&D") purchased in a business combination.

The following table provides information regarding amortization expense:

Amortization Expense
In millions
 
2011

 
2010

 
2009

Other intangible assets, excluding software
 
$
496

 
$
509

 
$
399

Software, included in “Cost of sales”
 
$
94

 
$
87

 
$
76



Total estimated amortization expense for the next five fiscal years is as follows:

Estimated Amortization Expense
for Next Five Years
In millions
2012
$
553

2013
$
531

2014
$
510

2015
$
492

2016
$
480