EX-5.1 14 d225694dex51.htm EXHIBIT 5.1 Exhibit 5.1

Exhibit 5.1

 

 

Avocats à la Cour de Paris

Solicitors of the Senior Courts of England and Wales

    

Linklaters LLP

25 rue de Marignan

75008 Paris

Telephone (+33) 1 56 43 56 43

Facsimile (+33) 1 43 59 41 96

Palais J 030

The Issuers

c/o Compagnie Générale de Géophysique–Veritas

Tour Maine-Montparnasse

33, avenue du Maine

B.P. 191

75755 Paris Cedex 15

France

 

September 27, 2011

Our Ref              L-190656

Dear Sirs,

Compagnie Générale de Géophysique–Veritas (the “Company”) U.S.$650,000,000 6 1/2% Senior Notes due 2021 (the “New Notes”) Guaranteed (the “New Guarantees”) by Sercel Inc., Sercel Canada Ltd., Sercel Australia Pty Ltd, CGG Canada Services Ltd., CGG Marine Resources Norge A/S, CGGVeritas Services Holding B.V., CGGVeritas Services Holding (UK) B.V., CGGVeritas Services Holding (U.S.) Inc., CGGVeritas Land (U.S.) Inc., CGGVeritas Services (U.S.) Inc., Veritas Investments Inc., Viking Maritime Inc., Veritas Geophysical (Mexico) LLC, and Alitheia Resources Inc. (the “Guarantors” and together with the Company, the “Issuers”)

 

1

We have acted as special United States counsel to the Company in connection with the registration of the New Notes and the New Guarantees under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and the proposed offer by the Issuers to exchange the New Notes and the New Guarantees for U.S.$650,000,000 aggregate principal amount of the Company’s 6 1/2% Senior Notes due 2021 (the “Original Notes”) and the Guarantors’ guarantees thereof (the “Original Guarantees”), each of which was originally issued on May 31, 2011.

 

2 This opinion is limited to the federal law of the United States and the laws of the State of New York, and we express no opinion as to the effect of the laws of any State of the United States or any other jurisdiction.

 

2.1 We also are delivering to you opinions dated the date hereof with respect to certain matters of French and Dutch law. We have relied on such opinions, filed as Exhibits 5.2 and 5.3, respectively, to the registration statement relating to the New Notes and the New Guarantees (the “Registration Statement”), with respect to the opinions set forth herein insofar as they may be affected by matters of French or Dutch law and, insofar as the opinions set forth herein may be

 

This communication is confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected by work product immunity. Linklaters LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number OC326345. It is a law firm regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. The term partner in relation to Linklaters LLP is used to refer to a member of the LLP or an employee or consultant of Linklaters LLP or any of its affiliated firms or entities with equivalent standing and qualifications. A list of the names of the members of Linklaters LLP and of the non-members who are designated as partners and their professional qualifications is open to inspection at its registered office, One Silk Street, London EC2Y 8HQ, England or on www.linklaters.com and such persons are either solicitors, registered foreign lawyers or European lawyers.

Please refer to www.linklaters.com/regulation for important information on our regulatory position.


  affected by matters of French or Dutch law, they are subject to the same assumptions, qualifications and limitations with respect to such matters as are contained in such opinions.

 

2.2 With respect to all matters of the law of the Province of Alberta, Canada, we have relied without independent investigation upon the opinion dated September 27, 2011, of Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP, special Alberta, Canada counsel to CGG Canada Services Ltd., filed as Exhibit 5.4 to the Registration Statement, and our opinions set forth herein, insofar as they may be affected by matters of the law of the Province of Alberta, are subject to the same assumptions, qualifications and limitations with respect to such matters as are contained in such opinion of Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP.

 

2.3 With respect to all matters of the law of Norway, we have relied without independent investigation upon the opinion dated September 27, 2011, of Wiersholm, Mellbye & Bech, special Norwegian counsel to CGG Marine Resources Norge A/S, filed as Exhibit 5.5 to the Registration Statement, and our opinions set forth herein, insofar as they may be affected by matters of the law of Norway, are subject to the same assumptions, qualifications and limitations with respect to such matters as are contained in such opinion of Wiersholm, Mellbye & Bech.

 

2.4 With respect to all matters of the law of the State of Oklahoma, we have relied without independent investigation upon the opinion dated September 27, 2011, of GableGotwals, special Oklahoma counsel to Sercel Inc., filed as Exhibit 5.6 to the Registration Statement, and our opinions set forth herein, insofar as they may be affected by matters of the law of the State of Oklahoma, are subject to the same assumptions, qualifications and limitations with respect to such matters as are contained in such opinion of GableGotwals.

 

2.5 With respect to all matters of the law of the Province of New Brunswick, Canada, we have relied without independent investigation upon the opinion dated September 27, 2011, of McInnes Cooper, special New Brunswick, Canada counsel to Sercel Canada Ltd., filed as Exhibit 5.7 to the Registration Statement, and our opinions set forth herein, insofar as they may be affected by matters of the law of the Province of New Brunswick, are subject to the same assumptions, qualifications and limitations with respect to such matters as are contained in such opinion of McInnes Cooper.

 

2.6 With respect to all matters of the law of New South Wales, Australia, we have relied without independent investigation upon the opinion dated September 27, 2011, of Mallesons Stephen Jaques, special New South Wales, Australia counsel to Sercel Australia Pty Ltd., filed as Exhibit 5.8 to the Registration Statement, and our opinions set forth herein, insofar as they may be affected by matters of the law of New South Wales, are subject to the same assumptions, qualifications and limitations with respect to such matters as are contained in such opinion of Mallesons Stephen Jaques.

 

3 For the purpose of this opinion, we have examined the Indenture dated as of May 31, 2011 (the “Indenture”) between the Issuers and The Bank of New York Mellon (the “Trustee”) as Trustee, the forms of the New Notes and the notation of New Guarantees, such certificates and other documents, and such questions of law, as we have considered necessary or appropriate.

 

4

In our opinion, when the terms of the New Notes and the New Guarantees and of their issuance have been duly established in conformity with the Indenture, and the New Notes and the New Guarantees have been duly executed and authenticated in accordance with the terms of the Indenture and duly issued and delivered in exchange for the Original Notes and Original Guarantees in accordance with the terms of the Indenture and the Registration Rights Agreement,

 

Page 2 of 3


  the New Notes and the New Guarantees will constitute valid and legally binding obligations of the Issuers, enforceable in accordance with their terms, subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent transfer, reorganization, moratorium or similar laws of general applicability relating to or affecting creditors’ rights and to general equity principles.

 

5 In connection with our opinion set forth above, we have assumed that the Indenture has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the Trustee, an assumption we have not independently verified.

 

6 We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement and to the reference to us under the heading “Legal Matters” in the prospectus contained therein. In giving such consent, we do not thereby admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act.

Yours faithfully,

/s/     Linklaters LLP

Linklaters LLP

 

Page 3 of 3