10-Q

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended February 27, 2011

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number: 1-7275

CONAGRA FOODS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	47-0248710 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
One ConAgra Drive, Omaha, Nebraska (Address of principal executive offices)	68102-5001 (Zip Code)

(402) 240-4000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer þ	Accelerated filer o	Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company o
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

Number of shares outstanding of issuer’s common stock, as of March 27, 2011, was 408,891,106.

Table of Contents

Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION	3
Item 1 Financial Statements	3
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the Thirteen and Thirty-nine Weeks ended February 27, 2011 and February 28, 2010	3
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Thirteen and Thirty-nine Weeks ended February 27, 2011 and February 28, 2010	4
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of February 27, 2011 and May 30, 2010	5
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Thirty-nine Weeks ended February 27, 2011 and February 28, 2010	6
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7
Item 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	29
Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	40
Item 4 Controls and Procedures	41
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION	42
Item 1 Legal Proceedings	42
Item 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	42
Item 6 Exhibits	42
Signatures	43
Exhibit Index
EX-10.1
EX-10.2
EX-10.3
EX-10.4
EX-10.5
EX-10.6
EX-10.7
EX-10.8
EX-12
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

2

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings
(in millions except per share amounts)
(unaudited)

	Thirteen weeks ended					Thirty-nine weeks ended
	February 27,		February 28,			February 27,		February 28,
	2011		2010			2011		2010
Net sales	$	3,154.7	$	3,030.5		$	9,133.4	$	9,016.9
Costs and expenses:
Cost of goods sold		2,357.1		2,251.9			6,923.9		6,689.5
Selling, general and administrative expenses		420.5		418.2			1,258.9		1,296.2
Interest expense, net		51.6		39.7			122.6		121.6
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity method investment earnings		325.5		320.7			828.0		909.6
Income tax expense		117.0		102.6			285.4		305.5
Equity method investment earnings		6.6		2.9			17.4		17.7
Income from continuing operations		215.1		221.0			560.0		621.8
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax		—		7.7			3.2		11.3
Net income	$	215.1	$	228.7		$	563.2	$	633.1
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests		0.3		(0.9	)		1.1		(2.1	)
Net income attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc.	$	214.8	$	229.6		$	562.1	$	635.2
Earnings per share — basic
Income from continuing operations attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders	$	0.50	$	0.50		$	1.28	$	1.40
Income from discontinued operations attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders		—		0.02			0.01		0.03
Net income attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders	$	0.50	$	0.52		$	1.29	$	1.43
Earnings per share — diluted
Income from continuing operations attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders	$	0.50	$	0.49		$	1.27	$	1.39
Income from discontinued operations attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders		—		0.02			—		0.03
Net income attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders	$	0.50	$	0.51		$	1.27	$	1.42
Cash dividends declared per common share	$	0.23	$	0.20		$	0.66	$	0.59

     See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(in millions)
(unaudited)

	Thirteen weeks ended						Thirty-nine weeks ended
	February 27,			February 28,			February 27,			February 28,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Net income	$	215.1		$	228.7		$	563.2		$	633.1
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Net derivative adjustment, net of tax		1.3			—			1.4			0.1
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, net of tax		(0.1	)		(0.1	)		(0.1	)		(0.1	)
Currency translation adjustment:
Unrealized translation gains (losses)		17.2			(6.8	)		35.2			8.3
Pension and postretirement healthcare liabilities, net of tax		1.1			(0.3	)		4.4			(0.9	)
Comprehensive income		234.6			221.5			604.1			640.5
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests		0.3			(0.9	)		1.1			(2.1	)
Comprehensive income attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc.	$	234.3		$	222.4		$	603.0		$	642.6

     See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in millions except share data)
(unaudited)

	February 27,			May 30,
	2011			2010
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	882.9		$	953.2
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $8.0 and $8.5		876.7			849.6
Inventories		1,932.7			1,606.5
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		343.2			307.3
Current assets held for sale		—			243.5
Total current assets		4,035.5			3,960.1
Property, plant and equipment		5,655.8			5,402.9
Less accumulated depreciation		(3,018.2	)		(2,777.9	)
Property, plant and equipment, net		2,637.6			2,625.0
Goodwill		3,611.1			3,552.1
Brands, trademarks and other intangibles, net		941.1			874.8
Other assets		247.5			695.6
Noncurrent assets held for sale		—			30.4
	$	11,472.8		$	11,738.0
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
Notes payable	$	—		$	0.6
Current installments of long-term debt		359.4			260.2
Accounts payable		1,031.3			919.1
Accrued payroll		147.9			263.9
Other accrued liabilities		764.8			579.0
Current liabilities held for sale		—			13.4
Total current liabilities		2,303.4			2,036.2
Senior long-term debt, excluding current installments		2,679.2			3,030.5
Subordinated debt		195.9			195.9
Other noncurrent liabilities		1,670.1			1,541.3
Noncurrent liabilities held for sale		—			5.2
Total liabilities		6,848.6			6,809.1
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
Common stockholders’ equity
Common stock of $5 par value, authorized 1,200,000,000 shares; issued 567,907,172 and 567,907,172		2,839.7			2,839.7
Additional paid-in capital		901.5			897.5
Retained earnings		4,692.9			4,417.1
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(244.4	)		(285.3	)
Less treasury stock, at cost, 153,270,669 and 125,637,495 common shares		(3,572.4	)		(2,945.1	)
Total ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders’ equity		4,617.3			4,923.9
Noncontrolling interests		6.9			5.0
Total stockholders’ equity		4,624.2			4,928.9
	$	11,472.8		$	11,738.0

     See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in millions)
(unaudited)

	Thirty-nine weeks ended
	February 27,			February 28,
	2011			2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	563.2		$	633.1
Income from discontinued operations		3.2			11.3
Income from continuing operations		560.0			621.8
Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations to net cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		266.3			241.0
Impairment charges related to Garner accident		—			19.6
Insurance recoveries recognized related to Garner accident		(2.1	)		(45.0	)
Advances from insurance carriers related to Garner accident		16.9			37.7
Proceeds from settlement of interest rate swaps		31.5			—
Loss on sale of fixed assets		7.5			2.8
Asset impairment charges		35.4			8.4
Gain on sale of business		—			(14.3	)
Distributions from affiliates greater (less) than current earnings		(6.8	)		8.7
Contributions to pension plans		(115.7	)		(19.7	)
Share-based payments expense		34.5			41.5
Non-cash interest income on payment-in-kind notes		—			(60.9	)
Receipt of interest on payment-in-kind notes earned in prior years		102.8			—
Gain on collection of payment-in-kind notes		(25.0	)		—
Other items (including noncurrent deferred income taxes)		238.8			40.3
Change in operating assets and liabilities excluding effects of business acquisitions and dispositions:
Accounts receivable		(22.4	)		(91.7	)
Inventory		(311.4	)		32.3
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(17.0	)		52.1
Accounts payable		151.0			81.5
Accrued payroll		(115.3	)		69.9
Other accrued liabilities		110.7			106.0
Net cash flows from operating activities — continuing operations		939.7			1,132.0
Net cash flows from operating activities — discontinued operations		0.2			(25.5	)
Net cash flows from operating activities		939.9			1,106.5
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to property, plant and equipment		(347.4	)		(359.6	)
Sale of property, plant and equipment		1.2			4.4
Advances from insurance carriers related to Garner accident		18.1			17.3
Purchase of businesses and intangible assets		(149.0	)		(3.0	)
Proceeds from collection of payment-in-kind notes		412.5			—
Sale of business, intangibles and other assets		—			21.7
Net cash flows from investing activities — continuing operations		(64.6	)		(319.2	)
Net cash flows from investing activities — discontinued operations		245.7			2.7
Net cash flows from investing activities		181.1			(316.5	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayment of long-term debt		(291.7	)		(12.4	)
Repurchase of ConAgra Foods, Inc. common shares		(662.4	)		—
Cash dividends paid		(276.7	)		(257.9	)
Exercise of stock options and issuance of other stock awards		30.0			18.7
Other items		2.0			2.2
Net cash flows from financing activities — continuing operations		(1,198.8	)		(249.4	)
Net cash flows from financing activities — discontinued operations		(0.1	)		(0.5	)
Net cash flows from financing activities		(1,198.9	)		(249.9	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		7.6			2.3
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(70.3	)		542.4
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		953.2			243.2
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	882.9		$	785.6

     See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Thirty-nine Weeks ended February 27, 2011 and February 28, 2010
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The unaudited financial information reflects all adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations, financial position, and cash flows for the periods presented. The adjustments are of a normal recurring nature, except as otherwise noted. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the ConAgra Foods, Inc. (the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 30, 2010.

The results of operations for any quarter or a partial fiscal year period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for other periods or the full fiscal year.

Basis of Consolidation — The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ConAgra Foods, Inc. and all majority-owned subsidiaries. In addition, the accounts of all variable interest entities for which we have been determined to be the primary beneficiary are included in our condensed consolidated financial statements from the date such determination is made. All significant intercompany investments, accounts, and transactions have been eliminated.

Comprehensive Income — Comprehensive income includes net income, currency translation adjustments, certain derivative-related activity, changes in the value of available-for-sale investments, and changes in prior service cost and net actuarial gains (losses) from pension and postretirement health care plans. We generally deem our foreign investments to be essentially permanent in nature and we do not provide for taxes on currency translation adjustments arising from converting the investment denominated in a foreign currency to U.S. dollars. When we determine that a foreign investment, as well as undistributed earnings, are no longer permanent in nature, estimated taxes are provided for the related deferred tax liability (asset), if any, resulting from currency translation adjustments.

The following details the income tax expense (benefit) on components of other comprehensive income:

	Thirteen weeks ended					Thirty-nine weeks ended
	February 27,		February 28,			February 27,		February 28,
	2011		2010			2011		2010
Net derivative adjustment	$	0.8	$	—		$	0.8	$	0.1
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities		—		(0.1	)		0.1		(0.1	)
Pension and postretirement healthcare liabilities		1.4		(0.2	)		4.3		0.5
	$	2.2	$	(0.3	)	$	5.2	$	0.5

Accounting Changes — In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) amended its guidance on the consolidation of variable interest entities. This guidance requires an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprise’s variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. This analysis identifies the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity as the enterprise that has both of the following characteristics: the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. We adopted the provisions of this guidance effective as of the beginning of our fiscal 2011. The impact of the adoption of this guidance was not material to our financial statements.

Reclassifications — Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with current year presentation.

Use of Estimates — Preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses as reflected in the condensed consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

7

2. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS AND DIVESTITURES

Discontinued Operations

Gilroy Foods & Flavors^TM

During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we completed the sale of substantially all of the assets of Gilroy Foods & Flavors™ dehydrated garlic, onion, capsicum and Controlled Moisture™, GardenFrost^®, Redi-Made™, and fresh vegetable operations for $245.7 million in cash. We reflected the results of these operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented. The assets and liabilities of the discontinued Gilroy Foods & Flavors™ dehydrated vegetable business have been reclassified as assets and liabilities held for sale within our condensed consolidated balance sheet for the period prior to divestiture.

In connection with the sale of this business, we entered into agreements to purchase certain ingredients from the divested business for a period of five years. The continuing cash flows related to these agreements are not significant, and accordingly, are not deemed to be direct cash flows of the divested business.

Summary of Operational Results

The summary comparative financial results of the discontinued operations were as follows:

	Thirteen weeks ended					Thirty-nine weeks ended
	February 27,			February 28,		February 27,			February 28,
	2011			2010		2011			2010
Net sales	$	—		$	66.3	$	40.7		$	215.2
Operating profit (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes		(0.3	)		5.9		3.8			10.6
Gain (loss) from disposal of businesses		(0.2	)		—		0.2			—
Income (loss) before income taxes		(0.5	)		5.9		4.0			10.6
Income tax benefit (expense)		0.5			1.8		(0.8	)		0.7
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax	$	—		$	7.7	$	3.2		$	11.3

Operating results from discontinued operations for the third quarter and first three quarters of fiscal 2011 include the impact of favorable resolutions of foreign tax matters. Results in the first three quarters of fiscal 2010 reflected charges related to certain legal and environmental matters of divested businesses.

The assets and liabilities classified as held for sale as of May 30, 2010 were as follows:

	May 30,
	2010
Receivables, less allowances for doubtful accounts	$	29.0
Inventories		213.3
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1.2
Current assets held for sale	$	243.5
Property, plant and equipment, net	$	30.4
Noncurrent assets held for sale	$	30.4
Current installments of long-term debt	$	0.9
Accounts payable		9.1
Accrued payroll		0.9
Other accrued liabilities		2.5
Current liabilities held for sale	$	13.4
Senior long-term debt, excluding current installments	$	5.2
Noncurrent liabilities held for sale	$	5.2

Other Divestitures

In February 2010, we completed the sale of our Luck’s^® brand for proceeds of $22.0 million in cash, resulting in a pre-tax gain of $14.3 million ($9.0 million after-tax), reflected in selling, general and administrative expenses.

3. ACQUISITIONS

In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we acquired the assets of American Pie, LLC (“American Pie”) for $131.0 million in cash plus assumed liabilities. American Pie is a manufacturer of frozen fruit pies, thaw and serve pies, fruit cobblers, and pie crusts under the licensed Marie Callender’s^® and Claim Jumper^® trade names, as well as frozen dinners, pot

8

pies, and appetizers under the Claim Jumper^® trade name. Approximately $51.5 million of the purchase price was allocated to goodwill and $61.3 million was allocated to brands, trademarks, and other intangibles. The amount allocated to goodwill is deductible for income tax purposes and is primarily attributable to American Pie’s product portfolio, as well as anticipated synergies and other intangibles that do not qualify for separate recognition. This business is included in the Consumer Foods segment.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, we acquired Elan Nutrition, Inc., a privately held formulator and manufacturer of private label snack and nutrition bars, for $103.5 million in cash plus assumed liabilities. Approximately $66.4 million of the purchase price was allocated to goodwill and $33.6 million was allocated to brands, trademarks, and other intangibles. The amount allocated to goodwill is not deductible for income tax purposes and primarily reflects the value of the synergies we expect from the acquisition as well as other intangibles that do not qualify for separate recognition. This business is included in the Consumer Foods segment.

4. PAYMENT-IN-KIND NOTES RECEIVABLE

In connection with the divestiture of the trading and merchandising operations in fiscal 2009, we received $550.0 million (face value) of payment-in-kind debt securities (the “Notes”) issued by the purchaser of the divested business. The Notes were recorded at an initial estimated fair value of $479.4 million.

The Notes were issued in three tranches: $99,990,000 original principal amount of 10.5% notes due June 2010; $200,035,000 original principal amount of 10.75% notes due June 2011; and $249,975,000 original principal amount of 11.0% notes due June 2012. The Notes permitted payment of interest in cash or in additional notes.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, we received $115.4 million as payment in full of all principal and interest due on the first tranche of the Notes, in advance of the scheduled maturity date. During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, we received $554.2 million as payment in full of all principal and interest due on the second and third tranches of the Notes, in advance of the scheduled maturity dates. As a result, we recognized a gain of $25.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2011.

At May 30, 2010, the Notes due in June 2011 and 2012, which were classified as other assets in our condensed consolidated balance sheet, had an aggregate carrying value of $490.2 million.

5. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

Variable Interest Entities Consolidated

We own a 49.99% interest in Lamb Weston BSW, LLC (“Lamb Weston BSW”), a potato processing venture with Ochoa Ag Unlimited Foods, Inc. (“Ochoa”). We provide all sales and marketing services to Lamb Weston BSW. Under certain circumstances, we could be required to compensate the other equity owner of Lamb Weston BSW for lost profits resulting from significant production shortfalls (“production shortfalls”). Commencing on June 1, 2018, or on an earlier date under certain circumstances, we have a contractual right to purchase the remaining equity interest in Lamb Weston BSW from Ochoa (the “call option”). Commencing on July 30, 2011, or on an earlier date under certain circumstances, we are subject to a contractual obligation to purchase all of Ochoa’s equity investment in Lamb Weston BSW at the option of Ochoa (the “put option”). The purchase prices under the call option and the put option (the “options”) are based on the book value of Ochoa’s equity interest at the date of exercise, as modified by an agreed-upon rate of return for the holding period of the investment balance. The agreed-upon rate of return varies depending on the circumstances under which any of the options are exercised. We have determined that Lamb Weston BSW is a variable interest entity and that we are the primary beneficiary of the entity. Accordingly, we consolidate the financial statements of Lamb Weston BSW.

As of February 27, 2011, we provide lines of credit of up to $15.0 million to Lamb Weston BSW. Borrowings under the lines of credit bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 200 basis points with a floor of 3.25%. In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we repaid $35.4 million of bank borrowings of Lamb Weston BSW and took assignment of a promissory note from the joint venture, the balance of which was $36.1 million at February 27, 2011. The promissory note is due in December 2015. The promissory note is currently accruing interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 200 basis points with a floor of 3.25%. The amounts owed by Lamb Weston BSW to the Company are not reflected in our balance sheets, as they are eliminated in consolidation.

Our variable interests in Lamb Weston BSW include an equity investment in the venture, the options, the promissory note, certain fees paid to us by Lamb Weston BSW for sales and marketing services, the contingent obligation related to production shortfalls, and the lines of credit advanced to Lamb Weston BSW. Our maximum exposure to loss as a result of our involvement with this venture is equal to our equity investment in the venture, the balance of the promissory note extended to the venture, the amount, if any, advanced under the lines of credit, and the amount, if any, by which the put option exercise price exceeds the fair value of the noncontrolling interest in Lamb Weston BSW on,

9

or after, the put option exercise date. Also, in the event of a production shortfall, we could be required to compensate the other equity owner of Lamb Weston BSW for lost profits. It is not possible to determine the maximum exposure to losses from the potential exercise of the put option or from potential production shortfalls. However, we do not expect to incur material losses resulting from these exposures.

We also consolidate the assets and liabilities of several entities from which we lease corporate aircraft. Each of these entities has been determined to be a variable interest entity and we have been determined to be the primary beneficiary of each of these entities. Under the terms of the aircraft leases, we provide guarantees to the owners of these entities of a minimum residual value of the aircraft at the end of the lease term. We also have fixed price purchase options on the aircraft leased from these entities. Our maximum exposure to loss from our involvement with these entities is limited to the difference between the fair value of the leased aircraft and the amount of the residual value guarantees at the time we terminate the leases (the leases expire between December 2011 and October 2012). The total amount of the residual value guarantees for these aircraft at the end of the respective lease terms is $38.4 million.

10

Due to the consolidation of these variable interest entities, we reflected in our condensed consolidated balance sheets:

	February 27,		May 30,
	2011		2010
Cash and cash equivalents	$	6.3	$	—
Receivables, net		15.1		16.9
Inventories		1.5		1.4
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		0.1		0.3
Property, plant and equipment, net		92.1		96.5
Goodwill		18.8		18.8
Brands, trademarks and other intangibles, net		9.1		9.8
Total assets	$	143.0	$	143.7
Current installments of long-term debt	$	8.7	$	6.4
Accounts payable		11.4		12.2
Accrued payroll		0.5		0.3
Other accrued liabilities		0.8		0.7
Senior long-term debt, excluding current installments		35.8		76.8
Other noncurrent liabilities (noncontrolling interest)		25.9		24.8
Total liabilities	$	83.1	$	121.2

The liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating the Lamb Weston BSW entity do not represent additional claims on our general assets. The creditors of Lamb Weston BSW have claims only on the assets of Lamb Weston BSW. The assets recognized as a result of consolidating Lamb Weston BSW are the property of the venture and are not available to us for any other purpose, other than as a secured lender under the promissory note and lines of credit.

Variable Interest Entities Not Consolidated

We also have variable interests in certain other entities that we have determined to be variable interest entities, but for which we are not the primary beneficiary. We do not consolidate the financial statements of these entities.

We hold a 50% interest in Lamb Weston RDO, a potato processing venture. We provide all sales and marketing services to Lamb Weston RDO. We receive a fee for these services based on a percentage of the net sales of the venture. We reflect the value of our ownership interest in this venture in other assets in our condensed consolidated balance sheets, based upon the equity method of accounting. The balance of our investment was $12.6 million and $13.8 million at February 27, 2011 and May 30, 2010, respectively, representing our maximum exposure to loss as a result of our involvement with this venture. The capital structure of Lamb Weston RDO includes owners’ equity of $25.2 million and term borrowings from banks of $47.8 million as of February 27, 2011. We have determined that we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of this venture.

We lease certain office buildings from entities that we have determined to be variable interest entities. The lease agreements with these entities include fixed-price purchase options for the assets being leased, representing our only variable interest in these lessor entities. These leases are accounted for as operating leases, and accordingly, there are no material assets or liabilities associated with these entities included in our balance sheets. We have no material exposure to loss from our variable interests in these entities. We have determined that we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of these entities. In making this determination, we have considered, among other items, the terms of the lease agreements, the expected remaining useful lives of the assets leased, and the capital structure of the lessor entities.

6. GARNER, NORTH CAROLINA ACCIDENT

On June 9, 2009, an accidental explosion occurred at our manufacturing facility in Garner, North Carolina (the “Garner accident”). This facility was the primary production facility for our Slim Jim^® branded meat snacks. On June 13, 2009, the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives announced its determination that the explosion was the result of an accidental natural gas release, and not a deliberate act.

The costs incurred and insurance recoveries recognized in the third quarter and first three quarters of fiscal 2011 related to the Garner accident were not material.

The costs incurred and insurance recoveries recognized, in the third quarter and first three quarters of fiscal 2010, are reflected in our condensed consolidated financial statements, as follows:

11

	Thirteen weeks ended February 28, 2010								Thirty-nine weeks ended February 28, 2010
	Consumer								Consumer
	Foods			Corporate		Total			Foods			Corporate		Total
Cost of goods sold:
Inventory write-downs and other costs	$	0.9		$	—	$	0.9		$	11.5		$	—	$	11.5
Selling, general and administrative expenses:
Fixed asset impairments, clean-up costs, etc.	$	2.3		$	0.9	$	3.2		$	35.1		$	2.2	$	37.3
Insurance recoveries recognized		(4.0	)		—		(4.0	)		(45.0	)		—		(45.0	)
Total selling, general and administrative expenses	$	(1.7	)	$	0.9	$	(0.8	)	$	(9.9	)	$	2.2	$	(7.7	)
Net loss (gain)	$	(0.8	)	$	0.9	$	0.1		$	1.6		$	2.2	$	3.8

The amounts in the table above exclude lost profits due to the interruption of the meat snacks business.

Through February 27, 2011, we had received payment advances from the insurers of $120.0 million for our initial insurance claims for this matter, $60.2 million of which has been recognized as a reduction to selling, general and administrative expenses (primarily in fiscal 2010), largely offsetting the cumulative charges of $64.1 million recognized to date in connection with the event. The deferred balance of $59.8 million is classified as other accrued liabilities within our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of February 27, 2011, in accordance with applicable accounting guidance.

Subsequent to the end of our fiscal 2011 third quarter, we reached a settlement in principle with our insurance providers under which we will receive additional payments totaling $47.5 million. We will recognize a gain of approximately $108 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 in connection with this settlement.

7. GOODWILL AND OTHER IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The change in the carrying amount of goodwill for the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 was as follows:

	Consumer		Commercial
	Foods		Foods		Total
Balance as of May 30, 2010	$	3,423.5	$	128.6	$	3,552.1
Acquisitions		51.5		—		51.5
Translation and other		6.7		0.8		7.5
Balance as of February 27, 2011	$	3,481.7	$	129.4	$	3,611.1

Other identifiable intangible assets were as follows:

	February 27, 2011				May 30, 2010
	Gross				Gross
	Carrying		Accumulated		Carrying		Accumulated
	Amount		Amortization		Amount		Amortization
Non-amortizing intangible assets	$	771.2	$	—	$	771.2	$	—
Amortizing intangible assets		214.1		44.2		134.8		31.2
	$	985.3	$	44.2	$	906.0	$	31.2

12

Non-amortizing intangible assets are comprised of brands and trademarks.

Amortizing intangible assets, carrying a weighted average life of approximately 13 years, are principally composed of licensing arrangements, customer relationships, and intellectual property. Based on amortizing assets recognized in our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of February 27, 2011, amortization expense is estimated to average $16.7 million for each of the next five years.

8. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Our operations are exposed to market risks from adverse changes in: commodity prices affecting the cost of raw materials and energy, foreign currency exchange rates, and interest rates. In the normal course of business, these risks are managed through a variety of strategies, including the use of derivatives.

Commodity futures and option contracts are used from time to time to economically hedge commodity input prices on items such as natural gas, vegetable oils, proteins, dairy, grains, and electricity. Generally, we economically hedge a portion of our anticipated consumption of commodity inputs for periods of up to 36 months. We may enter into longer-term economic hedges on particular commodities, if deemed appropriate. As of February 27, 2011, we had economically hedged certain portions of our anticipated consumption of commodity inputs using derivative instruments with expiration dates through September 2012.

In order to reduce exposures related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, when deemed prudent, we enter into forward exchange, option, or swap contracts for transactions denominated in a currency other than the applicable functional currency. This includes, but is not limited to, hedging against foreign currency risk in purchasing inventory and capital equipment, sales of finished goods, and future settlement of foreign-denominated assets and liabilities. As of February 27, 2011, we had economically hedged certain portions of our foreign currency risk in anticipated transactions using derivative instruments with expiration dates through May 2017.

From time to time, we may use derivative instruments, including interest rate swaps, to reduce risk related to changes in interest rates. This includes, but is not limited to, hedging against increasing interest rates prior to the issuance of long-term debt and hedging the fair value of our senior long-term debt.

Derivatives Designated as Cash Flow Hedges

During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, we entered into interest rate swap contracts to hedge the interest rate risk related to our forecasted issuance of long-term debt in 2014 (based on the anticipated refinancing of the senior long-term debt maturing at that time). We designated this interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge of the forecasted interest payments related to this debt issuance (the term of the forecasted debt issuance is thirty years). The unrealized gain associated with this derivative, which is deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss at February 27, 2011, is $2.0 million.

The net notional amount of these interest rate derivatives at February 27, 2011 was $250.0 million.

Derivatives Designated as Fair Value Hedges

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, we entered into interest rate swap contracts to hedge the change in the fair value of certain of our senior long-term debt instruments maturing in fiscal 2012 and 2015 due to changes in the benchmark interest rate. The interest rate swaps effectively changed our interest rates on the senior long-term debt instruments from fixed to variable. We designated these interest rate swap contracts as fair value hedges of the senior long-term debt instruments.

Changes in fair value of derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges are immediately recognized in earnings along with changes in the fair value of the items being hedged (based solely on the change in the benchmark interest rate). These gains and losses are classified within selling, general and administrative expenses. During the first half of fiscal 201l, a net gain of $23.0 million was recognized on the interest rate swap contracts and a net loss of $29.7 million was recognized on the senior long-term debt.

We terminated these interest rate swap contracts during the second quarter of fiscal 2011. As a result of this termination, we received proceeds of $31.5 million. The cumulative adjustment to the fair value of the debt instruments being hedged, $34.8 million, is being amortized as a reduction of interest expense over the remaining lives of the debt instruments (through fiscal 2015).

The entire change in fair value of the derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges was included in our assessment of hedge effectiveness.

The net notional amount of these interest rate derivatives outstanding at May 30, 2010 was $842.7 million.

13

Economic Hedges of Forecasted Cash Flows

Many of our derivatives do not qualify for, and we do not currently designate certain commodity and foreign currency derivatives to achieve, hedge accounting treatment. We reflect realized and unrealized gains and losses from derivatives used to economically hedge anticipated commodity consumption and to mitigate foreign currency cash flow risk in earnings immediately within general corporate expense (within cost of goods sold). The gains and losses are reclassified to segment operating results in the period in which the underlying item being economically hedged is recognized in cost of goods sold.

Economic Hedges of Fair Values — Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

We may use cross currency swaps to economically hedge the fair value of certain monetary assets and liabilities (including intercompany balances) denominated in a currency other than the functional currency. These derivatives are marked-to-market with gains and losses immediately recognized in selling, general and administrative expenses. These substantially offset the foreign currency transaction gains or losses recognized on the monetary assets or liabilities being economically hedged.

Derivative Activity in Our Milling Operations

We also use derivative instruments within our milling operations, which are part of the Commercial Foods segment. Derivative instruments used to economically hedge commodity inventories and forward purchase and sales contracts within the milling operations are marked-to-market such that realized and unrealized gains and losses are immediately included in operating results. The underlying inventory and forward contracts being hedged are also marked-to-market with changes in market value recognized immediately in operating results.

For commodity derivative trading activities within our milling operations that are not intended to mitigate commodity input cost risk, the derivative instrument is marked-to-market each period with gains and losses included in net sales of the Commercial Foods segment. There were no material gains or losses from derivative trading activities in the periods being reported.

All derivative instruments are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value. The fair value of derivative assets is recognized within prepaid expenses and other current assets, while the fair value of derivative liabilities is recognized within other accrued liabilities. In accordance with FASB guidance, we offset certain derivative asset and liability balances, as well as certain amounts representing rights to reclaim cash collateral and obligations to return cash collateral, where legal right of setoff exists. At February 27, 2011 and May 30, 2010, amounts representing an obligation to return cash collateral of $5.8 million and a right to reclaim cash collateral of $8.6 million, respectively, were included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Derivative assets and liabilities and amounts representing a right to reclaim cash collateral or obligation to return cash collateral were reflected in our condensed consolidated balance sheets as follows:

	February 27,		May 30,
	2011		2010
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	86.3	$	61.8
Other accrued liabilities		81.6		10.1

The following table presents our derivative assets and liabilities, on a gross basis, prior to the offsetting of amounts where legal right of setoff existed at February 27, 2011:

	Derivative Assets			Derivative Liabilities
	Balance Sheet			Balance Sheet
	Location	Fair Value		Location	Fair Value
Interest rate contracts	Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	2.0	Other accrued liabilities	$	—
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments		$	2.0		$	—
Commodity contracts	Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	111.8	Other accrued liabilities	$	84.0
Foreign exchange contracts	Prepaid expenses and other current assets		—	Other accrued liabilities		20.2
Other	Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1.2	Other accrued liabilities		0.3
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments		$	113.0		$	104.5
Total derivatives		$	115.0		$	104.5

14

The following table presents our derivative assets and liabilities, on a gross basis, prior to the offsetting of amounts where legal right of setoff existed at May 30, 2010:

	Derivative Assets			Derivative Liabilities
	Balance Sheet			Balance Sheet
	Location	Fair Value		Location	Fair Value
Interest rate contracts	Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	8.5	Other accrued liabilities	$	—
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments		$	8.5		$	—
Commodity contracts	Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	48.7	Other accrued liabilities	$	20.0
Foreign exchange contracts	Prepaid expenses and other current assets		8.1	Other accrued liabilities		1.3
Other	Prepaid expenses and other current assets		—	Other accrued liabilities		0.9
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments		$	56.8		$	22.2
Total derivatives		$	65.3		$	22.2

The location and amount of gains (losses) from derivatives not designated as hedging instruments in our statements of earnings were as follows:

	Location in
	Condensed Consolidated	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized on
	Statement	Derivatives in Condensed
Derivatives Not	of Earnings of Gain	Consolidated Statement of
Designated as Hedging	(Loss) Recognized	Earnings for the Thirteen Weeks Ended
Instruments	on Derivatives	February 27, 2011			February 28, 2010
Commodity contracts	Cost of goods sold	$	17.8		$	21.9
Foreign exchange contracts	Cost of goods sold		(7.1	)		2.4
Commodity contracts	Selling, general and administrative expense		2.5			—
Foreign exchange contracts	Selling, general and administrative expense		(6.4	)		—
Total gain from derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments		$	6.8		$	24.3

	Location in
	Condensed Consolidated	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized on
	Statement	Derivatives in Condensed
	of Earnings of Gain	Consolidated Statement of Earnings
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging	(Loss) Recognized	for the Thirty-nine Weeks Ended
Instruments	on Derivatives	February 27, 2011			February 28, 2010
Commodity contracts	Cost of goods sold	$	27.5		$	101.7
Foreign exchange contracts	Cost of goods sold		(19.4	)		(4.4	)
Commodity Contracts	Selling, general and administrative expense		2.5			—
Foreign exchange contracts	Selling, general and administrative expense		(8.8	)		—
Total gain from derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments		$	1.8		$	97.3

As of February 27, 2011, our open commodity contracts had a notional value (defined as notional quantity times market value per notional quantity unit) of $1.0 billion and $1.3 billion for purchase and sales contracts, respectively.

15

As of May 30, 2010, our open commodity contracts had a notional value of $563.7 million and $577.1 million for purchase and sales contracts, respectively. The notional amount of our foreign currency forward and cross currency swap contracts as of February 27, 2011, and May 30, 2010 was $239.2 million and $240.0 million, respectively. In addition, we held foreign currency option collar contracts with notional amounts of $114.1 million and $97.2 million as of February 27, 2011 and May 30, 2010, respectively.

We enter into certain commodity, interest rate, and foreign exchange derivatives with a diversified group of counterparties. We monitor our positions and the credit ratings of the counterparties involved and limit the amount of credit exposure to any one party. These transactions may expose us to potential losses due to the risk of nonperformance by these counterparties. We have not incurred a material loss due to nonperformance in any period presented and do not expect to incur any such material loss. We also enter into futures and options transactions through various regulated exchanges.

At February 27, 2011, the maximum amount of loss due to the credit risk of the counterparties, had the counterparties failed to perform according to the terms of the contracts, was $68.9 million.

9. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS

For the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended February 27, 2011, we recognized total stock-based compensation expense (including stock options, restricted stock units, and performance shares) of $11.8 million and $34.5 million, respectively. For the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended February 28, 2010, we recognized total stock-based compensation expense of $15.3 million and $42.0 million, respectively. During the first three quarters of fiscal 2011, we granted 1.4 million restricted stock units at a weighted average grant date price of $23.79, 6.2 million stock options at a weighted average exercise price of $23.80, and 0.5 million performance shares at a weighted average grant date price of $21.43.

The performance shares are granted to selected executives and other key employees with vesting contingent upon meeting various Company-wide performance goals. The performance goals are based upon our earnings before interest and taxes and our return on average invested capital measured over a defined performance period. The awards actually earned will range from zero to three hundred percent of the targeted number of the performance shares granted in fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 and from zero to two hundred percent of the targeted number of the performance shares granted in fiscal 2011, and will in each case be paid in shares of common stock. Subject to limited exceptions set forth in the plan, any shares earned will be distributed at the end of the defined performance period. The value of the performance shares granted in fiscal 2009, 2010, and 2011 is adjusted based upon the market price of our stock at the end of each reporting period and amortized as compensation expense over the vesting period.

The weighted average Black-Scholes assumptions for stock options granted during the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 were as follows:

Expected volatility (%)	22.83
Dividend yield (%)	3.51
Risk-free interest rate (%)	1.72
Expected life of stock option (years)	4.82

The weighted average value of stock options granted during the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 was $3.31 per option, based upon a Black-Scholes methodology.

10. EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share is calculated on the basis of weighted average outstanding common shares. Diluted earnings per share is computed on the basis of basic weighted average outstanding common shares adjusted for the dilutive effect of stock options, restricted stock awards, and other dilutive securities.

16

The following table reconciles the income and average share amounts used to compute both basic and diluted earnings per share:

	Thirteen weeks ended					Thirty-nine weeks ended
	February 27,		February 28,			February 27,			February 28,
	2011		2010			2011			2010
Net income available to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders:
Income from continuing operations attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders	$	214.8	$	221.9		$	558.9		$	623.9
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax, attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders		—		7.7			3.2			11.3
Net income attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders	$	214.8	$	229.6		$	562.1		$	635.2
Add/(subtract): Change in redemption value of noncontrolling interests in excess of earnings allocated		0.8		(0.8	)		(1.5	)		(1.4	)
Net income available to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders	$	215.6	$	228.8		$	560.6		$	633.8
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic weighted average shares outstanding		428.4		444.0			435.5			443.5
Add: Dilutive effect of stock options, restricted stock awards, and other dilutive securities		4.4		4.3			4.2			2.9
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding		432.8		448.3			439.7			446.4

For the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended February 27, 2011, there were 19.1 million and 19.9 million stock options outstanding, respectively, that were excluded from the computation of shares contingently issuable upon exercise of the stock options because exercise prices exceeded the average market value of our common stock during the period. For the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended February 28, 2010, there were 13.1 million and 29.5 million stock options, respectively, excluded from the calculation.

11. INVENTORIES

The major classes of inventories were as follows:

	February 27,		May 30,
	2011		2010
Raw materials and packaging	$	693.7	$	481.0
Work in process		109.8		95.9
Finished goods		1,043.4		945.0
Supplies and other		85.8		84.6
	$	1,932.7	$	1,606.5

17

12. RESTRUCTURING

During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, our Board of Directors approved a plan recommended by executive management designed to optimize our manufacturing and distribution networks. The plan consists of projects that will involve, among other things, the exit of certain manufacturing facilities, the disposal of underutilized manufacturing assets, and actions designed to optimize our distribution network. The plan is expected to be implemented over an 18 month period and is intended to improve the efficiency of our manufacturing operations and reduce costs. This plan is referred to as the 2011 restructuring plan (“2011 plan”).

In connection with the 2011 plan, we expect to incur pre-tax cash and non-cash charges for asset impairments, accelerated depreciation, severance, relocation, and site closure costs of $55.5 million. We have recognized, and/or expect to recognize, expenses associated with the 2011 plan, including but not limited to, impairments of property, plant and equipment, accelerated depreciation, severance and related costs, and plan implementation costs (e.g., consulting, employee relocation, etc.). We anticipate that we will recognize the following pre-tax expenses associated with the 2011 plan in the fiscal 2011 to 2013 timeframe (amounts include charges recognized during the third quarter of fiscal 2011):

	Consumer		Commercial
	Foods		Foods		Total
Accelerated depreciation	$	14.0	$	—	$	14.0
Inventory write-offs and related costs		4.5		—		4.5
Total cost of goods sold		18.5		—		18.5
Asset impairment		8.5		10.2		18.7
Severance and related costs		8.4		—		8.4
Other, net		7.1		2.8		9.9
Total selling, general and administrative expenses		24.0		13.0		37.0
Consolidated total	$	42.5	$	13.0	$	55.5

Included in the above estimates are $20.7 million of charges which have resulted or will result in cash outflows and $34.8 million of non-cash charges.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, we recognized the following pre-tax charges in our condensed consolidated statement of earnings for the 2011 plan:

	Consumer		Commercial
	Foods		Foods		Total
Asset impairment	$	8.5	$	10.2	$	18.7
Severance and related costs		6.0		—		6.0
Total selling, general and administrative expenses		14.5		10.2		24.7
Consolidated total	$	14.5	$	10.2	$	24.7

At February 27, 2011, we had recorded an accrual of approximately $5.8 million related to severance costs within other accrued liabilities related to the 2011 plan in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, our Board of Directors approved a plan recommended by executive management related to the long-term production of our meat snack products. The plan provides for the closure of our meat snacks production facility in Garner, North Carolina, and the movement of production to our existing facility in Troy, Ohio. Since the Garner accident, the Troy facility has been producing a portion of our meat snack products. Upon completion of the plan’s implementation, which is expected to be in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, the Troy facility will be our primary meat snacks production facility. The plan is expected to result in the termination of approximately 500 employee positions in Garner and the creation of approximately 200 employee positions in Troy.

Also in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, we made a decision to move certain administrative functions from Edina, Minnesota, to Naperville, Illinois. We completed the transition of these functions in the first half of fiscal 2011. This plan, together with the plan to move production of our meat snacks from Garner, North Carolina to Troy, Ohio, is collectively referred to as the 2010 restructuring plan (“2010 plan”).

In connection with the 2010 plan, we expect to incur pre-tax cash and non-cash charges for asset impairments, accelerated depreciation, severance, relocation, and site closure costs of $71.3 million, of which $39.2 million was recognized in fiscal 2010. We have recognized expenses associated with the 2010 plan, including but not limited to,

18

impairments of property, plant and equipment, accelerated depreciation, severance and related costs, and plan implementation costs (e.g., consulting, employee relocation, etc.). We anticipate that we will recognize the following pre-tax expenses associated with the 2010 plan in the fiscal 2010 to 2012 timeframe (amounts include charges recognized in fiscal 2010 and in the first three quarters of fiscal 2011):

	Consumer
	Foods		Corporate		Total
Accelerated depreciation	$	21.2	$	—	$	21.2
Inventory write-offs		1.2		—		1.2
Total cost of goods sold		22.4		—		22.4
Asset impairment		16.5		—		16.5
Severance and related costs		15.9		—		15.9
Other, net		12.9		3.6		16.5
Total selling, general and administrative expenses		45.3		3.6		48.9
Consolidated total	$	67.7	$	3.6	$	71.3

Included in the above estimates are $30.5 million of charges which have resulted or will result in cash outflows and $40.8 million of non-cash charges.

19

During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, we recognized the following pre-tax charges in our condensed consolidated statement of earnings for the 2010 plan:

	Consumer
	Foods		Corporate		Total
Accelerated depreciation	$	5.3	$	—	$	5.3
Inventory write-offs		0.6		—		0.6
Total cost of goods sold		5.9		—		5.9
Severance and related costs		0.4		—		0.4
Other, net		1.4		—		1.4
Total selling, general and administrative expenses		1.8		—		1.8
Consolidated total	$	7.7	$	—	$	7.7

During the first three quarters of fiscal 2011, we recognized the following pre-tax charges in our condensed consolidated statement of earnings for the 2010 plan:

	Consumer
	Foods		Corporate		Total
Accelerated depreciation	$	12.1	$	—	$	12.1
Inventory write-offs		0.6		—		0.6
Total cost of goods sold		12.7		—		12.7
Severance and related costs		1.1		—		1.1
Other, net		6.3		0.1		6.4
Total selling, general and administrative expenses		7.4		0.1		7.5
Consolidated total	$	20.1	$	0.1	$	20.2

We recognized the following cumulative (plan inception to February 27, 2011) pre-tax charges related to the 2010 plan in our condensed consolidated statement of earnings:

	Consumer
	Foods		Corporate		Total
Accelerated depreciation	$	15.4	$	—	$	15.4
Inventory write-offs		0.6		—		0.6
Total cost of goods sold		16.0		—		16.0
Asset Impairment		16.5		—		16.5
Severance and related costs		15.4		—		15.4
Other, net		8.0		3.6		11.6
Total selling, general and administrative expenses		39.9		3.6		43.5
Consolidated total	$	55.9	$	3.6	$	59.5

Liabilities recorded for the various initiatives and changes therein for the third quarter of fiscal 2011 under the 2010 plan were as follows:

	Balance at		Costs Incurred							Balance at
	November 28,		and Charged		Costs Paid			Changes in		February 27,
	2010		to Expense		or Otherwise Settled			Estimates		2011
Severance and related costs	$	11.6	$	0.4	$	(1.4	)	$	—	$	10.6
Plan implementation costs		0.8		1.3		(1.3	)		—		0.8
Other costs		3.0		—		—			—		3.0
Total	$	15.4	$	1.7	$	(2.7	)	$	—	$	14.4

20

13. INCOME TAXES

Our income tax expense from continuing operations for the third quarter of fiscal 2011 and 2010 was $117.0 million and $102.6 million, respectively. Income tax expense from continuing operations for the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 and 2010 was $285.4 million and $305.5 million, respectively. The effective tax rate (calculated as the ratio of income tax expense to pre-tax income from continuing operations, inclusive of equity method investment earnings) from continuing operations was approximately 35% and 34% for the third quarter and first three quarters of fiscal 2011, respectively, and 32% and 33% for the third quarter and first three quarters of fiscal 2010, respectively. The effective tax rate for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 reflected the benefit of favorable audit settlements and changes in estimates. The effective tax rate for the first three quarters of fiscal 2010 reflected a benefit of approximately 1% from certain income tax credits and deductions identified in the current period related to prior periods.

The amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions, including positions impacting only the timing of tax benefits, was $59.1 million as of February 27, 2011 and $53.4 million as of May 30, 2010. Included in the balance was $3.3 million as of February 27, 2011, and $4.6 million as of May 30, 2010 for tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility. Because of the impact of deferred tax accounting, the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period. Any associated interest and penalties imposed would affect the tax rate. The gross unrecognized tax benefits excluded related liabilities for gross interest and penalties of $14.8 million and $14.8 million as of February 27, 2011 and May 30, 2010, respectively.

The net amount of unrecognized tax benefits at February 27, 2011 and May 30, 2010 that, if recognized, would impact the Company’s effective tax rate was $37.5 million and $32.6 million, respectively. Recognition of these tax benefits would have a favorable impact on the Company’s effective tax rate.

We estimate that it is reasonably possible that the amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by an amount up to $5 million over the next twelve months due to various federal, state, and foreign audit settlements and the expiration of statutes of limitations.

14. CONTINGENCIES

In fiscal 1991, we acquired Beatrice Company (“Beatrice”). As a result of the acquisition and the significant pre-acquisition contingencies of the Beatrice businesses and its former subsidiaries, our consolidated post-acquisition financial statements reflect liabilities associated with the estimated resolution of these contingencies. These include various litigation and environmental proceedings related to businesses divested by Beatrice prior to its acquisition by us. The litigation includes suits against a number of lead paint and pigment manufacturers, including ConAgra Grocery Products and the Company as alleged successors to W. P. Fuller Co., a lead paint and pigment manufacturer owned and operated by Beatrice until 1967. Although decisions favorable to us have been rendered in Rhode Island, New Jersey, Wisconsin, and Ohio, we remain a defendant in active suits in Illinois and California. The Illinois suit seeks class-wide relief in the form of medical monitoring for elevated levels of lead in blood. In California, a number of cities and counties joined in a consolidated action seeking abatement of the alleged public nuisance.

The environmental proceedings include litigation and administrative proceedings involving Beatrice’s status as a potentially responsible party at 37 Superfund, proposed Superfund, or state-equivalent sites; these sites involve locations previously owned or operated by predecessors of Beatrice that used or produced petroleum, pesticides, fertilizers, dyes, inks, solvents, PCBs, acids, lead, sulfur, tannery wastes, and/or other contaminants. Beatrice has paid or is in the process of paying its liability share at 34 of these sites. Reserves for these matters have been established based on our best estimate of the undiscounted remediation liabilities, which estimates include evaluation of investigatory studies, extent of required clean-up, the known volumetric contribution of Beatrice and other potentially responsible parties, and its experience in remediating sites. The reserves for Beatrice environmental matters totaled $70.5 million as of February 27, 2011, a majority of which relates to the Superfund and state-equivalent sites referenced above. We expect expenditures for Beatrice environmental matters to continue for up to 20 years.

In limited situations, we will guarantee an obligation of an unconsolidated entity. At the time in which we initially provide such a guarantee, we assess the risk of financial exposure to us under these agreements. We consider the credit-worthiness of the guaranteed party, the value of any collateral pledged against the related obligation, and any other factors that may mitigate our risk. We actively monitor market and entity-specific conditions that may result in a change of our assessment of the risk of loss under these agreements.

21

We guarantee certain leases and other commercial obligations resulting from the divestiture of our fresh beef and pork operations. The remaining terms of these arrangements do not exceed five years and the maximum amount of future payments we have guaranteed was $14.1 million as of February 27, 2011.

We have also guaranteed the performance of the divested fresh beef and pork business with respect to a hog purchase contract. The hog purchase contract requires the divested fresh beef and pork business to purchase a minimum of approximately 1.2 million hogs annually through 2014. The contract stipulates minimum price commitments, based in part on market prices, and, in certain circumstances, also includes price adjustments based on certain inputs. We have not established a liability for any of the fresh beef and pork divestiture-related guarantees, as we have determined that the likelihood of our required performance under the guarantees is remote.

We are a party to various potato supply agreements. Under the terms of certain such potato supply agreements, we have guaranteed repayment of short-term bank loans of the potato suppliers, under certain conditions. At February 27, 2011, the amount of supplier loans we have effectively guaranteed was $3.1 million. We have not established a liability for these guarantees, as we have determined that the likelihood of our required performance under the guarantees is remote.

We are a party to various agreements with an onion processing company. We have guaranteed, under certain conditions, repayment of a portion of the loan held by this supplier for its onion processing related operations. At February 27, 2011, the amount of our guarantee was $25.0 million. In the event of default on this loan by the supplier, we have the contractual right to purchase the loan from the lender, thereby giving us secured rights to the underlying collateral. We have not established a liability in connection with this guarantee, as we believe the likelihood of financial exposure to us under this guarantee is remote.

Federal income tax credits were generated related to our sweet potato production facility in Delhi, Louisiana. Third parties invested in certain of these income tax credits. We have guaranteed these third parties the face value of these income tax credits over their statutory lives, a period of seven years, in the event that the income tax credits are recaptured or reduced. The face value of the income tax credits was $21.2 million as of February 27, 2011. We believe the likelihood of the recapture or reduction of the income tax credits is remote, and therefore we have not established a liability in connection with this guarantee.

We are a party to a number of lawsuits and claims arising out of the operation of our business, including lawsuits and claims related to the February 2007 recall of our peanut butter products and litigation we initiated against an insurance carrier to recover our settlement expenditures and defense costs. We recognized a charge of $24.8 million during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 in connection with the disputed coverage with this insurance carrier. During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, a Delaware state court rendered a decision on certain matters in our claim for the disputed coverage favorable to the insurance carrier. We have appealed this decision and continue to pursue this matter vigorously. Subsequent to the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2011, we received formal requests from the U.S. Attorney’s office in Georgia seeking a variety of records and information related to the operations of our peanut butter manufacturing facility in Sylvester, Georgia. The Company believes these requests are related to the previously disclosed June 2007 execution of a search warrant at the facility following the February 2007 recall of our peanut butter products. The Company is cooperating with officials in regard to the requests.

In June 2009, an accidental explosion occurred at our manufacturing facility in Garner, North Carolina. See Note 6 for information related to this matter.

We are a party to several lawsuits concerning the use of diacetyl, a butter flavoring ingredient that was added to our microwave popcorn until late 2007. The cases are primarily consumer personal injury suits claiming respiratory illness allegedly due to exposures to vapors from microwaving popcorn. Another case involved a putative class action contending that our packaging information with respect to diacetyl is false and misleading. Through the third quarter of fiscal 2011, we have received a favorable verdict, summary judgment ruling, and two dismissals in connection with these suits, and the class action motion in the packaging suit was denied. The verdict and the favorable summary judgment ruling have been appealed. We do not believe these cases possess merit and continue to vigorously defend them.

After taking into account liabilities recognized for all of the foregoing matters, management believes the ultimate resolution of such matters should not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity. It is reasonably possible that a change in one of the estimates of the foregoing matters may occur in the future. Costs of legal services are recognized in earnings as services are provided.

15. PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS

22

We have defined benefit retirement plans (“plans”) for eligible salaried and hourly employees. Benefits are based on years of credited service and average compensation or stated amounts for each year of service. We also sponsor postretirement plans which provide certain medical and dental benefits (“other postretirement benefits”) to qualifying U.S. employees.

Components of pension benefit and other postretirement benefit costs included:

	Pension Benefits
	Thirteen weeks ended						Thirty-nine weeks ended
	February 27,			February 28,			February 27,			February 28,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Service cost	$	14.9		$	12.5		$	44.7		$	37.5
Interest cost		36.8			37.0			110.6			111.0
Expected return on plan assets		(43.2	)		(40.3	)		(129.8	)		(120.9	)
Amortization of prior service cost		0.8			0.8			2.4			2.4
Settlement cost		—			—			—			1.9
Curtailment loss		0.1			—			1.4			—
Recognized net actuarial loss		4.1			1.0			12.3			2.9
Benefit cost — Company plans		13.5			11.0			41.6			34.8
Pension benefit cost — multi-employer plans		2.5			2.0			7.6			7.6
Total benefit cost	$	16.0		$	13.0		$	49.2		$	42.4

	Postretirement Benefits
	Thirteen weeks ended						Thirty-nine weeks ended
	February 27,			February 28,			February 27,			February 28,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Service cost	$	0.2		$	0.1		$	0.5		$	0.3
Interest cost		4.0			4.5			12.1			13.5
Expected return on plan assets		—			(0.1	)		(0.1	)		(0.3	)
Amortization of prior service cost		(2.5	)		(2.4	)		(7.2	)		(7.1	)
Recognized net actuarial loss		1.2			—			3.5			—
Total cost	$	2.9		$	2.1		$	8.8		$	6.4

During the third quarter and first three quarters of fiscal 2011, we contributed $3.7 million and $115.7 million, respectively, to our pension plans and contributed $8.1 million and $22.7 million, respectively, to our other postretirement plans. Based upon the current funded status of the plans and the current interest rate environment, we anticipate making further contributions of $6.9 million to our pension plans for the remainder of fiscal 2011. We anticipate making further contributions of $9.3 million to our other postretirement plans during the remainder of fiscal 2011. These estimates are based on current tax laws, plan asset performance, and liability assumptions, all of which are subject to change.

16. LONG-TERM DEBT

During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we repaid the entire principal balance of $248.0 million of our 7.875% senior notes, which were due September 15, 2010.

We consolidate the financial statements of Lamb Weston BSW. In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we repaid $35.4 million of bank borrowings by our Lamb Weston BSW potato processing venture.

Net interest expense consisted of:

	Thirteen weeks ended						Thirty-nine weeks ended
	February 27,			February 28,			February 27,			February 28,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Long-term debt	$	56.5		$	64.1		$	173.1		$	192.6
Short-term debt		—			—			0.2			0.1
Interest income		(2.5	)		(21.5	)		(41.3	)		(62.4	)
Interest capitalized		(2.4	)		(2.9	)		(9.4	)		(8.7	)
	$	51.6		$	39.7		$	122.6		$	121.6

Our net interest expense for the third quarter and first three quarters of fiscal 2011 was reduced by $3.1 million and $11.4 million, respectively, due to the impact of the interest rate swap contracts entered into in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. The interest rate swaps effectively changed our interest rates on the senior long-term debt instruments

23

maturing in fiscal 2012 and 2015 from fixed to variable. During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we terminated the interest rate swap contracts and received proceeds of $31.5 million. The cumulative adjustment to the fair value of the debt instruments being hedged (the effective portion of the hedge), is being amortized as a reduction of interest expense over the remaining lives of the debt instruments (through fiscal 2015).

17. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

We have repurchased shares of our common stock from time to time after considering market conditions and in accordance with repurchase limits authorized by our Board of Directors. In February 2010, our Board of Directors approved a $500 million share repurchase program with no expiration date. Upon receipt of payment for the final two outstanding tranches of the Notes from the purchaser of the trading and merchandising business, during the third quarter of fiscal 2011, our Board of Directors increased our share repurchase authorization by the amount of the payment, which was $554.2 million. We repurchased approximately 30.2 million shares of our common stock for $686.9 million under this program during the first three quarters of fiscal 2011. See Note 4 for further information on the Notes.

24

The following table presents a reconciliation of our stockholders’ equity accounts for the thirty-nine weeks ended February 27, 2011:

	ConAgra Foods, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity
											Accumulated
					Additional						Other
	Common		Common		Paid-in			Retained			Comprehensive			Treasury			Noncontrolling		Total
	Shares		Stock		Capital			Earnings			Income (Loss)			Stock			Interests		Equity
Balance at May 30, 2010		567.9	$	2,839.7	$	897.5		$	4,417.1		$	(285.3	)	$	(2,945.1	)	$	5.0	$	4,928.9
Stock option and incentive plans						5.5			(0.3	)					59.6					64.8
Currency translation adjustment												35.2								35.2
Repurchase of common shares															(686.9	)				(686.9	)
Unrealized loss on securities												(0.1	)							(0.1	)
Derivative adjustment, net of reclassification adjustment												1.4								1.4
Activities of noncontrolling interests						(1.5	)											1.9		0.4
Pension and postretirement healthcare benefits												4.4								4.4
Dividends declared on common stock; $0.66 per share									(286.0	)										(286.0	)
Net income attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc.									562.1											562.1
Balance at February 27, 2011		567.9	$	2,839.7	$	901.5		$	4,692.9		$	(244.4	)	$	(3,572.4	)	$	6.9	$	4,624.2

18. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

FASB guidance establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy based upon the assumptions (inputs) used to price assets or liabilities. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities,

Level 2 — Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets, and

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs reflecting our own assumptions and best estimate of what inputs market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

25

The following table presents our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis based upon the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, as of February 27, 2011:

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Derivative assets	$	17.4	$	68.9	$	—	$	86.3
Available-for-sale securities		1.9		—		—		1.9
Deferred compensation assets		7.1		—		—		7.1
Total assets	$	26.4	$	68.9	$	—	$	95.3
Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities	$	—	$	81.6	$	—	$	81.6
Deferred compensation liabilities		27.9		—		—		27.9
Total liabilities	$	27.9	$	81.6	$	—	$	109.5

The following table presents our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis based upon the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, as of May 30, 2010:

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Derivative assets	$	5.7	$	56.1	$	—	$	61.8
Available-for-sale securities		1.8		—		—		1.8
Deferred compensation assets		7.1		—		—		7.1
Total assets	$	14.6	$	56.1	$	—	$	70.7
Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities	$	0.3	$	9.8	$	—	$	10.1
Deferred compensation liabilities		22.1		—		—		22.1
Total liabilities	$	22.4	$	9.8	$	—	$	32.2

The following table presents our assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis based upon the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall:

	Balance at								Total
	February								Losses
	27, 2011		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Recognized
Assets measured at fair value:
Property, plant, and equipment	$	4.5	$	—	$	—	$	4.5	$	16.3
			$	—	$	—	$	4.5	$	16.3

Certain assets and liabilities, including long-lived assets, goodwill, asset retirement obligations, and cost and equity investments are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, we determined that certain property, plant and equipment was impaired, as we do not expect to recover the carrying amount of the assets. We recognized an impairment charge of $16.3 million to write-down the associated property, plant and equipment with a carrying amount of $20.8 million to a fair value of $4.5 million. The fair value measurement used to determine this impairment was based on the probability-weighted net present value of expected future cash flows. We used cash flow projections consistent with internal business plans of the assets, as well as potential sales proceeds, to estimate the fair value of these assets.

The carrying amount of long-term debt (including current installments) was $3.2 billion as of February 27, 2011. Based on current market rates provided primarily by outside investment bankers, the fair value of this debt at February 27, 2011, was estimated at $3.6 billion.

19. BUSINESS SEGMENTS AND RELATED INFORMATION

We report our operations in two reporting segments: Consumer Foods and Commercial Foods. The Consumer Foods reporting segment includes branded, private label, and customized food products, which are sold in various retail and foodservice channels, principally in North America. The products include a variety of categories (e.g., meals, entrees, condiments, sides, snacks, and desserts) across frozen, refrigerated, and shelf-stable temperature classes. The Commercial Foods reporting segment includes commercially branded foods and ingredients, which are sold principally to foodservice, food manufacturing, and industrial customers. The Commercial Foods segment’s primary products include: specialty potato products, milled grain ingredients, a variety of vegetable products, seasonings, blends, and flavors which are sold under brands such as Lamb Weston®, ConAgra Mills®, and Spicetec Flavors & Seasonings^TM.

26

Intersegment sales have been recorded at amounts approximating market. Operating profit for each of the segments is based on net sales less all identifiable operating expenses. General corporate expense, net interest expense, and income taxes have been excluded from segment operations.

	Thirteen weeks ended					Thirty-nine weeks ended
	February 27,		February 28,			February 27,		February 28,
	2011		2010			2011		2010
Net sales
Consumer Foods	$	2,084.9	$	2,034.4		$	6,013.3	$	5,972.6
Commercial Foods		1,069.8		996.1			3,120.1		3,044.3
Total net sales	$	3,154.7	$	3,030.5		$	9,133.4	$	9,016.9
Operating profit
Consumer Foods	$	263.3	$	306.3		$	761.2	$	886.2
Commercial Foods		139.4		142.5			377.5		427.6
Total operating profit	$	402.7	$	448.8		$	1,138.7	$	1,313.8
Equity method investment earnings
Consumer Foods	$	1.6	$	2.0		$	4.0	$	4.2
Commercial Foods		5.0		0.9			13.4		13.5
Total equity method investment earnings	$	6.6	$	2.9		$	17.4	$	17.7
Operating profit plus equity method investment earnings
Consumer Foods	$	264.9	$	308.3		$	765.2	$	890.4
Commercial Foods		144.4		143.4			390.9		441.1
Total operating profit plus equity method investment earnings	$	409.3	$	451.7		$	1,156.1	$	1,331.5
General corporate expenses	$	25.6	$	88.4		$	188.1	$	282.6
Interest expense, net		51.6		39.7			122.6		121.6
Income tax expense		117.0		102.6			285.4		305.5
Income from continuing operations	$	215.1	$	221.0		$	560.0	$	621.8
Less: Income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests		0.3		(0.9	)		1.1		(2.1	)
Income from continuing operations attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc.	$	214.8	$	221.9		$	558.9	$	623.9

Presentation of Derivative Gains (Losses) for Economic Hedges of Forecasted Cash Flows in Segment Results

Commodity derivatives used to manage commodity input price risk are not designated for hedge accounting treatment. We reflect realized and unrealized gains and losses from derivatives (except for those related to our milling operations) used to economically hedge anticipated commodity consumption in earnings immediately within general corporate expenses. The gains and losses are reclassified to segment operating results in the period in which the underlying item being economically hedged is recognized in cost of goods sold.

Foreign currency derivatives used to manage foreign currency risk of forecasted cash flows are not designated for hedge accounting treatment. We believe these derivatives provide economic hedges of the foreign currency risk of certain forecasted transactions. As such, these derivatives are recognized at fair market value with realized and unrealized gains and losses recognized in general corporate expenses. The gains and losses are subsequently recognized in the operating results of the reporting segments in the period in which the underlying transaction being economically hedged is included in earnings.

27

The following table presents the net derivative gains (losses) from economic hedges of forecasted commodity consumption and currency risk of our foreign operations under this methodology:

	Thirteen weeks ended						Thirty-nine weeks ended
	February 27,			February 28,			February 27,			February 28,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Net derivative gains (losses) incurred	$	25.1		$	(3.6	)	$	23.9		$	(18.0	)
Less: Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to reporting segments		1.3			(4.7	)		(3.2	)		(18.2	)
Net derivative gains recognized in general corporate expenses	$	23.8		$	1.1		$	27.1		$	0.2
Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to Consumer Foods	$	2.6		$	(4.1	)	$	(1.1	)	$	(12.9	)
Net derivative losses allocated to Commercial Foods		(1.3	)		(0.6	)		(2.1	)		(5.3	)
Net derivative gain (losses) included in segment operating profit	$	1.3		$	(4.7	)	$	(3.2	)	$	(18.2	)

Based on our forecasts of the timing of recognition of the underlying hedged items, we expect to reclassify to segment operating results gains of $3.7 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 and $20.1 million in fiscal 2012 and thereafter, respectively. Amounts allocated, or to be allocated, to segment operating results during fiscal 2011 and thereafter include $2.9 million of losses incurred prior to fiscal 2011, which had not been allocated to segment operating results.

Our largest customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and its affiliates, accounted for approximately 18% of consolidated net sales in both the third quarter and first three quarters of fiscal 2011, and 19% of consolidated net sales in both the third quarter and first three quarters of fiscal 2010, primarily in the Consumer Foods segment.

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and its affiliates accounted for approximately 15% and 16% of consolidated net receivables as of February 27, 2011 and May 30, 2010, respectively, primarily in the Consumer Foods segment.

28

ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Part I — Financial Information

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report, including Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on management’s current views and assumptions of future events and financial performance and are subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Readers of this report should understand that these statements are not guarantees of performance or results. Many factors could affect our actual financial results and cause them to vary materially from the expectations contained in the forward-looking statements, including those set forth in this report. These factors include, among other things: availability and prices of raw materials; the impact of the accident at the Garner, North Carolina manufacturing facility, including the ultimate costs incurred and the amounts received under insurance policies; the effectiveness of our product pricing, including any pricing actions and promotional changes; future economic circumstances; industry conditions; our ability to execute our operating plans; the success of our innovation, marketing, and cost savings initiatives; the amount and timing of repurchases of our common stock, if any; the competitive environment and related market conditions; operating efficiencies; the ultimate impact of our product recalls; access to capital; actions of governments and regulatory factors affecting our businesses, including the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; and other risks described in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements included in this report which speak only as of the date of this report.

The following discussion should be read together with our financial statements and related notes contained in this report and with the financial statements, related notes, and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 30, 2010. Results for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended February 27, 2011, are not necessarily indicative of results that may be attained in the future.

Fiscal 2011 Third Quarter Executive Overview

ConAgra Foods, Inc. (NYSE: CAG) is one of North America’s leading food companies, with brands in 97% of America’s households. Consumers find Banquet^®, Chef Boyardee^®, Egg Beaters^®, Healthy Choice^®, Hebrew National^®, Hunt’s^®, Marie Callender’s^®, Orville Redenbacher’s^®, PAM^®, Peter Pan^®, Reddi-wip^®, and many other ConAgra Foods brands in grocery, convenience, mass merchandise, and club stores. We also have a strong business-to-business presence, supplying frozen potato and sweet potato products, as well as other vegetable, spice, and grain products to a variety of well-known restaurants, foodservice operators, and commercial customers.

Our diluted earnings per share in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 were $0.50. Diluted earnings per share in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 were $0.51 (including earnings of $0.49 per diluted share from continuing operations and $0.02 per diluted share from discontinued operations). Diluted earnings per share were $1.27 and $1.42 (including earnings of $1.39 per diluted share from continuing operations and $0.03 per diluted share from discontinued operations), in the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. Several significant items affect the comparability of year-over-year results of continuing operations (see “Items Impacting Comparability” below).

Items Impacting Comparability

Segment presentation of gains and losses from derivatives used for economic hedging of anticipated commodity input costs and economic hedging of foreign currency exchange rate risks of anticipated transactions is discussed in the segment review below.

Items of note impacting comparability for the third quarter of fiscal 2011 included the following:

• charges totaling $32 million ($20 million after-tax) in connection with our restructuring plans,

• a gain of $25 million ($16 million after-tax) from the receipt, as payment in full of all principal and interest due on the remaining payment-in-kind notes received in connection with the divestiture of the trading and merchandising operations in fiscal 2009 (the “Notes”), in advance of the scheduled maturity dates, and

• a charge of $16 million ($10 million after-tax) recognized to reduce the carrying amount of certain property, plant and equipment to its estimated fair value, in anticipation of exiting a small business.

29

Items of note impacting comparability for the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 included the following:

• charges totaling $45 million ($28 million after-tax) in connection with our restructuring plans,

• a gain of $25 million ($16 million after-tax) from the receipt, as payment in full of all principal and interest due on the remaining Notes received in connection with the divestiture of the trading and merchandising operations in fiscal 2009, in advance of the scheduled maturity dates, and

• a charge of $16 million ($10 million after-tax) recognized to reduce the carrying amount of certain property, plant, and equipment to its estimated fair value, in anticipation of the sale of those assets.

Items of note impacting comparability for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 included the following:

• a benefit of $15 million ($9 million after-tax) from a favorable adjustment relating to an environmental liability,

• a gain of $14 million ($9 million after-tax) from the sale of the Luck’s^® brand, and

• a benefit of $11 million from a lower-than-planned income tax rate.

Items of note impacting comparability for the first three quarters of fiscal 2010 included the following:

• a benefit of $15 million ($9 million after-tax) from a favorable adjustment relating to an environmental liability,

• a gain of $14 million ($9 million after-tax) from the sale of the Luck’s^® brand, and

• a benefit of $19 million from a lower-than-planned income tax rate.

Acquisitions

In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we acquired the assets of American Pie, LLC (“American Pie”), a manufacturer of frozen fruit pies, thaw and serve pies, fruit cobblers, and pie crusts under the licensed Marie Callender’s^® and Claim Jumper^® trade names, as well as frozen dinners, pot pies, and appetizers under the Claim Jumper^® trade name. We paid $131 million in cash plus assumed liabilities for this business.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, we completed the acquisition of Elan Nutrition, Inc., a privately held formulator and manufacturer of private label snack and nutrition bars, for $103 million in cash plus assumed liabilities.

Divestiture of Gilroy Dehydrated Vegetable Business

In July 2010, we completed the sale of substantially all of the assets of Gilroy Foods & Flavors™ dehydrated garlic, onion, capsicum and Controlled Moisture™, GardenFrost^®, Redi-Made™, and fresh vegetable operations for $246 million in cash. We reflected the results of these operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

Garner, North Carolina Accident

On June 9, 2009, an accidental explosion occurred at our manufacturing facility in Garner, North Carolina (the “Garner accident”). This facility was the primary production facility for our Slim Jim^® branded meat snacks. On June 13, 2009, the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives announced its determination that the explosion was the result of an accidental natural gas release, and not a deliberate act.

The costs incurred and insurance recoveries recognized in the third quarter and first three quarters of fiscal 2011 related to the Garner accident were not material.

The costs incurred and insurance recoveries recognized, in the third quarter and first three quarters of fiscal 2010, are reflected in our condensed consolidated financial statements, as follows:

	Thirteen weeks ended February 28, 2010								Thirty-nine weeks ended February 28, 2010
	Consumer								Consumer
	Foods			Corporate		Total			Foods			Corporate		Total
Cost of goods sold:
Inventory write-downs and other costs	$	0.9		$	—	$	0.9		$	11.5		$	—	$	11.5
Selling, general and administrative expenses:
Fixed asset impairments, clean-up costs, etc.	$	2.3		$	0.9	$	3.2		$	35.1		$	2.2	$	37.3
Insurance recoveries recognized		(4.0	)		—		(4.0	)		(45.0	)		—		(45.0	)
Total selling, general and administrative expenses	$	(1.7	)	$	0.9	$	(0.8	)	$	(9.9	)	$	2.2	$	(7.7	)
Net loss (gain)	$	(0.8	)	$	0.9	$	0.1		$	1.6		$	2.2	$	3.8

The amounts in the table above exclude lost profits due to the interruption of the meat snacks business.

30

Through February 27, 2011, we had received payment advances from the insurers of $120 million for our initial insurance claims for this matter, $60 million of which has been recognized as a reduction to selling, general and administrative expenses (primarily in fiscal 2010), largely offsetting the cumulative charges of $64 million recognized to date in connection with the Garner accident. The deferred balance of $60 million is classified as other accrued liabilities within our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of February 27, 2011.

Subsequent to the end of our fiscal 2011 third quarter, we reached a settlement in principle with our insurance providers under which we will receive additional payments totaling $48 million. We will recognize a gain of approximately $108 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 in connection with this settlement.

Restructuring Plans

During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, our Board of Directors approved a plan recommended by executive management designed to optimize our manufacturing and distribution networks. The plan consists of projects that will involve, among other things, the exit of certain manufacturing facilities, the disposal of underutilized manufacturing assets, and actions designed to optimize our distribution network. The plan is expected to be implemented over an 18 month period and is intended to improve the efficiency of our manufacturing operations and reduce costs. This plan is referred to as the 2011 restructuring plan (“2011 plan”).

In connection with the 2011 plan, the Company currently estimates it will incur aggregate pre-tax costs of approximately $55 million, including approximately $21 million of cash charges. In the third quarter of fiscal 2011, we recognized charges of $25 million in relation to the 2011 plan.

In March 2010, we announced a plan, authorized by our Board of Directors, related to the long-term production of our meat snack products. The plan provides for the closure of our meat snacks production facility in Garner, North Carolina, and the movement of production to our existing facility in Troy, Ohio. Since the Garner accident, the Troy facility has been producing a portion of our meat snack products. Upon completion of the plan’s implementation, which is expected to be in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, the Troy facility will be our primary meat snacks production facility. This plan is expected to result in the termination of approximately 500 employee positions in Garner and the creation of approximately 200 employee positions in Troy.

In May 2010, we made a decision to move certain administrative functions from Edina, Minnesota, to Naperville, Illinois. We completed the transition of these functions in the first half of fiscal 2011. This plan, together with the plan to move production of our meat snacks from Garner, North Carolina to Troy, Ohio, are collectively referred to as the 2010 restructuring plan (“2010 plan”). In connection with the 2010 plan, we expect to incur pre-tax charges for asset impairments, accelerated depreciation, severance, relocation, and site closure costs of $71 million (of which $59 million have been incurred to date). Included in these estimates are $30 million of charges that have resulted or will result in cash outflows and $41 million of non-cash charges. In the third quarter and first three quarters of fiscal 2011, we recognized charges of $8 million and $20 million, respectively, in relation to the 2010 plan.

Capital Allocation

During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, we received $554 million as payment in full of all principal and interest due on the remaining Notes received in connection with the divestiture of the trading and merchandising operations in fiscal 2009, in advance of the scheduled maturity dates.

During the first three quarters of fiscal 2011, we repurchased 30.2 million shares of our common stock for $687 million, and we repaid the entire principal balance of $248 million of our 7.875% senior notes, which were due September 15, 2010.

Sweet Potato Investment

In the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we began operations at our new, state-of-the-art processing plant near Delhi, Louisiana, designed primarily to process high-quality sweet potatoes from the region into fries and related products. As of the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2011, we had invested in excess of $130 million in this production facility.

31

Segment Review

We report our operations in two reporting segments: Consumer Foods and Commercial Foods.

Consumer Foods

The Consumer Foods reporting segment includes branded and private label food products that are sold in various retail and foodservice channels, principally in North America. The products include a variety of categories (e.g., meals, entrees, condiments, sides, snacks, and desserts) across frozen, refrigerated, and shelf-stable temperature classes.

Commercial Foods

The Commercial Foods reporting segment includes commercially branded foods and ingredients, which are sold principally to foodservice, food manufacturing, and industrial customers. The segment’s primary products include: specialty potato products, milled grain ingredients, and a variety of vegetable products, seasonings, blends, and flavors, which are sold under brands such as ConAgra Mills^®, Lamb Weston^®, and Spicetec Flavors & Seasonings^TM.

As discussed above, we reflected the results of the Gilroy Foods & Flavors^TM operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented. The assets and liabilities of the divested Gilroy Foods & Flavors^TM dehydrated vegetable business have been classified as assets and liabilities held for sale within our condensed consolidated balance sheet for the period prior to divestiture.

Presentation of Derivative Gains (Losses) from Economic Hedges of Forecasted Cash Flows in Segment Results

Commodity derivatives used to manage commodity input price risk are not designated for hedge accounting treatment. We reflect realized and unrealized gains and losses from derivatives (except for those related to our milling operations) used to economically hedge anticipated commodity consumption in earnings immediately within general corporate expenses. The gains and losses are reclassified to segment operating results in the period in which the underlying item being economically hedged is recognized in cost of goods sold.

Foreign currency derivatives used to manage foreign currency risk of forecasted cash flows are not designated for hedge accounting treatment. We believe these derivatives provide economic hedges of the foreign currency risk of certain forecasted transactions. As such, these derivatives are recognized at fair market value with realized and unrealized gains and losses recognized in general corporate expenses. The gains and losses are subsequently reclassified to segment operating results in the period in which the underlying transaction being economically hedged is included in earnings.

The following table presents the net derivative gains (losses) from economic hedges of forecasted commodity consumption and currency risk of our foreign operations, under this methodology:

	Thirteen weeks ended						Thirty-nine weeks ended
	February 27,			February 28,			February 27,			February 28,
($ in millions)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Net derivative gains (losses) incurred	$	25.1		$	(3.6	)	$	23.9		$	(18.0	)
Less: Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to reporting segments		1.3			(4.7	)		(3.2	)		(18.2	)
Net derivative gains recognized in general corporate expenses	$	23.8		$	1.1		$	27.1		$	0.2
Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to Consumer Foods	$	2.6		$	(4.1	)	$	(1.1	)	$	(12.9	)
Net derivative losses allocated to Commercial Foods		(1.3	)		(0.6	)		(2.1	)		(5.3	)
Net derivative gains (losses) included in segment operating profit	$	1.3		$	(4.7	)	$	(3.2	)	$	(18.2	)

Based on our forecasts of the timing of recognition of the underlying hedged items, we expect to reclassify to segment operating results gains of $4 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 and $20 million in fiscal 2012 and thereafter, respectively. Amounts allocated, or to be allocated, to segment operating results during fiscal 2011 and thereafter include $3 million of losses incurred prior to fiscal 2011, which had not been allocated to segment operating results.

32

Net Sales

	Net Sales
	Thirteen weeks ended							Thirty-nine weeks ended
($ in millions)	February 27,		February 28,					February 27,		February 28,
Reporting Segment	2011		2010		% Inc			2011		2010		% Inc
Consumer Foods	$	2,085	$	2,035		2	%	$	6,013	$	5,973		1	%
Commercial Foods		1,070		996		7	%		3,120		3,044		2	%
Total	$	3,155	$	3,031		4	%	$	9,133	$	9,017		1	%

Net sales for the third quarter of fiscal 2011 were $3.15 billion, an increase of $124 million, or 4%, from the third quarter of fiscal 2010. Net sales for the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 were $9.1 billion, an increase of $116 million, or 1% from the first three quarters of fiscal 2010.

Consumer Foods net sales for the third quarter of fiscal 2011 were $2.08 billion, an increase of $50 million, or 2%, compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2010. Results reflected flat volume performance from existing businesses, a 2% benefit from acquisitions (net of divestitures), and essentially flat net pricing and mix. Consumer Foods net sales for the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 were $6.01 billion, an increase of $40 million, or 1% compared to the first three quarters of fiscal 2010. Consumer Foods results for the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 reflected a 2% increase in net sales from businesses acquired (net of divestitures), essentially flat volume from existing businesses, and a reduction of approximately 1% from net pricing and mix. Sales results in the third quarter and first three quarters of fiscal 2011 reflected difficult category conditions and a very competitive environment, which necessitated increased promotional spending. Volumes were negatively impacted by approximately 1% in the first three quarters of fiscal 2010 due to the limited supply of Slim Jim^® products as a result of the Garner accident in June 2009, although volumes returned to normal levels in the third quarter of fiscal 2010. The effect of foreign currency exchange rates did not have a significant impact on net sales for any of the periods presented.

Sales of products associated with some of our most significant brands, including ACT II^®, Banquet^®, Blue Bonnet^®, Healthy Choice^®, Hebrew National^®, Marie Callender’s^®, Peter Pan^®, Reddi-wip^®, Ro*Tel^®, Slim Jim^®, Snack Pack^®, Swiss Miss^®, and Wesson^® grew in the third quarter of fiscal 2011, as compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2010. Significant brands whose products experienced sales declines in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 include, Chef Boyardee^®, Egg Beaters^®, Hunt’s^®, Kid Cuisine^®, Libby’s^®, Orville Redenbacher’s^®, PAM^®, and Van Camp’s^®.

Commercial Foods net sales were $1.07 billion for the third quarter of fiscal 2011, an increase of $74 million, or 7%, compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2010. Commercial Foods net sales were $3.12 billion for the first three quarters of fiscal 2011, an increase of 2% compared to the first three quarters of fiscal 2010. Results in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 reflected the pass-through of $55 million of higher wheat prices, partially offset by decreased volume of approximately 3% in the segment’s flour milling operations. Results for the third quarter of fiscal 2011 also reflected increased volume of approximately 3% in the segment’s Lamb Weston specialty potato operations, partially offset by reduced pricing of specialty potato products. Results in the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 reflected the pass-through of $32 million of higher wheat prices and 1% lower sales volume in the flour milling operations. Results for the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 also reflected higher sales volumes of approximately 4% and lower average selling prices of approximately 2% in our Lamb Weston specialty potato products business.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (Includes general corporate expenses)

Selling, general and administrative expenses totaled $421 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2011, an increase of $2 million, as compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2010. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the third quarter of fiscal 2011 reflected the following:

• a decrease in incentive compensation expense of $30 million,

• charges totaling $26 million in connection with our restructuring plans,

• a gain of $25 million from the receipt, as payment in full of all principal and interest due on the remaining Notes received in connection with the divestiture of the trading and merchandising operations in fiscal 2009, in advance of the scheduled maturity dates,

• a decrease in advertising and promotion expenses of $17 million,

33

•	a charge of $16 million recognized to reduce the carrying amount of certain property, plant and equipment to its estimated fair value, in anticipation of the sale of those assets,
•	a $6 million decrease in sales and use taxes, and
•	an increase in salaries and wages of $6 million.
	Selling, general and administrative expenses for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 included:
•	a benefit of $15 million associated with favorable adjustments to environmental-related liabilities, and
•	a $14 million gain on the sale of the Luck’s® brand.
	Selling, general and administrative expenses totaled $1.26 billion for the first three quarters of fiscal 2011, a decrease of $37 million, or 3%, as compared to the first three quarters of fiscal 2010. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 reflected the following:

• a decrease in incentive compensation expense of $89 million,

• charges of $32 million related to the execution of our restructuring plans,

• a decrease in advertising and promotion expenses of $30 million,

• a gain of $25 million from the receipt, as payment in full of all principal and interest due on the remaining Notes received in connection with the divestiture of the trading and merchandising operations in fiscal 2009, in advance of the scheduled maturity dates,

• an increase in salaries and wages of $20 million,

• a charge of $16 million recognized to reduce the carrying amount of certain property, plant and equipment to its estimated fair value, in anticipation of the sale of those assets,

• losses totaling $11 million resulting from a hedge of the fair value of a portion of our outstanding debt and economic hedges of the foreign currency risk of certain financial assets,

• a decrease of $9 million in stock compensation expense,

• a decrease of $8 million in sales and use tax expense,

• an increase in the cost of self-insurance of employee health care of $7 million, and

•	charges of $7 million related to environmental remediation matters.
	Selling, general and administrative expenses for the first three quarters of fiscal 2010 included the following:

• a benefit of $19 million associated with favorable adjustments to environmental-related liabilities,

• a $14 million gain on the sale of the Luck’s^® brand,

• a net benefit of $8 million, representing costs associated with the Garner accident, more than offset by insurance recoveries, and

• charges related to the peanut butter and pot pie recalls of $6 million.

34

Operating Profit (Earnings before general corporate expenses, interest expense, net, income taxes, and equity method investment earnings)

	Operating Profit
	Thirteen weeks ended							Thirty-nine weeks ended
($ in millions)	February 27,		February 28,		%			February 27,		February 28,		%
Reporting Segment	2011		2010		(Dec)			2011		2010		(Dec)
Consumer Foods	$	263	$	306		(14	)%	$	761	$	886		(14	)%
Commercial Foods		139		142		(2	)%		378		428		(12	)%

Consumer Foods operating profit for the third quarter of fiscal 2011 was $263 million, a decrease of $43 million, or 14%, compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2010. Gross profits in Consumer Foods were $15 million lower for the third quarter of fiscal 2011 than for the third quarter of fiscal 2010, driven by the impact of higher input costs (particularly for proteins and vegetable oil), partially offset by the benefit of supply chain cost savings initiatives. Other items that significantly impacted Consumer Foods operating profit in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 included:

• charges of $22 million related to the execution of our restructuring plans,

• a decrease in advertising and promotion expenses of $19 million,

• a charge of $16 million recognized to reduce the carrying amount of certain property, plant and equipment to its estimated fair value, in anticipation of the sale of those assets, and

• a decrease in incentive compensation expense of $13 million.

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 included a $14 million gain on the sale of the Luck’s^® brand.

The weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies resulted in an increase of operating profit of $8 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 as compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2010.

Consumer Foods operating profit for the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 was $761 million, a decrease of $125 million, or 14%, compared to the first three quarters of fiscal 2010. Gross profits were $108 million lower in the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 than in the first three quarters of fiscal 2010 driven by the impact of higher input costs and lower net sales prices, discussed above, partially offset by the supply chain cost savings initiatives. Other items that significantly impacted Consumer Foods operating profit in the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 included:

• a decrease in incentive compensation expense of $31 million,

• charges of $35 million related to the execution of our restructuring plans,

• a decrease in advertising and promotion expenses of $36 million,

• an increase in salaries and wages of $10 million, and

• a charge of $16 million recognized to reduce the carrying amount of certain property, plant and equipment to its estimated fair value, in anticipation of the sale of those assets.

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 included a $14 million gain on the sale of the Luck’s^® brand.

Gross profits from Slim Jim^® branded products were $29 million and $14 million in the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively, reflecting the impact of the accident and the subsequent recovery of sales volumes. The weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies resulted in an increase of operating profit of $22 million in the first three quarters of fiscal 2011, as compared to the first three quarters of fiscal 2010.

For the third quarter of fiscal 2011, operating profit for the Commercial Foods segment was $139 million, a decrease of $3 million, or 2%, from the third quarter of fiscal 2010. Gross profits in the Commercial Foods segment were $12 million higher in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 than in the third quarter of fiscal 2010, driven by higher conversion margins in our flour milling operations. The benefit of 3% higher sales volume and a higher quality potato crop were largely offset by increased input and processing costs in our specialty potato operations during the third quarter of fiscal 2011.

For the first three quarters of fiscal 2011, operating profit for the Commercial Foods segment was $378 million, a decrease of $50 million, or 12%, largely driven by lower gross profit in the specialty potato operations due to increased input and processing costs. Lower gross profits were partially offset by lower incentive compensation expenses.

35

Interest Expense, Net

Net interest expense was $52 million and $40 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. Included in net interest expense was $2 million and $21 million of interest income in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively, principally from the Notes received in connection with the disposition of the trading and merchandising business in June 2008. Interest expense in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 also reflected a net benefit of $4 million from interest rate swaps used to hedge the fair value of certain of our outstanding debt instruments (this hedge was terminated in the second quarter of fiscal 2011) and the benefit of the repayment of $248 million of debt in September 2010.

Net interest expense was $123 million and $122 million for the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. Included in net interest expense was $41 million and $62 million of interest income in the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively, principally from the Notes received in connection with the disposition of the trading and merchandising business in June 2008. Net interest expense in the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 also reflected a net benefit of $11 million from interest rate swaps used to hedge the fair value of certain of our outstanding debt instruments and the benefit of the repayment of $248 million of debt in September 2010.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, we received $115 million as payment in full of all principal and interest due on a portion of the Notes, in advance of the scheduled maturity date. On December 6, 2010, we received $554 million as payment in full of all principal and interest due on the remaining Notes, in advance of the scheduled maturity dates. We expect net interest expense to be significantly higher in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 than in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, reflecting lower interest income.

Income Taxes

In the third quarters of fiscal 2011 and 2010, our income tax expense was $117 million and $103 million, respectively. The effective tax rate (calculated as the ratio of income tax expense to pre-tax income from continuing operations, inclusive of equity method investment earnings) was approximately 35% and 32% for the third quarters of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. In the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 and 2010, our income tax expense was $285 million and $306 million, respectively. The effective tax rate was approximately 34% and 33% for the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. The effective tax rate for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 reflected the benefit of favorable audit settlements and changes in estimates. The lower effective tax rate for the first three quarters of fiscal 2010 reflected the benefit of favorable audit settlements, changes in estimates, and certain income tax credits and deductions identified in fiscal 2010 that related to prior periods.

Equity Method Investment Earnings

Equity method investment earnings were $7 million and $3 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively, while equity method investment earnings were $17 million and $18 million for the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. Increased equity method investment earnings in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 were the result of more profitable operations of potato processing ventures.

Discontinued Operations

Our discontinued operations generated after-tax income of $8 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2010, and after-tax income of $3 million and $11 million in the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. Operating results from discontinued operations for the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 include the impact of a favorable resolution of a foreign tax matter relating to a divested business. Losses in the first three quarters of fiscal 2010 reflected charges related to certain legal and environmental matters of divested businesses.

Earnings Per Share

Our diluted earnings per share in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 were $0.50. Diluted earnings per share in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 were $0.51 (including earnings of $0.49 per diluted share from continuing operations and $0.02 per diluted share from discontinued operations). Diluted earnings per share were $1.27 and $1.42 (including earnings of $1.39 per diluted share from continuing operations and $0.03 per diluted share from discontinued operations), in the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources of Liquidity and Capital

Our primary financing objective is to maintain a prudent capital structure that provides us flexibility to pursue our growth objectives. If necessary, we use short-term debt principally to finance ongoing operations, including our seasonal requirements for working capital (accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, and inventories, less accounts payable, accrued payroll, and other accrued liabilities) and a combination of equity and long-term debt to finance both our base working capital needs and our noncurrent assets.

36

At February 27, 2011, we had a $1.5 billion revolving credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions, which matures in December 2011. We expect to refinance the facility prior to maturity at terms that will enable us to maintain sufficient liquidity to support our business needs. The facility has historically been used principally as a back-up facility for our commercial paper program. As of February 27, 2011, there were no outstanding borrowings under the facility. We did not draw upon this facility or the commercial paper program during the first three quarters of fiscal 2011. Borrowings under the facility bear interest at or below prime rate and may be prepaid without penalty. The facility requires that our consolidated funded debt not exceed 65% of our consolidated capital base, and that our fixed charges coverage ratio be greater than 1.75 to 1.0. As of February 27, 2011, we were in compliance with these financial covenants.

As of the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2011, our senior long-term debt ratings were all investment grade. A significant downgrade in our credit ratings would not affect our ability to borrow amounts under the revolving credit facility, although borrowing costs would increase. A downgrade of our short-term credit ratings would impact our ability to borrow under our commercial paper program by negatively impacting borrowing costs and causing shorter durations, as well as making access to commercial paper more difficult.

In connection with the divestiture of the trading and merchandising operations in fiscal 2009, we received $550 million (face value) of the Notes issued by the purchaser of the divested business. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, we received $115 million as payment in full of all principal and interest due on a portion of the Notes, in advance of the scheduled maturity date. During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, we received $554 million as payment in full of all principal and interest due on the remaining Notes, in advance of the scheduled maturity dates.

We repurchase our shares of common stock from time to time after considering market conditions and in accordance with repurchase limits authorized by our Board of Directors. In February 2010, our Board of Directors approved a $500 million share repurchase program with no expiration date. In December 2010, our Board of Directors increased the Company’s share repurchase authorization by the amount of the early repayment of the Notes. We repurchased approximately 21.4 million and 30.2 million shares of our common stock for $487 million and $687 million under this program in the third quarter and first three quarters of fiscal 2011, respectively. The Company’s total remaining share repurchase authorization was $267 million as of the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2011. The Company expects to continue repurchasing its shares during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, subject to market conditions. Repurchases may be completed through negotiated transactions or open market purchases.

In July 2010, we completed the sale of substantially all of the assets of Gilroy Foods & Flavors™ dehydrated garlic, onion, capsicum and Controlled Moisture™, GardenFrost^®, Redi-Made™, and fresh vegetable operations for $246 million in cash.

On September 15, 2010, we repaid the entire principal balance of $248 million of our 7.875% senior notes, due on that date.

On September 17, 2010, our Board of Directors approved an increase in our quarterly dividend to $0.23 per share from the previous level of $0.20 per share.

Cash Flows

During the first three quarters of fiscal 2011, we used $70 million of cash, which included $940 million generated from operating activities, $181 million generated from investing activities, and $1.20 billion used in financing activities.

Cash generated from operating activities of continuing operations totaled $940 million in the first three quarters of fiscal 2011, as compared to $1.13 billion generated in the first three quarters of fiscal 2010, reflecting contributions of $116 million to our pension plans in the first three quarters of fiscal 2011, decreased income from continuing operations, and higher incentive compensation payments paid in the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 (primarily related to fiscal 2010 performance) than in the first three quarters of fiscal 2010 (primarily related to fiscal 2009 performance). Lower cash generated from continuing operations for the first three quarters of fiscal 2011, as compared to the first three quarters of fiscal 2010, also reflected an increase in inventory in the milling operations of our Commercial Foods segment due largely to an increase in wheat prices. These factors were partially offset by the benefit of changes in certain federal income tax laws that will allow us to defer the payment of a significant amount of income taxes until future years, as well as the receipt of $142 million of interest due on the remaining Notes received in connection with the divestiture of the trading and merchandising operations in fiscal 2009. Cash used in operating activities of discontinued operations was $26 million in the first three quarters of fiscal 2010, reflecting increased inventory levels in the Gilroy Foods & Flavors™ business that was sold in July 2010.

37

Cash used in investing activities from continuing operations totaled $65 million in the first three quarters of fiscal 2011, versus cash used in investing activities of $319 million in the first three quarters of fiscal 2010. Investing activities of continuing operations in the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 consisted primarily of the receipt of $413 million, as payment in full of all amounts due on the remaining Notes received in connection with the divestiture of the trading and merchandising operations in fiscal 2009 (receipt of interest due is reflected in operating cash flows), capital expenditures of $347 million, and payments totaling $149 million for the acquisition of American Pie and other intangible assets, partially offset by $18 million of insurance proceeds related to the Garner accident. Investing activities of continuing operations in the first three quarters of fiscal 2010 consisted primarily of capital expenditures of $360 million, partially offset by insurance proceeds of $17 million. We generated $246 million of cash from investing activities of discontinued operations in the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 from the disposition of the Gilroy Foods & Flavors™ business in July 2010.

Cash used in financing activities of continuing operations totaled $1.20 billion and $249 million in the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. During the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 and 2010, we paid dividends of $277 million and $258 million, respectively. During the first three quarters of fiscal 2011, we decreased our debt by $292 million, including the repayment of the entire principal balance of $248 million of our 7.875% senior notes on September 15, 2010, due on that date, as well as the repayment of $35 million of bank borrowings by our Lamb Weston BSW potato processing venture. Also in the first three quarters of fiscal 2011, we made cash payments of $662 million to repurchase our common stock as part of our share repurchase program.

We have received $120 million through February 27, 2011 from insurance carriers related to the Garner accident, including $35 million received in the first three quarters of fiscal 2011. Subsequent to the end of our fiscal 2011 third quarter, we reached a settlement in principle with our insurance providers under which we will receive additional payments totaling $48 million.

We estimate our capital expenditures in fiscal 2011 will be approximately $475 million.

Management believes that existing cash balances, cash flows from operations, the proceeds from the early repayment of the Notes, existing credit facilities, and access to capital markets will provide sufficient liquidity to meet our working capital needs, planned capital expenditures and share repurchases, and payment of anticipated quarterly dividends for at least the next twelve months.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We use off-balance sheet arrangements (e.g., leases accounted for as operating leases) where sound business principles warrant their use. We also periodically enter into guarantees and other similar arrangements as part of transactions in the ordinary course of business. These are described further in “Obligations and Commitments,” below.

Variable Interest Entities Not Consolidated

We have variable interests in certain entities that we have determined to be variable interest entities, but for which we are not the primary beneficiary. We do not consolidate the financial statements of these entities.

We hold a 50% interest in Lamb Weston RDO, a potato processing venture. We provide all sales and marketing services to Lamb Weston RDO. We receive a fee for these services based on a percentage of the net sales of the venture. We reflect the value of our ownership interest in this venture in other assets in our condensed consolidated balance sheets, based upon the equity method of accounting. The balance of our investment was $13 million and $14 million at February 27, 2011 and May 30, 2010, respectively, representing our maximum exposure to loss as a result of our involvement with this venture. The capital structure of Lamb Weston RDO includes owners’ equity of $25 million and term borrowings from banks of $48 million as of February 27, 2011. We have determined that we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of this venture.

We lease certain office buildings from entities that we have determined to be variable interest entities. The lease agreements with these entities include fixed-price purchase options for the assets being leased, representing our only variable interest in these lessor entities. These leases are accounted for as operating leases, and accordingly, there are no material assets or liabilities associated with these entities included in our balance sheets. We have no material exposure to loss from our variable interests in these entities. We have determined that we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of these entities. In making this determination, we have considered, among other items, the terms of the lease agreements, the expected remaining useful lives of the assets leased, and the capital structure of the lessor entities.

Obligations and Commitments

As part of our ongoing operations, we enter into arrangements that obligate us to make future payments under contracts such as lease agreements, debt agreements, and unconditional purchase obligations (i.e., obligations to transfer funds in the future for fixed or minimum quantities of goods or services at fixed or minimum prices, such as “take-or-pay” contracts). The unconditional purchase obligation arrangements are entered into in our normal course of business in order to ensure adequate levels of sourced product are available. Of these items, debt and capital lease obligations, which totaled $3.3 billion as of February 27, 2011, were recognized as liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheet. Operating lease obligations and unconditional purchase obligations, which totaled $974 million as of February 27, 2011, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, were not recognized as liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheet.

38

A summary of our contractual obligations as of February 27, 2011 was as follows (including obligations of discontinued operations):

	Payments Due by Period
	(in millions)
			Less than						After 5
Contractual Obligations	Total		1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		Years
Long-term debt	$	3,237.5	$	351.9	$	36.9	$	578.4	$	2,270.3
Capital lease obligations		62.2		5.4		9.0		5.3		42.5
Operating lease obligations		377.6		65.8		106.5		69.7		135.6
Purchase obligations		596.2		501.3		58.0		20.9		16.0
Total	$	4,273.5	$	924.4	$	210.4	$	674.3	$	2,464.4

We are also contractually obligated to pay interest on our long-term debt and capital lease obligations. The weighted average interest rate of the long-term debt obligations outstanding as of February 27, 2011 was approximately 6.5%.

The purchase obligations noted in the table above do not reflect $535 million of open purchase orders, some of which are not legally binding. These purchase orders are settleable in the ordinary course of business in less than one year.

As part of our ongoing operations, we also enter into arrangements that obligate us to make future cash payments only upon the occurrence of a future event (e.g., guarantees of debt or lease payments of a third party should the third party be unable to perform). In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the following commercial commitments are not recognized as liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheet. A summary of our commitments, including commitments associated with equity method investments, as of February 27, 2011 was as follows:

	Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period
	(in millions)
			Less than						After 5
Other Commercial Commitments	Total		1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		Years
Guarantees	$	63.6	$	8.5	$	10.9	$	12.0	$	32.2
Other commitments		0.5		0.5		—		—		—
Total	$	64.1	$	9.0	$	10.9	$	12.0	$	32.2

In certain limited situations, we will guarantee an obligation of an unconsolidated entity. We guarantee certain leases and other commercial obligations resulting from the 2002 divestiture of our fresh beef and pork operations. The remaining terms of these arrangements do not exceed five years and the maximum amount of future payments we have guaranteed was $14 million, included in the table above, as of February 27, 2011.

We have also guaranteed the performance of the divested business with respect to a hog purchase contract. The hog purchase contract requires the divested fresh beef and pork business to purchase a minimum of approximately 1.2 million hogs annually through 2014. The contract stipulates minimum price commitments, based in part on market prices and, in certain circumstances, also includes price adjustments based on certain inputs.

We are a party to various potato supply agreements. Under the terms of certain such potato supply agreements, we have guaranteed repayment of short-term bank loans of the potato suppliers, under certain conditions. At February 27, 2011, the amount of supplier loans effectively guaranteed by us was $3 million, included in the table above. We have not established a liability for these guarantees, as we have determined that the likelihood of our required performance under the guarantees is remote.

We are a party to a supply agreement with an onion processing company. We have guaranteed repayment of a loan of this supplier, under certain conditions. At February 27, 2011, the amount of this loan was $25 million, included in the table above. In the event of default on this loan by the supplier, we have the contractual right to purchase the loan from the lender, thereby giving us the rights to underlying collateral. We have not established a liability in connection with this guarantee, as we believe the likelihood of financial exposure to us under this agreement is remote.

The obligations and commitments tables, above, do not include any reserves for income taxes, as we are unable to reasonably estimate the ultimate amount or timing of settlement of our reserves for income taxes. The liability for gross unrecognized tax benefits at February 27, 2011 was $59 million. The net amount of unrecognized tax benefits at February 27, 2011, that, if recognized, would impact our effective tax rate was $37 million. Recognition of this tax benefit would have a favorable impact on our effective tax rate.

39

Critical Accounting Estimates

A discussion of our critical accounting estimates can be found in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 30, 2010.

Other Matters

From time to time, we have used the services of a firm whose chief executive officer serves on our Board of Directors. Payments to this firm for environmental and agricultural engineering services performed and structures acquired totaled $0.1 million and $0.3 million in the third quarter and first three quarters of fiscal 2011, respectively, and $0.2 million and $0.3 million for both the third quarter and first three quarters of fiscal 2010, respectively.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The principal market risks affecting us are exposures to price fluctuations of commodity and energy inputs, interest rates, and foreign currencies.

Other than the changes noted below, there have been no material changes in our market risk during the thirty-nine weeks ended February 27, 2011. For additional information, refer to the “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” in Item 7A of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 30, 2010.

Commodity Market Risk

We purchase commodity inputs such as wheat, corn, oats, soybean meal, soybean oil, meat, dairy products, sugar, natural gas, electricity, and packaging materials to be used in our operations. These commodities are subject to price fluctuations that may create price risk. We enter into commodity hedges to manage this price risk using physical forward contracts or derivative instruments. We have policies governing the hedging instruments our businesses may use. These policies include limiting the dollar risk exposure for each of our businesses. We also monitor the amount of associated counter-party credit risk for all non-exchange-traded transactions.

Interest Rate Risk

From time to time, we use interest rate swaps to manage the effect of interest rate changes on the fair value of our existing debt as well as the forecasted interest payments for the anticipated issuance of debt. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, we entered into interest rate swap contracts used to hedge the fair value of certain of our senior long-term debt. During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we terminated these interest rate swap contracts.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, we entered into interest rate swap contracts to hedge the interest rate risk related to our forecasted issuance of long-term debt in 2014 (based on the anticipated refinancing of the senior long-term debt maturing at that time). The net notional amount of these interest rate derivatives at February 27, 2011 was $250 million. The maximum potential loss associated with these interest rate swap contracts from a hypothetical change of 1% in interest rates is approximately $48 million. Any such gain or loss would be deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income and recognized in earnings over the life of the forecasted interest payments associated with the anticipated debt refinancing.

Foreign Currency Risk

In order to reduce exposures for our processing activities related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, we may enter into forward exchange or option contracts for transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency for certain of our operations. This activity primarily relates to economically hedging against foreign currency risk in purchasing inventory and capital equipment, sales of finished goods, and future settlement of foreign denominated assets and liabilities.

Value-at-Risk (VaR)

We employ various tools to monitor our derivative risk, including value-at-risk (“VaR”) models. We perform simulations using historical data to estimate potential losses in the fair value of current derivative positions. We use price and volatility information for the prior 90 days in the calculation of VaR that is used to monitor our daily risk.

40

The purpose of this measurement is to provide a single view of the potential risk of loss associated with derivative positions at a given point in time based on recent changes in market prices. Our model uses a 95 percent confidence level. Accordingly, in any given one day time period, losses greater than the amounts included in the table, below, are expected to occur only 5 percent of the time. We include commodity swaps, futures, and options and foreign exchange forwards, swaps, and options in this calculation. The following table provides an overview of our average daily VaR for our energy, agriculture, and other commodities over the thirty-nine week period ending February 27, 2011 as well as the average daily foreign exchange VaR. Other commodities may include items such as packaging, livestock, and/or metals.

	Fair Value Impact
	Average
	During Thirty-nine		Average
	Weeks		During Thirty-nine Weeks
In Millions	Ended February 27, 2011		Ended February 28, 2010
Energy Commodities	$	1.5	$	1.4
Agriculture Commodities	$	2.8	$	1.5
Other Commodities	$	—	$	0.1
Foreign Exchange	$	1.3	$	0.8

In prior filings, we presented analyses of market risk using a sensitivity analysis methodology. We have begun using a VaR methodology for purposes of this presentation, as this is a methodology used by management in monitoring market risk, and we believe this is a more useful presentation to readers.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of February 27, 2011. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter covered by this report and determined that there was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

41

Part II — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are party to a number of lawsuits and claims arising out of the operation of our business, including lawsuits and claims related to the February 2007 recall of our peanut butter products. Subsequent to the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2011, we received formal requests from the U.S. Attorney’s office in Georgia seeking a variety of records and information related to the operations of our peanut butter manufacturing facility in Sylvester, Georgia. The Company believes these requests are related to the previously disclosed June 2007 execution of a search warrant at the facility following the February 2007 recall of our peanut butter products. The Company is cooperating with officials in regard to the requests. After taking into account liabilities recorded for these matters, we believe the ultimate resolution of such matters should not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

The following table presents the total number of shares of common stock purchased during the third quarter of fiscal 2011, the average price paid per share, the number of shares that were purchased as part of a publicly announced repurchase program, and the approximate dollar value of the maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the share repurchase program:

					Total Number of
					Shares		Approximate Dollar
	Total Number		Average		Purchased as Part of		Value of Shares that
	of Shares		Price Paid		Publicly Announced		may yet be Purchased
Period	Purchased		per Share		Programs		under the Programs (1)
November 29 through December 26, 2010		640,000	$	22.46		640,000	$	739,891,000
December 27, 2010 through January 23, 2011		8,709,234	$	22.84		8,709,234	$	541,007,000
January 24 through February 27, 2011		12,014,100	$	22.77		12,014,100	$	267,391,000
Total Fiscal 2011 Third Quarter Activity		21,363,334	$	22.79		21,363,334	$	267,391,000

(1) Pursuant to publicly announced share repurchase programs since December 2003, we have repurchased approximately 140.7 million shares at a cost of $3.3 billion through February 27, 2011. During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, the Board of Directors approved a $554.2 million increase to the share repurchase program. The current program has no expiration date.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

All exhibits as set forth on the Exhibit Index, which is incorporated herein by reference.

42

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

CONAGRA FOODS, INC.
By:	/s/ JOHN F. GEHRING
	John F. Gehring
	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

By:	/s/ PATRICK D. LINEHAN
	Patrick D. Linehan
	Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller

Dated this 4th day of April, 2011.

43

EXHIBIT	DESCRIPTION	PAGE
10.1*	Amendment One dated November 29, 2010 to the ConAgra Foods, Inc. Amended and Restated Non-Qualified CRISP Plan (January 1, 2009 Restatement)		47
10.2*	Amendment Two dated November 29, 2010 to the ConAgra Foods, Inc. Non-Qualified Pension Plan (January 1, 2009 Restatement)		48
10.3*	Amendment Two dated November 29, 2010 to ConAgra Foods, Inc. Amended and Restated Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan (January 1, 2009 Restatement)		52
10.4*	Amendment One dated December 10, 2010 to ConAgra Foods, Inc. Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan (September, 2009 Restatement)		54
10.5*	Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the ConAgra Foods 2009 Stock Plan (Choice Program —post November 2010)		55
10.6*	Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Non-Employee Directors under the ConAgra Foods 2009 Stock Plan		60
10.7*	ConAgra Foods, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan Requirements dated December 10, 2010		63
10.8*	Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation Program		65
12	Statement regarding computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges		67
31.1	Section 302 Certificate of Chief Executive Officer		68
31.2	Section 302 Certificate of Chief Financial Officer		69
32.1	Section 906 Certificates		70
101.1	The following materials from ConAgra Foods’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 27, 2011, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, and (vi) document and entity information.

* Management contract or compensatory plan.

44

EX-10.1

Exhibit 10.1

AMENDMENT ONE
CONAGRA FOODS, INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED
NONQUALIFIED CRISP PLAN
(January 1, 2009 Restatement)

               This Amendment One to the ConAgra Foods, Inc. Amended and Restated Nonqualified CRISP Plan (the “Plan”) is adopted by ConAgra Foods, Inc. (the “Company”) and is effective on the date this Amendment is adopted by the Committee (the “Adoption Date”).

RECITALS

     1. Initial capitalized terms that are not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Plan.

     2. The Company desires to amend the Plan to permit distribution of benefits under the Plan pursuant to certain domestic relations orders and to provide that the Committee may allocate specific categories of Plan expenses to the Account to which the expense relates, and to make certain other changes or clarifications.

AMENDMENT

1.	The second sentence of the second paragraph of Section 6(a) is deleted.
2.	The first sentence of Section 6(f) is revised to add “as of the date of Separation from Service” following “Specified Employee.”
3.	The last sentence of Section 13 is revised by addition of the following at the end thereof:

(which additional tax, interest, penalties or income inclusion shall individually and in the aggregate be referred to as “Adverse 409A Consequence” or “Adverse 409A Consequences”)

4. The following sentence is added to the end of Section 13:

The Company may delay any payment to the extent the delay would not result in any Adverse 409A Consequence.

5.	A new Section 25 is added as follows:
25.	Compliance with a Domestic Relations Order. Notwithstanding any provision in the Plan or any Participant election to the contrary, with respect to payments to a person other than the Participant, the Company may provide for acceleration of the time or form of a payment to an individual other than the Participant, or a payment may be made to an individual other than the Participant, to the extent necessary to fulfill a domestic relations order (as defined in Code § 414(p)(1)(B)). The Company may, in its sole and absolute discretion, impose any restrictions it desires on the terms of a domestic relations order with which it will comply pursuant to this Section.
6.	A new Section 26 is added as follows:
26.	Expenses. The reasonable expenses incident to the operation of the Plan may be paid by the Company; however, the Company may, in its sole discretion, allocate specific categories of Plan expenses to the Account or Accounts to which the expenses are attributable. Plan expenses that are not specifically allocated and are not paid by the Company shall be charged to the Accounts of Participants and beneficiaries in proportion to their respective Account balances. The Company may, in its sole discretion, choose to pay all or a portion of the Plan expenses allocable to Participants who are current Employees while not paying, or paying a lesser portion of, Plan expenses allocated to other Accounts.

               IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment One is executed this 29^th day of November, 2010, but effective as of the date set forth herein.

CONAGRA FOODS, INC.
By:	/s/ Charlie G. Salter
	Charlie G. Salter
	Vice President, Human Resources
Date:	November 29, 2010

47

EX-10.2

Exhibit 10.2

AMENDMENT TWO
TO
CONAGRA FOODS, INC.
NONQUALIFIED PENSION PLAN

     This Amendment Two to the ConAgra Foods, Inc. Nonqualified Pension Plan (the “Plan”) is adopted by ConAgra Foods, Inc. and is effective on the date this Amendment is adopted by the Committee (the “Adoption Date”).

RECITALS

     1. Initial capitalized terms that are not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Plan.

     2. The Company desires to clarify the calculation of the Plan benefit in the circumstance of a Participant who is eligible for early retirement under this Plan, but is not eligible for early retirement for purposes of the qualified pension plan due to imputed service under this Plan that does not apply for purposes of the qualified pension plan.

     3. The Company also desires to clarify the calculation of the Plan benefit so that it is measured at the Early Retirement Date rather than at the Normal Retirement Date in the case where the Participant is eligible for early retirement under this Plan and the qualified pension plan, so that the Participant receives the benefit of any early retirement subsidy on the entire benefit.

     4. The Company also desires to clarify the ability of certain participants whose most recent hire date is before June 1, 2001 to actively accrue a benefit under section 3.01(a), in addition to being a participant with respect to prior accruals.

     5. Currently all Participants who have elected to receive an annuity have elected to start payments on the later of Separation from Service or a stated date that is required under current Plan terms to be between normal or early retirement eligibility (as applicable) and age 70. The Company desires to clarify that in the event a future Participant elects an annuity but fails to elect a month and year to start, then the annuity will not start before early or normal retirement, as applicable.

     6. The Company desires to make certain other conforming changes and clarifications.

AMENDMENT

     1. A new Section 1.11B is added to read as follows:

     1.11B “Early Retirement Date” means the first day of the month coincident with or immediately following the later of the date the Participant separates from service, or attains age 55; provided, however, that a Participant will be eligible to have an Early Retirement Date if, and only if, as of the date of Separation from Service such Participant has at least ten years of “Service”, as that term is defined in the applicable Salaried Plan as in effect on December 31, 2008.

     2. Section 1.17 of the Plan is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows; provided, however, that in no event will the payments made to any Participant in accordance with this amendment for any month be less than the payments that would have been made for such month to such Participant in the absence of this amendment:

48

1.17 “Non-Qualified Accrued Benefit” means, except as specifically provided in an individual agreement under Section 3.01(c):

a)	For any Participant whose benefit under this Plan is to commence in the form of a life annuity before Normal Retirement Date, but such Participant is not eligible for “early retirement” under Section 3.03 of the Salaried Plan as in effect on December 31, 2008, the difference between the Total Accrued Benefit and, to the extent permitted by Treasury Regulation sections 1.409A-2(a)(9) and 1.409A-3(j)(5) related to increases and decreases in non-qualified deferred compensation due to the operation of a “qualified plan” (as defined in the 409A regulations), the Qualified Plan Accrued Benefit, expressed as a single life annuity commencing as of the first day of the month following age 65. This difference shall be reduced for early commencement, expressed as a single life annuity commencing as of the Early Retirement Date.
b)	For any Participant whose benefit under this Plan is to commence in the form of a life annuity before Normal Retirement Date, and such Participant is also eligible for “early retirement” under Section 3.03 of the Salaried Plan as in effect on December 31, 2008, the difference between the Total Accrued Benefit reduced for early commencement and, to the extent permitted by Treasury Regulation sections 1.409A-2(a)(9) and 1.409A-3(j)(5) related to increases and decreases in non-qualified deferred compensation due to the operation of a “qualified plan” (as defined in the 409A regulations), the Qualified Plan Accrued Benefit reduced for early commencement, expressed as a single life annuity commencing as of the “early retirement date” as defined in Section 1.12 of the Salaried Plan as in effect on December 31, 2008.
c)	For all other Participants, the difference between the Total Accrued Benefit and, to the extent permitted by Treasury Regulation sections 1.409A-2(a)(9) and 1.409A-3(j)(5) related to increases and decreases in non-qualified deferred compensation due to the operation of a “qualified plan” (as defined in the 409A regulations), the Qualified Plan Accrued Benefit, expressed as a single life annuity commencing as of the first day of the month coincident with or following the later of age 65 or the date of Separation from Service

3.	A new Section 1.17A is added to read as follows:
	1.17A “Normal Retirement Date” means the first day of the month coincident with or immediately following the Participant’s 65th birthday.
4.	Two new sentences are added after the first sentence of Section 2.01(a) to read as follows:

     If, and only if, such Employee who had an accrued benefit under Section 3.01(a) as of or prior to December 31, 2007 also has a most recent hire date prior to June 1, 2001, then such Employee shall also be eligible to actively participate in this Plan and accrue a benefit under Section 3.01(a) of this Plan until his first date of Separation from Service after June 1, 2001. All other Employees shall not be eligible to actively accrue a benefit under Section 3.01(a) of this Plan, except in accordance with the provisions of this Section 2.01(a) that follow this sentence.

5.	The second sentence of Section 3.01(c) is clarified by adding to the beginning thereof: “Notwithstanding anything in this Plan to the contrary,”.
6.	The second sentence of Section 4.01 is revised to read in its entirety as follows:

The normal date and form of payment of a Participant’s Non-Qualified Accrued Benefit shall be ten annual installments during January of each applicable year (the “Default Payment Form”) commencing during the January that next follows the earlier of the Participant’s Disability or Separation from Service (the “Default Payment Period”); provided that the Default Payment Period will be July, 2009, if such date is later than the Default Payment Period that would otherwise apply; and provided further that the Default Payment Period for Participants shall be July, 2009.

7. Section 4.01(b) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety as follows:

4.01(b)  One of the following life annuity forms may be elected to commence during the month following the month during which Separation from Service occurs, or during the later of the month following the month during which Separation from Service occurs or the month and year elected by the Participant (which must precede the date the Participant attains age 70 and must be later than the date the Participant attains age 65 (or age 55, if the Participant has at least ten years of “Service,” as that term is defined in the applicable Salaried Plan as in effect on December 31, 2008)), provided that the

49

	commencement date will be July, 2009, if such date is later than the date payments would otherwise commence under this Section 4.01(b); and provided further that, the date an annuity commences with respect to any Participant who becomes a Participant on or after the Adoption Date may not be earlier than the date the Participant attains such Participant’s Normal Retirement Date (or the date the Participant attains such Participant’s Early Retirement Date); and provided further that the Committee may designate (and such designation may be on the applicable payment election form) fewer than all of the following alternatives for any one or more of the Participants:
(i)	Single life;
(ii)	Joint and 50% survivor;
(iii)	Joint and 66.67% survivor;
(iv)	Joint and 75% survivor;
(v)	Joint and 100% survivor; or
(vi)	Single life with ten year certain.
	If a Participant has elected a life annuity without specifying the specific form, the default form for an unmarried Participant shall be single life and the default form for a married Participant shall be joint and 50% survivor. All annuity forms shall be paid monthly.
	If Section 1.17(a) is applicable and the Participant elected any form of life annuity form of payment (including, for example, a single life, joint and survivor or life with term certain annuity), an additional benefit will be payable in the form of a temporary monthly term certain annuity from the Early Retirement Date under the Plan to the Normal Retirement Date. Such additional term certain benefit shall be treated as a payment that is separate from the life annuity for Code Section 409A purposes. The amount of the temporary monthly annuity will be the difference between the Total Accrued Benefit reduced for early commencement, and the Non-Qualified Accrued Benefit as determined in Section 1.17(a), including the reduction for early commencement.

8. Section 4.01(d) of the Plan is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

4.01(d)      The Non-Qualified Accrued Benefit is expressed as a single life annuity payable at the applicable time set forth in Section 1.17. If the benefit is to be paid in another form or at another time, the Non-Qualified Accrued Benefit shall be converted to the scheduled form and time of payment by those administering this Plan using the factors used for comparable determinations under the Salaried Plan; provided, however, for purposes of calculating a lump sum or installments (but not any life annuity form), the determination will be made based on benefit amounts payable at the later of Normal Retirement Date or the date of Separation from Service, and the discount rate and mortality assumptions shall be those used by the Company for purposes of calculating pension expense under FAS 87 (or is successor) for this Plan for the Company’s fiscal year during which the lump sum is paid or installments commence (the “Applicable FAS 87 Assumption”). If any payment would have been made or commenced prior to July, 2009 but for a provision in this Section 4.01 that delays the making or commencement of payment until July, 2009, then the payment or payments that are made or commence during July, 2009 shall be adjusted as follows: (i) a lump sum or all installments shall be adjusted using the discount rate under the Applicable FAS 87 Assumption, and (ii) any monthly annuity payments that would have been paid before July, 2009 but are instead paid during July, 2009 will be adjusted using the discount rate under the Applicable FAS 87 Assumption.

9.	The second sentence of Section 4.02(c) is deleted.
10.	The first sentence of Section 4.06 is revised to add “as of the date of Separation from Service” following “Specified Employee.”
11.	The second sentence of Section 9.12 is revised by addition of the following at the end thereof:
	(which additional tax, interest, penalties or income inclusion shall individually and in the aggregate be referred to as “Adverse 409A Consequence” or “Adverse 409A Consequences”)
12.	The following sentence is added to the end of Section 9.12:

The Company may delay any payment to the extent the delay would not result in any Adverse 409A Consequence.

50

13.

New Section 9.14 is added to the Plan to read as follows:

Compliance with a Domestic Relations Order. Notwithstanding any provision in the Plan or any Participant election to the contrary, with respect to payments to a person other than the service provider, the Company may provide for acceleration of the time or form of a payment to an individual other than the Participant, or a payment may be made to an individual other than the Participant, to the extent necessary to fulfill a domestic relations order (as defined in Code § 414(p)(1)(B)). The Company may, in its sole and absolute discretion, impose any restrictions it desires on the terms of a domestic relations order with which it will comply pursuant to this Section.

This Amendment was approved by the HR Committee at its meeting held on November 29, 2010.

CONAGRA FOODS, INC.
By:	/s/ Charlie G. Salter
	Charlie G. Salter
	Vice President, Human Resources

Date: November 29, 2010

51

EX-10.3

Exhibit 10.3

AMENDMENT TWO
CONAGRA FOODS, INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED
VOLUNTARY DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
(January 1, 2009 Restatement)

     This Amendment Two to the ConAgra Foods, Inc. Amended and Restated Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) is adopted by ConAgra Foods, Inc. (the “Company”) and is effective on the date this Amendment is adopted by the HR Committee (the “Adoption Date”).

RECITALS

     1. Initial capitalized terms that are not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Plan.

     2. The Company desires to amend the Plan to permit distribution of benefits under the Plan pursuant to certain domestic relations orders and to provide that the Committee may allocate specific categories of Plan expenses to the Account to which the expense relates.

AMENDMENT

     1. The second, third and fourth sentences of Section 3.1 are revised to read in their entirety as follows:

Unless the Committee specifies otherwise, any Compensation Deferral Contribution election will continue from year-to-year until timely changed by the Participant (and such change will be effective for the Plan Year following the Plan Year during which such election is received by the Company) or until specified otherwise by the Committee to the extent permitted without resulting in any Adverse 409A Consequence. The minimum deposit shall be five percent (5%) of the Participant’s base salary or short-term incentive. The maximum deposit shall be determined and changed by the Committee from time to time to the extent permitted without resulting in any Adverse 409A Consequence (which may be set forth in the Compensation Deferred Agreement) and, in the absence of any such determination shall be fifty percent (50%) of the Participant’s normal salary and eighty-five percent (85%) of the Participant’s short-term incentive.

2. The second sentence of the second paragraph of Section 4.1(b) is deleted.

3. The first sentence of Section 4.5 is revised to add “as of the date of Separation from Service” following “Specified Employee.”

4. The second sentence of Article IX is revised by addition of the following at the end thereof:

(which additional tax, interest, penalties or income inclusion shall individually and in the aggregate be referred to as “Adverse 409A Consequence” or “Adverse 409A Consequences”)

5. The following sentence is added to the end of Article IX:

The Company may delay any payment to the extent the delay would not result in any Adverse 409A Consequence.

6. A new Section 10.22 is added as follows:

10.22 Compliance with a Domestic Relations Order. Notwithstanding any provision in the Plan or any Participant election to the contrary, with respect to payments to a person other than the Participant, the Company may provide for acceleration of the time or form of a payment to an individual other than the Participant, or a payment may be made to an individual other than the Participant, to the extent necessary to fulfill a domestic relations order (as defined in Code § 414(p)(1)(B)). The Company may, in its sole and absolute discretion, impose any restrictions it desires on the terms of a domestic relations order with which it will comply pursuant to this Section.

7. A new Section 10.23 is added as follows:

52

10.23. Expenses. The reasonable expenses incident to the operation of the Plan may be paid by the Company; however, the Company may, in its sole discretion, allocate specific categories of Plan expenses to the Account or Accounts to which the expenses are attributable. Plan expenses that are not specifically allocated and are not paid by the Company shall be charged to the Accounts of Participants and beneficiaries in proportion to their respective Account balances. The Company may, in its sole discretion, choose to pay all or a portion of the Plan expenses allocable to Participants who are current Employees while not paying, or paying a lesser portion of, Plan expenses allocated to other Accounts.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment Two is executed this 29^th day of November, 2010, but effective as of the date set forth herein.

CONAGRA FOODS, INC.
By:	/s/ Charlie G. Salter
	Charlie G. Salter
	Vice President, Human Resources
Date: November 29, 2010

53

EX-10.4

Exhibit 10.4

AMENDMENT ONE
CONAGRA FOODS, INC.
DIRECTORS’ DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
(September, 2009 Restatement)

     This Amendment One to the ConAgra Foods, Inc. Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) is adopted by ConAgra Foods, Inc. (the “Company”) and is effective on the date this Amendment is adopted by the subcommittee of the Human Resources Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors (the “Adoption Date”), pursuant to the authority (a) delegated to the Committee by the Board of Directors of the Company in resolutions adopted November 30, 2010 and (b) delegated to the subcommittee by the Committee in resolutions adopted November 29, 2010.

RECITALS

     1. The Company desires to amend the Plan to clarify a phrase in the Plan.

AMENDMENT

1. The phrase, “ceases to be a director” in Sections 3.6 and 3.11 is replaced with “separates from service”.

     This Amendment One is adopted by the subcommittee of the Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors at its December 10, 2010 meeting.

54

EX-10.5

Exhibit 10.5

FORM OF
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT
CONAGRA FOODS 2009 STOCK PLAN

This Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement” is made on the                      day of                     , 20___between ConAgra Foods, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“ConAgra Foods”), and the undersigned [as applicable: employee/consultant] of the Company (“Participant”).

1. Award Grant. ConAgra Foods hereby grants Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”, and each such unit an “RSU”) to the Participant under the ConAgra Foods 2009 Stock Plan (the “Plan”), as follows:

Participant:
Employee ID:
Number of RSUs:
Date of Grant:
Vesting Date:	(“Settlement Date”)
	The Settlement Date is subject to modification for early settlement upon termination as provided in Paragraph 3.

Dividends: Dividend equivalents on the RSU will [as applicable: be paid to the Participant when regular, cash dividends are declared and paid on the Stock/ be accumulated for the benefit of the Participant and paid to the Participant upon settlement of an RSU as regular, cash dividends are declared and paid on the Stock / not be paid or accumulated.]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, ConAgra Foods and the Participant have caused this Agreement to be executed effective as of the date first written above. ConAgra Foods and the Participant acknowledge that this Agreement includes six pages including this first page. The Participant acknowledges reading and agreeing to all six pages and that in the event of any conflict between the terms of this Agreement and the terms of the Plan, the Plan shall control.

CONAGRA FOODS, INC.	PARTICIPANT
By:
Date	Date

55

2. Definitions. Capitalized terms used herein without definition have the meaning set forth in the Plan. The following terms shall have the respective meanings set forth below:

(a) “Continuous Employment” shall mean the absence of any interruption or termination of employment with the Company and the performance of substantial services. Except as set forth in Section 3(c), Continuous Employment shall not be considered interrupted in the case of sick leave, long term disability, military leave or any other leave of absence approved by the Company.

(b) “Early Retirement” means terminating employment with the Company when the Participant is (i) at least age 55, and (ii) has at least ten years of vesting or credited service with the Company.

(c) “Normal Retirement” shall mean a Separation from Service with the Company on or after attaining age [applicable age, 65 or 62 to be inserted].

(d) “Separation from Service”: “Termination of employment,” “separation from service” and similar terms mean the date that the Participant “separates from service” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code. Generally, a Participant separates from service if and only if the Participant dies, retires, or otherwise has a termination of employment with the Company, determined in accordance with the following:

(i)	Leaves of Absence. The employment relationship is treated as continuing intact while the Participant is on military leave, sick leave, or other bona fide leave of absence if the period of such leave does not exceed six months, or, if longer, so long as the Participant retains a right to reemployment with the Company under an applicable statute or by contract. A leave of absence constitutes a bona fide leave of absence only if there is a reasonable expectation that the Participant will return to perform services for the Company. If the period of leave exceeds six months and the Participant does not retain a right to reemployment under an applicable statute or by contract, the employment relationship is deemed to terminate on the first date immediately following such six month period. Notwithstanding the foregoing, where a leave of absence is due to any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than six months, where such impairment causes the Participant to be unable to perform the duties of his or her position of employment or any substantially similar position of employment, a twenty nine month period of absence shall be substituted for such six month period.
(ii)	Dual Status. Generally, if a Participant performs services both as an employee and an independent contractor, such Participant must separate from service both as an employee, and as an independent contractor pursuant to standards set forth in Treasury Regulations, to be treated as having a separation from service. However, if a Participant provides services to the Company as an employee and as a member of the Board, and if any plan in which such person participates as a Board member is not aggregated with this Agreement pursuant to Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(c)(2)(ii), then the services provided as a director are not taken into account in determining whether the Participant has a separation from service as an employee for purposes of this Agreement.
(iii)	Termination of Employment. Whether a termination of employment has occurred is determined based on whether the facts and circumstances indicate that the Company and the Participant reasonably anticipated that no further services would be performed after a certain date or that the level of bona fide services the Participant would perform after such date (whether as an employee or as an independent contractor except as provided in (ii) above) would permanently decrease to no more than twenty (20) percent of the average level of bona fide services performed (whether as an employee or an independent contractor, except as provided in (ii) above) over the immediately preceding thirty-six month period (or the full period of services to the Company if the Participant has been providing services to the Company less than thirty-six months). For periods during which a Participant is on a paid bona fide leave of absence and has not otherwise terminated employment as described above, for purposes of this paragraph (iii) the Participant is treated as providing bona fide services at a level equal to the level of services that the Participant would have been required to perform to receive the compensation paid with respect to such leave of absence. Periods during which a Participant is on an unpaid bona fide leave of absence and has not otherwise terminated employment are disregarded for purposes of this paragraph (iii) (including for purposes of determining the applicable thirty-six month (or shorter) period).
	As used in connection with the definition of “Separation from Service,” Company includes ConAgra Foods and any other entity that

56

with ConAgra Foods constitutes a controlled group of corporations (as defined in section 414(b) of the Code), or a group of trades or businesses (whether or not incorporated) under common control (as defined in section 414(c) of the Code), substituting 25% for the 80% ownership level for purposes of both 414(b) and (c).

(e) “Specified Employee” is as defined under Section 409A of the Code and Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(i).

(f) “Successors” shall mean the beneficiaries, executors, administrators, heirs, successors and assigns of a person.

3. RSU Settlement.

(a) Continuous Employment. Subject to the Plan and this Agreement, if the Participant has been in Continuous Employment through a Settlement Date (as set forth on Page1 or as modified by Paragraph 3(b)), then the Company will issue to Participant one share of Stock on the Settlement Date for each RSU subject to such Settlement Date.

(b) Termination of Employment. If the Participant’s employment with the Company shall terminate by reason of:

(i)	Death: all RSUs granted pursuant to this Agreement shall become 100% vested and the Settlement Date shall be a date not later than thirty days after death, subject to any deferral on payment required by Section 409A of the Code or other applicable law.
(ii)	Normal Retirement: if Normal Retirement occurs after the first anniversary of the Date of Grant, then all RSUs granted pursuant to this Agreement shall become 100% vested and the Settlement Date shall be a date not later than thirty days after Normal Retirement, subject to any deferral on payment required by Section 409A of the Code or other applicable law.
(iii)	Not for Cause: all RSUs for which a Settlement Date has not occurred shall immediately be forfeited without further consideration to the Participant, except in the case of involuntarily termination as set forth in (iv) below.
(iv)	Early Retirement or Involuntary Termination Due to Disability [as applicable: , Position Elimination or Reduction in Force]. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Participant’s Continuous Employment should be terminated due to Early Retirement or involuntarily terminated due to disability [as applicable: , position elimination or reduction in force] ([each] as defined in the Company’s sole discretion) after a Vesting Date (as set forth below), but prior to the related Settlement Date (as set forth below), the Company will issue shares of Stock following such termination of employment in settlement of the RSUs that have vested as of the date of termination of employment, and such date of termination of employment shall be the Settlement Date for all purposes hereunder. All RSUs for which a Vesting Date (as set forth below) has not occurred on the date of such termination of employment shall immediately be forfeited without further consideration to the Participant.

% Vested		Vesting Date	Settlement Date
	%
	%
	%

57

(v) For Cause prior to the Settlement Date: all RSUs, whether vested or unvested prior to the Settlement Date, shall be immediately forfeited without further consideration to the Participant.

(c) Payment of Taxes Upon Settlement. As a condition of the issuance of shares of Stock upon settlement of RSUs hereunder, the Participant agrees to remit to the Company at the time of settlement any taxes required to be withheld by the Company under Federal, State or local law as a result of the settlement of the RSUs. As a condition of the issuance of shares of Stock upon settlement of RSUs hereunder, the Participant agrees that the Company will deduct from the total shares vested a sufficient number of shares to satisfy the minimum statutory withholding amount permissible. In addition, the Participant may deliver previously acquired shares of Stock held by the Participant for at least six months in order to satisfy additional tax withholding above the minimum statutory tax withholding amount permissible, provided, however, the Participant shall not be entitled to deliver such additional shares if it would cause adverse accounting consequences for the Company.

(d) Specified Employee. Notwithstanding anything (including any provision of the Agreement or Plan) to the contrary, if a Participant is a Specified Employee, payment to the Participant on account of a Separation from Service shall, in accordance with Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-3(i)(2), be made to the Participant on the earlier of (a) the Participant’s death or (b) the first business day (or within 30 days after such first business day) that is more than six months after the date of Separation from Service. In the Company’s sole and absolute discretion, interest may be paid due to such delay. Further, any interest will be calculated in the manner determined by the Company in its sole and absolute discretion. Dividend equivalents will not be paid with respect to any dividends that would have been paid during the delay if the Stock had been issued.

4. Non-Transferability of RSUs. The RSUs may not be assigned, transferred, pledged or hypothecated in any manner (otherwise than by will or the laws of descent or distribution) nor may the Participant enter into any transaction for the purpose of, or which has the effect of, reducing the market risk of holding the RSUs by using puts, calls or similar financial techniques. The RSUs subject to this Agreement may be settled during the lifetime of the Participant only with the Participant. The terms of this Agreement, shall be binding upon the Successors of the Participant.

5. Stock Subject to the RSUs. The Company will not be required to issue or deliver any certificate or certificates for shares to be issued hereunder until such shares have been listed (or authorized for listing upon official notice of issuance) upon each stock exchange on which outstanding shares of the same class are then listed and until the Company has taken such steps as may, in the opinion of counsel for the Company, be required by law and applicable regulations, including the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and state securities laws and regulations, in connection with the issuance of such shares, and the listing of such shares on each such exchange. The Company will use its best efforts to comply with any such requirements.

6. Rights as Stockholder. The Participant or his/her Successors shall have no rights as stockholder with respect to any shares covered by this Agreement until the Participant or his/her Successors shall have become the beneficial owner of such shares, and, except as provided in Section 7 of this Agreement, no adjustment shall be made for dividends or distributions or other rights in respect of such shares for which the record date is prior to the date on which the Participant or his/her Successors shall have become the beneficial owner thereof.

7. Adjustments Upon Changes in Capitalization; Change in Control. In the event of any change in corporate capitalization, corporate transaction, sale or disposition of assets or similar corporate transaction or event involving ConAgra Foods as described in Section 5.4 of the Plan, the Committee shall make equitable adjustment in the number and type of shares subject to this Agreement, provided, however, that no fractional share shall be issued upon subsequent settlement of the RSUs. No adjustment shall be made if such adjustment is prohibited by Section 5.4 of the Plan (relating to Section 409A of the Code). In the event of a “Change of Control” (as defined in the Plan) all of the RSUs shall become immediately vested as provided pursuant to Section 11.5 of the Plan, and the date of the Change of Control shall be a Settlement Date.

“Change of Control” shall occur upon any of the following dates:

(a) The date individuals who constitute the Board (the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least fifty percent (50%) of the members of the Board, provided that any person becoming a director subsequent to the date hereof whose election, or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders, was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors

58

then comprising the Incumbent Board shall be, for purposes of this Agreement, considered as though such person were a member of the Incumbent Board;

(b) The date of consummation of a reorganization, merger or consolidation, in each case, with respect to which persons who were the stockholders of ConAgra Foods immediately prior to such reorganization, merger or consolidation do not, immediately thereafter, own more than 50% of the combined voting power entitled to vote generally in the election of directors of the reorganized, merged or consolidated company’s then outstanding voting securities;

(c) The date of liquidation or dissolution of ConAgra Foods; or

(d) The date that any one person, or more than one person acting as a group who is not related to the Company within the meaning of Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-3(i)((vii)(B), acquires (or has acquired during the 12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person or persons) assets from the Company that have a total gross fair market value equal to or more than 80 percent of the total gross fair market value of all of the assets of the corporation immediately before such acquisition or acquisitions. For this purpose, gross fair market value means the value of the assets of the corporation, or the value of the assets being disposed of, determined without regard to any liabilities associated with such assets.

For purposes of this Section, “more than one person acting as a group” is determined under Treasury regulation Section 1.409A-3(i)(5)(v)(B). If a person owns stock in both entities that enter into a merger, consolidation, purchase or acquisition of stock, such shareholder is considered to be acting as a group with other shareholders in a corporation only with respect to the ownership in that corporation before the transaction giving rise to the change and not with respect to the ownership interest in the other corporation. In no event shall a change of control occur under circumstances that would not constitute a “change in the ownership of a corporation,” a “change in effective control of a corporation,” or a “change in the ownership of a substantial portion of a corporation’s assets,” as those terms are defined in regulations and other applicable guidance issued under section 409A of the Code.

8. Notices. Each notice relating to this Agreement shall be deemed to have been given on the date it is received. Each notice to the Company shall be addressed to its principal Office in Omaha, Nebraska, Attention: Compensation. Each notice to the Participant or any other person or persons entitled to shares issuable upon settlement of the RSUs shall be addressed to the Participant’s address and may be in written or electronic form. Anyone to whom a notice may be given under this Agreement may designate a new address by giving notice to that effect.

9. Benefits of Agreement, This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon each successor of the Company. All obligations imposed upon the Participant and all rights granted to the Company under this Agreement shall be binding upon the Participant’s Successors. This Agreement shall be the sole and exclusive source of any and all rights which the Participant or his/her Successors may have in respect to the Plan or this Agreement.

10. Resolution of Disputes. Any dispute or disagreement which should arise under or as a result of or in any way related to the interpretation, construction or application of this Agreement will be determined by the Committee. Any determination made hereunder shall be final, binding and conclusive for all purposes. This Agreement and the legal relations between the parties hereto shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state of Delaware.

11. Section 409A Compliance. This Agreement is intended to comply with Section 409A of the Code and any regulations or notices provided thereunder. The Company reserves the unilateral right to amend this Agreement on written notice to the Participant in order to comply with such section. It is intended that all compensation and benefits payable or provided to Participant under this Agreement shall, to the extent required to comply with Section 409A of the Code, fully comply with the provisions of Section 409A of the Code and the Treasury Regulations relating thereto so as not to subject Participants to the additional tax, interest or penalties which may be imposed under Section 409A of the Code. None of the Company, its contractors, agents and employees, the Board and each member of the Board shall be liable for any consequences (including, but not limited to, any additional tax, interest or penalties) of any failure to follow the requirements of Section 409A of the Code or any guidance or regulations thereunder, unless such failure was the direct result of an action or failure to act that was undertaken by the Company in bad faith.

12. Amendment. Any amendment to the Plan shall be deemed to be an amendment to this Agreement to the extent that the amendment is applicable hereto; provided, however, that no amendment shall adversely affect the rights of the Participant under this Agreement without the Participant’s consent.

59

EX-10.6

Exhibit 10.6

FORM OF
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT
FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
CONAGRA FOODS 2009 STOCK PLAN

This Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement” is made on the                      day of                     , 20                     between ConAgra Foods, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and the undersigned director of the Company (“Director”).

1. Award Grant. The Company hereby grants Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs,” and each such unit an “RSU”) to the Director under the ConAgra Foods 2009 Stock Plan (the “Plan”), as follows:

     Director: ___________________________

     Number of RSUs: ___________________________

     Date of Grant: ___________________________

     Vesting Date: ___________________________ (the “Vesting Date”)

     The Vesting Date is subject to modification for early settlement as provided in Sections 2 and 6.

Dividends: Dividend equivalents on the RSUs will be accumulated for the benefit of the Director if and when regular cash dividends are declared and paid on the Stock, and will be paid in shares of Stock to the Director upon settlement of the RSUs. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Director have caused this Agreement to be executed effective as of the date first written above. The Company and the Director acknowledge that this Agreement includes four pages including this first page. The Director acknowledges reading and agreeing to all four pages and that in the event of any conflict between the terms of this Agreement and the terms of the Plan, the Plan shall control. Capitalized terms used herein without definition have the meaning set forth in the Plan.

CONAGRA FOODS, INC.		DIRECTOR
By:		By:
	Gary M. Rodkin, President and Chief Executive Officer
Date:		Date:

60

2. RSU Settlement.

     (a) Continuous Service. Subject to the Plan and this Agreement, if the Director serves continuously as a member of the Board from the Date of Grant through the Vesting Date [for interim grant: (the “Vesting Period”)], then the Company will issue to the Director one share of Stock for each RSU as soon as administratively practicable after the Vesting Date (but in no event more than 30 days after the Vesting Date).

     (b) Death or Permanent Disability. If the Director ceases to serve as a member of the Board before the Vesting Date due to the death or permanent disability of the Director (with permanent disability determined in the Company’s sole discretion), then the RSUs will vest upon the date of the Director’s cessation of service as a member of the Board as a result of such death or permanent disability, and the Company will issue to the Director (or the Director’s legal representative) one share of Stock for each RSU as soon as administratively practicable after the Director incurs a Separation from Service (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code) as a result of such death or permanent disability (but in no event more than 30 days after the date of such Separation from Service).

     (c) Other than Death or Permanent Disability. If the Director ceases to serve as a member of the Board before the Vesting Date for any reason other than as set forth in Section 2(b), then the RSUs will vest upon the date of the Director’s cessation of service as a member of the Board at a rate of 25% of the RSUs for each fiscal quarter during the [for interim grant: Vesting Period / for annual grant: fiscal year in which the RSU is granted] with respect to which the Director was serving as a member of the Board on the first day of such fiscal quarter (with any RSUs that do not vest according to this Section 2(c) being forfeited by the Director upon such cessation of service), and the Company will issue to the Director one share of Stock for each vested RSU as soon as administratively practicable after the Director incurs a Separation from Service (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code) (but in no event more than 30 days after the date of such Separation from Service).

     (d) Deferral of Settlement. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything in this Agreement or the Plan to the contrary, a Director may elect to defer receipt of shares of Stock to be received pursuant to this Agreement pursuant to the Company’s Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended from time to time, or any successor deferred compensation plan applicable to non-employee directors.

     (e) Specified Employee. Notwithstanding anything (including any provision of the Agreement or Plan) to the contrary, if the Director becomes a specified employee (as defined in Section 409A of the Code), payment to the Director of any deferred compensation subject to Section 409A on account of a Separation from Service (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code) shall, in accordance with Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-3(i)(2), be made to the Director on the earlier of (i) the Director’s death or (ii) the first business day (or within 30 days after such first business day) that is more than six months after the date of Separation from Service. Interest may be paid due to such delay, provided that such interest payments are made at a reasonable rate in accordance with Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(o). Further, any interest will be calculated in the manner determined by the Company in its sole and absolute discretion. Dividend equivalents will be paid with respect to any dividends that would have been paid during the delay as if the Stock had been issued.

3. Non-Transferability of RSUs. The RSUs may not be assigned, transferred, pledged or hypothecated in any manner (otherwise than by will or the laws of descent or distribution), nor may the Director enter into any transaction for the purpose of, or which has the effect of, reducing the market risk of holding the RSUs by using puts, calls or similar financial techniques. The RSUs subject to this Agreement may be settled during the lifetime of the Director only with the Director. The terms of this Agreement shall be binding upon the beneficiaries, executors, administrators, heirs, successors and assigns (the “Successors”) of the Director.

4. Stock Subject to the RSUs. The Company will not be required to issue or deliver any certificate or certificates for shares to be issued hereunder until such shares have been listed (or authorized for listing upon official notice of issuance) upon each stock exchange on which outstanding shares of the same class are then listed and until the Company has taken such steps as may, in the opinion of counsel for the Company, be required by law and applicable regulations, including the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and state securities laws and regulations, in connection with the issuance of such shares, and the listing of such shares on each such exchange. The Company will use its best efforts to comply with any such requirements.

5. Rights as Stockholder. The Director or his/her Successors shall have no rights as a stockholder with respect to any shares subject to the RSUs until the Director or his/her Successors shall have become the beneficial owner of such shares, and, except as provided in Section 6 of this Agreement, no adjustment shall be made for dividends or distributions or other rights in respect of such shares for which the record date is prior to the date on which the Director or his/her Successors shall have become the beneficial owner thereof.

6. Adjustments Upon Changes in Capitalization; Change in Control. In the event of any change in corporate capitalization, corporate transaction, sale or disposition of assets or similar corporate transaction or event involving the Company as described in Section 5.4 of the Plan, the Committee shall make equitable adjustment in the number and type of shares subject to the RSUs;

61

provided, however, that no fractional share shall be issued upon subsequent settlement of the RSUs. No adjustment shall be made if such adjustment is prohibited by Section 5.4 of the Plan (relating to Section 409A of the Code). The provisions of Section 11.5 of the Plan related to any “Change of Control” (as defined in the Plan) are applicable to this Agreement and the Company will issue to the Director one share of Stock for each RSU as soon as administratively practicable after the date of the Change of Control (but in no event more than 30 days after such date).

7. Notices. Each notice relating to this Agreement shall be deemed to have been given on the date it is received. Each notice to the Company shall be addressed to its principal office in Omaha, Nebraska, Attention: Compensation. Each notice to the Director or any other person or persons entitled to receive shares issuable upon settlement of the RSUs shall be addressed to the Director’s address and may be in written or electronic form. Anyone to whom a notice may be given under this Agreement may designate a new address by giving notice to that effect.

8. Benefits of Agreement. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon each successor of the Company. All obligations imposed upon the Director and all rights granted to the Company under this Agreement shall be binding upon the Director’s Successors. This Agreement and the Plan shall be the sole and exclusive source of any and all rights which the Director or his/her Successors may have in respect to the Plan or this Agreement.

9. Resolution of Disputes. Any dispute or disagreement which should arise under or as a result of or in any way relate to the interpretation, construction or application of this Agreement will be determined by the Board. Any determination made hereunder shall be final, binding and conclusive for all purposes. This Agreement and the legal relations between the parties hereto shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware.

10. Section 409A Compliance. This Agreement is intended to comply with Section 409A of the Code and any regulations or notices provided thereunder. The Company reserves the unilateral right to amend this Agreement on written notice to the Director in order to comply with such section. It is intended that all compensation and benefits payable or provided to Director under this Agreement shall, to the extent required to comply with Section 409A of the Code, fully comply with the provisions of Section 409A of the Code and the Treasury Regulations relating thereto so as not to subject Directors to the additional tax, interest or penalties which may be imposed under Section 409A of the Code. None of the Company, its contractors, agents and employees, the Board and each member of the Board shall be liable for any consequences of any failure to follow the requirements of Section 409A of the Code or any guidance or regulations thereunder, unless such failure was the direct result of an action or failure to act that was undertaken by the Company in bad faith.

11. Amendment. Any amendment to the Plan shall be deemed to be an amendment to this Agreement to the extent that the amendment is applicable hereto; provided, however, that no amendment shall adversely affect the rights of the Director under this Agreement without the Director’s consent; further, provided, that the Director’s consent shall not be required to an amendment that is deemed necessary by the Company to ensure compliance with Section 409A of the Code.

62

EX-10.7

Exhibit 10.7

CONAGRA FOODS, INC.
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN REQUIREMENTS

          This binding commitment by ConAgra Foods, Inc. (the “Company”) is adopted as of the date approved by the sub-committee of the Human Resources Committee (the “Committee”) of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) that was constituted and authorized by the Board and the Committee at their respective November 29, 2010, meetings (the “Meeting Date”) to, among other things, consider and adopt this commitment.

RECITALS

          The Company maintains or has maintained, during the period beginning on January 1, 2009 and ending on the Meeting Date, certain deferred compensation arrangements that are subject to Internal Revenue Code Section 409A (all of which, whether they are policies, agreements, awards or plans are referred to collectively as the “Plans” and individually as a “Plan”). The term “Plan” does not include any arrangement adopted after the Meeting Date.

          Certain of the Plans may be interpreted to provide the Company with discretion to engage in certain acts that, if acted upon, could be argued to create adverse tax, penalty or interest implications as a result of Internal Revenue Code Section 409A (a “409A Violation”) and the Company wishes to commit itself that it will not exercise such discretion in such manner, and the Company desires to commit itself in this regard in a manner that can be enforced and relied upon by Plan participants and that constitutes a Plan amendment that removes the ability of the Company to commit a 409A Violation.

          Certain of the Plans have certain restrictions on certain payments to “Specified Employees,” as required by Internal Revenue Code Section 409A and the regulations and other guidance issued thereunder (all of which shall be referred to as “409A”), and, although not required to do so pursuant to guidance from the Internal Revenue Service related to 409A, the Company desires to amend those Plans to clarify the definition of “Specified Employee.”

BINDING COMMITMENT/AMENDMENTS
RELATED TO THE PLANS

          The Plans include restricted stock unit (“RSU”) agreements that provide (which provision is the “Representation Provision”) discretion to the Company, as a condition to settlement of the RSU, to require the participant to make a representation or warranty as may be required by any applicable law or regulation (a “Representation”). The Company has never required a Representation and has determined that none is required. Therefore, the Company hereby commits that it will not in the future require a Representation, and the Representation Provision is hereby deleted from any such Plan.

          To the extent any Plan that provides to the Company or the Committee the right to set off (a “Set Off Right”) a Plan liability that constitutes “deferred compensation” that is subject to 409A against an amount owed by the Plan participant to the Company (or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates), the Company, through the Committee, hereby commits not to exercise any Set Off Right, and any Set Off Right is hereby deleted from any Plan.

          To the extent any Plan that is an accepted offer of employment between the Company and an individual that was or is in effect on or after January 1, 2009, and provides for severance pay based on salary or base pay, as part of an offer letter and/or outside of a formal employment agreement, such Plan is hereby clarified to expressly state the intent and practice of the Company, which is that any severance pay under such Plan shall be triggered only by a “Separation from Service” (as defined in 409A) and shall commence with the next regular payroll processing date of the Company that follows a such Separation from Service (but not later than within thirty (30) days following such Separation from Service) and shall thereafter continue to be paid on each regular payroll payment date (but no less frequently than monthly), in the same amount as the rate of salary in effect for the individual as of the date of Separation from Service (or in the amount specified in the Plan for one or more payroll payment dates during the severance pay continuation period, including different amounts for two or more groups of payroll payment dates during such period). To the extent the individual is required to sign a release, the commencement of payment will not be delayed pending receipt of the release, but failure to sign and return the release by the deadline set by the Company, or timely execution of a revocation of the release, will result in forfeiture of all severance pay, and the individual must repay to the Company any previously paid severance pay.

          Each of the Plans that provides for the payment of any deferred compensation subject to 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) (“409A Compensation”) to an individual triggered by the individual’s “Separation from Service” (as defined in 409A) , “severance,” “termination of employment,” “retirement” or similar term or phrase (each of which shall be referred to as a “Separation from Service Event”), and that needs to be corrected under Section VIII of Internal Revenue Service Notice 2010-6, is hereby amended to provide that notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, if the individual is a “Specified Employee” (as defined in 409A), payment on account of such a Separation from Service of any 409A Compensation (and only such 409A Compensation) shall, in

63

accordance with Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-3(i)(2), be made at the time specified in the Plan but not earlier than the later of (i) eighteen (18) months following the date of correction, or (ii) the first business day that is more than six months after the date of the individual’s Separation from Service (except if the Plan would otherwise provide for an earlier payment related to the individual’s death, such earlier payment for death in accordance with the provisions of the Plan shall not be delayed). In addition, each Plan that includes the term “Specified Employee” is hereby amended to clarify that the determination of whether or not an individual is a Specified Employee for purposes of a six month delay in commencement of payments is made as of the date of such individual’s Separation from Service, all in accordance with 409A.

          To the extent any Plan provides for a payment period that begins after verification of an event, consistent with the application of section IV.A. of Internal Revenue Service Notice 2010-6 to such provision, such Plan is hereby amended to strike the reference to verification, and requirement of verification, so that the period during which the Company is required to make or commence payment begins on the date of the event, rather than after verification of the event.

          The following sentence is added to all Plans: “To the extent this document provides deferred compensation that is subject to 409A, this document (including terms used therein) shall be interpreted and operated in a manner so as to avoid a 409A Violation.”

          The undersigned hereby certifies that this document was approved and adopted by the Sub-Committee of the Committee on December 10, 2010.

CONAGRA FOODS, INC.
By:	/s/ Colleen Batcheler
	Title: EVP, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
	Date: December 10, 2010

64

EX-10.8

Exhibit 10.8

Non-Employee Director Compensation Program for the
Remainder of the 2011 Plan Year and for the 2012 Plan Year

          The following compensation program is available to non-employee directors for the remainder of the plan year that runs from the conclusion of the 2010 Annual Stockholders’ Meeting until the last day of fiscal 2011 (the “2011 Plan Year”) and for the plan year that runs from the first day of fiscal 2012 to the last day of fiscal 2012 (the “2012 Plan Year”).

          Retainers and Fees for Non-Employee Directors Other than the Chairman:

• Effective on January 1, 2011, an annual Board membership retainer of $85,000 shall be paid to each non-employee director (other than the Chairman of the Board).

o Prorated payments for the remainder of the 2011 Plan Year shall be payable (1) on January 3, 2011 in the total amount of $14,166.67, reflecting payment for January and February, and (2) on March 1, 2011 in the total amount of $21,250.00, reflecting payment for March, April, and May.

o Payments for the 2012 Plan Year will be made in advance in four equal installments on the first trading day of each of the following months: June 2011, September 2011, December 2011, and March 2012.

o Each of January 3, 2011, March 1, 2011 and the first trading day of each of June 2011, September 2011, December 2011, and March 2012, is referred to herein as a “Payable Date”.

• Effective on January 1, 2011, an annual Committee Chair retainer of $15,000 shall be paid to the Chair of each standing committee (other than the Executive Committee).

• Prorated payments for the remainder of the 2011 Plan Year shall be payable (1) on January 3, 2011 in the total amount of $2,500.00, reflecting payment for January and February, and (2) on March 1, 2011 in the total amount of $3,750.00, reflecting payment for March, April, and May.

o Payments for the 2012 Plan Year will be made in advance in four equal installments on each applicable Payable Date.

• Effective on January 1, 2011, in the event that a director’s attendance is required at more than 24 Board and committee meetings during the 2011 Plan Year or the 2012 Plan Year, meeting fees in the amount of $1,500 shall be paid to each non-employee director (other than the Chairman) for each Board and committee meeting attended and at which a director’s attendance was required in excess of 24 meetings for such Plan Year; fees will be aggregated and payment will be made in arrears on the applicable Payable Date.

• Directors who join the Board or who are elected to a Chairmanship after the start of a quarter will receive a prorated retainer for that quarter based on the actual number of days served. The prorated quarterly payment will be paid on the next Payable Date, along with the installment due on that date.

          Equity Awards for Non-Employee Directors Other than the Chairman:

• Each non-employee director (other than the Chairman of the Board) shall receive a grant of restricted stock units (the “RSUs”) with a value equal to $125,000 for each plan year in which she or he serves. The number of RSUs granted shall be equivalent to $125,000 divided by the average of the closing stock price of ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stock on the NYSE for the thirty (30) trading days prior to (and not including) the date of grant and rounding to the nearest share. The RSUs will be granted upon the terms and conditions approved by the Board and consistent with the ConAgra Foods 2009 Stock Plan.

o The grant date for the 2011 Plan Year shall be November 30, 2010.

o The grant date for the 2012 Plan Year shall be May 31, 2011, the first trading day of fiscal 2012.

          Chairman’s Compensation:

• For the 2012 Plan Year, in lieu of the cash and equity compensation described above and payable to other non-employee directors, the Chairman shall receive a grant of RSUs with a value equal to $375,000. The number of RSUs granted shall be equivalent to $375,000 divided by the average of the closing stock price of ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stock on the NYSE for the thirty (30) trading days prior to (and not including) the date of grant and rounding to the nearest share. The RSUs will be granted upon the terms and conditions approved by the Board and consistent with the ConAgra Foods 2009 Stock Plan. The grant date for the 2012 Plan Year shall be May 31, 2011, the first trading day of fiscal 2012.

65

RSU Terms

• Director RSUs will vest one year from the date of grant (100%), subject to continued service during the entire term. Vesting will be accelerated in the event of death or permanent disability or, in the event the director is no longer serving one year from the date of grant (as a director or in the Chairman role), vesting will be prorated 25% for each fiscal quarter during which the director served on the first day of the fiscal quarter. Should a director be newly appointed after the annual equity grant is made, then a prorata portion of the Board’s annual equity grant will be granted in connection with appointment based on the number of months remaining for the applicable Plan Year.

Other Programs: The following additional programs are available.

• Non-Employee Directors’ Medical Plan: Non-employee directors are eligible to participate in the medical plan in accordance with the plan’s terms, with premiums paid by the directors.

• Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan: Non-employee directors may elect to defer payment of their cash or stock compensation into the non-qualified deferred compensation plan for non-employee directors in accordance with the plan’s terms.

• ConAgra Foods Matching Gifts Program: ConAgra Foods will match up to $10,000 of each non-employee director’s gift(s) to eligible charitable organization(s) during each of the 2011 Plan Year and the 2012 Plan Year.

• Directors’ Charitable Award Program: Directors first elected to the Board prior to 2003 continue to have grandfathered participation in the Directors’ Charitable Award Program (which was discontinued in 2003).

66

EX-12

Exhibit 12

ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
($ in millions)

	Thirty-nine
	weeks ended
	February 27, 2011
Earnings:
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity method investment earnings	$	828.0
Add (deduct):
Fixed charges		200.3
Distributed income of equity method investees		10.6
Capitalized interest		(9.4	)
Earnings available for fixed charges (a)	$	1,029.5
Fixed charges:
Interest expense	$	163.9
Capitalized interest		9.4
One third of rental expense (1)		27.0
Total fixed charges (b)	$	200.3
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (a/b)		5.1

(1) Considered to be representative of interest factor in rental expense.

67 

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Gary M. Rodkin, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 27, 2011 of ConAgra Foods, Inc.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 4, 2011
 

/s/ GARY M. RODKIN  

Gary M. Rodkin 

Chief Executive Officer 

68 

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

          I, John F. Gehring, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 27, 2011 of ConAgra Foods, Inc.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 4, 2011
 

/s/ JOHN F. GEHRING  

John F. Gehring 

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 

69 

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     I, Gary M. Rodkin, Chief Executive Officer of ConAgra Foods, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that ConAgra Foods, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 27, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and that the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ConAgra Foods, Inc. as of and for the periods presented.

April 4, 2011

/s/ GARY M. RODKIN  

Gary M. Rodkin 

Chief Executive Officer 

     I, John F. Gehring, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of ConAgra Foods, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that ConAgra Foods, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 27, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and that the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ConAgra Foods, Inc. as of and for the periods presented.

April 4, 2011

/s/ JOHN F. GEHRING  

John F. Gehring  

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ConAgra Foods, Inc. and will be retained by ConAgra Foods, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

70