General (Policy)	9 Months Ended
Apr. 30, 2025
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]
Principles of Consolidation	The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Comtech Telecommunications Corp. and its subsidiaries ("Comtech," "we," "us," or "our") as of and for the three and nine months ended April 30, 2025 and 2024 are unaudited. In the opinion of management, the information furnished reflects all material adjustments (which include normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the unaudited interim periods. Our results of operations for such periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the full fiscal year. The preparation of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, and the reported amounts of net sales and expenses during the reported period. Actual results may differ from those estimates. Our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2024 and the notes thereto contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, and all of our other filings with the SEC. During the nine months ended April 30, 2025, we reclassified warrant liabilities as of July 31, 2024 from "Other Liabilities" to "Warrant and Derivative Liabilities" on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets to conform to the current period presentation. Liquidity and Going Concern Pursuant to the requirements of ASC Topic 205-40, Disclosure of Uncertainties About an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, we are required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. This evaluation does not take into consideration the potential mitigating effect of our plans that have not been fully implemented or are not within our control as of the date the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are issued. When substantial doubt exists, we are required to evaluate whether the mitigating effect of our plans sufficiently alleviates substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The mitigating effect of our plans, however, is only considered if both (i) it is probable that the plans will be effectively implemented within one year after the date that the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are issued, and (ii) it is probable that the plans, when implemented, will mitigate the relevant conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are issued. As of the date these financial statements were issued (the "issuance date"), we evaluated whether the following conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern over the next twelve months beyond the issuance date. Over the past three fiscal years, we incurred operating losses of $79,890,000, $14,660,000 and $33,752,000 in fiscal 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. More recently, we recognized an operating loss of $1,532,000 and $140,959,000 in the three and nine months ended April 30, 2025. In addition, over the past three fiscal years, net cash used in operating activities was $54,495,000 and $4,433,000 in fiscal 2024 and 2023, respectively, and net cash provided by operating activities was $1,997,000 in fiscal 2022. More recently, net cash used in operating activities was $19,739,000 in the nine months ended April 30, 2025. Our ability to meet future anticipated liquidity needs over the next year beyond the issuance date will largely depend on our ability to generate positive cash inflows from operations, maximize our borrowing capacity under our Credit Facility, as discussed further below, and/or secure other sources of outside capital. While we believe we will be able to generate sufficient positive cash inflows, maximize our borrowing capacity and secure outside capital, there can be no assurance our plans will be successfully implemented and, as such, we may be unable to continue as a going concern over the next year beyond the issuance date. As discussed further in Note (10) – Credit Facility, on June 17, 2024, we entered into a credit facility with a new syndicate of lenders, which replaced our prior credit facility. As further discussed below, we subsequently amended the credit facility on October 17, 2024 and March 3, 2025 (the "Credit Facility"). The Credit Facility consists of a committed $162,000,000 term loan (“Term Loan”) and $56,821,000 revolving loan (“Revolver Loan”). At April 30, 2025 and June 6, 2025 (the date closest to the issuance date), total outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility were $168,008,000. At April 30, 2025 and June 6, 2025, $23,416,000 was drawn on the Revolver Loan. As of the issuance date, our available sources of liquidity approximate $27,258,000, consisting of qualified cash and cash equivalents and the remaining available portion of the committed Revolver Loan. The Credit Facility was amended on October 17, 2024 (the "First Amendment") which, among other things: (i) waived all defaults under the Credit Facility, specifically in connection with our Net Leverage Ratio and Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenants as of July 31, 2024; (ii) increased the interest rate margins applicable to the Term Loan to 12.00% per annum for Base Rate Loans and 13.00% per annum for SOFR Loans and increased interest rate margins applicable to the Revolving Loan by 1.00% at each level; (iii) permitted the incurrence of $25,000,000 of total unsecured subordinated debt (as described below); (iv) suspended testing of the Net Leverage Ratio and the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenants until January 31, 2025; (v) provided the lenders a consent right with respect to Revolver Loan borrowings above $32,500,000; and (vi) amended the maturity date to the earlier of: (x) July 31, 2028; or (y) 90 days prior to the earliest date that the debt under the Amended Subordinated Credit Facility (as defined below) becomes due and payable. The Credit Facility was amended again on March 3, 2025 (the "Second Amendment") which, among other things: (i) waived all defaults under the Credit Facility, specifically in connection with our Net Leverage Ratio and Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenants as of January 31, 2025; (ii) decreased the interest rate margins applicable to the Term Loan from 12.00% per annum to 9.50% per annum for Base Rate Loans and from 13.00% per annum to 10.50% per annum for SOFR Loans; (iii) permitted the incurrence of an additional $40,000,000 of total unsecured subordinated debt (as described below); (iv) suspended testing of the Net Leverage Ratio and the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenants until October 31, 2025; (v) suspended our ability to pay interest in-kind until after the interest rate margins are tested based on net leverage ratios; (vi) permitted partial principal repayments of $27,252,000 and $9,084,000 on the Term Loan and Revolving Loan, respectively, and waived the prepayment fees that would have been payable under the Credit Facility with regard to such repayments; (vii) permanently reduced commitments under the Revolving Loan Facility by $3,179,000 and provided the lenders a consent right with respect to Revolver Loan borrowings above $29,321,000; (viii) reduced the minimum quarterly average liquidity requirement from $20,000,000 to $17,500,000; and (ix) provided the lenders the right to appoint an independent director to our Board of Directors after May 31, 2025. The Credit Facility, as amended, requires compliance with restrictive and financial covenants, including: a maximum Net Leverage Ratio of 3.15x commencing with the four fiscal quarter period ending October 31, 2025; a minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of 1.25x commencing with the four fiscal quarter period ending October 31, 2025; a minimum Average Liquidity requirement at each fiscal quarter end of $17,500,000; and a minimum EBITDA of $35,000,000 for the four fiscal quarter period ending October 31, 2025. Such covenants adjust under the Credit Facility in future periods. Over the next twelve months beyond the issuance date, we believe that it is probable we will not be able to comply with one or more of these covenants. As discussed further in Note (11) – Amended Subordinated Credit Facility, on October 17, 2024, we entered into a subordinated credit agreement (the "Subordinated Credit Agreement") with the existing holders of our Convertible Preferred Stock, which provided for an initial subordinated unsecured term loan facility in the aggregate principal amount of $25,000,000. On March 3, 2025, we entered into an amendment to the Subordinated Credit Agreement (the “Amended Subordinated Credit Facility”) which, in addition to providing incremental aggregate principal of $40,000,000, waived all defaults under the Subordinated Credit Agreement, specifically in connection with our Net Leverage Ratio and Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenants as of January 31, 2025 and suspends testing of the Net Leverage Ratio and the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenants under the Subordinated Credit Agreement until October 31, 2025. The net proceeds of the Amended Subordinated Credit Facility were principally used to repay a portion of the Term Loan and Revolving Loan on March 3, 2025 (as discussed above), fund our general working capital needs and enable us to negotiate the Second Amendment to the Credit Facility, including the waiver of existing defaults, as discussed above. At April 30, 2025 and June 6, 2025 (the date closest to the issuance date), total outstanding borrowings under the Amended Subordinated Credit Facility (excluding accreted interest and make-whole adjustments) were $65,000,000. Our ability to meet our current obligations as they become due may be impacted by our ability to remain compliant with the financial covenants required by the Credit Facility and Amended Subordinated Credit Facility, or to obtain future waivers or amendments from the lenders in the event compliance is not maintained. While we believe we will be able to secure such waivers or amendments, as needed, there can be no assurance such waivers or amendments will be secured or on terms that are acceptable to us. If we are unable to secure waivers or amendments, the lenders may declare an event of default, which would cause an immediate acceleration and repayment of all outstanding principal, interest and fees due under our Credit Facility and Amended Subordinated Credit Facility. Absent our ability to repay the forgoing amounts upon the declaration of an event of default, the lenders may exercise their rights and remedies under the Credit Facility and Amended Subordinated Credit Facility, which may include, among others, a seizure of substantially all of our assets and/or the liquidation of our operations. If an event of default occurs that allows the lenders to exercise these rights and remedies over the next year beyond the issuance date, we will be unable to continue as a going concern. As of the issuance date, our plans to address our ability to continue as a going concern include, among other things: •executing a strategy to transform Comtech including, but not limited to, the initiatives set forth below; •an exploration of strategic alternatives for our various businesses and product lines, including the potential sale or divestiture of assets or business lines; •the pursuit of further portfolio-shaping opportunities to enhance profitability, efficiency and focus; •the implementation of operational initiatives to reduce the cost structure and better align operating costs with revenue expectations; •pursuing initiatives to reduce investments in working capital, namely accounts receivable and inventory; •improving process disciplines to achieve operating profitability by entering into more favorable sales or service contracts; •reevaluating our business plans to identify opportunities (e.g., within each of our segments) to focus future investment on our most strategic, high-margin revenue opportunities; •reevaluating our business plans to identify opportunities to reduce capital expenditures; and •seeking opportunities to improve liquidity through any combination of debt and/or equity financing (including potentially further amending our Credit Facility, Convertible Preferred Stock and/or Amended Subordinated Credit Facility). While we believe the implementation of some or all of the elements of our plans over the next year beyond the issuance date will be successful, these plans are not all solely within management’s control and, as such, we can provide no assurance our plans are probable of being effectively implemented as of the issuance date. Therefore, as described above, there are uncertainties that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared on the basis that we will continue to operate as a going concern, which contemplates we will be able to realize assets and settle liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future. Accordingly, the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of these uncertainties.
Adoption of Accounting Standards and Updates	Adoption of Accounting Standards and Updates We are required to prepare our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with the FASB ASC, which is the source for all authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which are commonly referred to as "GAAP." The FASB ASC is subject to updates by the FASB, which are known as Accounting Standards Updates ("ASUs"). During the nine months ended April 30, 2025, the following FASB ASUs have been issued and incorporated into the FASB ASC and have not yet been adopted by us as of April 30, 2025: •FASB ASU No. 2023-07, which requires the disclosure of significant segment expenses, by reportable segment, regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) and included within each reported measure of segment profit or loss. The disclosure of other segment items by reportable segment are also required and would constitute the difference between segment revenues less these significant segment expenses and reported segment profit or loss. On an annual basis, the update requires an entity to disclose the CODM's title and position, as well as describe how the CODM uses the reported measures. Additionally, all existing annual disclosures about segment profit or loss must be provided on an interim basis in addition to the disclosure of significant segment expenses and other segment items. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023 (our fiscal year beginning on August 1, 2024) and for interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024 (our interim period beginning on August 1, 2025), with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this guidance will impact our disclosures only and we do not expect it to have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. •FASB ASU No. 2023-09 enhances and establishes new income tax disclosure requirements in addition to modifying and eliminating certain existing requirements. Most notably under the new requirements is greater disaggregation of information in the effective tax rate reconciliation, including the inclusion of both percentages and amounts, specific categories, and additional information for reconciling items meeting a quantitative threshold defined by the guidance. Additionally, disclosures of income taxes paid and income tax expense must be disaggregated by federal, state and foreign taxes, with income taxes paid further disaggregated for individual jurisdictions that represent 5 percent or more of total income taxes paid. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024 (our fiscal year beginning on August 1, 2025), with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this guidance will impact our disclosures only and we do not expect it to have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. •FASB ASU No. 2024-03, which requires more detailed disclosures of certain categories of expenses (including purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation, and amortization) that are components of existing expense captions presented on the face of the income statement. All entities are required to apply the guidance prospectively with an option for retrospective application. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026 (our fiscal year beginning on August 1, 2027), and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027 (our interim period beginning on August 1, 2028), with early adoption permitted, as clarified in ASU No. 2025-01 issued January 6, 2025.
Revenue Recognition	Revenue Recognition In accordance with FASB ASC 606, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" ("ASC 606"), we record revenue in an amount that reflects the consideration to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for goods or services promised to customers. Under ASC 606, we follow a five-step model to: (1) identify the contract with our customer; (2) identify our performance obligations in our contract; (3) determine the transaction price for our contract; (4) allocate the transaction price to our performance obligations; and (5) recognize revenue using one of the following two methods: •Over time - We recognize revenue using the over time method when there is a continuous transfer of control to the customer over the contractual period of performance. This generally occurs when we enter into a long-term contract relating to the design, development or manufacture of complex equipment or technology platforms to a buyer’s specification (or to provide services related to the performance of such contracts) for which we have determined there is no alternative use, as defined in ASC 606. Continuous transfer of control is typically supported by contract clauses which allow our customers to unilaterally terminate a contract for convenience, pay for costs incurred plus a reasonable profit and take control of work-in-process. Revenue recognized over time is generally based on the extent of progress toward completion of the related performance obligations. The selection of the method to measure progress requires judgment and is based on the nature of the products or services provided. In certain instances, typically for firm fixed-price contracts, we use the cost-to-cost measure because it best depicts the transfer of control to the customer which occurs as we incur costs on our contracts. Under the cost-to-cost measure, the extent of progress toward completion is measured based on the ratio of costs incurred to date to the total estimated costs at completion, including warranty costs. Revenues, including estimated fees or profits, are recorded proportionally as costs are incurred. Costs to fulfill generally include direct labor, materials, subcontractor costs, other direct costs and an allocation of indirect costs. When these contracts are modified, the additional goods or services are generally not distinct from those already provided. As a result, these modifications form part of an existing contract and we must update the transaction price and our measure of progress for the single performance obligation and recognize a cumulative catch-up to revenue and gross profits. A cost-to-cost measure of progress is principally used to account for contracts in our Satellite and Space Communications segment and, to a lesser extent, certain location-based and messaging infrastructure contracts in our public safety and location technologies product line within our Terrestrial and Wireless Networks segment. For over time contracts using a cost-to-cost measure of progress, we have an estimate at completion ("EAC") process in which management reviews the progress and execution of our performance obligations and calculates an estimated contract profit based on total estimated contract revenue and cost. Since certain contracts extend over a long period of time, the impact of revisions in revenue and/or cost estimates during the progress of work may impact current period earnings through a cumulative adjustment. Additionally, if the EAC process indicates a loss, a provision is made for the total anticipated loss in the period that it becomes evident. Contract revenue and cost estimates for significant contracts are generally reviewed and reassessed at least quarterly. For service-based contracts in our Terrestrial and Wireless Networks segment, we also recognize revenue over time. These services are typically recognized as a series of services performed over the contract term using the straight-line method, or based on our customers’ actual usage of the networks and platforms which we provide. •Point in time - When a performance obligation is not satisfied over time, we must record revenue using the point in time accounting method which generally results in revenue being recognized upon shipment or delivery of a promised good or service to a customer. This generally occurs when we enter into short-term contracts or purchase orders where items are provided to customers with relatively quick turn-around times. Modifications to such contracts and/or purchase orders, which typically provide for additional quantities or services, are accounted for as a new contract because the pricing for these additional quantities or services are based on standalone selling prices. Point in time accounting is principally applied to contracts in our satellite ground infrastructure product line (which includes satellite modems and traveling wave tube amplifiers). The contracts related to these product lines do not meet the requirements for over time revenue recognition because our customers cannot utilize the equipment for its intended purpose during any phase of our manufacturing process; customers do not simultaneously receive and/or consume the benefits provided by our performance; customers do not control the asset (i.e., prior to delivery, customers cannot direct the use of the asset, sell or exchange the equipment, etc.); and, although many of our contracts have termination for convenience clauses and/or an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date, our performance creates an asset with an alternative use through the point of delivery. In determining that our equipment has alternative use, we considered the underlying manufacturing process for our products. In the early phases of manufacturing, raw materials and work in process (including subassemblies) consist of common parts that are highly fungible among many different types of products and customer applications. Finished products are either configured to our standard configuration or based on our customers’ specifications. Finished products, whether built to our standard specification or to a customers’ specification, can be sold to a variety of customers and across many different end use applications with minimal rework, if needed, and without incurring a significant economic loss. When identifying a contract with our customer, at inception, we consider approvals and commitments from both parties, if the rights of the parties are identified, if the payment terms are identified, if it has commercial substance, the transaction price to which we are entitled and if collectability is probable. When identifying performance obligations, we consider whether there are multiple promises and how to account for them. In our contracts, multiple promises are separated if they are distinct, both individually and in the context of the contract. If multiple promises in a contract are highly interrelated or comprise a series of distinct services performed over time, they are combined into a single performance obligation. In some cases, we may also provide the customer with an additional service-type warranty, which we recognize as a separate performance obligation. Service-type warranties do not represent a significant portion of our consolidated net sales. When service-type warranties represent a separate performance obligation, the revenue is deferred and recognized ratably over the extended warranty period. Our contracts, from time-to-time, may also include options for additional goods and services. To date, these options have not represented material rights to the customer as the pricing for them reflects standalone selling prices. As a result, we do not consider options we offer to be performance obligations for which we must allocate a portion of the transaction price. In many cases, we provide assurance-type warranty coverage for some of our products for a period of at least one year from the date of delivery. When identifying the transaction price, we typically utilize the contract's stated price as a starting point. The transaction price in certain arrangements may include estimated amounts of variable consideration, including award fees, incentive fees or other provisions that can either increase or decrease the transaction price. We estimate variable consideration as the amount to which we expect to be entitled, and we include estimated amounts in the transaction price to the extent it is probable that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the estimation uncertainty is resolved. The estimation of this variable consideration and determination of whether to include estimated amounts in the transaction price are based largely on an assessment of our anticipated performance and all information (e.g., historical, current and forecasted) that is reasonably available to us. When allocating the contract’s transaction price, we consider each distinct performance obligation. For contracts with multiple performance obligations, we allocate the contract’s transaction price to each performance obligation using our best estimate of the standalone selling price of each distinct good or service in the contract. We determine standalone selling price based on the price at which the performance obligation is sold separately. If the standalone selling price is not observable through past transactions, we estimate the standalone selling price taking into account available information such as market conditions, including geographic or regional specific factors, competitive positioning, internal costs, profit objectives and internally approved pricing guidelines related to the performance obligations. Most of our contracts with customers are denominated in U.S. dollars and typically are either firm fixed-price or cost reimbursable type contracts (including fixed-fee, incentive-fee and time-and-material type contracts). In almost all of our contracts with customers, we are the principal in the arrangement and report revenue on a gross basis. Transaction prices for contracts with U.S. domestic and international customers are usually based on specific negotiations with each customer and in the case of the U.S. government, sometimes based on estimated or actual costs of providing the goods or services in accordance with applicable regulations.Sales to U.S. government customers include sales to the U.S. Department of Defense ("DoD"), intelligence and civilian agencies, as well as sales directly to or through prime contractors. Domestic sales include sales to commercial customers, as well as to U.S. state and local governments. For the three and nine months ended April 30, 2025 and 2024, except for the U.S. government, there were no customers that represented 10.0% or more of consolidated net sales. The timing of revenue recognition, billings and collections results in receivables, unbilled receivables and contract liabilities on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Under typical payment terms for our contracts accounted for over time, amounts are billed as work progresses in accordance with agreed-upon contractual terms, either at periodic intervals (e.g., monthly) or upon achievement of contractual milestones. For certain contracts with provisions that are intended to protect customers in the event we do not satisfy our performance obligations, billings occur subsequent to revenue recognition, resulting in unbilled receivables. Under ASC 606, unbilled receivables constitute contract assets. Except for certain unbilled receivables (see Note (7) - Accounts Receivable) and work in process inventory (see Note (8) - Inventories), there were no other material impairment losses recognized on contract assets during the three and nine months ended April 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. On large long-term contracts, and for contracts with international customers that do not do business with us regularly, payment terms typically require advanced payments and deposits. Under ASC 606, payments received from customers in excess of revenue recognized to-date results in a contract liability. These contract liabilities are not considered to represent a significant financing component of the contract because we believe these cash advances and deposits are generally used to meet working capital demands which can be higher in the earlier stages of a contract. Also, advanced payments and deposits provide us with some measure of assurance that the customer will perform on its obligations under the contract. Under the typical payment terms for our contracts accounted for at a point in time, costs are accumulated in inventory until the time of billing, which generally coincides with revenue recognition. Of the current contract liability balance of $65,834,000 at July 31, 2024 and $66,351,000 at July 31, 2023, $48,661,000 and $39,877,000 was recognized as revenue during the nine months ended April 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. We recognize the incremental costs to obtain or fulfill a contract as an expense when incurred if the amortization period of the asset is one year or less; otherwise, such costs are capitalized and amortized over the estimated life of the contract. During the three months ended April 30, 2025 and 2024, incremental costs to obtain or fulfill contracts with an amortization period greater than one year were $763,000 and $818,000, respectively. During the nine months ended April 30, 2025 and 2024, incremental costs to obtain or fulfill contracts with an amortization period greater than one year were $2,717,000 and $2,070,000, respectively. Commissions payable to our internal sales and marketing employees or contractors that are incremental to the acquisition of long-term customer contracts are capitalized and amortized consistent with the pattern of revenue recognition through cost of sales on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Commissions payable that are not incremental to the acquisition of long-term contracts are expensed as incurred in selling, general and administrative expenses on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. As for commissions payable to our third-party sales representatives related to large long-term contracts, we consider these types of commissions both direct and incremental costs to obtain and fulfill such contracts. Therefore, such commissions are included in total estimated costs at completion for such contracts and expensed over time through cost of sales on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Remaining performance obligations represent the transaction price of firm orders for which work has not been performed as of the end of a fiscal period. Remaining performance obligations, which we refer to as backlog, exclude unexercised contract options and potential orders under indefinite delivery / indefinite quantity ("IDIQ") contracts.
Fair Value Measurements and Financial Instruments	Fair Value Measurements and Financial Instruments Using the fair value hierarchy described in FASB ASC 820 "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures," we valued our cash and cash equivalents using Level 1 inputs that were based on quoted market prices. We believe that the carrying amounts of our other current financial assets (such as accounts receivable) and other current liabilities (including accounts payable, accrued expenses and the current portion of long-term debt) approximate their fair values due to their short-term maturities. Additionally, the carrying amounts of our senior debt approximate their fair values due to variable interest rates and pricing grids related to such debt, as amended. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs developed using the best available information under the circumstances. Level 3 inputs are supported by little or no market activity, are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities and reflect our assumptions related to how market participants would use similar inputs to price the asset or liability. As further discussed in Note (10) - Credit Facility, we used Level 3 inputs to value the warrants issued to lenders in connection with our Credit Facility. As of April 30, 2025, we determined the fair value of such warrants based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following estimates: exercise price of $0.10, risk free rate of 3.8%, volatility of 65.0%, and expected life of 6.1 years. We also used Level 3 inputs to value the combined embedded derivative liability associated with our Credit Facility. As of April 30, 2025, we determined the fair value of the combined embedded derivative liability using a with-and-without scenario-based discounted cash flow method, which reflected our estimates regarding the probability and timing of events that could result in additional payments of interest and/or fees to such lenders as stated in our Credit Facility. As further discussed in Note (11) - Amended Subordinated Credit Facility, we used Level 3 inputs to value the make-whole amount and combined embedded derivative liability associated with our Amended Subordinated Credit Facility. As of April 30, 2025, we determined the fair value of the combined embedded derivative liability using a with-and-without scenario-based discounted cash flow method, which reflected our estimates regarding the probability and timing of events that could result in additional payments of interest and/or accelerated payments of principal and make-whole amounts to such lenders as stated in our Amended Subordinated Credit Facility. As further discussed in Note (18) - Convertible Preferred Stock, we used Level 3 inputs to value the warrants contingently issuable and combined embedded derivative liability associated with our Convertible Preferred Stock. As of April 30, 2025, we determined the fair value of Convertible Preferred Stock warrants using the Monte Carlo simulation model with the following assumptions: expected life of 6.0 years; risk free rate of 3.8%; expected volatility of 65.0%; and dividend yield of 0%. As of April 30, 2025, we determined the fair value of the combined embedded derivative liability using a with-and-without scenario-based discounted cash flow method, which reflected our estimates regarding the probability and timing of events that could result in additional and/or accelerated payments to our preferred shareholders, or the conversion of the Convertible Preferred Stock into common stock, pursuant to the terms of our Convertible Preferred Stock. As of April 30, 2025 and July 31, 2024, other than the financial instruments discussed above, we had no other significant assets or liabilities included in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets recorded at fair value, as such term is defined by FASB ASC 820.
Earnings Per Share	Earnings Per ShareOur basic earnings per share ("EPS") is computed based on the weighted average number of common shares (including vested but unissued stock units, share units, performance shares and restricted stock units ("RSUs")) outstanding during each respective period. Our diluted EPS reflects the dilution from potential common stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of equity-classified stock-based awards, warrants issued to our lenders in connection with entering the Credit Facility, settlement of escrow arrangements related to our acquisition of UHP Networks Inc. ("UHP") and the assumed conversion of Convertible Preferred Stock, if dilutive, outstanding during each respective period. The warrants contingently issuable to our preferred shareholders upon a repurchase of the respective series of Convertible Preferred Stock are not reflected in diluted EPS. Pursuant to FASB ASC 260 "Earnings Per Share" ("ASC 260"), shares whose issuance is contingent upon the satisfaction of certain conditions are included in diluted EPS based on the number of shares, if any, that would be issuable if the end of the reporting period were the end of the contingency period. When calculating our diluted earnings per share, we consider the amount an employee must pay upon assumed exercise of stock-based awards and the amount of stock-based compensation cost attributed to future services and not yet recognized.

General (Policy)

9 Months Ended

Apr. 30, 2025

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]

The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Comtech Telecommunications Corp. and its subsidiaries ("Comtech," "we," "us," or "our") as of and for the three and nine months ended April 30, 2025 and 2024 are unaudited. In the opinion of management, the information furnished reflects all material adjustments (which include normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the unaudited interim periods. Our results of operations for such periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the full fiscal year.

The preparation of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, and the reported amounts of net sales and expenses during the reported period. Actual results may differ from those estimates.

Our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2024 and the notes thereto contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, and all of our other filings with the SEC.

During the nine months ended April 30, 2025, we reclassified warrant liabilities as of July 31, 2024 from "Other Liabilities" to "Warrant and Derivative Liabilities" on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets to conform to the current period presentation.

Liquidity and Going Concern

Pursuant to the requirements of ASC Topic 205-40, Disclosure of Uncertainties About an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, we are required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. This evaluation does not take into consideration the potential mitigating effect of our plans that have not been fully implemented or are not within our control as of the date the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are issued. When substantial doubt exists, we are required to evaluate whether the mitigating effect of our plans sufficiently alleviates substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The mitigating effect of our plans, however, is only considered if both (i) it is probable that the plans will be effectively implemented within one year after the date that the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are issued, and (ii) it is probable that the plans, when implemented, will mitigate the relevant conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are issued.

As of the date these financial statements were issued (the "issuance date"), we evaluated whether the following conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern over the next twelve months beyond the issuance date.

Over the past three fiscal years, we incurred operating losses of $79,890,000, $14,660,000 and $33,752,000 in fiscal 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. More recently, we recognized an operating loss of $1,532,000 and $140,959,000 in the three and nine months ended April 30, 2025. In addition, over the past three fiscal years, net cash used in operating activities was $54,495,000 and $4,433,000 in fiscal 2024 and 2023, respectively, and net cash provided by operating activities was $1,997,000 in fiscal 2022. More recently, net cash used in operating activities was $19,739,000 in the nine months ended April 30, 2025. Our ability to meet future anticipated liquidity needs over the next year beyond the issuance date will largely depend on our ability to generate positive cash inflows from operations, maximize our borrowing capacity under our Credit Facility, as discussed further below, and/or secure other sources of outside capital. While we believe we will be able to generate sufficient positive cash inflows, maximize our borrowing capacity and secure outside capital, there can be no assurance our plans will be successfully implemented and, as such, we may be unable to continue as a going concern over the next year beyond the issuance date.

As discussed further in Note (10) – Credit Facility, on June 17, 2024, we entered into a credit facility with a new syndicate of lenders, which replaced our prior credit facility. As further discussed below, we subsequently amended the credit facility on October 17, 2024 and March 3, 2025 (the "Credit Facility"). The Credit Facility consists of a committed $162,000,000 term loan (“Term Loan”) and $56,821,000 revolving loan (“Revolver Loan”). At April 30, 2025 and June 6, 2025 (the date closest to the issuance date), total outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility were $168,008,000. At April 30, 2025 and June 6, 2025, $23,416,000 was drawn on the Revolver Loan. As of the issuance date, our available sources of liquidity approximate $27,258,000, consisting of qualified cash and cash equivalents and the remaining available portion of the committed Revolver Loan.

The Credit Facility was amended on October 17, 2024 (the "First Amendment") which, among other things: (i) waived all defaults under the Credit Facility, specifically in connection with our Net Leverage Ratio and Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenants as of July 31, 2024; (ii) increased the interest rate margins applicable to the Term Loan to 12.00% per annum for Base Rate Loans and 13.00% per annum for SOFR Loans and increased interest rate margins applicable to the Revolving Loan by 1.00% at each level; (iii) permitted the incurrence of $25,000,000 of total unsecured subordinated debt (as described below); (iv) suspended testing of the Net Leverage Ratio and the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenants until January 31, 2025; (v) provided the lenders a consent right with respect to Revolver Loan borrowings above $32,500,000; and (vi) amended the maturity date to the earlier of: (x) July 31, 2028; or (y) 90 days prior to the earliest date that the debt under the Amended Subordinated Credit Facility (as defined below) becomes due and payable.

The Credit Facility was amended again on March 3, 2025 (the "Second Amendment") which, among other things: (i) waived all defaults under the Credit Facility, specifically in connection with our Net Leverage Ratio and Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenants as of January 31, 2025; (ii) decreased the interest rate margins applicable to the Term Loan from 12.00% per annum to 9.50% per annum for Base Rate Loans and from 13.00% per annum to 10.50% per annum for SOFR Loans; (iii) permitted the incurrence of an additional $40,000,000 of total unsecured subordinated debt (as described below); (iv) suspended testing of the Net Leverage Ratio and the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenants until October 31, 2025; (v) suspended our ability to pay interest in-kind until after the interest rate margins are tested based on net leverage ratios; (vi) permitted partial principal repayments of $27,252,000 and $9,084,000 on the Term Loan and Revolving Loan, respectively, and waived the prepayment fees that would have been payable under the Credit Facility with regard to such repayments; (vii) permanently reduced commitments under the Revolving Loan Facility by $3,179,000 and provided the lenders a consent right with respect to Revolver Loan borrowings above $29,321,000; (viii) reduced the minimum quarterly average liquidity requirement from $20,000,000 to $17,500,000; and (ix) provided the lenders the right to appoint an independent director to our Board of Directors after May 31, 2025.

The Credit Facility, as amended, requires compliance with restrictive and financial covenants, including: a maximum Net Leverage Ratio of 3.15x commencing with the four fiscal quarter period ending October 31, 2025; a minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of 1.25x commencing with the four fiscal quarter period ending October 31, 2025; a minimum Average Liquidity requirement at each fiscal quarter end of $17,500,000; and a minimum EBITDA of $35,000,000 for the four fiscal quarter period ending October 31, 2025. Such covenants adjust under the Credit Facility in future periods. Over the next twelve months beyond the issuance date, we believe that it is probable we will not be able to comply with one or more of these covenants.

As discussed further in Note (11) – Amended Subordinated Credit Facility, on October 17, 2024, we entered into a subordinated credit agreement (the "Subordinated Credit Agreement") with the existing holders of our Convertible Preferred Stock, which provided for an initial subordinated unsecured term loan facility in the aggregate principal amount of $25,000,000. On March 3, 2025, we entered into an amendment to the Subordinated Credit Agreement (the “Amended Subordinated Credit Facility”) which, in addition to providing incremental aggregate principal of $40,000,000, waived all defaults under the Subordinated Credit Agreement, specifically in connection with our Net Leverage Ratio and Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenants as of January 31, 2025 and suspends testing of the Net Leverage Ratio and the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenants under the Subordinated Credit Agreement until October 31, 2025. The net proceeds of the Amended Subordinated Credit Facility were principally used to repay a portion of the Term Loan and Revolving Loan on March 3, 2025 (as discussed above), fund our general working capital needs and enable us to negotiate the Second Amendment to the Credit Facility, including the waiver of existing defaults, as discussed above. At April 30, 2025 and June 6, 2025 (the date closest to the issuance date), total outstanding borrowings under the Amended Subordinated Credit Facility (excluding accreted interest and make-whole adjustments) were $65,000,000.

Our ability to meet our current obligations as they become due may be impacted by our ability to remain compliant with the financial covenants required by the Credit Facility and Amended Subordinated Credit Facility, or to obtain future waivers or amendments from the lenders in the event compliance is not maintained. While we believe we will be able to secure such waivers or amendments, as needed, there can be no assurance such waivers or amendments will be secured or on terms that are acceptable to us. If we are unable to secure waivers or amendments, the lenders may declare an event of default, which would cause an immediate acceleration and repayment of all outstanding principal, interest and fees due under our Credit Facility and Amended Subordinated Credit Facility. Absent our ability to repay the forgoing amounts upon the declaration of an event of default, the lenders may exercise their rights and remedies under the Credit Facility and Amended Subordinated Credit Facility, which may include, among others, a seizure of substantially all of our assets and/or the liquidation of our operations. If an event of default occurs that allows the lenders to exercise these rights and remedies over the next year beyond the issuance date, we will be unable to continue as a going concern.

As of the issuance date, our plans to address our ability to continue as a going concern include, among other things:

•executing a strategy to transform Comtech including, but not limited to, the initiatives set forth below;

•an exploration of strategic alternatives for our various businesses and product lines, including the potential sale or divestiture of assets or business lines;

•the pursuit of further portfolio-shaping opportunities to enhance profitability, efficiency and focus;

•the implementation of operational initiatives to reduce the cost structure and better align operating costs with revenue expectations;

•pursuing initiatives to reduce investments in working capital, namely accounts receivable and inventory;

•improving process disciplines to achieve operating profitability by entering into more favorable sales or service contracts;

•reevaluating our business plans to identify opportunities (e.g., within each of our segments) to focus future investment on our most strategic, high-margin revenue opportunities;

•reevaluating our business plans to identify opportunities to reduce capital expenditures; and

•seeking opportunities to improve liquidity through any combination of debt and/or equity financing (including potentially further amending our Credit Facility, Convertible Preferred Stock and/or Amended Subordinated Credit Facility).

While we believe the implementation of some or all of the elements of our plans over the next year beyond the issuance date will be successful, these plans are not all solely within management’s control and, as such, we can provide no assurance our plans are probable of being effectively implemented as of the issuance date. Therefore, as described above, there are uncertainties that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared on the basis that we will continue to operate as a going concern, which contemplates we will be able to realize assets and settle liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future. Accordingly, the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

Adoption of Accounting Standards and Updates

We are required to prepare our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with the FASB ASC, which is the source for all authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which are commonly referred to as "GAAP." The FASB ASC is subject to updates by the FASB, which are known as Accounting Standards Updates ("ASUs"). During the nine months ended April 30, 2025, the following FASB ASUs have been issued and incorporated into the FASB ASC and have not yet been adopted by us as of April 30, 2025:

•FASB ASU No. 2023-07, which requires the disclosure of significant segment expenses, by reportable segment, regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) and included within each reported measure of segment profit or loss. The disclosure of other segment items by reportable segment are also required and would constitute the difference between segment revenues less these significant segment expenses and reported segment profit or loss. On an annual basis, the update requires an entity to disclose the CODM's title and position, as well as describe how the CODM uses the reported measures. Additionally, all existing annual disclosures about segment profit or loss must be provided on an interim basis in addition to the disclosure of significant segment expenses and other segment items. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023 (our fiscal year beginning on August 1, 2024) and for interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024 (our interim period beginning on August 1, 2025), with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this guidance will impact our disclosures only and we do not expect it to have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

•FASB ASU No. 2023-09 enhances and establishes new income tax disclosure requirements in addition to modifying and eliminating certain existing requirements. Most notably under the new requirements is greater disaggregation of information in the effective tax rate reconciliation, including the inclusion of both percentages and amounts, specific categories, and additional information for reconciling items meeting a quantitative threshold defined by the guidance. Additionally, disclosures of income taxes paid and income tax expense must be disaggregated by federal, state and foreign taxes, with income taxes paid further disaggregated for individual jurisdictions that represent 5 percent or more of total income taxes paid. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024 (our fiscal year beginning on August 1, 2025), with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this guidance will impact our disclosures only and we do not expect it to have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

•FASB ASU No. 2024-03, which requires more detailed disclosures of certain categories of expenses (including purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation, and amortization) that are components of existing expense captions presented on the face of the income statement. All entities are required to apply the guidance prospectively with an option for retrospective application. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026 (our fiscal year beginning on August 1, 2027), and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027 (our interim period beginning on August 1, 2028), with early adoption permitted, as clarified in ASU No. 2025-01 issued January 6, 2025.

Revenue Recognition

In accordance with FASB ASC 606, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" ("ASC 606"), we record revenue in an amount that reflects the consideration to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for goods or services promised to customers. Under ASC 606, we follow a five-step model to: (1) identify the contract with our customer; (2) identify our performance obligations in our contract; (3) determine the transaction price for our contract; (4) allocate the transaction price to our performance obligations; and (5) recognize revenue using one of the following two methods:

•Over time - We recognize revenue using the over time method when there is a continuous transfer of control to the customer over the contractual period of performance. This generally occurs when we enter into a long-term contract relating to the design, development or manufacture of complex equipment or technology platforms to a buyer’s specification (or to provide services related to the performance of such contracts) for which we have determined there is no alternative use, as defined in ASC 606. Continuous transfer of control is typically supported by contract clauses which allow our customers to unilaterally terminate a contract for convenience, pay for costs incurred plus a reasonable profit and take control of work-in-process. Revenue recognized over time is generally based on the extent of progress toward completion of the related performance obligations. The selection of the method to measure progress requires judgment and is based on the nature of the products or services provided. In certain instances, typically for firm fixed-price contracts, we use the cost-to-cost measure because it best depicts the transfer of control to the customer which occurs as we incur costs on our contracts. Under the cost-to-cost measure, the extent of progress toward completion is measured based on the ratio of costs incurred to date to the total estimated costs at completion, including warranty costs. Revenues, including estimated fees or profits, are recorded proportionally as costs are incurred. Costs to fulfill generally include direct labor, materials, subcontractor costs, other direct costs and an allocation of indirect costs. When these contracts are modified, the additional goods or services are generally not distinct from those already provided. As a result, these modifications form part of an existing contract and we must update the transaction price and our measure of progress for the single performance obligation and recognize a cumulative catch-up to revenue and gross profits.

A cost-to-cost measure of progress is principally used to account for contracts in our Satellite and Space Communications segment and, to a lesser extent, certain location-based and messaging infrastructure contracts in our public safety and location technologies product line within our Terrestrial and Wireless Networks segment.

For over time contracts using a cost-to-cost measure of progress, we have an estimate at completion ("EAC") process in which management reviews the progress and execution of our performance obligations and calculates an estimated contract profit based on total estimated contract revenue and cost. Since certain contracts extend over a long period of time, the impact of revisions in revenue and/or cost estimates during the progress of work may impact current period earnings through a cumulative adjustment. Additionally, if the EAC process indicates a loss, a provision is made for the total anticipated loss in the period that it becomes evident. Contract revenue and cost estimates for significant contracts are generally reviewed and reassessed at least quarterly.

For service-based contracts in our Terrestrial and Wireless Networks segment, we also recognize revenue over time. These services are typically recognized as a series of services performed over the contract term using the straight-line method, or based on our customers’ actual usage of the networks and platforms which we provide.

•Point in time - When a performance obligation is not satisfied over time, we must record revenue using the point in time accounting method which generally results in revenue being recognized upon shipment or delivery of a promised good or service to a customer. This generally occurs when we enter into short-term contracts or purchase orders where items are provided to customers with relatively quick turn-around times. Modifications to such contracts and/or purchase orders, which typically provide for additional quantities or services, are accounted for as a new contract because the pricing for these additional quantities or services are based on standalone selling prices.

Point in time accounting is principally applied to contracts in our satellite ground infrastructure product line (which includes satellite modems and traveling wave tube amplifiers). The contracts related to these product lines do not meet the requirements for over time revenue recognition because our customers cannot utilize the equipment for its intended purpose during any phase of our manufacturing process; customers do not simultaneously receive and/or consume the benefits provided by our performance; customers do not control the asset (i.e., prior to delivery, customers cannot direct the use of the asset, sell or exchange the equipment, etc.); and, although many of our contracts have termination for convenience clauses and/or an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date, our performance creates an asset with an alternative use through the point of delivery.

In determining that our equipment has alternative use, we considered the underlying manufacturing process for our products. In the early phases of manufacturing, raw materials and work in process (including subassemblies) consist of common parts that are highly fungible among many different types of products and customer applications. Finished products are either configured to our standard configuration or based on our customers’ specifications. Finished products, whether built to our standard specification or to a customers’ specification, can be sold to a variety of customers and across many different end use applications with minimal rework, if needed, and without incurring a significant economic loss.

When identifying a contract with our customer, at inception, we consider approvals and commitments from both parties, if the rights of the parties are identified, if the payment terms are identified, if it has commercial substance, the transaction price to which we are entitled and if collectability is probable.

When identifying performance obligations, we consider whether there are multiple promises and how to account for them. In our contracts, multiple promises are separated if they are distinct, both individually and in the context of the contract. If multiple promises in a contract are highly interrelated or comprise a series of distinct services performed over time, they are combined into a single performance obligation. In some cases, we may also provide the customer with an additional service-type warranty, which we recognize as a separate performance obligation. Service-type warranties do not represent a significant portion of our consolidated net sales. When service-type warranties represent a separate performance obligation, the revenue is deferred and recognized ratably over the extended warranty period. Our contracts, from time-to-time, may also include options for additional goods and services. To date, these options have not represented material rights to the customer as the pricing for them reflects standalone selling prices. As a result, we do not consider options we offer to be performance obligations for which we must allocate a portion of the transaction price. In many cases, we provide assurance-type warranty coverage for some of our products for a period of at least one year from the date of delivery.

When identifying the transaction price, we typically utilize the contract's stated price as a starting point. The transaction price in certain arrangements may include estimated amounts of variable consideration, including award fees, incentive fees or other provisions that can either increase or decrease the transaction price. We estimate variable consideration as the amount to which we expect to be entitled, and we include estimated amounts in the transaction price to the extent it is probable that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the estimation uncertainty is resolved. The estimation of this variable consideration and determination of whether to include estimated amounts in the transaction price are based largely on an assessment of our anticipated performance and all information (e.g., historical, current and forecasted) that is reasonably available to us.

When allocating the contract’s transaction price, we consider each distinct performance obligation. For contracts with multiple performance obligations, we allocate the contract’s transaction price to each performance obligation using our best estimate of the standalone selling price of each distinct good or service in the contract. We determine standalone selling price based on the price at which the performance obligation is sold separately. If the standalone selling price is not observable through past transactions, we estimate the standalone selling price taking into account available information such as market conditions, including geographic or regional specific factors, competitive positioning, internal costs, profit objectives and internally approved pricing guidelines related to the performance obligations.

Most of our contracts with customers are denominated in U.S. dollars and typically are either firm fixed-price or cost reimbursable type contracts (including fixed-fee, incentive-fee and time-and-material type contracts). In almost all of our contracts with customers, we are the principal in the arrangement and report revenue on a gross basis. Transaction prices for contracts with U.S. domestic and international customers are usually based on specific negotiations with each customer and in the case of the U.S. government, sometimes based on estimated or actual costs of providing the goods or services in accordance with applicable regulations.Sales to U.S. government customers include sales to the U.S. Department of Defense ("DoD"), intelligence and civilian agencies, as well as sales directly to or through prime contractors. Domestic sales include sales to commercial customers, as well as to U.S. state and local governments. For the three and nine months ended April 30, 2025 and 2024, except for the U.S. government, there were no customers that represented 10.0% or more of consolidated net sales.

The timing of revenue recognition, billings and collections results in receivables, unbilled receivables and contract liabilities on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Under typical payment terms for our contracts accounted for over time, amounts are billed as work progresses in accordance with agreed-upon contractual terms, either at periodic intervals (e.g., monthly) or upon achievement of contractual milestones. For certain contracts with provisions that are intended to protect customers in the event we do not satisfy our performance obligations, billings occur subsequent to revenue recognition, resulting in unbilled receivables. Under ASC 606, unbilled receivables constitute contract assets. Except for certain unbilled receivables (see Note (7) - Accounts Receivable) and work in process inventory (see Note (8) - Inventories), there were no other material impairment losses recognized on contract assets during the three and nine months ended April 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. On large long-term contracts, and for contracts with international customers that do not do business with us regularly, payment terms typically require advanced payments and deposits. Under ASC 606, payments received from customers in excess of revenue recognized to-date results in a contract liability. These contract liabilities are not considered to represent a significant financing component of the contract because we believe these cash advances and deposits are generally used to meet working capital demands which can be higher in the earlier stages of a contract. Also, advanced payments and deposits provide us with some measure of assurance that the customer will perform on its obligations under the contract. Under the typical payment terms for our contracts accounted for at a point in time, costs are accumulated in inventory until the time of billing, which generally coincides with revenue recognition. Of the current contract liability balance of $65,834,000 at July 31, 2024 and $66,351,000 at July 31, 2023, $48,661,000 and $39,877,000 was recognized as revenue during the nine months ended April 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

We recognize the incremental costs to obtain or fulfill a contract as an expense when incurred if the amortization period of the asset is one year or less; otherwise, such costs are capitalized and amortized over the estimated life of the contract. During the three months ended April 30, 2025 and 2024, incremental costs to obtain or fulfill contracts with an amortization period greater than one year were $763,000 and $818,000, respectively. During the nine months ended April 30, 2025 and 2024, incremental costs to obtain or fulfill contracts with an amortization period greater than one year were $2,717,000 and $2,070,000, respectively.

Commissions payable to our internal sales and marketing employees or contractors that are incremental to the acquisition of long-term customer contracts are capitalized and amortized consistent with the pattern of revenue recognition through cost of sales on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Commissions payable that are not incremental to the acquisition of long-term contracts are expensed as incurred in selling, general and administrative expenses on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. As for commissions payable to our third-party sales representatives related to large long-term contracts, we consider these types of commissions both direct and incremental costs to obtain and fulfill such contracts. Therefore, such commissions are included in total estimated costs at completion for such contracts and expensed over time through cost of sales on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Remaining performance obligations represent the transaction price of firm orders for which work has not been performed as of the end of a fiscal period. Remaining performance obligations, which we refer to as backlog, exclude unexercised contract options and potential orders under indefinite delivery / indefinite quantity ("IDIQ") contracts.

Fair Value Measurements and Financial Instruments

Using the fair value hierarchy described in FASB ASC 820 "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures," we valued our cash and cash equivalents using Level 1 inputs that were based on quoted market prices. We believe that the carrying amounts of our other current financial assets (such as accounts receivable) and other current liabilities (including accounts payable, accrued expenses and the current portion of long-term debt) approximate their fair values due to their short-term maturities. Additionally, the carrying amounts of our senior debt approximate their fair values due to variable interest rates and pricing grids related to such debt, as amended.

Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs developed using the best available information under the circumstances. Level 3 inputs are supported by little or no market activity, are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities and reflect our assumptions related to how market participants would use similar inputs to price the asset or liability.

As further discussed in Note (10) - Credit Facility, we used Level 3 inputs to value the warrants issued to lenders in connection with our Credit Facility. As of April 30, 2025, we determined the fair value of such warrants based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following estimates: exercise price of $0.10, risk free rate of 3.8%, volatility of 65.0%, and expected life of 6.1 years. We also used Level 3 inputs to value the combined embedded derivative liability associated with our Credit Facility. As of April 30, 2025, we determined the fair value of the combined embedded derivative liability using a with-and-without scenario-based discounted cash flow method, which reflected our estimates regarding the probability and timing of events that could result in additional payments of interest and/or fees to such lenders as stated in our Credit Facility.

As further discussed in Note (11) - Amended Subordinated Credit Facility, we used Level 3 inputs to value the make-whole amount and combined embedded derivative liability associated with our Amended Subordinated Credit Facility. As of April 30, 2025, we determined the fair value of the combined embedded derivative liability using a with-and-without scenario-based discounted cash flow method, which reflected our estimates regarding the probability and timing of events that could result in additional payments of interest and/or accelerated payments of principal and make-whole amounts to such lenders as stated in our Amended Subordinated Credit Facility.

As further discussed in Note (18) - Convertible Preferred Stock, we used Level 3 inputs to value the warrants contingently issuable and combined embedded derivative liability associated with our Convertible Preferred Stock. As of April 30, 2025, we determined the fair value of Convertible Preferred Stock warrants using the Monte Carlo simulation model with the following assumptions: expected life of 6.0 years; risk free rate of 3.8%; expected volatility of 65.0%; and dividend yield of 0%. As of April 30, 2025, we determined the fair value of the combined embedded derivative liability using a with-and-without scenario-based discounted cash flow method, which reflected our estimates regarding the probability and timing of events that could result in additional and/or accelerated payments to our preferred shareholders, or the conversion of the Convertible Preferred Stock into common stock, pursuant to the terms of our Convertible Preferred Stock.

As of April 30, 2025 and July 31, 2024, other than the financial instruments discussed above, we had no other significant assets or liabilities included in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets recorded at fair value, as such term is defined by FASB ASC 820.

Earnings Per Share

Earnings Per ShareOur basic earnings per share ("EPS") is computed based on the weighted average number of common shares (including vested but unissued stock units, share units, performance shares and restricted stock units ("RSUs")) outstanding during each respective period. Our diluted EPS reflects the dilution from potential common stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of equity-classified stock-based awards, warrants issued to our lenders in connection with entering the Credit Facility, settlement of escrow arrangements related to our acquisition of UHP Networks Inc. ("UHP") and the assumed conversion of Convertible Preferred Stock, if dilutive, outstanding during each respective period. The warrants contingently issuable to our preferred shareholders upon a repurchase of the respective series of Convertible Preferred Stock are not reflected in diluted EPS. Pursuant to FASB ASC 260 "Earnings Per Share" ("ASC 260"), shares whose issuance is contingent upon the satisfaction of certain conditions are included in diluted EPS based on the number of shares, if any, that would be issuable if the end of the reporting period were the end of the contingency period. When calculating our diluted earnings per share, we consider the amount an employee must pay upon assumed exercise of stock-based awards and the amount of stock-based compensation cost attributed to future services and not yet recognized.