XML 24 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Note 4 - Supplier Concentration
12 Months Ended
Jan. 31, 2017
Notes to Financial Statements  
Concentration Risk Disclosure [Text Block]
4.
Supplier Concentration
 
The suppliers comprising
10
 percent or more of our gross accounts receivable due from suppliers at either
January
 
31,
2017
or
2016
are listed below (except percentages).
 
 
 
Years Ended January 31,
 
 
 
2017
 
 
2016
 
Total gross accounts receivable due from
suppliers
  $
-
     
0
%   $
122
     
100
%
Supplier concentration:
                               
Zheng Ge Electrical Co., Ltd.
  $
-
     
0
%   $
122
     
100
%
    $
-
     
0
%   $
122
     
100
%
     
Zheng Ge Electrical Co., Ltd. (“Zheng Ge”) was a tip supplier for the Bronx product, which was subject to a recall. We previously sourced some of the component parts that Zheng Ge used in the manufacture of the tips. We ceased paying Zheng Ge during the course of the product recall while we investigated the manufacturing defect which ultimately caused the recall and, likewise, Zheng Ge ceased paying us. During the year ended
January
31,
2017,
we performed a review of applicable laws underlying the related contracts with Zheng Ge. Based on this review, we determined that the statute of limitations on the Zheng Ge contracts had lapsed and we wrote off receivables of
$0.1
million from and liabilities of
$0.6
million to Zheng Ge to cost of sales in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.    
 
The suppliers and other vendors comprising
10
 percent or more of our gross accounts payable at either
January
 
31,
2017
or
2016
are listed below (in thousands, except percentages).
 
 
 
Years Ended January 31,
 
 
 
2017
 
 
2016
 
                                 
Total gross accounts payable
  $
39
     
100
%   $
883
     
100
%
Supplier concentration:
                               
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP
   
-
     
0
%    
432
     
49
%
    $
-
     
0
%   $
432
     
49
%
 
Pillsbury was our former legal counsel for the Kensington litigation as well as other patent and intellectual property matters. On
May
28,
2014,
we entered into an agreement with Pillsbury in which we paid Pillsbury a lump sum of
$1.5
million with the remaining contingent balance of
$0.4
million (the “Contingent Balance”) to be paid, if at all, in the event we obtain any monetary recovery, whether through settlement, judgment or otherwise, after
May
28,
2014
from or as a result of any of our current or future lawsuits related to our intellectual property. The Contingent Balance accrued interest at
20%
per annum, compounded annual from
May
28,
2014.
In connection with the
$1.5
million lump-sum partial repayment, no gain was recognized. In
April
2016,
we paid Pillsbury approximately
$0.4
million as a result of the settlement agreement with Targus, resulting in a remaining Contingent Balance of approximately
$0.1
million. In
December
2016,
we paid the remaining
$0.1
million including any accrued interest in full satisfaction of our obligations to Pillsbury.