XML 24 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Note 8 - Commitments and Contingencies
6 Months Ended
Jul. 31, 2016
Notes to Financial Statements  
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block]
8.                Commitments and Contingencies
 
 
Executive Severance Commitments
 
      We have a severance compensation agreement with our Chief Executive Officer, Thomas Lanni. This agreement requires us to pay Mr. Lanni, in the event of a termination of employment following a change of control of the Company or certain other circumstances, the amount of his then current annual base salary and the amount of any bonus amount he
would have achieved for the year in which the termination occurs plus the acceleration of unvested options. We have not recorded any liability in the consolidated financial statements for this agreement.
 
 
Executive and Board of Directors Compensation
 
On November 2, 2013, the Company approved a deferred compensation plan for its Chief Executive Officer and Board of Directors. As of
July 31, 2016 no compensation expense has been accrued under this deferred compensation plan as its goal has not yet been attained.
 
 
Legal Contingencies
 
On February 3, 2015, we filed a lawsuit against Apple for patent infringement. The complaint alleges that Apple products sold in the United States utilizing the Apple Lightning® power supply adapter system, including most iPad®, iPhone®, and iPod® products, infringe our patented intellectual property. This lawsuit represents our most significant enforcement effort to date, and, together with the Best Buy and Targus lawsuits,
demonstrates the our ongoing and accelerated efforts to methodically pursue those companies that we believe have infringed on the intellectual property estate that we have developed over the last 20 years. Although we intend to vigorously pursue our rights in this case, the outcome of this matter is not determinable as of the date of this report.
 
On February 13, 2015, we filed a lawsuit against Best Buy for patent infringement under the patent laws of the United States. The complaint alleges that certain Best Buy power charging products sold in the United States under the Rocketfish brand infringe the Company’s patented intellectual property. Although we intend to vigorously pursue our rights in this case, the outcome of this matter is not determinable as of the date of this report.
 
In addition to the pending matters described above, we are, from time to time, involved in various legal proceedings incidental to the conduct of our business. We are unable to predict the ultimate outcome of these matters.