UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One) | ||
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | ||
For the fiscal year ended | ||
OR | ||
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | ||
For the transition period from to | ||
Commission File Number 1-8641
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
(Zip Code) | ||
(Address of principal executive offices) | ||
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (312 ) 489-5800
Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
☑ | Accelerated filer | ☐ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ☐ | Smaller reporting company | |||
Emerging growth company | |||||
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No x
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.
$949,297,887
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
As of February 17, 2020, 243,074,353 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain information called for by Part III of the Form 10-K is incorporated by reference from the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders which will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.
COEUR MINING, INC.
FORM 10-K
INDEX
PART I | ||
PART II | ||
PART III | ||
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | ||
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence | ||
PART IV | ||
Item 16. | Form 10-K Summary | |
3
PART I
Item 1. | Business |
INTRODUCTION
Coeur Mining, Inc. (“Coeur”, “the Company”, or “we”) is a gold and silver producer, as well as a zinc and lead producer through operations at Silvertip (as defined below), with mines located in the United States, Canada, Mexico, and exploration projects in North America.
Coeur was incorporated as an Idaho corporation in 1928 under the name Coeur d’Alene Mines Corporation. On May 16, 2013, Coeur changed its state of incorporation from the State of Idaho to the State of Delaware and changed its name to Coeur Mining, Inc.
OVERVIEW OF MINING PROPERTIES AND INTERESTS
The Company’s operating properties and interests are described below:
• | Coeur owns 100% of Coeur Mexicana S.A. de C.V. (“Coeur Mexicana”), which has operated the Palmarejo complex in the State of Chihuahua in Northern Mexico since 2009. The processing facility at the Palmarejo complex is fed by the Guadalupe, Independencia and La Nacion underground mines. The Company also has several exploration targets at the Palmarejo complex. The Palmarejo complex produced 111,932 ounces of gold and 6.8 million ounces of silver in 2019. Proven and probable reserves at the Palmarejo complex totaled 693,000 ounces of gold and 50.5 million ounces of silver as of December 31, 2019. |
• | Coeur owns 100% of Coeur Rochester, Inc. (“Coeur Rochester”), which has operated the Rochester mine, an open-pit silver and gold mine located in northwestern Nevada, since 1986. Coeur Rochester also owns the Lincoln Hill and related assets adjacent to its Rochester mine. The Rochester mine produced 35,400 ounces of gold and 3.8 million ounces of silver in 2019. Proven and probable reserves at the Rochester mine totaled 737,000 ounces of gold and 117.5 million ounces of silver as of December 31, 2019. |
• | Coeur owns 100% of Coeur Alaska, Inc. (“Coeur Alaska”), which has operated the Kensington mine, an underground gold mine located north of Juneau, Alaska since 2010. The Kensington mine produced a total of 127,914 ounces of gold in 2019. Proven and probable reserves at the Kensington mine totaled 366,000 ounces of gold as of December 31, 2019. |
• | Coeur owns 100% of Wharf Resources (U.S.A.), Inc. (“Wharf”), which operates the Wharf mine, an open-pit gold mine located in the Black Hills mining district of South Dakota near Lead, South Dakota. Coeur acquired Wharf in February 2015. The Wharf mine produced 84,172 ounces of gold in 2019. Proven and probable reserves at the Wharf mine totaled 768,000 ounces of gold as of December 31, 2019. |
• | Coeur owns 100% of Coeur Silvertip Holdings Ltd. (“Silvertip”), which operates the underground Silvertip silver-zinc-lead mine located in northern British Columbia, Canada. Coeur acquired Silvertip in October 2017 and commenced commercial production in September 2018. In 2019, the Silvertip mine produced a total of 1.2 million ounces of silver, 17.1 million pounds of zinc and 16.6 million pounds of lead. Proven and probable reserves at the Silvertip mine totaled 15.0 million ounces of silver, 295.4 million pounds of zinc and 196.5 million pounds of lead as of December 31, 2019. Subsequent to the end of the period covered by this Report, the Company made the decision to temporarily suspend mining and processing activities as a result of further deterioration in zinc and lead market conditions as well as processing facility-related challenges. The Company plans to (i) double its exploration investment in 2020 to potentially further expand the mineralized material and extend the mine life, and (ii) pursue a mill expansion to improve the asset’s cost structure and its ability to deliver sustainable cash flow |
• | Coeur owns 100% of Coeur Sterling, Inc. whose principal asset is the Sterling gold project and the Crown Block of deposits consisting of the Daisy, Secret Pass and SNA historic mineralized material located in the Walker Lane trend in Nevada (the “Sterling Project”). |
• | Coeur owns 100% of Coeur La Preciosa Silver Corp. which owns the mining concessions of the La Preciosa project, which is a silver-gold exploration project in the State of Durango, Mexico (“La Preciosa”). |
• | Coeur has made strategic equity investments in other early-stage precious metals companies. |
4
GOLD, SILVER, ZINC, AND LEAD PRICES
The Company’s operating results are substantially dependent upon the market prices of gold and silver, and zinc and lead following the Silvertip acquisition, which fluctuate widely. The volatility of such prices is illustrated in the following table, which sets forth the high, low and average prices of each metal published by the London Bullion Market Association (“LBMA”) for silver and gold and the London Metal Exchange (“LME”) for zinc and lead:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
High | Average | Low | High | Average | Low | High | Average | Low | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gold (per oz.) | $ | 1,546 | $ | 1,393 | $ | 1,270 | $ | 1,355 | $1,268 | $ | 1,178 | $ | 1,346 | $1,257 | $ | 1,151 | |||||||||||||
Silver (per oz.) | $ | 19.31 | $ | 16.21 | $ | 14.38 | $ | 17.52 | $15.71 | $ | 13.97 | $ | 18.56 | $17.05 | $ | 15.22 | |||||||||||||
Zinc (per lb.) | $ | 1.37 | $ | 1.16 | $ | 1.00 | $ | 1.64 | $ | 1.33 | $ | 1.04 | $ | 1.53 | $ | 1.31 | $ | 1.10 | |||||||||||
Lead (per lb.) | $ | 1.03 | $ | 0.91 | $ | 0.80 | $ | 1.22 | $ | 1.02 | $ | 0.85 | $ | 1.17 | $ | 1.05 | $ | 0.91 | |||||||||||
MARKETING
The Company’s mining operations produce gold and/or silver doré, and gold, zinc and lead concentrate. The Company uses a geographically diverse group of third-party refiners, smelters in the United States, Switzerland and Japan and third-party customers who may use various smelters in Asia and Europe for Silvertip and Kensington’s concentrate.
The Company's doré, as well as the concentrate product produced by the Wharf mine, is refined into gold and silver bullion according to benchmark standards set by the LBMA, which regulates the acceptable requirements for bullion traded in the London precious metals markets. The Company then sells its gold and silver bullion to multi-national banks, bullion trading houses, and refiners across the globe. The Company had eight trading counterparties at December 31, 2019. The Company's sales of doré or concentrate product produced by the Palmarejo, Rochester, and Wharf mines amounted to approximately 68%, 77%, and 78% of total metal sales for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. In November 2018, one of the refiners of the Company’s doré, Republic Metals Corp. (“RMC”), a U.S.-based precious metals refiner, filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. See Note 3 -- Segments and Note 5 -- Receivables in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional detail.
The Company's gold concentrate product from the Kensington mine and the zinc and lead concentrates from the Silvertip mine are sold under a variety of agreements with smelters and traders, and the smelters and traders pay the Company for the metals recovered from the concentrates. The Company’s sales of concentrate produced by the Kensington and Silvertip mines amounted to approximately 32%, 23%, and 22% of total metal sales for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
The Company believes that the loss of any one smelter, refiner, trader or third-party customer would not materially adversely affect the Company due to the liquidity of the markets and current availability of alternative trading counterparties.
HEDGING ACTIVITIES
The Company’s strategy is to provide stockholders with exposure to gold, silver, zinc and lead prices by selling gold, silver, zinc and lead production at market prices. The Company may enter into short-term derivative contracts to protect the selling price for certain anticipated gold, silver, zinc and lead production and to manage risks associated with interest rates and foreign currencies. For additional information see “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” and Note 17 -- Derivative Financial Instruments in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional detail.
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
General
The Company’s activities are subject to extensive federal, state and local laws governing the protection of the environment, prospecting, development, production, closure, taxes, labor standards, occupational health, mine safety, toxic substances, protection of endangered, protected or other specified species and other matters. The costs to comply with such regulatory requirements are substantial and possible future legislation and regulations could cause additional expense, capital expenditures, restrictions and delays in the development and continued operation of the Company’s properties, the extent of which cannot be predicted. In the context of environmental permitting, including the approval of reclamation plans, the Company must comply with known standards and regulations which may entail significant costs and delays. Although the Company has been recognized for its commitment to environmental responsibility and believes it is in substantial compliance with applicable laws and regulations, amendments to current laws and regulations, more stringent application or interpretation of these laws and regulations through judicial review, or administrative action or the adoption of new laws could have a material adverse effect upon the Company and its results of operations.
5
Environmental Laws
Our mining operations are subject to extensive federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations governing environmental protection, natural resources, development, production and post-closure reclamation. Environmental regulations mandate, among other things, the maintenance of air and water quality standards, land development and land reclamation, and set forth limitations on the generation, transportation, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous waste. With respect to our operations in the United States, the Company is subject to federal and state laws and regulations, including the Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), the U.S. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”), the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, the Endangered Species Act, the Federal Land Policy and Management Act, the National Environmental Policy Act and related regulations and state law equivalents. Our operations in Canada and Mexico are subject to similar laws for the protection of the environment, including the Environmental Management Act, the Mines Act and the Greenhouse Gas Industrial Reporting and Control Act in Canada, and regulations promulgated by the Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources) and the Comisión Nacional del Agua and the National Water Commission in Mexico. Future changes in U.S., Mexican or Canadian federal, state or provincial laws or regulations could have a material adverse effect upon the Company and its results of operations.
Certain mining wastes from extraction and beneficiation of minerals would be considered hazardous waste under RCRA and state law equivalents, but are currently exempt from the extensive set of Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) regulations governing hazardous waste. If the Company’s mine wastes were treated as hazardous waste under RCRA or such wastes resulted in operations being designated as “Superfund” sites under CERCLA or state law equivalents for cleanup, material expenditures could be required for the construction of additional waste disposal facilities, for other remediation expenditures, or for natural resource damages. Under CERCLA, any present or past owners or operators of a Superfund site generally may be held liable and may be forced to undertake remedial cleanup action or to pay for the government’s cleanup efforts. Such owners or operators may also be liable to governmental entities for the cost of damages to natural resources, which may be substantial.
The Company has reviewed and considered current federal legislation relating to climate change and does not believe it to have a material effect on its operations. Future changes in U.S., Mexican or Canadian federal, state or provincial laws or regulations could have a material adverse effect upon the Company and its results of operations.
Estimated future reclamation costs are based primarily on legal and regulatory requirements. At December 31, 2019, $134.4 million was accrued for reclamation costs relating to currently developed and producing properties. The Company is also involved in several matters concerning environmental obligations associated with former mining activities. Based upon the Company’s best estimate of its liabilities for these items, $1.9 million was accrued as of December 31, 2019. These amounts are included in Reclamation on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, we had surety bonds totaling $215.6 million and $216.3 million in place as financial support for future reclamation and closure costs, respectively. See Note 21 -- Commitments and Contingencies in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional detail.
Environmental Permitting
The Rochester, Kensington and Wharf mines and Sterling Project are subject to extensive U.S. federal and state permitting laws and regulations. Mexico, where the Palmarejo complex and the La Preciosa exploration project are located, and Canada, where the Silvertip mine is located, have all adopted laws and guidelines for environmental permitting that are similar to those in effect in the United States. The permitting process in each jurisdiction requires, among other things, a thorough study to determine the baseline condition of the mining site and surrounding area, an environmental impact analysis, and proposed mitigation measures to minimize and offset the environmental impact of mining operations. The Company has received all permits required to operate and carry out the current scope of activities at the Palmarejo complex, Rochester, Kensington, Wharf and Silvertip mines, and has received all permits necessary for the exploration activities currently being conducted at its other properties. The Company is in the process of amending existing permits at its Rochester and Kensington mines and the Sterling Project to support future planned activities. For additional information regarding permitting risks, please see the section titled “Risk Factors” included in Item 1A.
6
Maintenance of Claims
United States
A portion of the Company’s U.S. mining properties consists of unpatented mining claims on federal lands, which the Company holds pursuant to the Mining Law of 1872, as amended (the “Mining Law”). Legislation has been introduced regularly in the U.S. Congress over the last decade to change the Mining Law and it is possible that the Mining Law may be amended or replaced by less favorable legislation in the future. Previously proposed legislation contained a production royalty obligation, new environmental standards and conditions, additional reclamation requirements and extensive new procedural steps which would likely result in delays in permitting. The ultimate content of future proposed legislation, if enacted, is uncertain. In addition, the U.S. Forest Service and the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) have considered revising regulations governing operations under the Mining Law on federal lands they administer, which, if implemented, may result in additional procedures and environmental conditions and standards on those lands. The majority of the Company’s operations, which are either outside of the United States or on private patented lands would be unaffected by potential legislation.
Any such reform of the Mining Law or BLM and U.S. Forest Service regulations thereunder could increase the costs of mining activities on unpatented mining claims, or could materially impair the ability of the Company to develop or continue operations which derive ore from federal lands, and as a result, could have an adverse effect on the Company and its results of operations. Until such time, if any, as new reform legislation or regulations are enacted, the ultimate effects and costs of compliance on the Company cannot be estimated.
At mining properties in the United States, including the Rochester, Kensington, Wharf mines and the Sterling Project, operations are conducted upon both patented and unpatented mining claims. Pursuant to applicable federal law, it is necessary to pay to the Secretary of the Interior, on or before September 1st of each year, a claim maintenance fee of $165 per unpatented federal claim. This claim maintenance fee is in lieu of the assessment work requirement contained in applicable mining laws. In addition, Nevada and South Dakota holders of unpatented federal mining claims are required to pay the county recorder of the county in which the claim is situated a de minimis annual fee per claim. In Alaska, the Company is required to pay a variable, annual rental fee for State claims and a State upland mining lease based on the age of the claim or claims converted to the upland mining lease. Annual labor must also be performed on the claim or an annual payment in lieu of annual labor must be paid to the State of Alaska for State claims and upland mining leases. No maintenance fees are payable for federal patented claims. Patented claims are similar to land held by an owner who is entitled to the entire interest in the property with unconditional power of disposition and are subject to local ad valorem property taxes.
Mexico
In order to carry out mining activities in Mexico, the Company is required to obtain a mining concession from the General Bureau of Mining, a part of the Ministry of Economy of the Mexican Federal Government, or be assigned previously granted concession rights, and both must be recorded with the Public Registry of Mining. In addition, mining works may have to be authorized by other authorities when performed in certain areas, including ejidos (communal owners of land recognized by the federal laws in Mexico), villages, dams, channels, general communications ways, submarine shelves of islands, islets and reefs, marine beds and subsoil and federal maritime-terrestrial zones. Reports have to be filed with the General Bureau of Mining in May of each year, evidencing previous calendar year mining investment and works. Annual reports, detailing technical and statistical information and production results, must be submitted during the first 30 business days of the following year for each concession or group of concessions bearing production and all concessions over six years of age. Bi-annual mining duties are payable in January and July of each year and, based on amount of surface of each mining concession, holders of mining concessions must also pay annually and no later than the last business day of March a special mining fee based on 7.5% of the income before interest and certain other permitted deductions derived from the transfer or sale of minerals, plus 0.5% of gross revenues from sales of gold, silver and platinum. Failure to pay any of these duties and submit the required reports could lead to cancellation of the concessions. Upon expiration or cancellation of the concession, certain obligations remain, such as filing technical reports and ground support.
Canada (British Columbia)
Mineral claims and mining leases in British Columbia are regulated by the provincial government under the Mineral Tenure Act. Mineral claims are initially valid for one year after recording. To maintain a claim, the recorded holder must, on or before the expiry date of the claim, either perform exploration and development work on that claim (or contiguous block of claims) and register such work, or register a payment instead of exploration and development work. Only work prescribed by regulation is acceptable for registration. The value of exploration and development work required to maintain a mineral claim for one year is CAD5/hectare (“ha”) for each of the first and second years, CAD10/ha for each of the third and fourth years, CAD15/ha for each of the fifth and sixth years, and CAD20/ha for each subsequent year. If a payment is made instead of performing exploration and development work, the payment must be double the value of the required work. The recorded holder of a mineral claim is
7
allowed to produce a very limited amount of mineralized material. For production in excess of these limits, a mining lease is required. Mining leases in British Columbia are generally issued for a term of 30 years, and renewal terms are available. An annual rental payment of CAD20/ha is required to maintain a mining lease. There are no annual work requirements for mining leases. Before any mechanical disturbance of the surface of the ground is performed by, or on behalf of, the recorded holder, the necessary approvals and permits under the Mineral Tenure Act must be obtained. Mines in production are subject to taxation by the provincial government. The Silvertip mine is subject to a British Columbia mining royalty tax of 13% of net revenues subject to certain permitted deductions.
EMPLOYEES
The number of full-time employees of the Company at December 31, 2019 was:
Palmarejo Complex | 876 | |
Rochester Mine | 276 | |
Kensington Mine | 383 | |
Wharf Mine | 218 | |
Silvertip Mine | 309 | |
Sterling Project | 9 | |
U.S. Corporate and Other | 84 | |
Total | 2,155 | |
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND COMPETITIVE STRENGTHS
The Company’s business strategy is to discover, develop and operate a balanced portfolio of high-quality precious metals assets currently in North America. The Company strives to Protect its People, Places and Planet; Develop Quality Resources, Growth and Plans; and Deliver Impactful Results through Teamwork.
Key components of the Company’s strategy include;
• | Geographical focus on North America; |
• | Concentrate on discovering, developing, and operating a balanced portfolio of precious metal assets; |
• | Disciplined capital allocation including portfolio optimization and prioritizing near mine growth opportunities; |
• | Bolstering a high-performing, healthy organization and culture; |
• | Achieving an investable level of scale and relevance through its unique portfolio of operating and growth assets; |
• | Delivering low cost production; |
• | Maintaining balance sheet flexibility to provide financial flexibility through cycles and inherent volatility; |
• | Engaging in leading Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) programs, priorities and initiatives; |
• | Maintaining peer leading levels of trading liquidity; and |
• | Promoting the highest level of employee health and safety. |
8
Management believes the following strengths provide the Company with significant competitive advantages:
Strong track record of developing and operating mines
The Company has successfully acquired, developed, and operated a portfolio of operating mines since its founding in 1928. In 2019, we had production from continuing operations of 359,418 ounces of gold, 11.7 million ounces of silver, 17.1 million pounds of zinc and 16.6 million pounds of lead,
Gold Production Silver Production
(Continuing Operations) (Continuing Operations)
Operating and commodity diversity
The Company’s gold, silver, zinc and lead production comes from five operating mines. The Company operates the Palmarejo gold and silver complex in Mexico, the Rochester silver and gold mine in Nevada, the Kensington gold mine in Alaska, the Wharf gold mine in South Dakota, and the Silvertip silver-zinc-lead mine in Canada.
The Company’s metal sales breakdown by operating mine in continuing operations and metal is set out below:
2019 Gold Sales by Mine (ounces) 2019 Silver Sales by Mine (millions of ounces)
The Company also sold 18.2 million pounds of zinc and 16.5 million pounds of lead produced at Silvertip in 2019.
Experienced management team and Board of Directors
The Company has built a high-caliber management team of devoted professionals with extensive mining industry expertise. President and Chief Executive Officer, Mitchell Krebs, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Thomas Whelan, Senior Vice President, Exploration, Hans Rasmussen and Senior Vice President, Operations, Terry Smith, each has significant experience in the mining industry. Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, Casey Nault helps drive leading ESG practices. Senior Vice President, Human Resources, Emilie Schouten, working closely with the Chief Executive Officer, helps drive the strategy of having a high performing organization and culture. The board of directors also brings diverse industry backgrounds and a depth of professional experience to the Company.
Reserve replenishment and resource growth
The Company has spent significant capital in developing or expanding its five 100%-owned operating mines that are considered continuing operations. The Company has been able to successfully maintain the proven and probable reserves at its mines through its exploration efforts.
9
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains numerous forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) relating to the Company’s gold, silver, zinc and lead mining business, including anticipated mineral reserve and mineralized material estimates, exploration efforts and expenditures, drilling, development, expansion initiatives at the Rochester, Kensington and Silvertip mines, development of the Sterling and Lincoln Hill projects, expectations for receiving permits, mill expansion and exploration plans and expectations for Silvertip, estimated production, costs, capital expenditures, expenses, recoveries, metals prices, sufficiency of assets, ability to discharge liabilities, liquidity management, financing needs, environmental compliance expenditures, risk management strategies, operational excellence, cost reduction initiatives, capital discipline and business strategies. Such forward-looking statements are identified by the use of words such as “believes,” “intends,” “expects,” “hopes,” “may,” “should,” “plan,” “projected,” “contemplates,” “anticipates” or similar words and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause Coeur’s actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. The factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements include (i) the risk factors set forth below under Item 1A and in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under Item 7, (ii) the risk that anticipated production, cost and expense levels are not attained, (iii) the risks and hazards inherent in the mining business (including risks inherent in developing large-scale mining projects, environmental hazards, industrial accidents, weather or geologically related conditions), (iv) changes in the market prices of gold, silver, zinc and lead and treatment and refining charges of gold, silver, zinc and lead, and a sustained lower price or higher treatment and refining charge environment or the impact to , (v) the uncertainties inherent in the Company’s production, exploratory and developmental activities, including risks relating to permitting and regulatory delays (including the impact of government shutdowns), ground conditions and grade variability, (vi) any future labor disputes or work stoppages (involving the Company and its subsidiaries or third parties), (vii) the uncertainties inherent in the estimation of gold, silver, zinc and lead mineral reserves and mineralized material, (viii) changes that could result from the Company’s future acquisition of new mining properties or businesses, (ix) the loss of access to or insolvency of any third-party smelter to whom the Company markets its production, (x) the effects of environmental and other governmental regulations and government shut-downs, (xi) the risks inherent in the ownership or operation of or investment in mining properties or businesses in foreign countries, and (xii) the Company’s ability to raise additional financing necessary to conduct its business, make payments or refinance its debt. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update publicly these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING DISCLOSURE OF MINERAL PROPERTIES
Reserves, Resources and Mineralized Material
Coeur Mining, Inc. is subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and applicable Canadian securities laws, and as a result we report our mineral reserves according to two different standards. Canadian reporting requirements for disclosure of mineral properties are governed by National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”). The definitions of NI 43-101 are adopted from those given by the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum. U.S. reporting requirements, however, are governed by Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Industry Guide 7 (“Guide 7”). Both sets of reporting standards have similar goals in terms of conveying an appropriate level of confidence in the disclosures being reported, but embody different approaches and definitions. Under Guide 7, mineralization may not be classified as a “reserve” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made.
In our public filings in Canada and in certain other announcements not filed with the SEC, we disclose measured, indicated and inferred resources, each as defined in NI 43-101, in addition to our mineral reserves. U.S. investors are cautioned that, while the terms “measured mineral resources,” “indicated mineral resources” and “inferred mineral resources” are recognized and required by Canadian securities laws, Guide 7 does not recognize them. The estimation of measured resources and indicated resources involve greater uncertainty as to their existence and economic feasibility than the estimation of proven and probable reserves, and therefore U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of measured or indicated resources will ever be converted into Guide 7 compliant reserves. The estimation of inferred resources involves far greater uncertainty as to their existence and economic viability than the estimation of other categories of resources, and therefore it cannot be assumed that all or any part of inferred resources will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Therefore, investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of inferred resources exist, or that they can be mined legally or economically.
In this Form 10-K and in our other filings with the SEC, we modify our estimates made in compliance with NI 43-101 to conform to Guide 7 for reporting in the United States. In this Form 10-K, we use the term “mineralized material” to describe mineralization in mineral deposits that do not constitute “reserves” under U.S. standards. “Mineralized material” is substantially
10
equivalent to measured and indicated mineral resources (exclusive of reserves) as disclosed for reporting purposes in Canada, except that the SEC only permits issuers to report “mineralized material” in tonnage and average grade without reference to contained ounces. We provide disclosure of mineralized material to allow a means of comparing our projects to those of other companies in the mining industry, many of which are Canadian and report pursuant to NI 43-101, and to comply with applicable disclosure requirements. We caution you not to assume that all or any part of mineralized material will ever be converted into Guide 7 compliant reserves.
Technical Reports and Qualified Persons
As required by Canadian securities laws, we hereby notify Canadian investors that the scientific and technical information concerning our mineral projects in this Form 10-K have been reviewed and approved by a “qualified person” under NI 43-101, namely our Director, Technical Services, Christopher Pascoe. For a description of the key assumptions, parameters and methods used to estimate mineral reserves included in this Form 10-K, as well as data verification procedures and a general discussion of the extent to which the estimates may be affected by any known environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political, marketing or other relevant factors, Canadian investors may view technical reports prepared for each of our properties as filed on SEDAR at http://www.sedar.com. Neither the technical reports nor the statements of any qualified person filed with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities are included in, incorporated by reference in or made a part of this Form 10-K. Because the definitions and standards of NI 43-101 differ from those of Guide 7, investors are cautioned that information contained in reports prepared pursuant to NI 43-101, like the technical reports, may not be comparable to similar information that we disclose in this Form 10-K or the other reports we file with the SEC.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
Coeur makes available, on its website (http://www.coeur.com), its Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and Proxy Statements, as well as Forms 3, 4 and 5 with respect to its common stock, including any amendments to any of the foregoing, as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with the SEC (and which are also available at http://www.sec.gov). Copies of Coeur’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, charters of the key committees of the Board of Directors (Audit, Compensation and Leadership Development, Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance, and Environmental, Health, Safety, and Corporate Responsibility Committees) and its Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, applicable to the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, among others, are also available on the Company’s website. Information contained on the Company’s website is not a part of this report.
11
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
RISKS RELATED TO OUR INDUSTRY
The Company’s results of operations, cash flows and operating costs are highly dependent upon the market prices of gold, silver, zinc and lead, and of key input commodities used in our business, which are volatile and beyond the Company’s control.
Gold, silver, zinc and lead are actively traded commodities, and their prices are volatile. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2019, the high and low price for each commodity are set forth in the following table:
Metal | Low Price for 2019 | Date | High Price for 2019 | Date |
Gold (per ounce) | $1,269.50 | April 23, 2019 | $1,546.10 | September 4, 2019 |
Silver (per ounce) | $14.38 | May 29, 2019 | $19.31 | September 4, 2019 |
Zinc (per pound) | $1.00 | September 3, 2019 | $1.37 | April 1, 2019 |
Lead (per pound) | $0.80 | May 14, 2019 | $1.03 | October 29, 2019 |
Gold, silver, zinc and lead prices are affected by many factors beyond the Company’s control, including U.S. dollar strength or weakness, speculation, global currency values, the price of products that incorporate gold, silver, zinc or lead, global and regional demand and production, political and economic conditions and other factors. In addition, Exchange Traded Funds (“ETFs”), which have substantially facilitated the ability of large and small investors to buy and sell precious metals and base metals, have become significant holders of gold, silver, zinc and lead. Gold and silver prices are also affected by prevailing interest rates and returns on other asset classes, expectations regarding inflation and governmental decisions regarding precious metals stockpiles.
Because the Company derives a significant portion of its revenues from sales of gold, silver, zinc and lead, its results of operations and cash flows will fluctuate as the prices of these metals change. A period of significant and sustained lower gold and silver prices and, to a lesser extent, zinc and lead prices, would materially and adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and cash flows. In response to lower metal price and/or higher treatment and refining charge environments, the Company may have to revise its operating plans, including reducing operating costs and capital expenditures, terminating or suspending mining operations at one or more of its properties and discontinuing certain exploration and development plans. These types of initiatives may not sufficiently offset reductions in revenues, and the Company may continue to incur losses associated with sustained lower metals prices.
Operating costs at the Company’s mines are also affected by the price of input commodities, such as fuel, electricity, labor, chemical reagents, explosives, steel and concrete. Prices for these input commodities are volatile and can fluctuate due to conditions that are difficult to predict, including global competition for resources, currency fluctuations, consumer or industrial demand and other factors. Continued volatility in the prices of commodities and other supplies the Company purchases could lead to higher costs, which would adversely affect results of operations and cash flows.
The estimation of mineral reserves and mineralized material is imprecise and depends upon subjective factors. Estimated mineral reserves and mineralized material may not be realized in actual production. The Company’s results of operations and financial position may be adversely affected by inaccurate estimates.
The mineral reserve and mineralized material figures presented in the Company’s public filings are estimates made by the Company’s technical personnel and independent mining consultants with whom the Company contracts. Mineral reserve and mineralized material estimates are a function of geological and engineering analyses that require the Company to make assumptions about production costs, recoveries and gold, silver, zinc and lead market prices. Mineral reserve and mineralized material estimation is an imprecise and subjective process. The accuracy of such estimates is a function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation, judgment and experience. Assumptions about gold, silver, zinc and lead market prices are subject to great uncertainty as those prices fluctuate widely and have fallen significantly at times over the past several years. Declines in the market prices of gold, silver, zinc or lead may render mineral reserves and mineralized material containing relatively lower grades of mineralization uneconomic to exploit, and the Company may be required to reduce mineral reserve and mineralized material estimates, discontinue development or mining at one or more of its properties or write down assets as impaired. Should the Company encounter mineralization or geologic formations at any of its mines or projects different from those predicted, it may adjust its mineral reserve and mineralized material estimates and alter its mining plans. Either of these alternatives may adversely affect actual production and financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
12
A significant delay or disruption in sales of concentrates or doré as a result of the unexpected disruption in services provided by smelters or refiners or other third parties could have a material adverse effect on results of operations.
The Company relies on refiners and smelters to refine and process and, in some cases, purchase, the gold and silver doré and gold, silver, zinc and lead concentrate produced by the Company’s mines. Access to refiners and smelters on economical terms is critical to the Company’s ability to sell its products to buyers and generate revenues. The Company has existing agreements with refiners and smelters, some of which operate their refining or smelting facilities outside the United States, and the Company believes it currently has contractual arrangements with a sufficient number of refiners and smelters so that the loss of any one refiner or smelter would not significantly or materially impact the Company’s operations or its ability to generate revenues. Nevertheless, services provided by a refiner or smelter may be disrupted by new or increased tariffs, duties or other cross-border trade barriers, the bankruptcy or insolvency of one or more refiners or smelters or the inability to agree on acceptable commercial or legal terms with a refiner or smelter. Such an event or events may disrupt an existing relationship with a refiner or smelter or result in the inability to create a contractual relationship with a refiner or smelter, which may leave the Company with limited, uneconomical or no access to refining or smelting services for short or long periods of time. Epidemics, pandemics or natural disasters may also impact refiners, smelters or other third parties with whom the Company has contractual arrangements or have an indirect effect on the Company's ability to obtain refining, smelting or other third party services. In early 2020, the Coronavirus outbreak has resulted in logistical constraints throughout China, including limiting zinc and lead smelting capacity. While the Company currently has no direct contractual arrangements with Chinese smelters, the reduced smelting capacity in China has increased competition for smelting services provided in other jurisdictions. This may lead to even higher global treatment charges for lead and zinc and/or the inability of the Company to find sufficient smelting capacity for its zinc or lead production on reasonable terms or at all.
Any delay or loss of access to refiners or smelters may significantly impact the Company’s ability to sell its doré and concentrate products and generate revenues. The Company cannot ensure that alternative refiners or smelters would be available or offer comparable terms if the need for them were to arise or that it would not experience delays or disruptions in sales that would materially and adversely affect results of operations.
In November 2018, one of the refiners of the Company's dore, RMC, filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. While the Company was able to divert shipments to alternative refiners following the bankruptcy filing, approximately 0.4 million ounces of the Company's silver and 6,500 ounces of the Company's gold were impacted by RMC's bankruptcy filing. In 2019, the Company entered into a partial settlement with RMC and certain other interested parties with respect to certain of its claims to this material; however, the Company did not recover the full value of the material, resulting in a write-down of the receivable balance in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
Refining charges and other fees charged by refiners and smelters may increase which may reduce the net revenues realized from production at our mines. For example, treatment charges for lead and zinc smelting have increased considerably since Coeur acquired the Silvertip mine in late 2017 due primarily to oversupply of lead and zinc, increasing costs and reducing the net proceeds from lead and zinc sales. The Silvertip mine is party to long-term lead and zinc concentrate sales agreements which provide discounts on lead and zinc treatment charges but require the Company to deliver all lead and zinc production to a single buyer until stated minimum quantities are met. Because most of the lead and all of the zinc produced by the Silvertip mine since the Company’s acquisition of Silvertip have not met minimum specifications for lead and zinc required under these long-term agreements, the Company has been exposed to market treatment charges which, in most cases, have been higher than the chargers applicable to the long-term agreements.
There are significant hazards associated with mining activities, some of which may not be fully covered by insurance.
The mining business is subject to risks and hazards, including environmental hazards, industrial accidents, the encountering of unusual or unexpected geological formations, cave-ins, flooding, earthquakes and periodic interruptions due to inclement or hazardous weather conditions or machine failure, such as the failure of the secondary crusher in Rochester’s new crushing circuit in 2019, which impacted crushing rates. These occurrences could result in damage to, or destruction of, mineral properties or production facilities, personal injury or death, environmental damage, reduced production and delays in mining, asset write-downs, monetary losses and possible legal liability.
Insurance fully covering many environmental risks, including potential liability for pollution or other hazards as a result of disposal of waste products occurring from exploration and production, is not generally available. Any liabilities that the Company incurs for these risks and hazards could be significant and could adversely affect results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
13
RISKS RELATED TO OUR OPERATIONS
The Company may be unable to successfully integrate and may not realize the expected benefits of recent or future acquisitions.
There can be no assurance that the anticipated benefits of recent acquisitions (including the Silvertip mine and the Sterling and Lincoln Hill projects) or any future acquisition, will be realized on the originally-anticipated timeline or at all. The success and the ability to realize the anticipated benefits of any acquisition will depend upon the Company’s ability to effectively manage the integration, performance and operations of entities or properties it acquires. The process of managing acquired businesses or assets may involve unforeseen challenges and may require a disproportionate amount of Company resources, which may divert focus and resources from other strategic opportunities and/or from operational matters during this process. As an example, the ramp up of the Silvertip mine, acquired in late 2017, has been slower and less profitable than originally anticipated, due primarily to more significant mill availability and maintenance challenges than were anticipated at the time Silvertip was acquired.
In addition to the above, any acquisition would be accompanied by risks, including:
• | a significant change in macroeconomic conditions, including commodity prices, treatment and refining charges or stock prices after the Company has committed to complete the transaction and established the purchase price or exchange ratio; |
• | additional debt incurred or issued to fund some or all of acquisition consideration (as was the case with Silvertip and Wharf), resulting in increased interest expense and other borrowing costs; |
• | issuance of equity securities as acquisition consideration (which occurred in the Sterling, Lincoln Hill and Silvertip project acquisitions), resulting in dilution of existing Company stockholders; |
• | a material ore body may prove to be below expectations; |
• | processing facilities may not operate as well as anticipated, and may require significant maintenance, downtime and capital investment, such as the mill at Silvertip; |
• | difficulties integrating and assimilating the operations and personnel of any acquired companies, realizing anticipated synergies and maximizing the financial and strategic position of the combined enterprise, and maintaining uniform standards, policies and controls across the organization |
• | difficulties or loss of social license to operate resulting from failure of efforts to establish positive relationships and/or agreements with local communities or local indigenous people; and |
• | the acquired business or assets may have unknown liabilities which may be significant. |
The Company cannot predict the impact of future acquisitions on the price of its common stock or assure that it would be able to obtain necessary acquisition or development financing on acceptable terms or at all. Unprofitable acquisitions, or additional indebtedness or issuances of securities in connection with such acquisitions or any future mine development, may negatively affect results of operations.
Finally, the Company’s systems, procedures and controls may be inadequate to support the expansion of our operations resulting from an acquisition or development of a new mine. The Company’s future operating results could be affected by the ability of its officers and key employees to manage changing business conditions and integrate an acquired business or new operation into Coeur. There may also be liabilities, such as environmental liabilities, or significant capital expenditures that the Company failed to discover or have underestimated in connection with any acquisition or development. Any such liabilities or capital expenditure requirements could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or future prospects.
Significant investment risks and operational costs are associated with exploration and development activities. These risks and costs may result in lower economic returns and may adversely affect the Company’s business.
The Company’s ability to sustain or increase its present production levels depends in part on successful exploration and development of new ore bodies and expansion of existing mining operations. Substantial expenditures are required to establish ore reserves, to extract metals from ores and, in the case of new properties, to construct mining and processing facilities.
Our plans include several significant projects to construct or upgrade mining and processing facilities at our existing mining operations, including the Plan of Operations Amendment (“POA”) 11 and POA 1 (each, as defined below) planned expansions and future plans to develop the Sterling and Lincoln Hill projects. These projects can take up to several months or years to complete, are complex and require significant capital expenditures. These projects are subject to significant risks, including delays, extreme weather events, unexpected increases in the cost of required materials, and disputes with third party providers of
14
materials, equipment or services, and a completed project may not yield the anticipated operational or financial benefit, any of which may have a material negative impact on returns on invested capital, operating costs or cash flows.
Mineral exploration involves many risks and is frequently unproductive. Even if mineral deposits are found, those deposits may be insufficient in quantity and quality to return a profit from production, or it may take a number of years until production is possible, during which time the economic viability of the project may change. Few properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. The commercial viability of a mineral deposit, once developed, depends on a number of factors, including: the particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade and proximity to infrastructure; government regulations including taxes, royalties and land tenure; land use; importing and exporting of minerals; environmental protection; mineral prices; and issuance and maintenance of necessary permits. Factors that affect adequacy of infrastructure include: reliability of roads, bridges, power sources and water supply; unusual or infrequent weather phenomena; sabotage; and government or other interference in the maintenance or provision of such infrastructure. All of these factors are highly cyclical. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination may result in not receiving an adequate return on invested capital.
In addition, exploration projects, such as the Company’s La Preciosa, Sterling/Crown and Lincoln Hill projects may have no operating history upon which to base estimates of future operating costs and capital requirements. Exploration project items such as estimates of reserves, metal recoveries and cash operating costs are to a large extent based upon the interpretation of geologic data, obtained from a limited number of drill holes and other sampling techniques, and feasibility studies. Estimates of operating costs are then derived based upon anticipated tonnage and grades of ore to be mined and processed, the configuration of the ore body, expected recovery rates of metals from the ore, comparable facility and equipment costs, anticipated climate conditions and other factors. As a result, actual operating costs and economic returns of any and all exploration projects may materially differ from the costs and returns estimated, and accordingly, the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be negatively affected.
The Company’s future growth will depend upon its ability to expand existing mines and develop and start-up new mines, either through exploration at existing properties or by acquisition of other mining companies.
Because mines have limited lives based on proven and probable mineral reserves, the Company’s ability to achieve significant additional growth in revenues and cash flows will depend upon success in further developing and expanding existing properties and the opportunistic acquisition or development and start-up of new mining properties, such as the Silvertip mine, the Sterling/Crown project and the Lincoln Hill and related assets.
While initial development of the Palmarejo, Rochester, and Kensington mines has been substantially completed, development work continues to expand these mines while leveraging existing infrastructure. In recent years, Palmarejo completed open pit mining and developed two new underground mining operations. At Rochester, a crushing circuit using high pressure grinding roll technology was commissioned in 2019 and planning and permitting is currently underway for a significant additional expansion, including the construction of two new leach pads, two new processing facilities and crushing systems (“POA 11”). At Kensington, the Company completed development and commenced commercial production from a new deposit in 2018 and is currently seeking to amend its operating permit to expand the operation to allow for mining activities for an additional 10 years (“POA 1”). The Company’s ability to timely complete these and future mine expansion and mine life extension projects is dependent on numerous factors, many of which are outside of the Company’s control, including, among others, availability of funding on acceptable terms and timing of receipt of permits and approvals from regulatory authorities. The Company cannot provide assurance that it will be able to successfully expand existing mining operations.
In addition, the Company acquired several mining properties in recent years, namely, the Sterling/Crown project, the Lincoln Hill and related assets and the Silvertip mine. The Company cannot assure that it will be able to successfully develop and start-up new mining properties or acquire additional mining properties on favorable economic terms or at all.
The Company regularly evaluates and engages in discussions or negotiations regarding acquisition opportunities. Any transactions that the Company contemplates or pursues would involve risks and uncertainties and would be subject to competition from other mining companies. There can be no assurance with respect to the timing, likelihood or business effect of any possible transaction.
The Company may be required to write down certain of its long-lived assets, due to metal prices, operational challenges or other factors. Such write- downs may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.
The Company reviews its long-lived assets for recoverability pursuant to the Financial Accounting Standard Board’s Accounting Standards Codification Section 360. Under that standard, the Company reviews the recoverability of its long-lived assets, such as its mining properties, upon a triggering event. Such review involves the Company estimating the future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. Impairment, measured by comparing an asset’s carrying value to its fair value, must be recognized when the carrying value of the asset exceeds these cash flows. The Company
15
conducts a review of the financial performance of its mines in connection with the preparation of its financial statements for each reported period and determines whether any triggering events are indicated.
During the fourth quarter of 2019, the Company performed a comprehensive analysis of its Silvertip property and determined that indicators of impairment existed, primarily as a result of continued deterioration in zinc and lead market conditions as well as ongoing challenges related to the processing facility. As a result of the impairment indicators, a recoverability test was performed and the Company concluded that the carrying value of the long-lived assets for the Silvertip property was impaired. A non-cash impairment charge of $250.8 million was recorded during the fourth quarter of 2019. The write-down was allocated between Property, plant and equipment, net, Mining properties, net and Other non-current assets, in the amounts of $43.6 million, $201.5 million and $5.7 million, respectively. See Note 4 -- Impairment of Long-lived Assets and 16 -- Fair Value Measurements for additional detail of the assumptions used in the determination of the fair value of the long-lived assets tested for impairment. In prior years, the Company’s assessment of the recoverability of its long-lived assets resulted in other write-downs in the Company's Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss) and reduced the carrying value of Mining properties and Property, plant, and equipment on the Company’s balance sheet. See Note 2 -- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail.
If there are further significant and sustained declines in relevant metal prices, or if the Company fails to control production and operating costs or realize the mineable ore reserves at its mining properties, the Company may terminate or suspend mining operations at one or more of its properties. These events could require a further write-down of the carrying value of the Company’s assets. Any such actions would adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.
The Company may record other types of charges in the future if it sells a property or asset for a price less than it’s carrying value or has to increase reclamation liabilities in connection with the closure and reclamation of a property. Any additional write-downs of mining properties or other assets could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.
The Company is an international company and is exposed to political and social risks associated with its foreign operations.
A significant portion of the Company’s revenues are generated by operations outside the United States. Exploration, development, production and closure activities in many countries are potentially subject to heightened political and social risks that are beyond the Company’s control and could result in increased costs, capacity constraints and potential disruptions to the Company’s business. These risks include the possible unilateral cancellation or forced renegotiation of contracts in which the Company, directly or indirectly, may have an interest, unfavorable changes in foreign laws and regulations, royalty and tax increases (including taxes associated with the import or export of goods), risks associated with the value-added tax (“VAT”) and income tax refund recovery and collection process, erection of trade barriers, including tariffs and duties, claims by governmental entities or indigenous communities, expropriation or nationalization of property and other risks arising out of foreign sovereignty over areas in which our operations are conducted. As an example, as disclosed in Note 21 -- Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company is currently engaged in efforts to recover VAT paid to the Mexican government that is owed to Coeur associated with Coeur Mexicana’s prior royalty agreement, including through ongoing litigation. The right to import and export gold, silver, zinc and lead may depend on obtaining certain licenses and quotas, which could be delayed or denied at the discretion of the relevant regulatory authorities, or could become subject to new taxes, tariffs or duties imposed by U.S. or foreign jurisdictions, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, or future prospects. In addition, the Company’s rights under local law may be less secure in countries where judicial systems are susceptible to manipulation and intimidation by government agencies, non-governmental organizations or civic groups.
Any of these developments could require the Company to curtail or terminate operations at its mines, incur significant costs to renegotiate contracts, meet newly-imposed environmental or other standards, pay greater royalties or higher prices for labor or services and recognize higher taxes, or experience significant delays or obstacles in the recovery of VAT or income tax refunds owed, which could materially and adversely affect financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
The Company’s operations outside the United States also expose it to economic and operational risks.
The Company’s operations outside the United States also expose it to economic and operational risks. Local economic conditions, as well as epidemics, pandemics or natural disasters, can cause shortages of skilled workers and supplies, increase costs and adversely affect the security of operations. In addition, higher incidences of criminal activity and violence in the area of some of the Company’s foreign operations, including drug-cartel related violence in Mexico, could adversely affect the Company’s ability to operate in an optimal fashion and may impose greater risks of theft and greater risks as to personnel and property security. These conditions could lead to lower productivity and higher costs, which would adversely affect results of operations and cash flows.
In addition, acts of civil disobedience are not uncommon in areas in Mexico where the Company’s operations or projects are located. In recent years, many mining companies have been the targets of actions to restrict their legally-entitled access to mining concessions or property. Such acts of civil disobedience often occur with no warning and can result in significant direct
16
and indirect costs. The Company cannot provide assurance that there will be no disruptions to site access in the future, which could adversely affect the Company’s business.
The Company sells silver and gold doré, gold concentrate, and silver, zinc and lead concentrates in U.S. dollars, but it conducts operations outside the United States in local currency. Currency exchange movements could also adversely affect the Company’s results of operations.
The Company’s success depends on developing and maintaining relationships with local communities and other stakeholders.
The Company’s ongoing and future success depends on developing and maintaining productive relationships with the communities surrounding its operations, including indigenous peoples who may have rights or may assert rights to certain of the Company’s properties, and other stakeholders in its operating locations. The Company believes its operations can provide valuable benefits to surrounding communities, in terms of direct employment, training and skills development and other benefits associated with ongoing payment of taxes. In addition, the Company seeks to maintain its partnerships and relationships with local communities, including indigenous peoples, and stakeholders in a variety of ways, including in-kind contributions, volunteer time, sponsorships and donations. Notwithstanding the Company’s ongoing efforts, local communities and stakeholders can become dissatisfied with its activities or the level of benefits provided, which may result in legal or administrative proceedings, civil unrest, protests, direct action or campaigns against it. Any such occurrences could materially and adversely affect the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Like any mining company, our mining assets are subject to geotechnical and hydrological risks, and a related incident could materially and adversely impact our production, profitability and financial condition and the value of our common stock.
Our mining assets are subject to geotechnical and hydrological risks which could impact the structural integrity of our mines, stockpiles, leach pads and tailings storage facilities. No assurances can be given that unanticipated adverse geotechnical and hydrological conditions, such as landslides, pit wall failures or tailings dam instability will not occur in the future or that such events will be detected in advance. Geotechnical and hydrological instabilities can be difficult to predict and are often affected by risks and hazards outside of our control, such as severe weather and considerable rainfall, which may lead to periodic floods, mudslides, wall instability and seismic activity, which may result in slippage of material. Waste rock in the form of tailings generated as a by-product of processed ore is produced at the Kensington, Palmarejo, and Silvertip Mines. Coeur places tailings into engineered containments, underground as structural backfill, and as a dry stack material. In response to several recent tailings dam failures unrelated to Coeur that have involved loss of life and resulted in severe property and environmental ecosystem damage, Coeur completed a comprehensive review of its tailings dams and operational practices to characterize its risk profile. Coeur concluded that its tailings dams represent a low exposure risk profile for several reasons, including that our tailings dams were constructed using construction methods recognized in the industry as the most stable tailings dam design using high strength and chemically stable rock in construction. Our dams are continuously monitored and inspected by internal resources as well as third party industry qualified experts. The significant dam failure events that have occurred in recent years may lead to regulatory governance changes stemming from updated laws, regulation or guidance, which could result in increased operational and compliance costs if we need to make changes to existing facilities. The failure of a tailings dam or tailings storage facility at one of our mine sites could result in severe, and in some cases catastrophic, property and environmental damage and loss of life. Geotechnical or hydrological failures could result in limited or restricted access to mine sites, suspension of operations, government investigations, lawsuits filed by parties who suffer injuries or property damage from such events, increased monitoring costs, remediation costs, loss of mineralized material and other impacts, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position as well as the value of our common stock.
The Company’s estimates of future production, costs, and financial results are imprecise, depend upon subjective factors, may not be realized in actual production and such estimates speak only as of their respective dates.
The Company has in the past, and may in the future, provide estimates and projections of its future production, costs and financial results. Any such information is forward-looking. Neither the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm nor any other independent expert or outside party compiles or examines these forward-looking statements and, accordingly, do not express any opinion or any other form of assurance on these estimates and projections. Estimates and projections are made by the Company’s management and technical personnel and are qualified by, and subject to the assumptions contained or referred in the filing, release or presentation in which they are made, including assumptions about the availability, accessibility, sufficiency and quality of mineralized material, the Company’s costs of production, the market prices of gold, silver, zinc and lead, the Company’s ability to sustain and increase production levels, the ability to produce and sell marketable concentrates and doré and related treatment and refining charges, the sufficiency of its infrastructure, the performance of its personnel and equipment, its ability to maintain and obtain mining interests and permits, the state of government and community relations, and its compliance with existing and future laws and regulations. The Company sometimes states possible outcomes as high and low ranges which are intended to provide a sensitivity analysis as variables are changed, but are not intended to represent that actual results could not fall outside of the suggested ranges. Actual results and experience may differ materially from these assumptions. Any production, cost, or financial results estimates speak only as of the date on which they are made, and the Company disclaims any intent or
17
obligation to update such estimates, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Accordingly, these forward-looking statements should be considered in the context in which they are made and undue reliance should not be placed on them.
Forward sales, advance sales, royalty arrangements, and certain derivative instruments can result in limiting the Company’s ability to take advantage of increased metal prices while increasing its exposure to lower metal prices.
The Company has in the past entered into, and may in the future enter into, arrangements under which it (or a mine acquired by the Company) has agreed to make advance metal sales to third parties or royalty or similar payments to lenders or other third parties in amounts that are based on expected production and price levels for gold or silver. The Company enters into such arrangements when it concludes that they provide it with necessary capital to develop a specific mining property or to achieve other business objectives. Advance metal sales, and royalty or similar payment obligations, however, can limit the Company’s ability to realize the full effects of rising metal prices and may, depending on the terms of the agreement, require the Company to make potentially significant cash payments if the mine fails to achieve specified minimum production levels or delivery requirements.
The Company is dependent upon information technology systems, which are subject to cybersecurity incidents, disruption, damage, failure and risks associated with implementation and integration.
The Company’s information technology systems used in its operations are subject to disruption, damage or failure from a variety of sources, including, without limitation, computer viruses, security breaches, cyberattacks, natural disasters and defects in design. Cybersecurity incidents, in particular, are evolving and include, but are not limited to, malicious software, attempts to gain unauthorized access to data or machines and equipment, and other electronic security breaches that could lead to disruptions in systems, unauthorized release of confidential or otherwise protected information, the corruption of data or the disabling, misuse or malfunction of machines and equipment. Various measures have been implemented to manage the Company’s risks related to information technology systems and network disruptions. However, given the unpredictability of the timing, nature and scope of information or operational technology disruptions, the Company could potentially be subject to production downtimes, operational delays, operating accidents, the compromising of confidential or otherwise protected information, destruction or corruption of data, security breaches, other manipulation or improper use of our systems and networks or financial losses from remedial actions, any of which could have a material adverse effect on cash flows, financial condition or results of operations.
The Company could also be adversely affected by system or network disruptions if new or upgraded information technology systems are defective, not installed properly or not properly integrated into operations. Various measures have been implemented to manage the risks related to the system implementation and modification, but system modification failures could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position and results of operations.
The Company’s business depends on good relations with, and the retention and hiring of, employees.
The Company may experience labor disputes, work stoppages or other disruptions in production that could adversely affect its business and results of operations. Labor disruptions may be used to advocate labor, political or social goals, particularly at non-U.S. mines. For example, labor disruptions may occur in sympathy with strikes or labor unrest in other sectors of local economies. The Company cannot assure that work stoppages, union organizing activities or other disruptions will not occur in the future. Any such work stoppage or disruption could expose the Company to significant costs and have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations or financial condition.
We compete with other mining companies to attract and retain key executives, skilled labor, contractors and other employees. We may be unable to continue to attract and retain skilled and experienced employees, which could have an adverse effect on our competitive position or adversely impact our results of operations or financial condition.
Continuation of the Company’s mining operations is dependent on the availability of sufficient and affordable water supplies.
The Company’s mining operations require significant quantities of water for mining, ore processing and related support facilities. In particular, the Company’s properties in Mexico and Nevada are in areas where water is scarce and competition among users for continuing access to water is significant. Continuous production and mine development is dependent on the Company’s ability to acquire and maintain water rights and claims and to defeat claims adverse to current water uses in legal proceedings. Although each of the Company’s operating mines currently has sufficient water rights and claims to cover its operational demands, the Company cannot predict the potential outcome of pending or future legal proceedings relating to water rights, claims and uses. Water shortages may also result from weather or environmental and climate impacts out of the Company’s control. Shortages in water supply could result in production and processing interruptions. In addition, the scarcity of water in certain regions could result in increased costs to obtain sufficient quantities of water to conduct the Company’s operations. The loss of some or all water rights, in whole or in part, or ongoing shortages of water to which we have rights or significantly higher costs to obtain sufficient quantities of water (or the failure to procure sufficient quantities of water) could result in the Company’s inability to maintain production at current or expected levels, require the Company to curtail or shut down mining production and could prevent the Company from pursuing expansion or development opportunities, which could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations
18
and financial condition. Laws and regulations may be introduced in some jurisdictions in which the Company operates which could also limit access to sufficient water resources, thus adversely affecting the Company’s operations.
We may not be able to recognize the benefits of deferred tax assets
The Company has accrued deferred tax assets in various jurisdictions from past operating losses, however, we may not be able to utilize part or all of these assets in the future. We only recognize the expected future tax benefit from these assets if it is considered more likely than not that the tax benefit will be realized. Otherwise, a valuation allowance is applied against deferred tax assets that are not more likely than not to be utilized. Assessing the recoverability of deferred tax assets requires management to make significant estimates related to expectations of future taxable income, including application of existing tax laws in each jurisdiction, assumptions about future metals prices, the macroeconomic environment and results of the Company’s operations. To the extent that future cash flows and taxable income differ significantly from estimates, the Company’s ability to realize deferred tax assets could be impacted. Additionally, future changes in tax laws could limit our ability to obtain the future benefits represented by our deferred tax assets. Deferred tax assets in the United States are also subject to limitation if the Company experiences a change in stock ownership in accordance with Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. Management has determined that the Company experienced ownership changes, for purposes of Section 382, during 2002, 2003, 2007, and 2015. Based on management’s calculations, the Company does not expect any of its deferred tax assets to expire unused as a result of the Section 382 annual limitations. However, the annual limitations may impact the timeframe over which the net operating loss carryforwards can be used, potentially impacting cash tax liabilities in a future period.
RISKS RELATED TO INDEBTEDNESS AND FINANCING
The Company’s future operating performance may not generate cash flows sufficient to meet debt payment obligations.
As of December 31, 2019, the Company had approximately $295.5 million of outstanding indebtedness. The Company’s ability to make scheduled debt payments on outstanding indebtedness will depend on future results of operations and cash flows. The Company’s results of operations and cash flows, in part, are subject to economic factors beyond its control, including the market prices of gold, silver, zinc and lead. The Company may not be able to generate enough cash flow to meet obligations and commitments under outstanding debt instruments.
If the Company’s cash flows from operations are insufficient to fund its debt service obligations, the Company could face substantial liquidity problems and could be forced to reduce or delay investments and capital expenditures, dispose of material assets or operations, seek additional debt or equity capital or restructure or refinance its indebtedness. The Company cannot predict whether it would be able to refinance debt, issue equity or debt securities or dispose of assets to raise funds on a timely basis or on satisfactory terms. In a rising interest rate environment, the costs of borrowing additional funds or refinancing outstanding indebtedness would also be expected to increase. In addition, the Facility’s (as defined below) interest rate is determined, at the Company’s option, by the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), and the Company and its lenders may not be able to agree to a new benchmark interest rate before LIBOR is expected to be eliminated by the end of 2021, which may result in higher interest costs for the Company. The agreements governing the Company’s outstanding indebtedness restrict the Company’s ability to dispose of assets and use the proceeds from those dispositions and may also restrict its ability to raise debt or equity capital to be used to repay other indebtedness when it becomes due. The Company may not be able to consummate those dispositions or to obtain proceeds in an amount sufficient to meet any debt service obligations then due. If the Company raises additional funds by issuing equity securities or securities convertible into equity securities, holders of its common stock could experience significant dilution of their ownership interest, and these securities could have rights senior to those of the holders of common stock.
The terms of the Company’s debt impose restrictions on its operations.
The agreements governing the Company’s outstanding indebtedness include a number of significant negative covenants. These covenants, among other things:
• | limit the Company’s ability to obtain additional financing, repurchase outstanding equity or issue debt securities; |
• | require the Company to meet certain financial covenants consisting of a consolidated net leverage ratio and a consolidated interest coverage ratio; |
• | require a portion of the Company’s cash flows to be dedicated to debt service payments instead of other purposes, which reduces the amount of cash flows available for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes; |
• | limit the Company’s ability to sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of assets, enter into transactions with and invest capital in affiliates, enter into agreements restricting our subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividends, consolidate, amalgamate, merge or sell all or substantially all of the Company’s assets; |
• | increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions; |
19
• | limit the Company’s flexibility in planning for and reacting to changes in the industry in which we compete; and |
• | place the Company at a disadvantage compared to other, less leveraged competitors. |
A breach of any of these covenants could result in an event of default under the applicable agreement governing the Company’s outstanding indebtedness that, if not cured or waived, could cause all amounts outstanding with respect to the debt to be due and payable immediately. Acceleration of any debt could result in cross-defaults under the Company’s other debt instruments. The Company’s inability to meet any of these covenants may also result in a lender requiring the Company to agree to additional restrictive covenants which may, among other things, limit its ability to fund its existing operations or incur additional indebtedness. The Company’s assets and cash flow may be insufficient to repay borrowings fully under all of its outstanding debt instruments if any of its debt instruments are accelerated upon an event of default, which could force the Company into bankruptcy or liquidation.
Any downgrade in the credit ratings assigned to the Company or its debt securities could increase future borrowing costs, adversely affect the availability of new financing and may result in increased collateral requirements under the Company’s existing surety bond portfolio.
There can be no assurance that any rating currently assigned by Standard & Poor’s Rating Services or Moody’s Investors Service to the Company or its debt securities will remain unchanged for any given period of time or that a rating will not be lowered if, in that rating agency’s judgment, future circumstances relating to the basis of the rating so warrant. If the Company is unable to maintain its outstanding debt and financial ratios at levels acceptable to the credit rating agencies, or should the Company’s business prospects or financial results deteriorate, including as a result of declines in gold and silver prices or other factors beyond our control, our ratings could be downgraded by the rating agencies. A downgrade by the rating agencies could adversely affect the value of the Company’s outstanding debt securities, its existing debt, and its ability to obtain new financing on favorable terms, if at all, increase borrowing costs, and may result in increased collateral requirements under the Company’s existing surety bond portfolio, which in turn may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial position.
The Company’s use of derivative contracts to protect against market price volatility exposes it to risk of opportunity loss, mark- to-market fair value adjustments and exposure to counterparty credit risk.
From time to time, the Company may enter into price risk management contracts to protect against fluctuations in the price of gold, silver, zinc and lead, foreign currency rates and changes in the prices of fuel and other input costs. These contracts could include forward sales or purchase contracts, futures contracts, purchased or sold put and call options and other derivative instruments. In 2019 and early 2020, the Company entered into price risk management contracts on a portion of its gold production for 2019 and 2020 after a significant increase in gold prices during 2019 and into early 2020. The Company determined to implement these contracts to provide for a minimum level of revenue from the sales of the covered gold ounces in order to mitigate the risk of not being able to fund all or a portion of the costs of several projects at existing operations.
The use of derivative instruments can expose the Company to risk of an opportunity loss and may also result in significant mark-to-market fair value adjustments, which may have a material adverse impact on reported financial results. The Company is exposed to credit risk with contract counterparties, including, but not limited to, sales contracts and derivative contracts. In the event of nonperformance in connection with a contract, the Company could be exposed to a loss of value for that contract.
RISKS RELATED TO APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS
The Company is subject to significant governmental regulations, including the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Act, the Health, Safety and Reclamation Code for Mines under the British Columbia Mines Act and Relevant Sections of the Mexican Official Regulations, and related costs and delays may negatively affect its business.
Mining activities are subject to extensive federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations governing environmental protection, natural resources, prospecting, development, production, post-closure reclamation, taxes, labor standards and occupational health and safety laws and regulations, including mine safety, toxic substances and other matters. The costs associated with compliance with such laws and regulations are substantial. Changes in existing laws, possible future laws and regulations, or more restrictive interpretations of current laws and regulations by governmental authorities, could cause additional expense, capital expenditures, restrictions on or suspensions of operations and delays in the development of new properties.
U.S. surface and underground mines like the Kensington, Rochester and Wharf mines and Sterling/Crown project are frequently inspected by the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”), which inspections often lead to notices of violation. Recently, MSHA has been conducting more frequent and more comprehensive inspections of mining operations in general. Similar inspections are conducted in British Columbia, Canada, at the Silvertip mine and in Mexico at the Palmarejo complex by the British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources and the Mexican Secretaria del Trabajo y Prevision Social (Secretary of Labor and Social Safety), respectively.
Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permitting requirements may result in temporary or extended shutdowns, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, which may
20
require corrective measures including the payment of fines or penalties, capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment or remedial actions, any of which could have a material, adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations.
Compliance with environmental regulations and litigation based on environmental regulations could require significant expenditures.
Environmental regulations mandate, among other things, the maintenance of air and water quality standards, land development and land reclamation, and set forth limitations on the generation, transportation, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous waste. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner that may require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects, and a heightened degree of responsibility for mining companies and their officers, directors and employees. The Company may incur environmental costs that could have a material adverse effect on financial condition and results of operations. Any failure to remedy an environmental problem could require it to suspend operations or enter into interim compliance measures pending completion of the required remedy. The environmental standards that ultimately may be imposed at a mine site affect the cost of remediation and could exceed the financial accruals that the Company has made for such remediation. The potential exposure may be significant and could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
Moreover, governmental authorities and private parties may bring lawsuits based upon damage to property and injury to persons resulting from the environmental, health and safety impacts of prior and current operations, including operations conducted by other mining companies many years ago at sites located on properties that the Company currently or formerly owned. These lawsuits could lead to the imposition of substantial fines, remediation costs, penalties and other civil and criminal sanctions. Substantial costs and liabilities, including for restoring the environment after the closure of mines, are inherent in the Company’s operations. The Company cannot assure that any such law, regulation, enforcement or private claim would not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Some of the mining wastes from the Company’s U.S. mines currently are exempt to a limited extent from the extensive set of EPA regulations governing hazardous waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”). If the EPA were to repeal this exemption, and designate these mining wastes as hazardous under RCRA, the Company would be required to expend additional amounts on the handling of such wastes and to make significant expenditures to construct hazardous waste storage or disposal facilities. Under the Mercury Export Ban Act of 2008 (“MEBA”), incidental elemental mercury generated at the Company's Rochester mine as part of the processing of ore may not be exported outside of the United States and is required to be stored in a storage facility designated by the U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”). Near the end of 2019, the DOE designated a facility and issued a long-term management and storage fee rule; however, the facility designation process and fee are currently subject to legal challenge by the Company and other third parties. If litigation is unsuccessful, the existing rule could result in material cost being incurred to ship and store Coeur Rochester's mercury. In addition, if any of these wastes causes contamination in or damage to the environment at a U.S. mining facility, that facility could be designated as a “Superfund” site under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”). Under CERCLA, any present owner or operator of a Superfund site or the owner or operator at the time of contamination may be held jointly and severally liable regardless of fault and may be forced to undertake extensive remedial cleanup action or to pay for the cleanup efforts. The owner or operator also may be liable to federal, state and tribal governmental entities for the cost of damages to natural resources, which could be substantial. Additional regulations or requirements also are imposed on the Company’s tailings and waste disposal areas in Alaska under the federal Clean Water Act (“CWA”), in Nevada under the Nevada Water Pollution Control Law which implements the CWA, and in South Dakota under the South Dakota Water Pollution Control Act and the Administrative Rules of the State of South Dakota. In addition, proposed CERCLA regulations requiring mining companies to obtain supplemental financial assurance could, if adopted, have a material adverse effect on results of operations and cash flows.
Airborne emissions are subject to controls under air pollution statutes implementing the Clean Air Act in Nevada, Alaska and South Dakota. In addition, there are numerous legislative and regulatory initiatives related to climate change, reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, or energy policy and adoption of these initiatives through legislative actions or administrative policy could have a material adverse effect on results of operations and cash flows.
In addition, U.S. environmental conservation efforts could result in the withdrawal of certain federal lands from mineral entry under the Mining Law, which could have the effect of restricting the Company’s current or future planned activities involving its unpatented mining claims on the affected public lands.
The Company is required to obtain and renew governmental permits in order to conduct operations, a process which is often costly and time-consuming. The Company’s ability to obtain necessary government permits to expand operations or begin new operations may be materially affected by third party activists.
In the normal course of its business, the Company is required to obtain and renew governmental permits for exploration, operations and expansion of existing operations and for the development of new projects, such as the permitting efforts currently underway for POA 11 at Rochester and POA 1 at Kensington. Obtaining and renewing governmental permits is a complex and
21
time-consuming process. The timeliness and success of permitting efforts are contingent upon many variables not within the Company’s control, including the interpretation of permit approval requirements administered by the applicable permitting authority. The Company may not be able to obtain or renew permits that are necessary to its operations or the cost and time required to obtain or renew permits may exceed the Company’s expectations. Any unexpected delays or costs associated with the permitting process could delay the development or impede the operation of a mine, which in turn could materially adversely affect the Company’s revenues and future growth. In addition, key permits and approvals may be revoked or suspended or may be changed in a manner that adversely affects the Company’s operations.
Private parties such as environmental activists frequently attempt to intervene in the permitting process and to persuade regulators to deny necessary permits or seek to overturn permits that have been issued. Obtaining the necessary governmental permits is a complex and time-consuming process involving numerous jurisdictions and often involving public hearings and costly undertakings. These third party actions can materially increase the costs and cause delays in the permitting process and could cause the Company to not proceed with the development or expansion of a mine. In addition, the Company’s ability to successfully obtain key permits and approvals to explore for, develop, operate and expand mines and to conduct its operations will likely depend on the Company’s ability to develop, operate, expand and close mines in a manner that is consistent with the creation of social and economic benefits in the surrounding communities, which may or may not be required by law. The Company’s ability to obtain permits and approvals and to successfully operate in particular communities may be adversely impacted by real or perceived detrimental events associated with its activities or those of other mining companies affecting the environment, human health and safety of communities in which it operates.
If future permitting applications or amendments are not approved on a timely basis or at all, or if the permitting process is delayed for any reason, including to address public comments, the Company’s plans for continued operations and future growth could be materially adversely affected, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
The Company’s business is subject to anti-bribery laws, a breach or violation of which could lead to civil and criminal fines and penalties, loss of licenses or permits and reputational harm.
The Company operates in certain jurisdictions that have experienced governmental and private sector corruption. The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, as well as Canadian and Mexican anti-bribery laws generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business or other commercial advantage. Violations of these laws, or allegations of such violations, could lead to civil and criminal fines and penalties, litigation, and loss of operating licenses or permits, and may damage the Company’s reputation, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position and results of operations. The Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and other corporate policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws; however, there can be no assurance that the Company’s internal control policies and procedures always will protect it from recklessness, fraudulent behavior, dishonesty or other inappropriate acts or violations of laws committed by the Company’s affiliates, employees or agents.
The Company is subject to litigation and may be subject to additional litigation in the future.
The Company is currently, and may in the future become, subject to other litigation, arbitration or proceedings with other parties. If decided adversely to the Company, these legal proceedings, or others that could be brought against the Company in the future, could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or prospects. In the event of a dispute arising at the Company’s foreign operations, the Company may be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of foreign courts or arbitral panels or may not be successful in subjecting foreign persons to the jurisdiction of courts or arbitral panels in the United States. The Company’s inability to enforce its rights and the enforcement of rights on a prejudicial basis by foreign courts or arbitral panels could have an adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial position.
Disputes regarding the Company’s mining claims, concessions or surface rights to land in the vicinity of the Company’s mining projects could adversely impact operations.
The validity of mining or exploration claims, concessions or rights, which constitute most of the Company’s property holdings, is often uncertain and may be contested. The Company has used commercially reasonable efforts, in accordance with industry standards, to investigate its title or claims to its various properties, however, no assurance can be given that applicable governments will not revoke or significantly alter the conditions of the applicable exploration and mining claims, concessions or rights or that such exploration and mining claims, concessions or rights will not be challenged by third parties. Although the Company has attempted to acquire satisfactory title to undeveloped properties, in accordance with mining industry practice it does not generally obtain title opinions until a decision is made to develop a property. As a result, some titles, particularly titles to undeveloped properties may be defective. Defective title to any of the Company’s exploration and mining claims, concessions or rights could result in litigation, insurance claims and potential losses affecting its business as a whole. There may be challenges to the title of any of the claims comprising the Company’s projects that, if successful, could impair development and operations.
22
A defect could result in the Company losing all or a portion of its right, title, estate and interest in and to the properties to which the title defect relates.
In Mexico, while mineral rights are administered by the federal government through federally issued mining concessions, federally recognized agrarian communities called ejidos control surface or surface access rights to the land. An ejido may sell or lease lands directly to a private entity. While the Company has agreements or is in the process of negotiating agreements with the ejidos that impact all of its projects in Mexico, some of these agreements may be subject to renegotiation.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON STOCK
The Company has the ability to issue additional equity securities, including in connection with an acquisition of other companies, which would lead to dilution of its issued and outstanding common stock and may materially and adversely affect the price of its common stock.
The issuance of additional equity securities or securities convertible into equity securities, whether to acquire new companies or businesses or for other strategic benefits, would result in dilution of the Company’s existing stockholders’ equity ownership. The Company is authorized to issue, without stockholder approval, 10.0 million shares of preferred stock in one or more series, to establish the number of shares to be included in each series and to fix the designation, powers, preferences and relative participating, optional, conversion and other special rights of the shares of each series as well as the qualification, limitations or restrictions on each series. Any series of preferred stock could contain dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption, redemption prices, liquidation preferences or other rights superior to the rights of holders of its common stock. If the Company issues additional equity securities, the price of its common stock may be materially and adversely affected.
Holders of our common stock may not receive dividends.
We have not historically declared cash dividends on our common stock. Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive only such dividends as our Board of Directors may declare out of funds legally available for such payments. We are incorporated in Delaware and governed by the Delaware General Corporation Law. Delaware law allows a corporation to pay dividends only out of surplus, as determined under Delaware law or, if there is no surplus, out of net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend was declared and for the preceding fiscal year. Under Delaware law, however, we cannot pay dividends out of net profits if, after we pay the dividend, our capital would be less than the capital represented by the outstanding stock of all classes having a preference upon the distribution of assets. Our ability to pay dividends will be subject to our future earnings, capital requirements and financial condition, as well as our compliance with covenants related to existing or future indebtedness and would only be declared in the discretion of our Board of Directors.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
23
Item 2. Properties
MINING PROPERTIES
Coeur Mining’s significant production and development properties are described below. Operating statistics are presented in the section entitled “Operating Statistics” below.
Mexico — Palmarejo
The Palmarejo complex consists of (1) the Palmarejo processing facility; (2) the Guadalupe underground mine, located about eight kilometers southeast of the Palmarejo mine; (3) the Independencia underground mine, located approximately 800 meters northeast of the Guadalupe underground mine, (4) the La Nacion underground mine, located adjacent to the Independencia underground mine; and (5) other nearby deposits and exploration targets. The Palmarejo complex is located in the state of Chihuahua, Mexico. Access to the property is provided by air, rail, and all-weather paved and gravel roads from the state capitol of Chihuahua.
The Palmarejo complex consists of 71 wholly-owned mining concessions, covering approximately 67,296 acres (27,233 hectares) of land. In total, the Palmarejo complex covers over 105 square miles. All mining concessions owned by Coeur Mexicana are valid until at least 2029.
The Palmarejo complex is located on the western flank of the Sierra Madre Occidental, a mountain range that comprises the central spine of northern Mexico. The north-northwest trending Sierra Madre Occidental is composed of a relatively flat-lying sequence of Tertiary volcanic rocks that forms a volcanic plateau, cut by numerous igneous intrusive rocks. This volcanic plateau is deeply incised in the Palmarejo mine area, forming steep-walled canyons. The Sierra Madre Occidental gives way to the west to an extensional terrain that represents the southward continuation of the Basin and Range Province of the western United States, and then to the coastal plain of western Mexico.
The gold and silver deposits at the Palmarejo complex, typical of many of the other gold and silver deposits in the Sierra Madre, are classified as epithermal deposits and are hosted in multiple veins, breccias, and fractures. These geologic structures trend generally northwest to southeast and dip either southwest or northeast. The dip on the structures ranges from about 45 degrees to 70 degrees. In the mineralized portions of the structures, gold and silver are zoned from top to bottom with higher silver values occurring in the upper parts of the deposit and higher gold values in the lower parts, sometimes accompanied by base metal mineralization, though local variations are common. The Palmarejo complex contains a number of mineralized zones or areas of interest. The most important of these to date is the Palmarejo zone in the north of the mining concessions,
24
which covers the old Palmarejo gold-silver mine formed at the intersection of the northwest-southeast trending La Prieta and La Blanca gold-and-silver bearing structures. In addition to the Palmarejo zone, other mineralized vein and alteration systems in the district area have been identified all roughly sub-parallel to the Palmarejo zone. The most significant of these additional targets are the Guadalupe (including Animas), Independencia, and La Patria vein systems in the southern part of the property, which are currently under development (Guadalupe and Independencia) and exploration (La Patria) by the Company.
A portion of the Palmarejo complex is subject to a gold stream agreement with a subsidiary of Franco-Nevada Corporation (“Franco-Nevada”) pursuant to which Coeur Mexicana sells 50% of applicable gold production for the lesser of $800 or spot price per ounce.
USA (Nevada) — Rochester
The Rochester mine, and associated heap leach facilities, is an open pit silver and gold mine located in Pershing County, Nevada, approximately 13 miles northeast of the city of Lovelock. The Company owns 100% of the Rochester mine through Coeur Rochester. The mine consists of the main Rochester deposit and the adjacent Nevada Packard deposit, southwest of the Rochester mine. In November 2018, Coeur Rochester acquired the Lincoln Hill, Gold Ridge and Wilco projects adjacent to Rochester from Alio Gold. The Rochester mine is fully supported with electricity, supplied by a local power company. Ore is mined using conventional open pit methods, with gold and silver recovered by heap leaching of crushed open-pit ore placed on pads located within the Rochester mining area. Based upon actual operating experience and metallurgical testing, the Company estimates ultimate recovery rates from the crushed ore of 70.0% for silver, depending on the ore being leached, and 92.5% for gold.
Coeur Rochester lands, including the Lincoln Hill and related assets, consist of approximately 43,541 net acres, which encompasses 1,478 Federal unpatented lode claims, appropriating approximately 30,038 net acres of Public Land, 23 patented lode claims, consisting of approximately 392 acres, interests owned in approximately 6,929 gross acres of additional real property and certain rights in and to approximately 6,182 acres, held either through lease, letter agreement or license.
The Federal unpatented lode claims are maintained via annual filings and timely payment of claim maintenance fees to the BLM, which acts as administrator of the claims.
At Rochester, silver and gold mineralization is hosted in folded and faulted volcanic rocks of the Rochester Formation and overlying Weaver Formation. Silver and gold, consisting of silver sulfosalt minerals, argentite, silver-bearing tetrahedrite and minor native gold, are contained in zones of multiple quartz veins and veinlets (vein, vein swarms and stockworks) with variable amounts of pyrite.
A security interest in the Rochester mine has been granted in favor of the lenders under the Company’s revolving credit facility.
USA (Alaska) — Kensington
The Kensington underground gold mine and associated milling facilities are located on the east side of the Lynn Canal about 45 miles north-northwest of Juneau, Alaska. The Company controls 100% of the mine through Coeur Alaska. The mine is accessed by a horizontal tunnel and utilizes conventional and mechanized underground mining methods. Ore is processed in a flotation mill that produces a concentrate that is sold to third party smelters. Waste material is deposited in an impoundment facility on the property. Power is supplied by on-site diesel generators. Access to the mine is by either a combination of road vehicles, boat, helicopter, floatplane, or by boat direct from Juneau.
Coeur Alaska controls two contiguous property groups: the Kensington Group and Jualin Group. The Kensington Group, totaling approximately 3,969 net acres, consists of 51 patented lode and patented mill site claims comprising approximately 766 net acres, 284 Federal unpatented lode claims covering approximately 3,108 net acres, and 13 State of Alaska mining claims covering approximately 95 net acres. The Jualin Group, totaling approximately 8,366 net acres, is comprised of 23 patented lode and patented mill site claims covering approximately 388 net acres, 471 Federal unpatented lode claims and one Federal unpatented mill site claim appropriating approximately 7,916 net acres, a State of Alaska upland mining lease comprising approximately 682 acres, one State of Alaska mining claim comprising approximately three acres and four State-selected mining claims covering approximately 70 acres. 14 of the 23 patented lode claims cover private surface estate only. The mineral estate to these 14 patented lode claims is owned by the State of Alaska, the mineral rights to which are secured by a State of Alaska upland mining lease. The Company controls properties comprising the Jualin Group, under a lease agreement with Hyak Mining Company, which is valid until August 5, 2035 and thereafter, provided mining and production are actively occurring within and from the leased premises.
The Federal unpatented lode and Federal unpatented mill site claims are maintained via annual filings and timely payment of claim maintenance fees to the BLM, which acts as administrator of the claims. State of Alaska mining claims and upland mining leases are maintained via fees and filings to the Alaska Department of Natural Resources, Division of Mining, Land and Water and the Juneau Recorder’s Office. Real property taxes are paid annually to the City and Borough of Juneau for the patented lode claims. Private lease payments are paid annually and all leases are in good standing.
25
The Kensington ore deposit consists of multiple gold bearing mesothermal, quartz, carbonate and pyrite vein swarms and discrete quartz-pyrite veins hosted in Cretaceous-aged Jualin diorite. Most of the gold is contained in calaverite (AuTe2) that occurs in association with native gold as inclusions in and interstitial to pyrite grains and in microfractures in pyrite.
A security interest in the Kensington mine has been granted in favor of the lenders under the Company’s revolving credit facility.
USA (South Dakota) — Wharf
The Wharf mine is located in the northern Black Hills of western South Dakota, approximately four miles south and west of the city of Lead, South Dakota. Access is established by paved road with power supplied by a local power company. Coeur acquired the Wharf mine in 2015 and owns all of the issued and outstanding equity interests in Wharf and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Golden Reward Mining Limited Partnership (“Golden Reward”), the owners of the Wharf mine.
There are two contiguous property groups located at the Wharf mine; the Wharf Group and the Golden Reward Group, owned or controlled by wholly-owned subsidiaries of Coeur and Wharf Resources. The Wharf Group is generally described as the northern and western portions of the project, while the Golden Reward Group is generally described as the southern and eastern portion of the project.
The Wharf Group comprises 362 patented lode claims, 35 government lots, 123 subdivided lots, and 59 federal unpatented lode claims. The Wharf Group is comprised of approximately 3,591 net acres of surface, 652 net mineral acres where both the Precambrian and younger formations are owned or controlled, 3,243 net mineral acres of non-Precambrian mineral estate, and 1,603 net mineral acres of Precambrian mineral estate and 287 net acres of federal unpatented lode claims. The Golden Reward Group encompasses 218 patented lode claims, 14 government lots, 19 subdivided lots and 34 federal unpatented lode claims. The Golden Reward Group is comprised of approximately 1,564 net acres of surface estate, 2,988 net mineral acres of mineral estate where both the Precambrian and younger formations are owned or controlled, 357 net mineral acres of Non-Precambrian mineral estate, 153 net mineral acres of Precambrian mineral estate and 25 net acres of federal unpatented lode claims.
The federal unpatented lode claims are maintained by the timely annual payment of claim maintenance fees, payable to the BLM. The patented lands are private land and therefore not subject to federal claim maintenance requirements. However, as private land, they are subject to property taxes assessed by Lawrence County, South Dakota, which may be paid semi-annually.
The Wharf mine is a structurally controlled disseminated gold deposit, hosted by Paleozoic sedimentary rocks and Tertiary alkalic intrusive rocks. Mining has occurred at Wharf for over 30 years as an open pit heap leach operation. Host rocks are sandstones of the upper and lower members of the Cambrian Deadwood Formation and Tertiary alkalic intrusive sills. Alteration styles as well as age dates in the deposit demonstrate both lithological and structural control, which are completely unrelated to the nearby gold deposits at the Homestake Gold Mine in Lead, South Dakota.
Wharf and Golden Reward are obligated to pay a sliding scale production royalty to Royal Gold, Inc. The royalty encumbers the majority of the land comprising the Wharf Group, together with a small portion of the lands encompassing the Golden Reward Group, and wholly excludes the Precambrian Mineral Estate. The sliding scale provides for a 2.0% royalty on the gross value less state severance taxes with a monthly average PM LBMA Gold Price of $500 or more per ounce.
Wharf and Golden Reward are also obligated to pay a 3.0% non-participating royalty to Donald D. Valentine, et al, on gold that is produced from ores mined and delivered to heap leach pads or recovered from tailings. This royalty encumbers the mineral estate, including the Precambrian Mineral Estate, of much of the lands comprising the Wharf Group, together with a small portion of the lands encompassing the Golden Reward Group. Wharf holds a right of first refusal to purchase this royalty upon any proposed transfer by the royalty holder.
A security interest in the Wharf mine has been granted in favor of the lenders under the Company’s revolving credit facility.
Canada (British Columbia) — Silvertip
The Silvertip mine is located in British Columbia, Canada and consists of sixty-four (64) contiguous mineral claims containing approximately 39,375 hectares (97,298 acres) and two mining leases containing approximately 1,528 hectares (3,777 acres). In total, the Silvertip mine covers an area of approximately 40,904 hectares (101,076 acres). All mineral claims are valid for one year after recording. To maintain a claim, the recorded holder must, on or before the expiry date of the claim, either perform exploration and development work on that claim (or contiguous block of claims) and register such work online, or register a payment instead of exploration and development work.
26
Silvertip maintains two mining leases which are also subject to the Mineral Tenure Act regulations. Coeur Silvertip’s mining leases cover 1,528.79 hectares (3,777.72 acres). Mining leases are held by making an annual rental payment of CAD20 per hectare. The mining leases expire 30 years after the grant date, and all leases held by Coeur Silvertip are valid until 2045 or later.
The Silvertip mine is a carbonate-hosted massive sulfide deposit. Economic mineralization occurs at the top of the McDame limestone, at or near the contact with the upper Earn Group sediments. Mineable massive sulfides form gently plunging tubes or cape-shaped mantos up to about 20 meters thick and 30 meters wide, and in places extend for at least 200 meters. Discordant, high-angle chimney feeders are also present and have been the target of recent underground exploration. Geologic contact between the massive sulfide and the host limestone can be sharp and easy to see in both drill core and underground mining. Mineralization consists of pyrite, pyrrhotite, sphalerite and argentiferous galena. Additionally, silver-bearing phases can include pyrargyrite-proustite, boulangerite-jamesonite and tetrahedrite (freibergite). The mineralizing event is assumed to be Late Cretaceous, which is consistent with other ore deposits in a belt that extends through the Yukon to southern Alaska.
Coeur Silvertip is obligated to pay a 2.5% net smelter returns royalty payable to Maverix Metals, Inc. on all mineral products produced from the Silvertip mine. Coeur Silvertip is also obligated to pay to Silvertip Resources Investment Cayman Ltd. a net smelter returns royalty of 1.429% on the first 1,434,000 tons of mineralized material mined, and 1.00% thereafter, on all mineral leases that underlie the Silvertip mine and that were in existence at April 11, 2016. The Company is party to a formal agreement with the Kaska Nation dated December 12, 2013, under which the Company is obligated to make an annual payment to the Kaska Nation that is calculated based on financial performance of the Silvertip mine and can increase or decrease based on the average price of silver for the relevant calendar year.
NEAR-MINE EXPLORATION
Exploration expense from continuing operations was $22.5 million, $25.4 million, and $30.3 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Capitalized drilling from continuing operations was $7.5 million in 2019 and $18.6 million in 2018. Coeur’s exploration program completed over 524,154 feet (159,762 meters) of combined core and reverse circulation drilling in 2019.
Mexico - Palmarejo
In 2019, exploration expense of $5.6 million was incurred, related to mapping, sampling, drill target generation, and drilling new silver and gold mineralization (100,663 feet or 30,682 meters). Expensed expansion drilling focused primarily on extensions of the Guadalupe and Independencia mines, including La Nación, Zapata, Colorado Sur, La Bavisa, Hidalgo and Barrera veins. Capitalized drilling of $4.5 million related to conversion drilling in the Guadalupe and Independencia (99,751 feet or 30,404 meters). In 2018, exploration expense of $7.4 million was incurred, related to mapping, sampling, drill target generation, and drilling new silver and gold mineralization (142,441 feet or 43,416 meters). Expensed expansion drilling focused primarily on Guadalupe, Independencia, La Nación underground mines, and several new discoveries including the Zapata, Madero, Hidalgo and Reforma veins. Capitalized conversion drilling of $4.1 million related to the Guadalupe, Independencia and La Nación ore bodies (110,655 feet or 33,728 meters).
In 2020, the Company expects to incur $8.7 million million of expansion drilling expense focused on discovery and expansion of mineralization at the northwestern portion of the Guadalupe mine; on the Hidalgo and Barrera Veins located north of the Independencia Mine Complex; on the La Bavisa vein located at approximately 1,500 feet (500 meters) east of the Independencia Mine; and, on the La Aurelia vein, located southwest of the Guadalupe mine. Additionally, the Company is planning for $4.1 million of conversion drilling in the Guadalupe and Independencia ore bodies.
USA (Nevada) - Rochester
In 2019, expensed expansion drilling was $0.7 million and capitalized conversion drilling was $1.2 million. Expansion drilling, consisted of 9,250 feet (2,819 meters) of reverse circulation drilling testing the Lincoln Hill mineralization. Capitalized conversion drilling, consisted of 7,111 feet (2,167 meters) of core drilling, focused on infill within the Rochester Pit and within the East Rochester mineralization. In 2018, expensed expansion drilling was $0.3 million and capitalized conversion drilling was $1.3 million. Expansion drilling consisted of 4,070 feet (1,241 meters) testing areas in the Packard and South Charlie target areas, while conversion drilling consisted of 37,330 feet (11,378 meters) mainly within the Sunflower mineralization and the main Rochester Pit. In 2020, the Company expects to incur $1.1 million of expansion drilling expense testing several targets around Rochester, including condemnation drilling in support of the next planned leach pads. Additionally, $3.0 million in conversion drilling is planned to infill the East Rochester and Sunflower-Southwest Rochester areas.
USA (Alaska) - Kensington
In 2019, exploration expense of $5.6 million, which consisted of 91,041 feet (27,749 meters), was focused on the expansion and discovery of the underground Raven, Elmira, Johnson, Eureka, Bear, Ophir, Jualin #2 and Jualin #5 veins, and Comet-Seward
27
veins from surface drill platforms, as well as limited expansion drilling of the Raven vein and Kensington Main. A total of $2.0 million of conversion drilling, which consisted of 36,635 feet (11,166 meters), was focused on Elmira, Raven and Kensington Main Zone 30. In 2018, expensed expansion drilling of $5.9 million consisted of 57,942 feet (17,661 meters), while $4.4 million of conversion drilling completed 35,294 feet (10,758 meters) to expand and define mineralization in the main Kensington and Raven deposits. Expansion drilling focused on testing new Ophir and Seward veins in the district, as well as expansion of Raven and main Kensington. In 2020, the Company expects to incur $9.5 million of expansion drilling expense related to the discovery or expansion of mineralized material at Comet-Seward, upper and lower Elmira, upper Raven and the new Johnson Vein, and $0.9 million of conversion drilling at Elmira, Raven, lower and upper Kensington.
USA (South Dakota) - Wharf
In 2019, 3,190 feet (972 meters) of expansion drilling at the new Richmond Hill project was completed due to the late season start to the program. In 2018, conversion drilling of $0.8 million completed 23,310 feet (7,105 meters) of drilling primarily within the Portland Ridge Main deposit with only a limited amount of exploration discovery drilling (3,750 feet or 1,143 meters) at Bald Mountain. In 2020, the Company expects to incur $1.3 million of expansion drilling at Richmond Hill.
Canada (British Columbia) - Silvertip
In 2019, expansion drilling expense was $1.7 million consisting of 50,745 feet (15,467 meters), focused on Discovery North, East and South zones, east of the Silvertip Underground Mine. Limited conversion drilling was completed, consisting of 7,794 feet (2,376 meters). In 2018, expensed expansion drilling of $2.4 million consisted of 48,118 feet (14,666 meters) and capitalized conversion drilling consisting of $8.0 million consisted of 143,094 feet (43,615 meters). In 2020, the Company expects to incur $8.0 million of expansion drilling expense around the current mineralization at the Silver Creek, Discovery North, East and South zones, and the 28 Zone, with large step out drill tests at a variety of targets in the district.
ADVANCED-STAGE EXPLORATION PROPERTIES
USA (Nevada) — Sterling/Crown Project
In 2019, expansion drilling expense was $4.8 million and capitalized conversion drilling was $0.8 million. Expensed expansion drilling consisted of 78,435 feet (23,907 meters) testing areas around the Sterling Project mineralization at Daisy, Secret Pass and SNA. Capitalized conversion drilling consisted of 30,300 feet (9,235 meters) within the Sterling Mine area. During 2019, the Company continued drilling the Sterling Mine area, expending $0.9 million and completing 20,760 feet (6,328 meters) of expansion drilling, focused near the historic Sterling Mine and on areas considered for future mine infrastructure. In 2020, the Company plans to spend $6.5 million on expansion drilling around the Sterling Mine and on a variety of new targets in the Crown area, as well as $1.0 million on conversion drilling in the Sterling Mine area.
EARLY-STAGE EXPLORATION PROPERTIES
In 2019, the Company invested $1.8 million in greenfields exploration, completing target analysis and regional exploration with a focus on projects in the USA, Mexico and Canada. A total of 9,240 feet (2,816 meters) were drilled at the El Sarape earn-in/JV, Sonora, Mexico. In 2018, the Company invested $6.6 million in greenfields exploration, completing target analysis and regional exploration with a focus on projects in Wyoming, South Dakota and Nevada, USA and Sonora and Chihuahua, Mexico. A total of 17,330 feet (5,282 meters) of drilling was completed on two projects in Nevada: Tonopah and Crow Springs. A total of 47,686 feet (14,535 meters) were drilled at the La Morita Project, located in Chihuahua, Mexico. In 2020, the Company has no plans for a greenfields, early-stage exploration program apart from review of potential advanced-stage projects that might fit the Company’s criteria for a strategic investment.
28
OPERATING STATISTICS
Palmarejo | Rochester | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||
Ore tons milled/placed | 1,755,957 | 1,382,471 | 1,498,421 | 10,582,518 | 16,169,807 | 16,440,270 | |||||||||||||||||
Ore grade gold (oz./ton) | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.004 | 0.003 | |||||||||||||||||
Ore grade silver (oz./ton) | 4.85 | 6.49 | 5.62 | 0.46 | 0.52 | 0.53 | |||||||||||||||||
Recovery/Au oz. (%) | 84.3 | % | 88.9 | % | 90.0 | % | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Recovery/Ag oz. (%) | 79.3 | % | 83.8 | % | 86.0 | % | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Gold produced (oz.) | 111,932 | 122,722 | 121,569 | 35,400 | 54,388 | 51,051 | |||||||||||||||||
Silver produced (oz.) | 6,762,265 | 7,516,390 | 7,242,082 | 3,761,060 | 5,037,983 | 4,713,574 | |||||||||||||||||
Costs applicable to sales per gold ounce(1) | $ | 685 | $ | 561 | $ | 588 | $ | 1,251 | $ | 941 | $ | 889 | |||||||||||
Costs applicable to sales per silver ounce(1) | $ | 9.13 | $ | 7.64 | $ | 9.06 | $ | 14.34 | $ | 11.54 | $ | 12.04 | |||||||||||
Kensington | Wharf | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||
Ore tons milled/placed | 658,378 | 641,058 | 668,727 | 4,613,359 | 4,923,774 | 4,560,441 | |||||||||||||||||
Ore grade gold (oz./ton) | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.023 | 0.022 | 0.027 | |||||||||||||||||
Recovery/Au oz. (%) | 91.0 | % | 92.3 | % | 93.5 | % | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Gold produced (oz.) (2) | 127,914 | 105,570 | 115,094 | 84,172 | 76,840 | 95,372 | |||||||||||||||||
Costs applicable to sales per gold ounce(1) | $ | 917 | $ | 1,055 | $ | 922 | $ | 937 | $ | 879 | $ | 693 | |||||||||||
Silvertip | Endeavor(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||
Ore tons milled | 236,547 | 49,454 | — | — | — | 133,904 | |||||||||||||||||
Ore grade silver (oz./ton) | 6.84 | 6.19 | — | — | — | 1.58 | |||||||||||||||||
Ore grade zinc | 7.1 | % | 6.2 | % | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Ore grade lead | 4.8 | % | 4.0 | % | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Recovery/Ag oz. (%) | 71.8 | % | 59.6 | % | — | — | — | 50.6 | |||||||||||||||
Recovery/Zn lb. (%) | 50.8 | % | 67.8 | % | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Recovery/Pb lb. (%) | 72.6 | % | 52.5 | % | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Silver produced (oz.) (3) | 1,161,926 | 182,254 | — | — | — | 107,026 | |||||||||||||||||
Zinc produced (lb.) (3) | 17,103,427 | 4,181,033 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Lead produced (lb.) (3) | 16,555,622 | 2,072,013 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Costs applicable to sales per silver ounce(1) | $ | 49.23 | $ | 55.91 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 6.96 | |||||||||||
Costs applicable to sales per zinc pound(1) | $ | 1.74 | $ | 3.34 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||
Costs applicable to sales per lead ounce(1) | $ | 1.21 | $ | 3.23 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||
(1) See Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures
(2) Excludes 8,208 ounces of gold which are excluded form the production numbers presented for 2018, unless otherwise noted.
(3) Excludes 0.2 million ounces of silver, 2.6 million pounds of zinc, 1.8 million pounds of lead which are excluded form the production numbers presented for 2018, unless otherwise noted.
(4) In 2017, the Company sold the Endeavor Silver Stream and remaining non-core royalties to Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd (“Metalla”).
29
OPERATING STATISTICS OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
San Bartolomé | |||||||||||
2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Ore tons milled | — | 221,171 | 1,509,708 | ||||||||
Ore grade silver (oz./ton) | — | 3.36 | 3.17 | ||||||||
Recovery/Ag oz. (%) | — | 86.5 | 89.3 | ||||||||
Silver produced (oz.) | — | 643,078 | 4,269,649 | ||||||||
Costs applicable to sales per silver ounce(1) | $ | — | $ | 16.99 | $ | 17.44 | |||||
(1) See Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures
PROVEN AND PROBABLE RESERVES
Gold Reserves at December 31, 2019(1)(2)(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proven Reserves | Probable Reserves | Proven and Probable Reserves | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tons (000s) | Grade (oz./ton) | Ounces (000s) | Tons (000s) | Grade (oz./ton) | Ounces (000s) | Tons (000s) | Grade (oz./ton) | Ounces (000s) | Metallurgical Recovery | |||||||||||||||||||
Kensington(7) | 898 | 0.200 | 180 | 779 | 0.239 | 186 | 1,677 | 0.218 | 366 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||
Palmarejo(4) | 1,093 | 0.093 | 102 | 10,576 | 0.056 | 591 | 11,669 | 0.059 | 693 | 90% | ||||||||||||||||||
Rochester(5) | 249,815 | 0.003 | 710 | 13,577 | 0.002 | 27 | 263,392 | 0.003 | 737 | 92% | ||||||||||||||||||
Wharf(8) | 23,436 | 0.024 | 571 | 7,530 | 0.026 | 197 | 30,966 | 0.025 | 768 | 79% | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Gold | 275,242 | 1,563 | 32,462 | 1,001 | 307,704 | 2,564 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Silver Reserves at December 31, 2019(1)(2)(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proven Reserves | Probable Reserves | Proven and Probable Reserves | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tons (000s) | Grade (oz./ton) | Ounces (000s) | Tons (000s) | Grade (oz./ton) | Ounces (000s) | Tons (000s) | Grade (oz./ton) | Ounces (000s) | Metallurgical Recovery | |||||||||||||||||||
Palmarejo(4) | 1,093 | 5.17 | 5,649 | 10,576 | 4.24 | 44,843 | 11,669 | 4.33 | 50,492 | 84% | ||||||||||||||||||
Rochester(5) | 249,815 | 0.45 | 112,286 | 13,577 | 0.38 | 5,187 | 263,392 | 0.45 | 117,473 | 70% | ||||||||||||||||||
Silvertip(6) | 176 | 11.31 | 1,990 | 1,636 | 7.94 | 12,986 | 1,812 | 8.26 | 14,976 | 81% | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Silver | 251,084 | 119,925 | 25,789 | 63,016 | 276,873 | 182,941 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Zinc Reserves at December 31, 2019(1)(2)(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proven Reserves | Probable Reserves | Proven and Probable Reserves | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tons (000s) | Grade (%) | Pounds (000s) | Tons (000s) | Grade (%) | Pounds (000s) | Tons (000s) | Grade (%) | Pounds (000s) | Metallurgical Recovery | |||||||||||||||||||
Silvertip(6) | 176 | 9.84 | 34,577 | 1,636 | 7.97 | 260,847 | 1,812 | 8.15 | 295,424 | 82% | ||||||||||||||||||
Lead Reserves at December 31, 2019(1)(2)(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proven Reserves | Probable Reserves | Proven and Probable Reserves | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tons (000s) | Grade (%) | Pounds (000s) | Tons (000s) | Grade (%) | Pounds (000s) | Tons (000s) | Grade (%) | Pounds (000s) | Metallurgical Recovery | |||||||||||||||||||
Silvertip(6) | 176 | 8.07 | 28,366 | 1,636 | 5.14 | 168,096 | 1,812 | 5.42 | 196,462 | 88% | ||||||||||||||||||
Gold Reserves at December 31, 2018(1)(2)(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proven Reserves | Probable Reserves | Proven and Probable Reserves | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tons (000s) | Grade (oz./ton) | Ounces (000s) | Tons (000s) | Grade (oz./ton) | Ounces (000s) | Tons (000s) | Grade (oz./ton) | Ounces (000s) | Metallurgical Recovery | |||||||||||||||||||
Kensington(7) | 1,600 | 0.186 | 298 | 986 | 0.258 | 254 | 2,586 | 0.213 | 552 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||
Palmarejo(4) | 1,283 | 0.084 | 108 | 8,118 | 0.072 | 585 | 9,401 | 0.074 | 693 | 90% | ||||||||||||||||||
Rochester(5) | 228,413 | 0.003 | 657 | 13,166 | 0.002 | 27 | 241,579 | 0.003 | 684 | 92% | ||||||||||||||||||
Wharf(8) | 34,043 | 0.026 | 877 | 153 | 0.035 | 5 | 34,196 | 0.026 | 882 | 79% | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Gold | 265,339 | 1,940 | 22,423 | 871 | 287,762 | 2,811 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
30
Silver Reserves at December 31, 2018(1)(2)(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proven Reserves | Probable Reserves | Proven and Probable Reserves | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tons (000s) | Grade (oz./ton) | Ounces (000s) | Tons (000s) | Grade (oz./ton) | Ounces (000s) | Tons (000s) | Grade (oz./ton) | Ounces (000s) | Metallurgical Recovery | |||||||||||||||||||
Palmarejo(4) | 1,283 | 4.97 | 6,376 | 8,118 | 5.39 | 43,788 | 9,401 | 5.34 | 50,164 | 84% | ||||||||||||||||||
Rochester(5) | 228,413 | 0.44 | 101,058 | 13,166 | 0.39 | 5,141 | 241,579 | 0.44 | 106,199 | 70% | ||||||||||||||||||
Silvertip(6) | 280 | 10.81 | 3,026 | 1,489 | 7.98 | 11,885 | 1,769 | 8.43 | 14,911 | 81% | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Silver | 229,976 | 110,460 | 22,773 | 60,814 | 252,749 | 171,274 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Zinc Reserves at December 31, 2018(1)(2)(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proven Reserves | Probable Reserves | Proven and Probable Reserves | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tons (000s) | Grade (%) | Pounds (000s) | Tons (000s) | Grade (%) | Pounds (000s) | Tons (000s) | Grade (%) | Pounds (000s) | Metallurgical Recovery | |||||||||||||||||||
Silvertip(6) | 280 | 9.83 | 55,039 | 1,489 | 7.93 | 236,200 | 1,769 | 8.23 | 291,239 | 82% | ||||||||||||||||||
Lead Reserves at December 31, 2018(1)(2)(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proven Reserves | Probable Reserves | Proven and Probable Reserves | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tons (000s) | Grade (%) | Pounds (000s) | Tons (000s) | Grade (%) | Pounds (000s) | Tons (000s) | Grade (%) | Pounds (000s) | Metallurgical Recovery | |||||||||||||||||||
Silvertip(6) | 280 | 7.53 | 42,156 | 1,489 | 5.22 | 155,305 | 1,769 | 5.58 | 197,461 | 88% | ||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Certain definitions: |
The term “reserve” means that part of a mineral deposit that can be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination.
The term “proven (measured) reserves” means reserves for which (a) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes, grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling; and (b) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurements are spaced so closely and the geologic character is sufficiently defined that size, shape, depth and mineral content of reserves are well established.
The term “probable (indicated) reserves” means reserves for which quantity and grade and/or quality are computed from information similar to that used for proven (measured) reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than that for proven (measured) reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation.
The term “cutoff grade” means the lowest grade of mineralized material considered economic to process. Cutoff grades vary between deposits depending upon prevailing economic conditions, mineability of the deposit, by-products, amenability of the mineralized material to silver or gold extraction and type of milling or leaching facilities available.
(2) | Assumed metal prices for 2019 Mineral Reserves were $17.00 per ounce of silver, $1,350 per ounce of gold, $1.15 per pound zinc, $0.95 per pound lead. Assumed metal prices for 2018 Mineral Reserves were $17.00 per ounce of silver, $1,250 per ounce of gold, $1.25 per pound of zinc and $1.00 per pound of lead. |
(3) | Mineral reserve estimates were prepared by the Company’s technical staff. |
(4) | The cutoff grade for mineral reserves is 1.97 to 2.00 g/tonne AuEq. |
(5) | The cutoff grade for mineral reserves is 0.31 to 0.38 oz/ton AgEq. |
(6) | The cutoff grade for mineral reserves is $130 to $160 net smelter return. |
(7) | The cutoff grade for mineral reserves is 0.14 to 0.22 oz/ton Au. |
(8) | The cutoff grade for mineral reserves is 0.011 oz/ton Au. |
31
MINERALIZED MATERIAL
Mineralized Material at December 31, 2019(1)(2)(3)(4) | ||||||||||||||
Tons (000s) | Gold Grade (oz./ton) | Silver Grade (oz./ton) | Lead Grade (percent) | Zinc Grade (percent) | ||||||||||
Palmarejo Mine, Mexico(5) | 8,764 | 0.048 | 3.94 | — | — | |||||||||
Kensington Mine, USA(6) | 3,226 | 0.236 | — | — | — | |||||||||
Wharf Mine, USA(7) | 11,557 | 0.029 | — | — | — | |||||||||
Rochester Mine, USA(8) | 236,345 | 0.002 | 0.35 | — | — | |||||||||
Silvertip Mine, Canada(9) | 1,716 | — | 6.75 | 4.19 | 8.89 | |||||||||
La Preciosa Project, Mexico(10) | 28,677 | 0.006 | 3.67 | — | — | |||||||||
Lincoln Hill Project, USA(11) | 32,310 | 0.011 | 0.32 | — | — | |||||||||
Total Mineralized Material | 322,595 | |||||||||||||
Mineralized Material at December 31, 2018(1)(2)(3)(4) | ||||||||||||||
Tons (000s) | Gold Grade (oz./ton) | Silver Grade (oz./ton) | Lead Grade (percent) | Zinc Grade (percent) | ||||||||||
Palmarejo Mine, Mexico(5) | 8,149 | 0.056 | 4.30 | — | — | |||||||||
Kensington Mine, USA(6) | 2,681 | 0.250 | — | — | — | |||||||||
Wharf Mine, USA(7) | 8,696 | 0.034 | — | — | — | |||||||||
Rochester Mine, USA(8) | 198,994 | 0.002 | 0.35 | — | — | |||||||||
Silvertip Mine, Canada(9) | 1,292 | — | 6.47 | 4.07 | 8.58 | |||||||||
La Preciosa Project, Mexico(10) | 28,677 | 0.006 | 3.67 | — | — | |||||||||
Lincoln Hill Project, USA(11) | 32,310 | 0.011 | 0.32 | — | — | |||||||||
Total Mineralized Material | 280,799 | |||||||||||||
(1) | Assumed metal prices for 2019 estimated mineralized material were $20.00 per ounce of silver, $1,500 per ounce of gold, $1.30 per pound zinc, $1.05 per pound lead, except Lincoln Hill and Wilco at $1,350 per ounce gold and $22.00 per ounce silver, and Sterling at $1,200 per ounce of gold. Assumed metal prices for 2018 estimated mineralized material was $20.00 per ounce of silver, $1,4000 per ounce of gold, $1.30 per pound of zinc, $1.05 per pound of lead, and Sterling at $1,200 per ounce of gold. |
(2) | Estimated with mining cost parameters and initial metallurgical test results. |
(3) | Mineralized material estimates were completed by the Company’s technical staff, except for La Preciosa, which was completed by an external consultant supervised by technical company staff. |
(4) | Estimated using 3-dimensional geologic modeling and geostatistical evaluation of the exploration drill data. Mineralized material is reported exclusive of reserves. “Mineralized material” as used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, although permissible under Guide 7, does not indicate “reserves” by SEC standards. There is no certainty that any part of the reported mineralized material will ever be confirmed or converted into Guide 7 compliant “reserves”. |
(5) | Cutoff grades for mineralized material is 1.97 to 2.00 g/tonne AuEq. |
(6) | The cutoff grade for mineralized material is 0.12 to 0.19 oz/ton Au. |
(7) | The cutoff grade for mineralized material is 0.010 oz/ton Au. |
(8) | The cutoff grade for mineralized material is 0.27 to 0.32 oz/ton AgEq. |
(9) | The cutoff grade for mineralized material is $130 net smelter return |
(10) | The cutoff grade for mineralized material is 121.71 g/ton AgEq for underground, and 71.86 g/t for surface mining. |
(11) | The cutoff grade for mineralized material 0.10 g/t AuEq for oxide and 0.20 g/t AuEg for sulfide material. |
32
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
See Note 21 -- Commitments and Contingencies in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Information pertaining to mine safety matters is reported in accordance with Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act in Exhibit 95.1 attached to this Form 10-K.
PART II
Item 5. | Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
The Company’s common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol CDE.
On February 17, 2020, there were 243,074,353 outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock which were held by approximately 1,373 stockholders of record.
In October 2017, the Company acquired the Silvertip mine from shareholders (the “JDS Silver Shareholders”) of JDS Silver Holdings Ltd. (“JDS Silver”) by acquiring all of the issued and outstanding common shares of JDS Silver. The consideration for the Silvertip mine included two contingent payments of $25.0 million each, payable in cash and shares of the Company’s common stock upon reaching a future permitting milestone and resource declaration milestone, respectively. On November 27, 2019, the Company issued approximately 952,904 shares of common stock (the “Permit Milestone Shares”) to the JDS Silver Shareholders in respect of the permitting milestone, which was achieved during the fourth quarter. On January 30, 2020, the Company issued 878,033 shares of common stock (the “Resource Milestone Shares” and, together with the Permit Milestone Shares, the “Contingent Shares”) to the JDS Silver Shareholders in respect of the resource declaration milestone. As previously disclosed, the issuances of the Contingent Shares to the JDS Silver Shareholders were made pursuant to a Plan of Arrangement (the “Plan of Arrangement”) under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia), and the Plan of Arrangement was approved by the Supreme Court of British Columbia on October 16, 2017. The issuances of the Contingent Shares were exempt from the registration requirements under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), pursuant to Section 3(a)(10) thereof.
33
STOCK PERFORMANCE CHART
COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
AMONG COEUR MINING, S&P 500 INDEX AND PEER GROUP INDEX
The following performance graph compares the performance of the Company’s common stock during the period beginning December 31, 2014 and ending December 31, 2019 to the S&P 500 and a Peer Group Index consisting of the following companies: Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited, Alamos Gold Inc., B2Gold Corp., Centerra Gold Inc., Detour Gold Corporation, Eldorado Gold Corporation, First Majestic Silver Corp., Hecla Mining Company, Hochschild Mining plc, IAMGOLD Corporation, New Gold, Inc., OceanaGold Corporation, Pan American Silver Corporation, Royal Gold, Inc., SSR Mining Inc., Tahoe Resources Inc., and Yamana Gold Inc. (“Peer Group”).
The graph assumes a $100 investment in the Company's common stock and in each of the indexes at the beginning of the period, and a reinvestment of dividends paid on such investments throughout the five-year period.
Dec. 2014 | Dec. 2015 | Dec. 2016 | Dec. 2017 | Dec. 2018 | Dec. 2019 | |||||||
Coeur Mining | 100.0 | 48.53 | 177.89 | 146.77 | 87.48 | 158.12 | ||||||
S&P 500 Index | 100.0 | 101.38 | 113.51 | 138.29 | 132.23 | 173.86 | ||||||
Peer Group | 100.0 | 70.67 | 127.84 | 142.15 | 129.13 | 206.98 | ||||||
34
Item 6. | Selected Financial Data |
The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes.
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
In thousands except share data | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 711,502 | $ | 625,904 | $ | 709,598 | $ | 571,897 | $ | 561,407 | |||||||||
Costs applicable to sales | 551,181 | 440,950 | 440,260 | 335,375 | 403,827 | ||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | (346,896 | ) | (48,955 | ) | 10,925 | 22,435 | (287,811 | ) | |||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | 5,693 | 550 | (12,244 | ) | 32,917 | (79,372 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (341,203 | ) | $ | (48,405 | ) | $ | (1,319 | ) | $ | 55,352 | $ | (367,183 | ) | |||||
Basic income (loss) per share: | |||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | (1.59 | ) | $ | (0.26 | ) | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.14 | $ | (2.22 | ) | ||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | $ | 0.03 | $ | — | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | 0.21 | $ | (0.61 | ) | |||||||
Basic | $ | (1.56 | ) | $ | (0.26 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.35 | $ | (2.83 | ) | |||||
Diluted income (loss) per share: | |||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | (1.59 | ) | $ | (0.26 | ) | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.14 | $ | (2.22 | ) | ||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | $ | 0.03 | $ | — | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | 0.20 | $ | (0.61 | ) | |||||||
Diluted | $ | (1.56 | ) | $ | (0.26 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.34 | $ | (2.83 | ) | |||||
At December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
In thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,378,636 | $ | 1,712,500 | $ | 1,701,175 | $ | 1,318,909 | $ | 1,332,489 | |||||||||
Reclamation and mine closure liabilities | $ | 136,531 | $ | 135,546 | $ | 120,832 | $ | 88,701 | $ | 74,958 | |||||||||
Debt, including current portion | $ | 295,497 | $ | 458,826 | $ | 411,322 | $ | 210,637 | $ | 485,505 | |||||||||
Stockholders’ equity | $ | 667,004 | $ | 852,512 | $ | 814,977 | $ | 768,487 | $ | 421,476 | |||||||||
During 2019, the Company adopted ASU No. 2016-02, Leases. Prior year amounts reflected in the table above have not been adjusted and continue to be reflected in accordance with the Company’s historical accounting. Refer to Note 11 -- Leases in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional detail.
35
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) provides information that management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Coeur Mining, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively the “Company”, “our”, or “we”). We use certain non-GAAP financial performance measures in our MD&A. For a detailed description of these measures, please see “Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures” at the end of this Item. We provide Costs applicable to sales (“CAS”) split, referred to as the co-product method, based on revenue contribution for Palmarejo, Rochester and Silvertip and based on the primary metal, referred to as the by-product method, for Wharf. Revenue from secondary metal, such as silver at Wharf, is treated as a cost credit.
Overview
We are primarily a gold and silver producer with five operating mines located in the United States, Canada and Mexico and several exploration projects in North America.
2019 Highlights
For the full year, Coeur reported revenue of $711.5 million and cash flow from operating activities of $91.9 million. Including non-cash write downs totaling $320.0 million, the Company reported GAAP net loss from continuing operations of $346.9 million, or $1.59 per share. On an adjusted basis1, the Company reported EBITDA of $173.9 million and net loss from continuing operations of $54.6 million, or $0.25 per share.
• | Solid improvement in annual financial results - Revenue, operating cash flow and adjusted EBITDA1 increased 14%, 357% and 11%, respectively, in 2019. The year-over-year improvement in financial results reflects solid performance from the Company’s primary gold operations as well as higher precious metals prices in 2019 |
• | Three consecutive quarters of increasing, positive free cash flow1 - Coeur generated $39.3 million of operating cash flow and $18.4 million of free cash flow1 during the fourth quarter, representing a 63% increase in free cash flow1 compared to the prior period and a $36.1 million improvement in free cash flow1 compared to the fourth quarter of 2018. The third consecutive quarter of increasing, positive free cash flow1 was primarily driven by strong performance from Palmarejo, Kensington and Wharf operations |
• | Positive results from high-pressure grinding roll (“HPGR”) unit at Rochester - 60-day silver recovery rates from HPGR-crushed ore are in-line with prior test work and appear significantly better than recoveries from traditionally-crushed material. Permitting and planning for Plan of Operations Amendment 11 (“POA 11”) expansion advancing on-schedule |
• | $250.8 million impairment and temporarily suspending commercial activities at Silvertip - Reduction in carrying value of long-lived assets to approximately $150 million and temporary suspension of mining and processing activities driven by further deterioration in zinc and lead market conditions as well as processing facility-related challenges. The Company plans to (i) double its exploration investment in 2020 to potentially further expand the mineralized material and extend the mine life, and (ii) pursue a mill expansion to improve the asset’s cost structure and its ability to deliver sustainable cash flow |
• | Success from 2019 exploration campaign delivers mineralization growth - The Company focused its exploration efforts primarily on expansion drilling in 2019. Measured and indicated mineralized material increased across all metals were higher year-over-year. Proven and probable silver reserves also increased, while zinc and lead reserves were consistent year-over-year |
• | Over $160.0 million reduction in total debt - The Company ended the year with $295.5 million in total debt, compared to $458.8 million at the end of 2018. The 36% reduction in total debt2 reflects the results of Coeur’s deleveraging initiatives and improved financial performance during 2019 |
36
Selected Financial and Operating Results
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||
In thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||
Financial Results from Continuing Operations: | |||||||||||
Gold sales | $ | 493,347 | $ | 427,008 | $ | 494,249 | |||||
Silver sales | $ | 191,478 | $ | 193,153 | $ | 215,349 | |||||
Zinc sales | $ | 12,806 | $ | 3,612 | $ | — | |||||
Lead sales | $ | 13,871 | $ | 2,131 | $ | — | |||||
Consolidated Revenue | $ | 711,502 | $ | 625,904 | $ | 709,598 | |||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (346,896 | ) | $ | (48,955 | ) | $ | 10,925 | |||
Net income (loss) per share, diluted | $ | (1.59 | ) | $ | (0.26 | ) | $ | 0.06 | |||
Adjusted net income (loss)(1) | $ | (54,583 | ) | $ | (2,165 | ) | $ | 4,223 | |||
Adjusted net income (loss) per share, diluted(1) | $ | (0.25 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.02 | |||
EBITDA(1) | $ | (154,378 | ) | $ | 87,102 | $ | 202,912 | ||||
Adjusted EBITDA(1) | $ | 173,854 | $ | 157,309 | $ | 203,340 | |||||
Total debt(2) | $ | 295,497 | $ | 458,826 | $ | 411,322 | |||||
Operating Results from Continuing Operations: | |||||||||||
Gold ounces produced | 359,418 | 359,520 | 383,086 | ||||||||
Silver ounces produced | 11,748,734 | 12,787,203 | 12,126,217 | ||||||||
Zinc pounds produced | 17,103,427 | 4,181,033 | — | ||||||||
Lead pounds produced | 16,555,622 | 2,072,013 | — | ||||||||
Gold ounces sold | 367,650 | 350,508 | 410,604 | ||||||||
Silver ounces sold | 11,914,567 | 12,354,817 | 12,698,635 | ||||||||
Zinc pounds sold | 18,154,521 | 4,375,995 | — | ||||||||
Lead pounds sold | 16,487,847 | 2,648,920 | — | ||||||||
Average realized price per gold ounce | $ | 1,342 | $ | 1,218 | $ | 1,204 | |||||
Average realized price per silver ounce | $ | 16.07 | $ | 15.65 | $ | 16.96 | |||||
Average realized price per zinc pound, gross | $ | 0.71 | $ | 0.83 | $ | — | |||||
Average realized price per lead pound, gross | $ | 0.84 | $ | 0.80 | $ | — | |||||
Financial and Operating Results from Discontinued Operations:(3) | |||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | $ | 5,693 | $ | 550 | $ | (12,244 | ) | ||||
Silver ounces produced | — | 643,078 | 4,269,649 | ||||||||
Gold ounces produced | — | 78 | 358 | ||||||||
Silver ounces sold | — | 704,479 | 4,240,901 | ||||||||
Gold ounces sold | — | 292 | 111 | ||||||||
(1)See “Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures.”
(2)Includes capital leases. Net of debt issuance costs and premium received.
(3)Reported production and financial results include operations through February 28, 2018.
37
Consolidated Financial Results
Year Ended December 31, 2019 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2018
Revenue
Revenue increased by $85.6 million as a result of a 5% increase in gold ounces sold combined with a 10% increase in average realized gold prices and the inclusion of full-year sales from the Jualin deposit at Kensington and Silvertip partially offset by 4% fewer silver ounces sold. The Company sold 367,650 gold ounces, 11.9 million silver ounces, 18.2 million zinc pounds and 16.5 million lead pounds compared to 350,508 gold ounces, 12.4 million silver ounces, 4.4 million zinc lead pounds and 2.6 million lead pounds in the prior year. Gold contributed 69% of sales, silver contributed 27%, zinc contributed 2% and lead contributed 2%, compared to 68% of sales from gold, 31% from silver, 1% from zinc and less than 1% from lead.
The following table summarizes consolidated metal sales:
Year ended December 31, | Increase | Percent | ||||||||||||
In thousands | 2019 | 2018 | (Decrease) | Change | ||||||||||
Gold sales | $ | 493,347 | $ | 427,008 | $ | 66,339 | 16 | % | ||||||
Silver sales | 191,478 | 193,153 | (1,675 | ) | (1 | )% | ||||||||
Zinc sales | 12,806 | 3,612 | 9,194 | 255 | % | |||||||||
Lead sales | 13,871 | 2,131 | 11,740 | 551 | % | |||||||||
Metal sales | $ | 711,502 | $ | 625,904 | $ | 85,598 | 14 | % | ||||||
Costs Applicable to Sales
Costs applicable to sales increased primarily due to higher sales volume at Kensington, the inclusion of full-year sales from the Jualin deposit at Kensington and Silvertip, a $64.6 million write-down of inventory at Silvertip and higher unit costs at Palmarejo, Rochester and Wharf, primarily due to lower production. For a complete discussion of costs applicable to sales, see Results of Operations below.
Amortization
Amortization increased $50.4 million, or 39%, resulting from the inclusion of full-year sales at Silvertip and higher sales at Kensington.
Expenses
General and administrative expenses increased $3.1 million, or 10%, primarily due to higher employee related expenses and higher legal fees.
Exploration expense decreased $2.9 million, or 11%, as a result of lower near-mine exploration costs at Palmarejo, Kensington and Silvertip as well as lower greenfields explorations expense in the United States and Mexico, partially offset by exploration expense at the Sterling/Crown project located in southern Nevada. The Company completed 342,564 (104,413 meters) of expansion drilling and 181,590 feet (55,349 meters) of infill drilling in 2019 compared to 342,096 feet (104,271 meters) of expansion drilling and 349,683 feet (106,583 meters) of infill drilling in 2018.
Pre-development, reclamation, and other expenses decreased $1.6 million, or 8%, stemming from a $3.4 million write-down of property, plant and equipment at Rochester in 2018.
Impairment of long-lived assets totaled $250.8 million in 2019. During the fourth quarter of 2019, the Company performed a comprehensive analysis of its Silvertip property and determined that indicators of impairment existed, primarily as a result of continued deterioration in zinc and lead market conditions as well as ongoing operating challenges primarily related to the processing facility. As a result of the impairment indicators, a recoverability test was performed and the Company concluded that the carrying value of the long-lived assets for the Silvertip property was impaired.
Other Income and Expenses
The Company incurred a $1.3 million loss in connection with the exchange of $20 million in aggregate principal amount of its 2024 Senior Notes (as defined in Note 12 -- Debt) for approximately 4.5 million shares of common stock.
Fair value adjustments, net, increased to a gain of $16.0 million from a gain of $3.6 million as a result of favorable fair value adjustments and realized gains related to the Company’s equity investment in Metalla, which has an estimated fair value of $28.2 million at December 31, 2019.
38
Interest expense (net of capitalized interest of $1.8 million) remained comparable at $24.8 million.
Income and Mining Taxes
The Company’s Income and mining tax (expense) benefit consisted of:
Year ended December 31, | |||||||
In thousands | 2019 | 2018 | |||||
Income and mining tax (expense) benefit at statutory rate | $ | 75,185 | $ | 14,052 | |||
State tax provision from continuing operations | 1,243 | 2,284 | |||||
Change in valuation allowance | (77,220 | ) | 2,471 | ||||
Percentage depletion | 820 | 89 | |||||
Uncertain tax positions | 2,358 | 1,830 | |||||
U.S. and foreign permanent differences | 2,272 | 3,314 | |||||
Foreign exchange rates | (7,066 | ) | (3,973 | ) | |||
Foreign inflation and indexing | (2,933 | ) | (2,374 | ) | |||
Foreign tax rate differences | 19,729 | (24 | ) | ||||
Mining, foreign withholding, and other taxes | (2,746 | ) | (3,857 | ) | |||
Other, net | (513 | ) | 2,968 | ||||
Income and mining tax (expense) benefit | $ | 11,129 | $ | 16,780 | |||
Income and mining tax benefit of approximately $11.1 million results in an effective tax rate of 3.1% for 2019. This compares to income tax benefit of $16.8 million or effective tax rate of 25.5% for 2018. The Company’s effective tax rate is impacted by multiple factors as illustrated above. The comparability of the Company’s income and mining tax (expense) benefit and effective tax rate for the reported periods was impacted by multiple factors, primarily: (i) the non-recognition of tax assets; (ii) mining taxes; (iii) variations in our income before income taxes; (iv) geographic distribution of that income and (v) foreign exchange rates. Therefore, the effective tax rate will fluctuate, sometimes significantly, period to period.
The following table summarizes the components of the Company’s income (loss) before tax and income and mining tax (expense) benefit:
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||||
In thousands | Income (loss) before tax | Tax (expense) benefit | Income (loss) before tax | Tax (expense) benefit | |||||||||
United States | $ | (16,702 | ) | $ | (5,446 | ) | $ | (50,522 | ) | $ | 16,819 | ||
Canada | (365,781 | ) | 32,203 | (43,793 | ) | 16,436 | |||||||
Mexico | 25,002 | (15,625 | ) | 32,073 | (16,092 | ) | |||||||
Other jurisdictions | (544 | ) | (3 | ) | (3,493 | ) | (383 | ) | |||||
$ | (358,025 | ) | $ | 11,129 | $ | (65,735 | ) | $ | 16,780 | ||||
The comparability of the Company’s income and mining tax (expense) benefit and effective tax rate for the reported periods was impacted by multiple factors, primarily: (i) the non-recognition of tax assets; (ii) mining taxes; (iii) variations in our income before income taxes; (iv) geographic distribution of that income and (v) foreign exchange rates. Therefore, the effective tax rate will fluctuate, sometimes significantly, period to period.
A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets for which it is more likely than not that the related tax benefits will not be realized. The Company analyzes its deferred tax assets and, if it is determined that the Company will not realize all or a portion of its deferred tax assets, it will record or increase a valuation allowance. Conversely, if it is determined that the Company will ultimately be more likely than not able to realize all or a portion of the related benefits for which a valuation allowance has been provided, all or a portion of the related valuation allowance will be reduced. There are a number of factors that impact the Company’s ability to realize its deferred tax assets. For additional information, please see “Item 1A - Risk Factors”.
39
Net Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
Net loss from continuing operations was $346.9 million, or $1.59 per share, compared to net loss of $49.0 million, or $0.26 per share. The decrease in net income from continuing operations was driven by an impairment of long-lived assets at Silvertip of $250.8 million, higher operating costs at Silvertip, which included a write-down of $64.6 million at Silvertip of metal inventory as a result of lower than expected production levels, and lower production at Rochester due to reduced placement rates caused by the planned commissioning of the new crusher configuration in the second half of 2019. This was partially offset by favorable fair value adjustments and realized gains related to the Company’s equity investment in Metalla and strong operating results at Kensington. Adjusted net loss was $54.6 million, or $0.25 per share, compared to $2.2 million, or $0.01 per share (see “Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures”).
Net Income (loss) from Discontinued Operations
In respect of the San Bartolomé mine and processing facility’s (which was divested by the Company in February 2018, “Manquiri Divestiture”) operating results, income increased $5.1 million. In February 2019, the Company recorded an adjustment to the gain from the Manquiri Divestiture following the release of a liability associated with the Company’s post-closing indemnification obligations which were extinguished at that time.
Year Ended December 31, 2018 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2017
Revenue
Revenue decreased by $83.7 million as a result of fewer gold (15%) and silver (3%) ounces sold and an 8% decrease in average realized silver prices, partially offset by an increase in average realized gold prices (1%) and sales from Silvertip, which commenced commercial production in September 2018. The Company sold 12.4 million silver ounces, 350,508 gold ounces, 4.4 million zinc pounds and 2.6 million lead pounds compared to 12.7 million silver ounces and 410,604 gold ounces in the prior year. Gold contributed 68% of sales, silver contributed 31%, zinc contributed 1% and lead contributed less than 1% , compared to 70% of sales from gold and 30% from silver.
Costs Applicable to Sales
Costs applicable to sales remained comparable despite lower ounces sold due to a $26.7 million write-down of inventory at Silvertip, higher costs applicable to sales per gold ounce at Wharf and Kensington, partially offset by lower costs applicable to sales per silver ounce at Palmarejo. For a complete discussion of costs applicable to sales, see Results of Operations below.
Amortization
Amortization decreased $18.1 million, or 12%, due to fewer ounces sold at all operating sites.
Expenses
General and administrative expenses decreased $2.3 million, or 7%, primarily due to lower compensation costs.
Exploration expense decreased $4.9 million, or 16%, as a result of lower exploration costs at Palmarejo, Rochester, Kensington and La Preciosa as the Company focused its exploration efforts on capitalized infill conversion drilling in 2018.
Pre-development, reclamation, and other expenses increased $1.1 million, or 6%, of which $3.4 million is attributable to the write-down of property, plant and equipment at Rochester.
Other Income and Expenses
Fair value adjustments, net, were a gain of $3.6 million due to a a net gain on equity securities of $3.0 million coupled with favorable fair value adjustment of zinc options. Effective January 1, 2018, as a result of ASU 2016-01, changes in the fair value of equity investments are recognized as fair value adjustments instead of other comprehensive income (loss) in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Interest expense (net of capitalized interest of $1.2 million) increased to $24.4 million from $16.4 million, due to higher average debt levels related to the 2024 Senior Notes and the Facility (each, as defined below).
Other, net was an expense of $24.7 million, as a result of the $18.6 million write-down of the receivable consideration from the Manquiri Divestiture, unfavorable foreign exchange rate movements, a write-down of $6.5 million related to the RMC receivable, partially offset by gains on the sale of non-core assets and investments in 2017.
40
Income and Mining Taxes
The Company’s Income and mining tax (expense) benefit consisted of:
Year ended December 31, | |||||||
In thousands | 2018 | 2017 | |||||
Income and mining tax (expense) benefit at statutory rate | $ | 14,052 | $ | (14,037 | ) | ||
State tax provision from continuing operations | 2,284 | 26 | |||||
Change in valuation allowance | 2,471 | 86,712 | |||||
Effect of tax legislation | — | (88,174 | ) | ||||
Percentage depletion | 89 | 703 | |||||
Uncertain tax positions | 1,830 | 2,596 | |||||
U.S. and foreign permanent differences | 3,314 | 2,348 | |||||
Foreign exchange rates | (3,973 | ) | (14,180 | ) | |||
Foreign inflation and indexing | (2,374 | ) | (2,346 | ) | |||
Foreign tax rate differences | (24 | ) | 2,929 | ||||
Mining, foreign withholding, and other taxes | (3,857 | ) | (11,274 | ) | |||
Other, net | 2,968 | 5,699 | |||||
Income and mining tax (expense) benefit | $ | 16,780 | $ | (28,998 | ) | ||
Income and mining tax benefit of approximately $16.8 million results in an effective tax rate of 26% for 2018. This compares to income tax expense of $29.0 million or effective tax rate of 73% for 2017. The Company’s effective tax rate is impacted by multiple factors as illustrated above. The comparability of the Company’s income and mining tax (expense) benefit for the reported periods was primarily impacted by (i) variations in our income before income taxes; (ii) geographic distribution of that income; (iii) foreign exchange rates; (iv) mining taxes; (v) the non-recognition of tax assets and (vi) the impact of specific transactions. Therefore, the effective tax rate will fluctuate, sometimes significantly, year to year.
The following table summarizes the components of the Company’s income (loss) before tax and income and mining tax (expense) benefit:
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||
In thousands | Income (loss) before tax | Tax (expense) benefit | Income (loss) before tax | Tax (expense) benefit | |||||||||
United States | $ | (50,522 | ) | $ | 16,819 | $ | 10,099 | $ | (5,635 | ) | |||
Canada | (43,793 | ) | 16,436 | (3,176 | ) | 979 | |||||||
Mexico | 32,073 | (16,092 | ) | 28,631 | (25,958 | ) | |||||||
Other jurisdictions | (3,493 | ) | (383 | ) | 4,369 | 1,616 | |||||||
$ | (65,735 | ) | $ | 16,780 | $ | 39,923 | $ | (28,998 | ) | ||||
A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets for which it is more likely than not that the related benefits will not be realized. The Company analyzes its deferred tax assets and if it is determined that the Company will not realize all or a portion of its deferred tax assets, it will record or increase a valuation allowance. Conversely, if it is determined that the Company will ultimately be able to realize all or a portion of the related benefits for which a valuation allowance has been provided, all or a portion of the related valuation allowance will be reduced. There are a number of risk factors that could impact the Company’s ability to realize its deferred tax assets.
The utilization of U.S. net operating loss carryforwards, tax credit carryforwards, and recognized built-in losses may be subject to limitation under the rules regarding a change in stock ownership as determined by the Internal Revenue Code and state tax laws. Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, imposes annual limitations on the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards, tax credit carryforwards, and certain built-in losses upon an ownership change as defined under that Section. Generally, an ownership change may result from transactions that increase the aggregate ownership of certain shareholders in the Company’s stock by more than 50 percentage points over a three-year testing period. If the Company experiences an ownership change, an annual limitation would be imposed on certain of the Company’s tax attributes, including net operating losses and certain other losses, credits, deductions or tax basis. Management has determined that the Company experienced ownership changes, for purposes of 382, during 2002, 2003, 2007, and 2015. Based on management’s calculations, the Company
41
does not expect any of its U.S. tax attributes to expire unused as a result of the Section 382 annual limitations. However, the annual limitations may impact the timeframe over which the net operating loss carryforwards can be used, potentially impacting cash tax liabilities in a future period. The U.S. federal tax credits and state net operating losses may potentially be limited as well. We continue to maintain a full valuation allowance on our U.S. net deferred tax assets since it is more likely than not that the related tax benefits will not be realized.
The Company may also experience ownership changes in the future as a result of subsequent shifts in our stock ownership. As a result, if the Company earns U.S. federal taxable income, it may be limited in the ability to (1) recognize current deductions on built-in loss assets and (2) offset this income with our pre-change net operating loss carryforwards and other tax credit carryforwards, which may be subject to limitations, potentially resulting in increased future tax liability to us. Under the new U.S. federal income tax law, federal net operating losses incurred in 2018 and in future years may be carried forward indefinitely, but the deductibility of such federal net operating losses is limited to 80% of future taxable income.
Net Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
Net loss from continuing operations was $49.0 million, or $0.26 per share, compared to net income of $10.9 million, or $0.06 per share. The decrease in net income from continuing operations was impacted by lower operating margin that includes a write-down of $26.7 million at Silvertip of metal inventory as a result of lower than expected production levels, grades and recovery rates as well as reduced process plant availability and unfavorable changes in average realized silver prices, a write-down of $18.6 million on the consideration received from the Manquiri Divestiture, a receivable write-down of $6.5 million related to the RMC bankruptcy, a write-down of $3.4 million of property, plant and equipment at Rochester and higher interest expense.
Net Income (loss) from Discontinued Operations
In respect of San Bartolomé’s operating results, income increased $12.8 million, due to a $1.5 million gain on the sale of San Bartolomé in 2018, partially offset by lower production and higher unit costs.
42
2020 Guidance Framework
2020 Production Guidance
Gold | Silver | |||
(oz) | (K oz) | |||
Palmarejo | 95,000 - 110,000 | 6,300 - 7,800 | ||
Rochester | 27,000 - 33,000 | 4,000 - 5,500 | ||
Kensington | 115,000 - 130,000 | — | ||
Wharf | 80,000 - 90,000 | — | ||
Total | 317,000 - 363,000 | 10,300 - 13,300 | ||
2020 Costs Applicable to Sales Guidance
Gold | Silver | |||
($/oz) | ($/oz) | |||
Palmarejo (co-product) | $785 - $885 | $10.35 - $11.35 | ||
Rochester (co-product) | $1,175 - $1,325 | $13.25 - $14.50 | ||
Kensington | $900 - $1,000 | — | ||
Wharf (by-product) | $1,025 - $1,125 | — | ||
2020 Capital, Exploration and G&A Guidance
($M) | ||||
Capital Expenditures, Sustaining | $65 - $80 | |||
Capital Expenditures, Development | $30 - $35 | |||
Exploration, Expensed | $38 - $44 | |||
Exploration, Capitalized | $6 - $10 | |||
General & Administrative Expenses | $32 - $36 | |||
Note: The Company’s guidance figures assume $1,520/oz gold, $17.25/oz silver, $1.00/lb zinc and $0.86/lb lead as well as CAD of 1.30 and MXN of 19.00.
43
Results of Continuing Operations
Palmarejo
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||
2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Tons milled | 1,755,957 | 1,382,471 | 1,498,421 | ||||||||
Average gold grade (oz/t) | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.09 | ||||||||
Average silver grade (oz/t) | 4.85 | 6.49 | 5.62 | ||||||||
Average recovery rate – Au | 84.3 | % | 88.9 | % | 90.0 | % | |||||
Average recovery rate – Ag | 79.3 | % | 83.8 | % | 86.0 | % | |||||
Gold ounces produced | 111,932 | 122,722 | 121,569 | ||||||||
Silver ounces produced | 6,762,265 | 7,516,390 | 7,242,082 | ||||||||
Gold ounces sold | 116,104 | 115,592 | 131,743 | ||||||||
Silver ounces sold | 6,841,380 | 7,229,179 | 7,586,154 | ||||||||
Costs applicable to sales per gold ounce(1) | $ | 685 | $ | 561 | $ | 588 | |||||
Costs applicable to sales per silver ounce(1) | $ | 9.13 | $ | 7.64 | $ | 9.06 | |||||
(1)See Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures.
Year Ended December 31, 2019 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2018
Gold and silver production decreased 9% and 10% in line with Company guidance, respectively, resulting from lower gold and silver grades and lower gold and silver recoveries, partially offset by higher mined tons from Guadalupe, Independencia and the new La Nación underground mine, which began production in the third quarter of 2019. Metal sales were $252.7 million, or 36% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared with $245.8 million, or 40% of Coeur’s metal sales. Lower production and higher consumable costs resulted in a 22% and 20% increase in costs applicable to sales per gold and silver ounce, respectively. Amortization decreased to $59.4 million due to lower ounces sold. Capital expenditures increased to $32.7 million from $29.4 million due to higher infrastructure expenditures at La Nacion.
Year Ended December 31, 2018 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2017
Gold and silver production increased 1% and 4%, respectively, resulting from higher silver and gold grades, which in turn, contributed to a 5% and 16% decrease in costs applicable to sales per gold and silver ounce, respectively. Metal sales were $245.8 million, or 40% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared with $274.8 million, or 38% of Coeur’s metal sales. Amortization decreased to $60.7 million primarily due to lower ounces sold. Capital expenditures remained comparable at $29.4 million. Capital expenditures focused on underground development at Guadalupe, Independencia and La Nacion, conversion drilling and the implementation of the new on-site absorption, desorption, and recovery plant.
44
Rochester
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||
2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Tons placed | 10,582,518 | 16,169,807 | 16,440,270 | ||||||||
Average gold grade (oz/t) | 0.003 | 0.004 | 0.003 | ||||||||
Average silver grade (oz/t) | 0.46 | 0.52 | 0.53 | ||||||||
Gold ounces produced | 35,400 | 54,388 | 51,051 | ||||||||
Silver ounces produced | 3,761,060 | 5,037,983 | 4,713,574 | ||||||||
Gold ounces sold | 36,052 | 52,789 | 54,642 | ||||||||
Silver ounces sold | 3,844,556 | 4,854,579 | 4,931,368 | ||||||||
Costs applicable to sales per gold ounce(1) | $ | 1,251 | $ | 941 | $ | 889 | |||||
Costs applicable to sales per silver ounce(1) | $ | 14.34 | $ | 11.54 | $ | 12.04 | |||||
(1)See Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures.
Year Ended December 31, 2019 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2018
Gold and silver production decreased 35% and 25%, respectively, due to lower placement rates caused by the planned commissioning of the new crushing circuit in the second half of 2019, unplanned downtime, and lower gold and silver grades. Metal sales were $112.0 million, or 16% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared with $141.8 million, or 23% of Coeur’s metal sales. Costs applicable to sales per gold and silver ounce increased 33% and 24%, respectively, due to a one-time charge associated with the operation’s power costs, lower production and planned mining equipment maintenance, partially offset by lower crushing costs. Amortization decreased to $18.0 million due to lower ounces sold. Capital expenditures increased to $22.6 million from $9.9 million due to the commissioning of the new crushing circuit, including the HPGR unit, and POA 11 expansion related capital expenditures.
Year Ended December 31, 2018 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2017
Gold and silver production increased 7% due to the timing of recoveries, partially offset by lower tons placed, which were anticipated following the decommissioning of a crusher. Metal sales were $141.8 million, or 23% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared with $152.7 million, or 22% of Coeur’s metal sales. Costs applicable to sales and amortization remained comparable. Capital expenditures decreased to $9.9 million from $40.9 million due to the completion of the Stage IV leach pad expansion in 2017. Capital expenditures focused on the purchase of mining equipment.
Kensington
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||
2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Tons milled | 658,378 | 641,058 | 668,727 | ||||||||
Average gold grade (oz/t) | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.18 | ||||||||
Average recovery rate | 91.0 | % | 92.3 | % | 93.5 | % | |||||
Gold ounces produced | 127,914 | 105,570 | 115,094 | ||||||||
Gold ounces sold | 130,495 | 106,555 | 125,982 | ||||||||
Costs applicable to sales per gold ounce(1) | $ | 917 | $ | 1,055 | $ | 922 | |||||
(1) | See Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures. |
Year Ended December 31, 2019 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2018
Gold production increased 21% due to higher ore feed from the high-grade Jualin deposit. The Jualin ore feed, which drove the 17% increase in gold grade, together with lower contractor costs led to a 13% decrease in costs applicable to sales per gold ounce. Metal sales were $181.1 million, or 25% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared to $132.9 million, or 21% of Coeur’s metal sales. Amortization increased to $50.6 million due to a significantly higher number of ounces sold. Capital expenditures decreased to $23.5 million from $44.7 million due to lower underground development at Kensington, Jualin and Raven, infill drilling and mining equipment expenditures.
45
Year Ended December 31, 2018 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2017
Gold production decreased 8% due to lower mill throughput resulting from lower mine production. Including the 8,208 gold ounces that were sourced from the Jualin deposit before commercial production was declared in December, gold production decreased by 1%. Metal sales were $132.9 million, or 21% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared to $154.5 million, or 22% of Coeur’s metal sales. Costs applicable to sales per ounce were 14% higher, primarily due to higher contractor costs and higher diesel costs. Amortization decreased to $29.5 million from $36.0 million due to higher life of mine reserves and lower ounces sold. Capital expenditures increased to $44.7 million resulting from increased underground development at Kensington, Jualin and Raven and higher mining equipment expenditures.
Wharf
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||
2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Tons placed | 4,613,359 | 4,923,774 | 4,560,441 | ||||||||
Average gold grade (oz/t) | 0.023 | 0.022 | 0.027 | ||||||||
Gold ounces produced | 84,172 | 76,840 | 95,372 | ||||||||
Silver ounces produced | 63,483 | 50,576 | 63,535 | ||||||||
Gold ounces sold | 84,999 | 75,572 | 98,237 | ||||||||
Silver ounces sold | 64,161 | 48,085 | 74,086 | ||||||||
Costs applicable to sales per gold ounce(1) | $ | 937 | $ | 879 | $ | 693 | |||||
(1) | See Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures. |
Year Ended December 31, 2019 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2018
Gold production increased 10% largely driven by the stacking of higher-grade ore, partially offset by the impact of inclement weather, which diluted leach pad solutions, during the first half of 2019. Metal sales were $121.4 million, or 17% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared to $96.5 million, or 15% of Coeur’s metal sales. Costs applicable to sales per gold ounce increased 7% due to a $3.6 million inventory write-down related to lower expected recoveries from leach pad 1 and higher processing costs during the first half of 2019. Amortization increased to $12.3 million due to higher ounces sold. Capital expenditures were $2.2 million.
Year Ended December 31, 2018 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2017
Gold production decreased 19% due to unplanned weather-related events and timing of leach pad recoveries. Metal sales were $96.5 million, or 15% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared to $125.9 million, or 18% of Coeur’s metal sales. Costs applicable to sales per gold ounce increased 27% due to lower production resulting from the completion of mining at the higher-grade Golden Reward deposit in 2017 and higher equipment rental and diesel costs. Amortization decreased to $11.1 million due to lower ounces sold. Capital expenditures decreased to $3.4 million due to lower mining equipment and process plant expenditures.
46
Silvertip
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||
2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Tons milled | 236,547 | 49,454 | — | ||||||||
Average silver grade (oz/t) | 6.84 | 6.19 | — | ||||||||
Average zinc grade (%) | 7.1 | % | 6.2 | % | — | ||||||
Average lead grade (%) | 4.8 | % | 4.0 | % | — | ||||||
Average recovery rate – Ag | 71.8 | % | 59.6 | % | — | ||||||
Average recovery rate – Zn | 50.8 | % | 67.8 | % | — | ||||||
Average recovery rate – Pb | 72.6 | % | 52.5 | % | — | ||||||
Silver ounces produced | 1,161,926 | 182,254 | — | ||||||||
Zinc pounds produced | 17,103,427 | 4,181,033 | — | ||||||||
Lead pounds produced | 16,555,622 | 2,072,013 | — | ||||||||
Silver ounces sold | 1,164,470 | 222,974 | — | ||||||||
Zinc pounds sold | 18,154,521 | 4,375,995 | — | ||||||||
Lead pounds sold | 16,487,847 | 2,648,920 | — | ||||||||
Costs applicable to sales per silver ounce(1) | $ | 31.92 | $ | 55.91 | $ | — | |||||
Costs applicable to sales per zinc pound(1) | $ | 2.34 | $ | 3.34 | $ | — | |||||
Costs applicable to sales per lead ounce(1) | $ | 1.76 | $ | 3.23 | $ | — | |||||
(1) | See Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures. |
Year Ended December 31, 2019 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2018
Metal sales were $44.3 million compared to $8.9 million. Costs applicable to sales per ounce were impacted by a $64.6 million write-down of metal inventory as a result of higher than expected maintenance costs and lower than expected production levels, grades and recovery rates. During the fourth quarter of 2019, the Company performed a comprehensive analysis of its Silvertip property and determined that indicators of impairment existed, primarily as a result of continued deterioration in zinc and lead market conditions as well as ongoing operating challenges primarily related to the processing facility. As a result of the impairment indicators, a recoverability test was performed and the Company concluded that the carrying value of the long-lived assets for the Silvertip property was impaired. A non-cash impairment charge of $250.8 million was recorded during the fourth quarter of 2019. Amortization was $36.7 million. Capital expenditures decreased to $17.5 million from $52.9 million due to pre-production capitalization, construction of the 220-person camp in 2018 and lower conversion drilling in 2019.
Year Ended December 31, 2018 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2017
The Company acquired Silvertip in October 2017. In September 2018, Silvertip commenced commercial production. Metal sales were $8.9 million, or 1% of Coeur’s metal sales. Costs applicable to sales were impacted by a $26.7 million write-down of metal inventory as a result of lower than expected production levels, grades and recovery rates as well as reduced process plant availability and unfavorable changes in metal prices. Amortization was $5.2 million. Capital expenditures were $52.9 million primarily related to pre-production capital, underground mine development and capitalized exploration spending.
47
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At December 31, 2019, the Company had $57.0 million of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and $250.0 million available under its revolving credit facility (the “Facility”) provided pursuant to the credit agreement entered into in September, 2017 (as amended, the “Credit Agreement”) among the Company, as borrower, and certain subsidiaries of the Company, as guarantors, and Bank of America, N.A, as administrative agent (the “Agent”), and Bank of America, N.A., Royal Bank of Canada, Bank of Montreal, Chicago Branch, and the Bank of Nova Scotia (the “RCF Lenders”). Cash and cash equivalents decreased $59.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to the Company’s debt reduction efforts including the repayment of the outstanding balance under the Facility, higher Silvertip operating costs, payment of contingent consideration of $18.7 million associated with the Silvertip acquisition and income and mining tax payments at Palmarejo, partially offset by lower capital expenditures, net proceeds of $123.1 million from the sale of 30.9 million shares in the Offerings (as defined in Note 19 -- Net Income (Loss) per Share) and strong operational results from Palmarejo, Kensington and Wharf.
Cash Provided by Operating Activities from Continuing Operations
Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $91.9 million, compared to net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2018 of $20.1 million. Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $173.9 million, compared to $157.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 (see “Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures”). Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities was impacted by the following key factors for the applicable periods:
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||
In thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||
Cash flow before changes in operating assets and liabilities | $ | 134,234 | $ | 112,350 | $ | 145,201 | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | |||||||||||
Receivables | (2,739 | ) | (9,260 | ) | 18,895 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other | 280 | 4,876 | (2,015 | ) | |||||||
Inventories | (62,998 | ) | (44,488 | ) | 23,517 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 23,103 | (43,370 | ) | 11,562 | |||||||
Cash provided by (used in) continuing operating activities | $ | 91,880 | $ | 20,108 | $ | 197,160 | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $71.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to 5% higher sales of gold at 10% higher average realized prices, the prepayment for deliveries of concentrate from Kensington of $15.0 million, the timing of payments for accounts payables across the company and lower income and mining tax payments at Palmarejo in 2019 when compared to 2018, partially offset by lower than anticipated production at Silvertip that resulted in a $64.6 million write-down of metals inventory. Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019 increased $85.6 million, of which $48.4 million was due primarily to higher average realized gold and silver prices and $37.2 million was due primarily to higher volume of gold, zinc and lead sales.
Cash provided by operating activities decreased $177.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the year ended December 31, 2017, primarily due to lower sales of gold and silver (15% and 3%, respectively) at a lower operating margin per ounce. In addition, Silvertip incurred higher than anticipated operating costs that included a $26.7 million write-down of metals inventory, and income and mining tax payments made by Coeur Mexicana in 2018 pertaining to 2017 Palmarejo earnings. Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2018 decreased $83.7 million, $72.8 million of which was due to lower ounces sold and $10.9 million was due to lower average realized prices.
Cash Used in Investing Activities from Continuing Operations
Net cash used in investing activities in the year ended December 31, 2019 was $92.6 million compared to $102.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2018. Cash used in investing activities decreased primarily due lower capital expenditures, partially offset by receipt of $19.0 million of proceeds under the Manquiri Notes Receivable (as defined in Note 22 -- Discontinued Operations) in 2018. The Company had capital expenditures of $99.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2019 compared with $140.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2018. Capital expenditures in the year ended December 31, 2019 were primarily related to underground development at Silvertip, Palmarejo, and Kensington, a new thickener at Palmarejo, POA 11 and the new crushing circuit, including the HPGR unit at Rochester. Capital expenditures in the year ended December 31, 2018 were primarily related to pre-production capital spending and the new 220-person camp at Silvertip, mining equipment at Kensington and underground development at Silvertip, Palmarejo and Kensington.
48
Net cash used in investing activities in the year ended December 31, 2018 was $102.0 million compared to net cash used in investing activities of $277.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2017. Cash used in investing activities decreased $175.2 million primarily due to the cash component of the Silvertip acquisition consideration paid in 2017, 2018 payments received totaling $19.0 million related to the Manquiri Divestiture, partially offset by a $4.0 million increase in capital expenditures. The Company had capital expenditures of $140.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2018 compared with $136.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2017. Capital expenditures in the year ended December 31, 2018 were primarily related to pre-production capital spending at Silvertip and underground development at Silvertip, Palmarejo, and Kensington. Capital expenditures in the year ended December 31, 2017 were primarily related to underground development at Palmarejo, Silvertip and Kensington, capitalized conversion drilling, and the Stage IV leach pad expansion at Rochester.
Cash Used in Financing Activities from Continuing Operations
Net cash used in financing activities in the year ended December 31, 2019 increased to $60.9 million compared to $5.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company repaid $135.0 million, net, of outstanding amounts under the Facility and made a payment of contingent consideration of $18.7 million associated with the Silvertip acquisition, partially offset by net proceeds of approximately $123.1 million from the sale of 30.9 million shares through an “at the market” offering. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company drew $35.0 million, net, from the Facility to repay a debt obligation of Silvertip and to finance working capital and general corporate purposes. As of December 31, 2019, there were no outstanding amounts under the Facility.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes the Company’s contractual obligations at December 31, 2019 and the effect such obligations are expected to have on its liquidity and cash flow in future periods.
Payments Due by Period | |||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations | Total | Less Than 1 Year | 1-3 Years | 3-5 Years | More Than 5 Years | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt obligations: | |||||||||||||||||||
2024 Senior Notes | $ | 230,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 230,000 | $ | — | |||||||||
Revolving Credit Facility(1) | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Interest on debt | $ | 61,657 | 14,642 | 41,385 | 5,630 | — | |||||||||||||
291,657 | 14,642 | 41,385 | 235,630 | — | |||||||||||||||
Finance lease obligations(2) | 75,879 | 25,661 | 42,171 | 7,912 | 135 | ||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations: | |||||||||||||||||||
Hyak mining lease (Kensington mine) | 885 | 291 | 594 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Operating leases | 60,181 | 13,319 | 25,807 | 21,055 | — | ||||||||||||||
61,066 | 13,610 | 26,401 | 21,055 | — | |||||||||||||||
Other long-term obligations: | |||||||||||||||||||
Reclamation and mine closure(3) | 344,760 | 3,114 | 5,307 | 52,306 | 284,033 | ||||||||||||||
Severance payments(4) | 7,817 | — | — | — | 7,817 | ||||||||||||||
Unrecognized tax benefits(5) | 3,690 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Other long-term obligations | 17,730 | 1,175 | 2,349 | 2,314 | 11,892 | ||||||||||||||
373,997 | 4,289 | 7,656 | 54,620 | 303,742 | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 802,599 | $ | 58,202 | $ | 117,613 | $ | 319,217 | $ | 303,877 | |||||||||
(1) | The Company had all $250.0 million available under the Facility as of December 31, 2019. |
(2) | The Company has entered into various finance lease agreements for commitments primarily over the next five years. |
(3) | Reclamation and mine closure amounts represent the Company’s estimate of the cash flows associated with its legal obligation to reclaim mining properties. This amount will decrease as reclamation work is completed. Amounts shown on the table are undiscounted. |
(4) | Accrued government-mandated severance at the Palmarejo complex. |
(5) | The Company is unable to reasonably estimate the timing of recognition of unrecognized tax benefits beyond 2019 due to uncertainties in the timing of the effective settlement of tax positions. |
49
Environmental Compliance Expenditures
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, the Company spent $8.2 million, $7.9 million, and $6.5 million, respectively, in connection with routine environmental compliance activities at its operating properties. The Company estimates that environmental compliance expenditures during 2020 will be approximately $10.0 million. Future environmental compliance expenditures will be determined by governmental regulations and the overall scope of the Company’s operating and development activities.
Critical Accounting Policies and Accounting Developments
Listed below are the accounting policies that we believe are critical to our financial statements due to the degree of
uncertainty regarding the estimates and assumptions involved and the magnitude of the asset, liability, revenue, and expense being reported. For a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements, see Note 2 -- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
The Company produces doré and concentrate that is shipped to third-party refiners and smelters, respectively, for processing. The Company enters into contracts to sell its metal to various third-party customers which may include the refiners and smelters that process the doré and concentrate. The Company’s performance obligation in these transactions is generally the transfer of metal to the customer.
In the case of doré shipments, the Company generally sells refined metal at market prices agreed upon by both parties. The Company also has the right, but not the obligation, to sell a portion of the anticipated refined metal in advance of being fully refined. When the Company sells refined metal or advanced metal, the performance obligation is satisfied when the metal is delivered to the customer. Revenue and Costs Applicable to Sales are recorded on a gross basis under these contracts at the time the performance obligation is satisfied.
Under the Company’s concentrate sales contracts with third-party smelters, metal prices are set on a specified future quotational period, typically one to three months, after the shipment date based on market prices. When the Company sells gold concentrate to the third-party smelters, the performance obligation is satisfied when the concentrate is loaded onto the third-party shipping vessel. The contracts, in general, provide for provisional payment based upon provisional assays and historical metal prices. Final settlement is based on the applicable price for the specified future quotational period and generally occurs three to six months after shipment. The Company’s provisionally priced sales contain an embedded derivative that is required to be separated from the host contract for accounting purposes. The host contract is the receivable from the sale of concentrates measured at the forward price at the time of sale. The embedded derivative does not qualify for hedge accounting and is adjusted to fair value through revenue each period until the date of final metal settlement.
The Company also sells concentrate under off-take agreements to third-party customers that are responsible for arranging the smelting of the concentrate. Prices can be either be fixed or based on a quotational period. The quotational period varies by contract, but is generally a one-month period following the shipment of the concentrate. The performance obligation is satisfied when the concentrate is loaded onto the third-party shipping vessel. The off-take agreement allows for the Company to sell concentrate in advance of shipment and results in the customer taking ownership of the concentrate prior to shipment.
The Company recognizes revenue from concentrate sales, net of treatment and refining charges, when it satisfies the performance obligation of transferring control of the concentrate to the customer.
For doré and off-take sales, the Company may incur a finance charge related to advance sales that is not considered significant and, as such, is not considered a separate performance obligation. In addition, the Company has elected to treat freight costs as a fulfillment cost under ASC 606 and not as a separate performance obligation.
The Company’s gold stream agreement with Franco-Nevada provided for a $20.0 million deposit paid by Franco-Nevada in exchange for the right and obligation, commencing in 2016, to purchase 50% of a portion of Palmarejo gold production at the lesser of $800 or market price per ounce. Because there is no minimum obligation associated with the deposit, it is not considered financing, and each shipment is considered to be a separate performance obligation. The stream agreement represents a contract liability under ASC 606, which requires the Company to ratably recognize a portion of the deposit as revenue for each gold ounce delivered to Franco-Nevada.
Estimates
The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of its financial statements, the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period, and
50
mined reserves. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from those estimates. There are a number of uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of reserves, including many factors beyond the Company’s control. Mineral reserve estimates are based upon engineering evaluations of samplings of drill holes and other openings. These estimates involve assumptions regarding future silver and gold prices, mine geology, mining methods and the related costs to develop and mine the reserves. Changes in these assumptions could result in material adjustments to the Company’s reserve estimates. The Company uses reserve estimates in determining the units-of-production amortization and evaluating mine assets for potential impairment.
Amortization
The Company amortizes its property, plant, and equipment, mining properties, and mine development using the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the ore body generally based on its proven and probable reserves or the straight-line method over the useful life, whichever is shorter. The accounting estimates related to amortization are critical accounting estimates because (1) the determination of reserves involves uncertainties with respect to the ultimate geology of its reserves and the assumptions used in determining the economic feasibility of mining those reserves and (2) changes in estimated proven and probable reserves and asset useful lives can have a material impact on net income.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets
We review and evaluate our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Asset impairment is considered to exist if the total estimated undiscounted pretax future cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset. In estimating future cash flows, assets are grouped at the lowest level for which there is identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of future cash flows from other asset groups. An impairment loss is measured by discounted estimated future cash flows, and recorded by reducing the asset's carrying amount to fair value. Future cash flows are estimated based on estimated quantities of recoverable minerals, expected gold, silver, lead and zinc prices (considering current and historical prices, trends and related factors), production levels, operating costs, capital requirements and reclamation costs, all based on life-of-mine plans.
During 2019, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $250.8 million. The write-down was allocated between Property, plant and equipment, net, Mining properties, net and Other non-current assets, in the amounts of $43.6 million, $201.5 million and $5.7 million, respectively.
Existing proven and probable reserves and value beyond proven and probable reserves, including mineralization other than proven and probable reserves are included when determining the fair value of mine site asset groups at acquisition and, subsequently, in determining whether the assets are impaired. The term “recoverable minerals” refers to the estimated amount of gold, silver, lead and zinc that will be obtained after taking into account losses during ore processing and treatment. Estimates of recoverable minerals from exploration stage mineral interests are risk adjusted based on management’s relative confidence in such materials. The ability to achieve the estimated quantities of recoverable minerals from exploration stage mineral interests involves further risks in addition to those risk factors applicable to mineral interests where proven and probable reserves have been identified, due to the lower level of confidence that the identified mineralized material could ultimately be mined economically. Assets classified as exploration potential have the highest level of risk that the carrying value of the asset can be ultimately realized, due to the still lower level of geological confidence and economic modeling.
Gold, silver, zinc and lead prices are volatile and affected by many factors beyond the Company’s control, including prevailing interest rates and returns on other asset classes, expectations regarding inflation, speculation, currency values, governmental decisions regarding precious metals stockpiles, global and regional demand and production, political and economic conditions and other factors may affect the key assumptions used in the Company’s impairment testing. Various factors could impact our ability to achieve forecasted production levels from proven and probable reserves. Additionally, production, capital and reclamation costs could differ from the assumptions used in the cash flow models used to assess impairment. Actual results may vary from the Company’s estimates and result in additional Impairment of Long-lived Assets.
Ore on Leach Pads
The heap leach process is a process of extracting silver and gold by placing ore on an impermeable pad and applying a diluted cyanide solution that dissolves a portion of the contained silver and gold, which are then recovered in metallurgical processes. The Company uses several integrated steps to scientifically measure the metal content of ore placed on the leach pads. As the ore body is drilled in preparation for the blasting process, samples are taken of the drill residue which are assayed to determine estimated quantities of contained metal. The Company estimates the quantity of ore by utilizing global positioning satellite survey techniques. The Company then processes the ore through crushing facilities where the output is again weighed and sampled for assaying. A metallurgical reconciliation with the data collected from the mining operation is completed with appropriate adjustments made to previous estimates. The crushed ore is then transported to the leach pad for application of the leaching solution. As the leach solution is collected from the leach pads, it is continuously sampled for assaying. The quantity of leach solution is measured by flow meters throughout the leaching and precipitation process. After precipitation, the product is converted to doré, which is the
51
final product produced by the mine. The inventory is stated at lower of cost or net realizable value, with cost being determined using a weighted average cost method.
The historical cost of the metal that is expected to be extracted within twelve months is classified as current. Ore on leach pad is valued based on actual production costs incurred to produce and place ore on the leach pads, less costs allocated to minerals recovered through the leach process.
The estimate of both the ultimate recovery expected over time and the quantity of metal that may be extracted relative to the time the leach process occurs requires the use of estimates and relies upon laboratory testwork. Testwork consists of 60-day leach columns from which the Company projects metal recoveries up to five years in the future. The quantities of metal contained in the ore are estimated based upon actual weights and assay analysis. The rate at which the leach process extracts gold and silver from the crushed ore is based upon laboratory column tests and actual experience occurring over more than twenty years of leach pad operations at the Rochester mine. The assumptions used by the Company to measure metal content during each stage of the inventory conversion process includes estimated recovery rates based on laboratory testing and assaying. The Company periodically reviews its estimates compared to actual experience and revises its estimates when appropriate. The ultimate recovery will not be known until leaching operations cease. Historically, our operating results have not been materially impacted by variations between the estimated and actual recoverable quantities of silver and gold on our leach pads.
Reclamation
The Company recognizes obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. The fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation will be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The fair value of the liability is added to the carrying amount of the associated asset and this additional carrying amount is depreciated over the life of the asset. An accretion cost, representing the increase over time in the present value of the liability, is recorded each period in Pre-development, Reclamation, and Other. As reclamation work is performed or liabilities are otherwise settled, the recorded amount of the liability is reduced. Future remediation costs for inactive mines are accrued based on management’s best estimate at the end of each period of the discounted costs expected to be incurred at the site. Such cost estimates include, where applicable, ongoing care and maintenance and monitoring costs. Changes in estimates are reflected in earnings in the period an estimate is revised.
Derivatives
The Company is exposed to various market risks, including the effect of changes in metal prices and interest rates, and uses derivatives to manage financial exposures that occur in the normal course of business. The Company may elect to designate certain derivatives as hedging instruments under U.S. GAAP.
The Company, from time to time, uses derivative contracts to protect the Company’s exposure to fluctuations in metal prices. The Company has elected to designate these instruments as cash flow hedges of forecasted transactions at their inception. Assuming normal market conditions, the change in the market value of such derivative contracts has historically been, and is expected to continue to be, highly effective at offsetting changes in price movements of the hedged item. For derivatives not designated as hedging instruments, the Company recognizes derivatives as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and measures those instruments at fair value. Changes in the value of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments are recorded each period in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss) in Fair value adjustments, net or Revenue. Management applies judgment in estimating the fair value of instruments that are highly sensitive to assumptions regarding commodity prices, market volatilities, and foreign currency exchange rates.
Income and Mining Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with the guidance of ASC 740. The Company’s annual tax rate
is based on income, statutory tax rates in effect and tax planning opportunities available to us in the various jurisdictions in which the Company operates. Significant judgment is required in determining the annual tax expense, current tax assets and liabilities, deferred tax assets and liabilities, and our future taxable income, both as a whole and in various tax jurisdictions, for purposes of assessing our ability to realize future benefit from our deferred tax assets. Actual income taxes could vary from these estimates due to future changes in income tax law, significant changes in the jurisdictions in which we operate or unpredicted results from the final determination of each year’s liability by taxing authorities.
The Company’s deferred income taxes reflect the impact of temporary differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and such amounts measured by tax laws and regulations. In evaluating the realizability of the deferred tax assets, management considers both positive and negative evidence that may exist, such as earnings history, reversal of taxable temporary differences, forecasted operating earnings and available tax planning strategies in each tax jurisdiction. A valuation allowance may be established to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is considered more likely than not to be realized through the generation of future taxable income and other tax planning strategies.
52
The Company has asserted indefinite reinvestment of earnings from its Mexican operations as determined by management’s judgment about and intentions concerning the future operations of the Company. The Company does not record a
U.S. deferred tax liability for foreign earnings that meet the indefinite reversal criteria. Refer to Note 14 -- Income and Mining Taxes for further discussion on our assertion.
The Company’s operations may involve dealing with uncertainties and judgments in the application of complex tax regulations in multiple jurisdictions. The final taxes paid are dependent upon many factors, including negotiations with taxing authorities in various jurisdictions and resolution of disputes arising from federal, state, and international tax audits. The Company recognizes potential liabilities and records tax liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in the United States and other tax jurisdictions based on its estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. The Company adjusts these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the progress of a tax audit; however, due to the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution could result in a payment that is materially different from our current estimate of the tax liabilities. These differences will be reflected as increases or decreases to income tax expense in the period which they are determined. The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.
Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases,” which will require lessees to recognize assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by most leases on the balance sheet. These changes become effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning January 1, 2019 and the Company adopted it using the cumulative-effect adjustment transition method approved by the FASB in July 2018, which does not require the Company to recast the comparative periods presented when transitioning to the new guidance on January 1, 2019. The Company has elected to utilize the transition related practical expedients permitted by the new standard. In addition to existing capital leases and other financing obligations, the adoption of the new standard resulted in the recognition of additional right-of-use assets and lease liabilities related to operating leases of approximately $65.0 million. These changes did not materially impact the Company’s consolidated net income, financial position or cash flows.
Other Liquidity Matters
We believe that our liquidity and capital resources in the U.S. are adequate to fund our U.S. operations and corporate activities. The Company has asserted indefinite reinvestment of earnings from its Mexican operations as determined by management’s judgment about and intentions concerning the future operations of the Company. The Company does not believe that the amounts reinvested will have a material impact on liquidity.
In order to reduce indebtedness, future cash interest payments and/or amounts due at maturity or upon redemption and for general working capital purposes, from time to time we may (1) issue equity securities for cash in public or private offerings or (2) repurchase certain of our debt securities for cash or in exchange for other securities, which may include secured or unsecured notes or equity, in each case in open market or privately negotiated transactions. We evaluate any such transactions in light of prevailing market conditions, liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions, and other factors. The amounts involved may be significant and any debt repurchase transactions may occur at a substantial discount to the debt securities’ face amount.
Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures
Non-GAAP financial measures are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standard meaning prescribed by generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Unless otherwise noted, we present the Non-GAAP financial measures of our continuing operations in the tables below. For additional information regarding our discontinued operations, see Note 22 -- to the Consolidated Financial Statements. These measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for performance measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.
53
Adjusted Net Income (Loss)
Management uses Adjusted net income (loss) to evaluate the Company’s operating performance, and to plan and forecast its operations. The Company believes the use of Adjusted net income (loss) reflects the underlying operating performance of our core mining business and allows investors and analysts to compare results of the Company to similar results of other mining companies. Management’s determination of the components of Adjusted net income (loss) are evaluated periodically and is based, in part, on a review of non-GAAP financial measures used by mining industry analysts. The tax effect of adjustments are based on statutory tax rates and the Company’s tax attributes, including the impact through the Company’s valuation allowance. The combined effective rate of tax adjustments may not be consistent with the statutory tax rates or the Company’s effective tax rate due to jurisdictional tax attributes and related valuation allowance impacts which may minimize the tax effect of certain adjustments and may not apply to gains and losses equally. Adjusted net income (loss) is reconciled to Net income (loss) in the following table:
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||
In thousands except per share amounts | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (341,203 | ) | $ | (48,405 | ) | $ | (1,319 | ) | ||
(Income) loss from discontinued operations, net of tax | (5,693 | ) | (550 | ) | 12,244 | ||||||
Fair value adjustments, net | (16,030 | ) | (3,638 | ) | 864 | ||||||
Foreign exchange loss (gain) | 5,900 | 8,611 | 1,562 | ||||||||
(Gain) loss on sale of assets and securities | 714 | (19 | ) | 1 | |||||||
Impairment of long-lived assets | 250,814 | — | — | ||||||||
Silvertip inventory write-down | 64,610 | 26,720 | — | ||||||||
Wharf inventory write-down | 3,596 | — | — | ||||||||
Loss on debt extinguishment | 1,282 | — | 9,342 | ||||||||
Receivable write-down | 1,040 | 6,536 | — | ||||||||
Interest income on notes receivables | (198 | ) | (1,776 | ) | — | ||||||
Manquiri sale consideration write-down | — | 18,599 | — | ||||||||
Rochester In-Pit crusher write-down | — | 3,441 | — | ||||||||
Mexico inflation adjustment | — | (1,939 | ) | — | |||||||
Transaction costs | — | 5 | 3,757 | ||||||||
Impairment of equity and debt securities | — | — | 426 | ||||||||
Gain on sale of Joaquin project | — | — | (21,138 | ) | |||||||
Gain on repurchase of Rochester royalty | — | — | (2,332 | ) | |||||||
Tax effect of adjustments(1) | (19,415 | ) | (9,750 | ) | 816 | ||||||
Adjusted net income (loss) | $ | (54,583 | ) | $ | (2,165 | ) | $ | 4,223 | |||
Adjusted net income (loss) per share - Basic | $ | (0.25 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.02 | |||
Adjusted net income (loss) per share - Diluted | $ | (0.25 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.02 | |||
(1) For the year ended December 31, 2019, tax effect of adjustments of $19.4 million (-6%) is primarily related to the write-down of Silvertip inventory.
For the year ended December 31, 2018, tax effect of adjustments of $9.8 million (-20%) is primarily related to the write-down of Silvertip start-up costs.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, tax effect of adjustments of $0.8 million (-10%) is primarily related to a taxable gain on the sale of the Joaquin project and deferred taxes on the Metalla transaction
54
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
Management uses EBITDA to evaluate the Company’s operating performance, to plan and forecast its operations, and assess leverage levels and liquidity measures. The Company believes the use of EBITDA reflects the underlying operating performance of our core mining business and allows investors and analysts to compare results of the Company to similar results of other mining companies. Adjusted EBITDA is a measure used in the 2024 Senior Notes Indenture (as such term is defined in Note 12 -- Debt) and the Facility to determine our ability to make certain payments and incur additional indebtedness. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not represent, and should not be considered an alternative to, Net income (Loss) or Cash Flow from Operations as determined under GAAP. Other companies may calculate Adjusted EBITDA differently and those calculations may not be comparable to our presentation. Adjusted EBITDA is reconciled to Net income (loss) in the following table:
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||
In thousands except per share amounts | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (341,203 | ) | $ | (48,405 | ) | $ | (1,319 | ) | ||
(Income) loss from discontinued operations, net of tax | (5,693 | ) | (550 | ) | 12,244 | ||||||
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest | 24,771 | 24,364 | 16,440 | ||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) | (11,129 | ) | (16,780 | ) | 28,998 | ||||||
Amortization | 178,876 | 128,473 | 146,549 | ||||||||
EBITDA | (154,378 | ) | 87,102 | 202,912 | |||||||
Fair value adjustments, net | (16,030 | ) | (3,638 | ) | 864 | ||||||
Foreign exchange (gain) loss | 4,346 | 9,069 | (1,281 | ) | |||||||
Asset retirement obligation accretion | 12,154 | 11,116 | 8,983 | ||||||||
Inventory adjustments and write-downs | 5,904 | 2,093 | 1,806 | ||||||||
(Gain) loss on sale of assets and securities | 714 | (19 | ) | 1 | |||||||
Impairment of long-lived assets | 250,814 | — | — | ||||||||
Silvertip inventory write-down | 64,610 | 26,720 | — | ||||||||
Wharf inventory write-down | 3,596 | — | — | ||||||||
Loss on debt extinguishment | 1,282 | — | 9,342 | ||||||||
Receivable write-down | 1,040 | 6,536 | — | ||||||||
Interest income on notes receivables | (198 | ) | (1,776 | ) | — | ||||||
Manquiri sale consideration write-down | — | 18,599 | — | ||||||||
Rochester In-Pit crusher write-down | — | 3,441 | — | ||||||||
Mexico inflation adjustment | — | (1,939 | ) | — | |||||||
Transaction costs | — | 5 | 3,757 | ||||||||
Gain on sale of Joaquin project | — | — | (21,138 | ) | |||||||
Gain on repurchase of Rochester royalty | — | — | (2,332 | ) | |||||||
Impairment of equity and debt securities | — | — | 426 | ||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 173,854 | $ | 157,309 | $ | 203,340 | |||||
55
Free Cash Flow
Management uses Free Cash Flow as a non-GAAP measure to analyze cash flows generated from operations. Free Cash Flow is Cash Provided By (used in) Operating Activities of Continuing Operations less Capital expenditures from continuing operations as presented on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The Company believes Free Cash Flow is also useful as one of the bases for comparing the Company’s performance with its competitors. Although Free Cash Flow and similar measures are frequently used as measures of cash flows generated from operations by other companies, the Company’s calculation of Free Cash Flow is not necessarily comparable to such other similarly titled captions of other companies.
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of Free Cash Flow, a non-GAAP financial measure, to Cash Provided By (used in) Operating Activities of Continuing Operations, which the Company believes to be the GAAP financial measure most directly comparable to Free Cash Flow.
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||
Cash flow from continuing operations | $ | 91,880 | $ | 20,108 | $ | 197,160 | |||||
Capital expenditures from continuing operations | 99,772 | 140,787 | 136,734 | ||||||||
Free cash flow | $ | (7,892 | ) | (120,679 | ) | 60,426 | |||||
Costs Applicable to Sales
Management uses CAS to evaluate the Company’s current operating performance and life of mine performance from discovery through reclamation. We believe these measures assist analysts, investors and other stakeholders in understanding the costs associated with producing gold, silver, zinc and lead, assessing our operating performance and ability to generate free cash flow from operations and sustaining production. These measures may not be indicative of operating profit or cash flow from operations as determined under GAAP. Management believes that allocating CAS to gold, silver, zinc and lead based on gold, silver, zinc and lead metal sales relative to total metal sales best allows management, analysts, investors and other stakeholders to evaluate the operating performance of the Company. Other companies may calculate CAS differently as a result of reflecting the benefit from selling non-silver metals as a by-product credit, converting to silver equivalent ounces, and differences in underlying accounting principles and accounting frameworks such as in International Financial Reporting Standards.
Year Ended December 31, 2019
In thousands except per ounce or per pound amounts | Palmarejo | Rochester | Kensington | Wharf | Silvertip | Total | |||||||||||||||||
Costs applicable to sales, including amortization (U.S. GAAP) | $ | 201,306 | $ | 118,246 | $ | 170,194 | $ | 92,969 | $ | 145,496 | $ | 728,211 | |||||||||||
Amortization | (59,379 | ) | (18,041 | ) | (50,592 | ) | (12,280 | ) | (36,738 | ) | (177,030 | ) | |||||||||||
Costs applicable to sales | $ | 141,927 | $ | 100,205 | $ | 119,602 | $ | 80,689 | $ | 108,758 | $ | 551,181 | |||||||||||
Metal Sales | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gold ounces | 116,104 | 36,052 | 130,495 | 84,999 | 367,650 | ||||||||||||||||||
Silver ounces | 6,841,380 | 3,844,556 | 64,161 | 1,164,470 | 11,914,567 | ||||||||||||||||||
Zinc pounds | 18,154,521 | 18,154,521 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Lead pounds | 16,487,847 | 16,487,847 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Costs applicable to sales | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gold ($/oz) | $ | 685 | $ | 1,251 | $ | 917 | $ | 937 | |||||||||||||||
Silver ($/oz) | $ | 9.13 | $ | 14.34 | $ | 31.92 | |||||||||||||||||
Zinc ($/lb) | $ | 2.34 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Lead ($/lb) | $ | 1.76 | |||||||||||||||||||||
56
Year Ended December 31, 2018
In thousands except per ounce or per pound amounts | Palmarejo | Rochester | Kensington | Wharf | Silvertip | Total | |||||||||||||||||
Costs applicable to sales, including amortization (U.S. GAAP) | $ | 180,832 | $ | 126,586 | $ | 141,872 | $ | 78,273 | $ | 40,855 | $ | 568,418 | |||||||||||
Amortization | (60,744 | ) | (20,909 | ) | (29,508 | ) | (11,072 | ) | (5,235 | ) | (127,468 | ) | |||||||||||
Costs applicable to sales | $ | 120,088 | $ | 105,677 | $ | 112,364 | $ | 67,201 | $ | 35,620 | $ | 440,950 | |||||||||||
Metal Sales | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gold ounces | 115,592 | 52,789 | 106,555 | 75,572 | 350,508 | ||||||||||||||||||
Silver ounces | 7,229,179 | 4,854,579 | 48,085 | 222,974 | 12,354,817 | ||||||||||||||||||
Zinc pounds | 4,375,995 | 4,375,995 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Lead pounds | 2,648,920 | 2,648,920 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Costs applicable to sales | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gold ($/oz) | $ | 561 | $ | 941 | $ | 1,055 | $ | 879 | |||||||||||||||
Silver ($/oz) | $ | 7.64 | $ | 11.54 | $ | 55.91 | |||||||||||||||||
Zinc ($/lb) | $ | 3.34 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Lead ($/lb) | $ | 3.23 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2017
In thousands except per ounce or per pound amounts | Palmarejo | Rochester | Kensington | Wharf | Endeavor | Total | |||||||||||||||||
Costs applicable to sales, including amortization (U.S. GAAP) | $ | 219,920 | $ | 130,227 | $ | 152,118 | $ | 82,334 | $ | 1,046 | $ | 585,645 | |||||||||||
Amortization | (73,744 | ) | (22,306 | ) | (36,022 | ) | (13,012 | ) | (301 | ) | (145,385 | ) | |||||||||||
Costs applicable to sales | $ | 146,176 | $ | 107,921 | $ | 116,096 | $ | 69,322 | $ | 745 | $ | 440,260 | |||||||||||
Metal Sales | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gold ounces | 131,743 | 54,642 | 125,982 | 98,237 | 410,604 | ||||||||||||||||||
Silver ounces | 7,586,154 | 4,931,368 | 74,086 | 107,027 | 12,698,635 | ||||||||||||||||||
Costs applicable to sales | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gold ($/oz) | $ | 588 | $ | 889 | $ | 922 | $ | 693 | |||||||||||||||
Silver ($/oz) | $ | 9.06 | $ | 12.04 | $ | 6.96 | |||||||||||||||||
57
Reconciliation of Costs Applicable to Sales for 2020 Guidance
In thousands except per ounce amounts | Palmarejo | Rochester | Kensington | Wharf | |||||||||||
Costs applicable to sales, including amortization (U.S. GAAP) | $ | 214,717 | $ | 132,647 | $ | 184,651 | $ | 100,828 | |||||||
Amortization | (57,235 | ) | (20,798 | ) | (62,001 | ) | (13,403 | ) | |||||||
Costs applicable to sales | $ | 157,482 | $ | 111,849 | $ | 122,650 | $ | 87,425 | |||||||
By-product credit | — | — | — | (806 | ) | ||||||||||
Adjusted costs applicable to sales | $ | 157,482 | $ | 111,849 | $ | 122,650 | $ | 86,619 | |||||||
Metal Sales | |||||||||||||||
Gold ounces | 102,500 | 30,000 | 125,000 | 82,200 | |||||||||||
Silver ounces | 7,000,000 | 5,300,000 | — | 46,700 | |||||||||||
Revenue Split | |||||||||||||||
Gold | 53% | 35% | 100% | 100% | |||||||||||
Silver | 47% | 65% | — | — | |||||||||||
Adjusted costs applicable to sales | |||||||||||||||
Gold ($/oz) | $785 - $885 | $1,175 - $1,325 | $900 - $1,000 | $1,025 - $1,125 | |||||||||||
Silver ($/oz) | $10.35 - $11.35 | $13.25 - $14.50 | |||||||||||||
58
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company is exposed to various market risks as a part of its operations and engages in risk management strategies to mitigate these risks. The Company continually evaluates the potential benefits of engaging in these strategies based on current market conditions. The Company does not actively engage in the practice of trading derivative instruments for profit. Additional information about the Company’s derivative financial instruments may be found in Note 17 -- Derivative Financial Instruments in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. This discussion of the Company’s market risk assessments contains “forward looking statements”. For additional information regarding forward-looking statements and risks and uncertainties that could impact the Company, please refer to Item 2 of this Report - Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements. Actual results and actions could differ materially from those discussed below.
Gold, Silver, Zinc and Lead Prices
Gold, silver, zinc, and lead prices may fluctuate widely due to numerous factors, such as U.S. dollar strength or weakness, demand, investor sentiment, inflation or deflation, and global mine production. The Company’s profitability and cash flow may be significantly impacted by changes in the market price of gold, silver, zinc, and lead.
Gold, Silver, Zinc and Lead Hedging
To mitigate the risks associated with gold, silver, zinc and lead price fluctuations, the Company may enter into option contracts to hedge future production. The Company had outstanding Asian put and call option contracts in net-zero-cost collar contracts on 96,000 ounces of gold at December 31, 2019 that settle monthly through August 2020. The weighted average strike prices on the put and call contracts are $1,408 and $1,803 per ounce of gold, respectively. The contracts are generally net cash settled and, if the price of gold at the time of the expiration is between the put and call prices, would expire at no cost to the Company. At December 31, 2019, the value of the put and call zero cost collars contracts was a net liability of $0.1 million. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company had not recognized any amount of gain or loss related to outstanding options in Revenue and the entire amount was included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). A 10% decrease in the price of gold at December 31, 2019 would result in a gain of $4.2 million. The Company had outstanding Asian put and call option contracts in net-zero-cost collar contracts on zinc at December 31, 2018 that settled in January 2019.
Provisional Gold, Silver, Zinc and Lead Sales
The Company enters into sales contracts with third-party smelters and refiners which, in some cases, provide for a provisional payment based upon preliminary assays and quoted metal prices. The provisionally priced sales contracts contain an embedded derivative that is required to be separated from the host contract. Depending on the difference between the price at the time of sale and the final settlement price, embedded derivatives are recorded as either a derivative asset or liability. The embedded derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting and, as a result, are marked to the market gold and silver price at the end of each period from the provisional sale date to the date of final settlement. The mark-to-market gains and losses are recorded in earnings. Changes in gold, silver, zinc and lead prices resulted in provisional pricing mark-to-market gain of $0.3 million as of December 31, 2019.
At December 31, 2019, the Company had outstanding provisionally priced sales of 11,054 ounces of gold at an average price of $1,471, 0.5 million ounces of silver at an average price of $17.89, 10.4 million pounds of zinc at an average price of $1.03 and 6.2 million pounds of lead at an average price of $0.88. A 10% change in realized gold, silver, zinc and lead prices would cause revenue to vary by $4.0 million.
Foreign Currency
The Company operates, or has mineral interests, in several foreign countries including Canada, Mexico, and New Zealand, which exposes it to foreign currency exchange rate risks. Foreign currency exchange rates are influenced by world market factors beyond the Company’s control such as supply and demand for U.S. and foreign currencies and related monetary and fiscal policies. Fluctuations in local currency exchange rates in relation to the U.S. dollar may significantly impact profitability and cash flow.
Foreign Exchange Hedging
To manage foreign currency risk, the Company may enter into foreign exchange forward and/or option contracts when the Company believes such contracts would be beneficial. The Company had no outstanding foreign exchange contracts at December 31, 2019.
Interest Rates
Interest Rate Hedging
We may use financial instruments to manage exposures to changes in interest rates on loans, which exposes us to credit risk and market risk. Credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. When the
59
fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes us, which creates credit risk for us. When the fair value of a derivative contract is negative, we owe the counterparty and, therefore, it does not pose credit risk. We seek to minimize the credit risk in derivative instruments by entering into transactions with what we believe are high-quality counterparties. Market risk is the adverse effect on the value of a financial instrument that results from a change in interest rates. The Company had no outstanding interest rate swaps at December 31, 2019.
60
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Coeur Mining, Inc.
Opinion on the financial statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Coeur Mining, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”), and our report dated February 19, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion.
Change in accounting principle
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for leases in 2019 due to the adoption of Account Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02, Leases.
Basis for opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical audit matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Ore on Leach Pads - Rochester Mine
As described in Notes 2 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s ore on leach pads balance for the Rochester mine is $119 million at December 31, 2019. This is a current balance of $48 million and a non-current balance of $71 million. The measurement and valuation of the ore on leach pads balance involves significant management estimates and assumptions related to the measure of metal content of ore placed on the leach pads, including recovery rates and ore grades. The balance is determined
61
based on actual production costs incurred to produce and place ore on the leach pads, less costs allocated to minerals recovered through the leach process. The historical cost of metal expected to be extracted within twelve months is classified as current on the balance sheet. We identified the measurement and valuation for the ore on leach pads for the Rochester mine as a critical audit matter.
The principal considerations for our determination that the measurement and valuation for Rochester’s ore on leach pads is a critical audit matter are that certain management assumptions are complex and have a higher degree of estimation uncertainty and that changes in these assumptions could have a significant impact on the balance. In turn, auditing Rochester’s ore on leach pads requires significant auditor judgment.
Our audit procedures related to the accounting for Rochester’s ore on leach pads included the following, among others.
• | We obtained and tested Rochester’s 2019 roll forward of the estimated ounces and costs added to, recovered from, and the resulting ending amounts of ounces and costs of the ore on leach pads balance, including testing of certain assumptions, such as recovery rates and ore grades. |
• | For the roll forward of estimated ounces, we assessed the completeness and accuracy of mining production information, including crusher tonnage data and truck load tonnage information. |
• | We evaluated management’s laboratory procedures related to assay testing used to estimate ore grade. |
• | We evaluated the company’s use of specialists and their qualifications and experience related to their input on the recovery rates and ore grades estimates used by management in its calculation of ore on leach pads. |
• | We assessed the estimated timing of recoveries, which management uses in classifying current and non-current portions of the ore on leach pads balance. |
• | We tested the operating effectiveness of management’s controls over mining production information, estimating the recovery rates, ore grades, and inventory roll forward related to recording Rochester’s balance of ore on lead pads. |
Reclamation
As described in Notes 2 and 13 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s consolidated reclamation liability balance for its operating sites was $134 million at December 31, 2019. The calculation of the reclamation liability involves significant management estimates and assumptions related to the amount and timing of reclamation costs and applicable inputs used in the calculation, such as discount rates. Management uses specialists to provide support in its assessment. We identified the reclamation liability valuation as a critical audit matter.
The principal considerations for our determination that the valuation of the reclamation liability is a critical audit matter are that certain management assumptions are complex and have a higher degree of estimation uncertainty and that changes in these assumptions could differ from current estimates and have a significant impact of the reclamation balance. In turn, auditing the reclamation liability requires significant auditor judgment.
Our audit procedures related to the reclamation liability included the following, among others.
• | We obtained management’s estimate of future reclamation costs, and compared a sample of estimated reclamation costs to appropriate underlying documentation, such as vendor support. |
• | We compared a sample of the timing of the estimated reclamation costs to appropriate underlying documentation, such as the life of mine plans. |
• | We evaluated the competence and objectivity of the management’s specialists who assisted with determining the reclamation cost estimates. |
• | We obtained management’s calculation of the reclamation liability and evaluated the appropriateness of significant inputs, such as the estimated discount rates. |
• | We tested the operating effectiveness of management’s controls over estimating the future reclamation costs, the timing of these costs and inputs into the calculation of the reclamation liability, such as estimated discount rates. |
62
Impairment of Long-lived Assets
As described in Notes 2, 4 and 16 to the financial statements, during the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recognized an impairment of Silvertip’s long-lived assets in the total amount of $251 million. As the impairment charge and the remaining property, plant and equipment and mining properties of the Silvertip mine are significant balances, we considered management’s assessment of the impairment as a critical audit matter.
The principal considerations for our determination that the impairment of the long-lived assets of the Silvertip mine is a critical audit matter are that management’s calculation of the fair value of Silvertip’s long-lived assets was estimated using a discounted future cash flow approach and includes certain management assumptions that are complex and have a higher degree of estimation uncertainty and that changes in these assumptions could have a significant impact on the balances. The discounted cash flow model used significant unobservable inputs. These assumptions include estimated quantities of recoverable minerals, expected lead, zinc and silver prices, treatment charges, production levels, operating costs, capital requirements and discount rates. Included in recoverable minerals is existing proven and probable reserves and an estimated value for mineralization other than proven and probable reserves, including exploration potential. Performing audit procedures to evaluate management’s assumptions required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve our specialists.
Our audit procedures related to Silvertip impairment included the following, among others.
• | We obtained and tested management’s discounted future cash flow calculation, including significant assumptions such as estimated quantities of recoverable minerals, expected lead, zinc and silver prices, treatment charges, production levels, operating costs, capital requirements, and discount rates. |
• | We evaluated the competence and objectivity of the management’s specialists who assisted with preparing the discounted cash flow analysis, including those involved in determining the recoverable minerals. |
• | We compared the amount of proven and probable reserves and an estimated value for mineralization other that proven and probable reserves to publicly available information. |
• | We compared the expected lead, zinc and silver pricing to available market information |
• | We evaluated the reasonableness for management’s forecasts of production levels, operating costs, and capital requirement by comparing to historical results and internal communications to management and the Board of Directors and external communications made by management to analysts and investors |
• | We utilized a valuation specialist to assist in testing the discount rate included in the Company’s discounted cash flow calculation |
• | We tested the operating effectiveness of management’s controls over the discounted future cash flow calculation, including the controls related the development of the associated assumptions. |
/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2016.
Chicago, Illinois
February 19, 2020
63
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Coeur Mining, Inc.
Opinion on internal control over financial reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Coeur Mining, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019, and our report dated February 19, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Basis for opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and limitations of internal control over financial reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
Chicago, Illinois
February 19, 2020
64
COEUR MINING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | |||||||
ASSETS | Notes | In thousands, except share data | ||||||
CURRENT ASSETS | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | $ | ||||||
Receivables | 5 | |||||||
Inventory | 6 | |||||||
Ore on leach pads | 6 | |||||||
Prepaid expenses and other | ||||||||
NON-CURRENT ASSETS | ||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | 8 | |||||||
Mining properties, net | 9 | |||||||
Ore on leach pads | 6 | |||||||
Restricted assets | ||||||||
Equity and debt securities | 7 | |||||||
Receivables | 5 | |||||||
Other | ||||||||
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | $ | ||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | $ | ||||||
Accrued liabilities and other | 23 | |||||||
Debt | 12 | |||||||
Reclamation | 13 | |||||||
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES | ||||||||
Debt | 12 | |||||||
Reclamation | 13 | |||||||
Deferred tax liabilities | ||||||||
Other long-term liabilities | ||||||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | 21 | |||||||
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; authorized 300,000,000 shares, 241,529,021 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 203,310,443 at December 31, 2018 | ||||||||
Additional paid-in capital | ||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
Accumulated deficit | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | $ | $ | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
65
COEUR MINING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2019 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||
Notes | In thousands, except share data | |||||||||||
Revenue | 3 | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||
COSTS AND EXPENSES | ||||||||||||
Costs applicable to sales(1) | 3 | |||||||||||
Amortization | ||||||||||||
General and administrative | ||||||||||||
Exploration | ||||||||||||
Impairment of long-lived assets | 4 | |||||||||||
Pre-development, reclamation, and other | ||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses | ||||||||||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET | ||||||||||||
Loss on debt extinguishment | 12 | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||
Fair value adjustments, net | 16 | ( | ) | |||||||||
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest | 12 | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||
Other, net | 18 | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||
Total other income (expense), net | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
Income (loss) before income and mining taxes | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
Income and mining tax (expense) benefit | 14 | ( | ) | |||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | |||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | 22 | ( | ) | |||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), net of tax: | ||||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges | ( | ) | ||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on debt and equity securities | ||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustments for impairment of equity securities | ||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustments for realized (gain) loss on sale of equity securities | ||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) | ( | ) | ||||||||||
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | |||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE | 19 | |||||||||||
Basic income (loss) per share: | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | |||||
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations | ( | ) | ||||||||||
Basic(2) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||
Diluted income (loss) per share: | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | |||||
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations | ( | ) | ||||||||||
Diluted(2) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||
(1) Excludes amortization.
(2) Due to rounding, the sum of net income per share from continuing operations and discontinued operations may not equal net income per share.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
66
COEUR MINING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2019 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||
Notes | In thousands | |||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||
(Income) loss from discontinued operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
Adjustments: | ||||||||||||
Amortization | ||||||||||||
Accretion | ||||||||||||
Deferred taxes | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
Loss on debt extinguishment | 12 | |||||||||||
Fair value adjustments, net | 16 | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||
Stock-based compensation | 15 | |||||||||||
Gain on sale of the Joaquin project | ( | ) | ||||||||||
Impairment of long-lived assets | 4 | |||||||||||
Write-downs | 5,6 | |||||||||||
Deferred revenue recognition | 21 | ( | ) | |||||||||
Other | ( | ) | ||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||||||
Receivables | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | ( | ) | ||||||||||
Inventory and ore on leach pads | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | ( | ) | ||||||||||
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES OF CONTINUING OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN )OPERATING ACTIVITIES OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS | ( | ) | ||||||||||
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
Acquisitions, net | 10 | ( | ) | |||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of assets | ||||||||||||
Purchase of investments | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
Sale of investments | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from notes receivable | ||||||||||||
Other | ||||||||||||
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES OF CONTINUING OPERATIONS | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock | 19 | |||||||||||
Issuance of notes and bank borrowings, net of issuance costs | 12 | |||||||||||
Payments on debt, finance leases, and associated costs | 12 | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||
Silvertip contingent consideration | 21 | ( | ) | |||||||||
Other | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES OF CONTINUING OPERATIONS | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
CASH USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | ||||||||||||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
Less net cash used in discontinued operations(1) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period | ||||||||||||
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
(1) Less net cash used in discontinued operations includes the following cash transactions: net subsidiary payments to parent company of $1,748 and $20,759 during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
67
COEUR MINING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
In thousands | Common Stock Shares | Common Stock Par Value | Additional Paid-In Capital | Accumulated Deficit | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2016 | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | — | — | — | ( | ) | — | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued for acquisitions | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued under stock-based compensation plans, net | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2017 | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | — | — | — | ( | ) | — | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||
Reclassification of unrealized gain (loss) on equity securities for ASU 2016-01 | — | — | — | ( | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued for acquisitions | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued under stock-based compensation plans, net | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2018 | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | — | — | — | ( | ) | — | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) | — | — | — | — | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||
Common stock issued for the extinguishment of Senior Notes | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued under "at the market" stock offering | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued for Silvertip contingent consideration payment | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued/canceled under long-term incentive plans and director fees and options, net | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2019 | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | |||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
68
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1 - THE COMPANY
Coeur Mining, Inc. (“Coeur” or “the Company”) is primarily a gold and silver producer with five operating mines located in the United States, Canada and Mexico and several exploration projects in North America. Coeur was incorporated as an Idaho corporation in 1928 under the name Coeur d’Alene Mines Corporation and on May 16, 2013, changed its state of incorporation from the State of Idaho to the State of Delaware and changed its name to Coeur Mining, Inc. Coeur’s corporate headquarters are in Chicago, Illinois. The cash flow and profitability of the Company's operations are significantly impacted by the market price of gold, silver, zinc and lead, which are affected by numerous factors beyond the Company's control.
NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Risks and uncertainties
As a mining company, the revenue, profitability and future rate of growth of the Company are substantially dependent on the prevailing prices for gold, silver, zinc and lead. The prices of these metals are volatile and affected by many factors beyond the Company’s control, including prevailing interest rates and returns on other asset classes, expectations regarding inflation, speculation, currency values, governmental decisions regarding precious metals stockpiles, global and regional demand and production, political and economic conditions and other factors. A substantial or extended decline in commodity prices could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, cash flows, access to capital and the quantities of reserves that the Company can economically produce. Further, the carrying value of the Company’s property, plant and equipment, net; mining properties, net; inventories and ore on leach pads are particularly sensitive to the outlook for commodity prices. A decline in the Company’s price outlook from current levels could result in material impairment charges related to these assets.
Use of Estimates
The Company's Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with United States Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles. The preparation of the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The more significant areas requiring the use of management estimates and assumptions relate to metal prices and mineral reserves that are the basis for future cash flow estimates utilized in impairment calculations and units-of production amortization calculations, environmental, reclamation and closure obligations, estimates of recoverable silver and gold in leach pad inventories, estimates of fair value for certain reporting units and asset impairments, valuation allowances for deferred tax assets, and the fair value and accounting treatment of financial instruments, equity securities, asset acquisitions, the allocation of fair value to assets and liabilities assumed in connection with business combinations, and derivative instruments. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Accordingly, actual results will differ from the amounts estimated in these financial statements.
Principles of Consolidation
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company, the most significant of
which are Coeur Mexicana S.A. de C.V., Coeur Rochester, Inc., Coeur Alaska, Inc., Wharf Resources (U.S.A.), Inc., Coeur Silvertip Holdings Ltd. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include all highly-liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less. The Company minimizes its credit risk by investing its cash and cash equivalents with major U.S. and international banks and financial institutions located principally in the United States with a minimum credit rating of A1, as defined by Standard & Poor’s. The Company’s management believes that no concentration of credit risk exists with respect to the investment of its cash and cash equivalents. At certain times, amounts on deposit may exceed federal deposit insurance limits.
Receivables
Trade receivables and other receivable balances are reported at outstanding principal amounts, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts, if deemed necessary. Management evaluates the collectability of receivable account balances to determine the allowance, if any. Management considers the other party's credit risk and financial condition, as well as current and projected economic and market conditions, in determining the amount of the allowance. Receivable balances are written off when management determines that the balance is uncollectible.
69
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Ore on Leach Pads
The heap leach process extracts silver and gold by placing ore on an impermeable pad and applying a diluted cyanide solution that dissolves a portion of the contained silver and gold, which are then recovered in metallurgical processes.
The Company uses several integrated steps to scientifically measure the metal content of ore placed on the leach pads. As the ore body is drilled in preparation for the blasting process, samples are taken of the drill residue which are assayed to determine estimated quantities of contained metal. The Company estimates the quantity of ore by utilizing global positioning satellite survey techniques. The Company then processes the ore through crushing facilities where the output is again weighed and sampled for assaying. A metallurgical reconciliation with the data collected from the mining operation is completed with appropriate adjustments made to previous estimates. The crushed ore is then transported to the leach pad for application of the leaching solution. As the leach solution is collected from the leach pads, it is continuously sampled for assaying. The quantity of leach solution is measured by flow meters throughout the leaching and precipitation process. After precipitation, the product is converted to doré at the Rochester mine and a form of gold concentrate at the Wharf mine, representing the final product produced by each mine. The inventory is stated at lower of cost or net realizable value, with cost being determined using a weighted average cost method.
The historical cost of metal expected to be extracted within twelve months is classified as current and the historical cost of metals contained within the broken ore expected to be extracted beyond twelve months is classified as non-current. Ore on leach pads is valued based on actual production costs incurred to produce and place ore on the leach pad, less costs allocated to minerals recovered through the leach process.
The estimate of both the ultimate recovery expected over time and the quantity of metal that may be extracted relative to the time the leach process occurs requires the use of estimates, which are inherently inaccurate due to the nature of the leaching process. The quantities of metal contained in the ore are based upon actual weights and assay analysis. The rate at which the leach process extracts gold and silver from the crushed ore is based upon laboratory testing and actual experience of more than twenty years of leach pad operations at the Rochester mine and thirty years of leach pad operations at the Wharf mine. The assumptions used by the Company to measure metal content during each stage of the inventory conversion process includes estimated recovery rates based on laboratory testing and assaying. The Company periodically reviews its estimates compared to actual experience and revises its estimates when appropriate. Variations between actual and estimated quantities resulting from changes in assumptions and estimates that do not result in write-downs to net realizable value are accounted for on a prospective basis.
Metal and Other Inventory
Inventories include concentrate, doré, and operating materials and supplies. The classification of inventory is determined by the stage at which the ore is in the production process. All inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, with cost being determined using a weighted average cost method. Concentrate and doré inventory includes product at the mine site and product held by refineries. Metal inventory costs include direct labor, materials, depreciation, depletion and amortization as well as overhead costs relating to mining activities.
Property, Plant, and Equipment
Expenditures for new facilities, assets acquired pursuant to capital leases, new assets or expenditures that extend the
useful lives of existing facilities are capitalized and depreciated using the straight-line method at rates sufficient to depreciate such costs over the shorter of estimated productive lives of such facilities, lease term, or the useful life of the individual assets. Productive lives range from 7 to 30 years for buildings and improvements and 3 to 10 years for machinery and equipment. Certain mining equipment is depreciated using the units-of-production method based upon estimated total proven and probable reserves.
Mining Properties and Mine Development
Capitalization of mine development costs begins once all operating permits have been secured, mineralization is classified as proven and probable reserves and a final feasibility study has been completed. Mine development costs include engineering and metallurgical studies, drilling and other related costs to delineate an ore body, the removal of overburden to initially expose an ore body at open pit surface mines and the building of access ways, shafts, lateral access, drifts, ramps and other infrastructure at underground mines. Costs incurred before mineralization are classified as proven and probable reserves are capitalized if a project is in pre-production phase or expensed and classified as Exploration or Pre-development if the project is not yet in pre-production. Mine development costs are amortized using the units of production method over the estimated life of the ore body generally based on recoverable ounces to be mined from proven and probable reserves. Interest expense allocable to the cost of developing mining properties and to construct new facilities is capitalized until assets are ready for their intended use.
Drilling and related costs incurred at the Company’s operating mines are expensed as incurred in Exploration, unless the Company can conclude with a high degree of confidence, prior to the commencement of a drilling program, that the drilling costs will result in the conversion of a mineralized material into proven and probable reserves. The Company’s assessment is based on
70
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
the following factors: results from previous drill programs; results from geological models; results from a mine scoping study confirming economic viability of the resource; and preliminary estimates of mine inventory, ore grade, cash flow and mine life.
In addition, the Company must have all permitting and/or contractual requirements necessary to have the right to and/or control
of the future benefit from the targeted ore body. The costs of a drilling program that meet these criteria are capitalized as mine development costs. Drilling and related costs of approximately $7.5 million and $18.6 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, were capitalized.
The cost of removing overburden and waste materials to access the ore body at an open pit mine prior to the production phase are referred to as “pre-stripping costs.” Pre-stripping costs are capitalized during the development of an open pit mine. Stripping costs incurred during the production phase of a mine are variable production costs that are included as a component of inventory to be recognized in Costs applicable to sales in the same period as the revenue from the sale of inventory.
Mineral Interests
Significant payments related to the acquisition of land and mineral rights are capitalized. Prior to acquiring such land or mineral rights, the Company generally makes a preliminary evaluation to determine that the property has significant potential to develop an economic ore body. The time between initial acquisition and full evaluation of a property’s potential is variable and is determined by many factors including: location relative to existing infrastructure, the property’s stage of development, geological controls and metal prices. If a mineable ore body is discovered, such costs are amortized when production begins using the units of- production method based on recoverable ounces to be mined from proven and probable reserves. If no mineable ore body is discovered, such costs are expensed in the period in which it is determined the property has no future economic value.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets
We review and evaluate our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Asset impairment is considered to exist if the total estimated undiscounted pretax future cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset. In estimating future cash flows, assets are grouped at the lowest level for which there is identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of future cash flows from other asset groups. An impairment loss is measured by discounted estimated future cash flows, and recorded by reducing the asset's carrying amount to fair value. Future cash flows are estimated based on estimated quantities of recoverable minerals, expected gold, silver, lead and zinc prices (considering current and historical prices, trends and related factors), production levels, operating costs, capital requirements and reclamation costs, all based on life-of-mine plans.
Existing proven and probable reserves and value beyond proven and probable reserves, including mineralization other than proven and probable reserves are included when determining the fair value of mine site asset groups at acquisition and, subsequently, in determining whether the assets are impaired. The term “recoverable minerals” refers to the estimated amount of gold, silver, lead and zinc that will be obtained after taking into account losses during ore processing and treatment. Estimates of recoverable minerals from exploration stage mineral interests are risk adjusted based on management’s relative confidence in such materials. The ability to achieve the estimated quantities of recoverable minerals from exploration stage mineral interests involves further risks in addition to those risk factors applicable to mineral interests where proven and probable reserves have been identified, due to the lower level of confidence that the identified mineralized material could ultimately be mined economically. Assets classified as exploration potential have the highest level of risk that the carrying value of the asset can be ultimately realized, due to the still lower level of geological confidence and economic modeling.
During the fourth quarter of 2019, the Company performed a comprehensive analysis of its Silvertip property and determined that indicators of impairment existed, primarily as a result of continued deterioration in zinc and lead market conditions as well as ongoing challenges related to the processing facility. As a result of the impairment indicators, a recoverability test was performed and the Company concluded that the long-lived assets for the Silvertip property was impaired. A non-cash impairment charge of $250.8 million was recorded during the fourth quarter of 2019. The write-down was allocated between Property, plant and equipment, net, Mining properties, net and Other non-current assets, in the amounts of $43.6 million,$201.5 million and $5.7 million, respectively. See Note 4 -- Impairment of Long-lived Assets and 16 -- Fair Value Measurements for additional detail of the impairment and assumptions used in the determination of the fair value of the long-lived assets tested for impairment.
Properties Held for Sale
In determining whether to classify a property as held for sale, the Company considers whether: (i) management has committed to a plan to sell the property; (ii) the investment is available for immediate sale, in its present condition; (iii) the Company has initiated a program to locate a buyer; (iv) the Company believes that the sale of the property is probable; (v) the Company has received a significant non-refundable deposit for the purchase of the property; (vi) the Company is actively marketing the property for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its estimated fair value; and (vii) actions required for the Company to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that any significant changes will be made to the plan. If all of the above criteria are met, the Company classifies the property as held for sale. When these criteria are met, the Company suspends depreciation on the properties held for sale. The properties held for sale and associated liabilities are classified separately on the consolidated
71
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
balance sheets. Such properties are recorded at the lesser of the carrying value or estimated fair value less costs to sell. Additionally, if the sale represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on the entity's results and operations, the assets, liabilities and operations for the periods presented are classified on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as held for sale and Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
Restricted Assets
The Company, under the terms of its self-insurance and bonding agreements with certain banks, lending institutions and regulatory agencies, is required to collateralize certain portions of its obligations. The Company has collateralized these obligations by assigning certificates of deposit that have maturity dates ranging from three months to a year, to the respective institutions or agencies. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company held certificates of deposit and cash under these agreements of $8.8 million and $12.3 million, respectively. The ultimate timing of the release of the collateralized amounts is dependent on the timing and closure of each mine and repayment of the facility. In order to release the collateral, the Company must seek approval from certain government agencies responsible for monitoring the mine closure status. Collateral could also be released to the extent the Company is able to secure alternative financial assurance satisfactory to the regulatory agencies. The Company believes there is a reasonable probability that the collateral will remain in place beyond a twelve-month period and has therefore classified these
investments as long-term.
Leases
We determine if an arrangement is, or contains, a lease at the inception date. Operating leases are included in Other assets, non-current with the related liabilities included in Accrued liabilities and Other and Other long-term liabilities. Assets under finance leases, which primarily represent property and equipment , are included in Property, plant and equipment, net, with the related liabilities included in debt, current and debt, non-current on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Operating lease assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease assets and liabilities are recognized at the lease commencement date based on the estimated present value of lease payments over the lease term. We use our estimated incremental borrowing rate in determining the present value of lease payments. Variable components of the lease payments such as maintenance costs are expensed as incurred and not included in determining the present value. Our lease terms include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise that option. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. We have lease agreements with lease and non-lease components which are accounted for as a single lease component.
Reclamation
The Company recognizes obligations for the expected future retirement of tangible long-lived assets and other associated asset retirement costs. The fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation will be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The fair value of the liability is added to the carrying amount of the associated asset and this additional carrying amount is depreciated over the life of the asset. An accretion cost, representing the increase over time in the present value of the liability, is recorded each period in Pre-development, reclamation, and other. As reclamation work is performed or liabilities are otherwise settled, the recorded amount of the liability is reduced. Future remediation costs for inactive mines are accrued based on management’s best estimate at the end of each period of the discounted costs expected to be incurred at the site. Such cost estimates include, where applicable, ongoing care and maintenance and monitoring costs. Changes in estimates are reflected prospectively in the period an estimate is revised.
Foreign Currency
The assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are measured using U.S. dollars as their functional currency. Revenues and expenses are remeasured at the average exchange rate for the period. Foreign currency gains and losses are included in the determination of net income or loss.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company is exposed to various market risks, including the effect of changes in metal prices and interest rates, and uses derivatives to manage financial exposures that occur in the normal course of business. The Company may elect to designate certain derivatives as hedging instruments under U.S. GAAP.
72
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company, from time to time, uses derivative contracts to protect the Company’s exposure to fluctuations in metal prices. The Company has elected to designate these instruments as cash flow hedges of forecasted transactions at their inception. Assuming normal market conditions, the change in the market value of such derivative contracts has historically been, and is expected to continue to be, highly effective at offsetting changes in price movements of the hedged item. For derivatives not designated as hedging instruments, the Company recognizes derivatives as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and measures those instruments at fair value. Changes in the value of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments are recorded each period in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss) in Fair value adjustments, net or Revenue. Management applies judgment in estimating the fair value of instruments that are highly sensitive to assumptions regarding commodity prices, market volatilities, and foreign currency exchange rates. See Note 17 -- Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities for additional information.
Stock-based Compensation
The Company estimates the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) awards using market comparison. Stock options granted are accounted for as equity-based awards and SARs are accounted for as liability-based awards. The value of the SARs is remeasured at each reporting date. The Company estimates forfeitures of stock-based awards based on historical data and periodically adjusts the forfeiture rate. The adjustment of the forfeiture rate is recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period the forfeiture estimate is changed. Compensation costs related to stock based compensation are included in General and administrative expenses, Costs applicable to sales, and Property, plant, and equipment, net as deemed appropriate.
The fair value of restricted stock is based on the Company's stock price on the date of grant. The fair value of performance leverage stock units (“PSUs”) with market conditions is determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model. Stock based compensation expense related to awards with a market or performance condition is generally recognized over the vesting period of the award utilizing the graded vesting method, while all other awards are recognized on a straight-line basis. The Company's estimates may be impacted by certain variables including, but not limited to, stock price volatility, employee stock option exercise behaviors, additional stock option grants, estimates of forfeitures, the Company's performance, and related tax impacts.
Income and Mining Taxes
The Company uses an asset and liability approach which results in the recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences or benefits of temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities, as well as operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse.
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of its deferred tax assets will not be realized. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. A valuation allowance has been provided for the portion of the Company’s net deferred tax assets for which it is more likely than not that they will not be realized.
Revenue Recognition
The Company produces doré and concentrate that is shipped to third-party refiners and smelters, respectively, for processing. The Company enters into contracts to sell its metal to various third-party customers which may include the refiners and smelters that process the doré and concentrate. The Company’s performance obligation in these transactions is generally the transfer of metal to the customer.
In the case of doré shipments, the Company generally sells refined metal at market prices agreed upon by both parties. The Company also has the right, but not the obligation, to sell a portion of the anticipated refined metal in advance of being fully refined. When the Company sells refined metal or advanced metal, the performance obligation is satisfied when the metal is delivered to the customer. Revenue and Costs Applicable to Sales are recorded on a gross basis under these contracts at the time the performance obligation is satisfied.
Under the Company’s concentrate sales contracts with third-party smelters, metal prices are set on a specified future quotational period, typically one to three months, after the shipment date based on market prices. When the Company sells gold concentrate to the third-party smelters, the performance obligation is satisfied when the concentrate is loaded onto the third-party shipping vessel. The contracts, in general, provide for provisional payment based upon provisional assays and historical metal prices. Final settlement is based on the applicable price for the specified future quotational period and generally occurs three to six months after shipment. The Company’s provisionally priced sales contain an embedded derivative that is required to be separated from the host contract for accounting purposes. The host contract is the receivable from the sale of concentrates measured at the forward price at the time of sale. The embedded derivative does not qualify for hedge accounting and is adjusted to fair value through revenue each period until the date of final metal settlement.
73
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company also sells concentrate under off-take agreements to third-party customers that are responsible for arranging the smelting of the concentrate. Prices can be either be fixed or based on a quotational period. The quotational period varies by contract, but is generally a one-month period following the shipment of the concentrate. The performance obligation is satisfied when the concentrate is loaded onto the third-party shipping vessel. The off-take agreement allows for the Company to sell concentrate in advance of shipment and results in the customer taking ownership of the concentrate prior to shipment.
The Company recognizes revenue from concentrate sales, net of treatment and refining charges, when it satisfies the performance obligation of transferring control of the concentrate to the customer.
For doré and off-take sales, the Company may incur a finance charge related to advance sales that is not considered significant and, as such, is not considered a separate performance obligation. In addition, the Company has elected to treat freight costs as a fulfillment cost under ASC 606 and not as a separate performance obligation.
The Company’s gold stream agreement with a subsidiary of Franco-Nevada Corporation (“Franco-Nevada”) provided for a $20.0 million deposit paid by Franco-Nevada in exchange for the right and obligation, commencing in 2016, to purchase 50 % of a portion of Palmarejo gold production at the lesser of $800 or market price per ounce. Because there is no minimum obligation associated with the deposit, it is not considered financing, and each shipment is considered to be a separate performance obligation. The streaming agreement represents a contract liability under ASC 606, which requires the Company to ratably recognize a portion of the deposit as revenue for each gold ounce delivered to Franco-Nevada.
The following table presents a rollforward of the Franco-Nevada contract liability balance:
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||
In thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||
Opening Balance | $ | $ | $ | |||||||
Revenue Recognized | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
Closing Balance | $ | $ | $ | |||||||
In December 2019, the Company received a $15.0 million prepayment for deliveries of gold concentrate from the Kensington mine pursuant to the Amended Sales Contract (as defined below). The Company expects to recognize the full value of the accrued liability by June 2020 when it satisfies the performance obligation of transferring control of the concentrate to the customer. See Note 21 -- Commitments and Contingencies for additional detail.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases,” which required lessees to recognize assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by most leases on the balance sheet. These changes became effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning January 1, 2019 and the Company adopted it using the cumulative-effect adjustment transition method approved by the FASB in July 2018, which did not require the Company to recast the comparative periods presented when transitioning to the new guidance on January 1, 2019. The Company elected to utilize the transition related practical expedients permitted by the new standard. In addition to existing capital leases and other financing obligations, the adoption of the new standard resulted in the recognition of additional right-of-use assets and lease liabilities related to operating leases of approximately $65.0 million. These changes did not materially impact the Company’s consolidated net income, financial position or cash flows.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326)”. The new standard is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The standard replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology under current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires the use of a forward-looking expected credit loss model for accounts receivables, loans, and other financial instruments. The standard requires a modified retrospective approach through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. We plan to adopt the new credit loss standard effective January 1, 2020. We do not expect the new credit loss standard to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, “Income Taxes - Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (Topic 740)” which is intended to simplify various aspects related to accounting for income taxes. ASU 2019-12 removes certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740 and also clarifies and amends existing guidance to improve consistent application. ASU 2019-12 will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2020 (January 1, 2021 for the Company). Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2019-12 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
74
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 3 – SEGMENT REPORTING
The Company’s operating segments include the Palmarejo complex, and the Rochester, Kensington, Wharf and Silvertip mines. Except for the Silvertip mine, all operating segments are engaged in the discovery, mining, and production of gold and/or silver. The Silvertip mine is engaged in the discovery, mining, and production of silver, zinc and lead. Silvertip commenced commercial production in September 2018. Other includes the Sterling/Crown project and La Preciosa project, other mineral interests, strategic equity investments, corporate office, elimination of intersegment transactions, and other items necessary to reconcile to consolidated amounts.
The Company determined that the disposition in the first quarter of 2018 of Empresa Minera Manquiri S.A., a Bolivian Sociedad anonima (“Manquiri”), which operates the San Bartolomé mine, represented a strategic shift to a North America-focused mining portfolio and had significant effect on the entity's results and operations; therefore, the results of operations are presented as discontinued operations in Other for all periods presented.
Financial information relating to the Company’s segments is as follows (in thousands):
Year ended December 31, 2019 | Palmarejo | Rochester | Kensington | Wharf | Silvertip (3) | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gold sales | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||
Silver sales | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Zinc sales | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lead sales | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metal sales | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs and Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs applicable to sales(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Write-downs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other operating expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss on debt extinguishment | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value adjustments, net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||
Other, net | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Income and mining tax (expense) benefit | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||
Segment assets(2) | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Excludes amortization
(2) Segment assets include receivables, prepaids, inventories, property, plant and equipment, and mineral interests
(3) Subsequent to the end of the period covered by this Report, the Company made the decision to temporarily suspend mining and processing activities at Silvertip as a result of further deterioration in zinc and lead market conditions as well as processing facility-related challenges. The Company plans to (i) double its exploration investment in 2020 to potentially further expand the mineralized material and extend the mine life, and (ii) pursue a mill expansion to improve the asset’s cost structure and its ability to deliver sustainable cash flow
75
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Year ended December 31, 2018 | Palmarejo | Rochester | Kensington | Wharf | Silvertip | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gold sales | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
Silver sales | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Zinc sales | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lead sales | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metal sales | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs and Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs applicable to sales(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other operating expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value adjustments, net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||
Other, net | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
Income and mining tax (expense) benefit | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
Segment assets(2) | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Excludes amortization
(2) Segment assets include receivables, prepaids, inventories, property, plant and equipment, and mineral interests
Year ended December 31, 2017 | Palmarejo | Rochester | Kensington | Wharf | Silvertip | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gold sales | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
Silver sales | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metal sales | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs and Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs applicable to sales(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other operating expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss on debt extinguishment | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value adjustments, net | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||
Other, net | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Income and mining tax (expense) benefit | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Segment assets(2) | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Excludes amortization
(2) Segment assets include receivables, prepaids, inventories, property, plant and equipment, and mineral interests
76
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Assets | December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | |||||
Total assets for reportable segments | $ | $ | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | |||||||
Other assets | |||||||
Total consolidated assets | $ | $ | |||||
Geographic Information
Long-Lived Assets | December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | |||||
United States | $ | $ | |||||
Mexico | |||||||
Canada | |||||||
Other | |||||||
Total | $ | $ | |||||
Revenue | Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||
2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
United States | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||
Mexico | |||||||||||
Canada | |||||||||||
Australia | |||||||||||
Total | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||
The Company's doré, as well as the concentrate product produced by the Wharf mine, is refined into gold and silver
bullion according to benchmark standards set by the LBMA, which regulates the acceptable requirements for bullion traded in the London precious metals markets. The Company then sells its gold and silver bullion to multi-national banks, bullion trading houses, and refiners across the globe. The Company had eight trading counterparties at December 31, 2019. The Company's sales of doré or concentrate product produced by the Palmarejo, Rochester, and Wharf mines amounted to approximately 68 %, 77 %, and 78 % of total metal sales for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. In November 2018, one of the refiners of the Company’s doré, RMC, a U.S.-based precious metals refiner, filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. See Note 5 -- Receivables for additional detail.
The Company's gold concentrate product from the Kensington mine and the zinc and lead concentrates from the Silvertip mine are sold under a variety of agreements with smelters and traders, and the smelters and traders pay the Company for the metals recovered from the concentrates. The Company’s sales of concentrate produced by the Kensington and Silvertip mines amounted to approximately 32 %, 23 %, and 22 % of total metal sales for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
The Company believes that the loss of any one smelter, refiner, trader or third-party customer would not materially adversely affect the Company due to the liquidity of the markets and current availability of alternative trading counterparties.
The following table indicates customers that represent 10% or more of total sales of metal for at least one of the years December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 (in millions):
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
Customer | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | Segments reporting revenue | ||||||||
Asahi | $ | $ | $ | Palmarejo, Wharf, Rochester | ||||||||
Ocean Partners | Silvertip, Kensington | |||||||||||
Techemet Metal Trading | Rochester, Wharf | |||||||||||
RMC | Palmarejo, Rochester | |||||||||||
China National Gold | Kensington | |||||||||||
77
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 4 – IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
During the fourth quarter of 2019, the Company performed a comprehensive analysis of its Silvertip property and determined that indicators of impairment existed, primarily as a result of further deterioration in zinc and lead market conditions as well as processing facility-related challenges. As a result of the impairment indicators, a recoverability test was performed and the Company concluded that the carrying value of the long-lived assets for the Silvertip property was impaired. A non-cash impairment charge of $250.8 million was recorded during the fourth quarter of 2019. The write-down was allocated between Property, plant and equipment, net, Mining properties, net and Other non-current assets, $43.6 million, $201.5 million and $5.7 million, respectively. Subsequent to the end of the period covered by this Report, the Company made the decision to temporarily suspend active mining and processing activities. The Company plans to (i) double its exploration investment in 2020 to potentially further expand the mineralized material and extend the mine life, and (ii) pursue a mill expansion to improve the asset’s cost structure and its ability to deliver sustainable cash flow. See Note 16 -- Fair Value Measurements for additional detail of the assumptions used in the determination of the fair value of the long-lived assets tested for impairment.
NOTE 5 – RECEIVABLES
Receivables consist of the following:
In thousands | December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | |||||
Current receivables: | |||||||
Trade receivables | $ | $ | |||||
Value added tax (“VAT”) receivable | |||||||
Income tax receivable | |||||||
Manquiri Notes Receivable | |||||||
Other | |||||||
$ | $ | ||||||
Non-current receivables: | |||||||
VAT receivable(1) | $ | $ | |||||
RMC Receivable(2) | |||||||
Total receivables | $ | $ | |||||
(1) Represents VAT that was paid to the Mexican government associated with Coeur Mexicana’s prior royalty agreement with a subsidiary of Franco-Nevada Corporation. The Company continues to pursue recovery from the Mexican government (including through ongoing litigation). See Note 21 -- Commitments and Contingencies for additional detail.
78
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 6 – INVENTORY AND ORE ON LEACH PADS
Inventory consists of the following:
In thousands | December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | |||||
Inventory: | |||||||
Concentrate | $ | ||||||
Precious metals | |||||||
Supplies | |||||||
Ore on leach pads: | |||||||
Current | |||||||
Non-current | |||||||
Total inventory and ore on leach pads | $ | $ | |||||
In the year ended December 31, 2019 Silvertip recognized inventory write-downs of $64.6 million, which is recognized in Costs applicable to sales, as a result of lower than expected production levels, grades and recovery rates as well as reduced process plant availability. It is possible that additional write-downs will be required as the Company works to optimize operations at Silvertip.
NOTE 7 – INVESTMENTS
Equity and Debt Securities
The Company makes strategic investments in equity and debt securities of silver and gold exploration, development and royalty and streaming companies.
At December 31, 2019 | |||||||||||||||
In thousands | Cost | Gross Unrealized Losses | Gross Unrealized Gains | Estimated Fair Value | |||||||||||
Equity Securities | |||||||||||||||
Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||
Integra Resources Corp. | |||||||||||||||
Rockhaven Resources Ltd. | ( | ) | |||||||||||||
Other | ( | ) | |||||||||||||
Equity securities | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | |||||||||
At December 31, 2018 | |||||||||||||||
In thousands | Cost | Gross Unrealized Losses | Gross Unrealized Gains | Estimated Fair Value | |||||||||||
Equity Securities | |||||||||||||||
Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||
Rockhaven Resources, Ltd. | ( | ) | |||||||||||||
Other | ( | ) | |||||||||||||
Equity securities | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | |||||||||
Debt Securities | |||||||||||||||
Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | |||||||||
Equity and debt securities | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | |||||||||
79
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table presents the disaggregated gain (loss) on equity securities recognized in Income (loss) from continuing operations on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income:
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||
In thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||
Net gain (loss) | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||
Less: Realized (gain) loss | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||
Unrealized gain (loss) | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||
The Company performs a quarterly assessment on its debt securities with unrealized losses to determine if the securities are other than temporarily impaired. At December 31, 2019, the Company had no remaining investments in debt securities.
NOTE 8 – PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:
In thousands | December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | |||||
Land | $ | $ | |||||
Facilities and equipment | |||||||
Assets under capital leases | $ | ||||||
Accumulated amortization(1) | $ | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||
Construction in progress | $ | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | $ | ||||||
(1) Includes $42.2 million and $44.2 million of accumulated amortization related to assets under capital leases at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.
NOTE 9 – MINING PROPERTIES
Mining properties consist of the following (in thousands):
December 31, 2019 | Palmarejo | Rochester | Silvertip | Kensington | Wharf | Sterling | La Preciosa | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mine development | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated amortization | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Mineral interests | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated amortization | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mining properties, net | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2018 | Palmarejo | Rochester | Silvertip | Kensington | Wharf | Sterling | La Preciosa | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mine development | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated amortization | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Mineral interests | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated amortization | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mining properties, net | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
80
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 10 – ACQUISITIONS
In November 2018, the Company and Coeur Rochester consummated the transactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement among the Company, Coeur Rochester and Alio Gold Inc. and one of its subsidiaries (“Alio Gold”) pursuant to which Coeur Rochester acquired all of Alio Gold’s rights, titles, and interests in and to certain real property assets and patented and unpatented mining claims located in Pershing County, Nevada (collectively, the “Lincoln Hill and related assets”). In consideration for the acquisition of Lincoln Hill and related assets, the Company paid Alio Gold consideration of $19.0 million in shares of Company common stock calculated using a five-day volume-weighted average price of Company common stock for a five-trading day period ending on the third trading day immediately preceding the closing.
The transaction was accounted for as an asset acquisition as the Lincoln Hill and related assets do not currently have processes, including experienced personnel, in place to extract the minerals from the ground to produce outputs. As such, the total purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their relative fair values. The purchase price and acquired assets and liabilities were as follows (in thousands except share data):
Common shares issued (4,268,703 at $4.40) | $ | ||
Transaction advisory fees and other acquisition costs | |||
Total purchase price | $ | ||
Total assets acquired | $ | ||
In October 2018, the Company completed its acquisition of Northern Empire, whose principal asset is the Sterling/Crown gold project. Upon completion of the acquisition, each share of Northern Empire common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Plan of Arrangement, excluding shares owned by the Company, was exchanged for shares of the Company’s common stock at a ratio of 0.1850 shares of Company common stock for each Northern Empire common share. Approximately 12.1 million Coeur shares were issued to Northern Empire shareholders (other than the Company) upon closing of the acquisition, representing aggregate value of approximately $73.6 million as of the closing date. Prior to the acquisition, the Company had an existing investment valued at $7.3 million in Northern Empire.
The transaction was accounted for as an asset acquisition as Northern Empire did not have processes, including experienced personnel, in place to extract the minerals from the ground to produce outputs. As such, the total purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their relative fair values. Total consideration and acquired assets and liabilities were as follows (in thousands except share data):
Common shares issued (12,122,683 at $5.27) | $ | ||
Fair value of existing investment in Northern Empire | |||
Transaction advisory fees and other acquisition costs | |||
Total consideration | |||
Total assets acquired | |||
Total liabilities assumed | |||
Net assets acquired | $ | ||
In October 2017, the Company completed the acquisition of JDS Silver Holdings Ltd. and its wholly-owned subsidiary JDS Silver Inc. (together, “JDS Silver”) which, following the closing of the acquisition, were amalgamated with a subsidiary of Coeur to form Coeur Silvertip Holdings Ltd., which owns the underground Silvertip silver-zinc-lead mine in northern British Columbia, Canada. JDS Silver was purchased for approximately $153.2 million in cash and $36.0 million in Coeur common stock. In addition, the Company recorded $47.7 million of contingent consideration payable in cash and common stock upon reaching future permitting and resource declaration milestones (see Note 21 -- Commitments and Contingencies), a portion of which was paid in 2019. The cash consideration was funded with $100.0 million of borrowing under the Facility (as defined in Note 12 -- Debt) and cash on hand. Upon closing, the Company issued approximately 4.2 million Coeur shares to former shareholders of JDS Silver Holdings Ltd.
81
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The transaction was accounted for as a business combination, which requires that assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recognized at their respective fair values at the acquisition date. The acquisition was not significant to the Company’s results of operations, individually or in the aggregate, because the Silvertip mine was in in pre-production. As there were no significant differences from the Company’s historical results of operations, no pro forma financial information was provided. The purchase price allocation is as follows (in thousands):
Common shares issued (4,191,679 at $8.59) | $ | ||
Cash | |||
Contingent consideration | |||
Total purchase price(1) | $ | ||
Total assets acquired | |||
Total liabilities assumed | |||
Net assets acquired | $ | ||
(1) Purchase price has been adjusted for restricted cash acquired due to the adoption of ASU 2016-01.
NOTE 11 – LEASES
Right of Use Assets and Liabilities
The following table summarizes quantitative information pertaining to the Company’s finance and operating leases.
Year Ended | |||
In thousands | December 31, 2019 | ||
Lease Cost | |||
Operating lease cost | $ | ||
Short-term operating lease cost | $ | ||
Finance Lease Cost: | |||
Amortization of leased assets | $ | ||
Interest on lease liabilities | |||
Total finance lease cost | $ | ||
Supplemental cash flow information related to leases was as follows:
Year Ended | |||
In thousands | December 31, 2019 | ||
Other Information | |||
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities: | |||
Operating cash flows from operating leases | $ | ||
Operating cash flows from finance leases | $ | ||
Financing cash flows from finance leases | $ | ||
82
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Supplemental balance sheet information related to leases was as follows:
In thousands | December 31, 2019 | ||
Operating Leases | |||
Other assets, non-current | $ | ||
Accrued liabilities and other | $ | ||
Other long-term liabilities | |||
Total operating lease liabilities | $ | ||
Finance Leases | |||
Property and equipment, gross | $ | ||
Accumulated depreciation | ( | ) | |
Property and equipment, net | $ | ||
Debt, current | $ | ||
Debt, non-current | |||
Total finance lease liabilities | $ | ||
Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term | |||
Weighted-average remaining lease term - finance leases | |||
Weighted-average remaining lease term - operating leases | |||
Weighted Average Discount Rate | |||
Weighted-average discount rate - finance leases | % | ||
Weighted-average discount rate - operating leases | % | ||
Minimum future lease payments under finance and operating leases with terms longer than one year are as follows:
At December 31, (In thousands) | ||||||
Operating leases | Finance leases | |||||
2020 | $ | $ | ||||
2021 | ||||||
2022 | ||||||
2023 | ||||||
2024 | ||||||
Thereafter | ||||||
Total | $ | $ | ||||
Less: imputed interest | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||
Net lease obligation | $ | $ | ||||
NOTE 12 – DEBT
December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||
In thousands | Current | Non-Current | Current | Non-Current | |||||||||||
2024 Senior Notes, net(1) | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||
Revolving Credit Facility(2) | |||||||||||||||
Finance lease obligations | |||||||||||||||
$ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
(1) Net of unamortized debt issuance costs of $3.1 million and $4.1 million at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.
(2) Unamortized debt issuance costs of $2.3 million and $2.2 million at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, included in Other Non-Current Assets.
83
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2024 Senior Notes
In May 2017, the Company completed an offering of $250.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.875% Senior Notes due 2024 (“2024 Senior Notes”) in a private placement conducted pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Securities Act, for net proceeds of approximately $245.0 million, followed by an exchange offer for publicly-traded 2024 Senior Notes. The 2024 Senior Notes are governed by an Indenture dated as of May 31, 2017 (the “Indenture”), among the Company, as issuer, certain of the Company's subsidiaries named therein, as guarantors thereto (the “Guarantors”), and the Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee. In connection with the sale of the 2024 Senior Notes, the Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement. On August 4, 2017, the Company commenced an exchange offer of registered 2024 Senior Notes for privately-placed 2024 Senior Notes which was completed on September 12, 2017. The 2024 Senior Notes bear interest at a rate of 5.875% per year from the date of issuance. Interest on the 2024 Senior Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on June 1 and December 1 of each year, commencing on December 1, 2017. The 2024 Senior Notes will mature on June 1, 2024 and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Guarantors. At any time prior to June 1, 2020, the Company may redeem all or part of the 2024 Senior Notes upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days’ prior notice at a redemption price equal to the sum of (i) 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus (ii) a make-whole premium as of the date of redemption, plus (iii) accrued and unpaid interest and additional interest, if any, thereon, to the date of redemption. In addition, the Company may redeem some or all of the 2024 Senior Notes on or after June 1, 2020, at redemption prices set forth in the Indenture, together with accrued and unpaid interest. At any time prior to June 1, 2020, the Company may use the proceeds of certain equity offerings to redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the 2024 Senior Notes, including any permitted additional 2024 Senior Notes, at a redemption price equal to 105.875% of the principal amount. The Indenture contains covenants that, among other things, limit the Company’s ability under certain circumstances to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends or make other distributions or repurchase or redeem capital stock, prepay, redeem or repurchase certain debt, make loans and investments, create liens, sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of assets, enter into transactions with affiliates, enter into agreements restricting the Company's subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends and impose conditions on the Company’s ability to engage in mergers, consolidations and sales of all or substantially all of its assets. The Indenture also contains certain “Events of Default” (as defined in the Indenture) customary for indentures of this type.
In the third quarter of 2019, the Company entered into multiple privately-negotiated agreements to exchange $20 million in aggregate principal amount of its 2024 Senior Notes for approximately 4.5 million shares of common stock. Based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of each exchange, the exchanges resulted in an aggregate loss of $1.3 million.
Revolving Credit Facility
In September 2017, the Company, as borrower, and certain subsidiaries of the Company, as guarantors, entered into the Credit Agreement with respect to the Company’s revolving credit facility (the “Facility”). The Facility originally had a term of four years. Loans under the Facility bear interest at a rate equal to either a base rate plus a margin ranging from 1.00% to 1.75% or an adjusted LIBOR rate plus a margin ranging from 2.00% to 2.75%, as selected by the Company, in each case, with such margin determined in accordance with a pricing grid based upon the Company’s consolidated net leverage ratio as of the end of the applicable period. In October 2018, the Company entered into an amendment to increase the Facility by $50.0 million from $200.0 million to $250.0 million and extend the term by approximately one year to October 2022. In April and August of 2019, the Company entered into amendments to the Credit Agreement to, among other items, modify the financial covenants to provide greater flexibility in 2019.
The Facility is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company and its domestic subsidiaries, including the land, mineral rights and infrastructure at the Kensington, Rochester and Wharf mines and Coeur Sterling, as well as a pledge of the shares of certain of the Company’s subsidiaries. The Credit Agreement contains representations and warranties and affirmative and negative covenants that are usual and customary, including representations, warranties, and covenants that, among other things, restrict the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to incur additional debt, incur or permit liens on assets, make investments and acquisitions, consolidate or merge with any other company, engage in asset sales and make dividends and distributions. The Credit Agreement contains financial covenants consisting of a consolidated net leverage ratio and a consolidated interest coverage ratio. Obligations under the Credit Agreement may be accelerated upon the occurrence of certain customary events of default.
At December 31, 2019, the Company had all $250.0 million available under the Facility. At December 31, 2019, the interest rate on the principal of the Facility was 4.2 %.
Silvertip Debt Obligation
The Company assumed an existing third-party debt obligation as part of the Silvertip acquisition. In February 2018, the Company voluntarily terminated and repaid the remaining debt obligation of $12.6 million.
84
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2021 Senior Notes
Concurrent with the offering of the 2024 Senior Notes, the Company commenced a cash tender offer (the “Tender Offer”) to purchase the outstanding $178.0 million in aggregate principal amount of its 7.875% Senior Notes due 2021 (the “2021 Senior Notes”). The Tender Offer was made on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Offer to Purchase dated May 19, 2017. Holders of the 2021 Senior Notes who tendered their notes were entitled to receive $1,043.88 per $1,000 principal amount of the Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest. $118.1 million aggregate principal amount of the Notes were tendered and purchased by the Company on May 31, 2017. In accordance with the terms of the indenture governing the 2021 Senior Notes, the remaining $59.9 million aggregate principal amount of the Notes were redeemed on June 30, 2017 at the redemption price of $1,039.38 per $1,000 principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The Company recorded a loss of $9.3 million as a result of the extinguishment of the 2021 Senior Notes.
Finance Lease Obligations
From time to time, the Company acquires mining equipment and facilities under finance lease agreements. In the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company entered into new lease financing arrangements primarily for mining equipment at Silvertip and Rochester. All capital lease obligations are recorded, upon lease inception, at the present value of future minimum lease payments. See Note 11 -- Leases for additional qualitative and quantitative disclosures related to finance leasing arrangements.
Interest Expense
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||
In thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||
2024 Senior Notes | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||
2021 Senior Notes | |||||||||||
Revolving Credit Facility | |||||||||||
Finance lease obligations | |||||||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs | |||||||||||
Accretion of Silvertip contingent consideration | |||||||||||
Other debt obligations | ( | ) | |||||||||
Capitalized interest | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||
Total interest expense, net of capitalized interest | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||
NOTE 13 – RECLAMATION
Reclamation and mine closure costs are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements. Management estimates costs associated with reclamation of mining properties. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and assumptions, and future expenditures could differ from current estimates.
Changes to the Company’s asset retirement obligations for its operating sites are as follows:
Year ended December 31, | |||||||
In thousands | 2019 | 2018 | |||||
Asset retirement obligation - Beginning | $ | $ | |||||
Accretion | |||||||
Additions and changes in estimates | ( | ) | |||||
Settlements | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||
Asset retirement obligation - Ending | $ | $ | |||||
85
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 14 – INCOME AND MINING TAXES
The components of Income (loss) before income taxes are below:
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||
In thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||
United States | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||
Foreign | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||
Total | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||
The components of the consolidated Income and mining tax (expense) benefit from continuing operations are below:
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||
In thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||
Current: | |||||||||||
United States | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ||||||
United States — State mining taxes | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||
United States — Foreign withholding tax | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||
Canada | |||||||||||
Mexico | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||
Other | ( | ) | |||||||||
Deferred: | |||||||||||
United States | |||||||||||
United States — State mining taxes | |||||||||||
Canada | |||||||||||
Mexico | |||||||||||
Other | ( | ) | |||||||||
Income tax (expense) benefit | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | ||||||
86
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company’s Income and mining tax benefit (expense) differed from the amounts computed by applying the United States statutory corporate income tax rate for the following reasons:
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||
In thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||
Income and mining tax (expense) benefit at statutory rate | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | ||||||
State tax provision from continuing operations | |||||||||||
Change in valuation allowance | ( | ) | |||||||||
Effect of tax legislation | ( | ) | |||||||||
Percentage depletion | |||||||||||
Uncertain tax positions | |||||||||||
U.S. and foreign permanent differences | |||||||||||
Foreign exchange rates | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||
Foreign inflation and indexing | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||
Foreign tax rate differences | ( | ) | |||||||||
Mining, foreign withholding, and other taxes | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||
Other, net | ( | ) | |||||||||
Income and mining tax (expense) benefit | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | ||||||
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are below:
Year ended December 31, | |||||||
In thousands | 2019 | 2018 | |||||
Deferred tax liabilities: | |||||||
Mineral properties | $ | $ | |||||
Inventory | |||||||
Foreign subsidiaries - unremitted earnings | |||||||
$ | $ | ||||||
Deferred tax assets: | |||||||
Net operating loss carryforwards | $ | $ | |||||
Property, plant, and equipment | |||||||
Mining Royalty Tax | |||||||
Capital loss carryforwards | |||||||
Asset retirement obligation | |||||||
Unrealized foreign currency loss and other | |||||||
Royalty and other long-term debt | |||||||
Accrued expenses | |||||||
Tax credit carryforwards | |||||||
Valuation allowance | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||
( | ) | ||||||
Net deferred tax liabilities | $ | $ | |||||
87
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets for which it is more likely than not that the related tax benefits will not be realized. The Company analyzes its deferred tax assets and, if it is determined that the Company will not realize all or a portion of its deferred tax assets, it will record or increase a valuation allowance. Conversely, if it is determined that the Company will ultimately be more likely than not able to realize all or a portion of the related benefits for which a valuation allowance has been provided, all or a portion of the related valuation allowance will be reduced. There are a number of factors that impact the Company’s ability to realize its deferred tax assets. For additional information, please see the section titled “Risk Factors” included in Item 1A. Based upon this analysis, the Company has recorded valuation allowances as follows:
Year ended December 31, | |||||||
In thousands | 2019 | 2018 | |||||
U.S. | $ | $ | |||||
Canada | |||||||
Mexico | |||||||
New Zealand | |||||||
Other | |||||||
$ | $ | ||||||
The Company has the following tax attribute carryforwards at December 31, 2019, by jurisdiction:
In thousands | U.S. | Canada | Mexico | New Zealand | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||
Regular net operating losses | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||
Expiration years | 2020-2038 | 2029-2039 | 2020-2030 | Indefinite | 2020-2022 | ||||||||||||||||||
Capital losses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Alternative minimum tax credits | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign tax credits | |||||||||||||||||||||||
The majority of the U.S. capital losses will expire from 2020 through 2022. Alternative minimum tax credits do not expire and foreign tax credits expire if unused beginning in 2020.
The utilization of U.S. net operating loss carryforwards, tax credit carryforwards, and recognized built-in losses may be subject to limitation under the rules regarding a change in stock ownership as determined by the Internal Revenue Code and state tax laws. Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, imposes annual limitations on the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards, tax credit carryforwards, and certain built-in losses upon an ownership change as defined under that Section. Generally, an ownership change may result from transactions that increase the aggregate ownership of certain shareholders in the Company’s stock by more than 50 percentage points over a three-year testing period. If the Company experiences an ownership change, an annual limitation would be imposed on certain of the Company’s tax attributes, including net operating losses and certain other losses, credits, deductions or tax basis. Management has determined that the Company experienced ownership changes during 2002, 2003, 2007, and 2015 for purposes of Section 382. Based on management’s calculations, the Company does not expect any of its U.S. tax attributes to expire unused as a result of the Section 382 annual limitations. However, the annual limitations may impact the timeframe over which the net operating loss carryforwards can be used, potentially impacting cash tax liabilities in a future period. The U.S. federal tax credits and state net operating losses may potentially be limited as well. We continue to maintain a full valuation allowance on our US net deferred tax assets since it is more likely than not that the related tax benefits will not be realized.
The Company may also experience ownership changes in the future as a result of subsequent shifts in our stock ownership. As a result, if the Company earns U.S. federal taxable income, it may be limited in the ability to (1) recognize current deductions on built-in loss assets and (2) offset this income with our pre-change net operating loss carryforwards and other tax credit carryforwards, which may be subject to limitations, potentially resulting in increased future tax liability to us. Under the new U.S. federal income tax law, federal net operating losses incurred in 2019 and in future years may be carried forward indefinitely, but the deductibility of such federal net operating losses is limited to 80% of future taxable income.
The Company intends to indefinitely reinvest earnings from Mexican operations.
88
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount related to unrecognized tax benefits is below (in thousands):
Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2017 | $ | ||
Gross increase to current period tax positions | |||
Gross increase to prior period tax positions | |||
Reductions in unrecognized tax benefits resulting from a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations | ( | ) | |
Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2018 | $ | ||
Gross increase to current period tax positions | |||
Gross increase to prior period tax positions | |||
Reductions in unrecognized tax benefits resulting from a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations | ( | ) | |
Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2019 | $ | ||
At December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, $2.7 million, $3.8 million, and $4.3 million, respectively, of these gross unrecognized benefits would, if recognized, decrease the Company’s effective tax rate.
The Company operates in numerous countries around the world and is subject to, and pays annual income taxes under, the various income tax regimes in the countries in which it operates. The Company has historically filed, and continues to file, all required income tax returns and paid the taxes reasonably determined to be due. The tax rules and regulations in many countries are highly complex and subject to interpretation. From time to time, the Company is subject to a review of its historic income tax filings and, in connection with such reviews, disputes can arise with the taxing authorities over the interpretation or application of certain rules to the Company’s business conducted within the country involved.
The Company files income tax returns in various U.S. federal and state jurisdictions, in all identified foreign jurisdictions, and various others. The statute of limitations remains open from 2016 for the US federal jurisdiction and from 2011 for certain other foreign jurisdictions. As a result of statutes of limitations that will begin to expire within the next 12 months in various jurisdictions and possible settlement of audit-related issues with taxing authorities in various jurisdictions with respect to which none of these issues are individually significant, the Company believes that it is reasonably possible that the total amount of its unrecognized income tax liability will decrease between $2.5 million and $0.0 million in the next 12 months.
The Company classifies interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense and recognized interest and penalties of $2.3 million, $3.5 million, and $4.8 million at December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2016, respectively.
NOTE 15 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company has stock incentive plans for executives and eligible employees. Stock awards include stock options, restricted stock, and performance shares. Stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 was $9.3 million, $8.3 million and $10.5 million, respectively. At December 31, 2019, there was $6.7 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation cost which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average remaining vesting period of 1.6 years.
Restricted Stock
Restricted stock granted under the Company’s incentive plans are accounted for based on the market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant and vest in equal installments annually over three years . Restricted stock awards are accounted for as equity awards. Holders of restricted stock are entitled to vote the shares and to receive any dividends declared on the shares.
89
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table summarizes restricted stock activity for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017:
Restricted Stock | ||||||
Number of Shares | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | |||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2016 | ||||||
Granted | ||||||
Vested | ( | ) | ||||
Canceled/Forfeited | ( | ) | ||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2017 | ||||||
Granted | ||||||
Vested | ( | ) | ||||
Canceled/Forfeited | ( | ) | ||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2018 | ||||||
Granted | ||||||
Vested | ( | ) | ||||
Canceled/Forfeited | ( | ) | ||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2019 | $ | |||||
At December 31, 2019, there was $3.8 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock awards to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.4 years.
Performance Shares
Performance shares granted under the Company’s incentive plans are accounted for as equity awards at fair value using a Monte Carlo simulation valuation model. Performance shares granted during and subsequent to 2018 will vest at the end of a three-year service period if internal performance metrics are met, with the number of shares vesting impacted by the inclusion of a modifier based upon a relative stockholder return metric. The relative stockholder return metric is included in the determination of the grant date fair value of the performance shares however the recognition of compensation cost for performance share awards is based on the results of the internal performance metrics. Outstanding performance shares granted prior to 2018 will vest at the end of a three-year service period if relative stockholder return and internal performance metrics are met. The existence of a market condition requires recognition of compensation cost for the performance share awards over the requisite period regardless of whether the relative stockholder return metric is met.
90
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table summarizes performance shares activity for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017:
Performance Shares | |||||
Number of Shares | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | ||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2016 | |||||
Granted | |||||
Vested | ( | ) | |||
Canceled/Forfeited | ( | ) | |||
Outstanding at December 31, 2017 | |||||
Granted (1) | |||||
Vested | ( | ) | |||
Canceled/Forfeited | ( | ) | |||
Outstanding at December 31, 2018 | |||||
Granted (2) | |||||
Vested | ( | ) | |||
Canceled/Forfeited (2) | ( | ) | |||
Outstanding at December 31, 2019 | |||||
(1) Includes 461,242 additional shares granted in connection with the vesting of the 2015 award in 2018 due to above-target performance in accordance with the terms of the awards.
(2) Includes 207,264 additional shares granted and 300,267 shares cancelled in connection with the vesting of the 2016 award in 2019 due to above-target and below target performance, respectively, in accordance with the terms of the award.
At December 31, 2019, there was $2.9 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to performance shares to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.9 years.
Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights
Stock options and stock appreciation rights (SARs) granted under the Company’s incentive plans vest over three years and are exercisable over a period not to exceed ten years from the grant date. The exercise price of stock options is equal to the fair market value of the shares on the date of the grant. The value of each stock option award is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Stock options are accounted for as equity awards and SARs are accounted for as liability awards and remeasured at each reporting date. SARs, when vested, provide the participant the right to receive cash equal to the excess of the market price of the shares over the exercise price when exercised.
The following table sets forth the weighted average fair value of stock options and the assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the stock options using the Black-Scholes option valuation model:
2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Weighted average fair value of stock options granted | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||
Volatility | % | % | |||||||||
Expected life in years | |||||||||||
Risk-free interest rate | % | % | |||||||||
Dividend yield | |||||||||||
91
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table summarizes stock option and SAR activity for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017:
Stock Options | SARs | ||||||||||
Shares | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Shares | Weighted Average Exercise Price | ||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2016 | |||||||||||
Granted | |||||||||||
Exercised | ( | ) | |||||||||
Canceled/forfeited | ( | ) | |||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2017 | |||||||||||
Granted | |||||||||||
Exercised | ( | ) | |||||||||
Canceled/forfeited | ( | ) | |||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2018 | |||||||||||
Exercised | ( | ) | |||||||||
Canceled/forfeited | ( | ) | |||||||||
Expired | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2019 | |||||||||||
The following table summarizes outstanding stock options as of December 31, 2019.
Range of Exercise Price | Number Outstanding | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands) | ||||||||
$ 0.00-$10.00 | $ | — | ||||||||||
$10.00-$20.00 | $ | — | ||||||||||
$20.00-$30.00 | $ | — | ||||||||||
Outstanding | $ | $ | ||||||||||
Vested and expected to vest | $ | $ | ||||||||||
Exercisable | $ | $ | ||||||||||
The total intrinsic value of options exercised for the year ended December 31, 2019 was nil . Cash received from options exercised for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $0.1 million for which there was no related tax benefit. The grant date fair value for stock options vested during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 was nil , $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively.
NOTE 16 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||
In thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on equity securities | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||
Realized gain (loss) on equity securities | |||||||||||
Zinc options | |||||||||||
Interest rate swap, net | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||
Other | — | — | (864 | ) | |||||||
Fair value adjustments, net | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | ||||||
Accounting standards establish a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1), secondary priority to quoted prices in inactive markets or observable inputs (Level 2), and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3).
92
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table presents the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually) by level within the fair value hierarchy. Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement:
Fair Value at December 31, 2019 | |||||||||||||||
In thousands | Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||||||||
Equity securities | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||
Other derivative instruments, net | |||||||||||||||
$ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
Liabilities: | |||||||||||||||
Silvertip contingent consideration | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||
Other derivative instruments, net | |||||||||||||||
$ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
Fair Value at December 31, 2018 | |||||||||||||||
In thousands | Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||||||||
Equity and debt securities | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||
Other derivative instruments, net | |||||||||||||||
$ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
Liabilities: | |||||||||||||||
Silvertip contingent consideration | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||
Other derivative instruments, net | |||||||||||||||
$ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
The Company’s investments in equity securities are recorded at fair market value in the financial statements based primarily on quoted market prices. Such instruments are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Quoted market prices are not available for certain debt securities; these securities are valued using pricing models, which require the use of observable and unobservable inputs, and are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
The Company’s other derivative instruments, net, include concentrate and certain doré sales contracts, gold and zinc hedges, and an interest rate swap which are valued using pricing models with inputs derived from observable market data, including contractual terms, forward market prices, yield curves, credit spreads, and other unobservable inputs. The model inputs can generally be verified and do not involve significant management judgment. Such instruments are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
In July 2017, the Company sold the Endeavor Silver Stream and remaining non-core royalties to Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (“Metalla”) for total consideration of $13.0 million, including a $6.7 million convertible debenture. The convertible debenture bears interest at a rate of 5% payable semi-annually, and is convertible into Metalla shares in connection with future equity financings or asset acquisitions by Metalla at the then-current price to maintain the Company’s approximate 19.9% ownership of Metalla. During 2018, Metalla completed a number of equity-based transactions, triggering the top-up clause in the convertible debenture, resulting in the conversion of $4.4 million of debt into 7.4 million shares of Metalla common stock during 2018. The fair value of the convertible debenture is estimated based on observable and unobservable data including yield curves and credit spreads. Therefore, the Company classifies the convertible debenture in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The convertible debenture was due to mature in June 30, 2027, however, through a combination of principal repayments and conversions into Metalla shares, the convertible debenture was extinguished in February 2019.
In October 2017, the Company acquired the Silvertip mine from shareholders of JDS Silver Holdings Ltd (the “Silvertip Acquisition”). The consideration for the Silvertip Acquisition includes two $25.0 million contingent payments, which were payable in cash and common stock upon reaching a future permitting milestone and resource declaration milestone, respectively. The fair value of the Silvertip contingent consideration is estimated based on an estimated discount rate of 2.5 % for the contingent permitting payment and 2.9 % for the contingent resource declaration payment and is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. During 2019, the Company paid the $25.0 million due for the permitting milestone in the form of cash and common stock and, subsequent to the end of the period covered by this Report, the Company paid the $25.0 million due for the resource declaration milestone in the form of cash and common stock.
93
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
No assets or liabilities were transferred between fair value levels in the year ended December 31, 2019.
The following tables present the changes in the fair value of the Company's Level 3 financial assets and liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
Year Ended December 31, 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||
In thousands | Balance at the beginning of the period | Revaluation | Settlements | Accretion | Balance at the end of the period | ||||||||||||||
Liabilities: | |||||||||||||||||||
Silvertip contingent consideration | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||
In thousands | Balance at the beginning of the period | Revaluation | Settlements | Accretion | Balance at the end of the period | ||||||||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||||||||||||
Equity and debt securities | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ||||||||||
Liabilities: | |||||||||||||||||||
Silvertip contingent consideration | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
The following table sets forth the quantitative and qualitative information related to the unobservable inputs used in the calculation of the Company's non-recurring Level 3 fair value measurements:
Description | Valuation technique | Unobservable input | Range / Weighted Average |
Property, plant, and equipment, Mining properties and Right of Use Assets | Discounted cash flow | Discount rate | |
Long-term silver price per Oz | $ | ||
Long-term zinc price per pound | $ | ||
Long-term lead price per pound | $ | ||
The fair value of financial assets and liabilities carried at book value in the financial statements at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 is presented in the following table:
December 31, 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||
In thousands | Book Value | Fair Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||||||
Liabilities: | |||||||||||||||||||
2024 Senior Notes(1) | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
Revolving Credit Facility(2) | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
(1) Net of unamortized debt issuance costs of $3.1 million.
(2) Unamortized debt issuance costs of $2.3 million included in Other Non-Current Assets.
94
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||
In thousands | Book Value | Fair Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||||||||||||
Manquiri Notes Receivable | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
Liabilities: | |||||||||||||||||||
2024 Senior Notes(1) | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
Revolving Credit Facility(2) | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
(1) Net of unamortized debt issuance costs of $4.1 million.
(2) Unamortized debt issuance costs of $2.2 million included in Other Non-Current Assets.
The fair value of the 2024 Senior Notes was estimated using quoted market prices. The fair value of the Revolving Credit Facility approximates book value as the liability is secured, has a variable interest rate, and lacks significant credit concerns.
NOTE 17 – DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS & HEDGING ACTIVITIES
The Company is exposed to various market risks, including the effect of changes in metal prices and interest rates, and uses derivatives to manage financial exposures that occur in the normal course of business. The Company does not hold or issue derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.
The Company may elect to designate certain derivatives as hedging instruments under U.S. GAAP. The Company formally documents all relationships between designated hedging instruments and hedged items as well as its risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking hedge transactions. This process includes linking all derivatives designated as hedges to either recognized assets or liabilities or forecasted transactions and assessing, both at inception and on an ongoing basis, the effectiveness of the hedging relationships.
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Provisional Metal Sales
The Company enters into sales contracts with third-party smelters, refiners and off-take customers which, in some cases, provide for a provisional payment based upon preliminary assays and quoted metal prices. The provisionally priced sales contracts contain an embedded derivative that is required to be separated from the host contract for accounting purposes. The host contract is the receivable recorded at the forward price at the time of sale. The embedded derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting and are marked to market through earnings each period until final settlement.
Interest Rate Swap
The Company enters into interest rate swap contracts in which it receives variable-rate interest and pays fixed-rate interest. The Company uses these instruments to manage its exposure to changes in interest rates related to the Facility (see Note 12-- Debt) and does not designate the instruments as hedges from an accounting standpoint and does not apply hedge accounting. The notional amount is used to measure interest to be paid or received.
During the second quarter of 2019, an interest rate swap derivative instrument, with a notional amount of $50.0 million, expired and was replaced with an instrument with a notional amount of $75.0 million, which became effective in June 2019, covered a contractual term of six months and net settled monthly. The Company had no outstanding interest rate swap contracts at December 31, 2019.
95
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
At December 31, 2019, the Company had the following derivative instruments that settle as follows:
In thousands except average prices and notional ounces | 2020 | Thereafter | |||||
Provisional silver sales contracts | $ | $ | |||||
Average silver price per ounce | $ | $ | |||||
Notional ounces | |||||||
Provisional gold sales contracts | $ | $ | |||||
Average gold price per ounce | $ | $ | |||||
Notional ounces | |||||||
Provisional zinc sales contracts | $ | $ | |||||
Average zinc price per pound | $ | $ | |||||
Notional pounds | |||||||
Provisional lead sales contracts | $ | $ | |||||
Average lead price per pound | $ | $ | |||||
Notional pounds | |||||||
The following summarizes the classification of the fair value of the derivative instruments:
December 31, 2019 | |||||||
In thousands | Prepaid expenses and other | Accrued liabilities and other | |||||
Provisional metal sales contracts | $ | $ | |||||
December 31, 2018 | |||||||
In thousands | Prepaid expenses and other | Accrued liabilities and other | |||||
Provisional metal sales contracts | $ | $ | |||||
Zinc options | — | ||||||
Interest rate swaps | — | ||||||
$ | $ | ||||||
The following represent mark-to-market gains (losses) on derivative instruments for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 and 2018, respectively (in thousands):
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
Financial statement line | Derivative | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||
Revenue | Provisional metal sales contracts | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||
Fair value adjustments, net | Zinc options | |||||||||||
Fair value adjustments, net | Interest rate swaps | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||
$ | $ | $ | ||||||||||
Derivatives Designated as Cash Flow Hedging Strategies
To protect the Company’s exposure to fluctuations in metal prices, in the third quarter of 2019, the Company entered into Asian (or average value) put and call option contracts in net-zero-cost collar arrangements on a volume of 21,000 ounces of gold per month for the last 4 months of 2019 and 12,000 ounces of gold per month for the first 8 months of 2020. The contracts are net cash settled monthly and, if the price of gold at the time of expiration is between the put and call prices, would expire at no cost to the Company. The Company has elected to designate these instruments as cash flow hedges of forecasted transactions at their inception.
At December 31, 2019, the Company had the following derivative cash flow hedge instruments that settle as follows:
96
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
In thousands except average prices and notional ounces | 2020 | ||
Gold put options | |||
Average gold strike price per ounce | $ | ||
Notional ounces | |||
Gold call options | |||
Average gold strike price per ounce | $ | ||
Notional ounces | |||
The effective portions of cash flow hedges are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. Deferred gains and losses associated with cash flow hedges of metal sales revenue are recognized as a component of net sales in the same period as the related revenue is recognized. For options designated as cash flow hedges, the total change in cash flows value will be considered when assessing of hedge effectiveness.
The Company has performed an assessment and determined that the terminal value of the hedging instrument and the forecasted transaction match and has qualitatively concluded that changes in the cash flows attributable to the variability of the total sales price of gold are expected to completely offset and the hedging relationship is considered perfectly effective. Future assessments are performed to verify that critical terms of the hedging instrument and the forecasted transaction continue to match, and the forecasted transactions remain probable, as well as an assessment of any adverse developments regarding the risk of the counterparties defaulting on their commitments. There have been no such changes in critical terms or adverse developments and the Company has concluded that there is no ineffectiveness to be recorded.
Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges must be de-designated as hedges when it is probable the forecasted hedged transaction will not occur in the initially identified time period or within a subsequent two-month time period. Deferred gains and losses in AOCI associated with such derivative instruments would be reclassified into fair value adjustments, net in the period of de-designation. Any subsequent changes in fair value of such derivative instruments would be reflected in fair value adjustments, net unless they are re-designated as hedges of other transactions.
As of December 31, 2019, the Company had $0.5 million of after-tax gains in AOCI related to gains from commodity cash flow hedge transactions. The Company does not expect to recognize any of these after-tax gains in its consolidated statement of comprehensive income during the next 12 months. Actual amounts ultimately reclassified to net income are dependent on the price of gold in effect when derivative contracts currently outstanding mature.
The following summarizes the classification of the fair value of the derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges:
December 31, 2019 | |||||||
In thousands | Prepaid expenses and other | Accrued liabilities and other | |||||
Gold zero cost collars | $ | $ | |||||
The following table sets forth the pre-tax gains (losses) on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges that have been included in AOCI and the consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.
In thousands | December 31, 2018 | Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income | Less: Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified From AOCI to Earnings | December 31, 2019 | ||||||||
Derivative contracts designated as cash flow hedges | $ | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||
Credit Risk
97
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 18 - OTHER, NET
Other, net consists of the following:
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||
In thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||
Foreign exchange gain (loss) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||
Interest income on notes receivable | |||||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of assets and investments | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||
Write-down of Manquiri consideration | ( | ) | |||||||||
RMC receivable write-down | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||
Mexico inflation adjustment | |||||||||||
Gain on sale of the Joaquin project | |||||||||||
Gain on repurchase of the Rochester royalty obligation | |||||||||||
Gain on sale of Endeavor stream and other royalties | |||||||||||
Impairment of Equity Securities | ( | ) | |||||||||
Other | |||||||||||
Other, net | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||
In 2019, the Company recorded a write-down of $1.0 million relating to the RMC bankruptcy. See Note 5 -- Receivables for additional detail.
NOTE 19 – NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that would occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, there were 1,137,726 , 1,312,737 and 653,354 common stock equivalents, respectively, related to equity-based awards were not included in the diluted earnings per share calculation as the shares would be antidilutive.
98
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||
In thousands except per share amounts | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders: | |||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | ( | ) | |||||||||
$ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||
Weighted average shares: | |||||||||||
Basic | |||||||||||
Effect of stock-based compensation plans | |||||||||||
Diluted | |||||||||||
Basic income (loss) per share: | |||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | ( | ) | |||||||||
Basic(1) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
Diluted income (loss) per share: | |||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | ( | ) | |||||||||
Diluted(1) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
(1) Due to rounding, the sum of net income per share from continuing operations and discontinued operations may not equal net income per share.
In June 2019, the Company completed a $50.0 million “at the market” offering of its common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “First Offering”). The First Offering was conducted pursuant to an Equity Distribution Agreement, entered into in May 2019 between the Company and Citigroup Global Markets Inc. as the sales agent. The Company sold a total of 16,630,444 shares of its common stock at an average price of $3.00 per share, raising net proceeds (after sales commissions) of $48.9 million in the First Offering. Proceeds from the First Offering were used to repay outstanding amounts under the Facility.
In September 2019, the Company completed a $75.0 million “at the market” offering of its common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Second Offering” and, together with the First Offering, referred to herein as the “Offerings”). The Second Offering was conducted pursuant to an Equity Distribution Agreement, entered into in August 2019 between the Company and Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and BMO Capital Markets Corp. as the sales agent. The Company sold a total of 14,219,677 shares of its common stock at an average price of $5.27 per share, raising net proceeds (after sales commissions) of $73.8 million in the Second Offering. Proceeds from the Offering were used to repay the Facility and for general working capital purposes.
Subsequent to the end of the period covered by this Report, the Company issued 0.9 million shares of common stock to satisfy the Resource contingent consideration (as defined below). See Note 21 -- Commitments and Contingencies for additional detail.
NOTE 20 - SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTOR INFORMATION
The following Consolidating Financial Statements are presented to satisfy disclosure requirements of Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X resulting from the guarantees by Coeur Alaska, Inc., Coeur Explorations, Inc., Coeur Rochester, Inc., Coeur South America Corp., Wharf Resources (U.S.A.), Inc. and its subsidiaries, Coeur Capital, Inc., Coeur Sterling, Inc., Sterling Intermediate Holdco, Inc., and Coeur Sterling Holdings LLC (collectively, the “Subsidiary Guarantors”) of the 2024 Senior Notes. The following schedules present Consolidating Financial Statements of (a) Coeur, the parent company; (b) the Subsidiary Guarantors; and (c) certain wholly-owned domestic and foreign subsidiaries of the Company (collectively, the “Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries”). Each of the Subsidiary Guarantors is 100% owned by Coeur and the guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several obligations. There are no restrictions on the ability of Coeur to obtain funds from the Subsidiary Guarantors by dividend or loan.
99
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
DECEMBER 31, 2019
In thousands | Coeur Mining, Inc. | Guarantor Subsidiaries | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||
ASSETS | |||||||||||||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
Receivables | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Ore on leach pads | |||||||||||||||||||
Inventory | |||||||||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other | |||||||||||||||||||
NON-CURRENT ASSETS | |||||||||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | |||||||||||||||||||
Mining properties, net | |||||||||||||||||||
Ore on leach pads | |||||||||||||||||||
Restricted assets | |||||||||||||||||||
Equity and debt securities | |||||||||||||||||||
Receivables | |||||||||||||||||||
Net investment in subsidiaries | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
Other | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |||||||||||||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES | |||||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
Other accrued liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||
Debt | |||||||||||||||||||
Reclamation | |||||||||||||||||||
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES | |||||||||||||||||||
Debt | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Reclamation | |||||||||||||||||||
Deferred tax liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany payable (receivable) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |||||||||||||||||||
Common stock | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Additional paid-in capital | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Accumulated deficit | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||||||||
100
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
DECEMBER 31, 2018
In thousands | Coeur Mining, Inc. | Guarantor Subsidiaries | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||
ASSETS | |||||||||||||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
Receivables | |||||||||||||||||||
Ore on leach pads | |||||||||||||||||||
Inventory | |||||||||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other | |||||||||||||||||||
NON-CURRENT ASSETS | |||||||||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | |||||||||||||||||||
Mining properties, net | |||||||||||||||||||
Ore on leach pads | |||||||||||||||||||
Restricted assets | |||||||||||||||||||
Equity and debt securities | |||||||||||||||||||
Receivables | |||||||||||||||||||
Net investment in subsidiaries | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |||||||||||||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES | |||||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||
Other accrued liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||
Debt | |||||||||||||||||||
Reclamation | |||||||||||||||||||
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES | |||||||||||||||||||
Debt | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Reclamation | |||||||||||||||||||
Deferred tax liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany payable (receivable) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |||||||||||||||||||
Common stock | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Additional paid-in capital | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Accumulated deficit | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||||||||
101
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019
In thousands | Coeur Mining, Inc. | Guarantor Subsidiaries | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
COSTS AND EXPENSES | |||||||||||||||||||
Costs applicable to sales(1) | |||||||||||||||||||
Amortization | |||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative | |||||||||||||||||||
Exploration | |||||||||||||||||||
Impairment of long-lived assets | |||||||||||||||||||
Pre-development, reclamation, and other | |||||||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses | |||||||||||||||||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET | |||||||||||||||||||
Loss on debt extinguishment | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
Fair value adjustments, net | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other, net | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||
Total other income (expense), net | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income and mining taxes | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||
Income and mining tax (expense) benefit | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||
Equity income (loss) in consolidated subsidiaries | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | |||||||||||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ( | ) | ||||||
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), net of tax: | |||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on debt and equity securities | |||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ( | ) | ||||||
102
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018
In thousands | Coeur Mining, Inc. | Guarantor Subsidiaries | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
COSTS AND EXPENSES | |||||||||||||||||||
Costs applicable to sales(1) | |||||||||||||||||||
Amortization | |||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative | |||||||||||||||||||
Exploration | |||||||||||||||||||
Pre-development, reclamation, and other | |||||||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses | |||||||||||||||||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET | |||||||||||||||||||
Fair value adjustments, net | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other, net | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||
Total other income (expense), net | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income and mining taxes | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||
Income and mining tax (expense) benefit | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
Equity income (loss) in consolidated subsidiaries | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||||||
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), net of tax: | |||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on debt securities, net of tax | |||||||||||||||||||
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||||||
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017
In thousands | Coeur Mining, Inc. | Guarantor Subsidiaries | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
COSTS AND EXPENSES | |||||||||||||||||||
Costs applicable to sales(1) | |||||||||||||||||||
Amortization | |||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative | |||||||||||||||||||
Exploration | |||||||||||||||||||
Pre-development, reclamation, and other | |||||||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses | |||||||||||||||||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET | |||||||||||||||||||
Loss on debt extinguishments | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
Fair value adjustments, net | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
Other, net | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||
Total other income (expense), net | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income and mining taxes | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Income and mining tax (expense) benefit | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Equity income (loss) in consolidated subsidiaries | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||||||||
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), net of tax: | |||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on debt securities, net of tax | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustments for impairment of equity securities, net of tax | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustments for realized gain (loss) on sale of equity securities, net of tax | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||||||||
103
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019
In thousands | Coeur Mining, Inc. | Guarantor Subsidiaries | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||||||||||||
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | |||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of assets | |||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of investments | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||
Sales of investments | |||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from notes receivable | |||||||||||||||||||
Other | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Investments in consolidated subsidiaries | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock | |||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of notes and bank borrowings, net of issuance costs | |||||||||||||||||||
Payments on debt, capital leases, and associated costs | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||
Silvertip contingent consideration | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net intercompany financing activity | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
NET CHANGE IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
104
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018
In thousands | Coeur Mining, Inc. | Guarantor Subsidiaries | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash provided by (used in) activities of continuing operations | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | |||||||||||
Cash provided by (used in) activities of discontinued operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | |||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of assets | |||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of investments | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
Sales of investments | |||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | |||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from notes receivable | |||||||||||||||||||
Other | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Investments in consolidated subsidiaries | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Cash provided by (used in) activities of continuing operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||
Cash provided by (used in) activities of discontinued operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of notes and bank borrowings, net of issuance costs | |||||||||||||||||||
Payments on debt, capital leases, and associated costs | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||
Net intercompany financing activity | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
Other | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
Cash provided by (used in) activities of continuing operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||
Cash provided by (used in) activities of discontinued operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Less net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
NET CHANGE IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
105
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017
In thousands | Coeur Mining, Inc. | Guarantor Subsidiaries | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash provided by (used in) activities of continuing operations | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | |||||||||||
Cash provided by (used in) activities of discontinued operations | |||||||||||||||||||
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | |||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of assets | |||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of investments | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||
Sales of investments | |||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
Other | |||||||||||||||||||
Investments in consolidated subsidiaries | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
Cash provided by (used in) activities of continuing operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||
Cash provided by (used in) activities of discontinued operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of notes and bank borrowings | |||||||||||||||||||
Payments on debt, capital leases, and associated costs | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||
Net intercompany financing activity | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
Cash provided by (used in) activities of continuing operations | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Cash provided by (used in) activities of discontinued operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | |||||||||||||||||||
Less net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
106
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 21 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Palmarejo Gold Stream
Coeur Mexicana, S.A. de C.V. (“Coeur Mexicana”), a subsidiary of Coeur, sells 50 % of Palmarejo gold production (excluding production from certain properties acquired in 2015) to a subsidiary of Franco-Nevada Corporation (“Franco-Nevada”) under a gold stream agreement for the lesser of $800 or spot price per ounce. In 2015, Coeur Mexicana received a $22.0 million deposit toward future deliveries under the gold stream agreement. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, although Coeur Mexicana has satisfied its contractual obligation to repay the deposit to Franco-Nevada, the deposit is accounted for as deferred revenue and is recognized as revenue on a units of production basis as ounces are sold to Franco-Nevada. At December 31, 2019 the remaining unamortized balance was $11.1 million, which is included in Accrued liabilities and other and Other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Kensington Prepayment
In June 2019, Coeur entered into a transaction with an existing metal sales counterparty whereby it amended its existing sales and purchase contract for gold concentrate from its Kensington mine (the “Amended Sales Contract”) to allow for a $25.0 million prepayment for deliveries of gold concentrate from the Kensington mine. The Amended Sales Contract also includes an option to allow for an additional $15.0 million prepayment for deliveries of gold concentrate, which Coeur exercised in December 2019. In 2019, the Kensington mine delivered approximately $25.0 million of gold concentrate to the counterparty. The remaining deliveries of $15.0 million are recognized as a deferred revenue liability and are presented in Accrued liabilities and other on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Under the relevant terms of the Amended Sales Contract, Coeur maintains its exposure to the price of gold and expects to recognize the full value of the accrued liability by the June 2020.
Silvertip Contingent Consideration
A total of up to $50.0 million of contingent consideration, payable in cash and common stock, is payable in conjunction with the Silvertip Acquisition based upon the achievement of two milestones, one of which was achieved and paid during 2019 and the other of which the Company has determined to be probable at December 31, 2019. The first milestone payment of $25.0 million was contingent upon receipt of a permit expansion for a sustained mining and milling rate of 1,000 tonnes per day (the “Permit contingent consideration”). The permit application was submitted to the British Columbia Ministry of Energy and Mining on April 30, 2018 and following its approval in November 2019, the Company provided a payment of $25.0 million in the form of $18.7 million in cash and 1.0 million shares of common stock to satisfy the Permit contingent consideration obligation. At December 31, 2019, based on the Silvertip mine’s total mineralized material (including reserves) (the “Resource contingent consideration”), the former JDS Silver Holdings Ltd. shareholders were entitled to the full second contingent payment of $25.0 million, which has been included in Accrued liabilities and other on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Subsequent to the end of the period covered by this Report, the Company made a payment of $25.0 million in the form of $18.8 million in cash and 0.9 million shares of common stock to satisfy the Resource contingent consideration obligation.
Mexico VAT Litigation
Included in non-current receivables as of December 31, 2019 are $28.0 million due from the Mexican government associated with VAT that was paid under Coeur Mexicana’s prior royalty agreement with a subsidiary of Franco-Nevada Corporation, which was terminated effective in 2016. Under the royalty agreement, Coeur applied for and initially received VAT refunds associated with the royalty payments in the normal course; however, in 2011 the Mexican tax authorities began denying the Company’s VAT refunds based on the argument that VAT was not legally due on the royalty payments. Accordingly, Coeur began to request refunds of the VAT as undue payments, which the Mexican tax authorities also denied. The Company has since been engaged in ongoing efforts to recover the VAT from the Mexican government (including through litigation). Despite a favorable ruling from Mexican tax courts in this matter in 2018, litigation continues, some of which has been determined unfavorably to the Company in 2019 based on interpretations of applicable law and prior court decisions which the Company and its counsel believe are erroneous and which are now under appeal. While the Company believes that it remains legally entitled to be refunded the full amount of the VAT receivable, the Company may continue to experience delays or obstacles in the recovery of VAT and it is possible that some or all of the VAT receivable may not ultimately be recovered as outcomes in Mexican tax courts and the process for recovering funds even if there is a successful outcome in litigation can be unpredictable.
Other Commitments and Contingencies
As part of its ongoing business and operations, the Company and its affiliates are required to provide surety bonds, bank letters of credit and bank guarantees as financial support for various purposes, including environmental remediation, reclamation, and other general corporate purposes. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, we had surety bonds totaling $215.6 million and $216.3 million, respectively in place as financial support for future reclamation and closure costs. The obligations associated with these instruments are generally related to performance requirements that the Company addresses through its ongoing operations. As the specific requirements are met, the beneficiary of the associated instrument cancels and/or returns the instrument to the issuing
107
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
entity. Certain of these instruments are associated with operating sites with long-lived assets and will remain outstanding until closure. The Company believes it is in compliance with all applicable bonding obligations and will be able to satisfy future bonding requirements through existing or alternative means, as they arise.
NOTE 22 – DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
In December 2017, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries entered into a definitive agreement (as amended, the “Manquiri Agreement”) to sell all of the outstanding capital stock of Empresa Minera Manquiri S.A. (“Manquiri”), which is the operator of the San Bartolomé mine and processing facility. On February 28, 2018, the Manquiri Divestiture was completed, and, in accordance with the Manquiri Agreement, the capital stock in Manquiri was sold to Ag-Mining Investments, AB, a privately-held Swedish company (the “Buyer”), in exchange for, among other items, (A) 2.0% net smelter returns royalty on all metals processed through the San Bartolomé mine’s processing facility (the “NSR”) and (B) promissory notes payable by the Buyer with an aggregate principal amount equal to $27.6 million (the “Manquiri Notes Receivable”). In September 2018, the Company entered into the Letter Agreement with the Buyer pursuant to which the total aggregate principal amount of the Manquiri Notes Receivable was reduced to $25.0 million, and the Buyer made a concurrent cash payment of $15.0 million to the Sellers in respect of the Manquiri Notes Receivable. In addition, the Company also agreed to suspend the quarterly payments in respect of the NSR until October 15, 2019 and to forgo any rights to any value added tax refunds collected or received by Manquiri.
On February 28, 2019, the parties executed a letter agreement (the “February Letter Agreement”), which amended certain terms of the Manquiri Agreement. Pursuant to the February Letter Agreement, the Buyer agreed to accelerate repayment of the remaining aggregate $6.0 million owed under the Manquiri Notes Receivable, by making a concurrent cash payment of $2.0 million to the Company in respect of the Manquiri Notes Receivable and agreeing to pay the remaining $4.0 million outstanding principal amount in two equal installments on March 31, 2019 and April 30, 2019, both of which were received. As of the date of the entry into the February Letter Agreement, the remaining obligations under the Manquiri Agreement (including post-closing indemnification obligations) terminated. The Company recorded a $5.7 million gain on the sale Manquiri following the release of the indemnification liability (associated with termination of post-closing indemnification obligations) pursuant to the February Letter Agreement.
In addition, pursuant to the February Letter Agreement, until October 31, 2019 (the “Option Period”) the Buyer had a non-exclusive option (the “Option”) to either purchase or terminate its obligations to pay the NSR, by making a payment to Coeur of $4.8 million (the “NSR Payment Amount”). During the Option Period, the Company’s right to receive NSR payments was suspended. Since the Buyer did not exercise the Option and pay the NSR Payment Amount to Coeur during the Option Period, the Buyer’s obligations to pay the NSR resumed for the quarterly period beginning on July 1, 2019 and ended September 30, 2019. Subsequent to the period covered by this Report, the Buyer purchased the NSR from the Company by making a payment to Coeur of $4.5 million.
The sale of Manquiri and the San Bartolomé mine had a significant effect on the Company's results and operations. Accordingly, San Bartolomé’s operations for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 are classified on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) as Income (loss) from discontinued operations. The major classes of line items constituting the pretax profit or loss for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. are as follows (in thousands):
108
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||
2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Revenue | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||
COSTS AND EXPENSES | |||||||||||
Costs applicable to sales(1) | |||||||||||
Amortization | |||||||||||
General and administrative | |||||||||||
Exploration | |||||||||||
Write-downs | |||||||||||
Pre-development, reclamation, and other | |||||||||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET | |||||||||||
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||
Other, net | ( | ) | |||||||||
Pretax profit (loss) on discontinued operations related to major classes of pretax profit (loss) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||
Pretax gain on the disposal of the discontinued operation | |||||||||||
Total pretax gain or loss on discontinued operations | ( | ) | |||||||||
Income and mining tax (expense) benefit | ( | ) | |||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | ||||||
(1) Excludes amortization.
Net cash provided by operating activities from San Bartolomé were nil and $2.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2017, respectively. Net cash used in operating activities were $11.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. Net cash used in investing activities from San Bartolomé were nil , $28.5 million and $1.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
NOTE 23 – ADDITIONAL BALANCE SHEET DETAIL AND SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Accrued liabilities and other consist of the following:
In thousands | December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | |||||
Accrued salaries and wages | $ | $ | |||||
Silvertip contingent consideration | |||||||
Deferred revenue (1) | |||||||
Income and mining taxes | |||||||
Accrued operating costs | |||||||
Taxes other than income and mining | |||||||
Accrued interest payable | |||||||
Operating lease liabilities | |||||||
Accrued liabilities and other | $ | $ | |||||
(1) See Note 21 -- Commitments and Contingencies for additional details on deferred revenue liabilities
The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash reported within the statement of financial position that total the same such amounts shown in the statement of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
109
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
In thousands | December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | $ | |||||
Restricted cash equivalents | |||||||
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash shown in the statement of cash flows | $ | $ | |||||
The following table presents non-cash financing and investing activities and other cash flow information:
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||
Non-cash financing and investing activities: | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||
Finance lease obligations | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||
Non-cash extinguishment of senior notes | |||||||||||
Non-cash acquisitions and related deferred taxes | |||||||||||
Non-cash Permit contingent consideration | |||||||||||
Other cash flow information: | |||||||||||
Interest paid | |||||||||||
Income taxes paid | |||||||||||
110
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
The following table sets forth a summary of the unaudited quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands, except per share data):
Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | ||||||||||||
2019 | |||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||
Costs applicable to sales | |||||||||||||||
Amortization | |||||||||||||||
Gross Profit | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||
Exploration | |||||||||||||||
Other operating expenses (General and administrative, Pre-development, reclamation, and other, and Impairment of long-lived assets) | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities | ( | ) | |||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | |||||||||||||||
Basic income (loss) per share: | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations | |||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||
Diluted income (loss) per share: | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations | |||||||||||||||
Diluted | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||
Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | ||||||||||||
2018 | |||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||
Costs applicable to sales | |||||||||||||||
Amortization | |||||||||||||||
Gross Profit | ( | ) | |||||||||||||
Exploration | |||||||||||||||
Other operating expenses (General and administrative, Pre-development, reclamation, and other, and Impairment of long-lived assets) | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | ( | ) | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities | ( | ) | |||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | |||||||||||||||
Basic income (loss) per share: | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | |||||||||
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations | |||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | |||||||||
Diluted income (loss) per share: | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | |||||||||
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations | |||||||||||||||
Diluted | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | |||||||||
111
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
Not applicable.
Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures |
(a) | Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by it in its periodic reports filed with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on an evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures conducted by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, such officers concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective and operating at a reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 2019.
(b) | Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting |
The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting. The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 defines internal control over financial reporting in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)
as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and
effected by the Company’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:
• | Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; |
• | Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and |
• | Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements. |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019. In making this assessment, the Company’s management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013). Based upon its assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2019, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.
The effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 has been audited by Grant Thornton LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.
(c) | Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting |
There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the most recently completed fiscal year that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.
112
Item 9B. | Other Information |
Suspension of Mining and Processing Activities at Silvertip
On February 19, 2020, the Company announced its decision to temporarily suspend mining and processing activities at the Silvertip mine in British Columbia, Canada, due to further deterioration in zinc and lead market conditions as well as processing facility-related challenges. The Company expects to incur one-time costs of up to $5.0 million for employee severance and up to $5.0 million for contractual and other costs, which are expected to be incurred during the first half of 2020. Quarterly care and maintenance costs during the suspension are estimated to be $6.0 million. During the suspension, the Company plans to (i) double its exploration investment in 2020 to potentially further expand the mineralized material and extend the mine life, and (ii) pursue a mill expansion to improve the asset’s cost structure and its ability to deliver sustainable cash flow.
Material Impairment
The information contained in Note 4 - Impairment of Long-Lived Assets is incorporated herein by reference.
113
PART III
Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance |
Pursuant to General Instruction G(3) of Form 10-K, the information called for by this item regarding directors is hereby incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed pursuant to Regulation 14A, or an amendment hereto, to be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report under the captions “Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors”, “Information about our Executive Officers”, “Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics” and “Audit Committee Report”.
Item 11. | Executive Compensation |
Pursuant to General Instruction G(3) of Form 10-K, the information called for by this item is hereby incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed pursuant to Regulation 14A, or an amendment hereto, to be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report under the captions “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “2019 Summary Compensation Table,” “2019 Grants of Plan-Based Awards,” “Outstanding Equity Awards at 2019 Year End,” “2019 Option Exercises and Stock Vested,” “Pension Benefits and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation,” “Director Compensation” and “Compensation Committee Report.”
Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
Pursuant to General Instruction G(3) of Form 10-K, certain information called for by this item is hereby incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed pursuant to Regulation 14A, or an amendment hereto, to be not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report under the caption “Share Ownership.”
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2019 regarding the Company’s equity compensation plans.
Plan category | Number of shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights | Number of shares remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a) (1) | |||||||
(a) | (b) | (c) | ||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 291,779 | $ | 14.05 | 4,230,413 | ||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | — | — | — | |||||||
Total | 291,779 | $ | 14.05 | 4,230,413 | ||||||
(1) | Amounts include 1,214,145 performance shares that cliff vest three years after the date of grant if certain market and performance criteria are met, if the recipient remains an employee of the Company and subject to approval of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. |
Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence |
Pursuant to General Instruction G(3) of Form 10-K, the information called for by this item is hereby incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed pursuant to Regulation 14A, or an amendment hereto, to be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report under the captions “Related Person Transactions”, “Committees of the Board of Directors and Attendance”, and “Director Independence”.
Item 14. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
Pursuant to General Instruction G(3) of Form 10-K, the information called for by this item is hereby incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed pursuant to Regulation 14A, or an amendment hereto, to be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report under the captions “Audit and Non-Audit Fees” and “Audit Committee Policies and Procedures for Pre-Approval of Independent Auditor Services.”
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits
(a) The Company's consolidated financial statements and notes, together with the reports thereon of Grant Thornton LLP dated February 19, 2020 is included herein as part of Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data above.
(b) The following listed documents are filed as Exhibits to this report:
2.1 | |
2.2 | |
3.1 | |
3.2 | |
3.3 | |
3.4 | |
4.1 | |
4.2 | |
4.3 | |
10.1 | |
10.2 | |
10.3 | |
10.4 | |
10.5 | |
10.6 | |
10.7 | |
10.8 | |
10.9 | |
10.10 | |
10.11 | |
10.12 | |
115
10.13 | |
10.14 | |
10.15 | |
10.16 | |
10.17 | |
10.18 | |
10.19 | |
10.20 | |
10.21 | |
10.22 | |
10.23 | |
10.24 | |
10.25 | |
21 | |
23.1 | |
31.1 | |
31.2 | |
32.1 | |
32.2 | |
95.1 | |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document. The instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.* |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema* |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase* |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase* |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase* |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase* |
104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and included in Exhibit 101). |
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
116
** The following financial information from Coeur Mining, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, Consolidated Balance Sheets, and Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
Item 16. | Form 10-K Summary |
None.
117
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
COEUR MINING, INC.
(Registrant)
Date: | February 19, 2020 | By: | /s/ Mitchell J. Krebs |
Mitchell J. Krebs (Director, President, and Chief Executive Officer) | |||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
/s/ Mitchell J. Krebs______________________ Mitchell J. Krebs | Director, President, and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | February 19, 2020 |
/s/ Thomas S. Whelan_____________________ Thomas S. Whelan | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) | February 19, 2020 |
/s/ Ken Watkinson______________________ Ken Watkinson | Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) | February 19, 2020 |
/s/ Linda L. Adamany_____________________ Linda L. Adamany | Director | February 19, 2020 |
/s/ Sebastian Edwards_____________________ Sebastian Edwards | Director | February 19, 2020 |
/s/ Randolph E. Gress_____________________ Randolph E. Gress | Director | February 19, 2020 |
/s/ Eduardo Luna_______________________ Eduardo Luna | Director | February 19, 2020 |
/s/ Jessica L. McDonald___________________ Jessica L. McDonald | Director | February 19, 2020 |
/s/ Robert E. Mellor______________________ Robert E. Mellor | Director | February 19, 2020 |
/s/ John H. Robinson______________________ John H. Robinson | Director | February 19, 2020 |
/s/ Brian E. Sandoval______________________ Brian E. Sandoval | Director | February 19, 2020 |
/s/ J. Kenneth Thompson___________________ J. Kenneth Thompson | Director | February 19, 2020 |
118