XML 31 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Derivative Financial Instruments
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2017
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]  
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Palmarejo Gold Production Royalty
In January 2009, the Company's subsidiary, Coeur Mexicana, S.A. de C.V. (“Coeur Mexicana”), entered into a gold production royalty agreement with a subsidiary of Franco-Nevada Corporation that covered 50% of the life of mine production from the Palmarejo mine and legacy adjacent properties. The royalty transaction included a minimum obligation of 4,167 gold ounces per month and terminated upon delivery of 400,000 gold ounces, which occurred in July 2016.
    The price volatility associated with the minimum royalty obligation was considered an embedded derivative. The Company was required to recognize the change in fair value of the remaining minimum obligation due to changing gold prices. For the three months ended March 31, 2016, the mark-to-market adjustment associated with the change was a loss of $4.9 million. Payments on the royalty obligation decreased the carrying amount of the minimum obligation and the derivative liability. For the three months ended March 31, 2016, realized loss on settlement of the liability was $3.0 million. The mark-to-market adjustments and realized losses are included in Fair value adjustments, net.
Provisional Silver and Gold Sales
The Company enters into sales contracts with third-party smelters and refiners which, in some cases, provide for a provisional payment based upon preliminary assays and quoted metal prices. The provisionally priced sales contracts contain an embedded derivative that is required to be separated from the host contract for accounting purposes. The host contract is the receivable recorded at the forward price at the time of sale. The embedded derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting and are marked to market through earnings each period until final settlement. Changes in silver and gold prices resulted in provisional pricing mark-to-market gains of $1.4 million and $0.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
At March 31, 2017, the Company had the following provisionally priced sales that settle as follows:
In thousands except average prices and notional ounces
2017
 
Thereafter
 
 
 
 
Provisional silver sales contracts
$
1,403

 
$

Average silver price
$
17.74

 
$

Notional ounces
79,084

 

 
 
 
 
Provisional gold sales contracts
$
35,849

 
$

Average gold price
$
1,211

 
$

Notional ounces
29,603

 


Silver and Gold Options
During three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company had realized losses of $1.6 million, from settled contracts. At March 31, 2017, the Company had no outstanding gold and silver options contracts.
The following summarizes the classification of the fair value of the derivative instruments:
 
March 31, 2017
In thousands
Prepaid expenses and other
 
Accrued liabilities and other
 
Current portion of royalty obligation
 
Non-current portion of royalty obligation
Provisional silver and gold sales contracts
$
614

 
$
4

 
$

 
$

 
December 31, 2016
In thousands
Prepaid expenses and other
 
Accrued liabilities and other
 
Current portion of royalty obligation
 
Non-current portion of royalty obligation
Provisional silver and gold sales contracts

 
762

 

 


The following represent mark-to-market gains (losses) on derivative instruments for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):
 
 
Three months ended March 31,
Financial statement line
Derivative
2017
 
2016
Revenue
Provisional silver and gold sales contracts
$
1,372

 
$
566

Fair value adjustments, net
Palmarejo gold production royalty

 
(4,878
)
Fair value adjustments, net
Silver and gold options

 
(1,568
)
 
 
$
1,372


$
(5,880
)

Credit Risk
The credit risk exposure related to any derivative instrument is limited to the unrealized gains, if any, on outstanding contracts based on current market prices. To reduce counter-party credit exposure, the Company enters into contracts with institutions management deems credit worthy and limits credit exposure to each institution. The Company does not anticipate non-performance by any of its counterparties.