XML 30 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Fair Value Measurements
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2017
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
 
Three months ended March 31,
In thousands
2017
 
2016
Rochester net smelter returns (“NSR”) royalty obligation
$
(1,200
)
 
$
(2,249
)
Palmarejo royalty obligation embedded derivative

 
(4,878
)
Silver and gold options


(1,568
)
Fair value adjustments, net
$
(1,200
)
 
$
(8,695
)

Accounting standards establish a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1), secondary priority to quoted prices in inactive markets or observable inputs (Level 2), and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3).
The following table presents the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually) by level within the fair value hierarchy. Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement:
 
Fair Value at March 31, 2017
In thousands
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3  
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity securities
$
3,796

 
$
3,517

 
$

 
$
279

Other derivative instruments, net
614

 

 
614

 

 
$
4,410

 
$
3,517

 
$
614

 
$
279

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rochester NSR royalty obligation
9,277

 

 

 
9,277

Other derivative instruments, net
4

 

 
4

 

 
$
9,281

 
$

 
$
4

 
$
9,277


 
 
Fair Value at December 31, 2016
In thousands
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3  
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity securities
$
4,488

 
$
4,209

 
$

 
$
279

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rochester NSR royalty obligation
9,287

 

 

 
9,287

Other derivative instruments, net
762

 

 
762

 

 
$
10,049

 
$

 
$
762

 
$
9,287


The Company’s investments in equity securities are recorded at fair market value in the financial statements based primarily on quoted market prices. Such instruments are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Quoted market prices are not available for certain equity securities; these securities are valued using pricing models, which require the use of observable and unobservable inputs, and are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
The Company’s other derivative instruments, net, relate to concentrate and certain doré sales contracts valued using pricing models, which require inputs that are derived from observable market data, including contractual terms, forward market prices, yield curves, credit spreads, and other unobservable inputs. The model inputs can generally be verified and do not involve significant management judgment. Such instruments are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The fair value of the Rochester NSR royalty obligation was estimated based on observable market data including contractual terms, forward silver and gold prices, yield curves, and credit spreads, as well as the Company’s current mine plan which is considered a significant unobservable input. Therefore, the Company has classified this obligation as Level 3 financial liabilities. Based on current mine plans, 1.6 years was used to estimate the fair value of the Rochester NSR royalty obligation at March 31, 2017.
No assets or liabilities were transferred between fair value levels in the three months ended March 31, 2017.
The following tables present the changes in the fair value of the Company's Level 3 financial assets and liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2017:
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
In thousands
Balance at the beginning of the period
 
Revaluation
 
Settlements
 
Balance at the
end of the
period
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity securities
$
279

 
$

 
$

 
$
279

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rochester NSR royalty obligation
$
9,287

 
$
1,200

 
$
(1,210
)
 
$
9,277


The fair value of financial assets and liabilities carried at book value in the financial statements at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 is presented in the following table:
 
March 31, 2017
In thousands
Book Value
 
Fair Value
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3  
Liabilities:
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
7.875% Senior Notes due 2021(1)
$
176,114

 
$
184,279

 
$

 
$
184,279

 
$


(1)
Net of unamortized debt issuance costs and premium received of $1.9 million.
 
December 31, 2016
In thousands
Book Value
 
Fair Value
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3  
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7.875% Senior Notes due 2021(1)
$
175,991

 
$
184,373

 

 
$
184,373

 


(1)
Net of unamortized debt issuance costs and premium received of $2.0 million.
The fair value of the 7.875% Senior Notes due 2021 (the “Senior Notes”) was estimated using quoted market prices.