XML 103 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Goodwill And Other Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Dec. 28, 2014
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill And Other Intangible Assets
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

We had intangible assets with a net book value of $64.9 million, and $78.2 million as of December 28, 2014 and December 29, 2013, respectively.

The following table reflects the components of intangible assets as of December 28, 2014 and December 29, 2013:

 
 
 
December 28, 2014
 
December 29, 2013
(amounts in thousands)
Amortizable
Life
(years)
 
Gross
Amount

 
Gross
Accumulated
Amortization

 
Gross
Amount

 
Gross
Accumulated
Amortization

Finite-lived intangible assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Customer lists
6 to 20
 
$
79,110

 
$
58,873

 
$
83,063

 
$
56,798

Trade names
1 to 30
 
27,172

 
18,031

 
30,256

 
19,346

Patents, license agreements
3 to 14
 
58,060

 
52,448

 
61,820

 
54,225

Internal-use software
3 to 7
 
24,034

 
14,758

 
24,039

 
12,358

Other
2 to 6
 
7,029

 
6,867

 
7,132

 
6,793

Total amortized finite-lived intangible assets
 
 
195,405

 
150,977

 
206,310

 
149,520

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trade names
 
 
20,512

 

 
21,376

 

Total identifiable intangible assets
 
 
$
215,917

 
$
150,977

 
$
227,686

 
$
149,520



We recorded $12.0 million, $11.8 million, and $14.3 million of amortization expense for 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.

In December 2014, as a result of our annual impairment test of our indefinite-lived trade names, we recorded a $0.9 million impairment charge to the value of the OAT trade name. The impairment charge was recorded in asset impairment expense in the Merchandise Availability Solutions segment on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The impairment is due to minimal anticipated growth in our legacy OAT Asset Tracking business, as our Merchandising Visibility focus shifts towards end-to-end retail inventory visibility solutions.

In the fourth quarter of 2013, through the budgeting process, working capital prioritization activities, and other strategic direction reviews, it was determined that our European ERP system implementation was no longer a strategic priority for 2014 through 2016. Therefore, during the fourth quarter of 2013, we recorded an impairment of $4.7 million recorded in internal-use software related to this portion of the ERP system implementation. The impairment charge was recorded in asset impairment expense on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. We plan to implement our South China ALS ERP system by the end of 2016.

In December 2013, as a result of our annual impairment test of our indefinite-lived trade names, we recorded a $0.1 million impairment charge to the remaining value of the SIDEP trade name. The impairment charges were recorded in asset impairment expense in the Merchandise Availability Solutions segment on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Estimated amortization expense for each of the five succeeding years is anticipated to be:
(amounts in thousands)
 
2015
$
11,350

2016
$
11,015

2017
$
10,604

2018
$
9,530

2019
$
3,665



Historically, we have reported our results of operations in three segments: Shrink Management Solutions (SMS), Apparel Labeling Solutions (ALS), and Retail Merchandising Solutions (RMS). During the third quarter of 2013, we adjusted the product allocation between our SMS and ALS segments, renamed the SMS segment Merchandise Availability Solutions (MAS) and began reporting our segments as: Merchandise Availability Solutions, Apparel Labeling Solutions, and Retail Merchandising Solutions.

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by segments are as follows:

(amounts in thousands)
Merchandise
Availability
Solutions

 
Apparel
Labeling
Solutions

 
Retail
Merchandising
Solutions

 
Total

Balance as of December 30, 2012
$
159,031

 
$

 
$
23,710

 
$
182,741

Segment reallocation
(2,116
)
 
2,116

 

 

Translation adjustments
2,242

 

 
881

 
3,123

Balance as of December 29, 2013
$
159,157

 
$
2,116

 
$
24,591

 
$
185,864

Translation adjustments
(9,511
)
 

 
(2,784
)
 
(12,295
)
Balance as of December 28, 2014
$
149,646

 
$
2,116

 
$
21,807

 
$
173,569



The following table reflects the components of goodwill as of December 28, 2014 and December 29, 2013:

 
December 28, 2014
 
December 29, 2013
(amounts in thousands)
Gross
Amount

 
Accumulated
Impairment
Losses

 
Goodwill,
Net

 
Gross
Amount

 
Accumulated
Impairment
Losses

 
Goodwill,
net

Merchandise Availability
Solutions
$
192,303

 
$
42,657

 
$
149,646

 
$
207,589

 
$
48,432

 
$
159,157

Apparel Labeling Solutions
84,407

 
82,291

 
2,116

 
86,764

 
84,648

 
2,116

Retail Merchandising Solutions
124,127

 
102,320

 
21,807

 
138,098

 
113,507

 
24,591

Total goodwill
$
400,837

 
$
227,268

 
$
173,569

 
$
432,451

 
$
246,587

 
$
185,864



We perform an assessment of goodwill by comparing each individual reporting unit’s carrying amount of net assets, including goodwill, to their fair value at least annually during the October month-end close and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The 2014 and 2013 annual assessments did not result in an impairment charge.

As of the date of our fiscal 2014 annual impairment test, the total estimated fair values for the reporting units in all of our segments substantially exceeded their total carrying values. Based on our most recent goodwill impairment assessment of the reporting units of our segments and our understanding of currently projected trends of the business and the economy, we do not believe that there is a significant risk of impairment for these reporting units for a reasonable period of time. While there is an overall significant percentage excess in comparing the discounted cash flow value to the overall book value of each reporting unit, the amount by which the Retail Merchandising Solutions Europe and International Americas reporting unit fair value exceeds its carrying value is approximately $7 million. Although our analysis regarding the fair values of the goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets indicates that they exceed their respective carrying values, materially different assumptions regarding the future performance of our businesses or significant declines in our stock price could result in additional goodwill impairment losses. Specifically, an unanticipated deterioration in revenues and gross margins generated by our Merchandise Availability Solutions, Apparel Labeling Solutions, and Retail Merchandising Solutions segments could trigger future impairment in those segments.

Determining the fair value of a reporting unit is a matter of judgment and involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. The use of different assumptions would increase or decrease estimated discounted future cash flows and could increase or decrease an impairment charge. If the use of these assets or the projections of future cash flows change in the future, we may be required to record additional impairment charges. An erosion of future business results in any of the business units could create impairment in goodwill or other long-lived assets and require a significant charge in future periods.