-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, QMuDQkFGFrhOWz6uX/YW68L8mckHO/zRnJrzjryhlRSfm6ZS2+VJpbJeefiGM6fj bqZ1TqFvrXBEM7AcPaFlHg== 0000950134-04-013544.txt : 20040913 0000950134-04-013544.hdr.sgml : 20040913 20040913153634 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000950134-04-013544 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 9 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20040630 FILED AS OF DATE: 20040913 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20040913 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000002135 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: SERVICES-COMPUTER PROCESSING & DATA PREPARATION [7374] IRS NUMBER: 510310342 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 0630 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-K SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-12665 FILM NUMBER: 041027533 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 2828 N HASKELL AVE STREET 2: PO BOX 219002 CITY: DALLAS STATE: TX ZIP: 75204 BUSINESS PHONE: 2148416111 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 2828 N HASKELL CITY: DALLAS STATE: TX ZIP: 75204 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: ACS INVESTORS INC DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19940603 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: AFFILIATED COMPUTER SYSTEMS INC DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19721130 10-K 1 d18146e10vk.htm FORM 10-K e10vk
Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

     
Mark One   Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
[ X ]   Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004
    OR
[     ]   Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    For the transition period from _____ to _____.
    Commission file number 1-12665

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware   51-0310342

 
 
 
State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization
  (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

2828 North Haskell
Dallas, Texas 75204

(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)

214-841-6111
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

     
Title of each class   Name of exchange on
which registered

 
 
 
Class A common stock, par
value $.01 per share
  New York Stock Exchange
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
NONE

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements the past 90 days.

             
Yes
  [X]   No   [    ]

     Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K. [  ]

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

             
Yes
  [X]   No   [    ]

     As of September 8, 2004, 121,372,636 shares of Class A common stock and 6,599,372 shares of Class B common stock were outstanding. The aggregate market value of the Class A common voting stock held by nonaffiliates of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. as of the last business day of the second quarter of fiscal year 2004 approximated $6,559,366,000.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement for the 2004 Annual Meeting - Part III are incorporated by reference herein.




AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC.

FORM 10-K
June 30, 2004

         
       
    1  
    8  
    8  
    10  
       
    10  
    13  
    14  
    32  
    33  
    62  
    62  
       
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
    62  
Item 11. Executive Compensation
    62  
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
    62  
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
    62  
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
    62  
       
    62  
 401(k) Supplemental Plan, as amended
 Subsidiaries of the Company
 Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 Consent of Value Incorporated
 Certification of CEO Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
 Certification of CFO Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
 Certification of CEO Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)
 Certification of CFO Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)

 


Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1. Business

General

We are a Fortune 500 and S&P 500 company with approximately 43,000 employees providing business process and information technology outsourcing solutions to commercial and government clients. We were incorporated in Delaware on June 8, 1988 and are based in Dallas, Texas. Our clients have time-critical, transaction-intensive business and information processing needs, and we typically service these needs through long-term contracts.

Our services enable businesses and government agencies to focus on core operations, respond to rapidly changing technologies and reduce expenses associated with business processes and information processing. Our business strategy is to expand our client base and enhance our service offerings through both marketing and acquisitions. Our marketing efforts focus on developing long-term relationships with clients that choose to outsource mission critical business processes and information technology requirements. Our business expansion has been accomplished both from internal growth as well as through acquisitions. Since inception, our acquisition program has resulted in geographic expansion, growth and diversification of our client base, expansion of services and products offered, and increased economies of scale.

Revenues for fiscal year 2004 totaled $4.1 billion. We serve two primary markets, which include government and commercial clients. We are a leading provider of business process outsourcing and information technology outsourcing services to state and local governments. During fiscal year 2004, revenues from our Government segment accounted for approximately $2.4 billion, or 59% of our revenues. Effective November 1, 2003, we completed the sale of a majority of our Federal government business to Lockheed Martin Corporation (the “Divested Federal Business”) for approximately $649 million. Our fiscal year 2004 Government segment revenues include approximately $251.1 million of revenues related to operations divested through June 30, 2004, primarily related to our Divested Federal Business. We provide technology-based services with a focus on transaction processing and program management services such as child support payment processing, electronic toll collection, welfare and community services, and traffic violations processing. We also design, develop, implement, and operate large-scale health and human services programs and the information technology solutions that support those programs. Our Government segment includes our relationship with the United States Department of Education (the “Department”), for which we service Federal student loans, including the Department’s Direct Student Loan program, and which represents approximately 5% of our consolidated revenues.

Our Commercial segment accounted for approximately $1.7 billion, or 41% of our fiscal year 2004 revenues. We provide business process outsourcing, information technology outsourcing, and systems integration services to our commercial sector clients. These services are provided to a variety of clients nationwide, including manufacturers, healthcare providers and payors, retailers, wholesale distributors, utilities, higher education institutions, financial institutions, insurance, and transportation companies. Our business process outsourcing services include administration, human resources, finance and accounting, customer care, and payment services. Our information technology outsourcing services include mainframe, midrange, desktop, network, and web-hosting solutions. Our systems integration services include application development and implementation, applications outsourcing, technical support and training, as well as network design and installation services.

1


Table of Contents

Market Overview

The demand for our services has grown substantially in recent years, and we believe that this will continue to increase in the future as a result of strategic, financial and technological factors. These factors include:

  the desire of organizations to focus on their core competencies;
 
  the increasing desire by organizations and governments to drive process improvements and improve the speed of and reduce the cost of execution;
 
  the desire by organizations to have a workforce that is able to expand and contract in relation to their business volumes;
 
  the increasing acceptance by organizations to utilize offshore resources for business process outsourcing;
 
  the increasing complexity of information technology systems and the need to connect electronically with citizens, clients, suppliers, and other external and internal systems;
 
  the increasing requirements for rapid processing of information and the instantaneous communication of large amounts of data to multiple locations; and
 
  the desire by organizations to take advantage of the latest advances in technology without the cost and resource commitment required to maintain in-house systems.

Business Strategy

The key components of our business strategy include the following:

  Expand Client Base - We seek to develop long-term relationships with new clients by leveraging our subject matter expertise, world-wide data manufacturing capabilities and infrastructure of information technology products and services. Our primary focus is to increase our revenues by obtaining new clients with recurring requirements for business process and information technology services.
 
  Expand Existing Client Relationships - We seek to expand existing client relationships by increasing the scope and breadth of services we provide.
 
  Build Recurring Revenues - We seek to enter into long-term relationships with clients to provide services that meet their ongoing business requirements while supporting their mission critical business process or information technology needs.
 
  Provide Flexible Solutions - We offer custom-tailored business process and information technology solutions using a variety of proprietary and third-party licensed software on multiple hardware and systems software platforms and domestic and international workforces that are able to expand and contract in relation to clients’ business volumes.
 
  Invest in Technology - We respond to technological advances and the rapid changes in the requirements of our clients by committing substantial amounts of our resources to the operation of multiple hardware platforms, the customization of products and services that incorporate new technology on a timely basis and the continuous training of our personnel.
 
  Maximize Economies of Scale - Our strategy is to develop and maintain a significant client and account/transaction base to create sufficient economies of scale that enable us to achieve competitive costs.
 
  Complete Strategic and Tactical Acquisitions - Our acquisition strategy is to acquire companies to expand the products and services we offer to existing clients, to obtain a presence in new, complementary markets and to expand our geographic presence.

2


Table of Contents

  Attract, Train and Retain Employees — We believe that attracting, training, and retaining high quality employees is essential to our growth. We seek to hire motivated individuals with strong character and leadership traits and provide them with ongoing technological and leadership skills training.

Segment Information

During the last three fiscal years, our revenues by segment were as follows (in thousands):

                         
    Year ended June 30,
    2004
  2003
  2002
Government (1)
  $ 2,428,029     $ 2,544,298     $ 2,105,585  
Commercial (2)
    1,678,364       1,242,908       957,333  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total Revenues
  $ 4,106,393     $ 3,787,206     $ 3,062,918  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

(1)   Includes $251.1 million, $679.3 million and $633.7 million of revenues for fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, from operations divested through June 30, 2004.

(2)   Includes $6.9 million, $30.2 million and $63.4 million of revenues for fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, from operations divested through June 30, 2004.

Certain reclassifications have been made to the segment disclosures as the result of the sale of our Divested Federal Business. For further information on our segments, see Note 20 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Government

We are a leading provider of business process outsourcing and information technology outsourcing services to state and local governments. Approximately 59% of our fiscal year 2004 consolidated revenues were derived from contracts with government clients. Effective November 1, 2003, we completed the sale of a majority of our Federal government business to Lockheed Martin Corporation for approximately $649 million. Our fiscal year 2004 Government segment revenues include approximately $251.1 million of revenues related to operations divested through June 30, 2004, primarily related to our Divested Federal Business. Our Government segment includes our relationship with the U. S. Department of Education, for which we service Federal student loans, including the Department’s Direct Student Loan program, and which represents approximately 5% of our consolidated revenues. Our services help government agencies reduce operating costs, increase revenue streams and increase the quality of services to citizens. Government clients may terminate most of these contracts at any time, without cause, for convenience or lack of funding. Additionally, government contracts are generally subject to audits and investigations by government agencies. If the government finds that we improperly charged any costs to a contract, the costs are not reimbursable or, if already reimbursed, the cost must be refunded to the government.

Pricing for our services in the government market is generally determined based on the number of transactions processed, human services cases managed or, in instances where a systems development project is required, for example, in state healthcare, we generally price our services on a fixed fee basis for the development work.

State Healthcare

We design, develop, implement, and operate large-scale healthcare programs and the information technology solutions that support those programs. Today, we operate state Medicaid programs and administer state child health programs, covering approximately 18 million program recipients, process over 450 million Medicaid healthcare claims annually, and disburse more than $42 billion in provider payments. We also operate state pharmacy benefits management programs that assist states in controlling prescription drug costs, pharmacy intervention and surveillance, and the processing of drug claims. We operate state decision support systems that provide the capability to assist states with data collection, fraud and abuse detection and case management. We also assist states in bringing their health programs and information systems into compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”).

3


Table of Contents

Children and Family Services

We are a major provider of child support payment processing services, including high volume remittance processing and disbursements, as well as associated employer outreach and customer service activities. Our services account for 52% of the nation’s child support collections as reported to the Federal government. Within the Children and Family Services area, we also provide electronic benefits transfer, which is the issuance of food stamps and cash benefits through magnetic stripe cards with redemption through point of sale devices (POS) and automated teller machines (ATM).

Transportation Systems and Services

We focus on three areas within our Transportation Systems and Services: Electronic Toll Collection, Motor Vehicle Services and Commercial Vehicle Operations. Within Electronic Toll Collection we offer toll agencies a complete array of services including the operation of the back-office customer service center as well as lane installation and integration. We currently operate the E-Z Pass programs in New Jersey and New York, the largest electronic toll collection programs in the world. Within Motor Vehicle Services, we assist states in the processing of fuel tax and registration revenues. We process approximately 30% of state-issued operating credentials and support the operations of more than 25% of the motor carriers operating in the United States. Within Commercial Vehicle Operations, we offer a nationwide network that electronically checks safety credentials and weighs trucks at highway speed, granting participating truckers authorization to bypass open weigh stations and ports-of-entry without stopping.

Municipal Services

We are a leading provider of full-service information technology outsourcing services to cities and counties throughout the United States. We provide to cities and local municipalities technology-based services and solutions with a focus on program management and transaction processing. We currently process approximately 70% of all parking violations in those cities among the 30 largest U.S. cities who outsource parking violation processing. Those services support the entire timeline of a violation, from citation issuance to final disposition, and include boot and tow programs, customer service, program management reviews, meter installation, maintenance and collections. Our public safety commitment further extends to emergency medical services billing and collections programs and red light photo and speed enforcement services. We provide photo enforcement systems and services to 15 of the 20 largest participating cities in North America. Additionally, we provide government records management via indexing and recording solutions to over 400 counties in 26 states. We offer court and juror management, processing and program management of court-ordered fines and fees, and administrative solutions and systems integration services to approximately 900 state and local clients and more than 800 courts, including the U.S. Federal Courts, eight statewide judicial systems, three U.S. territories, and six nations.

Welfare and Community Solutions

We provide management, operations and systems service offerings to local Workforce Development Boards and Coalitions, thereby creating a government-mandated, integrated One-Stop system linking job seekers and job providers in accordance with government mandated requirements. Through the operation of approximately 99 One-Stop centers across the country, we provide job-related service to assist economically disadvantaged individuals in securing and retaining employment and help employers find and retain potential employees.

Finance and Revenue Solutions

The ACS Unclaimed Property Clearinghouse is a leading provider of unclaimed property collection services, currently serving 49 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. During fiscal year 2004, we identified, reported and collected on behalf of these jurisdictions unclaimed assets owed to approximately 2.6 million owners.

4


Table of Contents

U.S. Department of Education

Our largest contract is with the Department of Education. In November 2003, the Department awarded us the Common Services for Borrowers contract, which includes comprehensive loan servicing, consolidation loan processing, debt collection and portfolio management services. The new, five-year base contract replaced our existing contract with the Department and will integrate a number of services, which will allow the Department to increase service quality while saving overall program costs. The contract is estimated at more than $1 billion in revenue over the five-year period and was effective January 1, 2004. The contract also includes provisions for five one-year extensions. Annual revenues from this relationship represent approximately 5% of our fiscal year 2004 consolidated revenues.

Commercial

Within the Commercial segment, which comprises 41% of our fiscal year 2004 consolidated revenues, we provide our clients with business process outsourcing, information technology outsourcing and systems integration services. Our fiscal year 2004 Commercial segment revenues include approximately $6.9 million of revenues related to our Divested Federal Business.

Pricing for our services in the commercial market varies by type of service. For business process outsourcing services, we typically price these services on the basis of the number of accounts or transactions processed. Our information technology outsourcing services are normally priced on a resource utilization basis. Resources utilized include processing time, the number of desktops managed, professional services, data storage and retrieval utilization, and output media utilized. Our systems integration services are generally offered on a time and materials basis to existing long-term clients under short-term contractual arrangements.

Business Process Outsourcing

Our commercial business process outsourcing practice is focused in five major categories: administration, human resources, finance and accounting, customer care, and payment services. Within administration, we provide healthcare claims processing, mailroom services and total records management. Within human resources, we provide benefit claims processing, employee services call centers, benefits administration, employee relocation, training administration and learning services, payroll services, vendor administration, and employee assistance programs. Within finance and accounting, we provide revenue/invoicing accounting, disbursement processing, expense reporting, procurement, payroll, cash management, fixed asset accounting, tax processing, general ledger and other services associated with finance and accounting that are process and technology sensitive. Within customer care, we provide dispatch and activation services, call center services and technical support. Within payment services, we provide check and credit/debit card processing, loan origination and servicing, electronic benefits transfer, electronic funds transfer and clearinghouse services.

We receive client information in all media formats such as over the web, EDI, fax, voice, paper, microfilm, computer tape, optical disk, or CD ROM. Information is typically digitized upon receipt and sent through our proprietary workflow software, which is tailored to our clients’ process requirements. Utilizing network technology, we have developed expertise in transmitting data around the world to our international workforce. We have approximately 12,000 employees in Mexico, Guatemala, India, Ghana, Jamaica, Dominican Republic, Spain, Malaysia, Ireland, Germany and China, as well as several other countries, that support our commercial business process outsourcing services. A majority of our business process outsourcing workforce is compensated using performance-based metrics, and as a result, their individual compensation varies with our clients’ transaction volumes, together with the quality and productivity generated by the workforce.

Information Technology Outsourcing

We offer a complete range of information technology outsourcing solutions to commercial businesses desiring to improve the performance of their information technology organizations. Our target market for information technology outsourcing services consists of medium-to-large-sized commercial organizations with time-critical, transaction-intensive information processing needs. Our information technology outsourcing solutions include the delivery of information processing services on a remote basis from host data centers that provide processing capacity, network management and desktop support. Information processing services include mainframe, mid-range, desktop, network, and web-hosting solutions.

5


Table of Contents

We provide our information technology outsourcing solutions through an extensive data center network. Our data center networks support our commercial and government clients. Our data centers and clients are connected via an extensive telecommunications network. We monitor and maintain local and wide area networks on a seven-day, 24–hour basis and provide shared hub satellite transmission service as an alternative to multi-drop and point-to-point hard line telecommunications networks.

Systems Integration Services

Our systems integration services include applications outsourcing, technical support and training, as well as network design and installation services. Our systems integration services include the development of web-based applications and web-enablement of information technology assets, allowing our clients to conduct business with their customers and business partners via the Internet. We also provide systems integration services to clients who are deploying client/server architectures, advanced networks and outsourcing legacy applications maintenance.

Revenues by Service Line

Our revenues by service line over the past three years are shown in the following table (in thousands):

                         
    Year ended June 30,
    2004
  2003
  2002
Business process outsourcing
  $ 3,017,699     $ 2,582,773     $ 1,942,865  
Information technology outsourcing
    694,890       492,848       441,249  
Systems integration services
    393,804       711,585       678,804  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total
  $ 4,106,393     $ 3,787,206     $ 3,062,918  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

Client Base

We achieve growth in our client base through marketing and acquisitions of other business process and information technology services companies. We have a diverse client base. Within the Government segment, our clients include a wide variety of state governments, municipal governments and agencies and the U.S. Department of Education. Within the Commercial segment, we serve the major vertical markets that spend heavily on technology including the healthcare, insurance, retail, transportation, higher education, manufacturing and financial industries. Clients may be lost due to merger, business failure, or conversion to a competing processor or to an in-house system. Our business with government clients is subject to various risks, including the reduction or modification of contracts due to changing government needs and requirements. Government contracts, by their terms, generally can be terminated for convenience by the government, which means that the government may terminate the contract at any time, without cause.

For fiscal year 2004, after adjusting for $258 million of revenues related to operations divested during the year, approximately 89% of our revenues were recurring. We define recurring revenues as revenues derived from services that are used by our clients each year in connection with their ongoing businesses, and accordingly, exclude software license fees, short-term contract programming engagements, product installation fees, and hardware and software sales.

Our five largest clients accounted for approximately 14%, 13% and 14% of our fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002 revenues, respectively. Our largest client represents approximately 5% of our consolidated revenues.

6


Table of Contents

Geographic information

Over 98% of our consolidated revenues for fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002 were derived from domestic clients. As of June 30, 2004 and 2003, approximately 94% and 96% of our long-lived assets, respectively, were located in the United States. Of our long-lived assets located outside the United States, the largest concentration is in Mexico, with approximately 1.5% and 1.8% of our total long-lived assets as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Please see “Risks Related to Our Business” for a discussion of the risks associated with our international operations.

Competition

The markets for our services are intensely competitive and highly fragmented. We believe our competitive advantage comes from our use of world-class technology, subject matter expertise, process reengineering skills, proprietary software, global production model, productivity-based compensation and the price of services.

We compete in the government market by offering a broad range of outsourcing services. Competition in the government market is fragmented by line of services and we are a leading provider in most of the areas we serve. Competition in the government market is primarily Electronic Data Systems Corporation (“EDS”), Unisys Corp., Maximus, JP Morgan, Accenture, Citicorp, IBM, Tier Technologies, Transcore, and Convergys.

We compete in the commercial market by offering value added business process outsourcing services and information technology outsourcing services. The competition for our commercial outsourcing services includes EDS, Computer Sciences Corp., IBM, Hewlett Packard, CGI, Hewitt, Convergys, Accenture, Sourcecorp, Inc., Sallie Mae, Perot Systems and in-house departments performing the function we are seeking to outsource. The competition for our commercial business process outsourcing services is most often clients’ in-house departments currently performing the function that they are seeking to outsource. We may be required to purchase technology assets from prospective clients or to provide financial assistance to prospective clients in order to obtain their contracts. Many of our competitors have substantially greater resources and thus, may have a greater ability to obtain client contracts where sizable asset purchases, investments or financing support are required. To maintain competitive prices, we operate with low overhead and maintain a significant client and account/transaction base to achieve sufficient economies of scale.

In the future, competition could continue to emerge from large computer hardware or software providers as they shift their business strategy to include services. Competition has also emerged from European and Indian offshore service providers seeking to expand into North America and from large consulting companies seeking operational outsourcing opportunities. We are also beginning to see the convergence of information technology outsourcing and business process outsourcing. We believe that vendors such as ourselves who have the infrastructure and capabilities to provide both services will benefit the greatest from this emerging trend.

Sales and Marketing

We market our services through subject matter experts and field sales forces. In order to enhance our sales and marketing efforts, we seek to hire sales representatives who have significant technical and subject matter expertise in the industries to which they will be marketing. Many of our existing subject matter experts have served in the industries in which they are servicing. Our sales forces are focused on specific service offerings or vertical markets, allowing our representatives to keep abreast of technology and industry developments.

Employees

We believe that our success depends on our continuing ability to attract and retain skilled technical, marketing and management personnel. As of June 30, 2004, we had approximately 43,000 employees, including approximately 31,000 employed domestically, with the balance employed in our international operations. Of the domestic employees, approximately 200 are represented by unions. Approximately 1,800 of our international employees are represented by unions, primarily in Mexico. We have had no work stoppages or strikes by our employees. Management considers its relations with employees and union officials to be good. Please see “Risks Related to Our Business” for a discussion of the risks associated with our international operations.

As of June 30, 2004, approximately 31,000 employees provide services to our commercial clients and approximately 12,000 employees provide services to our government clients.

7


Table of Contents

Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers and Corporate Governance Guidelines

Our Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers and our Corporate Governance Guidelines are posted on our internet website, www.acs-inc.com, under the Investor Relations and Corporate Governance captions. Information contained on our internet website is not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These documents are also available free of charge to any stockholder upon written request to 2828 North Haskell Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75204, Attention: William L. Deckelman, Jr., Corporate Secretary.

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Reports

All of our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports, filed with or furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on or after May 14, 1996 are available free of charge through our internet website, www.acs-inc.com, as soon as reasonably practical after we have electronically filed such material with, or furnished it to, the SEC. Information contained on our internet website is not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition, the SEC maintains an internet site containing reports, proxy and information statements, and other information filed electronically at www.sec.gov. You may also read and copy this information, for a copying fee, at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 to obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room.

Item 2. Properties

As of June 30, 2004, we have approximately 395 locations in the United States, of which 134 locations are occupied by Commercial operations, 260 locations are occupied by Government operations, and our company-owned facility in Dallas, Texas, which is occupied by primarily Commercial and Corporate functions. We also have 28 locations in 15 other countries, of which 24 locations are occupied by Commercial operations and 4 locations are occupied by Government operations. We own approximately 1.1 million square feet of real estate space and lease approximately 6.4 million square feet. The leases expire from calendar years 2004 to 2018 and we do not anticipate any significant difficulty in obtaining lease renewals or alternate space. Our executive offices are located in Dallas, Texas at a company-owned facility of approximately 630,000 square feet, which also houses a host data center and other operations. We believe that our current facilities are suitable and adequate for our business.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

On December 16, 1998, a state district court in Houston, Texas entered final judgment against us in a lawsuit brought by 21 former employees of Gibraltar Savings Association and/or First Texas Savings Association (collectively, “GSA/FTSA”). The GSA/FTSA employees alleged that they were entitled to the value of 803,082 shares of our stock (adjusted for February 2002 stock split) pursuant to options issued to the GSA/FTSA employees in 1988 in connection with a former technology outsourcing services agreement between GSA/FTSA and us. The judgment against us was for approximately $17 million, which included attorneys’ fees and pre-judgment interest. The judgment was appealed by the plaintiffs and us and the appellate process has now been concluded. As a result of the appeals, the trial court’s judgment was reversed and the case was remanded to the trial court for further proceedings, except that the trial court judgment was affirmed in part as to one of the plaintiffs and the trial court’s dismissal of certain of our affirmative defenses was upheld. The amount of the judgment for the one plaintiff whose judgment was upheld has been settled for $1.3 million. In August 2004, mediation was conducted which resulted in the settlement of claims of the other GSA/FTSA employees. As a result of this settlement, we accrued $10 million in other operating expenses in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2004 related to this settlement and paid $10 million in full settlement of all claims of the other GSA/FTSA employees in August 2004.

One of our subsidiaries, ACS Defense, LLC, and several other government contractors received a grand jury document subpoena issued by the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts in October 2002. The subpoena was issued in connection with an inquiry being conducted by the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”). The inquiry concerns certain IDIQ (Indefinite Delivery – Indefinite Quantity) procurements and their related task orders, which occurred in the late 1990s at Hanscom Air Force Base in Massachusetts. Our revenue from the contracts that we believe to be the focus of the DOJ’s inquiry was approximately $25 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, and approximately $17.2 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 representing approximately 0.7% of our revenue for fiscal year 2003 and 0.4% for fiscal year 2004. In February 2004, we sold the contracts associated with the Hanscom Air Force Base relationship to

8


Table of Contents

ManTech International Corporation; however, we have agreed to indemnify ManTech with respect to this DOJ investigation. We are continuing our previously announced internal investigation of this matter through outside legal counsel and we are continuing to cooperate with the DOJ in producing documents in response to the subpoena. At this stage of this inquiry, we are unable to express an opinion as to its likely outcome. (See Note 2 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the sale of the contracts associated with the Hanscom Air Force Base relationship.)

Another of our subsidiaries, ACS State & Local Solutions, Inc. (“ACS SLS”), and a teaming partner of this subsidiary, Tier Technologies, Inc. (“Tier”), received a grand jury document subpoena issued by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in May 2003. The subpoena was issued in connection with an inquiry being conducted by the Antitrust Division of the DOJ. The inquiry concerns the teaming arrangements between ACS SLS and Tier on child support payment processing contracts awarded to ACS SLS, and Tier as a subcontractor to ACS SLS, in New York, Illinois and Ohio. Our fiscal year 2004 revenue from these three contracts was approximately $67 million, representing approximately 1.6% of our fiscal year 2004 revenue. Our teaming arrangement also contemplated the California child support payment processing request for proposals, which was issued in late 2003; however, we did not enter into a teaming agreement with Tier for the California request for proposals. Based on Tier’s recent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, we understand that on November 20, 2003 the DOJ granted conditional amnesty to Tier in connection with this inquiry pursuant to the DOJ’s Corporate Leniency Policy. The policy provides that the DOJ will not bring any criminal charges against Tier as long as it continues to fully cooperate in the inquiry (and makes restitution payments if it is determined that parties were injured as a result of impermissible anticompetitive conduct). We are continuing our previously announced internal investigation of this matter through outside legal counsel and we are continuing to cooperate with the DOJ in producing documents in response to the subpoena. At this stage of this inquiry, we are unable to express an opinion as to its likely outcome.

On January 30, 2004, the Florida Agency for Workforce Innovation’s (“AWI”) Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) issued a report that reviewed 13 Florida workforce regions, including Dade and Monroe counties, and noted concerns related to the accuracy of customer case records maintained by our local staff. Our total revenue generated from the Florida workforce services amounts to approximately 1% of our total revenue. In March 2004 we filed our response to the OIG report. On May 20, 2004, at a meeting of the Workforce Florida, Inc. (“WFI”) Board of Directors which was attended by representatives of ACS SLS, which is our subsidiary performing these services, a representative of WFI, which is the principal workforce policy organization for the State of Florida and oversees and monitors the administration of the State’s workforce policy as well as the programs and services carried out by regional workforce boards and AWI, indicated that WFI did not see a systemic problem with the performance of these workforce services by ACS SLS and that it considered the issue closed. We were also advised in February 2004 that the SEC is conducting an informal investigation into the matters covered by the OIG’s report. On March 22, 2004, ACS SLS received a grand jury document subpoena issued by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The subpoena was issued in connection with an inquiry being conducted by the DOJ and the Inspector General’s Office of the U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”) into the subsidiary’s workforce contracts in Dade and Monroe counties in Florida, which expired in June 2003, and which were included in the OIG’s report. On August 25, 2004, ACS SLS received a grand jury document subpoena issued by the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida in connection with an inquiry being conducted by the DOJ and the Inspector General’s Office of the DOL. The subpoena relates to a contract in Pinellas County in Florida for the period from January 1999 to March 2001, when the contract expired. We acquired this contract from Lockheed Martin Corporation in August 2001 or approximately five months after the expiration of the workforce contract in Pinellas County. Further, we settled a civil lawsuit with Pinellas County in December 2003 with respect to claims under the services rendered to Pinellas County by Lockheed Martin Corporation prior to our acquisition of ACS SLS (those claims having been transferred with ACS SLS as part of the acquisition), and which settlement resulted in Pinellas County paying ACS SLS an additional $600,000. We are continuing our internal investigation of these matters through outside legal counsel and we are continuing to cooperate with the DOJ, the SEC and DOL to produce documents in connection with their investigations. At this stage of these investigations, we are unable to express an opinion as to their likely outcome.

In June 2004, the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (“MDEQ”) issued a Notice of Violation to ACS Image Solutions, Inc., one of our subsidiaries, that alleges noncompliance with the Clean Water Act and the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The alleged violations relate primarily to the operation of a permitted wastewater treatment system at the ACS Image Solutions in Flora, Mississippi from August 2001 to May 2004. We have implemented a number of remedial measures in response to the MDEQ’s concerns, including closing the specific operation that generated the

9


Table of Contents

wastewaters at issue. We responded to the Notice of Violation by letter dated July 19, 2004, and are currently working with the MDEQ toward a resolution of this matter. MDEQ has stated it will seek penalties. At this time, MDEQ has not provided us with an official penalty demand; however, we believe that any penalties assessed will be immaterial to our results of operations and liquidity.

In addition to the foregoing, we are subject to certain other legal proceedings, inquiries, claims and disputes, which arise in the ordinary course of business. Although we cannot predict the outcomes of these other proceedings, we do not believe these other actions, in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

During the fiscal fourth quarter covered by this report, no matter was submitted to a vote of our security holders.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Our Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

     Our Class A common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “ACS.” The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of our Class A common stock for the last two fiscal years as reported on the NYSE.

                 
    High
  Low
Fiscal year ended June 30, 2004
               
First Quarter
  $ 54.36     $ 42.10  
Second Quarter
    55.08       45.89  
Third Quarter
    57.96       47.72  
Fourth Quarter
    55.16       46.01  
                 
Fiscal year ended June 30, 2003
               
First Quarter
    49.90       34.84  
Second Quarter
    54.00       32.70  
Third Quarter
    56.56       41.16  
Fourth Quarter
    53.00       40.01  

On September 9, 2004, the last reported sales price of our Class A common stock as reported on the NYSE was $55.41 per share. As of that date, there were approximately 120,100 record holders of our Class A common stock and one record holder of our Class B common stock.

Between February 28, 2002 and March 31, 2004, we issued 1,055,968 shares of our Class A common stock to fifteen current or former employees or directors (collectively, the “optionees”) pursuant to the exercise of options granted under our 1988 Stock Option Plan in excess of the amount originally registered with the SEC on Form S-8 filed November 17, 1994 (Registration No. 33-86426). The exercise price of the options exercised ranged from $4.00 to $10.56 per share of Class A common stock and the aggregate exercise price of the options was $9.6 million. We believe the grant of the options and the subsequent issuance of the underlying securities to the optionees was exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 506 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. Each of the optionees had access to sufficient information regarding Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. required to make an informed investment decision and had the requisite sophistication to make an investment in our securities. In addition, some of the optionees are “accredited investors” as defined in Regulation D of the Securities Act.

10


Table of Contents

Under the terms of our unsecured revolving credit facility we are allowed to pay cash dividends. However, any cash dividends paid must be included in our fixed charge covenant calculation under our unsecured revolving credit facility agreement. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will be dependent upon our financial condition, results of operations, contractual restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant. We intend to retain earnings for use in the operation of our business and, therefore, did not pay cash dividends in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

The following table summarizes certain information related to our stock option and employee stock purchase plans.

                         
                    Number of securities
    Number of securities           remaining available for
    to be issued upon           future issuance under
    exercise of   Weighted average   equity compensation plans
    outstanding options,   exercise price of   (excluding securities
    warrants and rights   outstanding options,   reflected in initial column)
Plan Category
  as of June 30, 2004
  warrants and rights
  as of June 30, 2004
Equity compensation plans approved by security shareholders
                       
Stock options
    13,455,710     $ 33.04       3,927,478 (1)
Employee stock purchase plan
    N/A       N/A       1,546,660  
Equity compensation plans not approved by security shareholders
                 
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total
    13,455,710     $ 33.04       5,474,138  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

(1)   These plans consist of the 1988 Stock Option Plan and the 1997 Stock Incentive Plan. No additional shares can be issued under the 1988 Stock Option Plan. Upon exercise the holder is entitled to receive Class A common stock. Under our 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as authorized by our shareholders pursuant to our November 14, 1997 Proxy Statement, the number of shares of our Class A common stock available for issuance is subject to increase by approval of our Board of Directors pursuant to a formula that limits the number of shares optioned, sold, granted or otherwise issued under the 1997 Stock Incentive Plan to current employees, consultants and non-employee directors to no more than 12.8% of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock.

On February 27, 2004, we completed the redemption of our 3.5% Convertible Subordinated Notes due February 15, 2006 (the “Notes”). Holders of 99.9% of all the outstanding Notes converted their Notes to 23.0234 shares of our Class A common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Notes in accordance with the procedures specified in the related indenture governing the Notes. As the result of such conversions, approximately 7.3 million shares of our Class A common stock were issued to such noteholders at the conversion price of $43.44 per share. The remaining Notes were redeemed in cash at 101.4% of the principal amount, resulting in a cash redemption of $269,000.

Our Board of Directors has authorized two share repurchase programs totaling $1.25 billion of our Class A common stock. On September 2, 2003, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to $500 million of our Class A common stock and on April 29, 2004, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized a new, incremental share repurchase program of up to $750 million of our Class A common stock. The programs, which are open-ended, will allow us to repurchase our shares on the open market from time to time in accordance with SEC rules and regulations, including shares that could be purchased pursuant to SEC Rule 10b5-1. The number of shares to be purchased and the timing of purchases will be based on the level of cash and debt balances, general business conditions and other factors, including alternative investment opportunities. We intend to fund the repurchase program from various sources, including, but not limited to, cash on hand, cash flow from operations, and borrowings under our existing revolving credit facility. As of June 30, 2004, we had repurchased approximately 15 million shares at a total cost of approximately $743.2 million. We have not repurchased any shares subsequent to June 30, 2004 through the date of this filing.

11


Table of Contents

Repurchase activity for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 was as follows. Please refer to the discussion above for the cumulative repurchases under our share repurchase program.

                                 
                            Maximum number (or
                    Total number of   approximate dollar
                    shares purchased   value) of shares that
    Total number   Average   as part of publicly   may yet be purchased
    of shares   price paid   announced plans   under the plans or
Period
  purchased
  per share
  or programs
  programs
Inception through March 31, 2004
    8,282,693     $ 50.04       8,282,693     $ 85,556,431  
 
April 1 – April 30, 2004
    1,282,121       49.42       1,282,121       772,200,211  
May 1 – May 31, 2004
    4,524,300       48.79       4,524,300       551,455,037  
June 1 – June 30, 2004
    903,300       49.43       903,300       506,802,627  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total – Quarter ended June 30, 2004
    6,709,721       49.00       6,709,721       506,802,627  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Inception through June 30, 2004
    14,992,414     $ 49.57       14,992,414     $ 506,802,627  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

12


Table of Contents

Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data

The following selected consolidated financial data are qualified by reference to and should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this document. Please see the discussions, “Significant Developments – Fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002,” in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for a description of the more significant business combinations that impact comparability, as well as the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements. All share and per share information is presented giving effect to the two-for-one stock split of our Class A and Class B common shares that occurred February 22, 2002 (in thousands, except per share amounts).

                                         
    As of and for the year ended June 30,
    2004
  2003
  2002(b)
  2001
  2000
Results of Operations Data:
                                       
Revenues (a)
  $ 4,106,393     $ 3,787,206     $ 3,062,918     $ 2,063,559     $ 1,962,542  
Net income (b), (c), (f)
  $ 529,843 (c)   $ 306,842     $ 229,596     $ 134,292     $ 109,312  
Earnings per share – basic (d)
  $ 4.03 (c)   $ 2.32     $ 1.94     $ 1.35     $ 1.11  
Earnings per share – diluted (d)
  $ 3.83 (c)   $ 2.20     $ 1.76     $ 1.23     $ 1.03  
Weighted average shares outstanding – basic (d)
    131,498       132,445       118,646       99,758       98,487  
Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted (d)
    139,646       143,430       137,464       116,456       111,613  
Balance Sheet Data:
                                       
Working capital
  $ 406,854     $ 422,022     $ 388,476     $ 528,563     $ 413,632 (e)
Total assets
  $ 3,907,242     $ 3,698,705     $ 3,403,567     $ 1,891,687     $ 1,656,446  
Total long-term debt (less current portion)
  $ 372,439     $ 498,340     $ 708,233     $ 649,313     $ 525,619  
Stockholders’ equity
  $ 2,590,487     $ 2,429,188     $ 2,095,420     $ 885,515     $ 711,377  

(a)   Revenues from operations divested through June 30, 2004 were $258 million, $709.5 million, $697.1 million, $692.6 million and $847.5 million for fiscal years 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Please see the discussion in “Significant Developments” in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 2 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of divestiture activity.
 
(b)   During fiscal year 2002, we acquired Lockheed Martin IMS Corporation and AFSA Data Corporation. Please see the discussion in “Significant Developments – Fiscal Year 2002” in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 3 of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
(c)   Please see the discussion in “Significant Developments – Fiscal Year 2004” in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion of significant items which impacted fiscal year 2004 results of operations.
 
(d)   Please see Item 5 and Note 12 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of our share repurchase program.
 
(e)   Working capital at June 30, 2000 included $180.3 million of receivables from the divestiture of business units prior to June 30, 2000, and $43.4 million of net assets held-for-sale from business units to be divested subsequent to June 30, 2000.
 
(f)   During fiscal years 2001 and 2000, we had after-tax goodwill amortization expense of $20.7 million and $18.8 million, respectively, which, beginning July 1, 2001, were no longer expensed under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.”

13


Table of Contents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

All statements in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations that are not based on historical fact are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and the provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (which Sections were adopted as part of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). While management has based any forward-looking statements contained herein on its current expectations, the information on which such expectations were based may change. These forward-looking statements rely on a number of assumptions concerning future events and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties, and other factors, many of which are outside of our control, that could cause actual results to materially differ from such statements. Such risks, uncertainties, and other factors include, but are not necessarily limited to, those set forth under the caption “Risks Related to our Business.” In addition, we operate in a highly competitive and rapidly changing environment, and new risks may arise. Accordingly, investors should not place any reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results. We disclaim any intention to, and undertake no obligation to, update or revise any forward-looking statement.

We report our financial results in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). However, we believe that certain non-GAAP financial measures and ratios, used in managing our business, may provide users of this financial information with additional meaningful comparisons between current results and prior reported results. Certain of the information set forth herein and certain of the information presented by us from time to time (including free cash flow and internal revenue growth) may constitute non-GAAP financial measures within the meaning of Regulation G adopted by the SEC. We have presented herein and we will present in other information we publish that contains any of these non-GAAP financial measures a reconciliation of these measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. The presentation of this additional information is not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for comparable amounts determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.

General

We derive our revenues from delivering comprehensive business process outsourcing and information technology outsourcing solutions to commercial and government clients. A substantial portion of our revenues is derived from recurring monthly charges to our customers under service contracts with initial terms that vary from one to ten years. For fiscal year 2004, after adjusting for $258 million of revenues related to divested operations, approximately 89% of our revenues were recurring. We define recurring revenues as revenues derived from services that our clients use each year in connection with their ongoing businesses, and accordingly, exclude software license fees, short-term contract programming engagements, product installation fees, and hardware and software sales. Since inception, our acquisition program has resulted in geographic expansion, growth and diversification of our client base, expansion of services offered, and increased economies of scale.

Significant Developments – Fiscal Year 2004

During fiscal year 2004, we signed contracts with new clients and increased business with existing clients representing $621.5 million of annual recurring new revenue, which includes $25.2 million related to a majority of the Federal business sold in November 2003 (the “Divested Federal Business”). Excluding the $25.2 million related to the Divested Federal Business, the Commercial segment contributed 70% of new business signings, including contracts with McDonald’s Corporation to provide information technology services, The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company to provide human resources support and services and General Electric to provide finance and accounting services. Excluding the $25.2 million related to the Divested Federal Business, the Government segment contributed 30% of new business signings, including new contracts with the U. S. Department of Education to provide comprehensive loan servicing, consolidation loan processing, debt collection and portfolio management services, and the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services to replace and operate the North Carolina Medicaid Management Information System. We define new business signings as recurring revenue from new contracts, including the incremental portion of renewals, signed during the period and represent the estimated first twelve months of revenues, as measured under GAAP, to be recorded under that contract after full implementation. We use new business signings as a measure of estimated recurring revenues represented by contractual commitments, both to forecast prospective revenues and to estimate capital commitments.

14


Table of Contents

In November 2003, we completed the sale of the Divested Federal Business to Lockheed Martin Corporation for approximately $649.4 million, which included a cash payment of $586.5 million at closing and $70 million payable pursuant to a five-year non-compete agreement, less a working capital settlement of $7.1 million paid in the third quarter of fiscal year 2004. Assets sold were approximately $346.8 million and liabilities assumed by Lockheed Martin Corporation were approximately $67.9 million, both of which were primarily in the Government segment. We recognized a pretax gain of $285.3 million ($182.3 million, net of income tax) in fiscal year 2004. We incurred $9.8 million ($6.2 million, net of income tax) for compensation costs associated with former Federal employees, which is reflected in wages and benefits. The after tax proceeds from the divestiture were generally used to pay down debt, fund the acquisitions of Lockheed Martin Corporation’s commercial information technology outsourcing business, Patient Accounting Services Center, LLC, Truckload Management Services, Inc. and etravelexperts, LLC, and fund our share repurchase program. Revenues from the Divested Federal Business, which are primarily included in the Government segment, were approximately $237.7 million, $680.1 million and $627.2 million for fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. This divestiture excluded, among others, our Department of Education relationship, which during fiscal year 2004 had revenues of approximately $199 million. Additionally, our Commercial and Government operations will continue to serve as a subcontractor on portions of the Divested Federal Business.

In February 2004, we sold the contracts associated with the Hanscom Air Force Base relationship (“Hanscom”) to ManTech International Corporation (“ManTech”) for $6.5 million in cash. We recognized a pretax gain of $5.4 million ($3.4 million, net of income tax) for this transaction. For the Hanscom Air Force Base contracts, we reported revenue in our Government segment of approximately $17.2 million, $25.2 million and $26 million for fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. We have agreed to indemnify ManTech with respect to the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) investigation related to purchasing activities at Hanscom during the period 1998-2000. In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2004, we sold an additional small contractual relationship to ManTech. We reported revenue in our Government segment of approximately $3.1 million, $4.2 million and $4.5 million for the years ended June 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, for this contract.

The sales of the Divested Federal Business to Lockheed Martin Corporation and the contracts sold to ManTech International Corporation now allow us to focus on our business process and information technology outsourcing service offerings in the commercial, state and local, and Federal education and healthcare markets.

In November 2003, we acquired Lockheed Martin Corporation’s commercial information technology outsourcing business, with annual revenues of approximately $240 million. With this acquisition, we acquired four U.S. data centers, approximately 1,000 employees, and a diverse client base representing the manufacturing, automotive, retail, financial services, and communications industries. The transaction was valued at $107 million less a working capital settlement of $6.9 million, plus related transaction costs. The operating results of the acquired business are included in our financial statements primarily in the Commercial segment from the effective date of the acquisition, November 1, 2003.

In November 2003, the U.S. Department of Education awarded us the Common Services for Borrowers contract. This contract includes comprehensive loan servicing, consolidation loan processing, debt collection and portfolio management services. The new, five-year base contract replaced our existing contract with the Department and will integrate a number of services, which will allow the Department to increase service quality while saving overall program costs. The contract is estimated at more than $1 billion in revenue over the five-year period and was effective January 1, 2004. The contract also includes provisions for five one-year extensions.

In January 2004, we completed the acquisition of Patient Accounting Services Center, LLC (“PASC”), a provider of revenue cycle management for healthcare providers, including billing, accounts receivables, and collection services. PASC generated revenues of approximately $68 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The transaction was valued at approximately $94.9 million, excluding contingent consideration of a maximum of $25 million based on future financial performance, plus related transaction costs. The operating results of the acquired business are included in our financial statements in the Commercial segment from the effective date of the acquisition, January 3, 2004.

15


Table of Contents

In February 2004, we completed the acquisition of Truckload Management Services, Inc. (“TMI”), an expedited document processing and business process improvement services provider for the trucking industry. TMI had revenues of approximately $25 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The transaction was valued at approximately $28.1 million, excluding contingent consideration of a maximum of $14 million based upon future financial performance, plus related transaction costs. The operating results of the acquired business are included in our financial statements in the Commercial segment from the effective date of the acquisition, February 1, 2004.

On February 27, 2004, we completed the redemption of our 3.5% Convertible Subordinated Notes due February 15, 2006 (the “Notes”). Holders of 99.9% of all the outstanding Notes converted their Notes to 23.0234 shares of our Class A common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Notes in accordance with the procedures specified in the related indenture governing the Notes. As the result of such conversions, approximately 7.3 million shares of our Class A common stock were issued to such noteholders at the conversion price of $43.44 per share. The remaining Notes were redeemed in cash at 101.4% of the principal amount, resulting in a cash redemption of $269,000.

In April 2004, we acquired etravelexperts, LLC. etravelexperts had annual revenue of approximately $15 million and provides electronic ticket fulfillment and related customer care for the airline industry and travel websites. The transaction was valued at approximately $17.2 million, excluding contingent consideration of a maximum of $5.8 million based upon future financial performance, plus related transaction costs. The operating results of the acquired business are included in our financial statements in the Commercial segment from the effective date of the acquisition, April 1, 2004.

In 2001, we were awarded a contract by the Georgia Department of Community Health (“DCH”) to develop, implement and operate a system to administer health benefits to Georgia Medicaid recipients as well as state government employees (the “Georgia Contract”). This system development project was large and complex and anticipated the development of a system that would process both Medicaid and state employee claims. The Medicaid phase of this project was implemented on April 1, 2003. Various disputes arose because of certain delays and operational issues that were encountered in this phase. During the second quarter of fiscal year 2004, in connection with a settlement in principle, we recorded a $6.7 million reduction in revenue resulting from the change in our percentage-of-completion estimates primarily as a result of the termination of Phase II of the contract, a charge of $2.6 million to services and supplies associated with the accrual of wind-down costs associated with the termination of Phase II and an accrual of $10 million in other operating expenses to be paid to DCH pursuant to the settlement in principle. On July 21, 2004 we entered into a definitive settlement agreement with the DCH to settle these disputes. The terms of the definitive settlement, which were substantially the same as those announced in January 2004, include a $10 million payment by us to DCH; a payment by DCH to us of $9 million in system development costs; escrow of $11.8 million by DCH, with $2.4 million of the escrowed funds to be paid to us upon completion of an agreed work plan ticket and reprocessing of July 2003 – June 2004 claims, and the remaining $9.4 million of escrowed funds to be paid to us upon final certification of the system by the Center for Medicare/Medicaid Services, the governing Federal regulatory agency; cancellation of Phase II of the contract; and an agreement to settle outstanding operational invoices resulting in a payment to us of over $8.2 million and approximately $7 million of reduction in such invoices.

Our Board of Directors has authorized two share repurchase programs totaling $1.25 billion of our Class A common stock. On September 2, 2003, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to $500 million of our Class A common stock and on April 29, 2004, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized a new, incremental share repurchase program of up to $750 million of our Class A common stock. The programs, which are open-ended, will allow us to repurchase our shares on the open market from time to time in accordance with SEC rules and regulations, including shares that could be purchased pursuant to SEC Rule 10b5-1. The number of shares to be purchased and the timing of purchases will be based on the level of cash and debt balances, general business conditions and other factors, including alternative investment opportunities. We intend to fund the repurchase program from various sources, including, but not limited to, cash on hand, cash flow from operations, and borrowings under our existing revolving credit facility. As of June 30, 2004, we had repurchased approximately 15 million shares at a total cost of approximately $743.2 million. We have not repurchased any shares subsequent to June 30, 2004 through the date of this filing.

16


Table of Contents

On May 17, 2004, we announced that our outsourcing agreement with Gateway, Inc. was being terminated as a result of Gateway’s March 2004 acquisition of eMachines, Inc., which significantly changed its business strategy. The transition of the majority of the outsourcing operations back to Gateway will occur by the end of the first quarter of our fiscal year 2005. The outsourcing agreement contributed approximately $47.4 million in revenue during fiscal year 2004. Concurrent with the termination of our outsourcing relationship with Gateway, we also terminated our obligation to purchase products and services from Gateway (see “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Disclosures About Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments”).

Subsequent Events

In July 2004, we acquired Heritage Information Systems, Inc. (“Heritage”). Heritage provides clinical management and pharmacy cost containment solutions to fourteen state Medicaid programs, over a dozen national commercial insurers and Blue Cross Blue Shield licensees and some of the largest employer groups in the country. The transaction was valued at approximately $23 million, plus related transaction costs, excluding contingent consideration of maximum of $17 million based upon future financial performance, and was funded from our existing cash on hand. The operating results of the acquired business will be included in our Government segment from the effective date of the acquisition, July 1, 2004.

On August 13, 2004, we entered into a settlement agreement with former employees of Gibraltar Savings Association and/or First Texas Savings Association, whereby we paid $10 million in cash to settle in full their claims against us in August 2004 (see Item 3. Legal Proceedings). We accrued $10 million related to this settlement in other operating expenses in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2004.

In August 2004, we acquired BlueStar Solutions, an information technology outsourcer specializing in applications management of packaged enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) and messaging services. The transaction was valued at approximately $73 million plus related transaction costs and was funded from cash on hand. We believe that the acquisition of BlueStar provides us penetration into the emerging ERP/messaging market. The operating results of the acquired business will be included in our financial statements in the Commercial segment from the effective date of the acquisition, August 26, 2004.

Significant Developments — Fiscal Year 2003

During fiscal year 2003, we signed contracts with new clients and increased business with existing clients representing $701 million of annual recurring new revenue, which included $56.4 million related to the Divested Federal Business. The Government segment contributed 55% of new business signings, including new contracts with the Texas Health and Human Services Commission to provide fiscal agent and administrative services and New Jersey E-ZPass to provide electronic toll collection services. The Commercial segment contributed 45% of new business signings, including new contracts with Motorola to provide human resource outsourcing services and Ingram Micro to manage their IT infrastructure.

In January 2003, we acquired CyberRep, Inc. (“CyberRep”), which is included in our Commercial segment. CyberRep provides customer care and customer relationship management services for the telecommunications, wireless communications, technology, and consumer products industries. The transaction was valued at approximately $42 million plus transaction costs. CyberRep’s operating results are included in our consolidated financial statements from the effective date of the acquisition, January 1, 2003.

We completed four other acquisitions during fiscal year 2003, all of which were included in our state and local governments segment.

Significant Developments — Fiscal Year 2002

During fiscal year 2002, we signed contracts with new clients and increased business with existing clients representing $478.1 million of annual recurring new revenue, which included $46.5 million related to the Divested Federal Business. We acquired eight companies in fiscal year 2002, three of which serve our Government segment, four of which serve our Commercial segment, and AFSA, which serves both segments.

17


Table of Contents

In August 2001, we acquired Lockheed Martin IMS Corporation (“IMS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, now known as ACS State and Local Solutions, for $825 million plus transaction costs. ACS State and Local Solutions, with its principal offices located in Washington, D.C. and approximately 4,800 employees primarily throughout the United States, provides services to state and local government agencies in child support enforcement, welfare and community services, electronic toll collection, and other intelligent transportation services involving the trucking industry, photo enforcement of red-light and speeding violations, parking management, and information technology outsourcing. ACS State and Local Solutions’ operating results are included in the Government segment of our consolidated financial statements from the effective date of the acquisition, August 1, 2001.

In August 2001, we acquired the business process outsourcing services unit of National Processing Company (“NPC”). NPC provides healthcare claims processing, credit card application processing, and airline lift ticket processing. As part of the transaction, we acquired all of NPC’s offshore operations in Jamaica, the Dominican Republic, Barbados and a majority of NPC’s Mexican operations. The transaction value was approximately $43 million plus related transaction costs. NPC’s operating results are included in the Commercial segment of our consolidated financial statements from the effective date of the acquisition, August 1, 2001.

On October 10, 2001, we completed our offering of 18.4 million shares of our Class A common stock (adjusted for stock split). The shares were issued at $40.50 per share yielding proceeds of $714.3 million (net of underwriters’ fees and other costs), which were used to repay the $550 million 18-month interim credit facility incurred to fund the IMS acquisition and a portion of the amount outstanding under our revolving credit facility.

In February 2002, we completed a two-for-one stock split of our outstanding Class A common stock and Class B common stock implemented in the form of a 100% stock dividend (“Stock Split”). Each holder of record of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock as of the close of business on February 15, 2002 received an additional share of such stock held by them at that time.

On March 15, 2002, we completed the redemption of our 4% Convertible Subordinated Notes due March 15, 2005 (the “4% Notes”). Holders of all of the outstanding 4% Notes converted their 4% Notes to shares of our Class A common stock in accordance with the Indenture dated as of March 20, 1998 between ACS and U.S. Trust Company of Texas, N.A., as trustee prior to the March 15, 2002 redemption date. As a result of such conversions, approximately 10.8 million shares of our Class A common stock were issued to such holders.

In May 2002, we acquired the finance and accounting business process outsourcing unit of Andersen Worldwide (“Andersen”). Included in this acquisition are contracts with General Motors (“GM”) and the University of Phoenix (“the University”). Under a 10-year agreement with GM, we provide transactional accounting services such as payroll processing, disbursement processing, dealer accounting, accounts receivable processing, lease and subsidiary accounting, and expense reporting in the United States and Europe. Under the arrangement with the University, we provide student financial aid business process outsourcing services to the University including federal eligibility determinations, loan and grant processing, and disbursement of student aid as well as other support services related to student financial aid processing. The transaction was valued at approximately $65.2 million plus related transaction costs. Andersen’s operating results are included in the Commercial segment of our consolidated financial statements from the effective date of the acquisition, May 1, 2002 for the domestic operations, and June 1, 2002 for the foreign operations.

In June 2002, we acquired AFSA, a subsidiary of FleetBoston Financial Corporation, for approximately $410 million plus related transaction costs. AFSA is the nation’s largest educational services company, servicing a student loan portfolio of 8.1 million borrowers with outstanding loans of approximately $85 billion. Additionally, AFSA is a leading business process outsourcer for federal, state, and local governments for a variety of health and human services programs, including Medicare, Medicaid, children’s health insurance programs (CHIP), and welfare and community services. AFSA’s operating results are included primarily in the Commercial segment of our consolidated financial statements from the effective date of the acquisition, June 1, 2002.

18


Table of Contents

Revenue Growth

Internal revenue growth is measured as total revenue growth less acquired revenue from acquisitions and revenues from divested operations. Acquired revenue from acquisitions is based on pre-acquisition normalized revenue of acquired companies. We use the calculation of internal revenue growth to measure revenue growth excluding the impact of acquired revenues and the revenue associated with divested operations and we believe these adjustments to historical reported results are necessary to accurately reflect our internal revenue growth. Prior period calculations are as of the end of the reporting period presented and are not restated for subsequent acquisitions or divestitures. The following table sets forth the calculation of internal revenue growth (in thousands):

Consolidated

                                                                 
    Year ended June 30,
                  Year ended June 30,
       
    2004
  2003
  $ Growth
  Growth %
  2003
  2002
  $ Growth
  Growth %
Total Revenues
  $ 4,106,393     $ 3,787,206     $ 319,187       8 %   $ 3,787,206     $ 3,062,918     $ 724,288       24 %
Less: Divestitures
    (258,037 )     (709,512 )     451,475
 
   
 
 
          (37,340 )     37,340          
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Adjusted
  $ 3,848,356     $ 3,077,694     $ 770,662       25 %   $ 3,787,206     $ 3,025,578     $ 761,628       25 %
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Acquired revenues
  $ 259,596     $ 668     $ 258,928       8 %   $ 451,583     $ 146,236     $ 305,347       10 %
Internal revenues
    3,588,760       3,077,026       511,734       17 %     3,335,623       2,879,342       456,281       15 %
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total
  $ 3,848,356     $ 3,077,694     $ 770,662       25 %   $ 3,787,206     $ 3,025,578     $ 761,628       25 %
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

Government

                                                                 
    Year ended June 30,
                  Year ended June 30,
       
    2004
  2003
  $ Growth
  Growth %
  2003
  2002
  $ Growth
  Growth %
Total Revenues (a)
  $ 2,428,029     $ 2,544,298     $ (116,269 )     (5 )%   $ 2,544,298     $ 2,105,585     $ 438,713       21 %
Less: Divestitures
    (251,122 )     (679,340 )     428,218
 
   
 
 
          (4,343 )     4,343
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Adjusted
  $ 2,176,907     $ 1,864,958     $ 311,949       17 %   $ 2,544,298     $ 2,101,242     $ 443,056       21 %
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Acquired revenues
  $ 30,833     $ 668     $ 30,165       2 %   $ 261,579     $ 117,771     $ 143,808       7 %
Internal revenues
    2,146,074       1,864,290       281,784       15 %     2,282,719       1,983,471       299,248       14 %
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total
  $ 2,176,907     $ 1,864,958     $ 311,949       17 %   $ 2,544,298     $ 2,101,242     $ 443,056       21 %
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

Commercial

                                                                 
    Year ended June 30,
                  Year ended June 30,
       
    2004
  2003
  $ Growth
  Growth %
  2003
  2002
  $ Growth
  Growth %
Total Revenues (b)
  $ 1,678,364     $ 1,242,908     $ 435,456       35 %   $ 1,242,908     $ 957,333     $ 285,575       30 %
Less: Divestitures
    (6,915 )     (30,172 )     23,257
 
   
 
 
          (32,997 )     32,997
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Adjusted
  $ 1,671,449     $ 1,212,736     $ 458,713       38 %   $ 1,242,908     $ 924,336     $ 318,572       34 %
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Acquired revenues
  $ 228,763     $     $ 228,763       19 %   $ 190,004     $ 28,465     $ 161,539       17 %
Internal revenues
    1,442,686       1,212,736       229,950       19 %     1,052,904       895,871       157,033       17 %
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total
  $ 1,671,449     $ 1,212,736     $ 458,713       38 %   $ 1,242,908     $ 924,336     $ 318,572       34 %
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

(a)   The Government segment includes revenues from operations divested through June 30, 2004 of $251.1 million, $679.3 million and $633.7 million for fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
 
(b)   The Commercial segment includes revenues from operations divested through June 30, 2004 of $6.9 million, $30.2 million and $63.4 million for fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

19


Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth certain items from our Consolidated Statements of Income expressed as a percentage of revenues:

                         
    Percentage of Revenues
    Year ended June 30,
    2004
  2003
  2002
Revenues
    100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Operating expenses:
                       
Wages and benefits
    43.6       45.3       44.1  
Services and supplies
    26.5       26.3       29.0  
Rent, lease and maintenance
    10.1       9.3       9.1  
Depreciation and amortization
    4.5       4.0       3.6  
Gain on sale of business
    (6.9 )            
Other operating expenses
    1.7       1.4       1.1  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total operating expenses
    79.5       86.3       86.9  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
 
Operating income
    20.5       13.7       13.1  
                         
Interest expense
    0.4       0.6       1.0  
Other non-operating expense (income), net
    (0.1 )     0.1       0.3  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Pretax profit
    20.2       13.0       11.8  
 
                       
Income tax expense
    7.3       4.9       4.3  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Net income
    12.9 %     8.1 %     7.5 %
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

Comparison of Fiscal Year 2004 to Fiscal Year 2003

Revenues

Revenues increased $319.2 million, or 8%, to $4.1 billion in fiscal year 2004 from $3.8 billion in fiscal year 2003. Revenues related to the Divested Federal Business and the contracts sold to ManTech were $258 million and $709.5 million in fiscal year 2004 and 2003, respectively. Excluding the impact of the revenues related to the Divested Federal Business and the contracts sold to ManTech, revenues increased from $3.1 billion in fiscal year 2003 to $3.8 billion in fiscal year 2004, or 25%. Revenue in fiscal year 2004 includes a $6.7 million reduction resulting from the change in our percentage-of-completion estimates on the Georgia Contract primarily as a result of the termination of Phase II of the contract, which was recognized in the second quarter of fiscal year 2004. Internal revenue growth, excluding the impact of the revenues related to the Divested Federal Business and contracts sold to ManTech, for fiscal year 2004 was 17%. The remainder of the growth was related to acquisitions.

Revenue in our Government segment, which represents 59% of consolidated revenue for fiscal year 2004, decreased $116.3 million, or 5%, to $2.4 billion in fiscal year 2004 compared to fiscal year 2003. Revenues related to the Divested Federal Business and contracts sold to ManTech included in the Government segment were $251.1 million and $679.3 million for fiscal years 2004 and 2003, respectively. Excluding the impact of the revenues related to the Divested Federal Business and the contracts sold to ManTech, revenues grew 17% in fiscal year 2004 to $2.2 billion from $1.9 billion in fiscal year 2003. Revenues include a $6.7 million reduction resulting from the change in our percentage-of-completion estimates on the Georgia Contract primarily as a result of the termination of Phase II of the contract, which was recognized in the second quarter of fiscal year 2004. Internal revenue growth, excluding the impact of the revenues related to the Divested Federal

20


Table of Contents

Business and the contracts sold to ManTech, was 15%, due primarily to increased revenue in our Texas Medicaid, Department of Education, New Jersey E-ZPass, Florida Medicaid, Georgia Healthcare Partnership, Ohio and Illinois child support payment processing contracts, and higher non-recurring revenues related to our unclaimed property business and HIPAA remediation work. These revenues collectively represent 82% of the internal growth for the period in this segment. The remaining 2% of total revenue growth is from acquisitions.

Revenue in our Commercial segment, which represents 41% of consolidated revenue for fiscal year 2004, increased $435.5 million, or 35%, to $1.7 billion in fiscal year 2004 compared to fiscal year 2003. Revenues related to the Divested Federal Business included in the Commercial segment were $6.9 million and $30.2 million in fiscal years 2004 and 2003, respectively. Excluding the impact of the revenues related to the Divested Federal Business, revenues grew 38% in fiscal year 2004 compared to fiscal year 2003. Internal revenue growth, excluding the impact of the revenues related to the Divested Federal Business, was 19% primarily due to the ramp up of new business including, among others, the Motorola, General Motors, Gateway, Ingram Micro, Miller Brewing, Northwest Airlines, and Trilegiant contracts. These contracts collectively represent 74% of the internal growth for the period in this segment. As discussed previously, our Gateway contract has been terminated. The remaining 19% of total revenue growth was from acquisitions.

Operating Expense

Wages and benefits increased $73.5 million, or 4%, to $1.8 billion. As a percentage of revenues, wages and benefits decreased 1.7% to 43.6%. Included in fiscal year 2004 wages and benefits were compensation costs of $9.8 million associated with former Federal employees, which were primarily stay bonuses and accelerated option vesting due to the Divested Federal Business. Excluding these costs, wages and benefits increased $63.7 million, or 4% in fiscal year 2004 as compared to fiscal year 2003 (calculated as the $73.5 million increase less $9.8 million compensation costs, divided by reported fiscal year 2003 wages and benefits costs) and therefore decreased to 43.3% as a percentage of revenue. The sale of the Divested Federal Business and the acquisition of Lockheed Martin Corporation’s commercial information outsourcing business were primarily responsible for the decrease in labor costs as a percentage of revenue. The Divested Federal Business, which provided primarily system integration services to the Federal Government and its agencies, had a higher proportion of labor related expenses to its revenues. In addition, the acquisition of Lockheed Martin Corporation’s commercial information technology outsourcing business had a lower proportion of labor costs as a percentage of revenue than business process outsourcing.

Services and supplies increased $95.8 million, or 10%, to $1.1 billion. As a percentage of revenues, services and supplies increased 0.2% to 26.5% in fiscal year 2004. This percentage increase is primarily due to $2.6 million of wind-down costs related to the termination of Phase II of the Georgia Contract discussed earlier.

Rent, lease and maintenance expense increased $64.5 million, or 18%, to $416.4 million. As a percentage of revenue, rent, lease and maintenance increased 0.8% to 10.1%. This increase was primarily due to the sale of our Divested Federal Business in fiscal year 2004, which provided primarily system integration services to its clients. These services typically have a lower percentage of rent, lease and maintenance than information technology services, which have higher equipment costs.

Gain on sale of business was $285.3 million, or 6.9%, of revenues for fiscal year 2004. This gain was related to the sale of our Divested Federal Business, as discussed above.

Depreciation and amortization increased $31.7 million, or 21% to $183.8 million. Depreciation and amortization expense was positively impacted by approximately $6.2 million in fiscal year 2004 as a result of the cessation of depreciation and amortization related to the assets held for sale in our Divested Federal Business. As a percentage of revenue, depreciation and amortization increased 0.5%, to 4.5%, due to $258 million of capital expenditures and additions to intangible assets, offset by the sale of the Divested Federal Business, which had a lower percentage of depreciation and amortization to revenue than our remaining business, and the cessation of depreciation and amortization.

Other operating expenses increased $14.5 million, or 28% to $67.1 million. As a percentage of revenue, other operating expenses increased 0.3% to 1.7% primarily as a result of the previously discussed $10 million legal settlement with former employees of Gibraltar Savings Association and/or First Texas Savings Association and the $10 million settlement with the DCH discussed earlier, offset by the $5.4 million gain on the sale of the Hanscom contracts.

21


Table of Contents

Interest Expense

Interest expense decreased $8.2 million to $17 million primarily due to lower average debt outstanding. The lower average outstanding debt was the result of the paydown of our revolving credit facility with the proceeds from the sale of the Divested Federal Business in the second quarter of fiscal year 2004 and the conversion of our 3.5% Convertible Subordinated Notes in the third quarter of fiscal year 2004, offset by subsequent increases in our revolving credit facility resulting from borrowings incurred to fund our share repurchase program.

Other Non-Operating Expense (Income)

Other non-operating income in fiscal year 2004 includes increases of $1.2 million of investment income. Other non-operating expense in fiscal year 2003 includes $3.4 million of write-downs of long-term cost basis investments.

Tax Expense

Our effective tax rate decreased from 37.5% in fiscal year 2003 to 36.1% in fiscal year 2004. In fiscal year 2004, we recognized $4.6 million of income tax credits related to prior years’ research and development costs, $1.5 million of income tax credits related to current year research and development costs and approximately $1.6 million of divestiture related tax benefits related to the sale of a foreign subsidiary. In addition, the effective tax rate on the gain related to the sale of the Divested Federal Business was 36.1%. Our effective tax rate exceeds the 35% statutory rate primarily due to state income taxes, offset by the items above.

Comparison of Fiscal Year 2003 to Fiscal Year 2002

Revenues

Revenues increased $0.7 billion, or 24%, to $3.8 billion in fiscal year 2003 from $3.1 billion in fiscal year 2002. Internal revenue growth for fiscal year 2003 was 15% and the remaining growth resulted from acquisitions. Revenues include $709.5 million and $697.1 million for fiscal years 2003 and 2002, respectively, related to operations divested through June 30, 2004, primarily related to the Divested Federal Business.

Revenues in our Government segment increased $438.7 million to $2.5 billion in fiscal year 2003 from $2.1 billion in fiscal year 2002, or 21% over the prior year, including the full year impact of the AFSA and Andersen acquisitions. Internal revenue growth was 14%, due primarily to new contracts, including contracts with the Texas Health and Human Services Commission for fiscal agent and administrative services to support the State’s Medicaid traditional fee-for-service program and the Texas Health Network primary care case management and managed care program, New Jersey to operate its E-Z Pass system, State of Ohio to operate its child support collections and disbursement unit, Mississippi Medicaid and Commercial Vehicle Operations and full year impact of the Georgia Medicaid contract signed in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2002. These contracts collectively represent 60% of the internal growth for the period in this segment. The remainder of total revenue growth is from acquisitions. Revenues in our Government segment include $679.3 million and $633.7 million for fiscal years 2003 and 2002, respectively, related to operations divested through June 30, 2004, primarily related to the Divested Federal Business.

Revenues in our Commercial segment increased $285.6 million, to $1.2 billion in fiscal year 2003 from $924 million in fiscal year 2002, or approximately 30%. After adjusting for revenues from operations divested in fiscal year 2002 of $33 million, internal growth was 17% due primarily to the Motorola and Ingram Micro contracts and full year impact of the Ingersoll Rand contract signed in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2002. These contracts collectively represent 65% of the internal growth for the period in this segment. The remainder of total revenue growth is from acquisitions. Acquisition growth in our Commercial segment was 17% due primarily to the full year impact of the fiscal year 2002 AFSA and Andersen acquisitions. Revenues in our Commercial segment include $30.2 million and $63.4 million for fiscal years 2003 and 2002, respectively, for operations divested through June 30, 2004, primarily related to our Divested Federal Business.

Operating Expense

Wages and benefits increased $366.9 million, or 27% to $1.7 billion in fiscal year 2003. As a percentage of revenues, wages and benefits increased 1.2% to 45.3% in fiscal year 2003 from 44.1% in fiscal year 2002 due to increased business process outsourcing services in our revenue mix. Business process outsourcing (“BPO”) services are more labor intensive and have higher component of wages and benefits than traditional information technology outsourcing. BPO services accounted for approximately 68% of our fiscal year 2003 revenues as compared to approximately 63% in fiscal year 2002. The increase in BPO services is primarily the result of our 2002 acquisitions of AFSA and Andersen, as well as new business growth. Prior

22


Table of Contents

to the acquisition, AFSA served as a sub-contractor on the Department of Education contract, and therefore the payments to AFSA were included in services and supplies. Subsequent to the acquisition, AFSA’s employee costs related to this contract are included in wages and benefits.

Services and supplies increased $105.9 million, or 12%, to $1.0 billion. As a percentage of revenues, services and supplies decreased 2.7% to 26.3% in fiscal year 2003, primarily due to the acquisition of AFSA in June 2002 as discussed in wages and benefits above.

Rent, lease and maintenance expense increased $73.2 million, or 26%, to $351.9 million in fiscal year 2003. As a percentage of revenue, rent, lease and maintenance increased 0.2% to 9.3% for fiscal year 2003 due to new information technology outsourcing contracts in our Commercial segment. Information technology outsourcing contracts have a higher component of rent, lease and maintenance than our other lines of business.

Depreciation and amortization increased $41.6 million, or 38%, to $152.1 million in fiscal year 2003. As a percentage of revenue, depreciation and amortization increased 0.4%, to 4.0%, due to $253.6 million of capital expenditures and additions to other intangible assets during the year resulting from our growth and increased customer related intangible asset amortization primarily as a result of the full year impact of acquisitions during fiscal year 2002.

Other operating expenses increased $18 million to $52.6 million during fiscal year 2003. As a percentage of revenue, other operating expenses increased 0.3% due to increased legal and marketing expenses.

Interest Expense

Interest expense decreased $5.4 million to $25.2 million primarily due to lower average outstanding borrowings and lower borrowing costs, resulting from the conversion to equity of the 4% Convertible Subordinated Notes in March 2002 and reductions in amounts outstanding under our credit facilities.

Other Non-Operating Expense (Income)

Other non-operating expense in fiscal year 2003 includes $3.4 million of write-downs of long-term cost basis investments during fiscal year 2003. Other non-operating expense in fiscal year 2002 includes $8.4 million of write-downs of long-term cost basis investments and a $1.8 million loss on the sale of a business unit.

Tax Expense

Our effective tax rate of approximately 37.5% exceeded the federal statutory rate of 35% due primarily to the net effect of state income taxes. Our effective tax rate increased 1.2% for fiscal year 2003 to 37.5% from 36.3% for fiscal year 2002. Included in tax expense in fiscal year 2002 are certain tax benefits of approximately $4.3 million resulting primarily from recently enacted federal income tax rules that provide for a larger tax deduction associated with our June 2000 divestitures and deferred tax adjustments to reflect realization of tax deductions for which their probability is no longer uncertain.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We finance our ongoing business operations through cash flows from operations and utilize excess cash flow combined with the issuance of debt and equity to finance our acquisition strategy.

During fiscal year 2004, we generated approximately $476.2 million in cash flow from operations compared to the fiscal year 2003 amount of approximately $545.3 million. However, fiscal year 2004 was negatively impacted by a tax payment of approximately $88.1 million related to the gain from the sale of the Divested Federal Business (gross proceeds from the sale of the Divested Federal Business are reflected in cash flow from investing activities, but the tax payment related to the sale is presented as a reduction in cash flows from operating activities). Excluding this $88.1 million tax payment, fiscal year 2004 operating cash flow was $564.3 million. This increase from the prior year was primarily a result of growth in our business and the corresponding increase in net income. The fiscal year 2004 growth of operating cash flow over fiscal year 2003 was negatively impacted by deferred taxes, which decreased from $100.9 million in fiscal year 2003 to $66.2 million in fiscal year 2004. The decrease in deferred taxes was primarily due to differences in timing of deductibility of amortization as well as other tax and book differences.

23


Table of Contents

During fiscal year 2003, we generated $545.3 million in cash flow from operations compared to the fiscal year 2002 amount of approximately $372 million. This increase from the prior year was primarily a result of growth in our business and the corresponding increase in net income. The year over year growth in operating cash flow was also positively impacted by deferred taxes, which increased from $55.8 million in fiscal year 2002 to $100.9 million in fiscal year 2003. This increase was a result of an increase in the amount of deductible goodwill and accelerated depreciation on property and equipment.

Accounts receivable fluctuations may have a significant impact on our cash flows from operations. The payments received from customers on our billed accounts receivables and the increase in such accounts receivable are reflected as a single component of our cash flow from operations, and the timing of collections of these receivables may have either a positive or negative impact on our liquidity.

During fiscal year 2004, free cash flow was approximately $218.3 million versus approximately $291.7 million for fiscal year 2003. However, as discussed above, fiscal year 2004 was negatively impacted by a tax payment of approximately $88.1 million related to the gain from the sale of the Divested Federal Business. Excluding this $88.1 million tax payment, fiscal year 2004 free cash flow was $306.4 million. Other items impacting the year over year growth of free cash flow are discussed above. Capital expenditures (defined as purchases of property, equipment and software, net) and additions to other intangibles for fiscal year 2004 were $258 million, or 6.3% of revenue compared to $253.6 million, or 6.7% of revenue, in fiscal year 2003.

During fiscal year 2003, free cash flow was approximately $291.7 million versus approximately $208.3 million for fiscal year 2002. Items impacting the year over year growth of free cash flow are discussed above. Capital expenditures (defined as purchases of property, equipment and software, net) and additions to other intangibles for fiscal year 2003 were $253.6 million, or 6.7% of revenue compared to $163.7 million, or 5.3% of revenue, in fiscal year 2002.

Free cash flow is measured as operating cash flow (net cash provided by operating activities, as reported in our consolidated statements of cash flow), less capital expenditures (purchases of property, equipment and software, net of sales, as reported in our consolidated statements of cash flow) less additions to other intangible assets (as reported in our consolidated statements of cash flows). We believe this free cash flow metric provides an additional measure of available cash flow after we have satisfied the capital expenditure requirements of our operations, and should not be taken in isolation to be a measure of cash flow available for us to satisfy all of our obligations and execute our business strategies. We also rely on cash flows from investing and financing activities, which together with free cash flow, are expected to be sufficient for us to execute our business strategies. Our measure of free cash flow may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. The following table sets forth the calculations of free cash flow (in thousands):

                         
    Year ended June 30,
    2004
  2003
  2002
Net cash provided by operating activities (a)
  $ 476,209     $ 545,305     $ 372,014  
Purchases of property, equipment and software, net
    (224,621 )     (205,673 )     (144,406 )
Additions to other intangible assets
    (33,329 )     (47,967 )     (19,317 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Free cash flow (a)
  $ 218,259     $ 291,665     $ 208,291  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

(a)   Fiscal year 2004 net cash provided by operating activities and free cash flow includes a tax payment of approximately $88.1 million related to the gain from the sale of the Divested Federal Business.

During fiscal year 2004, cash provided by investing activities was $70.4 million. This includes $583.1 million of proceeds from divestitures, primarily to the sale of the Divested Federal Business, net of transaction costs. We used $251.7 million for acquisitions during the period, primarily for the purchase of Lockheed Martin Corporation’s commercial information technology outsourcing business, PASC, TMI and etravelexperts, LLC. Cash used for the purchase of property, equipment and software and additions to other intangible assets was $258 million in fiscal year 2004 versus $253.6 million in fiscal year 2003.

During fiscal year 2004, approximately $520.9 million was used in financing activities. Such financing activities included $743.2 million to repurchase approximately 15 million shares of our common stock pursuant to our share repurchase

24


Table of Contents

programs, offset by net borrowings primarily under our Credit Facility (defined below) of $185.4 million, primarily to fund our share repurchase programs.

We have an $875 million unsecured revolving credit facility (“Credit Facility”), which matures in December 2005. The Credit Facility provides for unsecured borrowings at rates based on our credit rating. Currently, borrowings bear interest at LIBOR (1.369% at June 30, 2004) plus 0.575%. The agreement contains certain covenants, including maintaining certain interest coverage and debt-to-equity ratios, as defined by the agreement. At June 30, 2004, we were in compliance with these covenants.

Draws made under our Credit Facility are normally made to fund cash acquisitions, share repurchases and general working capital requirements. During fiscal year 2004, the balance outstanding under our Credit Facility for borrowings ranged from $0 to $443.9 million. At June 30, 2004, we had $354.5 million available under our Credit Facility, after giving effect to outstanding letters of credit of $150.5 million that secure certain contractual performance and other obligations. These letters of credit reduce the availability of our Credit Facility. We had $370 million outstanding on our Credit Facility, which is reflected in long-term debt. In August 2004, letters of credit outstanding were reduced by $25 million.

Certain contracts, primarily in our Government segment, require us to provide a surety bond or a letter of credit as a guarantee of performance. As of June 30, 2004, outstanding surety bonds of $323.4 million and $109.7 million of our outstanding letters of credit secure our performance of contractual obligations with our clients. In addition, we had approximately $32.5 million of letters of credit outstanding which serve as collateral for our surety bond program. Approximately $8.3 million of letters of credit secure our casualty insurance programs. In general, we would only be liable for the amount of these guarantees in the event of default in our performance of our obligations under each contract, the probability of which we believe is remote. We believe that we have sufficient capacity in the surety markets and liquidity from our cash flow and Credit Facility to respond to future requests for proposals.

Our Board of Directors has authorized two share repurchase programs totaling $1.25 billion of our Class A common stock. On September 2, 2003, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to $500 million of our Class A common stock and on April 29, 2004, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized a new, incremental share repurchase program of up to $750 million of our Class A common stock. The programs, which are open-ended, will allow us to repurchase our shares on the open market from time to time in accordance with SEC rules and regulations, including shares that could be purchased pursuant to SEC Rule 10b5-1. The number of shares to be purchased and the timing of purchases will be based on the level of cash and debt balances, general business conditions and other factors, including alternative investment opportunities. We intend to fund the repurchase program from various sources, including, but not limited to, cash on hand, cash flow from operations, and borrowings under our existing revolving credit facility. As of June 30, 2004, we had repurchased approximately 15 million shares at a total cost of approximately $743.2 million. We have not repurchased any shares subsequent to June 30, 2004 through the date of this filing.

On February 27, 2004, we completed the redemption of our 3.5% Convertible Subordinated Notes due February 15, 2006 (the “Notes”). Holders of 99.9% of all the outstanding Notes converted their Notes to 23.0234 shares of our Class A common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Notes in accordance with the procedures specified in the related indenture governing the Notes. As the result of such conversions, approximately 7.3 million shares of our Class A common stock were issued to such noteholders at the conversion price of $43.44 per share. The remaining Notes were redeemed in cash at 101.4% of the principal amount, resulting in a cash redemption of $269,000.

Our management believes that available cash and cash equivalents, together with cash generated from operations and available borrowings under our Credit Facility, will provide adequate funds for our anticipated internal growth needs, including working capital expenditures. Our management also believes that cash provided by operations will be sufficient to satisfy all existing debt and other contractual obligations as they become due. However, we intend to continue our growth through acquisitions and from time to time to engage in discussions with potential acquisition candidates. In order to pursue such opportunities, which could require significant commitments of capital, we may be required to incur debt or to issue additional potentially dilutive securities in the future. No assurance can be given as to our future acquisition and expansion opportunities and how such opportunities will be financed.

25


Table of Contents

Related Party Transactions

As of June 30, 2002, we held a minority preferred stock interest in DDH Aviation, Inc., a corporate airplane brokerage company organized in 1997 (“DDH”). Our Chairman owns a majority voting interest in DDH and our President and General Counsel, along with our Chairman, were directors of DDH. At June 30, 2002, DDH had a $48 million line of credit with Citicorp USA, Inc., for which we and our Chairman, in exchange for warrants to acquire additional voting stock, acted as partial guarantors. In addition, we obtained access to corporate aircraft at favorable rates in consideration of our guaranty. We had guaranteed up to approximately $11.5 million of the line of credit and our Chairman guaranteed up to approximately $17.5 million of the line of credit.

In July 2002, our Chairman assumed in full our guaranty obligations to Citicorp and our guaranty to Citicorp was released in full. Our minority preferred stock interest and warrants (with a recorded value of $100,000 at June 30, 2002) in DDH were cancelled. We have no further ownership interest in DDH. Our officers, other than the Chairman, are no longer directors of DDH. In the first quarter of fiscal year 2003, we purchased $1 million in prepaid charter flights at favorable rates from DDH. As of June 30, 2004, we have $0.7 million remaining in prepaid flights with DDH. During fiscal year 2003, we paid DDH approximately $0.5 million for maintenance services, chartered aircraft and equipment. We made no payments to DDH during fiscal year 2004.

In August 2001, we purchased a Challenger 600 aircraft from DDH for a purchase price of $8.5 million, which included interior and exterior refurbishment of the aircraft. As of June 30, 2002, the purchase price for the aircraft was paid in full, and refurbishment was near completion. The aircraft was delivered to us in the first quarter of fiscal year 2003.

Disclosures about Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments as of June 30, 2004 (in thousands):

                                         
            Payments Due by Period
            Less than            
Contractual Obligations
  Total
  1 Year
  1-3 Years
  4-5 Years
  After 5 Years
Long-term debt
  $ 370,000     $     $ 370,000     $     $  
Capital lease obligations
    4,487       2,048       2,040       399        
Operating leases
    428,092       135,979       161,357       73,692       57,064  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total Contractual Cash Obligations
  $ 802,579     $ 138,027     $ 533,397     $ 74,091     $ 57,064  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
                                         
    Total   Amount of Commitment Expiration per Period
Other Commercial   Amounts   Less than            
Commitments
  Committed
  1 Year
  1-3 Years
  4-5 Years
  After 5 Years
Standby letters of credit
  $ 150,539     $ 150,539     $     $     $  
Surety Bonds
    323,428       297,131       26,257       40        
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total Commercial Commitments
  $ 473,967     $ 447,670     $ 26,257     $ 40     $  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

During fiscal year 2004, we entered into an agreement with a customer, Gateway, Inc., to purchase $50 million of products and services over a seven-year term, with a minimum purchase of $5 million annually, at prices consistent with Gateway’s commercial pricing and discount guidelines. As discussed earlier, we have announced that our outsourcing agreement has been terminated. Concurrent with the termination of our outsourcing relationship with Gateway, we have also terminated our obligation to purchase products and services from Gateway.

As discussed previously, certain contracts, primarily in our Government segment, require us to provide a surety bond or a letter of credit as a guarantee of performance. As of June 30, 2004, outstanding surety bonds of $323.4 million and $109.7 million of our outstanding letters of credit secure our performance of contractual obligations with our clients. In addition, we had approximately $32.5 million of letters of credit outstanding which serve as collateral for our surety bond program. Approximately $8.3 million of letters of credit secure our casualty insurance programs. In general, we would only be liable

26


Table of Contents

for the amount of these guarantees in the event of default in our performance of our obligations under each contract, the probability of which we believe is remote.

We are obligated to make certain contingent payments to former shareholders of acquired entities upon satisfaction of certain contractual criteria. As of June 30, 2004, the maximum aggregate amount of the outstanding contingent obligations is approximately $67.3 million. Upon satisfaction of the specified contractual criteria, any such payment would result primarily in a corresponding increase in goodwill.

We have indemnified Lockheed Martin Corporation against certain specified claims from certain pre-sale litigation, investigations, government audits and other issues related to the Divested Federal Business. Our contractual maximum exposure under these indemnifications is $85 million; however, we believe the actual exposure to be significantly less. As of June 30, 2004, other accrued liabilities include a reserve for these claims in an amount we believe to be adequate at this time. As discussed in Item 3. Legal Proceedings, we have agreed to indemnify ManTech International Corporation with respect to the DOJ investigation related to purchasing activities at Hanscom during the period 1998-2000.

Our Education Services business, which is included in our Commercial segment, performs third party student loan servicing in the Federal Family Education Loan program (“FFEL”) on behalf of various financial institutions. We service these loans for investors under an outsourcing arrangement and do not acquire any servicing rights that are transferable by us to a third party. At June 30, 2004, we serviced a FFEL portfolio of approximately 1.5 million loans with an outstanding principal balance of approximately $18.2 billion. Some servicing agreements contain provisions that, under certain circumstances, require us to purchase the loans from the investor if the loan guaranty has been permanently terminated as a result of a loan default caused by our servicing error. If defaults caused by us are cured during an initial period, any obligation we may have to purchase these loans expires. Loans that we purchase may be subsequently cured, the guaranty reinstated and then we repackage the loans for sale to third parties. We evaluate our exposure under our purchase obligations on defaulted loans and establish a reserve for potential losses, or default liability reserve, through a charge to the provision for loss on defaulted loans purchased. The reserve is evaluated periodically and adjusted based upon management’s analysis of the historical performance of the defaulted loans. This reserve was approximately $3.7 million and $4.2 million at June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. During fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, we purchased and charged against the reserve $4.5 million, $3.6 million and $0.2 million of loans, respectively, and recovered or sold loans with proceeds totaling $1.3 million, $1.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively, which were credited to our reserve. We recorded provisions of $2.7 million, $2.5 million and $0.2 million in fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions or conditions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Critical accounting policies are defined as those that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties and may result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. We believe that the following critical accounting policies used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements involve significant judgments and estimates.

Revenue recognition. A significant portion of our revenue is recognized based on objective criteria that does not require significant estimates or uncertainties. For example, transaction volumes and time and costs under time and material and cost reimbursable arrangements are based on specific, objective criteria under the contracts. Accordingly, revenues recognized under these methods do not require the use of significant estimates that are susceptible to change. Revenue recognized using the percentage-of-completion accounting method does require the use of estimates and judgment as discussed below.

Our policy follows the guidance from SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 104 “Revenue Recognition” (“SAB 104”). SAB 104 provides guidance on the recognition, presentation, and disclosure of revenue in financial statements and updates existing Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 13 to be consistent with recently issued guidance, primarily Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 00-21, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables” (“EITF 00-21”). We recognize revenues when persuasive evidence of

27


Table of Contents

an arrangement exists, the services have been provided to the client, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured.

During fiscal year 2004, approximately 62% of our revenue was recognized based on transaction volumes, approximately 19% were fixed fee based, wherein our revenue is earned as we fulfill our performance obligations under the arrangement, approximately 10% were related to cost reimbursable contracts, approximately 5% of our revenues were recognized using percentage-of-completion accounting and the remainder is related to time and material contracts.

Revenues on cost reimbursable contracts are recognized by applying an estimated factor to costs as incurred, such factor being determined by the contract provisions and prior experience. Revenues on unit-price contracts are recognized at the contractual selling prices of work completed and accepted by the client. Revenues on time and material contracts are recognized at the contractual rates as the labor hours and direct expenses are incurred.

Revenues for business process outsourcing services are recognized as services are rendered, generally on the basis of the number of accounts or transactions processed. Information technology processing revenues are recognized as services are provided to the client, generally at the contractual selling prices of resources consumed or capacity utilized by our clients. Revenues from annual maintenance contracts are deferred and recognized ratably over the maintenance period. Revenues from hardware sales are recognized upon delivery to the client and when uncertainties regarding customer acceptance have expired.

Revenues on certain fixed price contracts where we provide information technology system development and implementation services are recognized over the contract term based on the percentage of development and implementation services that are provided during the period compared with the total estimated development and implementation services to be provided over the entire contract using Statement of Position 81-1, “Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts” (“SOP 81-1”). SOP 81-1 requires the use of percentage-of-completion accounting for long-term contracts that are binding agreements between us and our customers in which we agree, for compensation, to perform a service to the customer’s specifications. These services require that we perform significant, extensive and complex design, development, modification and implementation activities for our customers’ systems. Performance will often extend over long periods, and our right to receive future payment depends on our future performance in accordance with the agreement.

The percentage-of-completion methodology involves recognizing revenue using the percentage of services completed, on a current cumulative cost to total cost basis, using a reasonably consistent profit margin over the period. Due to the longer term nature of these projects, developing the estimates of costs often requires significant judgment. Factors that must be considered in estimating the progress of work completed and ultimate cost of the projects include, but are not limited to, the availability of labor and labor productivity, the nature and complexity of the work to be performed, and the impact of delayed performance. If changes occur in delivery, productivity or other factors used in developing the estimates of costs or revenues, we revise our cost and revenue estimates, which may result in increases or decreases in revenues and costs, and such revisions are reflected in income in the period in which the facts that give rise to that revision become known.

EITF 00-21 addresses the accounting treatment for an arrangement to provide the delivery or performance of multiple products and/or services where the delivery of a product or system or performance of services may occur at different points in time or over different periods of time. The Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus regarding, among other issues, the applicability of the provisions regarding separation of contract elements in EITF 00-21 to contracts where one or more elements fall within the scope of other authoritative literature, such as SOP 81-1. EITF 00-21 does not impact the use of SOP 81-1 for contract elements that fall within the scope of SOP 81-1, such as the implementation or development of an information technology system to client specifications under a long-term contract. Where an implementation or development project is contracted with a client, and we will also provide services or operate the system over a period of time, EITF 00-21 provides the methodology for separating the contract elements and allocating total arrangement consideration to the contract elements. We adopted the provisions of EITF 00-21 on a prospective basis to transactions entered into after July 1, 2003. We believe that EITF 00-21 did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Revenues earned in excess of related billings are accrued, whereas billings in excess of revenues earned are deferred until the related services are provided.

Valuation of goodwill and intangibles. Due to the fact that we are primarily a services company, our business acquisitions typically result in significant amounts of goodwill and other intangible assets, which affect the amount of future period

28


Table of Contents

amortization expense and possible expense we could incur as a result of an impairment. In addition, in connection with our revenue arrangements, we incur costs to originate contracts and to perform the transition and setup activities necessary to enable us to perform under the terms of the arrangement. We capitalize certain incremental direct costs in connection with these activities and amortize them over the term of the arrangement. From time to time, we also provide certain inducements to customers in the form of various arrangements, including contractual credits, which are capitalized and amortized as a reduction of revenue over the term of the contract. The determination of the value of goodwill and other intangibles requires us to make estimates and assumptions about future business trends and growth. We continually evaluate whether events and circumstances have occurred that indicate the balance of goodwill or intangible assets may not be recoverable. In evaluating impairment, we estimate the sum of expected future cash flows derived from the goodwill or intangible asset. Such evaluation is significantly impacted by estimates and assumptions of future revenues, costs and expenses and other factors. If an event occurs which would cause us to revise our estimates and assumptions used in analyzing the value of our goodwill or other intangibles, such revision could result in a non-cash impairment charge that could have a material impact on our financial results.

Allowance for doubtful accounts. We make estimates of the collectibility of our accounts receivable. We specifically analyze accounts receivable and historical bad debts, customer credit-worthiness, current economic trends, and changes in our customer payment terms and collection trends when evaluating the adequacy of our allowance for doubtful accounts. Any change in the assumptions used in analyzing a specific account receivable may result in additional allowance for doubtful accounts being recognized in the period in which the change occurs.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2003, the SEC issued SAB 104. SAB 104 updates existing Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 13 “Revenue Recognition” to be consistent with recently issued guidance, primarily EITF 00-21. We do not believe that SAB 104 has had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Risks Related To Our Business

The risks described below should not be considered to be comprehensive and all-inclusive. Additional risks that we do not yet know of or that we currently think are immaterial may also impair our business operations. If any events occur that give rise to the following risks, our business, financial condition, cash flow or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected, and as a result, the trading price of our Class A common stock could be materially and adversely impacted. These risk factors should be read in conjunction with other information set forth in this report, including our Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes.

Loss of, or reduction of business from, clients. The loss of clients and/or the reduction of volumes and services provided to our clients could materially affect our revenues, profitability and cash flows. In addition, we incur fixed costs related to our information technology outsourcing and business process outsourcing clients. Therefore the loss of any one of our significant clients could leave us with a significantly higher level of fixed costs than is necessary to serve our remaining clients, thereby reducing our revenues, profitability and cash flow.

Termination of all or a part of a contract by a client or deterioration of the financial condition of a client. We may be required to make significant capital investments in order to attract and retain large outsourcing agreements. The termination of all or a part of a client contract or the deterioration of the financial condition or prospects of a client has in the past, and may in the future, result in an impairment of the net book value of the assets recorded, including a portion of our intangible assets, and a reduction in our earnings and cash flow.

Competition. We expect to encounter additional competition as we address new markets and new competitors enter our existing markets. If we are forced to lower our pricing or if demand for our services decreases, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow may be materially and adversely affected. Some of our competitors have greater resources, and they may be able to use their resources to adapt more quickly to new or emerging technologies or to devote greater resources to the promotion and sale of their products and services. In addition, we must frequently compete with a client’s own internal business process and information technology capabilities, which may constitute a fixed cost for the client.

Difficulties in executing our acquisition strategy. We intend to continue to expand our business through the acquisition of complementary companies. We cannot, however, make any assurances that we will be able to identify any potential acquisition

29


Table of Contents

candidates or consummate any additional acquisitions or that any future acquisitions will be successfully integrated or will be advantageous to us. Without additional acquisitions, we are unlikely to maintain historical total growth rates.

Failure to properly manage our operations and our growth. We have rapidly expanded our operations in recent years. We intend to continue expansion in the foreseeable future to pursue existing and potential market opportunities. This rapid growth places a significant demand on our management and operational resources. In order to manage growth effectively, we must implement and improve our operational systems, procedures, and controls on a timely basis. If we fail to implement these systems, procedures and controls on a timely basis, we may not be able to service our clients’ needs, hire and retain new employees, pursue new business, complete future acquisitions or operate our businesses effectively. We could also trigger contractual credits to clients. Failure to properly transition new customers to our systems, properly budget transition costs or accurately estimate new contract operational costs could result in delays in our contract performance, trigger service level penalties or result in contracts whose profit margins did not meet our expectations or our historical profit margins. Failure to properly integrate acquired operations could result in increased cost. As a result of any of these problems associated with expansion, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Government clients — termination rights, audits and investigations. A substantial portion of our revenues are derived from contracts with state and local governments and from contracts with the Department of Education. Governments and their agencies may terminate most of these contracts at any time, without cause. Also, our Department of Education contracts are subject to the approval of appropriations being made by the United States Congress to fund the expenditures to be made by the Federal government under these contracts. Additionally, government contracts are generally subject to audits and investigations by government agencies. If the government finds that we improperly charged any costs to a contract, the costs are not reimbursable or, if already reimbursed, the cost must be refunded to the government. If the government discovers improper or illegal activities in the course of audits or investigations, the contractor may be subject to various civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, which may include termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits, suspension of payments, fines and suspensions or debarment from doing business with the government. Any resulting penalties or sanctions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow. Further, the negative publicity that arises from findings in such audits, investigations or the penalties or sanctions therefore could have an adverse effect on our reputation in the industry and reduce our ability to compete for new contracts and may also have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.

Exercise of contract termination provisions and service level penalties. Most of our contracts with our clients permit termination in the event our performance is not consistent with service levels specified in those contracts, or provide for credits to our clients for failure to meet service levels. In addition, if clients are not satisfied with our level of performance, our clients may seek damages as permitted under the contract and/or our reputation in the industry may suffer, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow.

Pricing risks. Some of our contracts contain provisions requiring that our services be priced based on a pre-established standard or benchmark regardless of the costs we incur in performing these services. Some of our contracts contain pricing provisions that require the client to pay a set fee for our services regardless of whether our costs to perform these services exceed the amount of the set fee. Some of our contracts contain re-pricing provisions which can result in reductions of our fees for performing our services. In such situations, we are exposed to the risk that we may be unable to price our services to levels that will permit recovery of our costs, and may adversely affect our operating results and cash flow.

Loss of significant software vendor relationships. Our ability to service our clients depends to a large extent on our use of various software programs that we license from a small number of primary software vendors. If our significant software vendors were to terminate or refuse to renew our contracts with them, we might not be able to replace the related software programs and would be unable to serve our clients, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, revenues, profitability and cash flow.

Intellectual property infringement claims. We rely heavily on the use of intellectual property. We do not own the majority of the software that we use to run our business; instead we license this software from a small number of primary vendors. If these vendors assert claims that we or our clients are infringing on their software or related intellectual property, we could incur substantial costs to defend these claims, which could have a material effect on our profitability and cash flow. In addition, if any of our vendors’ infringement claims are ultimately successful, our vendors could require us (1) to cease selling or using products or services that incorporate the challenged software or technology, (2) to obtain a license or additional licenses from our vendors, or (3) to redesign our products and services which rely on the challenged software or technology. If we are unsuccessful in the

30


Table of Contents

defense of an infringement claim and our vendors require us to initiate any of the above actions, then such actions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.

Rapid technological changes. The markets for our information technology services are subject to rapid technological changes and rapid changes in client requirements. We may be unable to timely and successfully customize products and services that incorporate new technology or to deliver the services and products demanded by the marketplace.

Federal and State laws relating to individually identifiable information. We process and store information relating to identifiable individuals, both in our role as a service provider and as an employer. As a result, we are subject to numerous Federal and State laws and regulations designed to protect individually identifiable information, including financial and health information. For example, in 1996, Congress passed the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and as required therein, the Department of Health and Human Services established regulations governing, among other things, the privacy, security and electronic transmission of individually identifiable health information. We have taken measures to comply with each of those regulations on or before the required dates. Other Federal and State laws apply to the processing of individually identifiable information as well, and additional legislation may be enacted at any time. Failure to comply with these types of laws may subject us to liability for monetary damages, fines and/or criminal prosecution and may have a material adverse effect on our profitability and cash flow.

Budget deficits at, or fluctuations in the number of requests for proposals issued by, state and local governments and their agencies. A substantial portion of our revenues are derived from contracts with state and local governments and their agencies. Currently, many state and local governments that we have contracts with are facing potential budget deficits. Also, the number of requests for proposals issued by state and local government agencies is subject to fluctuation. While this has not had a material adverse impact on our results of operations through fiscal year 2004, it is unclear what impact, if any, these deficits may have on our future business, revenues, results of operations and cash flow.

International risks. Recently we have expanded our international operations and have also contemplated the acquisition of companies formed and operating in foreign countries. We have approximately 12,000 employees in Mexico, Guatemala, India, Ghana, Jamaica, Dominican Republic, Spain, Malaysia, Ireland, Germany and China, as well as several other countries, that support our commercial business process outsourcing services. International operations and acquisitions are subject to a number of risks including, but not limited to the following: fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; licensing and labor counsel requirements; staffing key managerial positions; cultural differences; integration of companies, their management, and operations, which are located in distant locations; data privacy laws adopted by various countries in which we do business, including but not limited to member states of the European Union; general economic conditions in foreign countries; additional expenses and risks inherent in conducting operations in geographically distant locations; laws of those foreign countries; political instability; trade restrictions such as tariffs and duties or other controls affecting foreign operations, and other factors that may adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Armed hostilities and terrorist attacks. Terrorist attacks and further acts of violence or war may cause major instability in the U.S. and other financial markets in which we operate. In addition, armed hostilities and acts of terrorism may directly impact our physical facilities and operations, which are located in North America, Central America, South America, Europe, Africa, Australia, Asia and the Middle East, or those of our clients. These developments subject our worldwide operations to increased risks and, depending on their magnitude, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Failure to attract and retain necessary technical personnel and skilled management and qualified subcontractors. Our success depends to a significant extent upon our ability to attract, retain and motivate highly skilled and qualified personnel and to subcontract with qualified, competent subcontractors. If we fail to attract, train, and retain, sufficient numbers of these technically-skilled people or are unable to contract with qualified, competent subcontractors, our business, financial condition, and results of operations will be materially and adversely affected. Our success also depends on the skills, experience, and performance of key members of our management team and on qualified, competent subcontractors. The loss of any key employee or the loss of a key subcontract relationship could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flow, results of operations and prospects.

Servicing Risks. We service (for various lenders and under various service agreements) a portfolio of approximately $18.2 billion of loans made under the Federal Family Education Loan Program, which loans are guaranteed by a Federal government agency. If a loan is in default, then a claim is made upon the guarantor. If the guarantor denies the claim because of a servicing

31


Table of Contents

error, then under certain of the servicing agreements we may be required to purchase the loan from the lender. Upon purchase of the loan, we attempt to cure the servicing errors and either sell the loan back to the guarantor (which must occur within a specified period of time) or sell the loan on the open market to a third party. We are subject to the risk that we may be unable to cure the servicing errors or sell the loan on the open market. Our reserves, which are based on historical information, may be inadequate if our servicing performance results in the requirement that we repurchase a substantial number of loans, which repurchase could have a material adverse impact on our cash flow and profitability.

Disruption in Utility or Network Services. Our services are dependent on the companies providing electricity and other utilities to our operating facilities, as well as network companies providing connectivity to our facilities and clients. While there are backup systems in many of our operating facilities, an extended outage of utility services may have a material adverse effect on our operations, revenues, cash flow and profitability.

Indemnification Risk. Our contracts, including our agreements with respect to divestitures, include various indemnification obligations. If we are required to satisfy an indemnification obligation, that may have a material adverse effect on our business, profitability and cash flow.

Other Risks. We have attempted to identify material risk factors currently affecting our business and company. However, additional risks that we do not yet know of, or that we currently think are immaterial, may occur or become material. These risks could impair our business operations or adversely affect revenues, cash flow or profitability.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. Sensitivity analysis is one technique used to measure the impact of changes in the interest rates and foreign exchange rates on our results of operations or financial position. The following analysis provides a framework to understand our sensitivity to hypothetical changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates as of June 30, 2004.

We have variable rate debt instruments. Our variable rate debt instruments are subject to market risk from changes in interest rates. Risk can be estimated by measuring the impact of a near-term adverse movement of 10% in short-term market interest rates. If these rates averaged 10% higher or lower during fiscal years 2004 and 2003, there would have been no material adverse impact on our results of operations.

We conduct business in the United States and in foreign countries. We are exposed to foreign currency risk from changes in the value of underlying assets and liabilities of our non-United States denominated foreign investments and foreign currency transactions. Risk can be estimated by measuring the impact of a near-term adverse movement of 10% in foreign currency rates against the U.S. dollar. If these rates averaged 10% higher or lower in fiscal years 2004 or 2003, there would have been no material adverse impact on our results of operations or financial position.

32


Table of Contents

Item 8. Financial Statements

     
    Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  34
Consolidated Balance Sheets
  35
Consolidated Statements of Income
  36
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
  37
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
  38
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
  39-61

33


Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.:

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. and its Subsidiaries at June 30, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2004 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Dallas, Texas
July 29, 2004, except as to the seventh
paragraph of Note 17, which is as of
August 13, 2004, the tenth paragraph of Note 17,
which is as of August 25, 2004, and
the second paragraph of Note 23, which is as of August 26, 2004.

34


Table of Contents

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
                 
    June 30,
    2004
  2003
ASSETS
               
Current assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 76,899     $ 51,170  
Accounts receivable, net
    873,471       835,478  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    94,054       92,850  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total current assets
    1,044,424       979,498  
 
Property, equipment and software, net
    521,772       478,212  
Goodwill
    1,969,326       1,905,878  
Other intangibles, net
    283,767       265,091  
Other assets
    87,953       70,026  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total assets
  $ 3,907,242     $ 3,698,705  
 
   
 
     
 
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Current liabilities:
               
Accounts payable
  $ 61,749     $ 58,376  
Accrued compensation and benefits
    133,530       132,027  
Other accrued liabilities
    342,648       272,578  
Income taxes payable
    10,628       17,057  
Deferred taxes
    25,426       26,054  
Current portion of long-term debt
    2,048       1,764  
Current portion of unearned revenue
    61,541       49,620  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total current liabilities
    637,570       557,476  
 
Convertible notes
          316,990  
Long-term debt
    372,439       181,350  
Deferred taxes
    234,183       176,484  
Other long-term liabilities
    72,563       37,217  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total liabilities
    1,316,755       1,269,517  
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 17)
               
 
Stockholders’ equity:
               
Class A common stock, $.01 par value, 500,000 shares authorized, 135,981 and 126,607 shares outstanding, respectively
    1,360       1,266  
Class B common stock, $.01 par value, 14,000 shares authorized, 6,600 shares outstanding
    66       66  
Additional paid-in capital
    1,730,783       1,358,418  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net
    (3,381 )     (971 )
Retained earnings
    1,600,252       1,070,409  
Treasury stock at cost, 14,900 shares
    (738,593 )      
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total stockholders’ equity
    2,590,487       2,429,188  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 3,907,242     $ 3,698,705  
 
   
 
     
 
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

35


Table of Contents

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands except per share amounts)
                         
    Year ended June 30,
    2004
  2003
  2002
Revenues
  $ 4,106,393     $ 3,787,206     $ 3,062,918  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Operating expenses:
                       
Wages and benefits
    1,790,479       1,716,946       1,350,057  
Services and supplies
    1,090,207       994,410       888,497  
Rent, lease and maintenance
    416,394       351,855       278,621  
Depreciation and amortization
    183,796       152,128       110,486  
Gain on sale of business
    (285,273 )            
Other operating expenses
    67,079       52,586       34,625  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total operating expenses
    3,262,682       3,267,925       2,662,286  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Operating income
    843,711       519,281       400,632  
 
Interest expense
    17,037       25,194       30,619  
Other non-operating expense (income), net
    (2,509 )     3,140       9,557  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Pretax profit
    829,183       490,947       360,456  
 
Income tax expense
    299,340       184,105       130,860  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Net income
  $ 529,843     $ 306,842     $ 229,596  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Earnings per share:
                       
Basic
  $ 4.03     $ 2.32     $ 1.94  
Diluted
  $ 3.83     $ 2.20     $ 1.76  
Shares used in computing earnings per share:
                       
Basic
    131,498       132,445       118,646  
Diluted
    139,646       143,430       137,464  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

36


Table of Contents

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands)
                                                                                 
    Common Stock
                  Accumulated
Other
  Treasury Stock    
    Class A   Class B   Additional           Comprehensive  
   
   
 
  Paid-in   Retained   Income (Loss),   Shares        
    Shares
  Amount
  Shares
  Amount
  Capital
  Earnings
  Net
  Held
  Amount
  Total
Balance at June 30, 2001
    47,282     $ 473       3,300     $ 33     $ 350,767     $ 534,374     $ (132 )         $     $ 885,515  
Comprehensive income:
                                                                               
Unrealized loss on marketable securities
                                        (84 )                 (84 )
Interest rate hedge
                                        216                   216  
Net income
                                  229,596                         229,596  
 
                                                                           
 
 
Total comprehensive income
                                                                            229,728  
 
                                                                           
 
 
Employee stock transactions and related tax benefits
    1,137       11                   38,993                               39,004  
Equity offering
    9,200       92                   714,200                               714,292  
Two-for-one stock dividend
    57,024       570       3,300       33       (603 )                              
Conversion of 4% Convertible Subordinated Notes
    10,781       108                   227,176                               227,284  
Other, net
                                  (403 )                       (403 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Balance at June 30, 2002
    125,424       1,254       6,600       66       1,330,533       763,567                         2,095,420  
Comprehensive income:
                                                                               
Foreign currency translation losses
                                        (971 )                 (971 )
Net income
                                  306,842                         306,842  
 
                                                                           
 
 
Total comprehensive income
                                                                            305,871  
 
                                                                           
 
 
Employee stock transactions and related tax benefits
    1,183       12                   27,776                               27,788  
Other, net
                            109                               109  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Balance at June 30, 2003
    126,607       1,266       6,600       66       1,358,418       1,070,409       (971 )                 2,429,188  
Comprehensive income:
                                                                               
Foreign currency translation losses
                                        (2,410 )                 (2,410 )
Net income
                                  529,843                         529,843  
 
                                                                           
 
 
Total comprehensive income
                                                                            527,433  
 
                                                                           
 
 
Share repurchases
                                              (14,992 )     (743,198 )     (743,198 )
Employee stock transactions and related tax benefits
    2,082       21                   59,167                   92       4,605       63,793  
Conversion of 3.5% Convertible Subordinated Notes
    7,292       73                   313,198                               313,271  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Balance at June 30, 2004
    135,981     $ 1,360       6,600     $ 66     $ 1,730,783     $ 1,600,252     $ (3,381 )     (14,900 )   $ (738,593 )   $ 2,590,487  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

37


Table of Contents

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
                         
    Year ended June 30,
    2004
  2003
  2002
Cash flows from operating activities:
                       
Net income
  $ 529,843     $ 306,842     $ 229,596  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
                       
Depreciation and amortization
    183,796       152,128       110,486  
Contract inducement amortization
    10,981       7,346       887  
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable
    1,461       4,838       3,283  
Deferred financing fee amortization
    3,142       4,172       2,938  
Provision for default loan liability
    2,685       2,540       200  
(Gain) loss on sale of business units
    (291,967 )     (1,585 )     1,841  
(Gain) loss on long-term investments
    (820 )     3,375       8,449  
Deferred income tax expense
    66,155       100,851       55,821  
Tax benefit of stock options
    26,263       16,124       21,951  
Other non-cash activities
    5,000       5,575       1,012  
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions:
                       
Increase in accounts receivable
    (156,063 )     (100,643 )     (115,806 )
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets
    (3,596 )     6,263       1,958  
Increase in other assets
    (18,362 )     (19,631 )     (9,448 )
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable
    14,194       (15,867 )     26,252  
Increase in accrued compensation and benefits
    11,502       787       7,209  
Increase in other accrued liabilities
    52,711       61,962       12,775  
Increase (decrease) in income taxes payable
    16,182       (3,350 )     13,118  
Increase (decrease) in other long-term liabilities
    12,047       1,468       (638 )
Increase in unearned revenue
    11,055       12,110       130  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total adjustments
    (53,634 )     238,463       142,418  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Net cash provided by operating activities
    476,209       545,305       372,014  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Cash flows from investing activities:
                       
Purchases of property, equipment and software, net
    (224,621 )     (205,673 )     (144,406 )
Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired
    (251,727 )     (76,838 )     (1,425,529 )
Proceeds from (payments on) divestitures, net of transaction costs
    583,133       4,093       (5,887 )
Additions to other intangible assets
    (33,329 )     (47,967 )     (19,317 )
Purchases of investments
    (7,690 )           (4,129 )
Proceeds from sale of investments
    1,196       466       700  
Additions to notes receivable
    (3,015 )     (3,478 )     (3,577 )
Proceeds from notes receivable
    6,452       9,314       3,981  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
    70,399       (320,083 )     (1,598,164 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Cash flows from financing activities:
                       
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt, net
    1,459,600       927,762       1,279,210  
Payments of long-term debt
    (1,274,238 )     (1,146,561 )     (992,510 )
Purchase of treasury shares
    (743,198 )            
Proceeds from equity offering, net of transaction costs
                714,292  
Employee stock transactions
    39,038       14,243       17,901  
Other, net
    (2,081 )     (3,310 )     (1,387 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
    (520,879 )     (207,866 )     1,017,506  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    25,729       17,356       (208,644 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
    51,170       33,814       242,458  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
  $ 76,899     $ 51,170     $ 33,814  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Supplemental information of non-cash financing activities:
                       
Conversion of 3.5% Convertible Subordinated Notes to Class A Common Stock
  $ 316,725     $     $  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
     See supplemental cash flow information in Notes 2, 3, 7, 8, 10 and 11.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

38


Table of Contents

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Description of business and basis of presentation

We are a Fortune 500 and S&P 500 company with approximately 43,000 employees providing business process and information technology outsourcing solutions to commercial and government clients. We were incorporated in Delaware on June 8, 1988 and are based in Dallas, Texas. Our clients have time-critical, transaction-intensive business and information processing needs, and we typically service these needs through long-term contracts.

The consolidated financial statements are comprised of our accounts and the accounts of our majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Our fiscal year ends on June 30. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America that require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period, as well as the accompanying notes. These estimates are based on information available to us. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of cash, short-term investments in commercial paper, and money market investments that have an initial maturity of three months or less. Cash equivalents are valued at cost, which approximates market.

Allowance for doubtful accounts

We make estimates of the collectibility of our accounts receivable. We specifically analyze accounts receivable and historical bad debts, customer credit-worthiness, current economic trends, and changes in our customer payment terms and collection trends when evaluating the adequacy of our allowance for doubtful accounts. Any change in the assumptions used in analyzing a specific account receivable may result in additional allowance for doubtful accounts being recognized in the period in which the change occurs.

Property, equipment and software, net

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which for equipment ranges primarily from 3 to 12 years and for buildings and improvements up to 40 years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the term of the lease or the estimated life.

In accordance with Statement of Position 98-1, “Accounting for Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use” (“SOP 98-1”), certain costs related to the development or purchase of internal-use software are capitalized and amortized over the estimated useful life of the software. During fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, we capitalized approximately $53.1 million, $44 million and $15.8 million, respectively, in software costs under SOP 98-1, which are being amortized over expected useful lives, which range from 2 to 10 years. These capitalized amounts include internal costs of approximately $12.2 million, $19.9 million and $12.1 million and external costs of approximately $40.9 million, $24.1 million and $3.7 million for fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. These costs were incurred primarily in the development of our proprietary software used in connection with our long-term client relationships.

Goodwill

Due to the fact that we are primarily a services company, our business acquisitions typically result in significant amounts of goodwill and other intangible assets, which affect the amount of future period amortization expense and possible expense we could incur as a result of an impairment. The determination of the value of goodwill requires us to make estimates and assumptions about future business trends and growth. We continually evaluate whether events and circumstances have occurred that indicate the balance of goodwill may not be recoverable. In evaluating impairment, we estimate the sum of expected future cash flows derived from the goodwill and future revenues, costs and expenses and other factors. If an event occurs which would cause us to revise our estimates and assumptions used in analyzing the value of our goodwill, such revision could result in a non-cash impairment charge that could have a material impact on our financial results.

39


Table of Contents

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Other intangible assets

Other intangible assets consist primarily of acquired customer-related intangibles, and contract and migration costs related to new business activity, both of which are recorded at cost and amortized using the straight-line method over the contract terms. In connection with our revenue arrangements, we incur costs to originate contracts and to perform the transition and setup activities necessary to enable us to perform under the terms of the arrangement. We capitalize certain incremental direct costs in connection with these activities and amortize them over the term of the arrangement. From time to time, we also provide certain inducements to customers in the form of various arrangements, including contractual credits, which are capitalized and amortized as a reduction of revenue over the term of the contract. The amortization period of customer-related intangible assets ranges from 1 to 11 years, with a weighted average of approximately 8 years. The amortization period for all other intangible assets, including trademarks, ranges from 4 to 20 years, with a weighted average of 7 years. For all the fiscal year 2004 acquisitions, the CyperRep acquisition in fiscal year 2003 and the IMS, Andersen, and AFSA acquisitions in fiscal year 2002 (as described in Note 3), we obtained a third-party valuation of the intangible assets from Value Incorporated. The determination of the value of other intangibles requires us to make estimates and assumptions about future business trends and growth. We continually evaluate whether events and circumstances have occurred that indicate the balance of intangible assets may not be recoverable. In evaluating impairment, we estimate the sum of expected future cash flows derived from the intangible asset. Such evaluation is significantly impacted by estimates and assumptions of future revenues, costs and expenses and other factors. If an event occurs which would cause us to revise our estimates and assumptions used in analyzing the value of our other intangibles, such revision could result in a non-cash impairment charge that could have a material impact on our financial results.

Other assets

Other assets primarily consist of long-term receivables and long-term investments accounted for using the cost method, long-term deposits and deferred debt issuance costs. It is our policy to periodically review the net realizable value of our long-term investments through an assessment of the recoverability of the carrying amount of each investment. Each investment is reviewed to determine if events or changes in circumstances have occurred which indicate that the recoverability of the carrying amount may be uncertain. In the event that an investment is found to be carried at an amount in excess of its recoverable amount, the asset is adjusted for impairment to a level commensurate with the recoverable amount of the underlying asset. The deferred debt issuance costs are being amortized using the straight-line method over the life of the related debt, which approximates the effective interest method.

Revenue recognition

A significant portion of our revenue is recognized based on objective criteria that does not require significant estimates or uncertainties. For example, transaction volumes and time and costs under time and material and cost reimbursable arrangements are based on specific, objective criteria under the contracts. Accordingly, revenues recognized under these methods do not require the use of significant estimates that are susceptible to change. Revenue recognized using the percentage-of-completion accounting method does require the use of estimates and judgment as discussed below.

Our policy follows the guidance from SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 104 “Revenue Recognition” (“SAB 104”). SAB 104 provides guidance on the recognition, presentation, and disclosure of revenue in financial statements and updates existing Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 13 to be consistent with recently issued guidance, primarily Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 00-21, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables” (“EITF 00-21”). We recognize revenues when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the services have been provided to the client, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured.

During fiscal year 2004, approximately 62% of our revenue was recognized based on transaction volumes, approximately 19% were fixed fee based, wherein our revenue is earned as we fulfill our performance obligations under the arrangement, approximately 10% was related to cost reimbursable contracts, approximately 5% of our revenues were recognized using percentage-of-completion accounting and the remainder is related to time and material contracts.

Revenues on cost reimbursable contracts are recognized by applying an estimated factor to costs as incurred, such factor being determined by the contract provisions and prior experience. Revenues on unit-price contracts are recognized at the contractual selling prices of work completed and accepted by the client. Revenues on time and material contracts are recognized at the contractual rates as the labor hours and direct expenses are incurred.

40


Table of Contents

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Revenues for business process outsourcing services are recognized as services are rendered, generally on the basis of the number of accounts or transactions processed. Information technology processing revenues are recognized as services are provided to the client, generally at the contractual selling prices of resources consumed or capacity utilized by our clients. Revenues from annual maintenance contracts are deferred and recognized ratably over the maintenance period. Revenues from hardware sales are recognized upon delivery to the client and when uncertainties regarding customer acceptance have expired.

Revenues on certain fixed price contracts where we provide information technology system development and implementation services are recognized over the contract term based on the percentage of development and implementation services that are provided during the period compared with the total estimated development and implementation services to be provided over the entire contract using Statement of Position 81-1, “Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts” (“SOP 81-1”). SOP 81-1 requires the use of percentage-of-completion accounting for long-term contracts that are binding agreements between us and our customers in which we agree, for compensation, to perform a service to the customer’s specifications. These services require that we perform significant, extensive and complex design, development, modification and implementation activities for our customers’ systems. Performance will often extend over long periods, and our right to receive future payment depends on our future performance in accordance with the agreement.

The percentage-of-completion methodology involves recognizing revenue using the percentage of services completed, on a current cumulative cost to total cost basis, using a reasonably consistent profit margin over the period. Due to the longer term nature of these projects, developing the estimates of costs often requires significant judgment. Factors that must be considered in estimating the progress of work completed and ultimate cost of the projects include, but are not limited to, the availability of labor and labor productivity, the nature and complexity of the work to be performed, and the impact of delayed performance. If changes occur in delivery, productivity or other factors used in developing the estimates of costs or revenues, we revise our cost and revenue estimates, which may result in increases or decreases in revenues and costs, and such revisions are reflected in income in the period in which the facts that give rise to that revision become known.

EITF 00-21 addresses the accounting treatment for an arrangement to provide the delivery or performance of multiple products and/or services where the delivery of a product or system or performance of services may occur at different points in time or over different periods of time. The Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus regarding, among other issues, the applicability of the provisions regarding separation of contract elements in EITF 00-21 to contracts where one or more elements fall within the scope of other authoritative literature, such as SOP 81-1. EITF 00-21 does not impact the use of SOP 81-1 for contract elements that fall within the scope of SOP 81-1, such as the implementation or development of an information technology system to client specifications under a long-term contract. Where an implementation or development project is contracted with a client, and we will also provide services or operate the system over a period of time, EITF 00-21 provides the methodology for separating the contract elements and allocating total arrangement consideration to the contract elements. We adopted the provisions of EITF 00-21 on a prospective basis to transactions entered into after July 1, 2003. We believe that EITF 00-21 did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Revenues earned in excess of related billings are accrued, whereas billings in excess of revenues earned are deferred until the related services are provided.

Income taxes

The determination of our provision for income taxes requires significant judgment, the use of estimates, and the interpretation and application of complex tax laws. Significant judgment is required in assessing the timing and amounts of deductible and taxable items. We establish reserves when, despite our belief that our tax return positions are fully supportable, we believe that certain positions may be challenged and that we may not succeed. We adjust these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances. Our provision for income taxes includes the impact of these reserve changes. In the event that there is a significant unusual or one-time item recognized in our operating results, the taxes attributable to that item would be separately calculated and recorded at the same time as the unusual or one-time item.

Deferred income taxes are determined based on the difference between financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the years in which such differences are expected to reverse. We routinely evaluate all deferred tax assets to determine the likelihood of their realization. See Note 11 for discussion of income taxes.

Earnings per share

Basic earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed using the combination of dilutive common share equivalents and the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. See Note 14 for the computation of earnings per share.

41


Table of Contents

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Stock-based compensation

We follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” (“APB 25”) in accounting for our stock-based compensation plans. Under APB 25, no compensation expense is recognized for our stock-based compensation plans since the exercise prices of awards under our plans are at current market prices of our stock on the date of grant. Had compensation cost for our stock-based compensation plans been determined based on the fair value at the grant date under those plans consistent with the fair value method of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”), our net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below:

                         
    For the year ended June 30,
    2004
  2003
  2002
Net income
                       
As reported
  $ 529,843     $ 306,842     $ 229,596  
Less: Pro forma employee compensation cost of stock-based compensation plans, net of income tax
    20,480       17,570       11,936  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Pro forma
  $ 509,363     $ 289,272     $ 217,660  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Basic earnings per share
                       
As reported
  $ 4.03     $ 2.32     $ 1.94  
Pro forma
  $ 3.87     $ 2.18     $ 1.83  
Diluted earnings per share
                       
As reported
  $ 3.83     $ 2.20     $ 1.76  
Pro forma
  $ 3.70     $ 2.09     $ 1.68  

The fair value of each option grant was estimated at the date of grant using a separate Black-Scholes option pricing calculation for each grant. The following weighted average assumptions were used for grants in fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002: dividend yield of 0% in all years for all plans; volatility of 30.25%, 34.65% and 34.94%, for fiscal years 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively, for all plans; risk-free interest rates of 3.46%, 3.74% and 4.36% for fiscal years 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively, for all plans; and weighted average expected option life of 5.5 years for the 1997 and 1988 Plans and 3 years for the 1991 Plan for all years presented. The average fair values of the options granted during fiscal years 2004, 2003, and 2002 are estimated at $15.70, $14.49 and $16.01, respectively, for the combined plans. The fair values have been adjusted to reflect the February 2002 two-for-one stock split.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period financial statements to conform to current presentation.

2. Sale of the Majority of our Federal Business

Effective November 1, 2003, we completed the sale of a majority of our Federal government business to Lockheed Martin Corporation (the “Divested Federal Business”) for approximately $649.4 million, which included a cash payment of $586.5 million at closing and $70 million payable pursuant to a five-year non-compete agreement, less a working capital settlement of $7.1 million paid in the third quarter of fiscal year 2004. Assets sold were approximately $346.8 million and liabilities assumed by Lockheed Martin Corporation were approximately $67.9 million, both of which were primarily in the Government segment. We recognized a pretax gain of $285.3 million ($182.3 million, net of income tax) in fiscal year 2004. The after tax proceeds from the divestiture were generally used to pay down debt, fund the acquisitions of Lockheed Martin Corporation’s commercial information technology outsourcing business, Patient Accounting Services Center, LLC, Truckload Management Services, Inc. and etravelexperts, LLC (see Note 3), and fund our share repurchase program (see Note 12).

42


Table of Contents

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Revenues from the Divested Federal Business, which are primarily included in the Government segment, were approximately $237.7 million, $680.1 million and $627.2 million for the years ended June 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. This divestiture excludes, among others, our Department of Education relationship. Additionally our Commercial and Government operations will continue to serve as a subcontractor on portions of the Divested Federal Business.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” requires that depreciation and amortization of long-lived assets held for sale be suspended during the holding period prior to sale. Accordingly, we suspended depreciation and amortization prior to the consummation of the sale in the amount of $6.2 million ($3.9 million, net of income tax) in fiscal year 2004, respectively, related to those long-lived assets sold.

In February 2004, we sold the contracts associated with the Hanscom Air Force Base relationship to ManTech International Corporation for $6.5 million in cash. We recognized a pretax gain of $5.4 million ($3.4 million, net of income tax) for this transaction. For the Hanscom Air Force Base contracts, we reported revenue in our Government segment of approximately $17.2 million, $25.2 million and $26 million for the years ended June 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. We have agreed to indemnify ManTech with respect to the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) investigation related to purchasing activities at Hanscom during the period 1998-2000 (see Note 17). In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2004, we sold an additional small contractual relationship to ManTech International Corporation. We reported revenue in our Government segment of approximately $3.1 million, $4.2 million and $4.5 million for the years ended June 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, for this contract.

The sales of the Divested Federal Business to Lockheed Martin Corporation and the contracts sold to ManTech International Corporation now allow us to focus on our business process and information technology outsourcing service offerings in the commercial, state and local, and Federal education and healthcare markets.

3. Business Combinations

From our inception through June 30, 2004, we have acquired several businesses in the information technology services and business process outsourcing industries. Our recent acquisition activity is summarized as follows (excluding transaction costs):

                         
Year ended June 30,
  2004
  2003
  2002
Purchase consideration (in thousands):
                       
Net cash paid
  $ 242,402     $ 65,395     $ 1,405,009  
Amounts due to seller
    22       325       14,740  
Liabilities assumed
    68,040       17,089       188,699  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Fair value of assets acquired (including intangibles)
  $ 310,464     $ 82,809     $ 1,608,448  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

Fiscal year 2004 acquisitions

During fiscal year 2004, we acquired five companies, the most significant of which was the acquisition of Lockheed Martin Corporation’s commercial information technology outsourcing business. The transaction was valued at $107 million less a working capital settlement of $6.9 million plus related transaction costs, and was funded from cash on hand. The purchase price was allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair value as of the date of acquisition. We acquired assets of $152.6 million and assumed liabilities of $52.5 million. Included in the assets acquired are goodwill of $88.9 million, which is deductible for income tax purposes, and $26.8 million in intangible assets. The $26.8 million of intangible assets are attributable to customer relationships and non-compete agreements with useful lives ranging from 5 to 8 years, with a weighted average anticipated useful life of approximately 6 years. The operating results of the acquired business are included in our financial statements primarily in the Commercial segment from the effective date of the acquisition, November 1, 2003. We believe this transaction expands our client bases representing the manufacturing, automotive, retail, financial services and communications industries and provides acquired clients with access to additional BPO and IT services. This acquisition is not considered material to our results of operations; therefore, no pro forma information is presented.

43


Table of Contents

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

In January 2004, we completed the acquisition of Patient Accounting Services Center, LLC (“PASC”), a provider of revenue cycle management for healthcare providers, including billing, accounts receivables, and collection services. The transaction was valued at approximately $94.9 million, excluding contingent consideration of a maximum of $25 million based on future financial performance, plus related transaction costs, and was funded from cash on hand. The purchase price was allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair value as of the date of acquisition. We acquired assets of $104.3 million and assumed liabilities of $9.4 million. We recorded goodwill of $71.9 million, which is deductible for income tax purposes, and $9.3 million in intangible assets. The $9.3 million of intangible assets are attributable to customer relationships and non-compete agreements with useful lives of 5 years. The operating results of the acquired business are included in our financial statements in the Commercial segment from the effective date of the acquisition, January 3, 2004. We believe this transaction expands the suite of business process outsourcing solutions we can offer new and existing healthcare clients. This acquisition is not considered material to our results of operations; therefore, no pro forma information is presented.

In February 2004, we completed the acquisition of Truckload Management Services, Inc. (“TMI”), an expedited document processing and business process improvement services provider for the trucking industry. The transaction was valued at approximately $28.1 million, excluding contingent consideration of a maximum of $14 million based upon future financial performance, plus related transaction costs, and was funded from cash on hand. The purchase price was allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair value as of the date of acquisition. We acquired assets of $30.2 million and assumed liabilities of $2.1 million. We recorded goodwill of $22.9 million, which is deductible for income tax purposes, and $2.5 million in intangible assets attributable to customer relationships and non-compete agreements with useful lives of 4 to 6 years, with a weighted average anticipated useful life of approximately 6 years. The operating results of the acquired business are included in our financial statements in the Commercial segment from the effective date of the acquisition, February 1, 2004. We believe this transaction will expand our business process outsourcing service offerings in the transportation industry, adding document management and document processing services for long-haul trucking fleets to our list of services. This acquisition is not considered material to our results of operations; therefore, no pro forma information is presented.

We also completed two other acquisitions during fiscal year 2004, one in our Commercial segment and the other in our Government segment.

These acquisitions are not considered material to our results of operations, either individually or in the aggregate; therefore, no pro forma information is presented.

Fiscal year 2003 acquisitions

During fiscal year 2003, we acquired five companies, the most significant of which was the acquisition of CyberRep, Inc. (“CyberRep”) in January 2003. CyberRep, which is included in our Commercial segment, provides customer care and customer relationship management services for the telecommunications, wireless communications, technology, and consumer products industries. The transaction was valued at approximately $42 million plus transaction costs, with assets acquired of $56.6 million and liabilities assumed of $14.9 million. We recorded goodwill of $33.6 million, which is fully deductible for income tax purposes, and $5.5 million in customer related intangible assets, which are attributable to customer relationships with lives of approximately 7 years. CyberRep’s operating results are included in our consolidated financial statements from the effective date of the acquisition, January 1, 2003. We believe this transaction expands our suite of business process outsourcing solutions for commercial clients worldwide by enhancing high-volume, customer care center capability and CRM business process outsourcing solutions for Fortune 500 companies.

We also completed four other acquisitions during fiscal year 2003, all of which were included in our Government segment.

These acquisitions are not considered material to our results of operations, either individually or in the aggregate; therefore, no pro forma information is presented.

Fiscal year 2002 acquisitions

During fiscal year 2002, we acquired eight companies, the most significant of which were the acquisitions of Lockheed Martin IMS Corporation (“IMS”) in August 2001 and AFSA Data Corporation (“AFSA”) in June 2002.

We acquired 100% of the stock of IMS, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, (now known as ACS State and Local Solutions), for approximately $825 million plus related transaction costs. The acquisition was funded from a $550 million 18-month interim credit facility, borrowings from our then existing revolving credit facility, and existing cash on hand. This interim credit facility was repaid in October 2001 with the proceeds from the equity offering of 18.4 million shares of our Class A common stock at $40.50 per share (see Note 12). IMS’ results have been included in the Government segment of our consolidated financial statements from the effective date of the acquisition, August 1, 2001. IMS provides

44


Table of Contents

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

business process outsourcing services to more than 230 state and local government agencies in 45 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, Canada, Australia, and Europe. IMS specializes in child support enforcement, welfare and community services, electronic toll collection, and other intelligent transportation services involving the trucking industry, photo enforcement of red-light and speeding violations, parking management, and information technology outsourcing. We believe the acquisition of IMS solidified us as a leader in technology-based outsourcing solutions to state and local government agencies.

The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting with assets acquired of $934.1 million and liabilities assumed of $109.1 million. The purchase price was allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on the estimated fair value at July 31, 2001 as follows (in thousands):

         
Current assets
  $ 111,561  
Property, equipment and software
    50,972  
Other assets
    2,826  
Intangible assets
    64,300  
Goodwill
    704,392  
 
   
 
 
Total assets acquired
    934,051  
 
Current liabilities
    109,051  
 
   
 
 
Total liabilities assumed
    109,051  
 
   
 
 
Net assets acquired
  $ 825,000  
 
   
 
 

The total amount of goodwill is deductible for income tax purposes. Software of $41.5 million is included in property, equipment and software and has lives ranging from 2 to 10 years. The $64.3 million of acquired intangible assets is attributable to customer relationships with useful lives of 5 to 20 years, with a weighted average anticipated useful life of approximately 11 years.

In June 2002 we acquired AFSA, a subsidiary of FleetBoston Financial Corporation, for approximately $410 million plus related transaction costs. The acquisition was funded with a combination of a $375 million 18-month interim credit facility, borrowings from our then existing revolving credit facility, and existing cash on hand. AFSA is a leading business process outsourcer for federal, state, and local governments for a variety of health and human services programs, including Medicare, Medicaid, children’s health insurance programs (CHIP), and welfare and community services. AFSA’s results have been included primarily in the Commercial segment of our consolidated financial statements from the effective date of the acquisition, June 1, 2002. We believe this transaction expanded our presence in student loan servicing, state healthcare programs and local government welfare-to-workforce programs.

The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting with assets acquired of $488.6 million and liabilities assumed of $54.7 million. The purchase price was allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on the estimated fair value at June 1, 2002 as follows (in thousands):

         
Current assets
  $ 83,855  
Property, equipment and software
    37,440  
Other assets
    5,475  
Intangible assets
    48,331  
Goodwill
    313,487  
 
   
 
 
Total assets acquired
    488,588  
 
Current liabilities
    54,678  
 
   
 
 
Total liabilities assumed
    54,678  
 
   
 
 
Net assets acquired
  $ 433,910  
 
   
 
 

The total amount of goodwill is deductible for income tax purposes. Software of $17.6 million is included in property, equipment and software and has an anticipated useful life of approximately 6 years. The $48.3 million of acquired intangible assets is primarily attributable to customer relationships with lives of approximately 11 years and non-compete agreements with amortization periods of approximately 5 years.

45


Table of Contents

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

In May 2002, we acquired the finance and accounting business process outsourcing unit of Andersen Worldwide (“Andersen”). Included in this acquisition are contracts with General Motors (“GM”) and the University of Phoenix (“the University”). Under a 10-year agreement with GM, we provide transactional accounting services such as payroll processing, disbursement processing, dealer accounting, accounts receivable processing, lease and subsidiary accounting, and expense reporting in the United States and Europe. Under the arrangement with the University, we provide student financial aid business process outsourcing services to the University including federal eligibility determinations, loan and grant processing, and disbursement of student aid as well as other support services related to student financial aid processing. The acquisition was valued at $65.2 million plus related transaction costs, with assets acquired of $79 million and liabilities assumed of $13.8 million. We recorded goodwill of $58.7 million (which is deductible for income tax purposes) and $9.1 million in customer related intangible assets, which are attributable to customer relationships with lives of three to ten years. Andersen’s operating results are included in the Commercial segment of our consolidated financial statements from the effective date of the acquisition, May 1, 2002 for the domestic operations and June 1, 2002 for the foreign operations. We believe this transaction advanced our finance and accounting business process outsourcing service offerings. This acquisition is not considered material to our results of operations; therefore, no pro forma information is presented.

In August 2001, we acquired the business process outsourcing services unit of National Processing Company (“NPC”). NPC provides healthcare claims processing, credit card application processing, and airline lift ticket processing. As part of the transaction, we acquired all of NPC’s offshore operations in Jamaica, the Dominican Republic, Barbados, and a majority of NPC’s Mexican operations. The transaction value was $43 million plus related transaction costs, with assets acquired of $50.3 million and liabilities assumed of $7.3 million. We recorded goodwill of $25.8 million of which 61% is deductible for income tax purposes and $2.8 million in customer related intangible assets, which are attributable to customer relationships with a life of approximately 3 years. NPC’s operating results are included in the Commercial segment of our consolidated financial statements from the effective date of the acquisition, August 1, 2001. We believe this transaction expanded our offshore business process outsourcing capabilities. This acquisition is not considered material to our results of operations; therefore, no pro forma information is presented.

We completed four other acquisitions during fiscal year 2002, two of which were included in our Commercial segment and two in our Government segment.

These acquisitions are not considered material to our results of operations either individually or in the aggregate; therefore, no pro forma information is presented.

We are obligated to make certain contingent payments to former owners based on the achievement of specified profit levels in conjunction with certain acquisitions. During fiscal year 2004, we made contingent consideration payments of $10.4 million related to acquisitions completed in prior years. During fiscal year 2003, we made $8 million contingent consideration payments related to acquisitions completed in prior years. As of June 30, 2004, the maximum aggregate amount of the outstanding contingent obligations is approximately $67.3 million, none of which has been earned to date. Any such payments primarily result in a corresponding increase in goodwill.

Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information

The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents a summary of our consolidated results of operations as if the IMS and AFSA acquisitions had occurred at the beginning of the period presented and are not necessarily indicative of future results or actual results that would have been achieved had the acquisitions occurred at the beginning of the period presented (in thousands, except per share amounts). Pro forma information for these acquisitions is not presented for fiscal years 2003 or 2004 because there is no difference between pro forma and reported financial information.

         
    For the year ended
    June 30, 2002
Revenue
  $ 3,267,517  
Net income
  $ 256,268  
Earnings per common share:
       
Basic
  $ 2.16  
Diluted
  $ 1.96  

46


Table of Contents

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

4. Georgia Contract

In 2001, we were awarded a contract by the Georgia Department of Community Health (“DCH”) to develop, implement and operate a system to administer health benefits to Georgia Medicaid recipients as well as state government employees (the “Georgia Contract”). This system development project was large and complex and anticipated the development of a system that would process both Medicaid and state employee claims. The Medicaid phase of this project was implemented on April 1, 2003. Various disputes arose because of certain delays and operational issues that were encountered in this phase. During the second quarter of fiscal year 2004, in connection with a settlement in principle, we recorded a $6.7 million reduction in revenue resulting from the change in our percentage-of-completion estimates primarily as a result of the termination of Phase II of the contract, a charge of $2.6 million to services and supplies associated with the accrual of wind-down costs associated with the termination of Phase II and an accrual of $10 million in other operating expenses to be paid to DCH pursuant to the settlement in principle. On July 21, 2004 we entered into a definitive settlement agreement with the DCH to settle these disputes. The terms of the definitive settlement, which were substantially the same as announced in January 2004, include a $10 million payment by us to DCH; a payment by DCH to us of $9 million in system development costs; escrow of $11.8 million by DCH, with $2.4 million of the escrowed funds to be paid to us upon completion of an agreed work plan ticket and reprocessing of July 2003 – June 2004 claims, and the remaining $9.4 million of escrowed funds to be paid to us upon final certification of the system by the Center for Medicare/Medicaid Services, the governing Federal regulatory agency; cancellation of Phase II of the contract; and an agreement to settle outstanding operational invoices resulting in a payment to us of over $8.2 million and approximately $7 million of reduction in such invoices.

5. Accounts Receivable

The components of accounts receivable are as follows (in thousands):

                 
    June 30,
    2004
  2003
Amounts Billed or Billable:
               
Government
  $ 377,619     $ 472,704  
Commercial
    283,341       204,386  
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
    660,960       677,090  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Amounts Unbilled:
               
Amounts not yet billed
    217,267       159,997  
Excess of actual indirect costs over amounts currently billable under cost reimbursable contracts
          4,445  
Contract retainages not currently billable
          1,186  
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
    217,267       165,628  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total accounts receivable
    878,227       842,718  
Allowance for doubtful accounts
    (4,756 )     (7,240 )
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
  $ 873,471     $ 835,478  
 
   
 
     
 
 

Unbilled amounts reflect those amounts that are associated primarily with percentage of completion accounting, and other unbilled amounts not currently billable due to contractual provisions. Of the above unbilled amounts at June 30, 2004 and 2003, approximately $157.5 million and $77.7 million, respectively was not expected to be billed and collected within one year. These amounts are primarily related to the Georgia Contract (see Note 4) and our Commercial Vehicle Operations contract in our Government segment. Billings are based on reaching contract milestones or other contractual terms.

Amounts to be invoiced in the subsequent month for current services provided are included in billable. Billable amounts at June 30, 2004 and 2003 include approximately $266.1 million and $278 million, respectively, for services which have been rendered and will be billed in the normal course of business in the succeeding month.

47


Table of Contents

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts were as follows:

                         
    For the year ended June 30,
    2004
  2003
  2002
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 7,240     $ 6,956     $ 5,620  
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable
    1,461       4,838       3,283  
Losses sustained, net of recoveries and other
    (2,913 )     (4,554 )     (1,947 )
Sale of Divested Federal Business
    (1,032 )            
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Balance at end of period
  $ 4,756     $ 7,240     $ 6,956  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

6. Property, Equipment and Software

Property, equipment and software consists of the following (in thousands):

                 
    June 30,
    2004
  2003
Land
  $ 19,089     $ 21,631  
Buildings and improvements
    106,003       114,897  
Computer equipment
    532,450       413,981  
Computer software
    236,188       185,022  
Furniture and fixtures
    77,285       135,861  
Construction in progress
          1,968  
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
    971,015       873,360  
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
    (449,243 )     (395,148 )
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
  $ 521,772     $ 478,212  
 
   
 
     
 
 

Depreciation expense on property and equipment was approximately $117.5 million, $98.8 million and $74.5 million for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Amortization of computer software was approximately $30.7 million, $23.8 million and $13.9 million in fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

7. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 are as follow (in thousands):

                         
    Government
  Commercial
  Total
Balance as of June 30, 2002
  $ 1,191,738     $ 654,744     $ 1,846,482  
Acquisition activity during the year
    23,853       35,543       59,396  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Balance as of June 30, 2003
    1,215,591       690,287       1,905,878  
Acquisition activity during the year
    3,024       202,937       205,961  
Divestiture activity during the year
    (136,079 )     (6,434 )     (142,513 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Balance as of June 30, 2004
  $ 1,082,536     $ 886,790     $ 1,969,326  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

Goodwill balances by segment as of June 30, 2003 and 2002 have been restated to reflect a change in our internal organization that caused the composition of our reportable segments to change (see Note 20). Fiscal years 2004 and 2003 activity is primarily related to acquisitions and divestitures completed during the periods (see Notes 2 and 3).

48


Table of Contents

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

     The following table reflects the balances of our other intangibles (in thousands):

                                 
    June 30,
    2004
  2003
    Gross Carrying   Accumulated   Gross Carrying   Accumulated
    Amount
  Amortization
  Amount
  Amortization
Amortized intangible assets:
                               
Acquired customer-related intangibles
  $ 191,517     $ (49,425 )   $ 154,771     $ (31,735 )
Customer contract costs
    142,802       (53,334 )     139,667       (50,129 )
All other
    2,854       (1,447 )     4,031       (2,314 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total
  $ 337,173     $ (104,206 )   $ 298,469     $ (84,178 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Unamortized intangible asset:
                               
Title plant
  $ 50,800            
$
50,800          
 
   
 
             
 
         
Aggregate amortization:
                               
For the year ended June 30, 2004
                          $ 46,600  
For the year ended June 30, 2003
                            36,889  
For the year ended June 30, 2002
                            22,994  
Estimated amortization for the years ended June 30:
                               
2005
                          $ 45,479  
2006
                            40,709  
2007
                            35,850  
2008
                            32,702  
2009
                            25,065  

Amortization includes amounts charged to amortization expense for customer contract costs and other intangibles, other than contract inducements. Amortization of contract inducements of $11 million, $7.3 million and $0.9 million for fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, is recorded as a reduction to related contract revenue. Amortization for fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002 includes approximately $21.9 million, $16.2 million, and $9 million, respectively, related to acquired customer-related intangibles. Amortized intangible assets are amortized over the related contract term. The amortization period of customer-related intangible assets ranges from 1 to 11 years, with a weighted average of approximately 8 years. The amortization period for all other intangible assets, including trademarks, ranges from 4 to 20 years, with a weighted average of 7 years.

8. Other Assets

Other assets primarily consist of long-term receivables, long-term investments accounted for using the cost method, long-term deposits, and deferred debt issuance costs. During fiscal year 2003, we recorded $3.4 million ($2.1 million, net of income tax) in other non-operating expense associated with the write-down of several long-term investments to their estimated net realizable value. We had approximately $26.8 million and $19.5 million in long-term investments as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, primarily related to our deferred compensation plan (see Note 13).

49


Table of Contents

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

9. Other Accrued Liabilities

The following summarizes other accrued liabilities at June 30, 2004 and 2003 (in thousands):

                 
    June 30,
    2004
  2003
Accrued payments to vendors and contract related accruals
  $ 213,027     $ 185,808  
Software and equipment lease and maintenance
    42,836       27,117  
Accruals related to acquisitions and divestitures
    28,937       19,643  
Accrual for Georgia Contract settlement (see Note 4)
    10,000        
Accrual for GSA/FTSA settlement (see Note 17)
    10,000        
Other
    37,848       40,010  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total
  $ 342,648     $ 272,578  
 
   
 
     
 
 

10. Long-term Debt

A summary of long-term debt follows (in thousands):

                 
    June 30,
    2004
  2003
Unsecured $875 million revolving credit agreement (“$875 million Credit Facility”) payable to banks, due in December 2005
  $ 370,000     $ 177,700  
3.5% Convertible Subordinated Notes due February 2006
          316,990  
Capitalized lease obligations at various interest rates, payable through 2008
    4,487       5,414  
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
    374,487       500,104  
Less current portion
    (2,048 )     (1,764 )
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
  $ 372,439     $ 498,340  
 
   
 
     
 
 

Maturities of long-term debt at June 30, 2004 are as follows:

         
Year ending June 30,
       
2005
  $ 2,048  
2006
    371,208  
2007
    832  
2008
    399  
2009
     
 
   
 
 
Total
  $ 374,487  
 
   
 
 

Interest on the $875 million Credit Facility is payable monthly at floating rates and fees based upon LIBOR and our credit rating. As a result, rates will fluctuate with both changes in the overall interest rate environment as well as changes in our credit rating. Currently, borrowings bear interest at LIBOR (1.369% at June 30, 2004) plus .575%, a facility fee of 0.175% per annum on the committed amount of the facility. We incur a usage fee of 0.125% per annum which is applicable only when borrowings and letters of credit outstanding exceed $437.5 million. The agreement contains covenants, which require that we comply with certain negative, affirmative and financial covenants customary in facilities of this nature, including but not limited to the maintenance of fixed charge ratios and minimum net worth requirements. The agreement also has provisions which would permit acceleration of the maturity of the borrowings after the occurrence of certain defined events of default. As of June 30, 2004 we were in compliance with the covenants of our $875 million Credit Facility.

On February 27, 2004, we completed the redemption of our 3.5% Convertible Subordinated Notes due February 15, 2006 (the “Notes”). Holders of 99.9% of all the outstanding Notes converted their Notes to 23.0234 shares of our Class A common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Notes in accordance with the procedures specified in the related indenture governing the Notes. As the result of such conversions, approximately 7.3 million shares of our Class A common stock were issued to such noteholders at the conversion price of $43.44 per share. The remaining Notes were redeemed in cash at 101.4% of the

50


Table of Contents

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

principal amount, resulting in a cash redemption of $269,000. The Notes were convertible at any time prior to the maturity date, unless redeemed or repurchased, into Class A common stock at a conversion rate of 23.0234 shares of Class A common stock for each $1,000 principal amount of Notes (equivalent to a conversion price of $43.44 per share of Class A common stock), subject to adjustments in certain events. Interest on the Notes was payable semi-annually on February 15 and August 15 of each year commencing August 15, 2001.

Cash payments for interest for the years ended June 30, 2004, 2003, and 2002 were approximately $16.4 million, $21.1 million, and $27.5 million, respectively. The decrease in cash paid for interest in fiscal year 2004 from fiscal year 2003 is due to the redemption of our Notes discussed above.

At June 30, 2004, we have approximately $354.5 million available for use under the $875 million revolving credit agreement after considering outstanding letters of credit of $150.5 million. We use letters of credit to secure certain contractual performance and other obligations.

11. Income Taxes

Income tax expense (benefit) is comprised of the following (in thousands):

                         
    Year ended June 30,
    2004
  2003
  2002
Current:
                       
U.S. Federal
  $ 202,797     $ 71,420     $ 74,112  
State
    25,285       8,334       8,934  
Foreign
    5,103       3,500       2,727  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total current expense
    233,185       83,254       85,773  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Deferred:
                       
U.S. Federal
    60,121       92,182       42,150  
State
    5,767       9,517       2,937  
Foreign
    267       (848 )      
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total deferred expense
    66,155       100,851       45,087  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total income tax expense
  $ 299,340     $ 184,105     $ 130,860  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

Deferred tax assets (liabilities) consist of the following (in thousands):

                 
    June 30,
    2004
  2003
Deferred tax assets:
               
Accrued expenses not yet deductible for tax purposes
  $ 31,955     $ 15,825  
Unearned revenue
    8,366       5,626  
Tax credits and loss carryforwards
    6,319       2,198  
Divestiture-related accruals
    6,909       1,017  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Subtotal
    53,549       24,666  
Deferred tax assets valuation allowance
    (3,695 )     (83 )
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total deferred tax assets
    49,854       24,583  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Deferred tax liabilities:
               
Goodwill amortization
    (160,809 )     (120,023 )
Depreciation and amortization
    (83,834 )     (64,605 )
Unbilled revenue
    (52,976 )     (31,832 )
Prepaid and receivables
    (10,221 )     (7,512 )
Other
    (1,623 )     (3,149 )
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total deferred tax liabilities
    (309,463 )     (227,121 )
 
   
 
     
 
 
Net deferred tax liabilities
  $ (259,609 )   $ (202,538 )
 
   
 
     
 
 

At June 30, 2004, we had available unused domestic net operating loss carry-forwards (“NOLs”), net of Internal Revenue Code Section 382 limitations, of approximately $4.6 million which will expire over various periods through 2017. We also generated approximately $3.6 million in tax credits carryforwards as of June 30, 2004 which may be carried forward indefinitely. A valuation allowance of $3.7 million and $83 thousand was recorded at June 30, 2004 and June 30, 2003,

51


Table of Contents

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

respectively, against deferred tax assets associated with net operating losses and tax credits carryforwards for which realization of any future benefit is uncertain due to taxable income limitations. We routinely evaluate all deferred tax assets to determine the likelihood of their realization. The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets increased by $3.6 million and decreased by $22 thousand during the years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

The depreciation and amortization related deferred tax liabilities significantly increased during the years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 predominantly due to current tax deductions for acquired intangibles, goodwill and depreciation. Generally, since the adoption of SFAS 142 eliminates the book goodwill amortization, the difference between the cumulative book and tax bases of these intangibles will continue to grow as current tax deductions are realized. In addition, accelerated tax depreciation is provided for under the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 on capital expenditures through December 2004.

Income tax expense varies from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before income taxes as follows (in thousands):

                         
    Year ended June 30,
    2004
  2003
  2002
Statutory U.S. Federal income tax
  $ 290,214     $ 171,831     $ 126,160  
State income taxes, net
    19,873       11,603       7,716  
Basis difference on sale of subsidiary
    (5,595 )           (2,104 )
Research and development tax credits
    (6,068 )            
Other
    916       671       (912 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total income tax expense
  $ 299,340     $ 184,105     $ 130,860  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

The effective tax rate for June 30, 2004 was 36.1%. It includes tax implications recognized from the sale of the Divested Federal Business, sale of a foreign subsidiary and research and development tax credits. The effective tax rate on normal operations excluding these items was 37.5%.

Cumulative undistributed earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries for which U.S. taxes have not been provided are included in consolidated retained earnings in the amount of approximately $16.8 million, $5.5 million and $8 million as of June 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. These earnings are intended to be permanently reinvested outside the U.S. If future events necessitates that these earnings should be repatriated to the U.S., an additional tax provision and related liability would be required. If such earnings were distributed, U.S. income taxes would be partially reduced by available credits for taxes paid to the jurisdictions in which the income was earned.

Federal, state and foreign income tax payments during the years ended June 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were approximately $189.6 million, $67.1 million and $39.5 million, respectively. Taxes paid in fiscal year 2004 include $88.1 million related to the gain on the Divested Federal Business (see Note 2).

12. Common Stock

Our Class A common stock trades publicly on the New York Stock Exchange (symbol “ACS”) and is entitled to one vote per share. Our Class B common stock is entitled to ten votes per share. Class B shares are convertible, at the holder’s option, into Class A shares, but until converted carry significant transfer restrictions.

On February 27, 2004, we completed the redemption of our 3.5% Convertible Subordinated Notes due February 15, 2006. Please see Note 10 for further discussion.

Our Board of Directors has authorized two share repurchase programs totaling $1.25 billion of our Class A common stock. On September 2, 2003, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to $500 million of our Class A common stock and on April 29, 2004, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized a new, incremental share repurchase program of up to $750 million of our Class A common stock. The programs, which are open-ended, will allow us to repurchase our shares on the open market from time to time in accordance with SEC rules and

52


Table of Contents

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

regulations, including shares that could be purchased pursuant to SEC Rule 10b5-1. The number of shares to be purchased and the timing of purchases will be based on the level of cash and debt balances, general business conditions and other factors, including alternative investment opportunities. We intend to fund the repurchase program from various sources, including, but not limited to, cash on hand, cash flow from operations, and borrowings under our existing revolving credit facility. As of June 30, 2004, we had repurchased approximately 15 million shares at a total cost of approximately $743.2 million.

In March 2002, we completed the redemption of our 4% Convertible Subordinated Notes due March 2005 (“4% Notes”). Holders of all of the outstanding 4% Notes converted their 4% Notes to shares of our Class A common stock in accordance with procedures specified in the related Indenture governing the 4% Notes. As the result of such conversions, 10.8 million shares of our Class A common stock were issued to such holders. In fiscal year 2001, prior to conversion, $63 thousand of our 4% Notes were converted into 2,952 shares of Class A common stock.

In February 2002, we completed a two-for-one stock split of our outstanding Class A common stock and Class B common stock implemented in the form of a 100% stock dividend (“Stock Split”). Each holder of record of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock as of the close of business on February 15, 2002 received an additional share of such stock held by them at that time. In connection with the Stock Split, the number of shares of Class A common stock reserved for issuance or subject to outstanding options granted under our employee stock option or other benefit plans, as well as the number of shares reserved for issuance under our 4% Notes and Notes outstanding at that time, were proportionately increased in accordance with the terms of such options, plans and other instruments.

On October 10, 2001, we completed our offering of 18.4 million shares (adjusted for stock split) of our Class A common stock. The shares were issued at $40.50 per share. Net proceeds of $714.3 million (net of transaction costs) were used to repay the $550 million 18-month interim credit facility incurred to fund the IMS acquisition and a portion of the amount outstanding under our then existing revolving credit facility.

13. Employee Benefit Plans

Under our 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the “1997 Plan”), we have reserved approximately 7.4 million shares of Class A common stock for issuance to key employees at exercise prices determined by the Board of Directors. In May 2000, February 2001, October 2001 and July 2003, the Board of Directors approved the additional allotment of approximately 1.7 million, 1.6 million, 4.1 million and 3.8 million shares, respectively, to the 1997 Plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of the 1997 Plan authorized by our shareholders pursuant to our November 14, 1997 Proxy Statement. Options granted under the 1997 Plan to our current employees cannot exceed 12.8% of our issued and outstanding shares. Our 1988 Stock Option Plan (the “1988 Plan”), which originally reserved 12 million shares of Class A common stock for issuance, was discontinued for new grants during fiscal year 1998 and terminated (except for the exercise of then existing option grants as of September 1997) and subsequently, 3.2 million unissued shares expired. Generally, the options under each plan vest in varying increments over a five-year period, generally become exercisable after five years, expire ten years from the date of grant and are issued at exercise prices no less than 100% of the fair market value of our Class A common stock at the time of the grant. As reported in Note 1, we have elected to adopt the disclosure only provisions of SFAS 123 and we account for stock-based employee compensation plans in accordance with APB 25. As a result, no compensation cost has been recognized in the periods presented for stock option or employee stock purchase plans.

Between February 28, 2002 and March 31, 2004, we issued 1,055,968 shares of our Class A common stock to fifteen current or former employees or directors (collectively, the “optionees”) pursuant to the exercise of options granted under our 1988 Stock Option Plan in excess of the amount originally registered with the SEC on Form S-8 filed November 17, 1994 (Registration No. 33-86426). The exercise price of the options exercised ranged from $4.00 to $10.56 per share of Class A common stock and the aggregate exercise price of the options was $9.6 million. We believe the grant of the options and the subsequent issuance of the underlying securities to the optionees was exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 506 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. Each of the optionees had access to sufficient information regarding Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. required to make an informed investment decision and had the requisite sophistication to make an investment in our securities. In addition, some of the optionees are “accredited investors” as defined in Regulation D of the Securities Act.

53


Table of Contents

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

The Computer Data Systems, Inc. 1991 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “1991 Plan”) provides for the granting of options to various employees, officers, and directors of ACS Government Solutions. This plan was discontinued for new grants effective with the December 1997 Government Solutions merger. All options issued under the 1991 Plan were fully vested as of the effective date of the merger. Exercise prices of options awarded in all years were equal to the market price of the stock on the date of the grant; therefore, no compensation costs have been recognized for awards under this plan. As of June 30, 2002, there are no outstanding options to be exercised under the 1991 Plan.

Option activity for the years ended June 30, 2004, 2003, and 2002 is summarized as follows:

                 
            Weighted
            Average
    Options
  Option Price
Outstanding at June 30, 2001
    10,712,090     $ 16.87  
 
Granted
    2,543,000       39.82  
Exercised
    (1,679,390 )     10.66  
Canceled
    (445,200 )     21.11  
 
   
 
         
Outstanding at June 30, 2002
    11,130,500       22.88  
 
Granted
    3,439,500       37.45  
Exercised
    (1,182,800 )     12.04  
Canceled
    (427,400 )     32.34  
 
   
 
         
Outstanding at June 30, 2003
    12,959,800       27.42  
 
Granted
    3,167,000       45.09  
Exercised
    (2,077,890 )     16.46  
Canceled
    (593,200 )     33.12  
 
   
 
         
Outstanding as of June 30, 2004
    13,455,710       33.04  
 
   
 
         
Vested and exercisable at June 30, 2004
    1,353,810     $ 15.98  
 
Vested and unexercisable at June 30, 2004
    3,261,500     $ 24.94  

Further information regarding outstanding and exercisable stock options by exercise price range as of June 30, 2004 is disclosed below:

                                         
    Options Outstanding
  Options Exercisable
            Weighted                
            Average   Weighted           Weighted
Range of   Number   Remaining   Average   Number   Average
Exercise Prices
  Outstanding
  Contractual Life
  Exercise Price
  Exercisable
  Exercise Price
$4.00 - $12.68
    727,200       3.68     $ 11.27       577,200     $ 11.20  
$15.26 - $20.94
    3,041,110       5.30       17.65       776,610       19.52  
$27.56 - $38.66
    5,400,600       7.35       35.23              
$40.62 - $50.23
    4,286,800       8.78       44.90              
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
 
    13,455,710       7.15     $ 33.04       1,353,810     $ 15.98  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

Under our 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), a maximum of 4 million shares of Class A common stock can be issued to substantially all full-time employees who elect to participate. In October 2002, the Board of Directors approved an amendment to the ESPP to increase the number of shares that can be issued under the plan from 2 million to 4 million. Through payroll deductions, eligible participants may purchase our stock at a 15% discount to market value. The stock is either purchased by the ESPP in the open market or issued from our treasury account, and our contributions for the years ended June 30, 2004, 2003, and 2002 which were charged to additional paid-in capital, were approximately $1.9 million, $3.3 million and $1.4 million, respectively. During fiscal year 2004, we issued 92,000 treasury shares to fund the ESPP.

Under a Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement (the “Retirement Agreement”) dated December 15, 1998, we are obligated to pay our Chairman certain retirement benefits (the “Retirement Benefit”). The payment of the Retirement Benefit would commence on the occurrence of several different events, including, retirement, total and permanent disability, death, resignation, change in control, or termination for any reason other than cause. We have issued (and may in the future issue) certain stock options to fund the Retirement Benefit. Based on assumptions we consider reasonable under the circumstances,

54


Table of Contents

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

we expect that the value of the existing stock options will be sufficient to fund the Retirement Benefit, but to the extent the value of the options granted would be insufficient to fund the Retirement Benefit, then we will have to fund such insufficiency. At our option, we may grant additional stock options prior to the commencement of the payment of the Retirement Benefit, if we estimate that the existing stock option grants are insufficient to satisfy our obligation under this arrangement.

We offer a deferred compensation plan to employees who meet specified compensation criteria. The assets and liabilities of this plan are included in our consolidated financial statements. Approximately 900 employees participate in the plan. Participants may elect to defer a specified percentage of base salary and incentive compensation annually. The assets of the plan as of June 30, 2004 and 2003 were $19.2 million and $11.5 million, respectively. Liabilities of the plan, representing participants’ account balances, were $20.4 million and $12.1 million at June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

We have contributory retirement and savings plans, which cover substantially all employees and allow for discretionary matching contributions by us as determined by our Board of Directors. Contributions made by us to certain plans during the years ended June 30, 2004, 2003, and 2002 were approximately $14.8 million, $24.5 million and $22.6 million, respectively.

14. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share of common stock is computed using the weighted average number of our common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is adjusted for the after-tax impact of interest on the Notes and the 4% Notes and reflects the incremental shares that would be available for issuance upon the assumed exercise of stock options and conversion of the Notes and the 4% Notes.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):

                         
    Year ended June 30,
    2004
  2003
  2002
Numerator:
                       
Numerator for earnings per share (basic) - income available to common stockholders
  $ 529,843     $ 306,842     $ 229,596  
Effect of dilutive securities:
                       
Interest on convertible debt (net of income tax)
    5,196       8,218       12,610  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Numerator for earnings per share assuming dilution-income available to common stockholders
  $ 535,039     $ 315,060     $ 242,206  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Denominator:
                       
Weighted average shares outstanding (basic)
    131,498       132,445       118,646  
Effect of dilutive securities:
                       
Convertible debt
    4,750       7,298       14,851  
Stock options
    3,398       3,687       3,967  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total potential common shares
    8,148       10,985       18,818  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Denominator for earnings per share assuming dilution
    139,646       143,430       137,464  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Earnings per share (basic)
  $ 4.03     $ 2.32     $ 1.94  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Earnings per share assuming dilution
  $ 3.83     $ 2.20     $ 1.76  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

Options to purchase approximately 457,000 shares of common stock were outstanding during fiscal year 2004 but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ exercise price was greater than the average market price during the period. There were 159,000 antidilutive shares in fiscal year 2003 and no antidilutive shares in fiscal year 2002.

55


Table of Contents

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

15. Financial Instruments

As of June 30, 2004 and 2003, the fair values of our revolving credit balances and other variable-rate debt instruments approximated the related carrying values.

As of June 30, 2003, we estimated the fair value of the Notes at approximately $373 million based on trading prices on that date. As discussed in Note 10, we redeemed the Notes in February 2004.

We had no derivative financial instruments as of June 30, 2004, 2003 or 2002.

16. Related Party Transactions

As of June 30, 2002, we held a minority preferred stock interest in DDH Aviation, Inc., a corporate airplane brokerage company organized in 1997 (“DDH”). Our Chairman owns a majority voting interest in DDH and our President and General Counsel, along with our Chairman, were directors of DDH. At June 30, 2002, DDH had a $48 million line of credit with Citicorp USA, Inc., for which we and our Chairman, in exchange for warrants to acquire additional voting stock, acted as partial guarantors. In addition, we obtained access to corporate aircraft at favorable rates in consideration of our guaranty. We had guaranteed up to approximately $11.5 million of the line of credit and our Chairman guaranteed up to approximately $17.5 million of the line of credit.

In July 2002, our Chairman assumed in full our guaranty obligations to Citicorp and our guaranty to Citicorp was released in full. Our minority preferred stock interest and warrants (with a recorded value of $100,000 at June 30, 2002) in DDH were cancelled. We have no further ownership interest in DDH. Our officers, other than the Chairman, are no longer directors of DDH. In the first quarter of fiscal year 2003, we purchased $1 million in prepaid charter flights at favorable rates from DDH. As of June 30, 2004, we have $0.7 million remaining in prepaid flights with DDH. During fiscal year 2003, we paid DDH approximately $0.5 million for maintenance services, chartered aircraft and equipment. We made no payments to DDH during fiscal year 2004.

In August 2001, we purchased a Challenger 600 aircraft from DDH for a purchase price of $8.5 million, which included interior and exterior refurbishment of the aircraft. As of June 30, 2002, the purchase price for the aircraft was paid in full, and refurbishment was near completion. The aircraft was delivered to us in the first quarter of fiscal year 2003.

17. Commitments and Contingencies

We have various non-cancelable operating lease agreements for information technology equipment, software and facilities with terms through 2018. A summary of these commitments at June 30, 2004 is as follows (in thousands):

         
Year ending June 30,
       
2005
  $ 135,979  
2006
    94,258  
2007
    67,099  
2008
    44,718  
2009
    28,974  
Thereafter
    57,064  
 
   
 
 
 
  $ 428,092  
 
   
 
 

Lease expense for information technology equipment, software and facilities was approximately $227.7 million, $174.7 million and $147 million for the years ended June 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

56


Table of Contents

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Our Education Services business, which is included in our Commercial segment, performs third party student loan servicing in the Federal Family Education Loan program (“FFEL”) on behalf of various financial institutions. We service these loans for investors under an outsourcing arrangement and do not acquire any servicing rights that are transferable by us to a third party. At June 30, 2004, we serviced a FFEL portfolio of approximately 1.5 million loans with an outstanding principal balance of approximately $18.2 billion. Some servicing agreements contain provisions that, under certain circumstances, require us to purchase the loans from the investor if the loan guaranty has been permanently terminated as a result of a loan default caused by our servicing error. If defaults caused by us are cured during an initial period, any obligation we may have to purchase these loans expires. Loans that we purchase may be subsequently cured, the guaranty reinstated and then we repackage the loans for sale to third parties. We evaluate our exposure under our purchase obligations on defaulted loans and establish a reserve for potential losses, or default liability reserve, through a charge to the provision for loss on defaulted loans purchased. The reserve is evaluated periodically and adjusted based upon management’s analysis of the historical performance of the defaulted loans. This reserve was approximately $3.7 million and $4.2 million at June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. During fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, we purchased and charged against the reserve $4.5 million, $3.6 million and $0.2 million of loans, respectively, and recovered or sold loans with proceeds totaling $1.3 million, $1.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively, which were credited to our reserve. We recorded provisions of $2.7 million, $2.5 million and $0.2 million in fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Certain contracts, primarily in our Government segment, require us to provide a surety bond or a letter of credit as a guarantee of performance. As of June 30, 2004, outstanding surety bonds of $323.4 million and $109.7 million of our outstanding letters of credit secure our performance of contractual obligations with our clients. In addition, we had approximately $32.5 million of letters of credit outstanding which serve as collateral for our surety bond program. Approximately $8.3 million of letters of credit secure our casualty insurance programs. In general, we would only be liable for the amount of these guarantees in the event of default in our performance of our obligations under each contract, the probability of which we believe is remote.

We are obligated to make certain contingent payments to former shareholders of acquired entities upon satisfaction of certain contractual criteria. As of June 30, 2004, the maximum aggregate amount of the outstanding contingent obligations is approximately $67.3 million. Upon satisfaction of the specified contractual criteria, any such payment would result primarily in a corresponding increase in goodwill.

We have indemnified Lockheed Martin Corporation against certain specified claims from certain pre-sale litigation, investigations, government audits and other issues related to the Divested Federal Business. Our maximum exposure under these indemnifications is $85 million; however, we believe the actual exposure to be significantly less. As of June 30, 2004, other accrued liabilities include a reserve for these claims in an amount we believe to be adequate at this time. As discussed below, we have agreed to indemnify ManTech International Corporation with respect to the DOJ investigation related to purchasing activities at Hanscom during the period 1998-2000.

On December 16, 1998, a state district court in Houston, Texas entered final judgment against us in a lawsuit brought by 21 former employees of Gibraltar Savings Association and/or First Texas Savings Association (collectively, “GSA/FTSA”). The GSA/FTSA employees alleged that they were entitled to the value of 803,082 shares of our stock (adjusted for February 2002 stock split) pursuant to options issued to the GSA/FTSA employees in 1988 in connection with a former technology outsourcing services agreement between GSA/FTSA and us. The judgment against us was for approximately $17 million, which included attorneys’ fees and pre-judgment interest. The judgment was appealed by the plaintiffs and us and the appellate process has now been concluded. As a result of the appeals, the trial court’s judgment was reversed and the case was remanded to the trial court for further proceedings, except that the trial court judgment was affirmed in part as to one of the plaintiffs and the trial court’s dismissal of certain of our affirmative defenses was upheld. The amount of the judgment for the one plaintiff whose judgment was upheld has been settled for $1.3 million. In August 2004, mediation was conducted which resulted in the settlement of claims of the other GSA/FTSA employees. As a result of this settlement, we accrued $10 million in other operating expenses in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2004 related to this settlement and paid $10 million in full settlement of all claims of the other GSA/FTSA employees in August 2004.

One of our subsidiaries, ACS Defense, LLC, and several other government contractors received a grand jury document subpoena issued by the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts in October 2002. The subpoena was issued in connection with an inquiry being conducted by the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”). The inquiry concerns certain IDIQ (Indefinite Delivery – Indefinite Quantity) procurements and their related task orders, which occurred in the late 1990s at Hanscom Air Force Base in Massachusetts. Our revenue from the contracts that we believe to be the focus of the DOJ’s inquiry was approximately $25 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, and approximately $17.2 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, representing approximately 0.7% of our revenue for fiscal year 2003 and 0.4% for fiscal year 2004. In February 2004, we sold the contracts associated with the Hanscom Air Force Base relationship to

57


Table of Contents

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

ManTech International Corporation; however, we have agreed to indemnify ManTech with respect to this DOJ investigation. We are continuing our previously announced internal investigation of this matter through outside legal counsel and we are continuing to cooperate with the DOJ in producing documents in response to the subpoena. At this stage of this inquiry, we are unable to express an opinion as to its likely outcome. (See Note 2 for a discussion of the sale of the contracts associated with the Hanscom Air Force Base relationship.)

Another of our subsidiaries, ACS State & Local Solutions, Inc. (“ACS SLS”), and a teaming partner of this subsidiary, Tier Technologies, Inc. (“Tier”), received a grand jury document subpoena issued by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in May 2003. The subpoena was issued in connection with an inquiry being conducted by the Antitrust Division of the DOJ. The inquiry concerns the teaming arrangements between ACS SLS and Tier on child support payment processing contracts awarded to ACS SLS and Tier, as a subcontractor to ACS SLS, in New York, Illinois and Ohio. Our fiscal year 2004 revenue from these three contracts was approximately $67 million, representing approximately 1.6% of our fiscal year 2004 revenue. Our teaming arrangement also contemplated the California child support payment processing request for proposals, which was issued in late 2003; however, we did not enter into a teaming agreement with Tier for the California request for proposals. Based on Tier’s recent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, we understand that on November 20, 2003 the DOJ granted conditional amnesty to Tier in connection with this inquiry pursuant to the DOJ’s Corporate Leniency Policy. The policy provides that the DOJ will not bring any criminal charges against Tier as long as it continues to fully cooperate in the inquiry (and makes restitution payments if it is determined that parties were injured as a result of impermissible anticompetitive conduct). We are continuing our previously announced internal investigation of this matter through outside legal counsel and we are continuing to cooperate with the DOJ in producing documents in response to the subpoena. At this stage of this inquiry, we are unable to express an opinion as to its likely outcome.

On January 30, 2004, the Florida Agency for Workforce Innovation’s (“AWI”) Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) issued a report that reviewed 13 Florida workforce regions, including Dade and Monroe counties, and noted concerns related to the accuracy of customer case records maintained by our local staff. Our total revenue generated from the Florida workforce services amounts to approximately 1% of our total revenue. In March 2004 we filed our response to the OIG report. On May 20, 2004, at a meeting of the Workforce Florida, Inc. (“WFI”) Board of Directors which was attended by representatives of ACS SLS, which is our subsidiary performing these services, a representative of WFI, which is the principal workforce policy organization for the State of Florida and oversees and monitors the administration of the State’s workforce policy as well as the programs and services carried out by regional workforce boards and AWI, indicated that WFI did not see a systemic problem with the performance of these workforce services by ACS SLS and that it considered the issue closed. We were also advised in February 2004 that the SEC is conducting an informal investigation into the matters covered by the OIG’s report. On March 22, 2004, ACS SLS received a grand jury document subpoena issued by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The subpoena was issued in connection with an inquiry being conducted by the DOJ and the Inspector General’s Office of the U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”) into the subsidiary’s workforce contracts in Dade and Monroe counties in Florida, which expired in June 2003, and which were included in the OIG’s report. On August 25, 2004, ACS SLS received a grand jury document subpoena issued by the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida in connection with an inquiry being conducted by the DOJ and the Inspector General’s Office of the DOL. The subpoena relates to a contract in Pinellas County in Florida for the period from January 1999 to March 2001, when the contract expired. We acquired this contract from Lockheed Martin Corporation in August 2001 or approximately five months after the expiration of the workforce contract in Pinellas County. Further, we settled a civil lawsuit with Pinellas County in December 2003 with respect to claims under the services rendered to Pinellas County by Lockheed Martin Corporation prior to our acquisition of ACS SLS (those claims having been transferred with ACS SLS as part of the acquisition), and which settlement resulted in Pinellas County paying ACS SLS an additional $600,000. We are continuing our internal investigation of these matters through outside legal counsel and we are continuing to cooperate with the DOJ, the SEC and DOL to produce documents in connection with their investigations. At this stage of these investigations, we are unable to express an opinion as to their likely outcome.

In June 2004, the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (“MDEQ”) issued a Notice of Violation to ACS Image Solutions, Inc., one of our subsidiaries, that alleges noncompliance with the Clean Water Act and the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The alleged violations relate primarily to the operation of a permitted wastewater treatment system at the ACS Image Solutions in Flora, Mississippi from August 2001 to May 2004. We have implemented a number of remedial measures in response to the MDEQ’s concerns, including closing the specific operation that generated the wastewaters at issue. We responded to the Notice of Violation by letter dated July 19, 2004, and are currently working with the MDEQ toward a resolution of this matter. MDEQ has stated it will seek penalties. At this time, MDEQ has not provided us with an official penalty demand; however, we believe that any penalties assessed will be immaterial to our results of operations and liquidity.

58


Table of Contents

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

In addition to the foregoing, we are subject to certain other legal proceedings, inquiries, claims and disputes, which arise in the ordinary course of business. Although we cannot predict the outcomes of these other proceedings, we do not believe these other actions, in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

18. New Accounting Standards

In December 2003, the SEC issued SAB 104. SAB 104 updates existing Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 13 “Revenue Recognition” to be consistent with recently issued guidance, primarily EITF 00-21. We do not believe that SAB 104 has had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

19. Comprehensive Income

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income” (“SFAS 130”), establishes standards for reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in financial statements. The objective of SFAS 130 is to report a measure of all changes in equity of an enterprise that result from transactions and other economic events of the period other than transactions with owners. Comprehensive income is the total of net income and all other non-owner changes within a company’s equity.

The components of comprehensive income are as follows (in thousands):

                         
    Year ended June 30,
    2004
  2003
  2002
Net income
  $ 529,843     $ 306,842     $ 229,596  
Other comprehensive income (loss):
                       
Foreign currency translation adjustment (net of income taxes of $1,445 and $583, respectively)
    (2,410 )     (971 )      
Unrealized loss on marketable security
                (84 )
Unrealized gain on hedging instruments (net of income taxes of $139)
                216  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Comprehensive income
  $ 527,433     $ 305,871     $ 229,728  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

The unrealized loss on marketable security relates to an investment in a marketable security, which was sold in June 2002. The unrealized gain on hedging instruments relates to derivative instruments held by us due in fiscal year 2002.

20. Segment Information

We are organized into Commercial and Government segments due to the different operating environments of each segment, caused by different types of customers, differing economic characteristics, and the nature of regulatory environments. In the Government segment, we provide business process outsourcing and information technology services to state and local governments. Our Government segment also includes our relationship with the Department of Education. In the Commercial segment, we provide business process outsourcing, information technology outsourcing, and systems integration services to clients in such industries as healthcare, retail, wholesale distributing, manufacturing, utilities, financial institutions, insurance, and transportation.

In fiscal year 2003, we reported our results of operations in three segments: Commercial, State and Local Government, and Federal. In fiscal year 2004, as a result of the sale of our Divested Federal Business, we combined our State and Local Government and Federal segments into our Government Segment. Prior period reporting has been restated to conform to the new segment reporting.

Over 98% of our consolidated revenues for fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002 were derived from domestic clients. Our relationship with the Department of Education is our largest contract and represents approximately 5%, 4% and 5% of consolidated revenues for fiscal years 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. No other single customer exceeded 5% of our revenues.

The accounting policies of each segment are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies (see Note 1).

59


Table of Contents

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

The following tables reflect the results of the segments consistent with our management system (in thousands):

                                 
    Government
  Commercial
  Corporate
  Consolidated
Fiscal year 2004
                               
Revenues (a)
  $ 2,428,029     $ 1,678,364     $     $ 4,106,393  
Operating expenses
    1,989,392       1,308,411       66,356       3,364,159  
Gain on sale of Divested Federal Business
    (285,273 )                 (285,273 )
Depreciation and amortization expense
    72,286       109,382       2,128       183,796  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Operating income (loss)
  $ 651,624     $ 260,571     $ (68,484 )   $ 843,711  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total assets
  $ 2,088,841     $ 1,718,115     $ 100,286     $ 3,907,242  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Capital expenditures
  $ 110,649     $ 112,519     $ 1,453     $ 224,621  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Fiscal year 2003
                               
Revenues (a)
  $ 2,544,298     $ 1,242,908     $     $ 3,787,206  
Operating expenses
    2,117,025       954,762       44,010       3,115,797  
Depreciation and amortization expense
    69,195       80,111       2,822       152,128  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Operating income (loss)
  $ 358,078     $ 208,035     $ (46,832 )   $ 519,281  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total assets
  $ 2,241,799     $ 1,338,728     $ 118,178     $ 3,698,705  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Capital expenditures
  $ 109,819     $ 93,912     $ 1,942     $ 205,673  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Fiscal year 2002
                               
Revenues (a)
  $ 2,105,585     $ 957,333     $     $ 3,062,918  
Operating expenses
    1,748,850       774,197       28,753       2,551,800  
Depreciation and amortization expense
    51,351       57,020       2,115       110,486  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Operating income (loss)
  $ 305,384     $ 126,116     $ (30,868 )   $ 400,632  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total assets
  $ 2,086,039     $ 1,235,841     $ 81,687     $ 3,403,567  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Capital expenditures
  $ 90,105     $ 43,432     $ 10,869     $ 144,406  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

(a)   Revenues in our Government segment for fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002 include revenues from operations divested through June 30, 2004 of $251.1 million, $679.3 million and $633.7 million, respectively. Revenues in our Commercial segment for fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002 include revenues from operations divested as of June 30, 2004 of $6.9 million, $30.2 million and $63.4 million, respectively.

60


Table of Contents

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

21. Revenue by Service Line

Our revenues by service line are shown in the following table (in thousands):

                         
    Year ended June 30,
    2004
  2003
  2002
Business process outsourcing
  $ 3,017,699     $ 2,582,773     $ 1,942,865  
Information technology outsourcing
    694,890       492,848       441,249  
Systems integration services
    393,804       711,585       678,804  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total
  $ 4,106,393     $ 3,787,206     $ 3,062,918  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

22. Quarterly Results of Operations (unaudited)

     (in thousands, except per share amounts)

                                                                 
    Quarter ended
    Fiscal Year 2004
  Fiscal Year 2003
    June 30,   Mar. 31,   Dec. 31,   Sept. 30,   June 30,   Mar. 31,   Dec. 31,   Sept. 30,
    2004
  2004
  2003
  2003
  2003
  2003
  2002
  2002
Revenues
  $ 1,062,447     $ 1,009,432     $ 997,879     $ 1,036,635     $ 1,014,178     $ 981,633     $ 908,814     $ 882,581  
Operating income
  $ 142,981 (a)   $ 153,820 (a)   $ 402,981 (a)   $ 143,929     $ 139,571     $ 135,089     $ 124,966     $ 119,655  
Net income
  $ 90,259 (a)   $ 99,746 (a)   $ 253,030 (a)   $ 86,808     $ 83,892     $ 79,493     $ 74,001     $ 69,456  
Earnings per share – basic
  $ 0.69 (a)   $ 0.76 (a)   $ 1.93 (a)   $ 0.65     $ 0.63     $ 0.60     $ 0.56     $ 0.53  
Weighted average shares outstanding
    130,216       131,503       131,001       133,235       132,998       132,540       132,175       132,073  
Earnings per share — diluted
  $ 0.68 (a)   $ 0.72 (a)   $ 1.80 (a)   $ 0.62     $ 0.60     $ 0.57     $ 0.53     $ 0.50  
Weighted average shares outstanding — diluted
    133,304       139,348       141,880       143,960       143,791       143,657       143,295       142,984  

(a)   During the second quarter of fiscal year 2004, we completed the sale of our Divested Federal Business. As a result of this transaction, we recognized a pretax gain of $284.3 million ($181.7 million, net of income tax) in the second quarter of fiscal year 2004. We recognized additional pretax gains of $0.5 million ($0.3 million, net of income tax) and $0.4 million ($0.3 million, net of income tax) in the third and fourth quarters of fiscal year 2004, respectively, primarily due to our final working capital settlement with Lockheed Martin Corporation. Please see the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion of other significant items which impacted fiscal year 2004 results of operations.

23. Subsequent Events

In July 2004, we acquired Heritage Information Systems, Inc. (“Heritage”). Heritage provides clinical management and pharmacy cost containment solutions to fourteen state Medicaid programs, over a dozen national commercial insurers and Blue Cross Blue Shield licensees and some of the largest employer groups in the country. The transaction was valued at approximately $23 million plus related transaction costs, excluding contingent consideration of a maximum of $17 million based upon future financial performance, and was funded from our existing cash on hand. The operating results of the acquired business will be included in our Government segment from the effective date of the acquisition, July 1, 2004.

In August 2004, we acquired BlueStar Solutions, an information technology outsourcer specializing in applications management of packaged enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) and messaging services. The transaction was valued at approximately $73 million plus related transaction costs and was funded from cash on hand. We believe that the acquisition of BlueStar provides us penetration into the emerging ERP/messaging market. The operating results of the acquired business will be included in our financial statements in the Commercial segment from the effective date of the acquisition, August 26, 2004.

61


Table of Contents

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Not applicable.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

The management of the Company, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of June 30, 2004. Based on such evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures were operating effectively as of June 30, 2004. There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during the quarter and year ending June 30, 2004 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART III

Pursuant to Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, the information required in Items 10 through 14 is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statements and Reports on Form 8-K

(a)   Financial Statements
 
    The following consolidated financial statements of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries are included in Part II, Item 8:

    Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Income
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(b)   Reports on Form 8-K

1.)   On April 5, 2004, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K (dated as of April 5, 2004) to announce the acquisition of etravelexperts, LLC and to furnish a copy of the Company’s press release regarding this matter.
 
2.)   On April 20, 2004, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K (dated as of April 20, 2004) for the purpose of furnishing the third quarter of fiscal year 2004 earnings press release, announcing the conference call to be hosted on the Company’s website to disclose the Company’s financial results and disclosing the location of the Company’s Supplementary Financial Information used during the conference call for the quarter ended March 31, 2004.
 
3.)   On April 27, 2004, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K (dated as of April 20, 2004) for the purpose of furnishing the transcript of the Company’s presentation during the conference call hosted on the Company’s website disclosing the Company’s financial results, the questions and answers following the presentation and furnishing a copy of the slides presented during the conference call hosted on the Company’s website.
 
4.)   On April 29, 2004, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K (dated as of April 29, 2004) for the purposes of furnishing the press release announcing that the Board of Directors had authorized a share repurchase program for the purchase of up to $750 million of its outstanding shares of Class A common stock.

(c)   Exhibits

    Reference is made to the Index to Exhibits beginning on page 64 for a list of all exhibits filed as part of this report.

62


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we have duly caused this Report to be signed on our behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized representative.
         
  Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.  
     
Date: September 13, 2004    
     
  By:   /s/ Warren D. Edwards    
    Warren D. Edwards   
    Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer 
 
 

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on the 13th day of September 2004.

     
Signature
  Title
/s/ Darwin Deason

(Darwin Deason)
  Director, Chairman of the Board
/s/ Jeffrey A. Rich

(Jeffrey A. Rich)
  Director and Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Mark A. King

(Mark A. King)
  Director, President and Chief Operating Officer
/s/ Warren D. Edwards

(Warren D. Edwards)
  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
/s/ Charles E. McDonald

(Charles E. McDonald)
  Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
/s/ J. Livingston Kosberg

(J. Livingston Kosberg)
  Director
/s/ Joseph P. O’Neill

(Joseph P. O’Neill)
  Director
/s/ Frank A. Rossi

(Frank A. Rossi)
  Director
/s/ Dennis McCuistion

(Dennis McCuistion)
  Director

63


Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

     
Exhibit    
Number
  Exhibit Name
3.1
  Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to our Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed March 30, 2001, File No. 333-58038 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
   
3.2
  Certificate Of Correction to Certificate of Amendment of the Company, dated August 30, 2001 (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed September 17, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
   
3.3
  Bylaws of the Company, as amended and in effect on September 11, 2003 (filed as Exhibit 3.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed February 17, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
   
4.1
  Form of New Class A Common Stock Certificate (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed May 26, 1994, File No. 33-79394 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
   
4.2
  Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated April 2, 1999, between the Company and First City Transfer Company, as Rights Agent (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 19, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
   
4.3
  Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated as of February 5, 2002, by and between the Company and First City Transfer Company (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed February 6, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
   
4.4
  Form of Rights Certificate (included as Exhibit A to the Amended and Restated Rights Agreement (Exhibit 4.3)).
 
   
4.5
  Indenture, dated as of February 21, 2001, between the Company, as Issuer, and U.S. Trust Company of Texas, N.A., as Trustee, relating to the Company’s 3.5% Convertible Subordinated Notes due February 15, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to our Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed March 30, 2001, File No. 333-58038 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
   
4.6
  Registration Rights Agreement, dated February 21, 2001, by and between the Company and Goldman, Sachs & Co., as representative of the several purchasers named therein relating to the Company’s 3.5% Convertible Subordinated Notes due February 15, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to our Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed March 30, 2001, File No. 333-58038 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
   
4.7
  Specimen Note for the Company’s 3.5% Convertible Subordinated Notes due February 15, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed March 30, 2001, File No. 333-58038 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
   
10.1
  Amended Stock Option Plan of the Company (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Amendment No. 1 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed July 15, 1994, File No. 33-79394 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
   
10.2
  1997 Stock Incentive Plan of the Company (filed as Appendix D to our Joint Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed November 14, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
   
10.3
  Form of Directors Indemnification Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.20 to Amendment No. 3 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed August 23, 1994, File No. 33-79394 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
   
10.4
  U.S. Department of Education Contract No. PM94017001 (portions of which are subject to an Order for Confidential Treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2) (filed as an exhibit to Form 10-Q/A filed August 24, 1994 by ACS Government Solutions, Inc. (formerly known as Computer Data Systems, Inc.) and incorporated herein by reference).
 
   
10.5
  Form of Severance Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2004, by and between Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. and each of Jeffrey A. Rich, Mark A. King, Warren D. Edwards, Lynn Blodgett, John Brophy and

64


Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

     
Exhibit    
Number
  Exhibit Name
  William L. Deckelman, Jr. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed May 17, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
   
10.6
  Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement, dated December 15, 1998 between the Company and Darwin Deason (filed as Exhibit 10.13 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed September 29, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
   
10.7
  Amendment to Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement, dated November 13, 2003 between the Company and Darwin Deason (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed February 17, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
   
10.8
  Employment Agreement, dated February 16, 1999 between the Company and Darwin Deason (filed as Exhibit 10(iii)(A) to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed May 17, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
   
10.9
  Credit Agreement, dated August 24, 2001 among the Company, Bear Stearns Corporate Lending Inc. as Administrative Agent and Syndication Agent, Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc. as Bookrunner and Co-Lead Arranger, Wells Fargo Bank Texas, National Association as Documentation Agent and Co-Lead Arranger, certain Lenders and certain Subsidiary Guarantors (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed August 29, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
   
10.10
  Second Amendment to the Credit Agreement and Consent, dated August 10, 2001 among the Company, Wells Fargo Bank Texas, National Association as Administrative Agent and Co-Lead Arranging Agent for Lenders, Bank One N.A. as Syndication Agent and Co-Lead Arranging Agent for Lenders, SunTrust Bank as Documentation Agent for Lenders and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, LTD. as Co-Agent for Lenders and the Subsidiary Guarantors (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed August 29, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
   
10.11
  Credit Agreement, dated June 10, 2002 among the Company, Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P. as Co-Lead Arranger, Sole Bookrunner and Sole Syndication Agent, Wells Fargo Bank Texas, National Association as Co-Lead Arranger and Administrative Agent, certain Lenders and certain Subsidiary Guarantors (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 12, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
   
10.12
  Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of September 12, 2002 among the Company and other borrowers from time to time party thereto, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Co-Lead Arranger and Sole Book Runner, JP Morgan Chase Bank as Co-Lead Arranger, Wells Fargo Bank Texas, National Association as Administrative Agent, JP Morgan Chase Bank And Bank One, N.A. as Co-Syndication Agents and Key Corporate Capital, Inc. and The Bank Of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd. as Co-Documentation Agents (filed as Exhibit 10.25 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2002, filed September 18, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
   
10.13
  Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2003 between Lockheed Martin Corporation and the Company (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed November 14, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
   
10.14
  Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2003 between Lockheed Martin Service, Inc. and the Company (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed November 14, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
   
10.15*
  Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. 401(k) Supplemental Plan, effective as of July 1, 2000, as amended.
 
   
21.1*
  Subsidiaries of the Company
 
   
23.1*
  Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
   
23.2*
  Consent of Value Incorporated

65


Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

     
Exhibit    
Number
  Exhibit Name
31.1*
  Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
   
31.2*
  Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
   
32.1*
  Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. Pursuant to SEC Release 34-47551, this Exhibit is furnished to the SEC and shall not be deemed to be “filed.”
 
   
32.2*
  Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. Pursuant to SEC Release 34-47551, this Exhibit is furnished to the SEC and shall not be deemed to be “filed.”

* Filed herewith

66

EX-10.15 2 d18146exv10w15.htm 401(K) SUPPLEMENTAL PLAN, AS AMENDED exv10w15
 

Exhibit 10.15

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC.

401(k) SUPPLEMENTAL PLAN

EFFECTIVE AS OF JULY 1, 2000

 


 

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC.

401(k) SUPPLEMENTAL PLAN

TABLE OF CONTENTS

                 
ARTICLE
  PAGE
ARTICLE I
  DEFINITIONS     1  
 
  1.1   Account     1  
 
  1.2   Administrative Committee     1  
 
  1.3   Base Pay     1  
 
  1.4   Beneficiary     2  
 
  1.5   Board     2  
 
  1.6   Bonus     2  
 
  1.7   Business Day     2  
 
  1.8   Code     2  
 
  1.9   Company     2  
 
  1.10   Compensation     2  
 
  1.11   Controlled Group     2  
 
  1.12   Controlling Company     2  
 
  1.13   Deferral Election     2  
 
  1.14   Deferred Compensation     2  
 
  1.15   Effective Date     2  
 
  1.16   Eligible Employee     2  
 
  1.17   Entry Date     3  
 
  1.18   ERISA     3  
 
  1.19   Financial Hardship     3  
 
  1.20   401(k) Plan     3  
 
  1.21   Investment Return     4  
 
  1.22   Matching Contributions     4  
 
  1.23   Participant     4  
 
  1.24   Plan     4  
 
  1.25   Plan Year     4  
 
  1.26   Retirement     4  
 
  1.27   Salary     4  
 
  1.28   Surviving Spouse     4  
 
  1.29   Trust or Trust Agreement     4  
 
  1.30   Trustee     4  
 
  1.31   Trust Fund     4  
 
  1.32   Valuation Date     4  

i


 

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC.

401(k) SUPPLEMENTAL PLAN

TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)

                 
ARTICLE
  PAGE
ARTICLE II   ELIGIBILITY AND PARTICIPATION     5  
 
  2.1   Eligibility     5  
 
  2.2   Procedure for Admission     5  
 
  2.3   Cessation of Eligibility     5  
ARTICLE III   PARTICIPANTS’ ACCOUNTS: DEFERRALS AND CREDITING   6  
 
  3.1   Participants’ Accounts     6  
 
  3.2   Deferral Elections     6  
 
  3.3   Crediting of Matching Contributions     7  
 
  3.4   Debiting of Distributions     8  
 
  3.5   Crediting of Investment Return     8  
 
  3.6   Vesting     8  
 
  3.7   Notice to Participants of Account Balances     9  
 
  3.8   Good Faith Valuation Binding     9  
 
  3.9   Errors and Omissions in Accounts     9  
ARTICLE IV   PARTICIPANT DIRECTION OF ACCOUNT BALANCES   10  
 
  4.1   Selection of Investment Funds     10  
 
  4.2   Participant Direction of Deemed Investments     10  
 
  4.3   Participation Direction Not Binding     11  
ARTICLE V   PAYMENT OF ACCOUNT BALANCES     12  
 
  5.1   Benefit Payments upon Termination of Service for Reasons Other than Death   12  
 
  5.2   Benefits Payable Upon Death     12  
 
  5.3   Retirement Benefits     12  
 
  5.4   In Service Distributions     13  
 
  5.5   Accelerated Distributions     14  
 
  5.6   Hardship Distributions     14  
 
  5.7   Beneficiary Designation     15  
 
  5.8   Taxes     15  

ii

 


 

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC.

401(k) SUPPLEMENTAL PLAN

TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)

                 
ARTICLE
  PAGE
ARTICLE VI   CLAIMS     16  
 
  6.1   Claims     16  
 
  6.2   Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies     16  
 
  6.3   Action for Recovery     17  
 
  6.4   Participant’s Responsibilities     17  
 
  6.5   Unclaimed Benefits     17  
ARTICLE VII   SOURCE OF FUNDS: TRUST     18  
 
  7.1   Source of Funds     18  
 
  7.2   Trust     18  
ARTICLE VIII   ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE     19  
 
  8.1   Action     19  
 
  8.2   Rights and Duties     19  
 
  8.3   Compensation, Indemnity and Liability     20  
ARTICLE IX   AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION     21  
 
  9.1   Amendments     21  
 
  9.2   Termination of Plan     21  
ARTICLE X   MISCELLANEOUS     22  
 
  10.1   Taxation     22  
 
  10.2   Withholding     22  
 
  10.3   No Employment Contract     22  
 
  10.4   Headings     22  
 
  10.5   Gender and Number     22  
 
  10.6   Assignment of Benefits     22  
 
  10.7   Legally Incompetent     23  
 
  10.8   Governing Law     23  
 
  10.9   Severability     23  
 
  10.10   Overpayments     23  
 
  10.11   Entire Plan     23  
    SIGNATURES     24  

iii

 


 

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC.

401(k) SUPPLEMENTAL PLAN

     Effective as of the 1st day of July, 2000, Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. (the “Controlling Company”) hereby adopts the Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. 401(k) Supplemental Plan (the “Plan”).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

     A. GENERAL PURPOSE. The Controlling Company desires to provide its designated key management and highly compensated employees (and those of its affiliated companies that participate in the Plan) with an opportunity to defer the receipt and income taxation of a portion of such employees’ annual compensation. The purpose of the Plan is to set forth the terms and conditions pursuant to which these deferrals may be made and to describe the nature and extent of the employees’ rights to their deferred amounts.

     B. TYPE OF PLAN. The Plan constitutes an unfunded, nonqualified deferred compensation plan that benefits certain designated employees who are within a select group of key management or highly compensated employees. This Plan and the participation in the Plan by Eligible Employees is not intended to create and shall not be deemed to create a security which would be subject to regulation by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or any state agency.

STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT

     To establish the Plan with the purposes and goals as hereinabove described, the Controlling Company hereby sets forth the terms and provisions as follows:

ARTICLE I

DEFINITIONS

     For purposes of the Plan, the following terms, when used with an initial capital letter, shall have the meaning set forth below unless a different meaning plainly is required by the context.

     1.1 ACCOUNT shall mean, with respect to a Participant or Beneficiary, the total dollar amount or value evidenced by the last balance posted in accordance with the terms of the Plan to the account record established for such Participant or Beneficiary.

     1.2 ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE shall mean the administrative committee of the 401(k) Plan, or such other committee as shall be appointed by the Board of Directors of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc., which shall act on behalf of the Controlling Company to administer the Plan, all as provided in Article VIII.

     1.3 BASE PAY shall mean the Participant’s regular annual salary plus commissions.

1


 

     1.4 BENEFICIARY shall mean, with respect to a Participant, the person(s) designated in accordance with Section 5.6 to receive any benefits that may be payable under the Plan upon the death of the Participant.

     1.5 BOARD shall mean the Board of Directors of the Controlling Company.

     1.6 BONUS shall mean the actual bonus paid to the Participant under the ACS Management Bonus Plan (or comparable plan of the Company employing the Participant).

     1.7 BUSINESS DAY shall mean each day on which national banks generally operate and are open to the public for business.

     1.8 CODE shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and any succeeding federal tax provisions.

     1.9 COMPANY shall mean Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. or other member of the Controlled Group of the Controlling Company who actually employs the Participant.

     1.10 COMPENSATION shall mean, for a Participant for any Plan Year, such Participant’s Base Pay plus Bonus.

     1.11 CONTROLLED GROUP shall mean all of the companies that are either (i) members of the same controlled group of corporations (within the meaning of ode Section 414(b)) or (ii) under common control (within the meaning of Code Section 414(c)), with the Controlling Company.

     1.12 CONTROLLING COMPANY shall mean Affiliated Computer Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Dallas, Texas.

     1.13 DEFERRAL ELECTION shall mean a written election form on which a Participant may elect to defer under the Plan a portion of his Compensation.

     1.14 DEFERRED COMPENSATION shall mean the amount of Compensation that a Participant elects to defer under this Plan pursuant to a timely, written Deferral Election for a given period.

     1.15 EFFECTIVE DATE shall mean July 1, 2000, the date that the Plan initially shall be effective.

     1.16 ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEE shall mean, for a Plan Year, an individual:

          (a) Who is a member of a select group of key management or highly compensated employees of a Company;

2


 

          (b) Whose Salary at the date or dates the Administrative Committee makes its determination of eligibility for such Plan Year (as described below), or for newly hired employees, whose Salary on the date of his hire is at least $85,000, or such higher or lower threshold as the Administrative Committee in its sole discretion may establish from time to time; and

          (c) Who is designated and notified by the Administrative Committee as eligible to participate in this Plan.

The Administrative Committee shall determine, from time to time and in its sole discretion, which employees satisfy said criteria and the Administrative Committee’s determination, whether or not accurate, shall be binding.

     1.17 ENTRY DATE shall mean the first day of every calendar quarter during the period in which the Plan remains in effect.

     1.18 ERISA shall mean the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.

     1.19 FINANCIAL HARDSHIP shall mean a severe financial hardship to the Participant resulting from a sudden and unexpected illness or accident of the Participant or of the Participant’s dependent (as defined in Code Section 152(a)), loss of the Participant’s property due to casualty, or other similar extraordinary and unforeseeable circumstances arising as a result of events beyond the control of the Participant. Financial Hardship shall be determined by the Administrative Committee on the basis of the facts of each case, including information supplied by the Participant in accordance with uniform guidelines prescribed from time to time by the Administrative Committee; provided, the Participant will be deemed not to have a Financial Hardship to the extent that such hardship is or may be relieved:

          (a) Through reimbursement or compensation by insurance or otherwise;

          (b) By liquidation of the Participant’s assets, to the extent the liquidation of assets would not itself cause severe financial hardship; or

          (c) By cessation of deferrals under the Plan.

Examples of what are not considered to be unforeseeable emergencies include the need to send a Participant’s child to college or the desire to purchase a home.

     1.20 401(k) PLAN shall mean the Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. 401(k) Plan, as amended from time to time, regardless of the 401(k) plan in which the Participant actually participates.

3


 

     1.21 INVESTMENT RETURN shall mean the amounts credited (as income, gains or appreciation on the deemed investments provided under Article IV) or charged (as losses or depreciation on the deemed investments provided under Article IV) to the balances in the Participant’s Accounts pursuant to Section 3.5.

     1.22 MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS shall mean, for each Plan Year, the amount credited to a Participant’s Account pursuant to Section 3.3.

     1.23 PARTICIPANT shall mean any person who has been admitted to, and has not been removed from, participation in the Plan pursuant to the provisions of Article II.

     1.24 PLAN shall mean the Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. 401(k)Supplemental Plan, as contained herein and all amendments hereto. For tax purposes and purposes of Title I of ERISA, the Plan is intended to be an unfunded, nonqualified deferred compensation plan covering certain designated employees who are within a select group of key management or highly compensated employees.

     1.25 PLAN YEAR shall mean the 12-consecutive month period ending on December 31 of each year. The first Plan Year shall be a short Plan Year beginning on the Effective Date, July 1, 2000, and ending on December 31, 2000.

     1.26 RETIREMENT shall mean the termination of employment with the Company and all other members of the Controlled Group on or after age fifty-five (55) with five (5) or more years of service (determined in accordance with the 401(k) Plan).

     1.27 SALARY shall mean an Employee’s regular annual salary.

     1.28 SURVIVING SPOUSE shall mean, with respect to a Participant, the person who is treated as married to such Participant under the laws of the state in which the Participant resides. The determination of a Participant’s Surviving Spouse shall be made as of the date of such Participant’s death.

     1.29 TRUST OR TRUST AGREEMENT shall mean a separate agreement or agreements between the Controlling Company and the Trustee governing the creation of the Trust Fund, if any, and any amendments thereto.

     1.30 TRUSTEE shall mean the party or parties so designated from time to time pursuant to the terms of the Trust Agreement, if any.

     1.31 TRUST FUND shall mean the total amount of cash and other property held by the Trustee (or any nominee thereof) at any time under the Trust Agreement, if any.

     1.32 VALUATION DATE shall mean each Business Day.

4


 

ARTICLE II
ELIGIBILITY AND PARTICIPATION

     2.1 ELIGIBILITY.

          (a) ANNUAL PARTICIPATION. Each individual who is an Eligible Employee for a Plan Year as of the first day of such Plan Year shall be eligible to participate in the Plan for the entire Plan Year. Such individual’s participation shall become effective as of the first day of such Plan Year (assuming he satisfies the procedures for admission described below).

          (b) INTERIM PLAN YEAR PARTICIPATION. Each newly hired employee who becomes an Eligible Employee during a Plan Year shall be eligible to participate in the Plan for a portion of such Plan Year. Such individual’s participation shall become effective as of the Entry Date coinciding with or next following the date he becomes an Eligible Employee (assuming he satisfies the procedures for admission described below). If the newly Eligible Employee does not make a Deferral Election prior to the first Entry Date for which he is eligible, the newly Eligible Employee may make a Deferral Election to defer Compensation for services to be performed subsequent to the Deferral Election within thirty (30) days after the date the Employee first becomes an Eligible Employee.

     2.2 PROCEDURE FOR ADMISSION.

     Each Eligible Employee shall become a Participant for a Plan Year by completing such forms and providing such data in a timely manner, as are required by the Administrative Committee as a precondition of participation in the Plan. Such forms and data may include, without limitation, a Deferral Election, the Eligible Employee’s acceptance of the terms and conditions of the Plan, and the designation of a Beneficiary to receive any benefits payable hereunder.

     2.3 CESSATION OF ELIGIBILITY.

     The Administrative Committee may remove an employee from active participation in the Plan if, as of any day during a Plan Year, he ceases to satisfy the criteria that qualified him as an Eligible Employee, in which case his deferrals under the Plan shall cease. Even if his active participation in the Plan ends, an employee shall remain an inactive Participant in the Plan until the earlier of (i) the date the full amount of his Account (if any) is distributed from the Plan, or (ii) the date he again becomes an Eligible Employee and recommences participation in the Plan. During the period of time that an employee is an inactive Participant in the Plan his Account shall continue to be credited with Investment Return as provided for in Section 3.5.

5


 

ARTICLE III.
PARTICIPANTS’ ACCOUNTS: DEFERRALS AND CREDITING

     3.1 PARTICIPANTS’ ACCOUNTS.

          (a) ESTABLISHMENT OF ACCOUNTS. The Administrative Committee shall establish and maintain, on behalf of each Participant, an Account. The Account shall be credited with (i) the Participant’s Deferred Compensation, (ii) the Participant’s Matching Contributions, and (iii) Investment Return attributable to such Account.

          (b) NATURE OF CONTRIBUTIONS AND ACCOUNTS. The Deferred Compensation and the Matching Contributions and Investment Return credited to a Participant’s Account shall, at the Controlling Company’s election, either, (i) be represented solely by bookkeeping entries, and no moneys or other assets shall actually be set aside for such Participant or (ii) credited to a Trust established pursuant to Section 7.2. The Administrative Committee or the Board shall allocate the total liability to pay benefits under the Plan among the Controlling Company and the members of its Controlled Group comprising the Company in such manner and amount as the Administrative Committee or the Board (as applicable) in its sole discretion deems appropriate. Any assets, which may be acquired by the Controlling Company in anticipation of its obligations under the Plan, shall be part of the general assets of the Controlling Company. The Controlling Company’s obligation to pay benefits under the Plan constitutes a mere promise of the Controlling Company to pay such benefits, and a Participant or Beneficiary shall be and remain no more than an unsecured, general creditor of the Controlling Company.

     3.2 DEFERRAL ELECTIONS.

     Each Eligible Employee who is or becomes eligible to participate in the Plan for all or any portion of a Plan Year may elect to become an active Participant for such Plan Year by completing and delivering to the Controlling Company (or its designee) a Deferral Election setting forth the terms of his election and such other forms as required by the Administrative Committee. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth below, a Deferral Election shall provide for the reduction of an Eligible Employee’s Compensation paid during the Plan Year for which the Deferral Election is in effect. Each Participant shall make a Deferral Election for each Plan Year, with such Deferral Elections being made and effective at the times provided below. Subject to any modifications, additions or exceptions that the Administrative Committee, in its sole discretion, deems necessary, appropriate or helpful, the following shall apply to such Deferral Elections:

          (a) EFFECTIVE DATE. A Participant’s initial Deferral Election with respect to his Compensation for any Plan Year shall be effective for the first paycheck earned after the date the Deferral Election becomes effective. To be effective, a Participant’s initial Deferral Election must be made within the time period prescribed by the Administrative Committee (generally, on or before the first day of the Plan Year, or, if later, on or before the Entry Date coinciding with or next following the date he first becomes eligible to participate in the Plan, subject to Section 2.1).

6


 

An Eligible Employee’s subsequent Deferral Election with respect to his Compensation for any Plan Year must be made on or before the last day of the Plan Year immediately preceding the Plan Year for which he desires to participate. If an Eligible Employee fails to submit a Deferral Election in a timely manner, he shall be deemed to have elected not to participate in the Plan for that Plan Year. Notwithstanding the foregoing, each Eligible Employee may make an initial Deferral Election for the Plan prior to or within the first thirty (30) days after (i) the Effective Date of the Plan or (ii) the Entry Date coinciding with or next following the date that the individual first becomes an Eligible Employee, provided that the initial Deferral Election shall be effective for the first paycheck earned after the date the Deferral Election is received.

          (b) TERM. Each Eligible Employee’s Deferral Election for a Plan Year shall remain in effect for all such Compensation paid during such Plan Year unless prior to the end of such Plan Year the Participant ceases to be an active Participant.

          (c) AMOUNT. An Eligible Employee may elect to defer his Compensation (i) payable as Base Pay by a minimum of 1 percent and a maximum of 15 percent and (ii) payable as Bonus by a minimum of 1 percent and a maximum of 50 percent (or such other minimum or maximum percentage and/or amount, if any, established by the Administrative Committee from time-to-time).

          (d) MINIMUM DEFERRAL AMOUNT. An Eligible Employee must elect to defer at least $2,000 of Compensation each Plan Year (or such other minimum or maximum percentage and/or amount, if any, established by the Administrative Committee from time-to-time). If an Eligible Employee’s deferral election is projected to result in less than an annual deferral of the minimum amount established under this Section, the Eligible Employee’s Deferral Election shall not be given effect and the Participant shall not be an active Participant for such Plan Year.

          (e) CREDITING OF DEFERRED COMPENSATION. For each Plan Year that a Participant has a Deferral Election in effect, the Administrative Committee shall credit the amount of such Participant’s Deferred Compensation to his Account on, or as soon as practicable after, the Valuation Date such amount would have been paid to him but for his Deferral Election.

     3.3 CREDITING OF MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS.

          (a) MATCH. As of each Valuation Date within the Plan Year that Deferred Compensation is credited to the Participant’s Account (or such other date or time as the Administrative Committee, in its sole discretion, determines from time-to-time), a Matching Contribution attributable to such Deferred Compensation, if any, shall also be credited to the Participant’s Account. The Administrative Committee shall determine the amount of the Matching Contribution, if any, to be credited to each Participant’s Account. The amount of the Matching Contribution to be credited to a Participant, if any, shall be an amount equal to the Matching Contribution that would have been

7


 

credited to the Participant under the 401(k) plan in which the Participant participates if the Participant’s Deferred Compensation payable as Base Pay had been contributed as 401(k) contributions to such plan, but which were not credited to such plan due to IRS limitations, provided that the Matching Contributions credited to the Participant’s Account for the Plan Year shall not exceed the maximum limits described in Section 3.3(b).

          (b) LIMITATIONS. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, Matching Contributions shall not be credited to a Participant’s Account to the extent that doing so would cause the following limits to be exceeded:

               (1) Compensation shall not be taken into account to the extent it exceeds the limitation of Code Section 401(a)(17)$170,000 for 2000); and

               (2) The elective deferral limitation of Code Section 402(g) ($10,500 for 2000 shall be applied).

     3.4 DEBITING OF DISTRIBUTIONS.

     As of each Valuation Date, the Administrative Committee shall debit each Participant’s Account for any amount distributed from such Account since the immediately preceding Valuation Date.

     3.5 CREDITING OF INVESTMENT RETURN.

          (a) INVESTMENT RETURN. The Administrative Committee shall credit to each Participant’s Account as of each Valuation Date the amount of Investment Return applicable thereto for the period since the immediately preceding Valuation Date.

          (b) TIMING. Investment Return shall ordinarily be credited as of each Valuation Date, provided the Administrative Committee may, in its sole discretion, designate another date or dates for crediting of Investment Return.

     3.6 VESTING.

     A Participant shall at all times be fully vested in his Deferred Compensation and the Investment Return credited to his Account with respect to such Deferred Compensation. The Matching Contributions credited to a Participant’s Account and the Investment Return credited with respect thereto shall vest in accordance with the vesting schedule under the Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. Savings Plan, two “years of service” — 50% vested; three “years of service” — 100% vested. For purposes of determining “years of service” for this Plan, a Participant shall be credited with the same number of years of service as the Participant is credited with in the 401(k) plan in which the Participant participates. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Participant shall become immediately 100 percent vested upon the occurrence of any of the following: (i) death, (ii) total and permanent disability (as defined in the ACS Long-Term Disability Plan), (iii) Retirement, or (iv) Change of Control of the Controlling Company.

8


 

If a Participant terminates employment with the Company and all Controlled Group Members before becoming 100 percent fully vested, the unvested portion of the Participant’s account shall be immediately forfeited.

A “Change of Control” shall have occurred if the Controlling Company is merged, consolidated, or reorganized into or with another person, entity, or group of entities under common control or if a majority of the outstanding capital stock or all or substantially all of the assets of the Controlling Company are sold to any other person, entity, or group of entities under common control and as a result of such merger, consolidation, reorganization, or sale of capital stock or assets, more than 51% of the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of the surviving person or entity immediately after such transaction are held in the aggregate by a person, entity, or group of entities under common control who beneficially owned less than 51% of the combined voting power of the Company prior to such transaction.

Upon distribution of a Participant’s entire vested Account balance under Section 5.1, any unvested amounts in the Participant’s Account shall be immediately forfeited. Forfeitures shall be applied to pay administrative expenses of the Plan or to reduce Matching Contributions payable to the Plan, as determined by the Administrative Committee, in its sole discretion.

     3.7 NOTICE TO PARTICIPANTS OF ACCOUNT BALANCES.

     At least once for each Plan Year, the Administrative Committee shall cause a written statement of a Participant’s Account balance to be distributed to the Participant.

     3.8 GOOD FAITH VALUATION BINDING.

     In determining the value of the Accounts, the Administrative Committee shall exercise its best judgment, and all such determinations of value (in the absence of bad faith) shall be binding upon all Participants and their Beneficiaries.

     3.9 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS IN ACCOUNTS.

     If an error or omission is discovered in the Account of a Participant or in the amount of a Participant’s deferrals, the Administrative Committee, in its sole discretion, shall cause appropriate, equitable adjustments to be made as soon as administratively practicable following the discovery of such error or omission.

9


 

ARTICLE IV
PARTICIPANT DIRECTION OF ACCOUNT BALANCES

     4.1 SELECTION OF INVESTMENT FUNDS.

     From time to time, the Administrative Committee shall select two or more investment funds (the “Investment Funds”) for purposes of determining the Investment Return on amounts deemed invested in accordance with the terms of the Plan. The Administrative Committee will notify Participants in writing prior to the beginning of each Plan Year and at such other times as the Administrative Committee deems necessary or desirable of the Investment Funds available under the Plan for such Plan Year. The Administrative Committee may change, add or remove Investment Funds on a prospective basis at any time and in any manner it deems appropriate. In the discretion of the Administrative Committee, the Investment Funds available under the Plan for Participant direction may be mirrored by investment funds that are actually maintained under the Trust, if any, but shall not be required to do so. In the event that such investment funds are maintained under the Trust, the Trustee shall invest the assets of the Trust as directed by the Administrative Committee in accordance with the Trust Agreement.

     4.2 PARTICIPANT DIRECTION OF DEEMED INVESTMENTS.

     Each Participant generally may direct the manner in which his Account shall be deemed invested in and among the Investment Funds, provided, such investment directions shall be made in accordance with the following terms:

          (a) NATURE OF PARTICIPANT DIRECTION. The selection of Investment Funds by a Participant shall be for the sole purpose of determining the Investment Return to be credited to his Account, and shall not be treated or interpreted in any manner whatsoever as a requirement or direction to actually invest assets in any Investment Fund or any other investment media. The Plan, as an unfunded, nonqualified deferred compensation plan, at no time shall have any actual investment of assets relative to the benefits or Account hereunder.

          (b) INVESTMENT OF CONTRIBUTIONS. Except as otherwise provided in this Section, each Participant may make an investment election prescribing the percentage of his future Deferred Compensation and Matching Contributions that will be deemed invested in each Investment Fund. An initial investment election of a Participant shall be made as of the date the Participant commences participation in the Plan and shall apply to all Deferred Compensation and Matching Contributions credited to such Participant’s Account after such date. Such Participant may make subsequent investment elections at such times as permitted by the Administrative Committee, and such elections shall apply to all such specified Deferred Compensation and Matching Contributions credited to such Participant’s Account after the effective date of such election. Any investment election timely and properly made pursuant to this subsection with respect to future contributions shall remain effective until changed by the Participant.

10


 

          (c) INVESTMENT OF EXISTING ACCOUNT BALANCES. Each Participant may make an investment election, effective as of the date the Participant commences participation in the Plan, prescribing a different percentage of his existing Account balances that will be deemed invested in each Investment Fund. Such Participant may make subsequent investment elections at such times as permitted by the Administrative Committee prescribing a different percentage of his existing Account balances that will be deemed invested in each Investment Fund. Each such election which is timely and properly made shall remain in effect until changed by such Participant.

          (d) PROCEDURES FOR INVESTMENT DIRECTION. Except as otherwise provided herein, with respect to deemed investments made available under the Trust, if any, the Administrative Committee (or its delegate) shall then relate to the Trustee the directions of each Participant as to which deemed investments are to be made for each Participant. The Participant’s directions, if any, shall be in a form and manner and in the minimum increments prescribed by the Administrative Committee. The Administrative Committee may, in its sole discretion, permit such Participant to communicate directly with the Trustee or his delegate to direct a change in the investment fund or funds in which his Account is invested. The Administrative Committee may prescribe the fund in which the Participants’ Account shall be deemed invested in the absence of a direction by any such Participant.

          (e) ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE DISCRETION. The Administrative Committee shall have complete discretion to adopt and revise procedures to be followed in making such investment elections. Such procedures may include, but are not limited to, the process of making elections, the permitted frequency of making elections, the incremental size of elections, the deadline for making elections and the effective date of such elections. Any procedures adopted by the Administrative Committee that are inconsistent with the deadlines or procedures specified in this Section shall supersede such provisions of this Section without the necessity of a Plan amendment.

     4.3 PARTICIPATION DIRECTION NOT BINDING

     Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, neither the Administrative Committee nor the Trustee of the Trust, if any, shall be bound to follow investment directions of each Participant, but the Participant nevertheless shall be credited with the deemed performance in the deemed investment or investments selected by the Participant with respect to the Investment Funds made available under the Plan. The Company shall have the right, at any time and from time to time, in its sole discretion, to substitute assets of equal fair market value for any asset held by the Trust, if any.

11


 

ARTICLE V
PAYMENT OF ACCOUNT BALANCES

     5.1 BENEFIT PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OF SERVICE FOR REASONS OTHER THAN DEATH OR RETIREMENT.

     If a Participant terminates his employment with the Company and all other members of the Controlled Group for any reason other than death or Retirement, he (or his Beneficiary, if he dies after such termination of employment but before distribution of his Account) shall be entitled to received a distribution of the total of: (i) the entire vested amount credited to his Account, determined as of the Valuation Date coinciding with or next following the date on which the Participant terminated employment; plus (ii) the vested amount of Deferred Compensation and Matching Contributions, deferred and/or credited to his Account since such Valuation Date plus (iii) Investment Return on such amounts since such Valuation Date. The vested benefit payable to a Participant under this Section shall be distributed in a single lump sum cash payment as soon as administratively feasible after the date the Participant terminates his employment with the Company and all other members of the Controlled Group for any reason other than death or Retirement.

     5.2 BENEFITS PAYABLE UPON DEATH.

     If a Participant dies before payment of his benefit from the Plan is made or commenced, the Beneficiary or Beneficiaries designated by such Participant in his latest beneficiary designation form filed with the Administrative Committee shall be entitled to receive a distribution of the total of (i) the entire vested amount credited to such Participant’s Account, determined as of the Valuation Date coinciding with or next following the date of the Participant’s death; plus (ii) the vested amount of Compensation and Matching Contributions, deferred and/or credited to his Account since such Valuation Date plus (iii) Investment Return on such amounts since such Valuation Date. The benefit shall be distributed to such Beneficiary or Beneficiaries, as soon as administratively feasible after the date of the Participant’s death, in the form of a single lump sum payment.

     5.3 RETIREMENT BENEFITS.

     If a Participant terminates his employment with the Company and all other members of the Controlled Group due to Retirement, he (or his Beneficiary, if he dies after such termination of employment but before full distribution of his Account) shall be entitled to receive or begin receiving a distribution of the total of: (i) the entire vested amount credited to his Account, determined as of the Valuation Date coinciding with or next following the date on which such Participant terminated employment; plus (ii) the vested amount of Deferred Compensation and Matching Contributions, deferred and/or credited to his Account since such Valuation Date plus (iii) Investment Return on such amounts since such Valuation Date. The vested benefit payable to a Participant under this Section shall be distributed or distribution shall commence as soon as

12


 

administratively feasible after the Participant’s Retirement and shall be payable in one of the following forms:

          (a) SINGLE-SUM PAYMENT. Except as provided in subsection (b) hereof the benefit payable to a Participant following Retirement shall be distributed in the form of a single lump sum payment.

          (b) ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS. A Participant may elect, at the time he makes his initial Deferral Election, to have his benefit payable in the event of Retirement paid in the form of annual installment payments. The following terms and conditions shall apply to installment payments made under the Plan:

               (1) The installment payments shall be made annually as soon as practicable after December 31st of each year during the installment term (the first installment shall be paid as soon as practicable after the Participant’s termination of employment). The installment term shall be either a five (5) year period or a ten (10) year period, as elected by the Participant at the time of his Initial Election. The initial value of the obligation for the installment payments shall be equal to the amount of the Participant’s Account balance calculated in accordance with the terms of this Section 5.3 and the amount of the initial installment payment shall be an amount equal to 1/5th or 1/10th, as the case may be, of such value. The amount of each subsequent installment shall be determined by dividing the Participant’s remaining Account balance as of the preceding December 31st by the number of remaining installments.

               (2) If a Participant dies after payment of his benefit from the Plan has begun, but before his entire benefit has been distributed, the remaining amount of his Account balance shall be distributed to the Participant’s designated Beneficiary in the form of a single lump sum payment.

               (3) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, if the Account balance of the Participant as of the Valuation Date coinciding with or next following the date of the Participant’s Retirement is $50,000 or less, the entire benefit shall be paid in a single lump sum cash payment as soon as practicable following the date of the Participant’s Retirement as provided in Section 5.3(a).

     5.4 IN SERVICE DISTRIBUTIONS.

     At the time a Participant makes a Deferral Election, the Participant may elect to have all or a portion of his Account balance attributable to his Deferred Compensation credited pursuant to such Deferral Election paid in a specified future year that is not earlier than the third Plan Year after the Plan Year for which such Deferral Election applies. A Participant may make a separate election under this Section 5.4 for each annual Deferral Election. After a Participant makes his Deferral Election choosing a Plan Year for payment, a Participant may not subsequently elect to change the time of payment specified in such Deferral Election.

13


 

Provided that the Participant has not terminated employment prior to the time for payment of a portion of his Deferred Compensation subject to this Section 5.4, the applicable portion of his Account balance shall be paid to the Participant as soon as administratively practicable after January 1st of the Plan Year chosen by the Participant. If the Participant has terminated employment with the Company and all other members of the Controlled Group prior to the time for payment of a portion of his Account under this Section 5.4, the time of payment shall be accelerated and paid in accordance with the provisions of Sections 5.1, 5.2 or 5.3, as applicable. In no event, shall a Participant be permitted to have any portion of his Account attributable to Matching Contributions paid prior to his termination of employment with the Company and all members of the Controlled Group.

It is expressly contemplated that a Participant may elect separate, fixed payment dates with regard to all or a portion of the annual Deferral Election for each Plan Year. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, the Administrative Committee may establish limits on the payment dates available to Participants.

     5.5 ACCELERATED DISTRIBUTIONS.

     Subsequent to making a Deferral Election and prior to the time that payment is to commence under this Article V, a Participant may elect to have the accelerated payment of part or all of his vested Account balance. Upon receipt of an application for an accelerated distribution and approval of the distribution by the Administrative Committee, made in its sole discretion, the Controlling Company shall pay the accelerated distribution to such Participant. Such distribution shall be paid in a single lump sum payment as soon as administratively practicable after the Administrative Committee approves the distribution. In determining whether or not to approve an accelerated distribution, the Committee shall treat similarly situated Participants similarly.

Effective with the date of distribution, the Participant’s Deferral Election shall be discontinued and the Participant shall not be permitted to elect to defer any additional Compensation for the remainder of that Plan Year and all of the following Plan Year. Upon payment, the amount of such distribute on, plus an additional 10% of such amount, shall be deducted from the Participant’s Account balance in accordance with Section 3.4. The additional 10% deducted and any unvested portions of the Participant’s Account Balance associated with the accelerated distribution amount from the Account of a Participant receiving an accelerated distribution under this Section 5.5 shall be added to forfeitures and applied as provided in Section 3.6.

     5.6 HARDSHIP DISTRIBUTIONS.

     Upon receipt of an application for a hardship distribution, the Administrative Committee shall make a decision, in its sole discretion, whether the Participant has suffered a Financial Hardship

14


 

and the distribution amount necessary to satisfy the Financial Hardship. If the Administrative Committee determines that the Participant has suffered a Financial Hardship, distribution of the amount determined to be necessary to satisfy the Financial Hardship shall be made in a single lump sum payment as soon as administratively feasible after the Administrative Committee’s determination. The amount of such distribution shall reduce the Participant’s Account balance as provided in Section 3.4.

     5.7 BENEFICIARY DESIGNATION.

          (a) GENERAL. Participants shall designate and from time to time may redesignate their Beneficiaries in such form and manner as the Administrative Committee may determine.

          (b) NO DESIGNATION OR DESIGNEE DEAD OR MISSING. In the event that:

               (1) a Participant dies without designating a Beneficiary;

               (2) the Beneficiary designated by a Participant is not surviving when a payment is to be made to such person under the Plan, and no contingent Beneficiary has been designated; or

               (3) the Beneficiary designated by a Participant cannot be located by the Administrative Committee within one (1) year from the date benefits are to be paid to such person; then, in any of such events, the Beneficiary of such Participant with respect to any benefits that remain payable under the Plan shall be the Participant’s Surviving Spouse, if any, and if not, the estate of the Participant.

     5.8 TAXES.

     If the whole or any part of any Participant’s or Beneficiary’s benefit hereunder shall become subject to any estate, inheritance, income or other tax which the Company shall be required to pay or withhold, the Company shall have the full power and authority to withhold and pay such tax out of any monies or other property in its hand for the account of the Participant or Beneficiary whose interests hereunder are so affected. Prior to making any payment, the Company may require such releases or other documents from any lawful taxing authority as it shall deem necessary.

15


 

ARTICLE VI
CLAIMS

     6.1 CLAIMS.

          (a) INITIAL CLAIM. Claims for benefits under the Plan may be filed with the Administrative Committee on forms or in such other written documents, as the Administrative Committee may prescribe. The Administrative Committee shall furnish to the claimant written notice of the disposition of a claim within ninety (90) days after the application therefore is filed In the event the claim is denied, the notice of the disposition of the claim shall provide the specific reasons for the denial, citations of the pertinent provisions of the Plan, and, where appropriate, an explanation as to how the claimant can perfect the claim and/or submit the claim for review.

          (b) APPEAL. Any Participant or Beneficiary who has been denied a benefit shall be entitled, upon request to the Administrative Committee, to appeal the denial of his claim. The claimant (or his duly authorized representative) may review pertinent documents related to the Plan and in the Administrative Committee’s possession in order to prepare the appeal. The request for review, together with written statement of the claimant’s position, must be filed with the Administrative Committee no later than sixty (60) days after receipt of the written notification of denial of a claim provided for in subsection (a). The Administrative Committee’s decision shall be made within sixty (60) days following the filing of the request for review. If unfavorable, the notice of the decision shall explain the reasons for denial and indicate the provisions of the Plan or other documents used to arrive at the decision.

          (c) SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS. Any payment to a Participant or Beneficiary shall to the extent thereof be in full satisfaction of all claims hereunder against the Administrative Committee and the Company, any of whom may require such Participant or Beneficiary, as a condition to such payment, to execute a receipt and release therefor in such form as shall be determined by the Administrative Committee or the Company. If receipt and release is required but the Participant or Beneficiary (as applicable) does not provide such receipt and release in a timely enough manner to permit a timely distribution in accordance with the general timing of distribution provisions in the Plan, the payment of any affected distribution may be delayed until the Administrative Committee or the Company receive a proper receipt and release.

     6.2 EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES.

     No action at law or in equity may be brought to recover under this Plan until all administrative remedies under the Plan have been exhausted . If a claimant fails to file a timely claim or, if a claim is denied, fails to timely appeal to the Administrative Committee and timely request review by the Administrative Committee in accordance with the procedures outlined here in, such claimant shall have no rights of review and shall have no right to bring any action in any court and the claim decision shall become final and binding on all persons for all purposes.

16


 

     6.3 ACTION FOR RECOVERY.

     No action at law or in equity may be brought for recovery under this Plan sooner than the date that the Plan’s administrative appeals pursuant to Section 6.1 have been exhausted nor later than two (2) years from the time the claim for benefit was made.

     6.4 PARTICIPANT’S RESPONSIBILITIES.

     Each Participant shall be responsible for providing the Administrative Committee with the Participant’s and each Beneficiary’s current address. Any notices required or permitted to be given hereunder shall be deemed given if directed to such address and mailed by regular United States mail. The Administrative Committee and the Company shall not have any obligation or duty to locate a Participant or Beneficiary. In the event that a Participant or Beneficiary becomes entitled to a payment under this Plan and such payment is delayed or cannot be made:

          (a) because the current address according to Company records is incorrect;

          (b) because the Participant, Dependent or Beneficiary fails to respond to the notice sent to the current address according to Company records;

          (c) because of conflicting claims to such payments; or

          (d) because of any other reason;

the amount of such payment, if and when made, shall be determined under the provisions of this Plan without payment of any Investment Return for the period of delay.

     6.5 UNCLAIMED BENEFITS.

     If, within twelve (12) months after any amount becomes payable hereunder to a Participant or Beneficiary and the same shall not have been claimed or any check issued under the Plan remains uncashed, provided reasonable care shall have been exercised in attempting to make such payments, the amount thereof shall be forfeited and shall cease to be a liability of the Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Participant or Beneficiary thereafter makes a claim for benefit in accordance with this Article VI, the amount payable shall be restored and shall be paid to the Participant or Beneficiary without payment of any Investment Return from the date of forfeiture. The amount forfeited under this Section 6.6 shall be added to forfeitures and applied as provided in Section 3.6.

17


 

ARTICLE VII
SOURCE OF FUNDS: TRUST

     7.1 SOURCE OF FUNDS.

     Except as provided in this Section and Section 7.2, the Company shall provide the benefits described in the Plan from the general assets of the Company. The Controlling Company may, but shall not be required to, establish a Trust and may pay over funds from time to time to such Trust (as described in Section 7.2), and, to the extent that funds in such Trust allocable to the benefits payable under the Plan are sufficient, the Trust assets shall be used to pay benefits under the Plan. If such Trust assets are not sufficient to pay all benefits due under the Plan, then the Company shall have the obligation, and the Participant or Beneficiary, who is due such benefits, shall look to the Company to provide such benefits. The Administrative Committee shall allocate the total liability to pay benefits under the Plan among the Controlling Company and the members of its Controlled Group comprising the Company in such manner and amount as the Administrative Committee or the Board (as applicable) in its sole discretion deems appropriate. To the extent that either the Company or the Trust pays an amount to the Participant or a Beneficiary, such payment shall operate as a complete discharge for such amount.

     7.2 TRUST.

     The Controlling Company may transfer all or any portion of the funds necessary to fund benefits accrued hereunder to the Trustee to be held and administered by the Trustee pursuant to the terms of the Trust Agreement. The assets contributed for the Eligible Employees of each Company, and earnings and losses thereon, shall be accounted for separately under the Trust. The assets held by the Trust, to the extent attributable to contributions for the Eligible Employees of a given Company, are and shall remain at all times subject to the claims of the general creditors of such Company. No Participant or Beneficiary shall have any interest in the assets held by the Trust or in the general assets of the Company other than as a general, unsecured creditor. Accordingly, the Controlling Company shall not grant a security interest in the assets held by the Trust in favor of the Participants, Beneficiaries or any creditor.

18


 

ARTICLE VIII
ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE

     8.1 ACTION.

     Action of the Administrative Committee may be taken with or without a meeting of committee members; provided, action shall be taken only upon the vote or other affirmative expression of a majority of the committee members qualified to vote with respect to such action If a member of the committee is a Participant or Beneficiary, he shall not participate in any decision which solely affects his own benefit under the Plan. For purposes of administering the Plan, the Administrative’ Committee shall choose a secretary who shall keep minutes of the committee’s proceedings and all records and documents pertaining to the administration of the Plan. The secretary may execute any certificate or any other written direction on behalf of the Administrative Committee.

     8.2 RIGHTS AND DUTIES.

     The Administrative Committee shall administer the Plan and shall have all powers necessary to accomplish that purpose, including (but not limited to) the following:

          (a) To construe, interpret and administer the Plan;

          (b) To make determinations required by the Plan, and to maintain records regarding Participants’ and Beneficiaries’ benefits hereunder;

          (c) To compute and certify to the Controlling Company or the Trustee, if any, the amount and kinds of benefits payable to Participants and Beneficiaries, and to determine the time and manner in which such benefits are to be paid;

          (d) To authorize all disbursements by the Controlling Company pursuant to the Plan;

          (e) To maintain all the necessary records of the administration of the Plan;

          (f) To make and publish such rules for the regulation of the Plan as are not inconsistent with the terms hereof;

          (g) To delegate to other individuals or entities from time to time the performance of any of its duties or responsibilities hereunder;

          (h) To hire agents, accountants, actuaries, consultants and legal counsel to assist in operating and administering the Plan.

19


 

The Administrative Committee shall have the exclusive right to construe and interpret the Plan, to decide all questions of eligibility for benefits and to determine the amount of such benefits, and its decisions on such matters shall be final and conclusive on all parties.

     8.3 COMPENSATION, INDEMNITY AND LIABILITY.

     The Administrative Committee and its members shall serve as such without bond and without compensation for services hereunder. All expenses of the Administrative Committee shall be paid by the Company. No member of the committee shall be liable for any act or omission of any other member of the committee, nor for any act or omission on his own part, excepting his own willful misconduct. The Company shall indemnify and hold harmless the Administrative Committee and each member thereof against any and all expenses and liabilities, including reasonable legal fees and expenses, arising out of his membership on the committee, excepting only expenses and liabilities arising out of his own willful misconduct.

20


 

ARTICLE IX
AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION

     9.1 AMENDMENTS.

          (a) The Controlling Company, through action of the Board, shall have the right, in its sole discretion, to amend the Plan in whole or in part at any time and from time to time. Any amendment shall be in writing and executed by a duly authorized officer of the Controlling Company. An amendment to the Plan may modify its terms in any respect whatsoever, and may include, without limitation, a permanent or temporary freezing of the Plan such that the Plan shall remain in effect with respect to existing Account balances without permitting any new contributions, provided, no such action may reduce the amount already credited to a Participant’s Account without the affected Participant’s written consent. All Participants and Beneficiaries shall be bound by such amendment.

          (b) The Administrative Committee may make administrative amendments to the Plan including but not limited to amendments to clarify the Plan language and to simplify and implement various administrative procedures, including matters relating to the calculation of benefits and payments to Beneficiaries, which the Administrative Committee determines are consistent with the purpose and intent of the Plan.

     9.2 TERMINATION OF PLAN.

     The Controlling Company expects to continue the Plan but reserves the right to discontinue and terminate the Plan at any time, for any reason. Any action to terminate the Plan shall be taken by the Board in the form of a written Plan amendment executed by a duly authorized officer of the Controlling Company. If the Plan is terminated, each Participant shall become 100 percent vested in his Account which shall be distributed in a single-sum as soon as practicable after the date the Plan is terminated. The amount of any such distribution shall be determined as of the date such termination distribution is processed. Such termination shall be binding on all Participants and Beneficiaries.

21


 

ARTICLE X
MISCELLANEOUS

     10.1 TAXATION.

     It is the intention of the Company that the benefits payable hereunder shall not be deductible by the Company nor taxable for federal income tax purposes to Participants or Beneficiaries until such benefits are paid by the Company, or the Trust, as the case may be, to such Participants or Beneficiaries. When such benefits are so paid, it is the intention of the Company that they shall be deductible by the Company under Code Section 162.

     10.2 WITHHOLDING.

     All payments made to a Participant or Beneficiary hereunder shall be reduced by any applicable federal, state or local withholding or other taxes or charges as may be required under applicable law.

     10.3 NO EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT.

     Nothing herein contained is intended to be nor shall be construed as constituting a contract or other arrangement between the Company and any Participant to the effect that the Participant will be employed by the Company for any specific period of time.

     10.4 HEADINGS.

     The headings of the various articles and sections in the Plan are solely for convenience and shall not be relied upon in construing any provisions hereof. Any reference to a section shall refer to a section of the Plan unless specified otherwise.

     10.5 GENDER AND NUMBER.

     Use of any gender in the Plan will be deemed to include all genders when appropriate, and use of the singular number will be deemed to include the plural when appropriate, and vice versa in each instance.

     10.6 ASSIGNMENT OF BENEFITS.

     Neither the Participant nor any other person shall have any right to commute, sell, assign, transfer, pledge, anticipate, mortgage, or otherwise encumber, transfer, hypothecate, or convey in advance of actual receipt the amounts, if any, payable hereunder, or any part thereof, which are, and all rights to which are, expressly declared to be unassignable and nontransferable. No part of the amounts payable shall, prior to actual payment, be subject to seizure or sequestration for the payment of any debts, judgments, alimony, or separate maintenance owed by the Participant or any other person, nor be transferable by operation of law in the event of the Participant’s or any other person’s bankruptcy or insolvency.

22


 

     10.7 LEGALLY INCOMPETENT.

     The Administrative Committee, in its sole discretion, may direct that payment be made to an incompetent or disabled person, whether because of minority or mental or physical disability, to the guardian of such person or to the person having custody of such person, without further liability on the part of the Company for the amount of such payment to the person on whose account such payment is made.

     10.8 GOVERNING LAW.

     The Plan shall be construed, administered and governed in all respects in accordance with applicable federal law (including ERISA) and, to the extent not preempted by federal law, in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas. Exclusive jurisdiction and venue of all disputes arising out of and relating to the Plan shall be in any court of appropriate jurisdiction in Dallas County, Texas.

     10.9 SEVERABILITY.

     If any provision of the Plan is held invalid or unenforceable, its invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision of the Plan, and the Plan shall be construed and enforced as if such invalid or unenforceable provision had not been included herein.

     10.10 OVERPAYMENTS.

     If for any reason, any benefit under this Plan is erroneously paid to a Participant or Beneficiary, the Participant or Beneficiary, as the case may be, shall be responsible for refunding the overpayment to this Plan. The refund shall be a lump-sum payment paid directly by the Participant or Beneficiary, a reduction of the amount of future benefits otherwise payable, or any other method which the Administrative Committee shall deem appropriate, including payroll deduction in which case the Participant shall execute such forms authorizing payroll deduction as the Administrative Committee shall request.

     10.11 ENTIRE PLAN.

     This document constitutes the entire Plan and there are no oral items or conditions to the contrary. Any change, modification or amendment to the Plan must be in writing.

23


 

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Controlling Company has caused the Plan to be executed by its duly authorized officer effective as of the 1st day of July, 2000.

         
    AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC.
     
  By:   /s/ LORA VILLAREAL
     
  Title:   SR. VP – HR

24


 

AMENDMENT
TO AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC.
401(K) SUPPLEMENTAL SAVINGS PLAN

     WHEREAS, Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. 401(k) Supplemental Savings Plan (“Plan”) and

     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend certain provisions of the Plan to clarify that the disposition of a Company subsidiary by stock sale shall constitute a termination of employment with the controlled group of the employees of such subsidiary for purposes of the plan, that such disposition shall be a distributable event under the Plan;

     NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective as of January 1, 2003:

1. Section 5.1 of the Plan is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

               “If a Participant terminates his employment with the Company and all other members of the Controlled Group for any reason (including the consummation of any transaction that causes such Participant’s employer to no longer be a member of the Controlled Group), other than death or Retirement, he (or his Beneficiary, if he dies after such termination of employment but before distribution of his Account) shall be entitled to receive a distribution of the total of: (i) the entire vested amount credited to his Account, determined as of the Valuation Date coinciding with or next following the date on which the participant terminated employment; plus (ii) the vested amount of Deferred Compensation and Matching Contributions, deferred and/or credited to his Account since such Valuation Date; plus (ii) Investment Return on such amounts since such Valuation Date. The vested benefit payable to a Participant under this Section shall be distributed in a single lump sum cash payment as soon as administratively feasible after the date the Participant terminates his employment with the Company and all other members of the Controlled Group in accordance with this section 5.1.”

END OF AMENDMENT

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Amendment on this the 15th day of August 2003, to be effective as provided herein.

         
    Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.
 
  By:   /s/ LORA VILLAREAL
  Its:   Sr. V.P. – HR

 


 

AMENDMENT
TO
ACS SUPPLEMENTAL SAVINGS PLAN

WHEREAS, Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the ACS Supplemental Savings Plan (the “Plan”);

WHEREAS, the Company desires that the Plan be amended before the 2004 and 2005 open enrollment seasons to make certain modifications to enhance the flexibility of the Plan;

WHEREAS, the Company desires that the Plan be amended to conform certain Plan provisions applicable to ACS Commercial (“Commercial”) and ACS Government (“Government”) business units with certain Plan provisions applicable to eligible employees of ACS State and Local Solutions, Inc. (“SLS”);

NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:

1. The Plan is amended to allow eligible employees of the Commercial and Government business units to participate in the Plan effective January 1, 2004 as follows:

a. Eligible employees in the Commercial and Government business units may defer up to 100% of base pay and up to 100% of bonus per plan year provided that the maximum amount of base pay or bonus that can be deferred by a participating Commercial or Government business unit employee in any given plan year will be reduced by required withholding of any and all applicable federal, state or other taxes, and normal benefit deductions, including 401(k) and health and welfare contributions;

b. The Plan is amended to allow eligible Commercial or Government business unit employees to make deferrals of base pay either:

i) A fixed amount or a fixed percentage of base pay into the Plan;

ii) Sequentially into the ACS Savings Plan or ACS Government Savings Plan until such time as additional deferrals into the ACS Savings Plan or ACS Government Savings Plan are prohibited due to certain plan limits, Company imposed caps or § 402(g) and then make deferrals into the Plan; or

iii) Simultaneously into the Plan and the ACS Savings Plan or ACS Government Savings Plan. In the event deferrals into the ACS Savings Plan or ACS Government Savings Plan reach certain plan limits, Company imposed caps, or the § 402(g) limit, subsequent deferrals would be made solely into the Plan.

     2. Section 1.17 is amended to read as follows:

     “1.17 Entry Date shall mean the first day of every year during the period in which the Plan remains in effect and, with respect to employees of newly acquired businesses only, such other date as may be determined by the Administrative Committee.”

     3. Section 2.2 is amended to read as follows:

 


 

     “2.2 Procedure for Admission.

     Each Eligible Employee shall become a Participant in the Plan by completing such forms and providing such data in a timely manner, as are required by the Administrative Committee as a precondition of participation in the Plan. Such forms and data may include, without limitation, a Deferral Election, the Eligible Employee’s acceptance of the terms and conditions of the Plan, and the designation of a Beneficiary to receive any benefits payable hereunder.”

     4. Section 3.2 is amended to read as follows:

     “3.2 Deferral Elections.

     Each Eligible Employee who is or becomes eligible to participate in the Plan for all or any portion of a Plan Year may elect to become an active Participant for such Plan Year by completing and delivering to the Controlling Company (or its designee) a Deferral Election setting forth the terms of his election and such other forms as required by the Administrative Committee. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth below, a Deferral Election shall provide for the reduction of an Eligible Employee’s Compensation paid during the Plan Year for which the Deferral Election is in effect. Subject to any modifications, additions or exceptions that the Administrative Committee, in its sole discretion, deems necessary, appropriate or helpful, the following shall apply to such Deferral Elections:

          (a) Effective Date. A Participant’s initial Deferral Election with respect to his Compensation for any Plan Year shall be effective for the first paycheck earned after the date the Deferral Election becomes effective. To be effective, a Participant’s initial Deferral Election must be made within the time period prescribed by the Administrative Committee (generally, on or before the first day of the Plan Year, or, if later, on or before the Entry Date coinciding with or next following the date he first becomes eligible to participate in the Plan, subject to Section 2.1). An Eligible Employee’s initial Deferral Election with respect to his Compensation for a Plan Year shall remain in effect for each subsequent Plan Year unless revoked, or modified and such modification must be made on or before the last day of the Plan Year immediately preceding the Plan Year for which he desires to modify his Deferral Election. Notwithstanding the foregoing, each Eligible Employee may make an initial Deferral Election for the Plan prior to or within the first thirty (30) days after (i) the Effective Date of the Plan or (ii) the Entry Date coinciding with or next following the date that the individual first becomes an Eligible Employee, provided that the initial Deferral Election shall be effective for the first paycheck earned after the date the Deferral Election is received.

          (b) Term. Each Eligible Employee’s Deferral Election for a Plan Year shall remain in effect for all such Compensation paid during such Plan Year unless prior to the end of such Plan Year the Participant ceases to be an active Participant.

          (c) Deleted In Its Entirety.

          (d) Minimum Deferral Amount. An Eligible Employee must elect to defer at least $2,000 of Compensation each Plan Year (or such other minimum or maximum percentage and/or amount, if any, established by the Administrative Committee from time-to-time). If an Eligible Employee’s deferral election is projected

 


 

to result in less than an annual deferral of the minimum amount established under this Section, the Eligible Employee’s Deferral Election shall not be given effect and the Participant shall not be an active Participant for such Plan Year.

          (e) Crediting of Deferred Compensation. For each Plan Year that a Participant has a Deferral Election in effect, the Administrative Committee shall credit the amount of such Participant’s Deferred Compensation to his Account on, or as soon as practicable after, the Valuation Date such amount would have been paid to him but for his Deferral Election.”

     5. Section 3.3(a) is amended to read as follows:

     “3.3 Crediting of Matching Contributions.

          (a) Match. As of each Valuation Date within the Plan Year that Deferred Compensation is credited to the Participant’s Account (or such other date or time as the Administrative Committee, in its sole discretion, determines from time-to-time), a Matching Contribution attributable to such Deferred Compensation, if any, shall also be credited to the Participant’s Account. The Administrative Committee shall determine the amount of the Matching Contribution, if any, to be credited to each Participant’s Account. The amount of the Matching Contribution to be credited to a Participant, if any, shall be an amount equal to the difference between (i) the matching contribution that would have been credited to the Participant under the 401(k) plan in which the Participant participates if the Participant’s Deferred Compensation payable as Base Pay had been contributed as 401(k) contributions to such plan, but which were not credited to such plan due to IRS limitations and Company imposed caps, and (ii) the amount of matching contribution actually contributed to the 401(k) plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Matching Contributions credited to the Participant’s Account for the Plan Year shall not exceed the maximum limits described in Section 3.3(b).”

6. Article V is hereby amended by modifying Sections 5.3(a) and (b) and adding Section 5.3(c) to read as follows:

“(a) Single-Sum Payment. Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c) hereof the benefit payable to a Participant following Retirement shall be distributed in the form of a single lump sum payment.”

“(b) Annual Installments. A Participant may elect, at the time he makes his initial Deferral Election, to have his benefit payable in the event of Retirement paid in the form of annual installment payments. The following terms and conditions shall apply to installment payments made under the Plan:

(1) The installment payments shall be made annually as soon as practicable after December 31st of each year during the installment term (the first installment shall be paid as soon as practicable after the Participant’s termination of employment). The installment term shall be no less than a two (2) year period or greater than a fifteen (15) year period, as elected by the Participant at the time of his Initial Election. The initial value of the obligation for the installment payments shall be equal to the amount of the Participant’s Account balance calculated in accordance with the terms of this Section 5.3 and the amount of the

 


 

initial installment payment shall be an amount between 1/2 or 1/15th, as the case may be, of such value. The amount of each subsequent installment shall be determined by dividing the Participant’s remaining Account balance as of the preceding December 31st by the number of remaining installments.

(2) If a Participant dies after payment of his benefit from the Plan has begun, but before his entire benefit has been distributed, the remaining amount of his Account balance shall be distributed to the Participant’s designated Beneficiary in the form of a single lump sum payment.

(3) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, if the Account balance of the Participant as of the Valuation Date coinciding with or next following the date of the Participant’s Retirement is $50,000 or less, the entire benefit shall be paid in a single lump sum cash payment as soon as practicable following the date of the Participant’s Retirement as provided in Section 5.3(a).

(4) A Participant shall be permitted to change his election of annual installment payments at any time by filing a new Deferral Election reflecting a new installment payment election (or by following such procedures as are set by the Plan Administrator regarding using the Participant website, when available), provided such request for change is made at least thirteen (13) months prior to the Participant’s date of Retirement. Any change to installment payments made within thirteen months of Retirement shall be null and void, and the most recent election which is dated at least thirteen months prior to Retirement will be in effect. If no such election is in effect, then distribution shall be made in a single lump sum.”

“(c) Partial Lump Sum and Partial Annual Installments. A Participant may elect, at the time he makes his initial Deferral Election, to have his benefit payable in the event of Retirement paid in the form of a partial lump sum and the remaining balance paid in the form of annual installment payments. The partial lump sum shall be paid as soon as administratively feasible after the Participant’s Retirement. The following terms and conditions shall apply to installment payments paid after the lump sum payment made under the Plan:

(1) The installment payments shall be made annually as soon as practicable after December 31st of each year during the installment term (the first installment shall be paid as soon as practicable after December 31st of the year of the installment term). The installment term shall be no less than a two (2) year period or greater than a fifteen (15) year period, as elected by the Participant at the time of his Initial Election. The initial value of the obligation for the installment payments shall be equal to the amount of the Participant’s Account balance remaining after payment of the partial lump sum calculated in accordance with the terms of this Section 5.3 and the amount of the initial installment payment shall be an amount between 1/2 or 1/15th, as the case may be, of such value. The amount of each subsequent installment shall be determined by dividing the Participant’s remaining Account balance as of the preceding December 31st by the number of remaining installments.

(2) If a Participant dies after payment of his benefit from the Plan has begun, but before his entire benefit has been distributed, the remaining amount of his

 


 

Account balance shall be distributed to the Participant’s designated Beneficiary in the form of a single lump sum payment.

(3) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, if the Account balance of the Participant as of the Valuation Date coinciding with or next following the date of the Participant’s Retirement is $50,000 or less, the entire benefit shall be paid in a single lump sum cash payment as soon as practicable following the date of the Participant’s Retirement as provided in Section 5.3(a).

(4) A Participant shall be permitted to change his election of annual installment payments at any time by filing a new Deferral Election reflecting a new installment payment election (or by following such procedures as are set by the Plan Administrator regarding using the Participant website, when available), provided such request for change is made at least thirteen (13) months prior to the Participant’s date of Retirement. Any change to installment payments made within thirteen months of Retirement shall be null and void, and the most recent election which is dated at least thirteen months prior to Retirement will be in effect. If no such election is in effect, then distribution shall be made in a single lump sum.”

     7. The effective dates for the provisions of this Amendment are as follows:

a.   Sections 1, 2, 5 and 6 are effective January 1, 2004.
 
b.   Sections 3 and 4 are effective January 1, 2005.

[SIGNATURE ON NEXT PAGE]

 


 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Amendment on the 6th day of November 2003, to be effective as provided herein.

         
    Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.
 
       
  By:   /s/ LORA VILLAREAL
     
 
  Name:   Lora Villareal
  Its:   Senior Vice President – HR

 


 

AMENDMENT

TO

AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC.

401(k) SUPPLEMENTAL PLAN

WHEREAS, Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. 401(k) Supplemental Plan (the “Plan”);

WHEREAS, the Company desires that the Plan be amended to change the Plan’s name to the “ACS Supplemental Savings Plan” and to make certain other modifications to enhance the flexibility of the Plan;

WHEREAS, the Company desires that the Plan be amended to reflect the participation of eligible employees of ACS State and Local Solutions, Inc. (“SLS”) and modifications to the Plan affecting these employees;

NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:

1. The Plan shall hereinafter be called the “ACS Supplemental Savings Plan”.

2. The Plan is amended to allow eligible employees of SLS to participate in the Plan effective January 1, 2002 as follows:

1. The Plan is amended to reflect the matching contribution formula applicable to SLS employees under the ACS Savings Plan;

2. SLS employees who were employed by SLS on January 1, 2002 shall be fully vested in their contributions under the Plan and SLS employees hired after January 1, 2002 shall have matching contributions and the investment return credited with respect thereto vest in accordance with the ACS Savings Plan (less than 2 years of service = 0%; 2 years of service but less than 3 years of service = 50%; and 3 or more years of service = 100%);

3. The Plan is amended to allow SLS employees to defer up to 100% of base pay and bonus per plan year provided that the maximum amount of base pay or bonus that can be deferred by a participating SLS employee in any given plan year will be reduced by required withholding of any and all applicable federal, state or other taxes, and normal benefit deductions, including 401(k) and health and welfare contributions;

4. The Plan is amended to allow SLS employees to make deferrals of base pay either:

1. Solely into the Plan;

2. Sequentially into the ACS Savings Plan until such time as additional deferrals into the ACS Savings Plan are prohibited due to certain plan limits or § 402(g) and then make deferrals into the Plan; or

 


 

3. Simultaneously into the Plan and the ACS Savings Plan. In the event deferrals into the ACS Savings Plan reach the 402(g) limit, subsequent deferrals would be made solely into the Plan.

5. The Plan is amended to include a one year eligibility period for SLS employees before a SLS employee may receive matching contributions. For this purpose, service is determined the same as under the ACS Savings Plan as applicable to SLS employees.

3. Article I is hereby amended by adding Sections 1.21, 1.22, and 1.23 to read as follows:

“1.21 In-Service Distribution. In-Service Distribution shall mean a payment by the Company to the Participant following a date elected by the Participant (the “In-Service Distribution Date”) of the amount represented by the account balance in the In-Service Account pertaining to that In-Service Distribution. In-Service Distributions shall be made in accordance with Participants’ In-Service Distribution form of payment election.”

“1.22 In-Service Account. In-Service Account shall mean a division of the Participant’s Account maintained as a separate sub-Account, created whenever a Participant elects a new In-Service Distribution Date (not already established with an Account) with respect to a portion, or all, of his or her deferral contributions, to which such portion of deferral specified by the Participant is credited and deemed invested in the investment funds elected by the Participant for each In-Service Account.”

“1.23 In-Service Distribution Date. In-Service Distribution Date shall mean the date selected by the Participant, following which the In-Service Distribution account balance corresponding to that In-Service Distribution Date shall be distributed in accordance with the Plan.”

4. Article I, existing Sections 1.21 through 1.32 are hereby renumbered to Sections 1.24 through 1.35 respectively.

5. V, Section 5.3 is hereby amended by adding the following sub-section (b)(4):

“A Participant shall be permitted to change his election of annual installment payments at any time by filing a new Deferral Election reflecting a new installment payment election (or by following such procedures as are set by the Plan Administrator regarding using the Participant website, when available), provided such request for change is made at least thirteen (13) months prior to the Participant’s date of Retirement. Any change to installment payments made within thirteen months of Retirement shall be null and void, and the most recent election which is dated at least thirteen months prior to Retirement will be in effect. If no such election is in effect, then distribution shall be made in a single lump sum.”

6. Article V, Section 5.4 is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following:

“5.4 The annual Deferral Election shall also indicate the Participant’s election of In-Service Distribution Date(s) (if any). An In-Service Distribution election shall pertain to such portion of Deferred Compensation for the Plan Year as elected by the Participant and shall cause an In-Service Account to be established (unless such Account already exists), to which such portion of Deferred Compensation shall be credited. In the event an In-Service Account has already been established for the In-Service Distribution Date

 


 

referred to in the Deferral Election, such portion of Deferred Compensation shall be credited to the existing In-Service Account.”

“(a) A Participant may maintain up to four (4) In-Service Accounts.”

“(b) A Participant may change or cancel an In-Service Distribution Date once only, as follows:”

“(i) An In-Service Distribution Date change (including a cancellation) may be made by submitting a new Deferral Election or such other form as may be provided for In-Service Distribution Date changes by the Plan Administrator (or completing and electronically submitting the appropriate screen on the Participant website, when available) at any time, so long as the date that such form is submitted to the Plan Administrator is at least thirteen (13) months prior to the In-Service Distribution Date being changed;”

“(ii) The In-Service Distribution Date may be extended to a subsequent year (and must be extended by at least one year), but it may not be made to occur sooner than the original date;”

“(iii) The In-Service Distribution Date may be cancelled, even after a change. A cancellation of an In-Service Distribution Date shall cause the In-Service Sub-Account associated with it to be merged into the undivided portion of the Participant’s Account; and”

“(iv) Making an In-Service Distribution Date change or cancellation in accordance with the Plan is specific to the In-Service Distribution to which it refers, and shall not affect other In-Service Distributions or the ability of the Participant to make new In-Service Distribution elections with respect to new deferral contributions.”

“(c) Any portion of a deferral not credited to an In-Service Distribution Account will be credited to the undivided portion of the Participant’s Account.”

“(d) The Deferral Election shall also indicate the Participant’s election of payment schedule for each In-Service Distribution Date. Permitted payment schedules for In-Service Distributions are a single lump sum or (assuming the In-Service Distribution Account Balance is at least $10,000) from two (2) to five (5) annual installment payments. A Participant shall be permitted to change his or her payment schedule election for an In-Service Distribution at any time by filing a new Deferral Election (or by following such procedures as are set by the Plan Administrator regarding using the Participant website, when available), provided such election is made at least thirteen (13) months prior to the In-Service Distribution Date. If the In-Service Account Balance is less than $10,000 at the time the distribution (or first installment of the distribution) is payable, the In-Service Distribution shall be made in a single lump sum regardless of the Participant’s election of installment payments.”

“(e) In the event a Participant terminates his employment with the Company, dies, or terminates his employment with the Company due to Retirement, and at the time of termination, death or Retirement, he has undistributed balances in In-

 


 

Service Accounts, the In-Service Accounts will be dissolved and combined with his undivided Participant account balance for purposes of distribution under Section 5.1, 5.2 or 5.3, as the case may be.”

7. The effective dates for the provisions of this Amendment are as follows:

1. Sections 1 and 2 are effective January 1, 2002.

2. Sections 3 through 6 are effective January 1, 2003.

[END OF AMENDMENT]

[SIGNATURE ON NEXT PAGE]

 


 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Amendment on the 1st day of January 2003, to be effective as provided herein.
         
  Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.
 
 
  By:   /s/ LORA VILLAREAL  
  Name:   Lora Villareal  
  Its:   Sr. V.P. – HR

 

EX-21.1 3 d18146exv21w1.htm SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY exv21w1
 

Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF
AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC.,
a Delaware corporation

         
    Jurisdiction of    
Subsidiary
  Organization
  Other Business Names
ACS BPS de Guatemala S.A.
  Guatemala    
ACS BRC Holdings, Inc.
  Delaware    
ACS Business Process Solutions (Dominican Republic), S.A.
  Dominican Republic    
ACS Business Process Solutions (Jamaica)
Limited
  Japan    
ACS Business Process Solutions de Mexico S.A. de C.V.
  Mexico    
ACS Business Process Solutions Limited
  United Kingdom    
ACS Business Resources Corporation
  Delaware    
ACS Business Services, LLC
  Delaware    
ACS Commercial Solutions, Inc.
  Nevada   ACS Business Process Solutions
ACS Defense, LLC
  Delaware    
ACS EDI Gateway, Inc.
  Delaware    
ACS Education Services, Inc.
  Delaware    
ACS Education Solutions, LLC
  Delaware    
ACS Enterprise Solutions, Inc.
  Delaware   ACS Government Information Services
      ACS Government Records
      ACS State & Local Services
      ACS Technical Services
      BRC Government Services
      BRC Records, Inc.
      Enduro Binder
      Logan Services, Inc.
ACS Global, Inc.
  Delaware    
ACS Government Systems, Inc.
  Delaware   SCT Government Systems, Inc.
ACS Health Administration, Inc.
  Delaware   Rewards Administration Center
ACS Health Care, Inc.
  Delaware    
ACS Image Solutions, Inc.
  Louisiana   DPX Corporation
ACS IT Solutions, LP
  Delaware    
ACS Legal Solutions, Inc.
  Pennsylvania    
ACS Lending, Inc.
  Delaware    
ACS Marketing, L.P.
  Delaware    
ACS Merger Corp.
  Delaware    

 


 

SUBSIDIARIES OF
AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC.,
a Delaware corporation

         
    Jurisdiction of    
Subsidiary
  Organization
  Other Business Names
ACS Outsourcing Solutions, Inc.
  Michigan    
ACS Print and Mail Services, Inc.
  Michigan    
ACS Properties, Inc.
  Delaware    
ACS Protection Services, Inc.
  Texas    
ACS Public Sector Solutions, Inc.
  Canada    
ACS REBGM, Inc.
  Illinois    
ACS Securities Services, Inc.
  Texas    
ACS State & Local Solutions, Inc.
  New York   Florida Alliance for Families
      LDC Collection Systems
      National Collections Center
ACS State Healthcare, LLC
  Delaware   Consultec, LLC
      GenAmerica Consultec, LLC
      General American Consultec
ACS TradeOne Marketing, Inc.
  Delaware   Affiliated ACS Eastern Services, Inc.
      Class Action Newsletter; TradeOne Marketing
      Unclaimed Property Recovery Reporting
      Unclaimed Property Recovery Reporting, Inc.
ACS Trust I
  Delaware    
ACS Trust II
  Delaware    
ACS Welfare Benefit Trust
  Texas    
ACS-BPS (Ghana) Limited
  Ghana    
ACS/ECG Holdings, LLC
  Delaware    
Affiliated Computer Services (Fiji) Limited
  Fiji    
Affiliated Computer Services (Tianjin) Co., Ltd.
  China    
Affiliated Computer Services Business
       
Process Solutions, S.A.R.L.
  France    
Affiliated Computer Services do Brasil Ltd.
  Brazil    
Affiliated Computer Services Hungary
       
Commercial and Service Provider Limited Liability Company
  Hungary    
Affiliated Computer Services International
(Barbados) Holdings Limited
  Barbados    
Affiliated Computer Services International
(Barbados) Limited
  Barbados    
Affiliated Computer Services International B.V.
  Netherlands    

 


 

SUBSIDIARIES OF
AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC.,
a Delaware corporation

         
    Jurisdiction of    
Subsidiary
  Organization
  Other Business Names
Affiliated Computer Services Ireland
Limited
  Ireland    
Affiliated Computer Services of Germany GmbH
  Germany    
Affiliated Computer Services of India Private Limited
  India    
Affiliated Computer Services of Spain, S.L., Sociedad Unipersonal
  Spain    
Consultec IPA, Inc.
  New York    
CyberRep of Tennessee, Inc.
  Tennessee    
CyberRep, Inc.
  Virginia    
Datacom Municipal Systems of Pennsylvania, Inc.
  Pennsylvania    
Digital Information Systems Company, LLC
  Georgia   Digital Indexing Systems Company
etravelexperts, LLC
  Delaware    
FCTC Transfer Services, L.P.
  Delaware   First City Transfer Company
Government Records Services, Inc.
  Delaware   ACS Government Records Services, Inc.
Health Technology Acquisition Company
  Indiana    
Heritage Information Systems, Inc.
  Virginia    
Lockheed Martin B.V. (Netherlands)
  Netherlands    
Lockheed Martin IMS Canada Inc.
  Canada    
MidasPlus, Inc.
  Arizona    
Outsourced Administrative Systems, Inc.
  Indiana   None
Patient Accounting Service Center, LLC
  Washington   ARSTRAT
      ACS Systems
Peter Martin Associates, Inc.
  Illinois   None
Tenacity Manufacturing Company, Inc.
  Delaware   None
The National Abandoned Property Processing
Corporation
  Delaware   None
Title Records Corporation
  Delaware   None
Transaction Processing Specialists, Inc.
  Texas   None
Truckload Management Services, Inc.
  Colorado   MultiMedia Recruiting, Inc.

 

EX-23.1 4 d18146exv23w1.htm CONSENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP exv23w1
 

Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-68656) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-117941, 333-117536, 333-105284, 333-62030, 333-44764, and 333-42385) of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. of our report dated July 29, 2004, except as to the seventh paragraph of Note 17, which is as of August 13, 2004, the tenth paragraph of Note 17, which is as of August 25, 2004, and the second paragraph of Note 23, which is as of August 26, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Dallas, Texas
September 13, 2004

EX-23.2 5 d18146exv23w2.htm CONSENT OF VALUE INCORPORATED exv23w2
 

EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF VALUE INCORPORATED

We hereby consent to all references to our firm and the reports issued by our firm to Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 and consent to the incorporation by reference of such Annual Report on Form 10-K in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-68656) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-117941, 333-117536, 333-105284, 333-62030, 333-44764, and 333-42385) of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.

         
  VALUE INCORPORATED
 
   
  By:   /s/ DAVID N. FULLER, CFA
  Title:   President

Irving, Texas
September 13, 2004

EX-31.1 6 d18146exv31w1.htm CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) exv31w1
 

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jeffrey A. Rich, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Intentionally omitted]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 13, 2004
         
     
  /s/ Jeffrey A. Rich    
  Jeffrey A. Rich   
  Chief Executive Officer
Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. 
 
 

 

EX-31.2 7 d18146exv31w2.htm CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) exv31w2
 

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Warren D. Edwards, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Intentionally omitted]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 13, 2004
         
     
  /s/ Warren D. Edwards    
  Warren D. Edwards,   
  Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. 
 
 

 

EX-32.1 8 d18146exv32w1.htm CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) exv32w1
 

Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     I, Jeffrey A. Rich, Chief Executive Officer of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:

  (1)   the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 
  (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
         
     
Dated: September 13, 2004  /s/ Jeffrey A. Rich    
  Jeffrey A. Rich,   
  Chief Executive Officer of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.   
 

EX-32.2 9 d18146exv32w2.htm CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) exv32w2
 

Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     I, Warren D. Edwards, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:

  (1)   the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 
  (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
         
     
Dated: September 13, 2004  /s/ Warren D. Edwards.    
  Warren D. Edwards,   
  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.   
 

-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----