XML 89 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2012
Fair Value Measurements
(5) Fair Value Measurements

GAAP defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly fashion between market participants at the measurement date. GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy for those instruments measured at fair value that distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and the Company’s assumptions (unobservable inputs).  The hierarchy consists of three levels:
 
     Level 1 –   Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
 
     Level 2 –   Inputs other than Level 1 inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable; and
 
     Level 3 –   Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

On a recurring basis, Aceto measures at fair value certain financial assets and liabilities, which consist of cash equivalents, investments and foreign currency contracts. The Company classifies cash equivalents and investments within Level 1 if quoted prices are available in active markets.  Level 1 assets include instruments valued based on quoted market prices in active markets which generally include corporate equity securities publicly traded on major exchanges.  Time deposits are very short-term in nature and are accordingly valued at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value, and are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. The Company uses foreign currency forward contracts (futures) to minimize the risk caused by foreign currency fluctuation on its foreign currency receivables and payables by purchasing futures with one of its financial institutions.  Futures are traded on regulated U.S. and international exchanges and represent commitments to purchase or sell a particular foreign currency at a future date and at a specific price.   Aceto’s foreign currency derivative contracts are classified within Level 2 as the fair value of these hedges is primarily based on observable forward foreign exchange rates. At June 30, 2012 the Company had foreign currency contracts outstanding that had a notional amount of $52,668. Unrealized (losses) gains on hedging activities for the years ended June 30, 2012, 2011, and 2010, amounted to ($560), $160 and ($981), respectively, and are included in interest and other income, net, in the consolidated statements of income. The contracts have varying maturities of less than one year.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Credit Agreement, the Company is required to deliver Hedging Agreements (as defined in the Credit Agreement) fixing the interest rate on not less than $20,000 of the Term Loan.  Accordingly, in March 2011, the Company entered into an interest rate swap for a notional amount of $20,000, which has been designated as a cash flow hedge.  The expiration date of this interest rate swap is December 31, 2015. The unrealized loss to date associated with this derivative, which is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income in the consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2012, is $427. The remaining balance of this derivative as of June 30, 2012 is $15,500. Aceto’s interest rate swap is classified within Level 2 as the fair value of this hedge is primarily based on observable interest rates.

As of June 30, 2012, the Company had $1,779 of contingent consideration that was recorded at fair value in the Level 3 category, which related to the acquisition of Rising, which was completed in December 2010. The contingent consideration was calculated using the present value of a probability weighted income approach. As of June 30, 2011, the Company had $974 of contingent consideration that was recorded at fair value in the Level 3 category, which related to the acquisition of Andrews Paper & Chemical, Co., Inc., which was completed during fiscal 2010 and the acquisition of Rising, which was completed in December 2010. The contingent consideration was calculated using the present value of a probability weighted income approach. The changes in contingent consideration relates to the settlement of $68 for Andrews Paper & Chemical, Co., Inc., accrued interest expense of $112 for the Rising contingent consideration and additional contingent consideration of $761 for the Rising acquisition, recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012.

During the fourth quarter of each year, the Company evaluates goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles for impairment at the reporting unit level using an undiscounted cash flow model using Level 3 inputs. Additionally, on a nonrecurring basis, the Company uses fair value measures when analyzing asset impairment. Long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.  If it is determined such indicators are present and the review indicates that the assets will not be fully recoverable, based on undiscounted estimated cash flows over the remaining amortization periods, their carrying values are reduced to estimated fair value.  Measurements based on undiscounted cash flows are considered to be Level 3 inputs.  
 
The following tables summarize the valuation of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities which were determined by using the following inputs at June 30, 2012 and 2011:
 
 
  Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2012 Using  
   
Quoted Prices
in Active
 Markets
 (Level 1)
   
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 (Level 3)
   
 
 
 
Total
 
                         
Cash equivalents:
                       
    Time deposits
    -     $ 814       -     $ 814  
                                 
Investments:
                               
    Time deposits
            1,518       -       1,518  
                                 
Foreign currency contracts-assets (1)
    -       138       -       138  
Foreign currency contracts-liabilities (2)
    -       661       -       661  
Derivative liability for interest rate swap (3)
    -       427       -       427  
Contingent consideration (3)
                  $ 1,779       1,779  
                                 
(1)
Included in “Other receivables” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2012.
(2)           Included in “Accrued expenses” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2012.
(3)
Included in “Long-term liabilities” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2012.


  Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2011 Using  
   
 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)
   
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 (Level 3)
   
 
 
 
 
Total
 
                         
Cash equivalents:
                       
    Time deposits
    -     $ 467       -     $ 467  
                                 
Investments:
                               
    Trading securities
  $ 475               -       475  
    Time deposits
            468       -       468  
                                 
Foreign currency contracts-assets (4)
    -       547       -       547  
Foreign currency contracts-liabilities (5)
    -       352       -       352  
Derivative liability for interest rate swap (6)
    -       333       -       333  
Contingent consideration (7)
                  $ 974       974  
 
(4)
Included in “Other receivables” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2011.
(5)           Included in “Accrued expenses” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2011.
(6)
Included in “Long-term liabilities” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2011.
(7)
$68 included in “Accrued expenses” and $906 included in Long-term liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2011.