EX-99.1 2 tm2517830d1_ex99-1.htm EXHIBIT 99.1

Exhibit 99.1

 

SingleSource Diligence Solutions Utah, LLC d/b/a Resolute Diligence Solutions

 

6546 North Landmark Drive

Suite E, Park City, UT 84098

714.614.2974

legal@setpoint.io

   

 

May 21, 2025

 

Executive Summary

 

Third Party Due Diligence Review

 

Overview

 

Resolute Diligence Solutions (“Resolute”), a third-party due diligence provider, performed the review described below on behalf of its client (“Client”). The review included a total of 1,019 home equity investments (each an “Option” and collectively the “Portfolio”), in connection with the securitization identified as SOLVE 2025-HEC1 (the “Securitization”). The review concluded in May of 2025.

 

Description of the Due Diligence Performed

 

Resolute performed valuation, data, document, title, and credit/underwriting guideline reviews for the Portfolio.

 

The table below summarizes the reviews by type:

 

Review Reviewed Total % Of Portfolio
Credit/Underwriting Guideline Review 1,019 100.00%
Data Review 1,019 100.00%
Document Review 1,019 100.00%
Valuation Review 1,019 100.00%
Hazard and Flood Insurance Review 1,019 100.00%
Title Review 1,019 100.00%

 

Credit/Underwriting Guideline Review:

 

Resolute reviewed the Options to determine compliance with mutually agreed underwriting guidelines at time of acquisition as provided by Client (the “Guidelines”).

 

 

 

 

Data Review:

 

Resolute compared the following data fields on the data tape provided by the Client against the data found on the origination documents.

 

FICO Score Option Term Occupancy Debt Pay Off
LOTV Sr. Lien Amount Title Type Option %
Option Amount As is Appraised Value Property Address Proceeds Cap

 

Document Review:

 

Resolute reviewed each Option file to determine if the documents were included and that the documents have been property executed and/or recorded:

 

Option Purchase Agreement

 

Recorded (or executed if pending recordation) Security Instrument

 

Recorded Memorandum (or executed if pending recordation)

 

Credit Report

 

1st Mortgage Statement

 

2nd Mortgage Statement (as applicable)

 

Identification Documents

 

Application

 

Appraisal

 

Settlement Statement

 

Flood Certification

 

Hazard Insurance

 

Flood Insurance, if applicable

 

HOA Insurance, if applicable

 

Verification of Title Evidence (as applicable)

 

Valuation Review:

 

Resolute reviewed the valuations provided by the Client and validated the following:

 

Property Address

 

Property type

 

Occupancy

 

 

 

 

Location

 

Condition rating

 

As is appraised value

 

As is appraisal date

 

Appraiser Cert is included

 

Appraiser executed the appraisal

 

Appraiser license is included

 

Appraiser insurance is included

 

For each Option, Resolute reviewed the original appraisal and an AVM or seller provided desk review, as applicable, and determined whether the appraised value was reasonably supported within at least a 10% downside variance. In each instance, Resolute confirmed that the applicable secondary valuation product with respect to each Option reviewed by it supported original value within at least a 10% downside variance.

 

Hazard and Flood Insurance Review:

 

Resolute verified that the hazard insurance meets the minimum coverage amount.

 

Resolute reviewed the Flood Certificate to verify if flood insurance is required. If flood insurance is required, Resolute verified that the flood insurance meets the minimum coverage amounts.

 

Title Review:

 

Resolute verified the following:

 

           Verify the legal description matches the current recorded deed.

 

           Verify that no liens/encumbrances negatively impact the property, or if applicable, provide the Client with an exception report identifying the issue.

 

 

 

 

Grading Methodology

 

Resolute applied a grading methodology to each Option based on the review criteria and the Guidelines.

 

CREDIT EVENT GRADE
A The Option conforms to all applicable Guidelines, no conditions noted.
B The Option does not meet every applicable Guideline, however most of the Option characteristics are within the Guidelines and there are documented and significant compensating factors.
C The Option does not meet every applicable Guideline, and most Option characteristics are outside Guidelines; or there are weak or no compensating factors.
D The Option does not meet every applicable Guideline, and most Option characteristics are outside Guidelines and not curable; or there are weak or no compensating factors.

 

VALUATION EVENT GRADE
A The value is supported within at least 10% on the downside of the original appraisal by the AVM or there are other supporting documents in the seller’s file (seller desk review) confirmed by a third-party diligence provider.
B The value is not supported within at least 10% on the downside of the original appraisal by the AVM and there are no other valuation support documents in the seller’s file that could be confirmed by a third-party diligence provider. The valuation methodology substantially meets the applicable Guidelines, but reasonable compensating factors were considered and documented for exceeding Guidelines.
C The value is not supported within at least 10% on the downside of the original appraisal. The valuation methodology did not meet the Guidelines and there were not sufficient compensating factors for exceeding the Guidelines.
D The file was missing the appraisal or there was not sufficient valuation documentation to perform a review.

 

Summary of Findings and Conclusions of Review

 

Completion of the credit and valuation reviews for the Portfolio resulted in an “A” grade for 945 Options and a “B” grade for 74 Options. The data integrity review of 1,019 Options resulted in no discrepancies.

 

OVERALL REVIEW RESULTS
Grade Count % Of
Portfolio
($)
Investment
Payment
A 945 93.94% $100,942,063.00
B 74 6.06% $6,512,786.00
C 0 0.00% $0.00
D 0 0.00% $0.00

 

 

 

 

CREDIT GRADES
Grade Count % Of
Portfolio
Investment
Payment
A 945 93.94% $100,942,063.00
B 74 6.06% $6,512,786.00
C 0 0.00% $0.00
D 0 0.00% $0.00
       
VALUATION GRADES
Grade Count % Of
Portfolio
($)
Investment
Payment
A 1,019 100.00% $107,454,849.00
B 0 0.00% $0.00
C 0 0.00% $0.00
D 0 0.00% $0.00

 

Portfolio Summary

 

LIEN POSITION Count % Of
Portfolio
($)
Investment
Payment
FIRST 116 9.81% $10,543,475.00
SECOND 816 80.34% $86,330,194.00
THIRD 82 9.53% $10,238,005.00
FOURTH 5 0.32% $343,175.00
TOTAL 1,019 100.00% $107,454,849.00
       
ORIG TERM Count % Of
Portfolio
($)
Investment
Payment
0-180 86 13.23% $14,212,550.00
181-240 0 0.00% $0
241-360 933 86.77% $93,242,299.00
Total 1,019 100.00% $107,454,849.00

 

 

 

 

OCCUPANCY Count % Of
Portfolio
($)
Investment
Payment
 
PRIMARY 981 95.41% $102,521,294.00
SECOND 30 3.62% $3,889,800.00
INVESTMENT 8 0.97% $1,043,755.00
Total 1,019 100.00% $107,454,849.00