Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)	12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2025
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Basis of Presentation	Basis of Presentation The accompanying consolidated financial statements (referred to hereafter as the “financial statements”) are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and are stated in United States (“U.S.”) dollars. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in these financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. A consolidated statement of changes in net assets, a consolidated statement of cash flows and financial highlights have not been presented because the Company has not commenced operations. Our fiscal year ends on December 31 of each year. The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared using the accounting and reporting guidance under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 946, Financial Services — Investment Companies (“ASC 946”).
Principles of Consolidation	Principles of Consolidation As provided under Regulation S-X and ASC 946, the Company will generally not consolidate its investment in a company other than a wholly owned investment company or controlled operating company whose business consists of providing services to the Company. All significant intercompany balances and transactions will be eliminated in consolidation.
Cash and Cash Equivalents	Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash, including cash denominated in foreign currencies, represents cash deposits held at financial institutions or in money market funds with maturities of three or fewer months at the time of acquisition. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the amount of cash and cash equivalents was $1,000 and $1,000, respectively.
Organization and Offering Costs	Organization and Offering Costs Organization costs are expensed as incurred. Organization costs consist of costs incurred to establish the Company and enable it legally to do business. Organization costs will be reimbursed by the Manager, subject to potential recoupment as described in Note 3. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company incurred organization costs of $2,778,481 and $2,070,985, respectively. Offering costs include registration fees and legal fees regarding the preparation of the initial registration statement on Form 10. Offering costs are accounted for as deferred costs until operations begin. Offering costs will be reimbursed by the Manager, subject to potential recoupment as described in Note 3. For continuous offerings, offering costs are then amortized over the first twelve months of operations on a straight-line basis. As of December 31, 2025, the cumulative offering costs incurred by the Company of $2,105,797 were deferred and recorded as deferred offering costs in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities.
Valuation of Investments at Fair Value	Valuation of Investments at Fair Value ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value. The Company recognizes and accounts for its investments at fair value. The fair value of the investments does not reflect transaction costs that may be incurred upon disposition of investments. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters, or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, valuation models are applied. These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency for the instruments or market and the instruments’ complexity for disclosure purposes. Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on the Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their value. Hierarchical levels, as defined under GAAP, are directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuations of these assets and liabilities, are as follows: Level I — Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date. Level II — Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level I that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level II inputs include quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability. Level III — Inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. A significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability is an indication that transactions or quoted prices may not be representative of fair value because in such market conditions, there may be increased instances of transactions that are not orderly. In those circumstances, further analysis of transactions or quoted prices is needed, and an adjustment to the transactions or quoted prices may be necessary to estimate fair value. Valuation techniques and observable inputs vary across investments. When fair value relies on less observable or unobservable inputs, greater judgment is required. Valuations inherently involve uncertainty, estimated values may differ materially for the investment if using a readily available market price. Therefore, the Manager exercises the highest degree of judgment in valuing Level III investments. When making fair value determinations for the Company, the Manager considers industry-accepted valuation techniques that maximizes observable inputs and minimizes unobservable inputs. The methodologies used by the Manager to derive fair value consists of the market or income approach. The market approach includes valuation techniques that use prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving comparable assets, liabilities or a group of assets and liabilities. Inputs used under a market approach may include valuation multiples applied to corresponding performance metrics, such as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”). The selected multiples are estimated through a comparative analysis of the performance and characteristics of each investment within a range of comparable companies or transactions in the observable marketplace. In addition, recent merger and acquisitions transactions of comparable companies may be used as a basis to develop implied valuation multiples. The income approach includes valuation techniques that measure the present value of anticipated future economic benefits (i.e., net cash flows). The estimated net cash flows are forecasted over the expected remaining economic life and discounted to present value using a discount rate commensurate with the level of risk associated with the expected cash flows. When making fair value determinations for assets that do not have a reliable readily available market price, the Manager will engage one or more independent valuation firms to provide positive assurance regarding the reasonableness of such valuations as of the relevant measurement date. However, the Manager is ultimately responsible for determining the fair value of all applicable investments in good faith in accordance with the Company’s valuation policies and procedures. Because assets are valued as of a specified valuation date, events occurring subsequent to that date will not be reflected in the Company’s valuations. However, if information indicating a condition that existed at the valuation date becomes available subsequent to the valuation date and before financial information is publicly released, it will be evaluated to determine whether it would have a material impact requiring adjustment of the final valuation. At least annually, the Manager reviews the appropriateness of the Company’s valuation policies and procedures and will recommend any proposed changes to the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”). From time to time, the Board, and the Manager may adopt changes to the valuation policies and procedures if they determine that such changes are likely to result in a more accurate reflection of estimated fair value.
Income Taxes	Income Taxes The Company intends to operate so that it will qualify to be treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes under the Internal Revenue Code and not a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation. As such, it will not be subject to any U.S. federal, state and/or local income taxes. In any year, it is possible that the Company will be considered a publicly traded partnership and will not meet the qualifying income exception, which would result in the Company being treated as a publicly traded partnership taxed as a corporation, rather than a partnership. In such case, the members would then be treated as stockholders in a corporation, and the Company would become taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The Company would be required to pay income tax at corporate rates on its net taxable income. In addition, the Company intends to operate, in part, through subsidiaries that may be treated as corporations for U.S. and non-U.S. tax purposes and therefore may be subject to current and deferred U.S. federal, state and/or local income taxes at the subsidiary level.
Calculation of Net Asset Value	Calculation of Net Asset Value Net asset value (“NAV”) by share class is calculated by subtracting total liabilities for each class from the total carrying amount of all assets for that class, which includes the fair value of investments. NAV per share for each class is calculated by dividing the net asset value for that class by the total number of outstanding common shares of that class on the reporting date.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2025

The accompanying consolidated financial statements (referred to hereafter as the “financial statements”) are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and are stated in United States (“U.S.”) dollars. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in these financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. A consolidated statement of changes in net assets, a consolidated statement of cash flows and financial highlights have not been presented because the Company has not commenced operations. Our fiscal year ends on December 31 of each year.

The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared using the accounting and reporting guidance under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 946, Financial Services — Investment Companies (“ASC 946”).

Principles of Consolidation

As provided under Regulation S-X and ASC 946, the Company will generally not consolidate its investment in a company other than a wholly owned investment company or controlled operating company whose business consists of providing services to the Company. All significant intercompany balances and transactions will be eliminated in consolidation.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash, including cash denominated in foreign currencies, represents cash deposits held at financial institutions or in money market funds with maturities of three or fewer months at the time of acquisition. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the amount of cash and cash equivalents was $1,000 and $1,000, respectively.

Organization and Offering Costs

Organization costs are expensed as incurred. Organization costs consist of costs incurred to establish the Company and enable it legally to do business. Organization costs will be reimbursed by the Manager, subject to potential recoupment as described in Note 3. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company incurred organization costs of $2,778,481 and $2,070,985, respectively.

Offering costs include registration fees and legal fees regarding the preparation of the initial registration statement on Form 10. Offering costs are accounted for as deferred costs until operations begin. Offering costs will be reimbursed by the Manager, subject to potential recoupment as described in Note 3. For continuous offerings, offering costs are then amortized over the first twelve months of operations on a straight-line basis. As of December 31, 2025, the cumulative offering costs incurred by the Company of $2,105,797 were deferred and recorded as deferred offering costs in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities.

Valuation of Investments at Fair Value

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value. The Company recognizes and accounts for its investments at fair value. The fair value of the investments does not reflect transaction costs that may be incurred upon disposition of investments.

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters, or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, valuation models are applied. These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency for the instruments or market and the instruments’ complexity for disclosure purposes.

Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on the Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their value. Hierarchical levels, as defined under GAAP, are directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuations of these assets and liabilities, are as follows:

Level I — Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date.

Level II — Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level I that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level II inputs include quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability.

Level III — Inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability.

A significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability is an indication that transactions or quoted prices may not be representative of fair value because in such market conditions, there may be increased instances of transactions that are not orderly. In those circumstances, further analysis of transactions or quoted prices is needed, and an adjustment to the transactions or quoted prices may be necessary to estimate fair value.

Valuation techniques and observable inputs vary across investments. When fair value relies on less observable or unobservable inputs, greater judgment is required. Valuations inherently involve uncertainty, estimated values may differ materially for the investment if using a readily available market price. Therefore, the Manager exercises the highest degree of judgment in valuing Level III investments.

When making fair value determinations for the Company, the Manager considers industry-accepted valuation techniques that maximizes observable inputs and minimizes unobservable inputs. The methodologies used by the Manager to derive fair value consists of the market or income approach.

The market approach includes valuation techniques that use prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving comparable assets, liabilities or a group of assets and liabilities. Inputs used under a market approach may include valuation multiples applied to corresponding performance metrics, such as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”). The selected multiples are estimated through a comparative analysis of the performance and characteristics of each investment within a range of comparable companies or transactions in the observable marketplace. In addition, recent merger and acquisitions transactions of comparable companies may be used as a basis to develop implied valuation multiples.

The income approach includes valuation techniques that measure the present value of anticipated future economic benefits (i.e., net cash flows). The estimated net cash flows are forecasted over the expected remaining economic life and discounted to present value using a discount rate commensurate with the level of risk associated with the expected cash flows.

When making fair value determinations for assets that do not have a reliable readily available market price, the Manager will engage one or more independent valuation firms to provide positive assurance regarding the reasonableness of such valuations as of the relevant measurement date. However, the Manager is ultimately responsible for determining the fair value of all applicable investments in good faith in accordance with the Company’s valuation policies and procedures.

Because assets are valued as of a specified valuation date, events occurring subsequent to that date will not be reflected in the Company’s valuations. However, if information indicating a condition that existed at the valuation date becomes available subsequent to the valuation date and before financial information is publicly released, it will be evaluated to determine whether it would have a material impact requiring adjustment of the final valuation.

At least annually, the Manager reviews the appropriateness of the Company’s valuation policies and procedures and will recommend any proposed changes to the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”). From time to time, the Board, and the Manager may adopt changes to the valuation policies and procedures if they determine that such changes are likely to result in a more accurate reflection of estimated fair value.

Income Taxes

The Company intends to operate so that it will qualify to be treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes under the Internal Revenue Code and not a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation. As such, it will not be subject to any U.S. federal, state and/or local income taxes. In any year, it is possible that the Company will be considered a publicly traded partnership and will not meet the qualifying income exception, which would result in the Company being treated as a publicly traded partnership taxed as a corporation, rather than a partnership. In such case, the members would then be treated as stockholders in a corporation, and the Company would become taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The Company would be required to pay income tax at corporate rates on its net taxable income.

In addition, the Company intends to operate, in part, through subsidiaries that may be treated as corporations for U.S. and non-U.S. tax purposes and therefore may be subject to current and deferred U.S. federal, state and/or local income taxes at the subsidiary level.

Calculation of Net Asset Value

Net asset value (“NAV”) by share class is calculated by subtracting total liabilities for each class from the total carrying amount of all assets for that class, which includes the fair value of investments. NAV per share for each class is calculated by dividing the net asset value for that class by the total number of outstanding common shares of that class on the reporting date.

- Definition

Disclosure of accounting policy for income taxes, which may include its accounting policies for recognizing and measuring deferred tax assets and liabilities and related valuation allowances, recognizing investment tax credits, operating loss carryforwards, tax credit carryforwards, and other carryforwards, methodologies for determining its effective income tax rate and the characterization of interest and penalties in the financial statements.

+ References + Details