January 27, 2025

Ibrahima Tall
Chief Executive Officer
Namib Minerals
71 Fort Street, PO Box 500
Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands, KY1-1106

Tulani Sikwila
Chief Financial Officer
Greenstone Corporation
71 Fort Street, PO Box 500
Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands, KY1-1106

       Re: Namib Minerals
           Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form F-4
           Filed January 10, 2025
           File No. 333-283650
Dear Ibrahima Tall and Tulani Sikwila:

     We have reviewed your amended registration statement and have the
following
comments.

        Please respond to this letter by amending your registration statement
and providing
the requested information. If you do not believe a comment applies to your
facts and
circumstances or do not believe an amendment is appropriate, please tell us why
in your
response.

       After reviewing any amendment to your registration statement and the
information
you provide in response to this letter, we may have additional comments. Unless
we note
otherwise, any references to prior comments are to comments in our December 20,
2024 letter.

Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form F-4
Q: What happens if a substantial number of Public Stockholders vote in favor of
the Business
Combination Proposal...?, page xxii

1.     Please revise the information in the table so the amounts listed in each
assumed
       redemption scenario corresponds with the correct total amounts.
 January 27, 2025
Page 2

Questions and Answers About the Business Combination and the HCVI Stockholders'
Meeting
Q. What conditions must be satisfied to complete the Business Combination?,
page xxvii

2.     We note your response to our prior comment 2. Revise your disclosure to
include
       cross references to the applicable risk factors.
Summary Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial Information, page
29

3.     We note your response to comment 4 in the letter dated December 20,
2024. Please
       further revise the total liabilities and total shareholders    deficit
for the 50% and
       maximum redemption scenarios on page 30 to reconcile with the
corresponding
       amounts on pages 83 and 84.
Risk Factors
Nasdaq may delist our securities from trading on its exchange, which could
limit investors'
ability to make transactions in our securities, page 66

4.     We note your response to our prior comment 6 and disclosure that on
December 19,
       2024, Nasdaq granted HCVI's request to continue its listing on Nasdaq
until March
       31, 2025, subject to HCVI's compliance with the conditions outlined in
the letter.
       Please disclose the conditions that HCVI must comply with in order to
continue its
       listing on Nasdaq.
Investors should be aware that the gratuitous waiver of all or part of the
deferred
underwriting fee is unusual..., page 72

5.     We note your response to our prior comment 8 and revised disclosure that
HCVI
       management approached the Underwriters and requested they waive
entitlement to the
       deferred fees. Please tell us the reason for seeking such waiver despite
the
       Underwriters having already performed all of their obligations under the
Underwriting
       Agreement and whether it was the result of any dispute or disagreement
with HCVI or
       on any matter relating to its operations.
The Backgound of the Business Combination, page 106

6.     We note the Greenstone valuation is based on 5,223,000 Greenstone
Resource Ounces
       however the How Mine, Mazowe Mine, and Redwing Mine mineral resources,
       exclusive of reserves, and reserves total 4,352,000 ounces. Please
explain the
       difference between these numbers.

       Additionally please tell us if the type of resource (e.g. measured,
       indicated, inferred) was considered in the valuation and comparison.
Business of Greenstone and Information Related to Greenstone, page 219

7.     We note your response to comment 16. Please include an inset to the map
on page
       225 that clearly identifies the general location of the claims in the
DRC. Please
       ensure the coordinates on the perimeter of the map are legible.
8.     We note your response to comment 18. Please include the equation for
your resource
       cut-off grade calculation in each technical report summary in order to
clearly
 January 27, 2025
Page 3

       articulate the cut-off grade calculation.

       We note that the Mazowe resource cut-off grade calculation incorporates
a percent
       mine call factor however the Redwing resource cut-off grade calculation
does not
       incorporate a similar factor. Please explain these differences in your
response.

       Please explain the significance of certain COG estimation parameters in
your
       technical reports, such as the assay plan factor and the block factor,
that are included
       in Table 11.5 of Exhibit 96.2 and Table 11.4 of Exhibit 96.3, however do
not appear
       to be included in the cut-off grade calculation.
Greenstone Corporation Financial Statements
3.3 Property and equipment, page F-108

9.     We note your revised disclosure in response to prior comment 20. We
believe your
       footnote disclosure requires additional detail to further support the
inclusion of
       inferred resources in the straight-line calculation for determining the
amount of
       depreciation of your mining assets. In order to understand the basis for
including
       these resources in the depreciation calculation and further expand your
footnote
       disclosure, address the following areas below:
           Explain why you do not apply the units of production method to
depreciate your
           mining assets and have concluded the use of the straight-line method
is more
           closely aligned with the consumption of the economic benefits of the
assets under
           paragraphs 60 through 62 of IAS 16.
           Provide us with the resource and reserve amounts and categories that
are included
           in the 72% and 79% disclosed amounts, including calculations. We
would expect
           such amounts to be based on your life of mine plan and agree with
reserve and
           resource amounts disclosed elsewhere in your filing.
           Revise your disclosure regarding when inferred mineral resources are
included in
           the depreciation calculation to ensure the terminology is consistent
with the
           definitions of Section 1300 of Regulation S-K. The term economically
viable is
           associated with mineral reserve determination and the term economic
potential
           relates to mineral resources. For an inferred resource to be viable
it would first
           have to be upgraded to a measured or indicated resource which would
have to be
           subsequently upgraded to a reserve.
           Supplement the information provided regarding your historical 81%
conversion
           rate based on 12 years of historical data by explaining where the
historical
           inferred resources were located in relation to areas of active
production within the
           How mine. Explain whether the 81% conversion rate is based on
inferred
           resources converted to proven and probable reserves or extracted for
production.
           Provide sections or drawings to demonstrate the location of the
inferred resources
           that are included in the depreciation calculation specifically
identifying where
           these portions of inferred resources are located with respect to
current active
           mining locations and drill holes.
           Provide us with an understanding of the continuity of the
mineralization within
           the How mine.
 January 27, 2025
Page 4

             Specify the average drill hole spacing for the inferred resources
that have been
           included in the depreciation calculation
             Quantify the percentage of inferred resources that have been
included in the
           depreciation calculation that have data that has been interpolated
between sample
           points, versus the percentage extrapolated, and the average distance
extrapolated.
             Provide any other empirical data that supports a high accuracy and
confidence
           level with respect to inferred resource conversion.

        Please contact Brian McAllister at 202-551-3341 or Shannon Buskirk at
202-551-
3717 if you have questions regarding comments on the financial statements and
related
matters. Please contact John Coleman at (202) 551-3610 for engineering related
questions.
Please contact Anuja Majmudar at 202-551-3844 or Irene Barberena-Meissner at
202-551-
6548 with any other questions.



                                                            Sincerely,

                                                            Division of
Corporation Finance
                                                            Office of Energy &
Transportation