Commitments and Contingencies	12 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2025
Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]
Commitments and contingencies	Note 20 — Commitments and contingencies Contingencies From time to time, the Company is a party to certain legal proceedings, as well as certain asserted and un-asserted claims. Amounts accrued, as well as the total amount of reasonably possible losses with respect to such matters, individually and in the aggregate, are not deemed to be material to the consolidated financial statements. On November 22, 2024, a plaintiff filed Semensato v. Foxx Development Holdings Inc., et al., No. 2024-1200 (Del. Ch. Ct.), a class action complaint (“Complaint”) in Delaware Chancery Court against the Company and certain “Individual Defendants” (“Joy” Yi Hua, Haitao Cui, “Jeff” Feng Jiang, “Eva” Yiqing Miao and Edmund R. Miller) (“Action”). The lawsuit seeks declaratory relief under provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law relating to a waiver of the corporate opportunity doctrine that is contained in the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation. The plaintiff seeks a declaration that the waiver provision is invalid, an injunction against the Company and the Individual Defendants to prevent them from attempting to enforce the waiver, attorneys’ fees, and the costs and disbursements of this action. The Company and each of the Individual Defendants deny any and all wrongdoing alleged in the Complaint. However, to avoid the cost and distraction of litigation, the directors of the board of the Company (the “Board”) determined that it was advisable and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to amend Article X of the Charter (the “Amendment”). The Board thus approved and adopted the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (the “Amended Charter”), and will direct the Amendment to be submitted to the stockholders of the Company for adoption and approval at the next annual meeting of stockholders with the Board’s recommendation that the Amendment be approved and adopted by the stockholders of the Company. On March 3, 2025, after the plaintiff was advised of the Board’s approval of the Amended Charter, the plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of the Action as moot, which the Court approved by order dated March 4, 2025. Believing that the swift resolution of this Action was in the best interests of and benefit to the Company, and without admitting the allegations the plaintiff made in the Complaint, the Company has agreed to pay $85,000 (the “Mootness Fee,” inclusive of a $500 service award to the plaintiff) to the plaintiff’s counsel to resolve the anticipated application by the plaintiff’s counsel for an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses. The fee was paid by the Company on March 18, 2025. In connection with the March 13, 2025 stipulated order closing the case, the Court ordered that the Company provide this notice. The Court has not and will not pass judgment on the amount of the Mootness Fee. Lease Commitment On July 12, 2024, the Company signed a seven-year lease agreement to rent a manufacturing plant for business operation with a monthly rent of $65,745, plus varied monthly CAM, for 50,573 square feet. The commencement date of this lease is February 1, 2025 and the termination date is January 31, 2032. On August 9, 2024, the Company expanded the existing lease to include additional 50,572 square feet from April 1, 2025 to January 31, 2032 with an additional monthly rent of $65,744. These two first-month rents were included in prepaid expenses and other current assets. On December 20, 2024, the Company revised the commencement date to July 1, 2025 and termination date to December 31, 2035, and further expanded the existing lease to include additional 102,099 square feet from January 1, 2026 to December 31, 2035 with an additional monthly rent of $132,729, which was included in prepaid expenses and other current assets. Additional $550,000 of security deposits were made as a result of this lease amendment, which was included in the caption “security deposits” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2025. These leases were not included in the operating right-of-use assets balance as of June 30, 2025 as the commencement date of the lease was on July 1, 2025. Reference to Note 19 for detailed disclosure of other entered lease agreements and liabilities. Risks and Uncertainties On April 2, 2025, President Trump signed the Executive Order, Regulating Imports with a Reciprocal Tariff to Rectify Trade Practices that Contribute to Large and Persistent Annual United States Goods Trade Deficits (“the April 2 EO”), to take action based on the results of certain investigations related to the causes of the U.S.’s large and persistent annual trade deficits in goods. Subsequent to the April 2 EO, there have been additional Executive Orders that have, among other actions, effectively suspended the enforcement of certain country-specific tariffs until November 10, 2025. The potential for further changes in trade policies, including new tariffs or changes to existing ones, introduces uncertainty regarding the Company’s future costs, revenues, collectability of account receivables, carrying value of inventories, and overall financial performance. The Company monitors these developments closely and will continue to evaluate their potential impact on its operations, financial condition, and results of operations. The ultimate financial impact of these uncertainties is difficult to quantify at this time.

Commitments and Contingencies

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2025

Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]

Note 20 — Commitments and contingencies

Contingencies

From time to time, the Company is a party to certain legal proceedings, as well as certain asserted and un-asserted claims. Amounts accrued, as well as the total amount of reasonably possible losses with respect to such matters, individually and in the aggregate, are not deemed to be material to the consolidated financial statements.

On November 22, 2024, a plaintiff filed Semensato v. Foxx Development Holdings Inc., et al., No. 2024-1200 (Del. Ch. Ct.), a class action complaint (“Complaint”) in Delaware Chancery Court against the Company and certain “Individual Defendants” (“Joy” Yi Hua, Haitao Cui, “Jeff” Feng Jiang, “Eva” Yiqing Miao and Edmund R. Miller) (“Action”). The lawsuit seeks declaratory relief under provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law relating to a waiver of the corporate opportunity doctrine that is contained in the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation. The plaintiff seeks a declaration that the waiver provision is invalid, an injunction against the Company and the Individual Defendants to prevent them from attempting to enforce the waiver, attorneys’ fees, and the costs and disbursements of this action. The Company and each of the Individual Defendants deny any and all wrongdoing alleged in the Complaint. However, to avoid the cost and distraction of litigation, the directors of the board of the Company (the “Board”) determined that it was advisable and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to amend Article X of the Charter (the “Amendment”). The Board thus approved and adopted the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (the “Amended Charter”), and will direct the Amendment to be submitted to the stockholders of the Company for adoption and approval at the next annual meeting of stockholders with the Board’s recommendation that the Amendment be approved and adopted by the stockholders of the Company.

On March 3, 2025, after the plaintiff was advised of the Board’s approval of the Amended Charter, the plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of the Action as moot, which the Court approved by order dated March 4, 2025. Believing that the swift resolution of this Action was in the best interests of and benefit to the Company, and without admitting the allegations the plaintiff made in the Complaint, the Company has agreed to pay $85,000 (the “Mootness Fee,” inclusive of a $500 service award to the plaintiff) to the plaintiff’s counsel to resolve the anticipated application by the plaintiff’s counsel for an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses. The fee was paid by the Company on March 18, 2025. In connection with the March 13, 2025 stipulated order closing the case, the Court ordered that the Company provide this notice. The Court has not and will not pass judgment on the amount of the Mootness Fee.

Lease Commitment

On July 12, 2024, the Company signed a seven-year lease agreement to rent a manufacturing plant for business operation with a monthly rent of $65,745, plus varied monthly CAM, for 50,573 square feet. The commencement date of this lease is February 1, 2025 and the termination date is January 31, 2032. On August 9, 2024, the Company expanded the existing lease to include additional 50,572 square feet from April 1, 2025 to January 31, 2032 with an additional monthly rent of $65,744. These two first-month rents were included in prepaid expenses and other current assets. On December 20, 2024, the Company revised the commencement date to July 1, 2025 and termination date to December 31, 2035, and further expanded the existing lease to include additional 102,099 square feet from January 1, 2026 to December 31, 2035 with an additional monthly rent of $132,729, which was included in prepaid expenses and other current assets. Additional $550,000 of security deposits were made as a result of this lease amendment, which was included in the caption “security deposits” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2025. These leases were not included in the operating right-of-use assets balance as of June 30, 2025 as the commencement date of the lease was on July 1, 2025.

Reference to Note 19 for detailed disclosure of other entered lease agreements and liabilities.

Risks and Uncertainties

On April 2, 2025, President Trump signed the Executive Order, Regulating Imports with a Reciprocal Tariff to Rectify Trade Practices that Contribute to Large and Persistent Annual United States Goods Trade Deficits (“the April 2 EO”), to take action based on the results of certain investigations related to the causes of the U.S.’s large and persistent annual trade deficits in goods. Subsequent to the April 2 EO, there have been additional Executive Orders that have, among other actions, effectively suspended the enforcement of certain country-specific tariffs until November 10, 2025. The potential for further changes in trade policies, including new tariffs or changes to existing ones, introduces uncertainty regarding the Company’s future costs, revenues, collectability of account receivables, carrying value of inventories, and overall financial performance. The Company monitors these developments closely and will continue to evaluate their potential impact on its operations, financial condition, and results of operations. The ultimate financial impact of these uncertainties is difficult to quantify at this time.