e10vq

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended July 1, 2006


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 0-9576

K-TRON INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)


New Jersey		22-1759452

(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

Routes 55 & 553, P.O. Box 888, Pitman, New Jersey		08071-0888

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

(856) 589-0500

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code

Not Applicable

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer o Accelerated Filer o Non-Accelerated Filer þ

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No þ

The Registrant had 2,611,549 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of August 4, 2006.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

K-TRON INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in Thousands except Per Share Data)


	(Unaudited)
	July 1,			December 31,
	2006			2005
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	9,108		$	15,051
Restricted cash		221			—
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $844 and $682		22,442			18,168
Inventories, net		19,980			15,235
Deferred income taxes		1,435			1,033
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		2,522			2,019

Total current assets		55,708			51,506


PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net		26,899			22,271
PATENTS, net		1,521			1,577
GOODWILL		3,779			2,053
OTHER INTANGIBLES, net		13,216			9,739
NOTES RECEIVABLE AND OTHER ASSETS		1,873			1,852
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES		426			112

Total assets	$	103,422		$	89,110


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Current portion of long-term debt	$	4,361		$	4,316
Accounts payable		8,287			6,025
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		7,444			6,526
Accrued commissions		2,573			2,297
Customer advances		3,578			1,704
Income taxes payable		3,297			3,421
Deferred income taxes		1,652			1,652

Total current liabilities		31,192			25,941


LONG-TERM DEBT, net of current portion		11,127			12,675
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES		3,418			974
SERIES B JUNIOR PARTICIPATING PREFERRED SHARES, $.01 par value – authorized 50,000 shares; none issued		—			—
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value – authorized 950,000 shares; none issued		—			—
Common stock, $.01 par value – authorized 50,000,000 shares; issued 4,614,123 shares and 4,578,166 shares		46			46
Paid-in capital		20,006			19,082
Retained earnings		62,056			56,383
Accumulated other comprehensive income		3,091			1,523

		85,199			77,034
Treasury stock, 2,002,574 shares – at cost		(27,514	)		(27,514	)

Total shareholders’ equity		57,685			49,520

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	103,422		$	89,110

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

- 1 -

K-TRON INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND RETAINED EARNINGS

(Dollars in Thousands except Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	July 1,		July 2,		July 1,		July 2,
	2006		2005		2006		2005
REVENUES:
Equipment and parts	$	34,436	$	28,182	$	64,614	$	54,841
Services and freight		2,325		2,042		4,261		3,935

Total revenues		36,761		30,224		68,875		58,776

COST OF REVENUES:
Equipment and parts		18,375		15,558		35,412		30,287
Services and freight		2,121		1,830		4,047		3,702

Total cost of revenues		20,496		17,388		39,459		33,989


Gross profit		16,265		12,836		29,416		24,787

OPERATING EXPENSES:
Selling, general and administrative		10,321		8,908		19,191		17,403
Research and development		588		686		1,173		1,351

		10,909		9,594		20,364		18,754


Operating income		5,356		3,242		9,052		6,033

INTEREST EXPENSE, net of interest income		210		259		366		522

Income before income taxes		5,146		2,983		8,686		5,511

INCOME TAX PROVISION		1,790		1,067		3,013		1,952


NET INCOME		3,356		1,916		5,673		3,559

RETAINED EARNINGS:
Beginning of period		58,700		50,744		56,383		49,101

End of period	$	62,056	$	52,660	$	62,056	$	52,660


EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Basic	$	1.29	$	0.75	$	2.19	$	1.40

Diluted	$	1.20	$	0.71	$	2.04	$	1.32


Weighted average common shares outstanding (basic)		2,597,000		2,550,000		2,587,000		2,543,000


Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding (diluted)		2,796,000		2,714,000		2,777,000		2,699,000

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

- 2 -

K-TRON INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollars in Thousands)

(Unaudited)


	Six Months Ended
	July 1,			July 2,
	2006			2005
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	5,673		$	3,559
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		2,238			2,084
Amortization of non-cash compensation		118			76
Deferred income taxes		(36	)		—
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of business acquired:
Accounts receivable, net		(1,069	)		1,926
Inventories, net		(2,001	)		(2,060	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(140	)		(45	)
Other assets		297			116
Accounts payable		1,460			(229	)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		149			(1,830	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		6,689			3,597


INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Business acquired net of cash received		(7,116	)		—
Capital expenditures		(1,615	)		(861	)
Other		(35	)		(14	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(8,766	)		(875	)


FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net repayments under lines of credit		(804	)		(700	)
Principal payments on long-term debt		(3,713	)		(2,531	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		460			312

Net cash used in financing activities		(4,057	)		(2,919	)


EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		412			(1,342	)


NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(5,722	)		(1,539	)


CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH:
Beginning of period		15,051			12,443

End of period	$	9,329		$	10,904

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

- 3 -

K-TRON INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

July 1, 2006

(Unaudited)

1.		Basis of Presentation

		The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q and do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of K-Tron International, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“K-Tron” or the “Company”). All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of a normal recurring nature) considered necessary for a fair presentation of results for interim periods have been made. All references to the second quarter or first six months of 2006 or 2005 mean the fiscal 13-week or 26-week period ended July 1, 2006 or July 2, 2005.

		The unaudited financial statements herein should be read in conjunction with the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 which was previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

		Certain reclassifications were made to the prior year’s consolidated financial statements to conform them to the current year presentation.

2.		Acquisition

		On March 3, 2006, the Company purchased all of the outstanding stock of J.M.J. Industries, Inc., which operated its business under the tradename Gundlach, and the results of that company, now known as Gundlach Equipment Corporation, have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements since that date. The purchase price was $9,154,500, of which $6,154,500 was paid in cash and $3,000,000 by delivery of an unsecured promissory note bearing interest at 5% per annum and payable in three equal, annual installments of $1,000,000 on March 3 in each of 2008, 2009 and 2010. The Company also paid off all of the acquired company’s bank debt, which amounted to approximately $1,347,000. The Company did not borrow any money in connection with either the acquisition or the payoff of the bank debt. The excess of the purchase price over the carrying value of the identifiable net assets acquired was $6,723,000, which was allocated as follows:

- 4 -


	Intangible Useful Life		(in thousands)
Property, plant and equipment		—	$	1,347
Goodwill	Indefinite			1,726
Customer relationships	15 Years			1,500
Drawings	25 Years			1,430
Tradenames	Indefinite			720

			$	6,723

The total purchase price of $10,501,500 (including the payoff of bank debt) was allocated as follows:


	(in thousands)
Cash	$	389
Accounts receivable		2,476
Inventories		2,313
Other current assets		175
Property, plant and equipment		4,287
Goodwill		1,726
Customer relationships		1,500
Drawings		1,430
Tradenames		720
Accounts payable		(502	)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		(2,248	)
Deferred taxes		(1,764	)

	$	10,502

		Customer relationships, drawings and tradenames are included in other intangibles in the consolidated balance sheet.

3.		New Accounting Pronouncements

		In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued the final revised version of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment”, which requires companies to recognize in the income statement the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees. In March 2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 107, “Share-Based Payment”, regarding the interaction between SFAS No. 123(R) and certain SEC rules and regulations. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R). Since January 1, 2006, the Company has recognized compensation expense related to share-based payments on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for share-based payment awards granted on or after January 1, 2006. For unvested awards granted prior to the effective date of the Company’s adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company has recognized compensation expense in the same manner as it did in its income statement or for pro forma disclosures prior to the effective date of its adoption of SFAS No. 123(R). See Note 10 for more information regarding the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R).

- 5 -

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs, an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 43, Chapter 4”. SFAS No. 151 clarifies the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted material and requires that such items be recognized as current-period charges regardless of whether they meet the “so abnormal” criterion outlined in ARB No. 43. SFAS No. 151 also introduces the concept of “normal capacity” and requires the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. Unallocated overheads must be recognized as an expense in the period incurred. SFAS No. 151 is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company adopted SFAS No. 151 effective January 1, 2006. The adoption did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets - an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29”. Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 29 requires a nonmonetary exchange of assets to be accounted for at fair value, recognizing any gain or loss, if the exchange meets a commercial substance criterion and fair value is determinable. The commercial substance criterion is assessed by comparing the entity’s expected cash flows immediately before and after the exchange. SFAS No. 153 eliminates the “similar productive assets exception”, which accounted for the exchange of assets at book value with no recognition of gain or loss. SFAS No. 153 is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company adopted SFAS No. 153 effective January 1, 2006. The adoption did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections- a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3”, which replaces APB Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes”, and SFAS No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements”, and changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principle, and also applies to changes required by an accounting pronouncement in the unusual instance that the pronouncement does not include specific transition provisions. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. SFAS No. 154 does not change the transition provisions of any existing accounting pronouncements, including those that are in a transition phase as of the effective date of SFAS No. 154. The Company adopted SFAS No.154 effective January 1, 2006. The adoption did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109”. This Interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. It also prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return, and it provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. Interpretation No. 48 is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2006.

- 6 -

		The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this Interpretation on its consolidated financial statements.

4.		Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information

		The Company considers all highly liquid short-term investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

		Cash paid for interest expense in the six-month periods ended July 1, 2006 and July 2, 2005 was $455,000 and $575,000 and for income taxes was $3,814,000 and $2,524,000.

		As part of the acquisition discussed in Note 2 above, the Company issued $3,000,000 in an unsecured promissory note for the benefit of the sellers of the stock of J.M.J. Industries, Inc.

5.		Inventories

		Inventories consist of the following:


	July 1,			December 31,
	2006			2005
	(in thousands)
Components	$	16,552		$	13,216
Work-in-process		4,632			2,850
Finished goods		—			81
Inventory reserves		(1,204	)		(912	)

	$	19,980		$	15,235

6.		Intangible Assets

		Intangible assets consist of the following:


	July 1, 2006				December 31, 2005
	Gross				Gross
	Carrying		Accumulated		Carrying		Accumulated
	Amount		Amortization		Amount		Amortization
	(in thousands)
Amortized intangible assets
Patents	$	2,850	$	1,329	$	2,815	$	1,238
Drawings		4,980		445		3,550		355
Customer relationships		6,398		327		4,898		244

	$	14,228	$	2,101	$	11,263	$	1,837


Unamortized intangible assets
Trademarks and tradenames	$	2,610			$	1,890

The amortized intangible assets are being amortized on the straight-line basis (half-year expense in the year of acquisition) over the expected periods of benefit, which range from

- 7 -

		15 to 50 years. The weighted average life of the amortizable assets is 32 years. The amortization expense of intangible assets for the six-month periods ended July 1, 2006 and July 2, 2005 was $264,000 and $210,000.

7.		Accrued Warranty

		The Company offers a one-year warranty on a majority of its products. Warranty is accrued as a percentage of sales on a monthly basis and otherwise as believed needed, and is included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities. The following is an analysis of accrued warranty for the six-month periods ended July 1, 2006 and July 2, 2005:


	Six Months Ended
	July 1,			July 2,
	2006			2005
	(in thousands)
Beginning balance	$	989		$	1,257
Accrued warranty of acquired business		150			—
Accrual of warranty expense		613			737
Warranty costs incurred		(444	)		(750	)
Foreign exchange adjustment		30			(56	)

Ending balance	$	1,338		$	1,188

8.		Long-Term Debt

		Long-term debt consists of the following, with the annual interest rates shown being those in effect on July 1, 2006:


	July 1,			December 31,
	2006			2005
	(in thousands)
U.S. mortgage, interest at 6.45%	$	1,643		$	1,731
U.S. line of credit, interest at 7.75%		—			805
U.S. term notes, interest at 5.00% to 6.94%		13,642			14,266
Other		203			189

		15,488			16,991
Less current portion		(4,361	)		(4,316	)

	$	11,127		$	12,675

9.		Earnings Per Share

		The Company previously adopted SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share”, which requires that the Company report Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share. Basic Earnings Per Share represents net income less preferred dividends divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted Earnings Per Share is calculated similarly, except that the denominator includes the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect of options, warrants, convertible securities and other instruments with dilutive effects if exercised.

- 8 -

The Company’s Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share are calculated as follows:


	For the Three Months Ended July 1, 2006
(Dollars and Shares in Thousands
except Per Share Data)	Net Income Available
	To Common				Earnings
	Shareholders		Shares		Per Share
Basic	$	3,356		2,597	$	1.29

Common Share Equivalent of Outstanding Options		—		199		(0.09	)

Diluted	$	3,356		2,796	$	1.20


	For the Three Months Ended July 2, 2005
(Dollars and Shares in Thousands
except Per Share Data)	Net Income Available
	To Common				Earnings
	Shareholders		Shares		Per Share
Basic	$	1,916		2,550	$	0.75

Common Share Equivalent of Outstanding Options		—		164		(0.04	)

Diluted	$	1,916		2,714	$	0.71


	For the Six Months Ended July 1, 2006
(Dollars and Shares in Thousands
except Per Share Data)	Net Income Available
	To Common				Earnings
	Shareholders		Shares		Per Share
Basic	$	5,673		2,587	$	2.19

Common Share Equivalent of Outstanding Options		—		190		(0.15	)

Diluted	$	5,673		2,777	$	2.04


	For the Six Months Ended July 2, 2005
(Dollars and Shares in Thousands
except Per Share Data)	Net Income Available
	To Common				Earnings
	Shareholders		Shares		Per Share
Basic	$	3,559		2,543	$	1.40

Common Share Equivalent of Outstanding Options		—		156		(0.08	)

Diluted	$	3,559		2,699	$	1.32

- 9 -

		The Company’s Diluted Earnings Per Share values shown in the preceding table are based on the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during a given time period. Such average shares include the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options after the assumed repurchase of common shares with the related proceeds at the average market price during the period.

10.		Share-Based Compensation

		The Company adopted SFAS No.123(R) effective January 1, 2006. SFAS No. 123(R) requires the Company to recognize expense related to the fair value of stock-based compensation awards, including employee stock options.

		Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company accounted for stock options using the intrinsic value method of APB Opinion No. 25, and it did not recognize compensation expense in its income statement for options granted that had an exercise price equal to or greater than the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. However, the Company did record compensation expense related to restricted stock grants based on the market value of its stock at the date of grant and the vesting period of the grant. As required by SFAS No. 123, the Company also provided certain pro forma disclosures for stock option awards as if the fair value-based approach of SFAS No. 123 had been applied.

		The Company has elected to use the modified prospective transition method as permitted by SFAS No. 123(R) and therefore has not restated its financial results for prior periods. Under this transition method, the Company will apply the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) to new awards and to awards modified, repurchased or cancelled after December 31, 2005. Additionally, for unvested awards granted prior to the effective date of the Company’s adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) which have not been fully expensed in prior years, either in the Company’s income statement or in pro forma disclosures in the notes thereto, the Company will recognize compensation expense in the same manner as was used in its income statement or for pro forma disclosures prior to the effective date of its adoption of SFAS No. 123(R).

		The pre-tax cost for stock option employee compensation was approximately $31,000 ($19,000 after tax) for the second quarter of 2006 and approximately $62,000 ($38,000 after tax) for the first six months of 2006. As a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company’s financial results were lower than under the previous accounting method for share-based compensation by the following amounts:

- 10 -


	Three Months Ended		Six Months Ended
	July 1, 2006		July 1, 2006
	(in thousands, except per share)
Income from continuing operations before income taxes	$	31	$	62

Net income	$	19	$	38

Basic earnings per share	$	0.01	$	0.01

Diluted earnings per share	$	0.01	$	0.01

As of July 1, 2006, the Company did not have any remaining prospective pre-tax cost of unvested stock option employee compensation to be expensed.

The following table illustrates the effect on net income and net income per common share as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to stock option employee compensation for the three and six-month periods ended July 2, 2005:


	Three Months Ended			Six Months Ended
	July 2,			July 2,
	2005			2005
	(in thousands, except per share)
Net income – as reported	$	1,916		$	3,559
Deduct stock option employee compensation expense determined, net of related tax effect		(55	)		(82	)

Net income – pro forma	$	1,861		$	3,477


Basic earnings per share – as reported	$	0.75		$	1.40
Basic earnings per share – pro forma		0.73			1.37
Diluted earnings per share – as reported		0.71			1.32
Diluted earnings per share – pro forma		0.69			1.29

		There were no employee stock options granted in the first six months of 2006.

11.		Comprehensive Income

		Comprehensive income is the total of net income, the change in the unrealized gain or loss on a foreign exchange hedge and an interest rate swap, in each case net of tax, and the change in foreign currency translation adjustments, all for a given period, which are the Company’s only non-owner changes in equity. For the three and six-month periods ended July 1, 2006 and July 2, 2005, the following table sets forth the Company’s comprehensive income:

- 11 -


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	July 1,			July 2,			July 1,			July 2,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
	(in thousands)
Net income	$	3,356		$	1,916		$	5,673		$	3,559
Unrealized loss on foreign exchange hedge, net of tax		(114	)		—			(114	)		—
Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swap, net of tax		(6	)		(10	)		(6	)		24
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)		1,455			(2,275	)		1,688			(3,951	)

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	4,691		$	(369	)	$	7,241		$	(368	)

12.		Management Geographic Information

		The Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”. SFAS No. 131 introduced a model for segment reporting called the management approach. The management approach is based on the way that the chief operating decision-maker organizes segments within a company for making operating decisions and assessing performance. The Company is engaged in one business segment, material handling equipment and systems. The Company operates in two primary geographic locations, North and South America (the “Americas”) and Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia (“EMEA/Asia”).

		For the three and six-month periods ended July 1, 2006 and July 2, 2005, the following table sets forth the Company’s geographic information:


			EMEA/		Elimi-			Consoli-
	Americas		Asia		nations			dated
	(in thousands)
THREE MONTHS ENDED
July 1, 2006
Revenues
Sales to unaffiliated customers	$	24,557	$	12,204	$	—		$	36,761
Sales to affiliates		794		906		(1,700	)		—

Total sales	$	25,351	$	13,110	$	(1,700	)	$	36,761


Operating income	$	4,342	$	1,024	$	(10	)	$	5,356

Interest expense									(210	)

Income before income taxes								$	5,146

- 12 -


			EMEA/		Elimi-			Consoli-
	Americas		Asia		nations			dated
	(in thousands)
THREE MONTHS ENDED
July 2, 2005
Revenues
Sales to unaffiliated customers	$	18,415	$	11,809	$	—		$	30,224
Sales to affiliates		702		893		(1,595	)		—

Total sales	$	19,117	$	12,702	$	(1,595	)	$	30,224


Operating income	$	2,423	$	804	$	15		$	3,242

Interest expense									(259	)

Income before income taxes								$	2,983


			EMEA/		Elimi-			Consoli-
	Americas		Asia		nations			dated
	(in thousands)
SIX MONTHS ENDED
July 1, 2006
Revenues
Sales to unaffiliated customers	$	45,446	$	23,429	$	—		$	68,875
Sales to affiliates		1,472		1,636		(3,108	)		—

Total sales	$	46,918	$	25,065		(3,108	)	$	68,875

Operating income	$	7,228	$	1,864	$	(40	)	$	9,052

Interest expense									(366	)

Income before income taxes								$	8,686


			EMEA/		Elimi-			Consoli-
	Americas		Asia		nations			dated
	(in thousands)
SIX MONTHS ENDED
July 2, 2005
Revenues
Sales to unaffiliated customers	$	35,528	$	23,248	$	—		$	58,776
Sales to affiliates		1,455		1,648		(3,103	)		—

Total sales	$	36,983	$	24,896	$	(3,103	)	$	58,776


Operating income	$	4,822	$	1,166	$	45		$	6,033

Interest expense									(522	)

Income before income taxes								$	5,511

-13-

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Introduction

We are engaged in one principal business segment – material handling equipment and systems. We operate in two primary geographic locations – North and South America (the “Americas”) and Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia (“EMEA/Asia”).

Within the material handling equipment and systems segment, we have two main business lines, which are our process and size reduction business lines. The process business line is a combination of our former feeder and pneumatic conveying business lines.

On March 3, 2006, we purchased all of the outstanding stock of J.M.J. Industries, Inc., which operated its business under the tradename Gundlach. The purchase price was $9,154,500, of which $6,154,500 was paid in cash and $3,000,000 by delivery of an unsecured promissory note bearing interest at 5% per annum and payable in three equal, annual installments of $1,000,000 on March 3 in each of 2008, 2009 and 2010. We also paid off all of the acquired company’s bank debt, which amounted to approximately $1,347,000. We did not borrow any money in connection with either the acquisition or the payoff of the bank debt. The Gundlach operation is part of our size reduction business line.

The following provides information that management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of our consolidated results of operations and financial condition. The discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. All references in this Item 2 to the second quarter or first six months of 2006 or 2005 mean the fiscal 13-week or 26-week period ended July 1, 2006 or July 2, 2005.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates; Recent Accounting Standards

Management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on the accounting policies used and disclosed in our 2005 consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes that were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and included as part of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the “2005 Form 10-K”). The preparation of those financial statements required management to make estimates and assumptions that affected the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual amounts or results could differ from those based on such estimates and assumptions.

Our critical accounting policies are described in Management’s Discussion and Analysis included in our 2005 Form 10-K. There have been no changes in these accounting policies.

Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to our 2005 consolidated financial statements. Information concerning our implementation and the impact of recent accounting standards issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board is included in the notes to our 2005 consolidated financial statements and also in the notes to our consolidated financial statements contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. We did not adopt any accounting

-15-

policy in the first six months of 2006 that had a material impact on our financial condition, liquidity or results of operations.

Results of Operations

Overview

For the second quarter and first six months of 2006, we reported revenues of $36,761,000 and $68,875,000 and net income of $3,356,000 and $5,673,000, compared to revenues of $30,224,000 and $58,776,000 and net income of $1,916,000 and $3,559,000 for the same periods in 2005. We believe that the increases in our revenues and net income in the second quarter and first six months of 2006 compared to the same periods in 2005 were primarily the result of (1) stronger business conditions and increased spending by customers in the Americas, (2) the contribution from four months of operations of our newly acquired Gundlach business and (3) improved margins in our process business line in EMEA/Asia, which more than offset the negative effect of a stronger U.S. dollar in the first six months of 2006 versus the same period in 2005 on the translation of the revenues and profits of our foreign operations into U.S. dollars. Our effective tax rates for the second quarter and first six months of 2006 were 34.8% and 34.7% compared to and 35.8% and 35.4% for the same periods in 2005.

Foreign Exchange Rates

We are an international company, and we derived 34.0% and 39.6% of our revenues for the first six months of 2006 and 2005 from products manufactured in, and services performed from, our facilities located outside the United States, primarily in Europe. With our global operations, we are sensitive to changes in foreign currency exchange rates (“foreign exchange rates”), which can affect both the translation of financial statement items into U.S. dollars as well as transactions where the revenues and related expenses may initially be accounted for in different currencies, such as sales made from our Swiss manufacturing facility in currencies other than the Swiss franc.

Since we receive substantial revenues from activities in foreign jurisdictions, our results can be significantly affected by changes in foreign exchange rates, particularly in U.S. dollar exchange rates with respect to the Swiss franc, euro and British pound sterling and, to a lesser degree, the Singapore dollar and other currencies. When the U.S. dollar weakens against these currencies, the U.S. dollar value of non-U.S. dollar-based sales increases. When the U.S. dollar strengthens against these currencies, the U.S. dollar value of non-U.S. dollar-based sales decreases. Correspondingly, the U.S. dollar value of non-U.S. dollar-based costs increases when the U.S. dollar weakens and decreases when the U.S. dollar strengthens. Overall, we generally benefit from a weaker dollar and are adversely affected by a stronger dollar relative to major currencies worldwide, especially those identified above. In particular, a general weakening of the U.S. dollar against other currencies would positively affect our non-U.S. dollar revenues, gross profit and operating income as expressed in U.S. dollars (provided that the gross profit and operating income numbers from foreign operations are not losses, since in the case of a loss, the effect would be to increase the loss), whereas a general strengthening of the U.S. dollar against such currencies would have the opposite effect. In addition, our revenues and income with respect to particular transactions may be affected by changes in foreign exchange rates where sales are made in currencies other than the functional currency of the facility manufacturing the product subject to the sale.

-16-

For the second quarter and first six months of 2006 and 2005, the changes in certain key foreign exchange rates affecting us were as follows:


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	July 1,				July 2,		July 1,				July 2,
	2006				2005		2006				2005
Average U.S. dollar equivalent of one Swiss franc		0.807				0.812		0.789				0.824
% change vs. prior year			-0.6	%					-4.2	%

Average U.S. dollar equivalent of one euro		1.260				1.254		1.232				1.283
% change vs. prior year			0.5	%					-4.0	%

Average U.S. dollar equivalent of one British pound sterling		1.833				1.848		1.793				1.869
% change vs. prior year			-0.8	%					-4.1	%

Average Swiss franc equivalent of one euro		1.561				1.544		1.561				1.557
% change vs. prior year			1.1	%					0.3	%

Average Swiss franc equivalent of one British pound sterling		2.271				2.276		2.272				2.268
% change vs. prior year			-0.2	%					0.2	%

Presentation of Results and Analysis

The following table sets forth our results of operations, expressed as a percentage of total revenues for the periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	July 1,			July 2,			July 1,			July 2,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
Total revenues		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%

Cost of revenues		55.8			57.5			57.3			57.8


Gross profit		44.2			42.5			42.7			42.2

Selling, general and administrative		28.0			29.5			27.9			29.6

Research and development		1.6			2.3			1.7			2.3


Operating income		14.6			10.7			13.1			10.3

Interest income (expense)		(0.6	)		(0.8	)		(0.5	)		(0.9	)


Income before income taxes		14.0	%		9.9	%		12.6	%		9.4	%

-17-

The following table sets forth our backlog at the end of the periods indicated:


	July 1, 2006		December 31, 2005		July 2, 2005
Backlog (at July 1, 2006 exchange rates, in thousands of dollars)	$	40,878	$	25,469	$	24,234

Total revenues increased by $6,537,000 or 21.6% in the second quarter of 2006 and by $10,099,000 or 17.2% in the first six months of 2006 compared to the same periods in 2005. We believe that these increases were primarily attributable to the contribution from four months of operations of our newly acquired Gundlach business and stronger business conditions and increased spending by customers in the Americas, which more than offset the $1,129,000 negative effect of a stronger U.S. dollar in the first six months of 2006 on the translation of our foreign revenues into U.S. dollars. Foreign exchange had only a small negative effect on revenues in the second quarter of 2006 versus the same period last year.

Gross profit as a percentage of total revenues increased to 44.2% in the second quarter of 2006 from 42.5% for the same period in 2005 and increased to 42.7% in the first six months of 2006 from 42.2% for the same period last year. We believe that these increases primarily reflected a change in the sales mix of the products and services that we sold in these periods, including the inclusion of the Gundlach products for a full quarter and a greater percentage of replacement parts sales in our size reduction business line. Sales mix refers to the relative amounts of different products sold and services provided. Gross margin levels vary with the product sold or service provided. For example, sales of replacement parts in the size reduction business line generally carry a higher gross margin than do sales of equipment within that line.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $1,413,000 or 15.9% in the second quarter of 2006 and by $1,788,000 or 10.3% in the first six months of 2006 compared to the same periods in 2005. We believe that these increases were primarily the result of the inclusion of four months of operations of our newly acquired Gundlach business, higher sales commissions related to increased revenues and a higher bonus accrual, partially offset by reduced expenses in our process business line, particularly in EMEA/Asia, reflecting cost reduction initiatives implemented in 2005 and, in the case of the six month comparison, by the favorable effect of a stronger U.S. dollar on the translation of foreign costs into U.S. dollars.

Research and development (“R&D”) expense decreased by $98,000 or 14.3% in the second quarter of 2006 and by $178,000 or 13.2% in the first six months of 2006 compared to the same periods in 2005. These decreases were primarily due to reduced staff and, in the case of the six month comparison, the favorable effect of a stronger U.S. dollar versus the Swiss franc on the translation of Swiss R&D costs into U.S. dollars.

Interest expense decreased by $49,000 or 18.9% in the second quarter of 2006 and by $156,000 or 29.9% in the first six months of 2006 compared to the same periods in 2005. These decreases were the result of lower debt levels in 2006 and an increase in interest income on cash equivalents, partially offset by higher interest rates on some of our debt in 2006.

Income before income taxes increased to $5,146,000 in the second quarter of 2006 and $8,686,000 for the first six months of 2006 compared to $2,983,000 and $5,511,000 for the same periods in 2005. The increases of $2,163,000 for the second quarter of 2006 and $3,175,000 for

-18-

the first six months of 2006, compared to the same periods in 2005, were primarily the net result of the items discussed above.

The income tax provisions for the second quarters of 2006 and 2005 were $1,790,000 and $1,067,000, and the overall effective tax rates were 34.8% and 35.8%. The income tax provisions for the first six months of 2006 and 2005 were $3,013,000 and $1,952,000, and the overall effective tax rates were 34.7% and 35.4%. The lower effective tax rates in 2006 versus 2005 were primarily due to a higher proportion of foreign taxable income in the second quarter and first six months of 2006 as compared to the same periods in 2005.

Our backlog at constant foreign exchange rates increased by $15,409,000 or 60.5% at the end of the second quarter of 2006 compared with year-end 2005, from $25,469,000 to $40,878,000. Our backlog at constant foreign exchange rates increased by $16,644,000 or 68.7% at the end of the second quarter of 2006 compared to the end of the second quarter of 2005, from $24,234,000 to $40,878,000. These increases were primarily the result of two large first quarter 2006 orders received by our process business line in EMEA/Asia (approximately $9,450,000) and the addition of the Gundlach business. While we normally expect a significant part of our backlog to be shipped within 120 days, the two large first quarter orders referred to above are not expected to be shipped before the fourth quarter of 2006 and one of them may not be shipped until the first quarter of 2007, which means they will remain in our backlog for most of 2006.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Capitalization

Our capitalization at the end of the second quarter of 2006 and at the end of fiscal years 2005 and 2004 is summarized below:


	July 1,			December 31,			January 1,
(Dollars in Thousands)	2006			2005			2005
Short-term debt, including current portion of long-term debt	$	4,361		$	4,316		$	4,185
Long-term debt		11,127			12,675			18,598

Total debt		15,488			16,991			22,783
Shareholders’ equity		57,685			49,520			45,559

Total debt and shareholders’ equity (total capitalization)	$	73,173		$	66,511		$	68,342

Percent total debt to total capitalization		21	%		26	%		33	%
Percent long-term debt to equity		19	%		26	%		41	%
Percent total debt to equity		27	%		34	%		50	%

The average annual interest rate on total debt at July 1, 2006 was 5.8%.

Total debt decreased by $1,503,000 in the first six months of 2006 ($1,517,000 at constant foreign exchange rates). At July 1, 2006, and subject to certain conditions which may limit the amount that may be borrowed at any particular time, we had $8,500,000 of unused borrowing capacity under our U.S. loan agreements and $9,996,000 of unused borrowing capacity under our foreign loan agreements.

-19-

Other Items

At July 1, 2006, working capital was $24,516,000 compared to $25,565,000 at December 31, 2005, and the ratio of current assets to current liabilities at those dates was 1.79 and 1.99.

In the first six months of 2006 and 2005, we utilized internally generated funds and our lines of credit to meet our working capital needs.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $6,689,000 in the first six months of 2006 compared to $3,597,000 in the same period of 2005. This $3,092,000 increase in operating cash flow was primarily due to higher net income and an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses, partially offset by an increase in accounts receivable, in each case in this year’s first six months versus last year’s first six months.

Net cash used in investing activities in the first six months of 2006 was primarily for the acquisition of Gundlach and capital additions, while net cash used in investing activities in the first six months of 2005 was primarily for capital additions.

Net cash used in financing activities in the first six months of 2006 and 2005 was primarily for net reductions in debt.

Shareholders’ equity increased $8,165,000 in the first six months of 2006 compared to year-end 2005, of which $5,673,000 was from net income, $924,000 was from the issuance of common stock pursuant to restricted stock grants and the exercise of stock options, and $1,688,000 was from changes in foreign exchange rates, primarily the translation of Swiss francs into U.S. dollars, between the beginning and the end of the six-month period, partially offset by $120,000 from an unrealized loss, net of taxes, primarily attributable to a foreign exchange hedge.

Future Payments Under Contractual Obligations

We are obligated to make future payments under various contracts such as debt agreements and lease agreements, and we are subject to certain other commitments and contingencies. There have been no material changes to Future Payments Under Contractual Obligations as reflected in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis in our 2005 Form 10-K, except for the addition of a $3,000,000 unsecured promissory note related to the Gundlach acquisition bearing interest at 5% per annum and payable in three equal, annual installments of $1,000,000 on March 3 in each of 2008, 2009 and 2010, a $1,700,000 principal prepayment of bank term debt that was due in 2008 and an $804,000 reduction in the balance due in 2007 under a revolving line of credit. Refer to Notes 9 and 16 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2005 Form 10-K for additional information on long-term debt and commitments and contingencies.

Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors.” in our 2005 Form 10-K, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our 2005 Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties

-20-

not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results.

Forward-Looking Statements

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”) provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf. We and our representatives may from time to time make written or oral statements that are “forward-looking”, including statements contained in this report and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, reports to our shareholders and news releases. All statements that express expectations, estimates, forecasts or projections are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Act. In addition, other written or oral statements which constitute forward-looking statements may be made by us or on our behalf. Words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “seeks”, “estimates”, “projects”, “forecasts”, “may”, “should”, variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions which are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in or suggested by such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this report include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the effect of changes in foreign exchange rates and interest rates on our business and financial results and the expected shipment dates for two large orders booked in the first quarter of 2006. We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements, or to make any other forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We are currently exposed to certain market risks related to (i) fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and (ii) interest rate changes.

Foreign Exchange Rate Risk

The primary currencies for which we have exchange rate exposure are the U.S. dollar versus the Swiss franc, the U.S. dollar versus the euro, the U.S. dollar versus the British pound sterling, the Swiss franc versus the euro and the Swiss franc versus the British pound sterling. We do not, as a routine matter, use hedging vehicles to manage foreign exchange exposures; however, with respect to a large order received in the first quarter of 2006 by our process business line in Switzerland which was priced in U.S. dollars instead of Swiss francs, we subsequently entered into a currency hedge for cash flow purposes to fix the purchase price of that order in Swiss francs. Foreign currency debt is used as necessary in Switzerland and the United Kingdom where we do business, thereby reducing any net asset value exposure. In addition, foreign cash balances in currencies other than the Swiss franc are limited in amount in order to manage the transaction exposure caused by the marking to market of non-Swiss franc balances to Swiss franc values on the balance sheet of our Swiss subsidiary.

As of July 1, 2006, a 10% unfavorable change in the foreign exchange rates affecting balance sheet transactional exposures would have resulted in a reduction in our pre-tax income for the first six months of 2005 of approximately $553,000, or 6%. This hypothetical reduction on transactional exposures is based on the differences between the July 1, 2006 actual foreign

-21-

exchange rates and hypothetical rates assuming a 10% unfavorable change in foreign exchange rates on that date.

The translation of the balance sheets of our non-U.S. operations from local currencies into U.S. dollars is also sensitive to changes in foreign exchange rates. These translation gains or losses are recorded as translation adjustments (“TA”) within the accumulated other comprehensive income component of shareholders’ equity on our balance sheet. Using the example above, a hypothetical change in TA would be calculated by multiplying the net assets of our non-U.S. operations by a 10% unfavorable change in the applicable foreign exchange rates. The result of this calculation shows that shareholders’ equity would be reduced by approximately $2,223,000, or 3.9% of our July 1, 2006 shareholders’ equity of $57,685,000.

Interest Rate Risk

We have several credit facilities or loans that require us to pay interest at an annual rate that may change periodically. These variable rate obligations expose us to the risk of increased interest expense if short-term interest rates rise. We limit our exposure to increased interest expense from rising short-term interest rates by including in our debt portfolio various amounts of fixed rate debt as well as through the use of an interest rate swap. As of July 1, 2006, we had total debt of $15,488,000, $8,063,000 of which was subject to fixed interest rates which ranged from 5.00% to 6.45%, $3,800,000 of which was variable rate debt with an interest rate of 6.94% and $3,625,000 of which was variable rate debt subject to an interest rate swap with the result that the interest rate was fixed at 5.11%. A 100 basis point increase in interest rates on the $3,800,000 of variable rate debt would increase annual interest expense by approximately $38,000.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

An evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report was carried out by us under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report are functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure. A controls system cannot provide absolute assurance, however, that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. In addition, since we acquired the Gundlach business on March 3, 2006, our ability to effectively apply our disclosure controls and procedures to the acquired business is inherently limited by the short period of time that we have had to evaluate the operation since the acquisition.

-22-

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

	(a)		The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company was held on May 12, 2006.

	(b)		Not applicable

	(c)		Shareholders of the Company were asked to vote on a proposal to elect one Class I director. The Board of Directors nominated Edward T. Hurd as the Class I director. There were no other nominations. Mr. Hurd was elected as the Class I director, with the result of the vote being as follows:


	Number of Votes
	For		Withheld
Edward T. Hurd		2,114,878		75,711

Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast; therefore, votes cast in the election were not recorded against or as an abstention, nor were broker non-votes recorded.

Shareholders of the Company were also asked to approve the Board of Directors’ adoption of the K-Tron International, Inc. 2006 Equity Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) as described in the Company’s 2006 Proxy Statement. A copy of the Plan was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with the Company’s 2006 Proxy Statement. The Board’s adoption of the Plan was approved by shareholders, with the result of the vote being as follows:

Number of Votes

Broker

For

Against

Abstain

Non-Votes

K-Tron International, Inc. 2006 Equity Compensation Plan

1,381,254

276,109

2,166

531,060

(d)

Not applicable

Item 6. Exhibits.

31.1 Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

31.2 Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

-24-


			Page No.
PART I.		FINANCIAL INFORMATION

	Item 1.	Financial Statements.

		Consolidated Balance Sheets July 1, 2006 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2005		1

		Consolidated Statements of Income and Retained Earnings (Unaudited) for the Three and Six Months Ended July 1, 2006 and July 2, 2005		2

		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the Six Months Ended July 1, 2006 and July 2, 2005		3

		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)		4 – 14

	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	15 – 21

	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.		21 – 22

	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures.		22 – 23

PART II.		OTHER INFORMATION

	Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.		24

	Item 6.	Exhibits.		24 – 25

SIGNATURES				26
Chief Executive Officer Certification
Chief Financial Officer Certification
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


	K-TRON INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Date: August 7, 2006	By:	RONALD R. REMICK

		Ronald R. Remick
		Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
		(Duly authorized officer and principal financial officer of the Registrant)

	By:	ALAN R. SUKONECK

		Alan R. Sukoneck
		Vice President, Chief Accounting & Tax Officer
		(Duly authorized officer and principal accounting officer of the Registrant)


Date: August 7, 2006		EDWARD B. CLOUES, II
		Edward B. Cloues, II
		Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

EDWARD B. CLOUES, II

RONALD R. REMICK

Edward B. Cloues, II

Ronald R. Remick Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

and Treasurer

Date: August 7, 2006

Date: August 7, 2006


Exhibit
Number		Description
31.1		Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

31.2		Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

32.1		Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

1.		I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 1, 2006 of K-Tron International, Inc.;

2.		Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.		Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.		The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:


Date: August 7, 2006		RONALD R. REMICK Ronald R. Remick
		Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

1.		The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.		The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.