XML 283 R21.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.0.814
Derivative Instruments
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2015
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]  
Derivative Instruments
Derivative Instruments
We use derivative and non-derivative contracts to engage in trading activities and manage risks related to obtaining adequate supplies and the price fluctuations of natural gas, electricity and propane. Our natural gas, electric and propane distribution operations have entered into agreements with suppliers to purchase natural gas, electricity and propane for resale to their customers. Purchases under these contracts typically either do not meet the definition of derivatives or are considered “normal purchases and sales” and are accounted for on an accrual basis. Our propane distribution operation may also enter into fair value hedges of its inventory or cash flow hedges of its future purchase commitments in order to mitigate the impact of wholesale price fluctuations. As of September 30, 2015, our natural gas and electric distribution operations did not have any outstanding derivative contracts.

Hedging Activities in 2015
In March, May and June 2015, Sharp paid a total of $143,000 to purchase put options to protect against a decline in propane prices and related potential inventory losses associated with 2.5 million gallons for the propane price cap program in the upcoming heating season. The put options are exercised if propane prices fall below the strike prices of $0.4950, $0.4888 and $0.4500 per gallon in December 2015 through February 2016 and $0.4200 per gallon in January through March 2016. If exercised, we will receive the difference between the market price and the strike price during those months. We accounted for the put options as fair value hedges, and there is no ineffective portion of these hedges. As of September 30, 2015, the put options had a fair value of $64,000. The change in fair value of the put options effectively reduced our propane inventory balance.
In March, May and June 2015, Sharp entered into swap agreements to mitigate the risk of fluctuations in wholesale propane index prices associated with 2.5 million gallons expected to be purchased for the upcoming heating season. Under these swap agreements, Sharp receives the difference between the index prices (Mont Belvieu prices in December 2015 through March 2016) and the swap prices of $0.5950, $0.5888, $0.5500 and $0.5200 per gallon for each swap agreement, to the extent the index prices exceed the swap prices. If the index prices are lower than the swap prices, Sharp will pay the difference. These swap agreements essentially fix the price of the 2.5 million gallons that we expect to purchase for the upcoming heating season. We accounted for the swap agreements as cash flow hedges, and there is no ineffective portion of these hedges. At September 30, 2015, the swap agreements had a liability fair value of $128,000. The change in the fair value of the swap agreements is recorded as unrealized gain/loss in other comprehensive income (loss).
Hedging Activities in 2014
In August and October 2014, Sharp entered into call options to protect against an increase in propane prices associated with 1.3 million gallons purchased at market-based prices to supply the demands of our propane price cap program customers. The retail price that we charged to those customers during the heating season was capped at a pre-determined level. We would have exercised the call options if the propane prices had risen above the strike price of $1.0875 per gallon in December 2014 through February of 2015, and $1.0650 per gallon in January through March 2015. In that event, we would have received the difference between the market price and the strike price during those months. We paid $98,000 to purchase the call options, which expired without exercise as the market prices were below the strike prices. We accounted for the call options as cash flow hedges.
In May 2014, Sharp entered into swap agreements to mitigate the risk of fluctuations in wholesale propane index prices associated with 630,000 gallons purchased in December 2014 through February 2015. Under these swap agreements, Sharp would have received the difference between the index prices (Mont Belvieu prices in December 2014 through February 2015) and the swap prices of $1.1350, $1.0975 and $1.0475 per gallon for each swap agreement, to the extent the index prices exceeded the swap prices. If the index prices were lower than the swap prices, Sharp would pay the difference. These swap agreements essentially fixed the price of the 630,000 gallons purchased during this period. We had initially accounted for them as cash flow hedges as the swap agreements met all the requirements. We paid $1.1 million, representing the difference between the market prices and strike prices during those months for the swap agreements. At December 31, 2014, we elected to discontinue hedge accounting on the swap agreements and reclassified $735,000 of unrealized loss from other comprehensive loss to propane cost of sales. Subsequently, we accounted for them as derivative instruments on a mark-to-market basis with the change in the fair value reflected in current period earnings.
In May 2014, Sharp entered into put options to protect against declines in propane prices and related potential inventory losses associated with 630,000 gallons for the propane price cap program in December 2014 through February 2015. We exercised the put options because the propane prices fell below the strike prices of $1.0350, $0.9975, and $0.9475 per gallon, for each option agreement in December 2014 through February 2015, respectively. We paid $128,000 to purchase the put options and received $868,000, representing the difference between the market prices and strike prices during those months. We accounted for them as fair value hedges.
Commodity Contracts for Trading Activities
Xeron engages in trading activities using forward and futures contracts. These contracts are considered derivatives and have been accounted for using the mark-to-market method of accounting. Under this method, the trading contracts are recorded at fair value, and the changes in fair value of those contracts are recognized as unrealized gains or losses in the statements of income for the period of change. As of September 30, 2015, we had the following outstanding trading contracts, which we accounted for as derivatives: 
 
Quantity in
 
Estimated Market
 
Weighted Average
At September 30, 2015
Gallons
 
Prices
 
Contract Prices
Forward Contracts
 
 
 
 
 
Sale
2,940,000

 
$0.4750 - $0.5288
 
$
0.5210

Purchase
2,940,000

 
$0.4350 - $0.5025
 
$
0.4545

Estimated market prices and weighted average contract prices are in dollars per gallon. All contracts expire by the end of the fourth quarter of 2015.

Xeron has entered into master netting agreements with two counterparties to mitigate exposure to counterparty credit risk. The master netting agreements enable Xeron to net these two counterparties' outstanding accounts receivable and payable, which are presented on a gross basis in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. At September 30, 2015, Xeron had no accounts receivable or accounts payable balances to offset with these two counterparties. At December 31, 2014, Xeron had a right to offset $1.6 million and $1.2 million of accounts receivable and accounts payable, respectively, with these two counterparties.
The following tables present information about the fair value and related gains and losses of our derivative contracts. We did not have any derivative contracts with a credit-risk-related contingency. The fair values of the derivative contracts recorded in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, are as follows: 
 
 
Asset Derivatives
 
 
 
 
Fair Value As Of
(in thousands)
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
September 30, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
Forward contracts
 
Mark-to-market energy assets
 
$
222

 
$
407

Derivatives designated as fair value hedges
 
 
 
 
 
 
        Put options
 
Mark-to-market energy assets
 
64

 
622

Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
 
 
 
 
 
 
Call options
 
Mark-to-market energy assets
 

 
26

Total asset derivatives
 
 
 
$
286

 
$
1,055



 
 
 
Liability Derivatives
 
 
 
 
Fair Value As Of
(in thousands)
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
September 30, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
Forward contracts
 
Mark-to-market energy liabilities
 
$
26

 
$
283

Propane swap agreements
 
Mark-to-market energy liabilities
 

 
735

Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
 
 
 
 
 
 
Propane swap agreements
 
Mark-to-market energy liabilities
 
128

 

Total liability derivatives
 
 
 
$
154

 
$
1,018

 

The effects of gains and losses from derivative instruments on the condensed consolidated financial statements are as follows: 
  
 
 
 
Amount of Gain (Loss) on Derivatives:
 
 
Location of Gain
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(in thousands)
 
(Loss) on Derivatives
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Realized gain on forward contracts (1)
 
Revenue
 
$
187

 
$
54

 
$
393

 
$
1,384

Unrealized gain (loss) on forward contracts (1)
 
Revenue
 
(7
)
 
(5
)
 
71

 
(67
)
Call option
 
Cost of sales
 

 

 

 
137

Propane swap agreements
 
Cost of sales
 

 

 
18

 

Derivatives designated as fair value hedges
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Put options
 
Cost of sales
 

 
(43
)
 
506

 
(92
)
Put options (2)
 
Propane Inventory
 
(46
)
 

 
(79
)
 

Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Propane swap agreements
 
Other Comprehensive Loss
 
(126
)
 
(45
)
 
(128
)
 
(46
)
Call options
 
Cost of sales
 

 

 
(81
)
 

Total
 
 
 
$
8

 
$
(39
)
 
$
700

 
$
1,316



(1) 
All of the realized and unrealized gain (loss) on forward contracts represents the effect of trading activities on our condensed consolidated statements of income.
(2) 
As a fair value hedge with no ineffective portion, the unrealized gains and losses associated with this put option are recorded in cost of sales, offset by the corresponding change in the value of propane inventory (hedged item), which is also recorded in cost of sales. The amounts in cost of sales offset to zero, and the unrealized gains and losses of this put option effectively changed the value of propane inventory.