XML 110 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Derivative Instruments
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2014
Text Block [Abstract]  
Derivative Instruments
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
We use derivative and non-derivative contracts to engage in trading activities and manage risks related to obtaining adequate supplies and the price fluctuations of natural gas, electricity and propane. Our natural gas, electric and propane distribution operations have entered into agreements with suppliers to purchase natural gas, electricity and propane for resale to their customers. Purchases under these contracts typically either do not meet the definition of derivatives or are considered “normal purchases and sales” and are accounted for on an accrual basis. Our propane distribution operation may also enter into fair value hedges of its inventory or cash flow hedges of its future purchase commitments in order to mitigate the impact of wholesale price fluctuations. As of December 31, 2014, our natural gas and electric distribution operations did not have any outstanding derivative contracts.

Hedging Activities in 2014
In August and October 2014, Sharp entered into call options to protect against an increase in propane prices associated with 1.3 million gallons we expect to purchase at market-based prices to supply the demands of our propane price cap program customers. The retail price that we can charge to those customers during the upcoming heating season is capped at a pre-determined level. The call options are exercised if the propane prices rise above the strike price of $1.0875 per gallon in December 2014 through February of 2015 and $1.0650 per gallon in January through March 2015. We will receive the difference between the market price and the strike price during those months. We paid $98,000 to purchase the call options, and we accounted for them as cash flow hedges. As of December 31, 2014, the call options had a fair value of $26,000. The change in fair value of the call options was recorded as unrealized loss in other comprehensive income.
In May 2014, Sharp entered into swap agreements to mitigate the risk of fluctuations in wholesale propane index prices associated with 630,000 gallons expected to be purchased for the upcoming heating season. Under these swap agreements, Sharp receives the difference between the index prices (Mont Belvieu prices in December 2014 through February 2015) and the swap prices of $1.1350, $1.0975 and $1.0475 per gallon for each swap agreement, to the extent the index prices exceed the swap prices. If the index prices are lower than the swap prices, Sharp will pay the difference. These swap agreements essentially fix the price of those 630,000 gallons purchased for the upcoming heating season. We had initially accounted for them as cash flow hedges as the swap agreements met all the requirements. At December 31, 2014, we elected to discontinue hedge accounting on the swap agreements and reclassified $735,000 of unrealized loss from other comprehensive loss to propane cost of sales. We are now accounting for them as derivative instruments on a mark-to-market basis with the change in the fair value reflected in current period earnings. As of December 31, 2014, we have a mark-to-market liability of $735,000 related to the swap agreements.
In May 2014, Sharp also entered into put options to protect against declines in propane prices and related potential inventory losses associated with 630,000 gallons purchased for the propane price cap program in the upcoming heating season. The put options are exercised if propane prices fall below the strike prices of $1.0350, $0.9975 and $0.9475 per gallon, for each option agreement in December 2014 through February 2015, respectively. We will receive the difference between the market price and the strike prices during those months. We paid $128,000 to purchase the put options. We accounted for them as fair value hedges, and there is no ineffective portion of these hedges. As of December 31, 2014, the put options had a fair value of $622,000. The change in fair value of the put options effectively reduced our propane inventory balance.
Hedging Activities in 2013
In June 2013, Sharp entered into put options to protect against the decline in propane prices and related potential inventory losses associated with 1.3 million gallons purchased for the propane price cap program in the upcoming heating season. If exercised, we would have received the difference between the market price and the strike price if propane prices had fallen below the strike prices of $0.830 per gallon in December 2013 through February of 2014 and $0.860 per gallon in January through March 2014. We accounted for those options as fair value hedges, and there was no ineffective portion of those hedges. We paid $120,000 to purchase the put options, which expired without exercise as the market prices exceeded the strike prices.

In May 2013, Sharp entered into a call option to protect against an increase in propane prices associated with 630,000 gallons we expected to purchase at market-based prices to supply the demands of our propane price cap program customers. The program capped the retail price at a pre-determined level that we could charge to those customers during the upcoming heating season. The call option was exercised because propane prices rose above the strike price of $0.975 per gallon in January through March of 2014. We accounted for this call option as a derivative instrument on a mark-to-market basis with any change in its fair value being reflected in current period earnings. We paid $72,000 to purchase the call option. In January through March of 2014, we received $209,000, representing the difference between the market price and the strike price during those months.
Hedging Activities in 2012
In May 2012, Sharp entered into call options to protect against an increase in propane prices associated with 1.3 million gallons purchased for the propane price cap program for the months of December 2012 through March 2013. The strike prices of these call options ranged from $0.905 per gallon to $0.990 per gallon during this four-month period. We paid $139,000 to purchase the call options, which expired without exercising the options as the market prices were below the strike prices. We accounted for the call options as a fair value hedge. At December 31, 2012, the call options had a fair value of $28,000. There was no ineffective portion of this fair value hedge in 2012.

Commodity Contracts for Trading Activities
Xeron engages in trading activities using forward and futures contracts. These contracts are considered derivatives and have been accounted for using the mark-to-market method of accounting. Under the mark-to-market method of accounting, the trading contracts are recorded at fair value, and the changes in fair value of those contracts are recognized as unrealized gains or losses in the consolidated statements of income in the period of change. As of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we had the following outstanding trading contracts, which we accounted for as derivatives:
 
 
Quantity in
 
Estimated Market
 
Weighted Average
At December 31, 2014
Gallons
 
Prices
 
Contract Prices
Forward Contracts
 
 
 
 
 
Sale
4,200,000

 
 $0.5400 - $0.7900
 
$
0.6714

Purchase
4,201,000

 
$0.4700 - $1.3176
 
$
0.6416



Estimated market prices and weighted average contract prices are in dollars per gallon. All contracts expire by the end of the first quarter of 2015.

At December 31, 2013
Quantity in
Gallons
 
Estimated Market
Prices
 
Weighted Average Contract Prices
Forward Contracts
 
 
 
 
 
Sale
1,892,000

 
 $0.9900 - $1.4750
 
$
1.2786

Purchase
1,991,000

 
$0.9411 - $1.4600
 
$
1.2444


Estimated market prices and weighted average contract prices are in dollars per gallon. All contracts expire by the end of the first quarter of 2014.

Xeron has entered into master netting agreements with two counterparties to mitigate exposure to counterparty credit risk. The master netting agreements enable Xeron to net these two counterparties' outstanding accounts receivable and payable, which are presented on a gross basis in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. At December 31, 2014, Xeron had a right to offset $1.6 million and $1.2 million of accounts receivable and accounts payable, respectively, with these two counterparties. At December 31, 2013, Xeron had a right to offset $2.8 million and $3.2 million of accounts receivable and accounts payable, respectively, with these two counterparties.
The following tables present information about the fair value and related gains and losses of our derivative contracts. We did not have any derivative contracts with a credit-risk-related contingency.
Fair values of the derivative contracts recorded in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, are as follows:
 
Asset Derivatives
 
 
 
Fair Value As Of
(in thousands)
Balance Sheet Location
 
December 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
 
 
 
 
 
Forward contracts
Mark-to-market energy assets
 
$
407

 
$
196

Call option
Mark-to-market energy assets
 

 
169

Derivatives designated as fair value hedges
 
 
 
 
 
Put options
Mark-to-market energy assets
 
622

 
20

Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
 
 
 
 
 
Call options
Mark-to-market energy assets
 
26

 

Total asset derivatives
 
 
$
1,055

 
$
385

 

 
Liability Derivatives
 
 
 
Fair Value As Of
(in thousands)
Balance Sheet Location
 
December 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
 
 
 
 
 
Forward contracts
Mark-to-market energy liabilities
 
$
283

 
$
127

Propane swap agreements
Mark-to-market energy liabilities
 
735

 

Total liability derivatives
 
 
$
1,018

 
$
127


 
The effects of gains and losses from derivative instruments are as follows:

 
Amount of Gain (Loss) on Derivatives:
  
Location of Gain
(Loss) on Derivatives
 
For the Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Realized gain on forward contracts and options (1)
Revenue
 
$
1,423

 
$
1,127

 
$
2,695

Unrealized gain (loss) on forward contracts (1)
Revenue
 
57

 
217

 
(339
)
Call Options
Cost of Sales
 

 
97

 

Propane swap agreements
Cost of Sales
 
(735
)
 

 

Derivatives designated as fair value hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Put/Call Option
Cost of Sales
 
235

 
(28
)
 
27

Put/Call Option (2)
Propane Inventory
 
517

 
(100
)
 
(40
)
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Propane swap agreements
Cost of Sales
 
(341
)
 

 

Call Options
Cost of Sales
 
(17
)
 

 

Call Options
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 
(55
)
 

 

Total
 
 
$
1,084

 
$
1,313

 
$
2,343


(1)
All of the realized and unrealized gain (loss) on forward contracts represents the effect of trading activities on our consolidated statements of income.
(2)
As a fair value hedge with no ineffective portion, the unrealized gains and losses associated with this call option are recorded in cost of sales, offset by the corresponding change in the value of propane inventory (hedged item), which is also recorded in cost of sales. The amounts in cost of sales offset to zero and the unrealized gains and losses of this call option effectively changed the value of propane inventory.