424B2 1 ea169633_424b2.htm PRICING SUPPLEMENT none
January 31, 2024
Registration Statement Nos. 333-270004 and 333-270004-01; Rule 424(b)(2)
image1_48134thv9.png
JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC
Structured Investments
$75,000
Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Large-Cap Dynamic BlendSM 5
Index due February 5, 2026
Fully and Unconditionally Guaranteed by JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The notes are designed for investors who seek exposure to any appreciation of the J.P. Morgan Large-Cap Dynamic BlendSM
5 Index, which we refer to as the Index, over the term of the notes.
Investors should be willing to forgo interest payments, while seeking full repayment of principal at maturity.
The notes are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC, which we refer to as
JPMorgan Financial, the payment on which is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by JPMorgan Chase & Co. Any payment
on the notes is subject to the credit risk of JPMorgan Financial, as issuer of the notes, and the credit risk of
JPMorgan Chase & Co., as guarantor of the notes.
Minimum denominations of $1,000 and integral multiples thereof
The notes priced on January 31, 2024 and are expected to settle on or about February 5, 2024.
CUSIP: 48134THV9
Investing in the notes involves a number of risks. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page S-2 of the accompanying prospectus
supplement, “Risk Factors” beginning on page PS-12 of the accompanying product supplement, “Risk Factors” beginning on
page US-3 of the accompanying underlying supplement and “Selected Risk Considerations” beginning on page PS-6 of this
pricing supplement.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of the
notes or passed upon the accuracy or the adequacy of this pricing supplement or the accompanying product supplement, underlying
supplement, prospectus supplement and prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
Price to Public (1)
Fees and Commissions (2)
Proceeds to Issuer
Per note
$1,000
$5
$995
Total
$75,000
$375
$74,625
(1) See “Supplemental Use of Proceeds” in this pricing supplement for information about the components of the price to public of the notes.
(2) J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, which we refer to as JPMS, acting as agent for JPMorgan Financial, will pay all of the selling commissions of
$5.00 per $1,000 principal amount note it receives from us to other affiliated or unaffiliated dealers. See “Plan of Distribution (Conflicts of
Interest)” in the accompanying product supplement.
The estimated value of the notes, when the terms of the notes were set, was $970.80 per $1,000 principal amount note. See
“The Estimated Value of the Notes” in this pricing supplement for additional information.
The notes are not bank deposits, are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other governmental agency and
are not obligations of, or guaranteed by, a bank.
Pricing supplement to product supplement no. 3-I dated April 13, 2023, underlying supplement no. 17-I dated April 13, 2023 and the prospectus and
prospectus supplement, each dated April 13, 2023
Key Terms
Issuer: JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC, an indirect,
wholly owned finance subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Guarantor: JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Index: The J.P. Morgan Large-Cap Dynamic BlendSM 5 Index
(Bloomberg ticker: JPUSSDB5 <Index>). The level of the
Index reflects the deduction of 0.50% per annum that accrues
daily.
Participation Rate: 240.00%
Pricing Date: January 31, 2024
Original Issue Date (Settlement Date): On or about February
5, 2024
Observation Date*: February 2, 2026
Maturity Date*: February 5, 2026
* Subject to postponement in the event of a market disruption event
and as described under “Supplemental Terms of the Notes —
Postponement of a Determination Date — Notes linked solely to the
Index” in the accompanying underlying supplement and “General
Terms of Notes — Postponement of a Payment Date” in the
accompanying product supplement
Payment at Maturity:
At maturity, you will receive a cash payment, for each $1,000
principal amount note, of $1,000 plus the Additional Amount,
which may be zero.
You are entitled to repayment of principal in full at maturity,
subject to the credit risks of JPMorgan Financial and
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Additional Amount:
The Additional Amount payable at maturity per $1,000 principal
amount note will equal:
$1,000 × Index Return × Participation Rate,
provided that the Additional Amount will not be less than zero.
Index Return:
(Final Value – Initial Value)
Initial Value
Initial Value: The closing level of the Index on the Pricing
Date, which was 239.46
Final Value: The closing level of the Index on the Observation
Date
PS-1 | Structured Investments
image4_48134thv9.jpeg
Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Large-Cap Dynamic BlendSM  5 Index
Supplemental Terms of the Notes
Any value of any underlier, and any values derived therefrom, included in this pricing supplement may be corrected, in the event of
manifest error or inconsistency, by amendment of this pricing supplement and the corresponding terms of the notes. Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary in the indenture governing the notes, that amendment will become effective without consent of the holders of the
notes or any other party.
PS-2 | Structured Investments
image4_48134thv9.jpeg
Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Large-Cap Dynamic BlendSM  5 Index
The J.P. Morgan Large-Cap Dynamic BlendSM 5 Index
The J.P. Morgan Large-Cap Dynamic BlendSM 5 Index (the “Index”) was developed and is maintained and calculated by J.P. Morgan
Securities LLC (“JPMS”). The Index has been calculated on a “live” basis (i.e., using real-time data) since March 2, 2022. The Index is
reported by Bloomberg L.P. under the ticker symbol “JPUSSDB5 Index.”
The Index attempts to provide a dynamic rules-based allocation to the J.P. Morgan US Large Cap Equities Futures Index (the “Equity
Constituent”) and the J.P. Morgan 2Y US Treasury Futures Index (the “Bond Constituent” and, together with the Equity Constituent, the
“Portfolio Constituents”) while targeting a level volatility of 5.0% (the “Target Volatility”). The Index tracks the return of (a) a notional
dynamic portfolio consisting of the Equity Constituent and the Bond Constituent, less (b) the daily deduction of 0.50% per annum (the
“Index Deduction”). Each futures contract underlying a Portfolio Constituent as of a particular time is referred to as an “Underlying
Futures Contract.”
The Equity Constituent is an excess return index that tracks the return of a notional rolling futures position in futures contracts on the
S&P 500® Index. For additional information about the Equity Constituent, see “Background on the J.P. Morgan Futures Indices” in
the accompanying underlying supplement.
The Bond Constituent is an excess return index that tracks the return of a notional rolling futures position in futures contracts on 2-Year U.S. treasury
notes. For additional information about the Bond Constituent, see “Background on the J.P. Morgan Futures Indices” in the accompanying underlying
supplement.
The Index provides a diversified exposure that rebalances daily based on measures of market risk and diversification to attempt to
deliver stable volatility over time.
Considerations Relating to the Volatility of the Portfolio Constituents. Under normal market conditions, the Equity Constituent’s realized
volatility has tended to be relatively more variable than the Bond Constituent’s realized volatility. Consequently, and because the Index
seeks to maintain an annualized realized volatility approximately equal to the Target Volatility, the Index methodology may be more likely
to shift exposure from the Equity Constituent to the Bond Constituent during periods of relatively higher market volatility and to shift
exposure from the Bond Constituent to the Equity Constituent under normal market conditions exhibiting relatively lower market volatility.
In general, equity markets have historically been more likely to outperform fixed-income markets during periods of relatively lower market
volatility and to underperform fixed-income markets during periods of relatively higher market volatility. However, there can be no
assurance that the Index allocation strategy will achieve its intended results or that the Index will outperform any alternative index or
strategy that might reference the Portfolio Constituents. Past performance should not be considered indicative of future performance.
In any initial selection between two eligible notional portfolios, the Index will select the portfolio that has the higher allocation to the
Portfolio Constituent with a higher realized volatility, as described below, which generally will cause the Equity Constituent to receive a
higher allocation than if the portfolio that has the higher allocation to the Portfolio Constituent with a lower realized volatility were
selected.
Furthermore, under normal market conditions, the Equity Constituent’s realized volatility tends to be significantly higher than the Bond
Constituent’s realized volatility. Under such circumstances and because the Target Volatility is 5.0%, the Index is generally expected to
be more heavily weighted towards the Bond Constituent. Past performance should not be considered indicative of future performance.
Under circumstances where the Equity Constituent’s realized volatility is significantly higher than that of the Bond Constituent, the
performance of the Index is expected to be influenced to a greater extent by the performance of the Equity Constituent than by the
performance of the Bond Constituent, unless the weight of the Bond Constituent is significantly greater than the weight of the Equity
Constituent.
Consequently, even in cases where the allocation to the Bond Constituent is greater than the allocation to the Equity Constituent, the
Index may be influenced to a greater extent by the performance of the Equity Constituent than by the performance of the Bond
Constituent because, under some conditions, the greater allocation to the Bond Constituent will not be sufficiently large to offset the
greater realized volatility of the Equity Constituent.
Calculating the level of the Index. On any given day, the closing level of the Index reflects (a) the weighted return performance of the
Portfolio Constituents less (b) the 0.50% per annum daily Index Deduction. The Index Level was set equal to 100.00 on July 25, 1990,
the base date of the Index. The Index is an “excess return” index because, through the Portfolio Constituents, it provides notional
exposure to futures contract returns that reflect changes in the price of those futures contracts, as well as their “roll” returns described
below. The Index is not a “total return” index because it does not reflect interest that could be earned on funds notionally committed to
the trading of futures contracts.
No assurance can be given that the investment strategy used to construct the Index will achieve its intended results or that the
Index will be successful or will outperform any alternative index or strategy that might reference the Portfolio Constituents.
Furthermore, no assurance can be given that the realized volatility of the Index will approximate the Target Volatility. The actual
realized volatility of the Index may be greater or less than the Target Volatility.
PS-3 | Structured Investments
image4_48134thv9.jpeg
Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Large-Cap Dynamic BlendSM  5 Index
If the aggregate weight of the Portfolio Constituents in the Index is less than 100%, the Index will not be fully invested, and any
uninvested portion will earn no return. The Index Deduction is deducted daily at a rate of 0.50% per annum, even when the
Index is not fully invested.
The Index is described as a “notional” or “synthetic” portfolio of assets because there is no actual portfolio of assets to which
any person is entitled or in which any person has any ownership interest. The Index merely references certain assets, the
performance of which will be used as a reference point for calculating the level of the Index.
See “The J.P. Morgan Large-Cap Dynamic BlendSM 5 Index” in the accompanying underlying supplement for more information
about the Index.
Hypothetical Payout Profile
The following table and graph illustrate the hypothetical payment at maturity on the notes linked to a hypothetical Index. The hypothetical
payments set forth below assume the following:
an Initial Value of 100.00; and
a Participation Rate of 240.00%.
The hypothetical Initial Value of 100.00 has been chosen for illustrative purposes only and does not represent the actual Initial Value.
The actual Initial Value is the closing level of the Index on the Pricing Date and is specified under “Key Terms — Initial Value” in this
pricing supplement. For historical data regarding the actual closing levels of the Index, please see the historical information set forth
under “Hypothetical Back-Tested Data and Historical Information” in this pricing supplement.
Each hypothetical total return or hypothetical payment at maturity set forth below is for illustrative purposes only and may not be the
actual total return or payment at maturity applicable to a purchaser of the notes. The numbers appearing in the following table and graph
have been rounded for ease of analysis.
Final Value
Index Return
Additional Amount
Payment at Maturity
200.00
100.00%
$2,400.00
$3,400.00
190.00
90.00%
$2,160.00
$3,160.00
180.00
80.00%
$1,920.00
$2,920.00
170.00
70.00%
$1,680.00
$2,680.00
160.00
60.00%
$1,440.00
$2,440.00
150.00
50.00%
$1,200.00
$2,200.00
140.00
40.00%
$960.00
$1,960.00
130.00
30.00%
$720.00
$1,720.00
120.00
20.00%
$480.00
$1,480.00
110.00
10.00%
$240.00
$1,240.00
105.00
5.00%
$120.00
$1,120.00
101.00
1.00%
$24.00
$1,024.00
100.00
0.00%
N/A
$1,000.00
95.00
-5.00%
N/A
$1,000.00
90.00
-10.00%
N/A
$1,000.00
80.00
-20.00%
N/A
$1,000.00
70.00
-30.00%
N/A
$1,000.00
60.00
-40.00%
N/A
$1,000.00
50.00
-50.00%
N/A
$1,000.00
40.00
-60.00%
N/A
$1,000.00
30.00
-70.00%
N/A
$1,000.00
20.00
-80.00%
N/A
$1,000.00
10.00
-90.00%
N/A
$1,000.00
0.00
-100.00%
N/A
$1,000.00
PS-4 | Structured Investments
image4_48134thv9.jpeg
Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Large-Cap Dynamic BlendSM  5 Index
The following graph demonstrates the hypothetical payments at maturity on the notes for a sub-set of Index Returns detailed in the table
above (-50% to 100%). There can be no assurance that the performance of the Index will result in a payment at maturity in excess of
$1,000.00 per $1,000 principal amount note.
Note Payoff at Maturity
············
Index Performance
image2_48134thv9.jpeg
Index Return
How the Notes Work
Upside Scenario:
If the Final Value is greater than the Initial Value, investors will receive at maturity the $1,000 principal amount plus the Additional
Amount, which is equal to $1,000 times the Index Return times the Participation Rate of 240.00%.
If the closing level of the Index increases 10.00%, investors will receive at maturity a return equal to 24.00%, or $1,240.00 per
$1,000 principal amount note.
Par Scenario:
If the Final Value is equal to the Initial Value or is less than the Initial Value, the Additional Amount will be zero and investors will receive
at maturity the principal amount of their notes.
The hypothetical returns and hypothetical payments on the notes shown above apply only if you hold the notes for their entire term.
These hypotheticals do not reflect the fees or expenses that would be associated with any sale in the secondary market. If these fees
and expenses were included, the hypothetical returns and hypothetical payments shown above would likely be lower.
PS-5 | Structured Investments
image4_48134thv9.jpeg
Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Large-Cap Dynamic BlendSM  5 Index
Selected Risk Considerations
An investment in the notes involves significant risks. These risks are explained in more detail in the “Risk Factors” sections of the
accompanying prospectus supplement, product supplement and underlying supplement.
Risks Relating to the Notes Generally
THE NOTES MAY NOT PAY MORE THAN THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT AT MATURITY —
If the Final Value is less than or equal to the Initial Value, you will receive only the principal amount of your notes at maturity, and
you will not be compensated for any loss in value due to inflation and other factors relating to the value of money over time.
THE LEVEL OF THE INDEX WILL INCLUDE A 0.50% PER ANNUM DAILY DEDUCTION —
The Index is subject to a 0.50% per annum daily deduction. As a result of the deduction of this index fee, the level of the Index will
trail the value of a hypothetical identically constituted synthetic portfolio from which no such fee or cost is deducted.
CREDIT RISKS OF JPMORGAN FINANCIAL AND JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. —
Investors are dependent on our and JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s ability to pay all amounts due on the notes. Any actual or potential
change in our or JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s creditworthiness or credit spreads, as determined by the market for taking that credit risk,
is likely to adversely affect the value of the notes. If we and JPMorgan Chase & Co. were to default on our payment obligations, you
may not receive any amounts owed to you under the notes and you could lose your entire investment.
AS A FINANCE SUBSIDIARY, JPMORGAN FINANCIAL HAS NO INDEPENDENT OPERATIONS AND HAS LIMITED ASSETS —
As a finance subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase & Co., we have no independent operations beyond the issuance and administration of
our securities. Aside from the initial capital contribution from JPMorgan Chase & Co., substantially all of our assets relate to
obligations of our affiliates to make payments under loans made by us or other intercompany agreements. As a result, we are
dependent upon payments from our affiliates to meet our obligations under the notes. If these affiliates do not make payments to us
and we fail to make payments on the notes, you may have to seek payment under the related guarantee by JPMorgan Chase & Co.,
and that guarantee will rank pari passu with all other unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of JPMorgan Chase & Co.
THE NOTES DO NOT PAY INTEREST.
YOU WILL NOT HAVE ANY RIGHTS WITH RESPECT TO THE PORTFOLIO CONSTITUENTS, THE UNDERLYING FUTURES
CONTRACTS OR THE SECURITIES INCLUDED IN THE INDEX UNDERLYING THE UNDERLYING FUTURES CONTRACTS.
LACK OF LIQUIDITY —
The notes will not be listed on any securities exchange. Accordingly, the price at which you may be able to trade your notes is likely
to depend on the price, if any, at which JPMS is willing to buy the notes. You may not be able to sell your notes. The notes are not
designed to be short-term trading instruments. Accordingly, you should be able and willing to hold your notes to maturity.
Risks Relating to Conflicts of Interest
POTENTIAL CONFLICTS —
We and our affiliates play a variety of roles in connection with the notes. In performing these duties, our and JPMorgan Chase &
Co.’s economic interests are potentially adverse to your interests as an investor in the notes. It is possible that hedging or trading
activities of ours or our affiliates in connection with the notes could result in substantial returns for us or our affiliates while the value
of the notes declines. Please refer to “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Conflicts of Interest” in the accompanying product
supplement. See also “ — Risks Relating to the Index — Our Affiliate, JPMS, Is the Index Sponsor and the Index Calculation Agent
of the Index and Each Portfolio Constituent and May Adjust the Index or Each Portfolio Constituent in a Way that Affects Its Level”
below.
JPMS is one of the primary dealers through which the U.S. Federal Reserve conducts open-market purchases and sales of U.S.
Treasury and federal agency securities, including U.S. Treasury notes. These activities may affect the prices and yields on the U.S.
Treasury notes, which may in turn affect the level of the Bond Constituent and the level of the Bond Constituent. JPMS has no
obligation to take into consideration your interests as a holder of the notes when undertaking these activities.
OUR PARENT COMPANY, JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., IS CURRENTLY ONE OF THE COMPANIES THAT MAKE UP THE S&P
500® INDEX, THE REFERENCE INDEX UNDERLYING THE UNDERLYING FUTURES CONTRACTS OF THE EQUITY
CONSTITUENT,
but JPMorgan Chase & Co. will not have any obligation to consider your interests in taking any corporate action that might affect the
securities included in the reference index underlying the Underlying Futures Contracts of the Equity Constituent.
JPMS AND ITS AFFILIATES MAY HAVE PUBLISHED RESEARCH, EXPRESSED OPINIONS OR PROVIDED
RECOMMENDATIONS THAT ARE INCONSISTENT WITH INVESTING IN OR HOLDING THE NOTES, AND MAY DO SO IN THE
FUTURE —
Any research, opinions or recommendations could affect the market value of the notes. Investors should undertake their own
independent investigation of the merits of investing in the notes and the Portfolio Constituents and the securities composing the
Portfolio Constituents.
PS-6 | Structured Investments
image4_48134thv9.jpeg
Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Large-Cap Dynamic BlendSM  5 Index
Risks Relating to the Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices of the Notes
THE ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE NOTES IS LOWER THAN THE ORIGINAL ISSUE PRICE (PRICE TO PUBLIC) OF THE
NOTES —
The estimated value of the notes is only an estimate determined by reference to several factors. The original issue price of the notes
exceeds the estimated value of the notes because costs associated with selling, structuring and hedging the notes are included in
the original issue price of the notes. These costs include the selling commissions, the projected profits, if any, that our affiliates
expect to realize for assuming risks inherent in hedging our obligations under the notes and the estimated cost of hedging our
obligations under the notes. See “The Estimated Value of the Notes” in this pricing supplement.
THE ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE NOTES DOES NOT REPRESENT FUTURE VALUES OF THE NOTES AND MAY DIFFER
FROM OTHERS’ ESTIMATES —
See “The Estimated Value of the Notes” in this pricing supplement.
THE ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE NOTES IS DERIVED BY REFERENCE TO AN INTERNAL FUNDING RATE —
The internal funding rate used in the determination of the estimated value of the notes may differ from the market-implied funding
rate for vanilla fixed income instruments of a similar maturity issued by JPMorgan Chase & Co. or its affiliates. Any difference may
be based on, among other things, our and our affiliates’ view of the funding value of the notes as well as the higher issuance,
operational and ongoing liability management costs of the notes in comparison to those costs for the conventional fixed income
instruments of JPMorgan Chase & Co. This internal funding rate is based on certain market inputs and assumptions, which may
prove to be incorrect, and is intended to approximate the prevailing market replacement funding rate for the notes. The use of an
internal funding rate and any potential changes to that rate may have an adverse effect on the terms of the notes and any secondary
market prices of the notes. See “The Estimated Value of the Notes” in this pricing supplement.
THE VALUE OF THE NOTES AS PUBLISHED BY JPMS (AND WHICH MAY BE REFLECTED ON CUSTOMER ACCOUNT
STATEMENTS) MAY BE HIGHER THAN THE THEN-CURRENT ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE NOTES FOR A LIMITED TIME
PERIOD —
We generally expect that some of the costs included in the original issue price of the notes will be partially paid back to you in
connection with any repurchases of your notes by JPMS in an amount that will decline to zero over an initial predetermined period.
See “Secondary Market Prices of the Notes” in this pricing supplement for additional information relating to this initial period.
Accordingly, the estimated value of your notes during this initial period may be lower than the value of the notes as published by
JPMS (and which may be shown on your customer account statements).
SECONDARY MARKET PRICES OF THE NOTES WILL LIKELY BE LOWER THAN THE ORIGINAL ISSUE PRICE OF THE
NOTES —
Any secondary market prices of the notes will likely be lower than the original issue price of the notes because, among other things,
secondary market prices take into account our internal secondary market funding rates for structured debt issuances and, also,
because secondary market prices may exclude selling commissions, projected hedging profits, if any, and estimated hedging costs
that are included in the original issue price of the notes. As a result, the price, if any, at which JPMS will be willing to buy the notes
from you in secondary market transactions, if at all, is likely to be lower than the original issue price. Any sale by you prior to the
Maturity Date could result in a substantial loss to you.
SECONDARY MARKET PRICES OF THE NOTES WILL BE IMPACTED BY MANY ECONOMIC AND MARKET FACTORS —
The secondary market price of the notes during their term will be impacted by a number of economic and market factors, which may
either offset or magnify each other, aside from the selling commissions, projected hedging profits, if any, estimated hedging costs
and the level of the Index. Additionally, independent pricing vendors and/or third party broker-dealers may publish a price for the
notes, which may also be reflected on customer account statements. This price may be different (higher or lower) than the price of
the notes, if any, at which JPMS may be willing to purchase your notes in the secondary market. See “Risk Factors — Risks
Relating to the Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices of the Notes — Secondary market prices of the notes will be
impacted by many economic and market factors” in the accompanying product supplement.
PS-7 | Structured Investments
image4_48134thv9.jpeg
Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Large-Cap Dynamic BlendSM  5 Index
Risks Relating to the Index
OUR AFFILIATE, JPMS, IS THE INDEX SPONSOR AND THE INDEX CALCULATION AGENT OF THE INDEX AND EACH
PORTFOLIO CONSTITUENT AND MAY ADJUST THE INDEX OR EACH PORTFOLIO CONSTITUENT IN A WAY THAT
AFFECTS ITS LEVEL —
JPMS, one of our affiliates, currently acts as the index sponsor and the index calculation agent for the Index and the Portfolio
Constituents and is responsible for calculating and maintaining the Index and the Portfolio Constituents and developing the
guidelines and policies governing their composition and calculation. In performing these duties, JPMS may have interests adverse
to the interests of the holders of the notes, which may affect your return on the notes, particularly where JPMS, as the index sponsor
and the index calculation agent of the Index and the Portfolio Constituents, is entitled to exercise discretion. The rules governing the
Index and the Portfolio Constituents may be amended at any time by the index sponsor of the Index and the Portfolio Constituents,
in its sole discretion. The rules also permit the use of discretion by the index sponsor and the index calculation agent of the Index
and the Portfolio Constituents in specific instances, including, but not limited to, the determination of whether to replace a Portfolio
Constituent with a substitute or successor upon the occurrence of certain events affecting that Portfolio Constituent, the selection of
any substitute or successor and the determination of the levels to be used in the event of market disruptions that affect the ability of
the index calculation agent of the Index and the Portfolio Constituents to calculate and publish the levels of the Index and the
Portfolio Constituents and the interpretation of the rules governing the Index and the Portfolio Constituents. Although JPMS, acting
as the index sponsor and the index calculation agent, will make all determinations and take all action in relation to the Index and the
Portfolio Constituents acting in good faith, it should be noted that JPMS may have interests adverse to the interests of the holders of
the notes and the policies and judgments for which JPMS is responsible could have an impact, positive or negative, on the level of
the Index and the value of your notes.
Although judgments, policies and determinations concerning the Index and the Portfolio Constituents are made by JPMS, JPMorgan
Chase & Co., as the ultimate parent company of JPMorgan Chase Bank and JPMS, ultimately controls JPMorgan Chase and
JPMS. JPMS has no obligation to consider your interests in taking any actions that might affect the value of your notes.
Furthermore, the inclusion of the Portfolio Constituents in the Index is not an investment recommendation by us or JPMS of any of
the Portfolio Constituents, or any of the futures contracts composing any of the Portfolio Constituents.
THE INDEX MAY NOT BE SUCCESSFUL OR OUTPERFORM ANY ALTERNATIVE STRATEGY THAT MIGHT BE EMPLOYED IN
RESPECT OF THE PORTFOLIO CONSTITUENTS —
The Index follows a notional rules-based proprietary strategy that operates on the basis of pre-determined rules. Under this strategy,
the Index seeks to maintain an annualized realized volatility approximately equal to the Target Volatility of 5.0% by rebalancing its
exposures to the Portfolio Constituents on each day based on two measures of realized portfolio volatility: a shorter-term volatility
measure and a longer-term volatility measure. By seeking to maintain an annualized realized volatility approximately equal to the
Target Volatility, the Index may underperform an alternative strategy that seeks to maintain a higher annualized realized volatility or
an alternative strategy that does not seek to maintain a level volatility.
In addition, on each day, the Index generally selects the notional portfolio identified for the volatility measure that has the lower
allocation to the Equity Constituent as the notional portfolio to be tracked by the Index. The Index’s selection of the notional portfolio
with the lower allocation to the Equity Constituent may be more likely to result in the Index tracking a notional portfolio with a lower
realized volatility than if the Index were to select the notional portfolio with the higher allocation to the Equity Constituent. No
assurance can be given that the investment strategy on which the Index is based will be successful or that the Index will outperform
any alternative strategy that might be employed in respect of the Portfolio Constituents.
THE INDEX MAY NOT APPROXIMATE ITS TARGET VOLATILITY —
No assurance can be given that the Index will maintain an annualized realized volatility that approximates the Target Volatility. The
actual realized volatility of the Index may be greater or less than the Target Volatility. The Index seeks to maintain an annualized
realized volatility approximately equal to the Target Volatility of 5.0% by rebalancing its exposures to the Portfolio Constituents on
each day based on two measures of realized portfolio volatility. However, there is no guarantee that trends exhibited by either
measure of realized portfolio volatility will continue in the future. The volatility of a notional portfolio on any day may change quickly
and unexpectedly. Accordingly, the actual realized annualized volatility of the Index on a daily basis may be greater than or less than
the Target Volatility, which may adversely affect the level of the Index and the value of the notes.
THE INDEX MAY BE SIGNIFICANTLY UNINVESTED —
For each volatility measure on each day, the Index seeks to identify a notional portfolio composed of the Portfolio Constituents that
has an annualized realized volatility determined for that volatility measure approximately equal to the Target Volatility of 5.0% and an
aggregate weight of 100%. If the Index identifies and selects such a notional portfolio for a volatility measure, but the weight of
either Portfolio Constituent is greater than 100%, the weight of that Portfolio Constituent in the notional portfolio selected for that
volatility measure on that day will be 100% and, if the weight of either Portfolio Constituent is less than 0%, the weight of that
Portfolio Constituent in the notional portfolio selected for that volatility measure on that day will be 0%. In addition, if there is no such
notional portfolio for a volatility measure, the Index selects for that volatility measure on that day the notional portfolio with the lowest
realized volatility.
As a result of applying a cap and floor and in the case of selecting the notional portfolio with the lowest realized volatility, the
resulting notional portfolio may be greater than or less than 5.0% for the relevant volatility measure. If the annualized realized
volatility of the notional portfolio selected for a volatility measure on any day is greater than 5.0%, that notional portfolio will be
adjusted so that the weight of each Portfolio Constituent in that notional portfolio will be reduced proportionately to achieve a
notional portfolio that has an annualized realized volatility for the relevant volatility measure of 5.0%. Under these circumstances,
the aggregate weight of the Portfolio Constituents in that notional portfolio will be less than 100%.
If the Index tracks a notional portfolio with an aggregate weight that is less than 100%, the Index will not be fully invested, and any
uninvested portion will earn no return. The Index may be significantly uninvested on any given day, and will realize only a portion of
any gains due to appreciation of the Portfolio Constituents on any such day. The Index Deduction is deducted daily at a rate of
0.50% per annum, even when the Index is not fully invested.
PS-8 | Structured Investments
image4_48134thv9.jpeg
Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Large-Cap Dynamic BlendSM  5 Index
THE INDEX MAY BE MORE HEAVILY INFLUENCED BY THE PERFORMANCE OF THE EQUITY CONSTITUENT THAN THE
PERFORMANCE OF THE BOND CONSTITUENT IN GENERAL OVER TIME —
In any initial selection between two eligible notional portfolios, the Index will select the portfolio that has the higher allocation to the
Portfolio Constituent with a higher realized volatility, as described under “The J.P. Morgan Large-Cap Dynamic BlendSM 5 Index” in
the accompanying underlying supplement, which generally will cause the Equity Constituent to receive a higher allocation than if the
portfolio that has the higher allocation to the Portfolio Constituent with a lower realized volatility were selected.
Furthermore, under normal market conditions, the Equity Constituent’s realized volatility tends to be significantly higher than the
Bond Constituent’s realized volatility. Under such circumstances and because the Target Volatility is 5.0%, the Index is generally
expected to be more heavily weighted towards the Bond Constituent. However, under circumstances where the Equity Constituent’s
realized volatility is significantly higher than that of the Bond Constituent, the performance of the Index is expected to be influenced
to a greater extent by the performance of the Equity Constituent than by the performance of the Bond Constituent, unless the weight
of the Bond Constituent is significantly greater than the weight of the Equity Constituent.
Consequently, even in cases where the allocation to the Bond Constituent is greater than the allocation to the Equity Constituent,
the Index may be influenced to a greater extent by the performance of the Equity Constituent than by the performance of the Bond
Constituent because, under some conditions, the greater allocation to the Bond Constituent will not be sufficiently large to offset the
greater realized volatility of the Equity Constituent.
Accordingly, the level of the Index may decline if the value of the Equity Constituent declines, even if the value of the Bond
Constituent increases at the same time. See also “— Risks Relating to the Index — The Returns of the Portfolio Constituents May
Offset Each Other or May Become Correlated in Decline” below.
A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF THE INDEX’S EXPOSURE MAY BE ALLOCATED TO THE BOND CONSTITUENT —
Under normal market conditions, the Equity Constituent has tended to exhibit a realized volatility that is higher than the Target
Volatility and that is higher than the realized volatility of the Bond Constituent in general over time. As a result, the Index will
generally need to reduce its exposure to the Equity Constituent in order to approximate the Target Volatility. Therefore, the Index
may have significant exposure for an extended period of time to the Bond Constituent, and that exposure may be greater, perhaps
significantly greater, than its exposure to the Equity Constituent. Moreover, under certain circumstances, the Index may have no
exposure to the Equity Constituent. However, the returns of the Bond Constituent may be significantly lower than the returns of the
Equity Constituent, and possibly even negative while the returns of the Equity Constituent are positive, which will adversely affect
the level of the Index and any payment on, and the value of, the notes.
THE RETURNS OF THE PORTFOLIO CONSTITUENTS MAY OFFSET EACH OTHER OR MAY BECOME CORRELATED IN
DECLINE —
At a time when the value of one Portfolio Constituent increases, the value of the other Portfolio Constituent may not increase as
much or may even decline. This may offset the potentially positive effect of the performance of the former Portfolio Constituent on
the performance of the Index. During the term of the notes, it is possible that the value of the Index may decline even if the value of
one Portfolio Constituent rises, because of the offsetting effect of a decline in the other Portfolio Constituent. It is also possible that
the returns of the Portfolio Constituents may be positively correlated with each other. In this case, a decline in one Portfolio
Constituent would be accompanied by a decline in the other Portfolio Constituent, which may adversely affect the performance of
the Index. As a result, the Index may not perform as well as an alternative index that tracks only one Portfolio Constituent or the
other.
HYPOTHETICAL BACK-TESTED DATA RELATING TO THE INDEX DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL HISTORICAL DATA AND
ARE SUBJECT TO INHERENT LIMITATIONS —
The hypothetical back-tested performance of the Index set forth under “Hypothetical Back-Tested Data and Historical Information” in
this pricing supplement is purely theoretical and does not represent the actual historical performance of the Index and has not been
verified by an independent third party. Hypothetical back-tested performance measures have inherent limitations. Alternative
modelling techniques might produce significantly different results and may prove to be more appropriate. Past performance, and
especially hypothetical back-tested performance, is not indicative of future results. This type of information has inherent limitations
and you should carefully consider these limitations before placing reliance on such information. Hypothetical back-tested
performance is derived by means of the retroactive application of a back-tested model that has been designed with the benefit of
hindsight.
THE INVESTMENT STRATEGY USED TO CONSTRUCT THE INDEX INVOLVES DAILY ADJUSTMENTS TO ITS NOTIONAL
EXPOSURE TO ITS PORTFOLIO CONSTITUENTS —
The Index is subject to daily adjustments to its notional exposure to its Portfolio Constituents. By contrast, a notional portfolio that is
not subject to daily exposure adjustments in this manner could see greater compounded gains over time through exposure to a
consistently and rapidly appreciating portfolio consisting of the relevant Portfolio Constituents. Therefore, your return on the notes
may be less than the return you could realize on an alternative investment in the relevant Portfolio Constituents that is not subject to
daily exposure adjustments. No assurance can be given that the investment strategy used to construct the Index will outperform any
alternative investment in the Portfolio Constituents of the Index.
PS-9 | Structured Investments
image4_48134thv9.jpeg
Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Large-Cap Dynamic BlendSM  5 Index
A PORTFOLIO CONSTITUENT OF THE INDEX MAY BE REPLACED BY A SUBSTITUTE INDEX OR FUTURES CONTRACT IN
CERTAIN EXTRAORDINARY EVENTS —
Following the occurrence of certain extraordinary events with respect to a Portfolio Constituent as described in the accompanying
underlying supplement, a Portfolio Constituent may be replaced by a substitute index or futures contract or the index calculation
agent may cease calculating and publishing in the Index. You should realize that changing a Portfolio Constituent may affect the
performance of the Index, and therefore, the return on the notes, as the substitute index or futures contract may perform significantly
better or worse than the original Portfolio Constituent. For example, the substitute or successor Portfolio Constituent may have
higher fees or worse performance than the original Portfolio Constituent.
Moreover, the policies of the sponsor of the substitute index or ETF concerning the methodology and calculation of the substitute
index or ETF, including decisions regarding additions, deletions or substitutions of the assets underlying the substitute index or ETF
could affect the level or price of the substitute index or ETF and therefore the value of the notes. The amount payable on the notes
and their market value could also be affected if the sponsor of a substitute index or the sponsor of the reference index of a substitute
ETF discontinues or suspends calculation or dissemination of the relevant index, in which case it may become difficult to determine
the market value of the notes. The sponsor of the substitute index or ETF will have no obligation to consider your interests in
calculating or revising such substitute index or ETF.
EACH PORTFOLIO CONSTITUENT IS SUBJECT TO SIGNIFICANT RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE UNDERLYING FUTURES
CONTRACTS —
The Portfolio Constituents each track the returns of the Underlying Futures Contracts. The price of an Underlying Futures Contract
depends not only on the price of the underlying asset referenced by the Underlying Futures Contract, but also on a range of other
factors, including but not limited to changing supply and demand relationships, interest rates, governmental and regulatory policies
and the policies of the exchanges on which the Underlying Futures Contracts trade. In addition, the futures markets are subject to
temporary distortions or other disruptions due to various factors, including the lack of liquidity in the markets, the participation of
speculators and government regulation and intervention. These factors and others can cause the prices of the Underlying Futures
Contracts to be volatile and could adversely affect the level of each Portfolio Constituent and the Index and any payments on, and
the value of, your notes.
SUSPENSION OR DISRUPTIONS OF MARKET TRADING IN THE UNDERLYING FUTURES CONTRACTS MAY ADVERSELY
AFFECT THE VALUE OF YOUR NOTES —
Futures markets are subject to temporary distortions or other disruptions due to various factors, including lack of liquidity, the
participation of speculators, and government regulation and intervention. In addition, futures exchanges generally have regulations
that limit the amount of the Underlying Futures Contract price fluctuations that may occur in a single day. These limits are generally
referred to as “daily price fluctuation limits” and the maximum or minimum price of a contract on any given day as a result of these
limits is referred to as a “limit price.” Once the limit price has been reached in a particular contract, no trades may be made at a price
beyond the limit, or trading may be limited for a set period of time. Limit prices have the effect of precluding trading in a particular
contract or forcing the liquidation of contracts at potentially disadvantageous times or prices. These circumstances could delay the
calculation of the level of each Portfolio Constituent and could adversely affect the level of each Portfolio Constituent and the Index
and any payments on, and the value of, your notes.
AN INCREASE IN THE MARGIN REQUIREMENTS FOR THE UNDERLYING FUTURES CONTRACTS INCLUDED IN THE
PORTFOLIO CONSTITUENTS MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT THE LEVEL OF THAT PORTFOLIO CONSTITUENT —
Futures exchanges require market participants to post collateral in order to open and keep open positions in the Underlying Futures
Contracts. If an exchange increases the amount of collateral required to be posted to hold positions in the Underlying Futures
Contracts, market participants who are unwilling or unable to post additional collateral may liquidate their positions, which may
cause the price or liquidity of the relevant Underlying Futures Contracts to decline significantly. As a result, the level of the relevant
Portfolio Constituent and the Index and any payments on, and the value of, the notes may be adversely affected.
THE INDEX MAY IN THE FUTURE INCLUDE UNDERLYING FUTURES CONTRACTS THAT ARE NOT TRADED ON
REGULATED FUTURES EXCHANGES —
The Index, through its exposure to the Portfolio Constituents, is currently based solely on futures contracts traded on regulated
futures exchanges (referred to in the United States as “designated contract markets”). If these exchange-traded futures contracts
cease to exist, or if the calculation agent for the Portfolio Constituents substitutes an Underlying Futures Contract in certain
circumstances, the Index may in the future include futures contract or over-the-counter contracts traded on trading facilities that are
subject to lesser degrees of regulation or, in some cases, no substantive regulation. As a result, trading in such contracts, and the
manner in which prices and volumes are reported by the relevant trading facilities, may not be subject to the provisions of, and the
protections afforded by, the U.S. Commodity Exchange Act, or other applicable statutes and related regulations that govern trading
on regulated U.S. futures exchanges or similar statutes and regulations that govern trading on regulated non-U.S. futures
exchanges. In addition, many electronic trading facilities have only recently initiated trading and do not have significant trading
histories. As a result, the trading of contracts on such facilities, and the inclusion of such contracts in the Index, through its exposure
to the Portfolio Constituents, may be subject to certain risks not presented by the Underlying Futures Contracts, including risks
related to the liquidity and price histories of the relevant contracts.
PS-10 | Structured Investments
image4_48134thv9.jpeg
Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Large-Cap Dynamic BlendSM  5 Index
NEGATIVE ROLL RETURNS ASSOCIATED WITH THE UNDERLYING FUTURES CONTRACTS CONSTITUTING THE
PORTFOLIO CONSTITUENTS MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT THE PERFORMANCE OF THE PORTFOLIO CONSTITUENTS AND
THE VALUE OF THE NOTES —
The Portfolio Constituents each reference Underlying Futures Contracts. Unlike common equity securities, Underlying Futures
Contracts, by their terms, have stated expirations. As the exchange-traded Underlying Futures Contracts that compose the Portfolio
Constituents approach expiration, they are replaced by similar contracts that have a later expiration. For example, an Underlying
Futures Contract notionally purchased and held in June may specify a September expiration date. As time passes, the contract
expiring in September is replaced by a contract for delivery in December. This is accomplished by notionally selling the September
contract and notionally purchasing the December contract. This process is referred to as “rolling.” Excluding other considerations, if
prices are higher in the distant delivery months than in the nearer delivery months, the notional purchase of the December contract
would take place at a price that is higher than the price of the September contract, thereby creating a negative “roll return.” Negative
roll returns adversely affect the returns of the Portfolio Constituents and, therefore, the level of the Index and any payments on, and
the value of, the notes. Because of the potential effects of negative roll returns, it is possible for the value of a Portfolio Constituent
to decrease significantly over time, even when the near-term or spot prices of the underlying assets or instruments are stable or
increasing. In addition, interest rates have been historically low for an extended period and, if interest rates revert to their historical
means, the likelihood that a roll return related to any Portfolio Constituent will be negative, as well as the adverse effect of negative
roll returns on any Portfolio Constituent, will increase.
OTHER KEY RISKS:
oTHE INDEX, WHICH WAS ESTABLISHED ON MARCH 2, 2022, AND THE PORTFOLIO CONSTITUENTS, WHICH WERE
ESTABLISHED ON DECEMBER 22, 2020, HAVE LIMITED OPERATING HISTORIES AND MAY PERFORM IN
UNANTICIPATED WAYS.
oTHE INDEX COMPRISES NOTIONAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES. THERE IS NO ACTUAL PORTFOLIO OF ASSETS TO
WHICH ANY PERSON IS ENTITLED OR IN WHICH ANY PERSON HAS ANY OWNERSHIP INTEREST.
oTHE NOTES ARE SUBJECT TO SIGNIFICANT RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH FIXED-INCOME SECURITIES, INCLUDING
INTEREST RATE-RELATED RISKS AND CREDIT RISK.
Please refer to the “Risk Factors” section of the accompanying underlying supplement for more details regarding the above-listed and
other risks.
Hypothetical Back-Tested Data and Historical Information
The following graph sets forth the hypothetical back-tested performance of the Index based on the hypothetical back-tested weekly
closing levels of the Index from January 4, 2019 through February 25, 2022, and the historical performance of the Index based on the
weekly historical closing levels of the Index from March 4, 2022 through January 26, 2024. The Index was established on March 2, 2022,
as represented by the vertical line in the following graph. All data to the left of that vertical line reflect hypothetical back-tested
performance of the Index. All data to the right of that vertical line reflect actual historical performance of the Index. The closing level of
the Index on January 31, 2024 was 239.46. We obtained the closing levels above and below from the Bloomberg Professional® service,
without independent verification.
The data for the hypothetical back-tested performance of the Index set forth in the following graph are purely theoretical and do not
represent the actual historical performance of the Index. See “Selected Risk Considerations — Risks Relating to the Index —
Hypothetical Back-Tested Data Relating to the Index Do Not Represent Actual Historical Data and Are Subject to Inherent Limitations”
above.
PS-11 | Structured Investments
image4_48134thv9.jpeg
Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Large-Cap Dynamic BlendSM  5 Index
The hypothetical back-tested and historical closing levels of the Index should not be taken as an indication of future performance, and no
assurance can be given as to the closing level of the Index on the Observation Date. There can be no assurance that the performance of
the Index will result in a payment at maturity in excess of your principal amount, subject to the credit risks of JPMorgan Financial and
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Hypothetical Back-Tested and Historical Performance of the
J.P. Morgan Large-Cap Dynamic BlendSM 5 Index
image3_48134thv9.jpeg
Source: Bloomberg
The hypothetical back-tested closing levels of the Index have inherent limitations and have not been verified by an independent third
party. These hypothetical back-tested closing levels are determined by means of a retroactive application of a back-tested model
designed with the benefit of hindsight. Hypothetical back-tested results are neither an indicator nor a guarantee of future returns. No
representation is made that an investment in the notes will or is likely to achieve returns similar to those shown. Alternative modeling
techniques or assumptions would produce different hypothetical back-tested closing levels of the Index that might prove to be more
appropriate and that might differ significantly from the hypothetical back-tested closing levels of the Index set forth above.
Treatment as Contingent Payment Debt Instruments
You should review carefully the section entitled “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences,” and in particular the subsection
thereof entitled “—Tax Consequences to U.S. Holders — Notes with a Term of More than One Year — Notes Treated as Contingent
Payment Debt Instruments,” in the accompanying product supplement no. 3-I. Unlike a traditional debt instrument that provides for
periodic payments of interest at a single fixed rate, with respect to which a cash-method investor generally recognizes income only upon
receipt of stated interest, our special tax counsel, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, is of the opinion that the notes will be treated for U.S.
federal income tax purposes as “contingent payment debt instruments.” As discussed in that subsection, you generally will be required to
accrue original issue discount (“OID”) on your notes in each taxable year at the “comparable yield,” as determined by us, although we
will not make any payment with respect to the notes until maturity. Upon sale or exchange (including at maturity), you will recognize
taxable income or loss equal to the difference between the amount received from the sale or exchange and your adjusted basis in the
note, which generally will equal the cost thereof, increased by the amount of OID you have accrued in respect of the note. You generally
must treat any income as interest income and any loss as ordinary loss to the extent of previous interest inclusions, and the balance as
capital loss. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations. The discussions herein and in the accompanying product
supplement do not address the consequences to taxpayers subject to special tax accounting rules under Section 451(b) of the Code.
Purchasers who are not initial purchasers of notes at their issue price should consult their tax advisers with respect to the tax
consequences of an investment in notes, including the treatment of the difference, if any, between the basis in their notes and the notes’
adjusted issue price.
PS-12 | Structured Investments
image4_48134thv9.jpeg
Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Large-Cap Dynamic BlendSM  5 Index
Section 871(m) of the Code and Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder (“Section 871(m)”) generally impose a 30% withholding
tax (unless an income tax treaty applies) on dividend equivalents paid or deemed paid to Non-U.S. Holders with respect to certain
financial instruments linked to U.S. equities or indices that include U.S. equities. Section 871(m) provides certain exceptions to this
withholding regime, including for instruments linked to certain broad-based indices that meet requirements set forth in the applicable
Treasury regulations. Additionally, a recent IRS notice excludes from the scope of Section 871(m) instruments issued prior to January 1,
2025 that do not have a delta of one with respect to underlying securities that could pay U.S.-source dividends for U.S. federal income
tax purposes (each an “Underlying Security”). Based on certain determinations made by us, our special tax counsel is of the opinion that
Section 871(m) should not apply to the notes with regard to Non-U.S. Holders. Our determination is not binding on the IRS, and the IRS
may disagree with this determination. Section 871(m) is complex and its application may depend on your particular circumstances,
including whether you enter into other transactions with respect to an Underlying Security. You should consult your tax adviser regarding
the potential application of Section 871(m) to the notes.
The discussions in the preceding paragraphs, when read in combination with the section entitled “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences” (and in particular the subsection thereof entitled “— Tax Consequences to U.S. Holders — Notes with a Term of More
than One Year — Notes Treated as Contingent Payment Debt Instruments”) in the accompanying product supplement, constitute the full
opinion of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP regarding the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of owning and disposing of notes.
Comparable Yield and Projected Payment Schedule
We have determined that the “comparable yield” is an annual rate of 6.16%, compounded semiannually. Based on our determination of
the comparable yield, the “projected payment schedule” per $1,000 principal amount note consists of a single payment at maturity, equal
to $1,129.28. Assuming a semiannual accrual period, the following table sets out the amount of OID that will accrue with respect to a
note during each calendar period, based upon our determination of the comparable yield and projected payment schedule.
Calendar Period
Accrued OID During
Calendar Period (Per
$1,000 Principal Amount
Note)
Total Accrued OID from Original Issue Date (Per
$1,000 Principal Amount Note) as of End of
Calendar Period
February 5, 2024 through December 31, 2024
$56.42
$56.42
January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2025
$66.13
$122.55
January 1, 2026 through February 5, 2026
$6.73
$129.28
The comparable yield and projected payment schedule are determined solely to calculate the amount on which you will be
taxed with respect to the notes in each year and are neither a prediction nor a guarantee of what the actual yield will be. The
amount you actually receive at maturity or earlier sale or exchange of your notes will affect your income for that year, as
described above under “Treatment as Contingent Payment Debt Instruments.”
The Estimated Value of the Notes
The estimated value of the notes set forth on the cover of this pricing supplement is equal to the sum of the values of the following
hypothetical components: (1) a fixed-income debt component with the same maturity as the notes, valued using the internal funding rate
described below, and (2) the derivative or derivatives underlying the economic terms of the notes. The estimated value of the notes does
not represent a minimum price at which JPMS would be willing to buy your notes in any secondary market (if any exists) at any time. The
internal funding rate used in the determination of the estimated value of the notes may differ from the market-implied funding rate for
vanilla fixed income instruments of a similar maturity issued by JPMorgan Chase & Co. or its affiliates. Any difference may be based on,
among other things, our and our affiliates’ view of the funding value of the notes as well as the higher issuance, operational and ongoing
liability management costs of the notes in comparison to those costs for the conventional fixed income instruments of JPMorgan Chase
& Co. This internal funding rate is based on certain market inputs and assumptions, which may prove to be incorrect, and is intended to
approximate the prevailing market replacement funding rate for the notes. The use of an internal funding rate and any potential changes
to that rate may have an adverse effect on the terms of the notes and any secondary market prices of the notes. For additional
information, see “Selected Risk Considerations — Risks Relating to the Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices of the Notes —
The Estimated Value of the Notes Is Derived by Reference to an Internal Funding Rate” in this pricing supplement.
The value of the derivative or derivatives underlying the economic terms of the notes is derived from internal pricing models of our
affiliates. These models are dependent on inputs such as the traded market prices of comparable derivative instruments and on various
other inputs, some of which are market-observable, and which can include volatility, dividend rates, interest rates and other factors, as
well as assumptions about future market events and/or environments. Accordingly, the estimated value of the notes is determined when
the terms of the notes are set based on market conditions and other relevant factors and assumptions existing at that time.
PS-13 | Structured Investments
image4_48134thv9.jpeg
Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Large-Cap Dynamic BlendSM  5 Index
The estimated value of the notes does not represent future values of the notes and may differ from others’ estimates. Different pricing
models and assumptions could provide valuations for the notes that are greater than or less than the estimated value of the notes. In
addition, market conditions and other relevant factors in the future may change, and any assumptions may prove to be incorrect. On
future dates, the value of the notes could change significantly based on, among other things, changes in market conditions, our or
JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s creditworthiness, interest rate movements and other relevant factors, which may impact the price, if any, at
which JPMS would be willing to buy notes from you in secondary market transactions.
The estimated value of the notes is lower than the original issue price of the notes because costs associated with selling, structuring and
hedging the notes are included in the original issue price of the notes. These costs include the selling commissions paid to JPMS and
other affiliated or unaffiliated dealers, the projected profits, if any, that our affiliates expect to realize for assuming risks inherent in
hedging our obligations under the notes and the estimated cost of hedging our obligations under the notes. Because hedging our
obligations entails risk and may be influenced by market forces beyond our control, this hedging may result in a profit that is more or less
than expected, or it may result in a loss. A portion of the profits, if any, realized in hedging our obligations under the notes may be
allowed to other affiliated or unaffiliated dealers, and we or one or more of our affiliates will retain any remaining hedging profits. See
“Selected Risk Considerations — Risks Relating to the Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices of the Notes — The Estimated
Value of the Notes Is Lower Than the Original Issue Price (Price to Public) of the Notes” in this pricing supplement.
Secondary Market Prices of the Notes
For information about factors that will impact any secondary market prices of the notes, see “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to the
Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices of the Notes — Secondary market prices of the notes will be impacted by many economic
and market factors” in the accompanying product supplement. In addition, we generally expect that some of the costs included in the
original issue price of the notes will be partially paid back to you in connection with any repurchases of your notes by JPMS in an amount
that will decline to zero over an initial predetermined period. These costs can include selling commissions, projected hedging profits, if
any, and, in some circumstances, estimated hedging costs and our internal secondary market funding rates for structured debt
issuances. This initial predetermined time period is intended to be the shorter of six months and one-half of the stated term of the notes.
The length of any such initial period reflects the structure of the notes, whether our affiliates expect to earn a profit in connection with our
hedging activities, the estimated costs of hedging the notes and when these costs are incurred, as determined by our affiliates. See
“Selected Risk Considerations — Risks Relating to the Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices of the Notes — The Value of the
Notes as Published by JPMS (and Which May Be Reflected on Customer Account Statements) May Be Higher Than the Then-Current
Estimated Value of the Notes for a Limited Time Period” in this pricing supplement.
Supplemental Use of Proceeds
The notes are offered to meet investor demand for products that reflect the risk-return profile and market exposure provided by the
notes. See “Hypothetical Payout Profile” and “How the Notes Work” in this pricing supplement for an illustration of the risk-return profile
of the notes and “The J.P. Morgan Large-Cap Dynamic BlendSM 5 Index” in this pricing supplement for a description of the market
exposure provided by the notes.
The original issue price of the notes is equal to the estimated value of the notes plus the selling commissions paid to JPMS and other
affiliated or unaffiliated dealers, plus (minus) the projected profits (losses) that our affiliates expect to realize for assuming risks inherent
in hedging our obligations under the notes, plus the estimated cost of hedging our obligations under the notes.
Validity of the Notes and the Guarantee
In the opinion of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, as special products counsel to JPMorgan Financial and JPMorgan Chase & Co., when the
notes offered by this pricing supplement have been issued by JPMorgan Financial pursuant to the indenture, the trustee and/or paying
agent has made, in accordance with the instructions from JPMorgan Financial, the appropriate entries or notations in its records relating
to the master global note that represents such notes (the “master note”), and such notes have been delivered against payment as
contemplated herein, such notes will be valid and binding obligations of JPMorgan Financial and the related guarantee will constitute a
valid and binding obligation of JPMorgan Chase & Co., enforceable in accordance with their terms, subject to applicable bankruptcy,
insolvency and similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally, concepts of reasonableness and equitable principles of general
applicability (including, without limitation, concepts of good faith, fair dealing and the lack of bad faith), provided that such counsel
expresses no opinion as to (i) the effect of fraudulent conveyance, fraudulent transfer or similar provision of applicable law on the
conclusions expressed above or (ii) any provision of the indenture that purports to avoid the effect of fraudulent conveyance, fraudulent
transfer or similar provision of applicable law by limiting the amount of JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s obligation under the related guarantee.
This opinion is given as of the date hereof and is limited to the laws of the State of New York, the General Corporation Law of the State
of Delaware and the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act. In addition, this opinion is subject to customary assumptions about the
trustee’s authorization, execution and delivery of the indenture and its authentication of the master note and the validity, binding nature
and enforceability of the indenture with respect to the trustee, all as stated in the letter of such counsel dated February 24, 2023, which
was filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 by JPMorgan Financial and JPMorgan Chase & Co. on February 24,
2023.
PS-14 | Structured Investments
image4_48134thv9.jpeg
Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Large-Cap Dynamic BlendSM  5 Index
Additional Terms Specific to the Notes
You should read this pricing supplement together with the accompanying prospectus, as supplemented by the accompanying prospectus
supplement relating to our Series A medium-term notes of which these notes are a part, and the more detailed information contained in
the accompanying product supplement and the accompanying underlying supplement. This pricing supplement, together with the
documents listed below, contains the terms of the notes and supersedes all other prior or contemporaneous oral statements as well as
any other written materials including preliminary or indicative pricing terms, correspondence, trade ideas, structures for implementation,
sample structures, fact sheets, brochures or other educational materials of ours. You should carefully consider, among other things, the
matters set forth in the “Risk Factors” sections of the accompanying prospectus supplement, the accompanying product supplement and
the accompanying underlying supplement, as the notes involve risks not associated with conventional debt securities. We urge you to
consult your investment, legal, tax, accounting and other advisers before you invest in the notes.
You may access these documents on the SEC website at www.sec.gov as follows (or if such address has changed, by
reviewing our filings for the relevant date on the SEC website):
Product supplement no. 3-I dated April 13, 2023:
Underlying supplement no. 17-I dated April 13, 2023:
Prospectus supplement and prospectus, each dated April 13, 2023:
Our Central Index Key, or CIK, on the SEC website is 1665650, and JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s CIK is 19617. As used in this pricing
supplement, “we,” “us” and “our” refer to JPMorgan Financial.
PS-15 | Structured Investments
image4_48134thv9.jpeg
Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Large-Cap Dynamic BlendSM  5 Index