XML 62 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT  v2.3.0.11
Derivative Instruments
 6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2011
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]  
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
For a further discussion of the Firm’s use and accounting policies regarding derivative instruments, see Note 6 on pages 191–199 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2010 Annual Report.
Notional amount of derivative contracts
The following table summarizes the notional amount of derivative contracts outstanding as of June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010.
 
 
Notional amounts(b)
(in billions)
 
June 30, 2011


December 31, 2010


Interest rate contracts
 
 
 
Swaps
 
$
44,191


$
46,299


Futures and forwards
 
8,871


9,298


Written options
 
4,361


4,075


Purchased options
 
4,623


3,968


Total interest rate contracts
 
62,046


63,640


Credit derivatives(a)
 
6,105


5,472


Foreign exchange contracts
 
 
 


Cross-currency swaps
 
2,875


2,568


Spot, futures and forwards
 
4,624


3,893


Written options
 
718


674


Purchased options
 
711


649


Total foreign exchange contracts
 
8,928


7,784


Equity contracts
 
 
 
Swaps
 
130


116


Futures and forwards
 
51


49


Written options
 
519


430


Purchased options
 
473


377


Total equity contracts
 
1,173


972


Commodity contracts
 
 
 


Swaps
 
401


349


Spot, futures and forwards
 
189


170


Written options
 
307


264


Purchased options
 
297


254


Total commodity contracts
 
1,194


1,037


Total derivative notional amounts
 
$
79,446


$
78,905


(a)
Primarily consists of credit default swaps. For more information on volumes and types of credit derivative contracts, see the Credit derivatives discussion on pages 123–124 of this Note.
(b)
Represents the sum of gross long and gross short third-party notional derivative contracts.


While the notional amounts disclosed above give an indication of the volume of the Firm’s derivatives activity, the notional amounts significantly exceed, in the Firm’s view, the possible losses that could arise from such transactions. For most derivative transactions, the notional amount is not exchanged; it is used simply as a reference to calculate payments.
Impact of derivatives on the Consolidated Balance Sheets
The following tables summarize information on derivative fair values that are reflected on the Firm’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, by accounting designation (e.g., whether the derivatives were designated as hedges or not) and contract type.
Free-standing derivatives(a) 
 
Derivative receivables
 
Derivative payables
June 30, 2011

(in millions)
Not designated
as hedges
Designated
as hedges
Total derivative
receivables
 
Not
designated
as hedges
Designated
as hedges
Total
derivative payables
Trading assets and liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate
$
994,157


$
5,747


 
$
999,904


 
$
962,219


$
1,352


 
$
963,571


Credit
129,022


—


 
129,022


 
125,474


—


 
125,474


Foreign exchange(b)
154,697


3,663


 
158,360


 
151,498


1,777


 
153,275


Equity
47,054


—


 
47,054


 
46,642


—


 
46,642


Commodity
57,717


315


 
58,032


 
56,582


1,732


 
58,314


Gross fair value of trading assets and liabilities
$
1,382,647


$
9,725


 
$
1,392,372


 
$
1,342,415


$
4,861


 
$
1,347,276


Netting adjustment(c)
 
 
 
(1,314,989
)
 
 
 
 
(1,283,608
)
Carrying value of derivative trading assets and trading liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
 
 
$
77,383


 
 
 
 
$
63,668


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative receivables
 
Derivative payables
December 31, 2010

(in millions)
Not designated
as hedges


Designated
as hedges
Total derivative
receivables


 
Not
designated
as hedges


Designated
as hedges
Total
derivative payables


Trading assets and liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate
$
1,121,703


$
6,279


 
$
1,127,982


 
$
1,089,604


$
840


 
$
1,090,444


Credit
129,729


—


 
129,729


 
125,061


—


 
125,061


Foreign exchange(b)
165,240


3,231


 
168,471


 
163,671


1,059


 
164,730


Equity
43,633


—


 
43,633


 
46,399


—


 
46,399


Commodity
59,573


24


 
59,597


 
56,397


2,078


(d) 
58,475


Gross fair value of trading assets and liabilities
$
1,519,878


$
9,534


 
$
1,529,412


 
$
1,481,132


$
3,977


 
$
1,485,109


Netting adjustment(c)
 
 
 
(1,448,931
)
 
 
 
 
(1,415,890
)
Carrying value of derivative trading assets and trading liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
 
 
$
80,481


 
 
 
 
$
69,219


(a)
Excludes structured notes for which the fair value option has been elected. See Note 4 on pages 114–116 of this Form 10-Q and Note 4 on pages 187–189 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2010 Annual Report for further information.
(b)
Excludes $15 million and $21 million of foreign currency-denominated debt designated as a net investment hedge at June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively.
(c)
U.S. GAAP permits the netting of derivative receivables and payables, and the related cash collateral received and paid when a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists between the Firm and a derivative counterparty.
(d)
Excludes $1.0 billion related to commodity derivatives that are embedded in a debt instrument and used as fair value hedging instruments that are recorded in the line item of the host contract (other borrowed funds) for December 31, 2010.
Derivative receivables and payables fair value
The following table summarizes the fair values of derivative receivables and payables, including those designated as hedges, by contract type and after netting adjustments as of June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010.
 
Trading assets – Derivative receivables
 
Trading liabilities – Derivative payables
(in millions)
June 30, 2011
December 31, 2010
 
June 30, 2011
December 31, 2010
Contract type
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate
$
32,911


$
32,555


 
$
17,306


$
20,387


Credit
6,198


7,725


 
4,878


5,138


Foreign exchange
19,898


25,858


 
19,015


25,015


Equity
7,084


4,204


 
11,430


10,450


Commodity
11,292


10,139


 
11,039


8,229


Total
$
77,383


$
80,481


 
$
63,668


$
69,219




Impact of derivatives on the Consolidated Statements of Income
Fair value hedge gains and losses
The following tables present derivative instruments, by contract type, used in fair value hedge accounting relationships, as well as pretax gains/(losses) recorded on such derivatives and the related hedged items for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Firm includes gains/(losses) on the hedging derivative and the related hedged item in the same line item in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
 
Gains/(losses) recorded in income
 
Income statement impact due to:
Three months ended

June 30, 2011 (in millions)
Derivatives
Hedged items
Total income
statement impact
 


Hedge
ineffectiveness(d)


  Excluded
    components(e)
Contract type
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate(a)
$
166


 
$
(102
)
$
64


 
$
(17
)
$
81


Foreign exchange(b)
(1,239
)
(f) 
1,401


162


 
—


162


Commodity(c)
(401
)
 
(97
)
(498
)
 
3


(501
)
Total
$
(1,474
)
 
$
1,202


$
(272
)
 
$
(14
)
$
(258
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gains/(losses) recorded in income
 
Income statement impact due to:
Three months ended

June 30, 2010 (in millions)
Derivatives
Hedged items


Total income
statement impact


 


Hedge
ineffectiveness(d)




  Excluded
    components(e)


Contract type
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate(a)
$
1,345


 
$
(1,100
)
$
245


 
$
96


$
149


Foreign exchange(b)
3,841


(f) 
(3,865
)
(24
)
 
—


(24
)
Commodity(c)
139


 
(332
)
(193
)
 
—


(193
)
Total
$
5,325


 
$
(5,297
)
$
28


 
$
96


$
(68
)


 
Gains/(losses) recorded in income
 
Income statement impact due to:
Six months ended
June 30, 2011 (in millions)
Derivatives
Hedged items
Total income
statement impact
 


Hedge
ineffectiveness(d)


  Excluded
    components(e)
Contract type
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate(a)
$
(552
)
 
$
698


$
146


 
$
(26
)
$
172


Foreign exchange(b)
(4,445
)
(f) 
4,525


80


 
—


80


Commodity(c)
(474
)
 
336


(138
)
 
2


(140
)
Total
$
(5,471
)
 
$
5,559


$
88


 
$
(24
)
$
112


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gains/(losses) recorded in income
 
Income statement impact due to:
Six months ended

June 30, 2010 (in millions)
Derivatives
Hedged items


Total income
statement impact


 


Hedge
ineffectiveness(d)




  Excluded
    components(e)


Contract type
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate(a)
$
1,977


 
$
(1,598
)
$
379


 
$
124


$
255


Foreign exchange(b)
5,488


(f) 
(5,522
)
(34
)
 
—


(34
)
Commodity(c)
(316
)
 
64


(252
)
 
—


(252
)
Total
$
7,149


 
$
(7,056
)
$
93


 
$
124


$
(31
)
(a)
Primarily consists of hedges of the benchmark (e.g., London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”)) interest rate risk of fixed-rate long-term debt and AFS securities. Gains and losses were recorded in net interest income.
(b)
Primarily consists of hedges of the foreign currency risk of long-term debt and AFS securities for changes in spot foreign currency rates. Gains and losses related to the derivatives and the hedged items, due to changes in spot foreign currency rates, were recorded in principal transactions revenue.
(c)
Consists of overall fair value hedges of certain commodities inventories. Gains and losses were recorded in principal transactions revenue.
(d)
Hedge ineffectiveness is the amount by which the gain or loss on the designated derivative instrument does not exactly offset the gain or loss on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk.
(e)
Certain components of hedging derivatives are permitted to be excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness, such as forward points on foreign exchange forward contracts. Amounts related to excluded components are recorded in current-period income.
(f)
Included $(1.8) billion and $3.8 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $(5.0) billion and $5.6 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, of revenue related to certain foreign exchange trading derivatives designated as fair value hedging instruments.


Cash flow hedge gains and losses
The following tables present derivative instruments, by contract type, used in cash flow hedge accounting relationships, and the pretax gains/(losses) recorded on such derivatives, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Firm includes the gain/(loss) on the hedging derivative in the same line item as the offsetting change in cash flows on the hedged item in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
 
Gains/(losses) recorded in income and other comprehensive income (“OCI”)/(loss)(c)
Three months ended

June 30, 2011 (in millions)
Derivatives – effective portion reclassified from AOCI to income
Hedge ineffectiveness recorded directly in income(d)
Total income statement impact
Derivatives – effective portion recorded in OCI
Total change
in OCI
for period
Contract type
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate(a)
$
75


$
6


$
81


$
(103
)
$
(178
)
Foreign exchange(b)
(7
)
—


(7
)
(40
)
(33
)
Total
$
68


$
6


$
74


$
(143
)
$
(211
)
 
Gains/(losses) recorded in income and other comprehensive income/(loss)(c)
Three months ended

June 30, 2010 (in millions)
Derivatives – effective portion reclassified from AOCI to income
Hedge ineffectiveness recorded directly in income(d)
Total income statement impact
Derivatives – effective portion recorded in OCI
Total change

in OCI

for period
Contract type
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate(a)
$
33


$
8


$
41


$
98


$
65


Foreign exchange(b)
(23
)
(3
)
(26
)
47


70


Total
$
10


$
5


$
15


$
145


$
135




 
Gains/(losses) recorded in income and other comprehensive income/(loss)(c)
Six months ended June 30, 2011 (in millions)
Derivatives – effective portion reclassified from AOCI to income
Hedge ineffectiveness recorded directly in income(d)
Total income statement impact
Derivatives - effective portion recorded in OCI
Total change
in OCI
for period
Contract type
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate(a)
$
169


$
9


$
178


$
(134
)
$
(303
)
Foreign exchange(b)
15


—


15


(22
)
(37
)
Total
$
184


$
9


$
193


$
(156
)
$
(340
)


 
Gains/(losses) recorded in income and other comprehensive income/(loss)(c)
Six months ended June 30, 2010 (in millions)
Derivatives – effective portion reclassified from AOCI to income
Hedge ineffectiveness recorded directly in income(d)
Total income statement impact
Derivatives – effective portion recorded in OCI
Total change

in OCI

for period
Contract type
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate(a)
$
82


$
11


$
93


$
349


$
267


Foreign exchange(b)
(75
)
(3
)
(78
)
(65
)
10


Total
$
7


$
8


$
15


$
284


$
277


(a)
Primarily consists of benchmark interest rate hedges of LIBOR-indexed floating-rate assets and floating-rate liabilities. Gains and losses were recorded in net interest income.
(b)
Primarily consists of hedges of the foreign currency risk of non-U.S. dollar-denominated revenue and expense. The income statement classification of gains and losses follows the hedged item – primarily net interest income, compensation expense and other expense.
(c)
The Firm did not experience any forecasted transactions that failed to occur for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the Firm reclassified a $25 million loss from accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) to earnings because the Firm determined that it was probable that forecasted interest payment cash flows related to certain wholesale deposits would not occur.
(d)
Hedge ineffectiveness is the amount by which the cumulative gain or loss on the designated derivative instrument exceeds the present value of the cumulative expected change in cash flows on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk.
Over the next 12 months, the Firm expects that $96 million (after-tax) of net gains recorded in AOCI at June 30, 2011, related to cash flow hedges will be recognized in income. The maximum length of time over which forecasted transactions are hedged is 10 years, and such transactions primarily relate to core lending and borrowing activities.
Net investment hedge gains and losses
The following tables present hedging instruments, by contract type, that were used in net investment hedge accounting relationships, and the pretax gains/(losses) recorded on such instruments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
 
Gains/(losses) recorded in income and other comprehensive income/(loss)
 
2011
 
2010
Three months ended June 30,

(in millions)
Excluded components recorded directly
in income(a)
Effective portion
recorded in OCI
 
Excluded components recorded directly
in income(a)
Effective portion
recorded in OCI
Contract type
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange derivatives
$
(74
)
$
(383
)
 
$
(32
)
$
429


Foreign currency denominated debt
—


—


 
—


2


Total
$
(74
)
$
(383
)
 
$
(32
)
$
431




 
Gains/(losses) recorded in income and other comprehensive income/(loss)
 
2011
 
2010
Six months ended June 30,

(in millions)
Excluded components recorded directly
in income(a)
Effective portion
recorded in OCI
 
Excluded components recorded directly
in income(a)
Effective portion
recorded in OCI
Contract type
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange derivatives
$
(145
)
$
(773
)
 
$
(73
)
$
714


Foreign currency denominated debt
—


—


 
—


43


Total
$
(145
)
$
(773
)
 
$
(73
)
$
757


(a)
Certain components of hedging derivatives are permitted to be excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness, such as forward points on foreign exchange forward contracts. Amounts related to excluded components are recorded in current-period income. There was no ineffectiveness for net investment hedge accounting relationships during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.


Risk management derivatives gains and losses (not designated as hedging instruments)
The following table presents nontrading derivatives, by contract type, that were not designated in hedge relationships, and the pretax gains/(losses) recorded on such derivatives for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. These derivatives are risk management instruments used to mitigate or transform market risk exposures arising from banking activities other than trading activities, which are discussed separately below.
 
Derivatives gains/(losses) recorded in income
 
Three months ended June 30,
 
Six months ended June 30,
(in millions)
2011


2010


 
2011


2010


Contract type
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate(a)
$
1,486


$
3,662


 
$
1,562


$
3,802


Credit(b)
(5
)
60


 
(63
)
(59
)
Foreign exchange(c)
(78
)
1


 
(98
)
(20
)
Commodity(b)
11


(24
)
 
—


(47
)
Total
$
1,414


$
3,699


 
$
1,401


$
3,676


(a)
Gains and losses were recorded in principal transactions revenue, mortgage fees and related income, and net interest income.
(b)
Gains and losses were recorded in principal transactions revenue.
(c)
Gains and losses were recorded in principal transactions revenue and net interest income.
Trading derivative gains and losses
The following table presents trading derivatives gains and losses, by contract type, that are recorded in principal transactions revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. The Firm has elected to present derivative gains and losses related to its trading activities together with the cash instruments with which they are risk managed.
 
Gains/(losses) recorded in principal transactions revenue
 
Three months ended June 30,
 
Six months ended June 30,
(in millions)
2011


2010


 
2011


2010


Type of instrument
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate
$
(353
)
$
(37
)
 
$
13


$
70


Credit
745


1,287


 
1,954


3,412


Foreign exchange(a)
229


424


 
831


1,051


Equity
743


85


 
1,571


907


Commodity
1,219


20


 
1,393


433


Total
$
2,583


$
1,779


 
$
5,762


$
5,873


(a)
In 2010, the reporting of trading gains and losses was enhanced to include trading gains and losses related to certain trading derivatives designated as fair value hedging instruments. Prior-period amounts have been revised to conform to the current presentation.
Credit risk, liquidity risk and credit-related contingent features
The aggregate fair value of net derivative payables that contain contingent collateral or termination features triggered upon a downgrade was $15.4 billion at June 30, 2011, for which the Firm has posted collateral of $11.2 billion in the normal course of business. At June 30, 2011, the impact of a single-notch and two-notch ratings downgrade to JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries, primarily JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association (“JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.”), would have required $1.4 billion and $2.8 billion, respectively, of additional collateral to be posted by the Firm. In addition, at June 30, 2011, the impact of single-notch and two-notch ratings downgrades to JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries, primarily JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., related to contracts with termination triggers would have required the Firm to settle trades with a fair value of $430 million and $930 million, respectively.
The following tables show the carrying value of derivative receivables and payables after netting adjustments and adjustments for collateral held and transferred as of June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010.
 
Derivative receivables
 
Derivative payables
(in millions)
June 30, 2011


December 31, 2010


 
June 30, 2011


December 31, 2010


Gross derivative fair value
$
1,392,372


$
1,529,412


 
$
1,347,276


$
1,485,109


Netting adjustment – offsetting receivables/payables(a)
(1,248,243
)
(1,376,969
)
 
(1,248,243
)
(1,376,969
)
Netting adjustment – cash collateral received/paid(a)
(66,746
)
(71,962
)
 
(35,365
)
(38,921
)
Carrying value on Consolidated Balance Sheets
$
77,383


$
80,481


 
$
63,668


$
69,219




 
 
Collateral held
 
Collateral transferred
(in billions)
 
June 30, 2011


 
December 31, 2010


 
June 30, 2011


 
December 31, 2010


Netting adjustment for cash collateral(a)
 
$
66.7


 
$
72.0


 
$
35.4


 
$
38.9


Liquid securities and other cash collateral(b)
 
16.5


 
16.5


 
12.5


 
10.9


Additional liquid securities and cash collateral(c)
 
22.3


 
18.0


 
10.0


 
8.5


Total collateral for derivative transactions
 
$
105.5


 
$
106.5


 
$
57.9


 
$
58.3


(a)
As permitted under U.S. GAAP, the Firm has elected to net cash collateral received and paid together with the related derivative receivables and derivative payables when a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists. 
(b)
Represents cash collateral received and paid that is not subject to a legally enforceable master netting agreement, and liquid securities collateral held and transferred.
(c)
Represents liquid securities and cash collateral held and transferred at the initiation of derivative transactions, which is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the transactions move, as well as collateral held and transferred related to contracts that have non-daily call frequency for collateral to be posted, and collateral that the Firm or a counterparty has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date. These amounts were not netted against the derivative receivables and payables in the tables above, because, at an individual counterparty level, the collateral exceeded the fair value exposure at both June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010.


Credit derivatives
For a more detailed discussion of credit derivatives, including a description of the different types used by the Firm, see Note 6 on pages 191–199 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2010 Annual Report.
The following tables present a summary of the notional amounts of credit derivatives and credit-related notes the Firm sold and purchased as of June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010. Upon a credit event, the Firm as a seller of protection would typically pay out only a percentage of the full notional amount of net protection sold, as the amount actually required to be paid on the contracts takes into account the recovery value of the reference obligation at the time of settlement. The Firm manages the credit risk on contracts to sell protection by purchasing protection with identical or similar underlying reference entities. Other purchased protection referenced in the following tables includes credit derivatives bought on related, but not identical, reference positions (including indices, portfolio coverage and other reference points) as well as protection purchased through credit-related notes.
The Firm does not use notional amounts of credit derivatives as the primary measure of risk management for such derivatives, because the notional amount does not take into account the probability of the occurrence of a credit event, the recovery value of the reference obligation, or related cash instruments and economic hedges, each of which reduces, in the Firm’s view, the risks associated with such derivatives.
Total credit derivatives and credit-related notes
 
Maximum payout/Notional amount
June 30, 2011
Protection sold
Protection purchased with identical underlyings(b)
Net protection (sold)/purchased(c)
Other protection purchased(d)
(in millions)
Credit derivatives
 
 
 
 
Credit default swaps
$
(2,972,180
)
$
2,912,446


$
(59,734
)
$
38,797


Other credit derivatives(a)
(120,733
)
36,278


(84,455
)
25,002


Total credit derivatives
(3,092,913
)
2,948,724


(144,189
)
63,799


Credit-related notes
(1,544
)
—


(1,544
)
4,009


Total
$
(3,094,457
)
$
2,948,724


$
(145,733
)
$
67,808


 
 
 
 
 
 
Maximum payout/Notional amount
December 31, 2010
Protection sold
Protection purchased with identical underlyings(b)
Net protection (sold)/purchased(c)
Other protection purchased(d)
(in millions)
Credit derivatives
 
 
 
 
Credit default swaps
$
(2,659,240
)
$
2,652,313


$
(6,927
)
$
32,867


Other credit derivatives(a)
(93,776
)
10,016


(83,760
)
24,234


Total credit derivatives
(2,753,016
)
2,662,329


(90,687
)
57,101


Credit-related notes
(2,008
)
—


(2,008
)
3,327


Total
$
(2,755,024
)
$
2,662,329


$
(92,695
)
$
60,428


(a)
Primarily consists of total return swaps and credit default swap options.
(b)
Represents the total notional amount of protection purchased where the underlying reference instrument is identical to the reference instrument on protection sold; the notional amount of protection purchased for each individual identical underlying reference instrument may be greater or lower than the notional amount of protection sold.
(c)
Does not take into account the fair value of the reference obligation at the time of settlement, which would generally reduce the amount the seller of protection pays to the buyer of protection in determining settlement value.
(d)
Represents protection purchased by the Firm through single-name and index credit default swap or credit-related notes.
The following tables summarize the notional and fair value amounts of credit derivatives and credit-related notes as of June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, where JPMorgan Chase is the seller of protection. The maturity profile is based on the remaining contractual maturity of the credit derivative contracts. The ratings profile is based on the rating of the reference entity on which the credit derivative contract is based. The ratings and maturity profile of credit derivatives and credit-related notes where JPMorgan Chase is the purchaser of protection are comparable to the profile reflected below.
Protection sold – credit derivatives and credit-related notes ratings(a)/maturity profile
June 30, 2011 (in millions)
<1 year
1–5 years
>5 years
Total
notional amount
Fair value(b)
Risk rating of reference entity
 
 
 
 
 
Investment-grade
$
(218,669
)
$
(1,450,354
)
$
(418,820
)
$
(2,087,843
)
$
(25,284
)
Noninvestment-grade
(190,728
)
(658,364
)
(157,522
)
(1,006,614
)
(52,238
)
Total
$
(409,397
)
$
(2,108,718
)
$
(576,342
)
$
(3,094,457
)
$
(77,522
)
December 31, 2010 (in millions)
<1 year
1–5 years
>5 years
Total
notional amount
Fair value(b)
Risk rating of reference entity
 
 
 
 
 
Investment-grade
$
(175,618
)
$
(1,194,695
)
$
(336,309
)
$
(1,706,622
)
$
(17,261
)
Noninvestment-grade
(148,434
)
(702,638
)
(197,330
)
(1,048,402
)
(59,939
)
Total
$
(324,052
)
$
(1,897,333
)
$
(533,639
)
$
(2,755,024
)
$
(77,200
)
(a)
The ratings scale is based on the Firm’s internal ratings, which generally correspond to ratings as defined by S&P and Moody’s.
(b)
Amounts are shown on a gross basis, before the benefit of legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral received by the Firm.