XML 36 R24.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
 6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2013
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets [Abstract]  
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill and other intangible assets
For a discussion of the accounting policies related to goodwill and other intangible assets, see Note 17 on pages 291–295 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2012 Annual Report.
Goodwill and other intangible assets consist of the following.
(in millions)
June 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
Goodwill
$
48,057

$
48,175

Mortgage servicing rights
9,335

7,614

Other intangible assets:
 
 
Purchased credit card relationships
$
221

$
295

Other credit card-related intangibles
201

229

Core deposit intangibles
255

355

Other intangibles
1,274

1,356

Total other intangible assets
$
1,951

$
2,235


The following table presents goodwill attributed to the business segments.
(in millions)
June 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
Consumer & Community Banking
$
30,971

$
31,048

Corporate & Investment Bank
6,869

6,895

Commercial Banking
2,862

2,863

Asset Management
6,978

6,992

Corporate/Private Equity
377

377

Total goodwill
$
48,057

$
48,175


The following table presents changes in the carrying amount of goodwill.
 
Three months ended
June 30,
 
Six months ended
June 30,
(in millions)
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Balance at beginning of period(a)
$
48,067

 
$
48,208

 
$
48,175

 
$
48,188

Changes during the period from:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Business combinations
11

 
10

 
36

 
20

Dispositions
(5
)
 
(4
)
 
(5
)
 
(4
)
Other(b)
(16
)
 
(83
)
 
(149
)
 
(73
)
Balance at June 30,(a)
$
48,057

 
$
48,131

 
$
48,057

 
$
48,131

(a)
Reflects gross goodwill balances as the Firm has not recognized any impairment losses to date.
(b)
Includes foreign currency translation adjustments and other tax-related adjustments.
Goodwill was not impaired at June 30, 2013, or December 31, 2012, nor was any goodwill written off due to impairment during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.
The goodwill impairment test is based upon a comparison between the carrying value and fair value of a reporting unit. The Firm uses the reporting units’ allocated equity plus goodwill capital as a proxy for the carrying amounts of equity for the reporting units in the goodwill impairment testing. Reporting unit equity is determined on a basis similar to that used for the allocation of equity to the Firm’s lines of business, which primarily considers stand-alone peer comparisons and regulatory capital requirements (as estimated under Basel III), although economic risk capital is also considered. Proposed line of business equity levels are incorporated into the Firm’s annual budget process, which is reviewed by the Firm’s Board of Directors. Allocated equity is further reviewed on a periodic basis and updated as needed. For a discussion of the primary method used to estimate the fair values of the reporting units, see Impairment testing on pages 291–292 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2012 Annual Report.
While no impairment of goodwill was recognized, the Firm’s mortgage lending business in CCB remains at an elevated risk for goodwill impairment due to its exposure to U.S. consumer credit risk and the effects of economic, regulatory and legislative changes. The valuation of this business is particularly dependent upon economic conditions (including new unemployment claims and home prices), regulatory and legislative changes (for example, those related to residential mortgage servicing, foreclosure and loss mitigation activities), and the amount of equity capital required. In addition, the earnings or estimated cost of equity of the Firm’s capital markets businesses could also be affected by regulatory or legislative changes. Declines in business performance, increases in allocated equity capital, or increases in the estimated cost of equity, could cause the estimated fair values of the Firm’s reporting units or their associated goodwill to decline, which could result in a material impairment charge to earnings in a future period related to some portion of the associated goodwill.
Mortgage servicing rights
Mortgage servicing rights represent the fair value of expected future cash flows for performing servicing activities for others. The fair value considers estimated future servicing fees and ancillary revenue, offset by estimated costs to service the loans, and generally declines over time as net servicing cash flows are received, effectively amortizing the MSR asset against contractual servicing and ancillary fee income. MSRs are either purchased from third parties or recognized upon sale or securitization of mortgage loans if servicing is retained. For a further description of the MSR asset, interest rate risk management, and the valuation of MSRs, see Note 17 on pages 291–295 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2012 Annual Report and Note 3 on pages 114–127 of this Form 10-Q.

The following table summarizes MSR activity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.
 
As of or for the three months ended June 30,
 
As of or for the six months ended June 30,
(in millions, except where otherwise noted)
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Fair value at beginning of period
$
7,949

 
$
8,039

 
$
7,614

 
$
7,223

MSR activity:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Originations of MSRs
652

 
524

 
1,342

 
1,096

Purchase of MSRs
3

 
2

 
(3
)
 
3

Disposition of MSRs
(19
)
 
—

 
(418
)
(g) 
—

Net additions
636

 
526

 
921

 
1,099

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Changes due to collection/realization of expected cash flows(a)
(288
)
 
(328
)
 
(547
)
 
(681
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Changes in valuation due to inputs and assumptions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Changes due to market interest rates and other(b)
1,074

 
(1,195
)
 
1,620

 
(551
)
Changes in valuation due to other inputs and assumptions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Projected cash flows (e.g., cost to service)(c)
—

 
(77
)
 
290

 
(295
)
Discount rates
—

 
—

 
(78
)
 
—

Prepayment model changes and other(d)
(36
)
 
153

 
(485
)
 
323

Total changes in valuation due to other inputs and assumptions
(36
)
 
76

 
(273
)
 
28

Total changes in valuation due to inputs and assumptions(a)
1,038

 
(1,119
)
 
1,347

 
(523
)
Fair value at June 30,(e)
$
9,335

 
$
7,118

 
$
9,335

 
$
7,118

Change in unrealized gains/(losses) included in income related to MSRs
held at June 30,
$
1,038

 
$
(1,119
)
 
$
1,347

 
$
(523
)
Contractual service fees, late fees and other ancillary fees included in income
$
835

 
$
949

 
$
1,704

 
$
1,982

Third-party mortgage loans serviced at June 30, (in billions)
$
839

 
$
868

 
$
839

 
$
868

Servicer advances at June 30, (in billions)(f)
$
10.1

 
$
10.2

 
$
10.1

 
$
10.2

(a)
Included changes related to commercial real estate of $(3) million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, and $(2) million and $(5) million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
(b)
Represents both the impact of changes in estimated future prepayments due to changes in market interest rates, and the difference between actual and expected prepayments.
(c)
For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the increase was driven by the inclusion in the MSR valuation model of servicing fees receivable on certain delinquent loans.
(d)
Represents changes in prepayments other than those attributable to changes in market interest rates. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the decrease was driven by changes in the inputs and assumptions used to derive prepayment speeds, primarily increases in home prices.
(e)
Included $21 million and $26 million related to commercial real estate at June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
(f)
Represents amounts the Firm pays as the servicer (e.g., scheduled principal and interest to a trust, taxes and insurance), which will generally be reimbursed within a short period of time after the advance from future cash flows from the trust or the underlying loans. The Firm’s credit risk associated with these advances is minimal because reimbursement of the advances is typically senior to all cash payments to investors. In addition, the Firm maintains the right to stop payment to investors if the collateral is insufficient to cover the advance.
(g)
Includes excess mortgage servicing rights transferred to an agency-sponsored trust in exchange for stripped mortgage backed securities (“SMBS”). A portion of the SMBS was acquired by third parties at the transaction date; the Firm acquired and has retained the remaining balance of those SMBS as trading securities.
The following table presents the components of mortgage fees and related income (including the impact of MSR risk management activities) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.
 
Three months ended
June 30,
 
Six months ended
June 30,
(in millions)
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Mortgage fees and related income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net production revenue:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Production revenue
$
1,064

 
$
1,362

 
$
2,059

 
$
2,794

Repurchase losses
16

 
(10
)
 
(65
)
 
(312
)
Net production revenue
1,080

 
1,352

 
1,994

 
2,482

Net mortgage servicing revenue
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

Operating revenue:
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

Loan servicing revenue
945

 
1,004

 
1,881

 
2,043

Changes in MSR asset fair value due to collection/realization of expected cash flows
(285
)
 
(327
)
 
(543
)
 
(678
)
Total operating revenue
660

 
677

 
1,338

 
1,365

Risk management:
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

Changes in MSR asset fair value due to market interest rates and other(a)
1,072

 
(1,193
)
 
1,618

 
(549
)
Other changes in MSR asset fair value due to other inputs and assumptions in model(b)
(36
)
 
76

 
(273
)
 
28

Change in derivative fair value and other
(957
)
 
1,353

 
(1,408
)
 
947

Total risk management
79

 
236

 
(63
)
 
426

Net mortgage servicing revenue
739

 
913

 
1,275

 
1,791

All other
4

 
—

 
6

 
2

Mortgage fees and related income
$
1,823

 
$
2,265

 
$
3,275

 
$
4,275

(a)
Represents both the impact of changes in estimated future prepayments due to changes in market interest rates, and the difference between actual and expected prepayments.
(b)
Represents the aggregate impact of changes in model inputs and assumptions such as projected cash flows (e.g., cost to service), discount rates and changes in prepayments other than those attributable to changes in market interest rates (e.g., changes in prepayments due to changes in home prices). For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the decrease was driven by changes in the inputs and assumptions used to derive prepayment speeds, primarily increases in home prices.
The table below outlines the key economic assumptions used to determine the fair value of the Firm’s MSRs at June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, and outlines the sensitivities of those fair values to immediate adverse changes in those assumptions, as defined below.
(in millions, except rates)
June 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
Weighted-average prepayment speed assumption (“CPR”)
8.82
%
 
13.04
%
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change
$
(410
)
 
$
(517
)
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change
(795
)
 
(1,009
)
Weighted-average option adjusted spread
7.80
%
 
7.61
%
Impact on fair value of 100 basis points adverse change
$
(386
)
 
$
(306
)
Impact on fair value of 200 basis points adverse change
(744
)
 
(591
)
CPR: Constant prepayment rate.
The sensitivity analysis in the preceding table is hypothetical and should be used with caution. Changes in fair value based on variation in assumptions generally cannot be easily extrapolated, because the relationship of the change in the assumptions to the change in fair value are often highly interrelated and may not be linear. In this table, the effect that a change in a particular assumption may have on the fair value is calculated without changing any other assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which would either magnify or counteract the impact of the initial change.
Other intangible assets
The $284 million decrease in other intangible assets during the six months ended June 30, 2013, was due to amortization.
The components of credit card relationships, core deposits and other intangible assets were as follows.
 
 
June 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
(in millions)
 
Gross amount(a)
Accumulated amortization(a)
Net carrying value
 
Gross
amount
Accumulated amortization
Net carrying value
Purchased credit card relationships
 
$
3,540

$
3,319

$
221

 
$
3,775

$
3,480

$
295

Other credit card-related intangibles
 
541

340

201

 
850

621

229

Core deposit intangibles
 
4,133

3,878

255

 
4,133

3,778

355

Other intangibles(b)
 
2,375

1,101

1,274

 
2,390

1,034

1,356

(a)
The decrease in the gross amount and accumulated amortization from December 31, 2012, was due to the removal of fully amortized assets.
(b)
Includes intangible assets of approximately $600 million consisting primarily of asset management advisory contracts, which were determined to have an indefinite life and are not amortized.
Amortization expense
The following table presents amortization expense related to credit card relationships, core deposits and other intangible assets.
 
 
Three months ended
June 30,
 
Six months ended
June 30,
(in millions)
 
2013
2012
 
2013
2012
Purchased credit card relationships
 
$
52

$
67

 
$
105

$
136

Other credit card-related intangibles
 
15

27

 
29

54

Core deposit intangibles
 
50

61

 
100

122

Other intangibles
 
35

36

 
70

72

Total amortization expense
 
$
152

$
191

 
$
304

$
384



Future amortization expense
The following table presents estimated future amortization expense related to credit card relationships, core deposits and other intangible assets at June 30, 2013.
For the year (in millions)
Purchased credit card relationships
Other credit
card-related intangibles
Core deposit intangibles
Other
intangibles
Total
2013(a)
$
196

$
57

$
196

$
135

$
584

2014
96

50

102

118

366

2015
12

40

26

98

176

2016
9

34

14

90

147

2017
5

29

13

90

137

(a)
Includes $105 million, $29 million, $100 million and $70 million of amortization expense related to purchased credit card relationships, other credit card-related intangibles, core deposit intangibles and other intangibles, respectively, recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2013.