XML 38 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.3.0.15
Fair Value Option
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2011
Fair Value Option [Abstract] 
FAIR VALUE OPTION
FAIR VALUE OPTION
For a discussion of the primary financial instruments for which the fair value option was previously elected, including the basis for those elections and the determination of instrument-specific credit risk, where relevant, see Note 4 on pages 187–189 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2010 Annual Report.
Changes in fair value under the fair value option election
The following table presents the changes in fair value included in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, for items for which the fair value option was elected. The profit and loss information presented below only includes the financial instruments that were elected to be measured at fair value; related risk management instruments, which are required to be measured at fair value, are not included in the table.
 
Three months ended June 30,
 
2011
 
2010
(in millions)
Principal
transactions
Other
income
Total changes
in fair value recorded
 
Principal
transactions
Other
income
Total changes
in fair value recorded
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements
$
121

$

 
$
121

 
$
261

$

 
$
261

Securities borrowed
(8
)

 
(8
)
 
27


 
27

Trading assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt and equity instruments, excluding loans
107

(4
)
(c) 
103

 
40

(12
)
(c) 
28

Loans reported as trading assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Changes in instrument-specific credit risk
429

4

(c) 
433

 
389

28

(c) 
417

Other changes in fair value
13

1,371

(c) 
1,384

 
(299
)
1,217

(c) 
918

Loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Changes in instrument-specific credit risk
(7
)

 
(7
)
 
32


 
32

Other changes in fair value
139


 
139

 
(44
)

 
(44
)
Other assets

(42
)
(d) 
(42
)
 

(49
)
(d) 
(49
)
Deposits(a)
(93
)

 
(93
)
 
(103
)

 
(103
)
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements
(14
)

 
(14
)
 
(56
)

 
(56
)
Other borrowed funds(a) 
739


 
739

 
838


 
838

Trading liabilities
(3
)

 
(3
)
 


 

Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs
(55
)

 
(55
)
 
(14
)

 
(14
)
Other liabilities
(1
)
(1
)
(d) 
(2
)
 
(19
)
14

(d) 
(5
)
Long-term debt:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Changes in instrument-specific credit risk(a) 
145


 
145

 
534


 
534

Other changes in fair value(b)
(93
)

 
(93
)
 
1,332


 
1,332

 
Six months ended June 30,
 
2011
 
2010
(in millions)
Principal
transactions
Other
income
Total changes
in fair value recorded
 
Principal
transactions
Other
income
Total changes
in fair value recorded
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements
$
3

$

 
$
3

 
$
280

$

 
$
280

Securities borrowed
1


 
1

 
39


 
39

Trading assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt and equity instruments, excluding loans
271

(1
)
(c) 
270

 
196

(11
)
(c) 
185

Loans reported as trading assets:




 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Changes in instrument-specific credit risk
909

4

(c) 
913

 
798

22

(c) 
820

Other changes in fair value
138

2,094

(c) 
2,232

 
(683
)
1,972

(c) 
1,289

Loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Changes in instrument-specific credit risk
(13
)

 
(13
)
 
79


 
79

Other changes in fair value
282


 
282

 
(71
)

 
(71
)
Other assets

(42
)
(d) 
(42
)
 

(102
)
(d) 
(102
)
Deposits(a)
(110
)

 
(110
)
 
(292
)

 
(292
)
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements
21


 
21

 
(65
)

 
(65
)
Other borrowed funds(a) 
956


 
956

 
912


 
912

Trading liabilities
(6
)

 
(6
)
 
(3
)

 
(3
)
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs
(89
)

 
(89
)
 
32


 
32

Other liabilities
(4
)
(3
)
(d) 
(7
)
 
4

14

(d) 
18

Long-term debt:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Changes in instrument-specific credit risk(a) 
199


 
199

 
585


 
585

Other changes in fair value(b)
(117
)

 
(117
)
 
1,558


 
1,558

(a)
Total changes in instrument-specific credit risk related to structured notes were $142 million and $588 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $165 million and $696 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Those totals include adjustments for structured notes classified within deposits and other borrowed funds, as well as long-term debt.
(b)
Structured notes are debt instruments with embedded derivatives that are tailored to meet a client’s need. The embedded derivative is the primary driver of risk. Although the risk associated with the structured notes is actively managed, the gains reported in this table do not include the income statement impact of such risk management instruments.
(c)
Reported in mortgage fees and related income.
(d)
Reported in other income.
Difference between aggregate fair value and aggregate remaining contractual principal balance outstanding
The following table reflects the difference between the aggregate fair value and the aggregate remaining contractual principal balance outstanding as of June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, for loans, long-term debt and long-term beneficial interests for which the fair value option has been elected.
 
June 30, 2011
 
December 31, 2010
(in millions)
Contractual
principal
outstanding
 
Fair value
Fair value
over/(under)
contractual
principal
outstanding
 
Contractual
principal
outstanding
 
Fair value
Fair value
over/(under)
contractual
principal
outstanding
Loans
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Performing loans 90 days or more past due
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans reported as trading assets
$

 
$

$

 
$

 
$

$

Loans

 


 

 


Nonaccrual loans
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans reported as trading assets
5,342

 
1,410

(3,932
)
 
5,246

 
1,239

(4,007
)
Loans
889

 
72

(817
)
 
927

 
132

(795
)
Subtotal
6,231

 
1,482

(4,749
)
 
6,173

 
1,371

(4,802
)
All other performing loans
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans reported as trading assets
40,255

 
34,945

(5,310
)
 
39,490

 
33,641

(5,849
)
Loans
2,239

 
1,488

(751
)
 
2,496

 
1,434

(1,062
)
Total loans
$
48,725

 
$
37,915

$
(10,810
)
 
$
48,159

 
$
36,446

$
(11,713
)
Long-term debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Principal-protected debt
$
20,620

(b) 
$
21,157

$
537

 
$
20,761

(b) 
$
21,315

$
554

Nonprincipal-protected debt(a)
NA

 
17,359

NA

 
NA

 
17,524

NA

Total long-term debt
NA

 
$
38,516

NA

 
NA

 
$
38,839

NA

Long-term beneficial interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Principal-protected debt
$

 
$

$

 
$
49

 
$
49

$

Nonprincipal-protected debt(a)
NA

 
911

NA

 
NA

 
1,446

NA

Total long-term beneficial interests
NA

 
$
911

NA

 
NA

 
$
1,495

NA

(a)
Remaining contractual principal is not applicable to nonprincipal-protected notes. Unlike principal-protected notes, for which the Firm is obligated to return a stated amount of principal at the maturity of the note, nonprincipal-protected notes do not obligate the Firm to return a stated amount of principal at maturity, but to return an amount based on the performance of an underlying variable or derivative feature embedded in the note.
(b)
Where the Firm issues principal-protected zero-coupon or discount notes, the balance reflected as the remaining contractual principal is the final principal payment at maturity.
At both June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the contractual amount of letters of credit for which the fair value option was elected was $3.8 billion, with a corresponding fair value of $(6) million. For further information regarding off-balance sheet lending-related financial instruments, see Note 30 on pages 275–280 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2010 Annual Report.