EX-5.2 3 fs12022a8ex5-2_aquarius1.htm OPINION OF LOEB & LOEB LLP.

Exhibit 5.2

 

Lawrence Venick
Partner
 
   
2206-19 Jardine House Tel +852 3923 1188
1 Connaught Place Fax +852 3923 1100
Central Email lvenick@loeb.com
Hong Kong  

 

January 14, 2022

 

Aquarius I Acquisition Corp.

Room 901-903, 9/F, Harbour Centre

25 Harbour Road

Wan Chai, Hong Kong SAR

 

Re:Aquarius I Acquisition Corp.

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

We have acted as counsel to Aquarius I Acquisition Corp., a Cayman Islands company (the “Company”), in connection with the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (the “Registration Statement”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”), covering an underwritten public offering of (i) 7,500,000 units (the “Units”), with each Unit consisting of one of the Company’s ordinary shares, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Ordinary Shares”), one redeemable warrant (collectively the “Warrants”), each warrant entitling its holder to purchase one-half (1/2) of one Ordinary Share and one right (the “Rights”), each ten rights entitling its holder to receive one Ordinary Share, (ii) up to 1,125,000 Units (the “Over-Allotment Units”) for which the underwriters have been granted an over-allotment option, (iii) an option (“Unit Purchase Option”) to purchase up to 431,250 Units (the “Purchase Option Units”) granted to Maxim Group, LLC, the representative of the underwriters (the “Representative”) or its designees, pursuant to the Registration Statement, (iv) all Ordinary Shares, Warrants and Rights issued as part of the Units, Over-Allotment Units and the Purchase Option Units; (v) up to 20,000 shares of Ordinary Shares issuable to the representative of the underwriters; (vi) all Ordinary Shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrants included in the Units, Over-Allotment Units and the Purchase Option Units; and (vii) all Ordinary Shares issuable upon conversion of the Rights included in the Units, Over-Allotment Units and the Purchase Option Units. 

 

We have examined such documents and considered such legal matters as we have deemed necessary and relevant as the basis for the opinion set forth below. With respect to such examination, we have assumed the genuineness of all signatures, the authenticity of all documents submitted to us as originals, the conformity to original documents of all documents submitted to us as reproduced or certified copies, and the authenticity of the originals of those latter documents. As to questions of fact material to this opinion, we have, to the extent deemed appropriate, relied upon certain representations of certain officers of the Company. Because the agreements governing the Warrants, the Rights, the Units, the Unit Purchase Option and the Purchase Option Units contain provisions stating that they are to be governed by the laws of the State of New York, we are rendering this opinion as to New York law. We are admitted to practice in the State of New York, and we express no opinion as to any matters governed by any law other than the law of the State of New York. In particular, we do not purport to pass on any matter governed by the laws of the Cayman Islands.

 

San Francisco      Los Angeles       New York      Chicago      Nashville       Washington, DC      Beijing Hong Kong
www.loeb.com

 

 

 

 

 January 14, 2022
Page 2

 

Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion that each of the Warrants (including the Warrants issuable in connection with the Over-Allotment Units and the Purchase Option Units), the Rights (including the Rights issuable in connection with the Over-Allotment Units and the Purchase Option Units), the Units, the Over-Allotment Units, the Unit Purchase Option and the Purchase Option Units, if and when paid for in accordance with the terms of the underwriting agreement between the Company and the Representative (the “Underwriting Agreement”), will constitute the valid and legally binding obligation of the Company, enforceable against it in accordance with its terms.

 

In addition, the foregoing opinions are qualified to the extent that (a) enforceability may be limited by and be subject to general principles of equity, regardless of whether such enforceability is considered in a proceeding in equity or at law (including, without limitation, concepts of notice and materiality), and by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium and other similar laws affecting creditors’ and debtors’ rights generally (including, without limitation, any state or federal law in respect of fraudulent transfers); and (b) no opinion is expressed herein as to compliance with or the effect of federal or state securities or blue sky laws.

 

We hereby consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement, to the use of our name as your U.S. counsel and to all references made to us in the Registration Statement and in the prospectus forming a part thereof. In giving this consent, we do not hereby admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Act, or the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

 

Very truly yours,

 

/s/ Loeb & Loeb LLP

 

Loeb & Loeb LLP