Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)	6 Months Ended
Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)	Jun. 30, 2025
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Basis of Presentation	The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Company in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements. The Company is an investment company and accordingly applies specific accounting and financial reporting requirements under Accounting Standards Codification, as issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“ASC”) Topic 946—Financial Services—Investment Companies (“Topic 946”). The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and pursuant to Articles 6, 10 and 12 of Regulation S-X. Certain reclassifications have been made to certain prior period balances to conform with current presentation. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and notes related thereto for the year ended December 31, 2024, included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on March 14, 2025. The results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year, any other interim period or any future year or period.
Use of Estimates	The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents	The Company deposits its cash in a financial institution and, at times, such deposits may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits.
Organization and Offering Costs	Organization costs consist of costs incurred to establish the Company and enable it to do business legally. Organization costs are expensed as incurred. Offering costs consist of costs incurred in connection with the offering of the common stock of the Company. The Company’s initial organizational costs incurred were expensed and initial offering costs are amortized over one year. The Company reimburses the Adviser for the organization and offering costs it incurs on the Company’s behalf. If actual organization and offering costs incurred exceed $1 million, the Adviser or its affiliates will bear the excess costs. As of June 30, 2025, the Company incurred $925 (since inception) of organization and offering costs.
Deferred Financing Costs	Deferred financing costs, incurred in connection with any credit facility and SBA-guaranteed debentures (see Note 5) are deferred and amortized over the life of the respective credit facility and SBA-guaranteed debentures.
Indemnifications	In the ordinary course of its business, the Company may enter into contracts or agreements that contain indemnifications or warranties. Future events could occur that lead to the execution of these provisions against the Company. Based on its history and experience, management feels that the likelihood of such an event is remote.
Revenue Recognition	Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade-date basis. Realized gains or losses on investments are measured by the difference between the net proceeds from the disposition and the amortized cost basis of investment using specific identification method without regard to unrealized gains or losses previously recognized. The Company reports current period changes in fair value of investments that are measured at fair value as a component of the net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Investment Income Interest income, including amortization of premium and accretion of discount, is recorded on the accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are collected. The Company records amortized or accreted discounts or premiums as interest income using the effective interest method or straight-line interest method, as applicable, and adjusted only for material amendments or prepayments. Dividend income, which represents dividends from equity investments and distributions from subsidiaries, if any, is recognized on an accrual basis to the extent that the Company collects such amount. Original Issue Discount Discounts to par on portfolio securities are accreted into income over the tenor of the instrument. Any remaining discount is accreted into income upon prepayment or redemption of the instrument. The Company then amortizes such amounts using the effective interest method as interest income over the expected life of the investment. PIK Interest The Company may, from time to time, hold loans in its portfolio that contain a payment-in-kind (“PIK”) interest provision. PIK interest, computed at the contractual rate specified in each loan agreement, is periodically added to the principal balance of the loan, rather than being paid to the Company in cash, and is recorded as interest income. Thus, the actual collection of PIK interest in cash may be deferred until the time of debt principal repayment. PIK interest, which is a non-cash source of income at the time of recognition, is included in the Company’s taxable income. This affects the amount the Company would be required to distribute to its stockholders to maintain its tax treatment as a RIC for federal income tax purposes, even though the Company has not yet collected the cash. Fee Income Origination fees received are recorded as deferred income and recognized as investment income over the term of the loan. Upon prepayment of a loan, any unamortized origination fees are recorded as investment income. The Company receives certain fees from portfolio companies, which are non-recurring in nature. Such fees include loan prepayment penalties, structuring fees, covenant waiver fees and loan amendment fees, which are recorded as investment income when earned. Non-accrual loans A loan can be left on accrual status during the period the Company is pursuing repayment of the loan. Management reviews all loans that become 90 days or more past due on principal and interest, or when there is reasonable doubt that principal or interest will be collected, for possible placement on non-accrual status. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, unpaid interest credited to income is reversed. Additionally, any original issue discount and market discount are no longer accreted to interest income as of the date such loan is placed on non-accrual status. Interest payments received on non-accrual loans are recognized as income or applied to principal depending upon management’s judgment regarding collectability. Non- accrual loans are restored to accrual status when past due principal and interest is paid, and, in management’s judgment, future payments are likely to remain current. As of June 30, 2025, we had no investments on non-accrual status.
Investment Classification	The Company classifies its investments in accordance with the requirements of the 1940 Act. Under the 1940 Act, the Company is deemed to be an “Affiliated Person” of a portfolio company if it owns more than 5% of a portfolio company's outstanding voting securities. The Company refers to such investments in Affiliated Persons as “Affiliated Investments.” Under the 1940 Act, the Company is deemed to be an Affiliated Person and to “control” a portfolio company if it owns more than 25% of its outstanding voting securities and/or has the power to exercise control over the management or policies of such portfolio company. Such investments in portfolio companies that the Company “controls” are referred to as “Control Investments.” Investments which are neither Control Investments or Affiliated Investments are referred to as “Non-Controlled/Non-Affiliated Investments.”
Fair Value of Financial Instruments	The Company applies fair value to all of its financial instruments in accordance with ASC Topic 820—Fair Value Measurement (“ASC Topic 820”). ASC Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework used to measure fair value and requires disclosures for fair value measurements. In accordance with ASC Topic 820, the Company has categorized its financial instruments carried at fair value, based on the priority of the valuation technique, into a three-level fair value hierarchy. The availability of observable inputs can vary depending on the financial instrument and is affected by a wide variety of factors, including, for example, the type of product, whether the product is new, whether the product is traded on an active exchange or in the secondary market and the current market conditions. To the extent that the valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by the Company in determining fair value is greatest for financial instruments classified as Level 3. Investments for which market quotations are not readily available are valued at fair value as determined in good faith pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act and ASC Topic 820. As a general principle, the fair value of a security or other asset is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Pursuant to Rule 2a-5, the board of directors (the “Board”) has designated the Adviser as the valuation designee (“Valuation Designee”) for the Company to perform the fair value determination relating to all Company investments, subject to the oversight of the Board. The Adviser may carry out its designated responsibilities as Valuation Designee through various teams and committees. The Valuation Designee’s Board-approved policies and procedures govern the Valuation Designee’s selection and application of methodologies for determining and calculating the fair value of Company investments. The Valuation Designee may value Company portfolio securities for which market quotations are not readily available and other Company assets utilizing inputs from pricing sources, quotation reporting systems, valuation agents and other third-party sources. The Adviser has established a valuation committee (the “Valuation Committee”) to carry out the day-to-day fair valuation responsibilities and has adopted policies and procedures to govern activities of the Valuation Committee and the performance of functions required to determine the fair value of the Company’s investments in good faith. These functions include periodically assessing and managing material risks associated with fair value determinations, selecting, applying, reviewing, and testing fair value methodologies, monitoring for circumstances that may necessitate the use of fair value, and overseeing and evaluating pricing services used. In accordance with ASC Topic 820, the Company discloses the fair value of its investments in a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to valuations based upon unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to valuations based upon unobservable inputs that are significant to the valuation (Level 3 measurements). To the extent that fair value is based on inputs that are less observable, the determination of fair value requires a significant amount of management judgment. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized below. Level 1 - Quoted prices are available in active markets/exchanges for identical investments as of the reporting date. Level 2 - Pricing inputs are observable inputs including, but not limited to, prices quoted for similar assets or liabilities in active markets/exchanges or prices quoted for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, and fair value is determined through the use of models or other valuation methodologies. Level 3 - Pricing inputs are unobservable for the investment and include activities where there is little, if any, market activity for the investment. The inputs into determination of fair value require significant management judgment and estimation. The inputs used by management in estimating the fair value of Level 3 investments may include valuations and other reporting provided by representatives of the portfolio companies, original transaction prices, recent transactions for identical or similar instruments, and comparisons to fair values of comparable investments, and may include adjustments to reflect illiquidity or non-transferability. The Adviser has policies with respect to its investments, which may assist the Adviser in assessing the quality of information provided by, or on behalf of, each portfolio investment and in determining whether such information continues to be provided by a reliable source or whether further investigation is necessary. Any such investigation, as applicable, may or may not require the Adviser to forego its normal reliance on the value supplied by, or on behalf of, such portfolio investment and to independently determine the fair value of the Company’s interest in such portfolio investments, consistent with the Adviser’s valuation procedures. The Company has engaged an independent third-party valuation provider, which performs valuation procedures to arrive at estimated valuation ranges of the illiquid investments on a quarterly basis (other than immaterial investments, which are internally valued quarterly unless otherwise deemed appropriate by the Valuation Committee, and subsequently corroborated by an independent valuation firm on an annual basis). Investments that have been completed within the past three months are fair valued approximating cost unless there has been a material event since the completion date. If there has been a material event or material information that was not known as of the close of the transaction, the independent third-party valuation provider provides an independent valuation range. The types of valuation methodologies employed by the third-party valuation provider include discounted cash flow, recent financing and enterprise value valuation methodologies. Pursuant to the Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act, the Board has chosen to designate the Adviser as the Valuation Designee to perform fair value determinations relating to the value of the assets for which market quotations are not readily available, subject to the Board's oversight. The Company’s investments and borrowings are subject to market risk. Market risk is the potential for changes in the value due to market changes. Market risk is directly impacted by the volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the investments and borrowings are traded. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in these securities. The availability of valuation techniques and observable inputs can vary from security to security and is affected by a wide variety of factors including the type of security, whether the security is new and not yet established in the marketplace, and other characteristics particular to the transaction. Inputs may include price information, volatility statistics, specific and broad credit data, liquidity statistics and other factors. The use of these valuation models requires significant estimation and judgment by the Adviser. While the Company believes its valuation methods are appropriate, other market participants may value identical assets differently than the Company at the measurement date. The methods used by the Company may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. The Company may also have risk associated with its concentration of investments in certain geographic regions and industries. To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Those estimated values do not necessarily represent the amounts that may be ultimately realized due to the occurrence of future circumstances that cannot be reasonably determined. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by the Adviser in determining fair value is greatest for securities categorized in Level 3. The determination of what constitutes “observable” requires significant judgment by the Adviser. The Adviser considers observable data to be market data which is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, not proprietary. Such observable data may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy where the fair value measurement falls (in its entirety) is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The categorization of an investment within the hierarchy is based upon the pricing transparency of the investment, and observability of prices and inputs may be reduced for many investments. This condition could cause the investment to be reclassified to a lower level within the fair value hierarchy.
Distributions	Distributions to common stockholders are recorded on the record date. Subject to the discretion of and as determined by the Board, the Company will authorize and declare ordinary cash distributions approved by the Board on a quarterly basis. The amount to be paid out as a dividend or distribution is determined by the Board each quarter and is generally based upon the earnings estimated by management. Net realized capital gains, if any, are distributed to shareholders at least annually, although the Company can retain such capital gains for investment in its discretion. The Company has adopted a dividend reinvestment plan (the “DRIP”) that provides for reinvestment of any distributions the Company declares in cash on behalf of its stockholders, unless a stockholder elects to receive cash. As a result, if the Board authorizes and the Company declares a cash distribution, then stockholders who have not “opted out” of the DRIP will have their cash distribution automatically reinvested in additional shares of the Company’s common stock, rather than receiving the cash distribution. Shares issued under the DRIP will be issued at a price per share equal to the most recent net asset value (“NAV”) per share as determined by the Board (subject to adjustment to the extent required by Section 23 of the 1940 Act).
Recent Accounting Pronouncements	The Company considers the applicability and impact of all accounting standard updates (“ASU”) issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). ASUs not listed below were assessed and either determined to be not applicable or expected to have minimal impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Segment Reporting	In accordance with ASC Topic 280 – “Segment Reporting (ASC 280),” the Company has determined that it has a single operating and reporting segment. As a result, the Company’s segment accounting policies are the same as described herein and the Company does not have any intra-segment sales and transfers of assets. The Company operates through a single operating and reporting segment with an investment objective to generate both current income, and to a lesser extent, capital appreciation through debt and equity investments. The chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) is comprised of the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer and assesses the performance and makes operating decisions of the Company on a consolidated basis primarily based on the Company’s net increase in net assets resulting from operations (“net income”). In addition to numerous other factors and metrics, the CODM utilizes net income as a key metric in determining the amount of dividends to be distributed to the Company’s stockholders. As the Company’s operations comprise of a single reporting segment, the segment assets are reflected on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as “total assets” and the significant segment expenses are listed on the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.