XML 39 R28.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.22.2.2
Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2022
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Basis of Presentation

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and follow the requirements of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim financial reporting. Accordingly, these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and disclosures required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements as certain footnotes or other financial information that are normally required by U.S. GAAP can be condensed or omitted.

The Company's condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and the accounts of the Company's subsidiaries. Any reference in these notes to applicable accounting guidance is meant to refer to the authoritative U.S. GAAP included in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), and Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). All intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.

The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual financial statements and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the Company’s financial position, its results of operations and comprehensive loss, and its cash flows for the periods presented. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2022 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2022 or for any other future annual or interim period. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 30, 2022.

 

Reclassification of Prior Year Presentation

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for consistency with the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on the reported results of operations. An adjustment has been made to the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2021 to reclassify the foreign exchange loss. The foreign exchange loss for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2021 was previously included in the other expense, net financial statement line.

Significant Accounting Policies

Significant Accounting Policies

During the six months ended June 30, 2022, there were no significant changes to the Company’s significant accounting policies as described in the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021 except as described below.

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Significant estimates and assumptions made in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include, but are not limited to the fair value of the Company’s investment in Intelgenx Technologies Corp. (“IntelGenx”), securities carried at fair value, contingent consideration liability—related parties, in-process research and development assets (“IPRD”), redeemable noncontrolling interests and noncontrolling interests

recognized in acquisitions, the valuations of common shares prior to IPO and share-based awards, and accruals for research and development costs.

 

The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable. Actual results may differ from those estimates or assumptions.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less from the purchase date to be cash equivalents. As of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, cash and cash equivalents consisted of cash on deposit and cash held in high-yield savings accounts and money market funds.

Investment Securities Portfolio

Investment Securities Portfolio

The following table sets forth the fair value of atai's available-for-sale securities portfolio at the dates indicated:

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

June 30, 2022

 

 

December 31, 2021

 

Money Market Funds

 

$

38,878

 

 

$

 

U.S. Treasuries

 

 

3,478

 

 

 

 

Commercial Paper

 

 

114,880

 

 

 

 

Corporate Notes/Bonds

 

 

107,045

 

 

 

 

U.S. Government Agencies

 

 

2,951

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

267,232

 

 

$

 

 

In January 2022, the Company invested in a certain investment portfolio, which is comprised of Money Market Funds, U.S. Treasury securities, Commercial Paper, Corporate Notes/Bonds, and U.S. government agencies securities. The Company classified securities in the investment portfolio as available-for-sale securities. Furthermore, the Company elected the fair value option for the available-for-sale securities in the investment portfolio (see Note 7). The decision to elect the fair value option, which is irrevocable once elected, is determined on an instrument-by-instrument basis and applied to an entire instrument. The net gains or losses, if any, on an investment for which the fair value option has been elected are recognized as a change in fair value of securities on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and the amortized cost of investments approximates their fair value.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair Value Measurements

 

Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in the consolidated balance sheets are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair values. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or an exit price that would be paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The authoritative guidance on fair value measurements establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements as follows:

 

Level 1—Observable inputs such as unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date;

 

Level 2—Inputs (other than quoted prices included in Level 1) are either directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; and

 

Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. To the extent that the valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by the Company in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in Level 3. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The Company’s contingent consideration liability—related parties, derivative liability associated with the Perception convertible promissory notes, IntelGenx Initial Warrants and IntelGenx Additional Units Warrant, and warrant liability with Neuronasal Inc. are carried at fair value, determined according to Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy described above (See Note 7). The IntelGenx common stock and securities carried at fair value are determined according to Level 2 inputs in the fair value hierarchy above. The carrying amount reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets for cash, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair values, due to their short-term nature.

 

The carrying amounts of the Company’s remaining outstanding convertible promissory notes—related parties issued in 2018 and 2020 (collectively, the “2018 Convertible Notes”) do not approximate fair value because the fair value is driven by the underlying value of the Company’s common shares into which the notes are to be converted. As of June 30, 2022, the carrying amount and fair value amount of the 2018 Convertible Notes was $0.6 million and $28.8 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2021, the carrying amount and fair value amount of the 2018 Convertible Notes was $0.8 million and $69.7 million, respectively. Subsequent to the IPO, several noteholders of the 2018 Convertible Notes elected to convert their promissory notes into the Company's common shares. See Note 10 for additional discussion.

Fair Value Option

Fair Value Option

As permitted under Accounting Standards Codification 825, Financial Instruments, or ASC 825, the Company has elected the fair value option to account for its investment in common shares of IntelGenx, which otherwise would be subject to ASC 323. In accordance with ASC 825, the Company records this investment at fair value under Other investments held at fair value in the Company's consolidated balance sheets and changes in fair value are recognized as a component of other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of operations. The carrying value of the investment remained at zero as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.

 

Furthermore, as noted above the Company also elected the fair value option for its investment securities portfolio.

Emerging Growth Company Status

Emerging Growth Company Status

The Company is an emerging growth company, as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”). Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards issued subsequent to the enactment of the JOBS Act until such time as those standards apply to private companies. The Company has elected to use this extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until the earlier of the date that it (i) is no longer an emerging growth company or (ii) affirmatively and irrevocably opts out of the extended transition period provided in the JOBS Act. As a result, these consolidated financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with the new or revised accounting pronouncements as of public company effective dates.

 

As described in “Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements” below, the Company early adopted certain accounting standards, as the JOBS Act does not preclude an emerging growth company from adopting a new or revised accounting standard earlier than the time that such standard applies to private companies. The Company expects to use the extended transition period for any other new or revised accounting standards during the period in which it remains an emerging growth company.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which is a comprehensive new lease standard that amends various aspects of existing accounting guidance for leases. The core principle of Topic 842 requires lessees to recognize on the consolidated balance sheets a liability to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term for both finance and operating leases with lease terms greater than twelve months. The lease liability is measured at the present value of the unpaid lease payments and the right-of-use asset is derived from the calculation of the lease liability. Topic 842 also requires lessees to disclose key information about leasing arrangements. For public entities, ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. As a result of the Company having elected the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards pursuant to Section 107(b) of the JOBS Act, ASU 2016-02 is effective for the Company beginning after December 15, 2021.

 

The Company adopted the new standard on January 1, 2022 using the modified transition approach as of the effective date.

 

The new standard provides a number of optional practical expedients in transition. The Company elected the “package of practical expedients,” which permitted it to not reassess under the new standard its prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification, and initial direct costs. As a result, the Company has continued to account for existing leases - i.e. leases for which the commencement date is before January 1, 2022 - in accordance with Topic 840 throughout the entire lease term, including periods after the effective date, with the exception that the Company applied the new balance sheet recognition guidance for operating leases and applied Topic 842 for remeasurements and modifications after the Transition Date. The Company also elected the hindsight expedient in determining the lease term and assessing impairment of right-of-use assets when transitioning to ASC 842. As a result, the Company evaluated the lease term for its existing leases as of the transition date, January 1, 2022.

 

The most significant impact of the adoption of Topic 842 on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements was the recognition of a $0.2 million operating lease right-of-use asset, a $0.1 million current operating lease liability, and a $0.1 million long-term operating lease liability on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet related to its existing facility operating lease. The Company did not have a deferred rent liability recorded in connection with its existing facility operating lease. There was no material impact to the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet, statement of operations, and no cumulative-effect adjustment to

accumulated deficit. The Company recorded an immaterial amount of general and administrative expense in its consolidated statement of operations related to lease expense, including short-term lease expense during the three and six months ended June 30, 2022.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

 

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses. This update requires immediate recognition of management’s estimates of current expected credit losses. Under the prior model, losses were recognized only as they were incurred. The new model is applicable to most financial assets and certain other instruments that are not measured at fair value through net income. In November 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-10, which delays adoption for "smaller reporting companies" as defined under the rules promulgated under the Exchange Act. Although, as of December 31, 2021, the Company was no longer a smaller reporting company, the Company qualified as a smaller reporting company at the time of its initial public offering and, as such, in accordance with ASU 2019-10, the effective date for adoption by the Company will begin after December 31, 2022. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this new standard will have a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.