XML 34 R24.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.23.3
Commitments and Contingencies
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2023
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies

Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies

The Company has various commitments to fund various revolving and delayed draw senior secured and subordinated loans, including commitments to issue letters of credit through a financial intermediary on behalf of certain portfolio companies. As of September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the Company had the following unfunded commitments to its portfolio companies:

 

 

 

September 30, 2023

 

December 31, 2022

Unfunded revolver obligations, bridge loan and backstop commitments (1)

 

 

$

245,111

 

$

181,974

Standby letters of credit issued and outstanding (2)

 

 

 

1,843

 

 

880

Unfunded delayed draw loan commitments (3)

 

 

 

257,387

 

 

252,210

Total Unfunded Commitments (4)

 

 

$

504,341

 

$

435,064

(1)
The unfunded revolver obligations may or may not be funded to the borrowing party in the future. The amounts relate to loans with various maturity dates, but the entire amount was eligible for funding to the borrowers as of September 30, 2023, subject to the terms of each loan’s respective credit agreements which includes borrowing covenants that need to be met prior to funding. As of September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the bridge loan and backstop commitments included in the balances were $30,777 and $93,000.
(2)
For all these letters of credit issued and outstanding, the Company would be required to make payments to third parties if the portfolio companies were to default on their related payment obligations. None of the letters of credit issued and outstanding are recorded as a liability on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities as such letters of credit are considered in the valuation of the investments in the portfolio company.
(3)
The Company’s commitment to fund delayed draw loans is triggered upon the satisfaction of certain pre-negotiated terms and conditions which can include covenants to maintain specified leverage levels and other related borrowing base covenants. For commitments to fund delayed draw loans with performance thresholds, borrowers are required to meet certain performance requirements before the Company is obligated to fulfill these commitments.
(4)
Additionally, from time to time, the Adviser and its affiliates may commit to an investment on behalf of the funds it manages, including the Company. Certain terms of these investments are not finalized at the time of the commitment and each respective fund's allocation may change prior to the date of funding. In this regard, the Company may have to fund additional commitments in the future that it is currently not obligated to but may be at a future point in time.

 

Organizational and Offering Costs

The Adviser agreed to bear all of the Company’s organization and offering expenses through the date on which the Company broke escrow for the initial offering of its common shares. The Company is obligated to reimburse the Adviser for such expenses incurred upon breaking escrow for our offering. The Company did not incur organization and offering costs for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2023. The total organization and offering costs incurred three and nine months ended September 30, 2022 were $2,940 and $2,940, which were recognized by the Company when it broke escrow for the initial offering of its common shares.

 

Warehousing Transactions

The Company entered into a warehousing transaction whereby the Company agreed, subject to certain conditions, to purchase certain assets from parties unaffiliated with the Adviser. The warehousing transaction was designed to assist the Company in deploying capital upon receipt of subscription proceeds.

On February 22, 2021, the Company entered into a Facility Agreement (“Facility Agreement”), which was subsequently amended on August 17, 2021, with Goldman Sachs Bank USA (the “Financing Provider”). The Facility Agreement creates a forward obligation of the Financing Provider to sell, and a forward obligation of the Company, or its designee, to purchase certain investments (the “Portfolio Investments”) owned and held by the Financing Provider at the Company’s request. Pursuant to the Facility Agreement, the Company may request the Financing Provider to acquire Portfolio Investments as it designates from time to time, which the Financing Provider can approve or reject in its sole and absolute discretion. Prior to any sale to the Company, the Portfolio Investments will be owned and held solely for the account of the Financing Provider. ADS will have no obligation to purchase the Portfolio Investments under the Facility Agreement until such time the Company has received subscriptions for its shares of at least $600 million (the “Capital Condition”). After the Company has met the Capital Condition, it will be obligated to purchase the Portfolio Investments from the Financing Provider on or before February 22, 2022 (the “Facility End Date”). ADS may elect, but is not obligated to, purchase Portfolio Investments prior to the Facility End Date or prior to or without meeting the Capital Condition. In consideration for the forward arrangement provided by the Financing Provider (the amount of the arrangement will not exceed $250 million before May 22, 2021 and $500 million between such date and the Facility End Date (the “Financing Amount”), the Company has agreed to pay certain fees and expenses to the Financing Provider, including (i) a facility fee at an annual rate of LIBOR plus 1.77% multiplied by the cash amount paid by the Financing Provider (subject to adjustment for, among other things, cash amounts received by the Financing Provider) for such Portfolio Investment (the “Funded Amount”) while it is being held by the Financing Provider, (ii) an unused fee at an annual rate of 0.50% of the unused Financing Amount minus the greater of (A) the Minimum Utilization Amount and (B) the Funded Amount, and (iii) a minimum utilization fee at an annual rate of 1.77% of (the “Minimum Utilization Amount”) (A) prior to May 22, 2021, 50% of the Financing Amount at such time and (B) on or after May 22, 2021, and prior to the Facility End Date, 75% of the Financing Amount at such time. As a general matter, the price the Company would pay to purchase any Portfolio Investment from the Financing Provider equals the cash amount paid by the Financing Provider subject to adjustment for, among other things, principal repayments and interest amounts earned by the Financing Provider. Accordingly, shareholders will benefit from any interest paid or accrued on any Portfolio Investment purchased by the Company.

Effective January 7, 2022, the Company had a contractual obligation to acquire all assets under the Facility Agreement through forward purchase agreement on or before June 30, 2022. The mark-to-market gain/loss of all investments held by the Financing Provider, in addition to other economic rights and obligations held by the Company, are recognized in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. These gains (losses) are realized at the time the Company settles on the purchases of each underlying asset from the Financing Provider.

For the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company purchased debt investments from the Financing Provider with an aggregate principal amount of $436 million (excluding unfunded revolvers and delayed draw positions of $0.2 million), at a purchase price of $412 million, resulting in an unrealized gain of approximately $3 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2023, no additional transactions with the Financing Provider as it relates to the warehousing transactions had occurred.

Other Commitments and Contingencies

From time to time, the Company may become a party to certain legal proceedings incidental to the normal course of its business.

On March 14, 2023, certain First Lien and Second Lien holders of debt issued by Mitel filed a complaint in New York State Court captioned Ocean Trails CLO VII et al v. MLN TopCo Ltd., et al, Index No. 651327/2023, against certain other First Lien and Second Lien debt holders, including Apollo Debt Solutions BDC, alleging, among other things, that the defendant lenders breached the terms of their lending agreements and the New York Uniform Voidable Transfer Act in connection with certain amendments to the relevant documents governing the debt. Plaintiffs seek to have the amendments in question declared void. No reasonable estimate of possible loss, if any, can be made at this time.

Management is not aware of any pending or threatened material litigation as of September 30, 2023 other than the matter disclosed above.