XML 42 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.25.0.1
Commitments and Contingencies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2024
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
The following summarizes our minimum contractual commitments as of December 31, 2024:
(in millions)
Minimum royalty payments(1)
Unconditional purchase obligations (unrecognized)Long-term debt (including interest)Operating leasesTotal
2025$41 $593 $154 $563 $1,351 
202634 516 271 492 1,313 
202732 386 852 418 1,688 
202831 317 — 355 703 
202931 311 — 278 620 
Thereafter95 313 — 687 1,095 
Total undiscounted payments$264 $2,436 $1,277 $2,793 $6,770 
Less: lease imputed interest(601)
Total lease commitments$2,192 
(1)Contract terminated by mutual agreement in February 2025.
Unconditional purchase obligations include legally binding contracts with terms in excess of one year that are not reflected on the consolidated balance sheets. These contractual commitments primarily relate to the purchases of technology related services, fulfillment center construction contracts, and software licenses. For contracts with variable terms, we do not estimate the total obligation beyond any minimum pricing as of the reporting date.
New Guards Group
In February 2025, New Guards Group Holdings S.p.A. (“New Guards”) and certain of its subsidiaries (collectively “NGGH”), a subsidiary acquired in the Farfetch Acquisition, and Authentic Brands Group LLC (the “licensor”) entered into a settlement agreement and mutual release with the licensor (the “Mutual Termination Agreement”) related to a license agreement. The license agreement granted NGGH distribution rights for Reebok-branded footwear and apparel ranges within certain countries in the European region and provided for minimum guaranteed royalties to be paid by NGGH over the remaining eight years of the agreement, with no cancellation rights. Pursuant to the Mutual Termination Agreement, NGGH’s distribution rights and licensor’s right to receive guaranteed minimum royalty payments over the remaining term totaling $264 million was terminated, in exchange for the transfer of inventory and certain working capital balances to a new licensee. In addition, NGGH entered into a Transition Services Agreement (“TSA”) with the new licensee to provide support services through April 2025 and licensee agreed to reimburse the cost of such services.
Legal Matters
From time to time, we may become party to litigation incidents and other legal proceedings, including regulatory proceedings, in the ordinary course of business. We assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes with respect to these matters and determines loss contingency assessments on a gross basis after assessing the probability of incurrence of a loss and whether a loss is reasonably estimable. In addition, we consider other relevant factors that could impact our ability to reasonably estimate a loss. A determination of the amount of reserves required, if any, for these contingencies is made after analyzing each matter. Our reserves may change in the future due to new developments or changes in strategy in handling these matters. Although the results of litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, we currently believe that the final outcome of currently pending legal matters will not have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Regardless of the outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources, and other factors.
Litigation
On August 26, 2022, a putative class action was filed on behalf of all purchasers of Coupang Class A common stock pursuant and/or traceable to Coupang’s registration statement issued in connection with our initial public offering. Choi v. Coupang, Inc. et al was brought against Coupang, Inc., and certain of its former and current directors, current officers, and certain underwriters of the offering. The action was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging inaccurate and misleading or omitted statements of material fact in Coupang's Registration Statement in violation of Sections 11, 12, and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. The action was amended on May 22, 2023, and added allegations of securities fraud under Sections 10 and 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The action seeks unspecified compensatory damages, attorneys’ fees, and reasonable costs and expenses. Between August and December 2023, three separate stockholders’ derivative actions were filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and in December of 2024, a derivative action was filed in Delaware Chancery Court, in each case against certain of Coupang’s former and current directors and current officers. Coupang was named as a nominal defendant in the various derivative actions. Aside from the aforementioned actions, there have been additional Delaware Section 220 records inspection demands. These derivative actions and related demands purport to assert claims on behalf of Coupang and make substantially similar factual allegations to Choi v. Coupang, Inc. et al, bringing claims for, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, and violations of securities laws. The actions seek compensatory damages, governance reforms, and other relief. We intend to vigorously defend against the aforementioned actions. A reasonable estimate of the amount of any possible loss or range of loss cannot be made at this time. Accordingly, we can provide no assurances as to the scope and outcome of these matters and no assurances as to whether our business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows will not be materially adversely affected. In February of 2025, we received two demands on the Board of Directors alleging claims similar to those in the class and derivative actions and demanding civil actions by the Board against certain current and former directors and officers. Those have been provided to the Board of Directors to evaluate.
Korean Fair Trade Commission Investigations
In June 2021, the Korea Fair Trade Commission (the “KFTC”) initiated an investigation into a potential violation of the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act by two of our Korean subsidiaries, Coupang Corp. and Coupang Private Label Brands (“CPLB”), including certain alleged treatment of private labelled products provided by CPLB. In June 2024, the KFTC publicly announced that as a result of their investigation, they determined that Coupang Corp.’s search rankings disclosure violated Korean law; a regulatory finding subject to judicial review, and that they would impose an administrative fine on Coupang Corp., direct Coupang Corp. and CPLB to take certain related corrective actions, and refer the matter for criminal prosecution. Payments of administrative fines to the KFTC are not stayed during an appeal process and as a result, we accrued the administrative fine in the second quarter of 2024, resulting in a charge, included within “Operating, general and administrative”, of approximately $121 million. Coupang Corp. will pay the administrative fine in six installments over two years and made the first payment in October 2024 and will make the last payment in June 2026.
In August 2024, Coupang Corp. and CPLB received the KFTC’s formal written decision, and in September 2024, Coupang Corp. and CPLB appealed such decision. That appeal is pending, and the first hearing of the administrative litigation action was held in November 2024 and the second hearing will be held at the end of March 2025. Coupang Corp. and CPLB also filed a preliminary injunction with the Seoul High Court to stay the fine and corrective orders during the pendency of the appeal. In October 2024, the Seoul High Court granted Coupang Corp.’s and CPLB’s request for suspension of the KFTC’s corrective orders, but dismissed the request for a stay of the KFTC’s administrative fine. The KFTC subsequently appealed the Seoul High Court’s decision to grant a suspension of the corrective orders and in February 2025, the Supreme Court of Korea dismissed the KFTC’s appeal. Last November, in response to the KFTC’s criminal referral, the Seoul Eastern District Prosecutors’ Office initiated a criminal investigation into Coupang Corp. and CPLB.
The KFTC is also investigating Coupang Corp. on other matters related to the alleged violations of certain KFTC regulations. Coupang Corp. is diligently cooperating with these investigations, and actively defending its practices as appropriate.
Under Korean law, the issues addressed in the investigations can be resolved through civil, administrative, or criminal proceedings. The ultimate case resolution could include fines, orders to alter our processes or procedures, and criminal investigations or charges against individuals or us. We cannot reasonably estimate any penalties, loss or range of loss that may arise from these other KFTC Investigations, in excess of the amounts accrued. Accordingly, we can provide no assurance as to the scope and outcome of these matters and no assurance as to whether our business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows will not be materially adversely affected.