425 1 ea166098-425_kludeln1acq.htm FORM 425

 

Filed by KludeIn I Acquisition Corp. and Near Intelligence Holdings Inc.

Pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act of 1933

and deemed filed pursuant to Rule 14a-12

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

Subject Company: KludeIn I Acquisition Corp.

Commission File No.: 001-39843

 

Transcript to The Absolute Return Podcast – Published Audio

Spokesperson: Anil Mathews
Interview Date: 2022.08.02
Release Date: 2022.09.18
Transcript is computer generated and may contain errors

 

Welcome investors to The Absolute Return Podcast. Your source for stock market analysis, global macro musings and hedge fund investment strategies, your hosts, Julian Klymochko, and Michael Kesslering aim to bring you the knowledge and analysis you need to become a more intelligent and wealthier investor. This episode is brought to you by Accelerate Financial Technologies. Accelerate because performance matters. Find out more at accelerateshares.com.

 

Julian Klymochko: Welcoming Anil to the show from Near. Anil, how are you doing today?

 

Anil Mathews: Good. It's a pleasure having you. A pleasure speaking to you again.

 

Julian Klymochko: It's great to have you on the show, excited to get into all things Near, but prior to that, you've spent the past 22 years as a serial entrepreneur. So, to start. Basic question that many people discuss are entrepreneurs born or made in your opinion?

 

Anil Matthews: [Laugh], that's a very interesting question. I believe that they both born and made. I met many successful entrepreneurs who are born to do this and many successful entrepreneurs who have made as well. And I think a lot of it boils down to the choices you make. Kind of how you implement the learnings in your life to, you know, being an entrepreneur because you know, different businesses might need different types of skills and levels of persistence. But I think everything boils down to the ability to take risks and garner a great team around you. And I think you know, so the answer to your question would be, I've seen both you know, if you're not born to do this, you can basically be made to do this as well.

 

Julian Klymochko: Certainly, a hotly debated topic, but that makes a lot of sense. Now, prior to founding Near you had a number of other ventures over more than a decade, can you walk us through some of these startups that you launched prior to founding Near?

 

Anil Matthews: Yeah. I've been an entrepreneur for most of my life I would say. I started my first company in 99. And, and then, you know, this is my third company by now, but all of these companies were deeply rooted in tech. So that was a common theme. And you know, myself, I like to do products and I'm a tech guy, so everything that I created I use my strengths and of course the first one is the most difficult because you have a lot of things to learn. You need to figure out a lot of ways on how not to do things, but eventually I think by the time you're on your third strength, you know, a lot on what mistakes might be costly, what is probably the right approach. And that's why I think when I started Near in 2012, by then, you know, we had a template on how to do this and I think that's where the success speaks for itself.

 

Michael Kesslering: And specifically, what has kept you coming back to the enterprise software sector? What makes that sector or vertical special in your mind?

 

Anil Matthews: I think it's also like I mentioned, it was a lot of learnings I had personally was around this sector and for us, I think the value that we could create as a team was a bunch of specialists who were all from the similar industry but knew what challenges enterprises are facing. And we always believe that we have a better solution than what they're doing internally today to sort of address some of those challenges.

 

 

 

 

Julian Klymochko: Now, as an entrepreneur in the enterprise software sector, and you founded a number of startups focused in this space, what was your background? Just so our listeners know, like, were you a programmer? Were you a technical founder? Were you on the, you know, on the product?

 

Anil Matthews: Yeah, my first company. By education. I am an engineer, electrical engineer but my first company, you know, I was doing little bit of programming. So, I started, you know, coding myself but then slowly move into more sales-oriented function and eventually sort of managing things. So that was my progression, but I think understanding coding and technology helped me work with other technologies and sort of design things in a way that was more efficient and sort of, I could contribute to each and every product, even today, I contribute to all the products that we make so that really helped, yeah.

 

Julian Klymochko: That's interesting. Yeah, I'm also an electrical engineer by training, not by vocation, because always been focused on the business and finance side, but I digress. Focusing on Near, after you've had these other startups, you said you founded the company in 2012. Where did the idea come from and what were you trying to accomplish?

 

Anil Matthews: Yeah, I think this was when I was out of my second company, you know, I was trying to create a completely different offering. I thought I I'll take a stab at, you know, creating a consumer-focused app, but then I needed to build that app successfully. I needed a service that could be an API or could be, you know, sort of a platform that I could latch into, which would give me I would say people's, you know, trends around people's moment or football trends as you would say, but I couldn't find that at that time, this was 2012, late, you know, 2011. I couldn't find that. And so, we said, okay, if we create a concept around this which we could use for ourselves, but it could be more useful for others as well. And eventually I sort of let go of the original idea and realized that this could be a lot more powerful because a lot of other you know, brands and enterprises might find this useful. So, we completely changed and pivot to sort of creating this platform instead of the app itself. That's how the whole thing originated.

 

Julian Klymochko: And if we rewind 10 years ago, 2012, you talk about consumer apps and mobile device data. That whole era was really coming, just a fruition then with the iPhone and the app store was really in its first few years there. So that makes a lot of sense. Digging into Near business model, you have data and data intelligence solutions. I was wondering how do these help businesses. Like what would your typical customer do with it?

 

Anil Matthews: Yeah, I think just to explain that a little better, if I take a step back. So, what we do is today we have you know, in simple terms, people's behavior around places. So, it's a massive data universe that we own and operate, which allows us in a privacy compliant way to look at this you know, people's moment across places and which we then use to understand what could be their behavior, not just in the physical world, but in the digital world as well. And all this is stitched and connected wire unified ID. So, we have around 1.6 billion active user IDs at any given month. And which means it's those many unique IDs that we have in our system and each ID would have. It won't have any personally identifiable information. So, we won't know who this person is, but it'll have signals.

 

Again, a lot of the signals are consent based signals from the digital world in terms of what apps this user could be using, what websites they might be visiting, what devices they carry and so on, but also physical world attributes in terms of what is a brand preference in the real world, how far do they go to get groceries or gas sort of, you know, where do they typically, which area do they live in and where do they go for work and all these aspects. So, this allows us to provide this information, this intelligence, as we call it to brands and enterprises, who needs to understand the consumer journey, because especially what has happened is, during the pandemic and post pandemic, consumer journey has completely changed. And a lot of this understanding that brands had about this consumer journey and sort of their behavior is completely, you know, I would say gone to a [Inaudible 00:8:36] and now they need to relook at, okay, so how do I engage with my consumers or my customers? And we help them with that. So, we take our platform, the license of platform, and then look at, okay, I know few things about my customer or my consumer, depending on the industry, but I need to know a little bit more now, what do they do when they walk out my door? Where do they go? How many times they go to competitor, where do they come from? How time spend there? And all these questions, they want answer which we provide to them.

 

Julian Klymochko: Now, in terms of providing your clients with these data sets that these vast data sets that you're assembling, how are they useful to those clients? Like what specific data? I don't know if you can provide insights into specific use cases.

 

2

 

 

Anil Matthews: Let, me take an example. So maybe, you know, probably help you answer your question. One of our customer is one of the largest media companies out there. Now they have, you know, they typically work with large websites and apps, which is very informational or entertaining in nature. So, before we came into picture, they have this large website where you would go to read news about, you know fashion or news about celebrities and things like that, or information and article about this. But the challenge they faced is that you're not logging into read these things. So, they don't know who you are and when you move from their website (A) to their website (B) they never had an idea that you're the same user because these both are disconnected. Which means, and their key revenue model was to basically monetize this data itself.

 

So, they would create profiles of users based on their digital world interactions of what you're reading, what you're liking, what you're watching. And they would create profiles of users, which they would then monetize by advertisements. The challenge with this was that because this is so disconnected, they had limited ability to sort of wrangle with this data. Also, they're not depreciating themselves in the market. [Inaudible 00:10:58] came into picture. The first thing we did is. We used our patent to technology to connect this siloed properties together and connect all of them to the single unique key that I just discussed about earlier. So now that's connected to single unique key. When you hop from website (A) to (B) to, you know, C, T, E, F, they would know that you're the same user. And most importantly, we would now be able to tell them these users, not only digital world behavior, but physical world, like I was telling.

 

So, all of a sudden, as an example, before us, they were creating buckets of people's behavior. Let's say, it's say it's called auto enthusiast. Based on you read something about a car in one of their magazines, online magazine, or you like to watch the video and this bucket is what they would sell to auto companies. But since we came into picture now because we can tell, Near can tell them how many of their users were seen in an actual auto dealership. They can take that data to the same auto company and tell them. Now we have a higher intent to purchase these users who are seen in the real dealership, have a higher intent to purchase because of that. You need to pay us more and they were paying them 30% more. So typically, in effect, what happened is durable to actually increase your data ease using our technology and our property without the need of actually increasing the user base itself. And that is a big impact. As an example, I can tell you of using a technology

 

Julian Klymochko: That makes a lot of sense in terms of the value proposition to your customers now, in terms of your data intelligence solutions, could you tell us a bit about the market, total addressable market in terms of size and also.

 

Anil Matthews: Yeah.

 

Julian Klymochko: What is out there in terms of competition?

 

Anil Matthews: Yeah, just to address to your sort of question, if you draw a quadrant and on one axis, if you look at companies that are local to global.

 

Julian Klymochko: Mm-hmm.

 

Anil Matthews: And other access, you look at companies that are point solutions to, let's say, aggregators to full stack solution. Near would sit on the top because we don't have a competition that is truly global in nature, providing full stack offering that we provide because and by full side, what I mean is, basically what we are allowing is. We are looking at enterprises who's big or small sitting on first party data, but they're not able to derive any meaningful value out of this. And there are three key reasons for that based on all our expertise and experience. And the first reason is, that most of these enterprises, the data is in silos.

 

Like I explained about this example, but even if you're a retailer, you know, your data is in, you know, there's some data which is an app, there's some CRM data, there's some POS data. So, data is all over different formats store differently and things like that. So that's first challenge. The second challenge is that most of this data is a poor quality, is half paid. There's missing information, missing addresses, you know, missing understanding of the consumers and the third, which we all think is a trivial issue, but it isn't. Is, most of these enterprises also don't have the right data skills because they're not data companies themselves. And so, when we come into picture, Near. We are trying to address these challenges that enterprise are facing on how do we maximize value out of this data? So, we are able to provide a full stack solution, which allows them to stitch this silo data and enrich it with deeper understanding from both the physical and the digital world. Derive intelligence in terms of deeper insights and analytics and help them act and measure this data's efficacy all in a single hosted platform.

 

So that full stack. Now coming to your question about competition, that full stack offering at a global scale doesn't exist. What we come across is either point solutions. Some of them being one of the piece that I just mentioned or companies, which is very local in nature, just doing it in, you know, let's say Australia, but not in Singapore, but doing in Singapore, but not in UK. One of the reason companies or customers like working with us is because we are very global in nature that allows them, them being global, to work with us across different regions and have a single vendor. So, they like that aspect as well. So that's where we stand. The total tam for what we offer is around 23 billion, which is because of the nature of you know, where we are today in terms of competition, we believe it's highly hard penetrated and are store.

 

3

 

 

Julian Klymochko: Now, in terms of the application of your technology, would you say that in the primary use would be lead generation for your customers to get for their sales process?

 

Anil Matthews: So, there are two products, one of which I touched upon and the other one. So basically, because if you remember, what I had just mentioned earlier i our call is that we are trying to look at people's behavior around places.

 

Julian Klymochko: Yeah.

 

Julian Klymochko: Which means from a platform perspective, the platform is a very generic platform, which does this at a large-scale day in day out. You can drive different kinds of, you know, uses and create different products out of it. So, we created two core products, one, which is looking at things from a lens of people. And the other one, which is looking at things from a lens of places. One of our product, which is especially designed for insights around places is used by some of the largest restaurants in the world, restaurant chains in the world, real estate companies, retailers in the world to look at where to open the next store, because we want to understand where is the catchment area of our customers, how are competition sparing?

 

If I open a store here, how will the people be? Where will they come from? Where will they go after? So, this is all this data able to decide using our data from a place perspective. So, supply chain optimization, route planning, site selection. These are the use cases of this product, which is designed based on you know, places. I would take a different cut of the same data and look at things from a people's perspective. That is what I just described to you in the earlier use case about how we are able to sort of provide you know, sort of insights on people's moment around the physical world and enhance this data yield for our customer. So, you could look at both ways. So that's why we simplify it and call ourselves a data intelligence platform, because what we are typically doing is we are looking at how do we assimilate all this data together, drive intelligence, and provide this in a platform on a fast basis to our customers.

 

Michael Kesslering: Thanks for that. It’s quite clear the value proposition for your customers that use the platform. What would you say is the benefit for end consumers with your product?

 

Anil Matthews: So, typically, I mean, what they're doing is, we are not directly, you know, sort of connected to the consumers because all our data sources are coming from partners, which could be telcos in some countries, which are Wi-Fi providers in some other regions, but majorly app data, but that's through partners, not directly, you know, by owning any app or any sort of STK setup. This means that all this data is first consensual. So the consensus is obtained by our partners on our behalf, but also that value that they get that they're receiving on the other side is if it's an app ecosystem, the app itself, right? Where the app is able to provide their services free, because they're able to monetize the data and not rely heavily on ads or any other mechanism or subscription mechanism, which they need to use to sort of generate revenues and similarly for other you know, ecosystems that I just described.

 

Julian Klymochko: So as the business has grown over the past decade, you're now reaching a major milestone, which is going public. And this going public transaction includes a 95 million pipe financing, certainly in a pretty tough market for, you know, startups, hyper growth companies going public. I was wondering why did you choose to go public? And what is the use of proceeds with the capital raise that you're doing with this transaction?

 

Anil Matthews: Sure. So, one is, you know, we look at going public as a financing event, not as an exit event. And we have raised around 134 million to date from some marque investors like Sequoia Capital, and JP Morgan’s of the world. We are looking at our next phase, you know, our last decade has been more about building the foundation, sort of creating this gold mine of a platform. And then we are just scratched the surface with these two products that I mentioned, but I think it has, you know, humongous potential on what it could do and going public gives us the credibility. So, it's primarily for the credibility that would help us open larger opportunities, even in countries that we could take that credibility to beyond North America. And so, that I would say the first sort of big advantage when looking at us as a public company, but also the currency, which will be our financing event, like I said, this is what we are excited about as a company where, you know, sort of, we would be able to get access to some of the largest retailers or banks across the globe as a result of being a public company.

 

And it's a huge milestone, a massive event for a company to become publicly listed. Now, looking at the equity market in the U.S., obviously software and technology stocks have proliferated. They now account for roughly 37% of the S&P 500. So certainly, as an investor evaluates the SaaS landscape, there are a myriad of stocks that they could take a look at, in your opinion, what are some of the reasons why an investor should look at Near?

 

4

 

 

Anil Matthews: Yeah, I think that's a very good question. First, I would say very, very, fairly valued at the based on the current market trends. And so, it is an opportunity that is, you know, going to grow very aggressively from here because of the new ammunitions that we have in hand. And the way we look at new ammunition is obviously the public credibility, but also some key new offerings that we are launching from our platform. We are also sort of acquired two companies in the past. So, one of the user funds is to see how we can strengthen our inorganic path as well, especially in regions that we need to strengthen our presence or sort of, you know, the slices of data ready to strengthen our mode. So, I think a combination of this, we are a real company with real revenues, you know, running this for almost a decade now. Unlike other, I would say a lot of other offerings that you would see which many times is based on future growth. We are already you know, sort of at a certain milestone. And from here, you know, we see, I would say significant growth in the next three to five years. And I think that is a journey. A lot of our investors want to hop onto. And I would say that's probably the most attractive piece of looking at Near as a public company as well.

 

Julian Klymochko: And with this entrepreneurial journey that you've been on. Third startup on the precipice of taking it public, as you reflect on that, what do you think is the number one most important attribute for an entrepreneur to have? And what are some of the key factors that have made you successful in your career?

 

Anil Matthews: Yeah, you know, from a trade perspective, I would say attention to detail is probably the most important trait I would see as part of a successful entrepreneur, but also the ability to attract smart brains around use, you know, because I think I wouldn't have been here if it wasn't for really a lot of smart people around each function, whether it is finance or tech or product, or, you know, or ops. And I think I'm really, I would say, you know, blessed from that point of view where I could garner this smart people around me, you know, building something so amazing. So, I think the two traits would be attention to detail and ability to attract smart people.

 

Julian Klymochko: That's really great to hear. Now Anil, one last question before letting you go, what time of the day do you wake up and when do you think you're most productive?

 

Anil Matthews: That's a very tricky question because we have offices across the globe. So, you know, we have an office in Australia, in Sydney which starts first, and we have office in Los Angeles and the other side, right. So, it depends on some days of the week, but I do wake up pretty early to kickoff the day from the Eastern part of the world and a bit late to sort of end the day at the Western part of the world. So, it's not ideal, but that's become a habit kind of thing now.

 

Julian Klymochko: Yeah, sounds like you're not allowed to get any sleep covering.

 

Anil Matthews: [Laugh].

 

Julian Klymochko: All parts of the world, but hopefully you're well rested these days and wish you the best of luck.

 

Anil Matthews: Thank you.

 

Julian Klymochko: With the going public transaction of Near. We'll be following the situation. It's an exciting story. And thank you for coming on the show.

 

Anil Matthews: Thank you. It was a pleasure. Thank you for having me. Thank you so much.

 

Julian Klymochko: All right. Thanks. Bye everybody.

 

Anil Matthews: Thank you. Thank you. Bye.

 

5

 

 

Thanks for tuning in to the Absolute Return Podcast. This episode was brought to you by Accelerate Financial Technologies. Accelerate, because performance matters. Find out more at www.AccelerateShares.com. The views expressed in this podcast to the personal views of the participants and do not reflect the views of Accelerate. No aspect of this podcast constitutes investment legal or tax advice. Opinions expressed in this podcast should not be viewed as a recommendation or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities or investment strategies. The information and opinions in this podcast are based on current market conditions and may fluctuate and change in the future. No representation or warranty expressed or implied is made on behalf of Accelerate as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this podcast. Accelerate does not accept any liability for any direct indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result relying on all or any part of this podcast and any liability is expressly disclaimed.

 

The following are social media posts first made available on September 20, 2022.

 

LinkedIn:

 

 

 

6

 

 

Twitter:

 

 

 Additional Information and Where to Find It

 

As previously disclosed, on May 18, 2022, KludeIn I Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation (“KludeIn”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (as may be amended or supplemented from time to time, the “Merger Agreement”) with Near Intelligence Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Near”), Paas Merger Sub 1 Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of KludeIn (“Merger Sub 1”), and Paas Merger Sub 2 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of KludeIn (“Merger Sub 2” and, together with Merger Sub 1, the “Merger Subs”) (the “Business Combination”).

 

In connection with the Merger Agreement and the proposed Business Combination, KludeIn filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) the Registration Statement on Form S-4 on July 1, 2022 (as may be amended, the “Registration Statement”), which will include a prospectus with respect to KludeIn’s securities to be issued in connection with the Business Combination, and a proxy statement of KludeIn (the “Proxy Statement”), to be used at the meeting of KludeIn’s stockholders to approve the proposed mergers and related matters. INVESTORS AND SECURITY HOLDERS OF KLUDEIN ARE URGED TO READ THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT, AND OTHER RELEVANT DOCUMENTS THAT WILL BE FILED WITH THE SEC CAREFULLY AND IN THEIR ENTIRETY WHEN THEY BECOME AVAILABLE BECAUSE THEY WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT NEAR, KLUDEIN AND THE BUSINESS COMBINATION. When available, the Proxy Statement contained in the Registration Statement and other relevant materials for the Business Combination will be mailed to stockholders of KludeIn as of a record date to be established for voting on the proposed business combination. Investors and security holders will also be able to obtain copies of the Registration Statement, including the Proxy Statement contained therein, and other documents containing important information about each of the companies once such documents are filed with the SEC, without charge, at the SEC’s web site at www.sec.gov. 

 

7

 

 

Forward-Looking Statements

 

This press release contains, “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. KludeIn’s and Near’s actual results may differ from their expectations, estimates and projections and consequently, you should not rely on these forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “budget,” “continues,” “could,” “expect,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “future,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “strategy,” “opportunity,” “plan,” “possible,” “potential,” “project,” “will,” “should,” “predicts,” “scales,” “representative of,” “valuation,” and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, KludeIn’s and Near’s expectations with respect to future performance of Near, anticipated financial impacts of the Business Combination (including future revenue, pro forma enterprise value and cash balance), the anticipated addressable market for Near and the satisfaction of the closing conditions to the Business Combination. These forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from expected results. Most of these factors are outside the control of KludeIn and are difficult to predict. Factors that may cause such differences include, but are not limited to: (1) the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstances that could give rise to the termination of the Merger Agreement; (2) the inability of KludeIn to obtain transaction financing between the date of the Merger Agreement and the Closing, or a default by one or more of investors on its commitment in connection with any financing, and KludeIn’s failure to find replacement financing; (3) the inability to consummate the Business Combination in a timely manner or at all, including due to failure to obtain approval of the stockholders of KludeIn or other conditions to the Closing in the Merger Agreement, which may adversely affect the price of KludeIn’s securities; (4) delays in obtaining or the inability to obtain any necessary regulatory approvals required to complete the Business Combination; (5) the risk that the Business Combination may not be completed by KludeIn’s business combination deadline and the potential failure to obtain an extension of the business combination deadline if sought by KludeIn; (6) the ability to maintain the listing of KludeIn’s securities on a national securities exchange; (7) the inability to obtain or maintain the listing of KludeIn’s securities on Nasdaq following the Business Combination; (8) the risk that the Business Combination disrupts current plans and operations as a result of the announcement and consummation of the Business Combination; (9) the ability to recognize the anticipated benefits of the Business Combination and to achieve its commercialization and development plans, and identify and realize additional opportunities, which may be affected by, among other things, competition, the ability of Near to grow and manage growth economically and hire and retain key employees; (10) costs related to the Business Combination; (11) changes in applicable laws or regulations, and Near’s ability to comply with such laws and regulations; (12) the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on KludeIn or Near and their ability to consummate the Business Combination; (13) the outcome of any legal proceedings that may be instituted against Near or against KludeIn related to the Merger Agreement or the Business Combination; (14) the enforceability of Near’s intellectual property, including its patents and the potential infringement on the intellectual property rights of others; (15) the risk of downturns in the highly competitive industry in which Near operates; (16) the possibility that KludeIn or Near may be adversely affected by other economic, business, and/or competitive factors; and (17) other risks and uncertainties to be identified in the Registration Statement (when available) relating to the Business Combination, including those under “Risk Factors” therein, and in other filings with the SEC made by KludeIn. KludeIn and Near caution that the foregoing list of factors is not exclusive, and caution readers not to place undue reliance upon any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. Readers are referred to the most recent reports filed with the SEC by KludeIn. None of KludeIn or Near undertakes or accepts any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect any change in its expectations or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based, subject to applicable law.

 

Participants in the Solicitation

 

KludeIn, KludeIn Prime LLC and Near and their respective directors and officers and other members of management and employees may be deemed participants in the solicitation of proxies in connection with the proposed Business Combination. KludeIn stockholders and other interested persons may obtain, without charge, more detailed information regarding directors and officers of KludeIn, the Registration Statement and other relevant materials filed with the SEC in connection with the proposed Business Combination when they become available. These documents can be obtained free of charge from the sources indicated above.

 

No Offer or Solicitation

 

This communication shall not constitute a solicitation of a proxy, consent or authorization with respect to any securities or in respect of the proposed business combination. This communication shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities pursuant to the proposed transactions or otherwise, nor shall there be any sale of securities in any jurisdiction in which the offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to the registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such jurisdiction. No offering of securities shall be made except by means of a prospectus meeting the requirements of Section 10 of the Securities Act, or a valid exemption from registration thereunder. 

 

 

8