Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2022

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation and Impact of Business Combination

We accounted for the September 1, 2021 Business Combination as a reverse recapitalization whereby Old Offerpad was determined as the accounting acquirer and Supernova as the accounting acquiree. This determination was primarily based on:

•former Offerpad stockholders having the largest voting interest in Offerpad Solutions;

•the board of directors of Offerpad Solutions having 7 members, and Offerpad’s former stockholders having the ability to nominate the majority of the members of the board of directors;

•Offerpad management continuing to hold executive management roles for the post-combination company and being responsible for the day-to-day operations;

•the post-combination company assuming the Offerpad name;

•Offerpad Solutions maintaining the pre-existing Offerpad headquarters; and

•the intended strategy of Offerpad Solutions being a continuation of Offerpad’s strategy.

Accordingly, the Business Combination was treated as the equivalent of Old Offerpad issuing stock for the net assets of Supernova, accompanied by a recapitalization. The net assets of Supernova are stated at historical cost, with no goodwill or other intangible assets recorded.

While Supernova was the legal acquirer in the Business Combination, because Old Offerpad was determined as the accounting acquirer, the historical financial statements of Old Offerpad became the historical financial statements of the combined company, upon the consummation of the Business Combination. As a result, the financial statements included in the accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements reflect (i) the historical operating results of Old Offerpad prior to the Business Combination; (ii) the combined results of the Company and Old Offerpad following the closing of the Business Combination; (iii) the assets and liabilities of Old Offerpad at their historical cost; and (iv) the Company’s equity structure for all periods presented.

In connection with the Business Combination transaction, we have converted the equity structure for the periods prior to the Business Combination to reflect the number of shares of the Company’s common stock issued to Old Offerpad’s stockholders in connection with the recapitalization transaction. As such, the shares, corresponding capital amounts and earnings per share, as applicable, related to Old Offerpad convertible preferred stock and common stock prior to the Business Combination have been retroactively converted by applying the exchange ratio established in the Business Combination.

Basis of Presentation and Interim Financial Information

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and note disclosures required for annual financial statements have been condensed or excluded pursuant to GAAP and SEC rules and regulations. Accordingly, the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and note disclosures

required by GAAP for complete financial statements. Therefore, this information should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021 included in the Company’s 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on March 7, 2022.

The accompanying financial information reflects all adjustments which are, in the opinion of the Company’s management, of a normal recurring nature and necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods. Any reference in these notes to applicable guidance is meant to refer to the authoritative GAAP as found in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”).

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements. Significant estimates include those related to the net realizable value of inventory and warrant liabilities, among others. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Principles of Consolidation

The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements include the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of the Company, its wholly owned operating subsidiaries and variable interest entities where the Company is the primary beneficiary. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Inventory

Inventory consists of acquired homes and are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, with cost determined by the specific identification of each home. Costs include initial purchase costs and renovation costs, as well as holding costs and interest incurred during the renovation period, prior to the listing date. Selling costs, including commissions and holding costs incurred after listing date, are expensed as incurred and included in sales, marketing and operating expenses.

The Company reviews inventory for impairment on a quarterly basis, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of inventory may not be recoverable. The Company evaluates inventory for indicators that net realizable value is lower than cost at the individual home level. The Company generally considers multiple factors in determining net realizable value for each home, including the residential real estate market conditions in both the local market in which the home is located and in the U.S. in general, recent comparable home sale transactions in the specific area where the home is located, the impact of national, regional or local economic conditions and expected selling costs. When evidence exists that the net realizable value of inventory is lower than its cost, the difference is recognized as impairment in cost of revenue and the related inventory is adjusted to its net realizable value.

For homes under contract to sell, if the carrying value exceeds the contract price less expected selling costs, the carrying value of these homes are adjusted to the contract price less expected selling costs. For all other homes, if the carrying value exceeds the expected sale price less expected selling costs, the carrying value of these homes are adjusted to the expected sale price less expected selling costs. Changes in the Company’s pricing assumptions may lead to a change in the outcome of the Company’s impairment analysis, and actual results may also differ from the Company’s assumptions.

The Company recorded inventory impairments of $21.2 million and $0.2 million during the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and $22.2 million and $0.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation awards consist of stock options, restricted stock units and performance-based restricted stock units. The Company measures and recognizes compensation expense for all stock-based compensation awards based on their estimated fair values on the grant date. The Company records compensation expense for all stock-based compensation awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the awards, which is generally the vesting period of the award. These amounts are reduced by forfeitures in the period the forfeitures occur.

Stock Options

The Company uses the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model to determine the fair value of stock option awards as of the grant date. The Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model requires the Company to estimate the following key assumptions based on both historical information and management judgment regarding market factors and trends:

•Expected term – The Company uses the simplified method when calculating the expected term due to insufficient historical exercise data. The expected term is estimated using the mid-point between the vesting period and the contractual term of the options.

•Risk-free interest rate – The Company estimates the risk-free interest rate using the rate of return on U.S. treasury notes interpolated between the years equal to the expected term assumption.

•Expected stock price volatility – As the Company’s shares were not publicly traded prior to the Business Combination, and have a limited trading history subsequent to the Business Combination, the Company estimates expected volatility for stock option awards based on the average historical volatility of similar publicly traded companies.

•Expected dividend yield – The expected dividend yield assumption considers that the Company has not historically paid dividends and does not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.

•Stock price – The Company has issued stock options with exercise prices equal to the fair value of the underlying stock price. Prior to the completion of the Business Combination and listing of the Company’s common stock on the public stock exchange, the fair value of Old Offerpad common stock that underlies the stock options was determined based on then-current valuation estimates at the time of grant. Because such grants occurred prior to the public trading of the Company’s common stock, the fair value of Old Offerpad common stock was typically determined with assistance of periodic valuation analyses from an independent third-party valuation firm. Subsequent to the Business Combination, the fair value of the Company’s common stock is based on the closing price of the Company’s Class A common stock on the grant date.

Restricted Stock Units

The Company determines the fair value of restricted stock units based on the closing price of the Company’s Class A common stock on the grant date.

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units

The Company determines the fair value of performance-based restricted stock units using a Monte Carlo simulation model that determines the probability of satisfying the market condition stipulated in the award. The Monte Carlo simulation model incorporates various key assumptions, including expected stock price volatility, contractual term, risk-free interest rate, dividend yield and stock price on the grant date. The Company estimates expected stock price volatility based on the average historical volatility of similar publicly traded companies. The Company estimates the risk-free interest rate using the rate of return on U.S. treasury notes equal to the contractual term of the award. The expected dividend yield assumption considers that the Company has not historically paid dividends and does not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.

The Company determines the requisite service period for performance-based restricted stock units by comparing the derived service period to achieve the market-based condition and the explicit service-based period, using the longer of the two service periods as the requisite service period.

New Accounting Pronouncements Recently Issued Not Yet Adopted

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848) (“ASU 2020-04”), which provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships and other transactions that reference the London Inter Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. This guidance is optional for a limited period of time to ease the potential burden in accounting for, or recognizing the effects of, reference rate reform on financial reporting. This guidance is effective from March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. Entities may elect to adopt the amendments for contract modifications as of any date from the beginning of an interim period that includes or is subsequent to March 12, 2020, or prospectively from a date within an interim period that includes or is subsequent to March 12, 2020, up to the date that the financial statements are available to be issued. The Company may elect to take advantage of this optional guidance in its transition away from LIBOR within certain debt contracts. While the goal of the reference rate reform transition is for it to be economically neutral to entities, the Company is currently evaluating the effect that the new guidance will have on its condensed consolidated financial statements and disclosures.