UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
| ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |||||
For the fiscal year ended December 31 , 2024
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to | |||||
Commission File Number 001-39516
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | ||||
| (Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) | ||||
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (844 ) 334-5330
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered | ||||||||||||
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES ☐ NO ☒
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. YES ☐ NO ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES ☒ NO ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit such files). YES ☒ NO ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Large accelerated filer | ☐ | Accelerated filer | ☐ | |||||||||||||||||
| ☒ | Smaller reporting company | |||||||||||||||||||
| Emerging growth company | ||||||||||||||||||||
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the Registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES ☐ NO ☒
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $25.0 million based on the closing market price as of the close of business on June 30, 2024, the last business day of the Registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter.
The number of shares of Registrant’s Class A common stock outstanding as of March 7, 2025 was 16,566,429 .
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Table of Contents
| Page | ||||||||
Item 1. | ||||||||
| Item 1C. | ||||||||
[Reserved] | ||||||||
i
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Report”) contains certain statements that are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "Reform Act"). All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this Report, including, without limitation, statements concerning possible or assumed future actions, business strategies, including with respect to reimbursements for BabySat events or results of operations, our ability to continue as a going concern, expectations for the growth of our business and products, expected benefits of our new subscription service offering, our ability to receive regulatory approvals, and any statements that refer to projections, forecasts or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.
In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “could,” “intend,” “target,” “project,” “contemplate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other similar expressions. The forward-looking statements in this Report are only predictions. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Report and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions described under the sections in this Report entitled "Risk Factors" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and elsewhere in this Report.
These risks and other important factors, including those discussed in this Report, may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Moreover, we operate in an evolving environment. Given these risks and uncertainties, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included elsewhere in this Report are not guarantees of future performance and our actual results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, and the development of the industry in which we operate, may differ materially from the forward-looking statements included elsewhere in this Report. In addition, even if our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, and events in the industry in which we operate, are consistent with the forward-looking statements included elsewhere in this Report, they may not be predictive of results or developments in future periods.
Any forward-looking statement that we make in this Report speaks only as of the date of such statement. Except as required by law, we do not undertake any obligation to update or revise, or to publicly announce any update or revision to, any of the forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, after the date of this Report. For all of our forward-looking statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Reform Act.
As used in this Report, unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise requires: “we,” “us,” “our,” “Owlet,” the “Company,” and similar references refer to Owlet, Inc. and its subsidiaries, and “common stock” refers to our Class A Common Stock.
Market and Industry Data And Forecasts
In this Report, we present certain market and industry data and statistics. This information is based on third-party sources, which we believe to be reliable. We have not independently verified data from these sources and cannot guarantee their accuracy or completeness. In addition, this Report contain estimates about our business and our market opportunity. Our estimates involve risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based upon various factors, including those discussed in this Report under “Forward-Looking Statements” and Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” Additionally, some data in this Report is based on our good faith estimates, which are derived from management’s knowledge of the industry and independent sources. Similarly, we believe our internal research is reliable, however, such research has not been verified by any independent sources.
Trademarks
This Report contains trademarks, trade names and service marks that are the property of the Company, as well as, for informational purposes, trademarks, trade names, and service marks that are the property of other organizations. Solely for convenience, certain trademarks, trade names, and service marks referred to in this report appear without the ®, ™ and SM symbols, but those references are not intended to indicate that we or the applicable owner, as the
1
case may be, will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our or their rights to such trademarks, trade names, and service marks.
2
Summary of Risk Factors
Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that represent challenges that we face in connection with the successful implementation of our strategy and the growth of our business. In particular, the following are the principal risks which could cause a decline in the price of shares of our common stock:
•We have a limited operating history.
•We have not been profitable to date, and operating losses could continue, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, including our ability to continue as a going concern.
•We have experienced fluctuations in the growth of our business and anticipate this will continue. If we fail to manage our growth effectively, our business could be materially and adversely affected.
•If any governmental authority or notified body were to require marketing authorization or similar certification for any product that we sell for which we have not obtained such marketing authorization or certification, we could be subject to regulatory enforcement actions and/or be required to cease selling or recall the product pending receipt of marketing authorization or similar certification from such other governmental authority or notified body, which can be a lengthy and time-consuming process, harm financial results and have long-term negative effects on our operations.
•Our products rely on mobile applications to function and we rely on Apple’s App Store and the Google Play Store for distribution of our mobile applications.
•A substantial portion of our sales comes through a limited number of retailers.
•We are required to obtain and maintain marketing authorizations or certifications from the FDA, foreign regulatory authorities or notified bodies for medical device products in the U.S. or in foreign jurisdictions, which can be a lengthy and time-consuming process, and a failure to do so on a timely basis, or at all, could severely harm our business.
•We currently rely on a single manufacturer for the assembly of our Dream Sock, Smart Sock and BabySat products and a single manufacturer for the assembly of our Owlet Cam. We will likely rely on single manufacturers for future products we may develop. If we encounter manufacturing problems or delays or increased costs, we may be unable to promptly transition to alternative manufacturers and our ability to generate revenue may be limited.
•Our success depends in part on our proprietary technology, and if we are unable to obtain, maintain or successfully enforce our intellectual property rights, the commercial value of our products and services will be adversely affected, our competitive position may be harmed and we may be unable to operate our business profitably.
•Our business and operations may suffer in the event of IT system failures, cyberattacks or deficiencies in our cybersecurity.
•We are involved, and may become involved in the future, in disputes and other legal or regulatory proceedings that, if adversely decided or settled, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
•We face the risk of product liability claims and the amount of insurance coverage we hold now or in the future may not be adequate to cover all liabilities we might incur.
•Operations in international markets expose us to additional business, political, regulatory, operational, financial and economic risks.
•Our success depends substantially on our reputation and brand.
•Some of our products and services are in development or have been recently introduced into the market and may not achieve market acceptance, which could limit our growth and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
•We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and we may identify additional material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fail to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, which may result in material misstatements of our consolidated financial statements, cause us to fail to meet our periodic reporting obligations or cause our access to the capital markets to be impaired.
•We will likely need to raise additional capital in the future in order to execute our strategic plan, which may not be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all.
3
PART I
Item 1. Business
We are Owlet
Globally, over 140 million new lives are brought into the world every year. Yet, the infancy period remains fraught with complexities. In the United States alone, a family will lose over 44 nights of sleep in the first year, and families of young children will see, annually, nearly 13 million sick visits and 3.4 million emergency room visits, and tragically, more than 3,700 infants are lost unexpectedly in their homes every year. We believe the majority of these challenges unfold within the security of the home.
The persistence of unexpected infant fatalities remains unchanged for over a quarter-century, compounded by a recent increase in Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) and pneumonia among children. The staggering number of healthcare visits underscores what we believe is a dire need for change, starting with the home.
Our belief is steadfast. We believe that parenting should come with empowerment, the kind that's informed, data-driven, and supported every step of the way. Owlet stands as a beacon for this empowerment, aimed to equip families with the tools intended for their little ones' safety, health, and joy.
Our vision is ambitious yet clear. We want to forge a world where every infant, regardless of socioeconomic background, benefits from health monitoring technologies akin to Owlet's. Our mission is to arm parents with crucial information when they need it most, aiming to safeguard children's health, optimize their well-being, and help facilitate peaceful sleep. We're committed to improving overall health outcomes.
Our values underscore our mission. We advocate for parental leadership in healthcare, backed by technological advancements. We prioritize our collective mission above individual egos, innovate to address genuine needs, and foster a culture of teamwork and mutual support. Our products are intended to empower parents with the right information at the right time.
We believe our ecosystem of digital parenting solutions can help transform modern parenting. We are providing parents data-driven insights into their children’s well-being in the comfort of their own home. Our digital parenting platform aims to give parents real-time data and insights to help parents feel calmer and more confident and well rested. We also believe that every child deserves to live a long, happy, and healthy life, and we are working to develop products to help further that belief.
Products and Services
Our devices are intended to empower parents with the right information at the right time. Owlet’s Dream Sock received a de novo device classification from United States Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") to market as a medical device a first-of-its kind, over-the-counter device for the in-home environment that provides a notification to the caregiver when an infant’s pulse rate and/or oxygen saturation moves outside of preset ranges (“Health Notifications”), displays the infant’s live pulse rate and oxygen saturation values and trends (“Live Health Readings”), and is intended for use in infants who are 1 to 18 months of age and between 6 and 30 pounds and have not been previously diagnosed with a cardiovascular or respiratory disease or condition. The notifications and associated data are intended to be used to supplement the decision by caregivers to seek additional guidance for medical care of the infant, but not to replace traditional methods of monitoring, diagnosis or treatment.
•Sock Monitor Offerings
•Dream Sock – An award-winning, wearable, smart infant health monitor equipped with pulse oximetry technology that tracks vital signs such as pulse rate, oxygen level, activity, and sleep patterns. Dream Sock aims to provide more peace of mind for parents by providing real-time notifications to caregivers when a baby’s pulse rate and/or oxygen saturation fall outside preset ranges, all while offering tailored sleep insights in the Owlet Dream App. Dream Sock with Live Health Readings and Health Notifications has an FDA marketing authorization in the U.S., and is CE marked, as defined below, under EU Medical Devices Regulation in the European Union and UKCA marked in the United Kingdom. A version of Dream Sock without Live Health Readings and Health Notifications is offered in Canada and tracks Sleep Quality Indicators, including heart rate, 10-minute historic average oxygen level, and more.
4
•BabySat – Designed for infants that could benefit from additional monitoring at home under the supervision of a physician, BabySat provides caregivers a prescription version of our wearable infant monitor that offers customizable alarm limits via the Owlet Care+ App. This device is best suited for babies with conditions such as RSV, pneumonia, bronchitis, croup, or other diagnoses. With BabySat, supported by insurance reimbursement, parents with coverage can secure vital monitoring at low or no cost. BabySat is FDA-cleared and offered in the U.S. only. The BabySat pulse oximeter is indicated for use in measuring and displaying functional oxygen saturation of arterial hemoglobin (SpO2) and Pulse rate. It is indicated for spot-checking and/or continuous monitoring of well-perfused patients greater than one month old up to 18 months old and weighing between 6 and 30 lbs., in the home environment.
•Owlet Smart Sock – Smart Sock is Owlet’s first smart baby monitor to track an infant’s oxygen saturation, heart rate, and sleep trends. Owlet Smart Sock allows parents to view their baby’s heart rate and oxygen readings in real-time from the Owlet Care App. If the baby’s readings leave preset zones, parents are notified through the Owlet Care App and a nearby base station. Owlet Smart Sock is sold in Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and certain other markets around the world. Owlet Smart Sock was also sold in the United States, the United Kingdom and the European Union prior to the launch of Dream Sock.
•Owlet Cam – This smart audio and video monitor allows caregivers to monitor their babies at anytime from anywhere, offering 1080p HD video, motion and cry detection, 4x zoom, and two-way audio, so parents can remain connected, regardless of distance.
•Dream Duo – Combining Dream Sock or Owlet Smart Sock with Owlet Cam, this baby monitoring solution offers HD video, sleep insights, and health tracking to offer an extensive view into an infant's well-being.
•Owlet360 – Owlet’s innovative subscription service leverages the Company’s infant health and sleep data to provide parents and caregivers with a deeper, personalized understanding of their babies’ development, health, and sleep trends. Owlet360 aims to empower parents with actionable information to support babies' well-being and parents’ peace of mind. Owlet360 is available for all new and existing Owlet Dream App users in the U.S. only.
•Accessories – Enhancing the Owlet experience, offered accessories include fabric accessory socks in various colors and patterns, the Owlet Dream Sleeper with Swaddle and the Owlet Sock Travel Case.
Our Platform and Pipeline
Since our inception, over 2 million Owlet devices have been sold worldwide, which has contributed to one of the largest data sets of infant health and sleep. We believe that data will be an invaluable tool in bridging the current healthcare gap between hospital and home. We will continue to develop our software and data in order to bring additional solutions into the home. Through leveraging our data, we believe we can help bridge the gap and better democratize access to individualized care.
We are building our data platform with the goal to be parents’ go-to brand in the areas of sleep, safety, health and well-being information. We will remain focused on commercializing our Dream Sock and BabySat devices, which we believe will open the door to launch additional services to continue the expansion of our data platform. We believe that we can use our data sets to enhance our product with additional valuable data insights as part of new subscription models and increasingly predictive technologies.
We believe we have developed deep and enduring relationships with our users and brand advocates around the world. We believe these parents are more likely to be early technology adopters and have a high affinity towards actionable insight to care for their children. This is evidenced by the millions of downloads of the Owlet applications and high social media engagement across our multiple platforms. These relationships continue to grow and develop in tandem with our novel product and software additions to our connected ecosystem, feature enhancements, omni-channel distribution, and marketing efforts. As we bring this valued relationship with consumer users into new medical communities, we believe that our platforms will continue to evolve and expand.
Strategic Business Segments
Owlet products are marketed and distributed in the United States and internationally through consumer and, more recently, through medical distribution channels.
Direct to Consumer & Digital Engagement: The Owlet brand resonates deeply with over 1 million social media followers, hundreds of millions of views and engagements and millions of website visitors each year. Our focus on
5
engaging directly with our customer is driving significant sales through direct channels and increases demand through our retail partnerships. Our digital presence is a cornerstone of our strategy, enhancing customer lifetime value and fostering brand loyalty.
Retail Partnerships: Our products are widely available across major U.S. retailers, including Amazon, Target, Walmart, Best Buy and BabyList.
Global Reach & Distribution: Our international strategy is taking root and continuing to grow, with distribution partners in key global markets including Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom and throughout the rest of the European Union. We intend to continue expanding our global footprint and accessibility, underscoring our commitment to global health and well-being.
Healthcare Distribution & Insurance Reimbursement: The FDA clearance and subsequent launch of BabySat marks a significant opportunity to expand into healthcare distribution, opening potential new channels for insurance reimbursement and professional recommendations. We believe that this development not only broadens access, but also cements Owlet's role in the healthcare ecosystem. Our partnership with AdaptHealth and other Durable Medical Equipment suppliers (“DMEs”) may facilitate access to insurance reimbursement and distribution through hospitals. Owlet is focused on enlisting a wide variety of healthcare partners to increase the accessibility and affordability of our products while increasing our margin.
Our Strategy
2024 - Pivotal Year
In 2024, we introduced FDA-cleared devices Dream Sock and BabySat to deliver improved comfort to parents wishing for better safety and monitoring for their children. We believe that the FDA marketing authorizations for both Dream Sock and BabySat mark a significant moment for the pediatric category and solidify the trust of consumers and healthcare professionals alike. Our de novo classification of Dream Sock as an over-the-counter device was the first of its kind, and Dream Sock is currently the only monitor on the market in our product category authorized by the FDA. We believe that this achievement is a testament to our unwavering dedication to enhancing accessibility and reinforcing confidence in our innovative solutions.
We launched Dream Sock in the European Union and the United Kingdom after having received certifications in May 2024 and June 2024, respectively. We leveraged these endorsements of our technologies to expand our global footprint throughout 2024, taking us to 26 total countries by year end, contributing to 98% international revenue growth in 2024 versus 2023.
Finally, we crossed an important milestone with the development and deployment of our Owlet360 subscription service. We released a beta version of the subscription, scaling to a limited number of users throughout 2024, which set the stage to unlock the potential of our massive pediatric health and sleep data set. This culminated in our recent full launch of Owlet360 in January 2025. The introduction of Owlet360 marks a significant step in Owlet's evolution into a comprehensive pediatric health platform.
Alongside our 2024 product, sales, and partnership successes, we significantly improved financial performance. We improved our net loss by $20.4 million in 2024 compared to 2023. We also set company records for revenue, gross profit, gross margin, and adjusted EBITDA for full year 2024. We improved adjusted EBITDA profitability by $14.3 million in 2024 compared to 2023, including reaching positive adjusted EBITDA in the final three quarters of 2024. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP metric. For additional information on Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP equivalent, see Part II, Item 7, “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”
We are committed to building a strong foundation for sustainable growth as we move forward and we believe that the FDA marketing authorizations of our BabySat and Dream Sock products will accelerate the adoption of our products and position us as the preferred pediatric data monitoring platform that bridges the gap between the hospital and the home. Throughout this journey, the Owlet team embodied our foundational values, undertaking substantial efforts to refine and advance our operations, setting the stage for growth and prosperity in 2025.
Strategy Overview
Driving Growth: Our vision is clear - we see health sensing technology becoming as ubiquitous as car seats and breast pumps for newborns. With the momentum we have gained from FDA marketing authorizations, the introduction of potential insurance coverage and reimbursement for BabySat, the launch of Owlet360 subscription
6
service, increased credibility in medical communities, and an increased retail presence, we see Owlet as strategically positioned for substantial growth. Combining both the 510(k) clearance and de novo FDA authorization for our pulse-oximetry medical devices, and accompanying digital health offerings with our existing consumer brand well-known with over 2 million devices sold, we believe that we can become one of the most recognizable brand names in the digital parenting category. We believe expanding our recognizable brand into new channels will help our offerings stand out in a highly fragmented market. We see potential to grow our existing product suite with medical market penetration. We see opportunity to leverage the value from our massive data set of pediatric health and sleep information as an additional growth driver through the launch of our new subscription service, Owlet360.
Achieving Profitability: In 2024, our objective was to significantly improve adjusted EBITDA and narrow the gap to achieving breakeven. Through volume growth, gross margin expansion, and diligent management of operating expenses, we achieved positive adjusted EBITDA in the final three quarters of 2024 and made significant progress towards meeting this target. These accomplishments have furnished Owlet with operational leverage and we believe have the potential to drive profitability and cash flow in the future.
Expanding Lifetime Value (LTV): We view Owlet's brand as synonymous with engagement and loyalty in our industry, supported by a rich dataset that underpins our market understanding. With the introduction of our new subscription service, Owlet360, we believe we are well-positioned to forge deeper connections among parents, their infants, and healthcare providers. Owlet360 aims to elevate home care to new standards, augmenting the value we believe Owlet delivers to families and increasing the lifetime value per customer. Our strategy is not just about growth; it is about enriching the ecosystem of infant care with Owlet at its heart, fostering a healthier future for the next generation.
Market Landscape and Competitive Dynamics
Owlet has a clear and specific market in pediatrics serving the needs of parents with children aged 1-18 months across key markets in the U.S., Europe, Australia, and Canada. With close to 10 million infants born annually in these regions, our Total Addressable Market (“TAM”) is continuously replenished, providing the potential for a steady demand for our products. Despite a slight decline in birth rates, the emphasis on infant care and the financial investment in the well-being of newborns have seen a consistent uptick over the years. This trend underscores a growing market resilience, notably within the baby care sector, which has remained robust against broader economic fluctuations affecting consumer spending.
Since its inception, Owlet has been at the forefront of the consumer digital health monitoring space for infants and their families. We believe that our pioneering achievement of obtaining the first de novo authorization for at-home monitoring without the need for a prescription underscores our trailblazing efforts and helps set a high regulatory bar for new entrants in the space. This distinction is critical as it denotes that any comparable product with medical applications will likely require similar regulatory endorsements.
In addition to spearheading the health monitoring category, Owlet competes within the broader realm of general video/audio baby monitors. Our strategic edge is encapsulated in the Dream Sock and Owlet Cam combo, providing parents with a holistic view of their baby's health and well-being. This integration allows parents to see, hear, and be assured of their baby's condition through our app, offering an unmatched value proposition.
We believe that we are uniquely positioned thanks to our regulatory marketing authorizations, extensive distribution network, intellectual property, and comprehensive feature set. We believe that this combination not only differentiates us from our competitors but also solidifies our commitment to extending the benefits of our technology to every infant.
Our competition spans from established players to emerging innovators in the space, including:
•VTech: Sells an extensive range of low-cost sound and video monitors.
•Nanit: Offers a line of video monitors and non-FDA cleared integrated breathing wrap wearable.
•Masimo: Primarily focused on patient monitoring solutions for hospital and clinical settings.
•Hubble: Delivers a variety of low-cost sound and video monitors, including options with non-FDA cleared wearable health monitoring capabilities.
We expect the industry in which we operate will continue to evolve and may be significantly affected by new product introductions and other market activities of industry participants. Certain potential competitors have substantially greater capital resources, larger product portfolios, larger user bases, larger sales forces and greater geographic presence, and have built relationships with retailers and distributors that may be more effective than ours. Our products and services face additional competition from companies developing products and services for use with third-party monitoring systems, as well as from companies that currently market similar products and
7
services of their own and may face further pressure from technology companies that have not historically operated in our industry.
Continuing technological advances and new product introductions within the home-use childcare electronics, medical monitoring and service industry place our products and services at risk of obsolescence. Our long-term success depends upon the development and successful commercialization of new products and services, new or improved technologies and additional applications for our existing technologies, including products or applications that may be subject to the oversight of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities and could require marketing authorization by the FDA or similar approval, clearance, authorization or certification from comparable foreign regulatory authorities or notified bodies. The research and development process is time-consuming and costly and may not result in products and services or applications that we can successfully commercialize.
We believe that the primary competitive factors in our market are:
•product quality and performance, including the size, quality, comfort, battery life, reliability, connectivity of the device to the application and/or monitor, and accuracy of our data provided to customers;
•FDA marketing authorizations and similar foreign regulatory authorities marketing authorizations and notified bodies certifications;
•customer purchasing experience;
•pricing;
•product support and service;
•effective marketing and education;
•brand recognition;
•breadth and depth of offerings;
•greater market penetration;
•technological innovation, product enhancements and speed of innovation; and
•sales and distribution capabilities.
We believe our ability to continue to compete effectively in our industry will also depend in part on our ability to respond more quickly and effectively than our peers to new or changing opportunities, technologies, regulatory standards or customer requirements. We anticipate that we will face increased competition in the future as existing companies and competitors develop new or improved products and distribution strategies and as new companies enter the market with new technologies and distribution strategies. With our 510(k) clearance and de novo authorization, competitors will also have the benefit of using our devices as predicate devices in their own regulatory clearance pursuits. Increased competition in the future could adversely affect our revenue, revenue growth rate, margins and market share.
We believe that Owlet's pioneering spirit and commitment to innovation have advanced our recognition as a leader in infant health monitoring but also as a trusted partner for parents worldwide, aiming to enhance the safety and well-being of every baby. As we pursue additional marketing authorizations from applicable regulatory authorities and certification from notified bodies, we believe Owlet could be positioned as a category leader with significant competitive barriers.
Research and Development
We are committed to ongoing research and development to create new products and improve the design, operation, and quality of existing products. Our research and development organization includes individuals with expertise in fields including engineering, product design, clinical science, consumer electronics, healthcare technologies and embedded software design. Our technical capabilities and commitment to innovation have allowed us to deliver significant product enhancements on a rapid development timeline. In 2024, we developed our subscription offering, Owlet360. From designing innovative and groundbreaking products to employing sophisticated software with proprietary algorithms and backend support, we believe we have built a strong competitive moat and early-mover advantage over potential competition in the connected nursery field. We also have the benefit of a vast infant data set obtained in the consumer setting which leads to stronger insights and allows us to develop better products and services, which we believe in turn leads to happier users and drives product purchases.
Our current research and development efforts are focused on enhancing the customer experience of our existing products, enhancing the feature set of our subscription offering, and new product development, while supporting commercialization of our medical devices. These efforts may include pursuing development of expanded indications
8
for our medical devices, such as expanded intended populations, that could include infants less than one month old, as well as developing new ways to deliver information that parents and caregivers value in their user experiences.
Harnessing the pediatric data set we have accumulated presents an opportunity to positively impact infant care and advance medical knowledge. Through strategic collaboration with healthcare professionals, establishment of clinical research initiatives, and innovative service offerings, we can leverage this wealth of information to enhance the well-being of infants and their families.
Integrating our findings into new service offerings represents the next frontier in infant care innovation. By leveraging subscription-based models, we can provide families with access to valuable insights, personalized recommendations, and ongoing support tailored to their child's developmental journey and empower parents to make informed decisions and nurture their child's health and well-being with confidence.
Regulatory Interactions
In October 2021, we received a Warning Letter from the FDA regarding the health notifications then provided with our Smart Sock that led Owlet to cease the distribution of Smart Sock in the U.S. (the “Warning Letter”). Since the Warning Letter, we have cooperated with and have worked diligently to seek marketing authorizations for our products with medical device functionality. In 2023, Owlet reached an important inflection point from a pioneer in the consumer-facing, in-home, digital health smart baby monitoring industry to a company that received two innovative regulatory authorizations from the FDA for its products. In June 2023, Owlet received a clearance of a premarket notification submitted to FDA pursuant to Section 510(k) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (“510(k) clearance”) for its prescription-required pulse oximeter device, BabySat, which is indicated for spot-checking and/or continuous monitoring of certain well-perfused infants in the home environment. In November 2023, Owlet then received a first-of-its kind, de novo authorization from the FDA for Dream Sock, enabling both displays of a baby’s live health readings, including pulse rate and oxygen saturation level, and as well as Health Notifications, which will alert caregivers with lights and alarm sounds if their infant’s readings fall outside of preset ranges. These notifications and associated data can be used to supplement the decision by caregivers to seek additional guidance for medical care of the infant and provide more helpful data in those moments. The FDA’s marketing authorizations for both BabySat and Dream Sock are significant foundational breakthroughs in our journey to bring care to the home and empower parents, to signify not only our commitment to innovation in the infant health category, but more importantly, our dedication to helping ensure the health and well-being of every baby. These clearances transform Owlet from solely a consumer technology company into a medical device company.
After Owlet received 510(k) clearance for its prescription-required pulse oximeter device, BabySat, which is indicated for spot-checking and/or continuous monitoring of certain well-perfused infants in the home environment, Owlet launched in the United States in January 2024 this FDA-cleared pulse-oximetry technology incorporating our advanced, wire-free and consumer-adopted sock design. BabySat, which requires a prescription from a physician or other authorized, licensed healthcare provider, has allowed Owlet to enter the medical and healthcare markets and compete with traditional hospital dispensed medical devices. BabySat is designed to be able to be utilized by various telehealth platforms and is designed specifically for babies with diagnosed illnesses and health conditions. The device uses pulse oximetry technology and is intended to be prescribed by physicians to assist with the in-home monitoring of babies under a physician’s care. The device is designed to provide alerts to parents when their baby’s heart rate or oxygen saturation level (or SpO2) does not fall within prescribed ranges. We believe BabySat provides significant advantages to the large, wired hospital monitoring technologies on the market today with its wireless, wearable form factor and cloud connected data integration designed for home use.
While our existing primary market is the United States, we have continued to expand into international and new geographic markets. Dream Sock has been CE and UKCA marked, as defined below, under European Union (“EU”) and United Kingdom (“UK”) Medical Device Regulations. As our retail penetration increases and brand awareness grows outside of the United States, we intend to further leverage retail channels and locations to ensure efficient and strategic global customer acquisition in key markets in the future.
Government Regulation
Certain of our products or their features and our operations are subject to regulation by the FDA and other federal and state authorities in the U.S., as well as comparable authorities in foreign jurisdictions.
U.S. Regulation
The FDA regulates the development, design, non-clinical and clinical research, manufacturing, safety, efficacy, labeling, packaging, storage, installation, servicing, recordkeeping, premarket clearance or approval, adverse event reporting, advertising, promotion, marketing and distribution, and import and export of medical devices to ensure
9
that medical devices distributed domestically are safe and effective for their intended uses and otherwise meet the requirements of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”).
FDA Premarket Clearance and Approval Requirements
Unless an exemption applies, each medical device commercially distributed in the U.S. requires either FDA clearance of a premarket notification submitted under Section 510(k) of the FDCA or approval of a premarket approval application, or PMA. Under the FDCA, medical devices are classified into one of three classes—Class I, Class II or Class III—depending on the degree of risk associated with each medical device and the extent of manufacturer and regulatory control needed to ensure its safety and effectiveness. Class I includes devices with the lowest risk to the patient and are those for which safety and effectiveness can be assured by adherence to the FDA’s General Controls for medical devices, which include compliance with the applicable portions of the Quality System Regulation (“QSR”), facility registration and product listing, reporting of adverse medical events, and truthful and non-misleading labeling, advertising, and promotional materials. Class II devices are subject to the FDA’s General Controls, and special controls as deemed necessary by the FDA to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the device. These special controls can include performance standards, post-market surveillance, patient registries and FDA guidance documents.
While most Class I devices are exempt from the 510(k) premarket notification requirement, manufacturers of most Class II devices are required to submit to the FDA a premarket notification under Section 510(k) of the FDCA requesting permission to commercially distribute the device. The FDA’s permission to commercially distribute a device subject to a 510(k) premarket notification is generally known as 510(k) clearance. Devices deemed by the FDA to pose the greatest risks, such as life sustaining, life supporting or some implantable devices, or devices that have a new intended use, or use advanced technology that is not substantially equivalent to that of a legally marketed device, are placed in Class III, requiring approval of a PMA. Some pre-amendment devices are unclassified, but are subject to FDA’s premarket notification and clearance process in order to be commercially distributed.
510(k) Clearance Marketing Pathway
To obtain 510(k) clearance, we must submit to the FDA a premarket notification submission demonstrating that the proposed device is “substantially equivalent” to a legally marketed predicate device. A predicate device is a legally marketed device that is not subject to premarket approval, i.e., a device that was legally marketed prior to May 28, 1976 (pre-amendments device) and for which a PMA is not required, a device that has been reclassified from Class III to Class II or I, or a device that was found substantially equivalent through the 510(k) process. The FDA’s 510(k) clearance process usually takes from three to twelve months but may take longer. The FDA may require additional information, including clinical data, to make a determination regarding substantial equivalence. In addition, FDA collects user fees for certain medical device submissions and annual fees and for medical device establishments.
If the FDA agrees that the device is substantially equivalent to a predicate device currently on the market, it will grant 510(k) clearance to commercially market the device. If the FDA determines that the device is “not substantially equivalent” to a previously cleared device, the device is automatically designated as a Class III device. The device sponsor must then fulfill more rigorous PMA requirements, or can request a risk-based classification determination for the device in accordance with the “de novo” process, which is a route to market for novel medical devices that are low to moderate risk and are not substantially equivalent to a predicate device.
After a device receives 510(k) clearance, any modification that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness, or that would constitute a major change or modification in its intended use, will require a new 510(k) clearance or, depending on the modification, PMA approval. The FDA requires each manufacturer to determine whether the proposed change requires submission of a 510(k) or a PMA in the first instance, but the FDA can review any such decision and disagree with a manufacturer’s determination. If the FDA disagrees with a manufacturer’s determination, the FDA can require the manufacturer to cease marketing and/or request the recall of the modified device until such marketing authorization has been granted. Also, in these circumstances, the manufacturer may be subject to significant regulatory fines or penalties.
De Novo Classification
Medical device types that the FDA has not previously classified as Class I, II, or III are automatically classified into Class III regardless of the level of risk they pose. The Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997 established a new route to market for low to moderate risk medical devices that are automatically placed into Class III due to the absence of a predicate device, called the “Request for Evaluation of Automatic Class III Designation,” or the de novo classification procedure. This procedure allows a manufacturer whose novel device is automatically classified into Class III to request down-classification of its medical device into Class I or Class II on
10
the basis that the device presents low or moderate risk, rather than requiring the submission and approval of a PMA application. Prior to the enactment of the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act, or FDASIA, in July 2012, a medical device could only be eligible for de novo classification if the manufacturer first submitted a 510(k) premarket notification and received a determination from the FDA that the device was not substantially equivalent. FDASIA streamlined the de novo classification pathway by permitting manufacturers to request de novo classification directly without first submitting a 510(k) premarket notification to the FDA and receiving a not substantially equivalent determination.
Over the last several years, the FDA has proposed reforms to its 510(k) clearance process, and such proposals could include increased requirements for clinical data and a longer review period, or could make it more difficult for manufacturers to utilize the 510(k) clearance process for their products.
PMA Approval Pathway
Class III devices require PMA approval before they can be marketed, although some pre-amendment Class III devices for which FDA has not yet required a PMA are cleared through the 510(k) process. The PMA process is more demanding than the 510(k) premarket notification process. In a PMA, the manufacturer must demonstrate that the device is safe and effective, and the PMA must be supported by extensive data, including data from preclinical studies and human clinical trials. The PMA must also contain a full description of the device and its components, a full description of the methods, facilities, and controls used for manufacturing, and proposed labeling. Following receipt of a PMA, the FDA determines whether the application is sufficiently complete to permit a substantive review. If the FDA accepts the application for review, it has 180 days under the FDCA to complete its review of a PMA, although in practice, the FDA’s review often takes significantly longer, and can take up to several years. An advisory panel of experts from outside the FDA may be convened to review and evaluate the application and provide recommendations to the FDA as to the approvability of the device. The FDA may or may not accept the panel’s recommendation. In addition, the FDA will generally conduct a pre-approval inspection of the applicant or its third-party manufacturers’ or suppliers’ manufacturing facility or facilities to ensure compliance with the QSR.
The FDA will approve the new device for commercial distribution if it determines that the data and information in the PMA constitute valid scientific evidence and that there is reasonable assurance that the device is safe and effective for its intended use(s). The FDA may approve a PMA with post-approval conditions intended to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the device, including, among other things, restrictions on labeling, promotion, sale and distribution, and collection of long-term follow-up data from patients in the clinical study that supported PMA approval or requirements to conduct additional clinical studies post-approval. The FDA may condition PMA approval on some form of post-market surveillance when deemed necessary to protect the public health or to provide additional safety and efficacy data for the device in a larger population or for a longer period of use. In such cases, the manufacturer might be required to follow certain patient groups for a number of years and to make periodic reports to the FDA on the clinical status of those patients. Failure to comply with the conditions of approval can result in material adverse enforcement action, including withdrawal of the approval.
Certain changes to an approved device, such as changes in manufacturing facilities, methods, or quality control procedures, or changes in the design performance specifications, which affect the safety or effectiveness of the device, require submission of a PMA supplement. PMA supplements often require submission of the same type of information as a PMA, except that the supplement is limited to information needed to support any changes from the device covered by the original PMA and may not require as extensive clinical data or the convening of an advisory panel. Certain other changes to an approved device require the submission of a new PMA, such as when the design change causes a different intended use, mode of operation, and technical basis of operation, or when the design change is so significant that a new generation of the device will be developed, and the data that were submitted with the original PMA are not applicable for the change in demonstrating a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness.
Clinical Trials
Clinical trials are almost always required to support a PMA and de novo classification and are sometimes required to support a 510(k) submission. All clinical investigations of devices to determine safety and effectiveness must be conducted in accordance with the FDA’s investigational device exemption, or IDE, regulations which govern investigational device labeling, prohibit promotion of the investigational device, and specify an array of recordkeeping, reporting and monitoring responsibilities of study sponsors and study investigators. If the device presents a “significant risk” to human health, as defined by the FDA, the FDA requires the device sponsor to submit an IDE application to the FDA, which must become effective prior to commencing human clinical trials. If the device under evaluation does not present a significant risk to human health, then the device sponsor is not required to submit an IDE application to the FDA before initiating human clinical trials, but must still comply with abbreviated IDE requirements when conducting such trials.
11
A significant risk device is one that presents a potential for serious risk to the health, safety or welfare of a patient and either is implanted, used in supporting or sustaining human life, substantially important in diagnosing, curing, mitigating or treating disease or otherwise preventing impairment of human health, or otherwise presents a potential for serious risk to a subject. An IDE application must be supported by appropriate data, such as animal and laboratory test results, showing that it is safe to test the device in humans and that the testing protocol is scientifically sound. The IDE will automatically become effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA unless the FDA notifies the company that the investigation may not begin. If the FDA determines that there are deficiencies or other concerns with an IDE for which it requires modification, the FDA may permit a clinical trial to proceed under a conditional approval.
Regardless of the degree of risk presented by the medical device, clinical studies must be approved by, and conducted under the oversight of, an Institutional Review Board, or IRB, for each clinical site. The IRB is responsible for the initial and continuing review of the IDE, and may impose additional requirements for the conduct of the study. If an IDE application is approved by the FDA and one or more IRBs, human clinical trials may begin at a specific number of investigational sites with a specific number of patients, as approved by the FDA. If the device presents a non-significant risk to the patient, a sponsor may begin the clinical trial after obtaining approval for the trial by one or more IRBs without separate approval from the FDA, but must still follow abbreviated IDE requirements, such as monitoring the investigation, ensuring that the investigators obtain informed consent, and complying with labeling and record-keeping requirements. In some cases, an IDE supplement must be submitted to, and approved by, the FDA before a sponsor or investigator may make a change to the investigational plan that may affect its scientific soundness, study plan or the rights, safety or welfare of human subjects.
Post-market Regulation
After a device is cleared or approved for marketing, numerous and pervasive regulatory requirements continue to apply. These include:
•establishment registration and device listing with the FDA;
•QSR requirements, which require manufacturers, including third-party manufacturers, to follow stringent design, testing, control, documentation and other quality assurance procedures during all aspects of the design and manufacturing process;
•labeling regulations and FDA prohibitions against the promotion of investigational products, or the promotion of “off-label” uses of cleared or approved products;
•requirements related to promotional activities;
•clearance or approval of product modifications to 510(k)-cleared devices that could significantly affect safety or effectiveness or that would constitute a major change in intended use of one of our cleared devices, or approval of certain modifications to PMA-approved devices;
•medical device reporting regulations, which require that a manufacturer report to the FDA if a device it markets may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury, or has malfunctioned and the device or a similar device that it markets would be likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury, if the malfunction were to recur;
•correction, removal and recall reporting regulations, which require that manufacturers report to the FDA field corrections and product recalls or removals if undertaken to reduce a risk to health posed by the device or to remedy a violation of the FDCA that may present a risk to health;
•the FDA’s recall authority, whereby the agency can order device manufacturers to recall from the market a product that is in violation of governing laws and regulations; and
•post-market surveillance activities and regulations, which apply when deemed by the FDA to be necessary to protect the public health or to provide additional safety and effectiveness data for the device.
Manufacturing processes for medical devices are required to comply with the applicable portions of the QSR, which cover the methods and the facilities and controls for the design, manufacture, testing, production, processes, controls, quality assurance, labeling, packaging, distribution, installation and servicing of finished devices intended for human use. The QSR also requires, among other things, maintenance of a device master file, device history file, and complaint files. As a manufacturer, we are subject to periodic scheduled and unscheduled inspections by the FDA. Failure to maintain compliance with the QSR requirements could result in the shut-down of, or restrictions on, manufacturing operations and the recall or seizure of marketed products. The discovery of previously unknown problems with any marketed products, including unanticipated adverse events or adverse events of increasing severity or frequency, whether resulting from the use of the device within the scope of its clearance or approval, or off-label by a physician in the practice of medicine, could result in restrictions on the device, including the removal of the product from the market or voluntary or mandatory device recalls.
12
The FDA has broad regulatory compliance and enforcement powers. If the FDA determines that a manufacturer has failed to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, it can take a variety of compliance or enforcement actions, which may result in any of the following sanctions:
•warning letters, untitled letters, fines, injunctions, consent decrees and civil penalties;
•recalls, withdrawals, or administrative detention or seizure of our products;
•operating restrictions or partial suspension or total shutdown of production;
•refusing or delaying requests for 510(k) clearance or PMA approvals of new products or modified products;
•withdrawing 510(k) clearances or PMA approvals that have already been granted;
•refusal to grant export approvals for our products; or
•criminal prosecution.
Low Risk General Wellness Products
The FDA has established a compliance policy for certain products that may fall within the definition of a medical device, but that are intended for only “general wellness use” and present a low risk to the safety of users and other persons. The FDA defines a “general wellness use” to be (i) an intended use that relates to maintaining or encouraging a general state of health or a healthy activity, or (ii) an intended use that relates the role of healthy lifestyle with helping to reduce the risk or impact of certain chronic diseases or conditions and where it is well understood and accepted that healthy lifestyle choices may play an important role in health outcomes for the disease or condition. For example, the FDA identifies sleep management – such as a product intended to track sleep trends – as an intended use of a product that falls within a general wellness use, provided that the product claims do not make reference to any diseases or conditions As such, if a medical device includes features that fall within the definition of a “low risk general wellness product,” those features may not be subject to enforcement of medical device requirements under the FDA’s compliance policy for such products and/or features.
Foreign Government Regulation
In addition to U.S. regulations, we are subject to a variety of foreign government regulations applicable to general consumer products and medical devices.
Regulation of General Consumer Products in the European Union
In the European Union (“EU”), since December 13, 2024, consumer products must comply with the General Product Safety Regulation (EU) 2023/988 which repealed and replaced Directive 2001/95/EC. The Regulation covers all products intended for consumers (and products designed exclusively for professional use but which subsequently reach the consumer market), placed onto the EU market, unless a specific product safety regulation applies. The General Product Safety Regulation strengthened the safety and conformity requirements as well as post-market surveillance obligations for manufacturers and importers. Manufacturers must undertake and document a conformity assessment that covers the risks and risk categories associated with the product. The recommended method of undertaking such an assessment is through the application of voluntary European Harmonized Standards, but other options are available, such as using European Commission guidelines and using product safety codes of good practice. The required conformity assessment consists of a self-assessment with no requirement to involve a third party. Manufacturers also have the obligation to report to the national competent authorities of the different EU member states any risks to the consumer that are incompatible with the general safety requirements. The Regulation further imposes other obligations such as collecting information related to use of products after they have been made available to consumers.
The General Product Safety Regulation also increased market surveillance powers. National authorities have more powers to conduct more effective inspections of products and take action against unsafe ones.
Unlike directives, which must be implemented into the national laws of the EU member states, regulations are directly applicable (i.e., without the need for adoption of EU member state laws implementing them) in all EU member states and are intended to eliminate current differences in the regulation of consumer products among EU member states. Penalties applicable to infringements of regulations remain mainly determined at national-level.
Additional regulations may apply to our products and impose further requirements, including the possible
Additional regulations may apply to our products and impose further requirements, including the possible application of EU Regulation No 1007/2011 on textile products, which imposes specific labeling and marking
13
requirements. In addition, we may also need to comply with requirements set forth by RoHs Directive No 2011/65/EU, which imposes specific restrictions on the use of hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment, and/or the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemicals (“REACH”) Regulation (EU) No 1907/2006, which restricts substances of very high concern and imposes substance registration requirements.
The advertising and promotion of consumer products is subject to EU directives concerning misleading and comparative advertising and unfair commercial practices and specific EU member state legislation governing the advertising and promotion of these products.
The aforementioned EU rules are generally applicable in the European Economic Area (“EEA”) which consists of the 27 EU member states plus Norway, Liechtenstein and Iceland.
Regulation of Medical Devices in the European Union
The EU has adopted specific directives and regulations regulating the design, manufacture, clinical investigations, conformity assessment, labeling and adverse event reporting for medical devices. Until May 25, 2021, medical devices were regulated by the Council Directive 93/42/EEC (the “EU Medical Devices Directive”), which has been repealed and replaced by Regulation (EU) No 2017/745 (the “EU Medical Devices Regulation”). Unlike the EU Medical Devices Directive, the EU Medical Devices Regulation is directly applicable in all EU member states without the need for member states to implement it into national law.
In the EU, there is currently no premarket government review of medical devices. However, all medical devices placed on the market in the EU must meet the relevant general safety and performance requirements laid down in Annex I to the EU Medical Devices Regulation including the requirement that a medical device must be designed and manufactured in such a way that, during normal conditions of use, it is suitable for its intended purpose. The medical device must be safe and effective and must not compromise the clinical condition or safety of patients, or the safety and health of users and – where applicable – other persons, provided that any risks which may be associated with their use constitute acceptable risks when weighed against the benefits to the patient and are compatible with a high level of protection of health and safety, taking into account the generally acknowledged state of the art. The European Commission has adopted various standards applicable to medical devices. These include standards governing common requirements, such as sterilization and safety of medical electrical equipment and product standards for certain types of medical devices. There are also harmonized standards relating to design and manufacture. While not mandatory, compliance with these standards is viewed as the easiest way to satisfy the general safety and performance requirements as a practical matter as it creates a rebuttable presumption that the device satisfies that general safety and performance requirement.
Compliance with the general safety and performance requirements of the EU Medical Devices Regulation is a prerequisite for European conformity marking (CE mark) without which medical devices cannot be marketed or sold in the EU. To demonstrate compliance with the general safety and performance requirements laid down in Annex I to the EU Medical Devices Regulation, medical device manufacturers must undergo a conformity assessment procedure, which varies according to the type of medical device and its (risk) classification. As a general rule, demonstration of conformity of medical devices and their manufacturers with the general safety and performance requirements must be based, among other things, on the evaluation of clinical data supporting the safety and performance of the products during normal conditions of use. Specifically, a manufacturer must demonstrate that the device achieves its intended performance during normal conditions of use, that the known and foreseeable risks, and any adverse events, are minimized and acceptable when weighed against the benefits of its intended performance, and that any claims made about the performance and safety of the device are supported by suitable evidence. Except for low-risk medical devices (Class I), where the manufacturer can self-assess the conformity of its products with the general safety and performance requirements (except for any parts which relate to sterility or metrology or reuse aspects), a conformity assessment procedure requires the intervention of a notified body. Notified bodies are independent organizations designated by EU member states to assess the conformity of devices before being placed on the market. A notified body would typically audit and examine a product’s technical dossiers and the manufacturer's quality system (notified body must presume that quality systems which implement the relevant harmonized standards – which is ISO 13485:2016 for Medical Devices Quality Management Systems – conform to these requirements). If satisfied that the relevant product conforms to the general safety and performance requirements, the notified body issues a certificate of conformity, which the manufacturer uses as a basis for its own declaration of conformity. The manufacturer may then apply the CE mark to the device, which allows the device to be placed on the market throughout the EU.
Throughout the term of the certificate of conformity, the manufacturer will be subject to periodic surveillance audits to verify continued compliance with the applicable requirements. In particular, there will be a new audit by the notified body before it will renew the relevant certificate(s).
14
The EU Medical Devices Regulation requires that before placing a device, other than a custom-made device, on the market, manufacturers (as well as other economic operators such as authorized representatives and importers) must register by submitting identification information to the European Database for Medical Devices (“EUDAMED”), unless they have already registered. The information to be submitted by manufacturers (and authorized representatives) also includes the name, address and contact details of the person or persons responsible for regulatory compliance. The regulation also requires that before placing a device, other than a custom-made device, on the market, manufacturers must assign a unique identifier to the device and provide it along with other core data to the unique device identifier (“UDI”) database. These new requirements aim at ensuring better identification and traceability of the devices. Each device – and as applicable, each package – will have a UDI composed of two parts: a device identifier (UDI-DI) specific to a device, and a production identifier (UDI-PI) to identify the unit producing the device. Manufacturers are also notably responsible for entering the necessary data on EUDAMED, which includes the UDI database, and for keeping it up to date. Certain obligations for registration in EUDAMED are expected to become applicable in the first quarter of 2026 (as EUDAMED is not yet fully functional). Until EUDAMED is fully functional, the corresponding provisions of the EU Medical Devices Directive continue to apply for the purpose of meeting the obligations laid down in the provisions regarding exchange of information, including, and in particular, information regarding registration of devices and economic operators.
All manufacturers placing medical devices into the market in the EU must comply with the EU medical device vigilance system which has been reinforced by the EU Medical Devices Regulation. Under this system, serious incidents and Field Safety Corrective Actions (“FSCAs”) must be reported to the relevant authorities of the EU member states. These reports will have to be submitted through EUDAMED – once functional – and aim to ensure that, in addition to reporting to the relevant authorities of the EU member states, other actors such as the economic operators in the supply chain will also be informed. Until EUDAMED is fully functional, the corresponding provisions of the EU Medical Devices Directive continue to apply. Manufacturers are required to take FSCAs, which are defined as any corrective action for technical or medical reasons to prevent or reduce a risk of a serious incident associated with the use of a medical device that is made available on the market. A serious incident is any malfunction or deterioration in the characteristics or performance of a device on the market (e.g., inadequacy in the information supplied by the manufacturer, undesirable side-effect), which, directly or indirectly, might lead to either the death or serious deterioration of the health of a patient, user, or other persons, or to a serious public health threat. An FSCA may include the recall, modification, exchange, destruction or retrofitting of the device. FSCAs must be communicated by the manufacturer or its legal representative to its customers and/or to the end users of the device through Field Safety Notices. For similar serious incidents that occur with the same device or device type and for which the root cause has been identified or a FSCA implemented or where the incidents are common and well documented, manufacturers may provide periodic summary reports instead of individual serious incident reports.
The advertising and promotion of medical devices is subject to some general principles set forth in EU legislation. According to the EU Medical Devices Regulation, only devices that are CE marked may be marketed and advertised in the EU in accordance with their intended purpose. Directive 2006/114/EC concerning misleading and comparative advertising and Directive 2005/29/EC on unfair commercial practices, while not specific to the advertising of medical devices, also apply to the advertising thereof and contain general rules, for example, requiring that advertisements are evidenced, balanced and not misleading. Specific requirements are defined at a national level. EU member states’ laws related to the advertising and promotion of medical devices, which vary between jurisdictions, may limit or restrict the advertising and promotion of products to the general public and may impose limitations on promotional activities with healthcare professionals.
Many EU member states have adopted specific anti-gift statutes that further limit commercial practices for medical devices, in particular vis-à-vis healthcare professionals and organizations. Additionally, there has been a recent trend of increased regulation of payments and transfers of value provided to healthcare professionals or entities and many EU member states have adopted national “Sunshine Acts” which impose reporting and transparency requirements (often on an annual basis), similar to the requirements in the U.S., on medical device manufacturers. Certain countries also mandate implementation of commercial compliance programs. The aforementioned EU rules are generally applicable in the EEA.
In the EU, regulatory authorities have the power to carry out announced and, if necessary, unannounced inspections of companies, as well as suppliers and/or sub-contractors and, where necessary, the facilities of professional users. Failure to comply with regulatory requirements (as applicable) could require time and resources to respond to the regulatory authorities' observations and to implement corrective and preventive actions, as appropriate. Regulatory authorities have broad compliance and enforcement powers and if such issues cannot be resolved to their satisfaction can take a variety of actions, including untitled or warning letters, fines, consent decrees, injunctions, or civil or criminal penalties.
15
Brexit and Regulation of Medical Devices in the United Kingdom
Since the end of the Brexit transition period on January 1, 2021, Great Britain (England, Scotland and Wales) has not been directly subject to EU laws, however under the terms of the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland, EU laws generally apply to Northern Ireland.
The EU laws that have been transposed into UK law through secondary legislation remain applicable in Great Britain, however, new legislation such as the EU Medical Devices Regulation is not applicable in Great Britain.
The UK government has passed the Medicines and Medical Devices Act 2021, which introduced delegated powers in favor of the Secretary of State or an ‘appropriate authority’ to amend or supplement existing regulations in the area of medicinal products and medical devices. This allows new rules to be introduced in the future by way of secondary legislation, which aims to allow flexibility in addressing regulatory gaps and future changes in the fields of human medicines, clinical trials and medical devices.
The EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement (“TCA”) came into effect on January 1, 2021. The TCA does not specifically refer to medical devices but does provide for cooperation and exchange of information in the area of product safety and compliance, including market surveillance, enforcement activities and measures, standardization related activities, exchanges of officials, and coordinated product recalls (or other similar actions). For medical devices that are locally manufactured but use components from other countries, the “rules of origin” criteria will need to be reviewed.
Since January 1, 2021, the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (“MHRA”) has become the sovereign regulatory authority responsible for Great Britain. New regulations require all medical devices to be registered with the MHRA, and since January 1, 2022, manufacturers based outside the UK have been required to appoint a UK responsible person that has a registered place of business in the UK to register devices with the MHRA.
Furthermore, on December 16, 2024, the UK government published an amendment to the Medical Devices Regulations 2002 (UK Medical Devices Regulations) to clarify and strengthen the post-market surveillance requirements for medical devices in Great Britain. This amendment will come into force on June 16, 2025, and aims to facilitate greater traceability of incidents and trends enabling the MHRA to act swiftly when needed to address safety issues and support the entire health system in better protecting patients. In addition, the MHRA launched a consultation between November 14, 2024 and January 5, 2025 on proposals to update the pre-market requirements for medical devices in Great Britain, covering four topics, namely: (1) a new international reliance scheme to enable swifter market access for certain devices that have already been approved in a comparable regulator country; (2) the new UKCA mark and, in particular, proposals to remove the requirement to place such UKCA marking on devices; (3) conformity assessment procedures for in vitro diagnostic devices; and (4) maintaining in UK law certain pieces of “assimilated” EU law which are due to sunset in 2025. This consultation builds on the MHRA’s previous consultation between September and November 2021, and the UK government’s response to that consultation which was published on June 26, 2022. The MHRA has stated that it will incorporate feedback to its recent consultation into new legislation on pre-market requirements for medical devices in Great Britain. The new legislation is expected to be implemented in 2026 and aims to enable greater international collaboration and practices, with more patient-centered, proportionate requirements for medical devices which are responsive to technological advances.
Under the UK Medical Devices Regulations, in order to be lawfully placed on the Great Britain market, class I (non-sterile, non-measuring or non-re-useable) medical devices need to be “UKCA” self-certified, and other medical devices need to be “UKCA” certified by a UK approved body. However, certain medical devices in compliance with: (1) the EU Medical Devices Directive can continue to be placed on the Great Britain market until the sooner of certificate expiration or June 30, 2028; or (2) the EU Medical Devices Regulation can continue to be placed on the Great Britain market until the sooner of certificate expiration or June 30, 2030.
Under the terms of the Ireland/Northern Ireland Protocol, Northern Ireland follows EU rules on medical devices, including the EU Medical Devices Regulation, and medical devices marketed in Northern Ireland require assessment according to the EU regulatory regime. Such assessment may be conducted by an EU notified body, in which case a CE mark is required before placing the device on the market in Northern Ireland. Alternatively, if a UK approved body conducts such assessment, a ‘UKNI’ mark and a CE mark are applied and the device may only be placed on the market in Northern Ireland and not the EU.
16
Other Foreign Regulations
Similarly, we are subject to regulations and product registration requirements in many foreign countries in which we may sell our products, including in the areas of:
•design, development, manufacturing, and testing;
•product standards;
•product safety;
•product safety reporting;
•marketing, sales, and distribution;
•packaging and storage requirements;
•labeling requirements;
•content and language of instructions for use;
•record keeping procedures;
•advertising and promotion;
•recalls and field corrective actions;
•import and export restrictions; and
•tariff regulations, duties, and tax requirements;
We may also become subject to the following additional requirements in many foreign countries in which we may sell future medical devices, including in the areas of:
•clinical testing;
•post-market surveillance, including reporting of deaths or serious injuries and malfunctions that, if they were to recur, could lead to death or serious injury;
•registration for reimbursement; and
•necessity of testing performed in country by distributors for licensees.
Other Healthcare Laws and Regulations
Coverage and Reimbursement
Sales of any product that we may develop and for which we may obtain marketing authorization or certification from the FDA and/or comparable foreign regulatory authorities or notified bodies depend, in part, on the extent to which such product or services associated with such product will be covered by third-party payors, such as federal, state, and foreign government healthcare programs, commercial insurance and managed healthcare organizations, and the level of reimbursement for such product or services associated with such product by third-party payors. Even though a new product may have been cleared or otherwise authorized, or certified for commercial distribution by the FDA, foreign regulatory authorities or notified bodies, we may find limited demand for the product unless and until reimbursement approval has been obtained from governmental and private third-party payors.
With respect to Dream Sock and Owlet Cam, we utilize a direct-to-consumer model where consumers purchase our products directly from us or one of our retailers. Currently, these products are not covered or reimbursed by any third-party payor.
Decisions regarding the extent of coverage and amount of reimbursement to be provided are made on a plan-by-plan basis. These third-party payors are increasingly reducing reimbursements for medical devices and services. In addition, the U.S. government, state legislatures and foreign governments have continued implementing cost-containment programs, including price controls, restrictions on coverage and reimbursement and requirements for substitution of generic products. Adoption of price controls and cost-containment measures, and adoption of more restrictive policies in jurisdictions with existing controls and measures, could further limit sales of any product. Decreases in third-party reimbursement for any product or a decision by a third-party payor not to cover the product or the services associated with the product could reduce physician usage and patient demand for the product and also have a material adverse effect on sales.
Healthcare Fraud and Abuse
17
Federal and state governmental agencies and equivalent foreign authorities subject the healthcare industry to intense regulatory scrutiny, including heightened civil and criminal enforcement efforts. These laws constrain the sales, marketing and other promotional activities of medical device manufacturers by limiting the kinds of financial arrangements we may have with hospitals, physicians and other potential purchasers and prescribers of our products. Federal healthcare fraud and abuse laws apply to our business when a customer submits a claim for an item or service that is reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid, or other federally funded healthcare programs. The laws that may affect our ability to operate include:
• the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving, offering or paying remuneration, directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, lease, order, arrangement for, or recommendation of, items or services for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, under federal healthcare programs, such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs. The term “remuneration” has been broadly interpreted to include anything of value, and the government can establish a violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute without proving that a person or entity had actual knowledge of, or a specific intent to violate, the law;
• the federal civil False Claims Act, which prohibits, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, false or fraudulent claims for payment of government funds; knowingly making, using, or causing to be made or used, a false record or statement to get a false claim paid or to avoid, decrease, or conceal an obligation to pay money to the federal government. A claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the False Claims Act. Actions under the False Claims Act may be brought by the government or as a qui tam action by a private individual in the name of the government and to share in any monetary recovery. There are also criminal penalties for making or presenting a false or fictitious or fraudulent claim to the federal government;
• the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, which imposes criminal and civil liability for, among other actions, knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program including private third-party payors, or knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing, or covering up a material fact or making a materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation, or making or using any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items, or services;
• the federal Civil Monetary Penalties law, which prohibits, among other things, offering or transferring remuneration to a federal healthcare beneficiary that a person knows or should know is likely to influence the beneficiary’s decision to order or receive items or services reimbursable by the government from a particular provider or supplier;
• the federal Physician Payment Sunshine Act, implemented by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) as the Open Payments program, which requires manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid, or the Children’s Health Insurance Program to report annually to the CMS, information related to payments and other “transfers of value” made to physicians (currently defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and chiropractors), other healthcare professionals (including physician assistants and nurse practitioners), and teaching hospitals, and requires applicable manufacturers to report annually to CMS ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members and payments or other “transfers of value” to such physician owners;
• analogous state and foreign law equivalents of each of the above federal laws, such as anti-kickback and false claims laws, which may apply to items or services reimbursed by any third-party payor, including commercial insurers and patients; state laws that require device companies to comply with the industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the applicable compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government or otherwise restrict payments that may be made to healthcare providers and other potential referral sources; state beneficiary inducement laws, and state laws that require device manufacturers to report information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians and other healthcare providers or marketing expenditures, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and may not have the same effect, thus complicating compliance efforts.
Violations of any of the above laws may result in significant administrative, civil and criminal penalties, including imprisonment, exclusion from participation in federal health care programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, significant fines, monetary penalties and damages, the restructuring or curtailment of our operations, imposition of compliance obligations and monitoring, and reputational harm.
18
Data Privacy and Security Laws
Numerous state, federal and foreign laws, including consumer protection laws and regulations, govern the collection, dissemination, use, access to, confidentiality and security of personal information, including health-related information. In the U.S., numerous federal and state laws and regulations, including data breach notification laws, health information privacy and security laws and consumer protection laws and regulations that govern the collection, use, disclosure, and protection of health-related and other personal information could apply to our operations or the operations of our partners. In addition, certain foreign laws govern the privacy and security of personal data, including health-related data in certain circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and may not have the same effect, thus complicating compliance efforts. Failure to comply with these laws, where applicable, can result in the imposition of significant civil and/or criminal penalties and private litigation. Privacy and security laws, regulations, and other obligations are constantly evolving, may conflict with each other to complicate compliance efforts, and can result in investigations, proceedings, or actions that lead to significant civil and/or criminal penalties and restrictions on data processing.
Anti-Bribery and Corruption Laws
We may also be subject to similar anti-corruption legislation implemented in Europe through EU Member State laws and under the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions.
Intellectual Property
Since inception, we have been methodical around our intellectual property strategy. We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws and confidentiality and invention assignment agreements to protect our intellectual property rights. As of February 15, 2025, we had 60 issued patents (with numerous others pending) and 49 registered trademarks. Our patents include utility patents covering technology ranging from placement of electrodes to the base of the baby monitor. We have foreign patents and patent applications pending in the EU, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, and Thailand. Our issued patents with claims generally directed to an infant sock comprised of a sensing device in a sleeve in the sock and a strap are expected to expire in the U.S. and China in 2033. Our issued patents with claims generally directed to placement of fabric electrodes and assembly of such are each expected to expire in the U.S., the EU, Australia, China and Canada in 2038. Pending applications in the aforementioned countries will have expiration dates between 2034 and 2043. We continually review our development efforts to assess the existence and patentability of new intellectual property.
Our pending patent applications may not result in issued patents, and we cannot assure you that any current or subsequently issued patents will protect our intellectual property rights. Third parties may challenge certain patents issued to us as invalid, may independently develop similar or competing technologies or may design around any of our patents. We cannot be certain that any of the steps we have taken will prevent the misappropriation of our intellectual property, particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect our proprietary rights in these countries as fully as in the U.S.
Manufacturing
We rely on several third-party suppliers for single source components used in our devices, including the WiFi chips, microcontrollers, batteries, accelerometers, temperature sensors, plastics and circuit boards.
We follow strict quality guidelines, including a detailed risk-based audit plan following our ISO certified quality management system that dictates how often and to what degree we audit our suppliers. We check all quality, regulatory, and safety standards for products that our contract manufacturers make. We deploy a robust manufacturer and supplier selection process including site audits, tooling design and setup quotes, open book pricing, quality specifications, and vendor guides. The Smart Sock and Dream Sock are currently manufactured at ISO 13485 certified required to adhere to specific quality requirements in accordance with the International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF) and Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP). We received ISO 13485 and MDSAP certifications, as we work to implement and maintain the requirements applicable to medical device manufacturer quality management systems. We believe that third-party facilities are adequate to meet our current and anticipated manufacturing needs. We do not currently plan to manufacture our products or any related components ourselves.
Manufacturing Services Agreement with Benchmark Electronics
In October 2017, we entered into a manufacturing services agreement with Benchmark Electronics, Inc. (“Benchmark”), pursuant to which Benchmark provides us certain manufacturing and related services for the production of Dream Sock, Smart Sock, BabySat, and Dream Duo offerings out of its facilities in Thailand, including procuring materials and assembling and testing finished products.
19
The initial term of the agreement was one year and automatically extends for additional one-year periods until either we or Benchmark provide notice of non-renewal at least 90 days prior to the end of the then-current term or extension. Among other things, either party may terminate the agreement for convenience upon 90-day notice, in the case of Owlet, or 180 day notice, in the case of Benchmark, to the other party. Either party may also terminate the agreement under certain other customary conditions, including if the other party materially breaches the agreement, for uncured breaches of the agreement, or in the event of the other party’s insolvency. Benchmark has exclusive manufacturing rights through May 31, 2027 for Owlet Sock and Duo products, including all revisions and future generations of those products and/or product families.
In connection with the services provided under the agreement, we have agreed to indemnify Benchmark against certain claims, including infringement of third-party intellectual property rights and noncompliance of our products with safety or other regulations. We are also entitled to customary indemnification rights, subject to certain caps.
Manufacturing Services Agreement with Aoni
In June 2018, we entered into a manufacturing and supply agreement with Shenzhen Aoni Electronic Co., Ltd (“Aoni”), pursuant to which Aoni provides certain manufacturing and related services for the production of our Owlet Cam product, including procuring materials and assembling and packaging finished products.
We have extended the term of the agreement several times following the expiration of the initial term of the agreement, and most recently extended the term through June 2026. We have the right to terminate the agreement, without cause, upon six months’ prior written notice to Aoni. Additionally, either party may terminate the agreement under certain other customary conditions, including for uncured breaches of the agreement or in the event of the other party’s insolvency.
In connection with the services provided under the agreement, Aoni has agreed to indemnify us against certain claims and liabilities, including claims arising in connection with product defects, breach of the agreement, negligence and violations of applicable law.
Network Hosting
We currently host our products and services, serve our customers and support our operations primarily from third-party data and call centers and other cloud-based services. For example, we rely on cloud services and bespoke software services provided by Ayla Networks for our Dream Sock and Smart Sock products to support the transfer of data to the cloud and back to us and the user.
Environmental Matters
Our operations, properties and products are subject to a variety of U.S. and foreign environmental laws and regulations governing, among other things, air emissions, wastewater discharges, management and disposal of hazardous and non-hazardous materials and waste and remediation of releases of hazardous materials. We believe, based on current information, that we are in material compliance with environmental laws and regulations applicable to us. However, our failure to comply with present and future requirements under these laws and regulations, or environmental contamination or releases of hazardous materials on our leased premises, as well as through disposal of our products, could cause us to incur substantial costs, including clean-up costs, personal injury and property damage claims, fines and penalties, costs to redesign our products or upgrade our facilities and legal costs, or require us to curtail our operations, any of which could seriously harm our business.
Human Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2024, we had 80 full-time employees and 5 part-time employees. None of our employees is represented by a labor union, and we consider our employee relations to be good. Our human capital resources objectives include, as applicable, identifying, recruiting, retaining, incentivizing and integrating our existing and additional employees. The principal purposes of our equity incentive plans are to attract, retain and motivate selected employees, consultants and directors through the granting of stock-based compensation awards and cash-based performance bonus awards.
We believe our innovation and operational excellence stems directly from our community and our common commitment to inclusion and equal access to healthcare. One cornerstone of our approach lies in our belief that every baby deserves access to monitoring, regardless of their background or circumstances. Through Owlet Cares, our advocacy initiative, we are dedicated to making a positive impact in the lives of babies and parents. We recognize that parenthood is a journey marked by a range of experiences, challenges, and joys. As such, we are dedicated to supporting all parents from a rich tapestry of backgrounds and perspectives.
20
Corporate Information
Owlet Baby Care Inc. was incorporated in Delaware on February 24, 2014 as a Delaware corporation. SBG was incorporated in Delaware on June 23, 2020. On July 15, 2021, SBG closed the Merger with Owlet Baby Care Inc. As a result of the Merger, Owlet Baby Care, Inc. became a wholly-owned subsidiary of SBG, and SBG changed its name to Owlet, Inc.
Available Information
Our website address is www.owletcare.com. The contents of, or information accessible through, our website are not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We make our filings with the SEC, including our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports, as well as beneficial ownership filings available free of charge on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we file such reports with, or furnish such reports to, the SEC.
We may use our website as a distribution channel of material information about the Company. Financial and other important information regarding the Company is routinely posted on and accessible through the Investors sections of its website at https://investors.owletcare.com. In addition, you may automatically receive email alerts and other information about the Company when you enroll your email address under the “Resources” menu on the Investors section of our website at https://investors.owletcare.com.
The reference to our website address does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained on or available through our website, and you should not consider such information to be a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that you should be aware of in evaluating our business. If any such risks and uncertainties actually occur, our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. The risk factors described below should be read together with the other information set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including our consolidated financial statements and the related notes, as well as in other documents that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").
Risks Related to Our Business and Operations
We have a limited operating history.
We were organized in 2014 and began selling Owlet Smart Sock in 2015, Owlet Cam in 2018, launched Dream Sock in January 2022 and launched BabySat and Dream Sock with Health Notifications in 2024. Accordingly, we have a limited operating history, which makes an evaluation of our future prospects difficult. Our operating results have fluctuated in the past, and we expect our future quarterly and annual operating results to fluctuate as we focus on increasing the demand for our products and services. We may need to make business decisions that could adversely affect our operating results, such as modifications to our pricing strategy, business structure or operations.
We have not been profitable to date, and operating losses could continue, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, including our ability to continue as a going concern.
The success of our business depends on our ability to increase revenues to offset expenses. Since our inception, we have incurred recurring operating losses, generated negative cash flows from operations, and financed our operations principally through equity raises and borrowings. Future profitability is difficult to predict with certainty, and failure to achieve profitability could materially and adversely affect our overall value and ability to obtain additional financing and capital. There can be no assurance that the Company will generate sufficient future cash flows from operations due to various potential factors, including but not limited to inflation, recession or decreased demand for our products. If our revenues decrease from current levels, we may be unable to further reduce costs, or such cost reductions may limit our ability to pursue and implement strategic initiatives and grow revenues in the future. Also, there can be no assurance as to whether or when we will be able to obtain additional debt or equity financing on acceptable terms. Our ability to reduce operating expenses or raise capital from external sources, if at all, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. Those factors, coupled with our current cash balance and current debt obligations, raise substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern.
21
We have experienced fluctuations in the growth of our business and anticipate this will continue. If we fail to manage our growth effectively, our business could be materially and adversely affected.
Prior to the Warning Letter, the Company experienced rapid revenue growth. Following a period of revenue decline subsequent to the Warning Letter, we have observed a significant recovery, with a 44.5% increase in revenue in 2024 compared to 2023 following receipt of marketing authorization for our BabySat and Dream Sock products. We anticipate that fluctuations in the growth of our business will continue as we adapt our plans and strategies to changing business and macroeconomic conditions.
Our business has experienced periods of significant fluctuations, which have placed, and we expect will continue to place, substantial demands on our management, financial, operational, and technological resources. These fluctuations necessitate ongoing development and enhancement of our internal controls, including operational and financial systems. Any future growth initiatives will further intensify these demands:
•manage our commercial operations effectively;
•identify, recruit, retain, incentivize and integrate additional employees;
•provide adequate training and supervision to maintain our high-quality standards and preserve our culture and values;
•manage our internal development and operational efforts effectively while carrying out our contractual obligations to third parties; and
•continue to improve our operational, financial and management controls, reports systems and procedures.
Rapid growth and rapid contractions increase the challenges involved in addressing these goals in a cost-effective or timely manner, or at all. If we do not effectively manage our growth, we may not be able to execute on our business plan, respond to competitive pressures, take advantage of market opportunities, satisfy customer requirements or maintain high-quality product offerings, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, we also expect to continue to incur additional legal, accounting, and other expenses as a public company. These investments may be more costly than we expect, and if we do not achieve the benefits anticipated from these investments, or if the realization of these benefits is delayed, they may not result in increased revenue or growth in our business. If we are not able to achieve or maintain positive cash flow in the long term, we may require additional financing, which may not be available on favorable terms or at all or which would be dilutive to our stockholders. If we are unable to successfully address these risks and challenges as we encounter them, our business, results of operations, and financial condition would be adversely affected. Our failure to achieve or maintain profitability could negatively impact the value of our common stock and warrants.
We will likely need to raise additional capital in the future in order to execute our strategic plan, which may not be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all.
We have experienced recurring losses from operations and negative cash flows from operations, and we expect to continue operating at a loss for the foreseeable future. As of December 31, 2024, we had an accumulated deficit of $268.2 million and cash and cash equivalents of $20.2 million. Our low, current cash balance, recurring operating losses, and negative cash flows from operations since inception raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the accompanying consolidated financial statements are issued.
Our ability to raise capital as we have done in recent years may not always be successful, and we will likely need to raise additional capital to fund our future operations in order to remain as a going concern. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional funding on acceptable terms, if at all. To the extent that we raise additional capital through future equity offerings, the ownership interest of common stockholders will be diluted, which dilution may be significant. However, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain any or sufficient additional funding or that such funding, if available, will be obtainable on terms satisfactory to us. Failure to secure additional funding may require us to modify, delay or abandon some of our planned future development, or to otherwise enact further operating cost reductions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition and ability to achieve our intended business objectives.
Substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern may materially and adversely affect the price per share of our common stock, and it may be more difficult for us to obtain financing. If potential investors decline to participate in any future financings due to such concerns, our ability to increase our cash position may be limited. The perception that we may not be able to continue as a going concern may cause others to choose not to deal with us due to concerns about our ability to meet our contractual obligations.
22
We have prepared our consolidated financial statements on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. Our consolidated financial statements included in this Report do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible inability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date of the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. If we are unable to continue as a going concern, you could lose all or part of your investment.
In addition, we have in the past and may in the future maintain our cash in bank deposit accounts which, at times, exceed federally insured limits. As of December 31, 2024, we maintain the majority of our cash and cash equivalents in accounts with primarily Silicon Valley Bank "SVB", a division of First Citizens Bank and Citibank, and exceeded federally insured limits. In the event of failure of any of the financial institutions where we maintain our cash and cash equivalents, there can be no assurance that we would be able to access uninsured funds in a timely manner or at all. Any inability to access or delay in accessing these funds could adversely affect our business and financial position.
We will likely still need additional funding to fund our operations, but additional funds may not be available to us on acceptable terms on a timely basis, if at all. We may seek funds through borrowings or additional rounds of financing, including private or public equity or debt offerings, or by other means. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:
•the timing, receipt and amount of sales from our current and future products and services;
•the cost and timing of manufacturing, either ourselves or through third party manufacturers, our products and services;
•the cost and timing of expanding our sales, marketing and distribution capabilities;
•the terms and timing of any other partnership, licensing and other arrangements that we may establish;
•the costs and timing of securing regulatory approvals or certifications;
•any product liability or other lawsuits related to our current or future products and services;
•the expenses needed to attract, hire and retain skilled personnel;
•the costs associated with being a public company;
•costs associated with any adverse market conditions or other macroeconomic factors;
•the costs involved in preparing, filing, prosecuting, maintaining, defending and enforcing our intellectual property portfolio; and
•the extent to which we acquire or invest in businesses, products or technologies.
If we raise additional funds through further issuances of equity or convertible debt securities, our existing stockholders could suffer significant dilution, and any new equity securities we issue could have rights, preferences, and privileges superior to those of holders of our common stock. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on terms satisfactory to us, when we require it, our ability to continue to pursue our business objectives and to respond to business opportunities, challenges, or unforeseen circumstances could be significantly limited, and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. We also could be required to seek funds through arrangements with partners or others that may require us to relinquish rights or jointly own some aspects of our technologies, products or services that we would otherwise pursue on our own.
Our debt arrangements contain certain covenants and restrictions that may limit our flexibility in operating our business and any failure to satisfy those covenants and restrictions could adversely affect our business and financial condition.
Our Loan Facility Agreement with WTI Fund X, Inc. and WTI Fund XI, Inc., dated September 11, 2024 (the “Loan Facility Agreement”) and our Credit and Security Agreement with ABL OPCO LLC and the lenders thereto, dated September 11, 2024 (the “ABL Credit Agreement”), contain various affirmative and negative covenants and restrictions that limit our ability to engage in specific types of transactions, including:
•incur certain liens;
•incur or guarantee additional indebtedness or make payment on certain subordinated debt;
•pay dividends and make other distributions on, or redeem or repurchase, capital stock;
•make certain investments, including loans to other parties;
•make certain capital expenditures;
•enter into certain transactions with affiliates;
23
•enter into certain leases and other material business agreements;
•merge, dissolve, liquidate or consolidate;
•dispose of certain assets, entity control or business locations;
•make certain amendments to our organizational documents;
•change lines of business;
•comply with governmental and regulatory authorities; and
•transfer or sell assets.
Consequences of this indebtedness may require a substantial portion of cash flow from operations to be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our debt, thereby reducing our ability to use our cash flow to fund operations, capital expenditures, and future business opportunities. The interest rates on our indebtedness are variable and therefore we are exposed to changes in interest rates, which could materially impact our ability to make interest payments as well as our results of operations and financial condition. If we cannot generate sufficient cash flow from operations to service our debt, we may need to refinance our debt, dispose of assets or issue equity to obtain necessary funds. We do not know whether we would be able to take any of these actions on a timely basis, on terms satisfactory to us, or at all. A failure by us or our subsidiaries to comply with the agreements governing our indebtedness could result in an event of default under such indebtedness, which could adversely affect our ability to respond to changes in our business and manage our operations. In addition, the ABL Credit Agreement contains a liquidity covenant requiring us to maintain liquidity of $4,000 and if the liquidity falls below $9,000, we are then subject to a minimum trailing-twelve-months EBITDA covenant as defined in the Credit Agreement. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under any of the agreements governing our indebtedness, the lenders could elect to declare all amounts outstanding to be due and payable and exercise other remedies as set forth in the agreements. If any of our indebtedness were to be accelerated, there can be no assurance that our assets would be sufficient to repay this indebtedness in full, which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue to operate as a going concern. As of December 31, 2024, $7.5 million in aggregate principal amount was outstanding in term loans under the Loan Facility Agreement and $6.3 million in aggregate principal amount was outstanding under the asset-based revolving credit facility under the ABL Credit Agreement. See Part II. Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Note 7," included in this Report.
Our products rely on mobile applications to function and we rely on Apple’s App Store and the Google Play Store for distribution of our mobile applications.
Our products rely on the installation of our mobile applications to function properly. We develop mobile applications on Apple’s iOS platform and Google’s Android platform. Our customers download our mobile applications on Apple’s App Store and the Google Play Store. The App Store and Google Play Store are controlled entirely by Apple and Google, respectively. Mobile applications on the iOS platform are subject to approval by Apple and mobile applications on the Android platform are subject to approval by Google. The terms and policies for maintenance of existing applications and the approval process of new applications are very broad and subject to interpretation and frequent changes, and Apple and Google have complete control over the approval or removal of each mobile application submitted to or offered on their respective platforms. If either Apple or Google changes its standard terms and conditions for maintaining or approving mobile applications in a way that is detrimental to us or decide to remove our mobile applications from their stores, it will be much more difficult or may not be possible for users to install the mobile applications and receive updates to the mobile applications, and our current or future products may cease to function as intended. Apple has informed us that it will remove our mobile applications from the App Store in any country in which any Owlet product requires marketing authorization or certification from any governmental authority or notified body. If Apple removes our applications from the App Store or Google removes our applications from the Google Play Store, our products would not function as intended, and we may be required to recall our products, issue refunds and accept returns, and we may be subject to costly litigation.
A substantial portion of our sales comes through a limited number of retailers.
Historically, we have relied on a limited number of retailers for a substantial portion of our total sales. For example, sales through our top three customers represented 58% of our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 54% for the year ended December 31, 2023. These retailers work with us on a non-exclusive basis. If we are unable to establish, maintain or grow these relationships over time, or if these relationships grow more slowly than we anticipate, we are likely to fail to recover these costs and our operating results will suffer. The loss of any significant retail customer, whether or not related to our business or our products or services, could have an impact on the growth rate of our revenue as we work to obtain new retail customers or replacement relationships. Contracts with retailers may typically be terminated or renegotiated before their term expires for various reasons, subject to certain
24
conditions. For example, after a specified period, certain of our contracts are terminable for convenience by such retailers, subject to a notice period. Additionally, certain contracts may be terminated immediately by the retailer if we go bankrupt or if we fail to comply with certain specified laws. Any renegotiation of the commercial agreements may result in less favorable economic terms for us. Retailers may also consolidate their operations, reducing the overall number of locations in which they sell our products and services. Historically, we have had retail customers declare bankruptcy and stop operations, negatively affecting our sales and business. If regulatory actions such as the Warning Letter we received in October 2021 regarding the regulatory status of the Smart Sock are threatened or taken against us or our products, retailers may stop carrying and return our products. Such returns have had, and may have, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In order to grow our business, we anticipate that we will continue to depend on our relationships with third parties, including our retailers. Identifying retailers, and negotiating and documenting relationships with them, requires significant time and resources. Our competitors may be effective in providing incentives to third parties to favor their products or services. If we are unsuccessful in establishing, or maintaining or strengthening our relationships with third parties, our ability to compete in the marketplace or to grow our revenue could be impaired and our results of operations may suffer. Even if we are successful, these relationships may not result in increased customer use of our services or increased revenue.
We currently rely on a single manufacturer for the assembly of our Dream Sock, Smart Sock and BabySat products and a single manufacturer for the assembly of our Owlet Cam. We will likely rely on single manufacturers for future products we may develop. If we encounter manufacturing problems or delays or increased costs, we may be unable to promptly transition to alternative manufacturers and our ability to generate revenue may be limited.
We have no manufacturing capabilities of our own. We currently rely on a single manufacturer located in Thailand, Benchmark Electronics, for the manufacture of our Dream Sock, Smart Sock and BabySat products. Additionally, we currently rely on a separate single manufacturer located in China, Shenzhen Aoni Electronic, for the manufacture of our Owlet Cam. We expect to rely on limited manufacturers for future products we may develop. For us to be successful, our contract manufacturers must be able to provide us with products in substantial quantities, in compliance with regulatory requirements, in accordance with agreed upon specifications, at acceptable costs and on a timely basis. Our existing manufacturers may not be able to continue to meet our demand requirements on a timely basis, their ability and willingness to continue to do so going forward may be limited for several reasons, including our relative importance as a customer of each manufacturer or their respective ability to provide assembly services to manufacture our products, which may be affected by pandemics or other natural or man-made disasters. Earthquakes are of particular significance since our headquarters are located in an earthquake-prone area. We are also vulnerable to damage from other types of disasters, including power loss, attacks from extremist or terrorist organizations, epidemics, communication failures, fire, floods and similar events. Certain of these events may be exacerbated by climate change; for more information, see our risk factor titled “We are subject to a series of risks regarding climate change.” Furthermore, we are subject to the risk that one or more of our critical third-party manufacturers, may experience financial instability, file for bankruptcy, or otherwise cease operations. The loss of a key provider could result in significant supply chain delays, inability to meet sales demand, and increased costs associated with transitioning to alternative providers. In addition, component parts sourced from these suppliers may also be subject to tariffs or other limitations imposed by the U.S. administration, which could limit availability of necessary parts for our products, increase our costs and impact our business and results of operations (see “—Increases in tariffs, trade restrictions or taxes on our products could have an adverse impact on our operations.” Furthermore, our manufacturing agreements can be terminated by our contract manufacturers without cause by giving us prior notice of six months or less. The facilities and the manufacturing equipment used to produce our products would be difficult to replace and could require substantial time to repair if significant damage were to result from any of these occurrences. An interruption in our commercial operations could occur if we encounter delays or difficulties in securing these manufactured products for any reason and we cannot obtain an acceptable substitute.
Any transition to a new contract manufacturer, or any transition of products between existing manufacturers, could be time-consuming and expensive, may result in interruptions in our operations and product delivery, could affect the performance specifications of our products, could require that we modify the design of our products, or could require clearance, or approval by the FDA, or similar clearances, approvals, or certifications from foreign regulatory authorities or notified bodies, depending on the nature of the product and the changes associated with the transition to the new manufacturer. If we are required to change a contract manufacturer, we will be required to verify that the new manufacturer maintains facilities, procedures and operations that comply with our quality standards and applicable regulatory requirements, which could further impede our ability to manufacture our products in a timely manner. We may not be able to identify and engage alternative contract manufacturers on similar terms or without
25
delay. Furthermore, our contract manufacturers could require us to move to a different production facility. The occurrence of any of these events could harm our ability to meet the demand for our products in a timely and cost-effective manner, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The manufacture of our products is complex and requires the integration of a number of components from several sources of supply. Our contract manufacturers must manufacture and assemble these complex products in commercial quantities in compliance with regulatory requirements and at an acceptable cost. Our products require significant expertise to manufacture, and our contract manufacturers may encounter difficulties in scaling up production of our products, including problems with quality control and assurance, component supply shortages, increased costs, shortages of qualified personnel, the long lead time required to develop additional facilities for purposes of testing our products or difficulties associated with compliance with local, state, federal and foreign regulatory requirements. Manufacturing or quality control problems may arise in connection with the scale-up of the manufacture of our products. If we are unable to obtain a sufficient supply of product, maintain control over product quality and cost or otherwise adapt to anticipated growth, or if we underestimate growth, we may not have the capability to satisfy market demand, and our business and reputation in the marketplace will suffer. In particular, if we are unable to obtain key materials and components from any sole or limited source suppliers, we would not be able to deliver our products to customers on a timely basis, if at all. Conversely, if demand for our products decreases, we may have excess inventory, which could result in inventory write-offs that would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Any of these outcomes could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Any disruption of service at our third-party data and call centers or other cloud infrastructure services could interrupt or delay our ability to deliver our services to our customers.
Because our products and services are used by caregivers to monitor infants, it is critical that our products and services be accessible without interruption or degradation of performance. Customers may become dissatisfied by any system failure that interrupts our ability to provide our services to them. Sustained or repeated system failures would reduce the attractiveness of our products or services to customers. Moreover, negative publicity arising from these types of disruptions could damage our reputation and may adversely impact use of our products and services.
We currently host our products and services, serve our customers and support our operations primarily from third-party data and call centers and other cloud-based services. For example, we rely on cloud services and bespoke software services provided by Ayla Networks for our Dream Sock and Smart Sock products to support the transfer of data to the cloud and back to us and the user. Additionally, we rely on the data transfer services of ThroughTek to enable video viewing access for the Owlet Cam. We do not have control over the operations of the services or the facilities of any of those providers. These facilities are vulnerable to damage or interruption from earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, fires, cyber security attacks, terrorist attacks, power losses, telecommunications failures and similar events. Certain of these events may be exacerbated by climate change; for more information, see our risk factor titled “We are subject to a series of risks regarding climate change.” The occurrence of a natural disaster or an act of terrorism, a decision to close the facilities without adequate notice, or other unanticipated problems could result in lengthy interruptions in our services. The facilities also could be subject to break-ins, computer viruses, sabotage, intentional acts of vandalism and other misconduct. We may not be able to easily switch our cloud operations to another cloud provider if there are disruptions or interference with such providers.
None of our third-party cloud-based providers has an obligation to renew their agreements with us on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. If we are unable to renew our agreements with these providers on commercially reasonable terms, if our agreements with our providers are prematurely terminated, or if in the future we add additional cloud-based providers, we may experience costs or downtime in connection with the transfer to, or the addition of, new providers. If these providers were to increase the cost of their services, we may have to increase the price of our products and services, and our operating results may be materially adversely affected.
Furthermore, we are subject to the risk that one or more of our critical third-party providers, such as Ayla Networks or ThroughTek, may experience financial instability, file for bankruptcy, or otherwise cease operations. The loss of a key provider could result in significant disruptions to our services, delays in product functionality, and increased costs associated with transitioning to alternative providers. Because our products are essential for infant monitoring, any such disruption could severely damage our reputation and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We rely on the experience and expertise of our senior management team, other key officers, our engineers, marketing and field sales team and other highly skilled personnel.
26
We are highly dependent on our senior management, other key officers, our engineers, marketing and field sales team, and may be increasingly dependent on healthcare and clinical specialists for the sale of any medical devices we may market. We face significant competition for talent from other healthcare, technology and high-growth companies, which include both large enterprises and privately-held companies. To attract top talent, we have had to offer, and believe we will need to continue to offer, highly competitive compensation packages before we can validate the productivity of those employees. In addition, we may not be able to hire new employees quickly enough to meet our needs and fluctuations in the price of our common stock may make it more difficult or costly to use equity compensation to motivate, incentivize and retain our employees.
In addition, we recruit professionals on a global basis and must comply with the immigration laws in the countries in which we operate, including the U.S. Some of our employees are working under Owlet-sponsored temporary work visas, including H1-B visas. Statutory law limits the number of new H1-B temporary work permit petitions that may be approved in a fiscal year. Furthermore, there is a possibility that the current U.S. immigration visa program may be significantly overhauled, and the number of H1-B visas available, as well as the process to obtain them, may be subject to significant change. Any resulting changes to this visa program could impact our ability to recruit, hire and retain qualified skilled personnel. If we are unable to obtain work visas in sufficient quantities or at a sufficient rate for a significant period of time, our business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Some of our products and services are in development or have been recently introduced into the market and may not achieve market acceptance, which could limit our growth and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our portfolio of products and services continues to expand, and we are investing significant resources to enter into, and in some cases create, new markets for these products and services. We are continuing to invest in sales and marketing resources to achieve market acceptance of these products and services, but our technologies may not achieve general market acceptance. New products and services, such as BabySat or our subscription offering, Owlet360, may also fail to achieve the market acceptance that we anticipate.
The degree of market acceptance of these products and services will depend on a number of factors, including:
•perceived benefits from and safety of our products and services;
•perceived cost effectiveness of our products and services;
•our ability to obtain any required marketing authorizations or certifications for our products and services and the label requirements of any marketing authorizations or certifications we may obtain;
•coverage and reimbursement available through government and private healthcare programs for using some of our products and services; and
•introduction and acceptance of competing products and services or technologies.
If our products and services do not gain market acceptance or if our customers prefer our competitors’ products and services, our potential revenue growth would be limited, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we are unable to successfully develop and effectively manage the introduction of new products and services, our business may be adversely affected.
We must successfully manage introductions of new or advanced products, such as BabySat and Dream Sock, and services, such as the development of our software platform and our subscription offering, Owlet360. Development of new products and services requires the expenditure of considerable time and resources, but we may not be able to successfully develop and introduce such products on a timely basis, or at all. Products and services that are not well-received by the market may lead to excess inventory and discounting of our existing products and services. Inventory levels in excess of consumer demand may result in inventory write-downs or write-offs and the sale of inventory at discounted prices, may affect our gross margin and could impair the strength of our brand. Reserves and write-downs for rebates, promotions and excess inventory are recorded based on our forecast of future demand. Actual future demand could be less than our forecast, which may result in additional reserves and write-downs in the future, or actual demand could be stronger than our forecast, which may result in increased shipping costs and a reduction to previously recorded reserves and write-downs in the future and increase the volatility of our operating results.
Introductions of new or advanced products and services could also adversely impact the sales of our existing products and services to consumers. For instance, the introduction or announcement of new or advanced products and services may shorten the life cycle of our existing products or reduce demand, thereby reducing any benefits of successful product or service introductions and potentially leading to challenges in managing write-downs or write-offs of inventory of existing products and services. In addition, some of our products are regulated by the FDA and
27
foreign regulatory agencies as medical devices and require marketing authorization from the FDA and similar marketing authorization or certification from other applicable regulatory authorities or notified bodies prior to commercialization. New products, particularly those products needing to meet FDA or other regulatory requirements, may have higher manufacturing costs than legacy products, which could negatively impact our gross margins and operating results. Accordingly, if we fail to effectively manage introductions of new or advanced products and services, our business may be adversely affected.
We have in the past experienced challenges managing the inventory of our products, which has led and may in the future lead to increased shipping costs for air freight in order to fulfill customer orders in a timely manner, which has affected our gross margin and could impair the strength of our brand.
We face and expect to face increasing competition from other companies, many of which have substantially greater resources than we do. If we do not successfully develop and commercialize enhanced or new products and services that remain competitive with products and services or alternative technologies developed by others, we could lose revenue opportunities and customers, and our ability to grow our business would be impaired, adversely affecting our financial condition and results of operations.
We expect the industry in which we operate will continue to evolve and may be significantly affected by new product introductions and other market activities of industry participants. Certain potential competitors have substantially greater capital resources, larger product portfolios, larger user bases, larger sales forces and greater geographic presence, and have built relationships with retailers and distributors that may be more effective than ours. Our products and services face additional competition from companies developing products and services for use with third-party monitoring systems, as well as from companies that currently market similar products and services of their own and may face further pressure from technology companies that have not historically operated in our industry.
Continuing technological advances and new product introductions within the home-use childcare electronics and service industry place our products and services at risk of obsolescence. Our long-term success depends upon the development and successful commercialization of new products and services, new or improved technologies and additional applications for our existing technologies, including products or applications that may be subject to the oversight of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities and could require marketing authorization by the FDA or similar marketing authorization or certification from comparable foreign regulatory authorities or notified bodies. The research and development process is time-consuming and costly and may not result in products and services or applications that we can successfully commercialize.
If we do not successfully adapt and advance our products and services and applications, we could see increased competition from our competitors who use our medical devices as predicates. Because our products that are regulated as medical devices now have marketing authorizations from the FDA, one or more of our competitors may develop and obtain authorization for similar products that compete with ours. For example, in the U.S., using our marketing authorizations for BabySat and/or Dream Sock, our competitors may develop products that the FDA determines are substantially equivalent to our products and may use our products as predicate devices to obtain 510(k) clearances for their competing products.
We are involved, and may become involved in the future, in disputes and other legal or regulatory proceedings that, if adversely decided or settled, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are, and may in the future become, party to litigation, regulatory proceedings or other disputes. In general, claims made by or against us in disputes and other legal or regulatory proceedings can be expensive and time-consuming to bring or defend against, requiring us to expend significant resources and divert the efforts and attention of our management and other personnel from our business operations. These potential claims may include but are not limited to personal injury and class action lawsuits, intellectual property claims and regulatory investigations relating to the advertising and promotional claims about our products and services and employee claims against us based on, among other things, discrimination, harassment or wrongful termination. Any one of these claims, even those without merit, may divert our financial and management resources that would otherwise be used to benefit the future performance of our operations. Any adverse determination against us in these proceedings, or even the allegations contained in the claims, regardless of whether they are ultimately found to be without merit, may also result in settlements, injunctions or damages that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Additionally, in the past, securities class action and derivative litigation has often been brought against a company following a decline in the market price of its securities. For example, in November 2021, two putative class action complaints were filed against us in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, the first captioned Butala v. Owlet, Inc., Case No. 2:21-cv-09016, and the second captioned Cherian v. Owlet, Inc., Case No. 2:21-
28
cv-09293. For additional information regarding these matters, and other legal proceedings involving the Company, see, Part II. Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” - Note 7. These lawsuits and any future lawsuits to which we may become a party are subject to inherent uncertainties and will likely be expensive and time-consuming to investigate, defend and resolve. Any litigation to which we are a party may result in an onerous or unfavorable judgment that may not be reversed upon appeal, or in payments of substantial monetary damages or fines, or we may decide to settle this or other lawsuits on similarly unfavorable terms, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or stock price.
We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and we may identify additional material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fail to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, which may result in material misstatements of our consolidated financial statements, cause us to fail to meet our periodic reporting obligations, or cause our access to the capital markets to be impaired.
As previously reported, in connection with the re-issuance of our consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, we identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. Further, during the year ended December 31, 2022, we identified additional material weaknesses to our internal control over financial reporting. These identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting continued to exist as of December 31, 2024.
We did not design and maintain an effective control environment commensurate with our financial reporting requirements. Specifically, we did not maintain a sufficient complement of personnel with an appropriate degree of internal controls and accounting knowledge, experience, and training commensurate with our accounting and financial reporting requirements. This material weakness contributed to the following material weaknesses:
•We did not design and maintain effective controls over the segregation of duties related to journal entries. Specifically, certain personnel have the ability to both create and post journal entries within the Company’s general ledger system. This material weakness did not result in any adjustments to the consolidated financial statements.
•We did not design and maintain effective controls over the accounting for the accuracy and existence of inventory, nor controls which verified the completeness and accuracy of accrued liabilities. Each of these material weaknesses resulted in immaterial adjustments within the year ended December 31, 2022 and the accrued liabilities material weakness resulted in immaterial adjustments within the year ended December 31, 2024.
•We did not design and maintain effective controls over the accounting for debt and equity arrangements, including convertible preferred stock, warrant arrangements, and stock-based compensation modifications. Further, we did not design and maintain effective controls to verify the completeness and accuracy of sales returns and accrued sales tax. Each of these material weaknesses resulted in material adjustments to several account balances and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019. The sales returns material weakness also resulted in immaterial adjustments to revenue and accrued and other expenses as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022. The convertible preferred stock and warrant arrangements material weakness and sales tax material weakness resulted in immaterial adjustments for the year ended December 31, 2024.
•We did not design and maintain effective controls related to the review of the statement of cash flows. This material weakness resulted in adjustments to various line items within the operating, investing, and financing categories of the cash flow and resulted in revisions to the previously issued Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2023 and to the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the interim periods ended March 31, 2023, June 30, 2023, September 30, 2023, March 31, 2024, June 30, 2024, and September 30, 2024.
•We did not design and maintain effective controls over IT general controls for information systems that are relevant to the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Specifically, we did not design and maintain (i) program change management controls to ensure that IT program and data changes affecting financial IT applications and underlying accounting records are identified, tested, authorized and implemented appropriately, (ii) user access controls to ensure appropriate segregation of duties and that adequately restrict user and privileged access to financial applications, programs, and data to appropriate Company personnel, (iii) computer operations controls to ensure that critical batch jobs are monitored, and data backups are authorized and monitored, and (iv) testing and approval controls for program development to ensure that new software development is aligned with business and IT requirements. This material weakness did not result in any adjustments to the consolidated financial statements.
29
Additionally, each of the material weaknesses described above could result in a misstatement of one or more account balances or disclosures that would result in a material misstatement to the interim or annual consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected.
See Part II. Item 9A. “Controls and Procedures” included in this Report for a discussion of our remediation plan to address these material weaknesses.
As a public company, we are required pursuant to Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, subject to certain exceptions, to furnish a report by management on, among other things, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting for each annual report on Form 10-K to be filed with the SEC. This assessment needs to include disclosure of any material weaknesses identified by our management in internal control over financial reporting. Once we cease to be an emerging growth company and cease to be a non-accelerated filer, our independent registered public accounting firm will also be required, pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, to attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in each annual report on Form 10-K to be filed with the SEC. We are required to disclose material changes made in our internal control over financial reporting on a quarterly basis. Failure to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could potentially subject us to sanctions or investigations by the SEC, the stock exchange on which our securities are listed or other regulatory authorities, which would require additional financial and management resources. We are in the costly and challenging process of compiling the system and processing documentation necessary to perform the evaluation needed to comply with Section 404, but we may not be able to complete our testing and any required remediation in a timely fashion.
Increases in tariffs, trade restrictions or taxes on our products could have an adverse impact on our operations.
The commerce we conduct in the international marketplace makes us subject to tariffs, trade restrictions and other taxes when the raw materials or components we purchase, and the products we ship, cross international borders. Trade tensions between the United States and China, Canada, Mexico and other countries have been escalating in recent years. Recently, the U.S. presidential administration has announced new tariffs on imports from China, Canada and Mexico and may impose restrictions against other regions. In prior years, U.S. tariff impositions against Chinese exports have been followed by retaliatory Chinese tariffs on U.S. exports to China and this may recur in China as well as Canada and Mexico. Our camera products are produced exclusively by manufacturers in China which have been or may in the future be subject to these tariffs. To the extent these tariffs increase our costs of goods sold, it could materially adversely impact our profitability, results of operations and financial condition. To the extent we alter our pricing as a result of such tariffs, it could reduce demand for our products or make our products less competitive than those of our competitors whose inputs are not subject to these tariffs, thereby decreasing our revenues and adversely impacting our results of operations. Products we sell into certain foreign markets could also become subject to similar retaliatory tariffs, making the products we sell uncompetitive compared to similar products not subjected to such import tariffs. We are still evaluating the potential impact of the recently-announced tariffs on our business and financial condition. There can be no assurances that we will not be adversely impacted by such tariffs or that we will be able to pass on any incremental costs to our customers.
Further changes in U.S. trade policies, tariffs, taxes, export restrictions or other trade barriers, or restrictions on raw materials or components may limit our ability to produce products, increase our manufacturing costs, decrease our profit margins, reduce the competitiveness of our products, or inhibit our ability to sell products or purchase raw materials or components, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our distributors or retail customers may experience financial difficulties, and we may not be able to collect our receivables, which could materially or adversely affect our profitability, cash flows, working capital and business operations.
The timely collection of our receivables allows us to generate cash flows, provide working capital and continue our business operations. Due to the challenging environment for traditional “brick-and-mortar” retail locations caused by declining in-store traffic, many retailers have closed physical stores, and some traditional retailers have engaged in significant reorganizations, filed for bankruptcy and gone out of business. In addition to furthering consolidation in the retail industry, such a trend could have a negative effect on the financial health of our retail customers and distributors, potentially causing them to experience difficulties in fulfilling their payment obligations to us or our distributors, reduce the amount of their purchases, seek extended credit terms or otherwise change their purchasing patterns, alter the manner in which they promote our products or the resources they devote to promoting and selling our products or cease doing business with us. If any of our retail customers were to file for bankruptcy, we could be
30
unable to collect amounts owed to us and could even be required to repay certain amounts paid to us prior to the bankruptcy filing. The occurrence of any of these events would have an adverse effect on our business, cash flows, financial condition and results of operations.
Our distributors and retail customers have in the past and may in the future experience financial difficulties for a number of reasons, such as macroeconomic or volatile market conditions, which could impact a distributor’s or retailer’s financial condition or cause its delay or failure to pay us. This could result in longer payment cycles, delay or default in payment or increased credit risk, which, in turn, could cause our cash collections to decrease and allowance for doubtful accounts to increase. While we may resort to alternative collection remedies or other methods to pursue claims with respect to receivables, these alternatives are expensive and time consuming, and successful collection is not guaranteed. Failure to collect our receivables or prevail on related claims could adversely affect our profitability, cash flows, working capital and business operations.
We are subject to risks associated with our distributors’ and retailers’ Owlet product inventories and sell-through to end consumers, which could adversely affect our revenues and results of operations.
Our distributors and retail customers typically stock and maintain their own inventories of Owlet products and sell a large portion of those products through to our end consumers. Substantially all of our revenues have historically been derived from product sales, and we recognize revenue when control of goods and services is transferred to customers, such as upon product shipment to our distributors and retailers.
In a given period, if these distributors and retailers are unable to sell an adequate amount of their Owlet product inventories, or if they decide to decrease or become unwilling to manage or sell their Owlet product inventories for any reason, our sales to and through these third parties could decline, which could result in lower sales volume or increased sales returns, excess inventory or inventory write-offs. Various factors could impact their ability or desire to sell their Owlet product inventories through to end consumers, including but not limited to economic conditions or downturns, pricing discounts or credits, marketing and promotion, customer incentives or other business arrangements. In addition, any deterioration in the financial condition of our distributors and retail customers could adversely impact the flow of our products to our consumers and thus our revenues and results of operations.
Adapting our production capacities to evolving patterns of demand is expensive, time-consuming and subject to significant uncertainties. We may not be able to adequately predict consumer trends and may be unable to adjust our production in a timely manner.
We market our products directly to consumers in the U.S. and a select number of international countries. If demand increases, we will be required to increase production proportionally. Adapting to changes in demand inherently lags behind the actual changes because it takes time to identify the change the market is undergoing and to implement any measures taken as a result. Further, increases in production requires significant capital expenditure. Finally, capacity adjustments are inherently risky because there is imperfect information, and market trends may rapidly intensify, ebb or even reverse. We have in the past not always been, and may in the future not be, able to accurately or timely predict trends in demand and consumer behavior or to take appropriate measures to mitigate risks and exploit opportunities resulting from such trends. Any inability in the future to identify or to adequately and effectively react to changes in demand could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The size and expected growth of our addressable market has not been established with precision and may be smaller than we estimate.
Our estimates of the addressable market for our current products and services and future products and services are based on a number of internal and third-party estimates and assumptions, including birth rate, income levels and demographic profiles. While we believe our assumptions and the data underlying our estimates are reasonable, these assumptions and estimates may not be correct. In addition, the statements in this Report relating to, among other things, the expected growth in the market for baby products and services are based on a number of internal and third-party estimates and assumptions and may prove to be inaccurate. For example, although we expect that the number of births will continue to increase, those trends could shift and the number of births could decrease. Furthermore, even if the birth rate increases as we expect, technological or medical advances could provide alternatives to our products and services and reduce demand. As a result, our estimates of the addressable market for our current or future products and services may prove to be incorrect. If the actual number of consumers who would benefit from our products and services, the price at which we can sell future products and services or the addressable market for our products and services is smaller than we estimate, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We spend significant amounts on advertising and other marketing campaigns to acquire new customers, which may not be successful or cost effective.
31
We market our products and services through a mix of digital and traditional marketing channels. These include retail marketing, paid search, digital display advertising, email marketing, affiliate marketing, and select print advertising. We also leverage our database of prospects and customers to further drive customer acquisition and referrals. We spend significant amounts on advertising and other marketing campaigns to acquire new customers, and we expect our marketing expenses to increase in the future as we continue to spend significant amounts to acquire new customers and increase awareness of our products and services. While we seek to structure our marketing campaigns in the manner that we believe is most likely to encourage consumers to use our products and services, we may fail to identify marketing opportunities that satisfy our anticipated return on marketing spend as we scale our investments in marketing, accurately predict customer acquisition, or fully understand or estimate the conditions and behaviors that drive consumer behavior. Further, state, federal and foreign laws and regulations governing the privacy and security of personal information are evolving rapidly and could impact our ability to identify and market to potential and existing customers. If federal, state, local or foreign laws governing our marketing activities become more restrictive or are interpreted by governmental authorities to prohibit or limit these activities, our ability to attract new customers and retain customers would be affected and our business could be materially harmed. In addition, any failure, or perceived failure, by us, to comply with any federal, state, or foreign laws or regulations governing our marketing activities could adversely affect our reputation, brand, and business, and may result in claims, proceedings, or actions against us by governmental entities, consumers, suppliers or others or other liabilities or may require us to change our operations and/or cease using certain marketing strategies. If any of our marketing campaigns prove less successful than anticipated in attracting new customers, we may not be able to adequately recover our marketing spend, and our rate of customer acquisition may fail to meet market expectations, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our marketing efforts may not result in increased sales of our products and services.
Further, web and mobile browser developers, such as Apple, Microsoft or Google, have implemented and may continue to implement changes, including requiring additional user permissions, in their browser or device operating system that impair our ability to measure and improve the effectiveness of advertising of our products and services. Such changes include limiting the use of first-party and third-party cookies and related tracking technologies, such as mobile advertising identifiers, and other changes that limit our ability to collect information that allows us to attribute consumer actions on advertisers’ websites to the effectiveness of advertising campaigns run by us. For example, Apple launched its Intelligent Tracking Prevention (“ITP”) feature in its Safari browser. ITP blocks some or all third-party cookies by default on mobile and desktop and ITP has become increasingly restrictive over time. Apple’s related Privacy-Preserving Ad Click attribution, intended to preserve some of the functionality lost with ITP, would limit cross-site and cross-device attribution, prevent measurement outside a narrowly-defined attribution window, and prevent ad re-targeting and optimization. Google has also put forth an initiative called the Privacy Sandbox, which is meant to curtail improper tracking while continuing to allow ad targeting within Google Chrome. Under Google’s Privacy Sandbox initiative, cookies will be replaced by certain browser application programming interfaces (“APIs”) that will allow advertisers to receive aggregated data without using cookies. Google Privacy Sandbox is still being developed, but if it is adopted, could require us to make changes to how we collect information on our consumers and our marketing activities. Further, Apple has implemented a framework called “App Tracking Transparency”, which gives users of Apple products more control over the way their data is tracked in mobile applications, and requires mobile applications to ask users for permission if they would like to track activity across other companies’ apps and websites via an iOS device’s advertising identifier. This may also affect our ability to track consumer actions.
In addition, we believe that building a strong brand and developing and achieving broad awareness of our brand is critical to achieving market success. If any of our brand-building activities prove less successful than anticipated in attracting new customers, we may not be able to recover our brand-building spend, and our rate of customer acquisition may fail to meet market expectations, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. There can be no assurance that our brand-building efforts will result in increased sales of our products and services.
If we are unable to continue to drive consumers to our website, it could adversely affect our revenue.
Many consumers find our website, www.owletcare.com by searching for baby products and services through internet search engines or from word-of-mouth and personal recommendations. A critical factor in attracting visitors to our website is how prominently we are displayed in response to search queries. Accordingly, we use search engine marketing as a means to provide a significant portion of our customer acquisition. Search engine marketing includes both paid website visitor acquisition on a cost-per-click basis and visitor acquisition on an unpaid basis, often referred to as organic or algorithmic search.
One method we employ to acquire visitors via organic search is commonly known as search engine optimization (“SEO”). SEO involves developing our website in a way that enables the website to rank high for search queries for
32
which our website’s content may be relevant. We also rely heavily on favorable recommendations from our existing customers to help drive traffic to our website. Additionally, the introduction of AI-assisted technologies could further impact search engine relevance, causing declines in our ranking and decreased traffic. If our website is listed less prominently or fails to appear in search result listings for any reason, it is likely that we will attract fewer visitors to our website, which could adversely affect our revenue.
Our success depends substantially on our reputation and brand.
Our success is dependent in large part upon our ability to maintain and enhance our reputation and brand. Brand value can be severely damaged even by isolated incidents, particularly if the incidents receive considerable negative publicity or result in litigation. Some of these incidents may relate to actions taken (or not taken) with respect to social, environmental, and community outreach initiatives, the personal conduct of individuals actually, or perceived to be associated, with our brand, and our growth or rebranding strategies. We are heavily dependent on customers who use our products and services, in particular Dream Sock and Owlet Cam, to provide good reviews and word-of-mouth recommendations to contribute to the growth of our brand and reputation. Customers who are dissatisfied with their experiences with our products and services or services may post negative reviews. We may also be the subject of blog, forum or other media postings that include statements that create negative publicity. If the FDA or other regulatory body makes public any determination that any of our products is not in compliance with applicable requirements, such as occurred in the FDA’s October 1, 2021 Warning Letter with respect to Owlet Smart Sock, or takes some other public action such as issuing a public enforcement action or recommending or mandating a recall, customers may react negatively and stop purchasing or recommending our products or services, or may demand refunds. Any negative reviews or publicity, whether real or perceived, disseminated by word-of-mouth, by the general media, by electronic or social networking means or by other methods, could harm our reputation and brand and could severely diminish consumer confidence in our products and services.
Increased use of social media could create or amplify the effects of negative publicity and adversely affect sales and operating results.
As part of our marketing efforts, we rely on search engine marketing and social media platforms to attract and retain customers. These efforts may not be successful, and pose a variety of other risks, including the improper disclosure of proprietary information, the posting of negative comments about our brand, the exposure of personally identifiable information, fraud, use of out-of-date information or failure to comply with regulations regarding such practices. Negative or false commentary about us or our products or services may be posted on social media platforms and may harm our reputation or business and social media has also given users the ability to more effectively organize collective actions, such as boycotts, which could be taken against us or our products or services. Customers value readily available information and often act on such information without affording us an opportunity for redress or correction. The inappropriate use of social media vehicles, including a failure to abide by applicable laws and regulations, in the use of social media by us or our influencers, employees, contractors, suppliers, customers or other third parties associated or perceived to be associated with us could increase our costs, lead to litigation, fines or regulatory action or result in negative publicity that could damage our reputation. The occurrence of any such developments could have an adverse effect on our business results.
In addition, events such as the Warning Letter reported in the media, including social media, whether or not accurate or involving us or our products or services, could create or amplify negative publicity for us or for the industry or market segments in which we operate. These and other types of social media risks could reduce demand for products and services offered by us and/or shift consumer preferences to competitors and could result in a decrease in customer demand for our products and services.
Defects or quality issues associated with our products could adversely affect the results of our operations.
The design, manufacture and marketing of medical devices involve certain inherent risks. Manufacturing or design defects, component failures, unapproved or improper use of our products, or inadequate disclosure of risks or other information relating to the use of our products can lead to injury or other serious adverse events. Such events have in the past and could in the future lead to recalls or safety alerts relating to our products (either voluntary or as required by the FDA or similar governmental authorities in other countries), and could result, in certain cases, in the removal of a product from the market. A recall could result in significant costs and lost sales and customers, enforcement actions and/or investigations by state and federal governments or other enforcement bodies, as well as negative publicity and damage to our reputation that could reduce future demand for our products. Personal injuries relating to the use of our products can also result in significant product liability claims being brought against us. In some circumstances, such adverse events could also cause delays in obtaining marketing authorizations of new products or the imposition of post-market requirements.
33
Our products must be manufactured, and services provided, in accordance with federal, state and foreign regulations, and we or any of our suppliers could be forced to recall products or terminate production or services if we fail to comply with these regulations.
The methods used in, and the facilities used for, the manufacture of our products must comply with the FDA’s QSR, which is a complex regulatory scheme that covers the procedures and documentation of the design, testing, production, process controls, quality assurance, labeling, packaging, handling, storage, distribution, installation, servicing and shipping of medical devices. Furthermore, we are required to verify that our manufacturers and suppliers maintain facilities, procedures and operations that comply with our quality standards and applicable regulatory requirements. The FDA enforces the QSR through periodic announced or unannounced inspections of medical device manufacturing facilities, which may include the facilities of subcontractors. Our products are also subject to similar state regulations and various laws and regulations of foreign countries governing manufacturing.
In addition, as the provider of products with a subscription-based element, a variety of laws and regulations govern the ability of users to cancel subscriptions and auto-payment renewals. California’s automatic renewal law in particular has been the basis for both consumer class actions and government enforcement.
Our third-party manufacturers may not take the necessary steps to comply with applicable regulations, which could cause delays in the delivery of our products. In addition, failure to comply with applicable FDA (or other regulatory authorities) requirements or later discovery of previously unknown problems with our products or manufacturing processes could result in, among other things: warning letters or untitled letters; fines, injunctions or civil penalties; suspension or withdrawal of approvals or certifications; seizures or recalls of our products; total or partial suspension of production or distribution; administrative or judicially imposed sanctions; the FDA’s (or foreign regulatory authorities’ or notified bodies’) refusal to grant pending or future clearances, certifications or approvals for our products; clinical holds; refusal to permit the import or export of our products; and criminal prosecution of us or our employees.
Any of these actions could significantly and negatively affect supply of our products. If any of these events occurs, our reputation could be harmed, we could be exposed to product liability claims and we could lose customers and experience reduced sales and increased costs.
Operations in international markets expose us to additional business, political, regulatory, operational, financial and economic risks.
Further expanding our business to attract customers in countries other than the U.S. is a key element of our long-term business strategy. International operations expose us and our representatives, agents and distributors to risks inherent in operating in foreign jurisdictions, and such exposure will increase as our international presence and activities increase. These risks include:
•the imposition of additional U.S. and foreign governmental controls or regulations;
•the imposition of costly and lengthy new export licensing requirements;
•the imposition of requirements to maintain data and the processing of that data on servers located within the U.S. or in foreign countries;
•a shortage of high-quality employees, sales people and distributors;
•the loss of any key personnel that possess proprietary knowledge, or who are otherwise important to our success in certain international markets;
•changes in duties and tariffs, license obligations and other non-tariff barriers to trade;
•the imposition of new trade restrictions;
•the imposition of restrictions on the activities of foreign agents, representatives and distributors;
•compliance with or changes in foreign tax laws, regulations and requirements and economic and trade sanctions programs;
•evolution in regulatory landscapes, such as on account of the UK leaving the EU, and uncertainties that arise from such evolution;
•pricing pressure;
•increased marketing costs;
•changes in foreign currency exchange rates;
•laws and business practices favoring local companies;
34
•political instability and actual or anticipated military or political conflicts;
•financial and civil unrest worldwide;
•outbreaks of illnesses, pandemics or other local or global health issues;
•natural or man-made disasters;
•the inability to collect amounts paid by foreign government customers to our appointed foreign agents;
•longer payment cycles, increased credit risk and different collection remedies with respect to receivables; and
•difficulties in enforcing or defending intellectual property rights.
In addition, we purchase a portion of our raw materials and components from international sources. The sale and shipment of our products and services across international borders, as well as the purchase of materials and components from international sources, subject us to extensive U.S. and foreign governmental trade regulations, including those related to conflict minerals. Compliance with such regulations is costly and we could be exposed to potentially significant penalties if we are found not to be in compliance with such regulations. Any failure to comply with applicable legal and regulatory obligations could impact us in a variety of ways that include, but are not limited to, significant criminal, civil and administrative penalties, including imprisonment of individuals, fines and penalties, denial of export privileges, seizure of shipments, restrictions on certain business activities, and exclusion or debarment from government contracting. Also, the failure to comply with applicable legal and regulatory obligations could result in the disruption of our shipping, manufacturing and sales activities. Any material decrease in our international sales would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business and operations may suffer in the event of IT system failures, cyberattacks or deficiencies in our cybersecurity.
We collect and maintain information in digital form that is necessary to conduct our business, and we are increasingly dependent on IT systems and infrastructure, including those of third-party service providers we rely on, to operate our business. In the ordinary course of our business, we collect, store and transmit large amounts of confidential information, including intellectual property, proprietary business information and personal information of customers and our employees and contractors. However, our IT systems and those of our those of our users, customers, partners, suppliers and third-party service providers are vulnerable to numerous and evolving cybersecurity risks that threaten the confidentiality, integrity and availability of our IT systems and data, including from computer viruses and malware (e.g. ransomware), malicious code, natural disasters, terrorism, war, telecommunication and electrical failures, hacking, cyberattacks, phishing attacks and other social engineering schemes, employee theft or misuse, human or technological error, fraud, denial or degradation of service attacks, as a result of bugs, misconfigurations or exploited vulnerabilities in software or hardware, sophisticated nation-state and nation-state-supported actors or unauthorized access or use by persons inside our organization, or persons with access to systems inside our organization. Attacks upon IT systems are also increasing in their frequency, levels of persistence, sophistication and intensity, and are being conducted by sophisticated and organized groups and individuals with a wide range of motives and expertise. For example, we have been and in the future may be the target of phishing and other scams and attacks. We have not always been successful in detecting these attacks, and while we have not experienced any significant loss or material expense as a result of these cybersecurity attacks or other information security breaches, there can be no assurance that we will not suffer additional attacks or incur material financial consequences or expense in the future. As a result of the continued hybrid work environment, we may also face increased cybersecurity risks due to our reliance on internet technology and the number of our employees who are working remotely, which may create additional opportunities for cybercriminals to exploit vulnerabilities due to the challenges associated with managing remote computing assets and security vulnerabilities that are present in many non-corporate and home networks.
Cybersecurity attacks in particular are evolving, including through the use of artificial intelligence, and because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to, or to sabotage, systems change frequently and often are not recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventative measures. We may experience security breaches that may remain undetected for an extended period. Even if identified, we may be unable to adequately investigate or remediate incidents or breaches due to attackers increasingly using tools and techniques that are designed to circumvent controls, to avoid detection, and to remove or obfuscate forensic evidence. There can also be no assurance that our cybersecurity risk management program and processes, including our policies, controls or procedures, will be fully implemented, complied with or effective in protecting our systems and information, and there can be no assurance that our protective measures will prevent or detect security breaches that could have a significant impact on our business, reputation, financial condition and results of operations.
If such an event were to occur and cause interruptions in our operations, it could result in a material disruption of our development programs and our business operations due to a loss of our trade secrets and confidential information,
35
negative publicity and damage to our reputation, loss of customers, loss of or delay in market acceptance of our products and services, loss of competitive position, loss of revenue or liability for damages or other similar disruptions. Depending on the nature of the attack, a successful attack may also bring into question our internal control over financial reporting. If a security breach or other incident were to result in the unauthorized access to or unauthorized use, disclosure, release or other processing of personal information, it may be necessary to notify individuals, governmental authorities, supervisory bodies, the media and other parties pursuant to privacy and security laws. Any security compromise affecting us, our customers, partners, suppliers, third-party service providers or our industry, whether real or perceived, could harm our reputation, erode confidence in the effectiveness of our security measures and lead to regulatory scrutiny. Furthermore, federal, state and international laws and regulations can expose us to enforcement actions and investigations by regulatory authorities, and potentially result in regulatory penalties, fines and significant legal liability, if our IT security efforts fail. We may also be exposed to a risk of loss or litigation and potential liability and costs including, significant incident response, system restoration or remediation and future compliance costs, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. We cannot guarantee that any costs and liabilities incurred in relation to an attack or incident will be covered by our existing insurance policies or that applicable insurance will be available to us in the future on economically reasonable terms or at all.
Our ability to effectively manage and maintain our internal business information, and to ship products and provide services to customers and invoice them on a timely basis, depends significantly on our enterprise resource planning system and other IT systems. Portions of our IT systems may experience interruptions, delays or cessations of service or produce errors in connection with ongoing systems implementation work. In addition, interfaces between our products and services and our customers’ computer networks could provide additional opportunities for cybersecurity attacks on us and our customers. The failure of these systems to operate or integrate effectively with other internal, customer, supplier or third-party service provider systems and to protect the underlying IT system and data integrity, including from cyberattacks, intrusions or other breaches or unauthorized access of these systems, or any failure by us to remediate any such attacks or breaches, may also result in damage to our reputation or competitiveness, delays in product fulfillment and reduced efficiency of our operations, and could require significant capital investments to remediate any such failure, problem or breach, all of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, our insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover the financial, legal, business or reputational losses that may result from an interruption or breach of our systems.
Development, maintenance, and use of artificial intelligence technologies may not be beneficial to our business, and may result in the poor performance of our products, services and business, as well as damage our reputation and the reputations of our customers, or cause us to incur liability resulting from the violation of laws or contracts to which we are a party.
We expect that investment will be required in the future to develop, maintain and use artificial intelligence ("AI") machine learning and automated decision-making technologies (collectively, "AI Technologies"). As with many technological innovations, there are significant risks involved in developing, maintaining and deploying these technologies, and there can be no assurance that the usage of, or our investments in, such technologies will enhance our products or services or be beneficial to our business, including our efficiency or profitability.
In particular, if the models underlying AI Technologies we deploy are, for example: incorrectly designed or implemented; trained or reliant on incomplete, inadequate, inaccurate, biased or otherwise poor quality data, or on data to which we do not have sufficient rights or in relation to which we and/or the providers of such data have not implemented sufficient legal compliance measures; used without sufficient oversight or governance to provide for their responsible use; and/or adversely impacted by unforeseen defects, technical challenges, cybersecurity threats or material performance issues, the performance of our products, services and business, as well as our reputation and the reputations of our customers, could suffer, or we could incur liability resulting from the violation of laws or contracts to which we are a party or civil claims.
The market for products and services that incorporate AI Technology is rapidly evolving and unproven in many industries, including our own, and important assumptions about the characteristics of targeted markets, pricing, sales cycles, cost, performance, and perceived value associated with our services or products may be inaccurate. We cannot be sure that the market will continue to grow or that it will grow in ways we anticipate. In addition, market acceptance of products and services that incorporate AI Technology is uncertain. Our failure to successfully develop and commercialize products or services that utilize AI Technologies could depress the market price of our stock and impair our ability to: raise capital; expand our business; provide, improve and diversify our product offerings; continue our operations and efficiently manage our operating expenses; and respond effectively to competitive developments.
36
In addition to any proprietary AI Technologies we may develop, our ability to implement and use AI Technologies licensed from third parties, including at the scale we need, may be dependent on access to specific third-party software and infrastructure. We cannot control the availability or pricing of such third-party AI Technologies, especially in a highly competitive environment, and we may be unable to negotiate favorable economic terms with the applicable providers. If any such third-party AI Technologies become incompatible with our solutions or unavailable for use, or if the providers of such models unfavorably change the terms on which their AI Technologies are offered or terminate their relationship with us, our solutions may become less appealing to our customers and our business will be harmed. In addition, to the extent any third party AI Technologies are used as a hosted service, any disruption, outage, or loss of information through such hosted services could disrupt our operations or solutions, damage our reputation, cause a loss of confidence in our solutions, or result in legal claims or proceedings, for which we may be unable to recover damages from the affected provider.
We are subject to a number of risks related to the credit extended by our manufacturing providers.
Our manufacturers extend credit to us and may revoke that credit. We use that credit to scale operations and increase production of our products. If our manufacturers revoke our credit, it could adversely affect our ability to meet demand for our products and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Given the concentration of our manufacturing providers, their willingness to provide credit and support our business is critical for our long-term growth, and losing that credit could create material adverse impact on our operations.
Changes in tax laws may impact our future financial position and results of operations.
New income, sales, use or other tax laws, statutes, rules, regulations or ordinances could be enacted at any time, or interpreted, changed, modified or applied adversely to us, any of which could adversely affect our business operations and financial performance. For example, the U.S. government may enact significant changes to the taxation of business entities including, among others, an increase in the corporate income tax rate, an increase in the tax rate applicable to the global intangible low-taxed income and elimination of certain exemptions, and the imposition of minimum taxes or surtaxes on certain types of income. No specific U.S. tax legislation has been proposed at this time and the likelihood of these changes being enacted or implemented is unclear. We are currently unable to predict whether such changes will occur and, if so, the ultimate impact on our business. To the extent that such changes have a negative impact on us, our suppliers or our customers, including as a result of related uncertainty, these changes may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In addition, as we expand our business internationally, the application and implementation of existing, new or future international laws regarding indirect taxes (such as a Value Added Tax) could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The applicability of sales, use and other tax laws or regulations on our business is uncertain. Adverse tax laws or regulations could be enacted or existing laws could be applied to us or our customers, which could subject us to additional tax liabilities and related interest and penalties, increase the costs of our products and adversely impact our business.
State, local and foreign tax jurisdictions have differing rules and regulations governing sales, use, value-added and other taxes, and these rules and regulations can be complex and are subject to varying interpretations that may change over time. Existing tax laws, statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances could be interpreted, changed, modified, or applied adversely to us (possibly with retroactive effect).
One or more states, countries or other jurisdictions may seek to impose sales, use, value added or other tax collection obligations on us, including for past sales. A successful assertion by a state, country or other jurisdiction that we should have been or should be collecting additional sales, use, value added or other taxes on our products could, among other things, result in substantial tax liabilities for past sales, create significant administrative burdens for us, or otherwise harm our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
37
Our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes may be limited.
We have incurred substantial net operating losses (“NOLs”) since inception, and we may not achieve profitability in the future. U.S. federal and certain state NOLs generated in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 are not subject to expiration. U.S. federal NOLs generally may not be carried back to prior taxable years except that, under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”), U.S. federal NOLs generated in 2018, 2019 and 2020 may be carried back to each of the five taxable years preceding the taxable year in which the loss arises. Additionally, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020, the deductibility of U.S. federal NOLs is limited to 80% of our taxable income in such taxable year. NOLs generated in tax years before 2018 may still be used to offset future taxable income without regard to the 80% limitation, although they have the potential to expire without being utilized if we do not achieve profitability in the future. However, under the rules of Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change,” generally defined as a greater than 50 percentage point change (by value) in its equity ownership over a rolling three-year period, the corporation’s ability to use its pre-change NOLs and other pre-change tax attributes to offset its post-change taxable income or taxes may be limited. The applicable rules generally operate by focusing on changes in ownership among stockholders considered by the rules as owning, directly or indirectly, 5% or more of the stock of a corporation, as well as changes in ownership arising from new issuances of stock by the corporation. If finalized, Treasury Regulations currently proposed under Section 382 of the Code may further limit our ability to utilize our pre-change NOLs or other pre-change tax attributes if we undergo a future ownership change. We could experience one or more ownership changes in the future, including in connection with this Merger and as a result of future changes in our stock ownership, some of which may be outside our control. As a result, if we earn net taxable income, our ability to use our pre-change NOL carryforwards to offset post-change taxable income may be subject to limitations. For these reasons, we may not be able to utilize a material portion of our NOLs and other tax attributes, which could adversely affect our future cash flows.
We are subject to a number of risks related to the credit card and debit card payments we accept.
We accept payments through credit and debit card transactions. For credit and debit card payments, we pay interchange and other fees, which may increase over time. An increase in those fees may require us to increase the prices we charge and would increase our operating expenses, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we or our processing vendors fail to maintain adequate systems for the authorization and processing of credit and debit card transactions, it could cause one or more of the major credit card companies to disallow our continued use of their payment products. In addition, if these systems fail to work properly and, as a result, we do not charge our customers’ credit or debit cards on a timely basis, or at all, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The payment methods that we offer also subject us to potential fraud and theft by criminals, who are becoming increasingly more sophisticated in exploiting weaknesses that may exist in the payment systems. If we fail to comply with applicable rules or requirements for the payment methods we accept, or if payment-related data is compromised due to a breach, we may be liable for significant costs incurred by payment card issuing banks and other third parties or subject to fines and higher transaction fees, or our ability to accept or facilitate certain types of payments may be impaired. In addition, our customers could lose confidence in certain payment types, which may result in a shift to other payment types or potential changes to our payment systems that may result in higher costs. If we fail to adequately control fraudulent credit card transactions, we may face civil liability, diminished public perception of our security measures and significantly higher card-related costs, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are also subject to payment card association operating rules, certification requirements and rules governing electronic funds transfers, which could change or be reinterpreted to make it more difficult for us to comply. We are subject to the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (“PCI DSS”) issued by the PCI Council, which includes guidelines with regard to the security policies and practices we should adopt regarding the physical and electronic storage, processing and transmission of cardholder data. Compliance with the PCI DSS and implementing related procedures, technology and information security measures requires significant resources and ongoing attention, and any security incident involving cardholder data could subject us to significant penalties and liability. Failure to comply with this standard may violate payment card association operating rules, federal and state laws and regulations and the terms of our contracts with payment processors. Any failure to comply fully also may subject us to fines, penalties, damages and civil liability, and may result in the loss of our ability to accept credit and debit card payments. Further, there is no guarantee that such compliance will prevent illegal or improper use of our payment systems or the theft, loss or misuse of data pertaining to credit and debit cards, cardholders and transactions.
If we are unable to maintain our chargeback rate or refund rates at acceptable levels, our processing vendor may increase our transaction fees or terminate its relationship with us. Any increases in our credit and debit card fees
38
could harm our results of operations, particularly if we elect not to raise our rates for our products and services to offset the increase. The termination of our ability to process payments on any major credit or debit card would significantly impair our ability to operate our business.
The increasing focus on environmental sustainability and social initiatives could increase our costs, harm our reputation and adversely impact our financial results.
There has been increasing public focus by investors, patients, environmental activists, the media, policymakers, nongovernmental organizations, and other stakeholders on a variety of environmental, social and other sustainability matters, including climate change and human capital. We may experience pressure to make commitments relating to sustainability matters that affect us, including the design and implementation of specific risk mitigation strategic initiatives relating to sustainability. Expectations regarding the management of ESG initiatives continues to evolve rapidly. While we may from time to time engage in various initiatives (including but not limited to voluntary disclosures, policies, or goals) to improve our ESG profile or respond to stakeholder expectations, we cannot guarantee that these initiatives will have the desired effect. For example, stakeholder expectations on ESG matters vary and, at times, conflict. There is also increasing regulatory scrutiny, including the adoption of certain reporting requirements, on such matters; however, such regulations are not uniform, and other policymakers have sought to constrain companies’ consideration of environmental, social, or other sustainability matters in certain instances. If we are not effective in addressing environmental, social and other sustainability matters affecting our business, or navigating stakeholder expectations, including new legal requirements or interpretations of existing requirements, we may be subject to reputational harm, loss of customers or employees, regulatory or investor engagement, or other adverse impacts to our business. Additionally, certain of our suppliers and other stakeholders are subject to similar expectations, which may result in additional or increased risks.
We are subject to a series of risks regarding climate change.
There are inherent climate-related risks wherever business is conducted. Certain of our facilities, as well as third-party infrastructure on which we rely, are located in areas that have experienced, and are projected to continue to experience, various meteorological phenomena or other catastrophic events that may disrupt our or our suppliers’ operations, cause damage or loss to facilities, result in additional costs or project delays, or otherwise adversely impact our business. Climate change, as well as other environmental and social pressures, may increase the frequency and/or intensity of such events and may also contribute to various chronic changes in the physical environment, such as changes in water levels or changes in ambient temperature or precipitation patterns, which may also impact our or our suppliers’ operations.
Concerns about climate change may also result in actions by various investors, consumers, regulators, or other stakeholders. For example, various policymakers, including the U.S. SEC and the State of California, have adopted (or are considering adopting) requirements for the disclosure of certain climate-related information, which may require additional costs for us to comply. Our suppliers may be subject to similar risks, which may indirectly impact us as well.
Risks Related to Regulation of Our Industry and Products
Despite having received 510(k) clearance from the FDA for our prescription-required, BabySat pediatric monitor, and having received de novo classification for our Dream Sock, such marketing authorizations do not ensure commercial success of these products, which will require us to implement processes, procedures and operations necessary to market and sell medical devices. We may not be successful in implementing these conditions, which could subject us to new risks.
In June 2023, we received 510(k) clearance from the FDA for BabySat, a prescription use-only pulse oximeter indicated for use in measuring and displaying functional oxygen saturation of arterial hemoglobin and pulse rate and for spot-checking and/or continuous monitoring of well-perfused patients, greater than one month old up to 18 months old and weighing between 6 and 30 pounds, in the home environment. In November 2023, we received de novo classification, another form of marketing authorization, from the FDA for Dream Sock. The BabySat clearance was the first medical device marketing authorization we have received. In order to market and distribute BabySat or other medical devices, we will need to modify certain of our internal business operations to ensure they comply with medical device requirements and to enable distribution of the product in accordance with the limitations of use described in our marketing authorizations. For example, the 510(k) clearance for BabySat limits distribution of this product to prescription use-only. In the direct-to-consumer model we utilize to distribute Dream Sock and Owlet Cam (as well as Owlet Smart Sock, in certain countries outside of the United States), consumers purchase our products directly from us or one of our retailers, which is a model we are not able to utilize to distribute BabySat in accordance with its prescription-required marketing authorization. We have implemented new distribution channels
39
for BabySat with durable medical equipment distributors, and continue to explore distribution options with healthcare institutions and other healthcare payor and provider channels. The success of these channels will depend on a number of factors, including our ability to identify, establish and maintain strong partnerships within these channels and the level of coverage and reimbursement payors provide for this product. Further, even though we have received FDA clearance for BabySat, we will still need to demonstrate the business and clinical rationale and justifications of this product in order for healthcare institutions and providers to be convinced of the need to prescribe it, and we may not be successful in these efforts.
We are required to obtain and maintain marketing authorizations or certifications from the FDA, foreign regulatory authorities or notified bodies for medical device products in the U.S. or in foreign jurisdictions, which can be a lengthy and time-consuming process, and a failure to do so on a timely basis, or at all, could severely harm our business.
In June 2023, we received 510(k) clearance from the FDA for BabySat, a prescription use-only pulse oximeter indicated for use in measuring and displaying functional oxygen saturation of arterial hemoglobin and pulse rate and for spot-checking and/or continuous monitoring of well-perfused patients, greater than one month old up to 18 months old and weighing between 6 and 30 pounds, in the home environment. In November 2023, we obtained de novo classification for Dream Sock. As such, both of these products are regulated as medical devices by the FDA, and we must continue to maintain compliance with medical device requirements with respect to the manufacture, sale, marketing, and distribution of these products.
Medical devices are subject to extensive regulation in the U.S. by local government, state government and the federal government, including by the FDA. The FDA regulates virtually all aspects of a medical device’s design, development, testing, manufacturing, labeling, storage, record keeping, reporting, sale, promotion, distribution and shipping. In the U.S., unless an exemption applies, any medical device that we seek to market in the U.S. must first undergo the FDA’s premarket review pursuant to the FDCA, and must receive the FDA’s marketing authorization either via clearance of a 510(k) premarket notification, de novo classification, or approval of a PMA application, depending on the type of device. In the 510(k) clearance process, before a device may be marketed, the FDA must determine that a proposed device is “substantially equivalent” to a legally-marketed “predicate” device. To be “substantially equivalent,” the proposed device must have the same intended use as the predicate device, and either have the same technological characteristics as the predicate device or have different technological characteristics and not raise different questions of safety or effectiveness than the predicate device. Clinical data are sometimes required to support substantial equivalence.
In the PMA process, the FDA must determine that a proposed device is safe and effective for its intended use based, in part, on extensive data, including, but not limited to, technical, pre-clinical, clinical trial, manufacturing and labeling data. The PMA process is typically required for devices that are deemed to pose the greatest risk, such as life-sustaining, life-supporting or implantable devices. However, some devices are automatically subject to the PMA pathway regardless of the level of risk they pose because they have not previously been classified into a lower risk class by the FDA. Manufacturers of these devices may request that the FDA review such devices in accordance with the de novo classification procedure, which allows a manufacturer whose novel device would otherwise require the submission and approval of a PMA prior to marketing to request down-classification of the device on the basis that the device presents low or moderate risk. If the FDA agrees with the down classification, the applicant will then receive authorization to market the device. This device can then be used as a predicate device for future 510(k) submissions.
Modifications to products that are approved through a PMA application may require FDA approval. Similarly, certain modifications made to products cleared through a 510(k) premarket notification or de novo classification may require a new 510(k) clearance. The PMA approval, de novo classification, and the 510(k) clearance process can be expensive, lengthy and uncertain. The FDA’s 510(k) clearance process usually takes from three to 12 months, but can last longer. The process of obtaining a PMA is much more costly and uncertain than the 510(k) clearance process and generally takes from one to three years, or even longer, from the time the application is filed with the FDA. In addition, a PMA and de novo classification generally require the performance of one or more clinical trials, and a 510(k) clearance sometimes requires clinical data to support clearance. Despite the time, effort and cost, any particular device may not be authorized for marketing by the FDA. Any delay or failure to obtain necessary marketing authorizations could harm our business.
Even if marketing authorization is granted, such marketing authorization may be limited to only certain indications for use. Medical devices may be marketed only for the indications of use for which they are authorized. Additionally, the FDA might not grant marketing authorizations on a timely basis, if at all, for products or new uses of existing products that are regulated as medical devices and that are determined to require such marketing authorization. In addition, even if FDA marketing authorization is obtained, if safety or effectiveness problems are later identified with any medical device products, we may need to initiate a product recall.
40
To support any submissions to the FDA seeking marketing authorizations, we may be required to conduct clinical testing of our product candidates. Such clinical testing must be conducted in compliance with FDA requirements pertaining to research with human subjects. Among other requirements, we must obtain informed consent from study subjects and approval by institutional review boards (“IRB”) before such studies may begin. We must also comply with other FDA requirements such as monitoring, record-keeping, reporting and the submission of information regarding certain clinical trials to a public database maintained by the National Institutes of Health. In addition, if the study involves a significant risk device, we are required to obtain the FDA’s approval of the study under an Investigational Device Exemption (“IDE”). Compliance with these requirements can require significant time and resources. If the FDA determines that we have not complied with such requirements, the FDA may refuse to consider the data to support our submissions seeking marketing authorization or may initiate enforcement actions.
Moreover, clinical testing is expensive and can take many years to complete, and its outcome is inherently uncertain. Failure can occur at any time during the clinical trial process. The results of preclinical studies and early clinical trials may not be predictive of the results of later-stage clinical trials. Product candidates in later stages of clinical trials may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy traits despite having progressed through preclinical studies and initial clinical trials. A number of companies have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials due to lack of efficacy or adverse safety profiles, notwithstanding promising results in earlier trials. Our future clinical trial results may not be successful. We may also be delayed in our clinical trials, including as related to, among other things: obtaining authorization to initiate clinical trials; reaching agreement on acceptable terms with vendors, clinical trial sites, and contract research organizations; obtaining IRB approvals, recruiting subjects and having them complete the study; experiencing deviations from clinical trial protocols; and adding new clinical sites. We could encounter delays if a clinical trial is suspended or terminated due to a number of factors, including failure to conduct the clinical trial in accordance with regulatory requirements or our clinical protocols, inspection of the clinical trial operations or trial site by the FDA or other regulatory authorities resulting in the imposition of a clinical hold, unforeseen safety issues or adverse side effects, failure to demonstrate a benefit from using a drug, changes in governmental regulations or administrative actions or lack of adequate funding to continue the clinical trial. If we experience delays in the completion of, or termination of, any clinical trial of our medical device products we seek to develop, the commercial prospects of our proposed products will be harmed, and our ability to generate product revenues from any of these products will be delayed. In addition, any delays in completing our clinical trials will increase our costs, slow down our product development and jeopardize our ability to generate product sales and revenues.
The FDA’s interpretations of its laws and regulations are subject to change. If the FDA changes its policy or concludes that the marketing of any of our products is not in accordance with current policies, regulations or statutory requirements, or if the FDA changes its applicable policies or if changes are introduced to applicable laws or regulations, we may be required to seek clearance or approval or other marketing authorization for these products through the 510(k), de novo classification or PMA processes, may not be permitted to continue marketing these products until marketing authorization is obtained, or may be the subject of regulatory enforcement actions or recalls.
If any governmental authority or notified body were to require marketing authorization or similar certification for any product that we sell for which we have not obtained such marketing authorization or certification, we could be subject to regulatory enforcement actions and/or be required to cease selling or recall the product pending receipt of marketing authorization or similar certification from such other governmental authority or notified body, which can be a lengthy and time-consuming process, harm financial results and have long-term negative effects on our operations.
We currently sell Owlet Smart Sock and Dream Sock in certain countries outside of the U.S., and we have not obtained any medical device marketing authorization, approval, or certification from any governmental authority or notified body, other than from the FDA, BSI, and SAPHRA for Dream Sock and the FDA for BabySat. In response to inquiries from the FDA and regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions regarding the marketing of Owlet Smart Sock and Dream Sock (in the case of the FDA, prior to ceasing distribution of Owlet Smart Sock and prior to our recent marketing authorization for Dream Sock Health Notifications features), we have communicated our beliefs that such products are not medical devices that require medical device or similar marketing authorization or certification from such other regulatory authorities or notified bodies. However, certain regulatory authorities have expressed that they do not agree with that conclusion and in some instances have required us to obtain marketing authorization, such as a clearance or approval, or other certification to continue to sell the product.
For example, we previously marketed and sold Owlet Smart Sock in the UK, but are not currently marketing or selling Owlet Smart Sock in the UK. The MHRA, the regulatory authority responsible for the UK medical device market, has asserted that the Owlet Smart Sock requires certification by an approved body and subsequent registration as a medical device in the UK, but has previously indicated it will allow us to continue to offer support for previously-sold Owlet Smart Sock monitors in the UK. If the MHRA determines that we are not permitted to continue supporting previously-sold Owlet Smart Sock monitors notwithstanding the fact that we have ceased
41
marketing and sales of Owlet Smart Sock in the UK, we may have to cease support of the product in the UK and could be subject to enforcement action.
In addition, Owlet ceased selling and advertising Owlet Smart Sock in Canada on December 10, 2021, and has marketed and sold Dream Sock in Canada since January 2022. Health Canada, the regulatory authority responsible for the Canadian medical device market, initially asserted that Dream Sock was a medical device that can no longer be sold in Canada unless a relevant license has been issued. In the second half of 2022, we responded with our position that Dream Sock is not a medical device, and Health Canada has not affirmatively concluded that it agrees or disagrees with our position. If Health Canada does not agree with our position, we may be required to cease distribution of the product into the Canadian market and may be subject to enforcement action.
Obtaining authorization or certification to sell any of our products as medical devices is a time-consuming and costly process and we may be precluded from selling such products if we are required to obtain marketing authorization, such as a clearance or approval, or other certification. The path to market varies among international jurisdictions and may require additional or different product testing than required to obtain FDA marketing authorization. Certifications or marketing authorizations from one foreign regulatory authority or notified body does not ensure certification or marketing authorization by any other foreign regulatory authority or notified body or by the FDA. If we fail to receive necessary certifications or marketing authorizations to commercialize our products in any jurisdictions on a timely basis, or at all, or if we later lose such certifications or marketing authorizations, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. Furthermore, regulatory requirements may change from time to time, which could adversely affect our ability to market new products and services, or continue to market existing products and services. Moreover, even if granted, a marketing authorization or certification could require conditions to sale, such as a prescription requirement. If regulatory authorities require such marketing authorization, including clearance or approval, or other certifications for the products that we sell, we could be subject to regulatory enforcement action, time-consuming and costly marketing authorization and certification application processes, or required to cease selling or to recall the product in the corresponding jurisdiction pending receipt of such marketing authorization or certification. We also could be required to modify the product’s functionality or limit our marketing claims for the product, whether or not we obtain such marketing authorization or other required certification. In any such event, our business could be substantially harmed.
We are expanding into international markets, and we will be required to obtain and maintain regulatory authorizations, including clearances or approvals, or other certifications in order to commercialize certain of our products in certain international markets. Failure to obtain such regulatory authorizations or certifications in relevant foreign jurisdictions may prevent us from marketing medical device products abroad.
We currently market and intend to continue to market our products and services internationally. We expect certain of our pipeline products to be regulated as medical devices, and we have received communications from certain regulatory authorities inquiring as to the regulatory status of our Smart Sock, and whether such product is regulated as a medical device in such jurisdictions. In these communications, some regulatory authorities have asserted that the Smart Sock is a medical device that must comply with medical device requirements in those jurisdictions. See “If any governmental authority or notified body were to require marketing authorization or similar certification for any product that we sell for which we have not obtained such marketing authorization or certification, we could be subject to regulatory enforcement actions and/or be required to cease selling or recall the product pending receipt of marketing authorization or similar certification from such other governmental authority or notified body, which can be a lengthy and time-consuming process, harm financial results and have long-term negative effects on our operations.”
In Europe, we can generally market a medical device only if we receive a certification by a notified body, i.e., an independent organization accredited or designated by an EU member state or a marketing authorization from other foreign regulatory authorities (and meet certain pre-marketing requirements) and, in some cases, pricing approval, from the appropriate regulatory authorities. The path to market varies among international jurisdictions and may require additional or different product testing than required to obtain FDA marketing authorization. We may be unable to obtain foreign certifications or marketing authorizations on a timely basis, if at all, and we may also incur significant costs in attempting to obtain foreign certifications or marketing authorizations.
In order to sell medical devices in the EU, products must comply with the general safety and performance requirements of the EU Medical Devices Regulation (2017/745 or “MDR”). Compliance with these requirements is a prerequisite to be able to affix the European Conformity (“CE”) mark to medical devices, without which they cannot be sold or marketed in the EU. All medical devices placed on the market in the EU must meet the general safety and performance requirements laid down in Annex I to the MDR. To demonstrate compliance with the general safety and performance requirements, we must undergo a conformity assessment procedure, which varies according to the type of medical device and its (risk) classification. Except for low risk medical devices (Class I), where the manufacturer can self-assess the conformity of its products with the general safety and performance requirements (except for any parts which relate to sterility, metrology or reuse aspects), a conformity assessment
42
procedure requires the intervention of a notified body. The notified body would typically audit and examine the technical file and the quality system for the manufacture, design and final inspection of our devices. If satisfied that the relevant product conforms to the relevant general safety and performance requirements, the notified body issues a certificate of conformity, which the manufacturer uses as a basis for its own declaration of conformity. The manufacturer may then apply the CE mark to the device, which allows the device to be placed on the market throughout the EU. Throughout the term of the certificate of conformity, the manufacturer will be subject to periodic surveillance audits to verify continued compliance with the applicable requirements. In particular, there will be a new audit by the notified body before it will renew the relevant certificate(s). If we fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations, we would be unable to affix and maintain the CE mark, which would prevent us from selling them within the EU. The aforementioned EU rules are generally applicable in the EEA. Non-compliance with the above requirements would also prevent us from selling medical devices in these countries.
In February 2024, we obtained our EU certification for Dream Sock under the MDR. Once certified under the MDR, we must inform the notified body that carried out the confirmatory assessment of our medical device that we market or sell in the EU, of any planned substantial changes to our quality system or substantial changes to our medical device that could affect compliance with the general safety and performance requirements laid down in Annex I to the MDR or cause a substantial change to the intended use for which the device has been CE marked. The notified body will then assess the planned changes and verify whether they affect the products’ ongoing conformity with the MDR. If the assessment is favorable, the notified body will issue a new certificate or an addendum to the existing certificate attesting compliance with the general safety and performance requirements and quality system requirements laid down in the Annexes to the MDR. The notified body may disagree with our proposed changes and product introductions or modifications could be delayed or cancelled, which could adversely affect our business.
In addition, marketing authorization by the FDA does not ensure marketing authorization, including clearance or approval, or other certification by foreign regulatory authorities or notified bodies. However, a failure to obtain such marketing authorization by the FDA may have a negative impact on our ability to obtain any necessary marketing authorizations, including clearances or approvals, or similar certifications in foreign jurisdictions. Moreover, certifications or marketing authorizations from one foreign regulatory authority or notified body does not ensure certification or marketing authorization by any other foreign regulatory authority or notified body or by the FDA. If we fail to receive necessary certifications or marketing authorizations to commercialize our products in foreign jurisdictions on a timely basis, or at all, or if we later lose such certifications or marketing authorizations, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. Furthermore, foreign regulatory requirements may change from time to time, which could adversely affect our ability to market new products and services, or continue to market existing products and services, internationally.
Following Brexit, EU laws no longer apply directly in Great Britain. The regulations on medical devices in Great Britain continue to be based largely on the three EU Directives which preceded the EU MDR, as implemented into national law. However, under the terms of the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland, the EU MDR does apply to Northern Ireland. Consequently, there are currently different regulations in place in Great Britain as compared to both Northern Ireland and the EU, respectively. Ongoing compliance with both sets of regulatory requirements may result in increased costs for our business.
Furthermore, on December 16, 2024, the UK government published an amendment to the UK Medical Devices Regulations to clarify and strengthen the post-market surveillance requirements for medical devices in Great Britain. This amendment will come into force on June 16, 2025. In addition, the MHRA launched a consultation between November 14, 2024 and January 5, 2025 on proposals to update the pre-market requirements for medical devices in Great Britain. The MHRA has stated that it will incorporate feedback to this consultation into new UK legislation on pre-market requirements for medical devices in Great Britain. The new legislation is expected to come into force in 2026. Under the UK Medical Devices Regulations, in order to be lawfully placed on the Great Britain market, class I (non-sterile, non-measuring or non-re-useable) medical devices need to be “UKCA” self-certified, and other medical devices need to be “UKCA” certified by a UK approved body. However, certain medical devices in compliance with: (1) the EU Medical Devices Directive can continue to be placed on the Great Britain market until the sooner of certificate expiration or June 30, 2028; or (2) the EU Medical Devices Regulation can continue to be placed on the Great Britain market until the sooner of certificate expiration or June 30, 2030. Medical devices also need to bear a physical United Kingdom Conformity Assessment (“UKCA”) mark in order to be lawfully placed on the Great Britain market. However, one of the key topics in the MHRA’s recent consultation was to obtain feedback on whether to remove the requirement for a medical device and its labelling (i.e. packaging and instructions for use) in Great Britain to bear a physical UKCA mark. Instead of requiring a medical device and its labelling to bear a UKCA mark, manufacturers would be required to assign a unique design identification, or UDI, to medical devices before they are placed on the Great Britain market. If this change is implemented, we may no longer be required to affix the
43
physical UKCA mark to our devices, but we may need to assign and affix a UDI. Understanding and ensuring compliance with any new such requirements is likely to lead to further complexity and increased costs to our business. If there is insufficient UK approved body capacity, there is a risk that our product certification could be delayed which might impact our ability to market products in Great Britain.
We have relied and expect to continue to rely on third parties to conduct our nonclinical and clinical studies and perform other tasks for us. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties, meet expected deadlines, or comply with regulatory requirements, we may not be able to obtain marketing authorization or other required certifications to commercialize our medical device products and our business could be substantially harmed.
We have relied upon and plan to continue to rely upon third parties for execution of our nonclinical and clinical studies, and we control only certain aspects of their activities. Nevertheless, we are responsible for ensuring that each of our studies is conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol, legal, regulatory, and scientific standards and our reliance on third parties does not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities. We and our third party contractors may be required to comply with Good Clinical Practice (“GCP”) requirements and Good Laboratory Practice requirements which are regulations and guidelines enforced by the FDA and other regulatory authorities for the conduct of certain clinical and nonclinical studies, respectively. Regulatory authorities enforce these regulations through periodic inspections of study sponsors, principal investigators, study sites, and other contractors. If we or any of our third party contractors fail to comply with applicable regulations, the data generated in our studies may be deemed unreliable and the FDA and other regulatory authorities or bodies may require us to perform additional nonclinical and clinical studies before issuing any marketing authorizations or other certifications for any medical device products we seek to market. Upon inspection by a given regulatory authority, such regulatory authority may determine that our clinical studies do not comply with GCP regulations. Our or our third party contractors’ failure to comply with these regulations may require us to repeat clinical studies, which would delay or prevent any required marketing authorization or similar certification from being granted.
If any of our relationships with these third parties terminate, we may not be able to enter into arrangements with alternative third parties or do so on commercially reasonable terms. In addition, our contractors are not our employees, and except for remedies available to us under our agreements with them, we cannot control whether or not they devote sufficient time and resources to our development programs. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or obligations or meet expected deadlines, if they need to be replaced or if the quality or accuracy of the data they obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to our protocols, regulatory requirements, or for other reasons, our studies may be extended, delayed, or terminated and we may not be able to obtain marketing authorizations or other required certifications to successfully commercialize our proposed medical device products. Third parties may also generate higher costs than anticipated. As a result, our results of operations and the commercial prospects for our proposed products would be harmed, our costs could increase, and our ability to generate revenue could be delayed.
We rely on third parties to manufacture our products. Failure of those third parties to provide us with sufficient quantities of our products, in compliance with applicable regulatory requirements, or to do so at acceptable quality levels or prices could adversely impact our business.
We do not currently have nor do we plan to acquire the infrastructure or capability internally to completely manufacture our commercial products or our development-stage products, and we lack the resources and the capability to manufacture any of our current or future products in the future. We do not control the manufacturing process of, and are completely dependent on, our contract manufacturing partners for compliance with applicable regulatory requirements for any medical device products we seek to market. For example, the FDA requires adherence to current good manufacturing practice requirements for medical devices, known as the Quality System Regulation (“QSR”). If our contract manufacturers cannot successfully manufacture material that conforms to our specifications and the strict regulatory requirements of the FDA or other regulators, our products may not be able to be lawfully marketed. In addition, we have no control over the ability of our contract manufacturers to maintain adequate quality control, quality assurance and qualified personnel. If the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority or notified body does not consider these facilities adequate for the manufacture of our products, we may need to find alternative manufacturing facilities, which would significantly impact our ability to develop, obtain marketing authorization or similar certification for or to market any medical device products we may seek to develop and commercialize.
Moreover, failure by us or one of our manufacturers or suppliers to comply with applicable statutes and regulations administered by the FDA or comparable regulatory bodies could result in, among other things, any of the following:
•warning letters or untitled letters issued by the FDA or Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and their counterparts in international jurisdictions;
44
•litigation, fines, civil penalties, in rem forfeiture proceedings, injunctions, consent decrees and criminal prosecution;
•import alerts and holds;
•unanticipated expenditures to address or defend such actions;
•delays in clearing, approving, authorizing, or certifying, or refusal to clear, approve, authorize, or certify, our products, where applicable;
•withdrawals or suspensions of clearance, approval, authorization or certification of our products or those of our third-party suppliers by the FDA or other regulatory authorities or notified bodies, where applicable;
•product recalls or seizures;
•adverse publicity;
•orders for device repair, replacement or refund;
•interruptions of production or inability to export to certain foreign countries; and
•operating restrictions.
If any of these items were to occur, it would harm our reputation and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We rely on third-party manufacturers to purchase from third-party suppliers the materials necessary to produce our products. There are a limited number of suppliers for raw materials that are used in the manufacture of our products and that we anticipate will be able to supply materials for the production of our future products, and there may be a need to assess alternate suppliers to prevent a possible disruption of the manufacture of the materials. We do not have any control over the process or timing of the acquisition of these raw materials by our manufacturers. If our manufacturers or we are unable to purchase these raw materials, the commercial launch of any medical device products we may seek to develop would be delayed or there would be a shortage in supply, which would impair our ability to generate revenues from the sale of such products, if authorized for marketing.
We expect to continue to depend on third-party contract manufacturers for the foreseeable future. We have not entered into long-term agreements with our current contract manufacturers or with any alternate suppliers, and we may be unable to enter into such an agreement or do so on commercially reasonable terms.
Regulatory reforms may impact our ability to develop and commercialize our products and services and technologies.
From time to time, legislation is drafted and introduced that could significantly change the regulatory frameworks governing our products and services. In addition, regulations and guidance are often revised or reinterpreted by the government agency in ways that may significantly affect our business or products and services. FDA requirements related to digital health have evolved over time as the FDA has gained additional experience with these kinds of products and modified its approach to regulation in light of changes to its statutory authority. For example, in 2016, the 21st Century Cures Act was enacted to, among other things, amend the FDCA to remove certain software functions from the definition of a “device.” The FDA also issued guidance in 2016, which was updated in 2019, establishing a policy of enforcement discretion for certain low risk general wellness products, including certain such products with software functions. The FDA’s approach to digital health continues to evolve, and the FDA continues to publish new guidance on its approach to software as a medical device. For example, in January 2025, the FDA issued a draft guidance document setting forth recommendations for testing, labeling, and premarket submission contents for pulse oximeters. The recommendations in this guidance are expected to have a significant impact on pulse oximeter product manufacturers, including by increasing the amount of clinical data required to obtain new marketing authorizations. Any new statutes, regulations, or policies, or revisions or reinterpretations of existing statutes, regulations, or policies, including those in the digital health area, may increase our costs or subject us to additional regulation or the need for marketing authorization or similar certification requirements for our products, or may lengthen review times of certain products or make it more difficult to obtain clearance or approval for, manufacture, market or distribute such products.
We cannot predict the likelihood, nature, or extent of the impact on our business of any legislation, regulations, or reinterpretations thereof that may be enacted or adopted in the future. However, future regulatory changes could make it more difficult for us to obtain or maintain any necessary marketing authorization or certification for our products and services, or to develop and commercialize future medical devices and technologies. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we would not be able to market the affected products and may lose any
45
marketing authorizations or certifications that we may have obtained, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.
Promotion of any medical devices using claims that are off-label, unsubstantiated, false or misleading could subject us to substantial penalties and enforcement action.
Obtaining FDA or foreign regulatory authorities marketing authorization or notified bodies certification would permit us to promote the subject medical device only for the specific use(s) cleared, approved, certified or otherwise authorized by the FDA, foreign regulatory authorities or notified bodies. Use of a medical device outside its authorized or certified indications is known as “off-label” use. Although physicians may use any medical devices we market off-label because the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities do not restrict or regulate a physician’s choice of treatment within the practice of medicine, we are prohibited from marketing or promoting any medical devices for off-label use. While we may pursue FDA or foreign regulatory authorities marketing authorizations or notified bodies certifications for certain indications for any medical devices we seek to market, the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities or notified bodies may deny those requests, require additional expensive clinical data to support any additional indications or impose limitations on the intended use of any authorized or certified product as a condition of marketing authorization or certification. If the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities determine that our products authorized or certified for marketing as medical devices were promoted for off-label use, or that false, misleading or inadequately substantiated promotional claims have been made by us or our commercial partners, it could request that we or our commercial partners modify those promotional materials or take regulatory or enforcement actions, including the issuance of an untitled letter or warning letter, injunction, seizure, civil fine and criminal penalties.
It is also possible that other federal, state or foreign enforcement authorities may take action if they consider our communications, including promotional or training materials, to constitute promotion of an uncleared, uncertified or unapproved use of a medical device. If not successfully defended, enforcement actions related to off-label promotion could result in significant fines or penalties under other statutory authorities, such as laws prohibiting false claims for reimbursement. In any such event, our reputation could be damaged, adoption of our products could be impaired and we could be subject to extensive fines and penalties.
Additionally, we must have adequate substantiation for the claims we make for our products and services. If any of our claims are determined to be false, misleading or deceptive, our products and services could be considered misbranded under the FDCA or in violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act. We could also face lawsuits from our competitors under the Lanham Act alleging that our marketing materials are false or misleading.
Foreign jurisdictions have their own laws and regulations concerning medical device marketing authorizations and certifications, including communications, claims and promotional or training materials surrounding those medical devices. Failure to comply with those laws and regulations could result in actions against us, including fines, penalties and exclusion from the market. Any such actions could adversely affect our ability to market new products and services or continue to market existing products and services in those jurisdictions.
Failure to comply with post-marketing regulatory requirements could subject us to enforcement actions, including substantial penalties, and might require us to recall or withdraw a product from the market.
We are subject to ongoing and pervasive regulatory requirements governing, among other things, the manufacture, marketing, advertising, medical device reporting, sale, promotion, import, export, registration, and listing of devices. The regulations to which we are subject are complex and have become more stringent over time. Regulatory changes could result in restrictions on our ability to continue or expand our operations, higher than anticipated costs, or lower than anticipated sales. Even after we have obtained the proper regulatory approval, certification or clearance to market a device, we have ongoing responsibilities under FDA regulations and applicable foreign laws and regulations. The FDA, state and foreign regulatory authorities have broad enforcement powers. Our failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements could result in enforcement action by the FDA, state or foreign regulatory authorities or notified bodies, which may include any of the following sanctions:
•untitled letters or warning letters;
•fines, injunctions, consent decrees and civil penalties;
•recalls, termination of distribution, administrative detention, or seizure of our products;
•customer notifications or repair, replacement or refunds;
•operating restrictions or partial suspension or total shutdown of production;
•delays in or refusal to grant our requests for future clearances, certifications or approvals (including foreign regulatory approvals) of new products, new intended uses, or modifications to existing products;
46
•withdrawals or suspensions of our current marketing authorizations, resulting in prohibitions on sales of our products;
•FDA refusal to issue certificates to foreign governments needed to export products for sale in other countries; and
•criminal prosecution.
Any of these sanctions could result in higher than anticipated costs or lower than anticipated sales and have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities may change their clearance or certification policies, adopt additional regulations or revise existing regulations, or take other actions, which may prevent or delay clearance, certification or approval of our future products under development or impact our ability to modify our currently cleared or certified products on a timely basis. Such policy or regulatory changes could impose additional requirements upon us that could delay our ability to obtain new clearances, certifications or approvals, increase the costs of compliance or restrict our ability to maintain our clearances of our current products. For more information, see “—Regulatory reforms may impact our ability to develop and commercialize our products and services and technologies.”
Changes in and actual or perceived failures to comply with U.S. and foreign privacy and data protection laws, regulations and standards may adversely affect our business, operations and financial performance.
The global data protection landscape is rapidly evolving, and we are or may become subject to numerous state, federal and foreign laws, requirements and regulations governing the collection, use, disclosure, retention, and security of health-related and other personal information, including information we collect about children and infants, their parents and other consumers who purchase our products and services, as well as information that we may now or in the future collect in connection with clinical trials in the U.S. and abroad. Implementation standards and enforcement practices are likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future, and we cannot yet determine the impact future laws, regulations, standards, or perception of their requirements may have on our business. This evolution may create uncertainty in our business, affect our ability to operate in certain jurisdictions or to collect, store, transfer, use and share personal information, necessitate the acceptance of more onerous obligations in our contracts, result in liability or impose additional costs on us. The cost of compliance with these laws, regulations and standards is high and is likely to increase in the future. Any failure or perceived failure by us to comply with federal, state or foreign laws or regulations, our internal policies and procedures, or our contracts governing our processing of personal information could result in negative publicity, government investigations and enforcement actions, claims by third parties and damage to our reputation, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our operations, financial performance and business.
As our operations and business grow, we may become subject to or affected by new or additional data protection laws and regulations and face increased scrutiny or attention from regulatory authorities. In the U.S., the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009, and regulations promulgated thereunder (collectively, “HIPAA”) imposes, among other things, certain standards relating to the privacy, security, transmission and breach reporting of individually identifiable health information. Certain states have also adopted comparable privacy and security laws and regulations, which govern the privacy, processing and protection of health-related and other personal information and some of which may be more stringent than HIPAA. Such laws and regulations will be subject to interpretation by various courts and other governmental authorities, thus creating potentially complex compliance issues for us and our future customers and strategic partners.
For example, the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act (collectively, the “CCPA”) requires covered businesses that process the personal information of California residents to, among other things: (i) provide certain disclosures to California residents regarding the business’s collection, use, and disclosure of their personal information; (ii) receive and respond to requests from California residents to access, delete, and correct their personal information, or to opt out of certain disclosures of their personal information; and (iii) enter into specific contractual provisions with service providers that process California resident personal information on the business’s behalf. Similar laws have been passed in other states and are continuing to be proposed at the state and the federal level, reflecting a trend toward more stringent privacy legislation in the U.S. For example, Washington State enacted a broadly applicable law to protect the privacy of health information known as the “My Health My Data Act,” which generally requires affirmative consent for the collection, use, or sharing of any “consumer health data.” Consumer health data is defined to include personal information that is linked or reasonably linkable to a consumer and that identifies a consumer’s past, present, or future physical or mental health status; consumer health data also includes information that is derived or extrapolated from non-health information, such as algorithms and machine learning. Other states, including Connecticut and Nevada, have also passed consumer health
47
data laws, and given the increased focus on the use of health data by entities that are not subject to HIPAA, additional states are expected to pass consumer health privacy laws. The enactment of such laws could have potentially conflicting requirements that would make compliance challenging. In the event that we are subject to or affected by or other domestic privacy and data protection laws, any liability from failure to comply with the requirements of these laws could adversely affect our financial condition.
Furthermore, the FTC also has authority to initiate enforcement actions against entities that make deceptive statements about privacy and data sharing in privacy policies, fail to limit third-party use of personal health information, fail to implement policies to protect personal health information or engage in other unfair practices that harm customers or that may violate Section 5(a) of the FTC Act. According to the FTC, failing to take appropriate steps to keep consumers’ personal information secure can constitute unfair acts or practices in or affecting commerce in violation of Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act. The FTC expects a company’s data security measures to be reasonable and appropriate in light of the sensitivity and volume of consumer information it holds, the size and complexity of its business, and the cost of available tools to improve security and reduce vulnerabilities. The FTC and many state Attorneys General also continue to enforce federal and state consumer protection laws against companies for online collection, use, dissemination and security practices that appear to be unfair or deceptive. These consumer protection laws are increasingly being applied by FTC and state Attorneys General to regulate the collection, use, storage, and disclosure of personal or personally identifiable information, through websites or otherwise, and to regulate the presentation of website content.
We are also or may become subject to rapidly evolving data protection laws, rules and regulations in foreign jurisdictions. For example, the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) went into effect in May 2018 and imposes strict requirements for processing the personal data of individuals within the EEA, including in relation to use, collection, analysis, and transfer (including cross-border transfer) of such personal data. Companies that must comply with the GDPR face increased compliance obligations and risk, including more robust regulatory enforcement of data protection requirements and potential fines for noncompliance of up to €20 million or 4% of the annual global revenues of the noncompliant company, whichever is greater. In addition to fines, a breach of the GDPR may result in regulatory investigations, reputational damage, orders to cease or change our data processing activities, enforcement notices, assessment notices (for a compulsory audit) and/ or civil claims (including class actions). Among other requirements, the GDPR regulates transfers of personal data subject to the GDPR to third countries that have not been found to provide adequate protection to such personal data, including the United States, and the efficacy and longevity of current transfer mechanisms between the EEA and the United States remains uncertain. Case law from the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) states that reliance on the standard contractual clauses – a standard form of contract approved by the European Commission as an adequate personal data transfer mechanism – alone may not necessarily be sufficient in all circumstances and that transfers must be assessed on a case-by-case basis. On July 10, 2023, the European Commission adopted its Adequacy Decision in relation to the new EU-US Data Privacy Framework (“DPF”), rendering the DPF effective as a GDPR transfer mechanism to U.S. entities self-certified under the DPF. We currently rely on the EU standard contractual clauses and the UK Addendum to the EU standard contractual clauses and the UK International Data Transfer Agreement and the DPF as relevant to transfer personal data outside the EEA and the UK, including to the United States, with respect to both intragroup and third party transfers. We expect the existing legal complexity and uncertainty regarding international personal data transfers to continue. In particular, we expect the DPF Adequacy Decision to be challenged and international transfers to the United States and to other jurisdictions more generally to continue to be subject to enhanced scrutiny by regulators. As a result, we may have to make certain operational changes and we will have to implement revised standard contractual clauses and other relevant documentation for existing data transfers within required time frames.
Since the beginning of 2021, after the end of the transition period following the UK’s departure from the European Union, we are also subject to the United Kingdom General Data Protection Regulation and Data Protection Act 2018 (collectively, the “UK GDPR”), which imposes separate but similar obligations to those under the GDPR and comparable penalties, including fines of up to £17.5 million or 4% of a noncompliant company’s global annual revenue for the preceding financial year, whichever is greater. On October 12, 2023, the UK Extension to the DPF came into effect (as approved by the UK Government), as a UK GDPR data transfer mechanism to U.S. entities self-certified under the UK Extension to the DPF. As we continue to expand into other foreign countries and jurisdictions, we may be subject to additional laws and regulations that may affect how we conduct business.
Although we work to comply with applicable laws, regulations and standards, our contractual obligations and other legal obligations, these requirements are evolving and may be modified, interpreted and applied in an inconsistent manner from one jurisdiction to another, and may conflict with one another or other legal obligations with which we must comply. Any failure or perceived failure by us or our employees, representatives, contractors, consultants, collaborators, or other third parties to comply with such requirements or adequately address privacy and security
48
concerns, even if unfounded, could result in additional cost and liability to us, regulatory investigations or enforcement actions, litigation (including class actions), damage our reputation, and adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Our relationships with customers, physicians and third-party payors may be subject, directly or indirectly, to federal, state and foreign healthcare fraud and abuse laws, false claims laws, and other healthcare laws and regulations. If we or our employees, independent contractors, consultants, commercial partners, or vendors violate these laws, we could face substantial penalties.
For any medical devices or other healthcare products and services we offer, our relationships with healthcare customers, physicians, and third-party payors may be subject, directly or indirectly, to federal, state and foreign healthcare fraud and abuse laws, false claims laws, and other healthcare laws and regulations. These laws may impact, among other things, our proposed and future sales, marketing, and education programs. In particular, the promotion, sales and marketing of healthcare items and services is subject to extensive laws and regulations designed to prevent fraud, kickbacks, self-dealing, and other abusive practices. These laws and regulations may restrict or prohibit a wide range of pricing, discounting, marketing and promotion, sales commission, customer incentive, and other business arrangements. We may also be subject to federal, state and foreign laws governing the privacy and security of identifiable patient information. The healthcare laws and regulations that may affect our ability to operate include, but are not limited to:
•the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, any person or entity from knowingly and willfully offering, paying, soliciting or receiving any remuneration, directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind, to induce, or in return for, the purchasing, leasing, ordering or arranging for the purchase, lease, or order of any item or service reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid or other federal healthcare programs. The term “remuneration” has been broadly interpreted to include anything of value. A person or entity does not have to have actual knowledge of this statute or specific intent to violate it to have committed a violation;
•federal civil and criminal false claims laws, including the federal civil False Claims Act, and civil monetary penalty laws, which prohibit, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for payment or approval from Medicare, Medicaid, or other federal government programs that are false or fraudulent or knowingly making a false statement to improperly avoid, decrease or conceal an obligation to pay money to the federal government, including federal healthcare programs. In addition, the government may assert that claim includes items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the false claims statute;
•HIPAA, which created new federal civil and criminal statutes that prohibit knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program or obtain, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, any of the money or property owned by, or under the custody or control of, any healthcare benefit program, including private third-party payors and knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up by any trick, scheme or device, a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statements in connection with the delivery of, or payment for, healthcare benefits, items or services. Similar to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a person or entity does not have to have actual knowledge of this statute or specific intent to violate it to have committed a violation;
•the federal Civil Monetary Penalties law, which prohibits, among other things, offering or transferring remuneration to a federal healthcare beneficiary that a person knows or should know is likely to influence the beneficiary’s decision to order or receive items or services reimbursable by the government from a particular provider or supplier;
•the federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act, which requires certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologicals and medical supplies for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program (with certain exceptions) to report annually to CMS information related to payments or other transfers of value made to physicians (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and chiropractors), certain non-physician practitioners (nurse practitioners, certified nurse anesthetists, physician assistants, clinical nurse specialists, anesthesiology assistants and certified nurse midwives), and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members;
•federal consumer protection and unfair competition laws, which broadly regulate marketplace activities and activities that potentially harm consumers; and
•state and foreign equivalents of each of the healthcare laws described above, some of which may be broader in scope.
49
Because of the breadth of these laws and the narrowness of the statutory exceptions and regulatory safe harbors available, it is possible that some of our business activities, or any arrangements with physicians, could be subject to challenge under one or more of such laws. It is not always possible to identify and deter employee misconduct or business noncompliance, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent inappropriate conduct may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to be in compliance with such laws or regulations. Efforts to ensure that our business arrangements will comply with applicable healthcare laws may involve substantial costs. It is possible that governmental and enforcement authorities will conclude that our business practices may not comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case law interpreting applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and regulations. If we or our employees, independent contractors, consultants, commercial partners and vendors violate these laws, we may be subject to investigations, enforcement actions or significant penalties, including the imposition of significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, disgorgement, monetary fines, imprisonment, possible exclusion from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings, additional reporting requirements or oversight if we become subject to a corporate integrity agreement or similar agreement to resolve allegations of non-compliance with these laws, and curtailment of our operations, any of which could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our results of operations. In addition, any regulatory approvals or certifications (as applicable) and commercialization of our products outside the U.S. will also likely subject us to foreign equivalents of the healthcare laws mentioned above, among other foreign laws. Any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we successfully defend against such action, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and divert our management’s attention from the operation of our business.
Expanding our commercial strategy based on third-party payor coverage and reimbursement may not be successful and will subject us to new risks, including, without limitation, changes in third-party payor coding, coverage and reimbursement rates for our products that obtain FDA or foreign regulatory authorities authorization or notified bodies certification which could affect the adoption of such products and negatively impact our future revenue.
With respect to Dream Sock and Owlet Cam, we utilize a direct-to-consumer model where consumers purchase our products directly from us or one of our retailers. Currently, these products are not covered or reimbursed by any third-party payor.
In the U.S., healthcare providers who may purchase these products generally rely on third-party payors, including Medicare, Medicaid and private health insurance plans, to pay for all or a portion of the cost of our products. To contain costs of new technologies, governmental healthcare programs and third-party payors are increasingly scrutinizing new and existing medical devices by requiring extensive evidence of favorable clinical outcomes. To the extent we market any medical devices, are successful in obtaining FDA marketing authorization to the extent applicable, and third-party payors determine that our products are medically necessary and clinically effective, the resulting reimbursement payment rates might not be adequate or may require co-payments that patients find unacceptably high. Third-party payors regularly update reimbursement amounts and may also revise the methodologies from time to time used to determine reimbursement amounts. This includes routine updates to payments to physicians for services provided. These updates could directly impact the demand for our products in the event our products or services using our products are covered and/or reimbursed by third-party payors. Although we believe that healthcare providers may be able to bill third-party payors using existing Current Procedural Terminology (“CPT”) codes for the remote monitoring of patients using products for which we obtain FDA authorization, including the initial set-up and patient education on the use of such products, their inability to obtain adequate reimbursement from third-party payors may adversely affect our business.
In addition, foreign jurisdictions have their own unique healthcare systems and regulation regimes that differ substantially from the U.S. and other international markets. Successfully navigating those regimes will require significant resources and may ultimately be unsuccessful. As a result, our financial performance could be harmed, our costs could increase, and our ability to generate revenue could be delayed.
Given the evolving nature of the healthcare industry and on-going healthcare cost reforms, the likelihood of success of our new commercial strategy is, and will continue to be, subject to changes in the level of third-party payor coverage and reimbursement for these products and services.
Legislative and regulatory changes in the healthcare industry could have a negative impact on our financial performance. Furthermore, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be significantly and adversely affected by healthcare reform legislation in the U.S. or in potential key international markets.
50
Changes in the healthcare industry in the U.S. and abroad could adversely affect the demand for our potential medical devices and the way in which we conduct our business. For example, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (collectively, the “ACA”), enacted in 2010, required most individuals to have health insurance, established new regulations on health plans, created insurance-pooling mechanisms and reduced Medicare spending on services provided by hospitals and other providers. Since its enactment, there have been legislative, executive and judicial challenges to certain aspects of the ACA. On June 17, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed the most recent judicial challenge to the ACA brought by several states without specifically ruling on the constitutionality of the ACA. It is unclear how new healthcare reform measures, if any, will impact our business.
Any medical devices we market and related business activities would be subject to rigorous regulation by the FDA and other federal, state and international governmental authorities. These authorities and members of Congress have been increasing their scrutiny over the medical device industry. In recent years, Congress, the Department of Justice, the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services, and the Department of Defense have issued subpoenas and other requests for information to medical device manufacturers, primarily related to financial arrangements with healthcare providers, regulatory compliance and marketing and product promotional practices. Furthermore, certain state governments have enacted legislation to limit or increase transparency of interactions with healthcare providers, pursuant to which we are required by law to disclose payments and other transfers of value to healthcare providers licensed by certain states.
We anticipate that the government will continue to scrutinize the medical device industry closely, and any new regulations or statutory provisions could result in delays or increased costs during the periods of product development, clinical trials and regulatory review and marketing authorization or certification, as applicable, as well as increased costs to assure compliance. For instance, in December 2021, the EU Regulation No 2021/2282 on Health Technology Assessment (“HTA”), amending Directive 2011/24/EU, was adopted. The Regulation entered into force in January 2022 and has been applicable since January 2025, with phased implementation based on the type of product i.e., certain high-risk medical devices as of 2026. This Regulation intends to boost cooperation among EU member states in assessing health technologies, including certain high-risk medical devices, and provide the basis for cooperation at the EU level for joint clinical assessments in these areas. It will permit EU member states to use common HTA tools, methodologies, and procedures across the EU, working together in four main areas, including joint clinical assessment of the innovative health technologies with the highest potential impact for patients, joint scientific consultations whereby developers can seek advice from HTA authorities, identification of emerging health technologies to identify promising technologies early, and continuing voluntary cooperation in other areas. Individual EU member states will continue to be responsible for assessing non-clinical (e.g., economic, social, ethical) aspects of health technologies, and making decisions on pricing and reimbursement.
We may be subject to regulatory reporting requirements if our products and services cause or contribute to a death or serious injury or malfunction in a way that would likely cause or contribute to a death or serious injury, or in certain other scenarios, and we may need to initiate voluntary corrective actions such as the recall of our products.
Regulatory agencies in many countries require us to report potential safety issues with our products and services under a variety of circumstances. For example, the FDA’s Medical Device Reporting regulations require that for any medical device we market, we report when we become aware of information that reasonably suggests that the product may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury, or has malfunctioned in a way that, if the malfunction were to recur, would likely cause or contribute to a death or serious injury. We may fail to report adverse events of which we become aware within the prescribed timeframe. We may also fail to recognize that we have become aware of a reportable adverse event, especially if it is not reported to us as an adverse event or if it is an adverse event that is unexpected or removed in time from the use of the implant system. If we fail to comply with our reporting obligations, the FDA could take action, including warning letters, untitled letters, administrative actions, criminal prosecution, imposition of civil monetary penalties, revocation of our device clearance, seizure of our products or delay in clearance of future products. Similarly, under the Consumer Product Safety Commission (“CPSC”) reporting requirements, we are required to report to the CPSC any incident in which a CPSC-regulated product of ours creates an unreasonable risk of serious injury or death, contains a defect which could create a substantial product hazard, fails to comply with an applicable consumer product safety rule, or fails to comply with any other rule, regulation, standard or ban enforced by the CPSC. In addition, all manufacturers placing medical devices on the market in the EU are legally required to immediately report any serious incidents and field safety corrective actions involving products produced or sold by the manufacturer to the relevant authority in those jurisdictions where any such incident occurred. As to general consumer products, where manufacturers and distributors know or ought to know that a product that they have placed on the market poses risks to the consumer that are incompatible with the general safety requirements, they shall immediately inform the relevant authority in the relevant jurisdictions. The FDA, CPSC and similar foreign regulatory authorities have the authority to require the recall of our commercialized products under certain circumstances and depending on the type of product. For
51
example, the FDA must find that there is a reasonable probability that a medical device would cause serious adverse health consequences or death in order to require a recall. The standard for ordering a mandatory recall may be different for each regulatory agency and in foreign jurisdictions. In addition, manufacturers may, under their own initiative, correct or remove a marketed product for any reason and under any circumstance, which may constitute a recall if the product violates applicable laws. A government-mandated or voluntary recall by us or by one of our distributors could occur as a result of component failures, manufacturing errors, design or labeling defects or other deficiencies and issues.
We may initiate certain field actions, such as a correction or removal of our products in the future. Any correction or removal initiated by us to reduce a health risk posed by a medical device, or to remedy a regulatory violation caused by the device that may present a risk to health, must be reported to the FDA. Other regulatory authorities may have similar reporting requirements. If the regulatory agency subsequently determines that a report was required for a correction or removal of our products that we did not believe required a report, we could be subject to enforcement actions.
Any recalls of our products or enforcement actions would divert managerial and financial resources and could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, given our dependence upon consumer perceptions, any negative publicity associated with any recalls could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.
We face the risk of product liability claims and the amount of insurance coverage we hold now or in the future may not be adequate to cover all liabilities we might incur.
Our products are predominantly used in the home and expose us to product liability claims and product recalls, including, but not limited to, those that may arise from off-label use, malfunctions, design flaws or manufacturing defects related to our products or the use of our products with incompatible components or systems. In addition, as we continue to expand our product portfolio, we may enter or create new markets, including consumer markets, which may expose us to additional product liability risks. Any such product liability claims may include allegations of defects in manufacturing, defects in design, a failure to warn of dangers inherent in the product, negligence, strict liability and a breach of warranty. Claims could also be asserted under state consumer protection acts. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against product liability claims, we may incur substantial liabilities or be required to limit commercialization of our products. Even successful defense would require significant financial and management resources. Regardless of the merits or eventual outcome, liability claims may result in decreased demand for our current or future products, injury to our reputation, costs to defend the related litigation, a diversion of management’s time and our resources, substantial monetary awards to customers, regulatory investigations, product recalls, withdrawals or labeling, marketing or promotional restrictions, loss of revenue, and the inability to sell our current or any future products.
Our product liability insurance may not be sufficient to cover any or all damages for product liability claims that may be brought against us in the future. Furthermore, we may not be able to obtain or maintain insurance in the future at satisfactory rates or in adequate amounts to protect us against any product liability claims. Additionally, the laws and regulations regarding product liability are constantly evolving, both through the passage of new legislation at the state and federal levels and through new interpretations of existing legislation. As the legal and regulatory landscape surrounding product liability change, we may become exposed to greater liability than currently anticipated.
We may incur environmental and personal injury liabilities related to certain hazardous materials used in our operations.
Certain manufacturing processes for our products may involve the storage, use, generation and disposal of certain hazardous materials and wastes, including lead, silicone adhesives, solder and solder paste, sealants, epoxies and various solvents such as methyl ethyl ketone, acetone and isopropyl alcohol. As a result, we are subject to certain environmental laws, as well as certain other laws and regulations, which restrict the materials that can be used in our products or in our manufacturing processes. For example, products that we sell in Europe are subject to regulation in the EU markets under the Restriction of the Use of Hazardous Substances Directive (“RoHS”). RoHS prohibits companies from selling products that contain certain hazardous materials in EU member states. In addition, the EU’s Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemicals Regulation also restricts substances of very high concern in products. Compliance with such regulations may be costly and, therefore, we may incur significant costs to comply with these laws and regulations. Additionally, certain laws apply liability for environmental remediation without regard to fault.
In addition, new environmental laws may further affect how we manufacture our products, how we use, generate or dispose of hazardous materials and waste, or further affect what materials can be used in our products. Any required changes to our operations may increase our manufacturing costs, detrimentally impact the performance of our
52
products, add greater testing lead-times for product introductions or have other similar effects. Moreover, certain laws, including regarding the remediation of hazardous materials, can impose liability regardless of fault or legality of actions, including the classification of materials at the time of disposal.
In connection with our research and manufacturing activities, we use, and our employees may be exposed to, materials that are hazardous to human health, safety or the environment. The risk of accidental injury to our employees or contamination from these materials cannot be eliminated, and we could be held liable for any resulting damages, the related liability for which could exceed our reserves. We do not specifically insure against environmental liabilities. If an enforcement action were to occur, our reputation and our business and financial condition may be harmed, even if we were to prevail or settle the action on terms favorable to us.
Changing laws and increasingly complex corporate governance and public disclosure requirements could have an adverse effect on our business and operating results.
Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure and new regulations issued by the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) have and will create additional compliance requirements for us. For example, the Dodd-Frank Act includes provisions regarding, among other things, advisory votes on named executive officer compensation and “conflict minerals” reporting. Complying with these rules and regulations has increased and will increase our legal and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming or costly and increase demand on our systems and resources. As a result, management’s attention may be diverted from other business concerns, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may also need to hire additional employees or engage outside consultants to comply with these requirements, which will increase our costs and expenses. To maintain high standards of corporate governance and public disclosure, we have invested in, and intend to continue to invest in, reasonably necessary resources to comply with evolving standards.
In addition, stockholder litigation surrounding executive compensation and disclosure of executive compensation has increased with the passage of the Dodd-Frank Act. Furthermore, our stockholders may not continue to approve our advisory vote on named executive officer compensation that is required to be voted on by our stockholders annually pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act. If we are involved in a lawsuit related to compensation matters or any other matters not covered by our directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, we may incur significant expenses in defending against such lawsuits, or be subject to significant fines or required to take significant remedial actions, each of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
New and changing laws, regulations, and executive orders can adversely affect our business by increasing our costs, limiting the Company’s ability to pursue or offer a product candidate or product, and requiring changes to our business. New and changing laws, regulations, and executive orders can also create uncertainty about how such laws and regulations will be interpreted and applied. Regulatory changes and other actions that materially adversely affect our business may be announced with little or no advance notice we may not be able to effectively mitigate all adverse impacts from such measures. Differing interpretations of such legal obligations can expose us to significant fines, government investigations, litigation and reputational harm. If we are found to have violated laws, regulations, or executive orders, it could materially adversely affect our business, reputation, results of operations and financial condition.
Changes in the regulation of the internet could adversely affect our business.
Laws, rules and regulations governing internet communications, advertising and e-commerce are dynamic, and the extent of future government regulation is uncertain. Federal and state regulations govern various aspects of our online business, including intellectual property ownership and infringement, trade secrets, the distribution of electronic communications, marketing and advertising, user privacy and data security, search engines and internet tracking technologies. Governmental authorities continue to evaluate the privacy implications inherent in the use of third-party “cookies” and other methods of online tracking for behavioral advertising and other purposes. In the U.S., federal and state governments have enacted, and may in the future enact, legislation or regulations impacting the ability of companies and individuals to engage in these activities, such as by regulating the level of consumer notice and consent required before a company can employ cookies or other electronic tracking tools or the use of data gathered with such tools. Additionally, some providers of consumer devices and web browsers have implemented, or announced plans to implement, limits on behavioral or targeted advertising and/or means to make it easier for internet users to prevent the placement of cookies or to block other tracking technologies, which could, if widely adopted, result in the decreased effectiveness or use of third-party cookies and other methods of online tracking, targeting or re-targeting. The regulation of the use of these cookies and other current online tracking and advertising practices or a loss in our ability to make effective use of services that employ such technologies could increase our costs of operations and limit our ability to acquire new consumers on cost-effective terms and
53
consequently, materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, in the EU and the UK, regulators are increasingly focusing on compliance with requirements in the online behavioral advertising ecosystem, and current national laws that implement the ePrivacy Directive are highly likely to be replaced by an EU regulation known as the ePrivacy Regulation, which will significantly increase fines for non-compliance. In the EU and the UK, informed consent is required for the placement of a cookie or similar technologies on a user’s device and for direct electronic marketing. The GDPR also imposes conditions on obtaining valid consent, such as a prohibition on pre-checked consents and a requirement to ensure separate consents are sought for each type of cookie or similar technology. While the text of the ePrivacy Regulation is still under development, a recent European court decision and regulators’ recent guidance are driving increased attention to cookies and tracking technologies. If regulators start to enforce the strict approach in recent guidance, this could lead to substantial costs, require significant systems changes, limit the effectiveness of our marketing activities, divert the attention of our technology personnel, adversely affect our margins, increase costs and subject us to additional liabilities.
Future taxation on the use of the internet or e-commerce transactions could also be imposed. Existing or future regulation or taxation could increase our operating expenses and expose us to significant liabilities. To the extent any such regulations require us to take actions that negatively impact us, they could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property
Our success depends in part on our proprietary technology, and if we are unable to obtain, maintain or successfully enforce our intellectual property rights, the commercial value of our products and services will be adversely affected, our competitive position may be harmed and we may be unable to operate our business profitably.
Our intellectual property includes the content of our website, our software code, our unregistered copyrights, our registered and unregistered trademarks, and our patents and patent applications. Our success and ability to compete depend in part on our ability to maintain and enforce existing intellectual property and to obtain, maintain and enforce further intellectual property protection for our products and services, both in the U.S. and in other countries. We attempt to protect our intellectual property rights through a combination of patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret laws, as well as licensing agreements and third-party and employee confidentiality and assignment agreements. Our intellectual property rights could also be challenged, invalidated, infringed or circumvented, or may not be sufficient to permit us to take advantage of current market trends or to otherwise provide competitive advantages. If we are unable to adequately protect our intellectual property rights or if they are challenged or otherwise prove ineffective, we may be required to undertake costly product redesign efforts or discontinue certain products, or our competitive position may be harmed.
We rely on our portfolio of issued and pending patent applications in the U.S. and other countries to protect our intellectual property and our competitive position. However, the patent positions of technology-based companies may involve complex legal and factual questions, and, therefore, the scope, validity and enforceability of any patent claims that we may obtain cannot be predicted with certainty. Accordingly, we cannot provide any assurances that any of our issued patents have, or that any of our currently pending or future patent applications that mature into issued patents will include claims with a scope sufficient to protect our products and services. Our pending and future patent applications may not result in the issuance of patents or, if issued, may not issue in a form that will be advantageous to us. While we generally apply for patents in those countries where we intend to make, have made, use or sell patented products and services, we may not accurately predict all of the countries where patent protection will ultimately be desirable. If we fail to timely file for a patent, we may be precluded from doing so at a later date. Additionally, any patents issued to us may be challenged, narrowed, invalidated, held unenforceable or circumvented, or may not be sufficiently broad to prevent third parties from producing competing products and services similar in design to our products and services.
In recent years, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on several patent cases and several laws have been enacted that, in certain situations, potentially narrow the scope of patent protection available and weaken the rights of patent owners. We may not be successful in securing additional patents on commercially desirable improvements, that such additional patents will adequately protect our innovations or offset the effect of expiring patents, or that competitors will not be able to design around our patents. In addition, third parties may challenge our issued patents through procedures such as Inter-Partes Review (“IPR”). In many IPR challenges, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) cancels or significantly narrows issued patent claims. IPR challenges could increase the uncertainties and costs associated with the maintenance, enforcement and defense of our issued and future patents and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We also utilize unpatented proprietary technology and know-how and often rely on confidentiality agreements and intellectual property assignment agreements with our employees, independent distributors and consultants to protect
54
and transfer to us such unpatented proprietary technology and know-how. However, such agreements may not be enforceable or may not provide meaningful protection for our proprietary information in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure or other breaches of the agreements, or in the event that our competitors discover or independently develop similar or identical designs or other proprietary information.
We rely on the use of common law copyrights with respect to the code, algorithms and trade secrets in our business and our products and services. Common law copyrights provide less protection than registered copyrights. Copyrights, common law or registered, do not generally prevent others from independently developing the same or similar code, algorithms or trade secrets, so our copyrights would not offer protection against our competitors to the extent they are able to independently generate similar code, algorithms or trade secrets as our own. Loss of rights in our copyrights could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We rely on the use of registered and common law trademarks with respect to the brand names of some of our products and services. Common law trademarks provide less protection than registered trademarks. If a third party were to register trademarks similar to our unregistered trademarks in a given jurisdiction, particularly outside the U.S., our ability to continue using our unregistered trademarks in the applicable jurisdiction could be substantially restricted and we may be subject to potentially costly and burdensome claims for trademark infringement. Loss of rights in our trademarks could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If our trademarks and trade names are not adequately protected, we may not be able to build name recognition in our markets of interest and our competitive position may be harmed.
We rely on our trademarks, logos, and trade names to distinguish our products and services from the products and services of our competitors and have registered or applied to register many of these trademarks. There can be no assurance that our trademark applications will be approved. While we generally apply for trademarks in those countries where we intend to sell our products and services, we may not accurately predict all of the countries where registered trademarks will be desirable. We may also fail to register appropriate localized versions of our trademarks. If we fail to timely file for a trademark application in a country, we may be precluded from doing so at a later date and our ability to sell products and services using our existing brands in such countries could ultimately be restricted. Third parties may also oppose our trademark applications or otherwise challenge our use of the trademarks. In the event that our trademarks are successfully challenged, we could be forced to rebrand our products and services, which could result in loss of brand recognition, and could require us to devote resources to advertising and marketing new brands. Further, there can be no assurance that competitors will not infringe our trademarks or that we will have adequate resources to enforce our trademarks or will be successful in enforcing our trademarks. If competitors or other third parties use similar trademarks for similar products and services, the value and recognition of our brand and trademarks may be diluted or diminished.
We also license third parties to use our trademarks. In an effort to preserve our trademark rights, we enter into license agreements with these third parties, which govern the use of our trademarks and require our licensees to abide by quality control standards with respect to the goods and services that they provide under our trademarks.
Although we make efforts to monitor the use of our trademarks by our licensees, there can be no assurance that these efforts will be sufficient to ensure that our licensees abide by the terms of their licenses. In the event that our licensees fail to do so, our trademark rights could be diluted. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.
We rely on third-party technology solutions, including software and software services, to support our IT infrastructure and in our products and services.
Both our IT infrastructure and our products and services leverage third-party technology solutions, software and software services. While much of this third-party technology is commercially available, off-the-shelf technology procured on standard terms and conditions, we cannot be assured that the applicable vendors will continue to make this third-party technology available on the same terms and conditions. Because this technology has been integrated into our operations and may have been configured for our specific needs, replacement of such technology could result in substantial delay, additional costs, and possible business interruptions. In addition, if third-party vendors, including any cloud service providers, were to experience unplanned downtime, delays or other similar issues, our products, services and internal operations could be significantly and adversely impacted.
The laws of foreign countries may not adequately protect our intellectual property rights.
Intellectual property protection laws in foreign jurisdictions differ substantially from those in the U.S. If we fail to apply for intellectual property protection in foreign jurisdictions, or if we cannot adequately protect our intellectual property rights in these foreign jurisdictions, our competitors may be able to compete more effectively against us, which could adversely affect our competitive position, as well as our business, financial condition and results of operations.
55
If third parties claim that we infringe their intellectual property rights, we may incur liabilities and costs and may have to redesign or discontinue selling certain products and services.
Searching for existing third-party intellectual property rights and evaluating its applicability to our products and services can be a costly and time-consuming process. Such searches and evaluation may not reveal important intellectual property and our competitors may also have filed for patent protection, which may not be publicly available information, or claimed trademark rights that have not been revealed through our searches. We may not undertake such searches and evaluation of third-party intellectual property rights and, as a result, may not be aware of intellectual property rights that could be asserted against our products or services. In addition, some of our employees were previously employed at other consumer product, medical device and Internet of Things/smart device companies. We may be subject to claims that our employees have disclosed, or that we have used, trade secrets or other proprietary information of our employees’ former employers. Our efforts to identify and avoid infringing on third parties’ intellectual property rights may not always be successful. Any claims of patent or other intellectual property infringement against us, even those without merit, could:
•be expensive and time-consuming to defend and result in payment of significant damages to third parties;
•force us to stop making or selling products and services that incorporate the intellectual property;
•require us to redesign, reengineer or rebrand our products and services, product candidates and technologies;
•require us to enter into royalty agreements that would increase the costs of our products and services;
•require us to indemnify third parties pursuant to contracts in which we have agreed to provide indemnification for intellectual property infringement claims;
•divert the attention of our management and other key employees; and
•result in our customers or potential customers deferring or limiting their purchase or use of the affected products and services impacted by the claims until the claims are resolved;
any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, new patents obtained by our competitors could threaten the continued commercialization of our products and services in the market even after they have already been introduced.
We may become involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our intellectual property, which could be expensive, time consuming and unsuccessful.
Third parties, including our competitors, could be infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating our intellectual property rights. We do not regularly conduct monitoring for unauthorized use at this time. From time to time, we seek to analyze our competitors’ products and services, or seek to enforce our rights against potential infringement, misappropriation or violation of our intellectual property. However, the steps we have taken, or take in the future, to protect our proprietary rights may not be adequate to enforce our rights as against such infringement, misappropriation or violation of our intellectual property. We may not be able to detect unauthorized use of, or take appropriate steps to enforce, our intellectual property rights. Any inability to meaningfully enforce our intellectual property rights could harm our ability to compete and reduce demand for our products and services.
We believe some of the new market entrants in our industry, including some of the world’s largest technology companies, may in the future infringe our intellectual property, and we may be required to engage in litigation to protect or enforce our intellectual property rights. An adverse result in any litigation proceeding could harm our business. In any lawsuit we bring to enforce our intellectual property rights, a court may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on grounds that our intellectual property rights do not cover the technology or actions in question. If we initiate legal proceedings against a third party to enforce a patent covering a product, the defendant could counterclaim that such patent is invalid or unenforceable. In patent litigation in the U.S., defendant counterclaims alleging invalidity or unenforceability are commonplace.
Grounds for a validity challenge could be an alleged failure to meet any of several statutory requirements, including lack of novelty, obviousness, or non-enablement. Grounds for an unenforceability assertion could be an allegation that someone connected with prosecution of the patent withheld relevant information from the PTO, or made a misleading statement, during prosecution. Mechanisms for such challenges include re-examination, post-grant review, IPR, interference proceedings, derivation proceedings, and equivalent proceedings in foreign jurisdictions (e.g., opposition proceedings). Such proceedings could result in the revocation of, cancellation of, or amendment to our patents in such a way that they no longer cover our products and services, or any future products and services that we may develop.
56
The outcome following legal assertions of invalidity and unenforceability is unpredictable. With respect to the validity question, for example, we cannot be certain that there is no invalidating prior art, of which we and the patent examiner were unaware during prosecution. If a third party were to prevail on a legal assertion of invalidity or unenforceability, we would lose at least part, and perhaps all, of the patent protection on our products and services. Such a loss of patent protection would have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.
Because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during litigation. There could also be public announcements of the results of hearing, motions, or other interim developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a material adverse effect on the price of shares of our common stock. Even if we ultimately prevail, a court may decide not to grant an injunction against further infringing activity and instead award only monetary damages, which may not be an adequate remedy. Furthermore, the monetary cost of such litigation and the diversion of the attention of our management could outweigh any benefit we receive as a result of the proceedings. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Our proprietary software may not operate properly, which could damage our reputation, give rise to claims against us, or divert application of our resources from other purposes, any of which could harm our business and operating results.
Proprietary software and hardware development is time-consuming, expensive and complex, and may involve unforeseen difficulties. We may encounter technical obstacles, and it is possible that we discover additional problems or design defects that prevent our proprietary software from operating properly. We have experienced product design issues in the past and continue to work to address those and anticipate additional concerns. If our services do not function reliably, malfunction, or fail to achieve customer expectations in terms of performance, customers could assert liability claims against us or attempt to cancel their contracts with us. This could damage our reputation and impair our ability to attract or maintain customers.
The software underlying our products and services is highly complex and may contain undetected errors or vulnerabilities, some of which may only be discovered after our products and services have been used by our customers. Any real or perceived errors, failures, bugs or other vulnerabilities discovered in our products or services could result in negative publicity and damage to our reputation, loss of customers, loss of or delay in market acceptance of our products and services, loss of competitive position, loss of revenue or liability for damages, fines or regulatory actions, overpayments or underpayments, any of which could harm our enrollment rates. Similarly, any real or perceived errors, failures, design flaws or defects in our devices could have similar negative results. In such an event, we may be required or may choose to expend additional resources in order to help correct the problem. Such efforts could be costly, or ultimately unsuccessful. Even if we are successful at remediating issues, we may experience damage to our reputation and brand. There can be no assurance that provisions typically included in our agreements with partners that attempt to limit our exposure to claims would be enforceable or adequate or would otherwise protect us from liabilities or damages with respect to any particular claim. Even if unsuccessful, a claim brought against us by any customers or partners would likely be time-consuming and costly to defend and could seriously damage our reputation and brand.
We may be subject to claims that we or our employees have misappropriated the intellectual property of a third party, including trade secrets or know-how, or are in breach of non-competition or non-solicitation agreements with our competitors and third parties may claim an ownership interest in intellectual property we regard as our own.
Many of our employees and consultants were previously employed at or engaged by other companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. Some of these employees, consultants and contractors may have executed proprietary rights, non-disclosure and non-competition agreements in connection with such previous employment. Although we try to ensure that our employees and consultants do not use the intellectual property, proprietary information, know-how or trade secrets of others in their work for us, we may be subject to claims that we or these individuals have, inadvertently or otherwise, misappropriated the intellectual property or disclosed the alleged trade secrets or other proprietary information, of these former employers, competitors or other third parties. Additionally, we may be subject to claims from third parties challenging our ownership interest in or inventorship of intellectual property we regard as our own, based on claims that our agreements with employees or consultants obligating them to assign intellectual property to us are ineffective or in conflict with prior or competing contractual obligations to assign inventions to another employer, to a former employer, or to another person or entity. Litigation may be necessary to defend against claims, and it may be necessary or we may desire to enter into a license to settle any such claim; however, there can be no assurance that we would be able to obtain a license on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. If our defense to those claims fails, in addition to paying monetary damages or a settlement payment, a court could prohibit us from using technologies, features or other intellectual property that are
57
essential to our products and services, if such technologies or features are found to incorporate or be derived from the trade secrets or other proprietary information of the former employers. An inability to incorporate technologies, features or other intellectual property that are important or essential to our products and services could have a material adverse effect on our business and competitive position, and may prevent us from selling our products and services. In addition, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel. Even if we are successful in defending against these claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and could be a distraction to management. Any litigation or the threat thereof may adversely affect our ability to hire employees or contract with independent sales representatives. A loss of key personnel or their work product could hamper or prevent our ability to commercialize our products and services, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results, cash flows and prospects.
If we fail to execute enforceable invention assignment and confidentiality agreements with our employees and contractors involved in the development of intellectual property or are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets, the value of our products and services and our business and competitive position could be harmed.
In addition to patent protection, we also rely on protection of copyrights, trade secrets, know-how and confidential and proprietary information. We generally enter into confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with our employees, consultants and third parties upon their commencement of a relationship with us. However, we may not enter into such agreements with all employees, consultants and third parties who have been involved in the development of our intellectual property and such agreements may not be enforceable in accordance with the terms in every jurisdiction where such employees, consultants or third parties reside or are employed. In addition, these agreements may not provide meaningful protection against the unauthorized use or disclosure of our trade secrets or other confidential information, and adequate remedies may not exist if unauthorized use or disclosure were to occur. The exposure of our trade secrets and other proprietary information would impair our competitive advantages and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In particular, a failure to protect our proprietary rights may allow competitors to copy our technology, which could adversely affect our pricing and market share. Further, other parties may independently develop substantially equivalent know-how and technology.
In addition to contractual measures, we try to protect the confidential nature of our proprietary information using commonly accepted physical and technological security measures. Such measures may not, for example, in the case of misappropriation of a trade secret by an employee or third party with authorized access, provide adequate protection for our proprietary information. Our security measures may not prevent an employee or consultant from misappropriating our trade secrets and providing them to a competitor, and recourse we take against such misconduct may not provide an adequate remedy to protect our interests fully. Unauthorized parties may also attempt to copy or reverse engineer certain aspects of our products and services that we consider proprietary and a trade secret. Enforcing a claim that a party illegally disclosed or misappropriated a trade secret can be difficult, expensive and time-consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. Even though we use commonly accepted security measures, trade secret violations are often a matter of state law, and the criteria for protection of trade secrets can vary among different jurisdictions. In addition, trade secrets may be independently developed by others in a manner that could prevent legal recourse by us. We also have agreements with our employees, consultants and third parties that obligate them to assign their inventions to us, however these agreements may not be self-executing, not all employees or consultants may enter into such agreements, or employees or consultants may breach or violate the terms of these agreements, and we may not have adequate remedies for any such breach or violation. If any of our intellectual property or confidential or proprietary information, such as our trade secrets, were to be disclosed or misappropriated, or if any such information was independently developed by a competitor, it could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock and Warrants
The price of our common stock and warrants may be volatile.
The price of our common stock and warrants may fluctuate due to a variety of factors, including:
•actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results or future prospects;
•our announcements or our competitors’ announcements of new products and services;
•the public’s reaction to our press releases, our other public announcements and our filings with the SEC;
•strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions or restructurings;
•new laws or regulations or new interpretations of existing laws or regulations applicable to our business;
•regulatory or other governmental actions, and actions taken in response to those actions;
•changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretations or principles;
58
•changes in our growth rates or our competitors’ growth rates;
•developments regarding our patents or proprietary rights or those of our competitors;
•ongoing legal proceedings;
•commencement of, or involvement in, litigation involving the combined company;
•our ability to raise additional capital as needed;
•changes in our capital structure, such as future issuances of securities or the incurrence of new or additional debt;
•the volume of shares of common stock available for public sale and the size of our public float;
•conversion of our outstanding Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (collectively, “Convertible Preferred Stock”) and exercise of our outstanding warrants, and the resale of such shares into the market;
•additions and departures of key personnel;
•concerns or allegations as to the safety or efficacy of our products and services;
•sales of stock by us or members of our management team, our board of directors (the “Board”) or certain significant stockholders;
•changes in stock market analyst recommendations or earnings estimates regarding our stock, other comparable companies or our industry generally; and
•changes in financial markets or general economic conditions, including the effects of recession or slow economic growth in the U.S. and abroad, interest rates, tariffs, fuel prices, international currency fluctuations, corruption, political instability, acts of war, acts of terrorism, and public health crises.
These market and industry factors may materially reduce the market price of our common stock and warrants regardless of our operating performance.
Our failure to meet the NYSE’s continued listing requirements could result in a delisting of our common stock.
If we fail to satisfy the NYSE’s continued listing requirements, the NYSE may take steps to delist our common stock. For example, in April 2023, we were notified by NYSE that we were not in compliance with Section 802.01B of the NYSE Listed Company Manual as the average global market capitalization of our common stock over a consecutive 30 trading-day period and, at the same time, our last reported stockholders’ equity were each less than $50 million. In May 2023, we submitted a business plan advising the NYSE of the definitive actions we had taken as of the date of that submission and were planning on taking in order to bring us into compliance with NYSE continued listing standards within 18 months of receipt of the NYSE Notification (the “Cure Period”). The plan was accepted by the NYSE in July 2023. On October 10, 2024, we received formal notice from the NYSE that we had regained compliance with the NYSE’s continued listing standards. As a result of our achievement of compliance with the NYSE’s minimum market capitalization requirement for the requisite period of time, the NYSE has advised us that we are no longer considered out of compliance with these continued listing standards, and the below compliance “BC” indicator has been removed from our Class A common stock. Additionally, we are no longer noted as being below continued listing standards on the NYSE’s website (www.nyse.com). In accordance with the NYSE’s Listed Company Manual, we will be subject to a 12-month follow-up period within which we will be reviewed to confirm that we do not once again fall below any of the NYSE’s continued listing standards. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain compliance with these or any other NYSE listing requirements during or after the 12-month follow-up period.
Delisting from the NYSE could make trading our common stock more difficult for investors, potentially leading to declines in our share price and liquidity. In addition, without a NYSE market listing, stockholders may have a difficult time getting a quote for the sale or purchase of our common stock, the sale or purchase of our common stock would likely be made more difficult and the trading volume and liquidity of our common stock could decline. Delisting from the NYSE could also result in negative publicity and could also make it more difficult for us to raise additional capital. The absence of such a listing may adversely affect the acceptance of our common stock as consideration or the value accorded by other parties. If our common stock is delisted by the NYSE, our common stock may be eligible to trade on an over-the-counter quotation system, such as the OTCQB market, where an investor may find it more difficult to sell our common stock or obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of our common stock. We cannot assure you that our common stock, if delisted from the NYSE, would be eligible to be listed on another national securities exchange or quoted on an over-the counter quotation system.
59
If securities or industry analysts issue an adverse or misleading opinion regarding our common stock or warrants, the price and trading volume of our common stock and warrants could decline.
The trading market for our common stock and warrants will be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us or our business. We currently have limited research coverage by securities and industry analysts. If any of the analysts who cover us issue an adverse or misleading opinion regarding us, our business model, our intellectual property or the performance of our common stock or warrants, or if our operating results fail to meet the expectations of analysts, the price of our common stock and warrants would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of us or fail to publish reports on us regularly, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause the price and trading volume of our common stock and warrants to decline.
Concentration of ownership among our existing directors, executive officers and principal stockholders may prevent new investors from influencing significant corporate decisions.
Our directors, executive officers and holders of 5% or more of our capital stock and their respective affiliates beneficially own and/or have the right to acquire a significant amount of our common stock. As of March 1, 2025, these stockholders beneficially owned shares of our common stock and Convertible Preferred Stock that represented approximately 45.8% of the voting power of our capital stock. Among these holders is Eclipse Ventures LLC and its affiliates (“Eclipse”), which beneficially owns shares of our common stock and Convertible Preferred Stock that represents approximately 29.62% of the voting power of our capital stock. Eclipse may acquire additional shares of our common stock, subject to provisions in the Company’s Certificate of Designation for Series B Preferred Stock that currently prevents Eclipse from acquiring shares of common stock that would result in their beneficial ownership exceeding 48.9%. Accordingly, these stockholders will be able to influence us through their ownership positions. Subject to any fiduciary duties owed to our other stockholders under Delaware law, these stockholders may be able to exercise significant influence over matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions, and will have some control over our management and policies. Some of these persons or entities may have interests that are different from yours. For example, these stockholders may support proposals and actions with which you may disagree or which are not in your best interests. For as long as Eclipse holds a significant amount of our voting equity, it will be able to exert significant control over us. Eclipse may also determine to sell substantial amounts of our securities in one or more transactions, including to one or several private parties in negotiated transactions, which may result in those buyers subsequently being able to exert significant control over us.
This concentrated control, including that solely of Eclipse, may limit or preclude other stockholders’ ability to influence corporate matters for the foreseeable future, including the election of directors, amendments of our organizational documents, and any merger, consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of our assets, or other major corporate transaction requiring stockholder approval. In addition, these stockholders could use their voting influence to maintain our existing management and directors in office or support or reject other management and Board proposals that are subject to stockholder approval, such as amendments to our employee stock plans and approvals of significant financing transactions, and may prevent or discourage unsolicited acquisition proposals or offers for our capital stock that stockholders may believe are in their best interest.
We may acquire other businesses or form other joint ventures or make investments in other companies or technologies that could negatively affect our operating results, dilute our stockholders’ ownership, increase our debt or cause us to incur significant expense.
We may pursue acquisitions of businesses and assets. We also may pursue strategic alliances and additional joint ventures that leverage our technology and industry experience to expand our offerings or distribution. We have no experience with acquiring other companies and limited experience with forming strategic partnerships. We may not be able to find suitable partners or acquisition candidates, and we may not be able to complete such transactions on favorable terms, if at all. If we make any acquisitions, we may not be able to integrate these acquisitions successfully into our existing business, and we could assume unknown or contingent liabilities. Any future acquisitions also could result in the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities or future write-offs of intangible assets or goodwill, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Integration of an acquired company also may disrupt ongoing operations and require management resources that we would otherwise focus on developing our existing business. We may experience losses related to investments in other companies, which could have a material negative effect on our results of operations and financial condition. We may not realize the anticipated benefits of any acquisition, technology license, strategic alliance or joint venture. To finance any acquisitions or joint ventures, we may choose to issue shares of our common stock as consideration, which would dilute the ownership of our stockholders. Additional funds may not be available on terms that are
60
favorable to us, or at all. If the price of our common stock is low or volatile, we may not be able to acquire other companies or fund a joint venture project using our stock as consideration.
We also expect to continue to carry out internal strategic initiatives that we believe are necessary to grow our revenues and expand our business, both in the U.S. and abroad. For example, we have continued to invest in international expansion programs designed to increase our worldwide presence and take advantage of market expansion opportunities around the world. We cannot be certain that such initiatives will yield favorable results for us. Accordingly, if these initiatives are not successful, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
If these risks materialize, our stock price could be materially adversely affected. Any difficulties in the integration of acquired businesses or unexpected penalties, liabilities or asset impairments in connection with such acquisitions or investments could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Because we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our capital stock in the foreseeable future, capital appreciation, if any, will be your sole source of gain.
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain all of our future earnings, if any, to finance the growth and development of our business. In addition, under certain circumstances, our loan and security agreement preclude us from paying dividends, and the terms of our Convertible Preferred Stock preclude us from paying dividends without the consent of the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of Convertible Preferred Stock. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock will be your sole source of gain for the foreseeable future.
The redemption of our outstanding Convertible Preferred Stock or exercise of the WTI Redemption Option may require us to make a significant cash payment.
At any time from and after February 17, 2028, the holders of at least a majority of our then outstanding shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and, at any time from and after March 1, 2029, the holders of at least a majority of our then outstanding shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock may specify a date and time or the occurrence of an event by vote or written consent that all, and not less than all, of such outstanding shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, as applicable, will automatically be: (i) converted into shares of common stock at the conversion rate then in effect, (ii) subject to certain exceptions and limitations, redeemed for an amount per share of such applicable shares of Series A Preferred Stock or Series B Preferred Stock equal to the liquidation preference of $1,000 per share plus all accrued or declared but unpaid dividends as of the redemption date and time or (iii) a combination of the foregoing.
In addition, in connection with the WTI Loan Facility (as defined below), we issued an aggregate of 750,000 shares of redeemable common stock, of which 187,500 are subject to forfeiture. These agreement under which these shares were issued provides for an embedded redemption option (the “Redemption Option”), such that WTI may elect to force us to redeem the shares that are no longer subject to forfeiture for a price of $8.40 per share. The Redemption Option may be exercised, with respect to any amount that is equal to or less than the entire balance of such shares, at any time during the period commencing on the first trading day following the fifth anniversary of September 11, 2024 and continuing through the date which is ten (10) years after September 11, 2024, subject to certain acceleration provisions set forth in the WTI Stock Issuance Agreement. If the Redemption Option were exercised in full, and assuming no shares were forfeited, this would result in a cash payment by us of up to $6,300.
Our corporate documents and Delaware law contain provisions that could discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company, prevent attempts to replace or remove current management and reduce the market price of our common stock and warrants.
Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition involving us that our stockholders may consider favorable. For example, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws authorize our Board to issue up to 100 million shares of preferred stock. As a result, without further stockholder approval, our Board will have the authority to attach special rights, including voting and dividend rights, to this preferred stock, including pursuant to a stockholder rights plan. With these rights, preferred stockholders could make it more difficult for a third-party to acquire us. In addition, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide for a staggered Board, whereby directors serve for three-year terms, with one-third of the directors coming up for reelection each year. A staggered Board will make it more difficult for a third-party to obtain control of our Board through a proxy contest, which may be a necessary step in an acquisition of us that is not favored by our Board. We are also subject to anti-takeover provisions under the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”). Under these provisions, if anyone becomes an “interested stockholder,” we may not enter into a “business combination” with that
61
person for three years without special approval, which could discourage a third-party from making a takeover offer and could delay or prevent a change in control of us. For purposes of these provisions, an “interested stockholder” generally means someone owning 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock or an affiliate of ours that owned 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock during the past three years, subject to certain exceptions as described in the DGCL.
We are an “emerging growth company” and a “smaller reporting company" and the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies and smaller reporting companies may make our common stock and warrants less attractive to investors.
We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act. As an emerging growth company, we may follow reduced disclosure requirements and do not have to make all of the disclosures that public companies that are not emerging growth companies do. We will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of December 31, 2025 or the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in nonconvertible debt during the previous three years. For so long as we remain an emerging growth company, we are permitted and intend to rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. These exemptions include:
•not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act;
•not being required to comply with any requirement that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information about the audit and the consolidated financial statements (i.e., an auditor discussion and analysis)
•reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports, proxy statements and registration statements; and
•exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote of stockholders on executive compensation, stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved and having to disclose the ratio of the compensation of our chief executive officer to the median compensation of our employees.
In addition, the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. This allows an emerging growth company to delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to use the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards; and as a result of this election, our consolidated financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company effective dates.
We also qualify as a “smaller reporting company” as defined under the Exchange Act and may continue to be a smaller reporting company even after we are no longer an emerging growth company. We will remain a smaller reporting company until we determine that either (1) as of the last business day of our most recent second fiscal quarter our prior year’s annual revenues are at least $100 million and our voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates as of such second fiscal quarter end is at least $250 million or (2) our voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates is at least $700 million measured on the last business day of our most recent second fiscal quarter. Similar to emerging growth companies, smaller reporting companies are able to provide simplified executive compensation disclosure and have certain other reduced disclosure obligations, including they may choose to provide only two years of audited consolidated financial statements in Annual Reports on Form 10-K.
We may choose to take advantage of some, but not all, of the available exemptions for emerging growth companies and smaller reporting companies. We cannot predict whether investors will find our common stock or warrants less attractive if we rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock or warrants less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and warrants and our share and warrant price may be more volatile.
Our bylaws provide that the state or federal courts located within the State of Delaware are the exclusive forum for substantially all disputes between us and our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees.
Our bylaws provide that the state or federal courts located within the State of Delaware are the sole and exclusive forum for: (i) any derivative action, suit or proceeding brought on our behalf, (ii) any action, suit or proceeding asserting a claim of breach of fiduciary duty owed by any of our directors, officers or stockholders to our stockholders, (iii) any action, suit or proceeding asserting a claim against us arising pursuant to any provision of the
62
DGCL, our bylaws, or (iv) any action, suit or proceeding asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine. However, this choice of forum provision does not apply to (a) actions in which the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware concludes that an indispensable party is not subject to the jurisdiction of Delaware courts, or (b) actions in which a federal court has assumed exclusive jurisdiction to a proceeding. This choice of forum provision is not intended to apply to any actions brought under the Exchange Act. Section 27 of the Exchange Act creates exclusive federal jurisdiction over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. As a result, the exclusive forum provision will not apply to suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction. Our bylaws also provide that the federal district courts of the U.S. of America will be the exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act). This choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees or stockholders, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and other employees or stockholders.
Furthermore, the enforceability of similar choice of forum provisions in other companies’ certificates of incorporation has been challenged in legal proceedings, and it is possible that a court could find these types of provisions to be inapplicable or unenforceable. If a court were to find the choice of forum provision in our bylaws to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
You may only be able to exercise our public warrants on a “cashless basis” under certain circumstances, and if you do so, you will receive fewer shares of common stock from such exercise than if you were to exercise such warrants for cash.
In the following circumstances holders of warrants who seek to exercise their warrants will not be permitted to do so for cash and will, instead, be required to do so on a cashless basis in accordance with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act: (i) if the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants are not registered under the Securities Act in accordance with the terms of the warrant agreement; (ii) if we have so elected and the shares of common stock are at the time of any exercise of a warrant not listed on a national securities exchange such that they satisfy the definition of “covered securities” under Section 18(b)(1) of the Securities Act; and (iii) if we have so elected and we call the public warrants for redemption. If you exercise your public warrants on a cashless basis, you would pay the warrant exercise price by surrendering the warrants for that number of shares of common stock equal to (A) the quotient obtained by dividing (x) the product of the number of shares of common stock underlying the warrants, multiplied by the excess of the “Fair Market Value” (as defined in the next sentence) over the exercise price of the warrants by (y) the Fair Market Value and (B) 0.361 per whole warrant. The “Fair Market Value” is the average reported last sale price of the common stock as reported for the 10 trading day period ending on the trading day prior to the date on which the notice of exercise is received by the warrant agent or on which the notice of redemption is sent to the holders of warrants, as applicable. As a result, you would receive fewer shares of common stock from such exercise than if you were to exercise such warrants for cash.
We may amend the terms of the warrants in a manner that may have an adverse effect on holders of public warrants with the approval by the holders of at least 50% of the then outstanding public warrants. As a result, the exercise price of your warrants could be increased, the exercise period could be shortened and the number of shares of common stock purchasable upon exercise of a warrant could be decreased, all without your approval.
Our warrants were issued in registered form under a warrant agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company (the “Warrant Agreement”), as warrant agent, and us. The Warrant Agreement provides that the terms of the warrants may be amended without the consent of any holder for the purpose of (i) curing any ambiguity or curing, correcting or supplementing any defective provision or (ii) adding or changing any provisions with respect to matters or questions arising under the Warrant Agreement as the parties to the Warrant Agreement may deem necessary or desirable and that the parties deem to not adversely affect the interests of the registered holders of the warrants, provided that the approval by the holders of at least 50% of the then-outstanding public warrants is required to make any change that adversely affects the rights of the registered holders of public warrants. Accordingly, we may amend the terms of the public warrants in a manner adverse to a holder of public warrants if holders of at least 50% of the then outstanding public warrants approve of such amendment. Although our ability to amend the terms of the public warrants with the consent of at least 50% of the then outstanding public warrants is unlimited, examples of such amendments could be amendments to, among other things, increase the exercise price of the warrants, convert the warrants into cash or shares, shorten the exercise period or decrease the number of shares of common stock purchasable upon exercise of a warrant.
Our Warrant Agreement designates the courts of the State of New York or the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that
63
may be initiated by holders of the warrants, which could limit the ability of warrant holders to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us.
Our Warrant Agreement provides that, subject to applicable law, (i) any action, proceeding or claim against us arising out of or relating in any way to the Warrant Agreement, including under the Securities Act, will be brought and enforced in the courts of the State of New York or the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, and (ii) that we irrevocably submit to such jurisdiction, which jurisdiction shall be the exclusive forum for any such action, proceeding or claim. We will waive any objection to such exclusive jurisdiction and that such courts represent an inconvenient forum. Notwithstanding the foregoing, these provisions of the Warrant Agreement will not apply to suits brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the federal district courts of the U.S. are the sole and exclusive forum.
This choice-of-forum provision may limit a warrant holder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us, which may discourage such lawsuits. Alternatively, if a court were to find this provision of our Warrant Agreement inapplicable or unenforceable with respect to one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and result in a diversion of the time and resources of our management and Board.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None
Item 1C. Cybersecurity.
Our cybersecurity risk management program is integrated into our Quality Management system, our overall enterprise risk management, and shares common methodologies, reporting channels and governance processes that apply across the Company to other legal, compliance, strategic, operational, and financial risk areas.
Key elements of our cybersecurity risk management program include, but are not limited to the following:
•a framework for identifying, mitigating and responding to cybersecurity threats and vulnerabilities;
•cybersecurity management and support, including team members responsible for managing (1) our cybersecurity risk assessment processes, (2) our security controls, and (3) our response to cybersecurity incidents;
•the use of external service providers, where appropriate, to assess, test or otherwise assist with aspects of our security controls, including benchmarking against NIST and FDA standards, and support customer data transfer;
•cybersecurity awareness training for employees;
•security tools in our system to monitor and detect cybersecurity threats;
•cyber liability insurance;
•a cybersecurity incident response plan that includes how to respond to cybersecurity incidents; and
•a third-party risk management process
64
information, see Part I. Item 1A "Risk Factors— Risks Related to Our Business and Operations— Our business and operations may suffer in the event of IT system failures, cyberattacks or deficiencies in our cybersecurity.”
Cybersecurity Governance
Item 2. Properties.
Our corporate headquarters are located in Lehi, Utah, where we lease approximately 3,100 square feet of office space. We use this leased space primarily for business meetings, research and development, engineering, quality and laboratory space. This lease is set to expire on April 30, 2027, subject to our option to extend the term.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
In the ordinary course of business we face various claims brought by third parties, and we may, from time to time, make claims or take legal actions to assert our rights, including intellectual property rights as well as claims relating to employment matters and the safety or efficacy of our products. Any of these claims could subject us to costly litigation, and, while we generally believe that we have adequate insurance to cover many different types of liabilities, our insurance carriers may deny coverage, may be inadequately capitalized to pay on valid claims, or our policy limits may be inadequate to fully satisfy any damage awards or settlements. If this were to happen, the payment of any such awards could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, any such claims, whether or not successful, could damage our reputation and business.
For a description of our legal proceedings, see Note 7, “Commitments and Contingencies,” to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Report, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
65
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Market information for Common Stock
Our common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol “OWLT.”
Holders of Record
As of March 7, 2025, there were 84 holders of record. The number of holders of record does not include a substantially greater number of “street name” holders or beneficial holders, whose shares are held of record by banks, brokers and other financial institutions.
Dividend Policy
We have never declared or paid dividends on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain any future earnings to fund the development and growth of our business, and therefore do not expect to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future determination as to the declaration and payment of dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our board of directors, subject to compliance with contractual restrictions and covenants in the agreements governing our current and future indebtedness, including our ABL Credit Agreement and Loan Facility Agreement. Additionally, the terms of our Convertible Preferred Stock preclude us from paying dividends without the consent of the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of such applicable series of Convertible Preferred Stock. Any such determination will also depend upon our business prospects, results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements and availability and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities; Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer or Affiliated Purchaser
Sales of Unregistered Equity Securities
Except as previously disclosed in our Current Reports on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2024 and September 11, 2024, there were no unregistered sales of equity securities for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Purchases of Equity Securities
We did not repurchase shares of our common stock during the three months ended December 31, 2024.
Item 6. [Reserved]
66
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report (this “Report”). This discussion contains forward-looking statements about our business, operations and industry that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements regarding our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Our results may differ materially from those currently described in the sections entitled “Risk Factors” and "Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" disclosed in this Report. Throughout this Item 7, unless otherwise noted, “we”, “us”, “our” and the “Company” refer to Owlet, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. Except as otherwise stated, dollars are shown in thousands, except per share amounts.
Overview
Our mission is to empower parents with the right information at the right time, to give them more peace of mind and help them find more joy in the journey of parenting. Our digital parenting platform aims to give parents real-time data and insights to help parents feel calmer and more confident. We believe that every parent deserves peace of mind and the opportunity to feel their well-rested best. We also believe that every child deserves to live a long, happy, and healthy life, and we are working to develop products to help facilitate that belief.
Dream Sock De Novo Device Classification
Our Dream Sock has received a de novo device classification from United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) for a first-of-its kind, over-the-counter device for use in the home environment that provides a notification to the caregiver when an infant’s pulse rate and/or oxygen saturation moves outside of preset ranges (“Health Notifications”), displays the infant’s live pulse rate and oxygen saturation values and trends (“Live Health Readings”), and is intended for use in infants who are 1 to 18 months of age and between 6 and 30 pounds.
NYSE Notification
In April 2023, we were notified by NYSE that we were not in compliance with Section 802.01B of the NYSE Listed Company Manual as the average global market capitalization of our common stock over a consecutive 30 trading-day period and, at the same time, our last reported stockholders’ equity were each less than $50,000 (the “NYSE Notification”). In May 2023, we submitted a business plan advising the NYSE of the definitive actions we had taken as of the date of that submission and were planning on taking in order to bring us into compliance with NYSE continued listing standards within 18 months of receipt of the NYSE Notification. The plan was accepted by the NYSE in July 2023. On October 10, 2024, we received formal notice from the NYSE that we had regained compliance with the NYSE’s continued listing standards. As a result of our achievement of compliance with the NYSE’s minimum market capitalization requirement for the requisite period of time, the NYSE has advised us that we are no longer considered out of compliance with these continued listing standards, and the below compliance “BC” indicator has been removed from our Class A common stock (“common stock”). Additionally, we are no longer noted as being below continued listing standards on the NYSE’s website (www.nyse.com). In accordance with the NYSE’s Listed Company Manual, we will be subject to a 12-month follow-up period within which we will be reviewed to confirm that we do not once again fall below any of the NYSE’s continued listing standards. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain compliance with these or any other NYSE listing requirements during or after the 12-month follow-up period. See Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors—Our failure to meet the NYSE’s continued listing requirements could result in a delisting of our common stock” in this Report.
Components of Operating Results
Revenues
We recognize revenue primarily from products and the associated mobile applications. Revenues are recognized when control of goods and services is transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration expected to be received by us in exchange for those goods and services. Substantially all of our revenues were derived from product sales.
Cost of Revenues
67
Cost of revenues consists of product costs, including contract manufacturing, shipping and handling, depreciation and amortization relating to tooling and manufacturing equipment and software, warranty replacement, fulfillment costs, warehousing, hosting and platform costs, and reserves for excess and obsolete inventory.
Operating Expenses
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries, benefits, stock-based compensation, and bonuses for finance and accounting, legal, human resources, operations, quality and administrative executives and employees; third-party legal, accounting, customer service, software, and other professional services; corporate travel and entertainment; depreciation and amortization of property and equipment, asset impairment charges, legal settlements, and facilities rent.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries, commissions, benefits, stock-based compensation, and bonuses for sales and marketing employees and contractors; third-party marketing expenses such as social media and search engine marketing, retail marketing, email marketing, and print marketing.
Research and Development. Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries, benefits, stock-based compensation, and bonuses for employees and contractors engaged in the design, development, maintenance, and testing of our products and platforms, including clinical testing.
Other Income (Expense)
Interest Income (Expense), Net. Interest income (expense), net consists of interest incurred on our outstanding borrowings, debt extinguishment costs, gain on interest for forgiveness of interest accrued related to an arrangement with a significant vendor, and amortization of the associated deferred financing costs. Interest income consists of interest earned on our money market account.
Common Stock Warrant Liability Adjustment. Mark to market adjustment to recognize the change in fair value of common stock warrant liabilities.
Other Income (Expense), Net. Other income (expense), net includes our net gain (loss) on foreign exchange transactions.
Income Tax Provision. Income tax provision consists primarily of U.S. federal and state income taxes related to the tax jurisdictions in which we conduct business.
68
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our results of operations for the periods presented (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 78,056 | $ | 54,010 | ||||||||||
| Cost of revenues | 38,748 | 31,423 | ||||||||||||
| Gross profit | 39,308 | 22,587 | ||||||||||||
| Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||
| General and administrative | 33,967 | 27,343 | ||||||||||||
| Sales and marketing | 15,760 | 13,527 | ||||||||||||
| Research and development | 9,801 | 10,349 | ||||||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 59,528 | 51,219 | ||||||||||||
| Operating loss | (20,220) | (28,632) | ||||||||||||
| Other income (expense): | ||||||||||||||
| Interest expense, net | (1,630) | (3,191) | ||||||||||||
| Common stock warrant liability adjustment | 9,293 | (924) | ||||||||||||
| Other income (expense), net | 75 | (144) | ||||||||||||
| Total other income (expense), net | 7,738 | (4,259) | ||||||||||||
| Loss before income tax provision | (12,482) | (32,891) | ||||||||||||
| Income tax provision | (54) | (10) | ||||||||||||
| Net loss and comprehensive loss | (12,536) | (32,901) | ||||||||||||
| Accretion on convertible preferred stock | (4,926) | (4,591) | ||||||||||||
| Accretion on redeemable common stock | (25) | — | ||||||||||||
| Allocation of net loss attributable to redeemable common stockholders | 270 | — | ||||||||||||
| Net loss attributable to redeemable common stockholders | (245) | — | ||||||||||||
| Net loss attributable to common stockholders | $ | (17,217) | $ | (37,492) | ||||||||||
| Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted | $ | (1.57) | $ | (4.53) | ||||||||||
| Weighted-average number of shares outstanding used to compute net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted | 10,951,270 | 8,276,481 | ||||||||||||
| Net loss per share attributable to redeemable common stockholders, basic and diluted | $ | (1.42) | $ | — | ||||||||||
| Weighted-average number of shares outstanding used to compute net loss per share attributable to redeemable common stockholders, basic and diluted | 172,131 | — | ||||||||||||
69
Revenues
| Year Ended December 31, | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 78,056 | $ | 54,010 | $ | 24,046 | 44.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Revenues increased by $24,046, or 44.5%, from $54,010 for the year ended December 31, 2023 to $78,056 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase was primarily due to higher sales of Dream Sock products, reflecting an increase in consumer demand across all sales channels as compared to the prior year.
Cost of Revenues and Gross Profit
| Year Ended December 31, | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cost of revenues | $ | 38,748 | $ | 31,423 | $ | 7,325 | 23.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Gross profit | $ | 39,308 | $ | 22,587 | $ | 16,721 | 74.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Gross margin | 50.4 | % | 41.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenues increased by $7,325, or 23.3%, from $31,423 for the year ended December 31, 2023 to $38,748 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase was primarily due to the increase in product sales. Gross margin increased from 41.8% for the year ended December 31, 2023 to 50.4% for the year ended December 31, 2024 primarily due to higher revenue, favorable product mix, lower returns, improved fixed cost absorption, and lower direct product and fulfillment costs.
General and Administrative
| Year Ended December 31, | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| General and administrative | $ | 33,967 | $ | 27,343 | $ | 6,624 | 24.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expense increased by $6,624, or 24.2%, from $27,343 for the year ended December 31, 2023 to $33,967 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase was driven primarily by litigation settlements, impairment charges related to intangible assets, and higher compensation expense, including accrued bonuses and severance-related expenses. These increases were partially offset by reduced insurance premiums, less bad debt expense, and lower consulting and outside services spend related to transaction costs as compared to the prior year.
Sales and Marketing
| Year Ended December 31, | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sales and marketing | $ | 15,760 | $ | 13,527 | $ | 2,233 | 16.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing expense increased by $2,233, or 16.5%, from $13,527 for the year ended December 31, 2023 to $15,760 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase was driven primarily by higher compensation expense due to additional employees, higher commissions from higher sales, and accrued bonuses, along with higher spend on social media marketing and public relations as compared to the prior year.
Research and Development
| Year Ended December 31, | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Research and development | $ | 9,801 | $ | 10,349 | $ | (548) | (5.3 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||
70
Research and development expense decreased by $548, or 5.3%, from $10,349 for the year ended December 31, 2023 to $9,801 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The decrease was driven primarily by lower stock-based compensation expense and higher costs capitalized related to internal-use software, partially offset by accrued bonuses as compared to the prior year.
Other Income (Expense), Net
| Year Ended December 31, | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense, net | $ | (1,630) | $ | (3,191) | $ | 1,561 | (48.9 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Common stock warrant liability adjustment | $ | 9,293 | $ | (924) | $ | 10,217 | (1105.7 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other income (expense), net | $ | 75 | $ | (144) | $ | 219 | (152.1 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense decreased by $1,561, from $3,191 for the year ended December 31, 2023 to $1,630 for the year ended December 31, 2024. During the year ended December 31, 2023, we entered into an agreement with a significant vendor to pay $3,000 of interest over 36 months with respect to past due payables. The present value of the future payments was expensed and included within interest expense, net on the consolidated statements of operations in that period. In January 2024, the agreement was amended and the schedule of interest payments was modified from 36 months to 28 months, but the amount of interest payable was unchanged. In September 2024, the agreement was amended again, allowing us to terminate the agreement with a final interest payment of $623, which was then fully settled in September 2024. The reduction in the total cumulative interest payments to $2,206 resulted in us recording a reduction of interest expense at termination of $508. The decrease in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2024 was partially offset by interest related to the Company's term loan facility and asset-based revolving credit facility, which were entered into in September 2024.
For the year ended December 31, 2024, we recognized a gain of $9,293 as compared to a loss of $924 for the same period in the prior year resulting from a decrease in the fair value of common stock warrants outstanding.
Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA
We have included a certain non-GAAP financial measure in this Annual Report, adjusted EBITDA. We use such non-GAAP financial measures as internal measures of business operating performance and as performance measures for benchmarking against our peers and competitors. We believe our presentation of adjusted EBITDA provides a meaningful perspective of the underlying operating performance of our current business and enables investors to better understand and evaluate our historical and prospective operating performance. We believe that this non-GAAP financial measure is an important supplemental measure of operating performance because it excludes items that vary from period to period without correlation to our core operating performance and highlight trends in our business that may not otherwise be apparent when relying solely on GAAP financial measures. Due to the nature of the items being excluded, such items do not reflect future gains, losses, expenses or benefits and are not indicative of our future operating performance. We believe investors, analysts and other interested parties use adjusted EBITDA in evaluating issuers, and the presentation of these measures facilitates a comparative assessment of our operating performance in addition to our performance based on GAAP results.
Our non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered as an alternative to net loss as a measure of financial performance or any other performance measure derived in accordance with GAAP, and should not be construed as an inference that our future results will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring items.
Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net loss adjusted for income tax provision, interest expense, net, depreciation and amortization, impairment of intangible assets related to internally developed software, common stock warrant liability adjustments, stock-based compensation, transaction costs, charges related to certain legal matters, and restructuring costs.
Adjusted EBITDA is not a recognized terms under GAAP, and our presentation of this non-GAAP measures does not replace the presentation of our financial results in accordance with GAAP. Because all companies do not use adjusted EBITDA (and similarly titled financial measures) in the same way, those measures as used by other companies may not be consistent with the way we calculate such measures. The non-GAAP financial measure included in this report should not be construed as a substitute for or better indicators of the Company’s performance than the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures. See the reconciliation tables below for additional information regarding the non-GAAP financial measure included herein (in thousands):
71
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Measures | 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||
| GAAP net Loss | $ | (12,536) | $ | (32,901) | |||||||
| Income tax provision | (54) | (10) | |||||||||
| Interest expense, net | 1,630 | 3,191 | |||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 452 | 842 | |||||||||
| Impairment of intangible assets related to internally developed software | 1,873 | — | |||||||||
| Common stock warrant liability adjustment | (9,293) | 924 | |||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | 8,633 | 9,933 | |||||||||
| Transaction costs | 394 | 1,710 | |||||||||
| Charges related to certain legal matters | 6,169 | — | |||||||||
| Restructuring costs | 764 | — | |||||||||
| Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA | $ | (1,968) | $ | (16,311) | |||||||
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We fund our operations primarily with proceeds from issuances of our convertible preferred stock, issuances of our common stock, borrowings under our loan facilities, issuances of convertible promissory notes, and sales of our products and services. As of December 31, 2024, we had cash and cash equivalents of $20,245.
On February 17, 2023 we entered into private placement investment agreements with certain investors, pursuant to which we issued and sold to the investors (i) an aggregate of 30,000 shares of our Series A convertible preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share and (ii) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 7,871,712 shares of our common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“February 2023 Warrants”) for an aggregate purchase price of $30,000.
The Series A convertible preferred stock is convertible into common stock at the option of the holder at any time after February 17, 2023 and ranks, with respect to dividend rights, rights of redemption and rights upon a liquidation event, (i) senior to the common stock and all other classes or series of our equity securities established after February 17, 2023, unless such shares or equity securities expressly provide that they rank in parity with or senior to the Series A convertible preferred stock with respect to dividend rights, rights of redemption or rights upon a liquidation event, (ii) on parity with each class or series of our equity securities established after February 17, 2023, the terms of which expressly provide that it ranks on parity with the Series A convertible preferred stock with respect to dividend rights, rights of redemption and rights upon a liquidation event and (iii) junior to each class or series of our equity securities established after February 17, 2023, the terms of which expressly provide that it ranks senior to the Series A convertible preferred stock with respect to dividend rights, rights of redemption and rights upon a liquidation event. On August 20, 2024, holders of the Series A Preferred Stock elected to convert an aggregate of 15,721 shares of Series A Preferred Stock in exchange for an aggregate of 2,291,686 shares of common stock. Except as otherwise provided in the certificate of designation relating to the Series A convertible preferred stock or as required by law, holders of shares of Series A convertible preferred stock are entitled to vote with the holders of shares of common stock (and any other class or series that may similarly be entitled to vote with the holders of common stock) on an as-converted to common stock basis at any annual or special meeting of our stockholders, and not as a separate class.
At any time from and after February 17, 2028, the holders of at least a majority of the then outstanding shares of Series A convertible preferred stock may specify a date and time or the occurrence of an event by vote or written consent that all, and not less than all, of the outstanding shares of Series A preferred stock will automatically be: (i) converted into shares of common stock at a conversion rate of 145.7726 per share (the "Conversion Rate"), (ii) subject to certain exceptions and limitations, redeemed for an amount per share of Series A preferred stock equal to the liquidation preference of one thousand dollars per share, plus all accrued or declared but unpaid dividends as of the redemption date and time or (iii) a combination of the foregoing.
Subject to certain exceptions, upon the occurrence of a fundamental change, voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company, we will be required to pay an amount per share of Series A Preferred Stock equal to the greater of (i) one thousand dollars per share or (ii) the consideration per share of Series A Preferred Stock as would have been payable had all such shares been converted to common stock immediately prior
72
to the liquidation event, plus, in each case, the aggregate amount of all declared but unpaid dividends thereon to the date of final distribution to the holders of Series A Preferred Stock.
Each of the February 2023 Warrants sold in the private placement offering is exercisable for one share of common stock at an exercise price of $4.66 per share, is immediately exercisable, and will expire on February 17, 2028. None of the warrants have been exercised as of December 31, 2024. As the February 2023 Warrants could require cash settlement in certain scenarios, the warrants were classified as liabilities upon issuance and were initially recorded at an aggregate estimated fair value of $26,133. The total proceeds from the offering were first allocated to the liability classified warrants, based on their fair values, with the residual $3,867 allocated to the Series A convertible preferred stock. The Series A convertible stock will accrete to their redemption value, starting from the issuance date to the date at which the shares become redeemable on February 17, 2028. Accretion will be recorded as a deemed dividend.
We incurred $1,963 of issuance costs related to the offering, of which $1,513 were paid as of December 31, 2023. The remaining $450 were paid as of December 31, 2024. Issuance costs allocated to the preferred stock of $253 were recorded as a reduction to the Series A preferred stock. Issuance costs allocated to the liability classified warrants of $1,710 were recorded as an expense within general and administrative expenses.
On February 25, 2024 we entered into a private placement investment agreement with certain investors, pursuant to which we issued and sold to the investors (i) an aggregate of 9,250 shares of our Series B convertible preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share and (ii) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,799,021 shares of our common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “February 2024 Warrants”), for an aggregate purchase price of $9,250.
The Series B convertible preferred stock is convertible into common stock at the option of the holder at any time after February 29, 2024 and ranks, with respect to dividend rights, rights of redemption and rights upon a liquidation event, (i) equal to our Series A convertible preferred stock, (ii) senior to the common stock and all other classes or series of our equity securities established after February 29, 2024, unless such shares or equity securities expressly provide that they rank in parity with or senior to the Series B convertible preferred stock with respect to dividend rights, rights of redemption or rights upon a liquidation event, (iii) on parity with each class or series of our equity securities established after February 29, 2024, the terms of which expressly provide that it ranks on parity with the Series B convertible preferred stock with respect to dividend rights, rights of redemption and rights upon a liquidation event and (iv) junior to each class or series of our equity securities established after February 29, 2024, the terms of which expressly provide that it ranks senior to the Series B convertible preferred stock with respect to dividend rights, rights of redemption and rights upon a liquidation event. Except as otherwise provided in the certificate of designation relating to the Series B convertible preferred stock or as required by law, holders of shares of Series B convertible preferred stock are entitled to vote with the holders of shares of common stock (and any other class or series that may similarly be entitled to vote with the holders of common stock) on an as-converted to common stock basis at any annual or special meeting of our stockholders, and not as a separate class.
At any time from and after March 1, 2029, the holders of at least a majority of the then outstanding shares of Series B convertible preferred stock may specify a date and time or the occurrence of an event by vote or written consent that all, and not less than all, of the outstanding shares of Series B preferred stock will automatically be: (i) converted into shares of common stock at a conversion rate of 129.6596 per share, (ii) subject to certain exceptions and limitations, redeemed for an amount per share of Series B preferred stock equal to the liquidation preference of one thousand dollars per share, plus all accrued or declared but unpaid dividends as of the redemption date and time or (iii) a combination of the foregoing.
Subject to certain exceptions, upon the occurrence of a fundamental change, voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company, we will be required to pay an amount per share of Series B Preferred Stock equal to the greater of (i) one thousand dollars per share or (ii) the consideration per share of Series B Preferred Stock as would have been payable had all such shares been converted to common stock immediately prior to the liquidation event, plus, in each case, the aggregate amount of all declared but unpaid dividends thereon to the date of final distribution to the holders of Series B preferred stock.
Each of the February 2024 Warrants sold in the private placement offering is exercisable for one share of common stock at an exercise price of $7.7125 per share, is immediately exercisable, and will expire on March 1, 2029. None of the warrants have been exercised as of the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Company incurred $394 of issuance costs related to the offering. Issuance costs allocated to the preferred stock of $102 were recorded as a reduction to the Series B convertible preferred stock. Issuance costs allocated to the liability classified warrants of $292 were recorded as an expense within general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of operations.
73
On September 11, 2024, we entered into the underwriting agreement and issued 3,135,136 shares of our common stock at a price to the public of $3.70 per share, less underwriting discounts and commissions. The net proceeds we received were $10,590. In addition, we incurred $874 in issuance costs, of which $286 was issuance costs that were unpaid as of December 31, 2024. We provided the underwriter a discount of 7% off the offering price. In addition to the underwriter discount, the offering expenses with third parties were $874, of which $286 in issuance costs that were unpaid as of December 31, 2024. We also reimbursed the underwriters for $198 in fees and expenses, including legal expenses, out-of-pocket expenses, and clearing expenses. The issuance costs associated with the September 2024 Offering were recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital on the consolidated balance sheets.
Pursuant to the underwriting agreement, we also issued, as a portion of the underwriting compensation payable to the underwriter, a warrant to purchase up to 125,405 shares of our common stock (which was subsequently transferred to certain affiliates of the underwriter, the “Titan Warrants”). The Titan Warrants are initially exercisable on March 13, 2025 at an exercise price of $4.63 and have a term of five years from such initial exercise date.
SVB Revolver and Term Loan
On November 23, 2022, we entered into the Third Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (as amended, the “LSA”) with Silicon Valley Bank, a division of First Citizens Bank and Trust Company (“SVB”). The LSA provided for a $10,000 revolving line of credit (the “SVB Revolver”) and for an $8,500 term loan, which amortized with equal monthly installments of $500.
On September 11, 2024, we terminated the LSA with SVB and used existing cash to prepay and extinguish all borrowings outstanding under the line of credit and term loan facilities with SVB. In addition to normal principal and interest, we paid $761 of termination fees to extinguish the loan. Of the total termination fees recorded, during the year ended December 31, 2024, $407 was recorded as interest expense, net on the consolidated statements of operations, and $11 was recorded within general and administrative expense on the consolidated statements of operations. The remaining $343 was accrued as interest expense, net, in prior periods.
WTI Loan Facility
On September 11, 2024 (the “Effective Date”), we, as guarantor, and our wholly-owned subsidiary, Owlet Baby Care, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“OBCI,” and together with us, collectively, the “Loan Parties”), as the borrower, entered into a Loan Facility Agreement (the “Loan Facility Agreement”) with WTI Fund X, Inc. and WTI Fund XI, Inc. (collectively “WTI” for a term loan facility of up to $15,000 (the “WTI Loan Facility”).
The WTI Loan Facility consists of two tranches. The first tranche of $10,000 was available at closing and through September 30, 2024, with $2,500 of the first tranche availability extendable until December 31, 2024 (the “First Tranche Commitment”). OBCI initiated our first drawdown under the WTI Loan Facility of $7,500 (the “Initial Loan”) shortly after closing. WTI and OBCI agreed to extend the remaining $2,500 of the First Tranche Commitment to March 31, 2025. As of the filing date, OBCI has not drawn on the remaining $2,500. Once repaid, we cannot reborrow from the WTI Loan Facility.
The second tranche of $5,000 is available through August 15, 2025 (the “Second Tranche Commitment,” or together with the First Tranche Commitment, the “Loan Commitments”) upon achievement of (a) at least $48,600 in revenue for the period that commenced October 1, 2024 and ending June 30, 2025 (the “Second Tranche Condition Period”), (b) total cash burn during the Second Tranche Condition Period not to exceed $600 for such period, (c) receipt by us of at least $6,000 of net proceeds from an equity financing during a period commencing on the closing date and ending on the second tranche borrowing date, and (d) receipt by WTI of our then-current, board-approved operating and financing plan to WTI's satisfaction, as well as compliance with certain reporting conditions.
Interest on the outstanding principal amounts of any borrowing under the WTI Loan Facility accrues at a rate per annum equal to the sum of the prime rate plus 3.5%, with a floor of 12%. Commencing on November 1, 2025 through maturity on January 1, 2028, we are required to make monthly interest and principal payments. Loans under the WTI Loan Facility also accrue 2.5% in payment-in-kind interest (“PIK Interest”) compounded monthly, and PIK Interest payments will be due and payable upon maturity of the loans. Accrued coupon interest and accrued PIK interest are recorded within accrued and other expenses and within long-term debt, net respectively on the consolidated balance sheets. Accrued PIK interest was $58 for the year ended December 31, 2024.
We have the option to prepay the outstanding loans issued under the WTI Loan Facility in whole at any time by repaying all outstanding principal and accrued interest, as well as all scheduled unpaid interest on the loan, including PIK Interest, as if the loan continued to accrue interest through its stated maturity. Provided if our fully diluted
74
market capitalization of our common stock is greater than or equal to $250,000 for 10 consecutive Trading Days, then so long as such prepayment is made within 60 days thereafter, the redemption price will be discounted by 30% of the total amount of all scheduled but unpaid interest (but excluding any PIK Interest, which will not be discounted).
The WTI Loan Facility contains certain reporting and operational covenants that we must meet in order to borrow funds under the Loan Commitments and not cause an event of default. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, WTI could elect to force redemption of the outstanding balances under the WTI Loan Facility, requiring us to pay all outstanding principal and accrued interest, as well as all scheduled unpaid interest on the loan, including PIK interest. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, we will also be required to pay default interest on any overdue balances at a rate of 5.0%. The WTI Loan Facility and any loans and obligations issued thereunder are collateralized by substantially all of our assets, with certain exceptions as set forth in the WTI Loan Facility, and are guaranteed by Owlet, Inc. As of December 31, 2024, we were in compliance with all covenants under the WTI Loan Facility.
As partial consideration for the availability and funding of the WTI Loan Facility, we and WTI Fund X, LLC (“Fund X”) and WTI Fund XI, LLC (“Fund XI”, and together with Fund X, the “WTI Funds”) entered into a Stock Issuance Agreement (the “WTI Stock Issuance Agreement”), dated as of the Effective Date. Pursuant to the WTI Stock Issuance Agreement, we issued to the WTI Funds an aggregate of 750,000 shares of redeemable common stock on the Effective Date, of which 187,500 are subject to forfeiture in the event that we do not draw on any portion of the remaining outstanding Loan Commitment. To the extent we do exercise our option under the Loan Commitments to issue additional debt, a number of forfeitable shares will 'vest' and no longer be subject to forfeiture based on the pro rata portion of the outstanding Loan Commitments drawn against.
The shares issued to WTI pursuant to the WTI Stock Issuance Agreement contain an embedded redemption option (the “Redemption Option”) such that WTI may elect to force us to redeem the shares that are no longer subject to forfeiture for a price of $8.40 per share. The Redemption Option may be exercised in whole or in part, at any time, from time to time, during the period commencing on the first trading day following the fifth anniversary of the Effective Date and continuing through the date which is 10 years after the Effective Date, subject to certain acceleration provisions set forth in the WTI Stock Issuance Agreement. Because the shares are redeemable at the option of the WTI Funds, the shares are recorded in mezzanine equity on the consolidated balance sheets. The redeemable common shares were initially recorded at their fair value of $7.66 per share, which was an aggregate value of $4,308. The value of the redeemable common shares was determined using a combination of the value of our stock on the date of issuance and the theoretical value of a stand-alone put option valued using a Black-Scholes put option model discounted by a present value factor that considers the credit spread between an estimated Company specific discount rate and the risk-free rate of return. Because the shares are required to be redeemed at the option of WTI, based solely on the passage of time, and provided WTI did not elect to otherwise sell or transfer the shares beforehand, the carrying value of the shares will accrete to their redemption value of $8.40 per share from the issuance date through September 11, 2029, the date the Redemption Option first becomes exercisable.
We allocated the lender fees (including the fair value of the vested shares) and third-party debt issuance costs between the Initial Loan and the remaining, undrawn Loan Commitments. The costs allocated to the Initial Loan are accounted for as a discount and will be amortized across the term of the Initial Loan using the effective interest method. The costs allocated to the remaining, undrawn Loan Commitments are accounted for as loan commitment assets, which are being amortized to interest expense using the straight-line method over the commitment periods, due to uncertainty about our intent to access the Loan Commitment. The unamortized portion of the loan commitment assets of $809 as of December 31, 2024 are recorded within Other assets on the consolidated balance sheet.
We recognized $256 of interest expense related to the amortization of debt issuance costs of the WTI Loan Facility and $764 of interest expense related to the amortization of the loan commitment assets during the year ended December 31, 2024.
ABL Line of Credit
On September 11, 2024, we, as guarantor, and our wholly-owned subsidiary, Owlet Baby Care, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("OBCI," and together with us, collectively, the "Loan Parties"), as borrower, entered into a Credit and Security Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with the financial institutions party thereto from time to time as lenders (collectively the “Lenders”) and ABL OPCO LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, in its capacity as administrative agent for the Lenders.
The Credit Agreement provides for an asset-based revolving credit facility (the “ABL Line of Credit”) in a maximum principal amount of up to $15,000, which amount shall increase to $20,000 on September 11, 2025 (the “Revolving Commitment”). The ABL Line of Credit is collateralized by substantially all of our assets. Loans and other obligations under the Credit Agreement bear interest at a rate per annum equal to the 1-month Secured
75
Overnight Financing Rate (subject to a floor of 3.5%) plus a margin, which varies between 7.5% and 8.5% depending on our earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), provided that the interest rate shall not exceed the maximum rate permitted under applicable law.
The ABL Line of Credit matures on September 10, 2027 (the “Maturity Date”). If for any reason the Credit Agreement is terminated or all outstanding loans and other obligations are paid in full and the ABL Line of Credit is terminated before the Maturity Date, we will be obligated to pay a prepayment fee equal to a percentage of the then-current Revolving Commitment, which percentage decreases on certain anniversary of the closing date.
The Credit Agreement contains representations, warranties, covenants, and events of default customary for agreements of this type. OBCI's obligations under the Credit Agreement are: (i) fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Owlet, Inc.; and (ii) secured by a security interest in substantially all our personal property assets, including Owlet Inc.'s pledge of the outstanding capital stock of the Company. Among these covenants is a liquidity covenant requiring the Company to maintain liquidity of $4,000. Liquidity is defined as the sum of (x) Undrawn Availability (as defined in the Credit Agreement) on the asset-based line of credit, plus (y) unrestricted cash and funds held in deposit accounts. In addition, if the liquidity falls below $9,000, the Company is then subject to a minimum trailing-twelve-months EBITDA covenant as defined in the Credit Agreement. As of December 31, 2024, we were in compliance with all covenants under the Credit Agreement.
The unamortized portion of debt issuance costs related to the Credit Agreement as of December 31, 2024 was $657 and is recorded as a loan commitment asset within other assets on the consolidated balance sheets. Issuance costs are amortized straight-line over the term of the Credit Agreement and recorded within interest income (expense), net on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
On December 31, 2024, there was $6,263 of outstanding borrowings, which is recorded as a current liability on the consolidated balance sheets based on our intent and ability to repay the outstanding borrowings in the near term. The remaining borrowing base availability under the Credit Agreement was $79 as of December 31, 2024. Subsequent to December 31, 2024 we've had various drawn downs and repayments. The outstanding balance as of March 11, 2025 is $2,669.
Financed Insurance Premiums
In 2024, we renewed a number of our insurance policies and entered into several new short-term commercial premium finance agreements with First Insurance Funding totaling $941 to be paid within one year, accruing interest at a weighted average rate of 8.7% As of December 31, 2024, the remaining principal balance on the combined financed insurance premiums was $615.
Funding Requirements and Going Concern
In accordance with ASU No. 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40), we have evaluated whether there are conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the consolidated financial statements are issued.
Since inception, we have experienced recurring operating losses and generated negative cash flows from operations, resulting in an accumulated deficit of $268,195 as of December 31, 2024. During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we had negative cash flows from operations of $11,209 and $23,527, respectively. As of December 31, 2024, we had $20,245 of cash on hand.
As we continue to address these financial conditions, management has undertaken the following actions:
•As described further in Note 9, Common Stock Issuance, Redeemable Common Stock, Common Stock Warrants, and Convertible Preferred Stock, in September 2024, we issued 3,135,136 shares of our common stock and received net proceeds of $10,003 and in February 2024, the Company consummated a sale of preferred stock and warrants to purchase our common stock for aggregate net proceeds of $8,855.
•As described in Note 6, Debt and Other Financing Arrangements, in September 2024, we entered into a loan facility agreement with WTI Fund X, Inc. and WTI Fund XI, Inc. (collectively “WTI” or “Lenders”) for a term loan facility of up to $15,000 (the “WTI Loan Facility”) and on September 11, 2024, we entered into an asset-based revolving credit facility (the “ABL Line of Credit”) with ABL OPCO LLC, as the lender, with a maximum revolving commitment amount of up to $15,000, with an additional $5,000 revolving commitment available on September 11, 2025. In connection with these transactions, we used our then-existing cash to repay and extinguish all borrowings outstanding under the line of credit and term loan agreement with Silicon Valley Bank, now a division of First Citizens Bank and Trust Company (“SVB”).
76
As of December 31, 2024 we have borrowings of $7,500 under the WTI Loan Facility and $6,263 under the ABL Line of Credit.
Notwithstanding the above actions, we have experienced recurring operating losses, negative cash flows from operations since inception, and a low cash balance relative to current obligations which raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the accompanying consolidated financial statements are issued. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis and accordingly, do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts, or the amount and classification of liabilities that might result should we be unable to continue as a going concern.
We have not generated sufficient cash flows from operations to satisfy our capital requirements for the next twelve months. There can be no assurance that we will generate sufficient future cash flows from operations to fund our ongoing operations due to potential factors, including but not limited to inflation, recession, or reduced demand for our products. If revenues decrease from current levels, we may be unable to further reduce costs, or such reductions may limit our ability to pursue strategic initiatives and grow revenues in the future.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional financing on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Failure to secure additional funding may require us to modify, delay or abandon some of our planned future development, or to otherwise enact further operating cost reductions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition and ability to achieve our intended business objectives.
If we raise additional funds through further issuances of equity or convertible debt securities, our existing stockholders could suffer significant dilution, and any new equity securities we issue could have rights, preferences, and privileges superior to those of holders of our common stock. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on terms satisfactory to us when we require it, our ability to continue to pursue our business objectives and to respond to business opportunities, challenges, or unforeseen circumstances could be significantly limited, and our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. We also could be required to seek funds through arrangements with partners or others that may require us to relinquish rights or jointly own some aspects of our technologies, products, or services that we would otherwise pursue on our own.
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes our cash flow (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Net cash used in operating activities | $ | (11,209) | $ | (23,527) | |||||||
| Net cash used in investing activities | (761) | (59) | |||||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | 16,044 | 28,912 | |||||||||
| Net change in cash and cash equivalents | $ | 4,074 | $ | 5,326 | |||||||
Subsequent to the release of our preliminary earnings results on March 4, 2025, we identified and corrected a $524 classification error between cash flows from operating activities and financing activities in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2024. Additionally, a balance sheet classification entry was recorded resulting in a $346 decrease in the current portion of long-term and other debt and increase in long term debt, net in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2024.
Operating Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2024, net cash used in operating activities was $11,209 as compared to net cash used in operating activities of $23,527 in the prior year. The change in operating cash flows was primarily driven by a lower net loss and partially offset by higher working capital usage. Higher working capital usage was driven by higher inventory balances due to the build up of inventory levels to support current demand, partially offset by lower accounts receivable due to a focus on improving our cash conversion cycle for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Investing Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2024, net cash used in investing activities increased to $761 from $59 for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase in cash used for investing activities is primarily related to the capitalization of internal-use software development costs for the year ended December 31, 2024.
77
Financing Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2024, net cash provided by financing activities was $16,044 as compared to cash used in financing activities of $28,912 for the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily driven by the private placement offering of shares of preferred stock in February 2023 and higher debt payments, partially offset by the private placement offering of shares of preferred stock in February 2024, and the September 2024 issuance of common stock.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our significant accounting policies are fundamental to understanding our results of operations and financial condition as they require that we use estimates and assumptions that may affect the value of our assets or liabilities and financial results. For a summary of our significant accounting policies, estimates, and methods used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements, see Part II. Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” - Note 2.
The accounting policies and estimates described below are those we consider most critical in preparing our consolidated financial statements because they require management to make subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Sales Returns, Rebates, Discounts, and Allowances
The Company’s contracts include promises to provide rights of return to customers as well as promises to issue discounts and provide rebates or allowances to certain retail channel customers if specified conditions are met. Revenues are reduced in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for anticipated sales returns, discounts, and allowances, based on our analysis of historical sales returns and contractual discounts and allowances. Expected returns and estimated rebates and allowances that have been earned but not yet honored or paid out are included in accrued and other expenses in the accompanying balance sheets. Estimated discounts that have been earned but not yet honored or paid out are included as a reduction to accounts receivable, net. Actual returns may vary from estimates if we experience a change in actual sales returns or exchange patterns due to unanticipated changes in products or competitive pressures.
Sales return rates, excluding the impact of regulatory actions, have been sufficiently predictable to allow us to estimate expected future returns. We review the actual returns as a percentage of sales to determine the historical rate of return. The historical rate of return is used as a basis for estimating future returns based on current sales. The sales return estimate can be affected by the release of new products and changes to sales channels. Actual returns may vary from estimates if we experience a change in actual sales returns or exchange patterns due to unanticipated changes in products, competitive pressures, or regulatory actions.
Sales rebates, discounts, and allowances provided to our customers have been sufficiently predictable to allow us to estimate expected future discounts and allowances. Discounts and allowances are estimable based on existing and expected promotional programs and contractual terms in place at the time of sale. New promotional programs or changes to existing promotional programs could impact the estimated sales rebates, discounts, and allowances.
Revenue for Contracts with Customers
We generated substantially all of our revenues from the sale of our hardware products, primarily the Owlet Dream Sock, Owlet Cam, and Owlet Monitor Duo. The transaction price is calculated as selling price less the estimate of variable consideration, including future returns, volume rebates, and sales incentives related to current period sales.
Arrangements with Multiple Performance Obligations
The Company enters into contracts that have multiple performance obligations. Product sales include three performance obligations. The first performance obligation is the delivery of hardware and embedded firmware essential to the functionality of the hardware. Embedded firmware allows the hardware to recognize inputs to the hardware and provide appropriate outputs. The second performance obligation is the implied right to connect the downloadable mobile application, provided free of charge, to the hardware, which enables users to view and access real-time data outputs. The third performance obligation is the implied right to receive, on a when-and-if-available basis, future unspecified application upgrades, added features, and bug fixes relating to the product’s essential firmware.
The Company allocates the transaction price to each performance obligation based on a relative standalone selling price (“SSP”). The Company’s process for determining its SSP considers multiple factors, including an adjusted
78
market assessment and consumer behaviors, and varies depending on the facts and circumstances of each performance obligation. Revenues allocated to the delivery of the hardware and embedded firmware essential to the functionality of the hardware represent substantially all of the arrangements consideration and reflect the Company’s best estimate of the selling price if it was sold regularly on a stand-alone basis. SSP for the mobile application and upgrade rights are estimated based on relevant market and consumer data.
Revenues are recognized at the time the related performance obligation is satisfied by transferring control of the promised good or service to a customer. Revenues allocated to the hardware and embedded firmware are recognized at the time of product delivery, provided the other conditions for revenue recognition have been met. This generally occurs upon delivery of the product to a third-party carrier. Revenues allocated to the implied right to access the mobile application and the implied right to receive, on a when-and-if-available basis, future unspecified application upgrades, added features, and bug fixes, are recognized on a straight-line basis over the estimated usage period of the underlying hardware product. The usage period is estimated based on historical user activity and ranges from 10 to 27 months.
The Company records revenues net of sales tax and variable consideration such as discounts and customer returns. Payment terms are short-term in nature and, as a result, do not have any significant financing components. The Company records estimated reductions to revenue in the form of variable consideration for customer sales programs, returns, and incentive offerings including rebates, markdowns, promotions, and volume-based incentives.
Consideration payable to a customer, such as cooperative advertising and pricing promotions to retailers and distributors, is recorded as a reduction to revenue. Deferred revenues represent advance payments received from customers prior to performance by the Company. Sales taxes collected from customers which are remitted to governmental authorities are not included in revenue and are reflected as a liability in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Inventory
Inventory includes material and third-party assembly costs. Inventory is recorded at the lower of cost or net realizable value, with cost being determined using the weighted average cost method. We review inventory for excess supply, obsolescence, and valuations above estimated realizable amounts, and write down inventory to net realizable value when net realizable value does not exceed cost. Substantially all of our inventory consisted of finished goods as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.
Warrant Liability
We account for warrants as either equity-classified or liability-classified instruments based on an assessment of the warrant’s specific terms and applicable authoritative guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 480 and ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”). The assessment considers whether the warrants are freestanding financial instruments pursuant to ASC 480, meet the definition of a liability pursuant to ASC 480, and whether the warrants meet all of the requirements for equity classification under ASC 815, including whether the warrants are indexed to our own shares of common stock, among other conditions for equity classification. This assessment, which requires the use of professional judgment, is conducted at the time of warrant issuance and as of each subsequent quarterly period end date while the warrants are outstanding.
For issued or modified warrants that meet all of the criteria for equity classification, the warrants are required to be recorded as a component of additional paid-in capital at the time of issuance. For issued or modified warrants that do not meet all the criteria for equity classification, the warrants are required to be recorded at their initial fair value on the date of issuance, and each balance sheet date thereafter. Changes in the estimated fair value of the warrants are recognized as a non-operating gain or loss in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. See Part II. Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Note 10” included in this Report for further discussion on fair value considerations.
Redeemable Shares
In connection with the Loan Facility Agreement with WTI, we issued redeemable common shares to WTI. The shares issued to WTI contain an embedded redemption option (the “Redemption Option”) such that WTI may elect to force the Company to redeem the shares that are no longer subject to forfeiture for a price of $8.40 per share. Because the shares are redeemable at the option of the WTI Funds, the shares are recorded in mezzanine equity on the consolidated balance sheets.
The redeemable common shares were initially recorded at their fair value determined using a combination of the value of the Company's stock on the date of issuance and the theoretic value of a stand-alone put option valued using
79
a Black-Scholes put option model discounted by a present value factor that considers the credit spread between an estimated Company specific discount rate and the risk-free rate of return.
Emerging Growth Company Status
We qualify as an emerging growth company (‘‘EGC’’) as defined in the Jumpstart our Business Startups (‘‘JOBS’’) Act. The JOBS Act permits companies with EGC status to take advantage of an extended transition period to comply with new or revised accounting standards, delaying the adoption of these accounting standards until they would apply to private companies. We intend to use this extended transition period to enable us to comply with new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until the earlier of the date we (i) are no longer an EGC or (ii) affirmatively and irrevocably opt out of the extended transition period provided in the JOBS Act. As a result, our consolidated financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with the new or revised accounting standards as of public company effective dates.
In addition, we intend to rely on the other exemptions and reduced reporting requirements provided by the JOBS Act. Subject to certain conditions set forth in the JOBS Act, as an EGC, we are not required to, among other things: (i) provide an auditor’s attestation report on our system of internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; (ii) provide all of the compensation disclosures that may be required of non-EGCs under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act; (iii) comply with the requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the communication of critical audit matters in the auditor’s report on the consolidated financial statements (auditor discussion and analysis); and (iv) disclose certain executive compensation-related items such as the correlation between executive compensation and performance and comparisons of the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation to median employee compensation.
We anticipate that we will remain an EGC under the JOBS Act until the earlier of December 31, 2025 or the date on which we have issued more than $1,000,000 in non-convertible debt securities during the previous three years.
Smaller Reporting Company
We also qualify as a “smaller reporting company” as defined under the Exchange Act and may continue to be a smaller reporting company even after we are no longer an emerging growth company. We will remain a smaller reporting company until (1) as of the last business day of our most recent second fiscal quarter, our prior year’s annual revenues are at least $100,000 and our voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates as of such second fiscal quarter end is at least $250,000 or (2) our voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates is at least $700,000 measured on the last business day of our most recent second fiscal quarter. Similar to emerging growth companies, smaller reporting companies are able to provide simplified executive compensation disclosure and have certain other reduced disclosure obligations.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
We are a "smaller reporting company" as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K and are not required to provide the information otherwise required under this Item.
80
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
81
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Owlet, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Owlet, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), of changes in mezzanine equity and stockholders’ deficit and of cash flows for the years then ended, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the "consolidated financial statements"). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Substantial Doubt About the Company's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company, since inception, has experienced recurring operating losses, negative cash flows from operations and a low cash balance relative to current obligations that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
March 11, 2025
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2020.
82
Owlet, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
| Assets | December 31, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | ||||||||||||
| Current assets: | ||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Restricted cash | ||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for credit losses of $ | ||||||||||||||
| Inventory | ||||||||||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | ||||||||||||||
| Total current assets | ||||||||||||||
| Property and equipment, net | ||||||||||||||
| Right of use assets, net | ||||||||||||||
| Intangible assets, net | ||||||||||||||
| Other assets | ||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Liabilities, Mezzanine Equity, and Stockholders’ Deficit | ||||||||||||||
| Current liabilities: | ||||||||||||||
| Accounts payable | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Accrued and other expenses | ||||||||||||||
| Current portion of deferred revenues | ||||||||||||||
| Line of credit | ||||||||||||||
| Current portion of long-term and other debt | ||||||||||||||
| Total current liabilities | ||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt, net | ||||||||||||||
| Common stock warrant liabilities | ||||||||||||||
| Other long-term liabilities | ||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities | ||||||||||||||
| Commitments and contingencies (Note 7) | ||||||||||||||
| Mezzanine equity: | ||||||||||||||
Series A convertible preferred stock, $ | ||||||||||||||
Series B convertible preferred stock, $ | ||||||||||||||
Redeemable common stock, | ||||||||||||||
| Total mezzanine equity | ||||||||||||||
| Stockholders’ deficit: | ||||||||||||||
Common stock, $ | ||||||||||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | ||||||||||||||
| Accumulated deficit | ( | ( | ||||||||||||
| Total stockholders’ deficit | ( | ( | ||||||||||||
| Total liabilities, mezzanine equity, and stockholders’ deficit | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
83
Owlet, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Cost of revenues | |||||||||||
| Gross profit | |||||||||||
| Operating expenses: | |||||||||||
| General and administrative | |||||||||||
| Sales and marketing | |||||||||||
| Research and development | |||||||||||
| Total operating expenses | |||||||||||
| Operating loss | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Other income (expense): | |||||||||||
| Interest expense, net | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Common stock warrant liability adjustment | ( | ||||||||||
| Other income (expense), net | ( | ||||||||||
| Total other income (expense), net | ( | ||||||||||
| Loss before income tax provision | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Income tax provision | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Net loss and comprehensive loss | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||
| Accretion on convertible preferred stock | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Accretion on redeemable common stock | $ | ( | $ | ||||||||
| Allocation of net loss attributable to redeemable common stockholders | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Net loss attributable to redeemable common stockholders | $ | ( | $ | ||||||||
| Net loss attributable to common stockholders | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||
| Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||
| Weighted-average number of shares outstanding used to compute net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted | |||||||||||
| Net loss per share attributable to redeemable common stockholders, basic and diluted | $ | ( | $ | ||||||||
| Weighted-average number of shares outstanding used to compute net loss per share attributable to redeemable common stockholders, basic and diluted | |||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
84
Owlet, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Mezzanine Equity and Stockholders’ Deficit
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
| Series A Convertible Preferred Stock | Series B Convertible Preferred Stock | Redeemable Common Stock | Common Stock | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Additional Paid-in Capital | Accumulated Deficit | Total Stockholders' Deficit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2022 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | $ | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of convertible preferred stock | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Preferred stock issuance costs | — | ( | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Accretion on convertible preferred stock | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ( | — | ( | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Conversion of preferred stock | ( | ( | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of SVB Warrants | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock for restricted stock units vesting | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock for employee stock purchase plan | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2023 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | $ | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of convertible preferred stock | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Preferred stock issuance costs | — | — | — | ( | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Accretion on convertible preferred stock | — | — | — | — | — | — | ( | — | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Accretion on redeemable common stock | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ( | — | ( | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Conversion of preferred stock (Note 9) | ( | ( | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock related to offering (Note 9) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common stock issuance costs | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ( | — | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of warrants to underwriter (Note 9) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| RSU to RSA conversion (Note 8) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock for restricted stock units vesting | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of redeemable common stock (Note 9) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock for employee stock purchase plan | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2024 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | $ | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
85
Owlet, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities | |||||||||||
| Net loss | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: | |||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | |||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | |||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | ( | ||||||||||
| Common stock warrant liability adjustment | ( | ||||||||||
| Impairment of intangible and other assets | |||||||||||
| Amortization of right of use assets | |||||||||||
| Amortization of issuance costs | |||||||||||
| (Gain)/Loss on Extinguishment of Debt | |||||||||||
| (Gain)/Loss on Forgiveness on Interest Accrued | ( | ||||||||||
| Other adjustments, net | |||||||||||
| Changes in assets and liabilities: | |||||||||||
| Accounts receivable | |||||||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other assets | ( | ||||||||||
| Inventory | ( | ||||||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued and other expenses | ( | ||||||||||
| Lease liabilities | ( | ||||||||||
| Other liabilities | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Deferred revenue | ( | ||||||||||
| Other, net | |||||||||||
| Net cash used in operating activities | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Cash flows from investing activities | |||||||||||
| Purchase of property and equipment | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Purchase of intangible assets | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Capitalized internal-use software development costs | ( | ||||||||||
| Net cash used in investing activities | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Cash flows from financing activities | |||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock and warrants, net of $ | |||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of $ | |||||||||||
| Proceeds from short-term borrowings | |||||||||||
| Payments of short-term borrowings | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Proceeds from long-term borrowings and issuance of redeemable common stock | |||||||||||
| Payments of long-term borrowings | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Payments related to debt extinguishment costs | ( | ||||||||||
| Employee taxes paid related to the net share settlement of stock-based awards | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Proceeds related to the net share settlement of stock-based awards | |||||||||||
| Debt issuance costs paid | ( | ||||||||||
| Issuance costs paid related to 2023 preferred stock and warrants | ( | ||||||||||
| Other, net | |||||||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | |||||||||||
| Net change in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash | |||||||||||
| Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of period | |||||||||||
| Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of period | $ | $ | |||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
86
Owlet, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (continued)
(in thousands)
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | |||||||||||
| Cash paid for income taxes | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Cash paid for interest | |||||||||||
| Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities: | |||||||||||
| Conversion of preferred stock | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Accretion on preferred stock and redeemable common stock | |||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock warrants to underwriter | |||||||||||
| Equity issuance costs included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities | |||||||||||
| Reclassification from long-term to current debt | |||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation for software development | |||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
87
Owlet, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Note 1. Description of Business and Basis of Presentation
Organization
Owlet Baby Care Inc. was incorporated on February 24, 2014 as a Delaware corporation. On February 15, 2021, Owlet Baby Care Inc. (“Old Owlet”) entered into a Merger Agreement with Sandbridge Acquisition Corporation (“SBG”) and Project Olympus Merger Sub, Inc. (“Merger Sub”), whereby on July 15, 2021 Merger Sub merged with and into Old Owlet, with Old Owlet surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of SBG (the “Merger”). Following the Merger, SBG was renamed Owlet, Inc. (“Owlet”, “OWLT”, or the “Company”).
The Company’s ecosystem of digital parenting solutions is helping to transform modern parenting by providing parents data to track the sleep patterns of their children. Its solutions are designed to provide insights aimed at improving children’s sleep and parents’ confidence and comfort.
Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) and applicable rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regarding financial reporting. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. All dollar amounts, except per share amounts, in the notes are presented in thousands, unless otherwise specified.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
Reverse Stock Split
On July 7, 2023, the Company filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware a Certificate of Amendment to its Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Charter Amendment”) to effect a one-for-14 reverse stock split (the “Reverse Stock Split”) of the Company’s Class A common stock (“common stock”) and a reduction in the number of authorized shares of common stock and authorized but unissued shares of the Company’s preferred stock. The number of authorized shares of common stock was reduced from 1,000,000,000 shares to 107,142,857 shares, which reflects a reduction to 1.5 times the then current number of authorized shares of common stock, divided by the Reverse Stock Split ratio. The Reverse Stock Split also reduced the number of authorized shares of preferred stock from 100,000,000 shares to 10,741,071 shares, which reflects a reduction to 1.5 times the then current number of authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock, divided by the Reverse Stock Split ratio. The Reverse Stock Split became effective on July 7, 2023.
There was no net effect on total stockholders’ equity, and the par value per share of our common stock remains unchanged at $0.0001
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates. Key management estimates include those related to revenue recognition (including standalone selling price, usage period of hardware products sold, sales incentives, product returns and implied post contract support and service), allowances for doubtful accounts, write-downs for obsolete or slow-moving inventory, useful lives for intangible assets, impairment assessments for long-lived tangible and intangible assets, warranty obligations, valuation allowances for net deferred income tax assets, and valuation of warrants, redeemable shares, and stock-based compensation.
Risks and Uncertainties
In accordance with ASU No. 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40), the Company has evaluated whether there are conditions and events, considered in the
88
aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the consolidated financial statements are issued.
Since inception, the Company has experienced recurring operating losses and generated negative cash flows from operations, resulting in an accumulated deficit of $268,195 as of December 31, 2024. During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we had negative cash flows from operations of $11,209 and $23,527 , respectively. As of December 31, 2024, we had $20,245 of cash on hand.
As the Company continues to address these financial conditions, management has undertaken the following actions:
•As described further in Note 9, Common Stock Issuance, Redeemable Common Stock, Common Stock Warrants, and Convertible Preferred Stock, in September 2024, the Company issued 3,135,136 shares of its common stock and received net proceeds of $10,003 and in February 2024, the Company consummated a sale of preferred stock and warrants to purchase its common stock for aggregate net proceeds of $8,855 .
•As described in Note 6, Debt and Other Financing Arrangements, in September 2024, the Company entered into a loan facility agreement with WTI Fund X, Inc. and WTI Fund XI, Inc. (collectively “WTI” or “Lenders”) for a term loan facility of up to $15,000 (the “WTI Loan Facility”) and on September 11, 2024, the Company entered into an asset-based revolving credit facility (the “ABL Line of Credit”) with ABL OPCO LLC, as the lender, with a maximum revolving commitment amount of up to $15,000 , with an additional $5,000 revolving commitment available on September 11, 2025. In connection with these transactions, the Company used its then-existing cash to repay and extinguish all borrowings outstanding under the line of credit and term loan agreement with Silicon Valley Bank, now a division of First Citizens Bank and Trust Company (“SVB”). As of December 31, 2024 the Company has borrowings of $7,500 under the WTI Loan Facility and $6,263 under the ABL Line of Credit.
Notwithstanding the above actions, the Company has experienced recurring operating losses, negative cash flows from operations since inception, and a low cash balance relative to current obligations that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the accompanying consolidated financial statements are issued. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis and accordingly, do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts, or the amount and classification of liabilities that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
The Company has not generated sufficient cash flows from operations to satisfy its capital requirements. There can be no assurance that the Company will generate sufficient future cash flows from operations due to potential factors, including but not limited to inflation, recession, or reduced demand for the Company’s products. If revenues decrease from current levels, the Company may be unable to further reduce costs, or such reductions may limit its ability to pursue strategic initiatives and grow revenues in the future.
There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain additional financing on terms acceptable to it, if at all. Failure to secure additional funding may require the Company to modify, delay or abandon some of its planned future development, or to otherwise enact further operating cost reductions, which could have a material adverse effect on its business, operating results, financial condition and ability to achieve its intended business objectives.
If the Company raises additional funds through further issuances of equity or convertible debt securities, its existing stockholders could suffer significant dilution, and any new equity securities the Company issues could have rights, preferences, and privileges superior to those of holders of its common stock. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on terms satisfactory to the Company when it requires it, its ability to continue to pursue its business objectives and to respond to business opportunities, challenges, or unforeseen circumstances could be significantly limited, and its business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. The Company also could be required to seek funds through arrangements with partners or others that may require the Company to relinquish rights or jointly own some aspects of its technologies, products, or services that the Company would otherwise pursue on its own.
The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts which, at times, exceed federally insured limits. As of December 31, 2024, substantially all of the Company’s cash was held with Silicon Valley Bank and Citibank, and exceeded federally insured limits.
Although the Company’s sales and accounts receivable are derived from sales contracts with a large number of customers, its top several customers account for a significant amount of its total sales, and make up a correspondingly large portion of its accounts receivable. The Company's largest customers by total net accounts receivable and total net revenue consisted of the following:
89
| December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Three largest customers by total net accounts receivable | % | % | |||||||||
| Largest customers by total net revenue: | |||||||||||
| Customer 1 | % | % | |||||||||
| Customer 2 | % | % | |||||||||
| Customer 3 | % | % | |||||||||
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Guidance
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash
Cash and cash equivalents include all cash balances and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase. Cash equivalents consist of money market funds. Restricted cash consists of cash collateral that is held by the Company’s financial institutions to secure its financing arrangements.
Revisions to Previously Issued Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Information
In connection with the preparation of its 2024 financial statements, the Company identified errors in its Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2023 and the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the interim periods ended March 31, 2023, June 30, 2023, September 30, 2023, March 31, 2024, June 30, 2024, and September 30, 2024. Specifically, the Company’s historical proceeds from short-term borrowings and payments of short-term borrowings were overstated by the same amount with no net impact to total cash flows from financing activities in its Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2023 and its Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the interim periods ended March 31, 2023, June 30, 2023, September 30, 2023, March 31, 2024, June 30, 2024, and September 30, 2024. Additionally, the Company also identified and corrected for immaterial classification errors between cash flows from operating activities and investing activities for the interim periods ended March 31, 2024, June 30, 2024, and September 30, 2024. The Company also identified and corrected for immaterial classification errors within the line items in the cash flows from operating activities and for an immaterial classification error between cash flows from operating activities and financing activities for the interim period ended September 30, 2024.
The Company assessed the effect of the errors on prior periods under the guidance of Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 99, “Materiality,” codified in ASC 250, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (“ASC 250”). Based on its assessment, the Company determined that the errors were not material to any previously issued financial statements; however, the Company has elected to revise the Company's Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. These corrections have no impact on the Company's previously reported consolidated net loss, financial position, net change in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, or total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash as previously reported on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The Company's Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the interim periods ended March 31, 2023, June 30, 2023, September 30, 2023, March 31, 2024, June 30, 2024, and September 30, 2024 have been revised and disclosed in Note 14, Revision of Previously Issued Unaudited Quarterly Information below.
Revisions of Previously Issued Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
As discussed above, the identified errors did not have a material impact on the previously issued financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2023. The Company has determined it appropriate to revise the following financial statement line items in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2023 (in thousands):
90
| Year Ended December 31, 2023 | |||||||||||||||||
As Reported | Adjustments | As Revised | |||||||||||||||
| Cash flows from financing activities | |||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from short-term borrowings | $ | $ | ( | $ | |||||||||||||
| Payments of short-term borrowings | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
Accounts Receivable
The Company records its accounts receivable at sales value and maintains an allowance for its current estimate of expected credit losses. Provisions for expected credit losses are estimated based on historical experience, assessment of specific risk, review of outstanding invoices, and forecasts about the future. The Company establishes specific reserves for customers in an adverse financial condition and adjusts for its expectations of changes in conditions that may impact the collectability of outstanding receivable.
Inventory
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated economic useful lives of the assets or, for leasehold improvements, over the shorter of the estimated economic useful life or related lease terms as follows:
| Furniture and fixtures | |||||
| Leasehold improvements | |||||
| Software | |||||
| Tooling and manufacturing equipment | |||||
| Computer equipment | |||||
Expenditures that materially increase values or capacities or extend useful lives of property and equipment are capitalized. Routine maintenance, repairs, and renewal costs are expensed as incurred.
Intangible Assets Subject to Amortization
Intangible assets subject to amortization consist of patents, trademarks, and software development costs and are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may be impaired. Patents and trademarks are amortized over ten years
Leases
The Company leases its office space and certain equipment under operating leases. For leases that contain rent escalation or rent concession provisions the Company records the total rent payable during the lease term on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
91
The Company has elected the practical expedients to exclude right of use assets and lease liabilities for leases with an initial term of 12 months or less from the balance sheet date, and to combine lease and non-lease components for property leases, which primarily relate to ancillary expenses such as common area maintenance charges and management fees.
Revenue Recognition
The Company generated substantially all of its revenues from the sale of its hardware products, primarily the Owlet Dream Sock, Owlet Cam, and Owlet Monitor Duo.
Revenues are recognized when control of goods and services are transferred to customers at the transaction price, an amount that reflects the consideration expected to be received by the Company in exchange for those goods and services. The transaction price is calculated as selling price less the Company’s estimate of variable consideration, including future returns, volume rebates, and sales incentives related to current period sales.
The Company applies the following five step-approach to recognizing revenue:
(1)Identify the contract with a customer
(2)Identify the performance obligations in the contract
(3)Determine the transaction price
(4)Allocate the transaction price to performance obligations in the contract
(5)Recognize revenue when or as a performance obligation is recognized
Arrangements with Multiple Performance Obligations
The Company enters into contracts that have multiple performance obligations. Product sales include three performance obligations. The first performance obligation is the delivery of hardware and embedded firmware essential to the functionality of the hardware. Embedded firmware allows the hardware to recognize inputs to the hardware and provide appropriate outputs. The second performance obligation is the implied right to connect the downloadable mobile application, provided free of charge, to the hardware, which enables users to view and access real-time data outputs. The third performance obligation is the implied right to receive, on a when-and-if-available basis, future unspecified application upgrades, added features, and bug fixes relating to the product’s essential firmware.
The Company allocates the transaction price to each performance obligation based on a relative standalone selling price (“SSP”). The Company’s process for determining its SSP considers multiple factors, including an adjusted market assessment and consumer behaviors, and varies depending on the facts and circumstances of each performance obligation. Revenues allocated to the delivery of the hardware and embedded firmware essential to the functionality of the hardware represent substantially all of the arrangements consideration and reflect the Company’s best estimate of the selling price if it was sold regularly on a stand-alone basis. SSP for the mobile application and upgrade rights are estimated based on relevant market and consumer data.
Revenues are recognized at the time the related performance obligation is satisfied by transferring control of the promised good or service to a customer. Revenues allocated to the hardware and embedded firmware are recognized at the time of product delivery, provided the other conditions for revenue recognition have been met. This generally occurs upon delivery of the product to a third-party carrier. Revenues allocated to the implied right to access the mobile application and the implied right to receive, on a when-and-if-available basis, future unspecified application upgrades, added features, and bug fixes, are recognized on a straight-line basis over the estimated usage period of the underlying hardware product. The usage period is estimated based on historical user activity and ranges from 10 to 27 months.
The Company records revenues net of sales tax and variable consideration such as discounts and customer returns. Payment terms are short-term in nature and, as a result, do not have any significant financing components. The Company records estimated reductions to revenue in the form of variable consideration for customer sales programs, returns, and incentive offerings including rebates, markdowns, promotions, and volume-based incentives.
Consideration payable to a customer, such as cooperative advertising and pricing promotions to retailers and distributors, is recorded as a reduction to revenue. Deferred revenues represent advance payments received from customers prior to performance by the Company. Sales taxes collected from customers which are remitted to governmental authorities are not included in revenue and are reflected as a liability in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Sales Returns, Rebates, Discounts, and Allowances
92
The Company’s contracts include promises to provide rights of return to customers as well as promises to issue discounts and provide rebates or allowances to certain retail channel customers if specified conditions are met. Revenues are reduced in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for anticipated sales returns, discounts, and allowances, based on the Company’s analysis of historical sales returns and contractual discounts and allowances. Expected returns and estimated rebates and allowances that have been earned but not yet honored or paid out are included in accrued and other expenses in the accompanying balance sheets. Estimated discounts that have been earned but not yet honored or paid out are included as a reduction to accounts receivable, net. Actual returns may vary from estimates if the Company experiences a change in actual sales returns or exchange patterns due to unanticipated changes in products or competitive pressures.
Sales return rates, excluding the impact of regulatory actions, have been sufficiently predictable to allow the Company to estimate expected future returns. The Company reviews the actual returns as a percentage of sales to determine the historical rate of return. The historical rate of return is used as a basis for estimating future returns based on current sales. The sales return estimate can be affected by the release of new products and changes to sales channels. Actual returns may vary from estimates if the Company experiences a change in actual sales returns or exchange patterns due to unanticipated changes in products, competitive pressures, or regulatory actions.
Sales rebates, discounts, and allowances provided to the Company’s customers have been sufficiently predictable to allow the Company to estimate expected future discounts and allowances. Discounts and allowances are estimable based on existing and expected promotional programs and contractual terms in place at the time of sale. New promotional programs or changes to existing promotional programs could impact the estimated sales rebates, discounts, and allowances.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues consists of product costs, including contract manufacturing, shipping and handling, depreciation of tooling and manufacturing equipment, amortization of internally developed software, warranty replacement, fulfillment costs, rework costs, warehousing, hosting, and write-downs of excess and obsolete inventory.
Product Warranty
The Company offers a limited warranty for product performance, generally one year from the date of device activation. The warranty obligation allows the Company to either repair or replace a defective product. The Company accrues for future expected warranty claims and records the amount to cost of revenues at the time of sale. The estimate of future warranty claims is based on historical warranty claim experience and known conditions. Estimated warranty liabilities are included in accrued and other expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel-related expenses, consulting and contractor expenses, prototype materials, and clinical testing. Substantially all of the Company’s research and development costs are related to developing new products and services and improving existing products and services. These costs are expensed as incurred.
Stock-based Compensation
The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense for service-based employee restricted stock units ("RSUs"), restricted stock awards ("RSAs"), and stock options on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
The fair value of RSUs and RSAs is based on the closing price of Owlet's common stock on the grant date. The fair value of stock options and purchase rights under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP") are measured at fair value on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which requires assumptions and judgments. The Company accounts for forfeitures as they occur.
The assumptions and judgments for stock options valuation included, but were not limited to the following:
•Expected term — The estimate of the expected term of awards was determined in accordance with the simplified method, which estimates the term based on an averaging of the vesting period and contractual term of the option award grant.
•Expected volatility — Since the Company does not have sufficient historical data on the volatility of its ordinary stock, the expected volatility was based on the volatility of similar entities for a period consistent with
93
the expected term of the award. In evaluating similarity, the Company considered factors such as industry, stage of life cycle, and size.
•Risk-free rate — The estimate of the risk-free rate is based on the average of the published applicable year US Treasury Bond rates, as of the date of grant, to align with the expected life.
Advertising
Warrant Liability
The Company accounts for warrants as either equity-classified or liability-classified instruments based on an assessment of the warrant’s specific terms and applicable authoritative guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 480 and ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”). The assessment considers whether the warrants are freestanding financial instruments pursuant to ASC 480, meet the definition of a liability pursuant to ASC 480, and whether the warrants meet all of the requirements for equity classification under ASC 815, including whether the warrants are indexed to the Company’s own shares of common stock, among other conditions for equity classification. This assessment, which requires the use of professional judgment, is conducted at the time of warrant issuance and as of each subsequent quarterly period end date while the warrants are outstanding.
For issued or modified warrants that meet all of the criteria for equity classification, the warrants are required to be recorded as a component of additional paid-in capital at the time of issuance. For issued or modified warrants that do not meet all the criteria for equity classification, the warrants are required to be recorded at their initial fair value on the date of issuance, and each balance sheet date thereafter. Changes in the estimated fair value of the warrants are recognized as a non-operating gain or loss in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Refer to Note 10 for further discussion on fair value considerations.
Redeemable Shares
In connection with the Loan Facility Agreement with WTI (see Note 6 for further discussion), the Company issued redeemable shares of common stock to WTI. The shares issued to WTI contain an embedded redemption option (the “Redemption Option”) such that WTI may elect to force the Company to redeem the shares that are no longer subject to forfeiture for a price of $8.40 per share. Because the shares are redeemable at the option of the WTI Funds, the shares are recorded in mezzanine equity on the consolidated balance sheets.
The redeemable shares of common stock were initially recorded at their fair value determined using a combination of the value of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance and the theoretical value of a stand-alone put option valued using a Black-Scholes put option model discounted by a present value factor that considers the credit spread between an estimated Company specific discount rate and the risk-free rate of return.
Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.
The Company utilizes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to the valuations used to measure fair value. Classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows:
•Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities,
•Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument,
•Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on the Company’s own assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value.
The carrying value of the Company’s accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, short-term debt approximate their fair value due to the short period of time to maturity or repayment.
94
Income Taxes
Income taxes are provided for the tax effects of transactions reported in the consolidated financial statements and consist of taxes currently due plus deferred taxes related primarily to differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities. The deferred taxes represent the future tax return consequences of those differences, which will either be taxable or deductible when the assets and liabilities are recovered or settled. Deferred income tax assets are reviewed periodically for recoverability, and valuation allowances are provided when it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred income tax assets may not be realized.
The Company believes that it has appropriate support for the income tax positions taken on its tax returns, and that its accruals for tax liabilities are adequate for all open tax years, which include 2014 through 2024, based on an assessment of many factors including experience and interpretations of tax laws applied to the facts of each matter. Uncertain tax positions are recorded when it is more likely than not that a given tax position would not be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. The Company’s policy for recording interest and penalties related to income taxes, including uncertain tax positions, is to record such items as a component of the provision for income taxes. The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and certain state and local jurisdictions.
Net Loss per Share
Basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders is presented in conformity with the two-class method required for participating securities. Under the two-class method, net loss is attributed to common stockholders and participating securities according to dividends declared or accumulated and participation rights in undistributed earnings. The two-class method requires income available to common stockholders for the period to be allocated between common and participating securities based upon their respective rights to receive dividends as if all income for the period had been distributed.
The Company considers its convertible preferred stock to be participating securities. Under the two-class method, the net loss attributable to common stockholders is not allocated to the convertible preferred stock as the holders of the Company’s convertible preferred stock do not have a contractual obligation to share in the Company’s losses.
The Company has redeemable common stock and non-redeemable common stock. The statements of operations include a presentation of income (loss) per redeemable share and income (loss) per non-redeemable share following the two-class method of income per share. Income and losses are shared pro rata between the two classes of shares. Net (loss) income per common share is calculated by dividing the net (loss) income by the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding for the respective period. For a period in which the Company reports a net loss, diluted net loss per common share attributable to common stockholders is the same as basic net loss per common share attributable to common stockholders because potentially dilutive common shares are not assumed to have been issued if their effect is anti-dilutive.
Litigation Accounting
From time to time, the Company may be involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types. The Company records a liability in its consolidated financial statements for these matters when a loss is known or considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Management reviews these estimates in each accounting period as additional information becomes known and adjusts the loss provision when appropriate. If the loss is not probable or cannot be reasonably estimated, a liability is not recorded in the consolidated financial statements. If a loss is probable but the amount of loss cannot be reasonably estimated, the Company discloses the loss contingency and an estimate of possible loss or range of loss (unless such an estimate cannot be made). The Company does not recognize gain contingencies until they are realized. Legal costs incurred in connection with loss contingencies are expensed as incurred.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2016, the Financing Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, and has since released various amendments including ASU No. 2019-04 and ASU No. 2022-02. The guidance modifies the measurement of expected credit losses on certain financial instruments. The Company adopted ASU 2016-13 on January 1, 2023. The impact of adoption was immaterial.
In November 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures, which expands annual and interim disclosure requirements for reportable segments, primarily through enhanced disclosures about significant segment expenses. The Company adopted ASU 2023-07 as of January 1, 2024 on a retrospective basis. While the adoption of this
95
standard did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements, additional disclosures were included in Note 13.
Recently Issued Accounting Guidance
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, which requires, among other things, additional disclosures primarily related to the income tax rate reconciliation and income taxes paid. The expanded annual disclosures are effective for our year ending December 31, 2025. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2023-09 will have on our consolidated financial statements and whether we will apply the standard prospectively or retrospectively.
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses. The standard is intended to require more detailed disclosures about specified categories of expenses (including employee compensation, depreciation, and amortization) included in certain expense captions presented on the face of the income statement. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and for interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments may be applied either prospectively to financial statements issued for reporting periods after the effective date of this ASU or retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. The Company is currently assessing the impact this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.
Note 3. Certain Balance Sheet Accounts
Restricted Cash
The Company’s restricted cash consists of cash collateral that is held by the Company’s financial institutions to secure its financing arrangements. Specifically, restricted cash that is classified within current assets in the consolidated balance sheets consists of cash collateral to secure its current credit card borrowings and long-term term-loan facility. Cash as reported on the consolidated statements of cash flows includes the aggregate amounts of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash as shown on the consolidated balance sheets and consists of the following (in thousands):
| December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash reported in the consolidated balance sheets: | |||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Restricted cash | |||||||||||
| Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash | $ | $ | |||||||||
Allowance for Credit and Other Losses
The Company records its accounts receivable at sales value and maintains an allowance for its current estimate of expected credit losses from customers. Provisions for expected credit losses are estimated based on historical experience, assessment of specific risk, review of outstanding invoices, and forecasts about the future. The Company establishes specific reserves for customers in an adverse financial condition and adjusts for its expectations of changes in conditions that may impact the collectability of outstanding receivables.
Changes in the Company's allowance for credit and other losses were as follows (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Beginning balance | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Charges to expense | ( | ||||||||||
| Charges to revenue | ( | ||||||||||
| Write-offs | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | $ | |||||||||
Write-offs for the year ended December 31, 2024 related to a settlement agreement with a former retailer for past due receivables which had previously been charged to the provision for credit losses in a prior period. A benefit was
96
recognized to charges to expense during the year ended December 31, 2024, which represented a partial recovery of the past due receivables in connection with the settlement.
Inventory
Details of inventory were as follows (in thousands):
| December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Raw materials | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Finished goods | |||||||||||
| Total inventory | $ | $ | |||||||||
Property and Equipment, net
Property and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):
| December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Tooling and manufacturing equipment | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Computer equipment | |||||||||||
| Furniture and fixtures | |||||||||||
| Software | |||||||||||
| Leasehold improvements | |||||||||||
| Total property and equipment | |||||||||||
| Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Property and equipment, net | $ | $ | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense on property and equipment was $306 and $765 for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company allocated $281 and $473 , respectively, of depreciation and amortization expense related to tooling and manufacturing equipment within cost of revenues on the consolidated statements of operations. The remaining depreciation and amortization expense related to property and equipment was recorded within general and administrative expenses.
97
Intangible Assets, net
The carrying amounts of intangible assets consisted of the following (in thousands):
| December 31, 2024 | |||||||||||||||||
| Gross carrying amount | Accumulated amortization | Net carrying amount | |||||||||||||||
| Trademarks and patents | $ | $ | ( | $ | |||||||||||||
| Internally developed software | ( | ||||||||||||||||
| Total intangible assets | $ | $ | ( | $ | |||||||||||||
| December 31, 2023 | |||||||||||||||||
| Gross carrying amount | Accumulated amortization | Net carrying amount | |||||||||||||||
| Trademarks and patents | $ | $ | ( | $ | |||||||||||||
| Internally developed software | |||||||||||||||||
| Total intangible assets | $ | $ | ( | $ | |||||||||||||
Amortization expense of intangible assets was $147 and $77 for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company recorded $81 and $0 , respectively, of amortization expense related to internally developed software within cost of revenues on the consolidated statements of operations. The remaining amortization expense related to trademarks and patents was recorded within general and administrative expenses.
As of December 31, 2024, the estimated future amortization expenses and reconciliation to total intangible assets consisted of the following (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | Amount | ||||
| 2025 | $ | ||||
| 2026 | |||||
| 2027 | |||||
| 2028 | |||||
| 2029 | |||||
| Thereafter | |||||
| Total future amortization expenses | $ | ||||
| Trademarks and patents not yet subject to amortization | |||||
| Total intangible assets | $ | ||||
In 2021, the Company began work on an internally developed software project and during 2021 and 2022 total costs of $1,873 were capitalized within intangible assets on the balance sheet. Due to financial constraints the Company was experiencing in 2022, work on the project was paused and each subsequent period the Company reconsidered the probability that the project would be resumed when the Company’s financial condition allowed and whether any technological developments had changed the prospects for the project's eventual success and recovery of the carrying amount of the asset. Because the software was still in development and not ready for general release the Company did not not 1,873 during the year ended December 31, 2024, to impair the software costs previously capitalized on the project, which was recorded within general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of operations.
98
Accrued and Other Expenses
Accrued and other expenses consisted of the following (in thousands):
| December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Accrued payroll | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Accrued sales discounts | |||||||||||
| Accrued sales returns | |||||||||||
| Accrued legal settlements | |||||||||||
| Other | |||||||||||
| Total accrued and other expenses | $ | $ | |||||||||
Changes in accrued warranty were as follows (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Accrued warranty, beginning of period | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Settlements of warranty claims during the period | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Provision for warranties issued during the period | |||||||||||
| Changes in provision for pre-existing warranties | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Accrued warranty, end of period | $ | $ | |||||||||
Note 4. Leases
Leases are determined at inception by assessing whether the arrangement conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. Owlet's leases consist of leases for corporate offices and have remaining lease terms of 0.1 to 2.3 years with options for renewal. Renewal and termination options have not been included in the lease terms, as it is not reasonably certain that such options will be exercised. Our lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.
Leases typically contain rent escalations over the lease term. The Company recognizes expense for these leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Certain leases require the Company to pay taxes, insurance, maintenance and other operating expenses associated with the leased asset. Such amounts are not included in the measurement of the ROU assets and lease liabilities to the extent they are variable in nature. These variable lease costs are recognized as a variable lease expense when incurred.
ROU assets and lease liabilities are recognized at the lease commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. Owlet uses its incremental borrowing rate, based on the information available at the lease commencement date, to determine the present value of lease payments. There were no finance leases during the years ended December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2024.
Income from subleased properties is recognized on a straight-line basis and presented as a reduction of costs, allocated among operating expense line items in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). In addition to sublease rent, variable non-lease costs such as common area maintenance and utilities are charged to subtenants over the duration of the lease for their proportionate share of these costs. These variable non-lease income receipts are recognized in operating expenses as a reduction to costs incurred by the Company in relation to the head lease.
The following table summarizes the Company's right-of-use assets, liabilities, and other information about our leases (dollars in thousands):
99
| December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Right of use assets, net | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Accrued and other expenses | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Other long-term liabilities | |||||||||||
| $ | $ | ||||||||||
| Weighted average remaining lease term | |||||||||||
| Weighted average discount rate | |||||||||||
Operating lease costs are recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Total operating lease costs were $998 and $1,537 for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, which included immaterial amounts related to short-term and variable lease costs.
Supplemental cash flow information related to leases was as follows (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Right of use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities | $ | $ | |||||||||
The following table shows the future maturities of lease liabilities for leases in effect as of December 31, 2024 (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | Amount | ||||
| 2025 | $ | ||||
| 2026 | |||||
| 2027 | |||||
| Total lease payments | |||||
| Less: imputed interest | ( | ||||
| Total | $ | ||||
As of December 31, 2024, the Company had no sublease arrangements, as all sublease agreements ended in 2024. The Company recognized sublease income of $765 and $1,292 for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
Note 5. Deferred Revenues
Deferred revenues relate to performance obligations for which payments are received from customers prior to the satisfaction of the Company’s obligations to its customers. Deferred revenues primarily consist of amounts allocated to the mobile application, unspecified upgrade rights, added features, bug fixes, and content, and are recognized over the service period of the performance obligations, which ranges from 10 to 27 months.
100
Changes in the total deferred revenues balance were as follows (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Beginning balance | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Deferral of revenues | |||||||||||
| Recognition of deferred revenues | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | $ | |||||||||
The Company recognized $1,134 and $1,169 of revenue during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, that was included in the deferred revenue balance at the beginning of the respective period.
Note 6. Debt and Other Financing Arrangements
The Company’s indebtedness consisted of the following (in thousands):
| December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Term note payable to SVB | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Term loan facility payable to WTI, net | |||||||||||
| Line of credit | |||||||||||
| Financed insurance premium | |||||||||||
| Total debt | |||||||||||
| Less: current portion | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Total long-term debt, net | $ | $ | |||||||||
The carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt, net approximate its fair value.
SVB Revolver and Term Loan
On November 23, 2022, the Company entered into the Third Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (as amended, the “LSA”) with Silicon Valley Bank, now a division of First Citizens Bank and Trust Company ("SVB"). The LSA provided for a $10,000 revolving line of credit (the “SVB Revolver”) and for an $8,500 term loan, which amortized with equal monthly installments of $500 .
On September 11, 2024, the Company terminated the LSA with SVB and used existing cash to prepay and extinguish all borrowings outstanding under the line of credit and term loan facilities with SVB. In addition to normal principal and interest, the Company paid $761 of termination fees to extinguish the loan. Of the total termination fees recorded, during the year ended December 31, 2024, $407 was recorded as interest expense, net on the consolidated statements of operations, and $11 was recorded within general and administrative expense on the consolidated statements of operations. The remaining $343 was accrued as interest expense, net, in prior periods.
WTI Loan Facility
On September 11, 2024 (the “Effective Date”), the Company, as guarantor, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Owlet Baby Care, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("OBCI," and together with the Company, collectively, the "Loan Parties"), as the borrower, entered into a Loan Facility Agreement (the “Loan Facility Agreement”) with WTI Fund X, Inc. and WTI Fund XI, Inc. (collectively “WTI” for a term loan facility of up to $15,000 (the “WTI Loan Facility”).
The WTI Loan Facility consists of two tranches. The first tranche of $10,000 was available at closing and through September 30, 2024, with $2,500 of the first tranche availability extendable until December 31, 2024 (the “First Tranche Commitment”). The second tranche of $5,000 is available through August 15, 2025 (the ‘Second Tranche Commitment,” or together with the First Tranche Commitment, the “Loan Commitments”) upon achievement of (a) at least $48,600 in revenue for the period commencing October 1, 2024 and ending June 30, 2025 (the “Second Tranche Condition Period”), (b) total cash burn during the Second Tranche Condition Period not to exceed $600 for such period, (c) receipt by the Company of at least $6,000 of net proceeds from an equity financing during a period commencing on the closing date and ending on the second tranche borrowing date, and (d) receipt by WTI of the
101
Company’s then-current, board-approved operating and financing plan to WTI's satisfaction, as well as compliance with certain reporting conditions.
OBCI initiated its first drawdown under the WTI Loan Facility of $7,500 (the “Initial Loan”) shortly after closing. WTI and OBCI agreed to extend the remaining $2,500 of the First Tranche Commitment until March 31, 2025. Once repaid, the Company cannot reborrow from the WTI Loan Facility.
Interest on the outstanding principal amounts of any borrowing under the WTI Loan Facility accrues at a rate per annum equal to the sum of the prime rate plus 3.5 %, with a floor of 12 %. The interest rate on the outstanding principal amounts of any borrowing under the WTI Loan Facility for the year ended December 31, 2024 was 12 %. Commencing on November 1, 2025 through maturity on January 1, 2028, the Company is required to make monthly interest and principal payments. Loans under the WTI Loan Facility also accrue 2.5 % in payment-in-kind interest (“PIK Interest”) compounded monthly, and PIK Interest payments will be due and payable upon maturity of the loans. Accrued coupon interest and accrued PIK interest are recorded within accrued and other expenses and within long-term debt respectively on the consolidated balance sheets. Accrued PIK interest was $58 for the year ended December 31, 2024.
The Company has the option to prepay the outstanding loans issued under the WTI Loan Facility in whole at any time by repaying all outstanding principal and accrued interest, as well as all scheduled unpaid interest on the loan, including PIK Interest, as if the loan continued to accrue interest through its stated maturity. Provided if the Company’s fully diluted market capitalization of its common stock is greater than or equal to $250,000 for 10 consecutive Trading Days, then so long as such prepayment is made within 60 days thereafter, the redemption price will be discounted by 30 % of the total amount of all scheduled but unpaid interest (but excluding any PIK Interest, which will not be discounted).
The WTI Loan Facility contains certain reporting and operational covenants that must be met by the Company to borrow funds under the Loan Commitments and not cause an event of default. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, WTI could elect to force redemption of the outstanding balances under the WTI Loan Facility, requiring the Company to pay all outstanding principal and accrued interest, as well as all scheduled unpaid interest on the loan, including PIK interest. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the Company will also be required to pay default interest on any overdue balances at a rate of 5.0 %. The WTI Loan Facility and any loans and obligations issued thereunder are collateralized by substantially all of the Company’s assets and are guaranteed by Owlet, Inc. As of December 31, 2024, the Company was in compliance with all covenants associated with the WTI Loan Facility.
As partial consideration for the availability and funding of the WTI Loan Facility, the Company and WTI Fund X, LLC (“Fund X”) and WTI Fund XI, LLC (“Fund XI”, and together with Fund X, the “WTI Funds”) entered into a Stock Issuance Agreement (the “WTI Stock Issuance Agreement”), dated as of the Effective Date. Pursuant to the WTI Stock Issuance Agreement, the Company issued to the WTI Funds an aggregate of 750,000 shares of redeemable common stock on the Effective Date, of which 187,500 are subject to forfeiture in the event that the Company does not draw on any portion of the remaining outstanding Loan Commitment. To the extent the Company does exercise its option under the Loan Commitments to issue additional debt, a number of forfeitable shares will 'vest' and no longer be subject to forfeiture based on the pro rata portion of the outstanding Loan Commitments drawn against.
The shares issued to WTI pursuant to the WTI Stock Issuance Agreement contain an embedded redemption option (the “Redemption Option”) such that WTI may elect to force the Company to redeem the shares that are no longer subject to forfeiture for a price of $8.40 per share. The Redemption Option may be exercised in whole or in part, at any time, from time to time, during the period commencing on the first trading day following the fifth anniversary of the Effective Date and continuing through the date which is 10 years after the Effective Date, subject to certain acceleration provisions set forth in the WTI Stock Issuance Agreement. Because the shares are redeemable at the option of the WTI Funds, the shares are recorded in mezzanine equity on the consolidated balance sheets. The redeemable common shares were initially recorded at their fair value of $7.66 per share, which was an aggregate value of $4,308 . The value of the redeemable common shares was determined using a combination of the value of the Company's stock on the date of issuance and the theoretic value of a stand-alone put option valued using a Black-Scholes put option model discounted by a present value factor that considers the credit spread between an estimated Company specific discount rate and the risk-free rate of return. Because the shares are required to be redeemed at the option of WTI, based solely on the passage of time, and provided WTI did not elect to otherwise sell or transfer the shares beforehand, the carrying value of the shares will accrete to their redemption value of $8.40 per share from the issuance date through September 11, 2029, the date the Redemption Option first becomes exercisable.
The Company allocated the lender fees (including the fair value of the vested shares) and third-party debt issuance costs between the Initial Loan and the remaining, undrawn Loan Commitments. The costs allocated to the Initial Loan are accounted for as a discount and will be amortized across the term of the Initial Loan using the effective
102
interest method. The costs allocated to the remaining, undrawn Loan Commitments are accounted for as loan commitment assets, which are being amortized to interest expense using the straight-line method over the commitment periods, due to uncertainty about the Company's intent to access the Loan Commitment. The unamortized portion of the loan commitment assets of $809 as of December 31, 2024 are recorded within Other assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
As of December 31, 2024, details of the WTI Loan Facility were as follows (in thousands):
| Amount | ||||||||
| Principal outstanding | ||||||||
| Unamortized debt issuance costs | ( | |||||||
| Accrued PIK Interest | ||||||||
| Net carrying value | $ | |||||||
The Company recognized $256 of interest expense related to the amortization of debt issuance costs of the WTI Loan Facility and $764 of interest expense related to the amortization of the loan commitment assets during the year ended December 31, 2024.
ABL Line of Credit
On the Effective Date, the Company, as guarantor, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Owlet Baby Care, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“OBCI,” and together with the Company, collectively, the “Loan Parties”), as borrower, entered into a Credit and Security Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with the financial institutions party thereto from time to time as lenders (collectively the “Lenders”) and ABL OPCO LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, in its capacity as administrative agent for the Lenders.
The Credit Agreement provides for an asset-based revolving credit facility (the “ABL Line of Credit”) in a maximum principal amount of up to $15,000 , which amount shall increase to $20,000 on September 11, 2025 (the “Revolving Commitment”). The ABL Line of Credit is collateralized by substantially all of the Company's assets. Loans and other obligations under the Credit Agreement bear interest at a rate per annum equal to the 1-month Secured Overnight Financing Rate (subject to a floor of 3.5 %) plus a margin, which varies between 7.5 % and 8.5 % depending on the Company’s earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), provided that the interest rate shall not exceed the maximum rate permitted under applicable law.
The ABL Line of Credit matures on September 10, 2027 (the “Maturity Date”). If for any reason the Credit Agreement is terminated or all outstanding loans and other obligations are paid in full and the ABL Line of Credit is terminated before the Maturity Date, the Company will be obligated to pay a prepayment fee equal to a percentage of the then-current Revolving Commitment, which percentage decreases on certain anniversary of the closing date.
The Credit Agreement contains representations, warranties, covenants, and events of default customary for agreements of this type. OBCI’s obligations under the Credit Agreement are: (i) fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Company; and (ii) secured by a security interest in substantially all personal property assets of the Company, including the Company's pledge of the outstanding capital stock of the Company. Among these covenants is a liquidity covenant requiring the Company to maintain liquidity of $4,000 . Liquidity is defined as the sum of (x) Undrawn Availability, as defined in the Credit Agreement, on the asset-based line of credit, plus (y) unrestricted cash and funds held in deposit accounts. In addition, if the liquidity falls below $9,000 , the Company is then subject to a minimum trailing-twelve-months EBITDA covenant as defined in the Credit Agreement. As of December 31, 2024, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the Credit Agreement.
The unamortized portion of debt issuance costs related to the Credit Agreement as of December 31, 2024 was $657 and is recorded as a loan commitment asset within other assets on the consolidated balance sheets. Issuance costs are amortized straight-line over the term of the Credit Agreement and recorded within interest income (expense), net on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
On December 31, 2024, there was $6,263 of outstanding borrowings, which is recorded as a current liability on the consolidated balance sheets based on the Company's intent and ability to repay the outstanding borrowings in the near term. The borrowing base availability under the Credit Agreement was $79 as of December 31, 2024. Subsequent to December 31, 2024 we've had various drawn downs and repayments. The outstanding balance as of March 11, 2025 is $2,669.
Financed Insurance Premiums
103
In 2024, the Company renewed a number of its insurance policies and entered into several new short-term commercial premium finance agreements with First Insurance Funding totaling $941 to be paid within one year, accruing interest at a weighted average rate of 8.7 % As of December 31, 2024, the remaining principal balance on the combined financed insurance premiums was $615 .
Future Aggregate Maturities
As of December 31, 2024, future aggregate maturities of the WTI Loan Facility and Financed Insurance Premium payables were as follows (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | Amount | |||||||
| 2025 | $ | |||||||
| 2026 | ||||||||
| 2027 | ||||||||
| 2028 | ||||||||
| Total | $ | |||||||
Note 7. Commitments and Contingencies
Purchase and Other Obligations
The Company entered into a services and license agreement for cloud platform services in June 2024. The Company has a purchase obligation of $6,739 to be paid over a 48 -month period beginning in June 2024.
In February 2023, the Company entered into an agreement with a significant vendor to pay $3,000 of interest over 36 months with respect to past due payables. The present value of the future payments was expensed and included within interest expense, net. In January 2024, the agreement was amended and the schedule of interest payments was modified from 36 months to 28 months, but the amount of interest payable was unchanged. In September 2024, the agreement was amended again, allowing the Company to terminate the agreement with a final interest payment of $623 , which was then fully settled in September 2024. The reduction in the total cumulative payment to $2,206 resulted in the Company recording a reduction of interest expense at termination of $508 .
Litigation
The Company is involved in legal proceedings from time to time arising in the normal course of business. While any outcome related to such legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, other than the matters discussed below, the Company believes that the outcome of these proceedings will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.
In November 2021, two putative class action complaints were filed against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, the first captioned Butala v. Owlet, Inc., Case No. 2:21-cv-09016, and the second captioned Cherian v. Owlet, Inc., Case No. 2:21-cv-09293. Both complaints alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) against the Company and certain of its officers and directors on behalf of a putative class of investors who: (a) purchased the Company’s common stock between March 31, 2021 and October 4, 2021 (“Section 10(b) Claims”); or (b) held common stock in Sandbridge Acquisition Corporation (“SBG”) as of June 1, 2021, and were eligible to vote at SBG's special meeting held on July 14, 2021 (“Section 14(a) Claims”). Both complaints allege, among other things, that the Company and certain of its officers and directors made false and/or misleading statements and failed to disclose certain information regarding the FDA’s likely classification of Smart Sock as a medical device requiring marketing authorization.
On September 8, 2023, the Court ruled that while the Butala and Cherian cases were consolidated, there would be two distinct and separate classes to represent the Section 10(b) Claims and Section 14(a) Claims, respectively, and appointed lead plaintiffs and lead counsel for each class. Amended complaints were filed for each class on November 21, 2023, and then further amended in consolidated filings on December 22, 2023. The Company filed motions to dismiss the complaints on February 9, 2024 on behalf of itself and the named officers and directors. The plaintiffs filed oppositions to the motions to dismiss on March 24, 2024, and the Company filed replies in support of the motions to dismiss on May 10, 2024. On August 5, 2024, the Court denied Owlet’s and its officers’ motions to dismiss the Section 10(b) Claims and the Section 14(a) Claims. On September 24, 2024, the Court entered a scheduling order in the case, setting trial to begin on February 17, 2026. On September 26, 2024, the Court granted Owlet’s and its officers’ motion for reconsideration regarding the Section 10(b) Claims and dismissed all claims arising out of statements made prior to the merger.
104
Following mediation, the parties to the Butala action reached agreements in principle to settle both the Section 10(b) Claims and the Section 14(a) Claims. The Section 10(b) Claims would be resolved for $3,500 and the Section 14(a) Claims would be resolved for $1,750 . On January 31, 2025, the plaintiffs filed motions seeking preliminary approval of the settlements of the Section 10(b) Claims and Section 14(a) Claims. Those motions remain pending. In accordance with ASC 450, as these amounts have become probable and estimable, the Company has recognized $5,250 of General and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the year ended December 31, 2024. The related liability is recorded in Accrued and other expenses on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2024.
Further, on August 26, 2024 and October 3, 2024, investors filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, derivatively on behalf of the Company, complaints asserting claims for violations of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act, as well as state law claims, including breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment and waste of corporate assets. One complaint (captioned Janet Vargas, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant Owlet, Inc., Case No. 2:24 cv-07258-FLA-PVC) asserts claims against twelve of the Company’s current or former directors and officers and six current or former directors and officers of Sandbridge Acquisition Corporation. The other (captioned Nathan Capleton, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant Owlet, Inc., Case No. 2:24 cv-08536-JAK-MAA) asserts claims against eleven of the Company’s current or former directors. Both complaints leverage the allegations made in one of the securities class action complaints. Neither complaint specifies the damages claimed in the action.
On December 13, 2024, these two complaints were consolidated into a single action captioned Vargas v. Workman, et al., No. 2:24-cv-07258-FLA (C.D. Cal.) On February 7, 2025, the plaintiffs filed an amended consolidated complaint asserting the claims previously made in the two derivative complaints. The parties in the Vargas action reached agreements in principle to settle, and plaintiffs filed a joint Notice of Settlement with the Court on March 3, 2025. On March 6, 2025, the Court vacated deadlines in the Vargas action in light of the plaintiffs’ settlement notice, and set April 2, 2025 as the deadline for plaintiffs to file a motion for preliminary approval of the settlement.
Indemnification
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into agreements that may include indemnification provisions. Pursuant to such agreements, the Company may indemnify, hold harmless, and defend an indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party. Some of the provisions will limit losses to those arising from third party actions. In some cases, the indemnification will continue after the termination of the agreement. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these provisions is not determinable. The Company has never incurred material costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification provisions. The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its directors and officers that may require the Company to indemnify its directors and officers against liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors or officers to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware corporate law. The Company currently has directors’ and officers’ insurance coverage that may reduce its exposure and enables the Company to recover a portion of any future amounts paid.
Note 8. Stock-based Compensation
2021 Incentive Award Plan
Effective February 12, 2021, the Board of Directors approved the adoption of the 2021 Incentive Award Plan (as amended, the "2021 Plan") as a successor to the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2014 Plan"), which permits the Company to grant options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance bonus, performance stock unit, dividend equivalents, or other stock or cash based awards to employees, directors, or consultants. Shares remaining for issuance, forfeited, expired, or other manner available to issue under terms of the 2014 Plan roll over to and become available for awards under the 2021 Plan. As of December 31, 2024, 3,432,702 shares were authorized for issuance under the 2021 Plan. In addition, the shares authorized for the 2021 Plan may be increased on an annual basis beginning January 1, 2022, in an amount equal to 5 % of the outstanding common stock on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year for a period of 10 years.
As of December 31, 2024, a total of 1,935,589 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance and 201,266 shares are available for future grants under the 2021 Plan.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
105
On January 1, 2022, the Company began offering an ESPP. The ESPP allows eligible employees to contribute a portion of their eligible earnings toward the semi-annual purchase of our shares of common stock at a discounted price, subject to an annual maximum dollar amount. Employees can purchase stock at a 15 % discount applied to the lower closing stock price on the first or last day of the -month purchase period.
Stock Options
The following is a summary of stock option information and weighted average exercise prices:
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of Options | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Number of Options | Weighted Average Exercise Price | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Outstanding at January 1 | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
Granted(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exercised | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||||||||
Canceled/Forfeited(1) | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Expired | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Outstanding at December 31 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exercisable at December 31 | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Includes 136,326 stock options repriced in September 2023, accounted for as a modification. Stock-based compensation related to the incremental fair value of repriced options was immaterial.
The grant date fair value of each option was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The key assumptions for grants presented on a weighted average basis are as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Expected volatility | N/A | % | |||||||||
| Risk-free rate | N/A | % | |||||||||
| Expected term in years | N/A | ||||||||||
| Dividend yield | N/A | % | |||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense related to options was $898 and $1,199 during the years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively. Generally, employees are subject to year vesting terms of 25 % after one year and monthly thereafter, with a maximum term of 10 years.
The intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the current market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option. The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $11 during 2024 and $29 during 2023. At December 31, 2024, options outstanding had an intrinsic value of $442 with a weighted average remaining life of 3.5 years. At December 31, 2024, options vested and exercisable had an intrinsic value of $442 with a weighted average remaining life of 3.5 years. At December 31, 2023, options outstanding had an intrinsic value of $763 with a weighted average remaining life of 4.8 years. At December 31, 2023, options vested and exercisable had an intrinsic value of $746 with a weighted average remaining life of 4.6 years.
The total grant date fair value of options vested during 2024 and 2023 was $377 and $1,153 , respectively. The grant date fair value of options granted during 2024 and 2023 was $0 and $171 , respectively. Weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during 2024 and 2023 was $0 and $1.26 , respectively. Stock options vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2024 totaled 427,555 shares, with an intrinsic value of $442 , weighted average exercise price of $17.02 , and weighted average remaining life of 3.5 years. Cash received from stock options exercised during 2024 and 2023 was $143 and $56 , respectively.
Restricted Stock Units
The following is a summary of RSU information and weighted average grant date fair values for the Company's RSUs:
106
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | Shares | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Unvested at January 1 | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Granted | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vested | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||||||||
Canceled/Forfeited(1) | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Unvested at December 31 | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Includes 352,093 RSUs converted to RSAs, accounted for as a cancellation of RSUs with a replacement award of RSAs.
RSUs are valued at the market value on the date of grant and compensation expense for employees is expensed over the vesting period. Generally, employees are subject to a year vesting term with 25 % vesting after one year and quarterly thereafter, or on a 2 year vesting term with 50 % after one year and the remaining after the second year, or a 1 year vesting term with 100 % after one year, depending on grant reason. Grants to directors typically vest after one year and, in certain circumstances, vest immediately.
Stock-based compensation expense related to RSU grants was $7,133 and $7,510 during the years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively. The aggregated fair value of RSUs granted during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 was $6,192 and $5,274 , respectively. The aggregated fair value of RSUs vested during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 was $6,154 and $10,080 , respectively.
Restricted Stock Awards
The following is a summary of RSA information and weighted average grant date fair values for the Company's RSAs:
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | Shares | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Unvested at January 1 | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Granted | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vested | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Forfeited | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unvested at December 31 | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company modified certain RSU awards for 11 employees and exchanged the RSUs previously granted for RSAs that vest within six months of the date of modification. The RSAs are valued at the market value on the date of grant.
As a result of the modification, the Company recognized $108 of incremental stock-based compensation expense during the year ended December 31, 2024. The aggregated incremental fair value of RSUs converted to RSAs during the year ended December 31, 2024 was $153 . The aggregated incremental fair value of RSAs vested during the year ended December 31, 2024 was $24 . Prior to year ended December 31, 2024, the Company did not have any RSAs.
Performance Stock Units
The following is a summary of PSU information and weighted average grant date fair values for the Company's PSUs:
107
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | Shares | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Unvested at January 1 | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Granted | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vested | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Forfeited | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Unvested at December 31 | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
The PSU awards function in the same manner as restricted stock units except that vesting terms are based on achievement of performance measures, such as the achievement of certain cumulative net revenue targets. PSUs are recognized as expense following a graded vesting schedule with their performance re-assessed and updated on a quarterly basis, or more frequently as changes in facts and circumstances warrant.
Stock-based compensation related to PSU grants was immaterial for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
Summary of Employee Stock Purchase Plan Shares
Employees purchased 59,325 shares at an average price of $3.71 during the year ended December 31, 2024, and 43,274 shares at an average price of $4.96 during the year ended December 31, 2023. The intrinsic value of shares purchased was $51 and $38 , respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. The intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the market value on the date of purchase and the purchase price of the shares.
During the year ended December 31, 2023, the rollover provision of our ESPP was triggered and resulted in incremental expense to be recognized over the new -month offering period, which did not have a material impact on our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. This did not occur during the year ended December 31, 2024.
Stock-based Compensation Expense
Total stock-based compensation was recognized as follows (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| General and administrative | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Sales and marketing | |||||||||||
| Research and development | |||||||||||
| Total stock-based compensation | $ | $ | |||||||||
As of December 31, 2024, the Company had an immaterial amount of unrecognized stock-based compensation costs related to non-vested options, $7,094 of unrecognized stock-based compensation costs related to unvested RSUs that will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.4 years, $45 of unrecognized stock-based compensation costs related to unvested RSAs that will be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.2 years, and $135 of unrecognized stock-based compensation costs related to unvested PSUs that will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1 year.
During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company capitalized $86 of stock-based compensation attributable to internally developed software. No stock-based compensation was capitalized during the year ended December 31, 2023.
Note 9. Common Stock Issuance, Redeemable Common Stock, Common Stock Warrants, and Convertible Preferred Stock
September 2024 Offering
108
On September 11, 2024, the Company entered into an underwriting agreement and issued 3,135,136 shares of its common stock at a price to the public of $3.70 per share, less underwriting discounts and commissions. The net proceeds received by the Company were $10,590 . The shares were issued pursuant to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-281556), filed by the Company with the SEC on August 14, 2024, which was declared effective on August 23, 2024. The Company provided the underwriter a discount of 7 % off the offering price.
In addition to the underwriter discount, the offering expenses with third parties were $874 , of which $286 in issuance costs that were unpaid as of December 31, 2024. The Company also reimbursed the underwriters for $198 in fees and expenses, including legal expenses, out-of-pocket expenses, and clearing expenses. The issuance costs associated with the September 2024 Offering were recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital on the consolidated balance sheets.
Pursuant to the underwriting agreement, the Company also issued, as a portion of the underwriting compensation payable to the underwriter, a warrant to purchase up to 125,405 shares of common stock (which was subsequently transferred to certain affiliates of the underwriter, the “Titan Warrants”). The Titan Warrants are accounted as a nonemployee stock-based award as it represents compensation for underwriter services. The compensation cost associated with the Titan Warrants was $382 , and was recorded as a direct and incremental issuance cost of the associated common stock offering that was earned upon the closing and issuance of the common stock. The Titan Warrants are classified as equity and included within additional paid-in capital on the consolidated balance sheets.
The Titan Warrants are initially exercisable on March 13, 2025 at an exercise price of $4.63 and have a term of years from such initial exercise date. None of the Titan Warrants have been exercised as of December 31, 2024.
Redeemable Common Stock
As discussed in Note 6, in September 2024 as partial consideration for the availability and funding of the WTI Loan Facility, the Company issued to the WTI Funds an aggregate of 750,000 shares of common stock. The Company also granted the WTI Funds the Redemption Option discussed in Note 6. The vested shares are recorded in mezzanine equity on the consolidated balance sheets and are being accreted to the redemption value at the date the redemption feature first becomes exercisable.
August 2024 Exchange
On August 20, 2024, holders of the Series A convertible preferred stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) of the Company elected to convert an aggregate of 15,721 shares of Series A Preferred Stock in exchange for an aggregate of 2,291,686 shares of the Company’s common stock, all as in accordance with the terms of the Certificate of Designation relating to the Series A Preferred Stock. As of December 31, 2024, the redemption value for Series A convertible preferred stock is $11,479 .
The converting holders of Series A Preferred Stock communicated to the Company that the election to convert a portion of shares of Series A Preferred Stock was due to the continued positive progress of the Company’s business and operating results, an initial step in simplifying the Company’s capital structure, and part of a coordinated effort by the Company to help ensure it regained compliance with the global market capitalization requirement under the NYSE Listed Company Manual.
February 2024 Offering
On February 25, 2024, the Company entered into a private placement investment agreement with certain investors, pursuant to which the Company issued and sold to the investors (i) an aggregate of 9,250 shares of the Company’s Series B convertible preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share and (ii) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,799,021 shares of the Company's common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Series B Warrants”), for an aggregate gross purchase price of $9,250 .
The Series B convertible preferred stock is convertible into common stock at the option of the holder at any time after February 29, 2024 and ranks, with respect to dividend rights, rights of redemption and rights upon a liquidation event, (i) equal to the Company’s Series A convertible preferred stock, (ii) senior to the common stock and all other classes or series of equity securities of the Company established after February 29, 2024, unless such shares or equity securities expressly provide that they rank in parity with or senior to the Series B convertible preferred stock with respect to dividend rights, rights of redemption or rights upon a liquidation event, (iii) on parity with each class or series of equity securities of the Company established after February 29, 2024, the terms of which expressly provide that it ranks on parity with the Series B convertible preferred stock with respect to dividend rights, rights of redemption and rights upon a liquidation event and (iv) junior to each class or series of equity securities of the
109
Company established after February 29, 2024, the terms of which expressly provide that it ranks senior to the Series B convertible preferred stock with respect to dividend rights, rights of redemption and rights upon a liquidation event. Except as otherwise provided in the certificate of designation relating to the Series B convertible preferred stock or as required by law, holders of shares of Series B convertible preferred stock are entitled to vote with the holders of shares of common stock (and any other class or series that may similarly be entitled to vote with the holders of common stock) on an as-converted to common stock basis at any annual or special meeting of stockholders of the Company, and not as a separate class.
At any time from and after March 1, 2029, the holders of at least a majority of the then outstanding shares of Series B convertible preferred stock may specify a date and time or the occurrence of an event by vote or written consent that all, and not less than all, of the outstanding shares of Series B convertible preferred stock will automatically be: (i) converted into shares of common stock at a conversion rate of 129.6596 per share, (ii) subject to certain exceptions and limitations, redeemed for an amount per share of Series B preferred stock equal to the liquidation preference of one thousand dollars per share, plus all accrued or declared but unpaid dividends as of the redemption date and time or (iii) a combination of the foregoing.
Subject to certain exceptions, upon the occurrence of a fundamental change, voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company, the Company will be required to pay an amount per share of Series B convertible preferred stock equal to the greater of (i) one thousand dollars per share or (ii) the consideration per share of Series B convertible preferred stock as would have been payable had all such shares been converted to common stock immediately prior to the liquidation event, plus, in each case, the aggregate amount of all declared but unpaid dividends thereon to the date of final distribution to the holders of Series B convertible preferred stock. As of December 31, 2024, the redemption value for Series B convertible preferred stock is $9,250 . None of the Series B convertible preferred stock had been converted as of December 31, 2024.
Each of the Series B Warrants sold in the private placement offering is exercisable for one share of common stock at an exercise price of $7.71 per share, is immediately exercisable, and will expire on March 1, 2029. As the Series B Warrants could require cash settlement in certain scenarios, the warrants were classified as liabilities upon issuance and were initially recorded at an aggregate estimated fair value of $6,856 2,394 allocated to the Series B convertible preferred stock. The Series B convertible stock is accreting to its redemption value, starting from the issuance date to the date at which the shares become redeemable on March 1, 2029. Accretion will be recorded as a deemed dividend. None of the Series B Warrants have been exercised as of December 31, 2024.
The Company incurred $394 of issuance costs related to the offering. Issuance costs allocated to the preferred stock of $102 were recorded as a reduction to the Series B convertible preferred stock. Issuance costs allocated to the liability classified warrants of $292 were recorded as an expense within general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of operations.
February 2023 Offering
On February 17, 2023 the Company entered into private placement investment agreements with certain investors, pursuant to which the Company issued and sold to the investors (i) an aggregate of 30,000 shares of the Company’s Series A convertible preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share and (ii) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 7,871,712 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, (“Series A Warrants”) for an aggregate purchase price of $30,000 .
The Series A convertible preferred stock is convertible into common stock at the option of the holder at any time after February 17, 2023 and ranks, with respect to dividend rights, rights of redemption and rights upon a liquidation event, (i) senior to the common stock and all other classes or series of equity securities of the Company established after February 17, 2023, unless such shares or equity securities expressly provide that they rank in parity with or senior to the Series A convertible preferred stock with respect to dividend rights, rights of redemption or rights upon a liquidation event, (ii) on parity with each class or series of equity securities of the Company established after the February 17, 2023, the terms of which expressly provide that it ranks on parity with the Series A convertible preferred stock with respect to dividend rights, rights of redemption and rights upon a liquidation event and (iii) junior to each class or series of equity securities of the Company established after February 17, 2023, the terms of which expressly provide that it ranks senior to the Series A convertible preferred stock with respect to dividend rights, rights of redemption and rights upon a liquidation event. Except as otherwise provided in the certificate of designation relating to the Series A convertible preferred stock or as required by law, holders of shares of Series A convertible preferred stock are entitled to vote with the holders of shares of common stock (and any other class or series that may similarly be entitled to vote with the holders of common stock) on an as-converted to common stock basis at any annual or special meeting of stockholders of the Company, and not as a separate class.
110
At any time from and after February 17, 2028, the holders of at least a majority of the then outstanding shares of Series A convertible preferred stock may specify a date and time or the occurrence of an event by vote or written consent that all, and not less than all, of the outstanding shares of Series A preferred stock will automatically be: (i) converted into shares of common stock at a conversion rate of 145.7726 per share (the "Conversion Rate"), (ii) subject to certain exceptions and limitations, redeemed for an amount per share of Series A preferred stock equal to the liquidation preference of one thousand dollars per share, plus all accrued or declared but unpaid dividends as of the redemption date and time or (iii) a combination of the foregoing.
Subject to certain exceptions, upon the occurrence of a fundamental change, voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company, the Company will be required to pay an amount per share of Series A convertible preferred stock equal to the greater of (i) one thousand dollars per share or (ii) the consideration per share of Series A convertible preferred stock as would have been payable had all such shares been converted to common stock immediately prior to the liquidation event, plus, in each case, the aggregate amount of all declared but unpaid dividends thereon to the date of final distribution to the holders of Series A convertible preferred stock.
Each of the Series A Warrants sold in the private placement offering is exercisable for one share of common stock at an exercise price of $4.66 per share, is immediately exercisable, and will expire on February 17, 2028. As the Series A Warrants could require cash settlement in certain scenarios, the warrants were classified as liabilities upon issuance and were initially recorded at an aggregate estimated fair value of $26,133 . The total proceeds from the offering were first allocated to the liability classified warrants, based on their fair values, with the residual $3,867 allocated to the Series A convertible preferred stock. The Series A convertible stock is accreting to its redemption value, starting from the issuance date to the date at which the shares become redeemable on February 17, 2028. Accretion will be recorded as a deemed dividend. None of the Series A Warrants have been exercised as of December 31, 2024.
The Company incurred $1,963 of issuance costs related to the offering, of which $1,513 were paid as of December 31, 2023. The remaining $450 were paid as of December 31, 2024. Issuance costs allocated to the preferred stock of $253 were recorded as a reduction to the Series A convertible preferred stock. Issuance costs allocated to the liability classified warrants of $1,710 were recorded as an expense within general and administrative expenses.
SBG Common Stock Warrants
As a result of the merger completed with SBG on July 15, 2021 (the “Merger”), the Company continues to record liabilities for warrants issued by SBG prior to the Merger.
Pursuant to the SBG initial public offering, SBG sold warrants to purchase an aggregate of 821,428 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $161.00 per share (“SBG Public Warrants”). Following the closing of the Initial Public Offering on September 17, 2020, the Company completed the sale of warrants to purchase an aggregate of 471,428 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $161.00 per share in a private placement to Sandbridge Acquisition Holdings LLC (the “SBG Private Placement Warrants”). Together, the SBG Public Warrants and SBG Private Placement Warrants are referred to as the “SBG Common Stock Warrants.” The SBG Public Warrants became exercisable 12 months from the closing of the Initial Public Offering. The SBG Common Stock Warrants will expire five years after the completion of the Merger or earlier upon redemption or liquidation. None of the SBG Common Stock Warrants have been exercised as of December 31, 2024.
See Part II, Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Merger” in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 for more information.
SVB Warrants
In March 2023, in connection with the first amendment to the LSA with SVB, the Company granted SVB a warrant to purchase 10,714 shares of the Company's common stock at a price of $5.32 per share, expiring on March 27, 2035 (the “SVB Warrants”). The SVB Warrants, which were valued at $43 , are classified as equity and included within additional paid-in capital on the consolidated balance sheets. None of the SVB Warrants have been exercised as of December 31, 2024.
Common Stock Warrants
The following table summarizes issuable shares of the Company’s common stock based on warrant activity for the year ended December 31, 2024:
111
| December 31, 2023 | Shares Issuable by New Warrants | Shares Purchased by Exercise | December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| SBG Public Warrants | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| SBG Private Placement Warrants | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Series A Warrants | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Series B Warrants | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| SVB Warrants | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Titan Warrants | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnout Shares
Following the Merger, 200,536 200,536 earnout shares, 100,268 shares will vest at such time as a $175.00 stock price level is achieved and 100,268 will vest at such time as a $210.00 stock price level is achieved, in each case, on or before the fifth anniversary of the Closing of the Merger. The ‘‘stock price level’’ will be considered achieved only (a) when the closing price of a share of Owlet common stock on the NYSE is greater than or equal to the applicable price for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading day period or (b) the price per share of Owlet common stock paid in certain change of control transactions following the Closing is greater than or equal to the applicable price. Earnout shares subject to vesting pursuant to the above terms that do not vest in accordance with such terms shall be forfeited and canceled for no consideration. The earnout shares are not redeemable. As the vesting event has not yet been achieved, these shares of Owlet common stock, which are issued and outstanding, are treated as contingently recallable and have been excluded from the denominator for the purposes of calculating basic and diluted net loss per share. See Note 12 for further discussion on the calculation of basic and diluted net loss per share.
The Company evaluated the earnout shares and concluded that they meet all conditions for equity classification. Because the settlement provisions in the agreement governing the earnout shares either include a fixed exercise price or involve the fair value of the entity's stock, the earnout shares are considered indexed to the Company's common stock. Because the Merger is accounted for as a reverse recapitalization, the issuance of the earnout shares has been treated as a deemed dividend, and since Owlet does not have retained earnings, the issuance is recorded within additional-paid-in-capital (“APIC”) and has a net zero impact on APIC.
Note 10. Fair Value Measurements
The Company’s assets and liabilities measured and reported in the financial statements at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows (in thousands):
112
| December 31, 2024 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Balance | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Money market funds | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
| Liabilities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| SBG Public Warrants | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
| SBG Private Placement Warrants | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Series A Warrants | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Series B Warrants | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Balance | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Money market funds | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
| Liabilities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| SBG Public Warrants | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
| SBG Private Placement Warrants | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Series A Warrants | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
Money market funds are included within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices.
The SBG Public Warrants and SBG Private Placement Warrants as of December 31, 2024 are presented in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. On June 15, 2023, the Company received notice from the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) that the NYSE had halted trading in the SBG Public Warrants due to the low trading price of those warrants. On June 16, 2023, the NYSE provided written notice to the Company and publicly announced that NYSE Regulation had determined to commence proceedings to delist the SBG Public Warrants and that such warrants were no longer suitable for listing based on “abnormally low” price levels, pursuant to Section 802.01D of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. As such, these instruments are no longer valued using quoted market prices and correspondingly, the SBG Private Placement Warrants can no longer be valued based on a quoted market price of the SBG Public Warrants. The Company measured the fair value of both the SBG Public Warrants and the SBG Private Placement Warrants as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:
| SBG Common Stock Warrants - Black-Scholes Inputs | December 31, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | |||||||||
| OWLT stock price | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Exercise price of warrants | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Term in years | |||||||||||
| Risk-free interest rate | % | % | |||||||||
| Volatility | % | % | |||||||||
The Series A Warrants are presented as Level 3 measurements, relying on unobservable inputs reflecting the Company’s own assumptions. Level 3 measurements, which are not based on quoted prices in active markets, introduce a higher degree of subjectivity and may be more sensitive to fluctuations in stock price, volatility rates, and U.S. Treasury Bond rates.
113
The Company measured the fair value of the Series A as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:
| Series A Warrants - Black-Scholes Inputs | December 31, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | |||||||||
| OWLT stock price | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Exercise price of warrants | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Term in years | |||||||||||
| Risk-free interest rate | % | % | |||||||||
| Volatility | % | % | |||||||||
The Series B Warrants are presented as Level 3 measurements, relying on unobservable inputs reflecting the Company’s own assumptions. The Company measured the fair value of the Series B Warrants at issuance and again as of December 31, 2024 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:
| Series B Warrants - Black-Scholes Inputs | December 31, 2024 | February 29, 2024 | |||||||||
| OWLT stock price | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Exercise price of warrants | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Term in years | |||||||||||
| Risk-free interest rate | % | % | |||||||||
| Volatility | % | % | |||||||||
The following table presents a reconciliation of the Company’s SBG Public Warrants, SBG Private Placement Warrants, Series A Warrants, and Series B Warrants (together, the “Level 3 Warrants”) measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2024 (in thousands):
| Level 3 Warrants | |||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2023 | $ | ||||
| Issuance of Series B Warrants | |||||
| Change in fair value included within common stock warrant liability adjustment | ( | ||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2024 | $ | ||||
There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 in the periods reported. The SBG Public Warrants and SBG Private Placement Warrants were transferred into Level 3 in 2023, as discussed above.
Equity-Classified Warrants
The fair value of the Titan Warrants at issuance on September 11, 2024 was $382 . The Company measured the fair value of the Titan Warrants at issuance on September 11, 2024, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:
Titan Warrants - Black-Scholes Inputs | September 11, 2024 | ||||
| OWLT stock price | $ | ||||
| Exercise price of warrants | $ | ||||
| Term in years | |||||
| Risk-free interest rate | % | ||||
| Volatility | % | ||||
Mezzanine-Classified Redeemable Common Stock
As described in Note 6, the vested shares issued to WTI are contingently redeemable at the option of the holder during the put period and are recorded in mezzanine equity on the consolidated balance sheets. The vested redeemable shares of common stock were recorded at their fair value of $7.66 per share, which was an aggregate value of $4,308 . The value of the redeemable shares of common stock was determined using a combination of the value of the Company's stock on the date of issuance and the theoretic value of a stand-alone put option valued using
114
a Black-Scholes put option model discounted by a present value factor that considers the credit spread between an estimated Company specific discount rate and the risk-free rate of return. The valuation model used the following assumptions:
| Redeemable Common Stock - Valuation Inputs | September 11, 2024 | ||||
| Common stock value per share | $ | ||||
| Put price | $ | ||||
| Term in years | |||||
| Risk-free interest rate | % | ||||
| Volatility | % | ||||
| Credit spread | % | ||||
| Present value discount | % | ||||
Note 11. Income Taxes
Income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 was $54 and $10 , respectively.
The provision for income taxes differs from the amount computed at federal statutory rates as follows (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
Federal income tax at statutory rates | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||
State income tax at statutory rates | ( | ( | |||||||||
Change in valuation allowance | |||||||||||
Warrant (benefit) expense (1) | ( | ||||||||||
Transaction costs (2) | |||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | |||||||||||
Other | |||||||||||
Total income tax provision | $ | $ | |||||||||
(1) Represents a permanent item attributed to common stock mark-to-market adjustments.
(2) Represents costs associated with the February 2023 and February 2024 preferred stock offerings and the July 2023 reverse stock split.
Significant components of the Company’s deferred income tax assets (liabilities) are as follows (in thousands):
115
| December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
Deferred tax assets: | |||||||||||
Accrued liabilities | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | |||||||||||
163(j) Interest expense limitation | |||||||||||
| Net operating loss carryforwards | |||||||||||
174 Capitalization | |||||||||||
Lease liability | |||||||||||
| Other | |||||||||||
Litigation settlement | |||||||||||
Total deferred income tax assets | $ | $ | |||||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: | |||||||||||
ROU asset | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Other | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Total deferred tax liabilities | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Valuation allowance | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||
Net deferred tax asset (liability) | $ | $ | |||||||||
As of December 31, 2024, the Company had $40,115 of federal and $6,619 of state net operating loss carry-forwards available to offset future taxable income, some of which, if not utilized, will begin to expire in 2034 for federal and 2036 for state purposes.
Accounting standards require that the tax benefit of net operating losses, temporary differences, and credit carryforwards be recorded as an asset to the extent that management assesses the realization is more likely than not. Realization of the future tax benefits from the net operating losses or credit carryforwards, if any, is dependent on the Company’s ability to generate sufficient taxable income within the applicable carryforward period. The Company has established a full valuation allowance due to historical cumulative losses and the uncertainty of its ability to generate sufficient taxable income to realize the deferred tax assets.
As of December 31, 2024, the Company recorded a valuation allowance of $59,060 for the portion of the deferred tax assets that we do not expect to be realized. Due to our history of losses in the U.S., the net cumulative deferred tax assets have been fully offset by a valuation allowance. The valuation allowance increased by $3,897 in the year ended December 31, 2024.
The utilization of the net operating loss carryforwards could be subject to annual limitations under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 382 imposes limitations on a corporation’s ability to utilize its NOL carryforwards if it experiences an “ownership change.” In general terms, an ownership change results from transactions increasing the ownership of certain stockholders in the stock of a corporation by more than 50% over a three-year period. Additionally, net operating losses utilized after 2017 would be limited to 80% of taxable income in years in which NOL carryforwards would be utilized.
Uncertain tax positions are recorded when it is more likely than not that a given tax position would not be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. Based on positions taken in the Company’s tax filings, the Company has concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions, and there are no material amounts of unrecognized tax benefits.
116
Note 12. Net Loss Per Share
Basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders is presented in conformity with the two-class method required for participating securities. Under the two-class method, net loss is attributed to common stockholders and participating securities according to dividends declared or accumulated and participation rights in undistributed earnings. The two-class method requires income available to common stockholders for the period to be allocated between common and participating securities based upon their respective rights to receive dividends as if all income for the period had been distributed.
The Company considers its convertible preferred stock to be participating securities. Under the two-class method, the net loss attributable to common stockholders is not allocated to the convertible preferred stock as the holders of the Company’s convertible preferred stock do not have a contractual obligation to share in the Company’s losses.
As discussed in Note 9, the Company issued redeemable common stock in connection to the WTI loan. The consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) include a presentation of income (loss) per redeemable share and income (loss) per non-redeemable share following the two-class method of income per share. Income and losses are shared pro rata between the two classes of shares. Net (loss) income per common share is calculated by dividing the net (loss) income by the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding for the respective period.
The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||||||
| Redeemable Common Stock | Common Stock | Common Stock | |||||||||||||||
| Numerator: | |||||||||||||||||
| Allocation of net loss attributable to common stockholders | $ | ( | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||||||
| Add: accretion on redeemable common stock | ( | ||||||||||||||||
| Allocated net loss attributable to common stockholders | $ | ( | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||||||
| Denominator: | |||||||||||||||||
| Weighted-average common shares used in computed net loss per share attributable to common stockholders basic and diluted | |||||||||||||||||
| Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders basic and diluted | $ | ( | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||||||
117
The following table summarizes the common stock equivalents of potentially dilutive outstanding securities excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share due to their anti-dilutive effect:
| December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Stock options | |||||||||||
| RSUs | |||||||||||
| RSAs | |||||||||||
| PSUs | |||||||||||
| ESPP Shares Committed | |||||||||||
| Common stock warrants | |||||||||||
| Preferred stock | |||||||||||
| Total | |||||||||||
The Company’s 200,536 unvested Earnout Shares, 187,500 unvested shares issued to WTI, and 326,153 unvested RSAs issued in connection to the RSU to RSA conversion, were excluded from the calculation of basic and diluted per share calculations as the vesting conditions have not yet been met as of December 31, 2024.
Note 13. Segments
The Company operates as a single operating segment. The Company’s Chief Operating Decision Maker ("CODM") is its Chief Executive Officer. All significant operating decisions are based upon analysis of the Company as one
The CODM considers consolidated net income (loss) to be the financial measure of segment profit and loss for monitoring budget versus actual results, perform variance analysis, and forecast future performance.
The CODM considers the impact of the significant segment expenses on net income, which are the same expenses presented on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), with the impact of stock-based compensation removed from the operating expense categories and presented separately when making operating decisions.
The measure of segment assets is reported on the consolidated balance sheets as total assets. The CODM does not review segment assets at a level other than that presented in the Company's consolidated balance sheets.
Revenue by geographic area is based on the delivery address of the customer and is summarized as follows (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| United States | $ | $ | |||||||||
| United Kingdom | |||||||||||
| Other | |||||||||||
| Total revenues | $ | $ | |||||||||
Other than the United States, no individual country exceeded 10% of total revenues for either of the years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023.
The Company’s long-lived assets are composed of property and equipment and right of use assets, net, and are summarized by geographic area as follows (in thousands):
118
| December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| United States | $ | $ | |||||||||
| International | |||||||||||
| Total long-lived assets, net | $ | $ | |||||||||
Note 14. Revision of Previously Issued Quarterly Information (Unaudited)
The Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the interim periods ended March 31, 2023, June 30, 2023, September 30, 2023, March 31, 2024, June 30, 2024, and September 30, 2024 have been revised to correct for prior period errors as discussed in Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Guidance and the Company intends to reflect the revisions to the 2024 interim periods in its 2025 quarterly reports to be filed on Form 10-Q. The effect on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for each affected period is as follows (in thousands):
| Three Months Ended March 31, 2023 | |||||||||||||||||
| (unaudited) | As Reported | Adjustments | As Revised | ||||||||||||||
| Cash flows from financing activities | |||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from short-term borrowings | $ | $ | ( | $ | |||||||||||||
| Payments of short-term borrowings | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 | |||||||||||||||||
| (unaudited) | As Reported | Adjustments | As Revised | ||||||||||||||
| Cash flows from financing activities | |||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from short-term borrowings | $ | $ | ( | $ | |||||||||||||
| Payments of short-term borrowings | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| Nine Months Ended September 30, 2023 | |||||||||||||||||
| (unaudited) | As Reported | Adjustments | As Revised | ||||||||||||||
| Cash flows from financing activities | |||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from short-term borrowings | $ | $ | ( | $ | |||||||||||||
| Payments of short-term borrowings | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
119
| Three Months Ended March 31, 2024 | |||||||||||||||||
| (unaudited) | As Reported | Adjustments | As Revised | ||||||||||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities | |||||||||||||||||
| Other, net | $ | ( | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||||||
| Net cash used in operating activities | $ | ( | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||||||
| Cash flows from investing activities | |||||||||||||||||
| Purchase of intangible assets | $ | ( | $ | $ | ( | ||||||||||||
| Net cash used in investing activities | $ | ( | $ | $ | ( | ||||||||||||
| Cash flows from financing activities | |||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from short-term borrowings | $ | $ | ( | $ | |||||||||||||
| Payments of short-term borrowings | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| Six Months Ended June 30, 2024 | |||||||||||||||||
| (unaudited) | As Reported | Adjustments | As Revised | ||||||||||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities | |||||||||||||||||
| Other, net | $ | ( | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||||||
| Net cash used in operating activities | $ | ( | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||||||
| Cash flows from investing activities | |||||||||||||||||
| Purchase of intangible assets | $ | ( | $ | $ | ( | ||||||||||||
| Net cash used in investing activities | $ | ( | $ | $ | ( | ||||||||||||
| Cash flows from financing activities | |||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from short-term borrowings | $ | $ | ( | $ | |||||||||||||
| Payments of short-term borrowings | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
120
| Nine Months Ended September 30, 2024 | |||||||||||||||||
| (unaudited) | As Reported | Adjustments | As Revised | ||||||||||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities | |||||||||||||||||
| Other adjustments, net | $ | ( | $ | $ | |||||||||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued and other expenses | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
| Other, net | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
| Net cash used in operating activities | $ | ( | $ | $ | ( | ||||||||||||
| Cash flows from investing activities | |||||||||||||||||
| Purchase of intangible assets | $ | ( | $ | $ | ( | ||||||||||||
| Net cash used in investing activities | $ | ( | $ | $ | ( | ||||||||||||
| Cash flows from financing activities | |||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from short-term borrowings | $ | $ | ( | $ | |||||||||||||
| Payments of short-term borrowings | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||
| Issuance costs paid related to 2023 preferred stock and warrants | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | $ | $ | ( | $ | |||||||||||||
121
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures
In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures (as such terms are defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated, as of December 31, 2024, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as that term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2024 due to the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting described below.
Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13(a)-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) under the Exchange Act. With the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024 based on the guidelines established in the Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013 framework) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on that evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2024 because of the material weaknesses described below.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
We did not design and maintain an effective control environment commensurate with our financial reporting requirements. Specifically, we did not maintain a sufficient complement of personnel with an appropriate degree of internal controls and accounting knowledge, experience, and training commensurate with our accounting and financial reporting requirements. This material weakness contributed to the following material weaknesses:
•We did not design and maintain effective controls over the segregation of duties related to journal entries. Specifically, certain personnel have the ability to both create and post journal entries within the Company’s general ledger system. This material weakness did not result in any adjustments to the consolidated financial statements.
•We did not design and maintain effective controls over the accounting for the accuracy and existence of inventory, nor controls which verified the completeness and accuracy of accrued liabilities. Each of these material weaknesses resulted in immaterial adjustments within the year ended December 31, 2022 and the accrued liabilities material weakness resulted in immaterial adjustments within the year ended December 31, 2024.
•We did not design and maintain effective controls over the accounting for debt and equity arrangements, including convertible preferred stock, warrant arrangements, and stock-based compensation
122
modifications. Further, we did not design and maintain effective controls to verify the completeness and accuracy of sales returns and accrued sales tax. Each of these material weaknesses resulted in material adjustments to several account balances and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019. The sales returns material weakness also resulted in immaterial adjustments to revenue and accrued and other expenses as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022. The convertible preferred stock and warrant arrangements material weakness and sales tax material weakness resulted in immaterial adjustments for the year ended December 31, 2024.
•We did not design and maintain effective controls related to the review of the statement of cash flows. This material weakness resulted in adjustments to various line items within the operating, investing, and financing categories of the cash flow and resulted in revisions to the previously issued Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2023 and to the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the interim periods ended March 31, 2023, June 30, 2023, September 30, 2023, March 31, 2024, June 30, 2024, and September 30, 2024.
•We did not design and maintain effective controls over IT general controls for information systems that are relevant to the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Specifically, we did not design and maintain (i) program change management controls to ensure that IT program and data changes affecting financial IT applications and underlying accounting records are identified, tested, authorized and implemented appropriately, (ii) user access controls to ensure appropriate segregation of duties and that adequately restrict user and privileged access to financial applications, programs, and data to appropriate Company personnel, (iii) computer operations controls to ensure that critical batch jobs are monitored, and data backups are authorized and monitored, and (iv) testing and approval controls for program development to ensure that new software development is aligned with business and IT requirements. This material weakness did not result in any adjustments to the consolidated financial statements.
Additionally, each of the material weaknesses described above could result in a misstatement of one or more account balances or disclosures that would result in a material misstatement to the interim or annual consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected.
Remediation Plan
We have initiated a plan to remediate these material weaknesses. The remediation measures will be ongoing, and although not all inclusive, remediation measures include hiring additional accounting and financial reporting personnel and implementing additional policies, procedures and controls, all of which will result in future costs for the Company.
We have taken actions to improve our IT general controls, segregation of duties over journal entries controls, inventory controls, accrued liabilities, convertible preferred stock, warrant arrangements, sales returns and accrued sales tax controls.
During the year ended December 31, 2024, we took actions to enhance the design of the controls we believe are necessary to remediate the material weaknesses related to the sales returns, accrued sales tax, and convertible preferred stock and warrant arrangements. While these enhancements to the design of the controls have been implemented as of September 30, 2024, we may determine the need to make further enhancements to the design of these controls. We will also develop a remediation plan to design and maintain effective controls related to the review of the statement of cash flows. These material weaknesses will not be considered remediated until our remediation plan has been fully implemented, the applicable controls operate for a sufficient period of time, and we have concluded, through testing, that the newly implemented and enhanced controls are operating effectively.
Notwithstanding the above, our management believes that the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K present fairly in all material respects our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.
Attestation Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm due to an exemption established by the JOBS Act for "emerging growth companies."
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Other than the remediation efforts described above, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the three
123
months ended December 31, 2024 that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information.
(a)
As disclosed above, this Annual Report on Form 10-K reflects the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by the Company’s executive officers. The Company has determined that no recovery of incentive-based compensation is required as the correction resulted in no changes to the performance metrics used to determine incentive-based compensation for executive officers during any of the applicable completed fiscal years.
Following the release of the Company’s earnings release for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2024, a copy of which was furnished in our Current Report on Form 8-K furnished to the SEC on March 4, 2025, we identified the correction of immaterial errors to the presentation of net cash used in operating activities and net cash provided by financing activities in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2024 as well as an immaterial balance sheet classification error between the current portion of long-term and other debt and long term debt, net in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2024. Such errors have been corrected herein. See Note 2., "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Guidance - Revisions to Previously Issued Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Information" and Note 14., "Revision of Previously Issued Quarterly Information (Unaudited)" to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Report.
(b) Insider Trading Arrangements and Policies.
During the three months ended December 31, 2024, no director or “officer” (as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) under the Exchange Act) of the Company adopted terminated
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections.
Not applicable
124
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information included in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the Company’s 2025 annual meeting of stockholders (the “definitive proxy statement”) , which will be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information included in the Company’s definitive proxy statement, which will be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information included in the Company’s definitive proxy statement, which will be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information included in the Company’s definitive proxy statement, which will be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information included in the Company’s definitive proxy statement, which will be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report.
125
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
Documents filed as part of this report
1)Financial Statements
The following consolidated financial statements are included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
2)Financial Statement Schedules
All financial statement schedules for the Company have been included in the consolidated financial statements or the related footnotes, or are either inapplicable or not required.
3)Exhibits
| Exhibit Number | Description | Form | File No. | Exhibit | Filing Date | ||||||||||||
| 2.1† | 8-K | 001-39516 | 2.1 | 2/16/2021 | |||||||||||||
| 3.1* | 10-K | 001-39516 | 3.1 | 3/8/2024 | |||||||||||||
| 3.2 | 8-K | 001-39516 | 3.1 | 7/7/2023 | |||||||||||||
| 3.3 | 8-K | 001-39516 | 3.1 | 2/21/2023 | |||||||||||||
| 3.4 | 8-K | 001-39516 | 3.1 | 3/4/2024 | |||||||||||||
| 3.5 | 8-K | 001-39516 | 3.1 | 11/12/2024 | |||||||||||||
| 4.1 | 8-K | 001-39516 | 4.1 | 9/18/2020 | |||||||||||||
| 4.2 | S-1 | 333-24832 | 4.4 | 9/1/2020 | |||||||||||||
| 4.3 | 8-K | 001-39516 | 4.1 | 2/21/2023 | |||||||||||||
| 4.4 | 8-K | 001-39516 | 4.1 | 2/26/2024 | |||||||||||||
| 4.5 | 8-K | 001-39516 | 4.2 | 2/26/2024 | |||||||||||||
| 4.6 | 8-K | 001-39516 | 4.1 | 9/13/2024 | |||||||||||||
4.7* | |||||||||||||||||
10.1+ | Owlet, Inc. 2021 Incentive Award Plan, as amended. | S-8 | 333-281623 | 99.1 | 8/16/2024 | ||||||||||||
10.1(a)+ | S-8 | 333-259663 | 99.1(a) | 9/20/2021 | |||||||||||||
10.1(b)+ | S-8 | 333-259663 | 99.1(b) | 9/20/2021 | |||||||||||||
10.1(c)+ | Form of Owlet, Inc. 2021 Incentive Award Plan Restricted Stock Award Grant Notice, | 8-K | 001-39516 | 10.6 | 11/14/2024 | ||||||||||||
10.2+ | 8-K | 001-39516 | 10.6 | 7/21/2021 | |||||||||||||
10.3+ | 8-K | 001-39516 | 10.7 | 7/21/2021 | |||||||||||||
126
10.3(a)+ | 8-K | 001-39516 | 10.7(a) | 7/21/2021 | |||||||||||||
10.3(b)+ | S-4 | 333-254888 | 10.7(b) | 3/31/2021 | |||||||||||||
10.3(c)+ | S-4 | 333-254888 | 10.7(c) | 3/31/2021 | |||||||||||||
10.4+ | S-4 | 333-254888 | 10.16 | 5/28/2021 | |||||||||||||
10.5+ | S-4 | 333-254888 | 10.9 | 3/31/2021 | |||||||||||||
10.6+ | S-4 | 333-254888 | 10.10 | 3/31/2021 | |||||||||||||
10.7†† | 8-K | 001-39516 | 10.2 | 7/21/2021 | |||||||||||||
10.8 | 8-K | 001-39516 | 10.1 | 2/16/2021 | |||||||||||||
10.9 | 8-K | 001-39516 | 10.2 | 2/16/2021 | |||||||||||||
10.10 | 8-K | 001-39516 | 10.3 | 2/21/2023 | |||||||||||||
10.11 | 8-K | 001-39516 | 10.1 | 2/21/2023 | |||||||||||||
10.12 | 8-K | 001-39516 | 10.2 | 2/21/2023 | |||||||||||||
10.13+ | 10-Q | 001-39516 | 10.5 | 8/14/2023 | |||||||||||||
10.14+ | 10-Q | 001-39516 | 10.1 | 11/14/2023 | |||||||||||||
10.15+ | 10-Q | 001-39516 | 10.2 | 11/14/2023 | |||||||||||||
10.16 | 8-K | 001-39516 | 10.1 | 2/26/2024 | |||||||||||||
10.17†† | 8-K | 001-39516 | 10.1 | 9/11/2024 | |||||||||||||
10.18 | 8-K | 001-39516 | 10.2 | 9/11/2024 | |||||||||||||
10.19†† | 8-K | 001-39516 | 10.3 | 9/11/2024 | |||||||||||||
10.20 | 8-K | 001-39516 | 10.4 | 9/11/2024 | |||||||||||||
10.21+ | 10-Q | 001-39516 | 10.7 | 11/14/2024 | |||||||||||||
10.22+ | 10-Q | 001-39516 | 10.8 | 11/14/2024 | |||||||||||||
19.1* | |||||||||||||||||
21.1* | |||||||||||||||||
| 23.1* | |||||||||||||||||
| 31.1* | |||||||||||||||||
| 31.2* | |||||||||||||||||
| 32.1** | |||||||||||||||||
| 32.2** | |||||||||||||||||
97.1 | 10-K | 001-39516 | 97.1 | 3/8/2024 | |||||||||||||
| 101.INS* | Inline XBRL Instance Document-the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document. | ||||||||||||||||
| 101.SCH* | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. | ||||||||||||||||
| 101.CAL* | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. | ||||||||||||||||
| 101.DEF* | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. | ||||||||||||||||
127
| 101.LAB* | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. | ||||||||||||||||
| 101.PRE* | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. | ||||||||||||||||
| 104* | Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101). | ||||||||||||||||
*Filed herewith
**Furnished herewith.
+Indicates management contract or compensatory plan
†The annexes, schedules, and certain exhibits to this Exhibit have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. The Registrant hereby agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted annex, schedule or exhibit to the SEC upon request.
††Certain of the exhibits and schedules to this Exhibit have been omitted in accordance with Regulation S-K Item 601(a)(5). The Company agrees to furnish a copy of all omitted exhibits and schedules to the SEC upon its request.
#Certain portions of this exhibit (indicated by “[***]”) have been omitted pursuant to Regulation S-K, Item 601(b)(10).
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
None.
128
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| Owlet, Inc. | ||||||||
Date: March 11, 2025 | By: | /s/ Kurt Workman | ||||||
| Kurt Workman | ||||||||
| Chief Executive Officer | ||||||||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| Name | Title | Date | ||||||||||||
| /s/ Kurt Workman | Chief Executive Officer and Director | March 11, 2025 | ||||||||||||
| Kurt Workman | (Principal Executive Officer) | |||||||||||||
| /s/ Lior Susan | Chairman of the Board | March 11, 2025 | ||||||||||||
| Lior Susan | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ Amanda Crawford | Chief Financial Officer | March 11, 2025 | ||||||||||||
| Amanda Crawford | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) | |||||||||||||
| /s/ Zane M. Burke | Director | March 11, 2025 | ||||||||||||
| Zane M. Burke | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ Laura J. Durr | Director | March 11, 2025 | ||||||||||||
| Laura J. Durr | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ Melissa A. Gonzales | Director | March 11, 2025 | ||||||||||||
| Melissa A. Gonzales | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ John C. Kim | Director | March 11, 2025 | ||||||||||||
| John C. Kim | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ Amy N. McCullough | Director | March 11, 2025 | ||||||||||||
| Amy N. McCullough | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ Marc F. Stoll | Director | March 11, 2025 | ||||||||||||
| Marc F. Stoll | ||||||||||||||
129