
Class and Period	Total Amount Outstanding Exclusive of Treasury Securities(1) ($ in millions)		Asset Coverage per Unit(2)		Involuntary Liquidating Preference per Unit(3)	Average Market Value per Unit(4)
Promissory Note(5)
December 31, 2024	$	—	$	—	—	N/A
December 31, 2023	$	—	$	—	—	N/A
December 31, 2022	$	—	$	—	—	N/A
December 31, 2021	$	—	$	—	—	N/A
December 31, 2020	$	10.0	$	2,226.8	—	N/A
SPV Asset Facility I
December 31, 2024	$	300.0	$	2,094.8	—	N/A
December 31, 2023	$	475.0	$	2,085.2	—	N/A
December 31, 2022	$	440.4	$	1,927.2	—	N/A
December 31, 2021	$	301.3	$	1,998.5	—	N/A
SPV Asset Facility II
December 31, 2024	$	920.0	$	2,094.8	—	N/A
December 31, 2023	$	1,718.0	$	2,085.2	—	N/A
December 31, 2022	$	1,538.0	$	1,927.2	—	N/A
December 31, 2021	$	446.0	$	1,998.5	—	N/A
SPV Asset Facility III
December 31, 2024	$	971.9	$	2,094.8	—	N/A
December 31, 2023	$	522.0	$	2,085.2	—	N/A
December 31, 2022	$	555.0	$	1,927.2	—	N/A
SPV Asset Facility IV
December 31, 2024	$	355.0	$	2,094.8	—	N/A
December 31, 2023	$	250.0	$	2,085.2	—	N/A
December 31, 2022	$	465.0	$	1,927.2	—	N/A
SPV Asset Facility V
December 31, 2024	$	250.0	$	2,094.8	—	N/A
December 31, 2023	$	200.0	$	2,085.2	—	N/A
SPV Asset Facility VI
December 31, 2024	$	350.0	$	2,094.8	—	N/A
December 31, 2023	$	160.0	$	2,085.2	—	N/A
SPV Asset Facility VII
December 31, 2024	$	165.9	$	2,094.8	—	N/A
SPV Asset Facility VIII
December 31, 2024	$	200.0	$	2,094.8	—	N/A
CLO VIII
December 31, 2024	$	290.0	$	2,094.8	—	N/A


Class and Period	Total Amount Outstanding Exclusive of Treasury Securities(1) ($ in millions)		Asset Coverage per Unit(2)		Involuntary Liquidating Preference per Unit(3)	Average Market Value per Unit(4)
December 31, 2023	$	290.0	$	2,085.2	—	N/A
December 31, 2022	$	290.0	$	1,927.2	—	N/A
CLO XI
December 31, 2024	$	260.0	$	2,094.8	—	N/A
December 31, 2023	$	260.0	$	2,085.2	—	N/A
CLO XII
December 31, 2024	$	260.0	$	2,094.8	—	N/A
December 31, 2023	$	260.0	$	2,085.2	—	N/A
CLO XV
December 31, 2024	$	312.0	$	2,094.8	—	N/A
CLO XVI
December 31, 2024	$	420.0	$	2,094.8	—	N/A
CLO XVII
December 31, 2024	$	325.0	$	2,094.8	—	N/A
CLO XVIII
December 31, 2024	$	260.0	$	2,094.8	—	N/A
CLO XIX
December 31, 2024	$	260.0	$	2,094.8	—	N/A
Revolving Credit Facility
December 31, 2024	$	1,335.0	$	2,094.8	—	N/A
December 31, 2023	$	628.1	$	2,085.2	—	N/A
December 31, 2022	$	302.3	$	1,927.2	—	N/A
December 31, 2021	$	451.2	$	1,998.5	—	N/A
September 2026 Notes
December 31, 2024	$	350.0	$	2,094.8	—	N/A
December 31, 2023	$	350.0	$	2,085.2	—	N/A
December 31, 2022	$	350.0	$	1,927.2	—	N/A
December 31, 2021	$	350.0	$	1,998.5	—	N/A
February 2027 Notes
December 31, 2024	$	500.0	$	2,094.8	—	N/A
December 31, 2023	$	500.0	$	2,085.2	—	N/A
December 31, 2022	$	500.0	$	1,927.2	—	N/A
September 2027 Notes
December 31, 2024	$	600.0	$	2,094.8	—	N/A
December 31, 2023	$	600.0	$	2,085.2	—	N/A
December 31, 2022	$	600.0	$	1,927.2	—	N/A
AUD 2027 Notes
December 31, 2024	$	295.5	$	2,094.8	—	N/A
June 2028 Notes
December 31, 2024	$	650.0	$	2,094.8	—	N/A
December 31, 2023	$	650.0	$	2,085.2	—	N/A


Class and Period	Total Amount Outstanding Exclusive of Treasury Securities(1) ($ in millions)		Asset Coverage per Unit(2)		Involuntary Liquidating Preference per Unit(3)	Average Market Value per Unit(4)
March 2025 Notes
December 31, 2024	$	500.0	$	2,094.8	—	N/A
December 31, 2023	$	500.0	$	2,085.2	—	N/A
December 31, 2022	$	500.0	$	1,927.2	—	N/A
January 2029 Notes
December 31, 2024	$	550.0	$	2,094.8	—	N/A
December 31, 2023	$	550.0	$	2,085.2	—	N/A
September 2029 Notes
December 31, 2024	$	500.0	$	2,094.8	—	N/A
March 2030 Notes
December 31, 2024	$	1,000.0	$	2,094.8	—	N/A
March 2031 Notes
December 31, 2024	$	750.0	$	2,094.8	—	N/A

__________________

(1)Total amount of each class of senior securities outstanding at the end of the period presented.

(2)Asset coverage per unit is the ratio of the carrying value of our total assets, less all liabilities excluding indebtedness represented by senior securities in this table, to the aggregate amount of senior securities representing indebtedness. Asset coverage per unit is expressed in terms of dollar amounts per $1,000 of indebtedness and is calculated on a consolidated basis.

(3)The amount to which such class of senior security would be entitled upon our involuntary liquidation in preference to any security junior to it. The “—” in this column indicates information that the SEC expressly does not require to be disclosed for certain types of senior securities.

(4)Average market value per unit not applicable because the senior securities are not registered for public trading.

(5)Facility was terminated in June 2022.

Senior Securities, Note [Text Block]

SENIOR SECURITIES

Information about our senior securities is shown in the following table as of the end of the periods ended December 31, 2024, December 31, 2023, December 31, 2022, December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020. The report of our independent registered public accounting firm on the senior securities table as of December 31, 2024, is attached as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.

Senior Securities Averaging Method, Note [Text Block]

Average market value per unit not applicable because the senior securities are not registered for public trading.

Senior Securities Headings, Note [Text Block]

Total amount of each class of senior securities outstanding at the end of the period presented.Asset coverage per unit is the ratio of the carrying value of our total assets, less all liabilities excluding indebtedness represented by senior securities in this table, to the aggregate amount of senior securities representing indebtedness. Asset coverage per unit is expressed in terms of dollar amounts per $1,000 of indebtedness and is calculated on a consolidated basis.The amount to which such class of senior security would be entitled upon our involuntary liquidation in preference to any security junior to it. The “—” in this column indicates information that the SEC expressly does not require to be disclosed for certain types of senior securities.Average market value per unit not applicable because the senior securities are not registered for public trading.Facility was terminated in June 2022.

General Description of Registrant [Abstract]

Investment Objectives and Practices [Text Block]

Structure of Investments

Our investment objective is to generate current income and, to a lesser extent, capital appreciation by targeting investment opportunities with favorable risk-adjusted returns.

We expect that generally our portfolio composition will be majority debt or income producing securities, which may include “covenant-lite” loans, with a lesser allocation to equity or equity-linked opportunities. In addition, we may invest a portion of our portfolio in opportunistic investments, which will not be our primary focus, but will be intended to enhance returns to our shareholders and from time to time, we may evaluate and enter into strategic portfolio transactions which may result in additional portfolio companies which we are considered to control. These investments may include high-yield bonds and broadly-syndicated loans, which are typically originated and structured by banks on behalf of large corporate borrowers with employee counts, revenues, EBITDAs and enterprise values larger than the middle-market characteristics described herein, and equity investments in portfolio companies that make senior secured loans or invest in broadly syndicated loans or structured products, such as life settlements and royalty interests. Our portfolio composition may fluctuate from time to time based on market conditions and interest rates.

Covenants are contractual restrictions that lenders place on companies to limit the corporate actions a company may pursue. Generally, the loans in which we expect to invest will have financial maintenance covenants, which are used to proactively address materially adverse changes in a portfolio company’s financial performance. However, to a lesser extent, we may invest in “covenant-lite” loans. See “Investment Process Overview —Inclusion of Covenants.”

Debt Investments. The terms of our debt investments are tailored to the facts and circumstances of each transaction. The Adviser negotiates the structure of each investment to protect our rights and manage our risk. We generally invest in the following types of debt:

•First-lien debt. First-lien debt typically is senior on a lien basis to other liabilities in the issuer’s capital structure and has the benefit of a first priority security interest in assets of the issuer. The security interest ranks above the security interest of any second-lien lenders in those assets. Our first-lien debt may include stand alone first-lien loans, “unitranche” loans (including “last out” portions of such loans), and secured corporate bonds with similar features to these categories of first-lien loans. As of December 31, 2024, 38.5% of our first lien debt was comprised of unitranche loans.

•Stand-alone first lien loans. Stand-alone first-lien loans are traditional first-lien loans. All lenders in the facility have equal rights to the collateral that is subject to the first-priority security interest.

•Unitranche loans. Unitranche loans (including the “last out” portions of such loans) combine features of first-lien, second-lien and mezzanine debt, generally in a first-lien position. In many cases, we may provide the issuer most, if not all, of the capital structure above their equity. The primary advantages to the issuer are the ability to negotiate the entire debt financing with one lender and the elimination of intercreditor

issues. “Last out” first-lien loans have a secondary priority behind super-senior “first out” first-lien loans in the collateral securing the loans in certain circumstances. The arrangements for a “last out” first-lien loan are typically set forth in an “agreement among lenders,” which provides lenders with “first out” and “last out” payment streams based on a single lien on the collateral. Since the “first out” lenders generally have priority over the “last out” lenders for receiving payment under certain specified events of default, or upon the occurrence of other triggering events under intercreditor agreements or agreements among lenders, the “last out” lenders bear a greater risk and, in exchange, receive a higher effective interest rate, through arrangements among the lenders, than the “first out” lenders or lenders in stand-alone first-lien loans. Agreements among lenders also typically provide greater voting rights to the “last out” lenders than the intercreditor agreements to which second-lien lenders often are subject. Among the types of first-lien debt in which we may invest, “last out” first-lien loans generally have higher effective interest rates than other types of first-lien loans, since “last out” first-lien loans rank below standalone first-lien loans.

•Second-lien debt. Our second-lien debt may include secured loans, and, to a lesser extent, secured corporate bonds, with a secondary priority behind first-lien debt. Second-lien debt typically is senior on a lien basis to unsecured liabilities in the issuer’s capital structure and has the benefit of a security interest over assets of the issuer, though ranking junior to first-lien debt secured by those assets. First-lien lenders and second-lien lenders typically have separate liens on the collateral, and an intercreditor agreement provides the first-lien lenders with priority over the second-lien lenders’ liens on the collateral.

•Mezzanine debt (unsecured debt investments). Structurally, mezzanine debt usually ranks subordinate in priority of payment to first-lien and second-lien debt, is often unsecured, and may not have the benefit of financial covenants common in first-lien and second-lien debt. However, mezzanine debt ranks senior to common and preferred equity in an issuer’s capital structure. Mezzanine debt investments generally offer lenders fixed returns in the form of interest payments, which could be paid-in-kind, and may provide lenders an opportunity to participate in the capital appreciation, if any, of an issuer through an equity interest. This equity interest typically takes the form of an equity co-investment or warrants. Due to its higher risk profile and often less restrictive covenants compared to senior secured loans, mezzanine debt generally bears a higher stated interest rate than first-lien and second-lien debt.

•Broadly syndicated loans. Broadly syndicated loans (whose features are similar to those described under “First-lien debt” and “Second-lien debt” above) are typically originated and structured by banks on behalf of large corporate borrowers with employee counts, revenues, EBITDAs and enterprise values larger than the middle-market characteristics described above. The proceeds of broadly syndicated loans are often used for leveraged buyout transactions, mergers and acquisitions, recapitalizations, refinancings, and financing capital expenditures. Broadly syndicated loans are typically distributed by the arranging bank to a diverse group of investors primarily consisting of: collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”); senior secured loan and high yield bond mutual funds; closed-end funds, hedge funds, banks, and insurance companies; and finance companies. A borrower must comply with various covenants contained in a loan agreement or note purchase agreement between the borrower and the holders of the broadly syndicated loan. The broadly syndicated loans in which we invest may include loans that are considered “covenant-lite” loans, because of their lack of a full set of financial maintenance covenants.

Our debt investments are typically structured with the maximum seniority and collateral that we can reasonably obtain while seeking to achieve our total return target. The Adviser seeks to limit the downside potential of our investments by:

•requiring a total return on our investments (including both interest and potential equity appreciation) that compensates us for credit risk;

•negotiating covenants in connection with our investments consistent with preservation of our capital. Such restrictions may include affirmative covenants (including reporting requirements), negative covenants (including financial covenants), lien protection, change of control provisions and board rights, including either observation rights or rights to a seat on the board under some circumstances; and

•including debt amortization requirements, where appropriate, to require the timely repayment of principal of the loan, as well as appropriate maturity dates.

Within our portfolio, the Adviser aims to maintain the appropriate proportion among the various types of first-lien loans, as well as second-lien debt and mezzanine debt, to allow us to achieve our target returns while maintaining our targeted amount of credit risk.

Equity Investments.

Our investment in a portfolio company could be or may include an equity interest, such as common stock or preferred stock, or equity linked interest, such as a warrant or profit participation right. We may make direct and indirect equity investments with or without a concurrent investment in a more senior part of the capital structure of the issuer. Our equity investments are typically not control-oriented investments and we may structure such equity investments to include provisions protecting our rights as a minority-interest holder.

Specialty Financing Portfolio Companies. We may make equity investments in portfolio companies that make senior secured loans or invest in broadly syndicated loans or structured products, such as life settlements and royalty interests. Our specialty financing companies include the following:

•Amergin, which consists of AAM Series 1.1 Rail and Domestic Intermodal Feeder, LLC and AAM Series 2.1 Aviation Feeder, LLC (collectively, “Amergin AssetCo”) and Amergin Asset Management LLC, which has entered into a Servicing Agreement with Amergin AssetCo. Amergin was created to invest in a leasing platform focused on railcar, aviation and other long-lived transportation assets. Amergin acquires existing on-lease portfolios of new and end-of-life railcars and related equipment and selectively purchases off-lease assets and is building a commercial aircraft portfolio through aircraft financing and engine acquisition on a sale and lease back basis.

•Fifth Season Investment LLC (“Fifth Season”), a portfolio company created to invest in life insurance based assets, including secondary and tertiary life settlement and other life insurance exposures using detailed analytics, internal life expectancy review and sophisticated portfolio management techniques.

•LSI Financing 1 DAC (“LSI Financing DAC”), a portfolio company formed to acquire contractual rights to revenue pursuant to earnout agreements in the life sciences space.

•LSI Financing LLC (“LSI Financing LLC”), a separately managed portfolio company formed to indirectly own royalty purchase agreements and loans in the life sciences space.

Joint Ventures

•OCIC SLF LLC (“OCIC SLF”). We may make equity investments in OCIC SLF, a Delaware limited liability company, which is a joint venture between us and State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio. OCIC SLF’s principal purpose is to make investments, primarily in senior secured loans that are made to middle-market companies, broadly syndicated loans and in senior and subordinated notes issued by collateralized loan obligations.

•Blue Owl Credit SLF LLC (“Credit SLF”). We may make equity investments in Credit SLF, a Delaware limited liability company, which is a joint venture between us, OBDC, OBDC II, OTF, OTIC, and State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio. Credit SLF’s principal purpose is to make investments in senior secured loans to middle-market companies, broadly syndicated loans and senior and subordinated notes issued by collateralized loan obligations.

Share Class Specifications

We have received an exemptive order that permits us to offer multiple classes of shares of common stock and to impose varying sales loads, asset-based service and/or distribution fees and early withdrawal fees.

Our Class S shares are subject to an Upfront Sales Load of up to 3.50% of the offering price. Our Class D shares are subject to an Upfront Sales Load of up to 1.50% of the offering price. Our Class I shares are not subject to an Upfront Sales Load. Pursuant to a distribution plan adopted by us in compliance with Rules 12b-1 and 17d-3 under the 1940 Act, as if those rules applied to us, our Class S and Class D shares are subject to annual ongoing servicing fees of 0.85% and 0.25%, respectively, of the then-current net asset value of such shares, as determined in accordance with applicable FINRA rules. Our Class I shares are not subject to an ongoing servicing fee.

Class S shares are generally available for purchase by certain investors meeting the suitability standards described herein and through brokerage and transaction-based accounts. Class D shares are generally available for purchase in this offering only (1) through fee-based programs, also known as wrap accounts, that provide access to Class D shares, (2) through participating broker-dealers that have alternative fee arrangements with their clients to provide access to Class D shares, (3) through certain registered investment advisers, (4) through bank trust departments or any other organization or person authorized to act in a fiduciary capacity for its clients or customers or (5) other categories of investors that we name in an amendment or supplement to this prospectus. Class I shares are generally available for purchase in this offering only (1) through fee-based programs, also known as wrap accounts, that provide access to Class I shares, (2) by endowments, foundations, pension funds and other institutional investors, (3) through participating broker-dealers that have alternative fee arrangements with their clients to provide access to Class I shares, (4) by our executive officers and directors and their immediate family members, as well as officers and employees of the Adviser, Blue Owl’s Credit platform, or other affiliates and their immediate family members, and, if approved by our Board, joint venture partners, consultants and other service providers or (5) other categories of investors that we name in an amendment or supplement to this prospectus. We may also offer Class I shares to certain feeder vehicles primarily created to hold our Class I shares, which in turn offer interests in themselves to investors; we expect to conduct such offerings pursuant to exceptions to registration under the Securities Act and not as a part of this offering. Such feeder vehicles may have additional costs and expenses, which would be disclosed in connection with the offering of their interests. We may also offer Class I shares to other investment vehicles. The Adviser and its affiliates will be expected to hold their Class I shares purchased as shareholders for investment and not with a view towards distribution.

A Class S share and a Class D share will convert into a Class I share upon the earliest of (i) our Dealer Manager advising us that the aggregate underwriting compensation payable from all sources (determined in accordance with applicable FINRA rules) would be in excess of 10% of the gross proceeds of this offering or (ii) a liquidity event. In addition, consistent with the exemptive relief allowing us to offer multiple classes of shares, at the end of the month in which the Dealer Manager in conjunction with the transfer agent determines that total upfront selling commissions and ongoing servicing fees paid with respect to any single share held in a shareholder’s account would exceed, in the aggregate, 10% of the gross proceeds from the sale of such share (or a lower limit as set forth in any applicable agreement between the Dealer Manager and a participating broker-dealer) (the “Sales Charge Cap”), we will cease paying the ongoing servicing fees on either (i) each such Class S share or Class D share that would exceed such limit or (ii) all Class S shares and Class D shares in such shareholder’s account. We may modify this requirement in a manner that is consistent with the applicable exemptive relief. At the end of such month, the applicable Class S shares or Class D shares in such shareholder’s account will convert into a number of Class I shares (including any fractional shares) with an equivalent aggregate net asset value as such Class S shares or Class D shares. See “Plan of Distribution — Compensation Paid to the Dealer Manager and Participating Broker-Dealers.”

Risk Factors [Table Text Block]

RISK FACTORS

Investing in our common stock involves a number of significant risks. The following information is a discussion of the known material risk factors associated with an investment in our common stock specifically, as well as those factors generally associated with an investment in a company with investment objectives, investment policies, capital structure or trading markets similar to ours. In addition to the other information contained in this prospectus, you should consider carefully the following information before making an investment in our common stock. The risks below are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or not presently deemed material by us may also impair our operations and performance. If any of the following events occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In such cases, the net asset value of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

We are subject to risks related to the economy.

•Global economic, political and market conditions, including uncertainty about the financial stability of the United States, could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

•The current period of capital markets disruption and economic uncertainty could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

•Inflation may adversely affect the business, results of operations and financial condition of our portfolio companies.

•We are dependent on information systems and systems failures could significantly disrupt our business, which may, in turn, negatively affect our liquidity, financial condition or results of operations

We are subject to risks related to our business and operations.

•The lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our business.

•We borrow money, which magnifies the potential for gain or loss and may increase the risk of investing in us.

•Defaults under our current borrowings or any future borrowing facility or notes may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

•If we are unable to obtain additional debt financing, or if our borrowing capacity is materially reduced, our business could be materially adversely affected.

•Our ability to achieve our investment objective depends on our Adviser’s ability to manage and support our investment process. If our Adviser were to lose a significant number of its key professionals, or terminate the Investment Advisory Agreement, our ability to achieve our investment objective could be significantly harmed.

•Because our business model depends to a significant extent upon Blue Owl’s relationships with corporations, financial institutions and investment firms, the inability of Blue Owl to maintain or develop these relationships, or the failure of these relationships to generate investment opportunities, could adversely affect our business.

•We may face increasing competition for investment opportunities, which could delay further deployment of our capital, reduce returns and result in losses.

•Our investment portfolio is recorded at fair value as determined in good faith by our Adviser in accordance with procedures approved by our Board and, as a result, there is and will be uncertainty as to the value of our portfolio investments.

•Our Board may change our operating policies and strategies without prior notice or shareholder approval, the effects of which may be adverse to our shareholders.

•Internal and external cybersecurity threats and risks, as well as other disasters, may adversely affect our business or the business of our portfolio companies by impairing the ability to conduct business effectively.

We are subject to risks related to our Adviser and its affiliates.

•Our Adviser and its affiliates, including our officers and some of our directors, may face conflicts of interest caused by compensation arrangements with us and our affiliates, which could result in increased risk-taking or speculative investments, or cause our Adviser to use substantial leverage.

•The time and resources that individuals associated with our Adviser devote to us may be diverted, and we may face additional competition due to, among other things, the fact that neither our Adviser nor its affiliates is prohibited from raising money for or managing another entity that makes the same types of investments that we target.

•Our Adviser and its affiliates may face conflicts of interest with respect to services performed for issuers in which we may invest.

•Our Adviser or its affiliates may have incentives to favor their respective other accounts and clients and/or Blue Owl over us, which may result in conflicts of interest that could be harmful to us.

•We may be obligated to pay our Adviser incentive fees even if we incur a net loss due to a decline in the value of our portfolio and even if our earned interest income is not payable in cash.

•Our ability to enter into transactions with our affiliates is restricted.

•Our Adviser’s inability to attract, retain and develop human capital in a highly competitive talent market could have an adverse effect on our Adviser, and thus us.

We are subject to risks related to business development companies.

•The requirement that we invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying assets could preclude us from investing in accordance with our current business strategy; conversely, the failure to invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying assets could result in our failure to maintain our status as a BDC.

•Regulations governing our operation as a BDC and RIC affect our ability to raise capital and the way in which we raise additional capital or borrow for investment purposes, which may have a negative effect on our growth. As a BDC, the necessity of raising additional capital may expose us to risks, including risks associated with leverage.

We are subject to risks related to our investments.

•Our investments in portfolio companies may be risky, and we could lose all or part of our investments.

•We have invested and may continue to invest through joint ventures, partnerships and other special purpose vehicles and our investments through these vehicles may entail greater risks, or risks that we otherwise would not incur, if we otherwise made such investments directly.

•Defaults by our portfolio companies could jeopardize a portfolio company’s ability to meet its obligations under the debt or equity investments that we hold which could harm our operating results.

•Subordinated liens on collateral securing debt investments that we may make to portfolio companies may be subject to control by senior creditors with first priority liens. If there is a default, the value of the collateral may not be sufficient to repay in full both the first priority creditors and us.

•We generally will not control the business operations of our portfolio companies and, due to the illiquid nature of our holdings in our portfolio companies, we may not be able to dispose of our interests in our portfolio companies.

•We and our portfolio companies are, and will continue to be, exposed to risks associated with changes in interest rates.

•International investments create additional risks.

•Our portfolio may be focused on a limited number of portfolio companies or industries, which will subject us to a risk of significant loss if any of these companies defaults on its obligations under any of its debt instruments or if there is a downturn in a particular industry.

We are subject to risks related to an investment in our common stock.

•The value of our common stock may fluctuate significantly.

•The amount of any distributions we may make on our common stock is uncertain. We may not be able to pay distributions to shareholders, or be able to sustain distributions at any particular level, and our distributions per share, if any, may not grow over time, and our distributions per share may be reduced. We have not established any limits on the extent to which we may use borrowings, if any, and we may use sources other than cash flows from operations to fund distributions (which may reduce the amount of capital we ultimately invest in portfolio companies).

•Our shares are not listed on an exchange or quoted through a quotation system and will not be listed for the foreseeable future, if ever. Therefore, our shareholders will have limited liquidity.

We are subject to risks related to an investment in our unsecured notes.

•Our unsecured notes are effectively subordinated to any secured indebtedness we have currently incurred or may incur in the future.

•Our unsecured notes are structurally subordinated to the indebtedness and other liabilities of our subsidiaries.

•A downgrade, suspension or withdrawal of the credit rating assigned by a rating agency to us or our unsecured notes, if any, or change in the debt markets, could cause the liquidity or market value of our unsecured notes to decline significantly.

We are subject to risks related to U.S. federal income tax.

•We will be subject to U.S. federal income tax if we are unable to maintain our tax treatment as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code or if we make investments through taxable subsidiaries.

•We may have difficulty paying our required distributions if we recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income.

We are subject to general risks.

•Changes in laws or regulations governing our operations may adversely affect our business or cause us to alter our business strategy.

•Heightened scrutiny of the financial services industry by regulators may materially and adversely affect our business.

Risks Related to the Economy

Global economic, political and market conditions, including uncertainty about the financial stability of the United States, could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The current worldwide financial markets situation, as well as various social, political, economic and other conditions and events (including political tensions in the United States and around the world, wars and other forms of conflict (including, for example, the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine and conflict in the Middle East and Northern Africa region), terrorist acts, security operations and catastrophic events, natural disasters such as fires, floods, earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes, global health epidemics, pandemics and emergencies, fluctuations in interest rates, strikes, work stoppages, labor shortages, labor disputes, supply chain disruptions and accidents), may disrupt our operations, contribute to increased market volatility, have long term effects on the United States and worldwide financial markets, and cause economic uncertainties or deterioration in the United States and worldwide. As global systems, economies and financial markets are increasingly interconnected, events that once had only local impact are now more likely to have regional or even global effects. Events that occur in one country, region or financial market will, more frequently, adversely impact issuers in other countries, regions or markets, including in established markets such as the United States. These impacts can be exacerbated by failures of governments and societies to adequately respond to an emerging event or threat.

Uncertainty can result in or coincide with, among other things: increased volatility in the financial markets for securities, derivatives, loans, credit and currency; a decrease in the reliability of market prices and difficulty in valuing assets (including portfolio company assets); greater fluctuations in spreads on debt investments and currency exchange rates; increased risk of default (by both government and private obligors and issuers); further social, economic, and political instability; nationalization of private enterprise; greater governmental involvement in the economy or in social factors that impact the economy; changes to governmental regulation and supervision of the loan, securities, derivatives and currency markets and market participants and decreased or revised monitoring of such markets by governments or self-regulatory organizations and reduced enforcement of regulations; limitations on the activities of investors in such markets; controls or restrictions on foreign investment, capital controls and limitations on repatriation of invested capital; the significant loss of liquidity and the inability to purchase, sell and otherwise fund investments or settle transactions (including, but not limited to, a market freeze); unavailability of currency hedging techniques; substantial, and in some periods extremely high rates of inflation, which can last many years and have negative effects on credit and securities markets as well as the economy as a whole; recessions; and difficulties in obtaining and/or enforcing legal judgments.

Any of the above factors, including sanctions, export controls, tariffs, trade wars and other governmental actions, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations and could cause the market value of our common shares and/or debt securities to decline. The United States has recently enacted and proposed to enact significant new tariffs. Additionally, the new U.S. Presidential administration has directed various federal agencies to further evaluate key aspects of U.S. trade policy and there has been ongoing discussion and commentary regarding potential significant changes to U.S. trade policies, treaties and tariffs. Global health emergencies, natural disasters, strikes, work stoppages or accidents could further weaken the domestic/global economies and create additional uncertainties, which may negatively impact the businesses in which we invest directly or indirectly and, in turn, could have a material adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition. We monitor developments and seek to manage our investments in a manner consistent with achieving our investment objective, but there can be no assurance that we will be successful in doing so. Additionally, social unrest and other political and security concerns may not abate, may worsen and could spread. Losses from terrorist attacks, global health emergencies, natural disasters, strikes, work stoppages or accidents are generally uninsurable.

The current period of capital markets disruption and economic uncertainty could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

In recent years, the U.S. corporate debt markets have experienced disruption resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and an inflationary economic environment. These market conditions may make it difficult to extend the

maturity of or refinance our existing indebtedness or obtain new indebtedness with similar terms and any failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business. The debt capital that will be available to us in the future, if at all, may be at a higher cost and on less favorable terms and conditions than what we currently experience, including being in an elevated rate environment. If we are unable to raise or refinance debt, then our equity investors may not benefit from the potential for increased returns on equity resulting from leverage and we may be limited in our ability to make new commitments or to fund existing commitments to our portfolio companies. An inability to extend the maturity of, or refinance, our existing indebtedness or obtain new indebtedness could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Significant disruption or volatility in the capital markets may also have a negative effect on the valuations of our investments. While most of our investments are not publicly traded, applicable accounting standards require us to assume as part of our valuation process that our investments are sold in a principal market to market participants (even if we plan on holding an investment through its maturity). Significant disruption or volatility in the capital markets may also affect the pace of our investment activity and the potential for liquidity events involving our investments. Thus, the illiquidity of our investments may make it difficult for us to sell such investments to access capital if required, and as a result, we could realize significantly less than the value at which we have recorded our investments if we were required to sell them for liquidity purposes. An inability to raise or access capital could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations and cause our net asset value to decline.

Economic recessions or downturns could impair our portfolio companies and harm our operating results.

Many of our portfolio companies may be susceptible to economic slowdowns or recessions and may be unable to repay our debt investments during these periods. In the past, instability in the global capital markets resulted in disruptions in liquidity in the debt capital markets, significant write-offs in the financial services sector, the re-pricing of credit risk in the broadly syndicated credit market and the failure of major domestic and international financial institutions. In particular, in past periods of instability, the financial services sector was negatively impacted by significant write-offs as the value of the assets held by financial firms declined, impairing their capital positions and abilities to lend and invest. In addition, continued uncertainty in connection with economic sanctions resulting from the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine, uncertainty around the conflict in the Middle East, and uncertainty between the United States and other countries, including China, with respect to trade policies, treaties, and tariffs, among other factors, have caused disruption in the global markets. There can be no assurance that market conditions will not worsen in the future.

In an economic downturn, we may have non-performing assets or non-performing assets may increase, and the value of our portfolio is likely to decrease during these periods. Adverse economic conditions may also decrease the value of any collateral securing our loans and the value of our equity investments. A severe recession may further decrease the value of such collateral and result in losses of value in our portfolio and a decrease in our revenues, net income, assets and net worth. Unfavorable economic conditions may require us to modify the payment terms of our investments, including changes in “payment in kind” or “PIK” interest provisions and/or cash interest rates, and also could increase our funding costs, limit our access to the capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to us on terms we deem acceptable. These events could prevent us from increasing investments and harm our operating results.

The occurrence of recessionary conditions and/or negative developments in the domestic and international credit markets may significantly affect the markets in which we do business, the value of our investments, and our ongoing operations, costs and profitability. Any such unfavorable economic conditions, including elevated interest rates, may also increase our funding costs, limit our access to capital markets or negatively impact our ability to obtain financing, particularly from the debt markets. In addition, any future financial market uncertainty could lead to financial market disruptions and could further impact our ability to obtain financing.

These events could limit our investment originations, limit our ability to grow and negatively impact our operating results and financial condition.

Inflation may adversely affect the business, results of operations and financial condition of our portfolio companies.

Certain of our portfolio companies operate in industries that have been, or may be, impacted by inflation. Recent inflationary pressures have increased the costs of labor, energy and raw materials and have adversely affected consumer spending, economic growth and our portfolio companies’ operations. If such portfolio companies are unable to pass any increases in the costs of their operations along to their customers, it could adversely affect their operating results. Such conditions would increase the risk of default on their obligations as a borrower. In addition, any projected future decreases in our portfolio companies’ operating results due to inflation could adversely impact the fair value of those investments. Any decreases in the fair value of our investments could result in future unrealized losses and therefore reduce our net assets resulting from operations. Any decreases in the fair value of our investments could result in future realized or unrealized losses.

Fluctuations in interest rates could have a material adverse effect on our business and that of our portfolio companies.

Fluctuations in interest rates could have a dampening effect on overall economic activity, the financial condition of our portfolio companies and the financial condition of the end customers who ultimately create demand for the capital we supply, all of which could negatively affect our business, financial condition or results of operations . The Federal Reserve decreased the federal funds rate twice in 2024. Although the Federal Reserve has signaled the potential for additional federal funds rate cuts, there remains uncertainty around the rate and timing of decreases, including as a result of the transition to the new U.S. Presidential administration. Uncertainty surrounding future Federal Reserve actions may have a material effect on our business making it particularly difficult for us to obtain financing at attractive rates, impacting our ability to execute on our growth strategies or future acquisitions.

Our cash and cash equivalents could be adversely affected if the financial institutions in which we hold our cash and cash equivalents fail.

We regularly maintain cash balances at third-party financial institutions in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits. If a depository institution fails to return these deposits or is otherwise subject to adverse conditions in the financial or credit markets, our access to invested cash or cash equivalents could be limited which adversely impact our results of operations or financial condition.

Risks Related to Our Business

The lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our business.

We may acquire a significant percentage of our investments from privately held companies in directly negotiated transactions. Substantially all of these investments are subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or are otherwise less liquid than exchange-listed securities or other securities for which there is an active trading market. We typically would be unable to exit these investments unless and until the portfolio company has a liquidity event such as a sale, refinancing, or initial public offering.

The illiquidity of our investments may make it difficult or impossible for us to sell such investments if the need arises. In addition, if we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we have previously recorded our investments, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Moreover, investments purchased by us that are liquid at the time of purchase may subsequently become illiquid due to events relating to the issuer, market events, economic conditions or investor perceptions.

We borrow money, which magnifies the potential for gain or loss and may increase the risk of investing in us.

The use of borrowings, also known as leverage, increases the volatility of investments by magnifying the potential for gain or loss on invested equity capital. We currently borrow under our credit facilities and have issued or assumed other senior securities, and in the future may borrow from, or issue additional senior securities to, banks, insurance companies, funds, institutional investors and other lenders and investors. Holders of these senior securities

have fixed-dollar claims on our assets that are superior to the claims of our shareholders. If the value of our assets decreases, leverage would cause our net asset value to decline more sharply than it otherwise would have if we did not employ leverage. Similarly, any decrease in our income would cause net income to decline more sharply than it would have had we not borrowed. Such a decline could negatively affect our ability to service our debt or make distributions to our shareholders. In addition, our shareholders will bear the burden of any increase in our expenses as a result of our use of leverage, including interest expenses and any increase in the base management or incentive fees payable to our Adviser attributable to the increase in assets purchased using leverage. There can be no assurance that a leveraging strategy will be successful.

Our ability to service any borrowings that we incur will depend largely on our financial performance and will be subject to prevailing economic conditions and competitive pressures. Moreover, the management fee will be payable based on our average gross assets excluding cash and cash equivalents but including assets purchased with borrowed amounts, which may give our Adviser an incentive to use leverage to make additional investments. See “—Our Adviser and its affiliates, including our officers and some of our directors, may face conflicts of interest caused by compensation arrangements with us and our affiliates, which could result in increased risk-taking or speculative investments, or cause our Adviser to use substantial leverage.” The amount of leverage that we employ will depend on our Adviser’s and our Board’s assessment of market and other factors at the time of any proposed borrowing. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain credit at all or on terms acceptable to us, which could affect our return on capital. However, to the extent that we use leverage to finance our assets, our financing costs will reduce cash available for distributions to shareholders. Moreover, we may not be able to meet our financing obligations and, to the extent that we cannot, we risk the loss of some or all of our assets to liquidation or sale to satisfy the obligations. In such an event, we may be forced to sell assets at significantly depressed prices due to market conditions or otherwise, which may result in losses.

In addition to having fixed-dollar claims on our assets that are superior to the claims of our common shareholders, obligations to lenders may be secured by a first priority security interest in our portfolio of investments and cash. As a BDC, generally, the ratio of our total assets (less total liabilities other than indebtedness represented by senior securities) to our total indebtedness represented by senior securities plus any preferred stock, if any, must be at least 200%; however, the Small Business Credit Availability Act has modified the 1940 Act by allowing a BDC to increase the maximum amount of leverage it may incur from an asset coverage ratio of 200% to an asset coverage ratio of 150%, if certain requirements are met. If this ratio declines below the relevant amount, we cannot incur additional debt and could be required to sell a portion of our investments to repay some indebtedness when it may be disadvantageous to do so. This could have a material adverse effect on our operations, and we may not be able to service our debt or make distributions.

The following table illustrates the effect of leverage on returns from an investment in our common stock assuming various annual returns on our portfolio, net of expenses. Leverage generally magnifies the return of shareholders when the portfolio return is positive and magnifies their losses when the portfolio return is negative. The calculations in the table below are hypothetical, and actual returns may be higher or lower than those appearing in the table below.


	Assumed Return on Our Portfolio (Net of Expenses)
	(10)%		(5)%		0%		5%		10%
Corresponding return to common shareholder(1)	(25.9)	%	(16.2)	%	(6.4)	%	3.3	%	13.0	%

______________

(1)Assumes, as of December 31, 2024, (i) $28.2 billion in total assets, (ii) $12.9 billion in outstanding indebtedness, (iii) $14.5 billion in net assets and (iv) weighted average interest rate, excluding fees (such as fees on undrawn amounts and amortization of financing costs), of 7.2%.

See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources” for more information regarding our borrowings.

Defaults under our current borrowings or any future borrowing facility or notes may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Our borrowings may include customary covenants, including certain limitations on our incurrence of additional indebtedness and on our ability to make distributions to our shareholders, or redeem, repurchase or retire shares of stock, upon the occurrence of certain events and certain financial covenants related to asset coverage and liquidity and other maintenance covenants, as well as customary events of default. In the event we default under the terms of our current or future borrowings, our business could be adversely affected as we may be forced to sell a portion of our investments quickly and prematurely at what may be disadvantageous prices to us in order to meet our outstanding payment obligations and/or support working capital requirements under the terms of our current or future borrowings, any of which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. An event of default under the terms of our current or any future borrowings could result in an accelerated maturity date for all amounts outstanding thereunder, and in some instances, lead to a cross-default under other borrowings. This could reduce our liquidity and cash flow and impair our ability to grow our business. Collectively, substantially all of our assets are currently pledged as collateral under our credit facilities. If we were to default on our obligations under the terms of our credit facilities or any future secured debt instrument the agent for the applicable creditors would be able to assume control of the disposition of any or all of our assets securing such debt, including the selection of such assets to be disposed and the timing of such disposition, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Provisions in our current borrowings or any other future borrowings may limit discretion in operating our business.

Any security interests and/or negative covenants required by a credit facility we enter into or notes we issue may limit our ability to create liens on assets to secure additional debt and may make it difficult for us to restructure or refinance indebtedness at or prior to maturity or obtain additional debt or equity financing.

A credit facility may be backed by all or a portion of our loans and securities on which the lenders will have a security interest. We may pledge up to 100% of our assets and may grant a security interest in all of our assets under the terms of any debt instrument we enter into with lenders. We expect that any security interests we grant will be set forth in a pledge and security agreement and evidenced by the filing of financing statements by the agent for the lenders. In addition, we expect that the custodian for our securities serving as collateral for such loan would include in its electronic systems notices indicating the existence of such security interests and, following notice of occurrence of an event of default, if any, and during its continuance, will only accept transfer instructions with respect to any such securities from the lender or its designee. If we were to default under the terms of any debt instrument, the agent for the applicable lenders would be able to assume control of the timing of disposition of any or all of our assets securing such debt, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

In addition, any security interests and/or negative covenants required by a credit facility may limit our ability to create liens on assets to secure additional debt and may make it difficult for us to restructure or refinance indebtedness at or prior to maturity or obtain additional debt or equity financing. In addition, if our borrowing base under a credit facility were to decrease, we may be required to secure additional assets in an amount sufficient to cure any borrowing base deficiency. In the event that all of our assets are secured at the time of such a borrowing base deficiency, we could be required to repay advances under a credit facility or make deposits to a collection account, either of which could have a material adverse impact on our ability to fund future investments and to make distributions.

In addition, we may be subject to limitations as to how borrowed funds may be used, which may include restrictions on geographic and industry concentrations, loan size, payment frequency and status, average life, collateral interests and investment ratings, as well as regulatory restrictions on leverage which may affect the amount of funding that may be obtained. There may also be certain requirements relating to portfolio performance, including required minimum portfolio yield and limitations on delinquencies and charge-offs, a violation of which could limit further advances and, in some cases, result in an event of default. An event of default under a credit facility could result in an accelerated maturity date for all amounts outstanding thereunder, which could have a material adverse

effect on our business and financial condition and could lead to cross default under other credit facilities. This could reduce our liquidity and cash flow and impair our ability to manage our business.

Under the terms of the Revolving Credit Facility, we have agreed not to incur any additional secured indebtedness other than in certain limited circumstances in which the incurrence is permitted under the Revolving Credit Facility. In addition, if our borrowing base under the Revolving Credit Facility were to decrease, we would be required to secure additional assets or repay advances under the Revolving Credit Facility which could have a material adverse impact on our ability to fund future investments and to make distributions.

In addition, under the terms of our credit facilities, we are subject to limitations as to how borrowed funds may be used, as well as regulatory restrictions on leverage which may affect the amount of funding that we may obtain. There may also be certain requirements relating to portfolio performance, a violation of which could limit further advances and, in some cases, result in an event of default. This could reduce our liquidity and cash flow and impair our ability to grow our business.

If we are unable to obtain additional debt financing, or if our borrowing capacity is materially reduced, our business could be materially adversely affected.

We may want to obtain additional debt financing, or need to do so upon maturity of our credit facilities, in order to obtain funds which may be made available for investments. Our credit facilities, notes and CLOs currently expire between March 2025 and October 2037. If we are unable to increase, renew or replace any such facilities and enter into new debt financing facilities or other debt financing on commercially reasonable terms, our liquidity may be reduced significantly. In addition, if we are unable to repay amounts outstanding under any such facilities and are declared in default or are unable to renew or refinance these facilities, we may not be able to make new investments or operate our business in the normal course. These situations may arise due to circumstances that we may be unable to control, such as lack of access to the credit markets, a severe decline in the value of the U.S. dollar, an economic downturn or an operational problem that affects us or third parties, and could materially damage our business operations, results of operations and financial condition. See “—The current period of capital markets disruption and economic uncertainty could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.”

Our ability to achieve our investment objective depends on our Adviser’s ability to manage and support our investment process. If our Adviser were to lose a significant number of its key professionals, or terminate the Investment Advisory Agreement, our ability to achieve our investment objective could be significantly harmed.

We do not have any employees. Additionally, we have no internal management capacity other than our appointed executive officers and will be dependent upon the investment expertise, skill and network of business contacts of our Adviser to achieve our investment objective. Our Adviser evaluates, negotiates, executes, monitors, and services our investments. Our success depends to a significant extent on the continued service and coordination of our Adviser, including its key professionals. The departure of a significant number of key professionals from our Adviser could have a material adverse effect on our ability to achieve our investment objective.

Our ability to achieve our investment objective also depends on the ability of our Adviser to identify, analyze, invest in, finance, and monitor companies that meet our investment criteria. Our Adviser’s capabilities in structuring the investment process, and providing competent, attentive and efficient services to us depend on the involvement of investment professionals of adequate number and sophistication to match the corresponding flow of transactions. To achieve our investment objective, our Adviser may need to retain, hire, train, supervise, and manage new investment professionals to participate in our investment selection and monitoring process. Our Adviser may not be able to find qualified investment professionals in a timely manner or at all. Any failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, the Investment Advisory Agreement has a termination provision that allows the agreement to be terminated by us on 60 days' notice without penalty by the vote of a Majority of the Outstanding Shares of our common stock or by the vote of our independent directors and generally may be terminated at any time, without penalty, by our Adviser upon 120 days' notice to us. Furthermore, the Investment Advisory Agreement automatically terminates in the event of its assignment, as defined in the 1940 Act, by the Adviser. If the Adviser

resigns or is terminated, or if we do not obtain the requisite approvals of shareholders and our Board to approve an agreement with the Adviser after an assignment, we may not be able to find a new investment adviser or hire internal management with similar expertise and ability to provide the same or equivalent services on acceptable terms prior to the termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement, or at all. If we are unable to do so quickly, our operations are likely to experience a disruption and costs under any new agreements that we enter into could increase. Our financial condition, business and results of operations, as well as our ability to meet our payment obligations under our indebtedness and pay distributions, are likely to be adversely affected, and the value of our common stock may decline.

Because our business model depends to a significant extent upon Blue Owl’s relationships with corporations, financial institutions and investment firms, the inability of Blue Owl to maintain or develop these relationships, or the failure of these relationships to generate investment opportunities, could adversely affect our business.

Blue Owl depends on its relationships with corporations, financial institutions and investment firms, and we rely to a significant extent upon these relationships to provide us with potential investment opportunities. The investment management business is intensely competitive, with competition based on a variety of factors, including investment performance, business relationships, quality of service provided to clients, fund investor liquidity, fund terms (including fees and economic sharing arrangements), brand recognition and business reputation. If Blue Owl fails to maintain its reputation it may not be able to maintain its existing relationships or develop new relationships or sources of investment opportunities, and we may not be able to grow our investment portfolio. In addition, individuals with whom Blue Owl has relationships are not obligated to provide us with investment opportunities, and, therefore, there is no assurance that such relationships will generate investment opportunities for us.

Negative publicity regarding Blue Owl or its personnel could give rise to reputational risk that could significantly harm our existing business and business prospects. Similarly, events could occur that damage the reputation of our industry generally, such as the insolvency or bankruptcy of large funds or a significant number of funds or highly publicized incidents of fraud or other scandals, any one of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, regardless of whether any of those events directly relate to us or our investments.

We may face increasing competition for investment opportunities, which could delay further deployment of our capital, reduce returns and result in losses.

We may compete for investments with other BDCs and investment funds (including registered investment companies, private equity funds and mezzanine funds), including the other Blue Owl Credit Clients or other funds managed by our Adviser or its affiliates comprising Blue Owl’s Credit platform, the private funds managed by Blue Owl’s GP Strategic Capital platform and the funds and accounts managed by Blue Owl’s Real Assets platform, as well as traditional financial services companies such as commercial banks and other sources of funding. Moreover, alternative investment vehicles, such as hedge funds, continue to increase their investment focus in our target market of privately owned U.S. companies. We may experience increased competition from banks and investment vehicles who may continue to lend to the middle market. Additionally, the U.S. Federal Reserve and other bank regulators may periodically provide incentives to U.S. commercial banks to originate more loans to U.S. middle-market private companies. As a result of these market participants and regulatory incentives, competition for investment opportunities in privately owned U.S. companies is strong and may intensify. Many of our competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical, and marketing resources than we do. For example, some competitors may have a lower cost of capital and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments than us. These characteristics could allow our competitors to consider a wider variety of investments, establish more relationships and offer better pricing and more flexible structuring than we are able to do.

Numerous factors increase our competitive risks, including, but not limited to:

•A number of our competitors may have or are perceived to have more expertise or financial, technical, marketing and other resources and more personnel than we do;

•We may not perform as well as competitors’ funds or other available investment products;

•Several of our competitors have raised significant amounts of capital, and many of them have similar investment objectives to ours, which may create additional competition for investment opportunities;

•Some of our competitors may have lower fees or alternative fee arrangements;

•Some of our competitors may have a lower cost of capital and access to funding sources that are not available to us, which may create competitive disadvantages for us;

•Some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances, different risk assessments or lower return thresholds than us, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and to bid more aggressively than us or to agree to less restrictive legal terms and protections for investments that we want to make; and

•Some of our competitors may be subject to less regulation or fewer conflicts of interest and, accordingly, may have more flexibility to undertake and execute certain businesses or investments than we do, bear less compliance expense than we do or be viewed differently in the marketplace.

We may lose investment opportunities if we do not match our competitors’ pricing, terms, and investment structure criteria. If we are forced to match these competitors’ investment terms criteria, we may not be able to achieve acceptable returns on our investments or may bear substantial risk of capital loss. A significant increase in the number and/or the size of our competitors in our target market could force us to accept less attractive investment terms. Furthermore, many competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that the 1940 Act imposes on us as a BDC or the source of income, asset diversification and distribution requirements we must satisfy to maintain our RIC tax treatment. The competitive pressures we face, and the manner in which we react or adjust to competitive pressures, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, effective yield on investments, investment returns, leverage ratio, and cash flows. As a result of this competition, we may not be able to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities from time to time. Also, we may not be able to identify and make investments that are consistent with our investment objective.

Our investment portfolio is recorded at fair value as determined in good faith by our Adviser in accordance with procedures approved by our Board and, as a result, there is and will be uncertainty as to the value of our portfolio investments.

Under the 1940 Act, we are required to carry our portfolio investments at market value or, if there is no readily available market value, at fair value as determined in accordance with procedures established by our Adviser and approved by our Board. There is not a public market or active secondary market for many of the types of investments in privately held companies that we hold and intend to make. Our investments may not be publicly traded or actively traded on a secondary market but, instead, may be traded on a privately negotiated over-the-counter secondary market for institutional investors, if at all. As a result, we will value these investments quarterly at fair value as determined in good faith in accordance with valuation policy and procedures approved by our Board.

The determination of fair value, and thus the amount of unrealized appreciation or depreciation we may recognize in any reporting period, is to a degree subjective, and our Adviser has a conflict of interest in determining fair value. We will value our investments quarterly at fair value as determined in good faith by our Adviser, based on, among other things, input of our Audit Committee and independent third-party valuation firm(s) engaged at the direction of our Adviser. The types of factors that may be considered in determining the fair values of our investments include the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company’s ability to make payments and its earnings, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, comparison to publicly traded companies, discounted cash flow, current market interest rates and other relevant factors. Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of private securities and private companies, are inherently uncertain, the valuations may fluctuate significantly over short periods of time due to changes in current market conditions. The determinations of fair value in accordance with procedures approved by our Board may differ materially from the values that would have been used if an active market and market quotations existed for such investments. Our net asset value could be adversely affected if the determinations regarding the fair value of the investments were materially higher than the values that we ultimately realize upon the disposal of such investments.

Our Board may change our operating policies and strategies without prior notice or shareholder approval, the effects of which may be adverse to our shareholders.

Our Board has the authority to modify or waive current operating policies, investment criteria and strategies without prior notice and without shareholder approval. We cannot predict the effect any changes to current operating policies, investment criteria and strategies would have on our business, net asset value, operating results and the value of our securities. However, the effects might be adverse, which could negatively impact our ability to pay you distributions and cause you to lose all or part of your investment. Moreover, we will have significant flexibility in investing the net proceeds of our offering and may use the net proceeds from our offering in ways with which our investors may not agree.

Any unrealized depreciation we experience on our portfolio may be an indication of future realized losses, which could reduce our income available for distribution.

As a BDC, we are required to carry our investments at market value or, if no market value is ascertainable, at the fair value as determined in good faith in accordance with procedures approved by our Board. Decreases in the market values or fair values of our investments relative to amortized cost will be recorded as unrealized depreciation. Any unrealized losses in our portfolio could be an indication of a portfolio company’s inability to meet its repayment obligations to us with respect to the affected loans. This could result in realized losses in the future and ultimately in reductions of our income available for distribution in future periods. In addition, decreases in the market value or fair value of our investments will reduce our net asset value. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations— Critical Accounting Policies — Investments at Fair Value.”

We are subject to risks associated with the market’s limited experience with SOFR, which will affect our cost of capital and results of operations.

We historically used the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) as a reference rate in the loans we extended to our portfolio companies. The terms of our debt investments generally included minimum interest rate floors which were calculated based on LIBOR. In July 2017, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, as supervisor of ICE Benchmark Administrator (“IBA”), the administrator of LIBOR, announced that it would phase out LIBOR by the end of 2021 (later extended to the end of June 2023 for USD LIBOR only). IBA ceased publishing GBP, EUR, CHF and JPY LIBOR rates on January 1, 2022 and ceased publishing overnight and 12-month USD LIBOR on June, 30 2023.

In January 2023, the Federal Reserve adopted a final rule implementing the U.S. Adjustable Interest Rate Act of 2022 (the “LIBOR Act”) that, among other things, identifies the applicable SOFR-based benchmark replacements under the LIBOR Act.

Beginning in the first quarter of 2022, we transitioned any LIBOR-based investments to SOFR and currently none of our investments are indexed to LIBOR.

SOFR is considered to be a risk-free rate, and USD LIBOR was a risk weighted rate. Thus, SOFR tends to be a lower rate than USD LIBOR, because SOFR does not contain a risk component. This difference may negatively impact our net interest margin of our investments. Also, the use of SOFR based rates is relatively new, and market experience with SOFR based rate loans is limited. There could be unanticipated difficulties or disruptions with the calculation and publication of SOFR based rates. This could result in increased borrowing costs for us or could adversely impact the interest income we receive from our portfolio companies or the market value of our investments.

Internal and external cybersecurity threats and risks, as well as other disasters, may adversely affect our business or the business of our portfolio companies by impairing the ability to conduct business effectively.

Cybersecurity incidents and cyber-attacks have been occurring globally at a more frequent and severe level, and will likely continue to increase in frequency in the future. Cyber-attacks and other security threats could originate from a wide variety of sources, including cyber criminals, nation state hackers, hacktivists and other outside parties.

Additionally, cyber-attacks and other security threats have become increasingly complex as a result of the emergence of new technologies, such as artificial intelligence, which are able to identify and target new vulnerabilities in information technology systems.

The occurrence of a disaster, such as a cyber-attack against us, any of our portfolio companies, or against a third-party that has access to our data or networks, a natural catastrophe, an industrial accident, failure of our disaster recovery systems, or consequential employee error, could have an adverse effect on our ability to communicate or conduct business, negatively impacting our operations and financial condition. This adverse effect can become particularly acute if those events affect our electronic data processing, transmission, storage, and retrieval systems, or impact the availability, integrity, or confidentiality of our data. In addition, the rapid evolution and increasing prevalence of artificial intelligence technologies may also intensify our cybersecurity risks. Although we are not currently aware of any cyber-attacks or other incidents that, individually or in the aggregate, have materially affected, or would reasonably be expected to materially affect our operations or financial condition, there has been an increase in the frequency and sophistication of the cyber and security threats that we face, with attacks ranging from those common to businesses generally to more advanced and persistent attacks.

We, and our portfolio companies, depend heavily upon computer systems to perform necessary business functions. Despite the implementation of a variety of security measures, our computer systems, networks, and data, like those of other companies, could be subject to cyber-attacks and unauthorized access, use, alteration, or destruction, such as from physical and electronic break-ins or unauthorized tampering. If one or more of these events occurs, it could potentially jeopardize the confidential, proprietary, and other information processed, stored in, and transmitted through our computer systems and networks, or otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in our operations, which could result in financial losses, litigation, regulatory penalties, client dissatisfaction or loss, reputational damage, and increased costs associated with mitigation of damages and remediation.

Third parties with which we do business may also be sources of cybersecurity or other technological risk. We outsource certain functions and these relationships allow for the storage and processing of our information, as well as client, counterparty, employee, and borrower information. While we engage in actions to reduce our exposure resulting from outsourcing, ongoing threats may result in unauthorized access, loss, exposure, destruction, or other cybersecurity incidents that adversely affects our data, resulting in increased costs and other consequences as described above.

In addition, cybersecurity risks are exacerbated by the rapidly increasing volume of highly sensitive data, including our proprietary business information and intellectual property, and personally identifiable information and other sensitive information that we collect and store in our data centers, on our cloud environments and on our networks. We may also invest in strategic assets having a national or regional profile or in infrastructure assets, the nature of which could expose them to a greater risk of being subject to a terrorist attack or security breach than other assets or businesses. The secure processing, maintenance and transmission of this information are critical to our operations. A significant actual or potential theft, loss, corruption, exposure, fraudulent use or misuse of fund investor, employee or other personally identifiable or, proprietary business data or other sensitive information, whether by third parties or as a result of employee malfeasance (or the negligence or malfeasance of third party service providers that have access to such confidential information) or otherwise, non-compliance with our contractual or other legal obligations regarding such data or intellectual property or a violation of our privacy and security policies with respect to such data could result in significant remediation and other costs, fines, litigation or regulatory actions against us and significant reputational harm., any of which could harm our business and results of operations.

Moreover, the increased use of mobile and cloud technologies due to the proliferation of remote work resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic could heighten these and other operational risks as certain aspects of the security of such technologies may be complex and unpredictable. Reliance on mobile or cloud technology or any failure by mobile technology and cloud service providers to adequately safeguard their systems and prevent cyber-attacks could disrupt our operations, the operations of a portfolio company or the operations of our or their service providers and result in misappropriation, corruption or loss of personal, confidential or proprietary information or the inability to conduct ordinary business operations. In addition, there is a risk that encryption and other protective measures may be circumvented, particularly to the extent that new computing technologies increase the speed and computing

power available. Extended periods of remote working, whether by us, our portfolio companies, or our service providers, could strain technology resources, introduce operational risks and otherwise heighten the risks described above. Remote working environments may be less secure and more susceptible to hacking attacks, including phishing and social engineering attempts. Accordingly, the risks described above, are heightened under the current conditions.

As our reliance on technology has increased, so have the risks posed to our information systems, both internal and those provided by third-party service providers. We cannot guarantee that third parties and infrastructure in our networks or our partners’ networks have not been compromised or that they do not contain exploitable defects or bugs that could result in a breach of or disruption to our information technology systems or the third-party information technology systems that support our services. Our ability to monitor these third parties’ information security practices is limited, and they may not have adequate information security measures in place.

We have implemented processes, procedures and internal controls to help mitigate cybersecurity risks and cyber intrusions, but these measures, as well as our increased awareness of the nature and extent of a risk of a cyber-incident, do not guarantee that a cyber-incident will not occur and/or that our financial results, operations or confidential information will not be negatively impacted by such an incident.

Finally, cybersecurity has become a top priority for global lawmakers and regulators around the world, and some jurisdictions have proposed or enacted laws requiring companies to notify regulators and individuals of data security breaches involving certain types of personal data. Compliance with such laws and regulations may result in cost increases due to system changes and the development of new administrative processes. If we or our Adviser or certain of its affiliates, fail to comply with the relevant and increasing laws and regulations, we could suffer financial losses, a disruption of our businesses, liability to investors, regulatory intervention or reputational damage.

We are dependent on information systems and systems failures could significantly disrupt our business, which may, in turn, negatively affect our liquidity, financial condition or results of operations.

Our business is dependent on our and third parties’ communications and information systems. Any failure or interruption of those systems, including as a result of the termination of an agreement with any third-party service providers, could cause delays or other problems in our activities. Our financial, accounting, data processing, portfolio monitoring, backup or other operating systems and facilities may fail to operate properly or become disabled or damaged as a result of a number of factors including events that are wholly or partially beyond our control. There could be:

•sudden electrical or telecommunications outages;

•natural disasters such as earthquakes, tornadoes and hurricanes;

•disease pandemics;

•events arising from local or larger scale political or social matters, including terrorist acts;

•outages due to idiosyncratic issues at specific service providers; and

•cyber-attacks.

These events, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and negatively affect the net asset value of our common stock and our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders.

Increased data protection regulation may result in increased complexities and risk in connection with the operation of our business.

Our business is highly dependent on information systems and technology. The costs related to cyber or other security threats or disruptions may not be fully insured or indemnified by other means. Cybersecurity has become a priority for regulators in the U.S. and around the world. Recently, the SEC adopted new rules related to cybersecurity risk management for registered investment advisers, registered investment companies and business

development companies, as well as amendments to certain rules that govern investment adviser and fund disclosures. In July 2023, the SEC adopted rules requiring public companies to disclose material cybersecurity incidents on Form 8-K and periodic disclosure of a registrant’s cybersecurity risk management, strategy, and governance in annual reports. The rules became effective beginning with annual reports for fiscal years ending on or after December 15, 2023 and beginning with Form 8-Ks on December 18, 2023. The SEC has also particularly focused on cybersecurity, and we expect increased scrutiny of our policies and systems designed to manage our cybersecurity risks and our related disclosures as a result. We also expect to face increased costs to comply with the new SEC rules, including increased costs for cybersecurity training and management.

Many jurisdictions in which we operate have laws and regulations relating to data privacy, cybersecurity and/or information security to which we may be subject (collectively, “Privacy Laws”). Compliance with applicable Privacy Laws may require adhering to stringent legal and operational requirements, which could increase compliance costs for us and require the dedication of additional time and resources to compliance. A failure to comply with applicable Data Protection Legislation could result in fines, sanctions, enforcement actions or other penalties or reputational damage. In addition, the SEC has indicated in recent periods that one of its examination priorities for the Division of Examinations is to continue to examine cybersecurity procedures and controls, including testing the implementation of these procedures and controls.

There may be substantial financial penalties or fines for a failure to comply with applicable Privacy Laws (which may include insufficient security for our personal or other sensitive information). For example, failure to comply with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (the “GDPR”) and the GDPR as it forms part of the laws of England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland (the “UK GDPR”) could (in the worst case) attract regulatory penalties up to the greater of (i) 20 million Euros in respect of the GDPR / £17.5 million in respect of the UK GDPR (as applicable), and (ii) 4% of group annual worldwide turnover, as well as the possibility of other enforcement actions (such as suspension of processing activities and audits), and liabilities from third-party claims.

Our operations will be impacted by a growing movement to adopt comprehensive privacy and data protection laws similar to the GDPR, including in the U.S., where such laws focus on privacy as an individual right in general. For example, the State of California passed the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (as amended, the “CCPA”), which took effect on January 1, 2020. The CCPA generally applies to businesses that collect personal information about California consumers and meet certain thresholds with respect to revenue or buying and/or selling consumers’ personal information. The CCPA imposes stringent legal and operational obligations on such businesses as well as certain affiliated entities that share common branding. The CCPA is enforceable by the California Attorney General. Additionally, if unauthorized access, theft, or disclosure of a consumer’s personal information occurs, and the business did not maintain reasonable security practices, consumers could file a civil action (including a class action) without having to prove actual damages. Statutory damages range from $100 to $750 per consumer per incident, or actual damages, whichever is greater. The California Attorney General also may impose civil penalties ranging from $2,500 to $7,500 per violation. Further, California passed the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020 (the “CPRA”) to amend and extend the protections of the CCPA. Under the CPRA, which became effective on January 1, 2023, California established a new state agency focused on the enforcement of its privacy laws, leading to greater levels of enforcement and greater costs related to compliance with the CCPA and CPRA.

Other jurisdictions, including other states in the United States, have either passed, proposed, adopted or are considering similar laws and regulations to the CCPA, CPRA and GDPR, which could impose similarly significant costs, potential liabilities and operational and legal obligations. Further, the fund’s portfolio companies and/or each of their affiliates are subject to regulations related to privacy, data protection and information security in the jurisdictions in which they do business. Such laws and regulations vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, thus increasing costs, operational and legal burdens and the potential for significant liability on regulated entities.

Non-compliance with any applicable Privacy Laws represents a serious risk to our business. Some jurisdictions have also enacted laws requiring companies to notify individuals of data security breaches involving certain types of personal information. Breaches in security could potentially jeopardize our, our employees’ or our product investors’ or counterparties’ confidential or other information processed and stored in, or transmitted through, our computer systems and networks (or those of our third party vendors), or otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in our, our employees’, our product investors’, our counterparties’ or third parties’ operations, which could result in

significant losses, increased costs, disruption of our business, liability to our product investors and other counterparties, fines or penalties, litigation, regulatory intervention or reputational damage, which could also lead to loss of product investors or clients.

Finally, there continues to be significant evolution and developments in the use of artificial intelligence technologies, such as ChatGPT. We cannot fully determine the impact or cybersecurity risk of such evolving technology to our business at this time. We may incorporate, directly or through third-party vendors, the use of artificial intelligence (“AI”) into our business and operations, and anticipate that usage and adoption of AI in the marketplace will continue to grow. As with many disruptive innovations, AI presents risks and challenges that could affect its accuracy adoption and therefore our business. While we intend the use of any AI to make processes more efficient, AI models may not achieve sufficient levels of accuracy. AI algorithms may be flawed, the datasets on which such algorithms are trained may be insufficient, raise privacy concerns or contain biased information, which could undermine the decisions, predictions or analysis of AI applications produce, subjecting us to competitive harm, legal liability, and brand or reputational harm. A number of jurisdictions have passed laws and implemented regulations, or are considering the same, related to the use of AI and affecting AI companies, which could limit or adversely affect our business.

Further, we may not be able to control how third-party AI technologies that we choose to use are developed or maintained, or how data we input is used or disclosed, even where we have sought contractual protections with respect to these matters. The misuse or misappropriation of our data could have an adverse impact on our reputation and could subject us to legal and regulatory investigations and/or actions.

We and our portfolio companies are subject to increasing scrutiny from certain investors, third party assessors and our shareholders with respect to ESG-related topics.

We and our portfolio companies face increasing scrutiny from certain investors, third party assessors that measure companies’ ESG performance and our shareholders related to ESG-related topics, including in relation to diversity and inclusion, human rights, environmental stewardship, support for local communities, corporate governance and transparency. For example, we and the companies in which we invest risk damage to our brands and reputations if we or they do not act (or are perceived to not act) responsibly either with respect to responsible investing processes or ESG-related practices. Adverse incidents related to ESG practices could impact the value of our brand or the companies in which we invest, or the cost of our or their operations and relationships with investors, all of which could adversely affect our business and results of operations. Further, there can be no assurance that any of our Adviser’s ESG initiatives, or commitments will meet the standards or expectations of our shareholders or other stakeholders. There can be no assurance that our Adviser will be able to accomplish any goals related to responsible investing or ESG practices, as statements regarding its ESG and responsible investing commitments and priorities reflect its current estimates, plans and/or aspirations and are not guarantees that it will be able to achieve them within the timelines announced or at all. Additionally, the Adviser may determine in its discretion that it is not feasible or practical to implement or complete certain aspects of its responsible investing program or ESG initiatives based on cost, timing or other considerations.

In recent years, certain investors have placed increasing importance on policies and practices related to responsible investing and ESG for the products to which they commit capital, and investors may decide not to commit capital to future fundraises based on their assessment of the Adviser’s approach to and consideration of ESG-related issues or risks. Similarly, a variety of organizations measure the performance of companies on ESG topics, and the results of these assessments are widely publicized. If the Adviser’s responsible investing or ESG-related practices or ratings do not meet the standards set by such investors or organizations, or if the Adviser receives a negative rating or assessment from any such organization, or if the Adviser fail, or is perceived to fail, to demonstrate progress toward its ESG priorities and initiatives, they may choose not to invest in us, and we may face reputational damage. Similarly, it is expected that investor and/or shareholder demands will require the Adviser to spend additional resources and place increasing importance on business relevant ESG factors in its review of prospective investments and management of existing ones. Devoting additional resources to our responsible investing or ESG-related practices could increase the amount of expenses we or our investments are required to bear. For example, collecting, measuring, and reporting ESG information and metrics can be costly, difficult and time consuming, is subject to evolving reporting standards, and can present numerous operational, reputational, financial,

legal and other risks. To the extent our access to capital from investors focused on ESG ratings or ESG-related matters is impaired, we may not be able to maintain or increase the size of our existing products or raise sufficient capital for new products, which may adversely affect our revenues. Further, growing interest on the part of investors and regulators in ESG-related topics and themes and increased demand for, and scrutiny of, ESG-related disclosure by asset managers, have also increased the risk that asset managers could be perceived as, or accused of, making inaccurate or misleading statements regarding the ESG-related investment strategies of their and their funds’ responsible investing or ESG-related efforts or initiatives, or “greenwashing.” This risk may also materialize where ESG-related statements and/or disclosures made by our portfolio companies are materially inconsistent with our ESG-related statements or disclosures, including those made on a voluntary basis or pursuant to any applicable regulation, such as Regulation EU 2019/2088 on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (“SFDR”) or the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (“CSRD.”) Such perception or accusation could damage our reputation, result in litigation or regulatory actions and adversely impact our ability to raise capital.

At the same time, various stakeholders may have differing approaches to responsible investing activities or divergent views on the consideration of ESG topics. These differing views increase the risk that any action or lack thereof with respect to our Adviser’s consideration of responsible investing or ESG-related practices will be perceived negatively. A growing number of states have enacted or proposed “anti-ESG” policies, legislation, issued related legal opinions and engaged in related litigation. For example: (i) boycott bills target financial institutions that “boycott” or “discriminate against” companies in certain industries (e.g., energy and mining) and prohibit state entities from doing business with such institutions and/or investing the state’s assets (including pension plan assets) through such institutions and (ii) ESG investment prohibitions require that state entities or managers/administrators of state investments make investments based solely on pecuniary factors without consideration of ESG factors. If investors subject to such legislation view our responsible investing or ESG practices as being in contradiction of such “anti-ESG” policies, legislation or legal opinions, such investors may not invest in us and it could negatively affect the results of operations or cash flows. Further, asset managers have been subject to recent scrutiny related to ESG-focused industry working groups, initiatives and associations, including organizations advancing action to address climate change or climate-related risk. In addition, state attorneys general, among others, have asserted that the Supreme Court’s decision striking down race-based affirmative action in higher education in June 2023 should be analogized to private employment matters and private contract matters. Cases alleging discrimination based on similar arguments have been filed since that decision, with scrutiny of certain corporate DEI practices increasing throughout 2024. Additionally, in January 2025, the new U.S. Presidential administration signed a number of executive orders focused on DEI (the “Executive Orders”), which include a broad mandate to eliminate federal DEI programs and a caution to the private sector to end what may be viewed as illegal DEI discrimination and preferences. The Executive Orders also indicate upcoming compliance investigations of private entities, including publicly traded companies, and changes to federal contracting regulations. If the Adviser does not successfully manage expectations across these varied stakeholder interests, it could erode stakeholder trust, impact our reputation and/or constrain our investment and fundraising opportunities. Such scrutiny of both ESG and DEI related practices could expose the Adviser to the risk of investigations or challenges by federal authorities, result in reputational harm and discourage certain investors from investing in us.

We are subject to increasing scrutiny with respect to ESG-related issues and the regulatory disclosure landscape surrounding related topics continues to evolve.

Responsible investing, ESG practices and ESG-related disclosures have been the subject of increased focus by certain regulators, and regulatory initiatives related to ESG-specific topics that are applicable to us, our products and our products’ portfolio companies could adversely affect our business. There has been a growing regulatory interest across jurisdictions in improving transparency regarding the definition, measurement and disclosure of ESG factors in order to allow investors to validate and better understand sustainability claims, including in the United States, the European Union and the United Kingdom.

For example, in March 2024, the SEC adopted final rules intended to enhance and standardize climate-related disclosures; however, these rules are stayed pending the outcome of consolidated legal challenges in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Further, the SEC sometimes reviews compliance with ESG commitments in examinations, and it has taken enforcement actions against registered investment advisers for not establishing adequate or consistently implementing ESG policies and procedures to meet ESG commitments to investors.

In addition, in October 2023, California enacted legislation that will ultimately require certain companies that (i) do business in California to publicly disclose their Scopes 1, 2 and 3 greenhouse gas emissions, with third party assurance of such data, and issue public reports on their climate-related financial risk and related mitigation measures and (ii) operate in California and make certain climate-related claims to provide enhanced disclosures around the achievement of climate-related claims, including the use of voluntary carbon credits to achieve such claims. From a European perspective, the European Union has adopted legislation aimed at increasing transparency for investors of sustainability-related policies, processes, performance and commitments which apply to certain of our products, including, without limitation: (a) the SFDR, for which most rules took effect beginning on March 10, 2021 and (b) Regulation (EU) 2020/852 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment and amending the SDFR. Further, the European Commission is currently considering whether to propose further changes or amendments to the SFDR and the associated regulatory framework. Relatedly, the European Securities and Markets Authority (“ESMA”) has identified promoting transparency through effective sustainability disclosures and addressing greenwashing as one of its key priorities per ESMA’s sustainable finance roadmap and strategy. ESMA has also introduced guidelines on funds with ESG, impact, transition or sustainability-related terms in their names.

There are still some uncertainties regarding the operation of some of these requirements and how they might evolve, and an established market practice is still being developed in certain cases, which can lead to diverging implementation and/or operationalization, data gaps or methodological challenges which may affect our ability to collect relevant data. These regimes continue to evolve and there is still a lack of clarity and established practice around the approach to their supervision and enforcement, which may vary across national competent authorities. There is a risk that a development or reorientation in the regulatory requirements or market practice in this respect could be adverse to our investments if they are perceived to be less valuable as a consequence of, among other things, their carbon footprint or perceived “greenwashing.” Compliance with requirements of this nature may also increase risks relating to financial supervision and enforcement action. There is the additional risk that market expectations in relation to certain commitments under the SFDR, such as disclosures made in relation to financial products, could adversely affect our ability to raise capital, especially from EEA investors.

There are a variety of other regulatory initiatives related to ESG-specific topics that may be applicable to us, our products or our products’ portfolio companies. For example, on January 5, 2023, the CSRD came into effect. The CSRD amends and strengthens the rules introduced on sustainability reporting for companies, banks and insurance companies under the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (2014/95/EU) (“NFRD”). The CSRD requires a much broader range of companies, including non-EU companies with significant turnover and a legal presence in EU markets, to produce detailed and prescriptive reports on sustainability-related matters within their financial statements. Although we are not currently directly in-scope of CSRD, it is possible that we may become subject to CSRD. This may result in additional compliance burdens and increased legal, accounting and compliance costs and enhanced disclosure obligations.

In November 2023, the Sustainability Labelling and Disclosure of Sustainability-Related Financial Information Instrument 2023 (“SDR”) introduced sustainability disclosure requirements, voluntary investment product labels and an ‘anti-greenwashing’ rule. The anti-greenwashing rule applies to all UK-authorized firms in relation to sustainability-related claims made in their communications, and/or communications of financial promotions with, clients in the UK. The balance of the new regime is currently directed at UK investment funds and UK-regulated asset management firms as well as distributors of such funds; however, the FCA consulted in Spring 2024 as to whether to extend the SDR to portfolio management, and the UK Government also announced in May 2024 its intention to launch a consultation on whether to extend the scope of SDR to overseas funds.

In Asia, examples of ESG-related regulations including those by regulators in Singapore and Hong Kong, have released guidelines for asset managers to integrate climate risk considerations in investment and risk management processes, together with enhanced disclosure and reporting and have also issued enhanced rules for certain ESG funds on general ESG risk management and disclosure.

As a result of these and other legislative and regulatory initiatives, and as our business grows through acquisition activity or changes to our structure, we or the Adviser may be required to provide additional disclosure to our investors with respect to ESG matters. This exposes us to increased disclosure risks, for example due to a lack of available or credible data, and the potential for conflicting disclosures may also expose us to an increased risk of

misstatement litigation or miss-selling allegations. Failure to manage these risks could result in a material adverse effect on our business in a number of ways. Compliance with frameworks of this nature may create an additional compliance burden and increased legal, compliance, governance, reporting and other costs to funds and/or fund managers because of the need to collect certain information to meet the disclosure requirements. In addition, where there are uncertainties regarding the operation of the framework, a lack of official, conflicting or inconsistent regulatory guidance, a lack of established market practice and/or data gaps or methodological challenges affecting the ability to collect relevant data, funds and/or fund managers may be required to engage third party advisers and/or service providers to fulfil the requirements, thereby exacerbating any increase in compliance burden and costs. To the extent that any applicable jurisdictions enact similar laws and/or frameworks, there is a risk that we may not be able to maintain alignment of a particular investment with such frameworks, and/or may be subject to additional compliance burdens and costs, which might adversely affect us.

Risks Related to Our Adviser and Its Affiliates

Our Adviser and its affiliates, including our officers and some of our directors, may face conflicts of interest caused by compensation arrangements with us and our affiliates, which could result in increased risk-taking or speculative investments, or cause our Adviser to use substantial leverage.

Our Adviser and its affiliates receive fees from us in return for their services. These fees may include certain incentive fees based on the amount of appreciation of our investments and arrangement, structuring or similar fees from portfolio companies in which we invest. These fees could influence the advice provided to us or create an incentive for our Adviser to make investments on our behalf that are risky or more speculative than would be the case in the absence of such incentive fees. Generally, the more equity we sell in public offerings and the greater the risk assumed by us with respect to our investments, including through the use of leverage, the greater the potential for growth in our assets and profits, and, correlatively, the fees payable by us to our Adviser. The way in which the incentive fee is determined may encourage our Adviser to use leverage to increase the leveraged return on our investment portfolio.

In addition, the fact that our base management fee is payable based upon our net assets (which includes any borrowings used for investment purposes) may encourage our Adviser to use leverage to make additional investments. Such a practice could make such investments more risky than would otherwise be the case, which could result in higher investment losses, particularly during cyclical economic downturns. Under certain circumstances, the use of substantial leverage (up to the limits prescribed by the 1940 Act) may increase the likelihood of our defaulting on our borrowings, which would be detrimental to holders of our securities.

These compensation arrangements could affect our Adviser’s or its affiliates’ judgment with respect to public offerings of equity, incurrence of debt, and investments made by us, which allow our Adviser to earn increased asset management fees.

The time and resources that individuals associated with our Adviser devote to us may be diverted, and we may face additional competition due to, among other things, the fact that neither our Adviser nor its affiliates is prohibited from raising money for or managing another entity that makes the same types of investments that we target.

Blue Owl is not prohibited from raising money for and managing future investment entities, in addition to the Blue Owl Credit Clients, that make the same or similar types of investments as those we target. As a result, the time and resources that our Adviser devotes to us may be diverted, and during times of intense activity in other investment programs they may devote less time and resources to our business than is necessary or appropriate. In addition, we may compete with any such investment entity also managed by our Adviser or its affiliates for the same investors and investment opportunities. Furthermore, certain members of the Diversified Lending Investment Committee or our affiliates are officers of Blue Owl and will devote a portion of their time to the operations of Blue Owl, including with respect to public company compliance.

Our Adviser and its affiliates may face conflicts of interest with respect to services performed for issuers in which we may invest.

Our Adviser and its affiliates may provide a broad range of financial services to companies in which we may invest, including providing arrangement, syndication, origination structuring and other services to portfolio companies, and will generally be paid fees for such services, in compliance with applicable law, by the portfolio company. Any compensation received by our Adviser or its affiliates for providing these services will not be shared with us and may be received before we realize a return on our investment. In addition, we may invest in companies managed by entities in which funds managed by GP Strategic Capital have acquired a minority interest. Our Adviser and its affiliates may face conflicts of interest with respect to services performed for these companies, on the one hand, and investments recommended to us, on the other hand and could, in certain instances, have an incentive not to pursue actions against a portfolio company that would be in our best interest.

Our Adviser or its affiliates may have incentives to favor their respective other accounts and clients and/or Blue Owl over us, which may result in conflicts of interest that could be harmful to us.

Because our Adviser and its affiliates manage assets for, or may in the future manage assets for, other investment companies, pooled investment vehicles and/or other accounts (including institutional clients, pension plans, insurance companies, co-invest vehicles and certain high net worth individuals), including the Blue Owl Credit Clients, and we may compete for capital and investment opportunities with these entities, certain conflicts of interest are present. These include conflicts of interest relating to the allocation of investment opportunities by our Adviser and its affiliates; compensation to our Adviser; services that may be provided by our Adviser and its affiliates to issuers in which we may invest; investments by us and other clients of our Adviser, subject to the limitations of the 1940 Act; the formation of additional investment funds managed by our Adviser; differing recommendations given by our Adviser to us versus other clients; our Adviser’s use of information gained from issuers in our portfolio for investments by other clients, subject to applicable law; restrictions on our Adviser’s use of “inside information” with respect to potential investments by us; the allocation of certain expenses; and cross transactions.

For instance, our Adviser and its affiliates may receive asset management performance-based, or other fees from certain accounts that are higher than the fees received by our Adviser from us. In addition, certain members of Blue Owl’s Credit platform’s investment committees and other executives and employees of our Adviser or its affiliates will hold and receive interest in Blue Owl and its affiliates, in addition to cash and carried interest compensation. In these instances, a portfolio manager for our Adviser may have an incentive to favor the higher fee and/or performance-based fee accounts over us and/or to favor Blue Owl. In addition, a conflict of interest exists to the extent our Adviser, its affiliates, or any of their respective executives, portfolio managers or employees have proprietary or personal investments in other investment companies or accounts or when certain other investment companies or accounts are investment options in our Adviser’s or its affiliates’ employee benefit plans or employee offerings. In these circumstances, personnel of our Adviser may have incentive to favor these other investment companies or accounts over us.

Because our Adviser may have incentive to favor other Blue Owl Credit Clients and we may compete for investments with Blue Owl Credit Clients, our Adviser and its affiliates are subject to certain conflicts of interest in evaluating the suitability of investment opportunities and making or recommending investments on our behalf. To mitigate these conflicts, the Blue Owl Credit Advisers will seek to execute such transactions for all of the participating investment accounts, including us, on a fair and equitable basis and in accordance with the Blue Owl Credit Advisers’ investment allocation policy, taking into account such factors as the relative amounts of capital available for new investments; cash on hand; existing commitments and reserves; the investment programs and portfolio positions of the participating investment accounts, including portfolio construction, diversification and concentration considerations; the investment objectives, guidelines and strategies of each client; the clients for which participation is appropriate’ each client’s life cycle; targeted leverage level; targeted asset mix and any other factors deemed appropriate. We may be prohibited under the 1940 Act from participating in certain transactions with our affiliates without the prior approval of our directors who are not interested persons and, in some cases, the prior approval of the SEC. We, our Adviser and certain affiliates have been granted exemptive relief by the SEC to permit us to co-invest with other funds managed by our Adviser or certain of its affiliates in a manner consistent with our

investment objective, positions, policies, strategies and restrictions as well as regulatory requirements and other pertinent factors. See “—Our ability to enter into transactions with our affiliates is restricted.”

Actions taken by our Adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the Blue Owl Credit Clients as a result of any conflict of interest may be adverse to us, which could harm our performance. For example, we may invest in the same credit obligations as other Blue Owl Credit Clients, although, to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act, our investments may include different obligations or levels of the capital structure of the same issuer. Decisions made with respect to the securities held by one of the Blue Owl Credit Clients may cause (or have the potential to cause) harm to the different class of securities of the issuer held by other Blue Owl Credit Clients (including us). While the Blue Owl Credit Advisers and their affiliates have developed general guidelines regarding when two or more funds can invest in different parts of the same company’s capital structure and created a process that they employ to handle those conflicts when they arise, their decision to permit the investments to occur in the first instance or their judgment on how to mitigate the conflict could be challenged or deemed insufficient. If the Blue Owl Credit Advisers and their affiliates fail to appropriately address those conflicts, it could negatively impact their reputation and ability to raise additional funds and the willingness of counterparties to do business with them or result in potential litigation against them.

From time to time, fees and expenses generated in connection with potential portfolio investments that are not consummated may be allocable to us and one or more Blue Owl Credit Clients. These expenses will be allocated in a manner that is fair and equitable over time and in accordance with policies adopted by the Blue Owl Credit Advisers and the Investment Advisory Agreement; however, the method for allocation expenses may vary depending on the nature of the expense and such determinations involve inherent discretion.

In addition, from time to time, our Adviser could cause us to purchase a security or other investment from, or sell a security or other investment to, another Blue Owl Credit Client. Such cross transaction would be in accordance with applicable regulations and our and our Adviser’s valuation and cross-trades policies; however, such cross transactions could give rise to additional conflicts of interest.

Our Board will seek to monitor these conflicts but there can be no assurances that such monitoring will fully mitigate any such conflicts.

The Adviser may have an incentive to delay a liquidity event, which may result in actions that are not in the best interest of our shareholders.

The ongoing servicing fee is payable by us to compensate our affiliated Dealer Manager and its affiliates for services rendered to shareholders, including, among other things, responding to customer inquiries of a general nature regarding the Company; crediting distributions from us to customer accounts; arranging for bank wire transfer of funds to or from a customer’s account; responding to customer inquiries and requests regarding shareholder reports, notices, proxies and proxy statements, and other Company documents; forwarding prospectuses, tax notices and annual and quarterly reports to beneficial owners of our shares; assisting us in establishing and maintaining shareholder accounts and records; assisting customers in changing account options, account designations and account addresses, and providing such other similar services as we may reasonably request to the extent the an authorized service provider is permitted to do so under applicable statutes, rules, or regulations. The ongoing servicing fee will terminate for all Class S and Class D shareholders upon a liquidity event. Although we do not intend to complete a liquidity event within any specific time period, if at all, the Advisor, an affiliate of our Dealer Manager, may have an incentive to delay a liquidity event if such amounts receivable by our Dealer Manager have not been fully paid. A delay in a liquidity event may not be in the best interests of our shareholders.

Reductions, waivers or absorptions of fees and costs can temporarily result in higher returns to shareholders than they would otherwise receive if full fees and costs were charged.

The Adviser and its affiliates are permitted to reduce, waive or absorb some of the fees or costs otherwise due by us. While this activity can be seen as friendly to shareholders, reductions, waivers and absorptions of fees and costs result in higher returns to shareholders than such shareholders would receive if full fees and costs were charged. There is no guarantee that any reductions, waivers or absorptions will occur in the future, and any reductions, waivers and absorptions are entirely at the discretion of the Adviser.

Products within Blue Owl’s Real Assets platform may enter into sale lease-back transactions with our portfolio companies or with borrowers under our credit facilities.

From time to time, companies in which we have invested or may invest, may enter into sale-leaseback transactions with products within Blue Owl’s Real Assets platform. As a result of these arrangements we could be a creditor to, or equity owners of, a company at the same time that company is a tenant of a product within Blue Owl’s Real Assets platform. If such a company were to encounter financial difficulty or default on its obligations as a borrower, our Adviser could be required to take actions that may be adverse to those of Blue Owl’s Real Assets platform in enforcing our rights under the relevant facilities or agreements, or vice versa. This could lead to actual or perceived conflicts of interest.

Our access to confidential information may restrict our ability to take action with respect to some investments, which, in turn, may negatively affect our results of operations.

We, directly or through our Adviser, may obtain confidential information about the companies in which we have invested or may invest or be deemed to have such confidential information. Our Adviser may come into possession of material, non-public information through its members, officers, directors, employees, principals or affiliates. In addition, funds managed by GP Strategic Capital may invest in entities that manage our portfolio companies and, as a result, may obtain additional confidential information about our portfolio companies. The possession of such information may, to our detriment, limit the ability of us and our Adviser to buy or sell a security or otherwise to participate in an investment opportunity. In certain circumstances, employees of our Adviser may serve as board members or in other capacities for portfolio or potential portfolio companies, which could restrict our ability to trade in the securities of such companies. For example, if personnel of our Adviser come into possession of material non-public information with respect to our investments, such personnel will be restricted by our Adviser’s information-sharing policies and procedures or by law or contract from sharing such information with our management team, even where the disclosure of such information would be in our best interests or would otherwise influence decisions taken by the members of the management team with respect to that investment. This conflict and these procedures and practices may limit the freedom of our Adviser to enter into or exit from potentially profitable investments for us, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will be able to fully leverage the resources and industry expertise of our Adviser in the course of its duties. Additionally, there may be circumstances in which one or more individuals associated with our Adviser will be precluded from providing services to us because of certain confidential information available to those individuals or to other parts of our Adviser.

We may be obligated to pay our Adviser incentive fees even if we incur a net loss due to a decline in the value of our portfolio and even if our earned interest income is not payable in cash.

The Investment Advisory Agreement entitles our Adviser to receive an incentive fee based on our pre-incentive fee net investment income regardless of any capital losses. In such case, we may be required to pay our Adviser an incentive fee for a fiscal quarter even if there is a decline in the value of our portfolio or if we incur a net loss for that quarter.

Any incentive fee payable by us that relates to the pre-incentive fee net investment income may be computed and paid on income that may include interest that has been accrued but not yet received or interest in the form of securities received rather than cash (“payment-in-kind” or “PIK” income”). PIK income will be included in the pre-incentive fee net investment income used to calculate the incentive fee to our Adviser even though we do not receive the income in the form of cash. If a portfolio company defaults on a loan that is structured to provide accrued interest income, it is possible that accrued interest income previously included in the calculation of the incentive fee will become uncollectible. Our Adviser is not obligated to reimburse us for any part of the incentive fee it received that was based on accrued interest income that we never receive as a result of a subsequent default.

The quarterly incentive fee on income is recognized and paid without regard to: (i) the trend of pre-incentive fee net investment income as a percent of adjusted capital over multiple quarters in arrears which may in fact be consistently less than the quarterly preferred return, or (ii) the net income or net loss in the current calendar quarter, the current year or any combination of prior periods.

For U.S. federal income tax purposes, we may be required to recognize taxable income in some circumstances in which we do not receive a corresponding payment in cash and to make distributions with respect to such income to maintain our tax treatment as a RIC and/or minimize corporate-level U.S. federal income or excise tax. Under such circumstances, we may have difficulty meeting the Annual Distribution Requirement necessary to maintain RIC tax treatment under the Code. This difficulty in making the required distribution may be amplified to the extent that we are required to pay the incentive fee on income with respect to such accrued income. As a result, we may have to sell some of our investments at times and/or at prices we would not consider advantageous, raise additional debt or equity capital, or forgo new investment opportunities for this purpose. If we are not able to obtain cash from other sources, we may fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment and thus become subject to corporate-level U.S. federal income tax.

Our ability to enter into transactions with our affiliates is restricted.

We are prohibited under the 1940 Act from participating in certain transactions with certain of our affiliates without the prior approval of a majority of our independent directors and, in some cases, the SEC. Any person that owns, directly or indirectly, 5% or more of our outstanding voting securities will be our affiliate for purposes of the 1940 Act, and we will generally be prohibited from buying or selling any securities from or to such affiliate on a principal basis, absent the prior approval of our Board and, in some cases, the SEC. The 1940 Act also prohibits certain “joint” transactions with certain of our affiliates, including other funds or clients advised by our Adviser or its affiliates, which in certain circumstances could include investments in the same portfolio company (whether at the same or different times to the extent the transaction involves a joint investment), without prior approval of our Board and, in some cases, the SEC. If a person acquires more than 25% of our voting securities, we will be prohibited from buying or selling any security from or to such person or certain of that person’s affiliates, or entering into prohibited joint transactions with such persons, absent the prior approval of the SEC. Similar restrictions limit our ability to transact business with our officers or directors or their affiliates or anyone who is under common control with us. The SEC has interpreted the BDC regulations governing transactions with affiliates to prohibit certain joint transactions involving entities that share a common investment adviser. As a result of these restrictions, we may be prohibited from buying or selling any security from or to any portfolio company that is controlled by a fund managed by either of our Adviser or its affiliates without the prior approval of the SEC, which may limit the scope of investment or disposition opportunities that would otherwise be available to us.

Our Adviser and certain of our affiliates have received an order for exemptive relief (as amended, the “Order”) from the SEC, on which we are permitted to rely, that permit us to co-invest with other funds managed by our Adviser or its affiliates in a manner consistent with our investment objective, positions, policies, strategies and restrictions as well as regulatory requirements and other pertinent factors. Pursuant to the Order, we generally are permitted to co-invest with certain of our affiliates if a “required majority” (as defined in Section 57(o) of the 1940 Act) of our independent directors make certain conclusions in connection with a co-investment transaction, including that (1) the terms of the transaction, including the consideration to be paid, are reasonable and fair to us and our shareholders and do not involve overreaching in respect of us or our shareholders on the part of any person concerned, (2) the transaction is consistent with the interests of our shareholders and is consistent with our investment objective and strategies, (3) the investment by our affiliates would not disadvantage us, and our participation would not be on a basis different from or less advantageous than that on which our affiliates are investing, and (4) the proposed investment by us would not benefit our Adviser, the other affiliated funds that are participating in the investment or any affiliated person of any of them (other than the parties to the transaction), except to the extent permitted by the Order and applicable law, including the limitations set forth in Section 57(k) of the 1940 Act. In addition, we have received an amendment to our Order to permit us to participate in follow-on investments in our existing portfolio companies with certain Affiliated Funds when such private funds are not invested in such existing portfolio company.

In situations when co-investment with our Adviser’s or its affiliates’ other clients is not permitted under the 1940 Act and related rules, existing or future staff guidance, or the terms and conditions of the exemptive relief granted to us by the SEC, our Adviser will need to decide which client or clients will proceed with the investment. Generally, we will not be entitled to make a co-investment in these circumstances and, to the extent that another client elects to proceed with the investment, we will not be permitted to participate. Moreover, except in certain circumstances, we will not invest in any issuer in which an affiliate’s other client holds a controlling interest.

We may make investments that could give rise to a conflict of interest.

We do not expect to invest in, or hold securities of, companies that are controlled by an affiliate’s other clients. However, our Adviser or an affiliate’s other clients may invest in, and gain control over, one of our portfolio companies. If our Adviser or an affiliate’s other client, or clients, gains control over one of our portfolio companies, it may create conflicts of interest and may subject us to certain restrictions under the 1940 Act. As a result of these conflicts and restrictions our Adviser may be unable to implement our investment strategies as effectively as they could have in the absence of such conflicts or restrictions. For example, as a result of a conflict or restriction, our Adviser may be unable to engage in certain transactions that it would otherwise pursue. In order to avoid these conflicts and restrictions, our Adviser may choose to exit such investments prematurely and, as a result, we may forego any positive returns associated with such investments. In addition, to the extent that an affiliate’s other client holds a different class of securities than us as a result of such transactions, our interests may not be aligned.

The recommendations given to us by our Adviser may differ from those rendered to their other clients.

Our Adviser and its affiliates may give advice and recommend securities to other clients which may differ from advice given to, or securities recommended or bought for, us even though such other clients’ investment objectives may be similar to ours, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our Adviser’s liability is limited under the Investment Advisory Agreement, and we are required to indemnify our Adviser against certain liabilities, which may lead our Adviser to act in a riskier manner on our behalf than it would when acting for its own account.

Our Adviser has not assumed any responsibility to us other than to render the services described in the Investment Advisory Agreement (and, separately, under the Administration Agreement), and it will not be responsible for any action of our Board in declining to follow our Adviser’s advice or recommendations. Pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement, our Adviser and its directors, officers, shareholders, members, agents, employees, controlling persons, and any other person or entity affiliated with, or acting on behalf of our Adviser will not be liable to us for their acts under the Investment Advisory Agreement, absent criminal conduct, willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of their duties. We have also agreed to indemnify, defend and protect our Adviser and its directors, officers, shareholders, members, agents, employees, controlling persons and any other person or entity affiliated with, or acting on behalf of our Adviser with respect to all damages, liabilities, costs and expenses resulting from acts of our Adviser not arising out of criminal conduct, willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of their duties. However, in accordance with Section 17(i) of the 1940 Act, neither our Adviser nor any of its affiliates, directors, officers, members, employees, agents, or representatives may be protected against any liability to us or our investors to which it would otherwise be subject by reason of criminal conduct, willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of its office. These protections may lead our Adviser to act in a riskier manner when acting on our behalf than it would when acting for its own account.

There are risks associated with any potential merger with or purchase of assets of another fund.

Our Adviser may in the future recommend to our Board that we merge with or acquire all or substantially all of the assets of one or more funds including a fund that could be managed by our Adviser or its affiliates (including another BDC). We do not expect that our Adviser would recommend any such merger or asset purchase unless it determines that it would be in our best interests, with such determination dependent on factors it deems relevant, which may include our historical and projected financial performance and that of any proposed merger partner, portfolio composition, potential synergies from the merger or asset sale, available alternative options and market conditions. In addition, no such merger or asset purchase would be consummated absent the meeting of various conditions required by applicable law or contract, at such time, which may include approval of the board of directors and common equity holders of both funds. If our Adviser is the investment adviser of both funds, various conflicts of interest would exist with respect to any such transaction. Such conflicts of interest may potentially arise from, among other things, differences between the compensation payable to our Adviser by us and by the entity resulting

from such a merger or asset purchase or efficiencies or other benefits to our Adviser as a result of managing a single, larger fund instead of two separate funds.

Our Adviser’s failure to comply with pay-to-play laws, regulations and policies could have an adverse effect on our Adviser, and thus, us.

A number of U.S. states and municipal pension plans have adopted so-called “pay-to-play” laws, regulations or policies which prohibit, restrict or require disclosure of payments to (and/or certain contacts with) state officials by individuals and entities seeking to do business with state entities, including those seeking investments by public retirement funds. The SEC has adopted a rule that, among other things, prohibits an investment adviser from providing advisory services for compensation to a government client for two years after the adviser or certain of its executives or employees makes a contribution to certain elected officials or candidates. If our Adviser, any of its employees or affiliates or any service provider acting on its behalf, fails to comply with such laws, regulations or policies, such non-compliance could have an adverse effect on our Adviser, and thus, us.

Our Adviser’s inability to attract, retain and develop human capital in a highly competitive talent market could have an adverse effect on our Adviser, and thus us.

The success of our business will continue to depend upon our Adviser attracting, developing and retaining human capital. Competition for qualified, motivated, and highly-skilled executives, professionals and other key personnel in asset management firms is significant. Turnover and associated costs of rehiring, the loss of human capital through attrition, death, or disability and the reduced ability to attract talent could impair our Adviser’s ability to maintain its standards of excellence and have an adverse effect on us.

Our Adviser’s net worth is not available to satisfy our liabilities and other obligations.

The North American Securities Administrators Association (“NASAA”), in its Omnibus Guidelines Statement of Policy adopted on March 29, 1992 and as amended on May 7, 2007 and from time to time, requires that our affiliates and Adviser, or our Sponsor under the Omnibus Guidelines, have an aggregate financial net worth, exclusive of home, automobiles and home furnishings, of 5.0% of the first $20 million of both the gross amount of securities currently being offered in our offering and the gross amount of any originally issued direct participation program securities sold by our affiliates and sponsors within the past 12 months, plus 1.0% of all amounts in excess of the first $20 million. Based on these requirements, our Adviser and its affiliates have an aggregate financial net worth in excess of those amounts required by the Omnibus Guidelines. However, no portion of such net worth will be available to us to satisfy any of our liabilities or other obligations. The use of our own funds to satisfy such liabilities or other obligations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our Class S and Class D shares are each subject to an ongoing servicing fee.

The ongoing servicing fees will be payable by investors in our Class S and Class D shares to compensate our Dealer Manager and its affiliates, participating broker-dealers and financial representatives for services rendered to shareholders, including, among other things, responding to customer inquiries of a general nature regarding the Company; crediting distributions from us to customer accounts; arranging for bank wire transfer of funds to or from a customer's account; responding to customer inquiries and requests regarding shareholder reports, notices, proxies and proxy statements, and other Company documents; forwarding prospectuses, tax notices and annual and quarterly reports to beneficial owners of our shares; assisting us in establishing and maintaining shareholder accounts and records; assisting customers in changing account options, account designations and account addresses, and providing such other similar services as we may reasonably request to the extent an authorized service provider is permitted to do so under applicable statutes, rules, or regulations.

Risks Related to Business Development Companies

The requirement that we invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying assets could preclude us from investing in accordance with our current business strategy; conversely, the failure to invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying assets could result in our failure to maintain our status as a BDC.

As a BDC, the 1940 Act prohibits us from acquiring any assets other than certain qualifying assets unless, at the time of and after giving effect to such acquisition, at least 70% of our total assets are qualifying assets. Therefore, we may be precluded from investing in what we believe are attractive investments if such investments are not qualifying assets. Conversely, if we fail to invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying assets, we could lose our status as a BDC, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Similarly, these rules could prevent us from making additional investments in existing portfolio companies, which could result in the dilution of our position, or could require us to dispose of investments at an inopportune time to comply with the 1940 Act. If we were forced to sell non-qualifying investments in the portfolio for compliance purposes, the proceeds from such sale could be significantly less than the current value of such investments.

Failure to maintain our status as a BDC would reduce our operating flexibility.

If we do not remain a BDC, we might be regulated as a closed-end investment company under the 1940 Act, which would subject us to substantially more regulatory restrictions, including a greater required asset coverage ratio and additional restrictions on transactions with affiliates, and correspondingly decrease our operating flexibility.

Regulations governing our operation as a BDC and RIC affect our ability to raise capital and the way in which we raise additional capital or borrow for investment purposes, which may have a negative effect on our growth. As a BDC, the necessity of raising additional capital may expose us to risks, including risks associated with leverage.

As a result of the Annual Distribution Requirement to qualify for tax treatment as a RIC, we may need to access the capital markets periodically to raise cash to fund new investments in portfolio companies. Currently, we may issue “senior securities,” including borrowing money from banks or other financial institutions only in amounts such that the ratio of our total assets (less total liabilities other than indebtedness represented by senior securities) to our total indebtedness represented by senior securities plus preferred stock, if any, equals at least 150% after such incurrence or issuance. If we issue senior securities, we will be exposed to risks associated with leverage, including an increased risk of loss. Our ability to issue different types of securities is also limited. Compliance with RIC distribution requirements may unfavorably limit our investment opportunities and reduce our ability in comparison to other companies to profit from favorable spreads between the rates at which we can borrow and the rates at which we can lend. Therefore, we intend to seek to continuously issue equity securities, which may lead to shareholder dilution.

We may borrow to fund investments. If the value of our assets declines, we may be unable to satisfy the asset coverage test under the 1940 Act, which would prohibit us from paying distributions and could prevent us from qualifying for tax treatment as a RIC, which would generally result in a corporate-level U.S. federal income tax on any income and net gains. If we cannot satisfy the asset coverage test, we may be required to sell a portion of our investments and, depending on the nature of our debt financing, repay a portion of our indebtedness at a time when such sales may be disadvantageous. Also, any amounts that we use to service our indebtedness would not be available for distribution to our shareholders.

In addition, as market conditions permit, we have and may continue to securitize our loans to generate cash for funding new investments. To securitize loans, we have and may continue to create a wholly owned subsidiary, contribute a pool of loans to the subsidiary and have the subsidiary issue primarily investment grade debt securities to purchasers who would be expected to be willing to accept a substantially lower interest rate than the loans earn. We have and may continue to retain all or a portion of the equity in the securitized pool of loans. Our retained equity would be exposed to any losses on the portfolio of loans before any of the debt securities would be exposed to such losses. See “—We are subject to certain risks as a result of our interests in the CLO Preferred Shares”; “The subordination of the CLO Preferred Shares will affect our right to payment”; and “The CLO Indentures require

mandatory redemption of the respective CLO Debt for failure to satisfy coverage tests, which would reduce the amounts available for distribution to us.”

Risks Related to Our Investments

Our investments in portfolio companies may be risky, and we could lose all or part of our investments.

Our strategy focuses primarily on originating and making loans to, and making debt and equity investments in, U.S. middle-market companies, with a focus on originated transactions sourced through the networks of our Adviser. Short transaction closing timeframes associated with originated transactions coupled with added tax or accounting structuring complexity and international transactions may result in higher risk in comparison to non-originated transactions.

Most debt securities in which we intend to invest will not be rated by any rating agency and, if they were rated, they would be rated as below investment grade quality and are commonly referred to as “high yield” or “junk.” Debt securities rated below investment grade quality are generally regarded as having predominantly speculative characteristics and may carry a greater risk with respect to a borrower’s capacity to pay interest and repay principal. In addition, some of the loans in which we may invest may be “covenant-lite” loans. We use the term “covenant-lite” loans to refer generally to loans that do not have a complete set of financial maintenance covenants. Generally, “covenant-lite” loans provide borrower companies more freedom to negatively impact lenders because their covenants are incurrence-based, which means they are only tested and can only be breached following an affirmative action of the borrower, rather than by a deterioration in the borrower’s financial condition. Accordingly, to the extent we invest in “covenant-lite” loans, we may have fewer rights against a borrower and may have a greater risk of loss on such investments as compared to investments in or exposure to loans with financial maintenance covenants.

First-Lien Debt. When we make a first-lien loan, we generally take a security interest in the available assets of the portfolio company, including the equity interests of its subsidiaries, which we expect to help mitigate the risk that we will not be repaid. However, there is a risk that the collateral securing our loans may decrease in value over time, may be difficult to sell in a timely manner, may be difficult to appraise, and may fluctuate in value based upon the success of the business and market conditions, including as a result of the inability of the portfolio company to raise additional capital. In some circumstances, our lien is, or could become, subordinated to claims of other creditors. Consequently, the fact that a loan is secured does not guarantee that we will receive principal and interest payments according to the loan’s terms, or at all, or that we will be able to collect on the loan should we need to enforce our remedies.

Unitranche Loans. In addition, in connection with any unitranche loans (including “last out” portions of such loans) in which we may invest, we would enter into agreements among lenders. Under these agreements, our interest in the collateral of the first-lien loans may rank junior to those of other lenders in the loan under certain circumstances. This may result in greater risk and loss of principal on these loans.

Second-Lien and Mezzanine Debt. Our investments in second-lien and mezzanine debt generally are subordinated to senior loans and will either have junior security interests or be unsecured. As such, other creditors may rank senior to us in the event of insolvency. This may result in greater risk and loss of principal.

Equity Investments. When we invest in first-lien debt, second-lien debt or mezzanine debt, we may acquire equity securities, such as warrants, options and convertible instruments, as well. In addition, we may invest directly in the equity securities of portfolio companies. We may structure such equity investments to include provisions protecting our rights as a minority-interest holder, as well as a “put,” or right to sell such securities back to the issuer, upon the occurrence of specified events. In many cases, we may also seek to obtain registration rights in connection with these equity interests, which may include demand and “piggyback” registration rights, which grants us the right to register our equity interest when either the portfolio company or another investor in the portfolio company files a registration statement with the SEC to issue securities. We seek to dispose of these equity interests and realize gains upon our disposition of these interests. However, the equity interests we receive may not appreciate in value and, in fact, may decline in value. Accordingly, we may not be able to realize gains from our equity

interests, and any gains that we do realize on the disposition of any equity interests may not be sufficient to offset any other losses we experience.

We have invested and may continue to invest through joint ventures, partnerships and other special purpose vehicles and our investments through these vehicles may entail greater risks, or risks that we otherwise would not incur, if we otherwise made such investments directly.

We may make indirect investments in portfolio companies through joint ventures, partnerships or other special purpose vehicles (“Investment Vehicles”). In general, the risks associated with indirect investments in portfolio companies through a joint venture, partnership or other special purpose vehicle are similar to those associated with a direct investment in a portfolio company; however, if we are not the sole investor in such Investment Vehicle, the investment may involve risks not present in investments where a third party is not involved. While we intend to analyze the credit and business of a potential portfolio company in determining whether to make an investment in an Investment Vehicle, we will nonetheless be exposed to the creditworthiness of the Investment Vehicle and any third party. In the event of a bankruptcy proceeding against the portfolio company, the assets of the portfolio company may be used to satisfy its obligations prior to the satisfaction of our investment in the Investment Vehicle (i.e., our investment in the Investment Vehicle could be structurally subordinated to the other obligations of the portfolio company). If a third party is involved, we are subject to the risk that such third-party could have financial difficulties resulting in a negative impact on the Investment Vehicle, could have economic or business interests or goals which are inconsistent with ours, or could be in a position to take (or block) action in a manner contrary to our investment objective or the increased possibility of default by, diminished liquidity or insolvency of, the third party, due to a sustained or general economic downturn. In addition, if we are not the sole investor in an Investment Vehicle, we may be required to rely on our partners in the Investment Vehicle when making decisions regarding such Investment Vehicle’s investments, accordingly, the value of the investment could be adversely affected if our interests diverge from those of our partners in the Investment Vehicle.

Any strategic investments that we pursue are subject to risks and uncertainties.

We have pursued and may continue to pursue growth through strategic investments in new businesses, including through investments in our specialty finance vehicles. Completion and timing of any such strategic investments may be subject to a number of contingencies, including the uncertainty in reaching a commercial agreement with our counterparty, our ability to obtain required board, shareholder and regulatory approvals, as well as any required financing (or the risk that these are obtained subject to terms and conditions that are not anticipated). We may not be required to announce an acquisition or strategic transaction until a definitive agreement is reached and the announcement or consummation of any such transaction may adversely impact our business relationships or engender competitive responses.

In addition, the proposal and negotiation of strategic investments, whether or not completed, as well as the integration of those businesses into our existing portfolio, could result in substantial expenses and the diversion of our Adviser’s time, attention and resources from our day-to-day operations.

Our ability to manage our growth through strategic investments will depend, in part, on our success in addressing these risks. Any failure to effectively implement our acquisition or strategic investment strategies could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Broadly syndicated loans, including “covenant-lite” loans, may expose us to different risks, including with respect to liquidity, price volatility, ability to restructure loans, credit risks and less protective loan documentation, than is the case with loans that contain financial maintenance covenants.

Our investments may consist of broadly syndicated loans that were not originated by us. Under the documentation for such loans, a financial institution or other entity typically is designated as the administrative agent and/or collateral agent. This agent is granted a lien on any collateral on behalf of the other lenders and distributes payments on the indebtedness as they are received. The agent is the party responsible for administering and enforcing the loan and generally may take actions only in accordance with the instructions of a majority or two-thirds in commitments and/or principal amount of the associated indebtedness. Accordingly, we may be precluded from directing such actions unless we or our investment adviser is the designated administrative agent or collateral

agent or we act together with other holders of the indebtedness. If we are unable to direct such actions, we cannot assure shareholders that the actions taken will be in our best interests.

There is also a risk that a loan agent may become bankrupt or insolvent. Such an event would delay, and possibly impair, any enforcement actions undertaken by holders of the associated indebtedness, including attempts to realize upon the collateral securing the associated indebtedness and/or direct the agent to take actions against the related obligor or the collateral securing the associated indebtedness and actions to realize on proceeds of payments made by obligors that are in the possession or control of any other financial institution. In addition, we may be unable to remove the agent in circumstances in which removal would be in our best interests. Moreover, agented loans typically allow for the agent to resign with certain advance notice.

In addition, a significant number of high yield loans in the market, in particular the broadly syndicated loan market, may consist of “covenant-lite” loans. Generally, “covenant-lite” loans provide borrower companies more freedom to negatively impact lenders because their covenants are incurrence-based, which means they are only tested and can only be breached following an affirmative action of the borrower, rather than by a deterioration in the borrower’s financial condition. Ownership of “covenant-lite” loans may expose us to different risks, including with respect to liquidity, price volatility, ability to restructure loans, credit risks and less protective loan documentation, than is the case with loans that contain financial maintenance covenants.

We may be subject to risks associated with our investments in bank loans.

We may invest in bank loans and participations. These obligations are subject to unique risks, including:

•the possible invalidation of an investment transaction as a fraudulent conveyance under relevant creditors’ rights laws,

•so-called lender-liability claims by the issuer of the obligations,

•environmental liabilities that may arise with respect to collateral securing the obligations, and

•limitations on our ability to directly enforce its rights with respect to participations.

In addition, the illiquidity of bank loans may make it difficult for us to sell such investments to access capital if required. As a result, we could realize significantly less than the value at which we have recorded our investments if we were required to sell them for liquidity purposes. Compared to securities and to certain other types of financial assets, purchases and sales of loans take relatively longer to settle. This extended settlement process can (i) increase the counterparty credit risk borne by us; (ii) leave us unable to timely vote, or otherwise act with respect to, loans it has agreed to purchase; (iii) delay us from realizing the proceeds of a sale of a loan; (iv) inhibit our ability to re-sell a loan that it has agreed to purchase if conditions change (leaving us more exposed to price fluctuations); (v) prevent us from timely collecting principal and interest payments; and (vi) expose us to adverse tax or regulatory consequences. To the extent the extended loan settlement process gives rise to short-term liquidity needs, we may hold cash, sell investments or temporarily borrow from banks or other lenders.

In purchasing participations, we generally will have no right to enforce compliance by the borrower with the terms of the loan agreement, nor any rights of set-off against the borrower, and we may not directly benefit from the collateral supporting the debt obligation in which we have purchased the participation. As a result, we will assume the credit risk of both the borrower and the institution selling the participation.

In analyzing each bank loan or participation, our Adviser compares the relative significance of the risks against the expected benefits of the investment. Successful claims by third parties arising from these and other risks will be borne by us.

If the assets securing the loans that we make decrease in value, then we may lack sufficient collateral to cover losses.

To attempt to mitigate credit risks, we intend to take a security interest in the available assets of our portfolio companies. There is no assurance that we will obtain sufficient collateral to cover losses or properly perfect our liens.

There is a risk that the collateral securing our loans may decrease in value over time, may be difficult to sell in a timely manner, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value based upon the success of the business and market conditions, including as a result of the inability of a portfolio company to raise additional capital. In some circumstances, our lien could be subordinated to claims of other creditors. Consequently, the fact that a loan is secured does not guarantee that we will receive principal and interest payments according to the loan’s terms, or that we will be able to collect on the loan should we be forced to enforce our remedies.

We may suffer a loss if a portfolio company defaults on a loan and the underlying collateral is not sufficient.

In the event of a default by a portfolio company on a secured loan, we will only have recourse to the assets collateralizing the loan. If the underlying collateral value is less than the loan amount, we will suffer a loss. In addition, we may make loans that are unsecured, which are subject to the risk that other lenders may be directly secured by the assets of the portfolio company. In the event of a default, those collateralized lenders would have priority over us with respect to the proceeds of a sale of the underlying assets. In cases described above, we may lack control over the underlying asset collateralizing our loan or the underlying assets of the portfolio company prior to a default, and as a result the value of the collateral may be reduced by acts or omissions by owners or managers of the assets.

In the event of bankruptcy of a portfolio company, we may not have full recourse to its assets in order to satisfy our loan, or our loan may be subject to “equitable subordination.” This means that depending on the facts and circumstances, including the extent to which we actually provided significant “managerial assistance,” if any, to that portfolio company, a bankruptcy court might re-characterize our debt holding and subordinate all or a portion of our claim to that of other creditors. In addition, certain of our loans are subordinate to other debt of the portfolio company. If a portfolio company defaults on our loan or on debt senior to our loan, or in the event of a portfolio company bankruptcy, our loan will be satisfied only after the senior debt receives payment. Where debt senior to our loan exists, the presence of intercreditor arrangements may limit our ability to amend our loan documents, assign our loans, accept prepayments, exercise our remedies (through “standstill” periods) and control decisions made in bankruptcy proceedings relating to the portfolio company. Bankruptcy and portfolio company litigation can significantly increase collection losses and the time needed for us to acquire the underlying collateral in the event of a default, during which time the collateral may decline in value, causing us to suffer losses.

Borrowers of broadly syndicated loans may be permitted to designate unrestricted subsidiaries under the terms of their financing agreements, which would exclude such unrestricted subsidiaries from restrictive covenants under the financing agreement with the borrower. Without restriction under the financing agreement, the borrower could take various actions with respect to the unrestricted subsidiary including, among other things, incur debt, grant security on its assets, sell assets, pay dividends or distribute shares of the unrestricted subsidiary to the borrower’s shareholders. Any of these actions could increase the amount of leverage that the borrower is able to incur and increase the risk involved in our investments in broadly syndicated loans accordingly.

If the value of collateral underlying our loan declines or interest rates increase during the term of our loan, a portfolio company may not be able to obtain the necessary funds to repay our loan at maturity through refinancing.

Decreasing collateral value and/or increasing interest rates may hinder a portfolio company’s ability to refinance our loan because the underlying collateral cannot satisfy the debt service coverage requirements necessary to obtain new financing. In some instances a borrower may engage in liability management exercises with certain of its investors who agree to provide additional capital or capital on modified terms in exchange for a superior position in the portfolio company’s capital structure. In such instances, the collateral securing our investment may be reduced or our lien may be further subordinated. If a borrower is unable to repay our loan at maturity, we could suffer a loss which may adversely impact our financial performance.

We may not realize any income or gains from our equity investments.

We have invested in and may continue to invest in equity-related securities, including common equity, warrants, preferred stock and convertible preferred securities. These equity interests we acquire may not appreciate in value and, in fact, may decline in value if the company fails to perform financially or achieve its growth objectives. We will generally have little, if any, control over the timing of any gains we may realize from our equity investments since these securities may have restrictions on their transfer or may not have an active trading market.

Equity investments also have experienced significantly more volatility in their returns and may under-perform relative to fixed income securities during certain periods. An adverse event, such as an unfavorable earnings report, may depress the value. Also, prices of equity investments are sensitive to general movements in the stock market and a drop in the stock market may depress the price of common stock investments to which we have exposure. Equity prices fluctuate for several reasons including changes in investors' perceptions of the financial condition of an issuer or the general condition of the relevant stock market, or when political or economic events affecting the issuers occur. In addition, common stock prices may be particularly sensitive to rising interest rates, as the cost of capital rises and borrowing costs increase.

Although we expect to receive current income in the form of dividend payments on any convertible preferred equity investments, a substantial portion of the gains we expect to receive from our investments in such securities will likely be from the capital gains generated from the sale of our equity investments upon conversion of our convertible securities, the timing of which we cannot predict and we cannot guarantee that such sale will happen at all. We do not expect to generate capital gains from the sale of our portfolio investments on a level or uniform basis from quarter to quarter. In addition, any convertible preferred stock instruments will generally provide for conversion upon the portfolio companies’ achievement of certain milestone events, including a qualified public offering and/or a senior exchange listing for their common stock. However, there can be no assurance that our portfolio companies will obtain either a junior or senior exchange listing or, even if a listing is obtained, that an active trading market will ever develop in the common stock of our publicly traded portfolio companies. In addition, even if our portfolio companies obtain an exchange listing, we may be subject to lock-up provisions that prohibit us from selling our investments into the public market for specified periods of time after such listing. As a result, the market price of securities that we hold may decline substantially before we are able to sell these securities following an exchange listing.

Accordingly, we may not be able to realize gains from our equity interests, and any gains that we do realize on the disposition of any equity interests may not be sufficient to offset any other losses we experience. Furthermore, due to the expected growth of our portfolio companies, we do not generally expect to receive dividend income from our common stock investments. In the case of cumulative preferred stock, there is no assurance that any dividends will ever be paid by a portfolio company. Dividends to any equity holders may be suspended or cancelled at any time.

Investments in equity securities can carry additional risks and may have other characteristics that require investments to be made indirectly through blocker entities or otherwise. In addition, if an issuer of equity securities in which we have invested sells additional shares of its equity securities, our interest in the issuer may be diluted and the value of our investment could decrease.

We may invest, to the extent permitted by law, in the equity securities of investment funds that are operating pursuant to certain exceptions to the 1940 Act and in advisers to similar investment funds and, to the extent we so invest, will bear our ratable share of any such company’s expenses, including management and performance fees. We will also remain obligated to pay the base management fee, income based fee and capital gains incentive fee to our investment adviser with respect to the assets invested in the securities and instruments of such companies. With respect to each of these investments, each of our common stockholders will bear his or her share of the base management fee, income based fee and capital gains incentive fee due to our investment adviser as well as indirectly bearing the management and performance fees and other expenses of any such investment funds or advisers. For the foregoing reasons, investments in equity securities can be highly speculative and carry a substantial risk of loss of investment.

An investment strategy focused primarily on privately held companies presents certain challenges, including the lack of available information about these companies.

We invest primarily in privately held companies. Investments in private companies pose certain incremental risks as compared to investments in public companies including that they:

•have reduced access to the capital markets, resulting in diminished capital resources and ability to withstand financial distress;

•may have limited financial resources and may be unable to meet their obligations under their debt obligations that we hold, which may be accompanied by a deterioration in the value of any collateral and a reduction in the likelihood of our realizing any guarantees we may have obtained in connection with our investment;

•may have shorter operating histories, narrower product lines and smaller market shares than larger businesses, which tend to render them more vulnerable to competitors’ actions and changing market conditions, as well as general economic downturns;

•are more likely to depend on the management talents and efforts of a small group of persons and, therefore, the death, disability, resignation or termination of one or more of these persons could have a material adverse impact on the company and, in turn, on us; and

•generally have less predictable operating results, may from time to time be parties to litigation, may be engaged in rapidly changing businesses with products subject to a substantial risk of obsolescence, and may require substantial additional capital to support their operations, finance expansion or maintain their competitive position.

In addition, investments in private companies tend to be less liquid. The securities of private companies are not publicly traded or actively traded on the secondary market and are, instead, traded on a privately negotiated over-the-counter secondary market for institutional investors. These over-the-counter secondary markets may be inactive during an economic downturn or a credit crisis and in any event often have lower volumes than publicly traded securities even in normal market conditions. In addition, the securities in these companies will be subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or will otherwise be less liquid than publicly traded securities.

If there is no readily available market for these investments, we are required to carry these investments at fair value as determined by our Board. As a result, if we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we had previously recorded these investments. We may also face other restrictions on our ability to liquidate an investment in a portfolio company to the extent that we, our Adviser or any of its affiliates have material nonpublic information regarding such portfolio company or where the sale would be an impermissible joint transaction under the 1940 Act. The reduced liquidity of our investments may make it difficult for us to dispose of them at a favorable price, and, as a result, we may suffer losses.

Finally, little public information generally exists about private companies and these companies may not have third-party credit ratings or audited financial statements. We must therefore rely on the ability of our Adviser to obtain adequate information through due diligence to evaluate the creditworthiness and potential returns from investing in these companies, and to monitor the activities and performance of these investments. To the extent that we (or other clients of our Adviser) may hold a larger number of investments, greater demands will be placed on our Adviser’s time, resources and personnel in monitoring such investments, which may result in less attention being paid to any individual investment and greater risk that our investment decisions may not be fully informed.

Additionally, these companies and their financial information will not generally be subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and other rules that govern public companies. If we are unable to uncover all material information about these companies, we may not make a fully informed investment decision, and we may lose money on our investments.

To the extent we invest in publicly traded companies, we may be unable to obtain financial covenants and other contractual rights, which subjects us to additional risks.

We have invested and may continue to invest in instruments issued by publicly-held companies, we may be subject to risks that differ in type or degree from those involved with investments in privately-held companies. Such risks include, without limitation, greater volatility in the valuation of such companies, increased obligations to disclose information regarding such companies, limitations on our ability to dispose of such instruments at certain times, increased likelihood of shareholder litigation against such companies’ board members and increased costs associated with each of the aforementioned risks. In addition, to the extent we invest in publicly traded debt instruments, we may not be able to obtain financial covenants or other contractual rights that we might otherwise be able to obtain when making privately-negotiated investments. We may not have the same access to information in connection with investments in public debt instruments that we would expect to have in connection with privately-negotiated investments. If we or our Adviser were deemed to have material, nonpublic information regarding the issuer of a publicly traded instrument in which we have invested, we may be limited in our ability to make new investments or sell existing investments in such issue.

The credit ratings of certain of our investments may not be indicative of the actual credit risk of such rated instruments.

Rating agencies rate debt securities based upon their assessment of the likelihood of the receipt of principal and interest payments. Rating agencies do not consider the risks of fluctuations in market value or other factors that may influence the value of debt securities. Therefore, the credit rating assigned to a particular instrument may not fully reflect the true risks of an investment in such instrument. Credit rating agencies may change their methods of evaluating credit risk and determining ratings. These changes may occur quickly and often. While we may give some consideration to ratings, ratings may not be indicative of the actual credit risk of our investments in rated instruments.

Prepayments of our debt investments by our portfolio companies could adversely impact our results of operations and reduce our return on equity.

We are subject to the risk that the investments we make in our portfolio companies may be repaid prior to maturity. When this occurs, we will generally reinvest these proceeds in temporary investments, pending their future investment in new portfolio companies. These temporary investments will typically have substantially lower yields than the debt being prepaid and we could experience significant delays in reinvesting these amounts.

Any future investment in a new portfolio company may also be at lower yields than the debt that was repaid. As a result, our results of operations could be materially adversely affected if one or more of our portfolio companies elect to prepay amounts owed to us. Additionally, prepayments, net of prepayment fees, could negatively impact our return on equity. This risk will be more acute when interest rates decrease, as we may be unable to reinvest at rates as favorable as when we made our initial investment.

A redemption of convertible securities held by us could have an adverse effect on our ability to achieve our investment objective.

A convertible security may be subject to redemption at the option of the issuer at a price established in the convertible security’s governing instrument. If a convertible security held by us is called for redemption, we will be required to permit the issuer to redeem the security, convert it into the underlying common stock or sell it to a third party. Any of these actions could have an adverse effect on our ability to achieve our investment objective.

To the extent original issue discount (“OID”) and payment-in-kind (“PIK”) interest income constitute a portion of our income, we will be exposed to risks associated with the deferred receipt of cash representing such income.

Our investments may include OID and PIK instruments. To the extent OID and PIK constitute a portion of our income, we will be exposed to risks associated with such income being required to be included in income for

financial reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) and taxable income prior to receipt of cash, including the following:

•Original issue discount instruments may have unreliable valuations because the accruals require judgments about collectability or deferred payments and the value of any associated collateral;

•Original issue discount instruments may create heightened credit risks because the inducement to the borrower to accept higher interest rates in exchange for the deferral of cash payments typically represents, to some extent, speculation on the part of the borrower;

•For U.S. GAAP purposes, cash distributions to shareholders that include a component of OID income do not come from paid-in capital, although they may be paid from the offering proceeds. Thus, although a distribution of OID income may come from the cash invested by the shareholders, the 1940 Act does not require that shareholders be given notice of this fact;

•The presence of OID and PIK creates the risk of non-refundable cash payments to our Adviser in the form of incentive fees on income based on non-cash OID and PIK accruals that may never be realized; and

•In the case of PIK, “toggle” debt, which gives the issuer the option to defer an interest payment in exchange for an increased interest rate in the future, the PIK election has the simultaneous effect of increasing the investment income, thus increasing the potential for realizing incentive fees.

Our portfolio companies may incur debt that ranks equally with, or senior to, our investments in such companies.

Our strategy focuses on investing primarily in the debt of privately owned U.S. companies with a focus on originated transactions sourced through the networks of our Adviser. Our portfolio companies may have, or may be permitted to incur, other debt that ranks equally with, or senior to, the debt in which we invest. By their terms, such debt instruments may entitle the holders to receive payment of interest or principal on or before the dates on which we are entitled to receive payments with respect to the debt instruments in which we invest. Also, in the event of insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of a portfolio company, any holders of debt instruments ranking senior to our investment in that portfolio company would typically be entitled to receive payment in full before we receive any distribution. After repaying such senior creditors, such portfolio company may not have any remaining assets to use for repaying its obligation to us. In the case of debt ranking equally with debt instruments in which we invest, we would have to share on an equal basis any distributions with other creditors holding such debt in the event of an insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of the relevant portfolio company and our portfolio company may not have sufficient assets to pay all equally ranking credit even if we hold senior, first-lien debt.

Our portfolio companies may be highly leveraged.

Some of our portfolio companies may be highly leveraged, which may have adverse consequences to these companies and to us as an investor. These companies may be subject to restrictive financial and operating covenants and the leverage may impair these companies’ ability to finance their future operations and capital needs. As a result, these companies’ flexibility to respond to changing business and economic conditions and to take advantage of business opportunities may be limited. Further, a leveraged company’s income and net assets will tend to increase or decrease at a greater rate than if borrowed money were not used.

If we cannot obtain debt financing or equity capital on acceptable terms, our ability to acquire investments and to expand our operations will be adversely affected.

Any working capital reserves we maintain may not be sufficient for investment purposes, and we may require additional debt financing or equity capital to operate. We generally are required to distribute at least 90% of our net ordinary income and net short-term capital gains in excess of net long-term capital losses, if any, to our shareholders to maintain our tax treatment as a RIC. Accordingly, in the event that we need additional capital in the future for investments or for any other reason we may need to access the capital markets periodically to issue debt or equity securities or borrow from financial institutions in order to obtain such additional capital. These sources of funding

may not be available to us due to unfavorable economic conditions, which could increase our funding costs, limit our access to the capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to us. Consequently, if we cannot obtain further debt or equity financing on acceptable terms, our ability to acquire additional investments and to expand our operations will be adversely affected. As a result, we would be less able to diversify our portfolio and achieve our investment objective, which may negatively impact our results of operations and reduce our ability to make distributions to our shareholders. See “—If we are unable to obtain additional debt financing, or if our borrowing capacity is materially reduced, our business could be materially adversely affected.”

Defaults by our portfolio companies could jeopardize a portfolio company’s ability to meet its obligations under the debt or equity investments that we hold which could harm our operating results.

A portfolio company’s failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to defaults and, potentially, termination of its debt financing and foreclosure on its secured assets, which could trigger cross-defaults under other agreements and jeopardize a portfolio company’s ability to meet its obligations under the debt or equity investments that we hold. We may incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms, which may include the waiver of certain financial covenants, with a defaulting portfolio company. In addition, some of the loans in which we may invest may be “covenant-lite” loans. We use the term “covenant-lite” loans to refer generally to loans that do not have a complete set of financial maintenance covenants. Generally, “covenant-lite” loans provide borrower companies more freedom to negatively impact lenders because their covenants are incurrence-based, which means they are only tested and can only be breached following an affirmative action of the borrower, rather than by a deterioration in the borrower’s financial condition. Accordingly, to the extent we invest in “covenant-lite” loans, we may have fewer rights against a borrower and may have a greater risk of loss on such investments as compared to investments in or exposure to loans with financial maintenance covenants.

As part of our lending activities, we may in certain opportunistic circumstances originate loans to companies that are experiencing significant financial or business difficulties, including companies involved in bankruptcy or other reorganization and liquidation proceedings. Any such investment would involve a substantial degree of risk. In any reorganization or liquidation proceeding relating to a company that we fund, we may lose all or part of the amounts advanced to the borrower or may be required to accept collateral with a value less than the amount of the loan advanced by us to the borrower.

Subordinated liens on collateral securing debt investments that we may make to portfolio companies may be subject to control by senior creditors with first priority liens. If there is a default, the value of the collateral may not be sufficient to repay in full both the first priority creditors and us.

Certain debt investments that we will make in portfolio companies will be secured on a second priority lien basis by the same collateral securing senior debt of such companies. We also make debt investments in portfolio companies secured on a first priority basis. The first priority liens on the collateral will secure the portfolio company’s obligations under any outstanding senior debt and may secure certain other future debt that may be permitted to be incurred by the portfolio company under the agreements governing the debt. In the event of a default, the holders of obligations secured by the first priority liens on the collateral will generally control the liquidation of and be entitled to receive proceeds from any realization of the collateral to repay their obligations in full before us.

In addition, the value of the collateral in the event of liquidation will depend on market and economic conditions, the availability of buyers and other factors. There can be no assurance that the proceeds, if any, from the sale or sales of all of the collateral would be sufficient to satisfy the debt obligations secured by the first priority or second priority liens after payment in full of all obligations secured by the first priority liens on the collateral. If such proceeds are not sufficient to repay amounts outstanding under the debt obligations secured by the first priority or second priority liens, then we, to the extent not repaid from the proceeds of the sale of the collateral, will only have an unsecured claim against the portfolio company’s remaining assets, if any.

We may also make unsecured debt investments in portfolio companies, meaning that such investments will not benefit from any interest in collateral of such companies. Liens on any such portfolio company’s collateral, if any,

will secure the portfolio company’s obligations under its outstanding secured debt and may secure certain future debt that is permitted to be incurred by the portfolio company under its secured debt agreements. The holders of obligations secured by such liens will generally control the liquidation of, and be entitled to receive proceeds from, any realization of such collateral to repay their obligations in full before us. In addition, the value of such collateral in the event of liquidation will depend on market and economic conditions, the availability of buyers and other factors. There can be no assurance that the proceeds, if any, from sales of such collateral would be sufficient to satisfy our unsecured debt obligations after payment in full of all secured debt obligations. If such proceeds were not sufficient to repay the outstanding secured debt obligations, then our unsecured claims would rank equally with the unpaid portion of such secured creditors’ claims against the portfolio company’s remaining assets, if any.

The rights we may have with respect to the collateral securing the debt investments we make in our portfolio companies with senior debt outstanding may also be limited pursuant to the terms of one or more inter-creditor agreements that we enter into with the holders of senior debt. Under such an inter-creditor agreement, at any time obligations that have the benefit of the first priority liens are outstanding, any of the following actions that may be taken in respect of the collateral will be at the direction of the holders of the obligations secured by the first priority liens: the ability to cause the commencement of enforcement proceedings against the collateral; the ability to control the conduct of such proceedings; the approval of amendments to collateral documents; releases of liens on the collateral; and waivers of past defaults under collateral documents. We may not have the ability to control or direct such actions, even if our rights are adversely affected.

Certain of our investments may be adversely affected by laws relating to fraudulent conveyance or voidable preferences.

Certain of our investments could be subject to federal bankruptcy law and state fraudulent transfer laws, which vary from state to state, if the debt obligations relating to certain investments were issued with the intent of hindering, delaying or defrauding creditors or, in certain circumstances, if the issuer receives less than reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration in return for issuing such debt obligations. If the debt proceeds are used for a buyout of shareholders, this risk is greater than if the debt proceeds are used for day-to-day operations or organic growth. If a court were to find that the issuance of the debt obligations was a fraudulent transfer or conveyance, the court could void or otherwise refuse to recognize the payment obligations under the debt obligations or the collateral supporting such obligations, further subordinate the debt obligations or the liens supporting such obligations to other existing and future indebtedness of the issuer or require us to repay any amounts received by us with respect to the debt obligations or collateral. In the event of a finding that a fraudulent transfer or conveyance occurred, we may not receive any repayment on such debt obligations.

Under certain circumstances, payments to us and distributions by us to our shareholders may be reclaimed if any such payment or distribution is later determined to have been a fraudulent conveyance, preferential payment or similar transaction under applicable bankruptcy and insolvency laws. Furthermore, investments in restructurings may be adversely affected by statutes relating to, among other things, fraudulent conveyances, voidable preferences, lender liability and the court’s discretionary power to disallow, subordinate or disenfranchise particular claims or re-characterize investments made in the form of debt as equity contributions.

There may be circumstances where our debt investments could be subordinated to claims of other creditors or we could be subject to lender liability claims.

Although we intend to structure certain of our investments as senior debt, if one of our portfolio companies were to go bankrupt, depending on the facts and circumstances, including the extent to which we provided managerial assistance to that portfolio company or a representative of us or our Adviser sat on the board of directors of such portfolio company, a bankruptcy court might re-characterize our debt investment and subordinate all or a portion of our claim to that of other creditors. In situations where a bankruptcy carries a high degree of political significance, our legal rights may be subordinated to other creditors.

In addition, a number of U.S. judicial decisions have upheld judgments obtained by borrowers against lending institutions on the basis of various evolving legal theories, collectively termed “lender liability.” Generally, lender liability is founded on the premise that a lender has violated a duty (whether implied or contractual) of good faith,

commercial reasonableness and fair dealing, or a similar duty owed to the borrower or has assumed an excessive degree of control over the borrower resulting in the creation of a fiduciary duty owed to the borrower or its other creditors or shareholders. Because of the nature of our investments in portfolio companies (including that, as a BDC, we may be required to provide managerial assistance to those portfolio companies if they so request upon our offer), we may be subject to allegations of lender liability.

We generally will not control the business operations of our portfolio companies and, due to the illiquid nature of our holdings in our portfolio companies, we may not be able to dispose of our interests in our portfolio companies.

We do not currently, and do not expect in the future to control most of our portfolio companies, although we may have board representation or board observation rights, and our debt agreements may impose certain restrictive covenants on our borrowers. As a result, we are subject to the risk that a portfolio company in which we invest may make business decisions with which we disagree and the management of such company, as representatives of the holders of their common equity, may take risks or otherwise act in ways that do not serve our interests as a debt investor. Due to the lack of liquidity for our investments in private companies, we may not be able to dispose of our interests in our portfolio companies as readily as we would like or at a favorable value. As a result, a portfolio company may make decisions that could decrease the value of our portfolio holdings.

We and our portfolio companies are, and will continue to be, exposed to risks associated with changes in interest rates.

General interest rate fluctuations and changes in credit spreads on floating rate loans may have a substantial negative impact on our portfolio company investments and our investment opportunities and, accordingly, may have a material adverse effect on our rate of return on invested capital, our net investment income and our net asset value. The majority of our debt investments have, and are expected to have, variable interest rates that reset periodically based on benchmarks such as the SOFR, the SONIA, the Euro Interbank Offered Rate, the Federal Funds rate or Prime rate. Increases in interest rates have made and may continue to make it more difficult for our portfolio companies to service their obligations under the debt investments that we will hold and may increase defaults even where our investment income increases. Elevated interest rates could also cause borrowers to shift cash from other productive uses to the payment of interest, which may have a material adverse effect on their business and operations and could, over time, lead to increased defaults. Additionally, as interest rates have increased and the corresponding risk of default by borrowers has increased, the liquidity of higher interest rate loans may decrease as fewer investors may be willing to purchase such loans in the secondary market in light of the increased risk of a default by the borrower and the heightened risk of a loss of an investment in such loans. All of these risks may be exacerbated when interest rates rise rapidly and/or significantly. Decreases in credit spreads on debt that pays a floating rate of return would have an impact on the income generation of our floating rate assets. Trading prices for debt that pays a fixed rate of return tend to fall as interest rates rise. Trading prices tend to fluctuate more for fixed rate securities that have longer maturities.

Conversely, if interest rates were to decline, borrowers may refinance their loans at lower interest rates, which could shorten the average life of the loans and reduce the associated returns on the investment, as well as require our Adviser and the Adviser’s personnel to incur management time and expense to re-deploy such proceeds, including on terms that may not be as favorable as our existing loans.

In addition, because we borrow money to make investments, our net investment income will depend, in part, upon the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds and the rate at which we invest those funds. As a result, we can offer no assurance that a significant change in market interest rates will not have a material adverse effect on our net investment income.

Portions of our investment portfolio and our borrowings have floating rate components. As a result, the recent significant changes in market interest rates have increased our interest expense as has the incurrence of additional fixed rate borrowings. In periods of elevated interest rates, such as in the current market, our cost of funds increases, which tends to reduce our net investment income. We may hedge against interest rate fluctuations by using standard hedging instruments such as interest rate swap agreements, futures, options and forward contracts, subject to

applicable legal requirements, including all necessary registrations (or exemptions from registration) with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. In addition, our interest expense may not decrease at the same rate as overall interest rates because of our fixed rate borrowings, which could lead to greater declines in our net investment income. These activities may limit our ability to participate in the benefits of lower interest rates with respect to the hedged borrowings. Adverse developments resulting from changes in interest rates or hedging transactions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We do not have a policy governing the maturities of our investments. This means that we are subject to greater risk (other things being equal) than a fund invested solely in shorter-term securities. A decline in the prices of the debt we own could adversely affect our net asset value. Also, an increase in interest rates available to investors could make an investment in our common stock less attractive if we are not able to increase our dividend rate.

International investments create additional risks.

We may make investments in portfolio companies that are domiciled outside of the United States. Our investments in foreign portfolio companies are deemed “non-qualifying assets,” which means that, as required by the 1940 Act, such investments, along with other investments in non-qualifying assets, may not constitute more than 30% of our total assets at the time of our acquisition of any such asset, after giving effect to the acquisition. Notwithstanding the limitation on our ownership of foreign portfolio companies, such investments subject us to many of the same risks as our domestic investments, as well as certain additional risks, including the following:

•foreign governmental laws, rules and policies, including those relating to taxation and bankruptcy and restricting the ownership of assets in the foreign country or the repatriation of profits from the foreign country to the United States and any adverse changes in these laws;

•foreign currency devaluations that reduce the value of and returns on our foreign investments;

•adverse changes in the availability, cost and terms of investments due to the varying economic policies of a foreign country in which we invest;

•adverse changes in tax rates, the tax treatment of transaction structures and other changes in operating expenses of a particular foreign country in which we invest;

•the assessment of foreign-country taxes (including withholding taxes, transfer taxes and value added taxes, any or all of which could be significant) on income or gains from our investments in the foreign country;

•changes that adversely affect the social, political and/or economic stability of a foreign country in which we invest;high inflation in the foreign countries in which we invest, which could increase the costs to us of investing in those countries;

•deflationary periods in the foreign countries in which we invest, which could reduce demand for our assets in those countries and diminish the value of such investments and the related investment returns to us; and

•legal and logistical barriers in the foreign countries in which we invest that materially and adversely limit our ability to enforce our contractual rights with respect to those investments.

In addition, we may make investments in countries whose governments or economies may prove unstable. Certain of the countries in which we may invest may have political, economic and legal systems that are unpredictable, unreliable or otherwise inadequate with respect to the implementation, interpretation and enforcement of laws protecting asset ownership and economic interests. In some of the countries in which we may invest, there may be a risk of nationalization, expropriation or confiscatory taxation, which may have an adverse effect on our portfolio companies in those countries and the rates of return that we are able to achieve on such investments. We may also lose the total value of any investment which is nationalized, expropriated or confiscated. The financial results and investment opportunities available to us, particularly in developing countries and emerging markets, may be materially and adversely affected by any or all of these political, economic and legal risks.

We expose ourselves to risks when we engage in risk management activities.

We have entered, and may in the future enter, into hedging transactions, which may expose us to risks associated with such transactions. We may seek to utilize instruments such as forward contracts, currency options and interest rate swaps, caps, collars and floors to seek to hedge against fluctuations in the relative values of our portfolio positions from changes in currency exchange rates and market interest rates and the relative value of certain debt securities from changes in market interest rates. Use of these hedging instruments may include counter-party credit risk. The scope of risk management activities we undertake varies based on the level of interest rates, prevailing foreign currency exchange rates, the types of investments that are made and other changing market conditions. To the extent we have non-U.S. investments, particularly investments denominated in non-U.S. currencies, our hedging costs will increase.

Hedging against a decline in the values of our portfolio positions would not eliminate the possibility of fluctuations in the values of such positions or prevent losses if the values of such positions were to decline. However, such hedging can establish other positions designed to gain from those same developments, thereby offsetting the decline in the value of such portfolio positions. Such hedging transactions may also limit the opportunity for gain if the values of the underlying portfolio positions were to increase. It also may not be possible to hedge against an exchange rate or interest rate fluctuation that is so generally anticipated that we are not able to enter into a hedging transaction at an acceptable price.

The success of our hedging strategy will depend on our ability to correctly identify appropriate exposures for hedging. In connection with the September 2027 Notes, AUD 2027 Notes, January 2029 Notes, September 2029 Notes, March 2030 Notes and, March 2031 Notes which bear interest at fixed rates, we entered into interest rate swaps to continue to align the interest rates of our liabilities with our investment portfolio, which consists of predominately floating rate loans. However, unanticipated changes in currency exchange rates or other exposures that we might hedge may result in poorer overall investment performance than if we had not engaged in any such hedging transactions. In addition, the degree of correlation between price movements of the instruments used in a hedging strategy and price movements in the portfolio positions being hedged may vary, as may the time period in which the hedge is effective relative to the time period of the related exposure.

For a variety of reasons, we may not seek to (or be able to) establish a perfect correlation between such hedging instruments and the positions being hedged. Any such imperfect correlation may prevent us from achieving the intended hedge and expose us to risk of loss. In addition, it may not be possible to hedge fully or perfectly against currency fluctuations affecting the value of securities denominated in non-U.S. currencies because the value of those securities is likely to fluctuate as a result of factors not related to currency fluctuations. Income derived from hedging transactions also is not eligible to be distributed to non-U.S. stockholders free from withholding taxes. Changes to the regulations applicable to the financial instruments we use to accomplish our hedging strategy could affect the effectiveness of that strategy. See “—The market structure applicable to derivatives imposed by the Dodd-Frank Act, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) and the SEC may affect our ability to use over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivatives for hedging purposes” and “We are, and will continue to be, exposed to risks associated with changes in interest rates.”

The market structure applicable to derivatives imposed by the Dodd-Frank Act, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) and the SEC may affect our ability to use over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivatives for hedging purposes.

The Dodd-Frank Act and the CFTC enacted and the SEC has issued rules to implement broad new regulatory and structural requirements applicable to OTC derivatives markets and, to a lesser extent, listed commodity futures (and futures options) markets. Similar changes are in the process of being implemented in other major financial markets.

The CFTC and the SEC have issued final rules establishing that certain swap transactions are subject to CFTC regulation. Engaging in such swap or other commodity interest transactions such as futures contracts or options on futures contracts may cause us to fall within the definition of “commodity pool” under the Commodity Exchange Act and related CFTC regulations. Our Adviser has claimed relief from CFTC registration and regulation as a

commodity pool operator with respect to our operations, with the result that we are limited in our ability to use futures contracts or options on futures contracts or engage in swap transactions. Specifically, we are subject to strict limitations on using such derivatives other than for hedging purposes, whereby the use of derivatives not used solely for hedging purposes is generally limited to situations where (i) the aggregate initial margin and premiums required to establish such positions does not exceed five percent of the liquidation value of our portfolio, after taking into account unrealized profits and unrealized losses on any such contracts we have entered into; or (ii) the aggregate net notional value of such derivatives does not exceed 100% of the liquidation value of our portfolio.

The Dodd-Frank Act also imposed requirements relating to real-time public and regulatory reporting of OTC derivative transactions, enhanced documentation requirements, position limits on an expanded array of derivatives, and recordkeeping requirements. Taken as a whole, these changes could significantly increase the cost of using uncleared OTC derivatives to hedge risks, including interest rate and foreign exchange risk; reduce the level of exposure we are able to obtain for risk management purposes through OTC derivatives (including as the result of the CFTC imposing position limits on additional products); reduce the amounts available to us to make non-derivatives investments; impair liquidity in certain OTC derivatives; and adversely affect the quality of execution pricing obtained by us, all of which could adversely impact our investment returns.

In addition, as a result of rules adopted by U.S. and foreign regulators concerning certain financial contracts, including OTC derivatives, entered into with counterparties that have been designated as global systemically important banking organizations, we may be restricted in our ability to terminate such contracts following the occurrence of certain insolvency-related default events. Transactions with these counterparties, therefore, carry heighted risk in the event that the counterparty defaults on its obligations to us.

Our ability to enter into transactions involving derivatives and financial commitment transactions may be limited.

Rule 18f-4 requires a BDC (or a registered investment company) that uses derivatives to, among other things, comply with a value-at-risk leverage limit, adopt a derivatives risk management program and implement certain testing and board reporting requirements. Rule 18f-4 exempts BDCs that qualify as “limited derivatives users” from the aforementioned requirements, provided that these BDCs adopt written policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to manage the BDC’s derivatives risks and comply with certain recordkeeping requirements. Under Rule 18f-4, a BDC may enter into an unfunded commitment agreement that is not a derivatives transaction, such as an agreement to provide financing to a portfolio company, if the BDC has, among other things, a reasonable belief, at the time it enters into such an agreement, that it will have sufficient cash and cash equivalents to meet its obligations with respect to all of its unfunded commitment agreements, in each case as it becomes due. Collectively, these requirements may limit our ability to use derivatives and/or enter into certain other financial contracts.

We may enter into total return swaps that would expose us to certain risks, including market risk, liquidity risk and other risks similar to those associated with the use of leverage.

A total return swap is a contract in which one party agrees to make periodic payments to another party based on the change in the market value of the assets underlying the total return swap, which may include a specified security or loan, basket of securities or loans or securities or loan indices during the specified period, in return for periodic payments based on a fixed or variable interest rate. A total return swap is typically used to obtain exposure to a security, loan or market without owning or taking physical custody of such security or loan or investing directly in such market. A total return swap may effectively add leverage to our portfolio because, in addition to our total net assets, we would be subject to investment exposure on the amount of securities or loans subject to the total return swap. A total return swap is also subject to the risk that a counterparty will default on its payment obligations thereunder or that we will not be able to meet our obligations to the counterparty. In addition, because a total return swap is a form of synthetic leverage, such arrangements are subject to risks similar to those associated with the use of leverage.

Our portfolio may be focused on a limited number of industries, which will subject us to a risk of significant loss if there is a downturn in a particular industry.

Beyond the asset diversification requirements associated with our qualification as a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we do not have fixed guidelines for diversification. While we are not targeting any specific industries,

our investments may be focused on relatively few industries.To the extent that we hold large positions in a small number of issuers, or within a particular industry, our net asset value may be subject to greater fluctuation. We may also be more susceptible to any single economic or regulatory occurrence or a downturn in particular industry. As a result, the aggregate returns we realize may be significantly adversely affected if a small number of investments perform poorly or if we need to write down the value of any one investment. Additionally, a downturn in any particular industry in which we are invested could significantly affect our aggregate returns. Further, any industry in which we are meaningfully concentrated at any given time could be subject to significant risks that could adversely impact our aggregate returns. For example, as of December 31, 2024, our investments in internet software and services represented 11.6% of our portfolio at fair value. Our investments in internet software and services are subject to substantial risks, including, but not limited to, intense competition, changing technology, shifting user needs, frequent introductions of new products and services, competitors in different industries and ranging from large established companies to emerging startups, decreasing average selling prices of products and services resulting from rapid technological changes, cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents and various legal and regulatory risks. In addition, as of December 31, 2024, our investments in insurance represented 9.4% of our portfolio at fair value. The U.S. insurance industry is heavily regulated and our investments in insurance are subject to a variety of risks, including, but not limited to, additional or changing government regulations that could increase compliance and other costs of doing business, which may impact the business of such portfolio companies.

We cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain various required licenses in U.S. states or in any other jurisdiction where they may be required in the future.

We are required to have and may be required in the future to obtain various state licenses to, among other things, originate commercial loans, and may be required to obtain similar licenses from other authorities, including outside of the United States, in the future in connection with one or more investments. Applying for and obtaining required licenses can be costly and take several months. We cannot assure you that we will maintain or obtain all of the licenses that we need on a timely basis. We also are and will be subject to various information and other requirements to maintain and obtain these licenses, and we cannot assure you that we will satisfy those requirements. Our failure to maintain or obtain licenses that we require, now or in the future, might restrict investment options and have other adverse consequences.

Certain investment analyses and decisions by our Adviser may be required to be undertaken on an expedited basis.

Investment analyses and decisions by our Adviser may be required to be undertaken on an expedited basis to take advantage of certain investment opportunities. While we generally will not seek to make an investment until our Adviser has conducted sufficient due diligence to make a determination as to the acceptability of the credit quality of the investment and the underlying issuer, in such cases, the information available to our Adviser at the time of making an investment decision may be limited. Therefore, no assurance can be given that our Adviser will have knowledge of all circumstances that may adversely affect an investment. In addition, our Adviser may rely upon independent consultants and others in connection with its evaluation of proposed investments. No assurance can be given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided by such independent consultants and we may incur liability as a result of such consultants’ actions, many of whom we will have limited recourse against in the event of any such inaccuracies.

We may not have the funds or ability to make additional investments in our portfolio companies.

After our initial investment in a portfolio company, we may be called upon from time to time to provide additional funds to such company or have the opportunity to increase our investment through the exercise of a warrant or other right to purchase common stock. There is no assurance that we will make, or will have sufficient funds to make, follow-on investments. Even if we do have sufficient capital to make a desired follow-on investment, we may elect not to make a follow-on investment because we may not want to increase our level of risk, we prefer other opportunities, we are limited in our ability to do so by compliance with BDC requirements, or in order to maintain our RIC status. Our ability to make follow-on investments may also be limited by our Adviser’s allocation policies. Any decision not to make a follow-on investment or any inability on our part to make such an investment may have a negative impact on a portfolio company in need of such an investment, may result in a missed

opportunity for us to increase our participation in a successful investment or may reduce the expected return to us on the investment.

We are subject to certain risks as a result of our interests in the CLO Preferred Shares.

Under the terms of the loan sale agreements entered into in connection with our debt securitization transactions with respect to the CLOs (collectively, the “CLO Transactions”), we and certain financing subsidiaries sold and/or contributed to the respective issuers in connection with the particular CLO Transaction (the "CLO Issuers"), all of the ownership interest in the portfolio loans and participations held by the CLO Issuers on the closing date for the CLO Transaction for the purchase price and other consideration set forth in such loan sale agreements. As a result of the CLO Transactions, we hold all of the preferred shares issued by the CLO Issuers (collectively, the “CLO Preferred Shares”), which comprise 100% of the equity interests (other than, in the case of CLO Issuers domiciled in the Cayman Islands, certain nominal interests held by a charitable trust for purposes of limiting the ability of the CLO Issuers to file for bankruptcy) in the CLO Issuers and in the case of CLO Transactions which have a Delaware limited liability company as co-issuer (the “CLO Co-Issuers”), such CLO Issuer in turn owns 100% of the equity of such CLO Co-Issuer. In the case of CLO Issuers organized in Delaware, we own the equity interests of such CLO Issuer (i.e., the CLO Preferred Shares). As a result, we expect to consolidate the financial statements of the CLO Issuers in our consolidated financial statements. However, once sold or contributed to a CLO, the underlying loans and participation interests have been securitized and are no longer our direct investment, and the risk return profile has been altered. In general, rather than holding interests in the underlying loans and participation interests, the CLO Transactions resulted in us holding equity interests in the CLO Issuers, with the CLO Issuers holding the underlying loans. As a result, we are subject both to the risks and benefits associated with the Preferred Shares and, indirectly, the risks and benefits associated with the underlying loans and participation interests held by the CLO Issuers. In addition, our ability to sell, amend or otherwise modify an underlying loan held by a CLO Issuer is subject to certain conditions and restrictions under the applicable CLO Transactions, which may prevent us from taking actions that we would take if we held such underlying loan directly.

The subordination of the CLO Preferred Shares will affect our right to payment.

The respective CLO Preferred Shares are subordinated to the notes issued and amounts borrowed by the CLO Issuers and CLO Co-Issuers, as applicable (collectively, the “CLO Debt”), respectively, and certain fees and expenses. If an overcollateralization test or an interest coverage test is not satisfied as of a determination date, the proceeds from the underlying loans otherwise payable to a CLO Issuer (which such CLO Issuer could have distributed with respect to the CLO Preferred Shares of such CLO Issuer) will be diverted to the payment of principal on the CLO Debt of such CLO Issuer. See “—The CLO Indentures require mandatory redemption of the respective CLO Debt for failure to satisfy coverage tests, which would reduce the amounts available for distribution to us.”

On the scheduled maturity of the CLO Debt of a CLO Issuer or if such CLO Debt is accelerated after an event of default, proceeds available after the payment of certain administrative expenses will be applied to pay both principal of and interest on the such CLO Debt until such CLO Debt is paid in full before any further payment will be made on the CLO Preferred Shares of such CLO Issuer. As a result, such CLO Preferred Shares would not receive any payments until such CLO Debt is paid in full and under certain circumstances may not receive payments at any time.

In addition, if an event of default occurs and is continuing with respect to the CLO Debt of a CLO Issuer, the holders of such CLO Debt will be entitled to determine the remedies to be exercised under the indenture pursuant to which such CLO Debt was issued (each a “CLO Indenture” and collectively, the “CLO Indentures”). Remedies pursued by the holders of CLO Debt could be adverse to our interests as the holder of CLO Preferred Shares, and the holders of CLO Debt will have no obligation to consider any possible adverse effect on such our interest or the interest of any other person. See “ —The holders of certain CLO Debt will control many rights under the CLO Indentures and therefore, we will have limited rights in connection with an event of default or distributions thereunder.”

The CLO Preferred Shares represent leveraged investments in the underlying loan portfolio of the applicable CLO Issuer, which is a speculative investment technique that increases the risk to us as the owner of the CLO Preferred Shares. As the junior interest in a leveraged capital structure, the CLO Preferred Shares will bear the primary risk of deterioration in the performance of the applicable CLO Issuer and its portfolio of underlying loans.

The holders of certain CLO Debt will control many rights under the CLO Indentures and therefore, we will have limited rights in connection with an event of default or distributions thereunder.

Under each CLO Indenture, as long as any CLO Debt of the applicable CLO Issuer is outstanding, the holders of the senior-most outstanding class of such CLO Debt will have the right to direct the trustee or the applicable CLO Issuer to take certain actions under the applicable CLO Indenture or any related credit agreement. For example, these holders will have the right, following an event of default, to direct certain actions and control certain decisions, including the right to accelerate the maturity of applicable CLO Debt and, under certain circumstances, the liquidation of the collateral. Remedies pursued by such holders upon an event of default could be adverse to our interests.

Although we, as the holder of the CLO Preferred Shares, will have the right, subject to the conditions set forth in the CLO Indentures, to purchase assets in any liquidation of assets by the collateral trustee, if an event of default has occurred and is continuing, we will not have any creditors’ rights against the applicable CLO Issuer and will not have the right to determine the remedies to be exercised under the applicable CLO Indenture. There is no guarantee that any funds will remain to make distributions to us as the holder of the CLO Preferred Shares following any liquidation of assets and the application of the proceeds from such assets to pay the applicable CLO Debt and the fees, expenses, and other liabilities payable by the applicable CLO Issuer.

The CLO Indentures require mandatory redemption of the respective CLO Debt for failure to satisfy coverage tests, which would reduce the amounts available for distribution to us.

Under the CLO Indentures governing the CLO Transactions, there are two coverage tests applicable to CLO Debt. These tests apply to each CLO Transaction separately. The first such test, the interest coverage test, compares the amount of interest proceeds received and, other than in the case of defaulted loans, scheduled to be received on the underlying loans held by each CLO Issuer to the amount of interest due and payable on the CLO Debt of such CLO Issuer and the amount of fees and expenses senior to the payment of such interest in the priority of distribution of interest proceeds. To satisfy this test interest received on the portfolio loans held by such CLO Issuer must meet a minimum percentage under the applicable CLO Indenture for the respective class or classes of the amount equal to the interest payable on the CLO Debt of such CLO Issuer for such class or classes, plus the senior fees and expenses.

The second such test, the overcollateralization test, compares the adjusted collateral principal amount of the portfolio of underlying loans of each CLO Issuer to the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the CLO Debt of such CLO Issuer. To satisfy this second test at any time, this adjusted collateral principal amount must meet a minimum percentage under the applicable CLO Indenture for the respective class or classes. In this test, certain reductions are applied to the principal balance of underlying loans in connection with certain events, such as defaults or ratings downgrades to “CCC” levels or below with respect to the loans held by each CLO Issuer. These adjustments increase the likelihood that this test is not satisfied.

If either coverage test with respect to a CLO Transaction is not satisfied on any determination date on which such test is applicable, the applicable CLO Issuer must apply available amounts to redeem its CLO Debt in an amount necessary to cause such test to be satisfied. This would reduce or eliminate the amounts otherwise available to make distributions to us as the holder of the CLO Preferred Shares of such CLO Issuer.

Our investments in portfolio companies may expose us to environmental risks.

We may invest in portfolio companies that are subject to changing and increasingly stringent environmental and health and safety laws, regulations and permit requirements and environmental costs that could place increasing financial burdens on such portfolio entities. Required expenditures for environmental compliance may adversely impact investment returns on portfolio companies. The imposition of new environmental and other laws, regulations and initiatives could adversely affect the business operations and financial stability of such portfolio companies.

There can be no guarantee that all costs and risks regarding compliance with environmental laws and regulations can be identified. New and more stringent environmental and health and safety laws, regulations and permit requirements or stricter interpretations of current laws or regulations could impose substantial additional costs on our portfolio companies. Compliance with such current or future environmental requirements does not ensure that the operations of the portfolio companies will not cause injury to the environment or to people under all circumstances or that the portfolio companies will not be required to incur additional unforeseen environmental expenditures. Moreover, failure to comply with any such requirements could have a material adverse effect on a portfolio company, and we can offer no assurance that any such portfolio companies will at all times comply with all applicable environmental laws, regulations and permit requirements.

Climate change and climate-related effects may expose us to systemic, global, macroeconomic risks and could adversely affect our business and the businesses of our products’ portfolio companies.

Global climate change is widely considered to be a significant threat to the global economy. We and the companies in which we invest may face risks associated with climate change, including physical risks such as an increased frequency or severity of extreme weather events and rising sea levels and temperatures. In addition, climate change may also impact our profitability and costs, as well as pose systemic risks for our businesses and those of the companies in which we invest. For example, to the extent weather conditions are affected by climate change, energy use by us or the companies in which we invest could increase or decrease depending on the duration and magnitude of any changes. Increases in the cost of energy could adversely affect the cost of operations of us or the companies in which we invest. On the other hand, a decrease in energy use due to weather changes may affect the financial condition of some of the companies in which we invest through decreased revenues. Additionally, extreme weather conditions in general require more system backup, adding to costs, including costs of insurance (particularly for real estate in certain regions), and can contribute to increased system stresses, including service interruptions.

The United States is currently a party to the Paris Agreement, which includes commitments from countries to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, among other commitments. While the new U.S. Presidential administration recently announced the United States’ withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, the withdrawal is not expected to go into affect until early 2026. In addition, various other regulatory and voluntary initiatives launched by international, federal, state, and regional policymakers and regulatory authorities as well as private actors seeking to reduce greenhouse gas emissions may expose our business operations, products and products’ portfolio companies to other types of transition risks, such as: (i) political and policy risks, (including changing regulatory incentives, and legal requirements, including with respect to greenhouse gas emissions, that could result in increased costs or changes in business operations), (ii) regulatory and litigation risks, (including changing legal requirements that could result in increased permitting, tax and compliance costs, enhanced disclosure obligations, changes in business operations, or the discontinuance of certain operations, and litigation seeking monetary or injunctive relief related to impacts related to climate change), (iii) technology and market risks, (including declining market for investments in industries seen as greenhouse gas intensive or less effective than alternatives in reducing greenhouse gas emissions), (iv) business trend risks, (including requirements for certain portfolio companies related to capital expenditures, product or service redesigns, and changes to operations and supply chains to meet changing customer expectations, and the increased attention to ESG considerations by our investors, including in connection with their determination of whether to invest), and (v) potential harm to our reputation if our shareholders believe that we are not adequately or appropriately responding to climate change and/or climate risk management, including through the way in which we operate our business, the composition of portfolio, our new investments or the decisions we make to continue to conduct or change our activities in response to climate change considerations.

Risks Related to an Investment in Our Common Stock

Investors will not know the purchase price per share at the time they submit their subscription agreements and could receive fewer shares of our common stock than anticipated if our Board determines to increase the offering price to a price that we believe reflects the net asset value per share of the Class S, Class D and Class I shares in accordance with our share pricing policy.

The Class S, Class D and Class I shares may, to the extent permitted or required under the rules and regulations of the SEC, be sold at prices necessary to ensure that shares are not sold at prices per share, after deducting the applicable Upfront Sales Load, that are below our net asset value per share for such class, if our net asset value per share: (i) declines more than 10% from the net asset value per share as of the effective date of this registration statement or (ii) increases to an amount that is greater than the net proceeds per share as stated herein.

In accordance with the Company’s share pricing policy, we will modify our public offering price to the extent necessary to comply with the requirements of the 1940 Act, including the requirement that we not sell our shares at a net offering price below our net asset value per share unless we obtain the requisite approval from our shareholders.

As a result, your purchase price may be higher than the prior subscription closing price per share, and therefore you may receive a smaller number of shares than if you had subscribed at the prior subscription closing price.

If we are unable to raise substantial funds in our ongoing, continuous “best efforts” offering, we may be limited in the number and type of investments we may make, and the value of your investment in us may be reduced in the event our assets under- perform.

Our continuous offering is being made on a best efforts basis, whereby our Dealer Manager and participating broker-dealers are only required to use their best efforts to sell our shares and have no firm commitment or obligation to purchase any of our shares. To the extent that less than the maximum number of shares is subscribed for, the opportunity for diversification of our investments may be decreased and the returns achieved on those investments may be reduced as a result of allocating all of our expenses among a smaller capital base.

Our shares are not listed, and we do not intend to list our shares, on an exchange, nor are our shares quoted through a quotation system. Therefore, our shareholders will have limited liquidity and may not receive a full return of invested capital (including front-end commissions, fees and expenses), upon selling their shares or upon liquidation of our company.

Our shares are illiquid investments for which there is not a secondary market nor is it expected that any such secondary market will develop in the future. We do not intend to complete a liquidity event within any specific time period, if at all. A liquidity event could include a merger or another transaction approved by our Board in which our shareholders will receive cash or shares of a listed company, or a sale of all or substantially all of our assets either on a complete portfolio basis or individually followed by a liquidation. We do not intend to list our shares on a national securities exchange. Upon the occurrence of a liquidity event, if any, all Class S and Class D shares will automatically convert into Class I shares and the ongoing servicing fee will terminate.

Our Dealer Manager in our continuous offering may be unable to sell a sufficient number of shares of common stock for us to achieve our investment objective. Our ability to conduct our continuous offering successfully is dependent, in part, on the ability of our Dealer Manager to successfully establish, operate and maintain relationships with a network of broker-dealers.

The success of our continuous public offering, and correspondingly our ability to implement our business strategy, is dependent upon the ability of our Dealer Manager to establish and maintain relationships with a network of licensed securities broker-dealers and other agents to sell our shares. If our Dealer Manager fails to perform, we may not be able to raise adequate proceeds through our public offering to implement our investment strategy. If we are unsuccessful in implementing our investment strategy, you could lose all or a part of your investment.

Purchases of shares of our common stock by persons affiliated with us or our Adviser should not influence investment decisions of independent, unaffiliated investors.

Except for certain share ownership and transfer restrictions contained in our charter, there is no limit on the number of shares that may be sold to our officers, directors, and Adviser, its affiliates and/or immediate family members. There is no assurance, however, that we will be successful in raising additional funds in our offering. If we are unsuccessful in raising additional funds, we may be unable to diversify our portfolio, and our operating expenses as a percentage of our gross offering proceeds will be higher.

We may be unable to invest a significant portion of the net proceeds of our offering on acceptable terms in an acceptable timeframe.

Delays in investing the net proceeds of our offering may impair our performance. We cannot assure you that we will be able to continue to identify investments that meet our investment objective or that any investment that we make will produce a positive return. We may be unable to invest the net proceeds of our offering on acceptable terms within the time period that we anticipate or at all, which could harm our financial condition and operating results.

Before making investments, we will invest the net proceeds of our continuous public offering primarily in cash, cash-equivalents, U.S. government securities, repurchase agreements, and/or other high-quality debt instruments maturing in one year or less from the time of investment. This will produce returns that are significantly lower than the returns which we expect to achieve when our portfolio is fully invested in securities and loans meeting our investment objective. As a result, any distributions that we pay while our portfolio is not fully invested may be lower than the distributions that we may be able to pay when our portfolio is fully invested in securities meeting our investment objective.

We intend, but are not required, to offer to repurchase shareholders’ shares on a quarterly basis. As a result, shareholders will have limited opportunities to sell their shares.

In the third quarter of 2017, we began offering, and on a quarterly basis, intend to continue offering, to repurchase shares of our common stock on such terms as may be determined by our Board in its complete discretion. Our Board has complete discretion to determine whether we will engage in any share repurchase, and if so, the terms of such repurchase. At the discretion of our Board, we may use cash on hand, cash available from borrowings, and cash from the sale of our investments as of the end of the applicable period to repurchase shares. We have not established limits on the amount of funds we may use from any available sources to repurchase shares; however, we will not borrow funds for the purpose of repurchasing shares if the amount of such repurchases would exceed our accrued and received Net Revenues for the previous four quarters. Economic events affecting the U.S. economy, such as volatility in the financial markets, inflation, higher interest rates or global or national events that are beyond our control, could cause an increased number of shares to be put to us for repurchase. To the extent that the number of shares put to us for repurchase exceeds the number of shares that we are able to purchase, we will repurchase shares on a pro rata basis, not on a first-come, first-serve basis. Further, we will have no obligation to repurchase shares if the repurchase would violate the restrictions on distributions under federal law or Maryland law. These limits may prevent us from accommodating all repurchase requests made in any quarter.

All shares purchased by us pursuant to the terms of each offer to repurchase will be retired and thereafter will be authorized and unissued shares.

Any periodic repurchase offers are subject in part to our available cash and compliance with the BDC and RIC qualification and diversification rules promulgated under the 1940 Act and the Code, respectively. While we intend to continue to conduct quarterly tender offers as described above, we are not required to do so and may suspend or terminate the share repurchase program at any time.

The timing of our repurchase offers pursuant to our share repurchase program may be at a time that is disadvantageous to our shareholders, and, to the extent shareholders are able to sell their shares under the program, they may not be able to recover the amount of their investment in our shares.

When we make repurchase offers pursuant to the share repurchase program, we may offer to repurchase shares at a price that is lower than the price that shareholders paid for our shares. As a result, to the extent shareholders paid a price that includes the related sales load and to the extent shareholders have the ability to sell their shares pursuant to our share repurchase program, the price at which they may sell shares, which will be the current net offering price per share in effect on each date of repurchase, may be lower than the amount they paid in connection with the purchase of shares in this offering.

A shareholder’s interest in us will be diluted if we issue additional shares, which could reduce the overall value of an investment in us.

Our shareholders do not have preemptive rights to purchase any shares we issue in the future. Our charter authorizes us to issue up to 4.5 billion shares of common stock. Pursuant to our charter, a majority of our entire Board may amend our charter to increase the number of shares of common stock we may issue without shareholder approval. Our Board may elect to sell additional shares in the future or issue equity interests in private offerings. To the extent we issue additional equity interests at or below net asset value, your percentage ownership interest in us may be diluted. In addition, depending upon the terms and pricing of any additional offerings and the value of our investments, you may also experience dilution in the book value and fair value of your shares.

Under the 1940 Act, we generally are prohibited from issuing or selling our common stock at a price below net asset value per share, which may be a disadvantage as compared with certain public companies. We may, however, sell our common stock, or warrants, options, or rights to acquire our common stock, at a price below the current net asset value of our common stock if our Board and independent directors determine that such sale is in our best interests and the best interests of our shareholders, and our shareholders, including a majority of those shareholders that are not affiliated with us, approve such sale. In any such case, the price at which our securities are to be issued and sold may not be less than a price that, in the determination of our Board, closely approximates the fair value of such securities (less any distributing commission or discount). If we raise additional funds by issuing common stock or senior securities convertible into, or exchangeable for, our common stock, then the percentage ownership of our shareholders at that time will decrease and you will experience dilution.

Certain provisions of our charter and actions of our Board could deter takeover attempts and have an adverse impact on the value of shares of our common stock.

Our charter, as well as certain statutory and regulatory requirements, contain certain provisions that may have the effect of discouraging a third party from attempting to acquire us. Our Board is divided into three classes of directors serving staggered three-year terms, which could prevent shareholders from removing a majority of directors in any given election. Our Board may, without shareholder action, authorize the issuance of shares in one or more classes or series, including shares of preferred stock; and our Board may, without shareholder action, amend our charter to increase the number of shares of our common stock, of any class or series, that we will have authority to issue. These anti-takeover provisions may inhibit a change of control in circumstances that could give the holders of shares of our common stock the opportunity to realize a premium over the value of shares of our common stock.

Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk.

The investments we make in accordance with our investment objective may result in a higher amount of risk than alternative investment options, including volatility or loss of principal. Our investments in portfolio companies may be highly speculative and aggressive and, therefore, an investment in our common stock may not be suitable for someone with lower risk tolerance.

The value of our common stock may fluctuate significantly.

The value and liquidity, if any, of the market for shares of our common stock may be significantly affected by numerous factors, some of which are beyond our control and may not be directly related to our operating performance. These factors include:

•changes in the value of our portfolio of investments and derivative instruments as a result of changes in market factors, such as interest rate shifts, and also portfolio specific performance, such as portfolio company defaults, among other reasons;

•changes in regulatory policies or tax guidelines, particularly with respect to RICs or BDCs;

•loss of RIC tax treatment or BDC status;

•distributions that exceed our net investment income and net income as reported according to U.S. GAAP;

•changes in earnings or variations in operating results;

•changes in accounting guidelines governing valuation of our investments;

•any shortfall in revenue or net income or any increase in losses from levels expected by investors;

•departure of our Adviser or certain of its key personnel;

•general economic trends and other external factors; and

•loss of a major funding source

We may experience fluctuations in our quarterly results.

We could experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating results due to a number of factors, including our ability or inability to make investments in companies that meet our investment criteria, the interest rate payable on the loans or other debt securities we originate or acquire, the level of our expenses (including our borrowing costs), variations in and the timing of the recognition of realized and unrealized gains or losses, the degree to which we encounter competition in our markets and general economic conditions. As a result of these factors, results for any previous period should not be relied upon as being indicative of performance in future periods or the full fiscal year.

The amount of any distributions we may make on our common stock is uncertain. We may not be able to pay distributions to shareholders, or be able to sustain distributions at any particular level, and our distributions per share, if any, may not grow over time, and our distributions per share may be reduced. We have not established any limits on the extent to which we may use borrowings, if any, and we may use sources other than cash flows from operations to fund distributions (which may reduce the amount of capital we ultimately invest in portfolio companies).

Subject to our Board’s discretion and applicable legal restrictions, we intend to authorize and declare cash distributions on a monthly or quarterly basis and pay such distributions on a monthly basis. We expect to pay distributions out of assets legally available for distribution. However, we cannot assure you that we will achieve investment results that will allow us to make a consistent targeted level of cash distributions or year-to-year increases in cash distributions. Our ability to pay distributions might be adversely affected by the impact of the risks described herein. Further, the per share amount of distributions on Class S, Class D and Class I shares may differ because of different allocations of class-specific expenses. For example, distributions on Class S and Class D shares will be lower than on Class I shares because Class S and Class D shares are subject to different ongoing servicing fees. In addition, the inability to satisfy the asset coverage test applicable to us as a BDC under the 1940 Act can limit our ability to pay distributions. Distributions from sources other than cash flows also could reduce the amount of capital we ultimately invest in debt or equity securities of portfolio companies. Further, the per share amount of distributions on Class S, Class D and Class I shares may differ because of different allocations of class-specific expenses. For example, distributions on Class S and Class D shares will be lower than on Class I shares because

Class S and Class D shares are subject to different ongoing servicing fees. We cannot assure you that we will pay distributions to our shareholders in the future.

Distributions on our common stock may exceed our taxable earnings and profits. Therefore, portions of the distributions that we pay may represent a return of capital to you. A return of capital is a return of a portion of your original investment in shares of our common stock. As a result, a return of capital will (i) lower your tax basis in your shares and thereby increase the amount of capital gain (or decrease the amount of capital loss) realized upon a subsequent sale or redemption of such shares, and (ii) reduce the amount of funds we have for investment in portfolio companies. We have not established any limit on the extent to which we may use offering proceeds to fund distributions.

We may pay our distributions from offering proceeds in anticipation of future cash flow, which may constitute a return of your capital and will lower your tax basis in your shares, thereby increasing the amount of capital gain (or decreasing the amount of capital loss) realized upon a subsequent sale or redemption of such shares, even if such shares have not increased in value or have, in fact, lost value. Distributions from offering proceeds also could reduce the amount of capital we ultimately have available to invest in portfolio companies.

Our stockholders could receive shares of our common stock as dividends, which could result in adverse tax consequences to them.

Although we currently do not intend to do so, we are permitted to declare a large portion of a dividend in shares of common stock instead of cash at the election of each stockholder. Revenue Procedures issued by the IRS allow a publicly offered RIC to distribute its own stock as a dividend for the purpose of fulfilling its distribution requirements, if certain conditions are satisfied. Among other things, the aggregate amount of cash available to be distributed to all stockholders is required to be at least 20% of the aggregate declared distribution. The Internal Revenue Service has also issued private letter rulings on cash/stock dividends paid by RICs and real estate investment trusts where the cash component is limited to 20% of the total distribution if certain requirements are satisfied. Stockholders receiving such dividends will be required to include the full amount of the dividend (including the portion payable in stock) as ordinary income (or, in certain circumstances, long-term capital gain) to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits for federal income tax purposes. As a result, stockholders could be required to pay income taxes with respect to such dividends in excess of the cash dividends received. It is unclear to what extent we will be able to pay taxable dividends in cash and common stock (whether pursuant to IRS Revenue Procedures, a private letter ruling or otherwise).

Our distributions to shareholders may be funded from expense reimbursements or waivers of investment advisory fees that are subject to repayment pursuant to our Expense Support Agreement.

Prior to its termination, substantial portions of our distributions were funded through the reimbursement of certain expenses by our Adviser and its affiliates, including through the waiver of certain investment advisory fees by our Adviser, that are subject to repayment by us within three years. Any such distributions funded through expense reimbursements or waivers of advisory fees will not be based on our investment performance, and can only be sustained if we achieve positive investment performance in future periods and/or our Adviser and its affiliates continue to make such reimbursements or waivers of such fees. Our future repayments of amounts reimbursed or waived by our Adviser or its affiliates will reduce the distributions that shareholders would otherwise receive in the future. There can be no assurance that we will achieve the performance necessary to be able to pay distributions at a specific rate or at all. Our Adviser and its affiliates have no obligation to waive advisory fees or otherwise reimburse expenses in future periods.

Shareholders will experience dilution in their ownership percentage if they do not participate in our distribution reinvestment plan.

We have a adopted a distribution reinvestment plan, pursuant to which we will reinvest all cash distributions declared by the Board on behalf of our shareholders who elect to participate, or “opt-in,” in shares of our common stock. As a result, shareholders that do not elect to participate in our distribution reinvestment plan will experience dilution over time. Shareholders who do not elect to participate in our distribution reinvestment plan may experience accretion to the net asset value of their shares if our shares are trading at a premium to net asset value and dilution if

our shares are trading at a discount to net asset value. The level of accretion or discount would depend on various factors, including the proportion of our shareholders who participate in the plan, the level of premium or discount at which our shares are trading and the amount of the distribution payable to shareholders.

Preferred stock could be issued with rights and preferences that would adversely affect holders of our common stock.

Under the terms of our charter, our Board is authorized to issue shares of preferred stock in one or more series without shareholder approval, which could potentially adversely affect the interests of existing shareholders. In particular, holders of preferred stock are required to have certain voting rights when there are unpaid dividends and priority over other classes of securities as to distribution of assets or payment of dividends.

If we issue preferred stock or convertible debt securities, the net asset value of our common stock may become more volatile.

We cannot assure you that the issuance of preferred stock and/or convertible debt securities would result in a higher yield or return to the holders of our common stock. The issuance of preferred stock or convertible debt would likely cause the net asset value of our common stock to become more volatile. If the dividend rate on the preferred stock, or the interest rate on the convertible debt securities, were to approach the net rate of return on our investment portfolio, the benefit of such leverage to the holders of our common stock would be reduced. If the dividend rate on the preferred stock, or the interest rate on the debt securities, were to exceed the net rate of return on our portfolio, the use of leverage would result in a lower rate of return to the holders of common stock than if we had not issued the preferred stock or convertible debt securities. Any decline in the net asset value of our investment would be borne entirely by the holders of our common stock. Therefore, if the market value of our portfolio were to decline, the leverage would result in a greater decrease in net asset value to the holders of our common stock than if we were not leveraged through the issuance of preferred stock or debt securities. This decline in net asset value would also tend to cause a greater decline in the market price, if any, for our common stock.

There is also a risk that, in the event of a sharp decline in the value of our net assets, we would be in danger of failing to maintain required asset coverage ratios, which may be required by the preferred stock or convertible debt, or our current investment income might not be sufficient to meet the dividend requirements on the preferred stock or the interest payments on the debt securities. In order to counteract such an event, we might need to liquidate investments in order to fund the redemption of some or all of the preferred stock or convertible debt. In addition, we would pay (and the holders of our common stock would bear) all costs and expenses relating to the issuance and ongoing maintenance of the preferred stock, convertible debt, or any combination of these securities. Holders of preferred stock or convertible debt may have different interests than holders of common stock and may at times have disproportionate influence over our affairs.

Holders of any preferred stock that we may issue will have the right to elect certain members of the Board and have class voting rights on certain matters.

The 1940 Act requires that holders of shares of preferred stock must be entitled as a class to elect two directors at all times and to elect a majority of the directors if dividends on such preferred stock are in arrears by two years or more, until such arrearage is eliminated. In addition, certain matters under the 1940 Act require the separate vote of the holders of any issued and outstanding preferred stock, including changes in fundamental investment restrictions and conversion to open end status and, accordingly, preferred shareholders could veto any such changes. Restrictions imposed on the declarations and payment of dividends or other distributions to the holders of our common stock and preferred stock, both by the 1940 Act and by requirements imposed by rating agencies, might impair our ability to maintain our tax treatment as a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Our board of directors has passed a resolution that no preferred stock will be issued that has voting rights that will limit or subordinate voting rights of the holders of our common stock afforded by the Omnibus Guidelines issued by NASAA. However, there can be no assurance that our Board will not issue preferred stock in the future.

Compliance with the SEC’s Regulation Best Interest by participating broker-dealers may negatively impact our ability to raise capital in our offering, which would harm our ability to achieve our investment objectives.

Commencing June 30, 2020, broker-dealers must comply with Regulation Best Interest, which, among other requirements, establishes a new standard of conduct for broker-dealers and their associated persons when making a recommendation of any securities transaction or investment strategy involving securities to a retail customer. Under Regulation Best Interest, high cost, high risk and complex products may be subject to greater scrutiny by broker-dealers and their salespersons. Regulation Best Interest imposes a duty of care for broker-dealers and their salespersons. Reasonable alternatives to us, such as listed entities, exist and may have lower expenses, less complexity and/or lower investment risk than us. Certain investments in listed entities may involved lower or no commissions at the time of initial purchase. Under Regulation Best Interest, broker-dealers participating in the offering must consider such alternatives in the best interest of their clients. The impact of Regulation Best Interest on participating dealers cannot be determined at this time, and it may negatively impact whether participating dealers and their associated persons recommend our offering to certain retail customers. If Regulation Best Interest reduces our ability to raise capital in our offering, it would harm our ability to create a diversified portfolio of investments and ability to achieve our investment objectives.

Risks Related to an Investment in our Unsecured Notes

Our unsecured notes are effectively subordinated to any secured indebtedness we have currently incurred or may incur in the future.

We have issued notes that are unsecured by any of our assets or any of the assets of our subsidiaries. As a result, these notes are effectively subordinated, or junior, to any secured indebtedness or other obligations we or our subsidiaries have currently incurred and may incur in the future (or any indebtedness that is initially unsecured that we later secure) to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness. Substantially all of our subsidiaries’ assets are currently pledged as collateral under our credit facilities or in connection with our CLOs. In any liquidation, dissolution, bankruptcy or other similar proceeding, the holders of any of our existing or future secured indebtedness and the secured indebtedness of our subsidiaries may assert rights against the assets pledged to secure that indebtedness in order to receive full payment of their indebtedness before the assets may be used to pay other creditors, including the holders of the unsecured notes. Secured indebtedness is effectively senior to the Notes to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness.

Our unsecured notes are structurally subordinated to the indebtedness and other liabilities of our subsidiaries.

The unsecured notes are exclusively our obligations and not of any of our subsidiaries. None of our subsidiaries are a guarantor of the unsecured notes and the unsecured notes are not required to be guaranteed by any subsidiaries we may acquire or create in the future. Except to the extent we are a creditor with recognized claims against our subsidiaries, all claims of creditors (including trade creditors) and holders of preferred stock, if any, of our subsidiaries will have priority over our equity interests in such subsidiaries (and therefore the claims of our creditors, including holders of the unsecured notes) with respect to the assets of such subsidiaries. Even if we are recognized as a creditor of one or more of our subsidiaries, our claims would still be effectively subordinated to any security interests in the assets of any such subsidiary and to any indebtedness or other liabilities of any such subsidiary senior to our claims. Consequently, our unsecured notes will be structurally subordinated, or junior, to our SPV Asset Facilities, CLOs and all existing and future indebtedness and other obligations (including trade payables) incurred by any of our subsidiaries, financing vehicles or similar facilities and any subsidiaries, financing vehicles or similar facilities that we may in the future acquire or establish. Our subsidiaries may incur indebtedness in the future, all of which would be structurally senior to the unsecured notes.

A downgrade, suspension or withdrawal of the credit rating assigned by a rating agency to us or our notes, if any, or change in the debt markets, could cause the liquidity or market value of our notes to decline significantly.

Our credit ratings are an assessment by rating agencies of our ability to pay our debts when due. Consequently, real or anticipated changes in our credit ratings will generally affect the market value of our notes. These credit ratings may not reflect the potential impact of risks relating to the structure or marketing of our notes. Credit ratings

are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security, and may be revised or withdrawn at any time by the issuing organization in its sole discretion.

An increase in market interest rates could result in a decrease in the market value of our unsecured notes.

The condition of the financial markets and prevailing interest rates have fluctuated in the past and are likely to fluctuate in the future, which could have an adverse effect on the market prices of our unsecured notes. In general, as market interest rates rise, debt securities bearing interest at fixed rates of interest decline in value. We cannot predict the future level of market interest rates.

The indenture under which the unsecured notes were issued contains limited protection for holders of our unsecured notes.

The indenture offers limited protection to holders of our unsecured notes. The terms of the indenture and the unsecured notes do not restrict our or any of our subsidiaries’ ability to engage in, or otherwise be a party to, a variety of corporate transactions, circumstances or events that could have an adverse impact on your investment in the unsecured notes. In particular, the terms of the indenture and the unsecured notes will not place any restrictions on our or our subsidiaries’ ability to:

•issue securities or otherwise incur additional indebtedness or other obligations other than an incurrence of indebtedness or other obligations that would cause a violation of Section 18(a)(1)(A) as modified by Section 61(a) of the 1940 Act or any successor provisions of the 1940 Act, but giving effect, in either case, to any exemptive relief granted to us by the SEC. Currently, these provisions generally prohibit us from incurring additional borrowings, including through the issuance of additional debt securities, unless our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 150% after such borrowings;

•pay dividends on, or purchase or redeem or make any payments in respect of, capital stock or other securities ranking junior in right of payment to the unsecured notes;

•sell assets (other than certain limited restrictions on our ability to consolidate, merge or sell all or substantially all of our assets);

•create liens (including liens on the shares of our subsidiaries) or enter into sale and leaseback transactions;

•enter into transactions with affiliates;

•make investments; or

•create restrictions on the payment of dividends or other amounts to us from our subsidiaries.

Furthermore, the terms of the indenture and the unsecured notes do not protect holders of the unsecured notes in the event that we experience changes (including significant adverse changes) in our financial condition, results of operations or credit ratings, as they do not require that we or our subsidiaries adhere to any financial tests or ratios or specified levels of net worth, revenues, income, cash flow or liquidity.

Our ability to recapitalize, incur additional debt and take a number of other actions that are not limited by the terms of the unsecured notes may have important consequences for you as a holder of the unsecured notes, including making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to the unsecured notes or negatively affecting the trading value of the unsecured notes.

Certain of our current debt instruments include more protections for their holders than the indenture and the unsecured notes. In addition, other debt we issue or incur in the future could contain more protections for its holders than the indenture and the unsecured notes, including additional covenants and events of default. The issuance or incurrence of any such debt with incremental protections could affect the market for and trading levels and prices of the unsecured notes.

The optional redemption provision may materially adversely affect your return on the unsecured notes.

The unsecured notes are redeemable in whole or in part at any time or from time to time at our option. We may choose to redeem the unsecured notes at times when prevailing interest rates are lower than the interest rate paid on the unsecured notes. In this circumstance, you may not be able to reinvest the redemption proceeds in a comparable security at an effective interest rate as high as that of the unsecured notes being redeemed.

We may not be able to repurchase the unsecured notes upon a Change of Control Repurchase Event.

Upon the occurrence of a Change of Control Repurchase Event, as defined in the indenture that governs the unsecured notes, as supplemented, subject to certain conditions, we will be required to offer to repurchase all outstanding unsecured notes at 100% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The source of funds for that purchase of the unsecured notes will be our available cash or cash generated from our operations or other potential sources, including borrowings, investment repayments, sales of assets or sales of equity. We cannot assure you that sufficient funds from such sources will be available at the time of any Change of Control Repurchase Event to make required repurchases of the unsecured notes tendered. Our debt instruments may contain restrictions and provisions that we would have to comply with in connection with any repurchase of the unsecured notes. If the holders of the unsecured notes exercise their right to require us to repurchase all the unsecured notes upon a Change of Control Repurchase Event, the financial effect of this repurchase could cause a default under our existing or future debt instruments, even if the Change of Control Repurchase Event itself would not cause a default. It is possible that we will not have sufficient funds at the time of the Change of Control Repurchase Event to make the required repurchase of the unsecured notes or our other debt.

If an active trading market does not develop for the unsecured notes, you may not be able to resell them.

We do not intend to apply for listing of the unsecured notes on any securities exchange or for quotation of the unsecured notes on any automated dealer quotation system. If no active trading market develops, you may not be able to resell the unsecured notes at their fair market value or at all. If the unsecured notes are traded after their initial issuance, they may trade at a discount from their initial offering price depending on prevailing interest rates, the market for similar securities, our credit ratings, general economic conditions, our financial condition, performance and prospects and other factors. We cannot assure you that a liquid trading market will develop for the unsecured notes, that you will be able to sell the unsecured notes at a particular time or that the price you receive when you sell will be favorable. To the extent an active trading market does not develop for the unsecured notes, the liquidity and trading price for the unsecured notes may be harmed. Accordingly, you may be required to bear the financial risk of an investment in the unsecured notes for an indefinite period of time.

Risks Related to U.S. Federal Income Tax

We cannot predict how new tax legislation will affect us, our investments, or our stockholders, and any such legislation could adversely affect our business.

Legislative or other actions relating to taxes could have a negative effect on us. The laws pertaining to U.S. federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the IRS and the U.S. Treasury Department. The likelihood of any such legislation being enacted is uncertain. New legislation and any U.S. Treasury regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions interpreting such legislation could have adverse tax consequences, such as significantly and negatively affecting our ability to qualify for tax treatment as a RIC or negatively affecting the U.S. federal income tax consequences applicable to us and our investors as a result of such qualification. Shareholders are urged to consult with their tax advisor regarding tax legislative, regulatory, or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our common stock.

We will be subject to U.S. federal income tax imposed at corporate rates if we are unable to maintain our tax treatment as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code or if we make investments through taxable subsidiaries.

To maintain RIC tax treatment under the Code, we must meet the following minimum annual distribution, income source and asset diversification requirements. See “ Tax Matters.”

The Annual Distribution Requirement for a RIC generally will be satisfied if we distribute to our shareholders on an annual basis at least 90% of our “investment company taxable income,” which is generally our net ordinary income plus the excess, if any, of realized net short term capital gains over realized net long term capital losses. In addition, a RIC may, in certain cases, satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement by distributing dividends relating to a taxable year after the close of such taxable year under the “spillover dividend” provisions of Subchapter M. We would be subject to U.S. federal income tax imposed, at corporate rates, on retained income and/or gains, including any short term capital gains or long term capital gains. We also must make distributions to satisfy the Excise Tax Avoidance Requirement and avoid a 4% excise tax on certain undistributed income. Because we may use debt financing, we are subject to (i) an asset coverage ratio requirement under the 1940 Act and may, in the future, be subject to (ii) certain financial covenants under loan and credit agreements that could, under certain circumstances, restrict us from making distributions necessary to satisfy the distribution requirements. If we are unable to obtain cash from other sources, or choose or are required to retain a portion of our taxable income or gains, we could (1) be required to pay excise taxes and (2) fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment. If we fail to qualify for treatment as a RIC, and certain amelioration provisions are not applicable, we would be subject to U.S. federal income tax on all of our taxable income (including our net capital gains) imposed at regular corporate rates. We would not be able to deduct distributions to our shareholders, nor would they be required to be made.

The income source requirement will be satisfied if we obtain at least 90% of our annual income from dividends, interest, payments with respect to loans of certain securities, gains from the sale of stock or other securities or foreign currencies, net income from certain "qualified publicly traded partnerships," or other income derived from the business of investing in stock or securities.

The asset diversification requirement will be satisfied if we meet certain asset diversification requirements at the end of each quarter of our taxable year. Specifically, to satisfy this requirement (1) at least 50% of the value of our assets must consist of (i) cash, cash items (including receivables), U.S. government securities, securities of other RICs, and (ii) other acceptable securities if such securities of any one issuer do not represent more than 5% of the value of our assets or more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of the issuer; and(2) no more than 25% of the value of our assets can be invested in (i) the securities, other than U.S. government securities or securities of other RICs, of one issuer, (ii) the securities, other than the securities of other RICs of two or more issuers that are controlled, by us and which are determined under applicable Treasury regulations, to be engaged in the same or similar or related trades or businesses, or (iii) the securities of certain “qualified publicly traded partnerships (as defined by the Code).” Failure to meet these requirements may result in our having to dispose of certain investments quickly in order to prevent the loss of RIC status. Because most of our investments will be in private companies, and therefore will be relatively illiquid, any such dispositions could be made at disadvantageous prices and could result in substantial losses.

If we fail to qualify for or maintain RIC tax treatment for any reason and are subject to U.S. federal income tax imposed at corporate rates, the resulting taxes could substantially reduce our net assets, the amount of income available for distribution, and the amount of our distributions.

We may invest in certain debt and equity investments through taxable subsidiaries and the net taxable income of these taxable subsidiaries will be subject to U.S. federal income and state and local taxes. We may invest in certain foreign debt and equity investments, which could be subject to foreign taxes (such as income tax, withholding, and value added taxes).

We may have difficulty paying our required distributions if we recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income.

For U.S. federal income tax purposes, we may be required to recognize taxable income in circumstances in which we do not receive a corresponding payment in cash. For example, since we will likely hold debt obligations that are treated under applicable tax rules as having OID (such as debt instruments with PIK, secondary market purchases of debt securities at a discount to par, interest or, in certain cases, increasing interest rates or debt instruments that were issued with warrants), we must include in income each year a portion of the OID that accrues over the life of the obligation, regardless of whether cash representing such income is received by us in the same taxable year. We may also have to include in income other amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as

unrealized appreciation for foreign currency forward contracts and deferred loan origination fees that are paid after origination of the loan or are paid in non-cash compensation such as warrants or stock. Furthermore, we may invest in non-U.S. corporations (or other non-U.S. entities treated as corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes) that could be treated under the Code and U.S. Treasury regulations as “passive foreign investment companies” and/or “controlled foreign corporations.” The rules relating to investment in these types of non-U.S. entities are designed to limit deferral and generally require the current inclusion of income derived by the entity. In certain circumstances, this could require us to recognize income where we do not receive a corresponding payment in cash.

Unrealized appreciation on derivatives, such as foreign currency forward contracts, may be included in taxable income while the receipt of cash may occur in a subsequent period when the related contract expires. Any unrealized depreciation on investments that the foreign currency forward contracts are designed to hedge are not currently deductible for tax purposes. This can result in increased taxable income whereby we may not have sufficient cash to pay distributions or we may opt to retain such taxable income and pay a 4% excise tax. In such cases we could still rely upon the “spillover provisions” to maintain RIC tax treatment.

We anticipate that a portion of our income may constitute OID or other income required to be included in taxable income prior to receipt of cash. Further, we may elect to amortize market discounts with respect to debt securities acquired in the secondary market and include such amounts in our taxable income in the current year, instead of upon disposition, as an election not to do so would limit our ability to deduct interest expenses for tax purposes. Because any OID or other amounts accrued will be included in our investment company taxable income for the year of the accrual, we may be required to make a distribution to our shareholders in order to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement, even if we will not have received any corresponding cash amount. As a result, we may have difficulty meeting the Annual Distribution Requirement necessary to maintain RIC tax treatment under the Code. We may have to sell some of our investments at times and/or at prices we would not consider advantageous, raise additional debt or equity capital, make a partial share distribution, or forgo new investment opportunities for this purpose. If we are not able to obtain cash from other sources, and choose not to make a qualifying share distribution, we may fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment and thus become subject to U.S. federal income tax.

If we are not treated as a “publicly offered regulated investment company,” as defined in the Code, certain U.S. shareholders will be treated as having received a dividend from us in the amount of such U.S. shareholders’ allocable share of the base management fee and incentive fees paid to our Adviser and some of our expenses, and these fees and expenses will be treated as miscellaneous itemized deductions of such U.S. shareholders.

A “publicly offered regulated investment company” is a RIC whose shares are either (i) continuously offered pursuant to a public offering within the meaning of Section 4 of the Securities Act, (ii) regularly traded on an established securities market or (iii) held by at least 500 persons at all times during the taxable year. While we anticipate that we will constitute a publicly offered RIC, there can be no assurance that we will in fact so qualify for any of our taxable years. If we are not treated as a publicly offered regulated investment company for any calendar year, each U.S. shareholder that is an individual, trust or estate will be treated as having received a dividend from us in the amount of such U.S. shareholder’s allocable share of the base management fee and incentive fees paid to our Adviser and certain of our other expenses for the calendar year, and these fees and expenses will be treated as miscellaneous itemized deductions of such U.S. shareholder.

General Risk Factors

Changes in laws or regulations governing our operations may adversely affect our business or cause us to alter our business strategy.

We and our portfolio companies are subject to regulation by laws at the local, state, and federal levels. These laws and regulations, as well as their interpretation, could change from time to time, including as the result of interpretive guidance or other directives from the new U.S. Presidential administration, and new laws, regulations and interpretations could also come into effect. Any new or changed laws or regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, and political uncertainty could increase regulatory uncertainty in the near term.

As a result of the 2024 U.S. election, a single political party currently controls both the executive and legislative branches of government, which increases the likelihood that legislation may be adopted that could significantly

affect the regulation of U.S. financial markets. Regulatory changes could result in greater competition from banks and other lenders with which we compete for lending and other investment opportunities. The United States may also potentially withdraw from or renegotiate various trade agreements and take other actions that would change current trade policies of the United States. In addition, in June 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed its longstanding approach under the Chevron doctrine, which provided for judicial deference to regulatory agencies. As a result of this decision, we cannot be sure whether there will be increased challenges to existing agency regulations or how lower courts will apply the decision in the context of other regulatory schemes without more specific guidance from the U.S. Supreme Court. For example, the U.S. Supreme Court's decision could significantly impact consumer protection, advertising, privacy, artificial intelligence, anti-corruption and anti-money laundering practices and other regulatory regimes with which we are required to comply. Any such regulatory developments could result in uncertainty about and changes in the ways such regulations apply to us, and may require additional resources to ensure our continued compliance. We cannot predict which, if any, of these actions will be taken or, if taken, their effect on the financial stability of the United States. Such actions could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Changes to the laws and regulations governing our permitted investments may require a change to our investment strategy. Such changes could differ materially from our strategies and plans as set forth in this report and may shift our investment focus from the areas of expertise of our Adviser. Thus, any such changes, if they occur, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and the value of your investment in us.

Heightened scrutiny of the financial services industry by regulators may materially and adversely affect our business.

The financial services industry has been the subject of heightened scrutiny by regulators around the globe. In particular, the SEC and its staff have focused more narrowly on issues relevant to alternative asset management firms, including by forming specialized units devoted to examining such firms and, in certain cases, bringing enforcement actions against the firms, their principals and employees. In recent periods there have been a number of enforcement actions within the industry, and it is expected that the SEC will continue to pursue enforcement actions against asset managers.

While the SEC’s recent lists of examination priorities include such items as assessments of investment advisers’ marketing practices, compensation arrangements and controls to protect non-public information, it is generally expected that the SEC’s oversight of alternative asset managers will continue to focus substantially on concerns related to fiduciary duty transparency and investor disclosure practices. Although the SEC has cited improvements in disclosures and industry practices in this area, it has also indicated that there is room for improvement in particular areas, including fees and expenses (and the allocation of such fees and expenses) and co-investment practices. To this end, many investment advisory firms have received inquiries during examinations or directly from the SEC’s Division of Enforcement regarding various transparency-related topics, including the acceleration of monitoring fees, the allocation of broken-deal expenses, outside business activities of firm principals and employees, group purchasing arrangements and general conflicts of interest disclosures. While we believe we have made appropriate and timely disclosures regarding the foregoing, the SEC staff may disagree.

Further, the SEC has highlighted BDC board oversight and valuation practices as one of its areas of focus in investment adviser examinations and has instituted enforcement actions against advisers for misleading investors about valuation.

If the SEC were to investigate our Adviser and find errors in its methodologies or procedures, our Adviser could be subject to penalties and fines, which could in turn harm our reputation and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Similarly, from time to time we or our Adviser could become the subject of litigation or other similar claims. Any investigations, litigation or similar claims could continue without resolution for long periods of time and could consume substantial amounts of our management’s time and attention, and that time and attention and the devotion of associated resources could, at times, be disproportionate to the amounts at stake. Investigations, litigations and other claims are subject to inherent uncertainties, and a material adverse impact on our financial statements could occur for the period in which the effect of an unfavorable final outcome in an investigation, litigation or other similar claims becomes probable and

reasonably estimable. In addition, we could incur expenses associated with defending ourselves against investigations, litigation and other similar claims, and these expenses could be material to our earnings in future periods.

Government intervention in the credit markets could adversely affect our business.

The central banks and, in particular, the U.S. Federal Reserve, have taken unprecedented steps in response to inflationary pressures. It is impossible to predict if, how, and to what extent the United States and other governments would further intervene in the credit markets. Such intervention is often prompted by politically sensitive issues involving family homes, student loans, real estate speculation, credit card receivables, pandemics, etc., and could, as a result, be contrary to what we would predict from an “economically rational” perspective.

On the other hand, recent governmental intervention could mean that the willingness of governmental bodies to take additional extraordinary action is diminished. As a result, in the event of near-term major market disruptions, there might be only limited additional government intervention, resulting in correspondingly greater market dislocation and materially greater market risk.

Provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law and of our charter and bylaws could deter takeover attempts and have an adverse effect on the price of our common stock.

The Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”), our charter and our bylaws contain provisions that may discourage, delay or make more difficult a change in control of the Company or the removal of our directors. We are subject to the Maryland Business Combination Act (the “Business Combination Act”), subject to any applicable requirements of the 1940 Act. Our board of directors has adopted a resolution exempting from the Business Combination Act any business combination between us and any other person, subject to prior approval of such business combination by our board, including approval by a majority of our disinterested directors. If the resolution exempting business combinations is repealed or our board or disinterested directors do not approve a business combination, the Business Combination Act may discourage third parties from trying to acquire control of us and may increase the difficulty of consummating such an offer. Our bylaws exempt from the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act (the “Control Share Acquisition Act”) acquisitions of our stock by any person. If we amend our bylaws to repeal the exemption from the Control Share Acquisition Act, subject to any applicable requirements of the 1940 Act, the Control Share Acquisition Act also may make it more difficult for a third party to obtain control of us and may increase the difficulty of consummating such an offer.

We have also adopted measures that may make it difficult for a third party to obtain control of us, including provisions of our charter classifying our board of directors into three classes serving staggered three-year terms, and provisions of our charter authorizing our board of directors to classify or reclassify shares of our stock into one or more classes or series, to cause the issuance of additional shares of our stock, and to amend our charter from time to time, without stockholder approval, to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of stock or the number of shares of stock of any class or series that we have authority to issue. These provisions, as well as other provisions of our charter and bylaws, may discourage, delay, defer, make more difficult or prevent a transaction or a change in control that might otherwise be in stockholders’ best interest.

Our Bylaws include an exclusive forum selection provision, which could limit our shareholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, or other agents.

Our Bylaws require that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Circuit Court for Baltimore City (or, if that court does not have jurisdiction, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Northern Division) shall be the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of any standard of conduct or legal duty owed by any of our directors, officers or other agents to us or to our shareholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the MGCL or the Charter or the Bylaws (as either may be amended from time to time), or (iv) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine. This exclusive forum selection provision in our Bylaws will not apply to claims arising under the federal securities laws, including the Securities Act and the Exchange Act. There is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce such a provision, and investors cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. In addition, this

provision may increase costs for shareholders in bringing a claim against us or our directors, officers or other agents. Any investor purchasing or otherwise acquiring our shares is deemed to have notice of and consented to the foregoing provision. The exclusive forum selection provision in our Bylaws may limit our shareholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other agents, which may discourage lawsuits against us and such persons. It is also possible that, notwithstanding such exclusive forum selection provision, a court could rule that such provision is inapplicable or unenforceable. If this occurred, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in another forum, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We expend significant financial and other resources to comply with the requirements of being a public entity.

As a public entity, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The Exchange Act requires that we file annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to our business and financial condition. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting, which are discussed below. In order to maintain and improve the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls, significant resources and management oversight are required. We have implemented procedures, processes, policies and practices for the purpose of addressing the standards and requirements applicable to public companies. These activities may divert management’s attention from other business concerns, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We may experience fluctuations in our operating results.

We may experience fluctuations in our operating results due to a number of factors, including our ability or inability to make investments in companies that meet our investment criteria, interest rates and default rates on the debt investments we make, the level of our expenses, variations in and the timing of the recognition of realized gains or losses, unrealized appreciation or depreciation, the degree to which we encounter competition in our markets, and general economic conditions. These occurrences could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, the value of your investment in us and our ability to pay distributions to you and our other shareholders.

We are subject to risks in using custodians, counterparties, administrators and other agents.

We depend on the services of custodians, counterparties, administrators and other agents to carry out certain transactions and other administrative services, including compliance with regulatory requirements in U.S. and non-U.S. jurisdictions. We are subject to risks of errors and mistakes made by these third parties, which may be attributed to us and subject us or our shareholders to reputational damage, penalties or losses. We depend on third parties to provide primary and back up communications and information systems. Any failure or interruption of those systems, including as a result of the termination of an agreement with any third-party service providers, could cause delays or other problems in our activities. Our financial, accounting, data processing, portfolio monitoring, backup or other operating systems and facilities may fail to operate properly or become disabled or damaged as a result of a number of factors including events that are wholly or partially beyond our control. The terms of the contracts with third-party service providers are often customized and complex, and many of these arrangements occur in markets or relate to products that are not subject to regulatory oversight. Accordingly, we may be unsuccessful in seeking reimbursement or indemnification from these third-party service providers. In addition, we rely on a select number of third-party services providers and replacement of any one of our service providers could be difficult and result in disruption and expense.

Effects of Leverage [Text Block]


	Assumed Return on Our Portfolio (Net of Expenses)
	(10)%		(5)%		0%		5%		10%
Corresponding return to common shareholder(1)	(25.9)	%	(16.2)	%	(6.4)	%	3.3	%	13.0	%

______________

See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources” for more information regarding our borrowings.

Annual Coverage Return Rate [Percent]

200.00%

Effects of Leverage [Table Text Block]


	Assumed Return on Our Portfolio (Net of Expenses)
	(10)%		(5)%		0%		5%		10%
Corresponding return to common shareholder(1)	(25.9)	%	(16.2)	%	(6.4)	%	3.3	%	13.0	%

______________

Return at Minus Ten [Percent]

(25.90%)

Return at Minus Five [Percent]

(16.20%)

Return at Zero [Percent]

(6.40%)

Return at Plus Five [Percent]

3.30%

Return at Plus Ten [Percent]

13.00%

Effects of Leverage, Purpose [Text Block]

Capital Stock, Long-Term Debt, and Other Securities [Abstract]

Long Term Debt [Table Text Block]

Note 5. Debt

In accordance with the 1940 Act, with certain limitations, the Company is allowed to borrow amounts such that its asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at least 150% after such borrowing. The Company’s asset coverage was 209% and 209% as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively.

Debt obligations consisted of the following as of the following periods:


	December 31, 2024
($ in thousands)	Aggregate Principal Committed		Outstanding Principal		Amount Available(1)		Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs (Premium)		Net Carrying Value
Revolving Credit Facility(2)(4)	$	3,100,000	$	1,335,012	$	1,726,832	$	(22,497)	$	1,312,515
SPV Asset Facility I	525,000		300,000		8,771		(5,464)		294,536
SPV Asset Facility II	1,500,000		920,000		115,020		(12,119)		907,881
SPV Asset Facility III(2)	1,500,000		971,917		55,727		(13,370)		958,547
SPV Asset Facility IV	500,000		355,000		26,504		(3,302)		351,698
SPV Asset Facility V	500,000		250,000		18,217		(4,991)		245,009
SPV Asset Facility VI	750,000		350,000		62,964		(8,248)		341,752
SPV Asset Facility VII(2)	500,000		165,859		168,563		(3,461)		162,398
SPV Asset Facility VIII	500,000		200,000		1,500		(3,077)		196,923
CLO VIII	290,000		290,000		—		(1,900)		288,100
CLO XI	260,000		260,000		—		(1,692)		258,308
CLO XII	260,000		260,000		—		(1,808)		258,192
CLO XV	312,000		312,000		—		(2,802)		309,198
CLO XVI	420,000		420,000		—		(2,697)		417,303
CLO XVII	325,000		325,000		—		(2,879)		322,121
CLO XVIII	260,000		260,000		—		(1,891)		258,109
CLO XIX	260,000		260,000		—		(1,794)		258,206
March 2025 Notes	500,000		500,000		—		(484)		499,516
September 2026 Notes	350,000		350,000		—		(2,916)		347,084
February 2027 Notes	500,000		500,000		—		(3,350)		496,650
September 2027 Notes(3)	600,000		600,000		—		(5,182)		593,270
AUD 2027 Notes(2)(3)	295,468		295,468		—		(2,397)		271,957
June 2028 Notes(3)	650,000		650,000		—		(8,067)		642,519
January 2029 Notes(3)	550,000		550,000		—		(11,458)		538,086
September 2029 Notes(3)	500,000		500,000		—		(10,769)		492,523
March 2030 Notes(3)	1,000,000		1,000,000		—		(20,518)		941,037
March 2031 Notes(3)	750,000		750,000		—		(19,599)		718,384
Total Debt	$	17,457,468	$	12,930,256	$	2,184,098	$	(178,732)	$	12,681,822

______________

(1)The amount available reflects any limitations related to each credit facility’s borrowing base.

(2)Includes unrealized gain (loss) on translation of borrowings denominated in foreign currencies.

(3)Net Carrying Value is inclusive of change in fair market value of effective hedge.

(4)The amount available is reduced by $38.2 million of outstanding letters of credit.


	December 31, 2023
($ in thousands)	Aggregate Principal Committed		Outstanding Principal		Amount Available(1)		Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs (Premium)		Net Carrying Value
Revolving Credit Facility(2)	$	1,945,000	$	628,128	$	1,316,872	$	(16,732)	$	611,396
SPV Asset Facility I	525,000		475,000		50,000		(6,080)		468,920
SPV Asset Facility II	1,800,000		1,718,000		82,000		(7,255)		1,710,745
SPV Asset Facility III	1,000,000		522,000		289,180		(8,954)		513,046
SPV Asset Facility IV	500,000		250,000		61,848		(3,704)		246,296
SPV Asset Facility V	300,000		200,000		12,439		(2,995)		197,005
SPV Asset Facility VI	750,000		160,000		18,188		(7,006)		152,994
CLO VIII	290,000		290,000		—		(2,093)		287,907
CLO XI	260,000		260,000		—		(1,856)		258,144
CLO XII	260,000		260,000		—		(1,998)		258,002
March 2025 Notes	500,000		500,000		—		(3,414)		496,586
September 2026 Notes	350,000		350,000		—		(5,318)		344,682
February 2027 Notes	500,000		500,000		—		(3,301)		496,699
September 2027 Notes(3)	600,000		600,000		—		(6,869)		598,564
June 2028 Notes	650,000		650,000		—		(9,988)		640,012
January 2029 Notes(3)	550,000		550,000		—		(13,679)		546,975
Total Debt	$	10,780,000	$	7,913,128	$	1,830,527	$	(101,242)	$	7,827,973

______________

(1)The amount available reflects any limitations related to each credit facility’s borrowing base.

(2)Includes unrealized gain (loss) on translation of borrowings denominated in foreign currencies.

(3)Net Carrying Value is inclusive of change in fair market value of effective hedge.

The below table represents the components of interest expense for the following periods:


	For the Years Ended December 31,
($ in thousands)		2024			2023			2022
Interest expense		$	759,984		$	457,035		$	190,110
Amortization of debt issuance costs		31,304			17,912			10,657
Net change in unrealized (gain) loss on effective interest rate swaps and hedged items(1)		9,676			(2,114)			(449)
Total Interest Expense		$	800,964		$	472,833		$	200,318
Average interest rate		7.4		%	7.0		%	4.8		%
Average daily borrowings		$	10,083,258		$	6,461,477		$	3,879,321

______________

(1)Refer to the September 2027, AUD 2027, June 2028, January 2029, September 2029, March 2030, and March 2031 Notes for details on the facilities’ interest rate swaps.

Credit Facilities

Revolving Credit Facility

On August 11, 2022, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Senior Secured Revolving Credit Agreement as amended from time to time (as amended from time to time, the “Revolving Credit Facility”). The

parties to the Revolving Credit Facility include the Company, as Borrower, the lenders from time to time parties thereto (each a “Revolving Credit Lender” and collectively, the “Revolving Credit Lenders”) and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, as Administrative Agent. On October 18, 2024 (the “Revolving Credit Facility Third Amendment Date”), the Revolving Credit Facility was amended to extend the availability period and maturity date, increase the total facility amount and make various other changes. The following describes the terms of the Revolving Credit Facility as modified through October 25, 2024.

The Revolving Credit Facility is guaranteed by certain subsidiaries of ours in existence as of the Revolving Credit Facility Third Amendment Date, and will be guaranteed by certain subsidiaries of ours that are formed or acquired by us thereafter (each a “Guarantor” and collectively, the “Guarantors”). Proceeds of the Revolving Credit Facility may be used for general corporate purposes, including the funding of portfolio investments.

As of October 25, 2024, the Revolving Credit Facility provides for, on an aggregated basis, a total of outstanding term loans and revolving credit facility commitments in the principal amount of $3.10 billion, which is comprised of (a) a term loan in a principal amount of $150.0 million (increased from $125.0 million to $150.0 million on the Revolving Credit Facility Third Amendment Date) and (b) subject to availability under the borrowing base, which is based on the Company’s portfolio investments and other outstanding indebtedness, a revolving credit facility in a principal amount of up to $2.95 billion (the revolving credit facility increased from $2.12 billion to $2.80 billion on the Revolving Credit Facility Third Amendment Date and increased from $2.80 billion to $2.95 billion on October 25, 2024). The amount available for borrowing under the Revolving Credit Facility is reduced by any standby letters of credit issued through the Revolving Credit Facility. Maximum capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility may be increased to $4.60 billion through the Company’s exercise of an uncommitted accordion feature through which existing and new lenders may, at their option, agree to provide additional financing. The Revolving Credit Facility includes a $200.0 million limit for swingline loans and is secured by a perfected first-priority interest in substantially all of the portfolio investments held by the Company and each Guarantor, subject to certain exceptions.

As of October 25, 2024, the availability period under the Revolving Credit Facility will terminate on October 18, 2028 (the “Revolving Credit Facility Commitment Termination Date”). The Revolving Credit Facility will mature on October 18, 2029 (the “Revolving Credit Facility Maturity Date”). During the period from the Revolving Credit Facility Commitment Termination Date to the Revolving Credit Facility Maturity Date, the Company will be obligated to make mandatory prepayments under the Revolving Credit Facility out of the proceeds of certain asset sales and other recovery events and equity and debt issuances.

The Company may borrow amounts in U.S. dollars or certain other permitted currencies. As of October 25, 2024, amounts drawn under the Revolving Credit Facility in U.S. dollars will bear interest at term SOFR plus any applicable credit adjustment spread plus margin of 1.875% per annum, or the alternative base rate plus margin of 0.875% per annum. With respect to loans denominated in U.S. dollars, the Company may elect either term SOFR or the alternative base rate at the time of drawdown, and such loans may be converted from one rate to another at any time at the Company’s option, subject to certain conditions. As of October 25, 2024, amounts drawn under the Revolving Credit Facility in other permitted currencies will bear interest at the relevant rate specified therein (including any applicable credit adjustment spread) plus margin of 1.875% per annum. Beginning on and after the Revolving Credit Facility Third Amendment Date, the Company will also pay a fee of 0.350% on undrawn amounts under the Revolving Credit Facility.

The Revolving Credit Facility includes customary covenants, including certain limitations on the incurrence by the Company of additional indebtedness and on the Company’s ability to make distributions to the Company’s shareholders, or redeem, repurchase or retire shares of stock, upon the occurrence of certain events and certain financial covenants related to asset coverage and other maintenance covenants, as well as customary events of default. The Revolving Credit Facility requires a minimum asset coverage ratio with respect to the consolidated assets of the Company and its subsidiaries to senior securities that constitute indebtedness of no less than 1.50 to 1.00 at any time.

SPV Asset Facilities

Certain of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries are parties to credit facilities (the “SPV Asset Facilities”). Pursuant to the SPV Asset Facilities, from time to time the Company sells and contributes certain investments to these wholly owned subsidiaries pursuant to sale and contribution agreements by and between the Company and the wholly owned subsidiaries. No gain or loss is recognized as a result of these contributions. Proceeds from the SPV Asset Facilities are used to finance the origination and acquisition of eligible assets by the wholly owned subsidiary, including the purchase of such assets from the Company. The Company retains a residual interest in assets contributed to or acquired to the wholly owned subsidiary through the Company’s ownership of the wholly owned subsidiary. The SPV Asset Facilities are secured by a perfected first priority security interest in the assets of these wholly owned subsidiaries and on any payments received by such wholly owned subsidiaries in respect of those assets. Assets pledged to lenders under the SPV Asset Facilities will not be available to pay the Company’s debts. The SPV Asset Facilities contain customary covenants, including certain limitations on the incurrence by the Company of additional indebtedness and on the Company’s ability to make distributions to its shareholders, or redeem, repurchase or retire shares of stock, upon the occurrence of certain events, and customary events of default (with customary cure and notice provisions). Borrowings of the wholly owned subsidiaries under the SPV Asset Facilities are considered the Company’s borrowings for purposes of complying with the asset coverage requirements under the 1940 Act.

SPV Asset Facility I

On September 16, 2021 (the “SPV Asset Facility I Closing Date”), Core Income Funding I LLC (“Core Income Funding I”), a Delaware limited liability company and newly formed wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company entered into a Credit Agreement (the “SPV Asset Facility I”), with Core Income Funding I, as borrower, the lenders from time to time parties thereto (the “SPV Asset Facility I Lenders”), Natixis, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent, State Street Bank and Trust Company as Collateral Agent and Alter Domus (US) LLC as Document Custodian. The following describes the terms of the SPV Asset Facility I as amended through June 20, 2023 (the “SPV Asset Facility I Second Amendment Date”).

The maximum principal amount of the Credit Facility is $525.0 million (decreased from $550.0 million on the SPV Asset Facility I Second Amendment Date); the availability of this amount is subject to an overcollateralization ratio test, which is based on the value of Core Income Funding I’s assets from time to time, and satisfaction of certain conditions, including an interest coverage ratio test, certain concentration limits and collateral quality tests.

The SPV Asset Facility I provides for the ability to (1) draw term loans and (2) draw and redraw revolving loans under the SPV Asset Facility I through September 16, 2025 unless the revolving commitments are terminated or converted to term loans sooner as provided in the SPV Asset Facility I (the “ SPV Asset Facility I Commitment Termination Date”). Unless otherwise terminated, the SPV Asset Facility I will mature on September 16, 2033 (the “SPV Asset Facility I Stated Maturity”). Prior to the SPV Asset Facility I Stated Maturity, proceeds received by Core Income Funding I from principal and interest, dividends, or fees on assets must be used to pay fees, expenses and interest on outstanding borrowings, and the excess may be returned to the Company, subject to certain conditions. On the SPV Asset I Facility Stated Maturity, Core Income Funding I must pay in full all outstanding fees and expenses and all principal and interest on outstanding borrowings, and the excess may be returned to the Company.

Amounts drawn bear interest at Term SOFR (or, in the case of certain lenders that are commercial paper conduits, the lower of their cost of funds and Term SOFR plus 0.40%) plus an applicable margin that ranges from 2.00% to 2.85% depending on a ratio of broadly syndicated loans to middle-market loans in the collateral. From the SPV Asset I Facility Closing Date to the SPV Asset I Facility Commitment Termination Date, there is a commitment fee that steps up during the year after the SPV Asset I Facility Closing Date from 0.00% to 0.625% per annum on the undrawn amount, if any, of the revolving commitments in the SPV Asset Facility I.

SPV Asset Facility II

On October 5, 2021 (the “SPV Asset Facility II Closing Date”), Core Income Funding II LLC (“Core Income Funding II”), a Delaware limited liability company entered into a loan and financing and servicing agreement (as

amended through the date hereof, the “SPV Asset Facility II”), with Core Income Funding II, as borrower, us, as equityholder and service provider, the lenders from time to time parties thereto (the “SPV Asset Facility II Lenders”), Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, as Facility Agent, State Street Bank and Trust Company, as collateral agent, and Alter Domus (US) LLC as collateral custodian. The following describes the terms of the SPV Asset Facility II as amended through August 9, 2024 (the “SPV Asset Facility II Eighth Amendment Date”).

The maximum principal amount of the SPV Asset Facility II is $1.50 billion (decreased from $1.80 billion to $1.50 billion on the SPV Asset Facility II Eighth Amendment Date); the availability of this amount is subject to the borrowing base, which is determined on the basis of the value and types of Core Income Funding II’s assets from time to time, and satisfaction of certain conditions, including interest spread and weighted average coupon tests, certain concentration limits and collateral quality tests.

The SPV Asset Facility II provides for the ability to borrow, reborrow, repay and prepay advances under the SPV Asset Facility II until October 5, 2026 unless such period is extended or accelerated under the terms of the SPV Asset Facility II (the “SPV Asset Facility II Revolving Period”). Unless otherwise extended, accelerated or terminated under the terms of the SPV Asset Facility II, the SPV Asset Facility II will mature on the date that is two years after the last day of the SPV Asset Facility II Revolving Period, on October 5, 2028 (the “SPV Asset Facility II Termination Date”). Prior to the Facility Termination Date, proceeds received by Core Income Funding II from principal and interest, dividends, or fees on assets must be used to pay fees, expenses and interest on outstanding advances, and the excess may be returned to the Company, subject to certain conditions. On the SPV Asset Facility II Termination Date, Core Income Funding II must pay in full all outstanding fees and expenses and all principal and interest on outstanding advances, and the excess may be returned to the Company.

Amounts drawn under the SPV Asset Facility II bear interest at Term SOFR (or, in the case of certain SPV Asset Facility II Lenders that are commercial paper conduits, the lower of (a) their cost of funds and (b) Term SOFR, such Term SOFR not to be lower than zero) plus a spread equal to 2.15% per annum, which spread will increase (a) on and after the end of the SPV Asset Facility II Revolving Period by 0.15% per annum if no event of default has occurred and (b) by 2.00% per annum upon the occurrence of an event of default (such spread, the “SPV Asset Facility II Applicable Margin”). Term SOFR may be replaced as a base rate under certain circumstances. During the SPV Asset Facility II Revolving Period, Core Income Funding II will pay an undrawn fee ranging from 0.00% to 0.25% per annum on the undrawn amount, if any, of the revolving commitments in the SPV Asset Facility II. During the SPV Asset Facility II Revolving Period, if the undrawn commitments are in excess of a certain portion (initially 20.0% and increasing in stages to 35%, 50% and 70%) of the total commitments under the SPV Asset Facility II, Core Income Funding II will also pay a make-whole fee equal to the SPV Asset Facility II Applicable Margin multiplied by such excess undrawn commitment amount, reduced by the undrawn fee payable on such excess. Core Income Funding II will also pay Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, certain fees (and reimburse certain expenses) in connection with its role as facility agent.

SPV Asset Facility III

On March 24, 2022 (the “SPV Asset Facility III Closing Date”), Core Income Funding III LLC (“Core Income Funding III”), a Delaware limited liability company and newly formed subsidiary of the Company entered into a Credit Agreement (the “SPV Asset Facility III”), with Core Income Funding III, as borrower, the Adviser, as servicer, the lenders from time to time parties thereto (the “SPV Asset Facility III Lenders”), Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, State Street Bank and Trust Company, as collateral agent, Alter Domus (US) LLC as collateral custodian and Bank of America, N.A., as sole lead arranger and sole book manager. On November 21, 2023, the parties to the SPV Asset Facility III entered into an amendment, including to increase the maximum principal amount available under the facility, extend the availability period and maturity date, change the interest rate, replace Alter Domus (US) as collateral custodian with State Street Bank and Trust Company and make various other changes. The following describes the terms of SPV Asset Facility III amended through July 30, 2024 (the “SPV Asset Facility III Second Amendment Date”).

The maximum principal amount of the SPV Asset Facility III is $1.50 billion (increased from $1.0 billion to $1.50 billion on the SPV Asset Facility III Second Amendment Date), which can be drawn in multiple currencies subject to certain conditions; the availability of this amount is subject to the borrowing base, which is determined on

the basis of the value and types of Core Income Funding III’s assets from time to time, and satisfaction of certain conditions, including certain portfolio criteria.

The SPV Asset Facility III provides for the ability to draw and redraw revolving loans under the SPV Asset Facility III for a period of up to three years after the SPV Asset Facility III Second Amendment Date unless the commitments are terminated sooner as provided in the SPV Asset Facility III (the “SPV Asset Facility III Commitment Termination Date”). Unless otherwise terminated, the SPV Asset Facility III will mature on July 30, 2029 (the “SPV Asset Facility III Stated Maturity”). To the extent the commitments are terminated or permanently reduced during the first two years following the SPV Asset Facility III Closing Date, Core Income Funding III may owe a prepayment penalty. Prior to the SPV Asset Facility III Stated Maturity, proceeds received by Core Income Funding III from principal and interest, dividends, or fees on assets must be used to pay fees, expenses and interest on outstanding borrowings, and the excess may be returned to the Company, subject to certain conditions. On the SPV Asset Facility III Stated Maturity, Core Income Funding III must pay in full all outstanding fees and expenses and all principal and interest on outstanding borrowings, and the excess may be returned to the Company.

Amounts drawn in U.S. dollars are benchmarked to Daily SOFR, amounts drawn in British pounds are benchmarked to SONIA plus an adjustment of 0.12%, amounts drawn in Canadian dollars are benchmarked to CORRA plus an adjustment of 0.30%, and amounts drawn in Euros are benchmarked to EURIBOR, and in each case plus a spread equal to the Applicable Margin. As of the SPV Asset Facility III Second Amendment Date, the “SPV Asset Facility III Applicable Margin” ranges from 1.60% to 2.60% depending on the composition of the collateral. The SPV Asset Facility III also allows for amounts drawn in U.S. dollars to bear interest at an alternate base rate without a spread.

From the SPV Asset Facility III Closing Date to the SPV Asset Facility III Commitment Termination Date, there is a commitment fee, calculated on a daily basis, on the undrawn amount under the SPV Asset Facility III.

SPV Asset Facility IV

On March 16, 2022 (the “SPV Asset Facility IV Closing Date”), Core Income Funding IV LLC (“Core Income Funding IV”), a Delaware limited liability company and newly formed subsidiary of the Company, entered into a Credit Agreement (the “SPV Asset Facility IV”), with Core Income Funding IV, as Borrower, the lenders from time to time parties thereto (the “SPV Asset Facility IV Lenders”), Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, as Administrative Agent, State Street Bank and Trust Company, as Collateral Agent, Collateral Administrator and Custodian and Alter Domus (US) LLC as Document Custodian.

The maximum principal amount of the SPV Asset Facility IV is $500.0 million; the availability of this amount is subject to an overcollateralization ratio test, which is based on the value of Core Income Funding IV’s assets from time to time, and satisfaction of certain conditions, including an interest coverage ratio test, certain concentration limits and collateral quality tests.

The SPV Asset Facility IV provides for the ability to (1) draw term loans and (2) draw and redraw revolving loans under the SPV Asset Facility IV for a period of up to three years after the SPV Asset Facility IV Closing Date unless the revolving commitments are terminated or converted to term loans sooner as provided in the SPV Asset Facility IV (the “SPV Asset Facility IV Commitment Termination Date”). Unless otherwise terminated, the SPV Asset Facility IV will mature on March 16, 2033 (the “SPV Asset Facility IV Stated Maturity”). Prior to the SPV Asset Facility IV Stated Maturity, proceeds received by Core Income Funding IV from principal and interest, dividends, or fees on assets must be used to pay fees, expenses and interest on outstanding borrowings, and the excess may be returned to the Company, subject to certain conditions. On the SPV Asset Facility IV Stated Maturity, Core Income Funding IV must pay in full all outstanding fees and expenses and all principal and interest on outstanding borrowings, and the excess may be returned to the Company.

Amounts drawn bear interest at Term SOFR (or, in the case of certain SPV Asset Facility IV Lenders that are commercial paper conduits, the lower of their cost of funds and Term SOFR plus 0.15%) plus an applicable margin that ranges from 1.70% to 2.30% depending on a ratio of broadly syndicated loans to middle-market loans in the collateral. From the SPV Asset Facility IV Closing Date to the SPV Asset Facility IV Commitment Termination Date, there is a commitment fee that steps up during the year after the SPV Asset Facility IV Closing Date from

0.00% to 0.50% per annum on the undrawn amount, if any, of the revolving commitments in the SPV Asset Facility IV.

SPV Asset Facility V

On March 9, 2023 (the “SPV Asset Facility V Closing Date”), Core Income Funding V LLC (“Core Income Funding V”), a Delaware limited liability company and newly formed subsidiary of the Company, entered into a loan and security agreement (the “SPV Asset Facility V”), with Core Income Funding V, as Borrower, the Company, as Servicer and Equityholder, the lenders from time to time parties thereto (the “SPV Asset Facility V Lenders”), Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, State Street Bank and Trust Company, as Collateral Agent, and Alter Domus (US) LLC as Collateral Custodian. On October 16, 2024, the parties to the SPV Asset Facility V entered into the Second Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, in order to, among other changes, replace Alter Domus (US) LLC) as collateral custodian with State Street Bank and Trust Company The following describes the terms of SPV Asset Facility V as amended through October 16, 2024 (the “SPV Asset Facility V Second Amendment Date”).

The maximum principal amount of the SPV Asset Facility V is $500.0 million; the availability of this amount is subject to a borrowing base test, which is based on the value of Core Income Funding V’s assets from time to time, and satisfaction of certain conditions, including certain concentration limits and other portfolio tests.

The SPV Asset Facility V provides for the ability to borrow, reborrow, repay and prepay advances under the SPV Asset Facility V until October 15, 2027 unless such period is extended or accelerated under the terms of the SPV Asset Facility V (the “SPV Asset Facility V Reinvestment Period”). Unless otherwise extended, accelerated or terminated under the terms of the SPV Asset Facility V, the SPV Asset Facility V will mature on October 16, 2029 (the “SPV Asset Facility V Maturity Date”). Prior to the SPV Asset Facility V Maturity Date, proceeds received by Core Income Funding V from principal and interest, dividends, or fees on assets must be used to pay fees, expenses and interest on outstanding advances, and the excess may be returned to the Company, subject to certain conditions. On the SPV Asset Facility V Maturity Date, Core Income Funding V must pay in full all outstanding fees and expenses and all principal and interest on outstanding advances, and the excess may be returned to the Company.

Amounts drawn bear interest at Daily Simple SOFR plus a weighted average spread equal to 1.60% per annum for the portion of the assets constituting broadly syndicated loans and 2.05% for the portion of the assets not constituting broadly syndicated loans, which spread will increase by 2.00% per annum upon the occurrence and during the existence of an event of default or following the SPV Asset Facility V Termination Date (such spread, the “SPV Asset Facility V Applicable Spread”). Daily Simple SOFR may be replaced as a base rate under certain circumstances. During the SPV Asset Facility V Reinvestment Period, Core Income Funding V will pay an undrawn fee of 0.50% per annum on the undrawn amount, if any, of the revolving commitments in the SPV Asset Facility V that are not subject to the separate, higher fee described below. On and after the SPV Asset Facility V Second Amendment Date and during the SPV Asset Facility V Reinvestment Period, if the undrawn commitments are in excess of a certain portion (initially 50% and decreasing to 30%) of the total commitments under the SPV Asset Facility V, such portion will not be subject to the undrawn fee described above, but Core Income Funding V will pay a separate fee on this portion of the undrawn commitments equal to 1.25% multiplied by such excess undrawn commitment amount over 50% or 30% of the total commitments, as applicable.

SPV Asset Facility VI

On August 29, 2023 (the “SPV Asset Facility VI Closing Date”), Core Income Funding VI LLC (“Core Income Funding VI”), a Delaware limited liability company and newly formed subsidiary of the Company, entered into a Credit Agreement (the “SPV Asset Facility VI”), with Core Income Funding VI LLC, as Borrower, the lenders from time to time parties thereto (the “SPV Asset Facility VI Lenders”), The Bank of Nova Scotia, as Administrative Agent, State Street Bank and Trust Company as Collateral Agent and Alter Domus (US) LLC as Document Custodian. On March 1, 2024 (the “SPV Asset Facility VI First Amendment Date”), the parties to the SPV Asset Facility VI entered into Amendment No. 1 (the “SPV Asset Facility VI Amendment No. 1”). On the SPV Asset Facility VI First Amendment Date, the Company also consented to the assignment of the term commitment under the SPV Asset Facility VI, and all of the outstanding term loans, to Hamburg Commercial Bank AG, Luxembourg

Branch. On November 12, 2024, the parties to the SPV Asset Facility VI entered into Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement, in order to, among other changes, replace Alter Domus (US) LLC as collateral custodian with State Street Bank and Trust Company. The following describes the terms of SPV Asset Facility VI as amended through November 12, 2024 (the “SPV Asset Facility V Second Amendment Date”).

The maximum principal amount of the SPV Asset Facility VI is $750.0 million; the availability of this amount is subject to an overcollateralization ratio test, which is based on the value of Core Income Funding VI’s assets from time to time, and satisfaction of certain conditions, including an interest coverage ratio test, certain concentration limits and collateral quality tests.

The SPV Asset Facility VI provides for the ability to (1) draw term loans and (2) draw and redraw revolving loans under the SPV Asset Facility VI for a period of up to two years after the SPV Asset Facility VI Closing Date until August 29, 2026 unless the revolving commitments are terminated or converted to term loans sooner as provided in the SPV Asset Facility VI (the “SPV Asset Facility VI Commitment Termination Date”). Unless otherwise terminated, the SPV Asset Facility VI will mature on August 29, 2033 (the “SPV Asset Facility VI Stated Maturity”). Prior to the SPV Asset Facility VI Stated Maturity, proceeds received by Core Income Funding VI from principal and interest, dividends, or fees on assets must be used to pay fees, expenses and interest on outstanding borrowings, and the excess may be returned to the Company, subject to certain conditions. On the SPV Asset Facility VI Stated Maturity, Core Income Funding VI must pay in full all outstanding fees and expenses and all principal and interest on outstanding borrowings, and the excess may be returned to the Company.

Amounts drawn bear interest at Term SOFR plus an applicable margin that ranges from 1.50% to 2.15% depending on a ratio of broadly syndicated loans to middle-market loans in the collateral during the SPV Asset Facility VI Reinvestment Period. From the SPV Asset Facility VI Closing Date to the SPV Asset Facility VI Commitment Termination Date, there is a commitment fee that steps up during the year after the SPV Asset Facility VI Closing Date from 0.00% to 0.55% per annum on the undrawn amount, if any, of the revolving commitments in the SPV Asset Facility VI.

SPV Asset Facility VII

On May 21, 2024 (the “SPV Asset Facility VII Closing Date”), Core Income Funding VII LLC (“Core Income Funding VII”), a Delaware limited liability company and newly formed subsidiary of the Company, entered into a Credit Agreement (the “SPV Asset Facility VII”), with Core Income Funding VII LLC, as Borrower, the lenders from time to time parties thereto (the “SPV Asset Facility VII Lenders”), Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, State Street Bank and Trust Company as Custodian, Collateral Agent and Collateral Administrator. The following describes the terms of SPV Asset Facility VII as amended through October 18, 2024 (the “SPV Asset Facility VII First Amendment Date”).

The maximum principal amount of the SPV Asset Facility VII is $500.0 million (increased from $300.0 million to $500.0 million on the SPV Asset Facility VII First Amendment Date”), which can be drawn in multiple currencies subject to certain conditions; the availability of this amount is subject to a borrowing base test (which is based on the value of Core Income Funding VII’s assets from time to time, an advance rate and concentration limitations) and satisfaction of certain conditions, including collateral quality tests.

The SPV Asset Facility VII provides for the ability to draw and redraw revolving loans under the SPV Asset Facility VII for a period of until May 21, 2027 (the “SPV Asset Facility VII Reinvestment Period”) unless the SPV Asset Facility VII Reinvestment Period is terminated sooner as provided in the SPV Asset Facility VII. Unless otherwise terminated, the SPV Asset Facility VII will mature two years after the last day of the SPV Asset Facility VII Reinvestment Period on May 21, 2029 (the “SPV Asset Facility VII Stated Maturity”). To the extent the commitments are terminated or permanently reduced during the first two years following the SPV Asset Facility Closing Date, Core Income Funding VII may owe a prepayment penalty. Prior to the SPV Asset Facility VII Stated Maturity, proceeds received by Core Income Funding VII from principal and interest, dividends, or fees on assets must be used to pay fees, expenses and interest on outstanding borrowings, and the excess may be returned to the Company, subject to certain conditions. On the SPV Asset Facility VII Stated Maturity, Core Income Funding VII

must pay in full all outstanding fees and expenses and all principal and interest on outstanding borrowings, and the excess may be returned to the Company.

Amounts drawn in U.S. dollars are benchmarked to Term SOFR, amounts drawn in British pounds are benchmarked to SONIA, amounts drawn amounts drawn in Canadian dollars are benchmarked to Daily Compounded CORRA, and amounts drawn in Euros are benchmarked to EURIBOR, and in each case plus a spread equal to the Applicable Margin. The “Applicable Margin” ranges from 1.60% to 2.10%, depending on the type of asset being funded by such draw and the utilization level of the SPV Asset Facility VII. Core Income Funding VII also paid Citibank an upfront fee and will reimburse certain expenses in connection with Citibank’s role as Administrative Agent.

During the SPV Asset Facility VII Reinvestment Period, Core Income Funding VII will pay certain unused fees subject to minimum utilization.

SPV Asset Facility VIII

On December 17, 2024 (the “SPV Asset Facility VIII Closing Date”), Core Income Funding VIII LLC (“Core Income Funding VIII”), a Delaware limited liability company and newly formed subsidiary of the Company, entered into a Credit Agreement (the “SPV Asset Facility VIII”), with Core Income Funding VIII LLC, as Borrower, the lenders from time to time parties thereto (the “SPV Asset Facility VIII Lenders”), Natixis, New York Branch, as Facility Agent, and State Street Bank and Trust Company as Collateral Agent, Collateral Administrator, Custodian and Document Custodian.

The maximum principal amount of the SPV Asset Facility VIII is $500.0 million; the availability of this amount is subject to an overcollateralization ratio test, which is based on the value of Core Income Funding VIII’s assets from time to time, and satisfaction of certain conditions, including an interest coverage ratio test, certain concentration limits and collateral quality tests.

The SPV Asset Facility VIII provides for the ability to (1) draw term loans and (2) draw and redraw revolving loans under the SPV Asset Facility VIII for a period of up to three years after the SPV Asset Facility VIII Closing Date unless the revolving commitments are terminated or converted to term loans sooner as provided in the SPV Asset Facility VIII (the “SPV Asset Facility VIII Commitment Termination Date”). Unless otherwise terminated, the SPV Asset Facility VIII will mature on December 17, 2035 (the “SPV Asset Facility VIII Stated Maturity”). Prior to the SPV Asset Facility VIII Stated Maturity, proceeds received by Core Income Funding VIII from principal and interest, dividends, or fees on assets must be used to pay fees, expenses and interest on outstanding borrowings, and the excess may be returned to the Company, subject to certain conditions. On the SPV Asset Facility VIII Stated Maturity, Core Income Funding VIII must pay in full all outstanding fees and expenses and all principal and interest on outstanding borrowings, and the excess may be returned to the Company.

Amounts drawn bear interest at Term SOFR (or, in the case of certain lenders that are commercial paper conduits, their cost of funds) plus an applicable margin of (x) with respect to the Class A-R Loans and the Class A-T Loans, 1.75%, (y) with respect to the Class A-D1 Loans, 1.65% and (z) with respect to the Class A-D2 Loans, 1.93%. From the SPV Asset Facility VIII Closing Date to the SPV Asset Facility VIII Commitment Termination Date, there is a commitment fee that steps up the date that is three months after the SPV Asset Facility VIII Closing Date from 0.25% to 0.50% per annum on the undrawn amount, if any, of the revolving commitments in the SPV Asset Facility VIII.

Debt Securitization Transactions

The Company incurs secured financing through debt securitization transactions (also known as collateralized loan obligation transactions) (the “CLO Transactions”) issued by the Company’s consolidated subsidiaries (the “CLO Issuers”), which are backed by a portfolio of collateral obligations consisting of middle-market loans and participation interests in middle-market loans as well as by other assets of the CLO Issuers. The CLO Issuers issue preferred shares which are not secured by the collateral securing the CLO Transactions which the Company purchases. The Company acts as retention holder in connection with the CLO Transactions for the purposes of satisfying certain U.S. and European Union regulations requiring sponsors of securitization transactions to retain

exposure to the performance of the securitized assets and as such is required to retain a portion of a CLO Issuer’s preferred shares. Notes issued by CLO Issuers have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or any state securities (e.g., “blue sky”) laws, and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission or pursuant to an applicable exemption from such registration. The Adviser serves as collateral manager for the CLO Issuers under a collateral management agreement. The Adviser is entitled to receive fees for providing these services. The Adviser routinely waives its right to receive such fees but may rescind such waiver at any time; provided, however, that if the Adviser rescinds such waiver, the management fee payable to Adviser pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement will be offset by the amount of the collateral management fee attributable to a CLO Issuer’s equity or notes owned by the Company. Assets pledged to debt holders of the CLO Transactions and the other secured parties under each CLO Transaction’s documentation will not be available to pay the debts of the Company. The Company consolidates the financial statements of the CLO Issuers in its consolidated financing statements.

CLO VIII

On October 21, 2022 (the “CLO VIII Closing Date”), the Company completed a $391.7 million term debt securitization transaction (the “CLO VIII Transaction”). The secured notes and preferred shares issued in the CLO VIII Transaction and the secured loan borrowed in the CLO VIII Transaction were issued and incurred, as applicable, by the Company’s consolidated subsidiary Owl Rock CLO VIII, LLC, a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (the “CLO VIII Issuer”).

The CLO VIII Transaction was executed by (A) the issuance of the following classes of notes and preferred shares pursuant to an indenture and security agreement dated as of the CLO VIII Closing Date (the “CLO VIII Indenture”), by and among the CLO VIII Issuer and State Street Bank and Trust Company: (i) $152.0 million of AAA(sf) Class A-T Notes, which bear interest at three-month term SOFR plus 2.50%, (ii) $46.0 million of AAA(sf) Class A-F Notes, which bear interest at 6.02%, (iii) $32.0 million of AA(sf) Class B Notes, which bear interest at three-month term SOFR plus 3.50% and (iv) $30.0 million of A(sf) Class C Notes, which bear interest at 4.90% (together, the “CLO VIII Secured Notes”) and (B) the borrowing by the CLO VIII Issuer of $30.0 million under floating rate Class A-L loans (the “Class A-L Loans” and together with the CLO VIII Secured Notes, the “CLO VIII Debt”). The Class A-L Loans bear interest at three-month term SOFR plus 2.50%. The Class A-L Loans were borrowed under a loan agreement (the “A-L Loan Agreement”), dated as of the CLO VIII Closing Date, by and among the CLO VIII Issuer, as borrower, various financial institutions, as lenders, and State Street Bank and Trust Company, as collateral trustee and loan agent. The CLO VIII Debt is secured by middle-market loans, participation interests in middle-market loans and other assets of the CLO VIII Issuer. The CLO VIII Debt is scheduled to mature on the Payment Date (as defined in the CLO VIII Indenture) in November, 2034. The CLO VIII Secured Notes were privately placed by Natixis Securities Americas LLC as placement agent.

Concurrently with the issuance of the CLO VIII Secured Notes and the borrowing under the Class A-L Loans, the CLO VIII Issuer issued approximately $101.7 million of subordinated securities in the form of 101,675 preferred shares at an issue price of U.S.$1,000 per share (the “CLO VIII Preferred Shares”).

As part of the CLO VIII Transaction, the Company entered into a loan sale agreement with the CLO VIII Issuer dated as of the CLO VIII Closing Date, which provided for the sale and contribution of approximately $143.1 million funded par amount of middle-market loans from the Company to the CLO VIII Issuer on the CLO VIII Closing Date and for future sales from the Company to the CLO VIII Issuer on an ongoing basis. Such loans constituted part of the initial portfolio of assets securing the CLO VIII Debt. The remainder of the initial portfolio assets securing the CLO VIII Debt consisted of approximately $113.0 million funded par amount of middle-market loans purchased by the CLO VIII Issuer from Core Income Funding I LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, under an additional loan sale agreement executed on the CLO VIII Closing Date between the CLO VIII Issuer and Core Income Funding I LLC. No gain or loss was recognized as a result of these sales and contributions. The Company and Core Income Funding I LLC each made customary representations, warranties, and covenants to the CLO VIII Issuer under the applicable loan sale agreement.

Through November 20, 2026, a portion of the proceeds received by the CLO VIII Issuer from the loans securing the CLO VIII Debt may be used by the CLO VIII Issuer to purchase additional middle-market loans under the

direction of the Adviser in its capacity as collateral manager for the CLO VIII Issuer and in accordance with the Company’s investing strategy and ability to originate eligible middle-market loans.

The CLO VIII Debt is the secured obligation of the CLO VIII Issuer, and the CLO VIII Indenture, the A-L Loan Agreement each include customary covenants and events of default.

CLO XI

On May 24, 2023 (the “CLO XI Closing Date”), the Company completed a $395.8 million term debt securitization transaction (the “CLO XI Transaction”). The secured notes and preferred shares issued in the CLO XI Transaction and the secured loan borrowed in the CLO XI Transaction were issued and incurred, as applicable, by the Company’s consolidated subsidiary Owl Rock CLO XI, LLC, a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (the “CLO XI Issuer”).

The CLO XI Transaction was executed by (A) the issuance of the following classes of notes and preferred shares pursuant to an indenture and security agreement dated as of the CLO XI Closing Date (the “CLO XI Indenture”), by and among the CLO XI Issuer and State Street Bank and Trust Company: (i) $152.5 million of AAA(sf) Class A-1T Notes, which bear interest at three-month term SOFR plus 2.50%, (ii) $25.5 million of AAA(sf) Class A-1F Notes, which bear interest at 6.10% and (iii) $32.0 million of AA(sf) Class B Notes, which bear interest at three-month term SOFR plus 3.60% (together, the “CLO XI Secured Notes”) and (B) the borrowing by the Issuer of $50.0 million under floating rate Class A-1L loans (the “CLO XI Class A-1L Loans” and together with the CLO XI Secured Notes, the “CLO XI Debt”). The CLO XI Class A-1L Loans bear interest at three-month term SOFR plus 2.50%. The CLO XI Class A-1L Loans were borrowed under a loan agreement (the “CLO XI A-1L Loan Agreement”), dated as of the CLO XI Closing Date, by and among the CLO XI Issuer, as borrower, various financial institutions, as lenders, and State Street Bank and Trust Company, as collateral trustee and loan agent. The CLO XI Debt is secured by middle-market loans, participation interests in middle-market loans and other assets of the Issuer. The CLO XI Debt is scheduled to mature on the Payment Date (as defined in the CLO XI Indenture) in May, 2035. The CLO XI Secured Notes were privately placed by SMBC Nikko Securities America, Inc. as Initial Purchaser.

Concurrently with the issuance of the CLO XI Secured Notes and the borrowing under the CLO XI Class A-1L Loans, the CLO XI Issuer issued approximately $135.8 million of subordinated securities in the form of 135,820 preferred shares at an issue price of U.S. $1,000 per share (the “CLO XI Preferred Shares”).

As part of the CLO XI Transaction, the Company entered into a loan sale agreement with the CLO XI Issuer dated as of the CLO XI Closing Date, which provided for the contribution of approximately $96.4 million funded par amount of middle-market loans from the Company to the CLO XI Issuer on the CLO XI Closing Date and for future sales from the Company to the CLO XI Issuer on an ongoing basis. Such loans constituted part of the initial portfolio of assets securing the CLO XI Debt. The remainder of the initial portfolio assets securing the CLO XI Debt consisted of approximately $260.6 million funded par amount of middle-market loans purchased by the CLO XI Issuer from Core Income Funding IV LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, under an additional loan sale agreement executed on the CLO XI Closing Date between the CLO XI Issuer and Core Income Funding IV LLC (the “Core Income Funding IV Loan Sale Agreement”). No gain or loss was recognized as a result of these sales and contributions. The Company and Core Income Funding IV LLC each made customary representations, warranties, and covenants to the CLO XI Issuer under the applicable loan sale agreement.

Through May 15, 2027, a portion of the proceeds received by the CLO XI Issuer from the loans securing the CLO XI Debt may be used by the CLO XI Issuer to purchase additional middle-market loans under the direction of Blue Owl Credit Advisors LLC (“OCA”), the Company’s investment advisor, in its capacity as collateral manager for the CLO XI Issuer and in accordance with the Company’s investing strategy and ability to originate eligible middle-market loans.

The CLO XI Debt is the secured obligation of the CLO XI Issuer, and the CLO XI Indenture and CLO XI A-1L Loan Agreement each include customary covenants and events of default.

CLO XII

On July 18, 2023 (the “CLO XII Closing Date”), the Company completed a $396.5 million term debt securitization transaction (the “CLO XII Transaction”). The secured notes and preferred shares issued in the CLO XII Transaction and the secured loan borrowed in the CLO XII Transaction were issued and incurred, as applicable, by the Company’s consolidated subsidiary Owl Rock CLO XII, LLC, a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (the “CLO XII Issuer”).

The CLO XII Transaction was executed by (A) the issuance of the following classes of notes and preferred shares pursuant to an indenture and security agreement dated as of the CLO XII Closing Date (the “CLO XII Indenture”), by and among the CLO XII Issuer and State Street Bank and Trust Company: (i) $90.0 million of AAA(sf) Class A-1A Notes, which bear interest at three-month term SOFR plus 2.55%, (ii) $22.0 million of AAA(sf) Class A-1B Notes, which bear interest at 6.37%, (iii) $8.0 million of AAA(sf) Class A-2 Notes, which bear interest at three-month term SOFR plus 3.10% and (iv) $24.0 million of AA(sf) Class B Notes, which bear interest at three-month term SOFR plus 3.55% (together, the “CLO XII Secured Notes”) and (B) the borrowing by the CLO XII Issuer of $116.0 million under floating rate Class A-1L loans (the “CLO XII Class A-1L Loans” and together with the CLO XII Secured Notes, the “CLO XII Debt”). The CLO XII Class A-1L Loans bear interest at three-month term SOFR plus 2.55%. The CLO XII Class A-1L Loans were borrowed under a credit agreement (the “CLO XII Class A-1L Credit Agreement”), dated as of the CLO XII Closing Date, by and among the CLO XII Issuer, as borrower, various financial institutions, as lenders, and State Street Bank and Trust Company, as collateral trustee and loan agent. The CLO XII Debt is secured by middle-market loans, participation interests in middle-market loans and other assets of the CLO XII Issuer. The CLO XII Debt is scheduled to mature on the Payment Date (as defined in the CLO XII Indenture) in July, 2034. The CLO XII Secured Notes were privately placed by BofA Securities, Inc. as Initial Purchaser.

Concurrently with the issuance of the CLO XII Secured Notes and the borrowing under the CLO XII Class A-1L Loans, the CLO XII Issuer issued approximately $136.5 million of subordinated securities in the form of 136,500 preferred shares at an issue price of U.S. $1,000 per share (the “CLO XII Preferred Shares”).

As part of the CLO XII Transaction, the Company entered into a loan sale agreement with the CLO XII Issuer dated as of the CLO XII Closing Date (the “CLO XII OCIC Loan Sale Agreement”), which provided for the contribution of approximately $78.0 million funded par amount of middle-market loans from the Company to the CLO XII Issuer on the CLO XII Closing Date and for future sales from the Company to the CLO XII Issuer on an ongoing basis. Such loans constituted part of the initial portfolio of assets securing the CLO XII Debt. The remainder of the initial portfolio assets securing the CLO XII Debt consisted of approximately $295.7 million funded par amount of middle-market loans purchased by the CLO XII Issuer from Core Income Funding III LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, under an additional loan sale agreement executed on the CLO XII Closing Date between the CLO XII Issuer and Core Income Funding III LLC (the “CLO XII Core Income Funding III Loan Sale Agreement”). No gain or loss was recognized as a result of these sales and contributions. The Company and Core Income Funding III LLC each made customary representations, warranties, and covenants to the CLO XII Issuer under the applicable loan sale agreement.

Through July 20, 2026, a portion of the proceeds received by the CLO XII Issuer from the loans securing the CLO XII Debt may be used by the CLO XII Issuer to purchase additional middle-market loans under the direction of the Adviser in its capacity as collateral manager for the CLO XII Issuer and in accordance with the Company’s investing strategy and ability to originate eligible middle-market loans.

The CLO XII Debt is the secured obligation of the CLO XII Issuer, and the CLO XII Indenture and CLO XII Class A-1L Credit Agreement each include customary covenants and events of default.

CLO XV

On January 30, 2024 (the “CLO XV Closing Date”), the Company completed a $478.0 million term debt securitization transaction (the “CLO XV Transaction”). The secured notes and preferred shares issued in the CLO XV Transaction and the secured loan borrowed in the CLO XV Transaction were issued and incurred, as applicable,

by the Company’s consolidated subsidiary Owl Rock CLO XV, LLC, a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (the “CLO XV Issuer”).

The CLO XV Transaction was executed by (A) the issuance of the following classes of notes and preferred shares pursuant to an indenture and security agreement dated as of the CLO XV Closing Date (the “CLO XV Indenture”), by and among the CLO XV Issuer and State Street Bank and Trust Company: (i) $273.6 million of AAA(sf) Class A Notes, which bear interest at three-month term SOFR plus 2.30%, (ii) $38.4 million of AA(sf) Class B Notes, which bear interest at three-month term SOFR plus 3.20% (together, the “CLO XV Secured Notes”). The CLO XV Secured Notes are secured by middle-market loans, participation interests in middle-market loans and other assets of the CLO XV Issuer. The CLO XV Secured Notes are scheduled to mature on the Payment Date (as defined in the CLO XV Indenture) in January, 2036. The CLO XV Secured Notes were privately placed by Natixis Securities Americas LLC as placement agent.

Concurrently with the issuance of the CLO XV Secured Notes, the CLO XV Issuer issued approximately $166.0 million of subordinated securities in the form of 165,980 preferred shares at an issue price of U.S. $1,000 per share (the “CLO XV Preferred Shares”).

As part of the CLO XV Transaction, the Company entered into a loan sale agreement with the CLO XV Issuer dated as of the CLO XV Closing Date (the “CLO XV OCIC Loan Sale Agreement”), which provided for the contribution of approximately $115.4 million funded par amount of middle-market loans from the Company to the CLO XV Issuer on the CLO XV Closing Date and for future sales from the Company to the CLO XV Issuer on an ongoing basis. Such loans constituted part of the initial portfolio of assets securing the CLO XV Secured Notes. The remainder of the initial portfolio assets securing the CLO XV Secured Notes consisted of approximately $329.7 million funded par amount of middle-market loans purchased by the CLO XV Issuer from Core Income Funding I LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, under an additional loan sale agreement executed on the CLO XV Closing Date between the CLO XV Issuer and Core Income Funding I LLC (the “CLO XV Core Income Funding I Loan Sale Agreement”). No gain or loss was recognized as a result of these sales and contributions. The Company and Core Income Funding I LLC each made customary representations, warranties, and covenants to the CLO XV Issuer under the applicable loan sale agreement.

Through January 20, 2028, a portion of the proceeds received by the CLO XV Issuer from the loans securing the CLO XV Secured Notes may be used by the CLO XV Issuer to purchase additional middle-market loans under the direction of the Adviser in its capacity as collateral manager for the CLO XV Issuer and in accordance with the Company’s investing strategy and ability to originate eligible middle-market loans.

The CLO XV Secured Notes secured obligation of the CLO XV Issuer, and the CLO XV Indenture each include customary covenants and events of default.

CLO XVI

On March 7, 2024 (the “CLO XVI Closing Date”), the Company completed a $597.0 million term debt securitization transaction (the “CLO XVI Transaction”). The secured notes and preferred shares issued in the CLO XVI Transaction and the secured loan borrowed in the CLO XVI Transaction were issued and incurred, as applicable, by the Company’s consolidated subsidiary Owl Rock CLO XVI, LLC, a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (the “CLO XVI Issuer”).

The CLO XVI Transaction was executed by the issuance of the following classes of notes and preferred shares pursuant to an indenture dated as of the CLO XVI Closing Date (the “CLO XVI Indenture”), by and among the CLO XVI Issuer and State Street Bank and Trust Company: (i) $342.0 million of AAA(sf) Class A Notes, which bear interest at three-month term SOFR plus 2.00%, (ii) $48.0 million of AA(sf) Class B Notes, which bear interest at three-month term SOFR plus 2.50% and (iii) $30.0 million of A(sf) Class C Notes, which bear interest at three-month term SOFR plus 3.30% (together, the “CLO XVI Secured Notes”). The CLO XVI Secured Notes are secured by middle-market loans, participation interests in middle-market loans and other assets of the CLO XVI Issuer. The CLO XVI Secured Notes are scheduled to mature on the Payment Date (as defined in the CLO XVI Indenture) in April, 2036. The CLO XVI Secured Notes were privately placed by Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. as Initial Purchaser.

Concurrently with the issuance of the CLO XVI Secured Notes, the CLO XVI Issuer issued approximately $177.0 million of subordinated securities in the form of 177,000 preferred shares at an issue price of U.S. $1,000 per share (the “CLO XVI Preferred Shares”).

As part of the CLO XVI Transaction, the Company entered into a loan sale agreement with the CLO XVI Issuer dated as of the CLO XVI Closing Date (the “OCIC CLO XVI Loan Sale Agreement”), which provided for the contribution of approximately $206.6 million funded par amount of middle-market loans from the Company to the CLO XVI Issuer on the CLO XVI Closing Date and for future sales from the Company to the CLO XVI Issuer on an ongoing basis. Such loans constituted part of the initial portfolio of assets securing the CLO XVI Secured Notes. The remainder of the initial portfolio assets secured the CLO XVI Secured Notes consisted of approximately $356.5 million funded par amount of middle-market loans purchased by the CLO XVI Issuer from Core Income Funding II LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, under an additional loan sale agreement executed on the CLO XVI Closing Date between the CLO XVI Issuer and Core Income Funding II LLC (the “CLO XVI Core Income Funding II Loan Sale Agreement”). The Company and Core Income Funding II LLC each made customary representations, warranties, and covenants to the CLO XVI Issuer under the applicable loan sale agreement. No gain or loss was recognized as a result of these sales and contributions.

Through April 20, 2028, a portion of the proceeds received by the CLO XVI Issuer from the loans securing the CLO XVI Secured Notes may be used by the CLO XVI Issuer to purchase additional middle-market loans under the direction of the Adviser, in its capacity as collateral manager for the CLO XVI Issuer and in accordance with the Company’s investing strategy and ability to originate eligible middle-market loans.

The CLO XVI Secured Notes is the secured obligation of the CLO XVI Issuer, and the CLO XVI Indenture includes customary covenants and events of default.

CLO XVII

On July 18, 2024 (the “CLO XVII Closing Date”), the Company completed a $500.6 million term debt securitization transaction (the “CLO XVII Transaction”). The secured notes and preferred shares issued in the CLO XVII Transaction and the secured loan borrowed in the CLO XVII Transaction were issued and incurred, as applicable, by the Company’s consolidated subsidiary Owl Rock CLO XVII, LLC, a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (the “CLO XVII Issuer”).

The CLO XVII Transaction was executed by the issuance of the following classes of notes and preferred shares pursuant to an indenture dated as of the CLO XVII Closing Date (the “CLO XVII Indenture”), by and among the CLO XVII Issuer and State Street Bank and Trust Company: (i) $275.0 million of AAA(sf) Class A-1 Notes, which bear interest at three-month term SOFR plus 1.68%, (ii) $25.0 million of AAA(sf) Class A-2 Notes, which bear interest at three-month term SOFR plus 1.85% and (iii) $25.0 million of AA(sf) Class B Notes, which bear interest at three-month term SOFR plus 1.95% (together, the “CLO XVII Secured Notes”). The CLO XVII Secured Notes are secured by middle-market loans, participation interests in middle-market loans and other assets of the CLO XVII Issuer. The CLO XVII Secured Notes are scheduled to mature on the Payment Date (as defined in the CLO XVII Indenture) in July 2036. The CLO XVII Secured Notes were privately placed by Natixis Securities Americas LLC, as Placement Agent.

Concurrently with the issuance of the CLO XVII Secured Notes, the CLO XVII Issuer issued approximately $175.6 million of subordinated securities in the form of $177,590 preferred shares at an issue price of U.S. $1,000 per share (the “CLO XVII Preferred Shares”).

As part of the CLO XVII Transaction, the Company entered into a loan sale agreement with the CLO XVII Issuer dated as of the CLO XVII Closing Date (the “CLO XVII OCIC Loan Sale Agreement”), which provided for the contribution of approximately $463.2 million funded par amount of middle-market loans from the Company to the CLO XVII Issuer on the CLO XVII Closing Date and for future sales from the Company to the CLO XVII Issuer on an ongoing basis. Such loans constituted part of the initial portfolio of assets securing the CLO XVII Secured Notes. The remainder of the initial portfolio assets secured the CLO XVII Secured Notes consisted of approximately $12.0 million funded par amount of middle-market loans purchased by the CLO XVII Issuer from Core Income Funding I LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, under an additional loan sale agreement executed on

the CLO XVII Closing Date between the CLO XVII Issuer and Core Income Funding I LLC (the “CLO XVII Core Income Funding I Loan Sale Agreement”). The Company and Core Income Funding I LLC each made customary representations, warranties, and covenants to the CLO XVII Issuer under the applicable loan sale agreement. No gain or loss was recognized as a result of these sales and contributions.

Through the Payment Date in July 2028, a portion of the proceeds received by the CLO XVII Issuer from the loans securing the CLO XVII Secured Notes may be used by the CLO XVII Issuer to purchase additional middle-market loans under the direction of the Adviser, in its capacity as collateral manager for the CLO XVII Issuer and in accordance with the Company’s investing strategy and ability to originate eligible middle-market loans.

The CLO XVII Secured Notes are the secured obligation of the CLO XVII Issuer, and the CLO XVII Indenture includes customary covenants and events of default.

CLO XVIII

On July 12, 2024 (the “CLO XVIII Closing Date”), the Company completed a $399.8 million term debt securitization transaction (the “CLO XVIII Transaction”). The secured notes and preferred shares issued in the CLO XVIII Transaction and the secured loan borrowed in the CLO XVIII Transaction were issued and incurred, as applicable, by the Company’s consolidated subsidiary Owl Rock CLO XVIII, LLC, a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (the “CLO XVIII Issuer”).

The CLO XVIII Transaction was executed by (A) the issuance of the following classes of notes and preferred shares pursuant to an indenture dated as of the CLO XVIII Closing Date (the “CLO XVIII Indenture”), by and among the CLO XVIII Issuer and State Street Bank and Trust Company: (i) $178.0 million of AAA(sf) Class A Notes, which bear interest at three-month term SOFR plus 1.70%, (ii) $32.0 million of AA(sf) Class B Notes, which bear interest at three-month term SOFR plus 1.95% (together, the “CLO XVIII Secured Notes”) and (B) the borrowing by the CLO XVIII Issuer of $50.0 million under floating rate Class A-1L Loans (the “CLO XVIII Class A-1L Loans” and together with the CLO XVIII Secured Notes, the “CLO XVIII Debt”). The CLO XVIII Class A-1L Loans bear interest at three-month term SOFR plus 1.70%. The CLO XVIII Class A-1L Loans were borrowed under a loan agreement (the “CLO XVIII A-1L Loan Agreement”), dated as of the CLO XVIII Closing Date, by and among the CLO XVIII Issuer, as borrower, various financial institutions, as lenders, and State Street Bank and Trust Company, as collateral trustee and loan agent. The CLO XVIII Debt is secured by middle-market loans, participation interests in middle-market loans and other assets of the CLO XVIII Issuer. The CLO XVIII Debt is scheduled to mature on the Payment Date (as defined in the CLO XVIII Indenture) in July 2036. The CLO XVIII Secured Notes were privately placed by Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. as Initial Purchaser.

Concurrently with the issuance of the CLO XVIII Secured Notes, the CLO XVIII Issuer issued approximately $139.8 million of subordinated securities in the form of $139,800 preferred shares at an issue price of U.S. $1,000 per share (the “CLO XVIII Preferred Shares”).

As part of the CLO XVIII Transaction, the Company entered into a loan sale agreement with the CLO XVIII Issuer dated as of the CLO XVIII Closing Date (the “CLO XVIII OCIC Loan Sale Agreement”), which provided for the contribution of approximately $246.2 million funded par amount of middle-market loans from the Company to the CLO XVIII Issuer on the CLO XVIII Closing Date and for future sales from the Company to the CLO XVIII Issuer on an ongoing basis. Such loans constituted part of the initial portfolio of assets securing the CLO XVIII Secured Notes. The remainder of the initial portfolio assets secured the CLO XVIII Secured Notes consisted of approximately $146.4 million funded par amount of middle-market loans purchased by the CLO XVIII Issuer from Core Income Funding IV LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, under an additional loan sale agreement executed on the CLO XVIII Closing Date between the CLO XVIII Issuer and Core Income Funding IV LLC (the “CLO XVIII Core Income Funding IV Loan Sale Agreement”). The Company and Core Income Funding IV LLC each made customary representations, warranties, and covenants to the CLO XVIII Issuer under the applicable loan sale agreement. No gain or loss was recognized as a result of these sales and contributions.

Through the Payment Date in July 2029, a portion of the proceeds received by the CLO XVIII Issuer from the loans securing the CLO XVIII Debt may be used by the CLO XVIII Issuer to purchase additional middle-market

loans under the direction of the Adviser, in its capacity as collateral manager for the CLO XVIII Issuer and in accordance with the Company’s investing strategy and ability to originate eligible middle-market loans.

The CLO XVIII Debt is the secured obligation of the CLO XVIII Issuer, and the CLO XVIII Indenture and CLO XVIII A-1L Loan Agreement each include customary covenants and events of default.

CLO XIX

On October 29, 2024 (the “CLO XIX Closing Date”), the Company completed a $401.3 million term debt securitization transaction (the “CLO XIX Transaction”). The secured notes and preferred shares issued in the CLO XIX Transaction and the secured loan borrowed in the CLO XIX Transaction were issued and incurred, as applicable, by the Company’s consolidated subsidiary Owl Rock CLO XIX, LLC, a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (the “CLO XIX Issuer”).

The CLO XIX Transaction was executed by (A) the issuance of the following classes of notes and preferred shares pursuant to an indenture and security agreement dated as of the Closing Date (the “CLO XIX Indenture”), by and among the CLO XIX Issuer and State Street Bank and Trust Company: (i) $153 million of AAA(sf) Class A Notes, which bear interest at three-month term SOFR plus 1.65% and (ii) $32 million of AA(sf) Class B Notes, which bear interest at three-month term SOFR plus 1.90% (together, the “Secured Notes”) and (B) the borrowing by the CLO XIX Issuer of (i) $50 million under floating rate Class A-1L-1 loans (the “CLO XIX Class A-1L-1 Loans”) and (ii) $25 million under floating rate Class A-1L-2 loans (the “CLO XIX Class A-1L-2 Loans” and together with the CLO XIX Class A-1L-1 Loans and the Secured Notes, the “CLO XIX Debt”). The CLO XIX Class A-1L-1 Loans bear interest at three-month term SOFR plus 1.65%. The CLO XIX Class A-1L-2 Loans bear interest at three-month term SOFR plus 1.65%. The CLO XIX Class A-1L-1 Loans were borrowed under a loan agreement (the “CLO XIX A-1L-1 Loan Agreement”), dated as of the CLO XIX Closing Date, by and among the CLO XIX Issuer, as borrower, the lenders party thereto, and State Street Bank and Trust Company, as collateral trustee and loan agent. The CLO XIX Class A-1L-2 Loans were borrowed under a loan agreement (the “CLO XIX A-1L-2 Loan Agreement”), dated as of the CLO XIX Closing Date, by and among the CLO XIX Issuer, as borrower, the lenders party thereto, and State Street Bank and Trust Company, as collateral trustee and loan agent. The CLO XIX Debt is secured by middle market loans, participation interests in middle market loans and other assets of the CLO XIX Issuer. The CLO XIX Debt is scheduled to mature on the Payment Date (as defined in the Indenture) in October 2037. The CLO XIX Secured Notes were privately placed by BofA Securities, Inc., as Initial Purchaser.

Concurrently with the issuance of the CLO XIX Secured Notes, the CLO XIX Issuer issued approximately $141.3 million of subordinated securities in the form of 141,300 preferred shares at an issue price of U.S.$1,000 per share (the “CLO XIX Preferred Shares”).

As part of the CLO XIX Transaction, the Company entered into a loan sale agreement with the CLO XIX Issuer dated as of the CLO XIX Closing Date (the “CLO XIX OCIC Loan Sale Agreement”), which provided for the contribution and sale of approximately $301.236 million funded par amount of middle market loans from the Company to the CLO XIX Issuer on the CLO XIX Closing Date and for future sales from the CLO XIX Company to the CLO XIX Issuer on an ongoing basis. Such loans constituted part of the initial portfolio of assets securing the CLO XIX Debt. The remainder of the initial portfolio assets securing the CLO XIX Debt consisted of approximately $56.224 million funded par amount of middle market loans purchased by the CLO XIX Issuer from Core Income Funding III LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, under an additional loan sale agreement executed on the Closing Date between the CLO XIX Issuer and Core Income Funding III LLC (the “CLO XIX Core Income Funding III Loan Sale Agreement”). The Company and Core Income Funding III LLC each made customary representations, warranties, and covenants to the CLO XIX Issuer under the applicable loan sale agreement. No gain or loss was recognized as a result of these sales or contributions.

Through October 2029, a portion of the proceeds received by the CLO XIX Issuer from the loans securing the Debt may be used by the CLO XIX Issuer to purchase additional middle market loans under the direction of the Adviser, in its capacity as collateral manager for the CLO XIX Issuer and in accordance with the Company’s investing strategy and ability to originate eligible middle market loans.

The CLO XIX Debt is the secured obligation of the CLO XIX Issuer, and the CLO XIX Indenture, the CLO XIX A-1L-1 Loan Agreement and the CLO XIX A-1L-2 Loan Agreement each include customary covenants and events of default.

Unsecured Notes

On November 30, 2022, the Company entered into an agreement of removal, appointment and acceptance (the “Tripartite Agreement”), with Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as successor to Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the “Retiring Trustee”) and Truist Bank (the “Successor Trustee”), with respect to the Indenture, dated September 23, 2021 between the Company and the Retiring Trustee (the “Base Indenture”), the first supplemental indenture, dated September 23, 2021 (the “First Supplemental Indenture”) between the Company and the Retiring Trustee, the second supplemental indenture, dated February 8, 2022 (the “Second Supplemental Indenture”) between the Company and the Retiring Trustee, the third supplemental indenture, dated March 29, 2022 (the “Third Supplemental Indenture”) between the Company and the Retiring Trustee, and the Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated September 16, 2022 (the “Fourth Supplemental Indenture” and together with the Base Indenture, the First Supplemental Indenture, the Second Supplemental Indenture and the Third Supplemental Indenture, the “Indenture”) between the Company and the Retiring Trustee.

The Tripartite Agreement provided that, effective as of the date thereof, (1) the Retiring Trustee assigns, transfers, delivers and confirms to the Successor Trustee all of its rights, title and interest under the Indenture and all of the rights, power, trusts and duties as trustee, security registrar, paying agent, authenticating agent and depositary custodian under the Indenture; and (2) the Successor Trustee accepts its appointment successor trustee, security registrar, paying agent, authenticating agent and depositary custodian under the Indenture, and accepts the rights, indemnities, protections, powers, trust and duties of or afforded to Retiring Trustee as trustee, security registrar, paying agent, authenticating agent and depositary custodian under the Indenture. The Successor Trustee’s appointment in its capacities as paying agent and security registrar became effective on December 14, 2022.

March 2025 Notes

On March 29, 2022, the Company issued $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.500% notes due 2025 (the notes initially issued on March 29, 2022, together with the registered notes issued in the exchange offer described below, the “March 2025 Notes”) in a private placement in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, and for initial resale by the Initial Purchasers to persons they reasonably believe to be qualified institutional buyers pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Rule 144A promulgated under the Securities Act. When initially issued, the March 2025 Notes were not registered under the Securities Act and could not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration.

The March 2025 Notes were issued pursuant to the Base Indenture and the Third Supplemental Indenture (together, the “March 2025 Indenture”). The March 2025 Notes will mature on March 21, 2025 and may be redeemed in whole or in part at the Company’s option at any time or from time to time at the redemption prices set forth in the March 2025 Indenture. The March 2025 Notes bear interest at a rate of 5.500% per year payable semi-annually on March 21 and September 21 of each year, commencing on September 21, 2022. Concurrent with the issuance of the March 2025 Notes, in connection with the offering, connection with the offering, the Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2022 (the “March 2025 Registration Rights Agreement”), for the benefit of the purchasers of the March 2025 Notes. Pursuant to the terms of the March 2025 Registration Rights Agreement, the Company filed a registration statement with the SEC and, on July 25, 2022, commenced an offer to exchange the notes initially issued on March 29, 2022 for newly issued registered notes with substantially similar terms, which expired on August 23, 2022 and was completed promptly thereafter.

The March 2025 Notes are the Company’s direct, general unsecured obligations and rank senior in right of payment to all of the Company’s future indebtedness or other obligations that are expressly subordinated, or junior, in right of payment to the March 2025 Notes. The March 2025 Notes rank pari passu, or equal, in right of payment with all of the Company’s existing and future indebtedness or other obligations that are not so subordinated, or junior to the March 2025 Notes. The March 2025 Notes rank effectively subordinated, or junior, to any of the Company’s future secured indebtedness or other obligations (including unsecured indebtedness that the Company

later secures) to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness. The March 2025 Notes rank structurally subordinated, or junior, to all existing and future indebtedness and other obligations (including trade payables) incurred by the Company’s subsidiaries, financing vehicles or similar facilities.

The March 2025 Indenture contains certain covenants, including covenants requiring the Company to (i) comply with Section 18(a)(1)(A) of the 1940 Act, as modified by Section 61(a) of the 1940 Act, for the period of time during which the March 2025 Notes are outstanding, whether or not it is subject to those requirements, and (ii) provide financial information to the holders of the March 2025 Notes and the Successor Trustee if the Company is no longer subject to the reporting requirements under the Exchange Act. These covenants are subject to important limitations and exceptions that are described in the March 2025 Indenture. In addition, if a change of control repurchase event, as defined in the March 2025 Indenture, occurs prior to maturity, holders of the March 2025 Notes will have the right, at their option, to require the Company to repurchase for cash some or all of the March 2025 Notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount of the March 2025 Notes being repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the repurchase date.

September 2026 Notes

On September 23, 2021, the Company issued $350.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.125% notes due 2026 (the notes initially issued on September 23, 2021, together with the registered notes issued in the exchange offer described below, the “September 2026 Notes”) in a private placement in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, and for initial resale to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Rule 144A promulgated under the Securities Act. When initially issued, the September 2026 Notes were not registered under the Securities Act and could not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration.

The September 2026 Notes were issued pursuant to the Base Indenture and the First Supplemental Indenture (together, the “September 2026 Indenture”). The September 2026 Notes will mature on September 23, 2026 and may be redeemed in whole or in part at our option at any time or from time to time at the redemption prices set forth in the September 2026 Indenture. The September 2026 Notes initially bear interest at a rate of 3.125% per year payable semi-annually on March 23 and September 23 of each year, commencing on March 23, 2022. Concurrent with the issuance of the September 2026 Notes, the Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the “September 2026 Registration Rights Agreement”) for the benefit of the purchasers of the September 2026 Notes. Pursuant to the terms of the September 2026 Registration Rights Agreement, the Company filed a registration statement with the SEC and, on July 25, 2022, commenced an offer to exchange the notes initially issued on September 23, 2021 for newly issued registered notes with substantially similar terms, which expired on August 23, 2022 and was completed promptly thereafter.

The September 2026 Notes are the direct, general unsecured obligations and will rank senior in right of payment to all of the future indebtedness or other obligations that are expressly subordinated, or junior, in right of payment to the September 2026 Notes. The September 2026 Notes rank pari passu, or equal, in right of payment with all of the Company’s existing and future indebtedness or other obligations that are not so subordinated, or junior. The September 2026 Notes rank effectively subordinated, or junior, to any of the Company’s future secured indebtedness or other obligations (including unsecured indebtedness that the Company later secures) to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness. The September 2026 Notes rank structurally subordinated, or junior, to all existing and future indebtedness and other obligations (including trade payables) incurred by the Company’s subsidiaries, financing vehicles or similar facilities.

The September 2026 Indenture contains certain covenants, including covenants requiring the Company to (i) comply with the asset coverage requirements of the 1940 Act, whether or not it is subject to those requirements, and (ii) provide financial information to the holders of the September 2026 Notes and the Successor Trustee if the Company is no longer subject to the reporting requirements under the Exchange Act. These covenants are subject to important limitations and exceptions that are described in the September 2026 Indenture.

In addition, if a change of control repurchase event, as defined in the September 2026 Indenture, occurs prior to maturity, holders of the September 2026 Notes will have the right, at their option, to require the Company to

repurchase for cash some or all of the September 2026 Notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount of the September 2026 Notes being repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the repurchase date.

February 2027 Notes

On February 8, 2022, the Company issued $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.70% notes due 2027 (the notes initially issued on February 8, 2022, together with the registered notes issued in the exchange offer described below, the “February 2027 Notes”) in a private placement in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, and for initial resale to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Rule 144A promulgated under the Securities Act. When initially issued, the February 2027 Notes were not registered under the Securities Act and could not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration.

The February 2027 Notes were issued pursuant to the Base Indenture and the Second Supplemental Indenture (together, the “February 2027 Indenture”). The February 2027 Notes will mature on February 8, 2027 and may be redeemed in whole or in part at the Company’s option at any time or from time to time at the redemption prices set forth in the February 2027 Indenture. The February 2027 Notes initially bear interest at a rate of 4.70% per year payable semi-annually on February 8 and August 8 of each year, commencing on August 8, 2022. Concurrent with the issuance of the February 2027 Notes the Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the “February 2027 Registration Rights Agreement”) for the benefit of the purchasers of the February 2027 Notes. Pursuant to the terms of the February 2027 Registration Rights Agreement the Company filed a registration statement with the SEC and, on July 25, 2022, commenced an offer to exchange the notes initially issued on February 8, 2022 for newly issued registered notes with substantially similar terms, which expired on August 23, 2022 and was completed promptly thereafter.

The February 2027 Notes are the Company’s direct, general unsecured obligations and rank senior in right of payment to all of its future indebtedness or other obligations that are expressly subordinated, or junior, in right of payment to the February 2027 Notes. The February 2027 Notes rank pari passu, or equal, in right of payment with all of the Company’s existing and future indebtedness or other obligations that are not so subordinated, or junior to the February 2027 Notes. The February 2027 Notes rank effectively subordinated, or junior, to any of the Company’s future secured indebtedness or other obligations (including unsecured indebtedness that we later secure) to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness. The February 2027 Notes rank structurally subordinated, or junior, to all existing and future indebtedness and other obligations (including trade payables) incurred by the Company’s subsidiaries, financing vehicles or similar facilities.

The February 2027 Indenture contains certain covenants, including covenants requiring the Company to (i) comply with asset coverage requirements of the 1940 Act, whether or not it is subject to those requirements, and (ii) provide financial information to the holders of the February 2027 Notes and the Successor Trustee if the Company is no longer subject to the reporting requirements under the Exchange Act. These covenants are subject to important limitations and exceptions that are described in the Indenture. In addition, if a change of control repurchase event, as defined in the February 2027 Indenture, occurs prior to maturity, holders of the February 2027 Notes have the right, at their option, to require us to repurchase for cash some or all of the February 2027 Notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount of the February 2027 Notes being repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the repurchase date.

September 2027 Notes

On September 16, 2022, the Company issued $600.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.750% notes due 2027 (the notes initially issued on September 16, 2022, together with the registered notes issued in the exchange offer described below, the “September 2027 Notes”) in a private placement in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, and for initial resale to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Rule 144A promulgated under the Securities Act. When initially issued, the September 2027 Notes were not registered under the Securities Act and could not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration.

The September 2027 Notes were issued pursuant to the Base Indenture and the Fourth Supplemental Indenture (together, the “September 2027 Indenture”). The September 2027 Notes will mature on September 16, 2027 and may be redeemed in whole or in part at the Company’s option at any time or from time to time at the redemption prices set forth in the September 2027 Indenture. The September 2027 Notes bear interest at a rate of 7.750% per year payable semi-annually on March 16 and September 16 of each year, commencing on March 16, 2023. Concurrent with the issuance of the September 2027 Notes, the Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the “September 2027 Registration Rights Agreement”) for the benefit of the purchasers of the September 2027 Notes. Pursuant to the terms of the September 2027 Registration Rights Agreement, the Company filed a registration statement with the SEC and, on July 21, 2023, commenced an offer to exchange the notes initially issued on September 16, 2022 for newly issued registered notes with substantially similar terms, which expired on August 23, 2023 and was completed promptly thereafter.

The September 2027 Notes are the Company’s direct, general unsecured obligations and rank senior in right of payment to all of the Company’s future indebtedness or other obligations that are expressly subordinated, or junior, in right of payment to the September 2027 Notes. The September 2027 Notes rank pari passu, or equal, in right of payment with all of the Company’s existing and future indebtedness or other obligations that are not so subordinated, or junior to the September 2027 Notes. The September 2027 Notes rank effectively subordinated, or junior, to any of the Company’s future secured indebtedness or other obligations (including unsecured indebtedness that the Company later secures) to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness. The September 2027 Notes rank structurally subordinated, or junior, to all existing and future indebtedness and other obligations (including trade payables) incurred by the Company’s subsidiaries, financing vehicles or similar facilities.

The September 2027 Indenture contains certain covenants, including covenants requiring the Company to (i) comply with Section 18(a)(1)(A) of the 1940 Act whether or not it is subject to those requirements, and (ii) provide financial information to the holders of the September 2027 Notes and the Successor Trustee if the Company is no longer subject to the reporting requirements under the Exchange Act. These covenants are subject to important limitations and exceptions that are described in the September 2027 Indenture.

In addition, if a change of control repurchase event, as defined in the Indenture, occurs prior to maturity, holders of the September 2027 Notes will have the right, at their option, to require the Company to repurchase for cash some or all of the September 2027 Notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount of the September 2027 Notes being repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the repurchase date.

In connection with the issuance of the September 2027 Notes, on October 18, 2022 the Company entered into centrally cleared interest rate swaps. The notional amount of the interest rate swaps is $600.0 million. The Company will receive fixed rate interest at 7.750% and pay variable rate interest based on SOFR plus 3.84%. The interest rate swaps mature on September 16, 2027. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company made periodic payments of $9.5 million and $4.9 million, respectively. The interest expense related to the September 2027 Notes is equally offset by the proceeds received from the interest rate swaps. The swap adjusted interest expense is included as a component of interest expense on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of December 31, 2024, the interest rate swap had a fair value of $(0.7) million ($0.8 million net of the present value of the cash flows of the September 2027 Notes). As of December 31, 2023, the interest rate swap had a fair value of $6.5 million ($1.1 million net of the present value of the cash flows of the September 2027 Notes). Depending on the nature of the balance at period end, the fair value of the interest rate swap is either included as a component of accrued expenses and other liabilities or prepaid expenses and other assets on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities. The change in fair value of the interest rate swap is offset by the change in fair value of the September 2027 Notes, with the remaining difference included as a component of interest expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

June 2028 Notes

On June 13, 2023, the Company issued $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 7.950% notes due 2028 and on July 14, 2023, the Company issued an additional $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 7.950% notes due 2028 (together, the “June 2028 Notes”) in a private placement in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) of the

Securities Act, and for initial resale to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Rule 144A promulgated under the Securities Act. The June 2028 Notes have not been registered under the Securities Act and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration.

The June 2028 Notes were issued pursuant to the Base Indenture and the Fifth Supplemental Indenture (together with the Base Indenture, the “June 2028 Indenture”), between the Company and the Trustee. The June 2028 Notes will mature on June 13, 2028 and may be redeemed in whole or in part at the Company’s option at any time or from time to time at the redemption prices set forth in the June 2028 Indenture. The June 2028 Notes bear interest at a rate of 7.950% per year payable semi-annually on June 13 and December 13 of each year, commencing on December 13, 2023. Concurrent with the issuance of the June 2028 Notes, the Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the “June 2028 Registration Rights Agreement”) for the benefit of the purchasers of the June 2028 Notes. Pursuant to the June 2028 Registration Rights Agreement, the Company is obligated to file a registration statement with the SEC with respect to an offer to exchange the June 2028 Notes for a new issue of debt securities registered under the Securities Act with terms substantially identical to those of the June 2028 Notes (except for provisions relating to transfer restrictions and payment of additional interest) and to use its commercially reasonable efforts to consummate such exchange offer on the earliest practicable date after the registration statement has been declared effective but in no event later than 365 days after the initial issuance of the June 2028 Notes. If the Company fails to satisfy its registration obligations under the June 2028 Registration Rights Agreement, it will be required to pay additional interest to the holders of the June 2028 Notes.

The June 2028 Notes are the Company’s direct, general unsecured obligations and rank senior in right of payment to all of the Company’s future indebtedness or other obligations that are expressly subordinated, or junior, in right of payment to the June 2028 Notes. The June 2028 Notes rank pari passu, or equal, in right of payment with all of the Company’s existing and future indebtedness or other obligations that are not so subordinated, or junior to the June 2028 Notes. The June 2028 Notes rank effectively subordinated, or junior, to any of the Company’s future secured indebtedness or other obligations (including unsecured indebtedness that the Company later secures) to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness. The June 2028 Notes will rank structurally subordinated, or junior, to all existing and future indebtedness and other obligations (including trade payables) incurred by the Company’s subsidiaries, financing vehicles or similar facilities.

The June 2028 Indenture contains certain covenants, including covenants requiring the Company to (i) comply with Section 18(a)(1)(A) of the 1940 Act whether or not it is subject to those requirements, and (ii) provide financial information to the holders of the June 2028 Notes and the Trustee if the Company is no longer subject to the reporting requirements under the Exchange Act. These covenants are subject to important limitations and exceptions that are described in the June 2028 Indenture.

In addition, if a change of control repurchase event, as defined in the Indenture, occurs prior to maturity, holders of the June 2028 Notes will have the right, at their option, to require the Company to repurchase for cash some or all of the June 2028 Notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount of the June 2028 Notes being repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the repurchase date.

In connection with the issuance of the June 2028 Notes, on February 16, 2024 the Company entered into centrally cleared interest rate swaps. The notional amount of the interest rate swaps is $650.0 million. The Company will receive fixed rate interest at 7.950% and pay variable rate interest based on SOFR plus 3.79%. The interest rate swaps mature on May 13, 2028. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company made periodic payments of $6.2 million. The interest expense related to the June 2028 Notes is equally offset by the proceeds received from the interest rate swaps. The swap adjusted interest expense is included as a component of interest expense on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of December 31, 2024, the interest rate swap had a fair value of $0.5 million ($(0.1) million net of the present value of the cash flows of the June 2028 Notes). Depending on the nature of the balance at period end, the fair value of the interest rate swap is either included as a component of accrued expenses and other liabilities or prepaid expenses and other assets on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities. The change in fair value of the interest rate swap is offset by the change in fair value of the June 2028 Notes, with the remaining difference included as a component of interest expense on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

January 2029 Notes

On December 4, 2023, the Company issued $550.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 7.750% notes due 2029 (the “January 2029 Notes”) in a private placement in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, and for initial resale to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Rule 144A promulgated under the Securities Act. The January 2029 Notes have not been registered under the Securities Act and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration.

The January 2029 Notes were issued pursuant to the Base Indenture and a Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 4, 2023 (the “Sixth Supplemental Indenture” and together with the Base Indenture, the “January 2029 Indenture”), between the Company and the Trustee. The January 2029 Notes will mature on January 15, 2029 and may be redeemed in whole or in part at the Company’s option at any time or from time to time at the redemption prices set forth in the January 2029 Indenture. The January 2029 Notes bear interest at a rate of 7.750% per year payable semi-annually on January 15 and July 15 of each year, commencing on July 15, 2024. Concurrent with the issuance of the January 2029 Notes, the Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the “January 2029 Registration Rights Agreement”) for the benefit of the purchasers of the January 2029 Notes. Pursuant to the January 2029 Registration Rights Agreement, the Company is obligated to file a registration statement with the SEC with respect to an offer to exchange the January 2029 Notes for a new issue of debt securities registered under the Securities Act with terms substantially identical to those of the January 2029 Notes (except for provisions relating to transfer restrictions and payment of additional interest) and to use its commercially reasonable efforts to consummate such exchange offer on the earliest practicable date after the registration statement has been declared effective but in no event later than 365 days after the initial issuance of the January 2029 Notes. If the Company fails to satisfy its registration obligations under the January 2029 Registration Rights Agreement, it will be required to pay additional interest to the holders of the January 2029 Notes.

The January 2029 Notes are the Company’s direct, general unsecured obligations and rank senior in right of payment to all of the Company’s future indebtedness or other obligations that are expressly subordinated, or junior, in right of payment to the January 2029 Notes. The January 2029 Notes rank pari passu, or equal, in right of payment with all of the Company’s existing and future indebtedness or other obligations that are not so subordinated, or junior, to the January 2029 Notes. The January 2029 Notes rank effectively subordinated, or junior, to any of the Company’s future secured indebtedness or other obligations (including unsecured indebtedness that the Company later secures) to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness. The January 2029 Notes rank structurally subordinated, or junior, to all existing and future indebtedness and other obligations (including trade payables) incurred by the Company’s subsidiaries, financing vehicles or similar facilities.

The January 2029 Indenture contains certain covenants, including covenants requiring the Company to (i) comply with Section 18(a)(1)(A) of the 1940 Act, as modified by Section 61(a) of the 1940 Act, for the period of time during which the January 2029 Notes are outstanding, whether or not it is subject to those requirements, and (ii) provide financial information to the holders of the January 2029 Notes and the Trustee if the Company is no longer subject to the reporting requirements under the Exchange Act. These covenants are subject to important limitations and exceptions that are described in the January 2029 Indenture.

In addition, if a change of control repurchase event, as defined in the January 2029 Indenture, occurs prior to maturity, holders of the January 2029 Notes will have the right, at their option, to require the Company to repurchase for cash some or all of the January 2029 Notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount of the January 2029 Notes being repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the repurchase date.

In connection with the issuance of the January 2029 Notes, on November 28, 2023 the Company entered into centrally cleared interest rate swaps. The notional amount of the interest rate swaps is $550.0 million. The Company will receive fixed rate interest at 7.750% and pay variable rate interest based on SOFR plus 3.647%. The interest rate swaps mature on January 15, 2029. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company made periodic payments of $4.8 million. The interest expense related to the January 2029 Notes is equally offset by the proceeds received from the interest rate swaps. The swap adjusted interest expense is included as a component of interest expense on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of December 31, 2024, the interest rate swap had a fair

value of $(0.4) million ($0.1 million net of the present value of the cash flows of the January 2029 Notes). As of December 31, 2023, the interest rate swap had a fair value of $12.1 million ($1.5 million net of the present value of the cash flows of the January 2029 notes). Depending on the nature of the balance at period end, the fair value of the interest rate swap is either included as a component of accrued expenses and other liabilities or prepaid expenses and other assets on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities. The change in fair value of the interest rate swap is offset by the change in fair value of the January 2029 Notes, with the remaining difference included as a component of interest expense on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

September 2029 Notes

On May 14, 2024, the Company issued $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 6.600% notes due 2029 (the “September 2029 Notes”) in a private placement in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, and for initial resale to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Rule 144A under the Securities Act and non-U.S. persons outside the United States in compliance with Regulation S under the Securities Act. The September 2029 Notes have not been registered under the Securities Act and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration.

The September 2029 Notes were issued pursuant to the Base Indenture and an Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 14, 2024 (the “Eighth Supplemental Indenture” and together with the Base Indenture, the “September 2029 Indenture”), between the Company and the Trustee. The September 2029 Notes will mature on September 15, 2029 and may be redeemed in whole or in part at the Company’s option at any time or from time to time at the redemption prices set forth in the September 2029 Indenture. The September 2029 Notes bear interest at a rate of 6.600% per year payable semi-annually on March 15 and September 15 of each year, commencing on September 15, 2024. Concurrent with the issuance of the September 2029 Notes, the Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the “September 2029 Registration Rights Agreement”) for the benefit of the purchasers of the September 2029 Notes. Pursuant to the September 2029 Registration Rights Agreement, the Company is obligated to file a registration statement with the SEC with respect to an offer to exchange the September 2029 Notes for a new issue of debt securities registered under the Securities Act with terms substantially identical to those of the September 2029 Notes (except for provisions relating to transfer restrictions and payment of additional interest) and to use its commercially reasonable efforts to consummate such exchange offer on the earliest practicable date after the registration statement has been declared effective but in no event later than 365 days after the initial issuance of the September 2029 Notes. If the Company fails to satisfy its registration obligations under the September 2029 Registration Rights Agreement, it will be required to pay additional interest to the holders of the September 2029 Notes.

The September 2029 Notes are the Company’s direct, general unsecured obligations and rank senior in right of payment to all of the Company’s future indebtedness or other obligations that are expressly subordinated, or junior, in right of payment to the September 2029 Notes. The September 2029 Notes rank pari passu, or equal, in right of payment with all of the Company’s existing and future indebtedness or other obligations that are not so subordinated, or junior, to the September 2029 Notes. The September 2029 Notes rank effectively subordinated, or junior, to any of the Company’s future secured indebtedness or other obligations (including unsecured indebtedness that the Company later secures) to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness. The September 2029 Notes rank structurally subordinated, or junior, to all existing and future indebtedness and other obligations (including trade payables) incurred by the Company’s subsidiaries, financing vehicles or similar facilities.

The September 2029 Indenture contains certain covenants, including covenants requiring the Company to (i) comply with Section 18(a)(1)(A) of the 1940 Act, as modified by Section 61(a) of the 1940 Act, for the period of time during which the September 2029 Notes are outstanding, whether or not it is subject to those requirements, and (ii) provide financial information to the holders of the September 2029 Notes and the Trustee if the Company is no longer subject to the reporting requirements under the Exchange Act. These covenants are subject to important limitations and exceptions that are described in the September 2029 Indenture.

In addition, if a change of control repurchase event, as defined in the September 2029 Indenture, occurs prior to maturity, holders of the September 2029 Notes will have the right, at their option, to require the Company to repurchase for cash some or all of the September 2029 Notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the aggregate

principal amount of the September 2029 Notes being repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the repurchase date.

In connection with the issuance of the September 2029 Notes, on May 14, 2024, the Company entered into a bilateral interest rate swap. The notional amount of the interest rate swap is $500.0 million. The Company will receive fixed rate interest at 6.600% and pay variable rate interest based on SOFR plus 2.337%. The interest rate swap matures on August 15, 2029. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company made periodic payments of $2.2 million. The interest expense related to the September 2029 Notes is equally offset by the proceeds received from the interest rate swap. The swap adjusted interest expense is included as a component of interest expense on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of December 31, 2024, the interest rate swap had a fair value of $3.7 million ($0.5 million net of the present value of the cash flows of the September 2029 Notes). Depending on the nature of the balance at period end, the fair value of the interest rate swap is either included as a component of accrued expenses and other liabilities or prepaid expenses and other assets on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities. The change in fair value of the interest rate swap is offset by the change in fair value of the September 2029 Notes, with the remaining difference included as a component of interest expense on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

March 2030 Notes

On September 13, 2024, the Company issued $1.00 billion aggregate principal amount of its 5.800% notes due 2030 (the “March 2030 Notes”) in a private placement in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, and for initial resale to qualified institutional buyers pursuant Rule 144A under the Securities Act and non-U.S. persons outside the United States in compliance with Regulation S under the Securities Act. The March 2030 Notes have not been registered under the Securities Act and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration.

The March 2030 Notes were issued pursuant to the Base Indenture and a Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 13, 2024 (the “Ninth Supplemental Indenture” and together with the Base Indenture, the “March 2030 Indenture”), between the Company and the Trustee. The March 2030 Notes will mature on March 15, 2030 and may be redeemed in whole or in part at the Company’s option at any time or from time to time at the redemption prices set forth in the March 2030 Indenture. The March 2030 Notes bear interest at a rate of 5.800% per year payable semi-annually on March 15 and September 15 of each year, commencing on March 15, 2025. Concurrent with the issuance of the March 2030 Notes, the Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the “March 2030 Registration Rights Agreement”) for the benefit of the purchasers of the March 2030 Notes. Pursuant to the March 2030 Registration Rights Agreement, the Company is obligated to file a registration statement with the SEC with respect to an offer to exchange the March 2030 Notes for a new issue of debt securities registered under the Securities Act with terms substantially identical to those of the March 2030 Notes (except for provisions relating to transfer restrictions and payment of additional interest) and to use its commercially reasonable efforts to consummate such exchange offer on the earliest practicable date after the registration statement has been declared effective but in no event later than 365 days after the initial issuance of the March 2030 Notes. If the Company fails to satisfy its registration obligations under the March 2030 Registration Rights Agreement, it will be required to pay additional interest to the holders of the March 2030 Notes.

The March 2030 Notes are the Company’s direct, general unsecured obligations and rank senior in right of payment to all of the Company’s future indebtedness or other obligations that are expressly subordinated, or junior, in right of payment to the March 2030 Notes. The March 2030 Notes rank pari passu, or equal, in right of payment with all of the Company’s existing and future indebtedness or other obligations that are not so subordinated, or junior, to the March 2030 Notes. The March 2030 Notes rank effectively subordinated, or junior, to any of the Company’s future secured indebtedness or other obligations (including unsecured indebtedness that the Company later secures) to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness. The March 2030 Notes rank structurally subordinated, or junior, to all existing and future indebtedness and other obligations (including trade payables) incurred by the Company’s subsidiaries, financing vehicles or similar facilities.

The March 2030 Indenture contains certain covenants, including covenants requiring the Company to (i) comply with Section 18(a)(1)(A) of the 1940 Act, as modified by Section 61(a) of the 1940 Act, for the period of

time during which the March 2030 Notes are outstanding, whether or not it is subject to those requirements, and (ii) provide financial information to the holders of the March 2030 Notes and the Trustee if the Company is no longer subject to the reporting requirements under the Exchange Act. These covenants are subject to important limitations and exceptions that are described in the March 2030 Indenture.

In addition, if a change of control repurchase event, as defined in the March 2030 Indenture, occurs prior to maturity, holders of the March 2030 Notes will have the right, at their option, to require the Company to repurchase for cash some or all of the March 2030 Notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount of the March 2030 Notes being repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the repurchase date.

In connection with the issuance of the March 2030 Notes, on September 10, 2024 the Company entered into a bilateral interest rate swaps. The notional amount of the interest rate swaps is $1.00 billion. The Company will receive fixed rate interest at 5.800% and pay variable rate interest based on SOFR plus 2.619%. The interest rate swaps mature on February 15, 2030. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company did not make a periodic payment. The interest expense related to the March 2030 Notes is equally offset by the proceeds received from the interest rate swaps. The swap adjusted interest expense is included as a component of interest expense on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of December 31, 2024, the interest rate swap had a fair value of $(44.5) million ($(6.1) million net of the present value of the cash flows of the March 2030 Notes). Depending on the nature of the balance at period end, the fair value of the interest rate swap is either included as a component of accrued expenses and other liabilities or prepaid expenses and other assets on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities. The change in fair value of the interest rate swap is offset by the change in fair value of the March 2030 Notes, with the remaining difference included as a component of interest expense on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

March 2031 Notes

On February 1, 2024, the Company issued $750.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 6.650% notes due 2031 (the “March 2031 Notes”) in a private placement in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, and for initial resale to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Rule 144A promulgated under the Securities Act. The March 2031 Notes have not been registered under the Securities Act and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration.

The March 2031 Notes were issued pursuant to the Base Indenture and a Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 1, 2024 (the “Seventh Supplemental Indenture” and together with the Base Indenture, the “March 2031 Indenture”), between the Company and the Trustee. The March 2031 Notes will mature on March 15, 2031 and may be redeemed in whole or in part at the Company’s option at any time or from time to time at the redemption prices set forth in the March 2031 Indenture. The March 2031 Notes bear interest at a rate of 6.650% per year payable semi-annually on March 15 and September 15 of each year, commencing on September 15, 2024. Concurrent with the issuance of the March 2031 Notes, the Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the “March 2031 Registration Rights Agreement”) for the benefit of the purchasers of the March 2031 Notes. Pursuant to the March 2031 Registration Rights Agreement, the Company is obligated to file a registration statement with the SEC with respect to an offer to exchange the March 2031 Notes for a new issue of debt securities registered under the Securities Act with terms substantially identical to those of the March 2031 Notes (except for provisions relating to transfer restrictions and payment of additional interest) and to use its commercially reasonable efforts to consummate such exchange offer on the earliest practicable date after the registration statement has been declared effective but in no event later than 365 days after the initial issuance of the March 2031 Notes. If the Company fails to satisfy its registration obligations under the March 2031 Registration Rights Agreement, it will be required to pay additional interest to the holders of the March 2031 Notes.

The March 2031 Notes are the Company’s direct, general unsecured obligations and rank senior in right of payment to all of the Company’s future indebtedness or other obligations that are expressly subordinated, or junior, in right of payment to the March 2031 Notes. The March 2031 Notes rank pari passu, or equal, in right of payment with all of the Company’s existing and future indebtedness or other obligations that are not so subordinated, or junior, to the March 2031 Notes. The March 2031 Notes rank effectively subordinated, or junior, to any of the

Company’s future secured indebtedness or other obligations (including unsecured indebtedness that the Company later secures) to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness. The March 2031 Notes rank structurally subordinated, or junior, to all existing and future indebtedness and other obligations (including trade payables) incurred by the Company’s subsidiaries, financing vehicles or similar facilities.

The March 2031 Indenture contains certain covenants, including covenants requiring the Company to (i) comply with Section 18(a)(1)(A) of the 1940 Act, as modified by Section 61(a) of the 1940 Act, for the period of time during which the March 2031 Notes are outstanding, whether or not it is subject to those requirements, and (ii) provide financial information to the holders of the March 2031 Notes and the Trustee if the Company is no longer subject to the reporting requirements under the Exchange Act. These covenants are subject to important limitations and exceptions that are described in the March 2031 Indenture.

In addition, if a change of control repurchase event, as defined in the March 2031 Indenture, occurs prior to maturity, holders of the March 2031 Notes will have the right, at their option, to require the Company to repurchase for cash some or all of the March 2031 Notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount of the March 2031 Notes being repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the repurchase date.

In connection with the issuance of the March 2031 Notes, on January 29, 2024 the Company entered into centrally cleared interest rate swaps. The notional amount of the interest rate swaps is $750.0 million. The Company will receive fixed rate interest at 6.650% and pay variable rate interest based on SOFR plus 2.902%. The interest rate swaps mature on January 15, 2031. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company made periodic payments of $8.5 million. The interest expense related to the March 2031 Notes is equally offset by the proceeds received from the interest rate swaps. The swap adjusted interest expense is included as a component of interest expense on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of December 31, 2024, the interest rate swap had a fair value of $(14.2) million ($(2.2) million net of the present value of the cash flows of the March 2031 Notes). Depending on the nature of the balance at period end, the fair value of the interest rate swap is either included as a component of accrued expenses and other liabilities or prepaid expenses and other assets on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities. The change in fair value of the interest rate swap is offset by the change in fair value of the March 2031 Notes, with the remaining difference included as a component of interest expense on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

AUD 2027 Notes

On October 23, 2024, Company issued A$450.0 million 6.500% Fixed Rate Notes due October 23, 2027 (the “AUD 2027 Notes”) under its A$2,500,000,000 Australian debt issuance program (the “Australian Debt Issuance Program”). The Australian Debt Issuance Program provides for the Company to issue debt securities from time to time. Debt securities issued pursuant to the Australian Debt Issuance Program (i) are issued pursuant to Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), (ii) are not registered under the Securities Act, (iii) may not be offered or sold in the United States or to a U.S. person without registration under, or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act, and (iv) are to be issued in amount not exceeding an aggregate of A$2.5 billion.

The terms of the AUD 2027 Notes are set out in a Pricing Supplement, dated October 21, 2024 (the “AUD 2027 Notes Pricing Supplement”) and the Note Deed Poll, dated October 6, 2024 (the “AUD 2027 Notes Note Deed Poll”) and the AUD 2027 Notes were issued pursuant to the Dealer Common Terms Deed Poll, dated October 6, 2024 (the “AUD 2027 Notes Dealer Common Terms Deed Poll”) and a Subscription Agreement (the “ AUD 2027 Notes Subscription Agreement”), dated October 21, 2024, by and among the Company and Deutsche Bank AG, Sydney Branch and Mizuho Securities Asia Limited, named as the joint lead managers and dealers therein (the “AUD 2027 Notes Dealers”).

The net proceeds from the sale of the AUD 2027 Notes offering were approximately A$446.643 million, after deducting the fees paid to the AUD 2027 Notes Dealers.

The AUD 2027 Notes will mature on October 23, 2027, and may be redeemed in whole at the Company’s option as set forth in the AUD 2027 Notes Pricing Supplement. The AUD 2027 Notes bear interest at 6.500% per

year payable semi-annually on April 23 and October 23 of each year, commencing on April 23, 2025. The AUD 2027 Notes will be the Company’s direct, general unsecured obligations and will rank senior in right of payment to all of the Company’s future indebtedness or other obligations that are expressly subordinated, or junior, in right of payment to the AUD 2027 Notes. The AUD 2027 Notes will rank pari passu, or equal, in right of payment with all of the Company’s existing and future indebtedness or other obligations that are not so subordinated, or junior to the AUD 2027 Notes. The AUD 2027 Notes will rank effectively subordinated, or junior, to any of the Company’s future secured indebtedness or other obligations (including unsecured indebtedness that the Company later secures) to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness. The AUD 2027 Notes will rank structurally subordinated, or junior, to all existing and future indebtedness and other obligations (including trade payables) incurred by the Company’s subsidiaries, financing vehicles or similar facilities.

In addition, if a change of control repurchase event, as defined in the AUD 2027 Notes Pricing Supplement, occurs prior to maturity, holders of the AUD 2027 Notes will have the right, at their option, to require the Company to repurchase for cash some or all of the AUD 2027 Notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount of the AUD 2027 Notes being repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the redemption date.

In connection with the issuance of the AUD 2027 Notes, the Company entered into both a bilateral cross-currency swap and interest rate swap, for notional amounts of A$379.0 million and A$71.0 million, respectively. The Company received fixed rate interest of 6.500% and paid variable rate interest based on, one-month SOFR plus 2.67% and three-month BBSY plus 2.72%, for the bilateral cross-currency swap and interest rate swap, respectively. The swaps mature on October 23, 2027. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company did not make any periodic payments. The interest expense related to the AUD 2027 Notes is equally offset by the proceeds received from the interest rate swaps. The swap adjusted interest expense is included as a component of interest expense on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of December 31, 2024, the swaps had an aggregate fair value of $(20.7) million ($0.4 million net of the present value of the cash flows of the AUD 2027 Notes). Depending on the nature of the balance at period end, the fair value of the interest rate swap is either included as a component of accrued expenses and other liabilities or prepaid expenses and other assets on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities. The change in fair value of the interest rate swap is offset by the change in fair value of the AUD 2027 Notes, with the remaining difference included as a component of interest expense on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. The change in foreign exchange rate of the cross-currency swap is offset by the change in foreign exchange rate of the AUD 2027 Notes, with the remaining difference included as a component translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Outstanding Securities [Table Text Block]

Outstanding Securities


Title of Class	Amount Authorized	Amount Held by Company for its Account	Amount Outstanding as of March 3, 2025
Common Stock	4,500,000,000	—	1,738,243,085
Class S	1,500,000,000	—	576,829,026
Class D	1,000,000,000	—	57,348,979
Class I	2,000,000,000	—	1,104,065,080