XML 31 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.2
FAIR VALUE
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2020
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE FAIR VALUE
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The following table reflects the Company’s fair value hierarchy for its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 (in thousands):

September 30, 2020Financial Statement ClassificationLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total
Assets:
Money market fundsCash and cash equivalents$77 $— $— $77 
Total$77 $— $— $77 
Liabilities:
Short-term contingent considerationContingent consideration, current portion$— $— $6,475 $6,475 
Long-term contingent considerationContingent consideration— — 35,188 35,188 
Total$— $— $41,663 $41,663 

December 31, 2019Financial Statement ClassificationLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total
Assets:
Collegium warrantsInvestments$— $9,629 $— $9,629 
Total$— $9,629 $— $9,629 
Liabilities:
Contingent considerationContingent consideration liability$— $— $168 $168 
Total$— $— $168 $168 
    
Cash equivalents consisted of money market funds with overnight liquidity and no stated maturities. The Company classified cash equivalents as Level 1, due to their short-term maturity, and measured the fair value based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.

Pursuant to the Zyla Merger, the Company assumed a contingent consideration obligation which is measured at fair value. The contingent consideration fair value represents the estimated fair value of the royalty payments (Royalty Consideration) owed by the Company to Iroko. The Company has obligations to make contingent payment consideration for future royalties to Iroko based upon annual INDOCIN product net sales over $20.0 million. The Company recorded the fair value of these contingent liabilities, based on the likelihood of contingent earn-out payments. The earn-out payments are subsequently remeasured to fair value each reporting date. The Company classified the acquisition-related contingent consideration liabilities to be settled in cash as Level 3, due to the lack of relevant observable inputs and market activity. Changes in assumptions described above could have an impact on the payout of contingent consideration. As of September 30, 2020, the balance of assumed contingent consideration from the Zyla Merger was $41.7 million with $6.5 million classified as short-term and $35.2 million classified as long-term Contingent Consideration, respectively, in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The fair value of the contingent consideration at the Zyla Merger date was determined using an option pricing model under the income approach based on estimated INDOCIN product revenues over 10 years, and discounted to present value at a rate of 10.0%. The fair value of the contingent consideration is remeasured each reporting period, with changes in the fair value
resulting from a change in the underlying inputs are recognized in operating expenses until the contingent consideration arrangement is settled. The valuation inputs utilized to estimate the fair value of the contingent consideration as of September 30, 2020 included a weighted average cost of capital of 10.5% and updated projections of future INDOCIN revenues. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration resulting from the passage of time are recorded within change in fair value of contingent consideration on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income, until the contingent consideration is settled.

The fair value of the warrants to purchase Collegium’s common stock was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. As of the first quarter of 2020, the significant inputs included the fair value of Collegium’s common stock of $16.33, an expected term of 2.61 years and a risk-free rate of 0.27%. The expected term was based on the remaining contractual period of 2.61 years, and the volatility was determined using Collegium’s historical common stock volatility over the expected term.

In May 2020, the Company sold the Collegium warrants for an aggregate purchase price of $6.0 million to Armistice Capital Mater Fund, Ltd. As a result, the Company derecognized the remaining carrying value of $6.5 million of the financial asset and recognized a net loss of approximately $0.5 million, recorded within other gain (loss) on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income, in the second quarter of 2020.

The carrying value of the Company’s debt for the period ended September 30, 2020 approximates its fair value. When determining the estimated fair value of the Company’s debt, the Company uses a commonly accepted valuation methodology and market-based risk measurements that are indirectly observable, such as credit risk. 
 
There were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019.