XML 41 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.2
FAIR VALUE
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2020
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE FAIR VALUE
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The following table reflects the Company’s fair value hierarchy for its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 (in thousands):

June 30, 2020Financial Statement ClassificationLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total
Assets:
Money market fundsCash and cash equivalents$77  $—  $—  $77  
Total$77  $—  $—  $77  
Liabilities:
Short-term contingent considerationContingent consideration, current portion$—  $—  $8,700  $8,700  
Long-term contingent considerationContingent consideration—  —  20,859  20,859  
Total$—  $—  $29,559  $29,559  

December 31, 2019Financial Statement ClassificationLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total
Assets:
Collegium warrantsInvestments$—  $9,629  $—  $9,629  
Total$—  $9,629  $—  $9,629  
Liabilities:
Contingent considerationContingent consideration liability$—  $—  $168  $168  
Total$—  $—  $168  $168  
        
Cash equivalents primarily consisted of money market funds with overnight liquidity and no stated maturities. The Company classified cash equivalents as Level 1, due to their short-term maturity, and measured the fair value based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.

Pursuant to the Zyla Merger, the Company assumed a contingent consideration obligation which is measured at fair value. The contingent consideration fair value represents the estimated fair value of the royalty payments (Royalty Consideration) owed by the Company to Iroko. The Company has obligations to make contingent payment consideration for future royalties to Iroko based upon annual INDOCIN product net sales over $20.0 million. The Company recorded the fair value of these contingent liabilities, based on the likelihood of contingent earn-out payments. The earn-out payments are subsequently remeasured to fair value each reporting date. The Company classified the acquisition-related contingent consideration liabilities to be settled in cash as Level 3, due to the lack of relevant observable inputs and market activity. Changes in assumptions described above could have an impact on the payout of contingent consideration. As of June 30, 2020, the balance of assumed contingent consideration from the Zyla Merger was $8.7 million and $20.7 million and classified as short-term and long-term Contingent consideration, respectively, in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The fair value of the contingent consideration was determined on the date of acquisition, May 20, 2020, using an option pricing model under the income approach based on estimated INDOCIN product revenues over 10 years, and discounted to present value at a rate of 11.0%. The fair value of the contingent consideration is remeasured each reporting period, with changes in the fair value resulting from a change in the underlying inputs are recognized in operating expenses until the
contingent consideration arrangement is settled. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration resulting from the passage of time are recorded within interest expense until the contingent consideration is settled.

The fair value of the warrants to purchase Collegium’s common stock was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. As of the first quarter of 2020, the significant inputs included the fair value of Collegium’s common stock of $16.33, an expected term of 2.61 years and a risk-free rate of 0.27%. The expected term was based on the remaining contractual period of 2.61 years, and the volatility was determined using Collegium’s historical common stock volatility over the expected term.

In May 2020, the Company sold the Collegium warrants for an aggregate purchase price of $6.0 million to Armistice Capital Mater Fund, Ltd. As a result, the Company derecognized the remaining carrying value of $6.5 million of the financial asset and recognized a net loss of approximately $0.5 million as of June 30, 2020.

When determining the estimated fair value of the Company’s debt, the Company uses a commonly accepted valuation methodology and market-based risk measurements that are indirectly observable, such as credit risk. 
 
There were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy during the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019.