___ |
Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.15Ga-1) for the reporting period ______________ to ______________.
|
_X__ |
Rule 15Ga-2 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.15Ga-2)
|
Item 2.01. |
Findings and Conclusions of a Third Party Due Diligence Report Obtained By the Issuer
|
PAWNEE LEASING CORPORATION
|
|||
(Securitizer)
|
|||
By:
|
/s/ Mike Prenzlow
|
||
Name:
|
Mike Prenzlow
|
||
Title:
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
99.1 |
Deloitte & Touche LLP Independent Accountants’ Report on Applying Agreed-Upon Procedures.
|
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Suite 400
Harborside Plaza 10 Jersey City, NJ 07311
USA Tel: +1 212 937 8200
Fax: +1 212 937 8298
www.deloitte.com
|
Pawnee Leasing Corporation
3801 Automation Way, Suite 207
Fort Collins, Colorado 80525
|
1. Contract number (informational purposes only)
2. Customer name
3. Contract class
4. State
5. Residual value
|
6. Payment amount
7. Equipment type
8. Original loan proceeds
9. Contract month of origination
|
|
Member of
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited
|
• |
with respect to our comparison of Characteristic 3., a contract class of (i) “AOR,” “$1 OUT,” “TRL,” “FMV,” “DISC-$1 OUT,” “DISC-TRL” or “DISC-FMV” set forth on the Statistical Data
File is deemed to be “in agreement” with a contract class of “lease” derived from the Agreement and (ii) “EFA” or “DISC EFA” set forth on the Statistical Data File is deemed to be “in agreement” with a contract class of “equipment finance”
derived from the Agreement;
|
• |
with respect to our comparison of Characteristic 4., we were instructed, by representatives of the Company, to compare the state set forth on the Statistical Data File to the state
indicated within the “billing address” on the Agreement. If the state indicated within the billing address on the Agreement did not agree to the state set forth on the Statistical Data File, we were instructed to use the state indicated
within the “equipment location” on the Agreement for purposes of our comparison;
|
• |
with respect to our comparison of Characteristic 5., differences of $1.00 or less are deemed to be “in agreement;” and
|
• |
with respect to our comparison of Characteristic 7., for those Sample Contracts comprised of multiple pieces of equipment (as derived from the Booking Worksheet), we observed whether
the equipment type set forth on the Statistical Data File agreed to one of the equipment types listed on the Booking Worksheet for such Sample Contract. Further, an equipment type of “Other” set forth on the Statistical Data File is deemed
to be “in agreement” with an equipment type of “refinance” as derived from the Booking Worksheet.
|